The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutReport on 1999 Street Reconstruction Project, Feb 1999 File No. 55-99-100I Report On 1999 Street Reconstruction Project Oak Park Heights, Minnesota • February, 1999 ' File No. 55 -99 -100 Bonestroo Rosene WAN Anderlik & ' " Associates Engineers & Architects 1 A MINNESOTA STAR CITY Project Schedule Receive Feasibility Report / Schedule March 1999 Neighborhood Meetings Meeting with City of Stillwater April 1999 Meeting with the County April 1999 Neighborhood Meeting May 1999 Public Hearing / Order Plans June 1999 And Specifications Approve Plans and Specifications November 1999 Open Bids December 1999 Award Project January 2000 Construction Begins Spring 2000 Substantial Construction Completed September 2000 Final Project Completion October 2000 Assessment Hearing December 2000 ' JA BorestroO, Recede Anderhk and Associates. Inc. is an Afbrmabve AcnonlEqual Opportunity Employer Bonestroo Prmopals Otto G Bonestroo, PE • Joseph C AnOerhk. PE • Marvin L. Sorvala. PE - Richard E Turner. PE. • Glenn R Cook, PE. • Robert G. Schumcht, PE. • Jerry A Bourdon. PE ' Rosene Robert W Rosene. PE and Susan M Eberli n. CPA, Senior Consultants MUM Anderlile & Associate Principals Howard A Sanford. PE • Keith A Gordon. PE • Robert R Pfetterle. PE Richard T. Foster. PE David O o PE • Robert C . AJA • Mark A. Hanson, PE M h rd T. Ra t P P R E • T 0 K.leld. Told. P PE Ken Robe P Andersoderson. P • Mark R RoHS, PE A ssociates Sidney P Williamson. PE LS • Robert F Kotsmieh • Agnes M Ring • Michael P Rau, PE t Allan Rick Schmidt, PE Engineers & Architects Ochres. St. Paul Rochester, Willmar and St Cloud MN • Milwaukee. WI Webslte: www. boneStroo Cam 1 ' February 11, 1999 ' Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Oak Park Heights ' 14168 57th Street Oak Park Heights, MIST 55082 t Re: 1999 Street Reconstruction Project Our File No. 55 -S9 -100 Dear Mayor and Council: ' Transmitted herewith is the feasibility report for the 1999 Street Reconstruction Project, which includes Area D, Area E and a portion of Area B of the Comprehensive Street Plan. ' This report includes information regarding the project scope, design details, costs, and financing. Respectfully submitted, BONEST , RO ENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. ' Karen S. Shimon, P.E. ' I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly ' Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the Stat of Min e2 en S. Shimon, P.E. 1 1 Date :February 11, 1999 Reg. No. 25428 1 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, MN 55113 • 651 - 636 -4600 • Fax: 651-636 -1311 Table Of Contents Page No. Letter of Transmittal I Table of Contents 2 Executive Summary 3 Introduction 7 Feasibility 11 Design Recommendations 13 Assessments / Revenue 15 Project Schedule 18 Appendix A Costs Appendix B Testing Results Figure No. 1 Comprehensive Street Plan Areas 2 Area D Location 3 Area E Location 4 Area B Location 5 Pavement Condition Index — Area D 6 Pavement Condition Index - Area E 7 Pavement Condition Index — Area B 8 Street Life Cycle 9 Typical Street Section 10 Proposed Storm Sewer - Area D 11 Proposed Storm Sewer — Area E 12 Area D properties to be Assessed 13 Area E properties to be Assessed 14 Area B properties to be Assessed Oak Park Heights 1999 Street Reconstruction Project 2 I I Executive Summary Background In May of 1993 the City of Oak Park Heights authorized the preparation of a Comprehensive Street Plan to develop a street rehabilitation program for its older streets. Figure 1 identifies the areas that were incorporated into this rehabilitation program. The program started in 1995 with the reconstruction of Area A. ' Scope Of Study This study focuses on the proposed 1999 pavement management project, which includes improvements to 3.2 miles of streets in Area D, 1.3 miles of streets in Area E and 0.5 miles of streets in Area B for a total of 5.0 miles. Figure 2 illustrates the project location and limits for Area D, ' Figure 3 illustrates the project location and limits for Area E and Figure 4 illustrates the project location for Area B. I I I 1 I Summary of Proposed Improvements The proposed improvements consist of the following. • Pavement reconstruction consistent with the policies established by the 1995 reconstruction project for District A which include: • full depth recycling of the existing bituminous pavement (grinding it up to create aggregate base), • subgrade correction where necessary, • installation of concrete curb and gutter, • installation of concrete driveway aprons, • paving a 3" bituminous mixture surface, and • saw and seal bituminous wear course. • Storm sewer improvements. Recommended Staging of the Work If the improvements are ordered, it is recommended that the work be accomplished under one construction contract. The proposed schedule for bidding and execution of the work is outlined in Oak Park Heights 1999 Street Reconstruction Project 3 I ' the report. The work is intended to be completed in the Summer of 2000. ' Summary of Costs The following table summarizes the estimated costs of the proposed project. In Area D, Area E and ' a small portion of Area B concrete curb and gutter is proposed. The majority of Area B has existing concrete curb and gutter (Figure 4) and therefore, it is recommended that the curb in this area be removed and replace only where necessary. The cost for the street reconstruction has been divided into two categories, "Areas of Proposed Concrete Curb and Gutter" and "Areas of Existing Concrete Curb and Gutter ". 