Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2011-11-03 Planning Report • TPC 3601 Thurston Avenue N, Suite 100 Anoka, MN 55303 Phone: 763.231 5540 ENCLOSURE 2 Facsimile; 763.427.0520 TPC@PlanningCo.com PLANNING REPORT TO: Eric Johnson FROM: Scott Richards DATE: November 3, 2011 • RE: Oak Park Heights — Oak Park Senior Living Phase I — Planned Unit Development Amendment TPC FILE: 236.02 — 11.06 BACKGROUND Tim Nolde, representing Oakgreen Villa LLC /Anchobaypro, Inc has submitted an application for amending the Oakgreen Village Planned Unit Development (PUD) to allow for a reduction in the number of approved townhome units and to construct brownstone senior living buildings. The proposed units would be senior rentals as opposed to the original townhouses that would have been owner occupied. The project is at Nova Scotia Avenue North and 58 Street. The general plan approval for the Oakgreen Village project was recommended by the Planning Commission on May 8, 2008 and approved by the City Council on May 27 2008. The plans show the buildings of the Oakgreen Village project that were constructed and the new plans for the Oak Park Senior Living project as found in the Exhibits as follows. The review is based upon the following submittals: Exhibit 1: Existing Conditions (Sheet 1) Exhibit 2: Master Plan and Traffic Analysis (Sheet 2) Exhibit 3: Area Analysis — Density (Sheet 3) Exhibit 4: Site Drainage /Grading Plan /Snow Removal (Sheet 4) Exhibit 5: Utility Plan (Sheet 5) Exhibit 6: Lighting Plan (Sheet 6) Exhibit 7: Trail Plan (Sheet 1) Exhibit 8: Preliminary Plat — Oak Park Senior Living Exhibit 9: Site Plan /Landscape Plan (AS1) Exhibit 10: Overall Tree Plan — Landscape Plan (L1.0) Exhibit 11: Building 1 and 2 Landscaping Plan (L1.1) Exhibit 12: Building 3 Landscaping Plan (L1.2) Exhibit 13: Parking Level Building 1 and 2 (A1.01) Exhibit 14: Parking Level Building 3 (A1.02) Exhibit 15: 1 Floor Plan Buildings 1 and 2 (A1.11) Exhibit 16: 1 Floor Plan Building 3 (A1.12) Exhibit 17: 2 Floor Plan Buildings 1 and 2 (A1.21) Exhibit 18: 2 " Floor Plan Building 3 (A1.22) Exhibit 19: Unit Plans (A2.0) Exhibit 20: Building 1 Elevations (A3.0) Exhibit 21: Building 2 Elevations (A3.1) Exhibit 22: Building 3 Elevations (A3.2) Exhibit 23: View from Nova Scotia Entrance Looking East (B/W) Exhibit 24: View from Pond Looking North East (B/W) Exhibit 25: 58 Looking North (Color) Exhibit 26: Project Narrative from Todd Erickson, FFE, September 13, 2011 Exhibit 27: Memo from Kathy Widin, City Arborist Exhibit 28: Memo from Chris Long, City Engineer PROJECT DESCRIPTION Todd Erickson of Folz, Freeman and Erickson, Inc, the project engineer has provided the following narrative related to the request for the PUD amendment: "On behalf of my client, Mr. Tim Nolde, we are submitting documentation for the revision or amendment to the Oakgreen Village PUD. Due to market driven conditions we are once again submitting for a change in regard to the previously approved use of the Oakgreen Village and Oakgreen Ponds area. The proposed submittal reduces the number of townhome units from 44 in the Oakgreen Village Platted Area to 15 units. The townhomes in the Oakgreen Ponds Plat would all be eliminated. The proposed change would be to add 111 units to the Oak Park Senior Living Phase I Addition, and constructing 8 of the remaining townhomes. The proposed plan would incorporate construction similar to that of the existing senior living building recently constructed over the past year. These units would be considered more of a "Brownstone" style of unit to accommodate the current market trend. As part of this PUD Amendment, TIF Financing is requested for the amount of $1,200,000. This request does not include the earlier created District; therefore, we do not need any consent from Bondholders and other interested parties. Construction of the proposed units for Phase 1, would begin as soon as approvals are given." 2 The units proposed with this amendment are as follows: One level townhomes (7 constructed) 15 dwelling units Multi level townhomes (4 constructed) 8 Building 1 26 Building 2 33 Building 3 52 Total 134 dwelling units ISSUES ANALYSIS Adjacent Uses. Uses adjacent to the subject site are listed below: North of Site: Present Zoning — B -4, Limited Business District Present Use — Highway 36 orientated commercial development, Goodwill and the Xcel Energy power line easement South of Site: Present Zoning — 0, Open Space and R -1 Single Family Residential District Present Use — City park land and a single family neighborhood West of Site: Present Zoning — B -4, Limited Business District Present Use — Lowe's /CSM Commercial development East of Site: Present Zoning — B -4 /PUD, Residential Planned Unit Development Present Use — Oakgreen Commons, open area and Oakgreen Avenue Comprehensive Plan. The 2008 Comprehensive Plan designates this area as medium density residential. The increase in number of approved units places the area into a high density residential classification for land use purposes. A Comprehensive Plan change would be required. The Planning Commission and City Council should comment on the land use classifications and whether the Comprehensive Plan should be revised to accommodate this development. Zoning. This property has been designated as B -4, Limited Business District which accommodates residential development as a conditional use. As such, the underlying base zoning district is B -4, Limited Business District with a PUD overlay. The B -4, Limited Business District lists two family, townhomes and multiple family dwellings as a conditional use. The performance standards of the R -3 Multiple Family District must be complied with for residential development in the B -4 Limited Business District. 3 Subdivision. The applicant has provided a preliminary plat labeled as Oak Park Senior Living. This would replace the Oakgreen Village plat. Outlot A would be created as the common area surrounding the buildings. Blocks 1, 2 and 4 represent the new multifamily buildings. The existing four plex and the four plex that is planned at the southwest corner of the site, as well as the townhouses on the north side of the site will retain the existing Oakgreen Village plat. The preliminary and final plat, as well as the vacation and dedication of any easements, shall be subject to review and approval of the City Engineer and the City Attorney. Park Dedication. Park dedication has been satisfied for this area. The applicant paid the maximum percentage (14 %) of equivalent cash value as part of the original approvals in 2006. Project Density. Section 401.15.C.3 of the Zoning Ordinance establishes the density thresholds for residential properties. Elderly housing requires 1,000 square feet of land area per unit excluding right -of -way and wetlands. The multiple family requirement is 2,500 square feet per unit. The project total, with what is proposed, the already constructed units and the Oakgreen Commons project is a density of 2,200 square feet per unit. As long as the project stays as a senior rental complex it would meet density requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. The development agreement will need to include a provision to assure that the project remains as senior rental and is not converted to non restricted rental housing. Proposed Street/Access. The existing roadway system that was developed for the Oakgreen Village and Oakgreen Commons projects will remain in place. The north /south roadway at the west edge of the site is to be reconfigured slightly to accommodate additional parking. The cul -de -sac at the end of this roadway will also be altered to accommodate the additional four plex that is to be constructed. The parking portion of this roadway is to be located directly on the property line. This is allowed through the PUD. The City has previously allowed a portion of the parking and the cul- de -sac to encroach on the setback area. The Planning Commission should comment on the extent to which this parking area will encroach. Trails /Sidewalks. The Trail Plan as attached includes the locations of the existing eight foot bituminous public trails and the proposed and existing five foot concrete sidewalks. The combination of the trails and sidewalks should provide adequate access within the development and connections to the surrounding public trails. The Planning Commission should comment about the proposed sidewalks and connections to the existing trail system. Private Park. A private landscaped area with a gazebo is proposed between Buildings 3 and 4. No active play equipment is proposed due to the nature of the development as senior rentals. 