HomeMy WebLinkAbout11-09-10 Council Handouts II —
i o
BUETOW AND ASSOCIATES INC
AN ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES COMPANY
2345 Rice Street Suite 210
St. Paul, Minnesota 55113
November 9, 2010
Bituminous Paving Installation Issues
Memorandum
To: Eric Johnson, AICP, City Administrator
From: Randy Engel, Principal -in- Charge
RE: Oak Park Heights City Hall
14168 Oak Park Boulevard North
Oak Park Heights, Minnesota 55082
u
BA #0822
Primary Issue
The General Contractor's installation of the bituminous paving has been found to have Drainage Issues
and Aesthetic Issues that now require repair or replacement. Most of the issues are present at the paved
parking areas directly south of the new City Hall building
Drainage Issues take the form of three (3) individual small depressions (i.e., "bird- baths ") that retain
water until evaporation and would be a slip hazard whenever such water – when present - would freeze.
Aesthetic Issues are four (4): Bituminous materials not neatly terminated at edges of concrete gutters
(rather, those materials are irregularly onto those gutters); aggregate particles of the bituminous mix are
exposed on the paving surface at several areas, are subject to rapid wear and thus have less longevity than
as designed; joints are readily apparent between application "passes" (rather than blended together) in
o several areas; and painted striping /accessibility symbols are irregularly placed, without clean edges and,
otherwise not properly applied.
Background
o 1. The Construction Documents describe the Work: Drawings C2 and A1.0 and Specification
Section 321000 Plant Mix Bituminous Pavement.
2. The Bituminous Paving Design Mix Submittal was approved and retumed to the General
Contractor on October 22, 2009.
3. The bituminous installation of the paved parking areas directly south of the new City Hall
o building occurred in early to mid- September, 2010. The above - stated issues were noticed directly
after the installation. That was followed by a notification of the above - stated issues sent to the
General Contractor on September 14, 2010 followed by two site meetings with the General
Contractor and Bituminous Subcontractor and issuance on September 27, 2010 of a Timeline of
events (attached). A response was requested from the General Contractor.
4. Braun Intertec had been requested for a quotation for professional services to provide visual
o inspection and coring /testing of the installation (the latter to verify density of the installation) on
September 20, 2010. A quotation was received but not acted upon.
5. The Bituminous Subcontractor has suggested repair recommendations and advised of similar
locations that could be reviewed and that his organization had accomplished.
6. The Architect toured sites in Osseo and Maple Grove on September 30, 2010 and October 4, 2010
and found the outcomes to not be acceptable (i.e., they were "patch jobs ").
(continued)
0
tel 651 483 -6701 fax 651 483-2574 www.buetowarchitects.com
Bituminous Paving Installation Issues Memorandum of November 9, 2010
Oak Park Heights City Hall
BA #0822
7. The Architect, after consultation with the City of Oak Park Heights, sent a communication to the
General Contractor on October 6, 2010 that provided different options to resolve these issues
(attached).
8. Later that day and after the Bituminous Subcontractor recommended a "chip and seal" solution,
the Architect, after consultation with the City of Oak Park Heights, sent another communication
to the General Contractor indicting that reinstallation of the 1.5" top course of bituminous paving
is the feasible solution to this issue.
Possible Options
• Replacement of the1.5" top course of bituminous paving in the paved parking areas directly south of
the new City Hall building in Spring 2011.
• Have the Contractor provide a "chip and seal" application to the: paved parking areas directly south
of the new City Hall building, to the South Parking Area and to patched -in areas of 57 street and
O'Brien Avenue directly adjacent to the new roadway construction; provide an extended (5 year)
labor and materials warranty to this work and removal of bituminous materials slopped onto the
concrete gutters all in Spring 2011.
• A monetary settlement.
• Accept the installation in place as installed.
The Possible Options discussed above are for review and consideration by the City of Oak Park
Heights. One or more may be addressed to the General Contractor for their review, consideration and
response.
