Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2003-06-XX Burger Project Communications Julie Hultman From: Julie Hultman Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 2:42 PM To: 'Mark.Swenson @AndersenCorp.com' Subject: James and Michelle Burger Hi Mark! Thanks for passing on the information to Michelle. She gave me a call this morning and we had a very nice conversation. I called her back, at work, just a bit ago and left her a message that I was dropping some information by her place after work. I think we will be in good shape. Just wanted to give you a follow up on your information so you know it is being worked on. Have a great night! Julie rppf I r j ! ` i V r 1 Message Page 1 of 3 Julie Hultman From: Julie Hultman Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 8:43 AM To: 'Swenson, Mark' Cc: Jim Butler; Eric A. Johnson Subject: Burger Deck Conversion Hi Mark - Jim is at the State offices until approximately 11:00 a.m. today, so I hope you don't mind my thoughts on your note, since it was copied to me. First I am sorry that you are receiving complaints from residents about the expenses associated with home improvements. In my opinion the Burgers would be taking the right first step in having a consultation with Jim. Generally it is done by their contacting Jim or myself to schedule an appointment with him to go over their plans and ideas. Project planning appointments have been had at the office and at the residents homes. Ideally it is nice to have this appointment scheduled so that Jim and the homeowner can have exclusive time with one another and be on the same page of understanding. At minimum, Jim will need to know where they plan to place the it (eg. same size as existing deck or alteration of size and shape) and he needs to know the size being proposed. These two things will help him determine whether or not the proposed project will meet local ordinance requirements for setbacks and size. At this time it is also imperative for Jim to have definite information /verification of the Burger's property lines in order to measure the setback requirements established by our local ordinance. With a pre - project meeting for something like this and information about property lines, setbacks, building size, height being confirmed, Jim should be able to determine if the proposed construction will meet local ordinance requirments and advise the homeowners whether or not a variance would be required. After this and assuming the homeowner wants to move forward with the project, they can begin the process of requesting a variance, if one is needed. Or if one is not needed, they can begin the building permit process by completing their building permit application and providing all of the information needed for the construction as necessary in order for it to be reviewed, processed and issued for them. I hope that I have been accurate in interpreting the messages shared in that the Burger's simply want some guidance as to whether or not they can convert their deck into a four season porch and as their first step are attempting to learn if they would need a variance in order to do so. Please advise me of any misinterpretation. If you happen to have the Burger's telephone number, I would be hapy to call them to coordinate a preproject meeting between them and Jim to discuss the project as it relates to the variance concern. It is important that they understand that verification of their property lines is a must in order for Jim to assist to this end. Also that any conversion of the deck will require whatever is necessary to comply with the