1 1 1 1 1 Summary of Estimated Costs Areas of Proposed Concrete Curb and Gutter Summary of Estimated Costs Area of Existing Concrete Curb and Gutter Construction Construction Total Cost Total Cost Cost Total Cost per foot per foot Street Reconstruction $1,737,600.00 $73.00 $2,172,100.00 $91.00 Storm Sewer $223,100.00 $9.00 $278,900.00 $12.00 Total $1,960,700.00 $82.00 $2,451,000.00 $103.00 Summary of Estimated Costs Area of Existing Concrete Curb and Gutter Oak Park Heights 1999 Street Reconstruction Project pi Construction Construction Total Cost Total Cost Cost Total Cost per foot per foot Street Reconstruction $137,400.00 $50.00 $171,800.00 $62.00 Storm Sewer NA NA NA NA Total $137,400.00 $50.00 $171,800.00 $62.00 Oak Park Heights 1999 Street Reconstruction Project pi I 1 i 1 ' Summary of Financing Implications 1 1 Summary of Total Cost Note: the total cost of the project does not include the cost for televising the sanitary sewer or testing the water main for leaks. These tests are necessary to determine if any major repairs are needed. The following summarizes the financing implications that will result from implementing these projects. Revenue Total Project Cost Construction Total Cost $1,030,950 Cost Total $85,800 Street Reconstruction - Areas of Proposed $1,737,600.00 $2,172,100.00 Concrete Curb and Gutter County Turnback Reimbursement Street Reconstruction- Areas of Existing $137,400.00 $171,800.00 Concrete Curb and Gutter Storm Sewer $223,100.00 $278,900.00 Total $2,098,100.00 $2,622,800.00 Note: the total cost of the project does not include the cost for televising the sanitary sewer or testing the water main for leaks. These tests are necessary to determine if any major repairs are needed. The following summarizes the financing implications that will result from implementing these projects. Revenue Total Project Cost $2,622,800 Residential Assessment Revenue (261units) Proposed Concrete Curb and Gutter $1,030,950 Residential Assessment Revenue (60 units) Existing Concrete Curb and Gutter $85,800 OPH Commercial Assessment Revenue $108,680 Stillwater Revenue $230,230 County Turnback Reimbursement General Fund $1,167,140 The following streets within Area D are bordered by properties within the Stillwater city limits: (Assessments and City Costs) - Panama Avenue - Paris Avenue south of Beach Road. ' Osman Avenue - 65 Street North Ozark Avenue North - 64` Street North - Part of Oxboro Avenue - Alley (Oxboro to Panama) 1 Oak Park Heights 1999 Street Reconstruction Project 5 I 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 The condition of these streets are such that they require reconstruction. Since Oak Park Heights residents do live on one side of the road it would be appropriate for the city to attempt to arrange the reconstruction of the street and ask the City of Stillwater to fund their half of the roadway either through their general fund or through assessments. If the City of Stillwater decides not to fund the project, it is recommended that these streets be removed from the project. The following summarizes the financing implications that will result if these streets are removed. Total Project Cost (W /O roads bordering Stillwater) $2,215,940 Residential Assessment Revenue (247units) Proposed Concrete Curb and Gutter $975,650 Residential Assessment Revenue (60 units) Existing Concrete Curb and Gutter $85,800 OPH Commercial Assessment Revenue $79,280 County Tumback Reimbursement General Fund $1,075,210 Special Issues Council will need to consider the information provided in this report and the information that will be obtained from the residents at the neighborhood meetings and public hearing to decide whether to accept the recommendations of this report or to modify the proposed project. In essence, the project as proposed follows previous policy decisions concerning the pavement management program and precedent set from the 1995 reconstruction project. There is, however, one previously established policy that Council should note would not be followed under these proposed improvements. The City's standard street width in new developments is 32 feet from face of curb to face of curb. The previous street capital improvement plan that was adopted by council, recommended a minimum street width of 30 feet. However, the existing streets in Area D and Area E are only 24 feet wide. In many cases on this project it is not practical to widen the street several feet due to existing trees, landscaping etc. Therefore, we recommend most