Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2012-01-31 Sign Variance & Design Guidelines Permit - Fully Executed
,• ►« CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS VARIANCE FOR SIGNAGE AND DESIGN GUIDELINES PERMIT NEW HORIZON ACADEMY 5903 NEAL AVE NORTH OAK PARK HEIGHTS MINNESOTA File No.: TPC 236.02 -11.08 Date Issued: January 31, 2012 Legal Description: (Washington County Geo. Code: 06.029.20.11.0012) See Attached Exhibit "A" Owner: NH Partners -Oak Park Heights 730 Second Ave So. Mpls, MN 55402 Applicant: A. Peter Hilger - Rylaur, LLC 752 Stillwater Road Mahtomedi, MN 55115 Site Address: 5903 Neal Ave North. Present Zoning District: PUD Commercial Planned Unit Development Permitted uses set forth in Ordinance 401 Section 401.301 The City Council of the City of Oak Park Heights approves the variance for the one wall sign subject to the following findings of fact: 1. The applicants have proposed a total of three wall signs, one each on three facades of the building. 2. The total square footage of signage is 256 square feet, or 144 square feet less than the maximum allowed of 400 square feet. 3. The building is located in the Destination Retail Highway Sign District in which allowances have been made because of the lack of visibility to this retail area from major roadways. 4. Due to the location of this business in that it is not visible from Highways 5 and 36 and has limited visibility from 58 Street, the applicants have indicated that only allowing two wall signs would cause an undue hardship for their business and the ability of parents to locate the building. The approvals are subject to the following conditions: 1. A representative of the shopping center owner shall provide written consent to the City for the changes that will occur to the parking lot on the shopping center property. 2. The City Engineer shall review the parking analysis and comment on any potential impacts to the street system. 3. The City Council approves the sign variance for three wall signs each on different facades of the building and not to exceed a total of 256 square feet. 4. The sign specifications and methods of illumination shall be subject to review and approval of the City Planner at the time of permitting. 5. All lighting fixtures shall be full cut off and installed in compliance with the lighting standards of the Zoning Ordinance. All visible interior lighting shall also be full cut off. The lighting specifications shall be subject to review and approval of the City Planner at the time of permitting. 6. Mechanical equipment that is located on the roof and visible from street level or from neighborhood properties shall be screened with materials that blend harmoniously with the building facade materials. 7. The City Council is favorable to the sustainability initiatives proposed for the building and site. 8. The City Council is favorable to the building material selection and colors. A materials board was provided by the applicant for the City Council to review and approve. 9. The applicant shall provide plans for the storage structure at the time of building permit review. The color of the storage structure shall be consistent with the color of the play structure. 10. The grading, drainage and utility plans shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer and the applicable watershed district. 11. A bike rack shall be added at the front entrance of the building. , , 12. The landscape plans are subject to review and approval of the City Arborist. III. Reference Attachment: The reports of the City Planner and Resolution approved by the City Council are annexed hereto by reference. Additionally the report of the city engineer Stantec Consulting Services, Inc dated January 5, 2012 is also incorporated by reference herein. IV. Abandonment: This permit requires continuous use in order to preserve the permit granted by the City under the terms hereof. Any discontinuation or abandonment of the uses permitted hereunder upon the site for a period of 12 continuous months shall constitute abandonment and void the permit. V. Annual review: Annual review is not imposed as a condition of this permit i I. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have . - i j., Aliol ; '., � '•-.. seals. i I I Cl • ^ i' I IGH TS 0 Date: 3 -2 2. Da e. G I � �(, /� / / . eaudet yor Date: 3 - 26 12_ B; II _ Eric Johnson City Administrator N.H. P RS -OAK PARK HEIGHTS if Date: 3 I S 1 Z By r i Applicant / K- P6---- - 4 2— Its: C.., R.Ej /aNP le v . V EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT 6, BLOCK 1, OAK PARK PONDS PID# 06.029.20.11.0012 t V EXHIBIT "B" PLANNERS REPORT AND RESOLUTION OF COUNCIL DATED JANUARY 4 2012 f 2 f T P C 3601 Thurston Avenue N, Suite 100 ENCLOSURE Anoka, MN 55303 Phone: 783.231.5840 Facsimile: 783.42 7.0520 TPC ®Planni ngCo. corn PLANNING REPORT TO: Eric Johnson FROM: Scott Richards DATE: January 4, 2012 RE: Oak Park Heights — New Horizon Academy — 5903 Neal Avenue North — Planned Unit Development Amendment, Sign Variance and Design Guidelines Review TPC FILE: 236.02 —11.08 BACKGROUND A. Peter Hilger, representing NH Partners — Oak Park Heights has made application for a Planned Unit Development (PUD) Amendment, Sign Variance and a Design Guidelines review for a remodel of the former Hollywood Video store into a New Horizon Academy child care center at 5903 Neal Avenue North. The building exterior will be updated and a playground will be added to the exterior of the site. The parking lot surrounding the building will be revised to accommodate the playground. The interior of the building will also be updated to accommodate the proposed child care center. EXHIBITS The review is based upon the following submittals: Exhibit 1: Project Narrative Exhibit 2: Aerial Site Plan Exhibit (EX.1) Exhibit 3: Existing Plan, Dispersal Plan (AO.2) Exhibit 4: Removals Plan (C1.0) Exhibit 5: Paving, Storm Sewer and Erosion Control Plan (C2.0) Exhibit 6: Site Plan and Details (SP2.1) Exhibit 7: Parking Analysis (EX -3) Exhibit 8: Preliminary Landscape Plan (L.1) Exhibit 9: Exterior Elevations (A4.1) Exhibit 10: Color Elevation — East Exhibit 11: Color Elevation — South Exhibit 12: Sign Plans Exhibit 13: Lighting Specifications Exhibit 14: Report of the City Engineer, Chris Long Exhibit 15: Report of the City Arborist, Kathy Widin PROJECT DESCRIPTION Mr. Hilger has provided a narrative describing the project found as Exhibit 1. The New Horizon Academy is a child care center that will occupy the former Hollywood Video building. The structure is 7,478 square feet and will not be expanded as part of this renovation. The center will provide a licensed capacity of 130 infants, toddlers and preschool children. School age programs will not be offered at this location. Staffing for the center at full capacity is 20 to 25 persons on staggered shift hours. The operating hours are from 6:30 AM to 6:30 PM Monday through Friday. The exterior and interior of the structure will be updated to accommodate the child care center use. A full playground will be added on the east side of the structure. It will be separated into two spaces, one for the younger children and the other for the older children. Play equipment is provided with a combination of hard surface, absorbent rubber impact materials and landscape areas. The exterior of the building will be updated and enhanced as follows: 1. Blue canvas awnings to help shade the large south exposure windows. 