Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
11-29-11 Council Packet
CITY Or OAK PARK HEIGHTS TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 29, 2011 CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA 7:00 P.M., or upon conclusion of workscssion 7:00 p.m. 1. Call to Order/Pledge of Mlemi of A renda Estimated times 7:05 p.m. 11. Department/Council Liaison Re ports A. Planning Commission B. Parks Commission C. Water Management Organizations D. Other Liaison /Staff reports 7:10 p.m. Ill. Visitors /Public Comment Recycling Award (1) This is an opportunity 1t)r 1he public to address the COtii?CH With qucslior }s or concerns on issues 1101 hart of the regular agenda (Please limit comments to 3 minutes in length). 7:15 p.m. IV. Consent Agenda (Roll Call Vote) A. Approve Bills & Investments B. Approve City Council Minutes — November 15, 2011 (2) C. Authorize Purchase and Placement of Additional Used Camera in Council Chambers (3) 7:20 p.m. V. Public Hearings A. Truth -in- Taxation Hearing: Proposed 2012 Budget and Tax Levies — Review and Discussion 7:40 p.m. VI. Old Business A. City Hall Facility 7:40 p.m, V11. New Business A. 2012 Water and Sewer Rate Study and Resolutions (4) B. P.W. Ford F550 Vehicle Purchase (5) C. Oak Park Heights — Oak Park Senior Living Phase I — Planned Unit Development Amendment (6) D. Oak Park Heights — Oak Park Senior Living Phase 11— Planned Unit Development Amendment (7) 8:00 p.m. VIII. Adjournment I Oak Park Heights Request for Council Action Meeting Date November 29, 2011 Agenda Itcm Recycling Award Time Req. 0 Agenda Placement Visitors /Public Comment Originating Department /Requcstor Adipinistration /Je Pinski Requester's Signature t Action Requested � Receive I n form atio�l Background /Justification (Please indicate any previous action has been taken or if other public bodies have been advised). See Attached. CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS 14168 Oak Pal I< Boulevard No. • 1 Box 1007 •Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 -2007 • Phone: C5 #/439 -4439 • Fax: fi,51 /439 0574 November 17, 2011 Lori Tauffen 5411 Ojibway Avenue North Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 Dear Ms. Tauffen: Thank you for participating in the City's recycling program. As an incentive to recycle and to increase fire prevention awareness, the City rewards two residents each month with their choice of an award of $25.00 or a fire extinguisher and /or smoke detector(s). Your residence was 'checked on Thursday, November 17, 2011, to determine if you had your recycling bin out with your regular garbage. Your recycling was out and ready for collection; therefore, you are one of this month's winners. Please contact me at 439 -449 at your convenience to arrange for delivery of the reward of your choice, On behalf of the Oak Park Heights City Council, thank you for participating in the City's recycling program. Co gratulati sJ fer Pinski Deputy. Clerk Tree City U.S.A. Oak Park Heights Request for Council Action Meeting Date November 29, 201 Agenda Item Ap2Kqye Cit Council Minutes — November l 5, 2 1 Time Req. 0 Agenda Placement Consent Originating Department/Requestor Adn /.len Pi Requester's Signature Action Requested A pprove Background /Justification (Please indicate any previous action has been taken or if other public bodies have been advised). See Attached. CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 15, 2011 CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES I. Call to Order/Pledge of Allegiance/Approval of Agenda: Mayor Beaudet called the meeting to order at 7:10 p.m. Present: Councilmembers Abrahamson, McComber, Runk, and Swenson. Staff present: City Administrator Johnson, City Attorney Vierling, Public Works Director Kegley, finance Director Caruso, and City Engineer Long. Absent: City Planner Richards. Mayor Beaudet added "Accept St. Croix River Crossing Impact Report" to the Consent Agenda as Item f, and moved New Business Item C. to the Consent Agenda as Item G. Councilnnember McComber, seconded by Councilmember Swenson, moved to approve the Agenda as amended. Carried 5 -0. Liaison Reports: ,.,,,.,... A. Planning Commission: Councilmember Abrahamson reported that the next meeting was scheduled for December 15 at 7:00 p.m. B. Parks Commission: Councilmember McComber reported that the Parks Commission's next meeting was set for November 21 at 7:00 p.m. She also reported that there was a vacancy on the Parks Commission and requested that persons interested in serving on the committee contact City Hall. C. Water Management Organizations/Middle St. Croix: Mayor Beaudet reported that the next meeting of the Middle St. Croix Watershed Management Organization was scheduled for December 8 at 7:00 p.m. at the Washington Conservation District Office. D. Other Liaison /Staff Reports: Mayor Beaudet reported that Truth in Taxation Hearing Notices were mailed to residents. He requested residents read through the letter that was included with the Notices. III. Visitors /Public Comment: A. Visitor John Doty of 5862 Oxboro Avenue North questioned who would pay utility relocation fees for the St. Croix River Bridge Crossing Project. He was provided with the St. Croix River Crossing Impact Report. City Council Meeting Minutes November 15, 2011 Page 2 of 4 B. Rec, chug Award Deputy Clerk Pinski reported that Craig and Jennifer Abrahamson of 5600 Osgood Avenue North were chosen as the recycling award winners. IV. Consent Agenda: A. Approve Bills & Investments B. Approve City Council Minutes — October 25, 2011 C. Authorize Deputy Clerk to Plan Employee Recognition Event D. Approve Renewal of Blue Cross /Blue Shield Employee Health Insurance with the South Central Service Cooperative E. Fund Balance Policy as Developed for Compliance with GASB 54 and the Maintenance of Unassigned Fund Balances F. Accept St. Croix River Crossing Impact Report G. Award Tree Pruning and Removal Bid Councilmember MCComber, seconded by Councilmember Runk, moved to approve the Consent Agenda. Roll call vote taken. Carried 5 -0. V. Public Hearings: None VI. Old Business: A. Valley View Park Entrance: Councilmember Abrahamson, seconded by Councilmember McComber, moved to not move forward with the purchase of the property. Carried 5 -0. B. City Hall Facility --Geothermal: Randy Engel of Buetow and Associates, architects for the City Hall facility, provided a letter to the City Council that lie received from the general contractor with an offer to remedy the problems with the compressors within the heat pumps. Engel reported that he wanted to meet with the general contractor and City staff to obtain more information. Engel stated he would provide an update at the next City Council meeting. Mayor Beaudet, seconded by Councilmember Runk, moved to provide $2500 out of council contingency to have staff's recommended bidder review information to provide their opinion for the next council meeting; on whether replacing current compressors with Copeland compressors was advisable. Carried 5 -0, City Administrator Johnson reported that he spoke with Shawn Whelan of Dunham regarding the security system. Johnson stated that Whelan did City Council Meeting Minutes November 15, 2011 Page 3 of 4 not feel an investigation of the security system would be beneficial. Whelan suggested that the City find out which type of cable was installed for the system to determine if it was compatible. Johnson reported that the information was requested by the City from the architect and general contractor. C. Pressure Reducing Station - Update: City Administrator Johnson reported that the costs to install a pressure reducing station were substantially higher than initially thought. Mayor Beaudet suggested that raising the water pressure may be a solution. Ile suggested staff discuss evaluating the number of valves there were and send a letter to the residents that the water pressure would be raised. Staff was directed to come back with this issue at the first meeting in December. D. sTH 5 & 58` Street Signalization W Timing I'rojcct _ Was11i�1gtan County Mayor Beaudet suggested that the City would do the work if the County came up with half the funding. Ile also suggested the City contact the school district as the timing would alleviate stacking issues at the 1 -ligh School. Mayor Beaudet, seconded by Councilmember Swenson, moved that the City would participate up to half of the cost estimate and that the City Heeds to partner with either the school district or the county. Carried 5 -0. VII. New Business: A. Tax Forfeited Lands — Parcel #04.029.20.13.0063 Mayor Beaudet, seconded by Councilmetnber McComber, moved to suggest to the County that they allow the adjacent landowners to purchase the lands before going to public auction. Carried 5 -0. B. Submittal of Comments to Washington County_ - Draft 2012 -2016 CIP Mayor Beaudet stated that the County needed to address whether the plan was just trails or a crosswalk, too. Councilmember McComber requested clarification. Beaudet questioned what happened to the 1999 Comprehensive Plan where the entire trail was included and why it was not completed. He also wanted to know if the County was ready to participate in the Safe Routes to School Grant Program. Mayor Beaudet, seconded by Councilmember McComber, moved to direct the City Administrator to write a letter to the County requesting clarification, what happened to the 1999 comp plan where the entire trail was included, why wasn't it completed, and question if they were willing to participate in Safe Routes to School Grant Program. Carried 5 -0. City Council Meeting Minutes November 15, 2011 Page 4 of 4 C. MOVED TO CONNENI'AGENDA VIII[. Adjournment Adjourned at 8:00 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Approved as to Content and born, Jennifer Pinski David Beaudet Administrative Secretary /Deputy Clerk Mayor Oak Park Heights Request for Council Action Meeting Date November 29` 2011 Time Required: 1 Minute Agenda Item Title: Authorize Purchase and Placement of Additional Used Camera in Council Chamber. Agenda Placement Consent Agenda. Originating Department /Requcsto Er' Johnson Citv Administrator Requester's Signature , Action Requested Authorise Pur chase and Placement of Additional used camera in Counc Chamber Background /Justification (Please indicate if any previous action has been taken or if other public bodies have advised): , In summer 2011, the City Council explored the possibility of replacing the video cameras in Council Chambers with digital upgrades. Those costs were decided to be high at this time, but would be explored in the future. One other element of that discussion was to improve the ability of the current cameras so the viewer at home can have a better angle for which to see speakers at the dais. This would be achieved via the installation of an additional camera with focus presets. This would allow the operator to simply press a button and move from person to person without having the need to focus the camera and would presumably improve the in -home watching experience. The current camera facing the dais does not have this ability. Mr. Fixmer prepared a total price of $499.99 for the installation of a use camera that would achieve this concept. This new camera would be mounted above the door leading into the conference room If the Council is amenable to the expense, funds could /should be taken from the significant fund balance of the City Hall Project, +/- $60,000. Eric Johnson From: KENNETH M FiXMER [Don Fixmer @msn.com] Sent: Friday, November 18, 2011 2;18 PM To: Eric Johnson Subject: Fw: OPHs Camera & Accessories FYI - - - -- Original Message - - - -- From: KENNETH M �=IXVIIER To: v<cty a7v� iv.r�rc Sent: Friday, November fib, 2011 1:05 PM Subject: OPHs Camera & Accessories Greg, Here's the price breakdown of everything needed for installing the camera that I bought for OPHs City Hall: (1) - Used Panasonic model a WV -CS954 PTZ Camera $350.00 *Fra e-baX; (1) - New Panasonic model # -Q118 Wall Mount Bracket $69.99 Shipping 7.99 Sub Total $77.98 * From B &H Video (2) - Comprehensive 6 foot BNC -BNC cables @$11.19 each $22.38 (1) - Marshall Electronics 24 volt AC Power Supply 18,50 Shipping 5.60 Sub Total $46.48 Miscellaneous Mounting Hardware for Camera Bracket 25.53 * GRAND TOTAL $499.99 Hopefully, this will keep the price below $500, therefore eliminating the need for the OPHs City Council to have to approve it on Nov.29 Please confirm that you received this today, Friday, to my e -mail address. THANKSI l Don F. 1 5, Oak Park Heights Request for Council Action Meeting Date November 29 _ , 2011 Time Required: 15 minutes Agenda Item Title Proposed 2012 Budget and Tax Levies - Review and Discussion Agenda Placement PiA lot + �_ 'Ctr (VI Originating Department / Requestor Finance -- Betty Caruso Finance Director Requester's Signature Action Requested Review and public discussion of 2012 budget and tax levies Background/ Justification (Please indicate if any previous action has been taken or if other public bodies have advised ): s:• S , ae, Oak Park Heights Request for Council Action Meeting Date November 29, 2011 Agenda Item Title 2012 Water and Sewer Rate Study Time Required 5 Minutes Agenda Placement New Business Originating Department/ Requestor Finance -Betty Caruso, Finance Director Requester's Signature Action Requested Approve Rate Study, Rate Increase for Waterworks and Sanity Sewer, and Ada t Resolution for Rate Increases Background /Justification (Please indicate any previous action, financial implications including budget information and recommendations). See attached memo, rate study and resolutions. RESOLUTION NO. CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING WATER USAGE .RATES WITHIN THE CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS EFFECTIVE January 1, 2012 WHEREAS, the City of Oak Park Heights by resolution and ordinance regulates water usage rates within the City for all users; and, WHEREAS, a rate study has been conducted