HomeMy WebLinkAbout2012-01-31 CC Meeting Packet Enclosure End 15
Oak Park Heights
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date January 31' 2012
Time Required: 20 Minutes
Agenda Item Title: , Oak Park Heights — Oak Park Senior Living Phase II -- Planned
Unit Development Amendment
Agenda Placement New BuInIss
j 1
Originating Department/Req estors' , / Erie- John s� on, City Administrator
Requester's Signature L l ;'
Action Requested Sc .Attached
Background /Justification (Please indicate if any previous action has been taken or if other public
bodies have advised):
Please see the attached documents from Mr. Scott Richards / TPC and in the following order:
1. Planning Report from Scott Richards, TPC dated January 24 2012. This memo reviews
the reasoning for the drafting of resolutions for DENIAL and for APPROVAL. This
memo also outlines approval timelines and Comprehensive Plan update including a
resolution relating to reversion to medium density.
2. Planning Report from Scott Richards, TPC dated Jan 24 2012
1 Proposed City Council Resolution — Approval
4. Proposed City Council Resolution — Denial
5. Site Plans: 350 Units and 291 Units.
6. Planning Report — Jan 13' 2012 — Discussion of Comparative Density to Boutwells
Landing.
Page 117 of 190
TPC 3601 Thurston Avenue N, Suite 100
Anoka, MN 55303
Phone: 763.231 .5840
Pacsir iie: 763.427.0520
TPC@PlanningCo.corn
PLANNING REPORT — CITY COUNCIL
TO: Eric Johnson
FROM: Scott Richards
DATE: January 24, 2012
RE: Oak Park Heights — Oak Park Senior Living — Phase I and 11—
City Council Denial
TPC FILE: 236.03 — 11.06
Background
For the January 31, 2012 City Council packet, City Staff has prepared resolutions to
adopt the Planned Unit Development amendment that has been proposed by Tim Nolde
for the Oak Park Senior Living Phase I and 11 project. In that this has been a
controversial project in which the City Council has not been entirely comfortable with the
increases in density proposed, Staff felt it necessary to also draft resolutions that would
deny the current proposal. Please find attached the two draft resolutions.
Votes Required
Please note that Section 401.06,G, of the Zoning Ordinance requires that an
amendment of a PUD amendment requires a four -fifths vote of the City Council.
Comprehensive Plan
At their December 13, 2011 meeting, the City Council voted to amend the
Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map to change the land use classification of this
property from medium density residential to high density residential, subject to approval
of the Metropolitan Council. Staff has delayed forwarding the amendment to the
Metropolitan Council until the City Council makes a final decision on Oak Park Senior
Living. If the City Council is inclined to deny the Oak Park Senior Living project, it
should also reverse its decision on the amendment to the Comprehensive Plan Land
Use Map and vote to change the land use classification back to medium density
residential. The single .greatest reason to deny a Planned Unit Development
amendment is if it is not in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan. This action
should be taken prior to the approval of the resolutions for denial. Please find attached
a resolution that has been drafted related to the Comprehensive Plan land use
designation.
Page 118 of 190
The resolutions for denial indicate that the project is not in conformance with the
Comprehensive Plan.
Timeline
The application for the Oak Park Senior Living Phase I Planned Unit Development
amendment was received on September 20, 2011 and deemed complete on October
28, 2011. The City had extended the 60 day timeline to 120 days with a letter sent on
September 22, 2011. The 120 day time line ends on February 24, 2012 unless Mr.
Nolde agrees to provide an extension. In that there is only one City Council meeting in
February on the 28 the City Council will need to act on this request at their January
31, 2012 meeting.
2 Page 119 of 190
RESOLUTION NO.
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS
WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA
A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING FINDINGS OF FACT AND
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL THAT THE PROPOSED LAND
USE MAP OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 2008 BE AMENDED
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Oak Park Heights approved the
2008 Comprehensive Plan at their December 23, 2008 meeting subject to final review and
approval of the Metropolitan Council; and
WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Council approved the Oak Park Heights
Comprehensive Plan 2008 on October 14 of 2009; and
WHEREAS, the City of Oak Park Heights has received a request for a Planned
Unit Development amendment as it relates to the Oak Park Senior Living Phase I and Phase 11
allowing an increase in density for the affected property between Oakgreen Avenue and Nova
Scotia Avenue north of 58 °i Street North; and
WHEREAS, the Planned Unit Development amendment necessitates a change to
the Proposed Land Use Map of the Comprehensive Plan 2008 from medium density residential
to high density residential land use; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Oak Park Heights, at their December
13, 2011 meeting voted to amend the Proposed Land Use Map of the Comprehensive Plan 2008
for the affected property from medium density residential to high density residential land use
subject to review and approval of the Metropolitan Council; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Oak Park Heights, after further
consideration and review of the Comprehensive Plan has determined that the land use
classification for the affected property should remain as medium density residential land use.
The City Council of the City of Oak Park Heights makes the following findings of fact and
resolution:
1. The real property affected by said application is legally described as
follows, to wit:
SEE ATTACHMENT A
and
2. The applicant has submitted an application and supporting documentation
to the Community Development Department consisting of the following items:
SEE ATTACHMENT B
and
Page 120 of 190
• 3. The City of Oak Park Heights did not forward the amendment of the
Proposed Land Use Map of the Comprehensive Plan 2008 changing the land use classification of
the affected property from medium density residential to high density residential property to
adjoining jurisdictions, affected agencies or to the Metropolitan Council. As such the
amendment was not yet been enacted; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE
CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVES THE
FOLLOWING:
A. The City Council of the City of Oak Park Heights, after further consideration and review
of the Comprehensive Plan has determined that the land use classification for the affected
property should remain as medium density residential land use and hereby reverses its action
taken at the December 13, 2011 City Council meeting.
Approved by the City Council of the City of Oak Park Heights this 31 day of January
2012.
•
David Beaudet, Mayor
ATTEST:
Eric A. Johnson, City Administrator
•
2
Page 121 of 190
ATTACHMENT A
(t .
