HomeMy WebLinkAbout2008-08-28 OPH Ltr to Applicant Forwarding Approved Concept Plan DocsCity of Oak Park Heights
14168 Oak Park Blvd. N • Box 2007. Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 • Phone (651) 439 -4439 • Fax (651) 439 -0574
August 28, 2008
Mr. Tim Nolde
PC Box 119
Stillwater, MN 55082
RE: Carriage House -- Multi -Unit Development Concept oncept Plan and TIF Proposal.
Dear Tim,
For your files I have enclosed a copy of the approved
C pp ed City Council resolutions for your
Carriage House
proposal and the most recent amendment to the oak re
Oakgreen Village PUD.
The PUD Amendment documents that will require
in the very near future and your signature should be forthcoming
d should allow you to construct this season.
As to the TIF Proposal, I am still working on contacting Mr. Nick Skarich from Northland
Securities to set up a meeting. He may be out of the he office this week.
Ply .+se - ow if you have any questions.
roc ... nson
Ci . dminisfrator
Cc: Julie Hultman, Planning File
Scott Richards
Mark Vierling
and
and
RESOLUTION NO.
OF THE
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS
WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA
A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING FINDINGS OF FACT AND
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL THAT THE
REQUEST BY TIM NOLDE REPRESENTING ANCHOBAYPRO, INC.
FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR PHASE 1 OF THE
OAKGRE +TIa.7.A(xT. DEVELOPMENT WEST OF OAKGREEN
AVENUE AND NORTH OF 58 STREET TO CHANGE THE NUMBER
OF DWELLING UNITS AND SITE PLAN BE APPROVED WITH
CONDITIONS
WHEREAS, the City of Oak Park Heights has received a request from Tim
Anchobaypro Inc. for a Planned Unit Development for Phase 1 of the
Nolde representing yP
Oak.gree g p
n Village development west of Oakgreen Avenue and north of 58 Street to change the
g
number
of dwelling units and site plan; and after having conducted a public hearing relative
Planning Commission of Oak Park Heights recommended that the application be
thereto, the g
approved with conditions. The City Council of the City of Oak Park Heights makes the
following findings of fact and resolution:
1. The real ro erty affected by said application is legally described as
p p
follows, to wit:
SEE ATTACHMENT A
2. The applicant has submitted an application and supporting
documentation Development to the Communi Develo ment Department consisting of the following items:
SEE ATTACHMENT B
3. The subject property is zoned B -4, Limited Business District which allows
for residential development as a conditional use. The Oakgreen Village development approvals
to date have been planned for a planned unit development; and
4. The City Council, at their April 11, 2006 meeting, approved the concept
plan with conditions for Phase 1 and 2 of the Oakgreen Village development; and
5. The City Council, at their May 23, 2006 meeting, approved the general
plan of development with conditions for Phase 1 of the Oakgreen Village development; and
6. The subject area is directly north of the ponding area and was approved
for 15 attached townhome sites in three buildings. The applicant now proposes one three unit
building and two two unit buildings; and
7. City staff prepared a planning report dated August 6, 2008 reviewing the
request for a planned unit development for Phase 1; and
8. The August 6, 2008 planning report recommended approval of the planned
unit development amendment subject to the fulfillment of conditions; and
9. The Planning Commission held a public hearing at their August 14, 2008
meeting, took comments from the applicants and pub cl �Pd the publiehearing, . , and
recommend that the application be approved with conditions:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL FOR
THE CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVES THE
FOLLOWING:
A. The application submitted by Tim Nolde representing Anchobaypro Inc. for a Planned
Unit Development for Phase 1 of the Oakgreen Village development west of Oakgreen Avenue
and north of 58 Street to change the number of dwelling units and site plan and affecting the
g p g
real property as follows:
SEE ATTACHMENT A
Be and the same as hereby approved by the City Council of the City of Oak Park Heights with
the following conditions:
1. The preliminary /final plat for Oakgreen Ponds is subject to review and approval by the
City Engineer and City Attorney.
2. All easements, as required by the City Engineer and City Attorney, shall be dedicated to
the City as part of the subdivision approvals.
3. Sidewalks /trails and timing for construction are subject to review and approval by the
Parks Commission, City Council, and City Engineer. The trail and crosswalk at 58
Street and Oakgreen Avenue shall cross 58 ' Street to the south.
4. The tree preservation and landscape plans are subject to review and approval of the City
Arborist.
5. Grading, drainage, erosion control, and utility plans are subject to review and approval b
pp by
the City Engineer. Stormwater plans are also subject to review and approval b y the
applicable watershed authority.
6. The buildings shall comply with the requirement for a 20 foot setback from the private
street. The site plan shall be revised subject to City Council approval.
2
p
7. The site plan does not include light fixtures on buildings. If lights are proposed on the
' they buildin g s the must be illustrated on the building plans, details submitted, and the
P hotometric • plan must be revised to include them subject to City staff
review and
approval.