and completed by the Finance Director recommending water rate increases to accommodate the cost for administrating, managing, and providing municipal water services to the citizens of the City of Oak Park Heights and all properties connected thereto; and, WHEREAS, current demands upon the municipal water systems of the city necessitate the future construction of additional infrastructure and rehabilitation of existing infrastructure that must be paid for by users of the system; and, WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed said rate increases and determined the same to be fair and equitable. WHEREAS, the city ordinances provide for the implementation of rate increases by resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council for the City of Oak park Heights as .follows: That effective January 1, 2012, the City of Oak park Heights shall establish a municipal water rate for all users as follows: a. A quarterly rate of $1.59 for state water connection, and $1.94 per 1,000 gallons used for the first 15,000 gallons, with a per quarter minimum charge of $30.70. b. A rate of $2.55 per 1,000 gallons for water_ use above 15,000 gallons up to 50,000 gallons. c. A rate of $3.05 per 1,000 gallons for water use above 50,000 gallons up to 99,000 gallons. d. A rate of $3.92 per 1,000 gallons for water use above 99,000 gallons up to 200,000 gallons. e. A rate of $9.74 per 1,000 gallons for water use above 200,000 gallons Passed by the City Council for the City of Oak Park Heights this 29th day of November, 2011. David Beaudet, Mayor - ATTEST: Eric A. Johnson Administrator RESOLUTION NO. CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING SEWER USAGE RATES WITHIN THE CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS EFFECTIVE January 1, 2012 WHEREAS, the City of Oak Park Heights by resolution and ordinance regulates sewer usage rates within the City for all users; and, WHEREAS, a rate study has been conducted and completed by the Finance Director recommending a sewer rate increase to accommodate the cost for administrating, managing, and providing municipal sewer services to the citizens of the City of Oak Park Heights and all properties connected thereto; and, WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed said rate increase and determined the same to be fair and equitable. WHEREAS, the city ordinances provide for the implementation of rate increases by resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council for the City of Oak Park Heights as follows: That effective January 1, 2012, the City of Oak Park Heights shall establish a municipal sewer rate for all users as follows: a. A quarterly rate $4.14 per 1,000 gallons of water used for the first 15,000 gallons, with a per quarter minimum charge of $62.10. b. A rate of $9.93 per 1,000 gallons of water used over 15,000 gallons up to 50,000 gallons. C. A rate of $4.90 per 1,000 gallons of water used over 50,000 gallons d. Residential sewer rates are determined by the amount of water used in the March quarter of each year. Commercial, industrial, institutional and high density residential sewer rates are based on actual usage. Passed by the City Council for the City of Oak Park Heights this 29th day of November, 2011. David Beaudet, Mayor ATTEST: Eric A. Johnson Administrator Oak Park Heights Request for Council Action Meeting Date: November 29 2011 Agenda Item : P, W. Cord x550 Vehicle Purch Time Reel. 5 - Minutes Agenda Placement: New Busin Originating Department / Requestor: 1', blic Wo ,_A 1dyKc leY, Pu blic Works Directo Requester's Signature � , j -rr i Action Requested: Aclf orize the urchase of re nested vehicle Background /Justification (Please indicate any previous action has been taken or if other public bodies have been advised). Please seas attached memo for discussion. City of Oak Park Heights ... ................ .... 14 168 Oak Park Blvd N.* Box 2007 ® Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 Phone (651) 439-4439 Im 439-0574 Memorandum To: Eric Johnson, Administrator From: Andrew Kegley, Public Works Director CC. Mayor and Council Date. 11/21/2011 Re: Purchase Ford F550 The 1999 Ford 1550 is beginning to show signs of heavy wear and tear and therefore should be replaced to prevent high repair costs. Staff obtained quotes ftom Elk River Ford and Hudson Ford to essentially replace the existing truck with a 2012 triodel. talk River Ford offered vehicles at state contract pricing; fludson Ford quoted lower than the state contract pricing and offered a guaranteed trade in value of $11,500 for the City's existing 19991"550. Because the F550 has a special dump box and other equipment attached after market, staff submitted specifications for the chassis only and obtained separate quotes for added equipment. The total purchase price for the 1550 and equipment after trade in will be $37,695. This is an expected 2011 expenditure and will be funded from the budgeted projects vehicle replacement fund. "I'lie lowest quote breakdown and recommended purchase is as follows: Chassis: I ludson Ford $21,800 — Includes guaranteed trade in value of $11,500 and tax 1 - title Dump Box Truck Utilities $8,468 Plow Fred's Tire $5,510 Light Bar EAT] $1,917 Total $37,695 TREE CITY U.S.A. Quote Summary; Chassis Hudson Ford $31,920 — less guaranteed $11 ,500 trade in + tax and title $21,800 Elk River Ford $33,614 ---- less estimated $7,000 resale value + tax and title $28,851 Box Truck Utilities $8,468 Aspen Equipment $9,618 Plow Fred's Tire $5,510 Tire Prop: $5,745 )Bight Bar EATI $1,917 "Truck Utilities $2,477 2 TREE CITY U.S.A. v5sluoh MOM UUMIRMATIUM 11/1U/11 lu:44:10 ri ------ ... f Dealer: F58437 2012 F-- SERIES SD Page: I of 2 Order No: 8877 Priority: M3 Ord FIN: QG915 Order Type: 5B Price Level: 220 Ord PEP: 660A Cust/Flt Name: OAK PARK PO Number: RETAIL RETAIL FSH 1550 4X4 CHAS/C $37540 TELE TT MTR-PWR 141 WHEELBASE 1811 MOLDED BLK STEP 320 zi OXFORD WHITE LESS TPMS I CLTH 40/20/40 100 41H ENG BLK HEATER NC S STEEL 425 So STATE EmISS NC 660A PREF EQUIP Pj.<C-� 473 SNOW PLOW PKG 85 .XL TRIM 52B BRAKE CONTR.OLLR 230 572 AIR CONDITIONER NC 65Z AFT AXLE TANK NTC .AM/FM STER/CLK 99Y 6I,8L BFI V10 EN NC TOTAL BASE AND OPTIONS 41150 44T 5-SPD AUTOMAT TC Ne TOTAL 41150 TGB 22>5 1IIU0r, Tfd-kC 215 *THIS TS EBT AN INVOICE* X81 4.88 LTD SLIP 360 18000# GVWR PIKCY MORE ORDER INFO NEXT PAGE 90L PWR EQUIP GROUP 895 F8- -Next FI=Help F2- Return to Order F3/F!2=Veh Ord Menu, F4=Submit FS=Add to Library 5006 - MORE IATA IS AVAILABLE. QC08701 A-1 -'s Yo C�0 413' 0 1 All 0.41.An ATU Vk 7-,111 =CTRL, ORDER CONFIRMATION 09/01./1.1. 13:09:41- Dea er: F58437 2012 L -S] RIES SD Page: 2 of 2 Order. No„ 8877 Priority: K3 Ord FIN: QG915 Order 'Type; B Price: Level: 215 Ord PER: 660A Cusi. /Flt Name: OAT{ PARK PO Number RETAIL RETAIL 945 Wl-iIsEL STM KIT $410 Sri DLR ACCT ADJ Sig FLT ACC'1' CR FUEL CHARGE D4A NET .INV FLT OPT IBC DES` AND DELIV 995 `_I'O'.T'A:S:., BASE AND OPTIONS 4 0920 TOTAL IN r ����/�. 1, 77�`'�( 40920 F7 Prev FI=Help F2-Return to Orde F3/F!2-Veh Ord Menu F4 -Submit F5 --Adc to Library 0099 _ PRESS F4 TO 7UBr. I'1` QCO8 701 s,��, i. �n�7 199107np PM al �• LLK RI VER THE LAST OF THE UrrLE GUYS" FORD•GUQQE•JEEP 7211 ll 0 N 0X 304 l t,lk Ri�cr, 11\' x FAX Number Of l - foes iI1Cj €I(jlI1U CON!cl silts Phone: ELK RIVER FORD IM9 HGrCNAY 10 %Mi E(1 ill`.R,'.1lr i53J0 774 Rhone, ;7631271- 3 :3?8Fix ryry - (01 23'1- a Aj le P 110110: pr {, =S\ . I11VI,coi � OSy,',Y�'�r1f��.CV�S i K� }f)i osrat�ri CC __ -- _.... I Rentat! t r4i For your reN ie l (� J�' 999 +•� __ � Keith Osman From, Nikki Greer (fleet ,erfdj.comj Sent: Monday, October 24, 2011 8:28 AM To: kosra)anverfdj corn) Subject: FW Request for Quote on a Ford F550 - City of Oak Park Heights From: Andrew Kegs ey (riiailto: akegley (gc=tyofoakparktieights.con)j Sent; - Mursday, October 20, 2011 1:1$ PM To: 'fleet;c- ferfdj.con)' Subject: Request for Quote can a Ford F550 City of Oak Park Heights Hello, Please provide a quote for a ford F550. Attached are the specifications. The vehicle to quote on is a 2012 F550: • F550 4x4 chassis /cab 141 wheelbase • Oxford white . Ciotti bench seat Preferred equipment package XL trial A/C . Standard stereo . 6.81- V10 EyFI 5 speed automatic trans . 4.88 limited slip rear end 225 max traction tire 18000 GVWR package Power equipment package, power mirrors, power windows, Running boards, black molded step Engine block heater Snow plow package Brake controller . Integrated dash mount switches Please also include a price for a 9' long 96' wide with drop sides dump box. Separate this quote from the vehicle. Andy Kegley, Public Works Director City of Oak Park Heights 651,439.4439 -- Office 651.775.5759 - Cell ��� �� ��������� �������� �`&�������� ���0��� ��m��� ��m � m��� ]����m�� m�n���~n���� ,�m���� 17219kIYYI'10 N%VBLK 55330 763'441'2300 vVlY�Y.0l'l�Dl�l��l.�T'�LC(;Uy8.0 f S.wkw_-______-_____-_'____ |}^�o_ Keith Os'nan_--_______-__-_____-____ f,*' Citv�of W'�w �� -__-__'-�_-_______--_-____-- �ms|o. ___-'ovu'/y A C o C0R Horap"o,� _�-_______---_______�_'0^cp�^''e'(�J|�����3�-_- 0*n000-'-�____- »� `/«' '-___'___ ooie,0L. *__-________---_--__________-'-_'_-___-nn�nv/o/U/, ^_ --_- '__.____ -_--__ Co L Trade In or D�SCOUTI Liunse Fee Exp. DAI� Lion RccoicJing Fee Poo q Vic) ff Sirviw Contract Rus pay or T9 terms ol ibis CONTRACT were ag?eed kopon and (no CONTHACT %Iqned in ihN Th � S ark OFFE R to buy tho abo�e v0 You ab) awh!)rlize-i to nak deal eship on ine d.4to no,ed al hiP of th form, 11 DEAtER is arranqlni) credit for YOU, this CONTRACT Is 101 vllld int I a credit <11sclos.irij Is (nade a!; described In R"Wal, oi IMPORTANT L :TlilSt,.-IAYBEADi�iDINGC()tITRACT 2 and you liave accoplad the credit extended ANP, YOU N!AY LOSF ANY DEPOSITS IF YOU DO 01 1 - %TEDAU111 W1 PERFORM ACCORDING TO ITS TERMS. Accepted ...... -__-__' -----��___'__-__�_-_�� ---__. ' x��� 1 i HA I' 10:22:4 Den 2012 F-SER123 K' Page: 1 or Plicrity: 42 Crd FIN: QG915 0 r d o r P L i 1. r:2 v I Ord PEP: 660A 7uso/At Nam: CAK PAR-' TO WKer: AWA 1 1; RE TA 111 FSH F51C U4 CHAS/C S301f'.' 7EIE T! MTR-?WR 141" 1Y"))'_ i-' , " Llk', 'S, I "-I '� � "I ZI OXYQRD WEITE LESS �;AS CLTH 4WCAC 11 Wn PRIF EQ7:P PK, �?A AIR CONDICICNER .AM/IV ST7ROW YUEL CNART'll i :i" TOTAI 3AAY ANG G?V WS T;:� I. ll'! .3 TWA 18ijod GvWR P G!"? P to Me- Fo-Add to Uhrar'y S099 PUSS K TC SUBVIT Qc C 9 1 TRUCKO UTILITIES INC. 2370 English Street at Highway 36 St. Paul, Minnesota 56109 .. 2038 (651) 484 -3305 Fax: (651) 4.84 -0076 November 9, 2011 City of Oak Park Heights Mtn. Andy Swenson �€stia�>>5�ti W e are pleased to quote the following; for <a F550 chassis with 60" CIS:: 9' long x 96" wide 12" one piece: fold down sides 18" IV-Latch tailgate Front bulkhead with window and cal shield 10 gauge; steel sides & ends; 10 gaugo steal 1loor Includes side and tail gate traces 3" structural steel crossrrauaaalaesa.s oll 16" centers 5" stiucturaal channel Icaragsills Fully boxed perimeter tailgate: with 2 vertical braces 6" vertical side braces Paint b crack Model 1IR -5 20 EDM u d€;rbody hoist Electric hump Pourer up and power down Push button controls 5/8" steel hitch plate with intle -2 -511 ball ITV Plug; Installed complete including rear mind flaps NF,Tprice p er State Bid, $ 7924-,00 Tax: $ 544.78 Total: Youw truck equipment ec i (musts v Arumk tit "'H S.co M A W7, F A � �, WFJV . ...... C." 'Ar:"'l 1 V.1 A J,.", '�t'j' 1: �dA7rh! -!,i� TE .;� 0-st N-Aalu City Of Oak Park Heights Quote Number: Owe 0.9le Cowpct CiTY phore fi Cealer5hjp7 Flk R Fwo Contact; K I11 0 sn to -i Aspen Equipment is pleased to offer the following quotation for your consideration gy f jij5f-q,,j_Nd",ber Destination 1 5 293 'i!",F Readit-9 y-d! Ste-L! Du BQJ,. iWE A C. 12 gai-qQ A40-AGO cc,aj w") m?,t steel coill 0,joijs '.';P dai �- 7 gajge wilira i 11, .A Stri-cliral S'.Cu` i rhrowh 2-igiliou-1 Dc'jmle ,Val 10' J:30 -S'd9 or .Y,' 10 GA hrl -n'led' zltLl 12 ga go A40-AF.1) 00.11 ng -tei�zh I slEpl out-arwa I D 12 pi..g A40,AF1 coif steel full r =e:pt LJOik'a-5 12 ga.-qr_ A40 ACJ rmi3A P verz,pj steel and caLsh _A -e-olood to bit khe-9d J ,'real !111 fi)'Is mou-ltej vertically if) (odt fokj"4 - 3 I Moij $.'I cati �v'j f ':m pc. IS 12 GA A49 ;Ieinil. doub`e wafl 22" $3 jzj, ru �V"Qlj C'k frlease p ns frk)nt m Ic,ker p n tadgate i0e.iso F0 length 4 ioroled r�aire zwc coated sub-1' :vn: R I H 8 1 3 NTFA Crass C -1I 'Ig 6 1015 " I- c )*o rrA Lu iprrs ? to body rear apior hull depill (c"If cofrpf pos'.G ]CC finder -nde otouuJ u'l J" Ink Pan jc'tCox ao '.)oly avail 9 t4azk wh li of GhEn _al 9 02 O'C4(702'. 5!5 0011 ate 2 f 4 1T13-'M h0l. UP to 20 -)0c b-, II .O 'CC 5149 '10 9 C 14 1 1 2 5715' P rX) 1-0 11 9 MOL-l"', '10 C33 2, -way 10 Pil t"a 'ef 56'k .1 553 5 25 UtJ f.3rk Fljfer jlj,,,jjj! lojj of (jfra lark f Her 'C-1 d es,l I t jckS 5114 3p 1 I I - j (y, Ird i j nc e rt ed Bo Al it n n im 163' 00 1 C 1 0 ' 1 tj it 1)).ziaf p!:ly ferd ar pR ir f-' s v-1lee I kM j n 1 1 '(j �1 ic: e's Re. 0 J: `i -x 35 01) S22 G J - -17C1SjVlrlfn'uf 19 5 iii'll-d'Is "Set of A 1 -�-Jrt.n'j bra 11 44 Ba :flarr^ 11 C5 R 'LPPA 15' t Pnflp CONa A Stfobo Ua'. P ' M0,A) f1s"S I 3 C, 1,)4 15 " '.'vide (x LigH Bat, 5 2 Or! 5 r4 s30 RPISAR4- W PP2 j HL -- �d e! 9' MS ' 3' 0W - sties 8P2f' S st, MMA 11 0 i SG 16 C Cor I CO3 -25x: ..... .... .. Subi by Kevin Dessart 612-437-0 0,71 • F VIL"TN41 71" A' �':"J c.�l W !4—, A Is - F Pt lAW ' -NTQJ,'M0,T p'r -I o'r t 7 A. r [ p' - 'I i r- i t S i r , I J Intl Andrew Ke le From: Freds Tire Co Stillwater, MN <frstico @gwestoffice.net> Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 201110:25 AM To: Andrew Kegley Subject: Fw: 9'2" V -XT - - - -- Original Message - - - -- From: 1_ beds Ti�r<:' ,. [i�_ CAL - Y(b)Cl! YO O To: K AI< ARKII IG: -1"1"S Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2011 4 :45 PM Subject: 9'2" V -XT �_�2 B 0 3 � ,` .: G .e �[JILE r� < 5 ,:�,.