streets in this area to be reconstructed to a width of 28 feet. Oak Park Heights 1999 Street Reconstruction Project 6 I I I I 1 1 Introduction Purpose This report provides information concerning the proposed Area D, Area E and a portion of Area B Street Reconstruction Project. Figure 1 shows a location of these areas. Project Description This 1999 reconstruction project includes Area D, Area E and a portion of Area B of the original pavement management report. Area D lies north of Highway 36, south of east 65th Street, and east of Panama Avenue as well as segments of Osman Avenue, Ozark Avenue, 64 Street, and Oxbom Avenue. Area E lies south of Highway 36 and includes Peller Avenue, Penrose Avenue, 58 Street, 57` Street, and Perkins Avenue. The portion of Area B is east of Osgood along Upper 55 Street North and 56 Street. Background The first area of the Comprehensive Street Plan included Area A, which was constructed during the I995 season. The project described in this report will be the second rehabilitation project of the Comprehensive Street Plan. It includes Area D as shown in Figure 1, Area E as shown in Figure 2 and the portion of Area B as shown in Figure 3. In the fall of 1996, soil borings were performed on Paris Avenue / Beach Road. The results, shown in Appendix C, indicate a 6" bituminous pavement and a 9" gravel base. There is much value in this amount of bituminous and gravel because these materials can be salvaged and reused on the project. In the spring of 1997 test holes were dug on the other residential streets in areas D and E to determine the soil characteristics. The results, which are shown in Appendix C, indicate that sandy clay exists below the bituminous surface. To provide support to the road, the material below the bituminous surface should be gravel. The test holes show that the streets are good candidates for a reclamation process, which would grind up the existing bituminous and mix it with some of the sandy clay to create an aggregate material that would provide a solid base for the road. Oak Park Heights 1999 Street Reconstruction Project I I I The condition of the existing pavements in Area D, Area E and Area B were last rated in 1987. For the 1998 street reconstruction report, the computer program, Paver, was used to help predict the ranking of the roads. These predicted rankings are shown in Appendix C and on Figure 5, Figure ' 6 and Figure 7. For Area D and Area E the average pavement condition index (PCI) for the predicted 1998 value was 58 and for Area B the average was 47. The general life cycle of a street ' is shown in Figure 8. This figure shows that by the year 2000 the average PCI for the streets in Area D /Area E and Area B will be 24 and 18, respectively. ' The table below presents general categories to define PCI Rankings. I 1 Maintenance Recommended Pavement Condition Index Seal Coat 50 -100 Overlay 30 -60 Reconstruct 0 -40 ' In general, PCI rankings below 35 require removal of the existing bituminous pavement before ' constructing a new bituminous surface. The existing aggregate base may also have to be reconstructed. PCI rankings between 35 and 55 require bituminous surface removal or major patching before constructing a bituminous overlay. PCI rankings over 55 typically do not require ' bituminous overlays and generally routine maintenance such as patching, crack sealing, and seal coats are cost effective. ' The deflection testing of Area D and Area E was completed in the summer of 1997. The results of ' this test show that the majority of the streets have an adequate subgrade. The testing identified Pans, Peabody and Ozark as streets that may need subgrade correction. Therefore, quantities and costs for ' some subgrade correction have been included in this report. In addition, the results showed that 65 d ', 64', Upper 63` 62n Paul, Peabody, Paris, Ozark, Penrose and Perkins would experience cracking of the bituminous surface. From Figure 8, the predicted average PCI ranks the streets in the "Reconstruct" category. The ' deflection tests showed that a majority of the streets would crack under repetitive use and several streets actually require subrgrade correction. The test holes showed that the streets are in need of 1 a solid base. These results make it feasible to recommend the total removal of the existing bituminous. Some streets will require removal of the existing aggregate base and subgrade improvements as well. In Area D, Area E and a small portion of Area B concrete curb and gutter Oak Park Heights 1999 Street Reconstruction Project 8 1 ' is proposed. The majority of Area B has existing concrete curb and gutter (Figure 3) and therefore, ' it is recommended that the curb in this area be removed and replace only where necessary. The streets included in this project are listed below along with the length and recommended width of each street: 1 1 I Area D Street Name Length (Feet) Existing Street Width ( Feet) Proposed Street Width (Feet) Upper 61st Street North 1010 24 28 62nd Street North 1360 24 28 