Mon, Sep 27, 2010 9 :09 AM
Subject: OAK PARK HEIGHTS CITY HALL (BA #0822) - BITUMINOUS PAVING
Date: Monday, September 27, 2010 9 :09 AM
From: Randy Engel < randy _engel @buetowarchitects.com>
To: Steve Gansmoe < steve @jorgensonconstruction.com >, Glen Schlichte
< glen @jorgensonconstruction.com>
Cc: Eric Meyer <emeyer @larsonengr.com >, Eric Johnson
<eajohnson @cityofoakparkheights.com>
Conversation: OAK PARK HEIGHTS CITY HALL (BA #0822) - BITUMINOUS PAVING
September 27, 2010
Recent Timeline:
.9/14/10 Architect sent email communication (attached) to Jorgenson Construction
Superintendent Glen Schlichte regarding observed issues found with recent paving
installation.
.9/15/10 Project Meeting Forty -Five of this date included discussion of observed issues
found with recent paving installation: Harddrives representative Kirk Langum was
present and discussed the installation.
*9/17/10 Architect issued email communication (attached) to Jorgenson Construction
summarizing observed issues found with recent paving installation.
. 9/20/10 Architect Randy Engel and Jorgenson Construction Superintendent Glen
Schlichte met onsite with Harddrives representative Mike Lever. Issues were discussed
and further discussion with Jorgenson Construction planned for Project Meeting Forty -
Six of 9/23/10.
.9/21/10 Requested and received Professional Services Proposal from Braun Intertec
for Visual Assessment, Coring and Testing of bituminous pavement if required.
. 9/23/10 Project Meeting Forty -Six of this date included discussion of observed issues
found with recent paving installation. Discussion as follows:
Relevant Issues (discussed at 9/20/10 onsite meeting):
1. Edges of bituminous paving at concrete curbs /gutters are too high, not neatly applied
and slopped over the gutter edges in spots. It is expected that these edges will be
subject to premature edge deterioration over a short period of time as water gets
between concrete gutter and bituminous paving (aesthetic issue and durability issue).
2. Three (3) individual "bird bath" ponding areas are still present notwithstanding
whatever effort was previously applied to base course by Subcontractor (Harddrives). A
solution such as surface patches may be short term in nature. However, an alternative
of pavement area cut -outs and reapplication of wear course with visible abutting joints
would not be acceptable (aesthetic issue and durability issue).
3. Exposed aggregate in the wear course that are visible at paving surfaces are not
acceptable. It is expected that those surfaces will be subject to premature edge
deterioration over a short period of time. (aesthetic issue and durability issue).
4. Painted striping lines and symbols: do not have sharp and distinct edges (windy
conditions notwithstanding), stop short of concrete gutter in many instances, is shorter
Page 1 of 2
than adjacent such lines at one accessible stall and have one accessible wheelchair
symbol placement located inconsistent with two adjacent similar symbols (aesthetic
issue).
5. Terminations of new paving adjacent to existing paving in the south parking lot and
at O'Brien Avenue /57th Street are zigzag and are irregular in shape. A straight cut was
shown in the Construction Documents for these locations (aesthetic issue and
durability issue).
6. Areas composed of surface "fines" aggregate are crumbling in some areas
(durability issue).
7. Specified MV3 mix design is for heavy duty use (with 3/4" aggregate) but, if properly
applied and without letting mixture cool, can be applied so as to be uniform in
appearance, without aggregate showing or projection to the top of the surface.
Exposure of aggregate can lad to pop -outs and quicker deterioration of paving surface.
The heavy duty MV3 mix has been placed with relatively smooth surface texture in
certain areas of this installation so it is apparent that an acceptable installation can be
achieved (aesthetic issue and durability issue).
8. Drainage slope of main parking lot from east to west a distance of 64' at 1/8" per
foot drainage slope is typical - not unusual - The design is not faulty or unusual
(aesthetic issue and durability issue).
9. Bird baths must be avoided even with 1/8" per foot drainage slope. That slope is
commonly implemented and is successfully achieved in other installations (aesthetic
issue and durability issue).
10. Potential solutions discussed included: removal and replacement of paving OR
leaving paving as installed with credit granted to Owner to reduce paving installation
price OR repairing by application of fines and heating OR extended performance
warranty.
Potential outcome(s) discussed 9/23/10 meeting:
1. Owner may be interested in having only main parking lot located south of new City
Hall improved in appearance and durability. That would require replacement of: wear
course, striping, top elevation of wear course same as concrete gutter, neat installation
and no bird baths.
2. Remainder of installation would be deemed acceptable but with extended warranty.
3. No increase in Contract Price.
4. A response is sought from Jorgenson Construction ASAP.
Randy Engel
Buetow and Associates, Inc.