` 11 P�:`E�F'� L iN a, 0 2- f —E "K13' f p p {.s � n9 � 4 l - a B A VA S OON 3 - TireProz & Wheel Experts ESTIMATE # 14661 N 60th St Stillwater, MN. 55082 � 104299 Phone - 651- 430 -0099 Fax - 651- 439 -6650 LOCAL PEOPLE, NATIONAL PRICING! ESTIMATE FOR SERVICES Estimate Date : 11/08/2011 Oak Park Weights Public Works 2012 Ford - F -550 Robertson, Mark Lic #: Odometer In: 0 14168 Oak Park Boulevard N Unit # Stillwater, MN 55082 VIN # Office 651 -439 -4439 - - -- Cellular 651 -775 -6179 Cust Id: 6,329 Part Description 1 Number Qty Sale Extended Labor Description Extended 9 2" POLY V -RTIll � INSTALL PLOW 500.00 92vx 1.00 4,838.00 4,838.00 Shop Supplies 39.99 -a Parts : $ 4,877.99 Labor : $ 500.00 Tax: g 366.99 Total : $ 5, 1 hereby authorize the above repair work to be done along with the necessary material and hereby grant you and /or your employees permission to operate the vehicle described for testing and /or inspection. Express mechanic's lien is hereby acknowledged on above vehicle to secure the amount of repairs thereto. TEARDOWN ESTIMATE: I understand that my vehicle will be reassembled within -- days of the date shown above if I choose not to authorize the service recommended. All Parts removed will be discarded unless instructed otherwise: Save all Parts . NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR LOSS OR DAMAGE TO CARS OR ARTICLES LEFT IN CARS IN CASE OF >"IRE, THEFT OR ANY OTI - IER CAUSE. SIGNATURE.................................................................. ............................... Date.......... ............................... Time......................... ANDREW$,JUDD Page 1 of 1 es117 _01.04 EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. QUOTATION 2755 GENEVA AVE. N OAKDALE, MN 55128 Quote Number: AW082611-45 USA Quote Date: Aug 26, 2011 Page: Voice: 651 765-2657 Fax: 651 765-2660 .. ................. ............ ............. .. ..... ......... . Quoted To; OAK PARK HEIGHTS PUBLIC WORKS PO BOX 2007 14168 OAK PARK HEIGHTS BLVD N OAK PARK HEIGHTS, MN 55082 Customer ID Good Payment Terms Sales Rep . .......................... ...... ......... . ................. . ..... ...... . ... ... .... ... ....................... .. OAK PARK HEIGHTS PW 9125111 Net 30 Days ALW ... ... ... . ... ................. .... . ......... . ........... .. .. ...... ... ua" Item Description nit Price Amount ... .......... ............ ........ ................. . . . .............. i.00 FT8AAAAP MINI EDGE ULTRA FREEDOM, 894.401 i PERMANENT MOUNT AMBER WA LINEAR 12 LED MODULES 1.00 FTDBBBB FTDBBBB MINI FREEDOM ADD 4 BLUE 524.55 524.55 LED 02- 0484222 -11 H 1.00 FTALY FACTORY INSTALLED ALLEY LIGHT FOR I 59-80 59.80 1 ULTRA FREEDOM 1.00 MK9S SUBSTITUTE COMPOSITE FEET FOR 36.75 36,75 CAST ALUMINUM PERMANENT MOUNT SLIDE BOLTS 1.00 EX-MISC SUPPLY STANDARD SHOP SUPPLIES FEE FOR 20.00 20,00 GENERAL INSTALLATION AND WIRING MATERIALS 4.00 LABOR MSP CONTRACT I MSP CONRACT LABOR RATE FOR 69.00 276.00 I INSTALLATION OF MINI LIGHTBAR ON F-550 DUMP BOX - WIRED TO UPFITTER SWITCH IN CAB . ..... ...... ... ..... ...... .. . ........ ................. . ..... ...... .... . ............ ............ .. Subtotal x Sales Tax 105.57'" Freight TOTAL 1,917.071 TRUCK ( GI O 'c"I", \ \ UTILITIES INC. ��fi�llt Wlcl!leTUltra Freedolm Mail! Bar: $2047.00 \ to instal( $ 270.00 .� .. �.� $2317.00 © $ 159.2® .. . . Add seta: $ 7 >6.� }< Pl ease Rlg if ! may be of further lI 1p 'Fh ank you, Wendy Laughter Commercial Sales Maagei, � 7##m twuck equipment specialists www.twucktot'glit'les.com K Ar. Q UOTE KEEPRS METRO 'AN AWESOME EXPERIENCE WORTH SNARING" 1055 WESTGATE DRIVE INVOICE NO. ST PAUL, MN 55114 DATE November 14, 2091 651 -338 -5720 CUSTOMER ID EXPIRATION DATE 1/30/2011 TO Andy Kegley City of Oak Park Heights SHIPPING SHIPPING DELIVERY PAYMENT SALESPERSON JOB DUE DATE I METHOD TERMS DATE TERMS Chris Meier {{ € ? I ____..--____..______....._.!_.-_,_._.._ ...................................................._...._.._..-----_..__..... ... _ ....... , L.......... _ .... __._.._.__.......... ... L ............... .........__ ..__._..._....�. ..__._._.,_......,. .__,..._......... _.. _._ _...____.. Q TY ITEM # DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE 1 DISCOUNT I LINE TOTAL __._,_._._....._. __... .. _.- ...........-_.. ._.._.,... - ...,......_.... .._.. 1.00 ; FTSBBBBP Wheten Mini Edge Ultra Freedom $ 905.00 - $ v 905.00 1.00 FTDAAAA !front /rear amber E 535,00 I 535.00 _._._ ._ . 1.00 FTALY Sally tights intregrated ! 69.00 69.00 .... ............ ....... .... .. ........_.__. i .._........_...... .._....,...._,- ..._- .._- .__.. -- E_._._..._.....,.,.._._..._,._.._-`-___....__._ s ................ ....... ._ .... _ ... ___._ ....... ..._.............._.,_. .........__.._..,_.,.._.......! 1.00 E PCC6Wm __...._. iswitchbox (if needed) l i 106.00 3 106.00 I 1.00 install !installation of lightbar 450.00 € 450.00 _. ...____._._. ......... .....m ------------------ ._,_,_,..._,._,...,_.-.,.,_.,._..._,... ... ......... ._.. .._.._.....__._......_......._. i _. _... ... .... i m .m.m...._,_. _..... _ __ .. .. ..._...._.... .._.,.... ....._. _._._ ,_._._.. _........ ... _, .... ,...... ...._,.._.- _.- ,.._.__. __._._......_..... E ___..._ w --- . ---- ....._..._ ..... _....._.._.._._._...__..._ ..._ ............._....._.._..__ -__ . ___.__._..._.----- .- .._._..__._._____.__...� I__.___....._....._._____. ......_.. __...._....__._._..... _ _____ __ __ _ _�__ _.____ -_ ___ . _____ ___ _�_ __ . ..... .. - i . ........ __ _ _ -- ...._..._. _ ___ ___ _ _ — —__ ;__ - -_ _ i _ __ ___- ._ -.__ __---- . - - - -. __ _ ____ ..... _ _ ___ -_ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ T _ _ _ _ __ _ _ ____ _ ___ __ _ __a _ _ ....- _.......____ .__ ___._ _ ... __._.____ .._._._ . _ _ __ __ _ . _ _ _ _ __ _ _� _ __ _ _ _. _..__..__..... I _ . .. 1.....__._..____-__._.___,.. 1.. .....__,._._._.- .._...___.___.1 TOTAL DISCOUNT Quotation pre pared by; ............ ... -_ - -- — - ___------ _-- ........,_ SUBTOTAL $ 2,065.00 This is a quotation on the goods named, subject to the conditions noted below: SALES TAX mmmm 6.875% (Describe any conditions pertaining to these prices and any additiona€ terms of the agreement. ------- --- - -- You may want to include contingencies that will affect the quotation.) TOTAL $ 2,206.97 To accept this quotation, sign here and return: _ _,_,,,.,._._-_._ __ -------- THANK YOU FOR YOUR BUSINESS! ya.�. Oak Park Heights Request for Council Action Meeting Date November 29"', 2011 Time Required: 10 Minutes Agenda Item Title: Oak. Park Heigh — Park Senior Living Phase I — Planned Unit Development E1_ e dment Agenda PIacement Ne Business Originating Department /Requ stor 'Eric Johnson City Administrator Requester's Signature. Action Requested Sec Att shed Background /Justification (Please ' dicate if any previous action has been taken or if other public bodies have advised): Please see the attached documents from Mr. Scott Richards / TPC: 1. Planning Report from Scott Richards, `l "PC dated Nov 3 "" , 2011 2. Recommending resolution by the City Planning Commission - Unsigned 3. Proposed City Council Resolution. TPC 3601 Thurston Avenue N, Suite 100 Anoka, MN 55303 Phone: 763.231 .5840 Facsimile: 763.427.0520 TPC:(?PPI@nningCo.com PLANNING REPORT TO: Eric Johnson PROM: Scott Richards DATE: November 3, 2011 RE: Oak Park Heights — Oak Park Senior Living Phase I — Planned Unit Development Amendment TPC FILE: 236.02 — 11.06 BACKGROUND Tim Nolde, representing Oakgreen Villa LLCIAnchobaypro, Inc has submitted an application for amending the Oakgreen Village Planned Unit Development (PUD) to allow for a reduction in the number of approved townhome units and to construct brownstone senior living buildings. The proposed units would be senior rentals as opposed to the original townhouses that would have been owner occupied. The project is at Nova Scotia Avenue North and 58 Street. The general plan approval for the Oakgreen Village project was recommended by the Planning Commission on May 8, 2008 and approved by the City Council on May 27 2008. The plans show the buildings of the Oakgreen Village project that were constructed and the new plans for the Oak Park Senior Living project as found in the Exhibits as follows. The review is based upon the following submittals: Exhibit 1: Existing Conditions (Sheet 1) Exhibit 2: Master Plan and Traffic Analysis (Sheet 2) Exhibit 3: Area Analysis — Density (Sheet 3) Exhibit 4: Site Drainage /Grading Plan /Snow Removal (Sheet 4) Exhibit 5: Utility Plan (Sheet 5) Exhibit 6: Lighting Plan (Sheet 6) Exhibit 7: Trail Plan (Sheet 1) Exhibit 8: Preliminary Plat — Oak Park Senior Living Exhibit 9: Site Plan /Landscape Plan (AS1) Exhibit 10: Overall Tree Plan — Landscape Plan (L1.0) Exhibit 11 : Building 1 and 2 Landscaping Plan (L1.1) Exhibit 12: Building 3 Landscaping Plan (1-1.2) Exhibit 13: Parking Level Building 1 and 2 (A1.01) Exhibit 14: Parking Level Building 3 (A1.02) Exhibit 15: 1St Floor Plan Buildings 1 and 2 (A1.11) Exhibit 16: 1" Floor Plan Building 3 (A1.12) Exhibit 17: 2nd Floor Plan Buildings 1 and 2 (Al .21) Exhibit 18: 2 nd Floor Plan Building 3 Exhibit 19: Unit Plans (A2.0) Exhibit 20: Building 1 Elevations (A3.0) Exhibit 21: Building 2 Elevations (A3.1) Exhibit 22: Building 3 Elevations (A3.2) Exhibit 23: View from Nova Scotia Entrance Looking East (BNV) Exhibit 24: View from Pond Looking North East (B/VV) Exhibit 25: 58 Looking North (Color) Exhibit 26: Project Narrative from Todd Erickson, FIFE, September 13, 2011 Exhibit 27: Memo from Kathy Widin, City Arborist Exhibit 28: Memo from Chris Long, City Engineer PROJECT DESCRIPTION Todd Erickson of 1 =olz, Freeman and Erickson, Inc, the project engineer has provided the following narrative related to the request for the PUD amendment: "On behalf of my client, Mr. Tim Nolde, we are submitting documentation for the revision or amendment to the Oakgreen Village PUD. Due to market driven conditions we are once again submitting for a change in regard to the previously approved use of the Oakgreen Village and Oakgreen Ponds area. The proposed submittal reduces the number of townhome units from 44 in the Oakgreen Village Platted Area to 15 units. The townhomes in the Oakgreen Ponds Plat would all be eliminated. The proposed change would be to add 111 units to the Oak Park Senior Living Phase 1 Addition, and constructing 8 of the remaining townhomes. The proposed plan would incorporate construction similar to that of the existing senior living building recently constructed over the past year. These units would be considered more of a "Brownstone" style of unit to accommodate the current market trend. As part of this PUD Amendment, TIF Financing is requested for the amount of $1,200, 000. This request does not include the earlier created District; therefore, we do not need any consent from Bondholders and other interested parties. Construction of the proposed units for Phase 1, would begin as soon as approvals are given." 2 The units proposed with this amendment are as follows: One level townhomes (7 constructed) 15 dwelling units Multi level townhomes (4 constructed) 8 Building 1 26 Building 2 33 Building 3 52 Total 134 dwelling units ISSUES ANALYSIS Adjacent Uses. Uses adjacent to the subject site are listed below: North of Site: Present Zoning — B -4, Limited Business District Present Use — Highway 36 orientated commercial development, Goodwill and the Xcel Energy power line easement South of Site: Present Zoning — O, Open Space and R -1 Single Family Residential District Present Use — City park land and a single family neighborhood West of Site: Present Zoning — B -4, Limited Business District Present Use — Lowe's /CSM Commercial development East of Site: Present Zoning — B -4 /PUD, Residential Planned Unit Development Present Use — Oakgreen Commons, open area and Oakgreen Avenue Comprehensive Plan. The 2008 Comprehensive Plan designates this area as medium density residential. The increase in number of approved units places the area into a high density residential classification for land use purposes. A Comprehensive Plan change would be required. The Planning Commission and City Council should comment on the land use classifications and whether the Comprehensive Plan should be revised to accommodate this development. Zoning. This property has been designated as B -4, Limited Business District which accommodates residential development as a conditional use. As such, the underlying base zoning district is B -4, Limited Business District with a PUD overlay. The B -4, Limited Business District lists two family, townhomes and multiple family dwellings as a conditional use. The performance standards of the R -3 Multiple Family District must be complied with for residential development in the B -4 Limited Business District. 