63rd Street North 1260 24 28 Upper 63rd Street North 1260 24 28 64th Street North 1260 24 28 Peacan Avenue North 700 24 24 Peabody Avenue North 400 24 24 Paris Avenue North / Beach Road 2200 24 32 Paul Avenue North 750 24 28 Panama Avenue North 1770 24 28 Paris Avenue (residential area) 975 24 28 Osman Avenue North 600 24 28 65' Street North (Beach to Peaean) 700 24 28 64` Street North Oxboro to Ozark 350 24 28 Ozark Avenue North (64 to 65') 320 24 28 Oxboro Ave. North (62 Id to Hwy 36) 1150 24 28 Alley (Oxboro to Panama) 670 24 28 Total 16,735 3.2 miles ' The italicized street names are those that are bordered by properties in the city of Stillwater. These streets would only be reconstructed if an agreement can be reached with Stillwater to pay for the cost of half of the roadway. 1 1 Oak Park Heights 1999 Street Reconstruction Project 2 I 1 I 1 F 1 1 1 I Area E Street Name Length (Feet) Existing Street Width eet Proposed Street Width Feet) Peller Avenue North (56 to 59) 1350 24 28 Penrose Avenue North (56 to 59) 1350 22.5 28 Penfield Avenue 560 18 18* 56 Street North (Penrose to Peller ) 370 24 28 Upper 56` Street North 220 24 28 57 Street North (Peller to Penfield) 830 24 28 58 Street North (Stagecoach to Peller) 990 23 28 Perkins Avenue North (56 to 57) 650 18 18* 57 (west of Perkins) 330 20.5 24 Total 6650 (1.3 miles) "UU w we ,ucauon ui exrsimg ouuamgs, the maximum allowable street width is 18 feet. Lyme Street Name Length (Feet) Existing Street Width (F eet) Proposed Street Width (Feet Ozark 660 32 32 Upper 55` Street 550 32 32 56' Steel 1150 32 32 56' Street Circle 400 32 32 Total 2760 0.5 miles) Oak Park Heights 1999 Street Reconstruction Project 10 1 Feasibility The 1998 Reconstruction Project is feasible. The following table summarizes the estimated costs of the proposed projects. The cost for the street reconstruction has been divided into two categories, "Areas of Proposed Concrete Curb and Gutter" and "Areas of Existing Concrete Curb and Gutter ". Summary of Estimated Costs Areas of Proposed Concrete Curb and Gutter Summary of Estimated Costs Area of Existing Concrete Curb and Gutter Construction Construction Total Cost Total Cost Cost Total Cost per foot per foot Street Reconstruction $1,737,600.00 $73.00 $2,172,100.00 $91.00 Storm Sewer $223,100.00 $9.00 $278,900.00 $12.00 Total $1,960,700.00 $82.00 $2,451,000.00 $103.00 Summary of Estimated Costs Area of Existing Concrete Curb and Gutter Summary of Total Cost Construction Construction Total Cost Total Cost Cost Total Cost per foot per foot Street Reconstruction $137,400.00 $50.00 $171,800.00 $62.00 Storm Sewer NA NA NA NA Total $137,400.00 $50.00 $171,800.00 $62.00 Summary of Total Cost Oak Park Heights 1999 Street Reconstruction Project 11 Construction Total Cost Cost Total Street Reconstruction - Areas of Proposed Concrete Curb and Gutter $1,737,600.00 $2,172,100.00 Street Reconstruction- Areas of Existing Concrete Curb and Gutter $137,400.00 $171,800.00 Storm Sewer $223,100.00 $278,900.00 Total $2,098,100.00 $2,622,800.00 Oak Park Heights 1999 Street Reconstruction Project 11 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 I I 1 At the time the 1993 Comprehensive Street Plan was prepared the fate of Paris Avenue/Beach Road was not certain. However, it is now the intention of the county to negotiate the tumback of this roadway to the city. As a part of this negotiation, an agreement will have to be reached regarding the amount of money the county will reimburse the city for the reconstruction of this street. It is important that Paris Avenue / Beach Road is reconstructed at the same time as the rest of the residential streets in Area D. Most residential streets in this area intersect this roadway, and the reconstruction of these intersections in conjunction with the rest of the streets will allow the new design to correct drainage problems. Also the residential streets can be designed to correctly tie into Paris Avenue / Beach Road which does not have curb and gutter but will have concrete curb and gutter when it is reconstructed. An additional benefit to reconstructing these roadways at the same time is the excess ground up bituminous material from Paris Avenue / Beach Road can be used as aggregate base on other residential streets. Oak Park Heights 1999 Street Reconstruction Project 12 I Design Recommendations ' The following are the design standards recommended for this project. ' Street Section: In the areas of proposed concrete curb and gutter the existing bituminous surface would be reclaimed (ground up) and recycled by using it as an aggregate base. Three inches of ' new bituminous would then be placed over an average aggregate base depth of 8 inches. In the areas of existing concrete curb and gutter the existing bituminous would be reclaimed and recycled. Four inches of new bituminous would then be place over an average aggregate base ' depth of 6 inches. Even though these two street sections are different, the strength of the roads are equivalent. These two street sections are