4 Setbacks. Within a PUD, the base district setback requirements (R -3) are applied only to the perimeter of the project. The R -3 District specifies setback requirements as follows: 30 feet front yard, 30 feet rear yard, and 20 feet side yard. If the lot is in a corner, not less than 30 feet from a lot line is required for side yards. The PUD section of the Zoning Ordinance specifies that buildings should be located at least 20 feet from the back of a curb line from roadways as part of the internal street pattern. Additionally, the ordinance specifies that no building within the project shall be nearer to another building by one -half the sum of the building heights of the two buildings. Building 1 will be constructed on the property line adjacent to Nova Scotia Avenue. According to R -3 District standards, at least a 30 foot setback should be maintained. The proposed four plex at the corner of Nova Scotia Avenue and 58 Street as well as the existing four plex further north were approved with setbacks of 20 feet as part of the Oakgreen Village plans. The setback for Building 3 is proposed at 52.5 feet from the right of way line of Nova Scotia Avenue. Staff recommends that Building 1 be pulled back at least 30 feet from the right of way line. The Planning Commission should comment. Buidling 1 and 2 are to be separated by a distance of 31 feet. The sum of the two building heights is 52 feet; half of that amount is 26 feet. The buildings are adequately separated. Building 3 and the existing four plex are separated by 23.5 feet. The sum of the two building heights is 46 feet; half of that amount is 23 feet. These buildings are compliant with the PUD setback requirements. Tree Preservation /Landscaping. The applicant has provided a general landscaping plan as well as detailed plans for the foundation plantings around each building. The City Arborist has reviewed the plan in memo as attached. The plans shall be subject to the final approval of the City Arborist. Grading and Drainage. Detailed grading and drainage plans have been provided as part of the development submittals. The City Engineer and the applicable watershed authority shall review and approve all of the grading and drainage plans. Utilities. A detailed utility plan has been submitted. The final utility plan is subject to review and approval of the City Engineer and Public Works Director. All of the utilities within the development shall be private but built to City specifications. Lighting. A lighting plan has been provided that includes street light fixture specifications and locations within the private street network. Some of the street lights are in place and others are proposed. The proposed light fixture is identical to what has been used previously. It is a full cut -off fixture with a flat Tens. The street lights will be maintained and all electricity costs will be paid for by the developer /homeowners association. The plans indicate the wall light fixtures to be used on each of the proposed buildings. These fixtures are the same as what was approved for the Oakgreen Commons project. 5 As part of the PUD approvals, the Planning Commission and City Council will need to determine of these fixtures are appropriate in that they are not full cut off. A photometric plan has been provided that is compliant with the light intensity requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. Signage. No additional signage has been proposed other than the monument signs on each of the two entrances from Nova Scotia Avenue and at the corner of 58 Street and Oakgreen Avenue. The applicant shall submit plans for these signs that are subject to City approval. Traffic. The applicant has provided projected vehicle count information for the proposed development in the Master Plan and Traffic Analysis. The traffic numbers are subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. Parking. The Zoning Ordinance requires the following for elderly housing: "m. Elderly (Senior Citizen) Housing. Reservation of area equal to one (1) parking space per unit. Initial development is, however, required for only one -half (1/2) space per unit and said number of spaces can continue until such time as the City considers a need for additional parking spaces has been demonstrated." A review of the proposed parking is as follows: Building Surface Stalls Underground Stalls Building 1 16 43 Building 2 30 55 Building 3 24 83 Total 70 181 With a total of 251 stalls, and 111 dwelling units, the multifamily buildings in the project comply with ordinance standards for elderly parking and leave additional spaces for guest parking. The one level and multi level townhome units are all constructed with one stall each and are compliant. Snow Storage. The plans indicate areas for snow storage. The City Engineer should comment on the adequacy of these areas. Mechanical Equipment. The applicant's architect has indicated that the mechanical equipment is located within the buildings. Any mechanical equipment that is ground mounted or visible from adjacent streets shall be screened as required by the Zoning Ordinance. 6 • Trash /Recycling. All of the trash storage and recycling will be internal to the buildings. The design of the driveways for the multifamily buildings accommodates roll out containers for pickup. Building Height. Building 1, 2 and 3 are all 26 feet to the midpoint of the gable roof in accordance with the definition of building height. The buildings are in conformance with the 35 foot height requirement of the Zoning Ordinance. Three Bedroom Units. Within the development, most of the units are either one or two bedroom. All of the units in Buildings 1, 2 and 3 are one and two bedroom and none of the two bedroom units have a den. Two of the one bedroom units in Building 3 have dens. There are six units in Building 4 that are two bedroom with a den. Three units in this building have one bedroom and a den. Staff is concerned that the den units in the one and two bedroom units could become bedrooms with a later addition of a closet. It is recommended that a condition be placed in the approvals that none of the den units be converted to a bedroom with the addition of a closet. Architectural Appearance. The application materials indicate elevations and perspective diagrams from various locations surrounding the development. From the initial submittal, the project architect has greatly improved the appearance of the multifamily buildings and has added architectural feature detailing and colors that were not present with previous diagrams. The Planning Commission, in their workshop review of the plans, indicated that the buildings be given more distinction so that they were not all the same in color and style. The perspective diagrams were requested to better indicate an actual view of the development. The Planning Commission should comment on the revised plans and determine if the applicant has provided enough distinction and difference in style between structures. The plans indicate the material types and specify colors. The project architect will provide a building materials board for review and the Planning Commission meeting. The residential units are not required to be reviewed under Design Guideline requirements, but as part of the PUD, the City can comment and require design and material changes. The Planning Commission and City Council shall comment further on the building appearance and materials as part of the review. B-4, Limited Business Standards. Section 401.301.E.9 of the Zoning Ordinance provides the CUP standards for allowing residential use in the B -4 District. The standards are as follows: Two family, townhomes and multiple family dwellings provided that: a. At least two parking spaces per unit must be provided for on site, or proof is shown of arrangements for private parking nearby. 