Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout11-10-11 Planning Commisison Meeting Packet A ,�: CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS :'.:, PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA Thursday, November 10, 2011 — 7:00 p.m. I. Call to Order II. Approval of Agenda • III. Approve Planning Commission Minutes — October 13, 2011 (1) IV. Department / Commission Liaison / Other Reports V. Visitors/Public Comment This is an opportunity for the public to address the Commission with questions or concerns not on the agenda. Please limit comments to three minutes. VI. Public Hearings A. Oak Park Sr. Living — Phase I: Planned Unit Development Amendment Related to the Construction of Oak Park Heights Senior Living — Phase I (Formerly Known As Oakgreen Village) Allowing A Reduction In Approved Number of Townhome Units, Construction of Brownstone Sr. Living Buildings, An Increase To Allowable Building Heights & Increase To Overall Density. (2) B. Oak Park Sr. Living — Phase II: Planned Unit Development Amendment Related to the Construction of Oak Park Heights Senior Living — Phase II (Formerly Known As Carriage House Co -op) To Increase Building Height & Density. (3) VII. New Business VIII. Old Business IX. Informational A. Upcoming Meetings: • Tuesday, November 29, 2011 City Council 7:00 p:m. /City Hall • Thursday, December 15, 2011 Planning Commission 7:00 p.m. /City Hall • Tuesday, December 27, 2011 City Council 7:00 p.m. /City Hall B. Council Representative: • Tuesday, November 29, 2011 — Commissioner Dougherty • Tuesday, December 27, 2011 — Commissioner LeRoux X. Adjourn. CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES Thursday, October 13, 2011— Oak Park Heights City Hall I. Call to Order: Chair Bye called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Present: Commissioners Dougherty, Powell, and Squyres; City Planner Richards, City Administrator Johnson and Commission Liaison Abrahamson. Not Present: Commissioner LeRoux. II. Approval of Agenda: Commissioner Powell, seconded by Commissioner Squyres, moved to approve the Agenda as presented. Carried 4 - 0. III. Approval of September 15, 2011 Meeting Minutes: Commissioner Dougherty, seconded by Commissioner Squyres, moved to approve the minutes as presented. Carried 4 - 0. IV. Department/Commission Liaison / Other Reports: None. V. Visitors /Public Comment: None. VI. Public Hearings: None VII. New Business: None. VIII. Old Business: None. IX. Informational: A. October 13, 2011 Planning Commission Worksession — Immediately Following Regular Meeting Re: Oak Park Sr. Living Phases I and II. B. Upcoming Meetings: • Thursday, October 13, 2011 Planning Commission 7:00 p.m. /City Hall • Tuesday, October 25, 2011 City Council 7:00 p.m. /City Hall • Tuesday, November 10, 2011 Planning Commission 7:00 p.m. /City Hall C. Council Representative: • Tuesday, October 25, 2011 — Chair Bye • Tuesday, November 22, 2011 — Commissioner Dougherty X. Adjourn: Commissioner Powell, seconded by Commissioner Dougherty, moved to adjourn the meeting at 8:09 p.m. Carried 4 — 0. Respectfully submitted, Jul ultman P1..1 g & Code Enforcement Officer Approved by the Planning Commission: II • TPC 3601 Thurston Avenue N, Suite 100 Anoka, MN 55303 Phone: 763.231 5840 ENC1LOSU 2 Facsimile: 763.427.0520 TPC «PlanningCo.com PLANNING REPORT TO: Eric Johnson FROM: Scott Richards DATE: November 3, 2011 • RE: Oak Park Heights — Oak Park Senior Living Phase I — Planned Unit Development Amendment TPC FILE: 236.02 — 11.06 BACKGROUND Tim Nolde, representing Oakgreen Villa LLC /Anchobaypro, Inc has submitted an application for amending the Oakgreen Village Planned Unit Development (PUD) to allow for a reduction in the number of approved townhome units and to construct brownstone senior living buildings. The proposed units would be senior rentals as opposed to the original townhouses that would have been owner occupied. The project is at Nova Scotia Avenue North and 58 Street. The general plan approval for the Oakgreen Village project was recommended by the Planning Commission on May 8, 2008 and approved by the City Council on May 27 2008. The plans show the buildings of the Oakgreen Village project that were constructed and the new plans for the Oak Park Senior Living project as found in the Exhibits as follows. The review is based upon the following submittals: Exhibit 1: Existing Conditions (Sheet 1) Exhibit 2: Master Plan and Traffic Analysis (Sheet 2) Exhibit 3: Area Analysis — Density (Sheet 3) Exhibit 4: Site Drainage /Grading Plan /Snow Removal (Sheet 4) Exhibit 5: Utility Plan (Sheet 5) Exhibit 6: Lighting Plan (Sheet 6) Exhibit 7: Trail Plan (Sheet 1) Exhibit 8: Preliminary Plat — Oak Park Senior Living Exhibit 9: Site Plan /Landscape Plan (AS1) Exhibit 10: Overall Tree Plan — Landscape Plan (L1.0) Exhibit 11: Building 1 and 2 Landscaping Plan (L1.1) Exhibit 12: Building 3 Landscaping Plan (L1.2) Exhibit 13: Parking Level Building 1 and 2 (A1.01) Exhibit 14: Parking Level Building 3 (A1.02) Exhibit 15: 1 Floor Plan Buildings 1 and 2 (A1.11) Exhibit 16: 1 Floor Plan Building 3 (A1.12) Exhibit 17: 2 Floor Plan Buildings 1 and 2 (A1.21) Exhibit 18: 2 Floor Plan Building 3 (A1.22) Exhibit 19: Unit Plans (A2.0) Exhibit 20: Building 1 Elevations (A3.0) Exhibit 21: Building 2 Elevations (A3.1) Exhibit 22: Building 3 Elevations (A3.2) Exhibit 23: View from Nova Scotia Entrance Looking East (BMW) Exhibit 24: View from Pond Looking North East (B/W) Exhibit 25: 58 Looking North (Color) Exhibit 26: Project Narrative from Todd Erickson, FFE, September 13, 2011 Exhibit 27: Memo from Kathy Widin, City Arborist Exhibit 28: Memo from Chris Long, City Engineer PROJECT DESCRIPTION Todd Erickson of Folz, Freeman and Erickson, Inc, the project engineer has provided the following narrative related to the request for the PUD amendment: "On behalf of my client, Mr. Tim Nolde, we are submitting documentation for the revision or amendment to the Oakgreen Village PUD. Due to market driven conditions we are once again submitting for a change in regard to the previously approved use of the Oakgreen Village and Oakgreen Ponds area. The proposed submittal reduces the number of townhome units from 44 in the Oakgreen Village Platted Area to 15 units. The townhomes in the Oakgreen Ponds Plat would all be eliminated. The proposed change would be to add 111 units to the Oak Park Senior Living Phase I Addition, and constructing 8 of the remaining townhomes. The proposed plan would incorporate construction similar to that of the existing senior living building recently constructed over the past year. These units would be considered more of a "Brownstone" style of unit to accommodate the current market trend. As part of this PUD Amendment, TIF Financing is requested for the amount of $1,200,000. This request does not include the earlier created District; therefore, we do not need any consent from Bondholders and other interested parties. Construction of the proposed units for Phase 1, would begin as soon as approvals are given." 2 The units proposed with this amendment are as follows: One level townhomes (7 constructed) 15 dwelling units Multi level townhomes (4 constructed) 8 Building 1 26 Building 2 33 Building 3 52 Total 134 dwelling units ISSUES ANALYSIS Adjacent Uses. Uses adjacent to the subject site are listed below: North of Site: Present Zoning — B-4, Limited Business District Present Use — Highway 36 orientated commercial development, Goodwill and the Xcel Energy power line easement South of Site: Present Zoning — O, Open Space and R -1 Single Family Residential District Present Use — City park land and a single family neighborhood West of Site: Present Zoning — B-4, Limited Business District Present Use — Lowe's /CSM Commercial development East of Site: Present Zoning — B -4 /PUD, Residential Planned Unit Development Present Use — Oakgreen Commons, open area and Oakgreen Avenue Comprehensive Plan. The 2008 Comprehensive Plan designates this area as medium density residential. The increase in number of approved units places the area into a high density residential classification for land use purposes. A Comprehensive Plan change would be required. The Planning Commission and City Council should comment on the land use classifications and whether the Comprehensive Plan should be revised to accommodate this development. Zoning. This property has been designated as B -4, Limited Business District which accommodates residential development as a conditional use. As such, the underlying base zoning district is B -4, Limited Business District with a PUD overlay. The B -4, Limited Business District lists two family, townhomes and multiple family dwellings as a conditional use. The performance standards of the R -3 Multiple Family District must be complied with for residential development in the B -4 Limited Business District. 3 Subdivision. The applicant has provided a preliminary plat labeled as Oak Park Senior Living. This would replace the Oakgreen Village plat. Outlot A would be created as the common area surrounding the buildings. Blocks 1, 2 and 4 represent the new multifamily buildings. The existing four piex and the four piex that is planned at the southwest corner of the site, as well as the townhouses on the north side of the site will retain the existing Oakgreen Village plat. The preliminary and final plat, as well as the vacation and dedication of any easements, shall be subject to review and approval of the City Engineer and the City Attorney. Park Dedication. Park dedication has been satisfied for this area. The applicant paid the maximum percentage (14 %) of equivalent cash value as part of the original approvals in 2006. Project Density. Section 401.15.C.3 of the Zoning Ordinance establishes the density thresholds for residential properties. Elderly housing requires 1,000 square feet of land area per unit excluding right -of -way and wetlands. The multiple family requirement is 2,500 square feet per unit. The project total, with what is proposed, the already constructed units and the Oakgreen Commons project is a density of 2,200 square feet per unit. As long as the project stays as a senior rental complex it would meet density requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. The development agreement will need to include a provision to assure that the project remains as senior rental and is not converted to non restricted rental housing. Proposed Street/Access. The existing roadway system that was developed for the Oakgreen Village and Oakgreen Commons projects will remain in place. The north /south roadway at the west edge of the site is to be reconfigured slightly to accommodate additional parking. The cul -de -sac at the end of this roadway will also be altered to accommodate the additional four piex that is to be constructed. The parking portion of this roadway is to be located directly on the property line. This is allowed through the PUD. The City has previously allowed a portion of the parking and the cul- de -sac to encroach on the setback area. The Planning Commission should comment on the extent to which this parking area will encroach. Trails /Sidewalks. The Trail Plan as attached includes the locations of the existing eight foot bituminous public trails and the proposed and existing five foot concrete sidewalks. The combination of the trails and sidewalks should provide adequate access within the development and connections to the surrounding public trails. The Planning Commission should comment about the proposed sidewalks and connections to the existing trail system. Private Park. A private landscaped area with a gazebo is proposed between Buildings 3 and 4. No active play equipment is proposed due to the nature of the development as senior rentals. 4 Setbacks. Within a PUD, the base district setback requirements (R -3) are applied only to the perimeter of the project. The R -3 District specifies setback requirements as follows: 30 feet front yard, 30 feet rear yard, and 20 feet side yard. If the lot is in a corner, not less than 30 feet from a lot line is required for side yards. The PUD section of the Zoning Ordinance specifies that buildings should be located at least 20 feet from the back of a curb line from roadways as part of the internal street pattern. Additionally, the ordinance specifies that no building within the project shall be nearer to another building by one -half the sum of the building heights of the two buildings. Building 1 will be constructed on the property line adjacent to Nova Scotia Avenue. According to R -3 District standards, at least a 30 foot setback should be maintained. The proposed four plex at the corner of Nova Scotia Avenue and 58 Street as well as the existing four plex further north were approved with setbacks of 20 feet as part of the Oakgreen Village plans. The setback for Building 3 is proposed at 52.5 feet from the right of way line of Nova Scotia Avenue. Staff recommends that Building 1 be pulled back at least 30 feet from the right of way line. The Planning Commission should comment. Buidling 1 and 2 are to be separated by a distance of 31 feet. The sum of the two building heights is 52 feet; half of that amount is 26 feet. The buildings are adequately separated. Building 3 and the existing four plex are separated by 23.5 feet. The sum of the two building heights is 46 feet; half of that amount is 23 feet. These buildings are compliant with the PUD setback requirements. Tree Preservation /Landscaping. The applicant has provided a general landscaping plan as well as detailed plans for the foundation plantings around each building. The City Arborist has reviewed the plan in memo as attached. The plans shall be subject to the final approval of the City Arborist. Grading and Drainage. Detailed grading and drainage plans have been provided as part of the development submittals. The City Engineer and the applicable watershed authority shall review and approve all of the grading and drainage plans. Utilities. A detailed utility plan has been submitted. The final utility plan is subject to review and approval of the City Engineer and Public Works Director. All of the utilities within the development shall be private but built to City specifications. Lighting. A lighting plan has been provided that includes street light fixture specifications and locations within the private street network. Some of the street lights are in place and others are proposed. The proposed light fixture is identical to what has been used previously. It is a full cut -off fixture with a flat lens. The street lights will be maintained and all electricity costs will be paid for by the developer /homeowners association. The plans indicate the wall light fixtures to be used on each of the proposed buildings. These fixtures are the same as what was approved for the Oakgreen Commons project. 