Page 2 of 2
Wed, Oct 6, 2010 7 :57 AM
Subject: OAK PARK HEIGHTS CITY HALL (BA #0822) - BITUMINOUS PAVING
(CORRECT MESSAGE OF 10/5/10 AND RESEND)
Date: Wednesday, October 6, 2010 7:57 AM
From: Randy Engel < randy _engel @buetowarchitects.com>
To: Steve Gansmoe < steve @jorgensonconstruction.com>
Cc: Eric Johnson <eajohnson @cityofoakparkheights.com >, Eric Meyer
<emeyer @larsonengr.com>
Conversation: OAK PARK HEIGHTS CITY HALL (BA #0822) - BITUMINOUS PAVING
(CORRECT MESSAGE OF 10/5/10 AND RESEND)
October 6, 2010 CORRECT MESSAGE OF 10/5/10 AND RESEND
Steve:
Yesterday I visited two sites (at which Civil Engineering Consultant Larson Engineering
had provided professional design services) to look at the result of recently completed
repair work onto existing bituminous pavement (each slightly less than or just 1 year
old): one site utilized an infrared heat process (Elm Creek Elementary School in Maple
Grove) and one site had a top seal coat placed onto existing bituminous pavement
(Osseo High School in Osseo). I believe that the bituminous paving and repair work
achieved at those locations are similar to what the Paving Subcontractor had discussed
last week.
In both of those areas that I visited, repaired /patched areas, existing joints and existing
cracks were more -or -less visible through the tops of the paved surface - signs of repair
and renewal work to existing bituminous paving.
It looks like that would be the same result at the newly paved areas at the Oak Park
Heights City Hall if infrared heat repairs and a seal coating would be utilized to correct
the visible deficiencies of the wear course of the heavy duty paving located on the west
side of the site and on public streets and /or at the visible deficiencies of the wear
course of the light duty paving located on the east side of the site in front of the new
City Hall building.
The paving Subcontractor had indicated that the installation is sound although special
testing has not occurred to substantiate that claim. The cost of such testing would be
borne by the Contractor if the installation would be found after testing to be not in
compliance with the Contract. The cost of such testing would be borne by the City if the
installation would be found after testing to be in compliance with the Contract. I am
not - at this time - advocating such testing.
I will contact the Owner about these findings and will discuss the following options that
have been previously discussed:
(1) Accept the installation of heavy duty paving on the west side of the site
and on public streets at: Oak Park Drive North; the Public Works Building: the Public
Page 1 of 2
Works Storage Yard; Garage Driveway; Police Impound Yard; Oak Park Boulevard
North, 57th Street, O'Brien Avenue and in the South Parking Area.
(2) Accept paragraph (1) above as well as the current light duty paving on the
east side of the site (i.e., at the driveway and parking area in front of the new City
Hall) subject to a cost credit to the Contract for the unacceptable installation on the
east side of the site.
(3) Accept paragraph (1) above but not the current light duty paving on the
east side of the site (i.e., at the driveway and parking area in front of the City Hall
installation) until the Contractor repairs to the Owner's satisfaction the already -
identified wear course deficiencies on the east side of the site utilizing the
infrared heating and seal coat applications.
(4) Accept paragraph (1) above but not the current light duty paving on the
east side of the site (i.e., at the driveway and parking area in front of the City Hall
installation). The wear course must be replaced with an installation that complies
with the Contract and meets the Owner's satisfaction.
Please let me know If you have anything to add to the above.
Randy Engel
Page 2 of 2
•
Wed, Oct 6, 2010 2:15 PM
Subject: OAK PARK HEIGHTS CITY HALL (BA #0822) - BITUMINOUS PAVING
Date: Wednesday, October 6, 2010 2 :15 PM
From: Randy Engel < randy _engel @buetowarchitects.com>
To: Steve Gansmoe < steve @jorgensonconstruction.com>
Cc: Eric Johnson < eajohnson @cityofoakparkheights.com >, Eric Meyer
<emeyer @larsonengr.com >, Andrew Kegley < akegley @cityofoakparkheights.com>
Conversation: OAK PARK HEIGHTS CITY HALL (BA #0822) - BITUMINOUS PAVING
October 6, 2010
I spoke to the Owner about the options presented in an email communication that was,
resent this morning regarding the bituminous paving recently placed in the Tight -duty
areas of the new parking and driveway areas located just south and adjacent to the
new City Hall.