Planned Unit Development Amendment
Related To The Construction Of
Oak Pak Senior Living — Phase II
Located at 13945 Upper 58 St. N.
(Formerly Known As Carriage House Co -op)
Washington County GEO Code: 05.029.20- XX -XXXX
Legal Description: Lot 1, Block 1 Carriage House Co -op & Assisted Living
Page 122 of 190
ATTACHMENT B
�s a
Planned Unit Development Amendment
Related To The Construction Of
Oak Pak Senior Living -- Phase II
Located at 13945 Upper 58 St. N.
(Formerly Known As Carriage House Co -op)
Application Materials
• Application & Fees
• Plan Sets (3 Large Scale Sets /20 1 1 X 17 Sets)
• Written Narrative and Graphic Materials Explaining Proposal
• Mailing Lisi from Washington County (500' from subject property)
• Proof of Ownership or Authorization to Proceed
Conference With City Staff Upon Application Submittal: October 12, 2011
Required Approvals: PUD Amendment
City Council 4/5
PUD Amendment:
Unless a General Plan of Development covering the area designated as in the General Concept
Plan as the first stage of the PUD has been filed within twelve (12) months from the date Council
grants General Concept Plan approval, or in any case where the applicant fails to file General
Plan of Development Stage and Final Plans and to proceed with development in accordance with
the provisions of this Ordinance and of an approved General Concept Plan, the approval may be
revoked by Council action. (401.06.C.2.e)
Page 123 of 190
Anoka3601 Thurston Avenue 55303 N, Suite 100
,
Phone: 763.231 .5840
Facsimile: 763.427.0520
TPC(5 ?Planni ngCo. corn
PLANNING REPORT - CITY COUNCIL
TO: Eric Johnson
FROM: Scott Richards
DATE: January 24, 2012
RE: Oak Park Heights — Oak Park Senior Living Phase 11 -
Planned Unit Development Amendment - City Council
TPC FILE: 236,02 —11.07
BACKGROUND
The City Council, at their November 29, and December 13, 2011 meetings reviewed the
Oak Park Senior Living Phase 11 application for amending the Carriage House CO -OP
Planned Unit Development (PUD) to allow for an increase in the density and building
height. The project is at Oakgreen Avenue and 58 Street.
At the November 29, 2011 meeting, the City Council had asked the developer to reduce
the number of total units from the original submittal of 350 which included the existing
townhomes and the Oakgreen Commons building (120 units). The developer came
back with a proposal to reduce the total to 334 units. At the December 13, 2011
meeting the City Council approved a motion to send the proposal back to the Planning
Commission with two conditions as follows:
1. The third story on Budding 4 shall be eliminated, Only two stories of
dwelling units will be allowed for Building 4.
2. The overall density of the development, including the existing townhomes
and Oakgreen Commons shall not exceed 275 to 291 dwelling units.
The developer has now reduced the total units to 291 and eliminated the third story on
all of the buildings. The Planning Commission, at their January 12, 2012 meeting
reviewed the new plan and recommended on a 3 — 1 vote the revised plan for Oak Park
Senior Living Phase 11 with the following conditions:
1. The third story of Building 4 shall be eliminated. Only two stories of
dwelling units shall be allowed for Building 4.
Page 124 of 190
2. The overall density of the development, including the existing townhomes
and Oakgreen Commons shall not exceed 291 dwelling units.
3. That City Council review the phasing of the development overall, and
consider the market for senior rental housing market prior to construction
of Phase 11.
4. That City Council review the setback for Building 4 at Oakgreen Avenue
and consider requiring it be equal (40 feet) to that of the setback
established for Oakgreen Commons, which has already been constructed.
Attached for reference:
Exhibit 1: Original Submittal Master Plan — Phase I and 11
Exhibit 2: Revised Master Plan - Phase 1 and 11— December 29, 2011
Exhibit 3: Revised Master Plan with Parking Counts
Exhibit 4: Building Elevations — Two Stories
Exhibit 5: January 12, 2012 Planning Commission minutes (not approved)
Phase 11
Tim No1de has provided revised plans for Phase 11 that reduces the number units for the
project. The building will be two stories. The units now proposed with this amendment
are as follows:
Building 4 62
(96 previously)
Parking
The applicant has provided updated plans that include parking counts. The plan shows
497 parking stalls and 51 proof of parking stalls for an overall total of 548 parking stalls.
There is adequate parking to meet City requirements for senior housing.
Building Design
The applicant has provided updated elevation plans to show the two story design. The
Planning Commission was favorable with the revised elevation plans.
Timeline
The application for the Oak Park Senior Living Phase I Planned Unit Development
amendment was received on September 20, 2011 and deemed complete on October
28, 2011. The City had extended the 60 day timeline to 120 days with a letter sent on
September 22, 2011. The 120 day time line ends on February 24, 2012 unless Mr.
2 Page 125 of 190
Nolde agrees to provide an extension. In that there is only one City Council meeting in
February on the 28 the City Council will need to act on this request at their January
31, 2012 meeting.
CONCLUSION 1 RECOMMENDATION
The City Council must act on the Oak Park Senior Living Phase 11 PUD amendment at
their January 31, 2012 meeting unless Mr. Noide is willing to give an extension. Please
find attached City Council resolutions for your consideration.
3 Page 126 of 190
RESOLUTION NO.