8. The Plannin g Commission is favorable to the building design with the stipulations that
the dormers on the front elevations be increased in size, shake siding be used on the
gables of the front and rear elevations and the gable ends of the rear elevation be
provided a vertical element from the roof eve to the foundation. The City Council should
review and approve the final design and materials for the townhome structures.
9. The Fire Marshal and :P s ;e should review the plans and determine the
accessibility of emergency v.hicles throughout the development.
10. The applicant shall supply the homeowners association documents as required by the City
pp su p
Attorney for review and approval.
11. The applicant shall provide all association duties and maintenance until the completion of
pP p
Phase 1. The homeowners association shall be organized with a funded reserve provided
b y p the developer. The details of the reserve amount shall be outlined in the development
agreement.
12. The applicant shall be required to disclose the entire development plans to include the
Carriage House Cooperative for all Phase 1 buyers. Disclosure is also required for
modification of all buyers within the development that the roadway and wetlands are to
be private and will not be accepted as public in the future by the City.
13. The applicant is required to enter into an amended development agreement with the City
in a form acceptable to the City, and subject to review and approval of the City Attorney.
2008.
ATTEST:
Approved by the City Council of the City of Oak Park Heights this 26th day of August
Eric A. Johnson, City Administrator
David Beaudet, Mayor
3
ATTAC `i..MENi i'
Planned Unit Development Amendment
Oakgreen Village --- Oak Park Ponds
Legally described as:
Lots 1 & 2, Block 1, Oak Park Ponds
Lots 1 3, Block 2, Oak Park Ponds
Lots 1 & 2, Block 3, Oak Park Ponds
Multiple Washington County GEED Codes:
Within NE Vi of Section 5, Township 29, Range 20
Page 84 of 86
ATTACHMENT B
Planned Unit Development (PUD) Amendment
Oakgreen Village —Oak Park Ponds
Application Materials
• Application Form
• Fees
• Plan Sets (3 Large Scale Sets /20 11X17 Sets)
• W ritten Narrative and Graphic Materials Explaining Proposal
g
• Mailing List from Washington County (500' from subject property)
• Proof of Ownership or Authorization to Proceed
• Property Tax Statement(s)/Legal Description(s)
City Upon With Cif Staff U on Application Submittal: July 30, 2008
PUD Amendment
Required Approvals:
City
Council 4/5
PUD Amendment - Limitation on General Concept Plan Approval:
Development covering the area designated as in the General
Unless a General Plan of p .
stage cf the PUD has been filed within twelve ( months
Concept Plan as the first g case where the
from the date Council grants General Concept Plan approval, or in any cas
fr g
applicant and Final Plans and to
licant fails to file General .
and of an
Pp G al Plan of Development Stage an � accordance with the provisions of this Ordinance proceed with development in accordant p
approved General Concept Plan, the approval may be revoked by Council action.
r p
(401 06 C . 2. e)
Page 85of86
RESOLUTION NO.
OF THE
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS
WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA
A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING FINDINGS OF FACT AND
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL THAT THE
REQUEST BY TIM NOLDE, REPRESENTING ANCHOBAYPRO INC.
FOR A PUD CONCEPT PLAN APPROVAL FOR TWO SENIOR
COOPERATIVE RENTAL BUILDINGS REFERRED TO AS THE
CARRIAGE HOUSE COOPERATIVE THAT WOULD BE
CONSTRUCTED IN TWO PHASES AND LOCATED NEAR THE
INTERSECTION OF 58 STREET NORTH AND OAKGREEN AVENUE
BE APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS
WHEREAS, the City of Oak Park Heights has received a request from Tim
Nolde, representing Anchobaypro Inc. for a PUD Concept Plan approval for two senior
cooperative rental buildings referred to as the Carriage House Cooperative that would be
constructed in two phases and located near the intersection of 58 Street North and Oakgreen
Avenue; and after having conducted a public hearing relative thereto, the Planning Commission
of Oak Park Heights recommended that the application be approved with conditions. The City
Council of the City of Oak Park Heights makes the following findings of fact and resolution:
1. The real property affected by said application is legally described as
follows, to wit:
SEE ATTACHMENT A
2. The applicant has submitted an application and supporting
documentation to the Community Development Department consisting of the following items:
and
and
SEE ATTACHMENT B
3. The subject property is zoned B-4, Limited Business District which allows
for residential development as a conditional use. The Oakgreen Village development approvals
to date have been for a planned unit development; and
4. The City Council, at their April 11, 2006 meeting, approved the concept
plan with conditions for Phase 1 and 2 of the Oakgreen Village development; and
5. The subject area includes portions of Phase 2 of the Oakgreen Village
development area.