illustrated in Figure 10. ' Street Width: The existing streets in Area D and Area E are 24' wide and 32' in Area B. The city's standard street width is 32', and the streets in Area A were reconstructed to this width. However, several of the streets in Area D have mature trees in close proximity to the street. ' Widening the street to 32' would require the removal of some of the trees and landscaping. Therefore, it is recommended that the majority of the streets be widened only to a width of 28'. This would provide for a minimum of an 8 foot parking lane on both sides of the road and a 12 ' foot driving lane. Street Surface: Saw and seal the new bituminous wear course. This procedure extends the life ' of the street section by reducing the moisture that penetrates the surface and causes the deterioration of the bituminous material. Curb: In Area D and Area E curb will be concrete barrier curb (MNDOT B618). In Area B the curb will be surmountable curb to match the existing curb. ' Storm Sewer: It is recommended that new storm sewer be installed where it will eliminate existing drainage problems and prolong pavement life by reducing ponding on the pavement ' surface. Figure 10 shows the proposed storm sewer for Area D. The proposed storm sewer in Area E is shown in Figure 11. The existing storm sewer castings in each area will be updated to meet current standards. ' Driveways: All existing driveways will have concrete aprons installed. 1 1 Oak Park Heights 1999 Street Reconstruction Project 13 1 Existing Utilities ' Sanitary Sewer: The sanitary lines will be televised during the plan and specification phase of this project. The condition of the existing lines will not be known until that report is received. Water Main: Leak tests will be performed on the existing system to determine the condition of the existing lines. ' Storm Sewer: Visual inspections will be done on the existing system to determine if any repairs need to be made. Only minor repairs and casting replacement is anticipated at this time. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Oak Park Heights 1999 Street Reconstruction Project 14 1 I 1 - -- 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 Assessments / Revenue The assessment policy as established by the city council for the 1995 Reconstruction Project was based on the following: • Each residential property will be assessed the same amount • This amount is based on the amount to be paid by the average size lot on this project • Commercial properties will be assessed on a front footage basis A new policy that is presented in this report is that the city of Stillwater should pay for half of the cost of the streets that abut properties that lie within Stillwater city limits. The assessment amounts are as follows: Residential PropeE gh Proposed Concreutter Eakar rk Heits $3,950 / each `� 41 a � Qp/jV1 � X1 Residential Propek Heights Existing Concrettter $1,430 /each Commercial Property in Oak Park Heights $56.00/ front foot Stillwater Properties $51.50/ front foot The figures above were calculated using the following rate schedule, which was established in the 1993 Comprehensive Street Plan. Assessments Rate Classifications Residential Curb (75% of total Curb Cost) Commerical/Industrial Curb (75% of total Curb Cost) Residential Street (50% of total Street Costs) Commercial/Industrial Street (50% of total Street Costs) Oak Park Heights 1999 Street Reconstruction Project 15 0 1 The total assessments for the project are as follows: ' Oak Park Heights Commercial Property Assessments 1 C 1 1 1 Property Assessable Footage Assessment St Croix Villas Condos 1087 $60,800 ($2,029 per unit) Church 330 $18,480 Orchard Park Condos 165 $9,240 Oak Park Heights Garden 360 $20,160 Total 135 $108,680 City of Stillwater Revenue Property Assessable Footage Amount 2 houses on W Street 298 $15,340 HSI Washington Count 330 $16,990 School 630 $32,440 House — 6282 Panama 165 $8,500 Church 135 $6,950 School 330 $16,990 Washington County Correctional Facility 555 $28,580 Washington Count Building 1500 $77,250 4 houses on 65 Street 528 $27,190 TOTAL $230,230 ' Oak Park Heights 1999 Street Reconstruction Project 1 I 1 1 The total project revenue is shown below: Revenue 1 1 Total Project Cost $2,622,800 Residential Assessment Revenue (261units) Proposed Concrete Curb and Gutter $1,030,950 Residential Assessment Revenue (60 units) Existing Concrete Curb and Gutter $85,800 OPH Commercial Assessment Revenue $108,680 Stillwater Revenue $230,230 County Tumback Reimbursement ? General Fund $1,167,140 ' As is shown, the burden on the general fund would be approximately $1.2 million. This burden on the General Fund would be reduced with the turnback agreement for Paris Avenue/Beach Road. 1 1 1 r- Oak Park Heights 1999 Street Reconstruction Project 17 1 Project Schedule Receive Feasibility Report / Schedule Neighborhood Meetings Meeting with the City of Stillwater Meeting with the County Neighborhood Meeting Public Hearing / Order Plans and Specifications Approve Plans and Specifications Open Bids Award project Construction Begins Substantial Construction Completed Final Project Completion Assessment Hearing February 1999 March 1999 March 1999 April 1999 May 1999 September 1999 October 1999 November 1999 �p w�U y 2000 September 2000 October 2000 e � : �: .111 •�' Oak Park Heights 1999 Street Reconstruction Project 18 I 1 I I 1 W ( -(n (n N NOO NO�OOr U) co N O a0 ' U cn nO co ' ID co cn O U O C r r C n ' ^� CL C v! r X N 1 C C Q a) Q m Q n Q M 1 1 I 1 v c0'ITN ( -(n (n N NOO NO�OOr co N c0 N10 a0 W anN nO co ID co O C r r r n a0 O) r r a0 N 1n N V m I' n M w w w o m, m m M� N V N O) N r N O) N r r r N M O O (D 00 In (D M N O OD N U d ' V) 60 vi 6n (n to , (n yr ca (0) WW n r N w O F . 