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS
WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA
A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING FINDINGS OF FACT AND
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL THAT THE
REQUEST FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
AMENDMENT FOR OAK PARK SENIOR LIVING PHASE II
(FORMERLY CARRIAGE HOUSE CO -OP) ALLOWING AN
INCREASE IN THE DENSITY AT OAKGREEN AVENUE AND 58
STREET NORTH BE APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS
WHEREAS, the City of Oak Park Heights has received a request for a Planned Unit
Development amendment as it relates to the Oak Park Senior Living Phase II (formerly
Carriage 1 -louse CO -OP) allowing an increase in the density at Oakgreen Avenue and 58
Street North; after having conducted a public hearing relative thereto, the Planning
Commission of Oak Park Heights recommended that the application be approved with
conditions. The City Council of the City of Oak Park Heights makes the following
findings of fact and resolution:
1. The real property affected by said application is legally described as
follows, to wit:
SEE ATTACHMENT A
and
2. The applicant has submitted an application and supporting documentation
to the Community Development Department consisting of the following items:
SEE ATTACHMENT B
and
3. The property was approved by the City Council for a Planned Unit
Development, general plan by the City Council on June 9, 2009; and
4. The Carriage House CO -OP was approved with 48 units in one, two story
building; and
5. The Planned Unit Development amendment for Oak Park Senior Phase II
includes a total of 62 units in one, two story building; and
Page 127 of 190
6. City staff prepared a planning reports dated November 3, 2011; December
8, 2011; and January 5, 2012 reviewing the request; and
7. Said reports recommended approval of the amended Planned Unit
Development amendment subject to the fulfillment of conditions; and
8. The Planning Commission held a public hearing at their November 10,
2011 meeting, took comments from the applicants and public, closed the public hearing,
and recommended that the application be approved with conditions.
9. The City Council reviewed the application, the Planning Commission
recommendation and the comments of the public and continued the discussion to the
December 13, 2011 meeting with a request to the applicant to reduce to density of the
overall project to 275 to 291 units and to remove the third story of Building 4. The City
Council also approved a motion to send the application back to the Planning
Commission.
10. The Planning Commission held a public hearing and reviewed the revised
plans at their January 12, 2011 meeting, took comments from the public and the
applicant, and recommended the Planned Unit Development Amendment for Oak Park
Senior Living 11 with the following conditions:
(1.) The third story of Building 4 shall be eliminated. Only two stories of
dwelling units shall be allowed for Building 4.
(2.) The overall density of the development, including the existing townhomes
and Oakgreen Commons shall not exceed 291 dwelling units.
(3.) That City Council review the phasing of the development overall, and
consider the market for senior rental housing market prior to construction
of Phase 11.
(4.) That City Council review the setback for Building 4 at Oakgreen
Avenue and consider requiring it be equal (40 feet) to that of the
setback established for Oakgreen Commons, which has already
been constructed.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL FOR
THE CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVES
THE FOLLOWING:
A. The application submitted for a Planned Unit Development amendment as it
relates to the Oak Park Senior Living Phase 11 (formerly Carriage House CO -OP)
allowing an increase in the density at Oakgreen Avenue and 58" Street North and
affecting the real property as follows:
2 Page 128 of 190
SEE ATTACHMENT A
Be and the same as hereby approved by the City Council of the City of Oak Park Heights
with the following conditions:
1. The City Council approves the proposed density of the project with 62 units in
Phase II and 291 in total for the development.
2. Building 4 of Phase II shall not exceed two stories of dwelling units.
3. That City Council review the phasing of the development overall, and
consider the market for senior rental housing market prior to construction of
Phase II.
4. That City Council review the setback for Building 4 at Oakgreen Avenue and
consider requiring it be equal (40 feet) to that of the setback established for
Oakgreen Commons, which has already been constructed.
5. The development agreement shall include provisions enforcing Developer's
assurances that the Oak Park Senior Living Phase 1 will remain as senior rental
housing and shall not be converted to non age restricted rental housing.
Reasonable security in the form of escrows, tax increment forfeitures, permit
suspension and other consequences for default of this provision by the Developer
or its transferees and assigns shall be imputed into the development contract and
be subject to the approval of the City Attorney.
6. The Park Commission was favorable to the proposed private and public trail
system subject to the approval of the City Council.
7. All tree removal and landscape plans shall be subject to review and approval of
the City Arborist.
8. The grading and drainage plans shall be subject to City Engineer and applicable
watershed authority review and approval.
9. All utility plans shall be subject to review and approval of the City Engineer.
10. The City Council was favorable to the non shielded, residential style light
fixtures on the building.
11. The applicant shall submit any plans for new signage subject to City approval.
12. The projected traffic counts are subject to review and approval of the City
Engineer. If the intersection at 58 Street and Oakgreen Avenue and /or Nova
Scotia Avenue requires signalization or other traffic control measures, the
3 Page 129 of 190
applicant shall agree to the share of the costs as outlined in the Development
Agreement and as determined by the City Council.
13. The Fire Marshal and Police Chief shall review the plans and determine the
accessibility of emergency vehicles throughout the development. The Fire
Marshal and City Engineer shall determine if the entrances onto Nova Scotia
Avenue should be widened to allow for better accessibility of fire equipment.
14. The trails and sidewalks shall be constructed in accordance with the City
Engineer's review and approvals.
15. A revised snow storage area plan shall be provided to the City by February 29,
2012 subject to review and approval of the City Engineer.
16. All air handling vents or condensers shall be installed in the building or placed on
the roof and totally screened subject to approval of the Building Official. Any
electrical or gas equipment and transformers that are ground mounted or visible
from adjacent streets shall be screened as required by the Zoning Ordinance.
17. The den rooms in the dwelling units shall not be converted to bedrooms.
18. The City Council was favorable to the final building appearance, colors,
materials and the variety between buildings. The applicant shall provide a
materials board for the building subject to review and approval of the City
Council.
19. The development agreement shall include a requirement that all of the buildings
be maintained in proper condition and in compliance with City Codes.
20. The applicant shall be required to enter into a development agreement. The
development agreement shall be subject to the review and approval of the City
Attorney and City Council.
21. The applicant shall provide additional details for the private park area including
elevations of the gazebo, materials to be used in the structures and walkways, and
landscaping details for review and approval of the City Council.
22. The sidewalk connection plan for the first floor units of Building 4 shall be
subject to City Council review and approval.
23. Phase 11 consisting of Buildings 4 shall be completed by the applicant and ready
for occupancy no later than December 31, 2014 unless extended by the City
Council.
4 Page 130 of 190
24. The applicant shall provide to the City payment in lieu of taxes if the properties
subject to this approval are converted to a tax exempt status as provided for within
the Development Agreement.