2. New windows and exit doors in the perimeter as needed for Code exiting. 3. Removal and burying of the mountain motif remaining from Hollywood 1 Video and creating a blue metal cap and cultured stone base piers. 4. New corner parapet feature to display signage along Neal Avenue with re- dashed stucco. 5. A large fenced playground area and a covered canopy structure at the entrance. 6. Modified parking arrangement to accommodate play areas. 7. New . landsca in P 9 2 • ISSUES ANALYSIS Comprehensive Plan. The property is designated as Commercial on the Proposed Land Use Map of the Comprehensive Plan. The New Horizon Academy child care center is consistent with this land use designation. Zoning. The property is zoned PUD Commercial Planned Unit Development. The standards of the B -2 General Business District apply. Any changes to a PUD, including revisions to the parking lot and addition of the play area require an amendment to the PUD. Child care facilities in a single occupancy, freestanding building are a permitted use. Subdivision. The property is described as Lot 6, Block 1, Oak Park Ponds Addition. The lot is owned separately from the shopping center but subject to the access and cross parking easements that were put into place when the shopping center was developed. Parking. The plans indicate that with the new layout, 39 spaces will be removed and 36 spaces provided. A portion of the change to the layout will occur outside of the property within the general shopping center parking lot. The Zoning Ordinance requires the following parking requirement for child care centers: "At least one parking space for each classroom plus one additional space for each fifty (50) students." The child care center will have seven classrooms and a maximum capacity of 130 students. The parking requirement would be 10 parking spaces. Additionally there are cross easements for parking with the shopping center. The shopping center was originally constructed with a surplus of parking over what was required by the Zoning Ordinance. A representative of the shopping center owner will need to provide written consent for the changes that will occur to the parking lot on the shopping center property. Traffic Analysis. Within the project narrative, Mr. Hilger has provided an analysis of traffic for the proposed child care center: Center operating capacity: 130 children Average number of families: 107 families Average Children per vehicle (family basis): 1.21 children Typical Attendance rate per day, as a percent of capacity: 75% - 82% Total staff, typical day: 25 staff Average vehicle turn around time (in to out): 5 — 10 minutes The traffic analysis shows that the AM traffic would be 111 trips between 7:00 and after 9:00 AM. The PM traffic would be 112 trips between 3:00 and 6:00 PM. The City 3 • Engineer shall review the traffic numbers and comment on any potential impacts to the street system. Grading /Drainage /Utilities. The plans indicate the changes required to accommodate the parking and the playground. The drainage and utility plans shall be subject to review and approval of the City Engineer and the applicable watershed district, if required. Landscaping. The plans indicate the existing as well as proposed landscape to be added to the site. The landscape plan is subject to review and approval of the City Arborist. Mechanical Screening. The existing parapet currently screens all mechanical equipment. All new mechanical equipment will need to be screened by the parapet or appropriate screening devises as specified in the Zoning Ordinance. Lighting Plans. Parking Lot Fixtures. The existing parking lot lights will not change with the exception of one pole and light that will be relocated on the site. The existing parking lot lights are full cut off and compliant with the Zoning Ordinance. Building Wall Fixtures. The elevation plans indicate the locations of the new wall light fixtures. They are an architectural LED wall sconce that appears to be full cut off. Mr. Hilger should confirm that the lens is installed such that it is completely shielded by the body of the fixture. Signage. Freestanding Signage. There is no freestanding signage proposed. The applicants have the option of locating signage on the existing shopping center freestanding monument and pylon signs if space is available. Wall Signage. The Zoning Ordinance allows for a total of two wall signs, each on separate facades. The current proposal provides for placement of the New Horizon Academy logo on the east, south and west elevations. A variance is required for the third wall sign. The Zoning Ordinance allows for up to 18 percent of the front building fagade (400 square feet) to a maximum of 500 square feet of signage in the Destination Retail Highway Sign District. The plans indicate a total of 256 square feet of signage with the three proposed signs. A review of the variance criteria for the proposed third wall sign is found in another section near the end of this Planning Report. Sign Illumination. All of the proposed signs will be internally lit individual letter signs and in compliance with the sign requirements for illumination. 4 II f J f Design Guidelines. Sustainable Guidelines. The applicant should address how the project has been designed to achieve at least a certain degree of sustainability. The applicant will need to discuss the plans with the Planning Commission and indicate if these issues have been addressed. Architectural Guidelines. Facade Treatments The building was originally constructed with a definite base, middle and top. The main building elements will not be significantly changed with this remodel. The proposed raised entrance feature will add to the building appearance. Ground Level Expression This is a one story building with a proposed entrance feature at east elevation. The main entrances will be well defined with the raised parapet, awning and signage. Awnings Blue cloth awnings are proposed over the windows. A metal canopy structure will be placed extending out from the east facade to allow a covered entrance from the parking lot. The metal canopy will be constructed of steel columns with a standing seam metal roof. Transparency The building uses glass on all of the facades. The transparency percentages will not significantly change from the current building. Entries The building features a prominent entry. Roof Design The roofline is broken by a raised parapet at the main entrance. The rooftop mechanical equipment is screened. Building Materials and Colors The existing block will remain and the existing EFIS will be recoated. The front entrance will feature manufactured stone columns on the lower level and EFIS in the upper portions and parapet feature. The applicant has provided color elevations. Building material samples will be available at the Planning Commission meeting. Franchise Architecture The building will not be franchise architecture. The design and material selection will be consistent with the Cities design goals. 