7 The development will comply with the specific Zoning Ordinance requirements for senior housing. b. No physical improvements, either interior or exterior, may preclude future re -use for commercial purposes. The development could be converted to future office use, but highly unlikely c. Unit floor areas must comply with Section 401.15.C.6. All of the units are at least 600 square feet for one bedroom and 720 square feet for two bedrooms as required by the Zoning Ordinance. d. Compliance with conditional use requirements of Section 401.03.A.8. The requirements will be complied with. e. The development does not conflict with existing or potential future commercial uses and activities. There would be no conflict. f. The density, setbacks, and building height standards imposed as part of the R -3 Zoning District are complied with. The building setbacks are not consistent. This will need to be addressed in revised plans. The Planning Commission and City Council will need to comment on the setbacks and project density. g. Adequate open space and recreational space is provided on site for the benefit of the occupants. Adequate open space is provided. h. The development does not conflict or result in incompatible land use arrangements as related to abutting residential uses or commercial uses. No incompatible land use arrangements are created. i. Residential use can be governed by all applicable standards of the Zoning Ordinance, Building Code, Housing Code and Fire Codes. All standards will be complied with. j. Residential and non - residential uses shall not be contained on the same floor. Not applicable. 8 k. Residential uses shall be provided with a separate entrance, and separately identified parking stalls. Not applicable. I. The architectural appearance, design and building materials of residential structures shall be consistent with the Design Guidelines and subject to approval of the City Council. The Planning Commission and City Council should comment on the architectural appearance. Demolition Clause. At their workshop meeting, the Planning Commission discussed the long term maintenance, appearance and functionality of the site as rental housing. It was suggested that the City place a demolition clause in the PUD approvals and the development agreement. This would state that once the site has exhausted its useful life that the buildings would need to be demolished in 40 or 50 years. This is done frequently for big box commercial sites that are often abandoned after 10 or 20 years once the same big box retailer opens another new store a few miles away. It is not that common to utilize a demolition clause for multiple family housing in that the useful life of this type of structure is usually much longer. The Planning Commission should consider this further. In the alternative, the City could implement a rental registration and inspection program that would provide the City more authority in assuring that the property is maintained and kept safe. The City Council has considered this option in the past and could be another method of addressing the long term viability of the multiple family housing stock in the City. Development Agreement. The applicant will be required to enter into an amended development agreement with the City should approval of the general plan of development be granted. The development agreement shall be subject to review and approval of the City Attorney. CONCLUSION / RECOMMENDATION Based upon the preceding review, City staff recommends that the Planning Commission review the issues raised with density, height of the buildings and setbacks prior to proceeding with a final recommendation. A change in setbacks from what is shown in the plans could potentially significantly affect the site plan and potentially the numbers of dwelling units that can be included in the buildings. Additionally the Planning Commission previously had limitations regarding the architectural appearance of the structure. This may also impact their recommendation. If the Planning Commission is ready to make a recommendation on the amended PUD please find as follows a list of suggested conditions: 9 1. The Planning Commission and City Council shall discuss the land use classifications and determine if the property should be designated has high density residential in the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The preliminary and final plat, as well as the dedication and vacation of any easements shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer and City Attorney. 3. The Planning Commission and City Council shall comment on the proposed density of the project. 4. The development agreement shall include a provision that the Oak Park Senior Living Phase I will remain as senior rental and shall not be converted to non restricted rental housing. 5. The Planning Commission and City Council shall comment on the added parking and changes to the private access roadway and cul de sac adjacent to Nova Scotia Avenue North. 6. The Planning Commission and City Council and shall comment on the proposed private and public trail system. 7. The setback for Building 1 should be moved at least 30 feet from the right of way line of Nova Scotia Avenue. The Planning Commission and City Council should comment. 8. All tree removal and landscape plans shall be subject to review and approval of the City Arborist. 9. The grading and drainage plans shall be subject to City Engineer and applicable watershed authority review and approval. 10. All utility plans shall be subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. 11. The Planning Commission and City Council shall determine if the non shielded, residential style light fixtures are appropriate. 12. The applicant shall submit any plans for new signage subject to City approval. 13. The traffic numbers are subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. 14. The Fire Marshal and Police Chief should review the plans and determine the accessibility of emergency vehicles throughout the development. 15. The trails and sidewalks shall be constructed in accordance with the City Engineer's review and approvals. 10 16. The snow storage areas and plan shall be subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. 17. Any mechanical equipment that is ground mounted or visible from adjacent streets shall be screened as required by the Zoning Ordinance. 18. The den rooms in the dwelling units shall not be converted to bedrooms with the addition of a closet. 19. The Planning Commission and City Council shall comment on the final building appearance, colors, materials and the variety between buildings. The applicant shall provide a materials board for all of the buildings to be discussed at the Planning Commission and City Council meetings. 20. The Planning Commission and City Council shall discuss including a demolition clause into the PUD approvals and development agreement. 21. The applicant shall be required to enter into a development agreement. The development agreement shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Attorney and City Council. 22. Any other conditions of City staff, the Planning Commission and the City Council. 11 \ � ® f �,,.� LAND PLANNING Freeman, Erickson, . ENGINEERING Inc. G : : I *SURVEYING . liN6INEEA7NG :. / - ._ NOR TH ( - ® 12445 ELMO, MINNESOTA 55042 . FFF n _ - — — ` ` 1/ }IOU 051) 939.8833 Fax (651) 9 3 49 7 31 V I I rllMlMlIiARIbY� WI x • 41 • II�NIXIRiA1;x11NW11•I O0f1RY0RD Sauflr Lm; e/ Nwf6em 0" _ _ .6.'. _. - y _ _ es ._I" 1 .•-- Ilk ': " ^ l0 EaH'11WCIi c�lusTxucim wn I, ,Sfatea Pawsr Le. Eoaament . . To PFI.6x1 h Ox Ne '' V ♦ e > ♦ • ♦ • ♦;♦ • ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ O♦ � ♦ ♦♦♦♦♦� �♦ � • ♦ ♦ ♦O♦ •O �iO♦ I - -- -- - - - - -- _ i!! i�i�ii! %a1i4 ♦ iii ♦ iii ♦ i • ♦ ♦i4 i i0 � i � MP i • i i i Vi `i i i r•♦ r %i ♦ s ♦♦ ; ii ♦i. ii ♦ 4 WAA. ∎ • �. Mn 0 �� ♦ i• ♦ 4is s i O• . _ r00 �♦ ... ♦ 1 ♦ ♦♦ Ir♦ ♦♦♦ ♦♦ ♦ ♦♦♦OOJJOOi♦♦ Az 1 I • ♦• 4 3 flapp4IP0 X4.4•♦6!.* A•p• ****♦: . ___, _ , , , i - .2_ 727" ---t -, ; .." ___ --____ 7 . ----7-_ _,t--: — — „ VO*0: _ _ ) 4,4 :• * *(43$44.44 fi r ; , ♦V'.� ® I a s a rr . O . ..�, 1r♦♦ . .�I I • 4! ;vr♦ . 4 i ♦ ♦ �• �O • �e.l • ♦� il Y •♦,i ••� •• ; O♦ iii i I A•xIMM r a'�` - -___ 1. •� . ♦•♦ ♦♦ ♦ • ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦1♦ / I r"♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦•♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ • ♦ ♦ ♦ �, i ♦ ♦ ♦•♦r 1`I a I a a } r „`�.....J ;O!;!;,•, '1......., 1 • • I • EKIST 0 25 Sa 100 ^1_- 6-5- -- -.5 - - - 1 -- -� - --- j � ( � LEGEND 0.- - '-rb �y� L • x . I / 'I I g I 1 I I PROPOSED NE -GENT BOUNDARY UNITS .I ,' I �/ .' �;� 1 .. - 3 P 'I EXISTING WATER MAIN 00 de' ~ P II /.� // ` STORM MO / I r 3 DIMING • I I / I� ® f ELECTRIC VW POWER POLE . I — - _ _ / j l , x 0 4 I i , 'Ke.; :. PREVIOUSLY APPROVED AREAS (NO CHANGE) gy�pp®® ,�� , / �, % Wl/ / %I: ' 141 V -• 0V OAK PA SLY APPROVED • PH S.SEPMATF SUBMITTAL REQUEST —• —• ' ®e . ,. ' 11 :,/ OAK PARK SENIOR LNMN3.RWEX • fl 40'' .a, I . f3 C ,,,n / ' ' ) , e., , w kWh*: O 4 VW LIM I g— • CZ ;X o rSI I r ,,r.e,. gt �•; / OAKPAIdK SENIOR LIVIll1G I kill mt PHASE o W PREM., APPROVED MIT , I TO.xTTNIC,ID y > _ W- 1 • I —i PUD AMENDMENT ,a; cc 58771 MEET NORTH EXISTING CONDITIONS EXHIBIT 1 w.x >ii_,r ANCHOBAYPRO- OAK PARE SENIOR LIVING PHASE I - OAK PARK HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA - IN1•201I SHEET I OF 6 SHEETS i \ — -_— — ' T Folz, Freeman, Erickson, Inc. � ' - -_ __ I AND PLANNQiG S{7i(pypNG • P.NGPIEERIIdG /�` I FFE 12445 y SSTH SIREE'P N ORTH i L ^'- • LA1�6 33 F,(6 5509 P6en (85114398573 Fea (851) 43093) 1 A 1)YANTER]Ot1/381Y UN t Ii LEGEND -- --- +( .