25. The project shall be subject to an annual inspection and review at the discretion of
the City to ensure compliance with the conditions of Planned Unit Development
approval and the Development Agreement.
26. Parking shall be allowed on only one side of the private roadway system in the
development, subject to review and approval of the City Engineer.
Approved by the City Council of the City of Oak Park Heights this 31" day of
day of January, 2012.
David Beaudet, Mayor
ATTEST:
Eric A. Johnson, City Administrator
5 Page 131 of 190
ATTACHMENT A
Planned Unit Development Amendment
Related To The Construction Of
Oak Pak Senior Living — Phase Il
Located at 13945 Upper 58 St. N.
(Formerly Known As Carriage House Co -op)
Washington County GEO Code: 05.029.20- XX -XXXX
Legal Description: Lot 1, Block 1 Carriage House Co -op & Assisted Living
Page 132 of 190
ATTACHMENT 13
Planned Unit Development Amendment
Related To The Construction Of
Oak Pak Senior Living — Phase II
Located at 13945 Upper 58` St. N.
(Formerly Known As Carriage House Co -op)
Application Materials
• Application & Fees
• Plan Sets (3 Large Scale Sets /20 1 1 X 1 7 Sets)
• Written Narrative and Graphic Materials Explaining Proposal
• Mailing List from Washington County (500' from subject property)
• Proof of Ownership or Authorization to Proceed
Conference With City Staff Upon Application Submittal: October 12, 2011
Required Approvals:. PUD Amendment
City Council 4/5
PUD Amendment:
Unless a General Plan of Development covering the area designated as in the General Concept
Plan as the first stage of the PUD has been filed within twelve (12) months from the date Council
grants General Concept Plan approval, or in any case where the applicant fails to file General
Plan of Development Stage and Final Plans and to proceed with development in accordance with
the provisions of this Ordinance and of an approved General Concept Plan, the approval may be
revoked by .Council action. (401.06.C.2.e)
Page 133 of 190
I 9 C / L
RESOLUTION NO.
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS
WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA
A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING FINDINGS OF FACT AND
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL THAT THE
REQUEST FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
AMENDMENT FOR OAK PARK. SENIOR LIVING PHASE II
(FORMERLY CARRIAGE HOUSE CO -OP) ALLOWING AN
INCREASE IN THE DENSITY AT OAKGREEN AVENUE AND 58
STREET NORTH BE DENIED
WHEREAS, the City of Oak Park Heights has received a request for a Planned Unit
Development amendment as it relates to the Oak Park Senior Living Phase II (formerly
Carriage House CO -OP) allowing an increase in the density at Oakgreen Avenue and 58
Street North; after having conducted a public hearing relative thereto, the Planning
Commission of Oak Park Heights recommended that the application be approved with
conditions. The City Council of the City of Oak Park Heights makes the following
findings of fact and resolution:
1. The real property affected by said application is legally described as
follows, to wit:
SEE ATTACHMENT A
and
2. The applicant has submitted an application and supporting documentation
to the Community Development Department consisting of the following items:
SEE ATTACHMENT B
and
3. The property was approved by the City Council for a Planned Unit
Development, general plan by the City Council on June 9, 2009; and
4. The Carriage House CO -OP was approved with 48 units in one, two story
building; and
5. The Planned Unit Development amendment for Oak Park Senior Phase II
includes a total of 62 units in one, two story building; and
Page 134 of 190
6. City staff prepared a planning reports dated November 3, 2011; December
8, 2011; and January 5, 2012 reviewing the request; and
7. Said reports recommended approval of the amended Planned Unit
Development amendment subject to the fulfillment of conditions; and
8. The Planning Commission held a public hearing at their November 10,
2011 meeting, took comments from the applicants and public, closed the public hearing,
and recommended that the application be approved with conditions.
9. The City Council reviewed the application, the Planning Commission
recommendation and the comments of the public and continued the discussion to the
December 13, 2011 meeting with a request to the applicant to reduce to density of the
overall project to 275 to 291 units, and to remove the third story of Building 4. The City
Council also approved a motion to send the application back to the Planning
Commission.
10. The City Council at their December 13, 2011 meeting voted to amend the
Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map to change the land use classification of the subject
property from medium density residential to high density residential subject to approval
of the Metropolitan Council. The amendment to the Comprehensive Plan was not
forwarded to the Metropolitan Council. The City Council, at their January 31, 2012
meeting reversed their decision and voted to retain the land use classification of the
subject property at medium density residential.
11. The Planning Commission held a public hearing and reviewed the revised
plans at their January 12, 2011 meeting, took comments from the public and the
applicant, and recommended the Planned Unit Development Amendment for Oak Park
Senior Living II with the following conditions:
(1.) The third story of Building 4 shall be eliminated. Only two stories of
dwelling units shall be allowed for Building 4.
(2.) The overall density of the development, including the existing townhomes
and Oakgreen Commons shall not exceed 291 dwelling units.
(3.) That City Council review the phasing of the development overall, and
consider the market for senior rental housing market prior to construction
of Phase II.
(4,) That City Council review the setback for Building 4 at Oakgreen
Avenue and consider requiring it be equal (40 feet) to that of the
setback established for Oakgreen Commons, which has already
been constructed.
2 Page 135 of 190
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL FOR
THE CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS THAT THE CITY COUNCIL DENIES
THE FOLLOWING:
A. The application submitted for a Planned Unit Development amendment as it
relates to the Oak Park Senior Living Phase 11 (formerly Carriage House CO -OP)
allowing an increase in the density at Oakgreen Avenue and 58` 1 Street North and
affecting the real property as follows:
SEE ATTACHMENT A
Be and the same as hereby denied by the City Council of the City of Oak Park Heights
with the following findings of fact:
1. The project density does not conform to the medium density land use
classification of the subject property as specified in the Comprehensive Plan.
2. The density of the project is not appropriate for the project area and is not
compatible with the surrounding single family neighborhoods to the south and east.