5 • Site Design Guidelines Building Placement No change to current site. Parking Areas Changes will be made to the site to accommodate the playground area. The net loss of parking is three stalls. Stormwater The drainage will be altered to accommodate the parking lot and playground area. The stormwater plans are subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. Pedestrian and Common Space The plans show an existing sidewalk from the trail along Neal Avenue that continues into the site and will connect with the building and playground area. Landscaping Five trees will be removed from the parking lot islands. The plans indicate a new landscape plan for the site. The landscape plan will be subject to review and approval of the City Arborist. A five foot ornamental steel fence will extend around the playground area and extend around the south and west facades. Trees /Shrubs Addressed above. Utilites /Service /Loading /Drive - Through /Storage Areas The plans indicate a 10 foot by 10 foot storage shed to be located within the play area. The plans do not detail the materials or design for this structure. The applicant shall provide plans for the structure for review by the Planning Commission and City Council. Lighting Addressed elsewhere in the planning report. Signage Addressed elsewhere in the planning report. Pedestrian/ Bicycle Routes A bike rack should be added near the front entrance of the building. 6 Sign Variance. Variance criteria are provided in Section 401.04 of the Oak Park Heights Zoning Ordinance. The Planning Commission and the City Council should review the following criteria and conditions to determine if the variance is justified. Review Criteria. The Planning Commission and City Council should make a finding of fact that the proposed action will not: a. Impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property. b. Unreasonably increase the congestion in the public street. c. Have the effect of allowing any district uses prohibited therein, permit a lesser degree of flood protection than the flood protection elevation for the particular area or permit standards which are lower than those required by State law. d. Increase the danger of fire or endanger the public safety. e. Unreasonably diminish or impair established property values within the neighborhood, or in any way be contrary to the intent of this Ordinance. f. Violate the intent and purpose of the Comprehensive Plan. g. Violate any of the terms or conditions of Item 5, below. Conditions for Approval. A variance from the terms of this Ordinance shall not be granted unless it can be demonstrated that: a. Undue hardship will result if the variance is denied due to the existence of special conditions and circumstances which are peculiar to the land, structure, or building involved and which are not applicable to other lands, structures or buildings in the same district. 1) Special cases may include exceptional topographic or water conditions or, in the case of an existing lot or parcel of record, narrowness, shallowness, insufficient area or shape of the property. • 2) Undue hardship caused by the special conditions and circumstances may not be solely economic in nature, if a reasonable use of the property exists under the terms of this Title. 3) Special conditions and circumstances causing undue hardship shall not be a result of lot size or building location when the lot qualifies as a buildable parcel. b. Literal interpretation of the provisions of this Ordinance would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same district under the terms of this ordinance or deny the applicant the ability to put the property in question to a reasonable use. c. The special conditions and circumstances causing the undue hardship do not result from the actions of the applicant. d. Granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this Ordinance to other lands, structure or buildings n the same district under the same conditions. e. The request is not a result of non - conforming lands, structures or buildings in the same district. f. The request is not a use variance. g. The variance requested is the minimum variance necessary to accomplish the intended purpose of the applicant. h. The request does not create an inconvenience to neighboring properties and uses. The applicants have requested the third sign to assure identification of the business and building in an area that is not visible from major highways or streets. Due to the location of this business in that is not visible from Highways 5 or 36 and has limited visibility from 58 Street, the applicants have indicated that allowing only two signs would cause an undue hardship for their business and the ability of parents to locate the building. A number of other businesses in this area including the Burger King have asked for and received a similar variance for additional wall signage. The proposed signs are relatively small in size and granting a variance request for one additional sign will not create an inconvenience to neighboring properties and uses. The overall proposed signage is 144 square feet Tess than what is allowable. The City created the Destination 7 Retail Highway Sign District in that it recognized the issues with visibility in this area. For these reasons, City staff recommends that the additional wall sign be approved. CONCLUSION / RECOMMENDATION Upon review of the requests for the PUD Amendment, sign variance and Design Guidelines review, City Staff would recommend the project with the conditions as follows: 1. A representative of the shopping center owner shall provide written consent to the City for the changes that will occur to the parking lot on the shopping center property. 2. The City Engineer shall review the parking analysis and comment on any potential impacts to the street system. 3. The Planning Commission should discuss the sign variance and determine whether the request for the one additional sign is justified. 4. The sign specifications and methods of illumination shall be subject to review and approval of the City Planner at the time of permitting. 5. All lighting fixtures shall be full cut off and installed in compliance with the lighting standards of the Zoning Ordinance. All visible interior lighting shall also be full cut off. The lighting specifications shall be subject to review and approval of the City Planner at the time of permitting. 6. Mechanical equipment that is located on the roof and visible from street level or from neighborhood properties shall be screened with materials that blend harmoniously with the building facade materials. 7. The applicant shall address sustainability initiatives with the Planning Commission. 8. The Planning Commission should comment on the building material selection and colors. A materials board shall be provided by the applicant for the Planning Commission to review. 9. The applicant shall provide plans for the storage structure subject to review of the Planning Commission and City Council. 10. The grading, drainage and utility plans shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer and the applicable watershed district. 8 11. A bike rack shall be added at the front entrance of the building. 12. The landscape plans are subject to review and approval of the City Arborist. 