3 Subdivision. The applicant has provided a preliminary plat labeled as Oak Park Senior Living. This would replace the Oakgreen Village plat. Outlot A would be created as the common area surrounding the buildings. Blocks 1, 2 and 4 represent the new multifamily buildings. The existing four plex and the four plex that is planned at the southwest corner of the site, as well as the townhouses on the north side of the site will retain the existing Oakgreen Village plat. The preliminary and final plat, as well as the vacation and dedication of any easements, shall be subject to review and approval of the City Engineer and the City Attorney. Park Dedication. Park dedication has been satisfied for this area. The applicant paid the maximum percentage (14 %) of equivalent cash value as part of the original approvals in 2006. Project Density. Section 401.15.C.3 of the Zoning Ordinance establishes the density thresholds for residential properties. Elderly housing requires 1,000 square feet of land area per unit excluding right -of -way and wetlands. The multiple family requirement is 2,500 square feet per unit. The project total, with what is proposed, the already constructed units and the Oakgreen Commons project is a density of 2,200 square feet per unit. As long as the project stays as a senior rental complex it would meet density requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. The development agreement will need to include a provision to assure that the project remains as senior rental and is not converted to non restricted rental housing. Proposed Street/Access. The existing roadway system that was developed for the Oakgreen Village and Oakgreen Commons projects will remain in place. The north /south roadway at the west edge of the site is to be reconfigured slightly to accommodate additional parking. The cul -de -sac at the end of this roadway will also be altered to accommodate the additional four plex that is to be constructed. The parking portion of this roadway is to be located directly on the property line. This is allowed through the PUD. The City has previously allowed a portion of the parking and the cul- de -sac to encroach on the setback area. The Planning Commission should comment on the extent to which this parking area will encroach. Trails /Sidewalks. The Trail Plan as attached includes the locations of the existing eight foot bituminous public trails and the proposed and existing five foot concrete sidewalks. The combination of the trails and sidewalks should provide adequate access within the development and connections to the surrounding public trails. The Planning Commission should comment about the proposed sidewalks and connections to the existing trail system. Private Park. A private landscaped area with a gazebo is proposed between Buildings 3 and 4. No active play equipment is proposed due to the nature of the development as senior rentals. 4 Setbacks. Within a PUD, the base district setback requirements'(R -3) are applied only to the perimeter of the project. The R -3 District specifies setback requirements as follows: 30 feet front yard, 30 feet rear yard, and 20 feet side yard. If the lot is in a corner, not less than 30 feet from a lot line is required for side yards. The PUD section of the Zoning Ordinance specifies that buildings should be located at least 20 feet from the back of a curb line from roadways as part of the internal street pattern. Additionally, the ordinance specifies that no building within the project shall be nearer to another building by one -half the sum of the building heights of the two buildings. Building 1 will be constructed on the property line adjacent to Nova Scotia Avenue. According to R -3 District standards, at least a 30 foot setback should be maintained. The proposed four plex at the corner of Nova Scotia Avenue and 58 Street as well as the existing four plex further north were approved with setbacks of 20 feet as part of the Oakgreen Village plans. The setback for Building 3 is proposed at 52.5 feet from the right of way line of Nova Scotia Avenue. Staff recommends that Building 1 be pulled back at least 30 feet from the right of way line. The Planning Commission should comment. Buidling 1 and 2 are to be separated by a distance of 31 feet. The sum of the two building heights is 52 feet; half of that amount is 26 feet. The buildings are adequately separated. Building 3 and the existing four plex are separated by 23.5 feet. The sum of the two building heights is 46 feet; half of that amount is 23 feet. These buildings are compliant with the PUD setback requirements. Tree Preservation /Landscaping. The applicant has provided a general landscaping plan as well as detailed plans for the foundation plantings around each building. The City Arborist has reviewed the plan in memo as attached. The plans shall be subject to the final approval of the City Arborist. Grading and Drainage. Detailed grading and drainage plans have been provided as part of the development submittals. The City Engineer and the applicable watershed authority shall review and approve all of the grading and drainage plans. Utilities. A detailed utility plan has been submitted. The final utility plan is subject to review and approval of the City Engineer and Public Works Director. All of the utilities within the development shall be private but built to City specifications. Lighting. A lighting plan has been provided that includes street light fixture specifications and locations within the private street network. Some of the street lights are in place and others are proposed. The proposed light fixture is identical to what has been used previously. It is a full cut -off fixture with a flat lens. The street lights will be maintained and all electricity costs will be paid for by the developer /homeowners association. The plans indicate the wall light fixtures to be used on each of the proposed buildings. These fixtures are the same as what was approved for the Oakgreen Commons project. 5 As part of the PUD approvals, the Planning Commission and City Council will need to determine of these fixtures are appropriate in that they are not full cut off. A photometric plan has been provided that is compliant with the light intensity requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. Signage. No additional signage has been proposed other than the monument signs on each of the two entrances from Nova Scotia Avenue and at the corner of 58 Street and Oakgreen Avenue. The applicant shall submit plans for these signs that are subject to City approval. Traffic. The applicant has provided projected vehicle count information for the proposed development in the Master Plan and Traffic Analysis. The traffic numbers are subject to review and approval .of the City Engineer. Parking. The Zoning Ordinance requires the following for elderly housing: "m. Elderly (Senior Citizen) Housing. Reservation of area equal to one (1) parking space per unit, Initial development is, however, required for only one -half (1/2) space per unit and said number of spaces can continue until such time as the City considers a need for additional parking spaces has been demonstrated." A review of the proposed parking is as follows: Building Surface Stalls Underground Stalls Building 1 16 43 Building 2 30 55 Building 3 24 83 Total 70 181 With a total of 251 stalls, and 111 dwelling units, the multifamily buildings in the project comply with ordinance standards for elderly parking and leave additional spaces for guest parking. The one level and multi level townhome units are all constructed with one stall each and are compliant. Snow Storage. The plans indicate areas for snow storage. The City Engineer should comment on the adequacy of these areas. Mechanical Equipment. The applicant's architect has indicated that the mechanical equipment is located within the buildings. Any mechanical equipment that is ground mounted or visible from adjacent streets shall be screened as required by the Zoning Ordinance. 6 Trash /Recycling. All of the trash storage and recycling will be internal to the buildings. The design of the driveways for the multifamily buildings accommodates roll out containers for pickup. Building Height. Building 1, 2 and 3 are all 26 feet to the midpoint of the gable roof in accordance with the definition of building height. The buildings are in conformance with the 35 foot height requirement of the Zoning Ordinance. Three Bedroom Units. Within the development, most of the units are either one or two bedroom. All of the units in Buildings 1, 2 and 3 are one and two bedroom and none of the two bedroom units have a den. Two of the one bedroom units in Building 3 have dens. There are six units in Building 4 that are two bedroom with a den. Three units in this building have one bedroom and a den. Staff is concerned that the den units in the one and two bedroom units could become bedrooms with a later addition of a closet. It is recommended that a condition be placed in the approvals that none of the den units be converted to a bedroom with the addition of a closet. Architectural Appearance. The application materials indicate elevations and perspective diagrams from various locations surrounding the development. From the initial submittal, the project architect has greatly improved the appearance of the multifamily buildings and has added architectural feature detailing and colors that were not present with previous diagrams. The Planning Commission, in their workshop review of the plans, indicated that the buildings be given more distinction so that they were not all the same in color and style. The perspective diagrams were requested to better indicate an actual view of the development. The Planning Commission should comment on the revised plans and determine if the applicant has provided enough distinction and difference in style between structures. The plans indicate the material types and specify colors. The project architect will provide a building materials board for review and the Planning Commission meeting. The residential units are not required to be reviewed under Design Guideline requirements, but as part of the PUD, the City can comment and require design and material changes. The Planning Commission and City Council shall comment further on the building appearance and materials as part of the review. B -4, Limited Business Standards. Section 401.301.E.9 of the Zoning Ordinance provides the CUP standards for allowing residential use in the B -4 District. The standards are as follows: Two family, townhomes and multiple family dwellings provided that: a. At least two parking spaces per unit must be provided for on site, or proof is shown of arrangements for private parking nearby. 7 The development will comply with the specific Zoning Ordinance requirements for senior housing. b. No physical improvements, either interior or exterior, may preclude future re -use for commercial purposes. The development could be converted to future office use, but highly unlikely C. Unit floor areas must comply with Section 401.15.C.6. All of the units are at least 600 square feet for one bedroom and 720 square feet for two bedrooms as required by the Zoning Ordinance. d. Compliance with conditional use requirements of Section 401.03.A.8. The requirements will be complied with. e. The development does not conflict with existing or potential future commercial uses and activities, There would be no conflict. f. The density, setbacks, and building height standards imposed as part of the R -3 Zoning District are complied with. The building setbacks are not consistent. This will need to be addressed in revised plans. The Planning Commission and City Council will need to comment on the setbacks and project density. g. Adequate open space and recreational space is provided on site for the benefit of the occupants. Adequate open space is provided. h. The development does not conflict or result in incompatible land use arrangements as related to abutting residential uses or commercial uses. No incompatible land use arrangements are created. i. Residential use can be governed by all applicable standards of the Zoning Ordinance, Building Code, Housing Code and Fire Codes. All standards will be complied with. j. Residential and non - residential uses shall not be contained on the same floor. Not applicable. S k. Residential uses shall be provided with a separate entrance, and separately identified parking stalls. Not applicable. I. The architectural appearance, design and building materials of residential structures shall be consistent with the Design Guidelines and subject to approval of the City Council. The Planning Commission and City Council should comment on the architectural appearance. Demolition Clause. At their workshop meeting, the Planning Commission discussed the long term maintenance, appearance and functionality of the site as rental housing. It was suggested that the City place a demolition clause in the PUD approvals and the development agreement. This would state that once the site has exhausted its useful life that the buildings would need to be demolished in 40 or 50 years. This is done frequently for big box commercial sites that are often abandoned after 10 or 20 years once the same big box retailer opens another new store a few miles away. It is not that common to utilize a demolition clause for multiple family housing in that the useful life of this type of structure is usually much longer. The Planning Commission should consider this further. In the alternative, the City could implement a rental registration and inspection program that would provide the City more authority in assuring that the property is maintained and kept safe. The City Council has considered this option in the past and could be another method of addressing the long term viability of the multiple family housing stock in the City. Development Agreement, The applicant will be required to enter into an amended development agreement with the City should approval of the general plan of development be granted. The development agreement shall be subject to review and approval of the City Attorney. CONCLUSION 1 RECOMMENDATION Based upon the preceding review, City staff recommends that the Planning Commission review the issues raised with density, height of the buildings and setbacks prior to proceeding with a final recommendation, A change in setbacks from what is shown in the plans could potentially significantly affect the site plan and potentially the numbers of dwelling units that can be included in the buildings. Additionally the Planning Commission previously had limitations regarding the architectural appearance of the structure. This may also impact their recommendation. If the Planning Commission is ready to make a recommendation on the amended PUD please find as follows a list of suggested conditions: 9 1. The Planning Commission and City Council shall discuss the land use classifications and determine if the property should be designated has high density residential in the Comprehensive Plan, 2. The preliminary and final plat, as well as the dedication and vacation of any easements shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer and City Attorney. 3. The Planning Commission and City Council shall comment on the proposed density of the project. 