3. The potential traffic generation from the proposed number of dwelling
units could adversely impact the intersections of Nova Scotia and 58 Street and
Oakgreen Avenue and 58 Street.
4. The narrow private street system with a high density of elderly residents
will be problematic for access by emergency vehicles.
5. Long term maintenance of the buildings and the grounds as a rental
complex is a concern for the health, safely and welfare of the residents and the
surrounding neighborhoods
Application denied by the City Council of the City of Oak Park Heights this 31
day of January, 2012.
David Beaudet, Mayor
ATTEST:
Eric A. Johnson, City Administrator
3 Page 136 of 190
•
ATTACHMENT A
.+
Planned Unit Development Amendment
Related To The Construction Of
Oak Pak Senior Living — Phase II
Located at 13945 Upper 58 St. N.
(Formerly Known As Carriage House Co -op)
Washington County GEO Code: 05.029.20- XX -XXXX
• Legal Description: Lot 1, Block 1 Carriage house Co -op & Assisted Living
Page 137 of 190
ATTACHMENT 13
Planned Unit Development Amendment
Related To The Construction Of
Oak Pak Senior Living — Phase II
Located at 13945 Upper 58 St. N.
(Formerly Known As Carriage House Co -op)
Application Materials
• Application & Fees
• Plan Sets (3 Large Scale Sets /20 1 1 X ] 7 Sets)
• Written Narrative and Graphic Materials Explaining Proposal
• Mailing List from Washington County (500' from subject property)
• Proof of Ownership or Authorization to Proceed
Conference With City Staff Upon Application Submittal: October 12, 2011
Required Approvals: PUD Amendment
City Council 4/5
PUD Amendment:
Unless a General Plan of Development covering the area designated as in the General Concept
Plan as the first stage of the PUD has been filed within twelve (12) months from the date Council
grants General Concept Plan approval, or in any case where the applicant fails to file General
Plan of Development Stage and Final Plans and to proceed with development in accordance with
the provisions of this Ordinance and of an approved General Concept Plan, the approval may be
revoked by Council action. (401.06.C.2.e)
•
Page 138 of 190
\ / fir ; a dt r �x� t y M kt y Folz, �=rccrnan, Erickson, Inc. 'v "t. - '� r5 y ^ t c . 7' \ y n J \ ia4 A
LANG PLANNING SURVEYING • E�Ct. ieFltE \c
` >'r r t 3'$i° £� r 2 s, s �4 , ,; , a t r_ 1 C � J �, . FFE � 124-13 557H MEET A 55(4 NORTH
z �., ,A s 'y < ` R '- W- -- 3- IICv
f 1'ES[7 558iI
n ! t f. r Y ° r 3�, j n. �' i ,�� x t l t �. 1 - `' r .. E llax Oil /crostN Fa Nib 1Y.0G1
5 1 t d'� dC,,+` fr€ 1zT W, '7' vH 7 ,� c y� r. t 5 rssm dr ' -.Fr
a - F s ue" , sr£ t ,,, a :',1:'..,„ «.�a a �n. r ' irittw 'h } � 3' , <
t o � Jr � tu , 2 w 'r' np �Tt ,,i v z7 :rf w d y'
t t, s`' ,;?z` ( , : . 'C. 1r� fi' Y ✓ 3i ,' x > ' ;"'? t a , a S c.`� e r "`'. ; w • • 5 i s 4 ' +A ✓`,� ' { � :•..4, x t --:K , "- .t .-;' QT`S e ,v c r . �` o " O C+J ".,,,, . r •` K- dEFt'f,._
i :yF ,fr :,, � .� C C' * " t ii 1 C'4 ji, jyi /x j r S r i` 2 ry di es `y' LEGEND
'' 1 Y . • ' r t'C < [ � r L 1 T j a� { Y} .5'1 '', ..✓‘ y' 4 x v�7 k / Yri 4 3 nhS ' R
v Tti
a h svu..? t y a,. r� .,,y `s 1
• • t , . tip• T 4 : . I
7 1 r S a/ f t '.!'43.."-f !O UNIT COUNT
. `v+ ;F Ci, " sy N t ^ r + 'Y F= ✓ g %1571.` -`G ASSISTED LINl -
' � r r r a r 3 t . 1 t 1 , . t 2U UNITS
h k.- r � :17.-1-,,,, !a a "3 � t Y�r�. -
EXISTING iOVJNHO.I!E 8E CO a tt UN
S•- "i' . 5 �� ' `""`" t �. yn / { � , s A n ty' 1 '7: Ijt TOWN.yO:4E UNITS TO BE CONSTRUCTeD - 12 U, i
• GE t I t r —i k ;46- } y f rtln,EI -
: i .- .,ALES n... �i k f r 44'; a { y , PHASE IE -SG:OR LINWG UNITS a r U5 TS
' f ., . I�' b y 1 17 . 7r r � j'IRS TOTAL I'S
j
-' , I � 1 # � 3 (uh fl ° t; � r acuuls
, • 3,,Y • t �—_—_,,,--:-.7,-..., t .'` y C _ 1 ^ r FS �- i 1 i T< „,,, t �`� ' p a
R p `� < •
,- v �l r � X� 3 1 i
_ f w { ry T - i .S a x .ta -i'K / a,4 i . t ! c i� r 4 � '. f •
r£. i�`G � s a ar+ ) i�1�' � 3 e ° aR y . wi, f >s
U f 4 P '-rY !^ • RR R1 . . �' f,. l
t dl 1::: tir t 1 55 t S'c rF r f 1 • �`' k ) � 8 , ..8 . - c i 4, c
2v si F ;�: j �. s r � 's< YC - h 7 1Rr R a 1 k ' .