9 L'\U R EXHIBIT 1 RY create + solve + advise December 7, 2011 Ms. Julie Hultman Planner, City of Oak Park Heights 14168 Oak Park Blvd., PO Box 2007 Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 Re: New Horizon Academy Project Narrative 5903 Neal Avenue; Lot 6, Block 1, Oaks Park Ponds Addition Dear Ms. Hultman, On behalf of my client, New Horizon Academy, we are seeking approval to amend the existing PUD to remodel the existing Hollywood Video store into a 7,478 SF childcare center in the existing shopping center PUD. New Horizon Academy is a regional chain with headquarters in Plymouth, MN. Fifty -nine New Horizon Academy centers exist in the Twin Cities, Rochester and St. Cloud. No building related variances are requested with this application, only a variance for the quantity of signs permitted is requested (three). DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY The center will consist of the following rooms with licensed capacity and operating capacity: Infant Care (1 room) 12 children Toddlers (2 rooms) 28 children Preschool (4 rooms) 90 children TOTAL CAPACITY 130 licensed capacity Licensed capacity is based on the 35 SF per child requirement dictated by State law. School age programs will not be offered at this location since these programs are available at the local schools. Staffing for this center at full capacity is roughly 20 to 25, with staggered shift hours. A full playground is provided for outdoor motor activity, segregated into two spaces, one for the younger children, and one for the older children. High quality play equipment is provided, along with a combination of hard surface, absorbent rubber impact materials, and landscaped areas. The existing exterior of the building will be somewhat modified and enhanced in the following ways: • Blue canvas awnings to help shade the large south exposure windows • Installing new windows and exit doors in the perimeter as needed for Code exiting • Removal and "burying" of the "mountain" motif remaining from Hollywood Video and creating a blue metal cap and cultured stone base piers. • New corner parapet feature to display signage along Neal Ave with re- dashed stucco. • A large, fenced playground area and a covered canopy structure at the entrance • Modified parking arrangement to accommodate play areas. • New landscaping - 1 - Rylaur, LLC 752 Stillwater Road, Mahtomedi, MN 55115 651.631.1300 www.rylaur.com TRAFFIC SUMMARY Parking will be provided for 36 cars. Operating hours are from 6:30 AM to 6:30 PM Monday through Friday. From a traffic perspective, the following information represents the typical traffic pattern seen across all the New Horizon centers. Center operating capacity: 130 children (max) Average number of families: 107 families Average Children per vehicle (family basis): 1.21children per vehicle Typical attendance rate per day, as a percent of capacity: 75% — 82% Total staff, typical day: 25 staff Average vehicle turn - around time (in to out) 5 - 10 minutes AM Peak Estimates (@ 80% attendance = 86 trips) Percentage (35 %) of Families arriving 7:00 to 8:00 AM: 30 trips Total Staff (50% arriving between 7:00 and 8:00 AM: 12 trips Total Period, 7:00 Am to 8:00 AM: 42 trips Percentage (45 %) of Families arriving 8:00 to 9:00 AM: 39 trips Total Staff (50 %) arriving between 8:00 and 9:00 AM: 13 trips Total Period, 8:00 Am to 9:00 AM: 52 trips Percentage (20 %) of Families arriving after 9:00 AM: 17 trips PM Peak Estimates (@ 80% capacity = 86 trips): Percentage (20 %) of Families pick up between 3:00 and 4:00 PM: 17 trips Percentage (45 %) of Families pick up between 4:00 and 5:00 PM: 39 trips Total staff (50 %) departing between 4:00 and 5:00 PM: 12 trips Total Trips between 4:00 and 5:00 PM: 52 trips Percentage (35 %) of Families pick up between 5:00 and 6:00 PM: 30 trips Total staff (50 %) departing between 5:00 and 6:00 PM: 13 trips Total Trips between 5:00 and 6:00 PM: 43 trips We believe the traffic generated is low by comparison to other commercial uses in the area, particularly retail uses, and that the existing roadway and parking configuration has the capacity to accept this traffic. We trust the - bove information is useful to your analysis and acceptance of this project for develop - 4 f you have further questions or concerns, kindly advise. le 7 Il itt Hilger, ' A Pri I cc: Ms. Jill Dunkley, New Horizon Academy Ms. Tom Bennett, NH Partners - OPH -2- Rylaur, LLC 752 Stillwater Road, Mahtomedi, MN 55115 651.631.1300 www.rylaur.com RR :::: ;:c 11 H ,w,.OEe � x :� + ' `•• ;air x' _.•�, �:;. 3k } t....'..,,,,, . i4 f ' A t �'' , � i. Y,,. ,fi . y .. "- i ' a : � we : + + rya' ''�y� t . .ea r f �'y f , ....... „, .: , :..,:.2,..,,,:42,,-.,z,.. .ie,...,..:.;,,,,;,,,,,,,t.,.:,,,. .�' Y C „.. "* ., •.1 , 7"..: 9r . PP rm . .. " f 4 .3 � ' � j, 4 ^�a a 1L 9t 'Y^ S: . ..p.,-. - / - z...,.-7... ,- ., , ��' j t st y i aat d► '� . q; ��� V µ � ' # : T , � ���� ., �, a �, r � a t o y � i . !� m a f � � � n � . :1.::,. - .7.:-.,- , ,,m : ,'1 i • ;- adr R c � + } � + � tom' . ',;,4; ti' it '2' - t 6 �3''f.4 xl .: a 1 t r a ,t+ + til ,. jd �" f f x � T�' 3• 1' ,.kl^4a1 • 1. w ,ref .- ( $"`' - .. ..... ...... , � �` 3 � -,, P -" a z 4 . , r `z1`Y f 1 c �i°.. -rr f �.� P: " 'M'�,a' 3 4 ',� r . ' a1'.w ,� s. s f R tt� "J' �`c ,�: : « +� r r a '� � ,; s °r= . '4'2' n - . $ ytn'. '�' , Y , .� ev p �, � t +4 y i . ' .r�' A ,. ' S "}. � t r � + t ? A t , , gr' f �"` i , , F `' r'� ',' .� "# , �• I> _ §� �, Iz°:.J k ',,. '�' , , ,, , i1 4 ' . .a a n a r a 3`: x.: .,:..- :.,. ,-. ... iii .. , +: � ,: H. " . Z . Za' � � j A � �#" t ...� -- ....._ .- f..,:,::,,10:,t..,,,,- F3 i : a s y € � X r , ' y � � y , ' . :, Al a ` t �S fi = . t j A • r r �Y i� t 1 4 k q y 5 � t 6.—.6 rwwM.,r.• Y' LS'wwJ s A �'# J 4 i � � b � '+ �:x` �A;I},. ... . f 3 .'{. . tr 'J�! .' . iti �An ue, • AERIAL `v�TE R rw EXH • O AERIAL SITE PLAN ® ...a ro. EX. I ' EXHIBIT 3 PLUMBING FIXTURE ANALYSIS CODE SUMMARY OCCUPANT LOAD i EXIT ANALYSIS RYLAUR OM MOLL ]Leal 0.43 A La 1+. 61111.1.10 r . •..m 0MM a MT 000000.11 Mawr raw. TOTAL BALMS ^ OCCUPANT LOAD BASED ON IBC. ��� 01 O R M "— ��. WW1 M saes Alo ,10 M A OK I .0.101•41P .., •...POi' LN ,4� ...."2;"` KMo 1.. Yl dJCa.MA •bOaL. MOMPER MOM OWN 1. •.mNW •r M ...rt. LD NOO ,M11 mMMO swot • OCOMM1 -•07 .11 Nf11 -J. 1W, mom rt. MS 14 ) N/f0M M v ,. 410•125 w— ,IAMG,w.O]S 1.0010•01.0•101 MOM -L ML - s11ow 302 m rt. ) 1 „ IO - 1eK _ _ _ _ w.a1 OTNOIaM 4 WOW ..�0oa 1 0 M oo. • J,4 w M M. ] MGM NGRILOI KAMM( IM 20 ] ] ] O ) J 11 .Ma>MOMS 1MM. 1aM000I 2 22 ,1 NM 010.2 bl .O.o V. 1!00•'0. • -M 00 � • S. ,W Mb 10. M. ) O O.Mwq • pl ~ w MR K SUM LOO• .]MOW V. 01000na. 1 MO 1 1 1 - A W. OK 1A NSA MM.. MOM 1010410. CO ,ma /f. Ma IM.sM.1CJ M,.., TAME MS - • - W .ax W N IM e mans �t_ LOAM • I .O mtlrt. •••••• 202.0.11•10 P 10.1 ,q M1OTr WW. S. M�MM.! (.mel MO•1 0T000 lm ll M > DY rt. MO w M .R rllrl W O Of4MO.O11apO•a - ) ORM0 M,GMM. V. s..MM 0210IM 122 10M 1tl m. Ma I41.MT MA PT P P !WAWA WOWEO 1 1° � i ro v,l a, ee • � + elAnw o r.0 Le, Mr ® vr. aJ.• •.v.Ime®. WO M. rt. rwo we Ikea_ ,Z -IN -II PM ,EW ,.•a,MM�,; N r a SM..rM w 20.. : ])+ . .. .. [QM M. ..11..,. ..e NM.. MO M; Raa® CU DCMOM 0100 MOP< MOM 10000 .000 MM.. 11000 MOM OP ilmoe Mt mot 0000. Onetameleteara 1 1.a. A^. I.o. PM Mc IMO Cou DI SMIXLITIO0 YAM. 110.xxs. 0010•C• I � PLAYGROUND CAPACITY t DISPERSAL AREA �' T ` MJ7 • »wawa. 2.212 �" M� MJaM t M '.. •141 I wAIWI,+ . 6Wraee MOM PiPLPLA eNa.w MX. a M. OM PRISM. M1 PM 10C 0MA. OM/TM A SAM OWOWW41. Wen 1.104.1. 1013 0/ MAW SO III= r, 1.1.11, :, ,._,1 1P 1. w 1.. i /� Int 7 - , -ahr iii i ! Y / / / C) *'' %?' - M 7 P .. / 1 , 1 . / L. ) j . 