HomeMy WebLinkAbout1997-05-01 Planning Report Enclosure 9B
NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS
INC N COMMUNITY PLANNING - DESIGN - MARKET RESEARCH
PLANNING REPORT J
'. ( MAY - 21997
_hI
TO: Mike Robertson - --
FROM: Cary Teague /Scott Richards
DATE: 1 May 1997
RE: Oak Park Heights - Ventura Homes Inc. - Minor Subdivision
FILE NO: 798.02 - 97.04
BACKGROUND
Ventura Homes Inc. is requesting a Minor Subdivision of Lots 11 and 12, Block 1 of the
East Oaks Planned Unit Development (PUD). The subject property is located south of
60th Street and east of Osgood Avenue. The subject property has been zoned PUD as
part of the East Oaks development. This Spring, construction began on a twin home over
these two lots, however, the wall separating the two units was not built on the side property
line, rather, it was constructed between 2.51 and 3.94 feet onto Lot 11. Therefore, the
applicant is requesting a Minor Subdivision to re -align the lot line to be located over the
wall which separates the two units.
Attached for reference:
Exhibit A - Site Location
Exhibit B - East Oaks Subdivision
Exhibit C - Proposed Minor Subdivision
ISSUES & ANALYSIS
Lot Area. Per Section 401.15.C.3 of the Zoning Ordinance, a minimum lot area of 6,000
square feet per unit must be provided for two family dwellings. As demonstrated on Exhibit
B, the subject Tots are two of the larger lots within East Oaks. As such, with the re- location
of the lot line between Lots 11 and 12, both of these lots exceed 8,000 square feet in size,
therefore, meet the City's minimum requirement.
5775 WAYZATA BOULEVARD, SUITE 555 ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA 55416
PHONE 612-595-9636 FAX 612-595-9837
Lot Width. The Zoning Ordinance does not specifically address the minimum lot widths
for this type of development. Lot widths for twin homes are determined by the lot size,
setback requirements and the proposed building style. As a result of the proposed
reconfiguration of the lot line, the width of Lot 11 is 39 feet and width of Lot 12 is 44 feet
(measured at the required front setback line). As demonstrated on Exhibit B, these are two
of the widest Tots within the East Oaks development.
Setbacks. The PUD Ordinance states that all perimeter setback requirements of the
underlying zoning district must be upheld. The underlying zoning district in this instance
is R -B, Residential Business which requires a perimeter setback of 30 feet. The proposed
subdivision will not have any effect on any required setback.
Registered Survey. The applicant has not yet submitted a survey that shows the specific
location of the proposed lot line, therefore, as a condition of approval a registered survey
showing the new location of the lot line must be submitted.
RECOMMENDATION
Based on the information contained herein, our office recommends that the City Council
make the following motion:
► Approval of the proposed Minor Subdivision under the condition that the applicant
submit a registered survey showing both Lot 11 and 12 and the relocated property
line.
pc: Mark Vierling
Dale Dockendorf
Jim Butler
2
CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS ..
I I LAND OUTSIDE CITY LIMITS N .1r4 tG
-••- • - CITY LIMITS This map in foe planning parponin onl)
and should not be utilised when en
measurements are required.
J.LjL.J LJ 1..1 �1 1 -.4 1 -� —� T — I
IIIIIIIIIIIII II III'.IIIIIIII ■ 1
® IIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIII'11111111
® CET IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 7�L '`,
LL�JIL.�JI IIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIII'II IIIII J -
�'"'I ((��jj IIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIAlll 111 �
� a { IDD l_,., n1I1IImI lilminllln r ;
_ La .i '(""� `[ IIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIILIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIillll 1111�II111111 i 1 6
2
IIIIIIIIIIIIIII I ulltll IIIII l
II I IIIIIIIIIIIIIII I h11111I1m11I ?��1
J T II1111InIlll I 101/111 n
Ir]u lll 1 __
SINS NKIINAI I6 .. N J — �_- .a_ —_.�
SATE HIGHNAT 36 = uu
i SITE LOCATION - ->-� —� � , 7 7.■
r _' E II
:/AY M \ / � �` i I i��- U�, 3B '�
AA ���j��. I '' 11 Inlul - � >� s ® '
n1 • • {
�1Q�i�j. � I�.en .0 * .: *, 1 111- MME ..� ...ea r • 1IN �t i _
0. � E ' 2 :'�tl � ► .��► ? ���IIID•�, • ....0: al li' rag _ - lu
. gis i vol _..„gam'. V. : mmH ►•,,, 01111111 III ■ 4 / . 1 1 1 L. �- �\
nplau eo a►a 4 ■ d
. - ptuuuuu►O_ awl 121II -III u I!' II �i ud : 7 1111. '
it rii'. ® I
11
11/11111 1(a or MILL — — • • — • • — • • — /1/11 1111 : e(9au( we 1MS P h 011tl1NWA _I
■1iiA1.� fl ca mau( IAalm WORT
�� 11.1 11 ro{m11 � ® \ , )
EXHIBIT A
•
S.T.H. 36
_ - - - - - - 60TH STREET NORTH
o P.P.