5 As part of the PUD approvals, the Planning Commission and City Council will need to determine of these fixtures are appropriate in that they are not full cut off. A photometric plan has been provided that is compliant with the light intensity requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. Signage. No additional signage has been proposed other than the monument signs on each of the two entrances from Nova Scotia Avenue and at the corner of 58 Street and Oakgreen Avenue. The applicant shall submit plans for these signs that are subject to City approval. Traffic. The applicant has provided projected vehicle count information for the proposed development in the Master Plan and Traffic Analysis. The traffic numbers are subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. Parking. The Zoning Ordinance requires the following for elderly housing: "m. Elderly (Senior Citizen) Housing. Reservation of area equal to one (1) parking space per unit. Initial development is, however, required for only one -half (1/2) space per unit and said number of spaces can continue until such time as the City considers a need for additional parking spaces has been demonstrated." A review of the proposed parking is as follows: Building Surface Stalls Underground Stalls Building 1 16 43 Building 2 30 55 Building 3 24 83 Total 70 181 With a total of 251 stalls, and 111 dwelling units, the multifamily buildings in the project comply with ordinance standards for elderly parking and leave additional spaces for guest parking. The one level and multi level townhome units are all constructed with one stall each and are compliant. Snow Storage. The plans indicate areas for snow storage. The City Engineer should comment on the adequacy of these areas. Mechanical Equipment. The applicant's architect has indicated that the mechanical equipment is located within the buildings. Any mechanical equipment that is ground mounted or visible from adjacent streets shall be screened as required by the Zoning Ordinance. 6 • Trash /Recycling. All of the trash storage and recycling will be internal to the buildings. The design of the driveways for the multifamily buildings accommodates roll out containers for pickup. Building Height. Building 1, 2 and 3 are all 26 feet to the midpoint of the gable roof in accordance with the definition of building height. The buildings are in conformance with the 35 foot height requirement of the Zoning Ordinance. Three Bedroom Units. Within the development, most of the units are either one or two bedroom. All of the units in Buildings 1, 2 and 3 are one and two bedroom and none of the two bedroom units have a den. Two of the one bedroom units in Building 3 have dens. There are six units in Building 4 that are two bedroom with a den. Three units in this building have one bedroom and a den. Staff is concerned that the den units in the one and two bedroom units could become bedrooms with a later addition of a closet. It is recommended that a condition be placed in the approvals that none of the den units be converted to a bedroom with the addition of a closet. Architectural Appearance. The application materials indicate elevations and perspective diagrams from various locations surrounding the development. From the initial submittal, the project architect has greatly improved the appearance of the multifamily buildings and has added architectural feature detailing and colors that were not present with previous diagrams. The Planning Commission, in their workshop review of the plans, indicated that the buildings be given more distinction so that they were not all the same in color and style. The perspective diagrams were requested to better indicate an actual view of the development. The Planning Commission should comment on the revised plans and determine if the applicant has provided enough distinction and difference in style between structures. The plans indicate the material types and specify colors. The project architect will provide a building materials board for review and the Planning Commission meeting. The residential units are not required to be reviewed under Design Guideline requirements, but as part of the PUD, the City can comment and require design and material changes. The Planning Commission and City Council shall comment further on the building appearance and materials as part of the review. B-4, Limited Business Standards. Section 401.301.E.9 of the Zoning Ordinance provides the CUP standards for allowing residential use in the B -4 District. The standards are as follows: Two family, townhomes and multiple family dwellings provided that: a. At least two parking spaces per unit must be provided for on site, or proof is shown of arrangements for private parking nearby. 7 The development will comply with the specific Zoning Ordinance requirements for senior housing. b. No physical improvements, either interior or exterior, may preclude future re -use for commercial purposes. The development could be converted to future office use, but highly unlikely c. Unit floor areas must comply with Section 401.15.C.6. All of the units are at least 600 square feet for one bedroom and 720 square feet for two bedrooms as required by the Zoning Ordinance. d. Compliance with conditional use requirements of Section 401.03.A.8. The requirements will be complied with. e. The development does not conflict with existing or potential future commercial uses and activities. There would be no conflict. f. The density, setbacks, and building height standards imposed as part of the R -3 Zoning District are complied with. The building setbacks are not consistent. This will need to be addressed in revised plans. The Planning Commission and City Council will need to comment on the setbacks and project density. g. Adequate open space and recreational space is provided on site for the benefit of the occupants. Adequate open space is provided. h. The development does not conflict or result in incompatible land use arrangements as related to abutting residential uses or commercial uses. No incompatible land use arrangements are created. i. Residential use can be governed by all applicable standards of the Zoning Ordinance, Building Code, Housing Code and Fire Codes. All standards will be complied with. j. Residential and non - residential uses shall not be contained on the same floor. Not applicable. 8 k. Residential uses shall be provided with a separate entrance, and separately identified parking stalls. Not applicable. I. The architectural appearance, design and building materials of residential structures shall be consistent with the Design Guidelines and subject to approval of the City Council. The Planning Commission and City Council should comment on the architectural appearance. Demolition Clause. At their workshop meeting, the Planning Commission discussed the long term maintenance, appearance and functionality of the site as rental housing. It was suggested that the City place a demolition clause in the PUD approvals and the development agreement. This would state that once the site has exhausted its useful life that the buildings would need to be demolished in 40 or 50 years. This is done frequently for big box commercial sites that are often abandoned after 10 or 20 years once the same big box retailer opens another new store a few miles away. It is not that common to utilize a demolition clause for multiple family housing in that the useful life of this type of structure is usually much longer. The Planning Commission should consider this further. In the alternative, the City could implement a rental registration and inspection program that would provide the City more authority in assuring that the property is maintained and kept safe. The City Council has considered this option in the past and could be another method of addressing the long term viability of the multiple family housing stock in the City. Development Agreement. The applicant will be required to enter into an amended development agreement with the City should approval of the general plan of development be granted. The development agreement shall be subject to review and approval of the City Attorney. CONCLUSION / RECOMMENDATION Based upon the preceding review, City staff recommends that the Planning Commission review the issues raised with density, height of the buildings and setbacks prior to proceeding with a final recommendation. A change in setbacks from what is shown in the plans could potentially significantly affect the site plan and potentially the numbers of dwelling units that can be included in the buildings. Additionally the Planning Commission previously had limitations regarding the architectural appearance of the structure. This may also impact their recommendation. If the Planning Commission is ready to make a recommendation on the amended PUD please find as follows a list of suggested conditions: 9 1. The Planning Commission and City Council shall discuss the land use classifications and determine if the property should be designated has high density residential in the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The preliminary and final plat, as well as the dedication and vacation of any easements shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer and City Attorney. 3. The Planning Commission and City Council shall comment on the proposed density of the project. 4. The development agreement shall include a provision that the Oak Park Senior Living Phase I will remain as senior rental and shall not be converted to non restricted rental housing. 5. The Planning Commission and City Council shall comment on the added parking and changes to the private access roadway and cul de sac adjacent to Nova Scotia Avenue North. 6. The Planning Commission and City Council and shall comment on the proposed private and public trail system. 7. The setback for Building 1 should be moved at least 30 feet from the right of way line of Nova Scotia Avenue. The Planning Commission and City Council should comment. 8. All tree removal and landscape plans shall be subject to review and approval of the City Arborist. 9. The grading and drainage plans shall be subject to City Engineer and applicable watershed authority review and approval. 10. All utility plans shall be subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. 11. The Planning Commission and City Council shall determine if the non shielded, residential style Tight fixtures are appropriate. 12. The applicant shall submit any plans for new signage subject to City approval. 13. The traffic numbers are subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. 14. The Fire Marshal and Police Chief should review the plans and determine the accessibility of emergency vehicles throughout the development. 15. The trails and sidewalks shall be constructed in accordance with the City Engineer's review and approvals. 10 16. The snow storage areas and plan shall be subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. 17. Any mechanical equipment that is ground mounted or visible from adjacent streets shall be screened as required by the Zoning Ordinance. 18. The den rooms in the dwelling units shall not be converted to bedrooms with the addition of a closet. 19. The Planning Commission and City Council shall comment on the final building appearance, colors, materials and the variety between buildings. The applicant shall provide a materials board for all of the buildings to be discussed at the Planning Commission and City Council meetings. 20. The Planning Commission and City Council shall discuss including a demolition clause into the PUD approvals and development agreement. 21. The applicant shall be required to enter into a development agreement. The development agreement shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Attorney and City Council. 22. Any other conditions of City staff, the Planning Commission and the City Council. 11 u I Folz, Freeman, Erickson, Inc. �, 12445 55TH SIREEf NORTH i LAIC EIAfO, IL�iNESOTA 55042 � -. _ � _ � -- _ _ _ - : , _ Phme 165114N997J Pa 16f1)1369ll1 8 1 +11 rle��ola�� curt t I R�NW ...... INf ro Soutn Lnr al Nwlnem ? b w - - -� roSCC11IIIlIIO1® CPOlII1f1RDINl ;�Sfolrr Pewer Co. • Eormrml, -- -- +�� —� 1 � i ?_ rollawL s °°` N. 'uo2r •• •••••••••••••p••• ...•. _ - - -- ... I.N. i4 :•iii • ..i 4 • : . .4. i iii 3 O • • • ! i i i .: • ; 1ii s. �'.••• ■ , ':Y.r • i !•••i•: 4 - .. .- - . �r :: ✓ i : i i i i e : ;. . . t . ___ C - �i• : ❖: :* : ! � :%0.24 0 • i ,v .. x : iJO: i 4* 0 r p .•i t . %�' rY0 : *:: ,:.:44. : + : : 44.: �i : : ,„ I �- a -r _� _..__ Jeti.y•ee it-.;e4:::46 •• • N a f i . : •' 0 •.4 "x• ❖�iW :❖�,♦i 4J r 1 I 44 a 1 • 4•• • �i•• • � ••I I _ • I I J. ° • ii i •i•j.;. jJ mn gip= _ I I ; r•• ❖ .� 's •♦ •. oo •• r � •, . � • .ri 1 l J 04 0 • 1 fr........ • •�.4�,: - O't,0 . •.. - , t.I ■�, { / // /�� I 1 i j ... , - I i / r LEGEND - w V as / / / i I �,– -_ _— PR OPOSED RE -PLAT 0011 YLWITS 1 / • / NO R Ir - �� — .w _ ELUTING MATER WW ;/ / .- EXNiW0 STORM SEWER •N T I , rMP OA" i , •• '� % / . / :: • - - EIOSTNOSAWPNIY SEWER — / Y �li• ® ¢EC Emma ELECTRIC MSPOWF/L POLE • ____ ` /' j \ k.. POI OVILY APPROVED AREAS POD Cl....E) O I ` �� % / I � PP ) ,1 ` .� t /. l / �� • L — PRevnuSLr AP PRw ®AIfAa- a1lPUUn EUrRrtAL MOUES, / pYL rARKE�I VED INSES / I_ . - / ! , I ! I J ,, / / � r1 ® . r % ) \ I 7 / ■ / • ' .1‘ / / / I //Al , ci L..) r • .. _ .W J 1 � i / az :ti � ; ' • OAK PARK SENIOR LIVING PHASE I o 1 R.YDR.YA,PRD,ImUNIT ro.TS0 PUD AMENDMENT la : 58TH 'STREET NORTH EXISTING CONDITIONS EXHIBIT 1 A • 1ti1v n-rY ANCHOBAVPRO. OAK PARK SENIOR LIVID PHASE I- OAK PARK REIORS. MINNESOTA - IWI9D0I1 SREEPI OF b SHEEI R -- /' Folz, Freeman, Erickson, Inc. —_ ______.____.____.____ —. LAND PLANNING • SURVEYING ENGINEERING 55TH STREET NORTH v 7 i ' LAIC 6LM0, MINNESOTA 55042 , `,1' T 4,f ; r )* � ' • I ens iau ass Fax (cs)wxigTlt r • Y ; ,. ✓; , . 2 � .) t 6 , LEGEND C J F • P- 00•Oa9:0♦:yp6yi ,°S••�O - H PRDPOSEDRBxATBOU,mARYLRNrs y "1+ �T�' �� W Rn� / ' ,`� ' R < 1 - N :O. - fYCf� �1 ,010 7�% ASS: PREVIOUSLY APPROVED AREAS (NO GNOME) ) � 1 J ♦ ,.{ ♦.•. t4' ♦1 wt t •i,4'rR • •• p •A0• •, n II "0 •' i i6 �• 11,14",'144,i , 41 � 4 64 5 4 W :0 :'44 Ri S o•••y1' ; "S�• ` ♦ , P• + , ; E •. 1� PREVIOUSLY APPROVED AREAS• SEPARATE SU&AITTAL REQUEST ' V '..4 0 � E ` r.i i0i •..0. v Z: . ' . 3 ,4 0 <, •44,4J ♦... "4.40 i:4 i 4Iv 4!0.., ♦•. ♦ tt :. "4 4 � ♦S J oni 0 I ....0.,...4 d " MMHG OR6.wN $ `� r � '40:4t44: � ♦ e � " 6 i � � NOTES 1 ♦ � ♦ 6 • •♦ �• ♦ 4 7 - . _. ,�,,,,, _._ I. _._ . .,s N . - _ . -._.L �.,O.�J '4 ♦ S♦ i � CALCULATIONS BELOW E,N:ORPORATE BOTH PUO ANeNDrENrauBwrtAts xo" ' I '' ' A 1, :.7 — - usasia itoi4i Y.r... ,.., \'''' •• , �♦♦�•♦d 3 .•.i i . P 6iiiif ` y I WITH N.LMEAS. UWE AND PMpND BUILDING 1 ' ? �'•4• : 44 ; • ♦o•J♦ 00; m = BUILDING Z •• J:o •❖ 3!0 `•. , e ' `` • .,..,: !l' ,I1 'ice •.. PARKING SUMMARY ly 26 LINOS 33 GNUS 6 � r • � 6 W. 6 4 .4):4t1,40,; 1 i t EXTERIOR PARNWO STALLS -tN STALLS k 4 J ♦ C0 J r I O i + t l ill EX TERIOR ARION UNDERGROUND STALLS < i 6 � • a'41, ' " ��) ♦,. ire t � � ( • � f[4U� Y : :. Cl '"1. Jr � sere''.'II''' r it i J < ,� . r *1 SI N• f e ! 1 7. 14 II , � �� r ' ; +` " � , p ♦ ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION TIMELINE E dY ��� 6 e, t) WINTER 2011! 3012• BEGIN CONSTRUCTION OP ALL REMAINING TOWNHONE BUILDINGS Q' rr L `y ,/ . : /. 1,- 1) O ENTIRE 8RE AND RE-PLATTE-0 AREAPENDWO APPROVAL TOWLINE. v. v d 16 ssr OrNXS ..!6.