7 r (O (0 (0 O O CO N CO C cO V n N I� m t0 c N a N N N m W N N l0 m m m co V OO O O CO r r r N OD m .- . OD N l0 N V m n I- m C7 Ifi (0 (0 O N CO 0) M m LO <t N (3) LO (A m N .- .- l0 M O fD (O W l0 (0 M N O O N ff) fA Vf N f9 E9 CA 617 V3 VD 69 Ln fA ffi (A - C_ 64 E U c LL ro m co (o 0,0 m 0 o m co co cD (,D m m 'D m m o - - •-•-,- •- n r� m � � r r r � r r N L V9 � %U4 w 00) 6 (a �09 �69 �69 �es � � I (D M I- O O 00 a N M a O OM M m N 0 n a 0 M M r [p7 O O p m m m m N It N m m m CO (0 .- N N W N (O 01 (0 1� M OD C V O N N N V (Ci (7 u) O V L0 M •1 CA (`1 N h O m m m114 N (D V) M n V N N N CD V N y (a - (A 6% to 69 60 , EA , Qf 69 69 69 69 % 64 N c c U E5 U 0 O + M M M M M O tD uJ M M M M M M M M M � C M M M M M M M V M M M M m M M M M O 0 n 69 n C9 n 61) r U) n fR (D fR O( V9E9fAV)69 Rf»6 n n f> r r P^ 64 n 6% fl9 60 6 n O U co w w m w d' 't N w w M OD 00 07 OD OD O] N N Cl) N N N N M N N N N N N (V N N L N LL O O O O O O O O 0 0 (0 0 0 0 0 O 10 L O (D co CO N (D N (D N O n O V O N LO f� n r n m 0 O 0 n (0 Cl) N M LO ' r (D M I� c N N I 'D D O) LL _J O M c co Y co p N )0 = p[ m ) O to 0 L N c o YO O O O c L co 5 U O O L V m E C O 'C O t C M L r c L X L (O Z Z o Z t Z a o m 0 r o c s L O) L Z Ql r 0 L r m Z p Z d `) O o o n c Z 0(D N r Z O O) C0 ZZ C d o d N C Z Z c Q Q c C> � z D N d M N> d Q > c w Q m > Q Z a) o> N> Q d x in O Cn c_0 m oQQ > EQ c �ininx Q o 0 h T c C O p L N N c 7 c ' E L Y N-0 d N in CL D N Dto�(DaD_D_dD_D_0(D(D000 M V O) O1 N m O3 Co 0 (n v (^l X= O F 1 I I 1 I 1 1 1 1 U) Of r O W rn U) to ' O U � r r r 0 r ' m c 0 E O et � r N 'Q LL VJ r.7 Q m ' X co N w i r C Q W C Q f W Q In O Q r 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 Of Of r O W rn r to r c0 r r r 0 r O 0 0 O et r N 'Q N O r.7 m y e v r v O W f W In O T r CO G%tO&! ST A to m LO U (4(o tr, 0 0 F v rn rn m m C O n O V Cl) O O a m N V N O M m m N N N V u7 C] m N O orj (f) E9 f9 (fl H) 6 f» M H3 fH H} C E 0 Q U 0 c LL1 m d — m m m m m m m m o o cl r N� m m mm mm cm m L O f9 [9 f9 f9 f9 69 ca t9 E9 U m m C N m T N�V U LO � N N N m m C h N n r N 0 U 0 U I R O M m , , (h D O a rr-r`t rlr�mr� 0 y co nr- ofm of rl- r- m0 r- r- of r- r; LO of m U U F9 b9 EA EA fR f9 fA f9 E9 m m m m m m m m It N N N N N N N L N a m ILL 000000000 C L N m WIN N m m N M LO m OJ w J N L N L L_ N N N d O O 0 d C N O O L CL U co L L O O O O D LO w Q L N In lA L C tf — YC L t� L O fl z 6- (n O Y z j U1 D N N z(nzz a c O E > > t > cu >¢¢ drn d m¢ a`�i z ¢ a v rn 3 p m c m N C C L L L Y L CS CL U) ma- CL Sri�d r F 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I v O rr v (n ' O U M 0 Co T ' czU c CO E N � O N ' ^L LL '' VJ Q m ' X cz C Q Q N W? Q (O 1 1 1 I v O rr v (n LO 0 Co T aT CO N PJ O N (O t0 O N W? (O n N O O 49 44 (a fA to U � N � 0 O H 'IT 0nvLn O C M O LO O O N m O - V V 00 V V Cl) I- N KS (9 (9 (a V3 (9 N (9 c_ E m Q U c W m m — m O N o LO N N N N N N a N O) N (D (D (D N (D O E9 (9 (a UA (9 U (O (O V (D co O Omco(v_m v m M N N V) m n v3 (9 (» (9 (9 a 5 c U 0 U 0 O + u1 r r n r n r C C m 0 D W O 4 CG U U f 699 V4 N N N N N co m (7 (7 CO L � W 00000 t O(D UO (OO N (n O LO r a C LL L J 9 U C N X O O Z d N O d N a c Z LO m - N N N Y (n Cn 4l N O N L L N 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ° 7 Q 1 X cn C CL Q 1 Q Q , cn cn O 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 V) O U 000000 000000 y Of N C9 CY Ln IA OD N y 1 n _ N V! M w 69 fg N (A /O N o U� 0 H a C O m C 0 0 <C0 C7 m m M N i 6 � � LA L Cd N LO LO N ? t 3 U d M O 0 0 0 m �CC) �r�v O . O N M 7 Qi _� r o X 616 F 3 O_ w C O U d m Z E m O E a rn U U rb SOW LLJm y m m m m m m C o m a o a a a< a F I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Appendix B Area D- Testing Results Street Name Soil Boring PCI Test Hole 1998 Predicated Value Upper 61" At county rd. 51 Street 5.5" Bituminous 59 North 7.5" Base 85 Fill, mostly silty sand with little gravel 62 Street North 70 2" Oil & Rock 78 18 " -20" sandy clay Below heavier clay 63 Street North 59 74 Upper W Street North 2.5 "Bituminous 52 2" Oil & Rock 9.5 base 70 Sandy Clay some small Fill to 5.0' mostly silty Rock sand 20" Sandy clay Below more cla W Street North 55 2" Oil & Rock 77 18" Sandy Rocky Clay Bigger Rock more Clay Pecan Avenue North 68 4 -5" Oil & Rock 70 12" Sandy Clay Below Heavier Clay Peabody Avenue North 84 Paris Avenue North/ Range from 5.5" — 