<�., . v+ P�w�0ii4°�i°Oe�° ♦y♦•♦i °y -- -�, - --- - PaoPaeED�- PUteouNwavuwra • J a ;• e�O ♦14.1° i i i ° ° � °4 •e4 r ie�� VA ` KA i ° i. e♦ ' Js. ♦♦ eo4'ri 9,, •. ♦ L - .iJ�1 4 4 4 .? : 1 ...• iJ ,. Vg P N g �.;i;.4. PREVIOUSLY APPROVED AREAS (NO GRANGE) P ♦ e e .+S.♦4 . • 1 .. .r ♦0 . 4 9 1 0 ♦ • r .O /.4.0, ;. 0 .;♦0es ° •; ♦4 i , i; 0 . , 4 , i° •i i♦J�O. _ .. fi. • 0 �♦ °♦,,,, °�I ...t♦ . ♦ • Oi4° . 4 . . e ° ♦�P * :4 14 :,44:44Pe� i 4 A ,.. 4 Ja „ • e O• ; ;rsa ♦ .,P 4� ), ,4 4 : °.°.•♦ a 4. °. • 1 PF �41 �e°`♦°i♦ °e P♦♦.g. I ;•.°i••° ♦r7 i• . ♦i ; .°'.";'re :e° ♦$e• ,, ♦•I PREVIOUSLY APRWV®ARFA4- sEPAMTE SUBMITTAL REQUEST .:r...4 .T ♦.� �is..♦e�v :.r.�..:.aP�,��4 ♦♦•O i`�P4i ♦ ♦' ♦° OO • ' a i IINeL.w 1 1 p0ain ,g.� rLS f 6we.rw ANN 9 �;'�•'• �. , .. . ° 4 s O ei ; ; • ° . t N OTES :4 at _L ♦ A ♦ e .. ,]P'P4��}}•��,, all W I ."j'�. ~' "� si911 999 \.." - 11 • �C • e ` '� "♦' ♦ e i \' ♦ iO� • � ,p.Yli fu do AWNS BELOW ENCORPORATE BOTH PUD ANENDAENT SIB•NTTALS _ , . ♦ I♦♦ O♦ BUILDING 1 s + ; :,; ,0 • MTN ALL AREAS. UNITS AND PARKING � x BUILDING 2 � �� a ♦ 1 ,�� � � ( ..,N...�P. n,. PARKING SUMMARY 1 6 UNITS 33 ITS ♦ Q • . t • 9 s t OI EXMOOR PARKINS STALLS• 1N STALLS 4 4 ♦ DI iO . , 1 � i I ) ' '' andia.r ' _ � •.ly s ♦ . ' ,E, s� II l am ( PROPOSED UNDERGROUND ►ARNNO.IPSSTALLS I Y 1 '" 5•P'rT� •E „� „ , . � j ` P° � j� ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION TIMELINE : u _ c ' , 4,1',- a...'440. '' 1 � � � 4 . BEGIN CONSTRUCTION OP ALL RIYABINS TOWNNONE SUKDINO6 O t k All % y I � I a y 1- ', - ,./; - ' � / '( OF ENTIRE SITE AND RE- PLAITED AREA. PENDENT APPROVAL TIMELINE. rffs X 10 I �SIE�e j ,. .. H '//.;.. - •!' Iz et 0) SPRING OF2012 - EHaw CONSTRUCTION OF WWI. } 4PTarN� - 99991 ” • - _ r l 3) SPRING OF 2013. MOM CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDING t t2 11 � � Ow 6, I fC I) FALL OF 2015 OR SPRING OF 294- SEWN CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDING 4, . I I� I,T ...471- ,.. T''''. t � 4 � v 1 IV Q ( � �� , ! � Y p TRAFFIC ANALYSIS y ` J' ./ tG // ITE Trip Generation 7N Edition - senior Adult Nws, study (252) � � 5 y �'_ _ _ "/,',/' / / j / p / / VEHI COUNT: AM PEAK HOUR VEHICLE COUNT: PM PEAK HOUR I__ 1 —' - , - - - . ( s - II _ gyy _ . ' � % ' ' ' / / // � / I • 501L ENTERING /SOX EXInNG -ITE irlD Generation, ]111 Etli /T___...)))"' ,� d 04 q S'gy� I�� , // / e / / NTERS %I - : ern. Edition Q , � V,.••(� T'2) `4 ei � // /1 � // 006 Trip Generation P D Und for Peak Hwr CdculaUm I �_ S 1 I r A / / j 0 SJ3 T Generatio m aJ Pa E Dwl TING N Un R Pork Gen Har Calc ulaUOn O 1 AI/kit e r r NORTH FNINANfF • z I _ 4 � ( 1 ' •` • , ;;.•:.-.^.-, P' � ! // ,6 � � L ) S OX OF UNITS t75 UNITS 50E OF F UN T ING S Nrc 175 UNITS f I : i ^' 3'1 . I/'/ 4' 4 �? 1 1 TOTAL 175 UNITS /� I / ,, , / S O / // � / / ♦! •• P 21 ENTERWC TOTAL 1]5 UNITS iB � 1 /i / / / P i ( o.os x n s . g . 4 . 5 z% _ / , e F 1 / ,, - _ _ . EXITING , 17s , a50) - 5 uwTS ENTERING (0 11 z 175 z 0.53) - 1O 01,005 I i / / 4�e / ♦ A l EYJRNC (an , 175 , 0.47) . s UNITS F r 3 �, , � �- / j / IS 505 C F UNITS l 5(KIS011111 ENTRANCE / 4' 1 � / / �., y / � j ^ 505 OF UNITS 1]5 UNITS SOX OF UNITS 175 UNITS {)rv- .., y+ 0 '46 / 9 Y ('y P / , / A1 ... /I ENTERING (0. x 175 z TOTAL 175 UNITS ( Tk } E} `''' S. ".°1‘°'''' A ' - TOTAL 175 UNITS ., 9' G•' 2 - - -- 0.50) - 5 UNITS E £10095 (0.11 z 175 z a5J - 10 UNITS i '.- ' EXITING (0.08 v 175 x 0.50) 5 UNITS E]oTNG (0.11 z 175 z ap) - 9 UNITS • I �.rwy ;.�.} `� ;,, -•°" S T R E E T NORTH TOTAL ADT: fY / ' iSrt h ■ ( (" ) �9� , 7 J 1-' i. r 32.48 CARS PER DAY % (22] HED 11 7 6 7 UNNG) 8 / 4 rv� 1 F� - C B� 2 C ARS PER DAY % (120 A5951 U 7 3 322 � ♦fir / y P� 1 0 CARS PER DAY % (4 FAMILY TOY/MOUES) 1 1 I 4 �. ' j d - OTC 44 r `J T'‘ s ,'/. OAK PARK SENIOR LIVING 1 T i PHASE I � 1 c ( '- � � _— PUDAMENDMENT EXHIBIT 2 MASTER PLAN & TRAFFIC ANALYSIS ' ' r•era ANCNORA OAK PARK SENIOR LIVING PHASE 1 - OAK PARK KNIGHTS. S@MEWTA- 10194011 SKEET 2 OF 6SID:ETS A \ r..........1.,,■- .\ Folz, Freeman, Erickson, Inc_ LAND PLANNING • FFE SURVEYING 44555 , ENGINEERING \ .‘ 1 2445 55TH STREET NORTH We ELMO,MINNESOrA 55042 Phone 1651/ 9394833 Fn (651) 9349331 ■ OPEN SPACE B 1 -FJ I L. I I___ _1 l I L , �S ■ A BUILDING .1 /3011.0.1N6 2 o s t. I6 UNITS 33 UNITS `` ,,��y 5 w -__ - a ♦ 0/ -- / ( r , �. LEGEND ljl � 1 , >' AREA SUMMARY ., — / G '!3 / 009160174461 Ana .T10.tM.1 �1/N! PARCEL EXCLUDING ALL ROUT Of 5 r TMA OP OARORl WAY 1 �a� ; � TROtl. 1400411.142.. 700 -> -1A \ 9 - s�s V. Planned Am Pr Una. 2.200 Al 1 1 ' AREA EQUAL OPEN TOTAL AREA 0 (1111 FL) MRS SPACE SNARE AREA PER UNIT . _ — —_ RI Al 0E,066 11 20,433 MAN TMI - , (5 �1 AY $4,203 110 AWE 122E10 1 k�0`1 AS 24E00 19 112,496 36E266 7,921 \J (. M 190,04 96 04771 203,017 2,19 0 4 ' ri 014A 164E74 / 033 14p11 TOTAL 770,111 700 '290.079 770,126 2,200 L - J / • 9114112 OF 042116744 RAM I.n26RITA11 >1om oOCVRDAw. 3 OPEN SPACE: TOTAL IMPERVIOUSNESS SURFACE. 373,027 &F. .51% TOTAL OPEN SPACE ■ E. I Jr ! OAK PARK SENIOR LIVING a IyI ; \ i PHASEI / _-- EXHIBIT LU PUD AMENDMENT AREA ANALYSIS ANC11OBAYPRO- OAK PARK SENIOR LIVING PHASEI- OAK PARK HEIGNTS. MINNESOTA. NO 2011 SHEET l OF 6 SHEETS Folz, Freeman, Erickson, Inc. � ' ` 1 � LAND PLANNING • SURVEYING • ENGINEERING z ' 1 ,I ]2445 557N STREET NORTH p� ` I I \ - _ _ •:.+) _ h ' LAIC ELMO, MINNESOTA 55092 95z FFE LAK (3SU 43988)] Fu 16504304331 • , 1 • • •. • i i i ♦ i • `• • ♦• %i •i 0 : • : , i r: • ..,.. r • i rr r �.yr - - y - • • � �! 4+: • •o . JO♦4 • •••:♦•••••• ♦�' • ••• i --- n I %: i� pJ� r ♦i3•%♦! '4 ♦ ♦ • :�i• ♦p.�•i �i0i' ` � ii ii' P <'`n'..' I•D:t�• i �' � i • - - i ii' `' O ♦ P ♦� J y ,� � 3-� — or, • iS 4 ' P •i ♦i • •1Pi• lOi 0 d ♦000•,S� ! •�. •i ,e. -4 A� •!. + . OPP L v i♦P�`..-; 4 ' P i ♦ ♦�.i%%i BUILDING A �♦ • .. .:. .. ■, l `. - gy m I I FFe ssio : I . � PlY ssta ••• 4. •♦ •') jtI 6 AI; ( S • •I.I� k 26 UNITS wRm 1 ♦ ♦ 1 r •�.' iO ? 1� , � ♦_ I 33 UN s,aw � � 37,. d t♦ ♦ P it O I_ I i / � 17 • l►�. N. J A r 1 .N♦9„M ,••� . f ��� V%� • rte iii• µl "� , r I i L 18 STA LLS �3113TdLL : � ° „ 7 ` a! R _ o rf 'Z (1 �, ..,. " t y o4y i 1 z '11° k+h.•.»• �� .„0.0-4; ._ , LEGEND --- ' r •iii '` i s P 47 �� I.. _ _ __. _ wry5 � 7f �,P.� ,�,�• di�.� / I I _ _ vaovosEO RE-PUT BOUNDARY LASTS ■ YDr' / I . µ�. 0 C , 1 _ ' DUSTING CONTOUR ■ ¢ \ F1 ^ .4 a 5 ry � � * � } I �.. _ ■ - - - W PROPOSED STORK SEWER 1 I 1 y ,m "''4` ' Y � 'B/ I d WIY K.OS dFE3 l (6 ,7 �µ --,T,17,1-7•) ) ' `rs' i ice. f 1,. P d I PROPOSED MANAGEwwOw 1 J " —_ _. - ' F F�` /: I >- � 11 . _ _ i1 PREVIOUSLY APPROVED AREAS (NO GNOME) �� �1 .� 9: •e—,0, � 0 �� �• �P � xa I%�� PREVIOOSLV APPROVED AREAS SEPARATE BUBYPGLREQUEST I j I ` jl`_ s P 0 ' e:47k,� I . SrVISTOPAG AREAS(EXCESS 7NOW TO BE REMOVED FROM SITE - - '/� I � I d I �Q ,%• � �f ) . OR D EPOBRFD W OMM1OTAREA4 „,,,,„,.,,. . „..., ,..., Ail / ,, E— ■ tide ' / : / - , , i!. .,). 9: #,A r // A 1 , / / 7 , ' ".".* j__. ------ ......0,,, Pp• =• :; o a-- EET NOR I ° , j ; � > , . % � / g t H 'v • I v .. : F j ,;....�� .•., OAK PARK SENIOR LIVING cr •i _ PHASE I EXHIBIT 4 _ — _ _ �� PUD AMENDMENT s f SITE DRAINAGE /GRADING PLAN/SNOW REMOVAL Lo a gue. rr - ANCHOBAVPRO- OAK PARK SENIOR LIVING PHASE I - OAK PARK HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA - 10/19TOI1 SHEET 4 OF SHEETS M Folz, Freeman, Erickson, Inc. si LANG PLANNING • SURVEYING • ENGINEERING i — �/ I — — 12445 55TH STREET NORTH ® Ph= (651) 4398833 P LAKE HI.MO. MINNESOTA 55042 P a (651) 430.9331 .,., >.... ,•,•,•,•; :,•;•s•:•:. ❖:•' ❖: - "- - - -- — ' - - - T •• . • R i • i ♦ ♦ ♦ i •Tiiii•'• P i• ♦i "i i�'•i <i i ii�.�i . .IiO 'p,♦ O. �� S* i - ♦ • •°iy -. ••.....•. y.. ° - v♦? 4g,— °v... i * ♦ _ _ -3.� — • %i : : 4 • ::• : ` . Q : iX•ii: ;•� ♦,� ::'. ir 4•.•. ♦ 0 4 0 0♦•+4.• : 444+: : :::a • OT• ii • • • : •): : !•j♦:�i t� • �:.�ivAdi i•. - ♦W;iO ;�• %J1i14. I g,i i -, �, S: r�. •• i• g pO ^•O % %i • ° i i navel .■. I •ii < �9♦vi�4tt$:4 :t$:t4 .t$: i 0 ♦ • i 4 0• i ;I _ *7--- - msu° . s sra _ d7lt L ••i. ♦ ,.O♦ , •• 0 di•i•:0♦i�t% — 1 BUILDING 1 , N � ° ClILDIN Z • . •. ,., . ' � . ❖d. 1 r j I I FFE 9510 ,' ,.C` PI' '5/0 . e ♦ ' 4.4.284,4%%4 • P ( s 26. Emirs / j wa ' • Oi J 14 ♦ •4 •i Iti ' r - 1 33 A UNITS • i • 1� T.