- ddd"' /• ' � // / /';.:( ./. l SPRING OF 5012. SEWN CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDING t J1 I � - � — _ I j g " • � •, ,r.° '� } # , . I 21 8PNWOOF 1013. BEGIN CONSTRUCTION OF BUYdNG'la p yNAYroFtrWl E v - ). � t ' 4 � '+ 0 _ � !r -c I � 4)PALL OF 101308 BPRWatTF 1014. BEGIN GOI487RIICTWM OF BUILDING a Q t, c_ , I ,; �' _ r u� � `w O TRAFFIC ANALYSIS �} a I l 4 1 E ` ti � �� d5 � , ' :� I / ; l ,(� a • . .. r ITE Trip Generation, 7th Edition - Senior Adult +w,nq Sway (252) y ,{EE{I \`� ^ �� 4 , � ♦ / / y f VVV y VEHICLE COUNT: AM PEAK HOUR VEHICLE COUNT: PM PEAK HOUR Ipi V ' :I y • ' 50% ENTERING / SOS EXITING - ITE Trip Generation, 7U Edition 0{{01111 V N .�{' � / 1 535 ENTERING 47; EXITING - ITE T. Generohm, 7th Ea4on Q _ J j 'S S 1! ,k .6 � / I � ; v C �` 0.06 Trip Generation Per D.Nlnq Unit for Peak Hour Calculation Trip Gener Generation Per Dvtl inq Unit tor Peak Hour Colculaiv 131 > I k._ c \} f / 1/ / 4 ( / /.) " _ }4 WIRTH FNTRANQ }� q (p (i( "i" 50X a UNITS 175 UNITS NORTH F UNITS l _ .\ Y 3 502 OF UNITS 17s UNITS ! Z ) z.-cT j 1 "!� / ( t(j IAT�'� , .•• ,., �`, y TOTAL 175 UNITS TOTAL 175 UNITS r .•.- •n_6.,... Y 1 � v'f n l V �a �, \' ```l EN ER r « � ING ..?,:g..:;;:: 0 - 5 UNITS ENTERING 0 11 a 175 x a53) - 10 UNITS ( j V ,. `V 1 EXITING ( 0.50) - 5 UNITS EXITING (0.11 v 1]5 x Q4]) - 9 UNITS , �f SMITH ENTRANCE ,. 7 � � i ��. PP � 44 ✓ � C(%11N FNIRANCF Q III .r"' 502 OF UNITS 175 UNITS , � , '� I Cx SOS OF UNITS 175 UNITS e / M1 / 4 � 1 S ' - - Ro TOTAL 175 UNITS TOTAL 175 UNITS ! ♦, ? _ EXITING ( � __. - ENTERING ( x 1 75 , 0.50) - 5 UNITS ENTERING ( 071 x 175 x 0.53) J) - 10 1015 i k. " .._ I ' 1 FP . _` _ _ __ _- EXITING (0 , 175 x 0.50) . 5 LINTS (071 x 175 0 0.47) - 9 UNITS Of � •,' S i ry 600••• r R E E T NORTH TOTAL ADT: • I f •i��'r I ( f y ~ t H S \ 1 .48 CMS PER OAY X (111 ATTACHED SEWM UNNG) 776 e6PTR•D (j' L1 F 6 8 1 1.74 CARS PER DAY X (120 ASSISTED UNNG) JIB II 1p'q , , - , - 7 -t 10 CARS PER DAY X (4 FAMILY TONN1101/E5) °'- C 4 E i k ' . r r TOTAL 1.141 h } ...1. � : , V , - OAK PARK SENIOR LIVING a I •,s°1 f r, t: PHASE I 1 1 s T -; �IG - .L! ' EXHIBIT 2 __ I ; 63 0 / — PUD AMENDMENT i —__ --- � / MASTER PLAN & TRAFFIC ANALYSIS F u. rv_r.r ANCHOBAYPRO.OAX?ASK SENIOR LIVING PHASEI OAK PARE let orrrs , MINNESOTA- 1 worm 1 SHEET 2 016 SHOOTS \ liL.mw Folz, Freeman, Erickson, Inc_ LAND PLANNING • SURVEYING s ENGINEERING 12445 55T1I STREET N I.ARE MWN 651) 55042 ORTH ■ S P6o.e OR 4394833 Pm 16311 9309331 OPEN SPACE B • LL B 05 1 E m u if 1 lj CHWr o :2 A , N 71 E A 5/1ILDING 1 i /ILDIN6 1 I ���Y 4.. -' 4. 26 UNITS 33 UNITS 15 eV II. 10 ,1 . , r - - A3 LEGEND S . r AREA BOUNDARY l / / 3 ! AREA SUMMARY L� '�.1L OII89 An o• Ae.1V0,III (ENTIRE LL E PARCEL EXCLUDING ALL RIGHT OF MR Aimed WO 4 350 WAY Or OARSMEN) 1 _ a �� 4 V EMIRS Am P.. uR. 1,206..1 V" I AREA 6111NA10710 TOTAL A610A Ili D (p. FT.) UNITS SPACE SNARE AMA PIl 01.E011 11 10,07 64,066 70$01 I 1 4/. w a 60.203 120 10,803 122 016 1,022 • 15 .) A3 140,100 123 11,106 880 2,121/ i V 0. I M 140.040 60 04,771 203.517 1,111 c0$ OM 161.$74 OM 134.398 • 770,1 naps 710,103 $164 / - --' 1 L / mum 64 64 or aft Mom mow or. PINIMerwo TOM cco oAUA • N.. OPEN SPACE: TOTAL IMPERVIOUSNESS SURFACE. 373,820 SF. - 61 %TOTAL OPEN SPACE _0?3 .:..- 3 — cc :7r I OAK PARK SENIOR LIVING # ,/' PHASE I /4t w° I / PUD AMENDMENT E(FIIBIT 3 W / U UJ AREA ANALYSIS ce .yw n - ,M ANCHORAYPRO -OAK PARIS SENIOR LIVING PHASE I -OAK PAM 110GH63, MINNESOTA. 16192011 SKEET OP 6 SHEETS z _ _ . Fo lz, Freernan, Erickson, Inc. 12445 55H SIRBET N RTH F G.411).* ' >>A 542 � , _ _ _ / Phme )651) Pa 1651)4769331 v a iii ❖P! l:♦:♦:♦:♦: rri♦ ♦•: ♦i�iii ♦i ♦i : ♦ :• ♦•: ♦ :�♦♦x.x. -- ;:♦ 1i': ��f: % %�i ♦i!i! �J % ::: J• •Mr :r :••r `e ♦•• !♦ri•: ♦i:•: i4 --44. tI:rtdF* , ♦ ;i' • •i 0e ,� 0�e• rrJrr••��jr. e i ♦ •••4 • •♦.•.♦1.••r I ♦ ♦• 6 , r ;.O � " : 4: /^I i � " 0111. ,=> sw aee. _.- w.,e .`• ?�•. �❖;0 0 ••, ♦ O� ?'w•,fJ i •♦• i i��i r , ae..� . —ice ..°., - :;:i4;.ra!♦•:V Z ,5 • �� i r V •i•� '•rtL 1? N w a � ♦ �. gy.. phi i9 Sri r• : ❖i{ • a I 1 _ I ✓ i • ♦ • I 2 ' _ BCIILOING 4 —_ ilLOING it 2 x y" • , • �a ; s :.110,30::::::4, . e y / 2 6 LNEIS j ,‘, LlNI7S r • • i t lY . H�...aa H. • � 4, g � "FE 9310 , , I I FFE 93/0 Mg I � � � I ♦ r •'v ; � 4 N • r �� �O C( ( Cr I " . 4.1. IS ia. - %/Igi�r ° - __. ' % ' � ' 0 i I ; I.� 18 STALLS SST LS _ = . , 1 „� V , f ) ) Y . �, J.a ' RIMS*. > 14 1� *f „, 2,/, , i — ill'. :1:: .P— - - ♦ /. 4 /� j " j Q I a€ Q l._ + - — - . r r° I � il gyp ,J.%,� il I� n'J; vaovoeEn ne.PUT eou'awr LRAM 1 • • m ,4 els,,,Y � 7 fi a I;A !� ) j A " EwEriHC CONTOUR 1 N S )9Y ,. d,t 1'..9.'''''' ,1 4� c 4• �M O S ` LEGEND • f--___ PROPOSED BroroM SEWER e - � y� , � '7.4/4 � I s � .4> PROPOSED Owwu+Euamw / 5 . - • 1 � . .F r ��' Oa I _ _ ` ,A : PR6v�,arAPPxarPO MANGE) / Q ,, 1 ,, / ♦ I. ,/ , �/ /' //� PREVIOUSLY APPROVED AREAS SEPARATE SUBMITTAL 131 2 I � % / ��Yi:,',� � awwsron,vieuvPs �a mrowro a nEUOVm FROM WE ' , dI OEPONI ® NIFAl) t 1 I ✓a yy I .-//, A 1 ' ,,,,,, • , . „__, ...,..,„5.,/,,,,,,,, /, • '� S T R EET NORTH r • .', // 5 8 t H I 1 I • ..:ii::::::. ec OAK PARK SENIOR LIVING , i 0:A M.. ..O.... i ....-% , PHASE I _ i , 1_ EXHIBIT 4 PUD AMENDMENT LI r SITE DRAINAGE /GRADING PLAN/SNOW REMOVAL Li ANCHORAYPRO- OAK PARK SENIOR LIVING PHASE i -OAK PARK HEIGHTS .MINNESOTA - 101900,1 SHEET OP&SHEETS si Folz, Freeman, Erickson, Inc. - LAND PLANNING • SURVEYING • ENGINEERING Izaas 55TH srer NORTH `�\ /' I I — — — _ • IAA'E EIA40, A1Q]NB40TA 55092 11111100 1.1111111111M >, \ _ Phme 16411439AE3J Pp 163q 4JD -9371 \ \ -- ••• . 1 ." r� — — P 4V� ,♦♦•..♦.-e gi p' ♦♦V C V♦ V+148:440..14".* I - — 'i♦i4**.:11 S kV�k�e*y: :♦:14, P ' : • 1 A t l, Oa / ,� • ; l 1 i 1 ea — .. NY. A •i I h �' fi n + ? , . V + N A __ - -- - -.. TBI,�T a --. —., \ '�. ` f FS $04:441''Z, . 7 x . ♦ . « Y N ; BUILDING - r WING 2 h ' °'. : 1 $ 0 9 .�� i a r ;1 0,- F„y„, y %! - ' „ . .I .� o . . 40 s �` y I F Ff 9J! 26 UNITS °ON - 1 33 UNITS M i � �4 ♦i ♦i Oi�l I n 1 vi - AAw • ijly0 d 3 ♦ • ��s),i0i ♦�•� ♦y�Oi��M• 1 I I '.I y m oc«aT« �P♦♦ Q>�.,I'0g4'��`�40♦� ♦���,♦♦e� 1 T q I - I $,R I ♦d ♦ ) y ♦ I 1 1 ! . i ♦J! ■ ! i i1 - Ill I'— '1.4 x - __ I ��( Hoop l � Q " ../ � S� A _ : 1 7 1 „, r r r - - -- s . . .. 4.11r....1.1. i Sr�Ip - — - it.,,,, . / t 4 A � .1 j , / I 1 r Iwo ; '6ii // /. « , r LEGEND _ Q / .. B.N r + r P(�ry/ I r ' / IY ( _�-_.._— PROPOSED RE-MAT BOUNDARY LASTS ; / .µ\ I (^� -� �_1� N6W w • L AK' / • } 4 {} `w ■ _ -- EXISTING STORM SEWER I it I,A 1 5 I I 1/ .i # / ' � % � EXISTING SANITARY BEWER 1 q \y1 \..01 4 I / / � � �. —EEEC ERIBTING ELECTRIC M6 POWER POLE 7 / I� ! / i � - I — �Mn4w-. - - -r PROPOSED STORM SEWER E q �� �e G v �� ' / / / /+ ! ) 6 wI MH., cB. BEES . ,p Q 4� °� / / �, 4, � — r— .— ' I — Oro--r— PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER WI M. H. I �! C i: � WA i • d � r / � llo 6 / 4 •YI PROPOSED S' WATERMAN ■ I jr � NOTES II SANRARY SEWER M 61 PVC 3DRffi OSAO%MWMIIY GRADE ! ]) WATEAMN', S'OIP CL 62 AT &FT BURY TO TOP OF PIPE % � / I �4 r Al / 3) MINIMUM HORIZONTAL SEPERATION BETWEEN UTILITIES: 1O PT • 7 ;�� / d e , 4) SERVICES : WATER 1 COPPER TYPE N, 9ANITMY4•SCH.4B � :; EXISTING UTILITY EASEMENT ‘It ` ♦ 11 r R E E NORTH ti ',yi!� . T! S T APORTION OF THE MIMING STORM WATER unur' BASEMENT 1i r j rr R,•4 ,•�'�, T H WILL ABANDONED 1 NERD TD BE AIAONED AND REDEFINED WRH THB I BM ew .'♦,'!�, -,% LJ REFLATTBq OP THE AREA ; ,,.. , i 1 as',�.E ��? '• .., 1 iv.:iti..11:i „- . , �_; :itil ♦ ...- OAK PARK SENIOR LIVING 1 I , I q �/ � — PHASE I o I - -- - -- — ��� I PUDAMENDMENT EXHIBIT 5 U I D,T R „0110474 W ' .�. UTILITY PLAN W Ce • W w rr -rr ANCHOBAYPRO -OAK PAM SENIOR LIVING PHASE!. OAK PARE N00H18,,@MFSOTA- Ib19/L011 SHEETS OF SHEETS • 3123195 9 20 9 5 31X5 110961)0 1 VJ.OSONNIN'514101911 101Vd OVO I aSVNd 005511 IOINNSXIVd xvo 011JAVUONONV '' -' °.. rn Nd7d ONLLHJI7 �� • I .. rn < INS YUt1 EIJIIV Qlld I ... - -- 9 118IHX3 r II X) L�L �lLIIL QQlA(. 11QVdlLYO / 7t ^ + 1 ...., i , . . .� n 4 I: � Ir_ i.w. " ..nnnn . �,,,:,.�., n . r ^ te . 1 d , , . :' ; .nn .,n . .1, .. .. ..; ... . , 1,04 51 Itlf4U.01411.10,1 r . n .d ., t y� v aeix9aNauaxadu h (--) n J ^ ^ • ��.(� ^' :':"' . '^ n • n. RR VOW 16 .no v19 N aancem mammas taw rem wean tio k ,, + n .wnw.n mxlum6vuam 1*N oNanan.o L�mruma ° !4 . 1 n.• ` n...n n.,. / � ) ., �a � ° .7'.:,',::;,',4 2 5 , i t a , d . da n S31ON 4 4 1 o-9'„ n al: + t• , g ' e li `� -1 1 1NOI�M3N a3sodoae ) .. 4 ' µ n.... "nn ' n ." ".""""" ! . k, m w : X 4 .3 -y. �6 j •• n ..nn ,.h� ' or wry -N L.tert mar* �� °' � P n•. n i 1 r r n . .n.� d ."n.n -- n... ".,..". n,n . } ; s1 ,. imw000 00 1V1a- aa03S0dOaa - --- n Al € „Al «f .. I_�_ 4. ON3O3l ^ 1 n � :4 ..: 1 nn n \ r i..p b n �.l .,. nnn . " ,, .. ... LEI", ' o. / l i. 5 4 1 ' O ,• %,7'.. �, . n . • ,� LU/VT? EF ^ ^ S1INll 97 ' 3 1 n n .. • n Z JNI0TI17P I 9NI07II79 S � s'� n i .. nnn. ., nn nn .... n ..:n n nn_.n nnn.. "nnn n nnnn.. S n n /,. 1 b .E'��.- rte- •4..- n 'b gam. .. n �'_ z ° " o - � _ " c ( : : : • .n. f n.... nnn nnnn,.,.. dss w. __^ ...." ..".,.,_ - -- - __ __'- , 5 ^ � L nn.n T4R'R'R'R��cx ..nnnn. . . .. n.. n.. .. n.. "n.... w., . ".a .....nnn NOM nnn ... ^..• .. n ., ..• ..nnnn . nnnn ..nnnn w IEF69I6(IS91md [taa6[41159).9.1 I , n MSS VIASTNNO OKEI EMI nnnn LJ 1.11.)10N1 1.11.)10N1 MN'S HISS SWIT - — — . , , n . , , - - - • OSS95SlarastN • ONIAHAIIIIS • ONINNVIJ Ot1V1 \ •aui ' �u uosaa 'usauaaia .nog •• \ I Folz, Freeman, Erickson, Inc. - - - - LAND PLANNING • SURVEYING • ENGINEERING — FFE - 12445 55TH STREET NORTH HA10. EXISTING 8 -FT WIDE TRAIL ' IAI� MINNESOTA 55042 ' — 7,ft ci9 r Rams 1651) 4391933 5,1651) 430.9331 7 ,. \ 1 ■ '■ c; , izr r,. *till c" .. v � a [-- -. ' i•♦7Pi �� ®d? �ii ti �r ii•.0 tiii7-dOi. • i rOWIRO ii 4•Ak .getii � ts�ig ifigt A�. i!?i!�♦ ♦ �� • - .., i0 .....p } O. .. r: 4 ....... „:„ • ,. :„.. . ii . • $ , ,,,. i d�� ♦ At.�,..w.s''i♦6. ��♦!w♦saev�♦�1:ii �G.• i3 r,: �ti:3i6♦♦•`ii♦ ♦i.i'iiiJ♦i�i� ♦4 i•10♦•Aii4s�. ♦i ♦ ♦• ♦ 1 ♦ r6 ♦. EXISTING 8-FT WIDE TRAIL 0 ♦ '�i6 • s. • ♦ ♦♦♦♦♦ : • . , c_Th � . 'k.1�a R �f :' • ♦ • • : • y 6ti • Oy � i�i' ♦� %. o i, 7i . . • ,,,,/ � ♦.♦ �♦ ; d .•..vim 4 , PROPOSED 5-FT n i t a ,♦• c �i o ,t. ♦i 4 600.4 2 r N r 1 ' w �. o �� WIDE CONCRETE PRIVATE WALK "' Tr 1 e ' � S .4 a♦ 4 c" w a (TYPICAL) � d) r � ° r, ffi'va e ), 3r S,dS •• -! 6 � � jl) O 1 _ - Aal Yn ! * r '1' 4 R , • ♦ , 0/4 ♦ ♦ 4 r � x . 1 µ.re Z , -- O / / i.�,nm+' , � w • ( � y1 /, � .� W ' Q — ....:�'....�?_ .—, .. ......... _ s "7: l'0 /// ��. ,r cva _, - - 4;91. PROPOSED 5 -FT - / 1 �.�.� 1 WIDE CONCRETE_ _ - ��� i / � g'4 '�� it f � :'/ " l r ;; 1 < LEGEND 1_. '. ) ` , , 40 � , ) L } : 1 ., PROPOSED aExu 190u, ____ raa uuO9 �e PRIVATE WALK ,, "',1r,% (TYPICAL • (, 1 - ! _ _ _- ,•+ _ 5 I�9 } 1 1 (Fb11NO NC PR0Y08E81oEWM1t (PRIVATE) 1 J I 1 - ' 1 +Zi ±'I:j - - ¢ � h � j � � 9 ` i s � � � ) 1 �` �' O G • i 6 � 1: % %� // � � �� �1 ) �1 asren.rwawaclwiouswa) 2 Ytl 5 FTC _ 5 ! " 6 ' ! J , WIDE PROPOSED CONCR _ v ) ? - i w,yl,1.. {' P . . �� PRIVATE WALK 1 / w .. I-• n 9` O "" t' t,J�i , L • • / (. (TYPICAL) /.1 � 5 � . 9 �� i. ,_ T , -'a a 'i EXISTING 8 -FT . I � .,; ' ,r,, 4 - 1 BIT. WIDE TRAIL �. - � , , i Ole °"- 3 18TIPICi 8 FT WIDE TRAIL t,4 •• ON0 0/r, , 8 t H T R EET NORTH '•••.0:* ° h , /' OAK PARK SENIOR LIVING i , 4 , .1 .5; --%-* j j' PHASEI ` PUD AMENDMENT I s - - - -- - a TING 8-FT/ EXHIBI fi l �E BIT. TRAIL TRAIL PLAN ANCNGHAYPEO- OAK PARK SENIOR 633150 PHASE 1- OAK PARK NRGNTS, MINNESOTA- 10/1.011 SHEET 10P I SHEETS RECEIVED OCT 19 1011 Foie, Freeman, Erickson, Inc. OAK PARK SENIOR LIVING ....WOOED 604511011331 PRELIMINARY PLAT w ti ;, / E � — v" Omar C I a.•.... \ ;:q+ tr. — r / GYrrzaf C �� r•�..,r r . s ..r I '� ,,,,,w, �1— se w AG V .` , � ` - �r ac 'r �� 00'1'-- '' i Z 1 000 Iws - MrP1r2f7r ,. , / 1 1 1 z 1 3 1 9 I I L 1 1 1 3 I 9 1 J 1 3 I ---� y i .--————— I I I Blob( 4 I I I aw Al ` y ai , �s ti L _- 1 __ 1 __L_J L_i__ 'L- --1 —_I ,w,_ 6 a I 1J c LW /r .1/r.N M7 _�(" ��Ew I EOLt G f 1 4,,.oeu T a -- —_ _ Amine, _ _ _ rue f 7- 2 I -3.1- � I— — - - - - r „�aL= -I - -I —_1- I »2 ° �7I j I ' Z 3 1 i z I 3 y� sr�.�� �i 1 I I Biakx 4 I I I 4T d4odr z1 A I � I Ovrw K 1 M 1 --1 -- JJ L_1 s✓' L_ ±".^� C�' _L ' .or blur .99727 , L I 1 , r% ■ , 1 z 1 z 1 „ 1 . 2 s 3 I g I i I 1 , u4o.rrr # I 1 L I 1 , 1 9 " 1 `” siO4 7 1 I I giai e 7 r l: i :sodr y k a; 1___1___1 L -1 _ - --1 L _ 1 _I_ _ L _ , OlffLor A 1 -- •- i- - 1 Samar o r a .oru°” _tool avow, [L4r4�ir D ruwirrsw V' b ..T Q vrzor c I diI k B \ z \ I� s, ' . . - .;I . R 11 \ [m L \ i L -� #___ 1 _ I !.l l 2 1..l i i Y ' 0,;.14_ 1- - - - J____ __1__ � 001!07 A" 1/0.01 ... 1 '; I _ � > r� T M u _ It �{ I 1 I 007407 G S ✓`,= .,REF1v' ✓l1LE I I 3 I swtwmw so,, co ; r - - - I I i. / ;' ♦ - i S • �,� g H 'i �� F - - - - I I 007407 $ s' 1 r I i F — — — - y 'c - 37owo,W lrr4N i L - 5 . _I r Ol nor A - � o tir tor ,a - � o,, % u _ � ,..� see x. . ,� . ;,n. j�.T:yE •11: --10--';;* 1.L3>i SL7/i 37,PFir /.b •. - l — ) r DE - a 0 t ;/1j i 1 0.14 nv a 01 MV'aiME / !•N 16 / p 4 p ;, IBr -ctI/ w' y 7 1 r /' I - - i - xfaw S T I 0001/7Z07 LO7 A / ". , ®. ■ � -- I P "Mare i : o , : a r / / V ldnity P • C — _ `• — • ators as's / - Ss H a n TAW ar ao.. Part 4 / P P I / SON 01001111E • 01.13 ,•,o���Sd 41•114/4 o,ar to—. on W THAW ,s MO, MOB Soto • .Sto•. a Su Will at S® "m0 IS 1 CD 0 20 40 SO N 1 VMS Sr. SIMI 6 KIM 0111E 404I Or MS WI /4 40 11C il ARCHNET \\._ , %T v UNITS TYPE S.F. sf OF UNITS - _ -- ___— _________________ I R[VE ETOWN 2 BED ROOM 11:11 a El BU + __ OOHS 3,457 S.F 6 3 -- - - -� r -49,-,1,,,, COTTAGE 1 BED ROOMS 1,248 892 S.F. 12 arebit“ture • Interiors _ TOTAL 2800 ROOMS 14 sustainable design t 4 J -� LJ _ i A +- - - TOTAL 1 BED ROOMS 12 i I TOTAL UNITS 26 333 N Main SL Ste. 201 ti - _ - - -- _— — sustainable r, MN 55082 /— '. ' 1 _ _ 1 �_ . -i 1 — 1 L - � . i 1 '.. 1 ..- i BUILDING - 651-430-0606 - �, — - _ I RIVERTOWN 2 BED ROOMS 1 S.F. 10 651 . __ _ n archnetusa.com =t COTTAGE 1 BED L OWELL 2 BED RO O MS 1,248 S.F. 6 _ ROOMS 892 S.F. 17 • `� \ ,1,; ti. c 0 - TOT 2 BED ROOMS 16 w. wM..s +4wt'••i. - -,..v - � . �1.. \ TOTAL 1BED ROOMS W/ '� 1 17 _ � ._ 8 4 1 N N N - — f1 TOTAL UNITS _ °"' i � f- TOTAL UNITS OAK PARK RIVERTOWN 2 BED ROOMS 1,457 S.F. 7 4 SENIOR LIVING 4 . 33.. LIT I \ I O LOWELL 2 BED ROOMS 1,248 S.F. 22 COTTAGE 1 BED ROOMS 892 S.F. 24 1 ' a rt.: � ..a �� L ,A Z AFTON 1 BED ROOMS + DEN 1,248 S.F. 2 I "1 `71 , ' I Jj L`a01EnaS�. 1 } ,..� 'x ' ' a te'' „ ` ' (� ,� ' � , • TOTAL 2 BED ROOMS 26 OAK PARK • ,.1 s ,, I 1 r % _ _' - lL TOTAL 1 BED ROOMS 26 --- `Y-r --- r" ; { g � x [ 1 , S .t. -. .. . ', , y A 6 > T /wL a 5 I — - - - _ - __. — - .. _.. ls? HEIGHTS, MN ryz P r. y' X B STAL S 30 STALLS _ N RIVERTOWN 2 BED ROOMS 3,957 S.F. 15 2 .