I 1 FI... :50 \ {�¢' t<µy r or s / ; . >i'jO II'1r `' . - ,;;;
y 6 „ v (� 4 {r a`i 6 tilt _ tF .. i. � .,;I Rr^ ' <
-+ Z A. , - sf . a e f y r h t�^ t 11 9 1� `�' C a s _
I s t 5l a ';' "vi y `' - . £A` t ""”" I. Z l .., ,� ,rf "v t + " * `('�� 0 / 1 r
s t . J ! 9 ! S 1 (1 *- sR .�T - : 1 )! e', eI •,� `.✓ V V � ' 1 f
J t r z - / u ,1 r ua r 3 n k
1 :,,,,;,'$,, ,, : y : s 4 t 1 t 1 iIr Z � .. ._.-._
,fix G _ > �lv' R { -� I ; iR�v�`:l' E , f r. A....'2',..:'..'-le.- .. 2 .
t y Y i ;t f (t t
E9 5
r /'i l r{ t}n.7 '. ','....;',F'...',.•': _.'10/.41,''',•`:'' s v� r y ,,;1%.. . { . ...._...... _.... / 1
T
s.,,'` .� ,r F { ;. ! 1 r , ; - ,.or ' � ' `�' E E T N O R T H T H OAK PARK SENIOR LIVING
i. 1,::::••,-.4,...,;.:,;,:...;::.,...,::::.::::,4,4„.1,0,4:,,:,:::,m,i,.:::,.:,..,5teay..;,;.,,,,, /�N ti 1 v. JB .F s T R ________.
............,,,::.,,.,„,.....,,,,,,,„......,,i,5.0;:,.,,,,,_::,.:„:„..1.:Li..,,,•:,,,...,„.,.:::,....,;.,..
_ x 'R z ' ` PHASE I & PHASE . I
r � ORIGINAL SUBM'IT`TAL MASTER PLAN
' ' , , � a 350 1.1 NITS
CD i
0
M.., <.lMY .tVSIM:.l1':y�.!AtK PA [ \'!:C1 IIfF.ta:s, \V%al Ko(n -r:'19.: i .ary(l::l(�f:illfF.:.
•
•
,-• - - -
Folz, Freeman, Erickson, 1.xle-
\ . ..:4:::::..::,;:.:Z."..:;::g:ki"::Xl':rrii::0:','.
r.,:::.r. .... :-...........ii:„H..,;;;;,::4.`,.;.;,::-.,,,•:;;;;J;:;',.';:.:',::4:0:e.,-1,-.V.,;,,:::,',i;i:::-2, -.':-...r"- ` .:i:::':!":: : : :: , ; , '; , :g;:W.:;,:',.:;:;:' , ,::.:._]: ..•
%. ..,..,''........ ...,.....-.-••''17.'..:.::;,* 7.;.:7,1.7:'..7..:-..::...;.',.',...:::::.4.P...',..,,,,-",;;;;;*---.3!*;„1'4,-;,-,
.•'''' ';':',.::`','4,'",.:=■::.,:'•'?:-..--;4:-fi':•'.■?':'-';'.::• :':,,,;,::..N..W.';`,!.:4•';''':ii:2:',.0%),',:'..t-qq-i,-;:,,,r.,:0,41'?;;;„3,":-Z.t.";;:.'tV:',',4'iqZ,P).,,A'..,.:',.: ',' -- ,- \ • te.../7'....:r:..:?r'',V*.421'.;:;g:-V,,:.:/::,.:>C'.:}:hr;a:.44A':':C;'[:4',:,:'ri;;IVYP..,-:;ZX:',;q4V:;:.,Vf,??,.I..;.(::Mg.'r,T,::'i:.I;i,4AU?.*;;t:'q:.5,ihf
.V;=.-YV::',;...i-N,;,,:?;;.',.,;-.32,:,:,K,-01/"Au.."1.n.,i',:,-4$.;i16.04:-;1,0,?!.?.4.';' .-A, •,•' :-
\ \ .:.,..,,,..:.;..,....;.,,..•;;,:7:::::::-..,:e..:-..:-,:r..::;,;:::::;ii......1-:-..e.:;.....i.:.,;:).;:-.,..,:,.0.,,,,kcim.;0,,,,,,v.to.:46,6i-:::4,:,--.,,,i4,-(5,,,ky.:2;i14,-:;te,..,-,......,...„::70,0,1:::,,::;,::,-• 11:010 "sa ' PLANNING -Y- .-- i -- : surtv8IL44 .,s3-7 1 ) . 40. G ..„..... , sTREET: G :E-T.„7,,NA.....°55R4TH2.
\ .,,,...,.::..„,„.4.,,,,..„.:„.„....4,...„.s..i.„:„;;,..._,,y,-,,,,,•::„„0....-- :-.:„...:::::::„...,.,,,,,-„,,,,,,,,.„7,-.:„.„,:::::..,,.-,,:.:.,:„.:-,..,,,,,,,ty„,-..,..„::
\ , ).1 a '''''''''''W2,:;,',.,S:::::"..M;9-*::::"';;I:;:fCr.+'''' :::::,).,g3,....-...-p;,:,
•, \.,, ::.„....,:.,,..,::'" ''..- . fr. ... r'...'''''''::::::..... '...7'.7',.'::':.'••.-7-'.7'.•'',• 27,..=' ..:::,...1:. -...:,_:::,...-';-:: ' : ': .1....;,..0eMA::
, ...- , ..- :::._ ---,..:;--, ..,,,,,,,- r r;•'••74:.?,•Zi,•••••,,PN:',,Z;,:SW),',,,;,•••,••,, 5:/r''''' •'••••:''....,W:7::••?V rf :r::::. ::',...;?:::7"':';;;':''''''.•'::::':: •,.•:••' ;:rr'''''''''' • 1 11
":,.1", e' .';",r;'r:'.''r:':::'',;,...,,r.„:„.riir,,4nr,:Va%',";:, V':!171:W:r':',".';,•Na.el:R.•':74:,'',•;.'•;Z::•???...;‘:1';';•:';.;:'.,.::::',..'::7-,':.V:.•:,-:':;.>7 ':....5..::::'3.:::;..'4::? ..':':•az •
“ : :!....,..::::::::';...'..,i'.,.....AZ::;::;:::;.•:::::5•6:'..:.:•::::..y , .,.: ,. ,..,.2:,:_,,,c4:,:,;:;;;;4,:::.--•,;,:,,•.4...4..,,,,
c±. 2 LEGEND
PPOI
„. , • ' I . : ''' 1.. '-..; ::.:; • ••:.:.'' ' '011f ;',;4 ' : : :4 1 115 _ ,__.b4 r___,.. ,
•
' ' '• ' • ''' ' - ' ' "10°7 ' ''' ' * / r ' '.... . ' ' - 1 S
• •,,: ••,., ,;!•••:7r!,...,. ',410:,r,,,••••;:rfrk:",, j i tf t. j i -
....1...,k....C. ...