4. The development agreement shall include a provision that the Oak Park Senior Living Phase I will remain as senior rental and shall not be converted to non restricted rental housing. 5. The Planning Commission and City Council shall comment on the added parking and changes to the private access roadway and cul de sac adjacent to Nova Scotia Avenue North. 6. The Planning Commission and City Council and shall comment on the proposed private and public trail system. 7. The setback for Building 1 should be moved at least 30 feet from the right of way line of Nova Scotia Avenue. The Planning Commission and City Council should comment. H. All tree removal and landscape plans shall be subject to review and approval of the City Arborist. 9. The grading and drainage plans shall be subject to City Engineer and applicable watershed authority review and approval. 10. All utility plans shall be subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. 11, The Planning Commission and City Council shall determine if the non shielded, residential style light fixtures are appropriate. 12, The applicant shall submit any plans for new signage subject to City approval. 13. The traffic numbers are subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. 14. The Fire Marshal and Police Chief should review the plans and determine the accessibility of emergency vehicles throughout the development. 15. The trails and sidewalks shall be constructed in accordance with the City Engineer's review and approvals. 10 16. The snow storage areas and plan shall be subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. 17. Any mechanical equipment that is ground mounted or visible from adjacent streets shall be screened as required by the Zoning Ordinance. 18. The den rooms in the dwelling units shall not be converted to bedrooms with the addition of a closet. 19. The Planning Commission and City Council shall comment on the final building appearance, colors, materials and the variety between buildings. The applicant shall provide a materials board for all of the buildings to be discussed at the Planning Commission and City Council meetings. 20. The Planning Commission and City Council shall discuss including a demolition clause into the PUD approvals and development agreement. 21. The applicant shall be required to enter into a development agreement. The development agreement shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Attorney and City Council. 22. Any other conditions of City staff, the Planning Commission and the City Council. 11 A RECOMMENDING RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL THAT THE REQUEST FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT FOR OAK PARK SENIOR LIVING PHASE I (FORMERLY OAKGREEN VILLAGE) ALLOWING A REDUCTION IN THE APPROVED NUMBER OF TOWNHOME UNITS, CONSTRUCTION OF BROWNSTONE UNITS AND INCREASE IN THE DENSITY AT NOVA SCOTIA AVENUE AND 58 S'T'REET NORTH SHOULD BE APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS WHEREAS, the City of Oak Park Heights has received a request for a Planned Unit Development amendment as it relates to Oak Park Senior Living Phase 1(formerly Oakgreen Village) allowing a reduction in the approved number of townhome units, construction of brownstone units and an increase in the density at Nova Scotia Avenue Street North; after having conducted a public hearing relative thereto, the Planning Commission of Oak Park Heights makes the following findings of fact: 1. The real property affected by said application is legally described as follows, to wit: SEE ATTACHMENT A and 2. The applicant has submitted an application and supporting documentation to the Community Development Department consisting of the following items: SEE ATTACHMENT I3 and 3. The property was approved by the City Council for a Planned Unit Development, general plan by the City Council on May 27, 2008; and 4. The Oakgreen Commons project was approved with a total of 44 townhome units; and 5. The Planned Unit Development amendment for Oak Park Senior Phase I includes a total of 134 units, 23 of which are single and multi level townhomes and 111 brownstone units in three buildings; and G. City staff prepared a planning report dated November 3, 2011 reviewing; the request; and 7. Said report recommended approval of the amended Planned Unit Development amendment subject to the fulfillment of conditions; and 8. The Planning Commission held a public hearing at their November 10, 2011 meeting, took comments from the applicants, closed the public bearing, and made the following recommendation: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR THE CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS 'T'HA'I' THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDS THE FOLLOWING: A. The application submitted for a Planned Unit Development amendment as it relates to Oak Pack Senior Living Phase I (formerly Oakgreen Village) allowing; a reduction in the approved number of townhome units, construction of brownstone units and an increase in the density at Nova Scotia Avenue Street North and affecting the real property as follows: SEE ATTACHMENT A The Planning Commission recommends to the City Council of the City of Oak Park lfieights approval of the application subject to the following conditions: I. The Planning Commission recommends the property should be re- designated from medium density to high density residential in the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The preliminary and final plat, as well as the dedication and vacation of any easements shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer and City Attorney. 3. The Planning Commission was favorable to the proposed density of the project. 4. The development agreement shall include a provision that the Oak Park Senior Living Phase I will remain as senior rental and shall not be converted to non restricted rental housing. 5. The Planning; Commission was favorable to the added parking and changes to the private access roadway and cul de sac adjacent to Nova Scotia Avenue North. 2 6. The Planning Commission was favorable to the proposed private and public trail system. 7. The Planning Commission was favorable to the zero lot line setback for Building 1 but recommended that the right of way area be enhanced with additional landscaping, subject to review and approval of the City Arborist. The applicant shall provide revised landscape plans for City Council approval. 8. All tree removal and landscape plans shall be subject to review and approval of the City Arborist. 9. The grading and drainage plans shall be subject to City Engineer and applicable watershed authority review and approval. 10. All utility plans shall be subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. 11, The Planning Commission was favorable to the use of the non shielded, residential style light fixtures. 12. 'rho applicant shall submit any plans 1'or new signage subject to City approval. 13. The projected traffic counts are subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. if the intersection at 58` Street and Oalrgreen Avenue requires signalization or other traffic control measures, the applicant shall agree to a share of the costs as outlined in the Development Agreement. 14. The fire Marshal and Police Chief should review the plans and determine the accessibility of emergency vehicles throughout the development. 15. The trails and sidewalks shall be constructed in accordance with the City Engineer's review and approvals. 16. The snow storage areas and plan shall be subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. 17. Any mechanical equipment that is ground mounted or visible from adjacent streets shall be screened as required by the Zoning Ordinance. 18. The den rooms in the dwelling units shall not be converted to bedrooms with the addition of a closet. 19, The Planning Commission was favorable to the final building appearance, colors, materials and the variety between buildings. The applicant shall provide a materials board for all of the buildings to be subject to review and approval of the City Council. 3 20. The development agreement shall include a requirement that all of the buildings be maintained in proper condition and in compliance with City Codes. 21. The applicant shall be required to enter into a development agreement. The development agreement shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Attorney and City Council. 23. The proposed multi level townhome four plex is to be constructed of the same building materials and appearance as the building at 5812 -5818 Nutmeg Court North and all of the existing and proposed one level townhomes are to be constructed with the same building materials and appearance as the building at 13848 -13872 Upper 58' Street subject to review and approval of the City Building Official. 24. The applicant shall provide additional details for the private park area including elevations of the gazebo, materials to be used in the structures and walkways, and landscaping details for review and approval of the City Council. Recommended by the Planning Commission of the City of Oak Park Heights this 10 "' clay of November, 2011. Jennifer Bye, Chair ATTEST: Eric A. Johnson, City Administrator 4 ATTACHMENT A Planned Unit Development Amendment Related To The Construction Of Oak Pak Senior Living — Phase I Located at Nova Scotia Ave. N. & 58 "' St. N. (Formerly Known As Oakgreen Village) Washington County GEO Code: 05.029.20- XX -XXXX Legal Description: Blocks 1 -3, 7 -12, Oakgreen Village; Outlots A & D, Oakgi•een Villa LLC; and Blocks 1 -3, Oakgreen Ponds ATTACHMENT B P Planned Unit Development Amendment Related To The Construction Of Oak Pak Senior Living — Phase I Located at Nova Scotia Ave. N. & 58 "' St. N. (Formerly Known As Oakgreen Village) Application Materials • Application & bees • Plan Setts (3 I.,arte Scale; Sets/20 1 IX17 Sets) • Written Narrative and Graphic Materials Explaining Proposal • Mailing List from Washington County (500' from subject property) • Proof of Ownership or Authorization to Proceed Conference With City Staff Upon Application Submittal: October 12, 2011 Required Approvals: PUD Amendment City Council 415 PUD Amendment Unless a General Plan of Development covering the area designated as in the General Concept Plan as the first stage of the PUD has been tiled within twelve (12) months from the date Council grants General Concept Plan approval, or in any case where the applicant fails to file General Plan of Development Stage and final Plans and to proceed with development in accordance with the provisions of this Ordinance and of an approved General Concept Plan, the approval may be revoked by Council action. (401.06.C.2.e) RESOLUTION NO. CITY COUNCIL CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING FINDINGS OF FACT AND RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL THAT THE REQUEST FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT FOR OAK PARK SENIOR LIVING PHASE I (FORMERLY OAKGREEN VILLAGE) ALLOWING A REDUCTION IN THE APPROVED NUMBER OF TOWNHOME UNIT'S, CONSTRUCTION OF BROWNSTONE UNITS AND INCREASE IN THE DENSITY AT NOVA. SCOTIA AVENUE AND 58 "" STREET NORTH BE APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS WHEREAS, the City of Oak Park Ileights has received a request for a Planned Unit Development amendment as it relates to Oak Park Senior Living Phase I (formerly Oakgreen Village) allowing a reduction in the approved number of townhome units, construction of brownstone units and an increase in the density at Nova Scotia Avenue Street North; after having; conducted a public hearing relative thereto, the Planning; Commission of Oak Park Heights recommended that the application be approved with conditions. The City Council of the City of Oak Park Heights makes the following findings of fact and resolution: 1. The real property affected by said application is legally described as follows, to wit: SEE ATTACHMENT A and 2. The applicant has submitted an application and supporting documentation to the Community Development Department consisting of the following items: SINE ATTACHMENT I3 and 3. The property was approved by the City Council for a Planned Unit Development, general plan by the City Council on May 27, 2008; and 4. The Oakgreen Commons project was approved with a total of 44 townhome units; and 5, The Planned Unit Development amendment for Oak Park Senior Phase I includes a total of 134 units, 23 of which are single and multi level townhomes and 111 brownstone units in three buildings; and &. City staff prepared a planning; report dated November 3, 2011 reviewing the request; and 7. Said report recommended approval of the amended Planned Unit Development amendment subject to the fulfillment of conditions; and 8. The Planning Commission held a public hearing at their November 10, 2011. meeting, took comments from the applicants and public, closed the public hearing, and recommended that the application be approved with conditions. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVES THE FOLLOWING. A. The application submitted for a Planned Unit Development amendment as it relates to Oak Park Senior Living Phase I (formerly Oakgreen Village) allowing a reduction in the approved number of townhome units, construction of brownstone units and an increase in the density at Nova Scotia Avenue Street North and affecting; the real property as follows: SEE ATTACHMENT A Be the same as hereby approved by the City Council of the City of Oak Park Heights with the following conditions: 1. The City Council directs that the Proposed Land Use Map should be re- designated from medium density to high density residential in the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The preliminary and final plat, as well as the dedication and vacation of any easements shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer and City Attorney. 3. The City Council favorable to the proposed density of the project. 