� I t ; I A Z LOWELL 2 BED ROOMS 1,298 S.F. 27 L. - - r I. THE S T . CROIX 2 BED ROOMS + DEN 1,549 S.F. 6 ii s • 0. '"l, , 1 lL ' COTTAGE 1 BED ROOMS 892 S.F. 45 . __. i - I' a[ LU AFTON 1 BED ROOMS + DEN 1 1,248 S.F r 3 -___ ■ - GIP ilk /,. _ _ •- - - _ �'' ,f V I� O# MTAL UNITS 2 BED ROOMS 9 6 REV1810n5 Q -- d 1 BED ROOMS 1 1 48 1, ��� : , p Q L _ em Date i _ RIV ERT OW UNIiS - - �♦ n ba,I- , y • ' l y(+ OWN 2 BED ROOMS 1,457 S.F, 7 35 - — y 1 • ..... — LOWELL 2 BED ROOMS 1,248 S.F. 63 ' y� ' + " U p �R, � I , tea ' a STALL - - l I COTTA THE ST. CROIX 2 BED ROOMS + DEN 1,549 S.F. 6 1 BED ROOMS 892 S.F. 98 -. • .. ,- T '.c' J _ C - it 0 AFTON E 1 BED ROOMS + DEN 1,298 S.F. 5 - -_— ;' Al . , p f , S iP I, I: I 1 TOTAL SITE 2 BED ROOMS 104 _ _ Q _ 3 , s - ' �, '"1 _ �� `\`- t TOTAL SITE 1 BED ROOMS 1 co I ( � '� s 1 4> I TO TAL SITE UNITS 207 ■ 1 111111 1 i PARKING STALLS k} 1 1 71 r SITE STALLS ■ 9 N ni I ,. � 4 y £ 6 ai' . ' 6' BUILDING 1 (26LWIT) to El '.! I G? 1 a (1 L " I y ` 9 e• ? BUILDING 2 (33 UNIT) 30 4 , f;'1‘ BUILDING 3 (52 UNIT) 24 I h '"" 1 I I f • - - ._ ■ BURRING 4 (TA IRIITI 13 , - - _ ,fir I 1 TOTAL SITE STALLS 130 1 aA - -_ . '5 UNDERGROUND PARKING } {' �1� F BUILDING 1 (26 UN m 43 Registration Information me or under my direct sop• 'ai '. }� � . y . ¢ a 1LW' _ _ - - a s' BUILDING 2 (33 UNIT) 55 I hereby certify tut this plan, ;:. -¢r BUILDING 3 (52 UNIT) 84 , nincetbn, or report was prepared by BB 1 S, , y r F I �L - f i s + TOTALING 4 (88 UNIT) 280 that I a du Licensed nSlon .0 Y J 4 .. —y .., . ..... °r° • : IS under the laws 01 to Stan of Minnesota. . • I Printed Name ! A 1 - .. ,SSA �/ y „ • MICHAEL F. DIEM 3 " � r Signature DATE License A 1 M( 10 - 19 - 11 16081 L , � � EXHIBIT 9 ■ 1 a t L " , " Sheet Information SITE PLAN /LANDSCAPE PLAN c t- r_ C Prop. Na : 11-154 Drawing No Draw, By : Q Lt 11111•1111na8NIIMIN Checked By : MD AS 1 - :3. O$IT TREE LANDSGAPINW PLAN WY : 1D - 19 - 11 ).-- ©2010 ARCHNET, Inc. �(.'+(� \) /�(�J� TREE LIST ARCHNET • _ .\_ 104. V •. _ � �� wWYa�N MrP p m. �. 333 S14 t , L 1.- indossi.•blugters ■ 1 -t q 11�r11Ii Ii 1 4 `'1 ■■ ■■ ■■ ■■ ■ ■ ■ I J, MN 65002 r. '\) � ∎�� \V e 6 ` m = TREE REPLACEMENT TOTALS OAK PARK + t I � � � � � ����� e ; � ' ® �,' I I- 52 DECIDUOUS TREES ®2.5 EA - 0 e• Y %0 ' d' 82 DECIDUOUS UNDERSTORY OVERSTORY TREES ®I .5' EA. . - 1 23130..0 CAUIN CAUIN SENIOR LIVING H ■ , ` �� \ I 1 1 CONIFEROUS TREES ® HT. (OR 2.5' EA.) ii 27.5 CAUIN i� a -_.. a a ■ — L�\ • • i e ..' TOTAL OF REMAINING SITE 280.5 CAUIN DIA !� �� e' I �t ^ - I TOTAL OF EXISTING NORTH SITE 85.5 CAUIN OAK PARK `• r ..,:-.:,--_77=---7..... �fl�.. - . I 1 mi�� i ii l u i > HEIGHTS, MN rs _ _ J TOTAL OF ENTIRE SITE 355 CAUIN A ■ 11 18 STALLS 30 STALLS lie i , )� = Illk a = C � � I II ��► ; Q ,�„wtt:' te- '1TF7. yT.11 T_71w ' = I , , � �`t^ •• /!� II r Revisions Item Date ta 0'4 :: b 11 1 PP E. �, • — 88 STALLS az 'p r * 1 1 1c _ ` 1-1 411 •►" • v ^ 1 ` - 11111r,'' e••, off:' , \ — � ' Y I� r; ;ice ; ' �• � �r\ A. !,, ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ .. '. i (A •� r, 1 ts � I A era * a , / I, , „„ I Registration Information _ plan, s _a ►_�� ir Wdaolkn, or mood was prepared by mo I �' • ,2 :Ito m s +� ' - . - under my direct aunarvYlan,W f \ �, - i �I Mat I am • duly Licensed Monkey! Y t — r , � �' �' • . • • umMar the law of the Slat of Minnesota. d . . ., Printed Name % I � '' • MICHAEL F. DIEM MIL r1 I t : / S Si ignature 7 4114 7 „ • All - IMMO DATE . 10 -19 -11 lfia, J Y t , 411. y ' + BB 1.1 I 4011 • , - Stoat Information • I ' 1 J OVERALL TREE PLAN y — `II EXHIBIT 1 0 Dew BY Q "" "' Checked ay : MD L 1 a 0 . T.," DM• : 10-19-11 F. e! .po C ©2010 ARCHNET, Inc. L / ARCHNET I Ell 111 M / ,0. gm � 7 � � i► i1' 7 i s _ �� �. MN Maas W. 5... 201 7i 71 toil _ - _ _ 0, BUILDING I PLANT UST StO.a.., MN 55042 it 651-4300106 q , . .. . . YiCImEtO.COm lirlilifIll Vii ii O'er --- - ,- r• � - �Rl_ • . mac-- � -x ■■== OAK PARK . 1011'' , y. , BLDG 1 °� '._r 1 - - r r—mmim er SENIOR LIVING ��� r5irifiifS = OAK PARK .. ; ` f` '` P.m /R` - 0.1111'114 aarui. ter,•,- ,-- ,.∎rsrsair,_,marr ^� ..���•rrr�o HEIGHTS, MN • I LANDSCAPING PLAN Revisions Item Data • 014 . �� . t` `�W?"" ' IPP CIi�1" -'''"r. �; - 0 ; c-- : -� 7 7V 7 Yr 744.1t: MIL • i BUILDING 2 PLANT LIST 33 UNIT BLDG 2 y r ° �� dill ...e II ' • It�r.��l.rls��o rrr ��...�rr 4 e. _ us r �:- -: = r- �_�>•ar Registration Information — -- _ - - --• �oatl MDaa, or rawll was mowed by / a - i - 1 - ] T- '�TT' ∎.= F I horoby art. Mat MY pl., �� ���� =ler my Area and . p.rvWan, -_ -.. ' :lam tl. uMw that I am • duly lammed Arc.. the laws W the S tab W Minnesota. mu � sr_.r Printed Name O1:Vi F. DIEM yJ���y . ��■�s�rr Signature I've + Ili" I DATE �� Ucense i 30 STALLS , ra ft D_ „_ll lase/ -I r • '�'If Sheet .C6 -aMI ii4 i -' / BUILDING 1 fl 2 - � LANDSCJIPING PLAN PnWa No : I1 - ISO Drawing No: BUI1-121N6 2 LAND5GAPIN6 PLAN one,: a. v • 1 atedoollBF: ND L1.1 D. : 10 - 11 0:010 Mc0NET, Inc. ARCHNET III III M aeYY9eY.e•teYEMn 333N Maim IM. Mo. 201 iNUMMor, MN 55052 6S1-420O 011 archnedua.com AIVP inink.;11111 ,- 411 ♦ ,' OAK PARK SENIOR LIV I. • r- OAK PARK � 1 HEIGHTS, MN .1W0011 . ♦ t�`1� - 1 A .a� aka . BUILDING 3 PLANT LIST I .ii 7 ""' VI ' _ - �� ..T. . 1e:_.r -. �rMo Revisions ' ' • �� pi* /II . _T_ ___ c Item Date 101,141014 411 1 I I • .. . —_ r• t G I ... I . Obiljg f Wir _ I 10 1111 IN s, 1 04 (9 4.0 in, , Reglstretion Information al I 1 Mnby ceraN tlrt ads plan, �� \� sppa:Ma io, or report rm prepared by R 1 I ; � 1 urea.r my there[ at on, and a re i unbar the la d the I a • duly licensed Ardlaect ws r State o/ f Minnesota. o. Printed Name MICHAEL F. DIEM iii , Signature DATE license e - - - -- 4• • � 0 • 101911 16844 r I I sheer [reformation H • - S LAtb0GAPIN6 PLAN EXHIBIT 12 LANDSCAPING ING ® '. a PLN az r C.-1 Ary. a No : 11-154 Drewln9 No : C:2 Moan By i CL LL.I Cleared ar 1 MD L1 . 2 > D : 10 -19 -11 l.l.r DM* W ©2010 ARCHNET, Inc. ce • ARCHNET STOILAGEITP. © - ;mil IL ;l ..ar99.o..r9. • � - 1 1133N S4Y 13. 550 01 ISti200606 archnetusa.com OAK PARK E" "0. '°"®°' . OAK SENIORS LIVING _•__�__________ PHASE 1 PM�Dt1OlEVEL aLaD8 O1 1M 8D I TS) i I t ^ OAK PARK HEIGHTS, MN • STORAGE TYP Revisions -. i , 1 ' !� 110 Revisions Date STORAGE _— _ — n • — • It STALLS TOTAL i C SrAal, p y - � H I I PEVAT01t vvv➢Y➢9 O, P a_ / Q Registration Information I hereby Certify that MP plan, specification, or report was prepared by m or Me my tNecton, and at I am a duly Licensed nsed kc Arch./ under laws of the State of the o__:) Mimeses Printed nted Namme MICHAEL F. DIEM Signature 1 i ` STAIR DATE License # 10-19 -11 16641 ■ Sheet Information I I' PARKING LEVEL BUILDING 1 &2 c —' PrvNCt NO : It -191 Dcawbp No : ,. EXHIBIT 13 Dawn�S ` OrearW ay: MFD A1a01 = PAR10q LEVEL BUILDING UNITS) L tnr a Td Date : 10-19 -11 CQa010 AROINET Inc. O • ARCHNET le U CI II II 1 STALLS I I SSS NlIi t SW ISI / a � I c ' l lr B� IRI UM EJ 6514131141606 N TOTAL OAK PARK I SENIORS LIVING ¢� , ° ° I ° Q ° a SSt PHASE 1 OAK PARK HEIGHTS, MN [..--. ,.. ... Revisions Item Date •�' [_____ ^ , i G , •� El Registration Information ntlon 0 certify ,ray rt w s r pn, a sp m. «leomt a p by STORAGE TT!. under my direct.upenWon, and that 1 am a duly limn. d m5t ct under Un M states • E . Printed Name 1 STAIR MICHAEL F. DIEM Signature n DATE License # 10 -19-11 16844 ["."--=: Sheet Information •l PARKING LEVEL BUILDING 3 EXHIBIT 14 Protect No ; 11 -164 Drawing No : 1/t G 1 4BL BUILDING 3 A2 UNITS) Drawn By : cal • rheokedBy: MfDA t Date: 10-19 -11 L 012010 ABOINET, Inc. C ARCHNET � rrR.1TTSf1.6. sweleiledile Nip MN YRY ■L s. 201 sle.rq AIN 55002 uI4300i06 " archretusa.00m S i —r —_Z 1.-- . COMMON SPACE 1 COTTAGE COTTAGE COTTAGE LOWELL LOWELL STAR ELEVATOR ‘ AI S OAK PARK SENIORS LIVING -- PHASE 1 .:1.'r' 1R. TAOOa PIIN sl1lDW0, a IMj O' ,21r OAK PARK HEIGHTS, MN ;-1a .e r — - ` Revisions I Item Date r - RIVERTOWN COTTAGE LOWEIL. LOWELL RIVERTOWN J ii r RIVEAT'OWN COTTAGE COTTAGE COTTAGE -. L COTTAGE L L L ..'' ` J COTTAGE Registration Information 11P 4', - i',. J L A I hereby certify that MN plan, .- ; , t specification, or report was red by ' % 3>1 f me or under my direct W.p.rvSfen, end U I em a duly Licensed Architect • OW - , under to laws of the State of Mlmesea COTTAGE J J Printed Name r n COTTAGE MICHAEL F. DIEM I Sii ig ggnature DATE License N I0-19 -tt 16.41 l Sheet Information 1ST. FLOOR PLAN BUILDING c EXHIBIT 1 I a L_ _ Prefect No ' 11 -1SA pew{n9Ne: _Drawn By : CAL C LI A1.11 CMCke6 By : MDF G IST FLOOR RAN BUILDING ]S UNIT) Se 1. -19 -11 L v+,e • ra ©2010 ARCNNET, Inc. u N. ARCHNET m© ® I I I 1 . > r 1 taE 1 cior l _ s _� _ . ` ...r .lie alga fff N Maio ft WWEIL COTTAGE COTTAGE COTTAGE LOWELL LOWELL LOWELL per. Maio N. f14hr MN 550112 4514700606 arebast W.00711 fit; '5.-. \' �, f z ; I. \, ' C corv,GE GDTC,OE arITAGE LOWELL LOWELL t RIVERTOWN OAK PARK . . 0.4. SENIORS LIVING ' ' — — PHASE 1 c -.cam -I : J J J; J ••. OAK PARK HEIGHTS, MN I — 1 �@ Revisions �E Item Date I . LOWELL 4 1 ._ . A r Ley 1 Lomax , i J F COTTAGE / / :;; Registration Information r "� I hereby certify that this Wan, W ak.aon, or report was prepared by COTTAGE y that my Licensed end a.l�,ll t I - -, under the lines of the state or COTTAGE Minna.. e _ J Printed Name MICHAEL F. DIEM STAIR Signature N� DATE License * 10-19 -1I 15541 r LOWELL LOWELL Sheet Information EXHIBIT 1 6 1ST. FLOOR PLAN BUILDING L_ J sr0lect No ; 11 -154 pawing No : Drawn Ey: CAL r � I ® ,,,v,LODp RAN BUILDING ] (51 UNIT) By NA 1 . 1 2 i f Deis : 10 49-11 I 02010 MCHNET, I. ARCHNET li © ©® _- , L 1 1111N Mau IL 11K 101 111Mw4 IIN 550111 1151410.0506 �L- ® rte°' ' etusa.COID • r COTTAGE COTTAGE C OTTAGE LOW EL IOWE1L S AL L ELEVATOR -- 1 1 A0. ®F'AIOR J OAK PARK ..;,L ' :_. L L -- SENIORS LIVING —J J PHASE 1 O TLD. R ODR PW146800 1 GE UNTO 1/1! • 1'd OAK PARK HEIGHTS, MN r ,, r 1 r 1111 r - - Revisions 'I r Item Date r RIVERIOWN COTTAGE LOWELL LOWELL LOWELL J • L r -- VEITIOWN COTTAGE COTTAGE COTTAGE -- RI L L_ L � J Q® COTTAGE ■� Registration Information COTTAQB ,. I hereby away Mat this Plan, spedlketbn, or report was Prepared by Mo r under my din. supervision. and at I am • duly Licensed Architect L. - — 7 urger the laws of Me State of COTTAGE Mimes. • pi -.1 Printed Name ®D r COTTAGE F. DIEM Signature L rFI y DATE License # 6N 10 -19-11 16 ep Sheet Information 2ND. FLOOR PLAN BUILDING 1 &2 t L PreiM NO: II -lea Drawing NO: c Dawn Ey : Ga1L L • Q 2N . FLOOR PLAN BUILDING 2 (33 UNIT) 8 EXHIBIT 17 "' � A 1 a 21 ` Date : 10-19-11 C Cam ARCHNET, Inc L C ARCHNET ©©© 4/ I.OWEIL COTTAGE COTTAGE COTTAGE TOWEL LOW01 • 117N74Y IL lib. 201 RIVERTOWN Is,, er, MN 13012 uli7oeasa uchaetusLcom • \ \ COTTAGE LOWEL LM9EL E VEODW„ OAK PARK 4 ,�� SENIORS LIVING L- PHASE 1 • O AK PARK HEIGHTS, MN d I 1 r ' Iowpu, v \ Revisions Item Date — I I Low.. � I , Igg J r AP7CN L — l COTTAGE __ J Registration Information ( ( I hereby certify that this plan, � COTTAGE y •> : r under mY direct was ion, see I I em a di* Licensed McnWect ,� L_T areas the State COTTAGE NWraoa - J Printed Name r MICHAEL F. DIEM COTTAGE LI STAIR Signature I_ //i DATE License * # to -ls-Il 16844 i I r- LOWEL LOWEIL I , Sheet Information L _ J EXHIBIT 1 8 2ND. FLOOR PLAN BUILDING t E 2ND, FLR PLAN BUILDING S ISE UNIT) 1NB 1'-0' : —A l 2 i a 2 Data : 10 -19-11 C 002010 ARCHNET, Inc. L C / ARCHNET 1 ' Ell 113 M � I r' S N Ii, rim &N • • II SUN d" PATIO —• • ROOM ROOM R OOA1 PATq �� id %d 1d Xd PATIO , 1d" i d 11'x1" ,1 T• 70 7• 1■1111■■ile 811 ■U N11N■ .L ■A 201 StIllembir, MN 00112 III 111, 1114300406 lad lad lad I • OINNG ROOM BEDROOM i t • BEDROOM , R 1 X1 11'x „• • ■ — LIVING • J ,:• 1a' BEDROOM 12x,1 ,Yx,f ,7xu' ,z•X,f ❑ R DOA 1 OAK PARK ® I�aOO J® s x,e SENIOR LIVING ...FMB 111 aa1 r 1 .�■ • J � I t I . ! iiiiii�aff wCi1..a l oci iii ; ....• OAK PARK 114 oa C: 001 uual no lolk- ■ t w o uual ^ – 1 reran lawn m I � alaB I MEW ■ i 1 nab Soo HEIGHTS, MN k In 10 13 • gum.' awi LLL lion f� 1a \ /II • aaa IOIY■ 1 �_ ii i_ 1 ■w ■wl a ■. L►n �N OCII O IaIZ 1 a:Jaal -- �� . 1 - N� Lis 11 am 1 21∎ N9 17"11 \' r__ L M.1– JaRITT ^a 4 1p /1 R11 1∎ = C� 1._:g61101!' � -16OIR aw la aw�aa! \F1aaai♦rYYa p ■ : laaa L01 a�Ja 1 1 0 :11 ".' 11. 11 1 11 : NY 1V la . - p MI 1 ...a "MI ,, — � , .� 1 /Le :�0�i � ■ ; �. I - � p ■ a ; 1..L.111 : � ' :. ,l . i ____ a1 �1 �E :a••1i - AFTON • LOWELL COTTAGE Revisions 1,248 S.F. 1,248 S.F. 892 S.F. • Item Date 5 TOTAL 63 TOTAL 98 TOTAL I ■1. �� L _ ■`i . n . la�a ii = N i L ,`' IaMIE: --:. wlnl WluL a... IMI:dYlal l • �I --- -- 11 - � BEDROOM ■ ` � J 10'X10' SUN I 'I - PA ��_ R OOM 'exit uv110 T•x,f 1. II ❑. e'x,f • - RDOM -- - \ — 17•x71• 9 Qi i1„ rnw ❑ ® R� R91T7 1 ���;� ��� anal( III Registration Information n1Tn/ Ia7TCF1 I3INIJ LMNG I ■■ eill SU NereOY certify that N4 Plan, ROOM spac .'A 11 11 11 ROOM ■ ■l:Won, r report wee Pmeored by era 0'X,0• .a. =:T1 7■IMEN 17'x IS' , PATIO me or under my direct supervision, and ■■ \ ►� ra U that 1 am duly Licensed Architect O ��■■ii awAA under Ma hru O die Shb of Minnesota. --ioN NOM a mow Pond Name 3lUaa ■1 L. I _ Nan 1� ■ aa ■■act■ .. la► \■1 Y mum laaa MICHAEL F. DIEM VI\a■wa L' .\` ■ ■O■ 1 O • DEN Signature r1wa11r O I CaaClas H ■act ■ \ ■ 01M1fi ..■ai i 1 1 ,7•x12 1 �cL:1LC a /a [p ■ a {C Y' c'nl a : a ct = V = 4444 ,A-- � t' :..: ` ' aa•9 • Rex,' tau i p _ MEC/I '1Ng �... ' �I DATE License i RIVERTOWN • , ■l■•• 10_19 -I1 16154 ■ 1,457 S.F. �'� 1 35 TOTAL *• J , a1.n1a 4LrmrK. ._ Sheet Information UNIT PLANS o0 o`er II/ , / Prs,d No : 11 -154 Drawing No : O °"”" By ° THE ST. CROIX w 1,549 S.F. EX HIBIT 1 9 Checked MD A2 > • 6 TOTAL Don : 101911 w U . W ®2010 ARONNEr, Inc. EC ARCHNET arOldt.dOae. Wtular, ,oUatooLk .a 333N Main S6 Sle. 201 StlNaatey MN 55082 .W',.;�- ;may 651. 430-0606 - archnetusa.com OAK PARK SENIORS LIVING — i F 6' B F _ °- M ....� OAK PARK HEIGHTS, MN ,1 1 - _ -- "? _ _ ___ '1 jJ ,. Revisions µ ,,,,�w,t�� Item Date y r sew �,ge, — - L Registration Information I 0 Mraby carNN that N'¢ Plan. I f I a S FLOgi L\ • o lkatbn 0 «.9 rDr. S p.0oS id aretl Dy m. W M wgrvb wr my tlbn, a aW aBWY llu 8 ofa uWr V,. law, of the Sb6. h d Mhwsaa Printed Name MICHAEL F. DIEM OBWLOwGr - -- Signature DATE License S "' I0-I0-11 16800 �\ - � Sheet Information F _ ^. - ^e . _ . TTTT vNR ta ^0 ,..: „f� Drawn By: {a1L ' — Cha<aetl By: MFD_ A3 • 0 ELEVaTWII eo.na BU,PaIG WORTH t�9-. 1•p J Date : 019 -11 1 tna• to U ©2010 MCMNET, IM. EXHIQ�r 2 ARCHNET ©lel la • ,r eatteeaue.,.trt., su W.tnable . - ;,..... .., i, el . 333 N �11rN SL Ste. 1 '1740 'a} T :, sdUsatae, MN 55082 20 >k 1 :. . _ 657. 430.0606 archnetusa.cou► a.- r „- w. OAK PARK • «» SENIORS LIVING `.y -7::,, PHASE 1 1 4 • __ F ' s -*' OAK PARK HEIGHTS, MN w_�wga. �. " rri; ..... ..... � � ; .... 1.- I fl _ IL - -` Item Revisions Date a ril a,maac.ar.o w - .. , 'H w .r sr R In anon m.a. ra,ar. no , hereby wweaworow ,...::.- . _... .r, — ... .� . .... 11 .1] 0 certify that o Plan. mo..a.u..,aw ��.. � .. . .. .- .. ,_o<�.. ..._.:� .. - ' .la. .w4 :... e., .. 1 n siwclfkatn,mr dPP Pares e�y 1 rtwaa°a rr0 n.wee t _ I 1 a e _ _ 1 I1 me ru r Y rect suP lon,a NaI l am a OW llwnutl Aritec. u PrtMs:e row rw x..rc d<a MIN.l.> Printed Name aucowo 9 Nonni Tt s s EAST MICHAEL F. DIEM 0vtr.rd — - " ,Ir = ' o " Signature DATE License ,Y 10 -1,11 16660 'Th \ \ / .. I ■.. ■ ... I ■ . l.` 114 •— ■ S ■ ..._. BUILDING 2 ELEVATIONS _ Sheet Information Nom= c F . .� �� 1 . t P1glattla: 11 -154 pawing No: •- Onwn BY : AOINgr E, _.. 4 BIIRDINO Checked By:checker A3 r.1'd 0111 .110' Uete: I4-19-1t L ti • EXHIBIT 2 1 009010 ARCHNET, Ins. ARCHNET © ©a aleb„eglle.interiors 1 . 