Mike Leuer of Harddrives called me today and suggested the placement of a hot
aggregate seal (or "chip seal ") onto the light -duty paving areas located on the east side
of the site. After consideration, discussion with the City's Consulting Engineer and after
speaking to the Owner, find that to be an inappropriate application as well as a
unsatisfactory solution for newly - installed paving.
The various repair options are not feasible and, thus the following must be
achieved at this time:
The recently - placed wear course of the light -duty paving located on the east side of the
site (i.e., at the driveway and parking area in front of the City Hall installation) is not
acceptable per comments stated below. The wear course must be replaced with an
installation that complies with the Contract and meets the Owner's satisfaction as
follows:
1. Edges of bituminous paving at concrete curbs /gutters are too high, not neatly applied
and slopped over the gutter edges in spots. It is expected that these edges will be
subject to premature edge deterioration over a short period of time as water gets
between concrete gutter and bituminous paving (aesthetic issue and durability issue).
Reinstallation of the 1.5" wear course must place the 1.5" thick wear course
level with the adjoining concrete gutter and without spillovers onto concrete
gutters.
2. Three (3) individual "bird bath" ponding areas are still present notwithstanding
whatever effort was previously applied to base course by Subcontractor (Harddrives). A
solution such as surface patches may be short term in nature. However, an alternative
of pavement area cut -outs and reapplication of wear course with visible abutting joints
would not be acceptable (aesthetic issue and durability issue). Also, Drainage slope of
main parking lot from east to west a distance of 64' at 1/8" per foot drainage slope is
typical - not unusual - The design is not faulty or unusual (aesthetic issue and
durability issue). Reinstallation of the 1.5" wear course must eliminate the three
Page 1 of 2
bird baths.
3. Exposed aggregate in the wear course that are visible at paving surfaces are not
acceptable. It is expected that those surfaces will be subject to premature edge
deterioration over a short period of time. (aesthetic issue and durability issue).
Reinstallation of the 1.5 " wear course must not have exposed aggregate.
4. Painted striping lines and symbols: do not have sharp and distinct edges (windy
conditions notwithstanding), stop short of concrete gutter in many instances, is shorter
than adjacent such lines at one accessible stall and have one accessible wheelchair
symbol placement located inconsistent with two adjacent similar symbols (aesthetic
issue). Reinstallation of the 1.5" wear course must include new striping that is
properly achieved.
5. Areas composed of surface "fines" aggregate are crumbling in some areas (durability
issue). Reinstallation of the 1.5" wear course must not result in crumbling
fines.
6. Specified MV3 mix design is for heavy duty use (with 3/4" aggregate) but, if properly
applied and without letting mixture cool, can be applied so as to be uniform in
appearance, without aggregate showing or projection to the top of the surface.
Exposure of aggregate can lad to pop -outs and quicker deterioration of paving surface.
The heavy duty MV3 mix has been placed with relatively smooth surface texture in
certain areas of this installation so it is apparent that an acceptable installation can be
achieved (aesthetic issue and durability issue). Reinstallation of the 1.5" wear
course must have a surface that is consistently smooth as achieved at the
west paved areas of this site.
Page2of2
•
Oak Park Heights
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date November 9 2010
Time Required: 3 Minutes
Agenda Item Title: Possible Revision to City Council Meeting Date — Nov 30
Agenda Placement New Business
Originating Department/Requestor Councilmember McComber
Requester's Signature
Action Requested See Below
Background/Justification (Please indicate if any previous action has been taken or if other public
bodies have advised):
At the end of 2009, the City Council did adopt a Council Meeting Schedule that shifted the
meeting from Nov 23` to Nov 30 I will not be able to attend such meeting, would the Council
wish to entertain one of a few options:
1. Revise the schedule to Nov 23` 2010.
2. Revise the schedule to Nov 23` 2010 and if the meeting is not needed, allow the City
Administrator to cancel the meeting.
3. Leave the Schedule as -is and if the meeting is not needed, allow the City Administrator to
cancel the meeting.