. \ ''' 4 .. - :,,• .. . .
•
'•;•:' .... : .:....-"...4 ' j'7- • 4,... 7. :-.: ';'-', '
....—
• ' , ,44I7=tfp1,1.7.6.11II:Ii;,..,:- :-.• : ... ..:''1 ,,'''''" ' ; ''..,: '1 ‘ -■■,', .......' , .. ,, • ''' ,.,.;:
--- '',":1
% CZ) I t r axalmoc...nurox..., I' • I ' •:..,.,_D.,.•,,.,c*.:. ' m r , b-z
,.•-■ , .
.....--‘,...). 4:
_. ..„ ,.„..
f •10. ' ' -, *, ', ". 'T.77.-.,",...:7''&'• 9 ' : Y . ' 274 '' 7 ' 'i.'',:-. ■-,A,....5-t'''':'''''',,-.'
. 047- - 7-2-•; i: I I. ... i:*e•,‹ • •• :,:-. ;,,*;, --;a*•••*'r'c;,;4N;q4 • :,4- '.;i:Vi.:i-X•)4-g•e,,`;`,PA: -• 4 ;p1 ' .. , .i' • • • ' • /‘; k...,4••••-...P.-;::- ,A:.
UNIT COUNT •
:7-- li ! :• .-1•:.:; ..,. AS ..f.' •
. 173 UNITS
11 li [ 1,1.: 41;."'''''',NOSIVit,64:fijrr '.. :'.4":4140t70/1, 'S: '% ''' 4k10. ./ 1r :
1,..
EXISTING ASSISTED I.NING
- ; !: 1 ; .. ,.,:„.,... ' „ :: op , „..:.:,,,..,
--.-_-: ! :•- ..4,0;' $14.., M -... .;;;;,- i,' ..*-_-_--■-...,____. .”' k'' :- ' ' ' . ; '..'.. :.•. % % D -- :; "
---:. i I 1; :::','...; .....•.,, ::, ..,.; 2. ....., :•. ::„.... : i : : :. ; r, 1 ; ..: ' 1 . .. , ...•::::;:;.,, , ,.(4.-.:.;
:-J •......,... ii 1 j .. .,....i.. .:...• .„ I - . : . 1:,tVivrirrik . ' ' ;...q;,..4...5,-...A;12,;',..r3..I.2,?„,..,14....:1'. ,–■/....! .:c . .., . ,y,,i,.„.,,„.;:„•:....,...
–H l' :4 -1 ;Ardr - r - 9 . : . 1 ..- w ..: . - - .---.---" ......::.::.,-,:;.:.;::,..:: :: . '-'iti ' • . " , s:...r:-.:;.:;.:::ri;,::`..;,.r. ••• : 1 if:I.:0:0) :;11, 3 :: : 0: . , 14: 0 1 0 T;S ° 1 .Luf 1. v i N : 1 0 ' i7U0B:NE uluelN:01 r ,T T 1 : u C TED. :
/ i .r... - . i, ji ypv <.- - .,-;:-:;;;;...f, ' A '
.•
1 v: .- _. - 1, 51
r i '. • – rr I , 1_1.-1 i .;--1, .. .7.' N. • , . 7 ': : 1 :.... ' - I . " .44 , "!..' " 41.'. '''.7..'" t•
- • 0 ' .; . ' : k.--- ---- 7 ----. '...• ' . I—I , ,5,4 ; '• .. ' I'''. -.:•;1.•1'.. . •-i::::. :-....,,,,.'f ' , W ra, • : : : ; .`- ' 1=10 .,::.',Y.1:::,' , ...:':,`. I
•
'''''T
• - .: ; .....!-- u I : ,......,....) 1: _ .....1_---i-
.. , I ;, ,.......,--.....,--, 0 :--. – .- ..------•'' I= '7 '':' - ':•:, ' '-',-':: 1 7 7 f ' I :..V:::: IM:r ";-,WRO, -A - 1 fr: ?. . :
. ---. : :
4 . - . , , • „,- .-..:„.-..;......tir-_ ,•.- :- i
ai i :. i . .. . ::::. i_ ...,i <„,.4,0„,. - .1g,f,..(4,a,yotr4„ .41,...W.A., 4, z • e/ ..-:...‘,/ 4 , ,.., ' . 1 ••-•:: " .- .1..:".:3W% ; .W •.• - ii :• •-• • ; - - •
27! - -: 1 I ; C • ..•-. • -' .; L-.; • 4; P :4 1 ., f:: •.••,', '.'-. ! i ;, .1 : ilP :!7Z4• .-:: ii ••••.•
, ? ; i ; 1 ... ; ie .:;,!?..11, t--.a•vp,frlp,,&;-*.o'IS•74. ...- , ;,. , '1: ..,..,„, , • ', '' : 1.11'. '. r r 4'.Y.14,4,1h:',,!SV: .. i :'•:'...-:::. ':.• ••
1 , .• , '• r• r°.• 7 ..,•",'".,..": ',7•IrR, ,•0•:*•:•0 ,'94,° ' .z.l.fit, fe;?4,, , :.. .d±... : ; ' .......;,.....;:;... .