4. The development agreement shall include a provision that the Oak: Park Senior Living Phase I will remain as senior rental and shall not be converted to non restricted rental housing. 5. The City Council was favorable to the added parking and changes to the private access roadway and cul de sac adjacent to Nova Scotia Avenue North. 2 6. The City Council was favorable to the proposed private and public trail system. 7. The City Council was favorable to the zero lot line setback for Building 1 with enhanced landscaping in the right of way area to be installed by the applicant and subject to review and approval of the City Arborist. 8. All tree removal and landscape plans shall be subject to review and approval of the City Arborist. 9. The grading and drainage plans shall be subject to City Engineer and applicable watershed authority review and approval. 10. All utility plans shall be subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. 11, The City Council was favorable to the use of the non shielded, residential style light fixtures. 12. The applicant shall submit: any plans for new signage subject to City approval. 1.3. The projected traffic counts are subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. if the intersection at 58` Street and Oakgreen Avenue requires sig;nalization or other traffic control measures, the applicant shall agree to a share of the costs as outlined in the Development Agreement. 14. The Fire Marshal and Police Chief should review the plans and determine the accessibility of emergency vehicles throughout the development. 15. The trails and sidewalks shall be constructed in accordance with the City Engineer's review and approvals. 16. The snow storage areas and plan shall be subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. 17. Any mechanical equipment that is ground mounted or visible froze adjacent streets shall be screened as required by the Zoning Ordinance. 18. The den rooms in the dwelling units shall not be converted to bedrooms with the addition of a closet. 19. 'Fhe City Council was favorable to the final building appearance, colors, materials and the variety between buildings. The applicant shall provide a materials board for all of the buildings to be subject to review and approval cif the City Council. 3 20. The development agreement shall include a requirement that all of the buildings be maintained in proper condition and in compliance with City Codes. 21. The applicant shall be required to enter into a development agreement. The development agreement shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Attorney and City Council. 23. The proposed multi level townhome four plea is to be constructed of the same building materials and appearance as the building at 5812 -5818 Nutmeg; Court North and all of the existing and proposed one level townhomes are to be constructed with the same building; materials and appearance as the building at 13848 -13872 Upper 58` Street subject to review and approval of the City Building Official. 24. The applicant shall provide additional details for the private park area including elevations of the gazebo, materials to be used in the structures and walkways, and landscaping details for review and approval of the City Council. Approved by the City Council of the City of Oak Park Heights this 29"' day of November, 2011, David Beaudet, Mayor ATTEST: Eric A. Johnson, City Administrator 4 ATTACHMENT A s., Planned Unit Development Amendment Related To The Construction Of Oak Pak Senior Living — Phase I Located at Nova Scotia Ave. N. & 58 "' St. N. (Formerly Known As Oakgreen Village) Washington County GEO Code: 05.029.20- XX -XXXX Legal Description: Blocks 1-3,7-12, Oakgreen Village; Outlots A & 1), Oakgreen Villa LLC; and Blocks 1 -3, Oakgreen fonds ATTACHMENT B Planned Unit Development Amendment Related To The Construction Of Oak Pak Senior Living -m- Phase I Located at Nova Scotia Ave. N. & 58 St. N. (Formerly Known As OakgreenVillage) Application Materials • Application & Fees • Plan Sets (3 Large Scale Sets /20 11X17 Sets) • Written Narrative and Graphic Materials Explaining Proposal • Mailing List from Washington County (500' from subject property) • Proof of Ownership or authorization to Proceed Conference With City Staff Upon Application Submittal: October 12, 2011 Required Approvals: PUD Amendment City Council 4/5 PUD Amendment: Unless a General Plan of Development covering the area designated as in the General Concept Plan as the first stage of the PUD has been filed within twelve (12) months from the date Council grants General Concept Plan approval, or in any case where the applicant fails to file General Plan of Development Stage and Final Plans and to proceed with development in accordance with the provisions of this Ordinance and of an approved General Concept Plan, the approval may be revoked by Council action. (401.06.C.2.e) 0 Oak Park Heights Request for Council Action Meeting Date November 29` 2011 Time Required: 10 Minutes Agenda Item 'Title: 08 Park Heights — Oak Park Senior Livin g Phase II .W Pl nned Unit Development Amen dment Agenda Placement New E usi' e f Originating; Department /Reque t l r' Johnson Ci Administrator Requester's Signature � e Action Requested Attached Background/Justification (Please indicate if any previous action has been taken or if other public bodies have advised): Please see the attached documents from Mr. Scott Richards / TPC: 1. Planning Report from Scott Richards, TPC dated Nov 3"", 2011 2. Recommending resolution by the City Planning Commission - Unsigned 3. Proposed City Council Resolution. TPC 3601 Thurston Avenue N, suite 100 Anoka, MN 55303 Phone: 763.231 .5840 Facsimile: 763,427,0520 TPCtDP1anningCo, corn PLANNING REPORT TO: Eric Johnson FROM: Scott Richards DATE: November 3, 2011 RE: Oak Park Heights — Oak Park Senior Living Phase 11 — Planned Unit Development Amendment TPC FILE: 236.02 — 11.07 BACKGROUND Tim Nolde, representing Green Twig LLCIAnchobaypro, Inc has submitted an application for amending the Carriage CO -OP Planned Unit Development (PUD) to allow an increase in the number of dwelling units from 48 to 96 units. The project would now be a senior rental instead of a cooperative. The proposed project is at Oakgreen Avenue and 58 Street North. The building is to be placed in the same location as the approved Carriage CO -OP but the interior of the building would be reconfigured to accommodate senior rentals. The previously approved building was to be constructed with two stories. The plans as provided below indicate the building will now be three stories. The general plan approval for the Carriage CO -OP project was recommended by the Planning Commission on May 14, 2009 and approved by the City Council on June 9, 2009. The review is based upon the following submittals: Exhibit 1: Existing Conditions (Sheet 1) Exhibit 2: Layout Plan/Traffic /Parking Plan (Sheet 2) Exhibit 3: Site Drainage /Grading Plan (Sheet 3) Exhibit 4: Utility Plan (Sheet 4) Exhibit 5: Lighting Plan (Sheet 5) Exhibit 6: Site Plan /Landscape Plan (AS1) Exhibit 7: Overall Tree Plan — Landscape Plan (L1.0) Exhibit 8: Building 4 Landscaping Plan (L1.1) Exhibit 9: Parking Level Building 4 (A1.0) Exhibit 10: 1 st Floor Plan Building 4 (A1.1) Exhibit 11: 2 nd Floor Plan Building 4 (A1.2) Exhibit 12: 3 rd Floor Plan Building 4 (A1.3) Exhibit 13: Unit Plans (A2.0) Exhibit 14: Building 4 Elevations (A3.0) Exhibit 15: Building 4 Elevations (A3.1) Exhibit 16: Oakgreen Avenue Looking North (Color) Exhibit 17: Project Narrative from Todd Erickson, FFE, September 13, 2011 Exhibit 18: Memo from Kathy Widin, City Arborist Exhibit 19: Memo from Chris Long, City Engineer PROJECT DESCRIPTION Todd Erickson of Folz, Freeman and Erickson, Inc, the project engineer has provided the following narrative related to the request for the PUD amendment: "On behalf of my client, Mr. Tim Nolde, we are submitting documentation for the revision or amendment to the Carriage CO -OP PUD. The proposed submittal changes the previously approved building to 96 total units. Also, changes to the site layout have been made to accommodate the revisions of Phase 1 of the Project and incorporates more usable outdoor space, with the creation of a small park and gazebo area. Additional exterior parking has also been added to the revised site plan. We also request an extension to the TIF Financing, to postpone construction for two additional years. This delay would allow for us to finalize the remainder of the site as proposed in the Oak Park Senior Living Phase 1 portion of the project and meet the anticipated market conditions." There are 96 units proposed in a three story building. The approved PUD for the Carriage CO -OP was a total of 48 in a two story building. ISSUES ANALYSIS Adjacent Uses. Uses adjacent to the subject site are listed below: North of Site: Present Zoning -- B -4, Limited Business District Present Use — Oakgreen Commons (120 Units Senior Living) Townhomes and Condominiums and the Xcel Energy power line easement 2 South of Site: Present Zoning — O, Open Space and R -1 Single Family Residential District Present Use — City park land and a single family neighborhood West of Site: Present Zoning — B -4, Limited Business District Present Use — Lowe's /CSM Commercial development East of Site: Present Zoning -- O, Open Space and R -3 Multiple Family Residential Present Use — Townhomes and Oakgreen Avenue Comprehensive Plan. The 2008 Comprehensive Plan designates this area as medium density residential. The proposed increase in number of units places the area into a high density residential classification for land use purposes. A Comprehensive Plan change would be required. The Planning Commission and City Council should comment on the land use classifications and whether the Comprehensive Plan should be revised to accommodate this development. Zoning. This property has been designated as B -4, Limited Business District which accommodates residential development as a conditional use. As such, the underlying base zoning district is B -4, Limited Business District with a PUD overlay. The B -4, Limited Business District lists two family, townhomes and multiple family dwellings as a conditional use. The performance standards of the R -3 Multiple Family District must be complied with for residential development in the B -4 Limited Business District. Subdivision. The existing Oakgreen Village plat will remain for this property. Park Dedication. Park dedication has been satisfied for this area. The applicant paid the maximum percentage (14 %) of equivalent cash value as part of the original approvals in 2006. Project Density. Section 401.15.C.3 of the Zoning Ordinance establishes the density thresholds for residential properties. Elderly housing requires 1,000 square feet of land area per unit excluding right -of -way and wetlands. The multiple family requirement is 2,500 square feet per unit. The project total including what is proposed, the already constructed units and the Oakgreen Commons project is a density of 2,200 square feet per unit. As long as the project stays as a senior rental complex it would meet density requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. The development agreement will need to include a provision to assure that the project remains as senior rental and is not converted to non restricted rental housing. Proposed Street/Access. The existing roadway system that was developed for the Oakgreen Village and Oakgreen Commons projects will remain in place. Access into Building 4 will be from the existing private roadway through a parking area and into the 3 front of the development. The access to the underground garage shall remain as originally planned directly opposite the entrance to the Oakgreen Commons building. Trails /Sidewalks. The Trail Plan as attached includes the locations of the existing eight foot bituminous public trails and the proposed and existing five foot concrete sidewalks. The combination of the trails and sidewalks should provide adequate access throughout the development to Building 4 and connections to the surrounding public trails. The Planning Commission should comment about the proposed sidewalks and connections to the existing trail system. Private Park. A private landscaped area with a gazebo is proposed between Buildings 3 and 4. No active play equipment is proposed due to the nature of the development as senior rentals. Setbacks. Within a PUD, the base district setback requirements (R -3) are applied only to the perimeter of the project. The R -3 District specifies setback requirements as follows: 30 feet front yard, 30 feet rear yard, and 20 feet side yard. If the lot is in a corner, not less than 30 feet from a lot line is required for side yards. The PUD section of the Zoning Ordinance specifies that buildings should be located at least 20 feet from the back of a curb line from roadways as part of the internal street pattern. Additionally, the ordinance specifies that no building within the project shall be nearer to another building by one -half the sum of the building heights of the two buildings. Building 4 will be located, at its closest point, 24 feet to the right of way line of Oakgreen Avenue. The Oakgreen Commons building is located 40 feet from the right of way line (the patio is 20 feet). The City Council specified this setback distance for Oakgreen Commons in that the structure was planned for four stories. Now that Building 4 is three stories with a height of 38 feet, the building should at least be setback 30 feet as specified for the R -3 District or the 40 feet to be consistent with the Oakgreen Commons building. The PUD allows the City to specify setbacks that may differ from the ordinance. The setback from the 58 Street right of way for Building 4 is planned at 32 feet 9 inches. The Planning Commission and City Council should discuss these two setbacks distances and provide direction to the applicant. Tree Preservation /Landscaping. The applicant has provided a general landscaping plan as well as detailed plans for the foundation plantings around each building. The City Arborist has reviewed the plan in memo as attached. The plans shall be subject to the final approval of the City Arborist. Grading and Drainage. Detailed grading and drainage plans have been provided as part of the development submittals. The City Engineer and the applicable watershed authority shall review and approve all of the grading and drainage plans. 