•E�. ♦•� < Oi P,�r• wA `i' I -- j! ' -- i• / �„ M I sue I -- RrwK. T 1 k > ) • 1 :4 ma • ..•X — - - µ U I RRR a rq �� �P . 7 G j � / r i l r �'��� /A ) {J]�� 1 ' '- — ' .. I -._ ' 1ww w•aF4 rtiE ,E fr EASE- ■ �' �� Q -- ,cY'i / • / /:{ Al s I, l LEGEND Y ' ,e A.: / 1 j� > •' }I Y 1 i � —� - -- - �- PROPOSED RE- PLAT LIMITS • =. I: A {� 1 _y Eavn. -I / I%•%� �'i I —'., DUSTING WATER MAIN A 4+•W �'( {. . _ 1 /� /. / i/ A O( - EXISTING Errom SEWER a 1 ,i). 5 l 4,-'.'.%,'.`,,f.,-,`..4 f ' / /r� I 9 I ♦ , . EXISTING SANITARY SEWER V — '( 5 1 , d ! � 1 / • /, r 1% $� AI Elft pi EXISTING ELECTRIC `IV/ PMKR POLE I E V ' — - ,. -- s y 6�i I S I � • � r � `� 1 �,0A ■ j -' - - �+ —r,.� ■ WII&H. 13 FE8 SEWER / \ : $ - ,� y , �. •,• f• .. � , ' / -.02-1 PROPOSED SiWTARY SEWER N4 RN '1, ;`. /� , . %� r I ' { f PROPOSED WAT9■SAN I wiz � p V r j, , [5S � ,f 1� f1r w o (� ( 5 /// Ir o� ♦ f S 5 �V il� # - - NOTES 1) SANITARY SEWER: r PVC SOS 36Q 040% AWIORU GRADE ,. / T6 ; R ) WATERMAN: r DIP CL 44 AT II-FT BURY TO TOP OF PIPE fI l•, % !y$i 3 )MINIMUM NONIZONfA1 lUNNI BETWEEN VfRI1 /7 / 1 1 .'� '� y��i 4) BERVICEB WATER I•COPPFA 3EPE TYPE K SANITMY4•SCN 0 < �•` �� 400 -: /// �i ,� _ x y r — � $ : ; :•� �! EXISTING UTILITY EASEMENT • =' T R EET NORTH -' p T S APORTgNOFTH EWBTWGSTORMWATERUTILITYEASFMBNT j I I J S �. 5 EA H ATNOOF AMtOON ®ANO REOEFSED YYf1/1 TEeE Rw �.,-A. I � • 1 0 1 1 ;':-'" X" OAK PARK SENIOR LIVING • 4 1 - -- .... - - 'y � " " �' ----- PHASE I PUD AMENDMENT EXHIBIT Lu v --- UTILITY PLAN W ce . �� -�� ANCROBAYPRO- OAK PARK SENIOR LIVING PHASE!- OAK PARK HEIGHTS- MINNESOTA 10 SHEETS OP 6 SHUTS Folz, Freeman, Erickson, Inc. LAND PLANNING • SURVEYING . ENGINEERING � ....,.... .. .. . .......: — — FFE ® 12M555Td STREET NORTH LAKE ©AN), MINNESOTA 55042 J . . ,... . ` .... .. �__ _._ \ Mane (651) 43941(03 Ism (651) U09J37 .. v . • YY v v Y_ V v y — t ....,. r __ y aa..., � Iv ` . Jt r. ff .,. u y y p ` ` N V I„ P K + v u v• u r 11,./M ✓ lvypfl 9 v� (l :: ' . v dL(I,LDIN 1 �.�� J , .. �- 11 BUIL DING 2 26 UNITS 33 UNITS . _ r ` a 45 r • ... �.. : • . ? \\ LEGEND It:. : ... r,....... . r • •• . ... v w . w . _ _ � . , v PROPOSED RE4LAT...RI' LINTS � ...., :sA . i. EXSTWGL KY TO REMAIN . :TIM „_„.„.4,-,r)-1',.53. ". e, p yy' R, ° .1 1+, ct yid 1 _ II PROPOSED NEW urrr 1 It - � w 5 . . u . ; .. „ ° t a { ' 15 ii� LIGHT INTENSITY • t1. :::::: , .' . ,a ;t .max `�, �. 5 P 't � ! t NOTES J: ...' MI- ., s 'a i,j, .s ` ! m ... 1 ,I waL.R� PPm�oPRO WRIA ED ANS�EC,R�L • �....., r�u . .. . ... . �....... YilPy , PAL BEM PORTIONED TOMO.*COPOUREOak 1 -.*T TR -: � yT P � r 4' y4y uu.. .. v v u s. (/' '. 1.. e ■ I: moo,. S� 1C� a� 5 " [ --3 . ,L l .. v ... , F w II /RIO uortwO•un.E. �: ... .; r ....., . _ ..,.... :. _ �1 'Y 1 46 .. . . • WANE — N EOF0 RSE,L6.RwO ,r te 4.r: s • — OAK PARK SENIOR LIVING ::.___ ..... ...:� PHASEI -.. -- -" — r c # -- - ... EXHIBIT b c. SR PUD AMENDMENT u. I OR RR LIGHTING PLAN u w•• " -"• ANCHOSAYPRO- OAK PARK SENIOR LIVING PHASE I -OAK PARK HEIGHTS .MINNESOTA - 15152011 SHEET 6 OP 6 SHEETS . iiiir ri / " /•'' _ _ - _ - -. -.. _ _- _ .. -- - - — - I Folz, Freeman, Erickson, Inc. -. . - -... LAND PLANNING • SURVEYING • ENGINEERING 12445 55TH STREET NORTH \ \ FFE - • LAICEE 1)439 33 N 165 55042 :::'(1) LAIC ELMOJ IM ESO 55042 EXISTING 8 -FT WIDE TRAIL / T • - - -- p•.• _ ' �e0° Jii� ♦�O ♦�'O�e♦♦e♦tIO♦O :t'i�O :pO$,l • ytI ♦ � 'i ♦ ♦♦ ♦$$1 iP ■♦i ' ♦ ei P ° :::**1 P� %♦ '♦ ♦:%°* • , K : • ` *:; • a • : asaA : ; ;; ;;S0 V'i' :4: �$' .�ri ♦�♦�aO,GeiM�'�ri p '4�� .fi!♦�iOOi♦ Pi!'O'd� ♦ "�iAii! ♦O' ee�i ♦i iri ::::::•" 9 ;iip ♦ ♦ ♦i''i♦'Oi4ei'� a ♦r .OS♦. ♦�r♦y : ♦ • • ♦ ♦ ♦i e ♦ ;. ♦ • �y♦♦iPi♦ • ���' ♦y! ♦ ♦t'♦ L l''!'♦ td O 4:,: ♦'O ♦♦ i ;$1, ♦ d""S' ::41% Po :VW +'♦ �� , - . :04 ( x + .p ♦ .m. t r '9♦ •e3. • ♦. w♦5..� . sa a .�... s� �.•rc ♦ep`�O�" NC O ♦ . ♦♦, 'SS♦q� - as o w♦ ♦.♦ - -- EXIt IING 8-FT WIDE TRAIL r ♦ i 4; 47e * � .41144:1.4 g �' ♦ O.4 -1 „ G uT s MOM . — — .w 4,AR. ,w►. = v ,;:� i ♦�y4�J9,a i� R PROPOSED 5 -FT R " J , . � ,' �O . . � y •^ _ i x f WIDE CONCRETE t '� •/ ' : I F- - ' PRIVATE WALK ' 1 ) • e ;$$.44:3 v ♦'♦ ♦ • i•: ♦�r�°i �1 s * (TYPICAL) s h. I f . � ��� ♦es �M " "'i Of y ir . I -- f!,l1 as ♦ •'i i4 :; 4 ♦♦ • > 2 44 . , � // ; � Nr g �r „ _ -_ a 1 V•_.__:,-.• � % � 1 _sl,� 1�•: r ",y�a � / /�c/ W+ . /i//:;,<.,, / A / 1 ® �% ' 1"! / PROPOSED r - r 1 - ,. ; .t.,d' R ,4 Yjr- --.' -� W IDE CONCRETE __ , ''4 / / , ,.�� ri Tr" Z « Q LEGEND PATE WALK _ ___ r —_ - N� / ✓ % ∎4 .� O �_�__ PROPOSED n�wAT BOUNDARY LIMITS N ! O (TYPICAL) � / i 4 i /I CO 4) � T r r 6-FT WIDE CONCRETE 8Y)EWAUt (PRIVATE) _. f e, _ _ 1 �� ��-y�y,, 1:4;'','/ ,. CI � : r., ; (COSTING AND rnaosEUl Q /F `O `I%iJ� ` � I 7 1 .. 1 , 1 5 1 <, ♦i , .. % , ".- 7/ �� - scr err. rnlalweuq vu MM..) p !Y PROPOSED S-F I P � ( / ,1 . � ' 2 B -- 4 WIDE CONCRETT, v�•.� / ;., r� % E EI x- _ BIT. WIDE TRAIL 4 l C -• y . N . . .',fie 6& �� !STING 8-FT WIDE TRAIL , ♦ ,, ,,- TREET EET NORTH ..r ♦O .; y - y H S 1 0 OAK PARK SENIOR LIVING ! I , "I .. 0,-• ..0,-• PHASE I , A 63 III , .i %% PUD AMENDMENT EXHIBIT 1 i TING _ -Ff ' on D T ` ' TRAIL PLAN ANCHOBAYPRO- OAK PARK SENIOR LAVING PHASE I -OAR PARK HEIGHTS. MINNESOTA. I0'I92011 SHEET 1041 SITS RECEIVED OCT 1 A 1011 Folz, Freeman. Erickson, Inc. OAK PARK SENIOR LIVING F am Mr *UMW P. 051)03401 PRELIMINARY PLAT F A A is \ — fi � -- "T . -, .. ,. — ...�^ -��°,— — — 1_ _ — �- .--- `' Q fa K ..! / LYii Via., a...... , s w r i . .� ssrre ss� { . \ ' 11 6 RM6�r 19LIfE ___-- t , ..1 I i ,rr.., r v. w.r — — ws Air Az A y — _ I arrl a.•.. •er o . m w erne I Aer/rarw - Ul -. 11 1 2 1 3 1 4' 1 1 / I 2 I 3 I v ) 1 z 31 ° I E I I 5 O X 2 I I B1n�A Ai `; ei k y - �.� m-- t ■ I L_ L- 1- -I__L_ g IL -1 - -1— A 'i ,Z•., , LW armor mirror im U �$ I Ares Ow. . I I I I II / 2 3 f� / j.'�I— -- -- I -- r ri SO WL577 l NtLY , I 1 �r1 f 1 1 1 2 3 1 "I 1 1 2 1 3 1 4' 1 I I eiolx x� L- 1 - - 1�aT1LL L -1 L %� P d�k izL , �; , I ce�,�. ,r �p ' 4 ( � V 3 %..:' 2 1 � g L r z t 1 I 2v> 3 I y 1 1 1 2 II E'�" y I 1 I 3 �` ' °A `l Btxk 7 1 mode 71 , T I :LOC�e ? a : 1 .1._1 L- 1 - ,_I - - ` � I L_1 —I__L_ 1 t Ourcor A CYIJ I % A IW " I � _,�I 1 - r o,� OUTLOT A I sows down.. . 'nth I . L ' "'rr "`� V' L 1-"f .' L�'//!O7 U rue e•ruu'r . ra s W'' U _Agawam !111 / �\ r B tot J T z glTyp� C I - _ ` Q�lrlII! c t 06710. c t ��A I /'C Lm z \ lm 1 La z J La, . ? ,(-�`� 1h. 1 2 - h� a !, r 1 Is • >e `✓ L — I ,— r Qt9La; F 1100 I I I I- — — — I cyE a� waw I 1 titre y .a Arr. x rz A( MIr y I- — — — - Rnwr G 2 x� 1 z I a•MVREEN LIZL42E 1 I j I 1 0 - SMLGYVw NEAT -.. 1 I • 1 I-- — — -I 1 I r: a5 N � I " 1 ,i1. `; ° s I M� c;..rlar H ,n4 L — — — - / T — — — I Or m- --, r - - - -I y °-- swroomw 1.W e �— � _ A 0117207" A _ - A <�z ,; «- --, 4_ M ,uw° 500.56-: i ` ie W2 C _ _ n N ^"` 4 1 5 1 ! 5I.M STREh7 /x '4, y - — 1 2 ,P+ , 1 - _ - — / Q1QDl�` D �J, ` t— — / a Ot1 eeraomz / - t-P - - -- - - I / 1 2 V° — 11 *, —H- – 6 OUTLOT A / ". 1 I rsT ff / / N — rr�iirrs, __---------- Vicinity - / / a eer s N. - al 1. Vicinity TM rMyb / xwrolon crania& Mx..ane• 4 P — --- / r le,;red ` INN • NAM GP 61■111,.•••• u xrr. uem SIM MIME .� • mnffi rwo ® ® xw •a MR nnerr wan VIM W • 'rms u w' usm as mesa s nm KUL MIDI WIMP "IMMO u r an . 1111 cr m i CD a m a so Noon 9 =mums or ns au. ssoi s ass as we usrun. w[sr /aa ne 0 WA Sens a r. s, mme, Ms sans 501010 i ARCHNET yl BUILDING 2 ( TYPE S.F. • D! UNITE BUILDING 1 _.. -- COTTAGE 2 S.F. s -, _ -- RIVERTOWN R E D ROOMS 1, S.F. 6 imi Eli ra -. - - --_— I LOWELL 2 BED ROOMS 1,249 S.F. 8 - I ) Y 1 BED R 892 5 12 architecture taaarchitecture • interiors - - - - - , TOTAL 2BED ROOMS 14 Sustainable design I _(_ 1 -- TOTAL 1 BED ROOMS 12 �� _ - - r - - - - ' - ^ TOTAL UNITS 26 333 N Maki St. 55 201 9 -IL — ,.. I ___ _ l � t_ 1 r- _ ( - _ Stillwater, MN 55082 �.� _L 1_�_ L I_ I — r ', I _ � I W LLDINOR 651-430-0606 arch � _ RIV ERTOWN 2 BED 0.0 0MS 1,45] S.FS.F. 610 netusaacom _ - LOWELL 2 BED ROOMS 1,248 . _t Mi . yf_ COTTAGE 1 BED ROOMS 892 S.F. 17 r ,\. TOTAL 2 BED RMS 16 OO I 1 t ��aa�st�Ri " ^�7c.�wv"7 ° ^�1 •. ,� ^'�' � -"}. - '^7p� „(� I TOTAL 2 BEDR 17 / 9 41ci 11 7w 7I ,.w 7''. ,•, 7. Z.. 7 0 \ OTAL UNITS 33 we �� ' lit i 0 _ — — —_ H OAK PARK „ F- BUILDINGS SENIOR LIVING 4 n 1 , • 3-.- N a reL Y• I ♦ -'t • , SIB 1��� �}I^- I r ` ± y, - COTT 1 BED ROOMS +DEN 18248 SFF. 2 1 BED �, I O Z ? { " a �i i r I � TOTAL 2 BED ROOMS 26 OAK PARK , I — ' , - ul TOTAL 1 BED ROOMS 5 HEIGHTS, MN z r : • I 1 � _ . I _ gr > TO TA L UNIT - -- - --- - _. -- - - - - -- [-- - - - - -- r 5 0 . ' :. JL ., ,�.