0 All 4 J ■C1, i F I� z •� 0 120200 Vii; '. 0 .: 0 . 1 1] my COMMLIM -_ o o CODE E)OTJtl OLIN DISPERSAL RAN O EXITING FLOOR PLAN ® 0 DISPERSAL PLAN ® ..M ro. A0.2 .2 DCHIBIT 4 Removal Notes lipLRY1. I. wK V N. 0N44M aw. ,e K 110414-0.14 M. 6CC -w1ID. a KT. .a 411,6 . 751 1.10. II .0 1 IN .6l OKC 04 (110101) •1004 /CM w M 9 l0it/C 04 R ova / tray *4 r •o . .tN � rCC KCCAMIY. I Ka areCro TOMMY. me 1 11%.000 Am nrn.4af or 44 1. . ..0613 XIS.. Cx OK VI. 1 �r 0.4044001L 0 M 040.. MILL K b!0 ...MT I Nn osanmo f � C KM HORIZON .....r K /0.110 4. 0111.410 110.41. 00040•A .41110 100110 90. w4s® 40100010 710 HOW TOW/ 000101 10 0a0.0 MITIM1W.MOIS A MM. I.f MICR COMACTCM 9 10 TO. 1*0 W MK. 0* .. R o 1011 111016010 01 004100 Y0M1M[R0 1106 (!IM me 0744 111311441 K 04.46 11100 (10<00. 001140101 SW. 11104 •1 104001 MOS..111 .0A0041 K01w0 10 IT ..M. w¢ on town. .400.1 .. KKK ro 1.1.44.0 Mr 0A 113.13K. fin4wraw um/ 131 to F 0101.010. 0.4L K IE 0 410 0000x.11 UM MT/ M.O. KM KM.. I .w w.l 4= ROAM. 6 06wa 40110 M16®R 0A 0.11.04K. NE NEWTS. YW! 0001NO1IIf 0 7 =TIM= O.NL 000 0 4019111. LOC TOl N0 ear 10 )11011 Mese ST.. 1 . • 0 1010•101. 1•11 K YMa1O40 mo0wL 0 0 0w1rw0 AYOe IS414 0101/ C• KF . TO .0011411 0T 104 K W.. K OE.. lucm Al ,: T 1 00011 10 O.1. 10.11: CO.T4 KMSS O.N. 414.11.. A 0.471101. A 140 %/N0w. • F 00.0.410 0.4. wont. 0■11a 4010 To .0000.1 4(00101 11•.40.o.r • 01940100 1. 114.0401 1. •>�0 . 00/ 140.4 O 414101 N .0,404.0) 410 111 • K.101Q CONCRETE 110 K 141141.1 40/0.406 *44 •••1 44O0 191111 40 401.0..1! A-0 Mf.11 1111 yy� 0019 / ‘V y / • \ l■ . (M.) 11 0114.71110 O 100411.E ,0 I4 K40v4a 40 10•044• 01•1111 KR ■••.t4011. 04 .414T �4 Remo I c6a+d IM.) ¢ i C a wove r . � • - 00016 071004//100 • / 7 . , ti dP'' F - , I ' '.T 10 _1010- _.•MMMti WA / S. w1 Pon./ - ! 1 --•=--40 f wt.N1 0161 KmOvm. /. •• 1010. 1010. -44444-411. .1100¢4= 01 M 006¢1 a04.L 471.9 1 .. ._ ----111 .M /' ` 9 •�� '�` • Iew.c n j,,• - -- - 1010 - 1049..10 600710 . C� 47 ..o4w.o wow ` { 00.010 0M TO -. 4400 KID11o[ • • 0 I ) 04..4410 mDMK N. .� r $ i 01.E a not • \ > - - 17.1.6 O COMMIE f elvaed SIM • • N. a h - ...f• 000AS 016 TO ONg 0440.06 . ,� . Q .K 9.014 a1 \ \ Y. 940.0 if .o )f T104 O..E • \ \ ,% ` I sn.1 snug ._ W 6N .� . .,.., Do: - - - 041,..,. • X • ......1. 10113. Piw1 10_.4... 0 1. 0 I 36 i I M1.777 t 33 2. - " 0 O 7Z0 .1 .1 0 004.1111 1677 1114110 -1x1 1730 >a - 70 ��� 73•. 0 0 • 3171 7377 YO 70 07 71 al 7377 •N'L 377 777 M1 \414-0 17 w 74 7 13 7 - 73 7737 7.0001 71 1 .11 JOI w 70 1 I X 17 10[ /..11 77 07 -7 by 70 ■ 01611 1177 77 177 7.• m .euw314a �yj j� 7 77 770 )W 3404 017.6 10/7107 7 71 77167 77167 Y �OY..Y7 m!I 1 / w 770 110 07 370.07 7 117.6 33I 37 7743 w 7 (07310.0 7071 000130 3311 w 8 774 74 a 717 7 a 77 72 711 741 777 7 7771071000 7711 7771. 1417 771 711 • - 'n w O 01 11 44 / r74u17> x7.130 laa -.- 7.000r� 1167 4777 a 11717 a.+ •.1017 A 7173.07071 0 0x 30 77473 77 'u3 71 u 6074 • v7 107.7 >•7.N 171 + w Oa 7700 17 m 017 •-• 737 (71036 3 7070 1077 10071 1 104137 ow . i 3107700 101 3 6770 iulY171703 ow ' i.. 1 03� 23 '7 77x47 '7773 .03 111 101 ow) 3.7 3 77101 ®70337 x777 77x3 57 1777 3..••7 'w 70 710 7 A 011007171 w 737 1730 76 7171074 7 7 7737 711737772 / . ,0074.03 77 A .71760106371 7 10 1 X _ - - • 77 0 6 3 1x71+ 77 7 a O 07 A 34 • .77147.0. A .A7o mfr .17 O un .- 17700 OM 00 oa 11733777 7 3 7170 13 10 4 ..11707 n ° 477310 .. /' 74777 7 el m 7 731.!0 19147 717 79.100.7 730 0!477 520 • . 0 J77 1 7077 47777 7 377 r .07777117. 4140 7 -y TAI r9i3'J • ii 47.073 al ro7 3410-0 OA07 714.7 40 77 '7 I 71731 /71700 ,...117 AI 7 Y 0•'71711.' 13 470170 7 4716 7711477 ow 31101703 31101703 71 7711011. 0, r 77. Ca .1x477 7.1 u76o+ war 1716 711+7147 'a . 7 , 71 7 ' v 173 101 l•• __ 1 'Karl s 70737 23011 n 76 737 .17--1-7 317133 77 1/717073 4 - \ . • 77.77. . 4x7 7 01 0 7 7 3 ] 7177* 01 - 7 •x177 N A - 774773 -' 7 731 777 r 031-414.0 7 07 7700 7770 7W . � \ ' s �w f _ _ 1!/7R1 77117 77 730 077110 - � . _ ^ IIR . '7ro 7 73 301111773173 77 137.601 7a 7 0416 751 �;i7'.:�,.` `1 r''' r''' ` 704 77 ' 0170 103 711 7777 OW 770 7 170 173 737 .. 7 0 • , � . . � , J s r� 1> 7434 MO 7 600773 7LL 707 401 00 771 01 71007 • ♦ 'T - an - . -.--005-•• 7.77ns7 w 717 706 7 7703 >7 14007.47 0 147 1 //® .L- T ..r .110.6.7 .0.10617 770 7 w >0 777 n- 47 7 c . 11417471010.7 wolf OW 7777 10047 7 T 777 am 07.174777 w 6..03.7131774.7 -7 ���' �'L^ 7773 74 77377777 " 7 1 10 73 ON 7 770 77.7 wet.. 11 1 0 +7 ` \ 7177 777 777 71.0177 7 �11w A 7 7773 7 1000 1111 0141 017 .0117111770 W ` ..` ... - f.DU7741 Or133 . 0.6 1d 34.30 X'70777 7 U 32 • � 0 .`� a e 0701 7 107 17776 7747 X 761 7 X r .4701 77.01 t , 17 , 770077.771 7x OW 13 773 WWI 01 7 X A 7410171 77 7 . �. 3774 7/ 70 17.6670167117x07 70 / 1O grow 1 X 7.73 1717777 1161473 1 473' 11147 X 1 �i ` • `\ \ - d • MON Lamm .-.._. 7 07 7 /) 6. \ .. • tm may- / . • 3701030141 Ow x730 7107 a> 37 1x 4 47 777 7 4 1 1 Pr ' , 0 • X • ri 371 311 776 1717 X i 117 0 77.477 / I �m7 74 r 611361 7 1416 773 70.1701 NO 77771 I 77 I t d 3.. 1001011 A 70474 74 773 77.1 X70 104714 770713 777 .7104 r `,. 7 077 r 1. 0317773 7 1416 771 7747.7 Ow 107 77'0 ! - 1 = ) / 1040 47.117 7371 .7770 67..07 X ,, 1 1 ` , 4 Saw 7 • 01 i. wu 1007077+ r 1 00011+ 7 vw 0009+ 1! 7 * 73x0 xN 47 07 w w 14 107 =...11.44040 1 .� t A 06•073-71 7 1 477 600 NOW N 07773 7 77771 _ (7.1) : i 700 00 077 7 7 7 0 ..17 3 x4731 7 037703 7 77 3770 17737 w 7200411 77171 0377 771177 7007.04 01 7 77 1 \ • 3COM 0777 n 177707 117 61.1x7 1 I. d - .10 .• 7x471 A 7717 '1777077 007311.044.00. X / A 7 747 A 07770 714 737 1077 7 47 73 11773344 3 `,. ar _ • A 73 w 7701 60737 73 `131 we 3107301.1 6070.•1177 • - -_ - 774111 -01 3 A 47601 010311 Y 61141171.170v 61141171.170v 043/ a / 77 1 nw .10714 mots w 70 1x7707 7 17 * v T4I r 11d 7 10 71 7737 7 7 1.000'14 W 1037 0 r ' \ 1 ' 1 1 11 Y: 0 F A. 7 7 7 . ,1) � ,. • (73301) 7777 77770 *71040 110/0107 7 7071 74 70 7 ` F t NA 7374 01461 O0 3 77 1731 01 777337 10.6 65'773 -7 14 32 _ A. . A 1 47.07 017717 71 70 Oa 1 )7 4017 AI' • 7 107 V 07 073 3 7 07 041]16Y. 2 W 4i7n O w w irrl0 76 1011 3 N • 1 ` \ • •7 t J 447 110 033 007 77 A ADAM x771 13530 00 - 1 ♦ j �` x1.701 07 7 77300.3 077 71 77009 70.7 7 V d MIAOW b W 777 al 77 713 00 70] 6 7 14103 740.10 X771 71004 • 7 7 160 6. .4 677 371 7713 103 [ 7307 . 07 6 41,.. • 47U71 0.0 4031 746 MOU3 *7746 77 3747.713 3747.713 477 17 71 t 137637 30* x e rx l> 0 ,,,:r.,,,,.....2.4 ' . 747'x14.. ` rll y73W0 777 1 747 7 7 01 GAO A 7 1416 707 00 C 177700 77177777.7 Oa ay 761 7 1016 7337 77.47 -WY 1000/4 01 YOW 1004 70 7MOWN 7 774 06710 7711 A 100 100 01011 . 3 7 7777 A 1.00707 X 7/903 01 0741 7w 711 776 J , 0 . 1 7 a 370 71707 7/0 7 mi11171070 '. •• • 776 077 7777 SV 0.71 w 1777� 0 WA 1.0.61011 70777777 OA 0070 711 r7v r rrsow+ a 7 / 0x16 7 177. • 0 0 1 076 7 /7 777. 77.1 '7 7 477 71 004 7 777 17 3717/ * 317 7377 03707 7773 7 1 . W7ar Tn s�.71v7 7 .7700677 703.0 40 71 0 011707 A 1011 r � 10 / c * A 177 03 701 3 7704® 7 • 7 7 177.6 7 77 7 71 17 'L 40930707 111■107 776 7770 777670/101773 01 77�• 130300117 030 3 47 3 061 0 ] 0 mos . .! 00 7 . 1 � 0 .i 1 3 1 0 O A Y � an •13 0' W 3 2301 1 onaln we IA. 07 6 . ; .te 117060 -7 71.70 77 ga0O S"3Y - . 1x170 0 7.17 7 21 nv i A11� „r3 3)a liVu a314 ..s..w71 wow 17, I s 11911013 • • _ &RYLAUR IL� rr �� • N sw rr , R ��o ' � � .1 n :IS iTic, .e.. ,, , l VF ,11.4 WS W I ...NT ., .. — N I _ 'W =Pt= I ^ e N �: r , [ .rat- l'.. I ... �Y v H"..:--- p 1 PP cc..: ax - bon rm... — M STYE[ an ,.rD twT,U .. eV .Lr.Q t�f Nogg. N...T[t MpiClr.. OIMeY.s■11l■.