7" 16 Beach Road Bituminous Pavement Range from 7.5 "- 18.5" Base Fill mostly silty sand Paul Avenue North 42 51 I 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 n 1 Appendix B Area D- Testing Results Street Name Soil Boring PCI Test Hole 1998 Predicated Value Panama Avenue North 38 3" Oil & Rock 18" Sandy Gravel Below 18" Rocky, some big Paris Avenue 39 (residential area) 53 Osman Avenue North 56 5" Oil & Rock 20" Sandy Clay Heavy Clay Some Big Rocks 65 Street North 67 2 -3" Oil & Rock (Beach to Pecan) Sandy Clay Some Bigger Rock 6 Street North (Oxboro to Ozark) Ozark Avenue North 58 (W to 65'") Oxboro Avenue North 5" Oil & Rock (62 to Hwy 36) 20" Sandy Clay Heavy Clay Some Big Rock Alley (Oxboro to Panama) I I 1 [1 1 1 1 1 Appendix B Area E- Testing Results Street Name Soil Boring PCI Test Hole 1998 Predicated Value Peller Avenue North 59 2 -3" Mix (56" to 59'") 81 Rocky, Sandy Clay 63 Penrose Avenue North 56 2 -3" (56" to 59 73 12" Sandy Clay 72 Heavier Clay More Rock Penfield Avenue 32 56 56 Street North 56 3 -3.5" (Penrose to Peller) Big Rocks 12" Sandy Clay Heavier Clay Upper 5& Street No. 55 57 Street North 55 (Peller to Penfield) 58 Street North 84 (Stagecoach to Peller) 54 71 Perkins Avenue North 23 4 -5" (2 Lifts) (56" to 57") 42 Big Rock Limestone 57' (west of Perkins) 87 N i 0 750 15 00 STREET AREAS OAK PARK HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA FIGURE 1 COMPERHENSIVE STREET PLAN K: \55 \55134 \55134F08 FEB 1999 COMM. 55134 JA Sonestroo 0 Rosene Anderlik 6 Associates O d O u U C mU m O O c co U]Et QQ 1 1 I I I l' /J FI E - -- -- -- - -- - - - 7 z JZ 1 i Z I I Q O U O V) I__________ _ ___ N 3 d i cn 8, it \ \ a 1 1 11 1 \ II 1 i n 1 1 I I 1 I 1 I11 1 I 1 1 I I I I 1 j I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I ' I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I — I I 1 I I I I ,I fa W Q III Z II ' W ' '1 W 1 , O 1 I` a W - w V) 0 W N O a- d N w c� H U W O Of CL 00 0) 0) w w O � 0 V) w .^ W E' J W If O Q Q d 3 V) f W J W O - CL O0V) J Of 0) w W Z O- 0O U M W 3 LLJ O O D Q Of Of of M W P �— �— 0) W W W www P� P� f�w V) (f) (1)0 IIIZ I Q O U) w Z Z� � 0 O 0 Q- w � = W W Y � U) Q 0) O a M In N E u U m m m w 0 a M LO LO M LO m m = m m m m = m = m = S � = m = w m 0 b� O Y U C 0 7 m 0 O C m m Q Q Q LIME a V) Z w w O a w' w Of V) 0 W V) d M, W ry L� a M L In Z O U Q O W z o _ Of Ln U' 0- o VJ L M = LL1 Y W i � a M Q7 L Y O� , Q O) i O x m m m= w m i m= m r m m m m m= m o o OD O Y C U O O O O cm'Oco) O O c m m Cc Q Q W U' N * :IA �NdWSO FT 0 0 w = Z � a� 0 P Q W Q Z W W O d I W H N 0 W (n d O a w H H ~ H � C7 m m x W U D U W W ~ W W a� W C-) U Z Z 0 0 U U C3 C� N Z 0 CL 0 w d 0 0 m m N N O V Q O m � m Z ro ? g � 0 O ° _ cr- ° o O a � W m _ Lo Y W o0 af of F rn Q cn a rn i Y 0 Q rn i O r m = m m m m m r m m m � m m m = = = m o Kr O Y L � C L U c mU CO O O C m En a: < I I I 1 ----- ----------- - _ -- ____ -- ---- -- ----- - ----------- - - ----------- - - - -- -- - -_ - LO IE n I I I 1 I I I I I L Y I 11 j V I I I I t' I u l 1 LL LLJ W I I I I HAAN' I I I I I I I I I I 11 11 I I ; 1 I I I I I I I II I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 I I I I 1 1 I I I I I i i`I i t i t � 1 I I 1 I I I III I I I I I I I I I I 11 I I I1II I I I I I I A I I 1 i; I I 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I�I I I I I I i t Q Ld UI i I Ld I L j l l i i i 1 I I I X U 1 Ji 1�1 \ O P2 V$] IO2N Y S 7 N ']Ad Qoo0SO __ z I CD I , o W ° W o W Q 0- N, N W 11 V W W J Q J 00 O) 0) U 0 W d' d U a- a M 0 0 U O (n W Z O c Z Q� m V) 0 4 O 0 W W W � 2 Y W N Q cn d � rn � Y N Q rn 0 Y O .6 O Y q C L U C m U 0 OOCco m[LQQ T W U L� W J 1 Q1 O LLJ H U w a. I U d Im W i �Z y M � c O U O Ll N Q LLJ Q X C) Z Z — O O U ' Z W LLJ Q v M N N m 0 O U O U) LL) Z Q Z o O _ Ckf Lo O a LL LLJ LLJ M Y W Q V) " Y O) N O Y m m m r = = = == m m m r m= m o .c co o �_co U C m U w O O C m 2]2QQ 7mmq , p,r I ""mi O \N 1 ,N \ u i11 11 ', 1 , I, I I I , I I I I 11 11 11 11 1l tl 11 11 }j rr I; Ili + �llryl II II I rpgr Ill ; I 1 I 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I F1 I 1 �I II I I II ;II I I I , II II 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I ; 1 I I I I I I ' 1 I i � i I I I I I 1 I I I I 1 I' ' I II I I I I C) w c a� a U O N II \ II - -IL r� II : cn 3 I� 7c z r 1- Ln � } 7 � C ,t L .. Q I x w 0 z z O z O U z W W Q 0 w Qf D w a 00 rn rn 0 w U_ W af U n. 0 0 0 m cy m m a a m � w O U) W z Z o_ Q 00 CD IY v) N O 2 � 3 0 a- Li Y W °o Cjf Of a Ln N a) Q rn <: O Y m = � r = " = = = = m = = m m � m r r m o� LO N NO / N N O / M 03 4 N / v 0 / m° 0)_ a / W OD 00 Cb L LLJ o ° a / Q i a 0 ° ,o o o o m N NO W W d � I O V " / > O Q / > v � Q O � / � Q / Cn LL > �w 0' / o> o> o o c N Q W W O N W C' C.7 « N « E Q Q u° m Of Of O Z N « V N V y U N V « C O W W N« N N •- N N '- d p N N N U Q Q 1 a •— N a c m o y m m v v w W W 00 / d m o a�i rn� v �v v o c c E �— Z / >> > N c > m o > > rn Q Q o 0 0 0 0 0° Q 0 0 0- 0 ( c a o 0 c a o o_ a e a N o / X X / IY aY r rZ rl r a tl I Q Q I r « Q z 1 $ ° o v 0 of~ 1 0 0 LL o • o �"� >� w > a > I G_ O I W Z m— O O O O O O O O O � Q O O) 00 n cfl It r� N O Z (if (NOIIIONOO 1N3W3AVd) O tl O y � i0 C L U O O C 0 m¢aa ■ -. •• W J U W LL- J H W W F— W C7 Li F O W Z Z_ Q W 2 Y Q d Y Q O No W W 0 0 rn 0 0 rn rn i W cn Z W W Of a- 0 U O O rn m 0 ° U m rn m ai L \ / « \ « d « // // \® 4/ // eg � G9 ) )\ ° \§ \j a =2 w \, ) Lh / \j 2 Ld /� C) < \\ V / - k >/f e / \ \�\ / « d « // // \® 4/ // eg � G9 ) )\ ° \§ \j a =2 w \, ) Lh / 2 Ld /� a < \\ V / k e / �o / \j/ / / 4 z� h 00 /< / }\ ° 2 � 4 BEc / / , vr G // //< / f j( / ƒ /3 U) ƒ / LLJ g > \/ �m m 2 C v \] % \ \\ / 2J< E 3a2 ® / \ 7§f / 2 //\ � R LLJ Z /� cr-3 « d « // // \® 4/ // eg � G9 ) )\ ° \§ \j a =2 w \, ) \k §n)m � ■� �.