4 Utilities. A detailed utility plan has been submitted. The final utility plan is subject to review and approval of the City Engineer and Public Works Director. All of the utilities within the development shall be private but built to City specifications. Lighting. A lighting plan has been provided that includes street light fixture specifications and locations within the private street network. Some of the street lights are in place and others are proposed. The proposed light fixture is identical to what has been used previously. It is a full cut -off fixture with a flat lens. The street lights will be maintained and all electricity costs will be paid for by the developer /homeowners association. The plans indicate the wall light fixtures to be used on each of the proposed buildings. These fixtures are the same as what was approved for the Oakgreen Commons project. As part of the PUD approvals, the City Council will need to determine of these fixtures are appropriate in that they are not full cut off. A photometric plan has been provided that is compliant with the light intensity requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. Signage. No additional signage has been proposed other than the monument signs on each of the two entrances from Nova Scotia Avenue and at the corner of 58 Street and Oakgreen Avenue. The applicant shall submit plans for these signs that are subject of City approval. Traffic. The applicant has provided projected vehicle count information for the proposed development in the Master Plan and Traffic Analysis. The traffic numbers are subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. Parking. The Zoning Ordinance requires the following for elderly housing: "m. Elderly (Senior Citizen) Housing. Reservation of area equal to one (1) parking space per unit. Initial development is, however, required for only one -half (112) space per unit and said number of spaces can continue until such time as the City considers a need for additional parking spaces has been demonstrated." A review of the proposed parking is as follows: Building Surface Stalls Underground Stalls Building 4 68 98 With a total of 166 stalls, and 96 dwelling units, Building 4 will comply with ordinance standards for elderly parking and leave additional spaces for guest parking. 5 Snow Storage. The plans indicate areas for snow storage. The City Engineer should comment on the adequacy of these areas. Mechanical Equipment. The applicant's architect has indicated that the mechanical equipment is located within the buildings. Any mechanical equipment that is ground mounted or visible from adjacent streets shall be screened as required by the Zoning Ordinance. Trash /Recycling. All of the trash storage and recycling will be internal to the buildings. The design of the driveway for building accommodates roll out containers for pickup. Building Height. Building 4 with three stories will be 38 feet to the midpoint of the gable roof in accordance with the definition of building height. ' The building will not be in conformance with the 35 foot height requirement of the Zoning Ordinance. The Zoning Ordinance allows building heights in excess of three stories or 35 feet within the B -4 Zoning District as a conditional use. The proposed height of Building 4 can be pursued as a conditional use permit as part of the PUD. Three Bedroom Units. Within the development, most of the units are either one or two bedroom. All of the units in Buildings 1, 2 and 3 are one and two bedroom and none of the two bedroom units have a den. Two of the one bedroom units in Building 3 have dens. There are six units in Building 4 that are two bedroom with a den. Three units in this building have one bedroom and a den. Staff is concerned that the den units in the one and two bedroom units could bedrooms with a later addition of a closet. It is recommended that a condition be placed in the approvals that none of the den units be converted to a bedroom with the addition of a closet. Architectural Appearance. The application materials indicate elevations and perspective diagrams from various locations surrounding the development. From the initial submittal, the project architect has greatly improved the appearance of the building and has added architectural feature detailing and colors that were not present with previous diagrams. The Planning Commission, in their workshop review of the plans, indicated that the buildings be given more distinction so that they were not all the same in color and style. The perspective diagrams were requested to better indicate an actual view of the development. The Planning Commission should comment on the revised plans and determine if the applicant has provided enough distinction and difference in style between structures. The plans indicate the material types and specify colors. The project architect will provide a building materials board for review and the Planning Commission meeting. The residential units are not required to be reviewed under Design Guideline requirements, but as part of the PUD, the City can comment and require design and material changes. The Planning Commission and City Council shall comment further on the building appearance and materials as part of the review. 6 B -4, Limited Business Standards, Section 401,301.E.9 of the Zoning Ordinance provides the CUP standards for allowing residential use in the B -4 District. The standards are as follows: Two family, townhomes and multiple family dwellings provided that: a. At least two parking spaces per unit must be provided for on site, or proof is shown of arrangements for private parking nearby. The development will comply with the specific Zoning Ordinance requirements for senior housing. b. No physical improvements, either interior or exterior, may preclude future re -use for commercial purposes. The development could be converted to future office use, but highly unlikely. C. Unit floor areas must comply with Section 401.15.C.6. All of the units are at least 600 square feet for one bedroom and 720 square feet for two bedrooms as required by the Zoning Ordinance. d. Compliance with conditional use requirements of Section 401.03.A.8. The requirements will be complied with. e. The development does not conflict with existing or potential future commercial uses and activities. There would be no conflict. f. The density, setbacks, and building height standards imposed as part of the R -3 Zoning District are complied with. The building setbacks are not consistent. This will need to be addressed in revised plans. The Planning Commission and City Council will need to comment on the setbacks and project density. g. Adequate open space and recreational space is provided on site for the benefit of the occupants. Adequate open space is provided. h. The development does not conflict or result in incompatible land use arrangements as related to abutting residential uses or commercial uses. No incompatible land use arrangements are created. 7 i. Residential use can be governed by all applicable standards of the Zoning Ordinance, Building Code, Housing Code and Fire Codes. All standards will be complied with, j, Residential and non - residential uses shall not be contained on the same floor. Not applicable. k, Residential uses shall be provided with a separate entrance, and separately identified parking stalls, Not applicable. I. The architectural appearance, design and building materials of residential structures shall be consistent with the Design Guidelines and subject to approval of the City Council. The Planning Commission and City Council should comment on the architectural appearance. Demolition Clause. At their workshop meeting, the Planning Commission discussed the long term maintenance, appearance and functionality of the site as rental housing. It was suggested that the City place a demolition clause in the PUD approvals and the development agreement. This would state that once the site has exhausted its useful life that the buildings would need to be demolished in 40 or 50 years. This is done frequently for big box commercial sites that are often abandoned after 10 or 20 years once the same big box retailer opens another new store a few miles away. It is not that common to utilize a demolition clause for multiple family housing in that the useful life of this type of structure is usually much longer. The Planning Commission should consider this further. In the alternative, the City could implement a rental registration and inspection program that would provide the City more authority in assuring that the property is maintained and kept safe. The City Council has considered this option in the past and could be another method of addressing the long term viability of the multiple family housing stock in the City. Development Contract. The applicant will be required to enter into an amended development contract with the City should approval of the general plan of development be granted. The development agreement shall be subject to review and approval of the City Attorney. 8 CONCLUSION 1 RECOMMENDATION Based upon the preceding review, City staff recommends that the Planning Commission review the issues raised with density, height of the building and setbacks prior to proceeding with a final recommendation. A change in setbacks from what is shown in the plans could potentially significantly affect the site plan and potentially the numbers of dwelling units that can be included in the building. Additionally the Planning Commission previously had limitations regarding the architectural appearance of the structures. This may also impact their recommendation. If the Planning Commission is ready to make a recommendation on the amended PUD please find as follows a list of suggested conditions: 1. The Planning Commission and City Council shall discuss the land use classifications and determine if the property should be designated has high density residential in the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The Planning Commission and City Council shall comment on the proposed density of the project. 3. The development agreement shall include a provision that the Oak Park Senior Living Phase 11 will remain as senior rental and shall not be converted to non restricted rental housing. 4. The Planning Commission and City Council and shall comment on the proposed private and public trail system. 5. The setback for Building 4 should be moved at least 30 to 40 feet from the right of way line of Oakgreen Avenue. The Planning Commission and City Council should comment on that setback as well as the setback to 58 Street. 6. All tree removal and landscape plans shall be subject to review and approval of the City Arborist, 7. The grading and drainage plans shall be subject to City Engineer and applicable watershed authority review and approval. 8. All utility plans shall be subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. 9. The Planning Commission and City Council shall determine if the non shielded, residential style light fixtures are appropriate. 10. The applicant shall submit any plans for new signage subject to City approval. 11. The traffic numbers are subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. 9 12. The Fire Marshal and Police Chief should review the plans and determine the accessibility of emergency vehicles throughout the development. 13. The trails and sidewalks shall be constructed in accordance with the City Engineer's review and approvals. 14. The snow storage areas and plan shall be subject to review and approval of the City Engineer, 15. Any mechanical equipment that is ground mounted or visible from adjacent streets shall be screened as required by the Zoning Ordinance. 16. The Planning Commission and City Council shall comment on the 38 foot height of Building 4 as part of the PUD approvals. 17, The den rooms in the dwelling units shall not be converted to bedrooms with the addition of a closet. 18. The Planning Commission and City Council shall comment on the final building appearance, colors, materials and the variety between buildings. The applicant shall provide a materials board for all of the buildings to be discussed at the Planning Commission and City Council meetings, 19. The Planning Commission and City Council shall discuss including a demolition clause into the PUD approvals and development agreement. 20. The applicant shall be required to enter into a development agreement. The development agreement shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Attorney and City Council. 21. Any other conditions of City staff, the Planning Commission and the City Council. 