�,� )y Q BUILDINGS -. - � - -'- — J } � I 18 STALLS �� LS / _ . ROVERTOWN 2 BED ROOMS 11,457 S.F. 15 2 BED ROOMS - ` Z LOWELL 248 S.F. 27 , I , ”. r r g:*,-, ; /� COTTA 1 BED ROOMS + OEN! 1,549 S.F. 6 892 S.F 95 - Q ( ^ _ ^� , ,� - L J , • t ^ ] f - w , i / TMANGE RO DI 1 BED ROOMS +DEN 1,248 248 S.F . 48 —__� ReVi51On5 f` 1 I Jr , nil a I ' El L IL� W I,,:y Y TOTALUNITS 9 6 _. -_. tErrl _._.._ -___— �. IL A — . L _. ,.� a It Yt Q TOTAL SITE UNI TS I t � ` x , 2 BED ROOMS 1 248 S F. ,� 68 STALLS ' ' .I ' 0 LOWELL � 83 35 ` �I �� I COTTAGE _ ] �' o Imo • y TOTAL SITE 2 BED ROOMS 104 ( . - CO 2 BED ROOMS 1,248 S.F. 63 () , eBa 999 THE 5T. CROIX 2 BED ROOMS +DEN. 1,549 S.F. 6 , [7,3 �' .3..." a � E - �� Q AFTON 1 BED ROOMS +DEN 1,298 S.F. 5 �' + ' ,,„ - 892 S.F J� TOTAL SITE 1 BED ROOMS 103 i I \ '=w ' l TOTAL SITE UNITS 207 J • ' Z ry "' t + E 1 "' ° �_ o� c T," I PARKING STALLS j I j � ' , 4C A t 71 r Z � I • SITE STALLS i • � ' BUILDING 1 ( UNIT) 16 �' r0 33 UNIT) 30 a N I ,,, \ _ ; ;¢ � ' 33 1 4 �.,.'4A 9 S U y BUILD ING4 ( 86 UNIT) 24 BUILDING 4 I I fj' a � � I ( ) N I , .r TOTAL SITE STALLS 138 m....111 q 1 BI aA a •1 a ) ',At �4 + q UNDERGROUND PARKING R IStration Information . ; k • B UILDING 1 (26 UNIT) 43 6 9 . c 8 � , : ; — BUILDING 2 (33 UNIT) 55 I hereby orraly that this Plan, ( • ! '" I `+ Oe k'.' , ,L,,,; BUILDING 3 (52 UNIT) 84 apecl g am. "" w 0caaon, or report was Prepared by ' ' � f .o „, , p, 'fiiir' _' BUILDING 4 (96 UNIT) 86 me or under my direct swan/Non, and I1,3 'ti 1R4 i"' 'N+ : v L • • . . T TOTAL 2a0 under the Mwe of the State o f Arent. esota. - - - t n , I , y 'r, - 4` " y Printed Name 1 1 nT, ` - B MICHAEL F. DIEM __ A i .‘ "t.t � Signature DATE License Y 16884 ys y 10-19-11 16869 EXHIBIT Sheet Information - f :: /', / SITE PLAN/LANDSCAPE PLAN C emott No : 11 -154 thawing No : Dawn By : CL Li I1111•11•111111111111 Checked By : MD AS 1 i SITE / TREE LANDSCAPIN6 PLAN Mta : 10 -19.11 L- O r. eac it ®2010 ARCHNET, Inc. TREE LIST ARCHNET /• ' ms' µ' -� L I I — — � — — I t �w ..\.) _ AA" C 1 CI r Milan On 177N Mai 8t tits. 201 Sdnentsr,IIIN 5501112 ,,, 0 Ili ■- .- ..' ..- .- .■■■■■■ .... Ilhilmilaiiallimillniiiiiii to •z"tt"" ' ';,."..17.;:r40•17.1, 10I - S '-= '13. - ` , al = TREE REPLACEMENT TOTALS OAK PARK - J 1 � � 11� 61 11�� .12 °, . ' �j �j j ' ♦ , !- 52 DECIDUOUS OVERSTORY TREES ®2.5 EA. - 130.0 CA!/I SENIOR LIVING _ �I �Y. 0 82 DECIDUOUS UNDERSTORY TREES 0I.5' EA. ••• 123.0 CAL/IN N ' t! °! ! �� a ,I I 1 CONIFEROUS TREES ® 6' Nf. (OR 2.5' EA.) - 27.5 CAUIN �4 - J F: � �'i :r' • L�� \ i O TOTAL OF REMAINING 517E 280.5 GAUIN 'a a , 7l •. . . ,O r ' Z — �• n - i��. /�� �'��+ �� Ii • TOTAL OF EXISTING NORTH SITE 85.5 CAUIN OAK PARK ` . - - >A - '��� � � �: u • w HEIGHTS, MN — •.. -. ." - 1ti + _aL 1a., -493E09 -` _ f �/ Q TOTAL OF ENTIRE SITE 366 CAL/1N - 4 t A � • , 16 STALLS " 30 STALLS EN, ',O I (� ►,- Z iii; - Q Q w_:�a= ': F7= " rTta_aw� awl- iiw =1\ I �� � �� ` 1 1 - limaI� ► ~ _ y� Revisions �r� /I ; : . 0 01 �� ,� _ / 111111111111111111111' 10 �, .p 112- - � ir I a Item oats - i i i ow; `: _ ❑ = -8 8 STALLS 1 '� W I ism goi It u ii; 1:4 ,f,- ?., 44: , .....Nt. rzni El , ,., - az RIF r cp. .,,, ,.. , ,.....,,„ ' ; ,, ,. ,i. .. 4 : (j iii ile : 0, • II 114 i i . _ L � , a S - eaa -rir specification. or repot wapored I , i l '1� � �6 dui e - war my direct supervision, and ME 1 .: � that I am a duly Dammed Architect � �� • • un der tlw laws o/ the Stab of Minnesota. $ Mir � • ' w Printed Name I t •• 1 �, / % - e MICHAEL F. DIEM Signature DATE Ucense ♦!" ' 10 - 19 - 11 158a4 • J M t VI , , Oi l Sheet information I }, 4 • OVERALL TREE PLAN • EXHIBIT 1 0 gatMA No : 11 -154 Drawing No : r1a1111 Ja- ..: a Checked By: MD L 1. 0 L J O Me PLAN Der 10 -18-11 e C t ©2010 ARCHNET, Inc. L • • • ARCHNET 1 El 111 FA / w w �` , a• `� •, � w , BUILDING I PLANT UST 3U NN a.y 1679 - SOK 1 MI y J r .et■...com II — 116111111 - Iiiiii111111111111111011111111 Il ;1 —` - .• . s;, .� OAK PARK � - / 6 UNI SENIOR LIVING BLDG 1 Memaam■t■ " ' ► n*��._�.._,�_•_-tni�ii- r �-�r� AK r � � .... F. ... 1, pm. �` :7�� a.a����-- HEIGH P , R MN LOWS I LANDSGAPIN6 PLAN Revisions Item Date .. i ' 1.; . t BUILDING 2 PLANT LIST 33 UNIT .- BLDG 2 .a - . .L r ter. .. � ��r�1,1!V it.. AI 1...> a■ .. .air - - ' - 1- -, ∎.ci:w MI. Registration Information • `+ -. �ae.�_ee.. specification, or report was prepared by � ' - ■■ = r m. maoon my direct wgMWr by 11 _ +1 �11I,P „ . � that t la . duly a State ammo _ . .a.r the I.ws or a. State a Minn... �� r ∎�� le. Printed Name - MICHAEL F. DIEM ....„„,,:---■,--Itossissommir-a--E-mr �I . ���■� -- SS -- I / �.� ' �S , a DATE License C 30 STALLS t' .•_ D_ „_„ 168134 Sheet information 9information 0information � ' C� $ 4' II` V I . LANDSCAPING NG PLAN pea. N.: II - 151 Dr.wing No : y r. � 2 LMbSGAPIN6 PLA Dn. aF : MI MI! a . i . I MI! 1 1 Owm.O by MD L1. . 1 1 D. : 10-19 -11 ©2010 MCMNEr, Inc. ARCHNET El 111 13 aaaUYaiM dodge 55lN Wla SL Bre. 201 e0rrrw, MN 55012 •51 -450.0606 .,T , A )".'..r. m_ ,' OAK PARK SENIOR LIVING . % 7-- OAK PARK '3 HEIGHTS, MN a BUILDING 3 PLANT LIST • a VI �� ... - -.. 1 a ' ' li • , „ 014 Revisions W00% / . — — 04 ," —r , ;jai Item Date .14_ 4,,, ____ O /� I. ^1• 1 : 111 0 I 4111. 40 4.0 4., • ' a ' I • G Registration Information �- • r C S I hereby o rtuy M this plan, , �� me or under vent prepared n der mY t au of Min n, and i that I am • duly Lensed Architect under the on, r the report State of pared y Printed Name =WIN MICHAEL I. DIEM i , S DATE 0......_ License a �• 10 r 16/ . . - ° . I l Sheet Information N ®DIMLDIN6 S Wb3GAPIN PLAN 6 AN v EXHIBIT 1 2 LANDSCAPING PLAN 1— S— t-) Protect M.: I1 -151 Drawing Me : O Mews By : a O or UJ 09.0.0 av: MD L1.2 > Dale : 10-19 -11 LJJ V uJ ©2010 ADCHNET, Inc. CZ ARCHNET - -- BrOMOETYP. Ell 1111 111 FL a • - 1 IIM: 77f NffBY fl. 2OI �r - i 8tlY•B -4 ffN 56O02 _ - f1tt�Inctuu.COm 43 STALLS TOTAL i11 • 1 I I I I I I I I J I MB� Q p Q a PHASE 1 O 'M PA � N.EVEL wiz** 1 OS 1.1111181 OAK PARK HEIGHTS, MN SIORAOETTP. �• it 1 Revisions -; Item Date • STORAGE • 55 STALLS TOTAL `' I I II r I o a STADI. D . 0 71D ELEVATOR, AIR, Lei ices" 11=j lace= 2. Registration Information hereby certify that this plan, Me ., . me or my direct supervision, and Oct 1 em • duly Licensed Architect under ri Printed Name a Mlnnes w Printed Name MICHAEL F. DIEM • b Signature �� di DATE License DATE tcew . Sheet Information PARKING LEVEL BUILDING 1 &2 c c C EXHIBIT 13 � � �'°"° ` A1.01 L ChecaW By: MFD O PARI®10 LEVEL BUILDING 2(33 MGM tN• • 1'.y Date : 10-19 -11 ©2010 ARCHNET, Inc. LI / 0 ARCHNET _ _ _ _ ©©D III II I I 1 stIllu.r , sav MU 45141001011 uehtodsw.com INSTALLS TOTAL ' .. RK 1 I SENOS VING Lit ' i <69 Jr'al PHASE 1 OAK PARK HEIGHTS, MN [ = \ - Revisions Item Date QI _ [_____ rd ,____- —..–.--■. Q Registration Information I under my me Mkrvbbna. 0 p ec9katlon, or report Information prepared by a at m uMM my direct wpe, and Sm9A0B M. M 1 a a duty lHaneed Architect under the laws of the Stab of Mmes. 4 Printed Name MICHAEL F. DIEM Signature I DATE License d „ 1 0-19 -11 16644 / ,E11.– \ - ; Sheet Information Q PARKING LEVEL BUILDING 3 EXHIBIT 14 p 11 -1,. DraalQNO: pAIMING LEVEL 9UR.DI003 A 3VWTS) Drawn SY: GAL /� I �tnr•rd Ch... eT : NFDA1 a 0 t Date t0-19 -11 L ©2010 ARGNNET, Inc. C ARCHNET le II El 111 IS COTTAGE TOWEL COTTAGE LOVYBl COTTAGE MILLTOWN .B.W.... YB.1.. J77 N 11i 7L 016. 201 /tlOBBBq 7124 55002 651.4700000 i i alchnctusa.00m ' — - / COMMON SPACE, COTTAGE COTTAGE COTTAGE LOWELL TOWER STAHL ELEVATOR to — OAK PARK ;�^ : SENIORS LIVING ` , PHASE 1 A. . s +BT. RO o PLAN auanwo, as torn /N' OAK PARK HEIGHTS, MN • / -- r r r r r 1 ' Revisions I I Item Date r c ITAae IOWBL I.OWEL LOWED HIVHBTOWN , — L. _ ii - r - COTTAGE COTTAGE COTTAGE L COTTAGE _ —_ _ y8q i / -14 COTTAGE Registration Information J "ffi ". J b I specification, ce that NU plan, J me or Under�my di supervision, and or g':•' that I under the duly Uceneed the Architect 1 Mlmeem COTTAGE Printed Name _r.,' MICHAEL F. DIEM ®D r 7 COTTAGE .. Signature „O._ i i DATE License # 1049.11 16804 BIVERTOWN EIVEETOWN Sheet Information EXHIBIT 1 t 1ST FLOOR i LAN BUILDING Q I_ -J J L -_. _. . Protect No : Il -164 Drawing No : Drawn By : CAL C U. A1.11 (OwckW BY: MDF � is, ROOR UNIT) Date : 10 -19-11 L1. L 03010 AHCNNET, Inc a ARCHNET s ,_ , .iel...de..tr 111N AWN IL IN& 201 WW01 COTTAGE COTTAGE COTTAGE LOW®L LOWElL �ItE,MN 11002 ut4100WN h 49 1:,.t s _ � � s ° OAK PARK `;; � , , 1 .. .. COTTAGE LOWm, gWEIL TT OAK PARK HEIGHTS, MN LOWELL Revisions Item Date 1 LOWS L I. LOWEL _ J I LOWELL ARC - - -. —1 ' COTTAGE Registration Information 1 S: _ - _, I hereby certify Drat this Plan, m si motor., or report was prepared by I under my direct sunervlalan, and ` COTTAGE I - that i am a duly Licensed Architect -- 1 * . under the laws of ti,. stew a �, Minneso. Printed Name el . - -.. MIC HAEL F. DIEM I Li OOTTAGE STAR yy Signature DATE License J 10 -19 -11 16341 r- tOWE L LOWmL i I Sheet Information EXHIBIT U L 1ST. FLOOR PLAN BUILDING _ ProLCt No : 11 -191 Orew9,9 No : Dm.. By : CAL 18T. ROOO PLAN i11LON(rJ(6J UPC) Checked BY: MiD r A 1.1 i t 1HS•1'd' Date : 10-19-11 t 132010 AECHNET, Inc. t ARCHNET I � ..... Iii_..., • mom ' lNW L - I 737 N141•111.11126 201 wt1 S O6f ION 55002 6514300606 r L aTCLaeh7t61.com r • L OAK PARK L VI Ilipiiiip ' L ' L L ' i SE NIORS LIVING - L — ( � — - - -J PHASE 1 • t 2 . FLOOR IRAN EULDeIO t 116 iNITI I Y a Ovr.ra OAK PARK HEIGHTS, MN r r ` % r - A Revisions .