City Council Meeting Minutes
December 22, 2009
Page 4 of 4
Mayor Beaudet, seconded by Councilmember McComber, moved to set a
worksession with the Pine Grove Gardens neighbors on January 26 at 6:30
p.m. to discuss the Highway 36 frontage road impact. Carried 5-0.
Dick Johnson, a resident of Oak Park Heights, requested clarification on
whether the 1995 plan was approved by the City Council. City Attorney
Vierling reported that there was an approval of the concept layout but
there have been a number of changes since then. Vieding stated that the
City's position is that the current plan was not in compliance with the
1995 plan.
H. Consider Resolution Anjroving an Amended Planning Commission
Schedule for 2010: Councilmember McComber, seconded by
Councilmember Swenson, moved to approve the Resolution. Roll call
vote taken. Carried 5-0.
L 2010 City Council Meeting Dates: Mayor Beaudet reported that there was
not going to be a conflict with the September 14 meeting date because
legislation cannot hold a primary on that date.
Mayor Beaudet, seconded by Councilmember Abrahamson, moved to
410 cancel the first meeting in February; move the March 23 meeting to March
30; cancel the first meetings in June, July, and August subject to the call of
the City Administrator, and move the November 23 meeting to November
30. Carried 5-0.
VIII. Adjournment:
Mayor Beaudet, seconded by Councilmember Swenson, moved to adjourn at 7:55
p.m. Carried 5 -0.
A s . wed as to Con - i • o Form,
"lbov eg
c� d Beaudet
Administrative Secretary/Deputy Clerk Mayor
•
1
Oak Park Heights
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date November 9 2010
Time Required: 3 Minutes
Agenda Item Title: Metro Cities — Policy Adoption Meeting — 11/17/10
Agenda Placement New Business
Originating Department/Requestor Councilmember McComber
Requester's Signature
Action Requested Designate METRO CITIES Policy Adoption Meeting - Voting Delegate
Background/Justification (Please indicate if any previous action has been taken or if other public
bodies have advised):
On Nov 17 2010 the METRO CITIES group will be holding their Policy Adoption meeting.
They have asked each city to designate a `voting delegate' and I would be honored to be such
delegate.
See attached.
Eric Johnson
From: Laurie Jennings [Iaurie @metrocitiesmn.org]
Sent: Monday, November 08, 2010 2:29 PM
To: marymccomber @aol.com
Subject: Metro Cities Policy Adoption Meeting Memo
G ETRo crriEs
Association of Metropolitan Municipalities
DATE: November 8, 2010
TO: Metro Cities Members
FROM: Patricia Nauman, Executive Director
SUBJECT: Policy Adoption Meeting
We hope that you plan to attend Metro Cities Policy Adoption meeting and the LMC/Metro Cities Regional
Meeting next Wednesday, November 17 at the Brooklyn Park Community Center.
We want to remind member cities that each city is responsible to designate a voting delegate who will
represent their city's position on the Policies. Delegates will be asked to identify themselves at the Policy
Adoption Meeting registration/check -in table
The following represents Metro Cities' Policy Adoption protocol:
• One vote per member city, plus one additional vote for each 50,000 population above the initial 50,000
population.
• As policies are introduced for consideration, the President of Metro Cities will distinguish questions of
clarification or explanation, and questions that could result in an amendment of a policy.
• The President will establish that individual policies can be opened for discussion if five city delegates
request a discussion.
• Discussion on individual policies will be allowed and limited to 10 minutes.
• If there is a motion to amend a policy, the President will honor the motion if five or more delegates
request a vote by municipality.
• Any individual requesting a vote will be asked to verify their delegate status.
• If five delegates request a vote, a vote will be taken by municipality per our by -laws.
• If there is no discussion, or following any votes on individual policies, the President will entertain a
motion for adoption of the entire policy section.
1
If you have any questions, please contact Laurie Jennings at 651.215.4004 or Laurie @MetroCitiesMN.org,
or Patty Nauman at 651.215.4002, or patricia@MetroCitiesMN.org.
The staff and Board of Metro Cities look forward to seeing you next week!