7 sustainable deny. i 1 333 N Male S. SIe. 201 � i Suu. MN 55082 ` 651- 451-4 30-0606 ti "` archnetusa.com A ° OAK PARK SENIORS LIVING PHASE 1 -1_1-; a ' ' ' 4 !Mlle - r - IRAN .6.1.1 _. _ ' - I OAK PARK HEIGHTS. MN 1 I I I 1 I Ill Item Revisions Date ! .7,.,. Registration Information .� /" , -' / i • :w aro,w That crcw OP - - - -. : . .. �. \. \ T s y� roe nsad. a M no I I 1 I I I ... . � M= Stew a I -- _... I II I I i I I f i11 �I . . .... I ' 9 J MICHAEL F. DIEM SOaN. 4 NoNORTH 'NEST EKEY. SW.1 Signatur I ne•• NG r.rc DATE License 8 101411 16844 Sheet Information BUILDING 3 ELEVATIONS ` �1 � �. Ro.tNa: 11 -154 Drawing No • •.• - 1 * . Pi I - 1 • - 1 ...•E .�.i.aa■- I {. I I ... ..,., Dnwn BY M.D C 11 O 1 ro ItteleD 9EAST(SOUTHELEV. SW) -- PORTICO DETAIL checked By CAL A3.2 1ne DM: 10 -19-11 EXHIBIT 2 2 Oka to AWCNNET Inc. 1E • r �/ � �_ nm?inmuonmonnmm 727: ,l� � u � I __ _ _ .� j a � , �. = " ° i L II I = = - o o _ _ IP I Al' I '��I� I�I�I��I' ��II,'Iil»F1 I!, I IfTTl o I • � �� r7 11=- °i .' �'��' i n ,' VIEW FROM NOVA SCOTIA ENTRANCE LOOKING EAST EXHIBIT 2 3 RECEIVED OCT 1 91011 • • PROPOSED 3 STORY PROPOSED 2 STORY EXISTING 4 STORY SENIORS _ _,.���,��;`�I ■ !� . ► /l 11� - ,, \► /�. '! � i � m. - .. = -' G - � - � 1 - 1 - f i r r r ill • I �.■I��__i 1 i 1 1� (���: _ � I l _ ll lif71 _ _ _ iII'1 Ii i uil - np1r I1;� I �i� -71 i -- - - — 1 it ' r J1flflTi 1:171 T� n l� _C ; ICI � ;; � �i _ _ ... - ■�. I I ,1� In ■n — . I r T 11`l1l.r . — - - - iii ?TT7n,: in n � � n1.-.in-t. d� lT�T7�I�11 �. - I-in� na _ _�nc �.i�l� _ I � r. � I un fly -" 4 ■•" . �_ VIEW FROM POND LOOKING NORTH EAST �.. ■...„ -- "- -- � EXHIBIT 2 4 RECEIVED OCT 19 2011 1191 HX3 11171(1\ '1 1 )(t1I 11:11:. III. IP(t211 11,11 ;J,Al21. `) NIAII XOINI XWVcd fVO w., Ay uu I .., .11 f y1. SL � ` v im/ i .. a Z. en.. IM-- r , Y;. 4 L Y.,, ,, fit. : l �. •, I raV el + fyt t fy ,9. 'Ni- �t41 . `,_ 11 { f k' Z n b w., F r Folz, Freeman, Erickson, Inc. WE �! s LAND PLANNING • SURVEYING • ENGINEERING September 13, 2011 Mayor and City Council City of Oak Park Heights 14168 Oak Park Blvd. N. Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 RE: PUD Amendment — Oakgreen Commons — Oak Park Senior Living Phase I Dear Mayor and Council Members: On behalf of my client, Mr. Tim Nolde, we are submitting documentation for the revision or amendment to the Oakgreen Village PUD. Due to market driven conditions we are once again submitting for a change in regard to the previously approved use of the Oakgreen Village and Oakgreen Ponds area. The proposed submittal reduces the number of townhome units from 44 in the Oakgreen Village Platted Area to 15 units. The townhomes in the Oakgreen Ponds Plat would all be eliminated. The proposed change would be to add 111 units to the Oak Park Senior Living Phase I Addition, and constructing 8 of the remaining townhomes. The proposed plan would incorporate construction similar to that of the existing senior living building recently constructed over the past year. These units would be considered more of a "Brownstone" style of unit to accommodate the current market trend. As part of this PUD Amendment, TIF Financing is requested for the amount of $1,200,000. This request does not include the earlier created District; therefore, we do not need any consent from Bondholders and other interested parties. Construction of the proposed units for Phase I, would begin as soon as approvals are given. We have a neighborhood meeting scheduled for October 4 with other meetings to follow. We look forward to working with the City in finalizing this development. Thank you again for your support and patience. Sincerely, Folz, Fre , Erickson, Inc. 44/ "I A. Erickson, PE EXHIBIT 2 6 1244555th Street North, Lake Elmo, MN 55042 • Phan: (651) 439 -8833 • Fax: (651) 430-9331 • Wehfde: www.lk inc.com Bruce A. Fob. LS TimotJran, LS Todd PS 1939- 20101 rrm Julie Hultman From: K.D. Widin <kdwidin @comcast.net> Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2011 11:43 AM To: Scott Richards; Eric Johnson; Mark Vierling (E- mail); Betty Caruso; Julie Hultman Subject: Oak Park Senior Living - Review of Landscape Plan and Tree Replacement Scott - I have done an additional review of the landscape plan for the Oak Park Senior Living development and the tree replacement requirement for the PUD as a whole. 1. The comment (2 d), in my review of the landscape plan dated 10/21/11, regarding trees on the west property boundary was answered; however, there are still trees depicted in the landscape plan to be planted over the east boundary of the property into the road r.o.w for Oakgreen Ave.. The simulated image included does not show these trees, but the trail and landscape plans show them( ?). Are trees to be planted in the r.o.w. or not? If not, the depiction of trees in that r.o.w. should be changed on the revised landscape plan to show where these trees will be planted. 2. Plant Material - As I read over my reviews of earlier landscape plans for this PUD, I had raised the same issues with some of the plant material in the earlier plans, such as replacing eastern pin oak with northern pin oak. I recommend that the developer be asked to submit a revised landscape plan for Oak Park Senior Living incorporating the recommended changes of plant material listed in my report of 10/21/11. One additional recommendation is that the Ky. coffee trees, depicted on the west side of the development, not be planted in the narrow medians in the proposed additional parking area since they are a large tree. It would be better to plant smaller ornamental trees, such as serviceberry or thornless cockspur hawthorn, in the narrow parking lot medians. 3. Planting Detail - Please ask the developer to submit a diagrammatic detail of how the trees and shrubs are to be planted. This is a required part of any landscape plan submitted to the city. The city requires deveopment projects and contractors installing plant material to adhere to the approved planting detail. 4. Tree Replacement Requirement - 366 cal. in. of trees planted for replacement are proposed in the landscape plans submitted for the north building (landscaping already in place) and the current proposed phase. Subtracting these replacement cal. in. listed in the two landscape plans, from the calculated tree replacement requirement (4/27/09) for the development of 1,521 cal. in., results in a re- calculated tree replacement requirement of 1,155 in.. Since only 366 in. of replacement trees are proposed to be planted on the development site, there is a "cash in lieu of tree planting" (1,155 cal. in. x $50. /cal. in.) requirement of $57,750. per the OPH Tree Protection Ordinance 1307. Monies are to be paid to the City of OPH by the developer and placed in the OPH Tree Planting Fund. Has this amount been paid by the developer yet? Please include this information in the Planning Report for this development. Contact me if you have any questions regarding this review or report. Kathy Widin OPH Arborist 1 EXHIBIT 2 7 Stantec Consulting Services Inc. INF 2335 Highway 36 West St. Paul MN 55113 Tel: (651) 636 -4600 Fax: (651) 636 -1311 Stank< .#' Bonestroo November 2, 2011 Mr. Eric Johnson City Administrator City of Oak Park Heights 14168 Oak Park Blvd., P.O. Box 2007 Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 -2007 Re: Oak Park Senior Living — Phase 1 Plan Review Bonestroo Ale No.: 000055- 11000 -1 Dear Eric: We have reviewed the site development plans received for Oak Park Senior Living, Phase 1, as submitted by Folz, Freeman, Erickson, Inc. on October 12, 2011. Following are our comments and /or recommendations. Sheet 2 — Master Plan & Traffic Analysis 1. The traffic analysis has been reviewed and the trip calculations have been verified. The trip generations at the peak hours (AM and PM) are fairly low and are not of concem. Sheet 4 — Site Drainage /Grading Plan /Snow Removal 1. The existing storm sewer in the southwest corner of the site needs to be shown on an existing layer. 2. Show the redefined drainage and utility easement for the 21" diameter storm sewer between Building 1 and 2 on both Sheets 4 and 5. 3. The 21" diameter storm sewer shall be reinforced concrete pipe (RCP). 4. All storm sewer design data needs to be displayed (rims, inverts, structure type and sizes, pipe slopes, and material). 5. The existing catch basin located just north of Building 2 shall be verified as being a sump catch basin manhole for sediment and debris removal, prior to discharging into the northern pond. If this catch basin structure is to remain, the former pipe opening to the south requires bulkhead. 6. Another catch basin needs to be considered within the 46 stall parking lot for Buildings 1 and 2. The entire western parking lot sheet drains across the driveway entrance. Sheet 5 — Utility Plan 1. Rather than abandoning the existing sanitary and storm sewer as labeled, the pipe and structures need to be removed. 2. The existing hydrant located in the driveway entrance to the Building 1 and 2 parking lot needs to be relocated. EXHIBIT 2 8 Stantec Oak Park Senior Living — Phase 1 Plan Review Page 2 of 2 Sheet 6 — Lighting Plan. 1. Verify proposed Tight poles do not conflict with existing and proposed utilities. Preliminary PIat 1. Identify "NEW DRAINAGE EASEMENT" for storm sewer between Buildings 1 and 2 as "NEW DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT ". 2. Outlot A needs to show the 10' wide drainage, utility, and trail easement on the north side of 58 Street North. General Comments 1. The scales shown on the 11 "x17" size plans are not accurate and need to be shown correctly. 2. Several City standard detail plates are provided as attachments. 3. Records plan drawings showing as -built information need to be provided at completion of construction. If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact me at (651) 604 -4808. Sincerely, STANTEC • lsu 4,„ au. ,.�.., Christopher W. Long, P.E. Attachments: Detail Plates — Complete Set cc: Andy Kegley, Public Works Director Jim Butler, Building Official Scott Richards, City Planner Mark Vierling, City Attorney Kath Widin, City Arborist Todd Erickson, FFE MAH, File - Stantec T 3601 oka Thurston Avenue N, Suite 100 An, MN 55303 ENOL Phone: 783.231.5840 tiRC „ Facsimile: 763.427.0520 TPC@PlanningCo.com PLANNING REPORT TO: Eric Johnson FROM: Scott Richards DATE: November 3, 2011 RE: Oak Park Heights — Oak Park Senior Living Phase II — Planned Unit Development Amendment TPC FILE: 236.02 — 11.07 BACKGROUND Tim Nolde, representing Green Twig LLC /Anchobaypro, Inc has submitted an application for amending the Carriage CO -OP Planned Unit Development (PUD) to allow an increase in the number of dwelling units from 48 to 96 units. The project would now be a senior rental instead of a cooperative. The proposed project is at Oakgreen Avenue and 58 Street North. • The building is to be placed in the same location as the approved Carriage CO -OP but the interior of the building would be reconfigured to accommodate senior rentals. The previously approved building was to be constructed with two stories. The plans as ` provided below indicate the building will now be three stories. The general plan approval for the Carriage CO -OP project was recommended by the Planning Commission on May 14, 2009 and approved by the City Council on June 9, 2009. The review is based upon the following submittals: • . Exhibit 1: Existing Conditions (Sheet 1) Exhibit 2: Layout Plan/Traffic /Parking Plan (Sheet 2) Exhibit 3: Site Drainage /Grading Plan (Sheet 3) Exhibit 4: Utility Plan (Sheet 4) , Exhibit 5: Lighting Plan (Sheet 5) Exhibit 6: Site Plan /Landscape Plan (AS1) Exhibit 7: Overall Tree Plan — Landscape Plan (L1.0) Exhibit 8: Building 4 Landscaping Plan (L1.1) • Exhibit 9: Parking Level Building 4 (A1.0) Exhibit 10: 1 Floor Plan Building 4 (A1.1) Exhibit 11: 2 Floor Plan Building 4 (A1.2) Exhibit 12: 3rd Floor Plan Building 4 (A1.3) Exhibit 13: Unit Plans (A2.0) Exhibit 14: Building 4 Elevations (A3.0) Exhibit 15: Building 4 Elevations (A3.1) Exhibit 16: Oakgreen Avenue Looking North (Color) Exhibit 17: Project Narrative from Todd Erickson, FFE, September 13, 2011 Exhibit 18: Memo from Kathy Widin, City Arborist Exhibit 19: Memo from Chris Long, City Engineer PROJECT DESCRIPTION Todd Erickson of Folz, Freeman and Erickson, Inc, the project engineer has provided the following narrative related to the request for the PUD amendment: "On behalf of my client, Mr. Tim Nolde, we are submitting documentation for the revision or amendment to the Carriage CO -OP PUD. The proposed submittal changes the previously approved building to 96 total units. Also, changes to the site layout have been made to accommodate the revisions of Phase I of the Project and incorporates more usable outdoor space, with the creation of a small park and gazebo area. Additional exterior parking has also been added to the revised site plan. We also request an extension to the TIF Financing, to postpone construction for two additional years. This delay would allow for us to finalize the remainder of the site as proposed in the Oak Park Senior Living Phase I portion of the project and meet the anticipated market conditions." There are 96 units proposed in a three story building. The approved PUD for the Carriage CO -OP was a total of 48 in a two story building. ISSUES ANALYSIS Adjacent Uses. Uses adjacent to the subject site are listed below: North of Site: Present Zoning — B-4, Limited Business District Present Use — Oakgreen Commons (120 Units Senior Living) Townhomes and Condominiums and the Xcel Energy power line easement 2 South of Site: Present Zoning — 0, Open Space and R -1 Single Family Residential District Present Use — City park land and a single family neighborhood West of Site: Present Zoning — B -4, Limited Business District Present Use — Lowe's /CSM Commercial development East of Site: Present Zoning — 0, Open Space and R -3 Multiple Family Residential Present Use — Townhomes and Oakgreen Avenue Comprehensive Plan. The 2008 Comprehensive Plan designates this area as medium density residential. The proposed increase in number of units places the area into a high density residential classification for land use purposes. A Comprehensive Plan change would be required. The Planning Commission and City Council should comment on the land use classifications and whether the Comprehensive Plan should be revised to accommodate this development. Zoning. This property has been designated as B-4, Limited Business District which accommodates residential development as a conditional use. As such, the underlying base zoning district is B-4, Limited Business District with a PUD overlay. The B -4, Limited Business District lists two family, townhomes and multiple family dwellings as a conditional use. The performance standards of the R -3 Multiple Family District must be complied with for residential development in the B-4 Limited Business District. Subdivision. The existing Oakgreen Village plat will remain for this property. Park Dedication. Park dedication has been satisfied for this area. The applicant paid the maximum percentage (14 %) of equivalent cash value as part of the original approvals in 2006. Project Density. Section 