• ' ii is l gal i -I Item Date r L • • COTTAGE COTTAGE COTTAGE -- j L L , L iii _ COTTAGE __ Registration Information I COTTAGE � I hereby certify that this plan, speaflutbn, on report we. Prepared by or under my direct supervision, and + that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the lees of the State of L -- Minns,. LOrrA 8 ' Minr ` J ; J I Printed Name ® r r co , T ,,� MICHAEL F. DIEM Signature • DATE License # 10-19 -11 16849 W®tTOWN RIVERTOWN r 1 Sheet Information 2ND. FLOOR PLAN BUILDING 1 &2 LJ , a rplect No : 11 -159 Drawing No : r Drawn By : GL C EXHIBIT 1 ? en A1.21 ` O L y10.FL ODR PLAN BUILDING 2(33 tR2In Date: 10-19-11 L 002010 MCi1NET, Inc. L ■ ARCHNET ©©© 1.oWHl. corrACt¢ corrAOE CdrtwGe Wweu LO WELL ' '. W h al e s,m. 11/5 201 le/ IW®IIOWN -1 . 3040 55052 45143040M arcs rn.com :/' wrrA� coru® CVrfA� oorco WwP�L WW BL g nrvFxroKm OAK PARK 4 PHASE 1 SENIORS LIVING O AK PARK HEIGHTS, MN 1 Revisions Item Date I LOWE L. 4 11 , — r- wean ` I LOWELL , .; / COTTACiE I! _ --I Registration Information E - , 1 hereby certify that Mh plan, I rk I t ha t a m or report e may e 4 —1.'1 that I am a duly licensed Architect under the laws of the State of Mirm innea oe - . Printed Name r MICHAEL F. DIEM COTTAGE IL scAal Signature DATE License #' 10-19-11 10-19-11 lceaa i � r LOWELL WW LL l Sheet Information • L _ J EXHIBIT 1 8 2ND. FLOOR PLAN BUILDING ■ i PreNCt No : 11 -150 pawing No : 1 Drawn By : CAL t O AND. FLOOR PUN BUILOMO 3(52 UNIT) A 1. 2 t mr•ra ChKked By : MFD Date : 10 -19-11 C t 0010 MCHNET, in L c ARCHNET r. Il • I SUN I■ rpm SUN I ' • i ■I SUN • I ROOM ROOI,, ROOM PATIO r•Wtllere.I 4.lele PAn o hit , d xd I — ,dxd d PAT1 ldxd ti 1o'xY =Mime= aesiga 11' %7• 1:1%r R I B M k ltte. 201 _ _ — — 11■eme=MN 550112 1141-4304406 .■ LNf n I _ [ archnetusa.com ° ■ ,2 BED ROOM ■ ■ f % ■ fix i< LIVING OAK PARK t■EDROOA" ® ■asp'p Ja 1a x1Y fix le' D 1Y 5 S ENIOR LIVING a, ■a■ 1"ll ■■■ "n 1 ■■■ ■1 I ► Viii sill I :eTe• \' ■1ri �ag; fi' rivl .;■ ■ ■ 11 1111 o ■a 1__■ 1■O■1 - -1 , 1 1 . 11 ' MOW � cO nn �r� � . � .. ■■ . � �OO�I HEIGHTS, MN 1 ■■ ■I 1 ■.c\ ■ ►/1 1 ,110 Is i . , 1 iii 1 �� I C•IlJ1■ : . ■fi'1l�II ■■ .■ � {I I. — 1 A.A. • i ■ ■� Q I ■fI11{Yi1 ■Mt lu ■■■�I1t ■ 1� "iL Ce' '. • p 11G.■ ■1 i1r4■I ■■■■ ' 11 ■■ I — \..■ . ' mi l ..P ]i� rumna maw .o lol EN O :Ell mr. •11 - AFTON LOWELL COTTAGE Revisions 1,248 S.F. 1,248 S.F. 892 S.F. Item Date 5 TOTAL 63 TOTAL 98 TOTAL I� I L I . :: I !dwu dl I BEDROOM i l l [ win t 1f %1 SUN , E Y x ■o. I • 9 .. O 80011 ❑ l _ O ' 041171.11 7 aP 9 1 ❑ C(71 ■897. ll I • I _ , III ■ r � ! ' .�■ r.�l Registration Information in .fn , SUN LIVING I thereby certify that MN Nen, - e ' RaaM ■ ■■ ■ 1■■■ ROOM specification, or feat w. ProPerad IN ► ita - � ' I e' %10' ■11 1 il■ ■W 17 PATIO der my direct wwlwbn,.M ■ •, I .NW 7' %1A' that l am a duly licensed Anyllt O i■ . ■1t under the laws of the State of Minnesota 111 ,, ma :=■ , I Printed Name ^ I, 1 ■ ■ RI t I . i ■ ■1 Imi■■■ MICHAEL F. DIEM ■ C \ ■1 1■ 111111111: DEN Signature �\ ■■p L , 1 atla ■■■■■■ swim MMM C . ti %ti .111\ r'' •■61NS 11■ =■_ DINING - 1■■ ■LI.irY •• ,‘*•.-'' E 1 7 r - 1L � ' ■711:4 [ p■ ■it , . rt i ■1 i■ =i - al.■■ ! : ... -. , ■1f •I I.�L] ■ ■ ex. . 1 .■■ _ s 9. O,O -- wr ex.. IMAM, i \ ' I DATE i re a RIVERTOWN �.. •■•. ■ ■' Mµae , 1,457 S.F. t „ � . j IM`°'v� CM 35 TOTAL ` � r ` i �vl sheet information UNIT PLANS CO �j U � Project No : 11-154 Drawing Na : 0 THE ST. CROIX EXHIBIT 9 Drawn ”` a o • 1,549 S.F. Checked MD A2.0 w 6 TOTAL as 1.19-13 ©2010 ARCHNET, Inc. L31 W ARCHNET - © © 1 ,- > ' 1111141- ee.� dada* e ms " 33 3 N Main St. Ste. 201 Stillwater, MN 55082 �,{� 651- 430-0606 archlnetusa.COW i toil001111°°. OAK PARK i xuu ,� SENIORS LIVING -1 1 �.i PHASE 1 S. ._ iiiii.: _ — ..... OAK PARK HEIGHTS, MN MOO ma _.. 1�R .+e 'it kl. a.. - _. Revisions . I I I ! I I Registration Information 1 __ IMreby certify thee as pan — - I I I --yam , .. 1 r I Krtbry «r.iwc wK V nwnd St I 7 I uwx my aw t s .w +w.n ua that I em a duly Licensed Architect esker the laws of the Stata of 0 Manes. Printed Name MICHAEL F. DIEM t o ?y, '„ Signature �� - I DATE License if i ?I l0 -]9-]I Li - "� - 4 i' � I • � __ ... —... Sheet Information >— �' s.rr oaw 0.4. waled I__. BUILDING I ELEVATIONS � e 1 ! !*F — ' ar ., .. � D .a er : cu A3 Lry Checked Dr: -MFC A3 a 0 °' W0.DNCtIIOHIH ® E T: 1, 1 O t /1T•1'-0' Dan: ]0 -]9 -ll r� EXHIBIT 2 ©2e10 ARCHNET, 10c. W , ARCHNET a©© arehlteelre • Ogaden ..� K...._ . r .. a _r • 333N Hale St. Sic 201 ' : Slmeaur, M4 55082 • ` - • s ; 65630.0606 t �` lll archnetUSff.CU & a � , .., OAK PARK ` ',,, SENIORS LIVING .:.., PHASE 1 OAK PARK HEIGHTS, MN i _ — i ::I ::I _ i G:.._. ��_ ._ F 7_ r- „ 7 : 11,1 11 ii *T'P ■ 1 ; .. t t .. .. _ _ �i Ill - _. ` - Revisions � r f ,, . -_ .�_ AMt" _ tea Date e e I '+nti p^xmYU. a ..n. .aruurnyynres +•a k I • a:,.: roa z mweW. ow °wescom . �.� - - - i .. e + .. zs - Registration Information ■ i kii&fir I �.. . ._ f r rm A_ - -. I ... ... <_. _...... spec ..- 11 ' ]y9` V lhercnY Ceres was pre M1 specification , w re was Dreparetl by r m area =uDeraron, nna = -s.nr t - _ ,.1"14 _ . . — su.. '__' '. — " ,• • r_LOOR �l [Oat l am dWY llceK¢tl Arch tea �I uM the bws ul the SGte d wo vTr Printed Name 0 BULt• DWG ane-1 -( EAST MICHAEL nature EM ve • ra ms -ro DATE License ,1t is -Is -11 10544 -- _______r_ _ / �.,._,%`�� , ' .��� Igjft, s - Sheet Information �...� ... ... I I I 4Ih I BUILDING 2 ELEVATIONS pr, 81.108 Dra.ang ee: Drawn By : Author ARCHNET, Inc �w,pwazN ^e I Checked By : Checker A3.1 vls'•1 U EXHIBIT 2 1 Date: lo-taa/ L r EXHIBIT 2 1 c >20. c >20. . Li R ARCHNET ,, architecture • talerlNa _ sustainable &Nip 333 N Male St. Sits 201 Stillwater, MN 550112 �J 651. 430-0606 i,;- , archnetusa.com a : �' 3, OAK PARK [ III a SENIORS LIVING a PHASE 1 :, OAK PARK HEIGHTS, MN I r I I I Revisions a ( I Date i I _ ii • -- I rrroe \ wwa Registration Information wme ep..p ap.p� v rwnave ucnrecvx 1 cart of r a t apeo.r n, or r ti sew., <cun .cru, . - � ' - ' report Oared by -u.n e•ra rno i 19-r71,-,f0 ..f'I-1— - 1� � -.._ _. - ... y ' a � . l �\ 1 11 mY Elractsu ar lon.and pee ... that am a duty Ucensed Alter. cttw awtt..lo r I I I I I I ® ®•• •• c under Ow laws of the State d —1 •\ �. I Minn.. . Printed Name I F 10Q s MICHAEL F. DIEM O 8U0.DMG HORTH IWEST EIEV. SIM I Signature nE .1'-0 DATE License # 10-19 -1l 16844 • Sheet Information BUILDING 3 ELEVATIONS r-- (0' .� _ II IlE11 _s — - v — \ >� I I I I I� I A I : r I � I I _. - prows No : C t 11 - 1511 Drawing No : C a w.. - I. a I _.. I ..e - I ' _I S' I .., ....,�, Drawn ey: MFD U 1 ouiLsUG 3 EAST (SOUTH ELEV. slid PORTICO DETAIL c'''''° os � cos A3.2 mr•r� Drte: 10 -19 -I1 EXHIBIT 2? C©20106R0MET, Inc. • • '4l lIliillIlIllu 4urwr /, I ..,3411141L_ � � 1 ' ! � __i 00000n000 - irrr! -. a'' ►.owe __ aIN =r -.= i� o _II ■ __ _ ^^ff II I ... I = I a000� - II�' Il plf� TT Ii 7 i I A ■ 'I' = 10 •I LI = I == no o \ � - 1 I III! I �I� I� jr _ ITirr � VIEW FROM NOVA SCOTIA ENTRANCE LOOKING EAST EXHIBIT 2 3 RECEIVED OCT 19 2011 • PROPOSED 3 STORY PROPOSED 2 STORY EXISTING 4 STORY SENIORS 'S � _. � _. I , 1 ����, ,C . „ IMIMMI air � I��d i_ i �- Ti. I11i� ® ®I ,li _ n■� � ' ; ' 1 I 1 s w ∎Ins ��� __n — � I-- u-- ■ . I inr- il�I� r I I n r •_L - - - -Y — .............. . - •..... — n .— -- ' 'I ,�I d r 1 1 . ; T I ,_T '_ n n r- �In nrr�n � � ��n����n,� . �_ VIEW FROM POND LOOKING NORTH EAST �. EXHIBIT 2 4 RECEIVED OCT 19 2011 :,'.8ifiX3 T71,1(-)..')VI T 11;11 11 11 71.1 :).\trra 111 ot\irAri .Irc)r&T,:lc ,VWVcr .4C . . . . • . ti4i, 1. J. 1 -- ,*, 1.7, li '3 ..1 . . . — ''''" ---- - - - / .- - - •.'N, , ' .... ,., J. ii -.T_ a a a ,. . -<(;; "'"!.;;- • .,-, . _ . . , ..-4 . •, , ..- . . • ..,.' - _•. i; — I .. . ..,..,.,;„•'''.. _ _ . . . •'''''''.',' .. ., ..,•,-,,,',,....':.