\lt 1111/1111M MEM /IA .w.r" r. MFlLIOATd DESIGN -- . .. • _ _ L'.tYA .. x..rttu, r.w.ws rr [.s+[>•. w v w x1..4. cet ' •� T.tTNtpN R 99N NM •� •..•�•••• - -.- -" •ecor arm auT n.m... v ^ ".,,..y,rN Newry wt. ln9..N.Y. au Kan .r.. 1E..9sr ©7 Y tl s dR rfl Cox O e nr h ar f Li 4� 5 ?t A mr.ler,nwY.e 1. o.s Y.N. w.. ..w baton*. r..:9.s _ . -� -� P.P. 'T.P...w.[' — 1 '°. N9. 1 S,Oi n. *Io5i /IS M/3T.1016 ! "rl p8.. �— M - St* 1& Vault sG1.9•111 gt*.. a /d..M_(.l.n 1 N.T - . . �_ - - � \\ _ •,* *IT or f1 Inches* .wd...ne twnS.I %I m ..a * Mum... of chambers: 10111/w11 /dwmb_• chambers r ;: oft °^ OA - - - - _ .chambers Iii f�. 1 ` 4.1 ' OA _ I ��t K4 •. Sbr.nvwh.mlwn **wee r. later* rot anent =.7.7.=.... ... - "• 7 _ — w ,. WY.n... . tauW. .ON. r 1 sndmew manhole ♦hNY! . i ' .. .WM. w... b w.fw..arw�n w Yr.tM nun. . 1 i will control wow**.[Wn **wok =====.:=.1.:.—...r.. •A ".?,7e«c .�sn ic: .w "'°. A - :. Jscodp rt Arca %: ri.w {ey _; 9 sf -,146/ Gt(t Nary +. rgiAn ;a or*, •,n .1 o. •+•••••••• • • ..3»11, --- _ .�.. ■LA. •►1i 1 MILL co.L - PPP. WPM.. 9ac \ ,.a.. — / _a - / / / � ' - - - s e j egill • 1- - J - - .' .� • -_R __ 1 Doha m ._[ .n. C 3 O •©te - ..::.:,F': ''.;X,:� :... ,:iizd." aistPS S E K.sb.s1. ' a.k`Jr kilw...�.4. , .:jL,37ar. :,f_ "1�::3 ';r N Pr EXHIBIT 6 IMAM ^;.:r I . ;� Q KE, NOTES RY LAUR .. a .r�. I ionmt R S. L1k 10 POR/ZON AGAI errr tj lin 4. '':= I Si PLAY SOINTIIT 40 OPTIPTIC. LOOK, PPOPPOO A..2 INTIAJZO ST 4.110,-All. liatElli Z:411=1" I, El 191MIWOR XIA. IIII PL 1.2,.7 PAM. WYO. *IRKS., Ora.. PATOUAL, APO IPIPTALLASOP III KIM, POO.. 11 PK WWI O HANDICAP PARKINS SISN ®ORNAMENTAL STEEL FENCE 1-.c. ..u.1- se. In ram 1-s 016 w u.nw�.....u.or..n a.. PO. M. P PPM LATENT. ta.ecro.. // 22.4 .......... . OTA.........7 OTTAM L.,..., COPPITTO Lil . POTTIOG IMO IT PR ONOVIS .0 CONGO. ...0. PAL Mena MIA M.G. r A i vLi�.TwOM. POI WOMAN RAY n 4 w� let BM... VMS ...1410D IVIO *Tel / e / "°'K'1-. RPM. . �. a� / �� o UMW. ..01 M, �J / ,./Y. - '' 9 p \ 51TE STATISTICS / ..4(7 ' / •= ' . � . t . , 44 0 4" �-1 O \_ Para.. 01.01° .w.. KM . s.e..�, • SP / ar . '� �■ .4• A _V0- 0° ` ., e..A...l... ,. • ` : T - 4 •::.-: 1 �. O 1-c.» cAJMIN* .. , vi, / (:: ,.': 1 7 f_ . . __ w.Wln G M.�rt 7 / � .. . ' 4 -r . - I _ *YAWL.... ,.......„......,..„..i"..................." L� tie...... w.YYI... ,F I TV 1�. •i w� .a• LEGEND .. . .............. / 4,4, *• r ' 1 �t01I „ q �1 • 447 lerillaril .:> .. , 41 : 4 4 4 , 4 0 . o ,,,, , -------.1f .ir[�, p I ff I 0 L � 1 . / PLAN , I SI.E PLAN . DET/.IL+i P O SITE PLAN ® . .....' S1 2.I EXHIBIT 7 ARYLAUR Ma IMI.MAIIRINOwt) AroJelas 2•011 MAL ANS. ONT.3.0 fra NW / / / /� /' / y „, / �,, '�' / _,, 1 / , , A” ,* ' ' 0 ,,,,,,,,..... MO. 1 1 1 1 11 ♦ ♦ � � • t iii ; ` % .' ' 11 1 l e J S. v .. -t. •• — ♦j =♦ ♦s ♦ �/ 4 Ian I fte aF - • I ] ,.... • 44 tAtt : ' . . A gt . : - 1 : , , ,.., F / / / . " %.' ' 0 \``� • `• ~ ��� 1 V� ) /• ___ (_ PARKING ANALYSIS ff 1- - -- - - -- — — — — _1 .�,..�...� �, 9 . 0 /i. QO %/ - -- LEGEND Q..a. — ... -� / r I I I !� 8 .....<.s wwwo rwciw ...../.,51$ O 51 M PLAN g ....1.0 "" EX -3 EXHIBIT 8 • LANDSCAPE SPECIFICATIONS PLANTING DETAILSRYLAUR MA. LLC TREES. *OWL ANDPlBENM14d d ,, • ,...r...rr..r. 'A �.M. •.. T. a..t w....rw.rr h.•r4 r vw ... rr..rhwi m . .... 7 , A, / wet . ..sai i i ' e • s • + L. ..44.4.1.4•• 44/•••••••••••••••• • rw .wr.•W.r.... a • yr .•• =1 �•aa.... `\ ��� u �N a A>�.nm • w.....�r r. ... )..1iW1. C. ••∎ r•444.4+w4.Y. •••46.y.•.... wrwvmAF �r�rw~ •.� wrracre 4..4 .rA•w we.w.r. ho 1 r +..M r `• - T (: 1 - 1f - f/ / NEW NORTON ACADEMY • ` ha.r•.. w o or a w • .0.•4 u..•..r..rw. y rr∎•• • ∎YM�r .. 11-I II - II •CC•1 OP 1.4•40r.4044COR 0. *44.40.1•41.04441•1•14024. v r..i..rw.w...+r •• ....` II•. .... .41.61•` amore .M.•r!~ n='''. ,ll� \� !!j l� .aa .r..nwn .n wr.rr.r......w. ao +r.r....r Wrra.. .11 ...w ..sm. I. 11 =.I • 11 -11= 11 II 11 -11- 6666 rr a .............+..,....w.... c ..+r.,i....w...a.......w. . � wh. 44 or.rrr.l....h.r . wrr I n1 1 1 1 I I l17, II II � I 111�II I111�111�1 �1 cant C. Wow O .wor •anw....+...... .......•.rr.,..r...WmA.• .r.+•w...r�Ww.rr aM .rW..rrr.W• .a.,N C. .rww+...a..,r.r...r+......r rrr.w4..Wr.w...•. • • •... .. +r�. •6666 • a..�•.•■. 0•••• ∎rr...r..,W..w ..Aw.. I• 31.44/ .•r.W..rN.r.m. r. .0wain m.. 1:w. �.=..w c .:r.....wr.r. c o�r■rrrrw•..r•rr. - .. v".•E.m L ...r•.. «�� •••44.4.4.44.....1•41.1.3•44-.. „-- .'- »<.m ,.....,m.. ax COMMIS, ®. . .., • ^r�° —............•••• ....� ..:. 666 6666 ^.• ...:: �. �.mY.,... 6666.. a. •. �e..�.. p hr . .r_'.. w�w..w i.uAn mo•.e....MW w.an KILL \J•/ C.n•.Y....O•.•.. CL y;trA >dAa..i rr..W.. .m.w W.•u�•r. \ \II. • ObWY IOS w T.W.r......r.M. •r.r•.• ...�Mwfi.+rawrn.r.• v onu..mmu P.nV..•.n %Ir1.W16106 IEt�..•h. FS ...lw.v n�r •4CM. �.w..I. r ••.►...w.+R WW0En 4. v•rw.M .esw w p A... 04• ..wr. M. .w ..w.w.r rT .....w O. Mr.► .na Mx. 6MWiLOD.maPM Vr.. �....wr...M..•m.a.w wW wwwwWo Y.1....w. •.�. ww o.r�Owwe ..r...hr. ...r•we.. N. i.Mw....prWnw...•.w• .�rNOma P W • '�� VICTIM .r...Mam.ww moor / / SCOPE •••A.L.tlTrUM my ?Y Y • a•I•IOIOI M71,1.4 mWO. gAIi MC.LM • .aa M,. a•.,._.p •ai m.A 14•71404•41.144. • 041/01C••••TY44 CO MAR AMMAN. GaLIPLET47. 1 / EX. SHRUBS • p •aY..,• Vm.1e•ur aa.• w� n •M'•l i.a • � "•'• Ex SHRUBS k p _ aa...a. 44./ ,Sip4I1NN 41 1•1011 NM. 14 LAM. ow= r mow WALMINISMOCATO2 WT. 10411 _. ay....c.a.... .m.r+.a..w.MwMo-.. 111.1.4411144•RIONT*114•411114WILL P131•311 �jll ,a.maMWMn•...N.aMAWMI....p 4, taS . . .. EDGER Um) ♦ ♦♦ �•. k - w '.., SOIL AMEND WOE PLAN AWL '•^ f , / =,...,... „ .... .... SOIL frlf PER[NMAL AREAS �. II �� ...� EA CRABAPPLE �.♦ KM '1lIZ CP�OSE 2.1: i Lmaa mrtaros••am u... I EpA AA DOUBLE I UNDER SR RUBS. HARDWOOD 1• ♦♦ , %. !<. I - A�,er /. NULCN FOR WIRE BED: USE ' r , a . wwruwm.xM•mnM. WEE OVER R E O 1 ARE BET EEN E. MEN I � .. .4R S OEM W401 OM RMMp KD iwe AREAS BEAMEEN ALL PLOWS 1 ._ Op NOT S MK . O m NAYNNO K AND TAPER 00.111 rO 7 UNDER ..' .. ... I ~_ a. MW1ggaY NR • RANTS O �� INE PERENNIALS. ....0.01 Alb:. 1 ' ` .;dm,mN '. AN: I t .0? ' 0 + 1� ♦ L PFw nnnxlo DEW. � j 1.1 .������ 11��\.t7 : PLANT SCHEDULE ' • Ex. MAPLE •�� �N .�� 1 1 " ♦♦ VW]. ∎ m ,. ∎ _ - O o 1 E ... f. W ]. M\ W __.�FEiO W,_..- .—r. --E W." Ow. • `' yy _ .. !Jl_\: _� • -, = t: C . 1En∎INIM∎∎ 1. , �� " /v a .■ 111- _ .:=," --�— _ - ��� * �'' �4 u ••UU••••U••E 1.1 7 .- ■ �■ • .. � _ - Ex. ASN Ex ISM � �E ___�._ laM•c.p. Plan O OLANDSCAPE PLAN ..w N. Li 1 f.n EXHIBIT 9 • °KEYNOTES EXTERIOR MATERIAL SCHEDULE RYLAUR LTrrtT AV .e.e. (i) FASTING ROCK FACE CLOCK 0) EXISTOO POCK FACE MOCK —• —•— o girTn _ � N o...... A� _— 0 ro) E a.PINIS.eD CLOCK. CO NuW1FACTWEO sTQE O H � tA,?:' , New HORIZON ACADEMY ra .rw.. « a . liniliF":1-.CM.74111111151111111111 —= CO LO..CRETE F400T CO FJTISnW DES - RECOAT tinwa.«. • BUILDING SIGN ANALYSIS M snl. m.o... • w0""' .07MOMI OMIW0C 401 a.. OOP. O 0 0 0 • .... +e... OM ./ n SEICGO CO EAST. PREEIN. METAL CORNS 7 Trig?". Hn. A.Mf Tw.esi M MLb 1. . OSOVTH ELEVATION .1.0....... POO V u � (4.0. r mpg (.) PREFWK.ED METAL COPING PREEN•SPED METAL .wm AM.I WM At r '.'. .m v ..c �. '� . � .61 T KN.. .00 SP C...74. . • x Re. .•ew. sr' (4 E.ST. ALVIINM srol!PRO.R 0) EAST. AL..MYNM DOOR cORNIXou AM -.V• . 0-.