building code and local ordinance requirements for construction of a 4- season porch (eg. change in footing size, building material, etc..). Jim will discuss these kinds of things with them also and will need to ensure that specs are noted upon their construction plans with submission of their bulding permit. I hope you have found my note useful. Julie Hultman City of Oak Park Heights Community Development/Building Inspections - - - -- Original Message---- - 6/30/2003 Message Page 1 of 2 Julie Hultman From: Swenson, Mark [Mark.Swenson @AndersenCorp.com] Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 5:50 AM To: Jim Butler Cc: Eric A. Johnson; Julie Johnson; Julie Hultman Subject: RE: telephone message Jim, This is one of the main complaints that I hear from the residents. It is a very costly process for our residents to accrue. I feel that the residents are due a pre permit view in order to see if the permit is even possible. Our residents have voiced this concern prior to this issue to me. It is not to much of our residents to ask nor should it be that our permitting official can look over the project to give any insight or help. These people do not do plans,specs,surveying and the such on a daily basis and do need direction on this process. Please let me know your feelings. Mark - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Jim Butler [ mailto: jbutler @cityofoakparkheights.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 3:18 PM To: Swenson, Mark Cc: Eric A. Johnson; Julie Johnson; Julie Hultman Subject: RE: telephone message Mark, received the message you provided to Julie Johnson regarding Mr. and Mrs. Burgers deck situation. Please be advised that Mr. and Mrs. Burger need to submit a building permit application for a four season porch, 2 sets of detailed plans drawn to scale, a survey which needs to show the set backs to the four season porch and to the deck. Without this information, I am unable to ascertain whether or not the structure would be compliant to our ordinance set back requirements. More than likely the existing deck footings will not have been designed to sufficiently support a four season porch. I appreciate your assisting the Burgers in their endeavor and ask that you have them contact me directly with any questions they may have regarding this situation. Please feel free to direct your building questions directly to myself and /or Julie Hultman anytime. Our e -mail addresses are our first initial and last name at cityofoakparkheights.com. We are always happy to help when we are able. Take Care, Jim - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Julie Johnson Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 1:08 PM To: Jim Butler Cc: Mark Swenson (E -mail) Subject: telephone message Jim: Mark Swenson called today at 1:00 p.m. He would like you to look at the deck at Jim & Michelle Burger's home at 14195 Upper 54th Street N. The Burgers would like to convert the deck to a four 6/30/2003 Message Page 2 of 2 season porch and need to know if a variance would be required and if so what would it take to get a variance. Please contact Mark with you answer. He can be reached at home (speed dial 15) or work, 651- 264 -2138. Thanks! -Julie J. 6/30/2003 J 1 J 9 TH ADDIT,JN A 'L f t' I, Donald W. Schmidt, hereby certify that I have surveyed and platted the property described on this plat as SWAGER BROS. 9TH ADDITION, that this plat is a correct representation of the survey, that all distances are correctly shpwn on the plat in feet and hundredths of a foot, that all monuments have been correctly placed in the ground