10 A RECOMMENDING RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING- FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL THAT THE REQUEST FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT FOR OAK PARK SENIOR LIVING PHASE II (FORMERLY CARRIAGE HOUSE COOP) ALLOWING AN INCREASE IN THE DENSITY AND BUILDING HEIGHT AT OAKGREEN AVENUE AND 58 111H STREET NORTH SHOULD BE APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS WHEREAS, the City of Oak Park Heights has received a request for a Planned Unit Development amendment as it relates to the Oak Park Senior Living Phase 11 (formerly Carriage house CO -OP) allowing an increase in the density and building height at Oakgreen Avenue and 58"' Street North; after having conducted a public hearing relative thereto, the Planning Commission of Oak Park Heights snakes the following findings of fact: 1. The real property affected by said application is legally described as follows, to wit: SEE ATTACHMENT A and 2. The applicant has submitted an application and supporting documentation to the Community Development Department consisting of the following items: SEE ATTACHMENT B and 3. The property was approved by the City Council for a Planned Unit Development, general plan by the City Council on June 9, 2009; and 4. The Carriage House CO -OP was approved with 48 units in one, two story building; and 5. "The Planned Unit Development amendment for Oak Park Senior Phase 11 includes a total of 96 units in one, three story building; and 6. The building is proposed with setbacks of 24 feet to the right of way of Oakgreen Avenue and a building height of 38 feet; and 7. City Staff prepared a planning report dated November 3, 2011 reviewing the request; and 8, Said report recommended approval of the amended Planned Unit Development subject to the fulfillment of conditions; and 9. The Planning Commission held a public hearing at their November 10, 2011 meeting, took comments from the applicants and public, closed the public hearing, and made the following recommendation: NOW, THEREFORE, RE IT RESOLVED BY THIN PLANNING COMMISSION FOR THE CITY OF OAK PARIS HEIGHTS THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDS THE FOLLOWING- A. The application submitted for a Planned Unit Development amendment as it relates to the Oak Park Senior Living Phase II (formerly Carriage blouse CO-OP) allowing an increase in the density and building height at Oakgreen Avenue and 58 Streit North and affecting the real property as follows: SEC ATTACHMENT A The Planning Commission recommends to the City Council of the City of Oak Park Heights approval of the application subject to the following conditions: 1. The Planning Commission recommends the properly should be redesignated from medium density to high density residential in the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The Planning Commission was favorable to the proposed density of the project. 3. The development agreement shall include a provision that the Oak Park Senior Living Phase 11 will remain as senior rental and shall not be converted to non restricted rental housing. 4. The Planning Commission was favorable to the proposed private and public trail system. 5. The setback for Building 4 should be moved at least 30 feet from the right of way line of Oakgreen Avenue. Revised plans shall be provided to the City Council for review and approval. 6. All tree removal and landscape plans shall be subject to review and approval of the City Arborist. 2 7. The grading and drainage plans shall be subject to City Engineer and applicable watershed authority review and approval. 8. All utility plans shall be subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. 9. The Planning Commission was favorable to the non shielded, residential style light fixtures. 10. The applicant shall submit any plans for new signage subject to City approval. 11. The projected traffic counts are subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. If the intersection at 58` Street and Oakgreen Avenue requires sit nali anon or other traffic control measures, the applicant shall agree to a share of the costs as outlined in the Development Agreement. 12. The Fire Marshal and Police Chief should review the plans and determine the accessibility of emergency vehicles throughout the development. 13. The trails and sidewalks shall be constructed in accordance with the City Engineer's review and approvals. 14, The snow storage areas and plan shall be subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. 15. Any mechanical equipment that is ground mounted or visible from adjacent streets shall be screened as required by the Zoning Ordinance. 16. The Planning Commission was favorable to the 38 foot height of Building 4 as part of the PUD approvals. 17. The den rooms in the dwelling units shall not be converted to bedrooms with the addition of a closet. 18. The Planning Commission was favorable to the final building appearance, colors, materials and the variety between buildings. The applicant shall provide a materials board for the building to be discussed at the Planning Commission and City Council meetings. 19. The development agreement shall include a requirement that all of the buildings be maintained in proper condition and in compliance with City Codes. 20. The applicant shall be required to enter into a development agreement. The development agreement shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Attorney and City Council. 3 21. The applicant shall provide additional details for the private park area including elevations of the gazebo, materials to be used in the structures and walkways, and landscaping details for review and approval of the City Council. 22. The applicant shall provide a sidewalk connection plan for the first floor units of Building 4 subject to City Council review and approval. Recommended by the Planning Commission of the City of Oak Park Heights this 10` day of November, 2011. Jennifer Bye, Chair ATTEST: Eric A. Johnson, City Administrator 4 ATTACHMENT A t Planned Unit Development Amendment Related To The Construction Of Oak Pak Senior Living — Phase it Located at 13915 Upper 58 "' St. N. (Formerly Known As Carriage House Co -op) Washington County CEO Code: 05.029.20- XX -XXXX Legal Description: Lot 1, Block 1 Carriage house Co -op &.Assisted Living ATTACHMENT B Planned Unit Development Amendment Related To The Construction Of Oak Pak Senior Living — Phase II Located at 13945 Upper 58"' St. N. (Formerly Known As Carriage House Co -op) Application Materials • Application & bees • Plan Sets (3 Large Scale Sets /20 1 I X17 Sets) • Written Narrative and Graphic Materials Explaining Proposal • Mailing List from Washington County (500' from subject property) • Proof of Ownership or Authorization to Proceed Conference With City Staff Upon Application Submittal: October 12, 2011 Required Approvals: PUD Amendment City Council 4/5 PUD Amendment Unless a General flan of Development covering the area designated as in the General Concept Plan as the first stage of the PUD has been filed within twelve (12) months from the date Council grants General Concept Plan approval, or in any case where the applicant fails to file General Plan of Development Stage and Final Plans and to proceed with development in accordance with the provisions of this Ordinance and of an approved General Concept Plan, the approval may be revoked by Council action. (401.06.C.2.e) RESOLUTION NO. CITY COUNCIL CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING FINDINGS OF FACT AND RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL THAT THE REQUEST FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT FOR OAK PARK SENIOR LIVING PHASE II (FORMERLY CARRIAGE HOUSE CO -OP) ALLOWING AN INCREASE IN THE DENSITY AND BUILDING HEIGHT AT OAKGREEN AVENUE AND 58"' STREET NORTH BE APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS WHEREAS, the City of Oak Park. Heights has received a request for a Planned Unit Development amendment as it relates to the Oak Park Senior I..iving; Phase 11 (formerly Carriage House CO -OP) allowing; an increase in the density and building height at Oakgreen Avenue and 58"' Street North; after having conducted a public hearing relative thereto, the Planning Commission of Oak Park Heights recommended that the application be approved with conditions. The City Council of the City of Oak Park Heights makes the following findings of fact and resolution: 1. The real property affected by said application is legally described as follows, to wit: SEE A'T'TACHMENT A and 2. The applicant has submitted an application and supporting documentation to the Community Development Department consisting of the following items: SEE ATTACHMENT B and 3. The property was approved by the City Council for a Planned Unit Development, general plan by the City Council on June 9, 2009; and 4. The Carriage House CO -OP was approved with 48 units in one, two story building; and 5, The Planned Unit Development amendment for Oak Park Senior Phase ll includes a total of 96 units in one, three story building; and 6. The building is proposed with setbacks of 24 feet to the right of way of Oakgreen Avenue and a building height of 38 feet; and 7. City Staff prepared a planning report dated November 3, 2011 reviewing the request; and & Said report recommended approval of the amended Planned Unit Development subject to the fulfillment of conditions; and 9. The Planning Commission held a public hearing at their November 10, 2011 meeting, took comments from the applicants and public, closed the public hearing, and recommended that the application be approved with conditions. NOW, THEREFORE, ICE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE CITY OF OAK PARIS HEIGHTS THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVES THE FOLLOWING: A. The application submitted for a Planned Unit Development amendment as it relates to the Oak Park Senior Living Phase 11 (formerly Carriage House CO -OP) allowing an increase in the density and building height at Oakgreen Avenue and 58 "' Street North and affecting the real property as follows: SEE ATTACHMENT A Be and the sane as hereby approved by the City Council of the City of Oak Park Heights with the following conditions: I . The City Council directs that the Proposed Land Use Map should be re- designated from medium density to high density residential in the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The City Council was favorable to the proposed density of the project. 3. The development agreement shall include a provision that the Oak Park Senior Living Phase 11 will remain as senior rental and shall not be converted to lion restricted rental housing. 4. The City Council was favorable to the proposed private and public trail system. 5. The setback for Building 4 should be moved at least 30 feet from the right of way line of Oakgreen Avenue. Revised plans shall be provided to the City Council for review and approval. 6. All tree removal and landscape plans shall be subject to review and approval of the City Arborist. 2 7. The grading and drainage plans shall be subject to City Engineer and applicable watershed authority review and approval. 8. All utility plans shall be subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. 9. The City Council was favorable to the non shielded, residential style light fixtures. 10. The applicant shall submit any plans for new signage subject to City approval. 11. The projected traffic counts are subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. If the intersection at 58` Street and Oakgreen Avenue requires signalization. or other traffic control measures, the, applicant shall agree, to a share of the costs as outlined in the Development Agreement. 12. The Eire Marshal and Police Chief should review the plans and determine the accessibility of emergency vehicles throughout the development. 13. The trails and sidewalks shall be constructed in accordance with the City Engineer's review and approvals. 14, The snow storage areas and plan shall be subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. 15. Any mechanical equipment that is ground mounted or visible from adjacent streets shall be screened as required by the Zoning Ordinance. 16. The City Council was favorable to the 38 foot height of Building 4 as part of the PUD approvals. 17. The den rooms in the dwelling units shall not be converted to bedrooms with the addition of a closet. 18. The City Council was favorable to the final building appearance, colors, materials and the variety between. buildings. The applicant shall provide a materials board for the building subject to review and approval of the City Council. 19. The development agreement shall include a requirement that all of the buildings be maintained in proper condition and in compliance with City Codes, 20. The applicant shall be required to canter into a development agreement. The development agreement shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Attorney and City Council. 3 21. The applicant shall provide additional details for the private park area including elevations of the gazebo, materials to be used in the structures and walkways, and landscaping details for review and approval of the City Council. 22. The applicant shall provide a sidewalk connection plan for the first floor units of Building; 4 subject to City Council review and approval. Approved by the City Council of the City of Oak Park Heights this 29` day of November, 2011. David Beaudet, Mayor XrTEST: Eric A. Johnson, City Administrator 4 ATTACHMENT A Planned Unit Development Amendment Related To The Construction Of Oak Pak Senior Living — Phase It Located at 13945 Upper 58` St. N. (Formerly Known As Carriage House Co -op) Washington County CEO Code: 05.029.20- XX -XXXX Legal Description: Lot 1, Block 1 Carriage House Co -op &.Assisted Living ATTACHMENT B . P, Planned Unit Development Amendment Related To The Construction Of Oak Pak Senior Living — Phase 11 Located at 13945 Upper 58 St. N. (Formerly Known As Carriage House Co -op) Application Materials ® Application & Fees Plan Sets (3 Large Scale Sets /20 I 1 X17 Sets) r Written Narrative and Graphic Materials Explaining Proposal Mailing List from Washington County (500' from subject property) ® Proof of Ownership or Authorization to Proceed Conference With City Staff Upon Application Submittal: October 12, 2011 Required Approvals: PUD Amendment City Council 4/5 PUD Amendment: Unless a General Plan of Development covering the area designated as in the General Concept Plan as the first stage of the PUD has been filed within twelve (12) months from the date Council grants General Concept Plan approval, or in any case where the applicant fails to file General Plan of Development Stage and Final Plans and to proceed with development in accordance with the provisions of this Ordinance and of an approved General Concept Plan, the approval may be revoked by Council action. (401.05.C.2.e)