• - - w CO eenf .eo.. .14 .14 . � �yl�" �� _ ^ covens O : � =1111 I - b,> w+srOREFRONr W) pre. xr+ 0oaR -� - - - I - . .wan. - R. 40..... . 4..a.. CO NOLLAPP TETAL DOOR . FTLAE 4) CANVAS Ap•Fa OMIORo ELEVATION P.I. COW. as 4) ARLMTECn& . LEO MMLL scam= 0) NOT useo ..wro 0 T .T. •L wTa. ■ -..- .... `� Mme, • •..wannR u» w cane C.M.C. W Q o o � WT1OMO: "• - - v i -. a STAIONf SEAM META. ROOF 40 C.OUMF . suP PORT5 e 1 � Pr Q -� ...On O PTZ� 'e5w. Ma. .n.0 ..........,....... O O 0 — -- N � - © � -- - !i cA.oPt DoeR$.O f d tG BATE wzTS M eou.wvs �.... R .. .. • •. - 0 0 0 TE. 6ATE5 0 DALOIRS v sNSN Ow 54 KJ ELEVAT N .g. i s co a—e a.. 0 O • ���Y� 0 0 0 0 III�SSTTT�� _ ® w ► • . Tot ...RR Am lirtgrill HIR;1111111r11 �] o Do•ATW T - - EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 °• 0 0 O ()EAST ELEVATION sir A4.I • • v . � Y' w' tiefd9 .?FEYGL!bC.+��- S.uT.urn.a�' ` `,. `• 111111® _40 • East Elevation rvl CO CD a ,. waysaa�m.. trz�istswr .+aw+nawei>aewnxxawfi�imramvea �ea<. n�autr�Ua.. ssecrr +w. a.wa a.' - . a,ozrua. • Imo aim South Elevation • • 0, =-1 . 9 5' X20' O Q ORIGINAL AREA, � STRETCHED LAYOUT O E W 4' 58 X Q. FT. SIGN, / � � ; 98.48 SQ. FT SIGN, H O R I ,.SON 4' X25' lI T e - I , , Ti• Academy I , - ORIGINAL AREA, 1 1 L 46 "H X 16'2 "W = Acade 62 SQ. FT SIGN, • m STRETCHED LAYOUT ) r -3 ,%:•;, Az; 0 ' a l LIN V7 -;":". 4171 ( - - A 0 ME 11 ' iraz-40., inn§ ,,,,,.„ 1 li , , ', ' : FV,...4, © O 4 O O 5 O EAST ELEVATION 3 SO(JTH ..- • r ELEVATION 0 I/8 • I•-IX (SAME FOR WEST ELEVATION) 4' 4 1. 5' 4 TRW CAP LED -WHITE ACCESS DOORS 1. 1 I PLED FACE OREENPIELO CONNECT°. SWMAV: ,AOIN[A ?it A��I� MARE INSULATOR u I� NOUNT LETTER TO RACEWAY - Gig. OREENfIDW -� - 1100 NMILSUNTY TO POWER \ MOUNT RACEWAY TO fASOA ._. - -- REDO, FASCIA SECTION - TYP. ILLUM. LETTERS ON RACEWAY LANDLORD APPROVAL: DATE: CLIENT APPROVAL: DATE: : S I G N s U N I M L I T SCALE DATE. E ID NEW HORIZON ACADEMY 12 -9 -1 1 2 2 400 H WY S S OAK PARK HEIGHTS, MN DRAWN BY REVISED = HA 1\ A EI_,1\/1N SS3 MICHAEL CONTENT IS PROPERTY OF CO O F F I C E- 763/478 -9460 SIGNS UNLIMITED, NO USE FILE: DRAWING NUMBER FAX - 763/478 - 2 0 34 IS PERMITTED WITHOUT APPROVAL .,.i N ' • Sr nc" CATALOG NO. TYPE NO. JOB NAME 15 -11 FXHJBIT 1 LytePro7 Architectural LED Wall Sconce ORDERING INFORMATION Catalog Number: Example: LP7T - LP 7 T I I I SERIES I I COLOR I LP- LytePro7 T- Titanium PRODUCT Architectural I LED ( W-White LED D Wall SPECIFICATIONS Sconce 7 -Hi -lumen LEDs • Provides safety and security in residential and light commercial applications in locations such as entrances, over garages, illuminate house numbers, wall signs and ACCESSORIES located d along perimeters and • Seven high- output LEDS having an PCB1- Button -type photocontrol. 2 -1/8" x 1" x 3/4 ". average rated life of 60,000 hours 3/8" NPS threaded nipple for use in boxes, • Patented Philips LED Optical fittings and other protective enclosures. System individually controls the placement of light in the target area minimizing glare • 4100k neutral color temperature delivers light with minimal waste • Type III distribution with shielded optics and no uplight • Individual precision collimating optics collects and redirect light to optimize performance. TECHNICAL INFORMATION PHOTOMETRIC DATA • Functions in environments with temperatures that range from - 30°C to 40 °C • Housing constructed of heavy die '��� ���' Corrosion aluminum and fully gasketed 3 9" • Corrosion resistant constructed of heavy II ex II _ __ ��� woo powder coated finish - I.. n�� �►• �1n • Acrylic lens M'��, available in white and titanium I � 7.6" 4.5" { , a' • Electronic Class II LED driver \ _ accepts120 -220v, 50 /60Hz input 0 2 „ 7" 0 3.5" r wIt (constant current) \ • Requires only 13 system watts for environmentally - friendly operation • Integral cast aluminum heat sink ensures cool operation Horizontal Footcandles • Complete with integral splice 3.3" Scale: 1 Inch = 8 Ft. chamber Light Loss Factor = 1.00 • Built -in bubble level for accuracy. Luminaire Lumens = 555 • Universal mounting plate with hook Mounting Height = 8.00 Ft and lock mounting Maximum Calculated Value = 1.82 Fc • Optional field installed PCB1 photocontrol for automatic all night tiOus "•"`• lighting • Patent Pending Design • ETL tested suitable for wet location • Five year warranty Crescent/Stonco • 2345 Vauxhall Rd. • Union, NJ 07083. 908 -964 -7000 • www.stoncolighting.corn 10/10 Stonco is a Philips group brand PHILIPS t IMI 1 4 Stantec Consulting Services Inc. 2335 Highway 36 West St. Paul MN 55113 Tel: (651) 636 -4600 Fax: (651) 636 -1311 Stantec .#' Bonestroo January 5, 2012 Mr. Eric Johnson City Administrator City of Oak Park Heights 14168 Oak Park Blvd., P.O. Box 2007 Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 -2007 Re: New Horizon Academy Plan Review Stantec File No.: 000055- 11000 -1 Dear Eric: We have reviewed the site redevelopment plans received for New Horizon Academy as submitted by Rylaur, LLC. on December 13, 2011. Following are our initial comments and /or recommendations: Sheet C2.0 and C3.0:. 1. The soil material needs to be verified at the proposed infiltration vault location. Borings need to be taken to verify the soil materials will allow infiltration. Traffic Analysis Comments: 1. The developer has underestimated the amount of trips generated by the redevelopment. According to the ITE Trip Generation Manual, which is the industry standard for traffic impact analysis, a 7,500 SF daycare will generate 92 trips in the AM, and 94 trips in the PM peak hour. Although this amount is greater than the submittal estimated, many communities use 100 hourly trips as a threshold basis for determining whether or not to perform an impact analysis on a development This new daycare would generate around 90 trips in the peak hour, which is slightly beneath this threshold. 2. The majority of trips will be impacting the 58th St & Neal Ave intersection, as well as the Stillwater Blvd & 58th St intersection. These intersections are signalized and Washington County recently performed a project coordinating these intersections. If conditions at these intersections are already congested, especially during the PM peak hour, the addition of 40 left- turning vehides at 58th St & Neal Ave would exacerbate such conditions. Additional coordination with Washington County and their recent traffic count data should be identified with their traffic impact study. S1il1eC Page 2 of 2 Reference: New Horizon Academy Plan Review If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact me at (651) 604 -4808. Sincerely, STANTEC, formerly BONESTROO Christopher W. Long, P.E. cc: Julie Hultman, Planning & Code Enforcement Andy Kegley, Public Works Director Jim Butler, Building Official Scott Richards, City Planner Mark Vierling, City Attorney Kath Widen, City Arborist A. Peter Hilger, Rylaur, LLC. Mark Hanson, Scott Israelson, File - Stantec EXHIBIT 15 Julie Hultman From: K.D. Widin <kdwidin @comcast.net> Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2012 4:08 PM To: Eric Johnson; Mark Vierling (E- mail); Chris Long (E- mail); Andrew Kegley; Jim Butler; Betty Caruso; Julie Hultman; Scott Richards Subject: New Horizon Academy - Landscape Plan OP Staff - 1 have reviewed the proposed landscape plan for the New Horizon Academy at the old Hollywood Video location and I also made a