401.15.C.3 of the Zoning Ordinance establishes the density thresholds for residential properties. Elderly housing requires 1,000 square feet of land area per unit excluding right -of -way and wetlands. The multiple family requirement is 2,500 square feet per unit. The project total including what is proposed, the already constructed units and the Oakgreen Commons project is a density of 2,200 square feet per unit. As long as the project stays as a senior rental complex it would meet density requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. The development agreement will need to include a provision to assure that the project remains as senior rental and is not converted to non restricted rental housing. Proposed Street/Access. The existing roadway system that was developed for the Oakgreen Village and Oakgreen Commons projects will remain in place. Access into Building 4 will be from the existing private roadway through a parking area and into the 3 front of the development. The access to the underground garage shall remain as originally planned directly opposite the entrance to the Oakgreen Commons building. Trails /Sidewalks. The Trail Plan as attached includes the locations of the existing eight foot bituminous public trails and the proposed and existing five foot concrete sidewalks. The combination of the trails and sidewalks should provide adequate access throughout the development to Building 4 and connections to the surrounding public trails. The Planning Commission should comment about the proposed sidewalks and connections to the existing trail system. Private Park. A private landscaped area with a gazebo is proposed between Buildings 3 and 4. No active play equipment is proposed due to the nature of the development as senior rentals. Setbacks. Within a PUD, the base district setback requirements (R -3) are applied only to the perimeter of the project. The R -3 District specifies setback requirements as follows: 30 feet front yard, 30 feet rear yard, and 20 feet side yard. If the lot is in a corner, not less than 30 feet from a lot line is required for side yards. The PUD section of the Zoning Ordinance specifies that buildings should be located at least 20 feet from the back of a curb line from roadways as part of the internal street pattern. Additionally, the ordinance specifies that no building within the project shall be nearer to another building by one -half the sum of the building heights of the two buildings. Building 4 will be located, at its closest point, 24 feet to the right of way line of Oakgreen Avenue. The Oakgreen Commons building is located 40 feet from the right of way line (the patio is 20 feet). The City Council specified this setback distance for Oakgreen Commons in that the structure was planned for four stories. Now that Building 4 is three stories with a height of 38 feet, the building should at least be setback 30 feet as specified for the R -3 District or the 40 feet to be consistent with the Oakgreen Commons building. The PUD allows the City to specify setbacks that may differ from the ordinance. The setback from the 58 Street right of way for Building 4 is planned at 32 feet 9 inches. The Planning Commission and City Council should discuss these two setbacks distances and provide direction to the applicant. Tree Preservation /Landscaping. The applicant has provided a general landscaping plan as well as detailed plans for the foundation plantings around each building. The City Arborist has reviewed the plan in memo as attached. The plans shall be subject to the final approval of the City Arborist. Grading and. Drainage. Detailed grading and drainage plans have been provided as part of the development submittals. The City Engineer and the applicable watershed authority shall review and approve all of the grading and drainage plans. 4 Utilities. A detailed utility plan has been submitted. The final utility plan is subject to review and approval of the City Engineer and Public Works Director. All of the utilities within the development shall be private but built to City specifications. Lighting. A lighting plan has been provided that includes street light fixture specifications and locations within the private street network. Some of the street lights are in place and others are proposed. The proposed light fixture is identical to what has been used previously. It is a full cut -off fixture with a flat lens. The street lights will be maintained and all electricity costs will be paid for by the developer /homeowners association. • The plans indicate the wall light fixtures to be used on each of the proposed buildings. These fixtures are the same as what was approved for the Oakgreen Commons project. As part of the PUD approvals, the City Council will need to determine of these fixtures are appropriate in that they are not full cut off. A photometric plan has been provided that is compliant with the light intensity requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. Signage. No additional signage has been proposed other than the monument signs on each of the two entrances from Nova Scotia Avenue and at the corner of 58 Street and Oakgreen Avenue. The applicant shall submit plans for these signs that are subject of City approval. Traffic. The applicant has provided projected vehicle count information for the proposed development in the Master Plan and Traffic Analysis. The traffic numbers are subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. Parking. The Zoning Ordinance requires the following for elderly housing: "m. Elderly (Senior Citizen) Housing. Reservation of area equal to one (1) parking space per unit. Initial development is, however, required for only one -half (1/2) space per unit and said number of spaces can continue until such time as the City considers a need for additional parking spaces has been demonstrated." A review of the proposed parking is as follows: Building Surface Stalls Underground Stalls Building 4 68 98 With a total of 166 stalls, and 96 dwelling units, Building 4 will comply with ordinance standards for elderly parking and leave additional spaces for guest parking. 5 Snow Storage. The plans indicate areas for snow storage. The City Engineer should comment on the adequacy of these areas. Mechanical Equipment. The applicant's architect has indicated that the mechanical equipment is located within the buildings. Any mechanical equipment that is ground mounted or visible from adjacent streets shall be screened as required by the Zoning Ordinance. Trash /Recycling. All of the trash storage and recycling will be internal to the buildings. The design of the driveway for building accommodates roll out containers for pickup. Building Height. Building 4 with three stories will be 38 feet to the midpoint of the gable roof in accordance with the definition of building height. The building will not be in conformance with the 35 foot height requirement of the Zoning Ordinance. The Zoning Ordinance allows building heights in excess of three stories or 35 feet within the B -4 Zoning District as a conditional use. The proposed height of Building 4 can be pursued as a conditional use permit as part of the PUD. Three Bedroom Units. Within the development, most of the units are either one or two bedroom. All of the units in Buildings 1, 2 and 3 are one and two bedroom and none of the two bedroom units have a den. Two of the one bedroom units in Building 3 have dens. There are six units in Building 4 that are two bedroom with a den. Three units in this building have one bedroom and a den. Staff is concerned that the den units in the one and two bedroom units could bedrooms with a later addition of a closet. It is recommended that a condition be placed in the approvals that none of the den units be converted to a bedroom with the addition of a closet. Architectural Appearance. The application materials indicate elevations and perspective diagrams from various locations surrounding the development. From the initial submittal, the project architect has greatly improved the appearance of the building and has added architectural feature detailing and colors that were not present with previous diagrams. The Planning Commission, in their workshop review of the plans, indicated that the buildings be given more distinction so that they were not all the same in color and style. The perspective diagrams were requested to better indicate an actual view of the development. The Planning Commission should comment on the revised plans and determine if the applicant has provided enough distinction and difference in style between structures. The plans indicate the material types and specify colors. The project architect will provide a building materials board for review and the Planning Commission meeting. The residential units are not required to be reviewed under Design Guideline requirements, but as part of the PUD, the City can comment and require design and material changes. The Planning Commission and City Council shall comment further on the building appearance and materials as part of the review. 6 B -4, Limited Business Standards. Section 401.301.E.9 of the Zoning Ordinance provides the CUP standards for allowing residential use in the B -4 District. The standards are as follows: Two family, townhomes and multiple family dwellings provided that: a. At least two parking spaces per unit must be provided for on site, or proof is shown of arrangements for private parking nearby. The development will comply with the specific Zoning Ordinance requirements for senior housing. b. No physical improvements, either interior or exterior, may preclude future re -use for commercial purposes. The development could be converted to future office use, but highly unlikely. c. Unit floor areas must comply with Section 401.15.C.6. All of the units are at least 600 square feet for one bedroom and 720 square feet for two bedrooms as required by the Zoning Ordinance. d. Compliance with conditional use requirements of Section 401.03.A.8. The requirements will be complied with. e. The development does not conflict with existing or potential future commercial uses and activities. There would be no conflict. f. The density, setbacks, and building height standards imposed as part of the R -3 Zoning District are complied with. The building setbacks are not consistent. This will need to be addressed in revised plans. The Planning Commission and City Council will need to comment on the setbacks and project density. g. Adequate open space and recreational space is provided on site for the benefit of the occupants. Adequate open space is provided. h. The development does not conflict or result in incompatible land use arrangements as related to abutting residential uses or commercial uses. No incompatible land use arrangements are created. 7 Residential use can be governed by all applicable standards of the Zoning Ordinance, Building Code, Housing Code and Fire Codes. All standards will be complied with. j. Residential and non - residential uses shall not be contained on the same floor. Not applicable. k. Residential uses shall be provided with a separate entrance, and separately identified parking stalls. Not applicable. I. The architectural appearance, design and building materials of residential structures shall be consistent with the Design Guidelines and subject to approval of the City Council. The Planning Commission and City Council should comment on the architectural appearance. Demolition Clause. At their workshop meeting, the Planning Commission discussed the long term maintenance, appearance and functionality of the site as rental housing. It was suggested that the City place a demolition clause in the PUD approvals and the development agreement. This would state that once the site has exhausted its useful life that the buildings would need to be demolished in 40 or 50 years. This is done frequently for big box commercial sites that are often abandoned after 10 or 20 years once the same big box retailer opens another new store a few miles away. It is not that common to utilize a demolition clause for multiple family housing in that the useful life of this type of structure is usually much longer. The Planning Commission should consider this further. In the alternative, the City could implement a rental registration and inspection program that would provide the City more authority in assuring that the property is maintained and kept safe. The City Council has considered this option in the past and could be another method of addressing the long term viability of the multiple family housing stock in the City. Development Contract. The applicant will be required to enter into an amended development contract with the City should approval of the general plan of development be granted. The development agreement shall be subject to review and approval of the City Attorney. 8 CONCLUSION / RECOMMENDATION Based upon the preceding review, City staff recommends that the Planning Commission review the issues raised with density, height of the building and setbacks prior to proceeding with a final recommendation. A change in setbacks from what is shown in the plans could potentially significantly affect the site plan and potentially the numbers of dwelling units that can be included in the building. Additionally the Planning Commission previously had limitations regarding the architectural appearance of the structures. This may also impact their recommendation. If the Planning Commission is ready to make a recommendation on the amended PUD please find as follows a list of suggested conditions: 1. The Planning Commission and City Council shall discuss the land use classifications and determine if the property should be designated has high density residential in the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The Planning Commission and City Council shall comment on the proposed density of the project. 3. The development agreement shall include a provision that the Oak Park Senior Living Phase II will remain as senior rental and shall not be converted to non restricted rental housing. 4. The Planning Commission and City Council and shall comment on the proposed private and public trail system. 5. The setback for Building 4 should be moved at least 30 to 40 feet from the right of way line of Oakgreen Avenue. The Planning Commission and City Council should comment on that setback as well as the setback to 58th Street. 6. All tree removal and landscape plans shall be subject to review and approval of the City Arborist. 7. The grading and drainage plans shall be subject to City Engineer and applicable watershed authority review and approval. 8. All utility plans shall be subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. 9. The Planning Commission and City Council shall determine if the non shielded, residential style Tight fixtures are appropriate. 10. The applicant shall submit any plans for new signage subject to City approval. 11. The traffic numbers are subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. 9 12. The Fire Marshal and Police Chief should review the plans and determine the accessibility of emergency vehicles throughout the development. 