6. City staff prepared a planning report dated August 7, 2008 reviewing the
request for the PUD Concept Plan approval; and
7. The August 7, 2008 planning report recommended approval of the
Concept Plan subject to the fulfillment of conditions; and
8. The Planning Commission held a public hearing at their August 14, 2008
meeting, took comments from the applicants and public, closed the public hearing, and
recommended that the application be approved with conditions.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL FOR
THE .CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS THAT THE CITY CO u _NCIs f'
VFS THE
FOLLOWING:
A. The application submitted by Tim Nolde, representing Anchobaypro Inc. for a PUD
Concept Plan approval for two senior cooperative rental buildings referred to as the Carriage
House Cooperative that would be constructed in two phases and located near the intersection of
58 Street North and Oakgreen Avenue and affecting the real property as follows:
SEE ATTACHMENT A
Be and the same as hereby approved the City Council of the City of Oak Park Heights with the
following conditions:
1. R -3 District standards for density, and building height are complied with for this project.
2. The plat shall dedicate right-of-way for Oakgreen Avenue and shall be approved by the
City Engineer and City Attorney.
3. The City Council should discuss the need for and the timing of improvements to
Oakgreen Avenue as part of the discussions of the concept plan.
4. The Fire Marshal and Police Chief should review the plans and determine the
accessibility of emergency vehicles throughout the development.
5. The Planning Commission and Park Commission should comment on the proposed
private and public trail system. The general plan submittals shall address the location of
trails and their maintenance.
6. All perimeter units must maintain a 30 foot setback to 58 Street and shall not have less
than a 20 foot setback to Oakgreen Avenue. The City Council recommends that the
setback from Oakgreen be closer to 30 feet.
7. Detailed tree inventory, tree preservation, and landscape plans shall be provided for
general plan of development.
2
8. Detailed grading, drainage and utility plans shall be provided for general plan of
development review.
9. Detailed architectural plans for the proposed buildings in the project shall be required for
general plan of development review.
10. The Planning Commission was favorable to the architectural appearance of the proposed
structures. The City Council shall comment as part of the Concept Plan review.
11. The City Engineer shall comment on the vehicle count and traffic information.
An alternative arkin design be provided for the front entrance of the Phase 1 Carriage
p g � p
House building.
13. The City Council shall comment on building placement of the Carriage House
Cooperative buildings.
14. The applicant shall provide a redesign of the lower level parking area to meet all drive
aisle and disability parking requirements.
15. The applicant has submitted a request for Tax Incremental Financing (TIF) assistance to
benefit the ultimate development of the submitted plan. Any approval of the Concept
Plan does not approve imply that the City will provide any financial assistance through
pp or p y
the use of TIF or in any other method. The City will be reviewing the TIF request over
the next six ty days s and will make a determination regarding such application independent
of the Concept Plan review andlor subsequent approvals.
2008.
ATTEST:
Eric A. Johnson, City Administrator
Approved by the City Council of the City of Oak Park Heights this 26th day of August
David Beaudet, Mayor
3
ATTACHMENT A
Planned Unit Development (PUD): General Concept Plan
Carriage House Coo perative
Washington County GEO Code: O5.O29.2O XX -XXX
Legal Description: Lot 1 & 2, Block 1,
Carriage House Cooperative of the St. Croix Valley
Page 66of86
ATTACHMENT B
Planned Unit Development (PUD): General Concept Plan
Carriage House Cooperative
App1icaU.o:
• /•\p .. i ca.° io.`. . U . i .. ....
• Fees
• Plan Sets (3 Large scale Sets /20 11X17 Sets)
1 Writte n Narrative and Graphic Materials Explaining Proposal
• Mailing List Washington from Washin ton County (500' from subject property)
• �
Proof of Ownership or Authorization to Proceed
• Property Tax statements }/Legal Description(s)
p y
City Upon With
Cit Staff u on Application Submittal: July 30, 2008
PU ]: General Conce t
4/5
Required Approvals:
Planning Commission
City Council 415
PUD: ..�
General Cor ce . t — Effect of Concept Plan Approval:
shall fail to meet time schedules for filing General Plan of
Unless the applicant sh
Development Stage e and/or Final Plans or shall fail to proceed with development
in
approved or shall in any other manner
accordance with the plans as pp fail to comply with general
any condition
of Ordinance 401 or any approval granted pursuant to it, a
been approved and a PUD Agreement signed by the applicant
Concept Plan which has bee pp for
Tied revoked or otherwise impaired pending the application
shall not be modified, b action of
approval of
the General Plan of Development Stage and Final Plans y any
the City of Oak Park Heights without consent of the applicant. (401 .06C.2.d)
�
PUD. general cork e t - Limitation on General Concept Plan Approval:
�
covering the area designated a General Plan of g gnated as in the General ,
of the PUD has been filed within twelve (12) months
Concept Plan as the first stage where the
date Council grants General Concept Plan approval, or in any case
from the d g anal Plans and to
applicant
fails to file General Plan of Development Stage and F
accordance with the provisions of this Ordinance and of an
proceed with development in a action.
Plan the approval General Concept f pP roval may be revoked by Council a
(401.06.C.2.e)
Page 67 of 86