—, i i • - 4 . ,! ' .:' . 1 , . '0 . " ,,,' .- ,,,:;. %Ago igiw : :• . :: : ;tvki., ..v r r 1 ': '7...7., '
.„..-,,,-.7-':'••:',',','",".','-'!!-:='''.'''':''''',-:,--!--7.--:.''.!,...''. ' . i 1 ; Ii. .. V ••• . • VP.i.-: ,...:. •
! : 4. Vk , ''. '-::':" '.....'Y.E= “ '7.. ..;,,," ,,,), s. -- :'; . . U i ' • ' '.!. :r •P':-.--A - Z 9 i ,
0 IQ i 'is
Y i ,. ! ' 1 0,0 9 - Z4... 7 . 41, .. - '
; 'I' : 1 1 .01! '41'i ..'-',',4t.:..';.::::::::.?f :';','.'•;::::::::::"..:':.,-,L'::;;V:ft:'1.: .':',;:'':,:.;'.,:.'::.':'...,:..:::..';.k...-.:.,,,:-.-',--0:,,,,.,: .7""'"''" 1 f.. 1
i ,.:-. t I 1 4, ' -',': (1.;.!::::.::::..;:`,I:4.i::;,:::::::/;:::::.':.,:7'. ...:•;'..'..' : ' '' ''' ' ''' . ! : , .'e .:,.. - .....
(.. ihmato)... ; -;-.F.:-....,-.....rf,....,..,..,,,,:.....:::,,,,,,,..,.,..,:..,,,,,,,,„::.„...,.,•..,,,...:1040.4,
, j ,,.. . , .11.0„...-,.,,,,..„.. :-.- ,..„:„....„:„..„,:„,,,,:.,.
// .;: • ., ;: - , ..... -3.-.6.,, lsri .....:'..- - -.:fzkv.; -4 41,,, ,...,..::. -.:...-.... r : 'r-•:.'
'' r!: i ‘. V i ft.q,4,0grik?.:‘. t ri :•:,:r..;:::::•.: ":::,",':::;•,::t7.:.;.:.:".'..7•:':';;;:•',....,:ir:Yri";•:,,....::•!: .7,••• r:,:::::::';'•,:,'::::,::,'',;::::•:..1.:. : '1 :•W' fi,:iAAki47,:'• ' Pll,W •••••,•77.':.:•• ::,'" : : r r,‘ • - ':
1 :!':: / ' ;4‘gl ti( 4; : f -i ...a'A ' -. .•J.:,.:.'•••.••••..-..:*•:•';•-;.;•;....','...•.••••:••••..•••:.,..:.-;:.••••••:•..•;:-'..:''.-:-,....; '.......:.:;•;.•-•.-.;•,•:;••••.•..••••!' ••• •-•,;,"•-••,.;.,•,, :: "•• -•- •• ' • ' • • .., I •-•:. - .; ; :.... - il • - • ... •.• ...••• ......: . :: .. ; 1
f l i -' -•.' 1 • i 1 it•'--i*%•.i•;;',•;':=54.1 ...;',..::.......-••.• - '-: .. • •.-'. -: ...-•• ''.•-:•:'•••••.•.;.-;.•;;;••••••••:••• - -•-:; ,.•.•• • :•:;..•••.;. ...••• . •••••• • • .. ... - - •• • • • 1 . - •--- :' 'Ll- . -- ; :.. .: .; -: -.. --: :::::
----
1 1 ,•:' l --/ i ; ----ii----- - - - ! • :' • •-• - '....?::':;•;:-...-::: •:'; • i: .-';;;:.::::•' - .:•• .? I- : , :„.-.......:'-:.---
i f '' • . . • i - 1 .;•••••.•:-.',.••••;.' ::•::::::- "..;-:::::•.:•'-;:.;•;„,•.-.,,:.;:•R-..::::..:..;.-;•-:: ....-:-.-.':-:.-:.- • • -;',. - • •
.--,
- - -
P 1', r .....------ ; g j ge,..j --; .'. ,:.;,:, ::-.:. ,...•,:::::.......:,-;',..:.,.., .-:..,:„ ..--' ,, -- OAK
PUD AltiEl\IDAIENT
. , . ....._.. .. .. . i y: q,:k..: ..:.:,.' , .-.::-..: .. ' ,-- r • ,.---„,:;.,--
. .
• MASTER PLAN
jg b •:,. :r. i "-' ------ ' .. . ." -
,- -
—
•
.... "
- CA. •• ,.., , 113 sIl1: I SIFTIS
0:
-ts .
co
TPC 3601 Thurston Avenue N. Suite 100
Anoka, MN 55303
Phone: 763.231 .5840
Facsimile: 763, 427.0520
TPC @PIanningCo.com
PLANNING REPORT
TO: Eric Johnson
FROM: Scott Richards
DATE: January 13, 2012
RE: Oak Park Heights — Oak Park Senior Living — Phase 1 and 11 —
Boutwells Landing Density Comparison
TPC FILE: 236.03 - -11.06
The Mayor has requested that I do a density comparison for the Boutwells Landing
development versus the current proposal from Tim Noide for Oak Park Senior Living
Phases 1 and II. Please find the following results:
Boutwells Landing
I have calculated the density in two ways, one as a total development and second, just
the main campus with the higher density development.
Total Development
The Boutwells Landing development consists of a total of 116,7 acres which includes
the City Park land that is 11,10 acres. That results in a development area of 105.6
acres. There are 537 housing units in the overall development. The density calculation
is as follows:
105.6 (4,599,936 sq ft) / 537 units = 8,565.9 square feet per unit.
Main Campus
The main campus consists of a total of 38.8 acres. There are 404 units in the main
campus. The density calculation is as follows:
38.8 (1,690,128 sq ft) / 404 units = 4,183.4 square feet per unit
Page 141 of 190
Oak Park Senior Living Phase land 11
The most recent plan for Oak Park Senior Living Phase 1 and 11 indicate a total of 291
units. This had been reduced from the original submittal of 350 units. Both of these
totals include the 120 units in the Oakgreen Commons building and the existing
townhomes that will remain. The development has a total of 17.68 acres. The density
calculation is as follows:
17.68 (770,186 sq ft) / 291 units = 2,646.7 square feet per unit
2
Page 142 of 190