145 University Ave. W, St. Paul, MN 55103 -2044 Phone: 651- 215 -4000 Fax: 651- 281 -1299 www.MetroCitiesMN.org
2
City of Oak Park Heights
Bills Presented for Payment November 9, 2010
Payroll
Gross Payroll with PERA, FICA, and Medicare
Mayor & Council:
11 -9 -10 2,675.10
City administration:
Full -Time
11 -15 -10 9,095.67
Finance
Full -Time
11 -15 -10 13,032.69
Police Department:
Full -Time
10 -31 -10 Overtime 5,224.62
11 -15 -10 34,902.17
Total Police Department 40,126.79
Building Inspection Department:
11 -15 -10 4,893.88
Street Department
Part-Time
11 -1 -10 72.77
Full -Time
11 -15 -10 770.20
Park and Recreation Department:
Part-Time
11 -1 -10 582.17
Full -Time
11 -15 -10 884.25
Utility Department
Part-Time (Water)
11 -1 -10 436.63
Full -Time (Water)
10 -31 -10 Overtime 1,187.50
11 -15 -10 5,244.21
City of Oak Park Heights
Bills Presented for Payment November 9, 2010
Payroll
Page 2
Part-Time (Sewer)
11 -1 -10 291.08
Full -Time (Sewer)
10 -31 -10 Overtime 904.75
11 -15 -10 3,318.75
Part-Time (Storm Sewer)
11 -1 -10 72.77
Full -Time (Storm Sewer)
10 -31 -10 Overtime 0.00
11 -15 -10 624.54
Total Utility Department 12,080.23
Total Payroll 84,213.75
•
CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS Check Register - Council Report Page: 1
Nov 09, 2010 04:14pm
Check Issue Date(s): ALL - ALL
Report Criteria:
Check.Input Date = 10/27/2010- 11/09/2010
Check.GL Invoice Acct (3 Characters) = { < >} 901
Date Check No Payee Invoice Description Inv Amount
11/04/2010 110420107 BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF MN PREMIUM - NOV 27,753.05 M
11/09/2010 52904 ACE HARDWARE SHELVING, MISC SUPPLIES 213.56
11/09/2010 52905 ACTION RENTAL PROPANE 19.77
11/09/2010 52906 AKER DOORS INSTALL RECEIVERS GARAGE DOOR 250.00
11/09/2010 52907 ANIMAL HUMANE SOCIETY ANIMAL CONTROL - 3RD QTR 2010 98.26
11/09/2010 52908 APPOLLO SYSTEMS SECURITY SERVICES 12/10 - 3/11 67.49
11/09/2010 52909 ASSURANT BENEFITS PREMIUM - NOV 971.57
11/09/2010 52910 BAYPORT PRINTING HOUSE INC INVENTORY SHEET FORMS 104.74
ORANGE DOOR HANGERS 138.94
Total 52910 243.68
11/09/2010 52911 BAYPORT, CITY OF REIMB FOR POLICE OFFICER FOR HIGH SCHOOL 120.00
FOOTBALL GAME
11/09/2010 52912 VOID - BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF I PREMIUM - NOV .00 M
11/09/2010 52913 BONESTROO ROSENE ANDERLIK PROF SRVS - ENERGY EFFICIENCY & 19,173.00
CONSERVATION GRANT
11/09/2010 52914 BRUNCKHORST, GARY REIMB FOR MILEAGE 1/4 - 11/4/10 176.70
11/09/2010 52915 BUBERL RECYCLING & COMPOS INC BRUSH WASTE 20.00
BRUSH WASTE 24.00
BRUSH WASTE 16.00
BRUSH WASTE 24.00
Total 52915 84.00
11/09/2010 52916 BUETOW AND ASSOCIATES INC CITY HALL ARCHITECTURAL SRVS - MAY 4,312.50
CITY HALL ARCHITECTURAL SRVS - JUL 1,725.00
CITY HALL ARCHITECTURAL SRVS - AUG 862.50
Total 52916 6,900.00
11/09/2010 52917 CUB FOODS CITY HALL SUPPLIES 453.71
11/09/2010 52918 CULLIGAN OF STILLWATER SOLAR SALT 188.97