as shown, that the outside boundary lines are correctly designated on the plat and that there are no wetlands or public highways to be designated other than as shown. /� f DonaId W. Schmidt, Land Sur Minnesota Registration No. 10459 STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) The foregoing Surveyor's Certificate by Donald W. Schmidt, Minnesota Registration No. 10459 was acknowledged before me this " day of Jump 198 l ALAA! 3 ; A lan John Irwin n�xA a ppv WiliC_ Notary Public, Anoka County, Minnesota Mvcauo� My Commission Expires JuNe a 199 1 Approved by �ell i of the City f Oak Park Heights, Minnesota, this %^day of � , 198. Signed 1% Sign J Mayor Jerk 1 Pursuant to Chapter 820, Laws of Minnesota, 1971, this plat has been approved this/YfA day of ,T" . 198 7 By Washington CounVy Surveyor No delinqu nt taxes and transf r entered this 1 day of �t.�J� ^ , 198 . B Washington County Auditor By Deputy Current t es due and able or the year 120 have been paid this d of , 1982. B Washington County Treasurer By Deputy Document Number � I hereby certify that this instrument was filed in the Office of the Registrar of Titles for record on this RL: day of U L. , 198 at$ o'clock.M., and was duly recorded in Washington County Records. B Washington County Registrar of Titles By Deputy IF • Denotes iron monument found in place. J 60th sT N. ca .719 1 1 O Denotes 1/2 inch iron pipe set and marked ' S91i with Registration No. 10459 except as shown. W o Distances shown to feet i 33, 60, etc.) are exact NW see, se NE 1/4 extrinsic values. _ 5Tall, Z All distances on curves are arc lengths. > ►,� 'SBih The orientation of this bearing system is based on the Washington County. Coordinate System. Utility easements are, shown thus. o 5 0 — Y J 5 Lot Line o �. STREET R/W Line SW %P �� 1�4 Being 5 feet in width adjoining lot Fines and 10 feet in width adjoining street lines. VICINITY MAP SECTION 4, T 29 N, R 20 W CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS WASHINGTON COUNTY MINNESOTA 100 80 60 40 20 o 100 200 SCALE IN FEET SCALE= 1 inch =100 feet •- 5. 54 -- w w o Cv 1 1 i I 26 .53; o 18 t n 0 " S A ? 124 E _ ~ �' S89`2C O 9 0 0_ 1 W to, '�� v ti °D M 'a ° K? `� > to P 191... <� 7 , t2ip 0� M _ M 12N. � 13a o r„ 0, Z �"' u S88 °54'48'W I - ' � 14 41 1 �' t� „ M ° i 1 6C' r !A M i I _ IA I 1; c� W 40 O .3 f N88 ° 18'42"E - �N cn- (n- - , , 7 �7�J t- -• --•• T ' , 4- 1 C# Mt - ... OUTLOT C o ; in I { ' 1 _BO. = _.... ontra e M onumen t 1 Q rrl 3 ' I I I g0,93 -� _ 00 80. l S - (9 °17'49 "` Sal Corner of 0 0 � I I p93- �- " r a �7 9 " 1 1 3 I S'E 1/4 of NW 1/4 of DETAIL 8 3 ti i i L "8 r ! 1 57 91 t Section 4,T29N,R20W 1F Denotes iron monument ftwnd in pi( -- Q' ��` 0, - - 126.82 - - .L 79,05_ r _7500" t Ic�79°17 ,i 1 a ' ' ; W O. O �J . �. fi r - N88°18,4Z,E- - -7 �579 1579 °1'f `J I 1 1 1� n N 1 Denotes 1/2 inch iron pipe set on -South line of North 166.70feet of Trott B ` , <f - o i with Registration No. 10459 ex I - '�" o _� Z 0 ' l 1 1 1 �nQ. Dis #ances.ahown to feat r EXC �r z o o , 3 ►�. a a (33, 60, etc 0 I , . � Oo 1 I i �� m ao''I o�O' °� u' 1 " 212 extrinsic values. „ 1 I3. (r- z 1 e r OUTLOT C N89 E ��� -- ! , 3 ! a - -128 05 - J - a' �' I , �'' �� 51.83 ,; All distances on curves are arc I 501:46 _' - N88 °18'42 "E 01 Z 1 2� 1''� The orientation of this beari aster. F- 86.98-'1 r 81.00 71 F 81.00 - "1 r - 8100 - 7 r - 8.00" ""1 r 90.00" M t' N o I 8 9 Y W 888 ° 5448 /{ I S88 IS8854'48"W I t588 ° 54'48'WI �S88°54'48 "'W INN C'i d o \ : i on the Washington Coun#y Coard 3 1 3 ° r a yI z - r �, I 5 Q 3 - 3 0 = Le =IS 2102 N ;n l 1 °35 59 Utility easements are, shown thus. 54'48'W 1` N O r` 00 - O u�`i Q 0 0 m. � cD 0 , �ti, i iq I I �` Op N �` M 6 0 0 V O M V O ,'n� I'O � t� M O ,co r= p_17o 629 N o l I a t �i 4 3� 0 5 5 3 M o M in M M ° M -C N N s 13 Lot Line o o z 1 i o N 1 1 1 22 43 a ,L - g5,� / 0 1 __ J - �M z 778 I z i I t ? Q , a L 11.30 ' J -65. ` �: _..