� 2 2 O \ / \ ƒ \ \ U � / \ E \ \ / \ ® / \ \ \ � E % ( / ) \ \ \ ~ i / \ \ j m m m m m m m m m= m= m= m m m m m Lh « /� \\ V / �o LLJ \j/ > / 4 E h 00 / }\ ° k � 4 BEc ® , vr G //< / f \ U) ƒ LLI v \] % / �2 2 \ ® E \k §n)m � ■� �.� 2 2 O \ / \ ƒ \ \ U � / \ E \ \ / \ ® / \ \ \ � E % ( / ) \ \ \ ~ i / \ \ j m m m m m m m m m= m= m= m m m m m Imo) W w Z N O � V ' ---------/ I I I 1 , I ' I 1 1 I I " 1 I I I __ - --'J I II - II 1 II II II II \ II \ II \ II a \ II N \ II N \ II \ N \ I I \\ M \\ I I \ q t1 \ \ q 1 \\ \q 1 1 ♦\ N \V \1 1 \\ 1 1 11 I I \ 11 1 \\I 1V 1 I u 1 \ I1 1 I 11 1 1 i I 1 I 11 1 I 1 1 l 1 1 I I I 1 I I I 1 I I I I II' I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I 1 1 I I 1 I �I IIn:I l i I I I III 1 I � 1 1 I 1 jl lit �I I I 1 1 III / 1N� I I 1 III I II II I II 1I I II rI I I I I I I II II I 1 I 1 III I II I I I I ICI I I 11 1 I II � j I I I I I I I I I 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I III I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 I I I 1 L I I I I \ l I I I I I I \ \ I I I \ I I I I I I f I 1 ! 1_- Q N W 1..1� Q N � LL W , W V N G LL O co 0 W O d O CE d a M O U Q O W Z Z C m Q O 0 N LLJ (7 Q O = W n Y W i � a Q C/) rn i Y LO Q 01 i 0 — z O ^O O ac m C i 6 U 0 (a O O c m IM cr Q Q ■ O W Of D CD LL o .a O Y .m C U O N O O C m W C O O c m Cox << waq�rOV -1W'r- u Q Ld ry Q W W V) O cn (] W (n O 0- O cr- 0- W a M N LO 0 O U Q O (n W Z Z Q C7 m 0 _ � n CD o = W M W N Y � N (if V) M_ LO 07 O Q O) 0 r O 0) O Y O C m 'a m O O C In OEM I offifilml 111h Biala w N I '1S IS z Eel I I �I I I I I 1 I e I I 1 I I I I I 1 I MIN mom 1011101 111111 11111 P1111012 illlE :1111111: IN I \ I \ I 1 , � 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Vl \ I, I I I I � n 1 II i1 i I I i 1 I I 1 I 1 I 1 1 I I I I 1 I 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I 4 I 1 I I I I I I � I I I I f I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I 1 11 I I I I I I I I I I I it I I I I I I 11 I I I I I IQ I I I II I I I ri l I I 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 I I I t III I I I I II I i 11 11 I 1 1 1 I I t I I I t l l l I I I I I I I I I I I j l l l I I II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 11 I I I I I 11 it : I I X11 j I j I I I 1 1 1 I I I I If I I I i t I 1 1 \ I I I I I I 1 1 I 1 1 I I I I 1 1 III I I , 1 IIII I I I I I I I11 I I I I I I I I I I I I j I 1 j I I I p I I I I I I I N p I I I I I I I I I I I I 11 III I11 I I I I I f i i I I l i I 1 II WAN Q w Q V) z W , N V/ w W Q N W V LL a M LO M 0 O U O LL) z m ? � m � Q Of m vi cD i ° G a a w � � = n Y W i N M_ 0 Y 0) Q 0 i O x 1111111 111111 11111111 111111 11110 11111 111111 1111111 1111111 111111 11110 11111111 111111 1111111 1111111 1111111 1111111 111111 111111 W- 1 I -- r I Jr OEM I offifilml 111h Biala w N I '1S IS z Eel I I �I I I I I 1 I e I I 1 I I I I I 1 I MIN mom 1011101 111111 11111 P1111012 illlE :1111111: IN I \ I \ I 1 , � 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Vl \ I, I I I I � n 1 II i1 i I I i 1 I I 1 I 1 I 1 1 I I I I 1 I 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I 4 I 1 I I I I I I � I I I I f I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I 1 11 I I I I I I I I I I I it I I I I I I 11 I I I I I IQ I I I II I I I ri l I I 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 I I I t III I I I I II I i 11 11 I 1 1 1 I I t I I I t l l l I I I I I I I I I I I j l l l I I II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 11 I I I I I 11 it : I I X11 j I j I I I 1 1 1 I I I I If I I I i t I 1 1 \ I I I I I I 1 1 I 1 1 I I I I 1 1 III I I , 1 IIII I I I I I I I11 I I I I I I I I I I I I j I 1 j I I I p I I I I I I I N p I I I I I I I I I I I I 11 III I11 I I I I I f i i I I l i I 1 II WAN Q w Q V) z W , N V/ w W Q N W V LL a M LO M 0 O U O LL) z m ? � m � Q Of m vi cD i ° G a a w � � = n Y W i N M_ 0 Y 0) Q 0 i O x 1111111 111111 11111111 111111 11110 11111 111111 1111111 1111111 111111 11110 11111111 111111 1111111 1111111 1111111 1111111 111111 111111 o . y co O Y c (o 'OC) O O c m Mcr << N, w LL- C� n 0 0 U P r7 giow LLJ Q LL) Q I V) F— Z L.LJ V) LLJ Q Q H O U) W Z C) m m V U O _ � m = W W n � � a Q N n a. LO 0) i Y U') 0 o .o m O y m = L U C m q O O C m mcc<< -w � r- w 0 0 LO LO E U U E of WIN Q W Q Z W w Q Q O rn U W Z m Z � � � Q (n 0 N _ 0 o 0 a 8 Ln rn W i Q (n 0 a Ln rn Y N O rn Y