11/09/2010 52919 ECKBERG LAMMERS BRIGGS PROSECUTION LEGAL SRVS - OCT 4,001.35
LEGAL SERVICES - GRANTS - OCT 2,333.50
Total 52919 6,334.85
11/09/2010 52920 GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL INC GOPHER STATE SPLIT 101.50
11/09/2010 52921 GRAFIX SHOPPE INC INSTALL LETTERING - UNIT 4107 INS REIMB 229.78
11/09/2010 52922 GUARANTEED CLEAN INC. GENERAL CLEANING - NOV 702.17
11/09/2010 52923 HERITAGE PRINTING PARK & TRAIL GUDES 1,532.37
BUSINESS CARDS - CARUSO 145.51
UTILITY BILL POSTCARDS 574.61
Total 52923 2,252.49
11/09/2010 52924 HULTMAN, JULIE A REIMB FOR MILEAGE 7/2 - 10/7/10 97.15
11/09/2010 52925 HUNT ELECTRIC CORP REFUND BP PERMIT #2010 -00241 OVRPYMT 2.00
11/09/2010 52926 HYATT REGENCY DENVER NATL LEAGUE OF CITIES CONF HOTEL 1,200.18
11/09/2010 52927 INNOVATIVE OFFICE SOLUTIONS FIBERGLASS PANELS 1,308.80
11/09/2010 52928 INSTRUMENTAL RESEARCH INC TOTAL COLIFORM BACTERIA 104.50
11/09/2010 52929 INTEGRA TELECOM LOCAL PHONE SERVICE 10/23 -11/22 801.96
M = Manual Check, V = Void Check
CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS Check Register - Council Report Page: 2
Nov 09, 2010 04:14pm
Check Issue Date(s): ALL - ALL
Date Check No Payee Invoice Description Inv Amount
11/09/2010 52930 JIMMY'S JOHNNYS INC PORTA -POT RENTAL 10/04 - 10/31/10 306.19
11/09/2010 52931 JOHNSON, ERIC CAR ALLOWANCE - NOV 250.00
11/09/2010 52932 JORGENSON CONSTRUCTION NEW CITY HALL CONSTRUCTION - PYMT 16 10,837.00
11/09/2010 52933 KEEPRS INC AMMO 358.89
11/09/2010 52934 KEGLEY, ANDREW REIMB FOR MILEAGE - OCT 117.00
11/09/2010 52935 KINNEY, JANET REFUND STORMWATER OVERPAYMENT 9.00
11/09/2010 52936 LOFFLER COMPANIES INC CANNON COPIER COSTS - OCT 162.47
11/09/2010 52937 LUCY WINTON BELL ATHLETIC FLD 2010 CONTRIBUTION 5,032.00
11/09/2010 52938 MENARDS - STILLWATER CITY HALL SUPPLIES 92.54
ANTIFREEZE 50.98
STREET SIGN MATERIALS 30.97
FIRE EXTINGUISHERS - RECYCLING AWARD 32.87
GENERATOR CABLES 23.04
Total 52938 230.40
11/09/2010 52939 MET COUNCIL ENVIRON SVCS WASTEWATER - DEC 32,508.84
11/09/2010 52940 MET COUNCIL -ENVIR SVC DIV SAC CHARGES - OCT 10,395.00
11/09/2010 52941 MILLER EXCAVATING INC. REPAIR WATER MAIN BREAK - OSGOOD & 36TH 4,477.18
11/09/2010 52942 MISTER CAR WASH FUEL 27.20
11/09/2010 52943 MN RURAL WATER ASSN CITY ASSOCIATE MEMBERSHIP 200.00
11/09/2010 52944 MOSER, MEREDITH REFUND STORMWATER OVERPAYMENT 9.00
11/09/2010 52945 NEWMAN SIGNS INC CITY HALL SIGNS 177.53
11/09/2010 52946 OFFICE DEPOT CALENDARS 297.95
11/09/2010 52947 OFFICE MAX INC EXTERNAL DRIVE 74.97
COMPUTER SPEAKERS 48.19
Total 52947 123.16
11/09/2010 52948 OLSON, ANDREW BELL PROPERTY MOWING 9/26 - 10/9 80.00
11/09/2010 52949 PINSKI, JENNIFER REIMB FOR MILEAGE - OCT 952.77
11/09/2010 52950 PURCHASE POWER REPLENISH POSTAGE METER 200.00
11/09/2010 52951 ROSE FLORAL & GREENHOUSE FLOWERS - MILLER 53.51
11/09/2010 52952 STILLWATER & OAK PARK HTS LODGING TAX - 3RD QTR 2010 9,757.01