13. The trails and sidewalks shall be constructed in accordance with the City Engineer's review and approvals. 14. The snow storage areas and plan shall be subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. 15. Any mechanical equipment that is ground mounted or visible from adjacent streets shall be screened as required by the Zoning Ordinance. 16. The Planning Commission and City Council shall comment on the 38 foot height of Building 4 as part of the PUD approvals. 17. The den rooms in the dwelling units shall not be converted to bedrooms with the addition of a closet. 18. The Planning Commission and City Council shall comment on the final building appearance, colors, materials and the variety between buildings. The applicant shall provide a materials board for all of the buildings to be discussed at the Planning Commission and City Council meetings. 19. The Planning Commission and City Council shall discuss including a demolition clause into the PUD approvals and development agreement. 20. The applicant shall be required to enter into a development agreement. The development agreement shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Attorney and City Council. 21. Any other conditions of City staff, the Planning Commission and the City Council. 10 Folz, Freeman, Erickson, Inc. LAND PLANNING • SURVEYING • ENGINEERING ,L % 0•4 t ♦ ♦ ,•� ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ • 1 � 9 �I ♦ ♦ ♦• '� 12445 55TH STREET NORTH LAKE ELMO, MINNESOTA 55042 i �♦ ► ° N yet ! cl! ► i . ° • • f �� ° °A > ♦ ° ♦ ° ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ • ♦ ♦ 4 0 • . now (651) 439-13833 Fax (651) 430 ♦ ► i � ♦ ° ♦ ° ♦ ° ♦ ° � ° ♦� ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ • ♦ • ♦ ► • 4 1 f ♦ _v ♦ • ♦ • ♦ • ♦O ♦ • ♦ 1 � • ► i 0i4 Oure,or , 1.-- { I1 � ,t. • . .. .„4„ A V c0; r � � ; � �� , o �� LEGEND / / _ / /t / AQ __ .. . ,_ . _...._ EXISTING TIF DISTRICT. CARRIAGE COOP ...AM .+�' - - - -- EXISTING WATER M411, 1 EXISTING STORM SEWER • �A _ -- L � 1 0— a —y EXISTING SANITARY SEALER ' EXISTING ELECTRIC NH POWER POLE L � •`:i PREVIOUSLY APPROVED AREAS (NO CHANGE) MI • PREVIOUSLY APPROVED AREAS. SEPARATE SUBMITTAL REQUEST n • n C) OmerA y - _ / ',,, 1 .."' OAK PARK SENIOR LIVING # PHASE II PUD AMENDMENT I r!l a EXISTING CONDITIONS ANCHOHAYPRO- OAK PARK SENIOR LIVING PHASE H- OAK PARK HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA .1.011 SHEET I OP 5 SHEETS ryy 44 ,41t,„,..4.4.4. � ♦ ► � � ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ � �♦ ♦, -. Folz, Freeman, Erickson, Inc_ vat K� -- L . L \(><:' , • •� ♦ �, ♦ 1 " ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ *$- ♦ ♦ LAND PLANNING • SUING ENGINEER al' t„ ♦�,♦ ♦� ► ♦♦ 55TH N ]2415 STREET NORTH t LII,LDI�l� Z ° � �, r 3 ` : ; _ FFE -+' 5 2 Pn 49331 ♦, ♦♦♦ 1 ♦ ♦ �♦ ♦ ♦♦ ♦� ►�♦�fi♦� f ■ . ' . / / ' - t . AIS 4 ,R 1 1. - 4101 9 4 i r � T SETBACK TO 80 1 ♦ 1 L ® s I l o 12 /. "/ / 1., t f- 0 I - i '.4 oa�A ►� �'� A i' Pi ,.. , ir A . • . .�_ --� r rr Liu r n r r _ 7 r,( I 0 + 1 z 011 . S _ ,i ce / 24 s r� i1 S _ ,4 68 STALLS V 4 . � LEGEND � ;:1, 1 Iroe' „�� 1 } ' l* e- i �k 1� PREVIOOar APPROVED AREAS (NO 01650F.) Iii � 1.1111 w i { s FF f V7/) 6-F7 X7&F7 STALLS ' PRSVpUYV APPROVED AREAS - SEPARATE SUb1115TAL REQUEST ti.-rrr 410 PARKING SUMMARY � %R ". �+: >a• � .nr <°+ - � d .. O1 E PAM. STALLS .S. STALL! 1 0001.316115 UNDERORDUND 0411.01.3 ...TAUS � 1 11 � 0 �_ - o COOP EXISTING � �Y 1 0 I • PARKING SUMMARY MOW. PAM. WAW.II WALLS //�''. • PROPOUS UHDSRGROUNO P0519140. 61 STALLS „ y ' 1); •• •••■• 0.. ....!..!” "*. TOTAL ADT: 4. _ ' Mg 3. 9E CMS PER DAY 0 ___ _ _._� —. aas r' , w s g ,, d ,��" T W E E T NORTH OAK PARK S ENIOR LIVING f` . H S PHASE H 1 .y .- ,- S a t �xHi�i r 1 % PUN) A11�i"ENI)1 E1VT" - � �/ LAYOUT PLAN/I'RAFFIC/PARKIIVGILAN ANCHORAYPRO- OAK PARR SENIOR LIVING PHASE 11 - OAK PARK HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA- 16192011 SNEE62 Di 5 SHEETS . . Folz, Freeman, Erickson., Inc. . daLIZDIN6 2 /,,-// . sok i' . ... ,* 4' - / 0. It tr 41?" * ** * *". iloo .,, V 4 . 0 . , '" 4 0 .4 LAND PLANNING 4 SURVEYING • ENGINEIMING 4 . FFE. 12445 557 STREET N . , / 9.52.0 42 .■ .4,1,1 #.4te At :OM "0 4,. . 1, 4 , ;14, >>, ..,,, . ..,/,' , ,w • •.04.•NfXeif 1: '' \ • / 1,2 4 - ' trplopt 4.0 4 #"' ;- .■ ' . I Ce , T Fix= (651) 4394833 Fax 1651) 4304331 • %,...._ , 3..3 zuvirs ,Aw ..t.. 4 A . ■ • 4 0 ' ' t. j 10 I .. . . ,,/ --. ---- ABANDON STORM V WO .■'4 V i ;',/V40 ,4 ? - 4 0 4 4 \ A',. / • • /// i 4 t ... ' ' * .. tetIVS • A t■ ..0 i t "4 Ak, 1 4 - . A. 4r4 44 .0..,- • - 4P-4 ■ . J. ' '9r, 830 SO pip+ Apra r uor 4 ■ 42 . ; ,... t 4 o 4„,,k,-",„ 4 „., ,,. _ ___ 1. 1 , . • .. :41 , V** 4:+ ■ 41 4 t, 4 4 .. - / ,. 'IP ," • 44 1‘4111 ' 0 ,414+ 746 t 4* . 4.41U 4 0 k .e * • . V ...IN): PORTION OF , 4,..,\) --"ASEMENT fi p -EnIFINE A : ' . • Of 4.- , lc — 11 Z,Li III - ' . ■■■ i / ' OP k 1.1 okAP....."••■......• _,-,-.÷.- , . ‘.. / 4os:iv/ 7/ , i i , • . II 41 :jp , ,. pi fir ir _-_ 7 . • i 1 , . • ... 1 ,, ,.., • , , , LEGEND 'c / •—)0,„4,7 _z_d ', , . , , -,,,, , ___...... - ■.4 Pr.---:11 wire /, ' ... , EXISTING 1ST DISTR. - CARRAGE Gtauf' BASIDAR. ■ 10. .., i L• J ' -1 , '', EXISTiNG CONTOUR -,. 3 _ _ ._ • 0 PROPOSED STORM SEWER "5,,,t". WMA.11,,CS SF ES '-} 1 air _S => PROPOSED ORAINACIE ARROW A1,4%;),.>) , ' • ' , ' f 1 6..... ... _ I _,....., pp AB.— 1 . , V .. r i 1 1 ( Ir EFE 070 c)% . 1 5 l'I . . . v 0 ci° 447 i 1 I • / _______ _ • .., - , s T R EET NORTH -_, - OAK PARK SENIOR LIVING - r :J .5, PHASE H . Lt: EXHIBI i 3 >. i PUD AMENDMENT u I OG SITE DRAINAGE/GRADING PLAN ! ANCHOR/MHO - OAK PARK SENIOR LIVING PHASE II • OAK PARK RETORTS, MINNESOTA -10190011 SHEETS OP 5 SHEETS vc 4 /{j j1z(./1/ Ncr / ►� r ► ' / ., ,, ., - f♦ � k 1 ♦ A "� • 1 ♦+ i l z, man, ksonnc - go.o k I-'1 '� ♦ •i ♦ � ,, ► � "∎ 4 # 4 ` 7 � i ♦ X 1 1 r ( uxu Fol naNN NG Free . sunv -nr Ericc • ENGINEERI I NG 9391°4- 1 FFE 9510 11b�i x * �� ♦�� ♦ : ♦ ►1 4� 930 3B / I ` / �� / , T I 1 ♦ 1 v ♦ ♦ ( 12845 55TH STREET NORTH Sac 54/. / 4t IA W1 •6� 7-t r '∎ �,, 4 • •', 1 1 1 1 t ��� * 1 ( ut E O MO MmNesorn ssoa2 9,4.ss I / � .3.3 UNrs /': . Q► -. I: I.Iw•)�I.♦. ,� ?.111111 • ♦1r♦ I � Po0°ISSn4»av3 �lbsD4xiv3n { / _. ABANDON STORM 1 S -' MS • `'&,1 1 1 1 1 I I i �, `44 j � 4 ` • ♦ 1'i + 114 ", O • • „ i ge , R �. „4 I ►111•, ♦�L timi /0 � 4 ' � • 11 ' � E► e1 ♦1/111 � IP'�r.l o �.J�i 7”; 11111 � 3r►I ► � ti� •4$P► � g �► 1 ♦'11 .. , � i ® I100�10�I f . 47 1 � _ ► 1 414 A E A. ♦♦��t ∎ a / 1 � % ��? +�a �`i ►��► ■ � � Nl0 : PORTION Of - .- 1' . � /� a 04t J ■. " = ;::ASEMENT �f� \ < {i . , , a I - 8'- EP PANE '' 'I l - _��� M • Ay 412.""! y ' � i — EXISTING WATER STUB VI / / // i��IC� ti-_ 1 3 L ei/! , D gel CONNECT TO EXISTING J I0 ./.L/// - V ; SANITARY SEWER STUB �'- i d,-.i. S y � ' 1- i � : �� /� % V LEGEND , $5) i A ���o' % EXISTING TCOS we CARRIAGE COOP eouROAR. cU,4f WG WATFR YAW 7iirdiahh_NE31 • i ' _a_ '' Exisn.Ka crow. MATING SANITARY sEweR ewsnYC E Ec we w vDWER POLE 944.0 + /- RIM 948 -OH- � I �' - � — a PROPOSED STORY SEWER W/ 1 11 ¢ INV. 941 .5 INV 942 J 1 YH,GD KFES •,• ----.11/ —� Si � – K'° PROPOSE-10 SAl11rARY SEWER AU IIH { % \9% \11 5 I PR .' WATERMAN 935. I FEE 95 ��� 2I NOTES K _ � n PROPOSED om . s�+IcED WITH Ewr1vwww„cEMIMES 1 ` y I NO uMNGESWILL EE REOIEED TO SEW WADING FOR VMTEA &SEWER IL A y I N V RIM 9470+/- c � „. L._ . . 938.0 .. _______----- - -- ___ __ ____ ..r__ ��� i S T R EET NORTH H ., . •� .'� 5 a - OAK PARK SENIOR LIVING t PHASE H w XFIIBIT 4 W ! �� � PUD AMENDMENT EXHIBIT UTILITY PLAN ANCNDDAYIRO.OAK FAEK SWIM LIVING ERASE D -OAK PARK 50'JDMIE, N9NWP.SOTA- IW192011 SHEET <OFSSHEETS L5 JL ),INC . P • ; )( +► L L Folz Freernan Erickson, Inc, ' 1,‹. � i P * . + � ' \� . A `�yi 4 D t'� A'��% :4 //* � L L LAND MANNING • scmvcYU'�c • alvcuaeeRU�c ■ F! 9.51G � �`.# "� 4i4"‘(1";:". �? � �. � !,�\,jF 1 L 1 17445 55TH STREET NORTH r , i :1 c Dd I m L ( LAKE ELNILAKE niNNESCYTA 55042 33 LI/VIT � �r L/. � t A!� � 1��A � a u m L 1 r > r (651/ 439.8833 r Ibsnaw -v3I P - y , ,,,, � �4 x . / � r. " . ' _ 4 ���+ ...ti A� 1 4 � � L y L if'. ( • T4iLJ 1i e, I 11 I� � ��� *e . v y p .....,,,,. , L ., u L , ' � L L 1 U +E `` " � LL,., y m,,,.' ¢,. ,>, y,� N m� y LEGE I • � � U L � 1. Y. y y U , v U M � � O ' ��_ PROPOSED AE.PIATBWNDARV LIMITS j , .� LL L'4 'eL 6 L L /1, .41‘441. , , , * / 4 4 7 4 fr 7,01 / l g . : 41 • / 7 ;V , , ,.. , , w a l l ' '''' '' — Al\ ..., ..... I : : ',.., . / A 11 , Altd d , : - ' 71 ' . %I " . " 1 y, o r + EMS TWG LIGHT TO REMAIN -f � , y L y u L y ,n , • u v �, m L \ E PROPOSED NEW WHO li. qqq II ,,, 50555 INTENSITY � R ae ;.1 'u M u L t, b L la ss ' e ` T, 'U 1T • To _I ., L U U Y, U U ,. L' L y ,a a L y\ u y ,+ \r y 4 L \+ , L ls i ,.,. ,. lays.,. ,.my..t t U LL, +� mLL NOTES ............... e� i 111a iL L,. ,. • ` „ a, e neanwr ro 0. rnw,onorru.rner.Neanwrx u y y y L L L Y 19 y ,• „ , ,. ,. ,. �_ , ,^ V ], .. „ ., L L L R ueweoAND ORM vaNF AINAT n.ornwoE CrnEawE OWN y L ALL MEN all /04 FFE 97.0 `, � �� , \1 L L ...1.1 (]y HWL 151 � ? � \ �C _ . t s , . -. J rr / M' "`° � , xx snwlc&waax0 L •,a , , ,e. „ � \ YY ( y. • . U b L L ammo, FORUM L • \� q l L as 14 � � y � L y L L L yly y MI , L L L Q .; ,4•A x 1 m 1. L L U b b re 'uI L L It + /0/4 1 M A(" u 'u , ,, L U L L y tl i. l 'k - . L L L 1, L L la L y b W „ y . L L Yu ,v , �^ ,• y L L L L L L L. L 1, y L y L y L L ' a L L \• L L - Fri�r�. v 1 '111 to 1 L L. - mWFO RiFRitOrtwO Y L L y L L u y L L L L L y y y L L il l L : 4 L la w -LL O ; y " y; t `�,I ,e S. L L y y L .. L .. L L L V L L L L L L la y L . � S y ,, 111104.1444F DIENMSCH MEMO MONNE •74 ,. 5 OAK PARK SENIOR LIVI1VG ! PHASE II LSJ w Z .°. z77 PUD AMENDMENT91Bi i ` CZ LIGHTING PLAN A a ,eRw. ANCHOHATPRO -OAK PARK SENIOR LIVING PHASE E -OAK PARK HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA - Id19/L011 SHEETS OF SHEETS • . ,,,,,$ 88 t , . ARCHNET ( - - - - IHLB*D t TYPE AP. a OP Will* 4 • \ �' RIVERT OW 2 BED ROOMS 1, S.F. 6 LOWELL t . - —_ -�� COTTAGE 1 BED ROOMS 1,248 S.F. 12 4, � ______ ^ architecture EE8 Interiors �"• , 1 TOTAL 2 BED ROOMS 14 BUBIBSDBbIO — 7 I -{ 1 1 -i - -� ABED ROOMS 26 1 J F ) f f , I I UNITS 3 81 10natm l MN 55 82 201 L I -�. -�--I L. �� - -L �_ j r � - 1 . 4 n 2 BED ROOMS 1,457 S.F. 10 a]`C�C Sa COm _,._ S.F. 17 6 Y \ .\----/\,,-L LOWELL 2 ROOMS 1 248 ' - - _ - COTTAGE 1 BED ROOMS 892 .F. - ..� �. "*, � �, — R, TOTAL 2 BED ROOMS 16 -�. 71 1BBi 1t1 1•V 7 N4-71-"---- --•. - ?Aar .., _ TOTAL 1BEDROOMS 17 Q = TOTAL UNITS 33 • OAK PARK 8 + t • { ! — � r �-« '` � 'ti BI OW? 2BED ROOMS 1,457s.F. 4 SENIOR LIVING • ..., ' � _ C .� O AFTON 1 B 2 BED ROOMS 1,248 ROOMS 892 S .F. 24 S.F. 22 COTTAGE OO . �` I 1}. �:a t,._ !; Z AFTON 1 BED ROOMS + DEN 1,248 S.F. 2 11 it 7N �4A } _ —r s - I, TOTAL 2 BED ROOMS 26 OAK PARK � ' W TOTAL BEDROOMS 2c HEIGHTS, MN t1, . '. I -' * > TOTAL UNITS _- - - - - -- _ __ SZ T B N ( 1 I 1 t . r,� / — '- -� I I � Q n E lDElo — T — — i - LL 16 STALLS 30 STALLS = .. -, R VRRTOWN N 2 BED ROOMS 1,457 S.F. 15 4 3 1 J 1 1` Z LOWELL 2 BED ROOMS 1,248 S.F. 12 } i �� �. ' A R // W THE ST. C IX 2 BED ROOMS DEN 1549 S.F. 6 m -v.wr- r r 4 .. 111 COTTAGE RO 1 BED ROOMS 892 S.F a5 ,_N ACTON I BED ROOMS +DEN 1,248 S.F, 13 - ' T .3 i Q 1 r Y �� _ A .; ug �yy TOTAL 2 BED ROOMS 48 Revisions ' •_ .• y, l ' I 7777...77711/ �� W TOTAL 1 BED ROOMS 48 � � , L + t i UN1T5 I % ��� � B ' 1 ' ! ri Q RLRLVERTOWN UNITS 2BED ROOMS 14575 F. X35 em _.___ I _ _ It De {� I ' LOWELL 2 BED ROOMS 1 248 5 F. 63 4 ( 1 py, 5 1 a , *: STALLS THE ST. CROIX 2BED ROOMS +DEN 1.519 S.F. 6 • (/) 1 ( v COTTAGE 1 BED ROOMS 892 S.F. 98 _ AFTON 1 BED ROOMS + OEN 1,248 5.F. 15 �/ „„ 2„„ i ' �' - r G f, ' ' ) — � '. TOTAL SITE 2 BED ROOMS 1 106 r 0 . tI i . ,, TI'2 � n . ' n 7 ` \ Il 411 : ' � TO TAL 5 I1'E UNITS 1 BED ROOMS 1207 _ I _ aI Q 1 * IllII A l �' PARKING STALLS _ I y - I Y!t ! 1 71 7• 1W BUILDING 1 8 N y I ,' X 4 4 1 r �� n y i `. BUILDING 2 ( 33 8 UNIT) 50 ± i i 'l • SI 1 �4 _ BUILDING 3 (52 UNIT) 24 • ITI •••• 1 • a =� y , Y I BUILDING 4 (06 UN TOTAL SITE STALLS t,s / ' C .LL __ I 7 #w #BI # I { ;' '� •. I UNDERGRWND PARKING t IN � t 4 ' A` BUILDNG 1 `26 U P N A'U 43 Registration Inform/100n / 1 l "' " '"° ��� BUILDING 3 (52 UNIT) M I report was prepared Pan, ���"" ana6Y catty this I T+ / me o r under or report ision, by BUILDING UN �' - � •y TOTAL 280 , IT) 23 under my dlrart nDEd4 nd supervision, and that I aN a Mdy Licensed Architect 1 A 1 _ --- -'f ' - - • ■ under he lalas State Of Mumma. 18) MICHAEL F. DIEM . y �...._ ✓ Ar. Y nr Signature 1 i ,r.,-,r.,-,9-11 DATE License S .,.1 tt9 - 16884 J 9 1' .. Sheet INOnnetlon ,. 4 ' ,4 SIT PUN/LANDSCAPE PLAN t C 65 *8 Na : 11 -154 Drawing NO : 4 B1WEr NW WW EXHIBIT f Dm.' M R 6d. TREE LANDSGAP'IN6 PLAN " `1. f checked ev 10-19-11 MD AS y LL �ATE / , sa.o 02010 ARCHNET, Inc. _ FREE usr ARCHNET .. \._ c--) '�, iii , % \%\ 11 1111- , 1111 - - ��1 - \ ww... ., v yL . v rY11Md�s. rI I - - 1111---- - , 111 El a Stlibreter, MN 55002 .. q .111. MIMS 11.119111 11.11 651-4300606 ■ _ �p %u, — _1111— j =r=z :�, --- .. .,i,,■ - - ;'r .. - = �� 'i � I • l • �' el r r : ® , ® = TREE REPLACEMENT TOTALS OUS OVERSTORYTR I t � ����� >e, �, ♦ , 5 2 DECIDUOUS ® 2.5' EA. ■ 130.0 GAUIN OAK PARK Er— rel191911. �� � � w , / CC 82 DECIDUOUS UNDERSTORY TREES ®1.5' EA. - 123.0 CAUIN SENIOR LIVING ���; r 'all `� \ •\ ♦ ■ O 1 1 CONIFEROUS TREES Q G MT. (OR 2.5' EA.) 4. 27.5 CABIN aro% s a is 1a ■ . �. _ : - TOTAL OF r4:,-: � I Z REMAINING SITE 280.5 CA/AN — ((i 11 11 - • I � _ � I � W1 fl � TOTAL OF EXISTING NORTH SITE 85.5 CA LAN UIN OAK PARK R'. • . _ ", L J � � m '� � � :. L . , i > TOTAL OF ENTIRE SITE 366 CA HEIGHTS, MN lij _ - , - . ■ a „ f _, r f l/IN - t • = 1111 == 11111.1, _ ,8 STALLS 11 " ' S 1, A ? l' :, . Z — a I ,, 1.1 dB 0.1 ► ,,• n`�- 1 r _ 1 40 014 Ok .111 I .. " � F. 'A' 77,' 7,71a �/\ / \/\ /� --�I� r Revlslons p. a ' f► Item Dote COI t � i ai a1 w� - ° 4. ❑ INSTALLS E_ i'� % Oh- i■ ili t , . .. ir ,,,,-- Or s ral Illf 3:4 1t ( ' Registration Information . s �� .r\ ILO V ; W �t I< I \ III I R S �«"'"w:E9 ■ I .....lie"--.""'. a 4 ChM 1 fm • duly Ucarred Anchltact .` . �' I %� • unbr the laws of the State 0 /Nmmwts. t .. t �r ..) /\ - • Printed Name DIEM MIL �� '� MI F. r Q� Signature Sipnatore rc 1111 _ _ ' DATE Lkense ft 10 - 19 - 11 1611•4 9 en Si .1 4 0A � Seer Intorm■ion OVERALL TREE PLAN n••• No : 11 -I54 Drawing No : arm 111 OM TREE PLAN EXHIBIT 7 Oa try ' MD L1•0 dis r • s r e Dab : 10-19 -11 ©2010 AROINET, Inc I ARCHNET .,,._4 i. ill p, El U Fa o �s eselWsele design 0 I ° , 4, 333N Male 8t as 201 i _ 91mrw., MN 55082 651-4300 606 ••• • • 1 •.. archnetu a.com % ^ m• Imo iir 7 OAK PARK SENIOR LIVING OAK PARK II d te r ' - HEIGHTS, MN IDAKOZ --. - ...I • —� I , • � w Rev isions \� I BUILDING 4 PLANT LIST Item Dan - i 68 STALLS -- 70 _ I ol� � i • l ik _ _ _ .Y_ •`r1 ',• I. , °` , M . nr •r7 . ■ D [ � a •. IL , . i/� / e� ∎emu ea ,^ - ti .::' RRegistration Registration Information • - .. ` A. 1 .. +t•. ! - IN I hereby carte), ... oeetleolbh et report pewee by Mt 71 711 IMO 7. '. .0 Mat ems .� 611 ,. � •_ anew the e.. of tn. slate of wlM.ela. { V s; Minted Name •- ' , — — `� •- DATE License a 10 lsew : , v r _ Sheet IMomteUon ( - - - - �* e�� �� s�� ... ` .. BUILDING 4 ,, .