- ,,:,' - ' '' ' -'''._,''.:„'•,':,..:'''' i ''''''`..\''`''' . ...,,,..,, ,.._ . . . . . ..... . , .••di; ' ,,., , . „'* ,,,:.,,, .:, ._ ,,‘'• - „,..-:•',.\*‘,•,- ,, ,,,,,,..„ .., •,.-4;0 ' ''., --'-' : - . - ,..,-.7-:;:e...,;' . .' 1 .rr: - .; , ,t)' , ..- .. . , : , ,,,.. '1'.,'::;,, .',,,'..: ,•,,.. --., -';., ' Folz, Freeman, Erickson, Inc. T F E N W�E I S LAND PLANNING • SURVEYING • ENGINEERING September 13, 2011 Mayor and City Council City of Oak Park Heights 14168 Oak Park Blvd. N. Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 RE: PUD Amendment — Oakgreen Commons — Oak Park Senior Living Phase I Dear Mayor and Council Members: On behalf of my client, Mr. Tim Nolde, we are submitting documentation for the revision or amendment to the Oakgreen Village PUD. Due to market driven conditions we are once again submitting for a change in regard to the previously approved use of the Oakgreen Village and Oakgreen Ponds area. The proposed submittal reduces the number of townhome units from 44 in the Oakgreen Village Platted Area to 15 units. The townhomes in the Oakgreen Ponds Plat would all be eliminated. The proposed change would be to add 111 units to the Oak Park Senior Living Phase I Addition, and constructing 8 of the remaining townhomes. The proposed plan would incorporate construction similar to that of the existing senior living building recently constructed over the past year. These units would be considered more of a "Brownstone" style of unit to accommodate the current market trend. As part of this PUD Amendment, TIF Financing is requested for the amount of $1,200,000. This request does not include the earlier created District; therefore, we do not need any consent from Bondholders and other interested parties. Construction of the proposed units for Phase I, would begin as soon as approvals are given. We have a neighborhood meeting scheduled for October 4 with other meetings to follow. We look forward to working with the City in finalizing this development. Thank you again for your support and patience. Sincerely, Folz, Fre , Erickson, Inc. odd A. Erickson, PE EXHIBIT 2 6 1244555th Street North, Lake Ehno, MN 55042 • Phone: (651) 439-8833 • Fax: (651) 430-9331 • Webdte: www.11b-inc.com Bruce A. F 4 ZS Timodig LS Todd A PS 1939.1001 Julie Hultman From: K.D. Widin <kdwidin @comcast.net> Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2011 11:43 AM To: Scott Richards; Eric Johnson; Mark Vierling (E- mail); Betty Caruso; Julie Hultman Subject: Oak Park Senior Living - Review of Landscape Plan and Tree Replacement Scott - I have done an additional review of the landscape plan for the Oak Park Senior Living development and the tree replacement requirement for the PUD as a whole. 1. The comment (2 d), in my review of the landscape plan dated 10/21/11, regarding trees on the west property boundary was answered; however, there are still trees depicted in the landscape plan to be planted over the east boundary of the property into the road r.o.w for Oakgreen Ave.. The simulated image included does not show these trees, but the trail and landscape plans show them( ?). Are trees to be planted in the r.o.w. or not? If not, the depiction of trees in that r.o.w. should be changed on the revised landscape plan to show where these trees will be planted. 2. Plant Material - As I read over my reviews of earlier landscape plans for this PUD, I had raised the same issues with some of the plant material in the earlier plans, such as replacing eastern pin oak with northern pin oak. I recommend that the developer be asked to submit a revised landscape plan for Oak Park Senior Living incorporating the recommended changes of plant material listed in my report of 10/21/11. One additional recommendation is that the Ky. coffee trees, depicted on the west side of the development, not be planted in the narrow medians in the proposed additional parking area since they are a large tree. It would be better to plant smaller ornamental trees, such as serviceberry or thornless cockspur hawthorn, in the narrow parking lot medians. 3. Planting Detail - Please ask the developer to submit a diagrammatic detail of how the trees and shrubs are to be planted. This is a required part of any landscape plan submitted to the city. The city requires deveopment projects and contractors installing plant material to adhere to the approved planting detail. 4. Tree Replacement Requirement - 366 cal. in. of trees planted for replacement are proposed in the landscape plans submitted for the north building (landscaping already in place) and the current proposed phase. Subtracting these replacement cal. in. listed in the two landscape plans, from the calculated tree replacement requirement (4/27/09) for the development of 1,521 cal. in., results in a re- calculated tree replacement requirement of 1,155 in.. Since only 366 in. of replacement trees are proposed to be planted on the development site, there is a "cash in lieu of tree planting" (1,155 cal. in. x $50. /cal. in.) requirement of $57,750. per the OPH Tree Protection Ordinance 1307. Monies are to be paid to the City of OPH by the developer and placed in the OPH Tree Planting Fund. Has this amount been paid by the developer yet? Please include this information in the Planning Report for this development. Contact me if you have any questions regarding this review or report. Kathy Widin OPH Arborist 1 EXHIBIT 2 7 Stantec Consulting Services Inc. 2335 Highway 36 West St. Paul MN 55113 Tel: (651) 636 -4600 Stantec (651) 636 -1311 Stantec #' Bonestrmo November 2, 2011 Mr. Eric Johnson City Administrator City of Oak Park Heights 14168 Oak Park Blvd., P.O. Box 2007 Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 -2007 Re: Oak Park Senior Living — Phase 1 Plan Review Bonestroo File No.: 000055 - 11000 -1 Dear Eric: We have reviewed the site development plans received for Oak Park Senior Living, Phase 1, as submitted by Folz, Freeman, Erickson, Inc. on October 12, 2011. Following are our comments and /or recommendations. Sheet 2 — Master Plan & Traffic Analysis 1. The traffic analysis has been reviewed and the trip calculations have been verified. The trip generations at the peak hours (AM and PM) are fairly low and are not of concem. Sheet 4 — Site Drainage /Grading Plan /Snow Removal 1. The existing storm sewer in the southwest corner of the site needs to be shown on an existing layer. 2. Show the redefined drainage and utility easement for the 21" diameter storm sewer between Building 1 and 2 on both Sheets 4 and 5. 3. The 21" diameter storm sewer shall be reinforced concrete pipe (RCP). 4. All storm sewer design data needs to be displayed (rims, inverts, structure type and sizes, pipe slopes, and material). 5. The existing catch basin located just north of Building 2 shall be verified as being a sump catch basin manhole for sediment and debris removal, prior to discharging into the northern pond. If this catch basin structure is to remain, the former pipe opening to the south requires bulkhead. 6. Another catch basin needs to be considered within the 46 stall parking lot for Buildings 1 and 2. The entire western parking lot sheet drains across the driveway entrance. Sheet 5 — Utility Plan 1. Rather than abandoning the existing sanitary and storm sewer as labeled, the pipe and structures need to be removed. 2. The existing hydrant !orated in the driveway entrance to the Building 1 and 2 parking lot needs to be relocated. EXHIBIT 2 8 SIM IteC Oak Park Senior Living — Phase 1 Plan Review Page 2 of 2 Sheet 6 — Lighting Plan 1. Verify proposed light poles do not conflict with existing and proposed utilities. Preliminary Plat 1. Identify "NEW DRAINAGE EASEMENT" for storm sewer between Buildings 1 and 2 as "NEW DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT ". 2. Out lot A needs to show the 10' wide drainage, utility, and trail easement on the north side of 58 Street North. General Comments 1. The scales shown on the 11 "x17" size plans are not accurate and need to be shown correctly. 2. Several City standard detail plates are provided as attachments. 3. Records plan drawings showing as -built information need to be provided at completion of construction. If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact me at (651) 604 - 4808. Sincerely, STANTEC • Christopher W. Long, P.E. Attachments: Detail Plates — Complete Set cc: Andy Kegley, Public Works Director Jim Butler, Building Official Scott Richards, City Planner Mark Vierling, City Attorney Kath Widin, City Arborist Todd Erickson, FFE MAH, File - Stantec