11/09/2010 52953 STILLWATER GAZETTE ADV - OAKGREEN COMMONS AMENDMENT 40.18
ADV COMP PLAN AMENDMENTS 35.26
Total 52953 75.44
11/09/2010 52954 STILLWATER MOTOR COMPANY 2007 CROWN VIC MAINT VIN #9233 888.78
11/09/2010 52955 TETZLAFF, JUDY REIMB FOR MILEAGE - OCT 27.00
11/09/2010 52956 THE PLANNING COMPANY LLC MUNICIPAL ORDINANCES - EE /RENEWABLE - OCT 1,790.00
MUNICIPAL PLAN - SUSTAINABILITY - OCT 1,410.00
MEETING RETAINER - OCT 1,800.00
PLANNING SERVICES - OCT 1,904.00
PLANNING SERVICES - OCT 876.00
Total 52956 7,780.00
11/09/2010 52957 TR COMPUTER SALES INC COMPUTER CONSULTING - 10/20 30.00
11/09/2010 52958 TRUCK UTILITIES INC REPAIR FITTING FOR PLOW 285.27
11/09/2010 52959 U S INTERNET ANNUAL HOSTING FEE & SECURENCE SUPPORT 107.50
11/14 - 12/13/10
11/09/2010 52960 VEOLIA ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES FALL CLEAN UP 2010 1,244.93
11/09/2010 52961 VERIZON WIRELESS CELL PHONE 372.05
CELL PHONE 155.90
M = Manual Check, V = Void Check
CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS Check Register - Council Report Page: 3
Nov 09, 2010 04:14pm
Check Issue Date(s): ALL - ALL
Date Check No Payee Invoice Description Inv Amount
Total 52961 527.95
11/09/2010 52962 WASHINGTON CTY SHERIFF MDC 4 QTR 3 2010 1,500.00
11/09/2010 52963 WASHINGTON CTY SURVEYOR UPDATED PARCEL DATA 106.88
11/09/2010 52964 WASHINGTON CTY TREASURER 2010 PROPERTY TAX PID #3303020430040 1,616.76
11/09/2010 52965 WELCOA WELLNESS SUBSCRIPTIONS - 24 100.75
11/09/2010 52966 WEST GOVERNMENT SERVICES CONTRACT CHARGES FOR CLEAR - OCT 88.94
11/09/2010 52968 XCEL ENERGY FIRE SIREN 6.96
STREET LIGHT UTILITY 4,197.41
ELECTRIC UTILITY 1,153.28
PARK LIGHT 262.03
SIGNAL LIGHT UTILITY 28.66
ELECTRIC UTILITY 149.76
ELECTRIC UTILITY 16.53
STREET LIGHT UTILITY 47.61
SIGNAL LIGHTS UTILITY 89.72
STREET LIGHT UTILITY 615.60
ELECTRIC UTILITY 119.43
ELECTRIC & GAS UTILITY 47.98
ELECTRIC UTILITY 11.24
ELECTRIC UTILITY 68.13
ELECTRIC UTILITY 137.49
GAS UTILITY 21.32
ELECTRIC UTLITY 24.81
GAS UTILITY 52.48
Total 52968 7,050.44
Totals: 167,841.88
Report Criteria:
Check.Input Date = 10/27/2010- 11/09/2010
Check.GL Invoice Acct (3 Characters) = { < >} 901
M = Manual Check, V = Void Check
CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS Check Register - Treasurer's Report Page: 1
Nov 09, 2010 04:16pm
Check Issue Date(s): ALL - ALL
Report Criteria:
Check.Input Date = 10/27/2010 - 11/09/2010
Check.GL Invoice Acct (3 Characters) = {=} 901
Date Check No Payee Invoice Description Inv Amount
11/03/2010 52903 OAK PARK HEIGHTS, CITY OF PURCHASE 4M FUNDS 360,000.00
11/03/2010 110320109 UBS FINANCIAL SERVICES INC PURCHASE UBS FINANCIAL MONEY MARKET 212.33 M
11/04/2010 110420109 SMITH BARNEY CITIGROUP PURCHASE SMITH BARNEY MONEY MARKET 263.29 M
11/07/2010 110720109 CENTRAL BANK #10-41 PURCHASE 11 MOS CD 1.0% DUE 10 -7 -11 100,000.00 M
Totals: 460,475.62
M = Manual Check, V = Void Check