i i
\-- P. ?. f ( — P — — — — 0P. ?. . o
1 , v , ,<A,„ 9,3,J. Y N
in
\ N
1l 3 I
II I
I i ---..>"-.1.--.. N
?Ab7YG ` I l . , 0
•
/ ;//�;// / , , •
..e.''..*"..tV C:: 1.4 ; 1 I ,.. \ ,. /./,/,./.// /://: / ... ' //
r.._. 9 / ,,. Z5•M •.,ety ° �j' / /,' l `4P..:4--ii ue� x
I . \ 1 . ° .: +, ° + ��, S. 9' ; .71c ",7.03' !.` --" /F j /? C'�s.∎<
.'./...15:741 Pa,Y / (37aufa) 5/ p' /' 1 ` - .ci' �„�
I I •
�� I I 1 / / lid-,,_; : !? ,.
— P ; Y Y ���� 1 1 3 1 4 5 1 6 7 I 8 / 9 / ( �� %i: i.� C
20 I : I I I / / / � % ` r
----- 25 1 1 1 s , I • CR f\
6 �b 25' R` C� tr : 5 BJS.: T s
_ P. `s.f %:�" • _ • 20 19 1 8 1 17 16 I 15 14 1 :• :} ;,;r. /'r itex'. } t � .
� ..
/ r r + ,sue / 8913'19- W 79d.t / ,: K � �; —`T r2L.�/ /
o_, =P,,,2 %,- , ;:sir ice, -.:i F „c
I , �� / / / / / / /.^•(/Sr /,Lo /-= .4 /Tr2 =c.5 -...:- T6t.Z=P2'i -
I • C• .0) Y- . 8:.! /r..-.= + -; J
I
s 63 7IC - /i.7 :.0 it ;w719■7K.•3'.: T.;:_:
'r)0T,Y:i%s ?:.1"L,U - - 7 '5 i.e..'M 5, 7E 6 ?r.:' N7g; 4',t :=.)
i l B9✓:- -ri T,L =5 4 A.,c/7% 11.4
(. c 4w-,4.::1) .. _ .22 - B.+1L 3.4V.a?
EXHIBIT B
i s .v X 4 4 III ✓ r a,i 7/
1 0
vacant
1 589'13'19 "W
6 01\ as�sa � , tbS> 142.00 q 40
(0 N 853.4 `` /„ h $ S. 844.2
�3>\N
`v im N i ``\ N `•
1 1 I
/ 11 ,PROPOSED LOT LINE ti
Ix On i
EXISTING LOT LINE � � �/ \,, OO / , \ N ) 1 • d , o \ i ( . 0 _� `\ / ki� � 5 t i 4).
ms 's ab A r9g0
8 c4 00 !Y S H .7
\\
�S � � � '*;t 4 8 r N90 30.00 -'^ •
r 1 ` \ .�0 / �� ,._•0 I '00'00
I ` 1,94,5. 4 s , i ( ....,...•
s
C V l' 9f t
1
'� / 'aa ^ gig 166 7'
13 i
TOP OF FILOCK.857.4
\ 608 ..% • C3
_ � ..•'. 61,,,.2 p{tArIkCE 11c UTILITY oo
.�- EASEMENT
a cP
•48.•
.__ 845.8 ow.
78,00
S891 3'19 "W
x 900.0 Denotes Existing Elevation =LONG V& N$ itur
�. •> Denotes Proposed Elevation Lowest Floor Elevat/on; -840;3- 849.0
---4 -- Denotes Drainage Flow Direction To p of Block Elevation: - 815 - 771 - gS� t
Denotes Drainage & Utility Easement a SIQb Devotion: $ 1355.0
—o-- Denotes Monument NOTE (at door)
: Proposed building site grading is In oceoecionce with the
+�R Denotes Offset iron Bearings shown ore assumed grading pions approved by the city engineer.
NOTE: Contractor must verity all dimensions & driveway design.
LOTS 11--1 BLOCK 1 .E.AST OAKS p• "► L.
WASHINGTON COUNTY. MINNESOTA
We hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that. 1 a duly licensed
Land Surveyor under tho Tows of the State of Minnesota. Dated this 131/I doy 01
Signed: EXHIBIT
—' 1 r _ 4 -._ .,, . .
. - - - cam