•- _ 5' t R/W Line I { _ - `- a j,'�, _.. -43711 t- - 8100 - _' - 81.00 - J �' - 81.00 -' • -• 54 158.9 o/' ` 0•. d N 125.66 D�.. 1 t�2 1 STREE I z bg� o � a= 5o ;01" �, ono b " o W QD Being 5 feet in wide adjoining lot liner { Off' 340 .08 � REE " T. =`1- 94 77 �.: No •74 -52• f eet In widt a d jo ining s treet it � _"� _ 47 ; 0 .16 12 r7 1 o c -° e+ Co 10 f 'dth dJo 'ng t t - o --- - p3. (A. � N / K •7• • • N88 ° 54'4WE r• N ,� „ N / R 1 19 "\ Ca I N i , , , i J 1 "' ' ..; M o _ 4`�Ofi 56" ' . 63 6' (' 'o N 2 °' °C ° � N I ✓ � Q -. _101.11 - t" - _ ► -1 op d a �ya� =70.00 - 80.00 - 1- 80.00 - - r- 00 --) �' - =14.06 ; 1 , 16.67 m 1 w o I 30', 30 .1 M °p oi g I t i i 30.08 _d - _ 0 ,'T o+ 0 1 `�I -1,_ _ _ 134.00 - -J \rL O w , w W I NN o O' QD. pp9 °55'p7 �4 ;n �a 1 r - N 89 °23'49 "£ - O o 0 M In vl ' N M N N 0 i N qv M 00 st „ m o+ ct- 1 0 %i p-1 °1345 O CQ 2 N , o '3 M M cad. 3'52 N N 42.24' e' N I fQ� e"n x L; N I a N a N tt N� I x= 1 N 1'� i 1 l 1 3 s J1 1 1 T I 00 W `I- - - 137.94 - - J I 1 , I cn 1 L _ _ 127.64 - - J ° L ._ 100 18 - 4 ^�-, . = t- - 89.53 --� - - 130:00 - - '� In i i I r - S 89 "W 1-- - - -� µ - - ._ d d tn 7 ° " ' O 1 139 69 ` 131 .77 - -" ,� r - N89 49 "E d� 1 N89 ° 47'30' "E ' S89 2349 W o o �o �, °p50 o L _80.0 _ 1 L_ So of _ L_ So.oi_ o N 1 F $� o � 8 0 m- N d fN89 E, 1id89� "E� rN89 O �o '41'0 5 - 604044 A. pN O �� O G ='7 20 p5 $ c`t 4 $ 3 0 M '00 0 1 I I I I I 9 -J L -- 130.00- --1 v I oo L. --130.83-- _ ; 131.95 - -i 1 3 I I ;_ I L - 131.55- - J t - - - 13504 - - z - - " O O d• O 3 O r - S89 "W - - r - N 89 ° 55'20 "E - -1 '- - S 89 °23'49 "W - -7 �" - N 89 °23'49 "E - 3 110 Bn Mtn 0 N 89 E' 7 4 � - t o Ui 0 Z 0_5°04 26 O N ° 'r o fo Q p 'N 3 O d N 30! 0 O Iz Z �iO T O I4 5 ti S 4 Iz II z o O oM t I 3 s Il i I 1 I I I N - - 135,00 - - ? - - 132.13 - -� "_'' ►- - - 130.00 - - J o _} TO d; I L _ _ J L _ _J L J L_ -J L - _ -i t ° r- - N89 23'49 "E' r- - S 89 ° 23'49 "W -, cO +° r - N89 "E - -+ w M o. 130.00 - 80.00 80.00 80.00 130.00 M Z 6 ' rfl- _ O o O � _. _560.62 -._ - - M _._ O 13 ; • - 830.02 M �a? dt aD co ao N 89 23'49" E L - - 135.00 - - ? - - 1 32.31 - __J _ - 130.00 - - , I F-80.00- 1 1 F -80.00- 1 �- - - - S000 -_ r -- 80.00- t - 80.00 - - - 100.00 - - r N 89 2349 "E - N 89 °2349 E - li i1 tl ii t t! vv�i O 0i; O 0 W lw I OW 0= p '� OW I { p Via' 0 !2 r O; l o O t O 6 a in u 1 j O 'J` 0 i ©� O $ u� O ar °- ao I o c0 a? i U') 3 O 4 ,° � 5 M � 6 O �. 7 O �c' S. o � � i�i z �- - - I35.00 - - -� Z - - 132.49 - --� �- - - 130.00 - _ -� M - r' - N 89 23 49 E - _ S 89 23'49 W - r - N 89 0 23'49 "E - .•. i { ,;� j , .z i i .. g' • :� :'ti ..:0 �- 80:0.0 -� L- 80.00 --1 L- 80.00 -J L- 80.00 -a t _80.00 -� L _80.00 - 1 L- 100.00 -! a 1! C5 7 I rN89 FN89°2349'E, I N89 "El FN89 I N89 rN89 r' N89 t m' i •� C° L -- 135.00 - --i 1-- -- 132.67 - - L _130.00- 1 _ ! 1 1 o r - N89 ° 2349" E I r - S 89 0 23 1 49 "W - , r - N 89 "E 0 _ 0' r Njti 0� Oti 0 0 1 ! 3 I I I� . 4 o IS o' o !3 ° off I2 ° dam I IO °o M o oti �a g o 0 Olt )° :moo Mo M_ M Mo �a to IO O 'n I V I 0 S O i I ,. , 3 Z .30 30 ` 1. �. ' ' L'8000' =' ' 8000 -� �- 80.00-' 1 -- 80.00 -' `- -' `--80.00 -� '_ -- 100.00- 1 135.00. J 132.89 - ` 1 I ` --- 130.00 -' -_ ..- F9 83 �� _ 1_84._- - -- -- STREET � "� �• � ._ _�� !�___ _ �;`:��. 32798 = - -� -- • -- -- . tF