- •— Y .. - - .. - - - •: - . .• tANDSCAP! PLAN ; 11-154 Drawing Ne: t EXHIBIT 8 MIMI 4' Checked a: wo L1 .1 INN ■ 10 -19-11 1 ® - • !b 4 LAND0GMIN6 PLAN I ®3010 ARCNNEf. Inc ARCHNET 0 a ©© 333 N Mak 8L 91 .201 S88aa m, MN 55082 - 151-4300306 uchnetuss.com Ilir I OAK PARK II I j SENIORS LIVING =2 PHASE 2 1 OAK PARK HEIGHTS, MN Q ■ • / Revisions Rem Date 11 Q _ .7_ j Ana 0 Q . Registration Information hereby certify met the pen, STORAGE me specification. m y E�hctwprSIon end " , ,. I D l ( I eme ! MIEDIEM Signature 17 DAT License # "imam TOTAL D -19- 1aN. - - - - ;, Sheet Information I 0 I p r I QI I I 110 � PARKING LEVEL BUILDING 4 L Li EXHIBIT 9 Prefect Na: 11.194 brewing Ne: E e ey:0eat. A 1.0 , p 1ne•ee. ra GLEVaa BUILDINGS OM UNITS) Ds.: 10-19-11 � Como ARCHNET, Inc. ■ ARCHNET � � ©©© OVERTONE t; LOWEL LOWELL OVERTONE .ehYsea.. Wed.. Noi.r9w••a RY M 333N M. Sts. 201 F F I 33 N M. MN 55002 631430-0606 lLe - archnetusa.com W yyy.�'� VERTOWN COTTAGE COTTAGE COMMON 9PAB 7 COTTAGE -. OAK PARK a pl SENIORS LIVING LOWEL LOWEiL PHASE 2 • si OAK PARK HEIGHTS, MN COTTAGE COTTAGE ®D ga Revisions Item Date COTTAGE COTTAGE F COTTAGE COTTAGE COTTAGE THE ST. CEOIX N R egistration Information � I ..by c. Mn ms eN. plan, A v dG.i.o„ ae � �� w duly �EO Archlitact of g 1� Manes. PHnted Name OVERTONE =TAM L LOWU L MICHAEL F. DIEM / Signature F F DATE License F Y N `,YS_�_ 10 -19-11 161 COTTAGE WWI LOWWL LOWEL Min dtax l Sheet Information EXHIBIT 1ST. FLOOR P LAN BUILDING A N Protect NN : 11 -134 0-0000550: I HI ' / Drawn M : CAL O tSr .LOGE . t'b PIAN WRONG 1 fae UNIT) / • \ O, d,0 0r : MFO A 1 e 1 Ao ina 0.5.: 10-19-00 02010 ARCHNET, IM. ARCHNET _ ©©© r z r ill r • a it 333 N Main 77. SAL 201 111 ,7W 55002 05543OO601 • r arcbnetusLWW T '� CONAON • ' ' OAK PARK L __ s - �L ;. L SENIORS LIVING - PHASE 2 • p LOWEIL LOWELL J 1 f r OAK PARK HEIGHTS, MN • r . r - CORAL COTTAGE J ' Revisions 1:11`' ` Item Date r: COTTAGE comes Ja L -_ T r COTTAGE J ' FA L ✓ CarrAGE TNEST. CROW , • L Registration Information 4k LNaaEy ydir that a W dnon this O aP.on, or was prepared M 1 Mot Lam Licensed Architect -_ O under We Ewe of the SOW or M Mmes. r r r , ,y. ¢ Y Printed Name r a l l -_.— _ 1 I 4 M ICHAEL F. DIEM Signature COTTAGE �! L DAT License * 10-1g -u 161144 C It 4=0 , EXHIBIT 1 1 - L.O > Sheet Information COTTAGE L.ow®L LOWELL WELL Taasr. LT X ` 2ND. FLOOR PLAN BUILDING N 4 L — anal. NO : 11 -154 pawing NO : L - L.., L -__ L - -. .a -' I- -- -I Drwn.y: CAL by: M R' A 1a2 O; �FLOCR PUN KELDN+O 4 Led CNm 4i,, Date : I•19 -11 All CT010 AAGINET, Inc. • ARCHNET Fa .. RIV TOWN L01y01 © © J wmtaaat. Wp L - 333 N Mato St. Ste. 201 55 SdM,MBr, MN MOW a2 K14300606 a rchnetusa.com r / . - R1vBa1OWN COITAOE DLWaADNSrACJ? L ' L__I l SENIORS LIVING LOWELL J _, PHASE 2 ` OAK PARK HEIGHTS, MN ` ;!f l r 1— COITAOE J ®D ` - Revisions II Item Date r j comas J - l r 17 COTTAOB -. 1 _ r' �I comas J / ' • " L Registration Information 0 �� 1RaNby catty Mat MY plan, p cr�ra...r moat woo ar.oWod EY ormy area wooryy, Bnn �1 • S q M .w wr e r wn •aq LicensedLicensedArdYWO (" - 1 1 12ai1 1 r 1 . r O under MG M Me atN M W gm . g Printed Name C > MICHAEL F. DIEM COTTAOE L _ _ > DATE License # L dw� IS , tatF17 161144 , / i COTTAGE IAW31L LOWE L IOWE L Sheet Information v 3TH. FLOOR PLAN BUILDING H 4 c L J L L _, L J L J Pypat[ NO : 11 -15 Drawing No : u Drown By : CAL L{ 0 FLOOR ELM WELDING 4 No UNm CMCNnd By : NrO A1.3 u EXHIBIT 12 Oats: 10-14.11 is 0010 ARCHNEf, Inc • AR CHNET • 7 ■ S UN 1 .0 Iii Bun • I �11 2U ■ • 'ex r l 1 /ate I ; � PATq . f 'ex I w'xY r r• . , eeweYeBY — _ . _ — _ _ _ 333F4 MIN S(. Me. lot 1 StIlhader, MN WOW ill i iiN 11. , . . _ 1a•xw• • 11 XIt. 12•x12' I d xit R O O M BEDROOM BEDROOM ee∎ ® ■a'�0o J ® ,a x/Y ,Yx 12 , ❑ 1d LiViNG z id OAK PARK SENIOR LIVING =AFRO 0 ..BBf:� � q3 ` M ■.I Qs c AEI , O Bl =mast 4 nM IM a_�r OAK PARK w ht IEEE., - -I rmnT .III n111 �Mn !Mr ■ ■ B 111,111M1 i. uud ■ u �ouA! _ 1./M IM 311:41 . F 7- pl, I HEIGHTS, MN 0 rO _ 1 ■ ■ ■ ■I ■ ■.c.. m ■4,1 a 1..11.1 QI - ■ J ■■ t. � [: 0' ` :Ili , ' �I • I ■M ■ fl7l• a 1,1111a rle Il i I I. a J ■.C� ■.FII !It' r ■LL�w Ir rI /N 1 6 •■/7r ■ IOI•I s.1,1 W W!Ylu ■■ _ If / 1 •• 6 1 � ' 1■/f 9741 E / IIB _ I• /■ I ° � IZ � � ;1 a� � , 1 re 1— 1 I. 1i r� l ^I L.L ■11 1 1 . ! SOD Cpl ■ .� �Di I. �e i :�.ai R - MO NI— - , AFTON • LOW ELL COTTAGE Revisions 1,248 S.F. 1,248 S.F. 892 S.F. 5 TOTAL 63 TOTAL 98 TOTAL Item Date • MI I % . , 1 L ... .r u ,per. „Ilw, :,. , II I.La14A I ROOM '�■ slolca ■I — 'Cn 86°R° SUN 1a 111V/10 PAno _ _ ROOM — teen' i .. O • i „Nil aliiiiiel �n,r,1 N . 'ai , ■� ��. Registration Information ' 1r7 BUN • i ■� . [MnbY on ne Ma NM prepared ^i. �1 x, UUU i 1 ■�... 0 ' eperXlollm.rl.p.eN . nweleda n. or L JJ I'Ba11 B /0' ...= i 7. ../ ,2X16 '1.4 14' weir r my direct ollpendsk , and .0 /1 ■ ■►\P! 7 %11 tlrtl rpedWFUnlre6 ANNUM I.. �• • Q� ::1 " � under me Imo ornane.aw�..w. 7. ■11 I■1,.■ ,nmmw I Minted Name • .►■ 11 G Y • _ M CBI.■ EOM= 1■.. � MICHAEL F. DIEM I ti :Ie Rid a'e \= L•> .. 1 . r . ■M l /.. DEN I syneture a 1■. ■. C. /.1 .- N■ ■ ■ ■ ._ 01.1, ■ /MIPIPMR•c ,2•x12' �: t L:,L/. ' 0 ■1/.. 1.1i Y'..ai 1 Noss - 1.a . .e.I : : :1.. '11:',4611 C ; Road , ' ��� exe ■ DATE Vcense B` RIVERTOWN `> on -- .. 1\..ii1 11 _ .r •`\ 10 -19 -11 16881 1,457 S.F. ' 35 TOTAL * '°""° Sneer BIIo1,nstion O ® / 114/ UNIT PLANS Planet 50: II -ISO Marino No: THE ST. CROIX Mum By : 0. 1,549 S.F. EXHIBIT 1 �,.,q.: ND A2•0 6 TOTAL 0.` 10-19-11 ®2010 MCNNEr, Inc. • I ARCHNET �i 1-11 Brahitec tbia b aaig.a ' �A't ��o suslaivabir desi r / `` 333 N Main St. Ste. 201 Stillwater, MN 55082 1 y ataissaimmomaimunimm �t'Ij 651- 4360606 I _ i1�pltlf i litifppilllpi archnetusa.com r , ioupi 4,ni OAK PARK SENIORS LIVING ! 1..._�-_ 1 L j _ b9- PHASE 2 • 2■ Iinu� +gilglunnnil -� Y yy�� ��yy OAK PARK HEIGHTS, MN . 1 I 1"I I 1 ■ ■ ' ,17;, ! , Revisions �''?, ,y ; .. ° rFha ,:,,: 9-;N ,E�, {.. Item Date • y`Yn Registration Information I hereby cek■ry that [his Mar, ..' a m �� a.c o. reaon waa weaarea by Maie 9-,e .Amermy,aa aaa Met I am a auh licensetl archtett '9-'W" - iatler Me laws of fne State M Printed Name MICHAEL F. DIEM /. /r' , , Signature .4 �" DATE License 1n �,F 4 ,,•i w• l •� r~ �r I •. �}�- ._ { i t , ■■ �� - +�— ! I . i 20.19-11 HON 11 Cll 11 11 ' d L11 l , M ' � r �r 77 II �1T° ti 17 _ !: '�WW J WIi`'WWI I Lasso � � II, • �.? .. . BUILDING c L tt�.B. '' F . " s .. 1�1 ., ,....... „.,.. ^ R a .n .. . v .„ ar0lert N9-: I1 -151 Drawing No C . .,,w •. .... w. * mug..,... C : 'k • Drawn Be: MFD LI DBy CAL A3.0 Dab: 10.10.11 0201D MCHNET, Inc ZXHIBIT 14 ARCHNET ©©© arebilechtre• Interiors sustainable desiea 333N Main SI. Ste. 201 Stillwater, MN 55082 p.e n.aear. recrw. sa wwr w,pe wc.ra. .. map _ archnetusa.com come wean rangy w ui � S ., I art,_ 31 ...we p pa. , T . - ( I ■ ' A J .. I LA teed rw=rruo ...ea. . 3 F a � - Z I stet. a 1 I �� �- OAK PARK =',z-.;,--=- 1 • " — — SE NIORS LIVING — — — — — -- pMO§ l i EVE 9 B PHASE 2 0 UILDN G. NORTH ' •• � OAK PARK HEIGHTS, MN / Revisions Rem Date R r — 1 I a ... . Lr=I . ,.—.. ,. _ =� — ' —11 `�`� ""_( 1 k .I, Iii ... 1 I ._. ti • ,_ O BUILDING. SOUTH IELEV. EAST SIM.I • Registration Information I hereby certify that this plan, speciOCAtlon, or report was prepared by N or under my direct supervision, and at I am a duly hens. Architect rawer the laws of the State or Printed Name MICHAEL F. DIEM i s y':...., .'' Signature l ■ . I M ".I J mErml I tL. I .i..■ VIIIIF D ATE License u IIMIN• MIN= MIMI 1•1•1•111 0111=11 • se . lo-lrll 16840 .,, I ' I ■ I I I ■r9 'in. I a� — wwe _ are .a — Sheet Information BUILDING ELEVATIONS O O BUILDWG. WEST ,llf•V. Prefect Np : 11 -154 pawing No Drawn By : Author Checked By : Checker A3.1 Data : 10 -19-1 ©3010 ARCHNET, Inc FXHIBIT 1 5 9 I. 119IHX3 III no.v :),\,rroo I I, 1N.1.l V .V.Bigi:.”11"1 ! , /1 II n % 'NM rov nt . ' k - • LVTAri ilft. )M1 X e . [ VC) ' . ,- 141 - . , ... . , ' Nttt . . iiiiiiw *411 ‘.' 411 110" li tt • * ., r 1. ,:4 ' . ,..,., ,:„,',..'''',, :'', "ripmr.,................ '''' ' ...w., 1 -. .....„, .... - • . ... . A . . . , 1 11 I .. . • ...... r• t , ii .._ . p l; 1 . .•... . --". 1, .„ 1 : 1 ' . . ...,0401.1. . - . .. . 0-....- ' -.0#0.y.104.4, 041 - Il ' l ill S. ' .,... .... . . ...,.. . ., -,,,-...., ,.. ......, , .... . .. .. , , ... • ..... • ...• ,.. ,,, • . . . .. 4161 3.1 . .. . . . , -, .,,,• -, • . _.. . . , • . .. • . ., . . „.• -, ,. •, ,. -1 .., • , ... ,, , , , ii..,. , - i I •• .,. • 145', ' .. , IIP , a • , wo, . . . . %.K.• 14 . r .4 • , , . 11 • ' 4 . . . .. • 11111 Folz, Freeman, Erickson, Inc. N i S WE s LAND PLANNING • SURVEYING • ENGINEERING September 13, 2011 Mayor and City Council City of Oak Park Heights 14168 Oak Park Blvd. N. Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 RE: PUD Amendment — Carriage CO -OP — Oak Park Senior Living Phase II Dear Mayor and Council Members: On behalf of my client, Mr. Tim Nolde, we are submitting documentation for the revision or amendment to the Carriage CO -OP PUD. The proposed submittal changes the previously approved building to 96 total units. Also, changes to the site layout have been made to accommodate the revisions of Phase I of the Project and incorporates more usable outdoor space, with the creation of a small park and gazebo area. Additional exterior parking has also been added to the revised site plan. We also request an extension to the TIF Financing, to postpone construction for two additional years. This delay would allow for us to finalize the remainder of the site as proposed in the Oak Park Senior Living Phase I portion of the project and meet the anticipated market conditions. We have a neighborhood meeting scheduled for October 4 with other meetings to follow. We look forward to working with the City hi finalizing this development. Thank you again for your support and patience. Sincerely, Folz, Fre , Erickson, Inc. / 1 2:,...., odd A. Erickson, PE EXHIBIT 1 7 1244555th StteetNatth, Lake Elmo, MN 55042 .• Phan: (651) 439-8833 • Fax: (6.31) 4.30.9331 • Website: www.lk-inc.com ',awe A. PA LS 77mothA d Van, LS Todd PH 1939 -3001 PHnc Julie Hultman From: K.D. Widin <kdwidin @comcast.net> Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2011 11:43 AM To: Scott Richards; Eric Johnson; Mark Vierling (E- mail); Betty Caruso; Julie Hultman Subject: Oak Park Senior Living - Review of Landscape Plan and Tree Replacement Scott - I have done an additional review of the landscape plan for the Oak Park Senior Living development and the tree replacement requirement for the PUD as a whole. 1. The comment (2 d), in my review of the landscape plan dated 10/21/11, regarding trees on the west property boundary was answered; however, there are still trees depicted in the landscape plan to be planted over the east boundary of the property into the road r.o.w for Oakgreen Ave.. The simulated image included does not show these trees, but the trail and landscape plans show them( ?). Are trees to be planted in the r.o.w. or not? If not, the depiction of trees in that r.o.w. should be changed on the revised landscape plan to show where these trees will be planted. 2. Plant Material - As I read over my reviews of earlier landscape plans for this PUD, I had raised the same issues with some of the plant material in the earlier plans, such as replacing eastern pin oak with northern pin oak. I recommend that the developer be asked to submit a revised landscape plan for Oak Park Senior Living incorporating the recommended changes of plant material listed in my report of 10/21/11. One additional recommendation is that the Ky. coffee trees, depicted on the west side of the development, not be planted in the narrow medians in the proposed additional parking area since they are a large tree. It would be better to plant smaller ornamental trees, such as serviceberry or thornless cockspur hawthorn, in the narrow parking lot medians. 3. Planting Detail - Please ask the developer to submit a diagrammatic detail of how the trees and shrubs are to be planted. This is a required part of any landscape plan submitted to the city. The city requires deveopment projects and contractors installing plant material to adhere to the approved planting detail. 4. Tree Replacement Requirement - 366 cal. in. of trees planted for replacement are proposed in the landscape plans submitted for the north building (landscaping already in place) and the current proposed phase. Subtracting these replacement cal. in. listed in the two landscape plans, from the calculated tree replacement requirement (4/27/09) for the development of 1,521 cal. in., results in a re- calculated tree replacement requirement of 1,155 in.. Since only 366 in. of replacement trees are proposed to be planted on the development site, there is a "cash in lieu of tree planting" (1,155 cal. in. x $50. /cal. in.) requirement of $57,750. per the OPH Tree Protection Ordinance 1307. Monies are to be paid to the City of OPH by the developer and placed in the OPH Tree Planting Fund. Has this amount been paid by the developer yet? Please include this information in the Planning Report for this development. Contact me if you have any questions regarding this review or report. Kathy Widin OPH Arborist 1 EXHIBIT 1 8 Stantec Consulting Services Inc. 2335 Highway 36 West St. Paul MN 55113 Tel: (651) 636 -4600 Fax: (651) 636 -1311 Stantec .'#.' Bonestroo November 3, 2011 Mr. Eric Johnson City Administrator City of Oak Park Heights 14168 Oak Park Blvd., P.O. Box 2007 Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 -2007 Re: Oak Park Senior Living — Phase 2 Plan Review Bonestroo He No.: 000055 - 11000 -1 Dear Eric: We have reviewed the site development plans received for Oak Park Senior Living, Phase 2, as submitted by Folz, Freeman, Erickson, Inc. on October 12, 2011. Following are our comments and /or recommendations. Sheet 1— Existing Conditions 1. The existing sanitary sewer connection to Oakgreen Avenue needs to be shown. Sheet 3 — Site Drainage /Grading Plan 1. All storm sewer design data needs to be displayed (rims, inverts, structure type and sizes, pipe slopes, and material). 2. The contours at the southwestern comer of Outlot A need to be corrected to show the drainage into the catch basin (beehive). Sheet 4 — Utility Plan 1. Rip rap needs to be installed at flared -end sections into the existing pond. Install per City standard detail as shown attached (see STO -13). General Comments 1. The scales shown on the 11"x17" size plans are not accurate and need to be shown correctly. 2. Several City standard detail plates are provided as attachments. 3. Records plan drawings showing as -built information need to be provided at completion of construction. EXHIBIT 1 Ci Stantec Oak Park Senior Living — Phase 2 Plan Review Page 2 of 2 If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact me at (651) 604 -4808. Sincerely, STANTEC Christopher W. Long, P.E. Attachments: Detail Plates — Complete Set cc: Andy Kegley, Public Works Director Jim Butler, Building Official Scott Richards, City Planner Mark Vierling, City Attorney Kath Widin, City Arborist Todd Erickson, FFE MAH, File - Stantec