site visit to inspect the existing trees and shrubs which they are planning to incorporate in the new landscape plan. I have the following comments about the plan: 1. Landscape Plan - the plan is attractive and utilizes some of the existing trees and shrubs on the site. The plan complements the site and makes sense in terms of the proposed function of the site. 2. Plant Species /Cultivars to be used - the plant species and cultivated varieties listed in the plant schedule are mostly native or "near- native" species. Some non - natives listed, such as hydrangeas, do well under local growing conditions and are appropriate for the site. The plants specified are hardy, relatively low maintenance, and have few serious insect or disease problems. The planting stock is sized appropriately for the type of plant and for commercial landscape planting specifications per the Oak Park Heights zoning code. 3. Planting Detail - this is very good and no changes are needed. Contractors must adhere to the approved planting detail and the site will be inspected after planting to confirm proper planting methods. 4. Landscape Specifications - these are very good and the most detailed that I have seen. The specifications take into consideration the site requirements for good establishment and future growth of landscape plants. 5. Existing Trees & Shrubs - according to the proposed plans, 1 existing tree (a maple in fair -poor condition with a trunk wound) is scheduled to be removed. Most other trees which were part of the original landscaping will remain. These plants are in fair -good condition. Some of the existing shrubs will remain and it looks like the shrubs which are to be removed will be replaced. Please contact me if you have any questions. Due to a conflict, I will not be at the site design review meeting on 1/4/12. Please forward my comments to the developer. Kathy Widin OPH Arborist 1 RESOLUTION NO.1 2-01-11 CITY COUNCIL CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING FINDINGS OF FACT AND RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL THAT THE REQUEST BY NH PARTNERS - OAK PARK HEIGHTS FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT, DESIGN GUIDELINES REVIEW AND VARIANCE FOR ONE ADDITIONAL WALL SIGN FOR A NEW HORIZON ACADEMY CHILD CARE CENTER AT 5903 NEAL AVENUE NORTH BE APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS WHEREAS, the City of Oak Park Heights has received a request from NH Partners — Oak Park Heights for a Planned Unit Development Amendment, Design Guidelines review and Variance for one additional wall sign for a New Horizon Academy child care center at 5903 Neal Avenue North; and after having conducted a public hearing relative thereto, the Planning Commission of Oak Park Heights recommended that the application be approved with conditions. The City Council of the City of Oak Park Heights makes the following findings of fact and resolution: 1. The real property affected by said application is legally described as follows, to wit: SEE ATTACHMENT A and 2. The applicant has submitted an application and supporting documentation to the Community Development Department consisting of the following items: SEE ATTACHMENT B and 3. The property is zoned PUD Commercial Planned Unit Development in which changes to the Planned Unit Development, including revisions to the parking lot and the addition of outdoor play area require an amendment; and 4. A review of the project for conformance with the Design Guidelines is required in that the exterior of the structure is to be remodeled; and 5. The applicants have requested a sign variance to allow for one additional wall sign on the building; and 6. City staff prepared a planning report dated January 4, 2012 reviewing the request; and 7. Said report recommended approval of the Planned Unit Development Amendment, Design Guidelines review and Variance for one additional wall sign subject to the fulfillment of conditions; and 8, The Planning Commission held a public hearing at their January 12, 2012 meeting, took comments from the applicants and public, closed the public hearing, and recommended that the application be approved with conditions. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVES THE FOLLOWING: A. The application submitted by NH Partners — Oak Park Heights for a Planned Unit Development Amendment, Design Guidelines review and Variance for one additional wall sign for a New Horizon Academy child care center at 5903 Neal Avenue North and affecting the real property as follows: SEE ATTACHMENT A The City Council of the City of Oak Park Heights approves the variance for the one wall sign subject to the following findings of fact: 1. The applicants have proposed a total of three wall signs, one each on three facades of the building. 2. The total square footage of signage is 256 square feet, or 144 square feet less than the maximum allowed of 400 square feet. 3. The building is located in the Destination Retail Highway Sign District in which allowances have been made because of the lack of visibility to this retail area from major roadways. 4. Due to the location of this business in that it is not visible from Highways 5 and 36 and has limited visibility from 58 Street, the applicants have indicated that only allowing two wall signs would cause an undue hardship for their business and the ability of parents to locate the building. The approvals are subject to the following conditions: 2 • • 1. A representative of the shopping center owner shall provide written consent to the City for the changes that will occur to the parking lot on the shopping center property. 2. The City Engineer shall review the parking analysis and comment on any potential impacts to the street system. 3. The City Council approves the sign variance for three wall signs each on different facades of the building and not to exceed a total of 256 square feet. 4. The sign specifications and methods of illumination shall be subject to review and approval of the City Planner at the time of permitting. 5. All lighting fixtures shall be full cut off and installed in compliance with the lighting standards of the Zoning Ordinance. All visible interior lighting shall also be full cut off. The lighting specifications shall be subject to review and approval of the City Planner at the time of permitting. 6. Mechanical equipment that is located on the roof and visible from street level or from neighborhood properties shall be screened with materials that blend harmoniously with the building facade materials. 7. The City Council is favorable to the sustainability initiatives proposed for the building and site. 8. The City Council is favorable to the building material selection and colors. A materials board was provided by the applicant for the City Council to review and approve. 9. The applicant shall provide plans for the storage structure at the time of building permit review. The color of the storage structure shall be consistent with the color of the play structure. 10. The grading, drainage and utility plans shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer and the applicable watershed district. 11. A bike rack shall be added at the front entrance of the building. 12. The landscape plans are subject to review and approval of the City Arborist. 3 Approved by the City Council of the City of Oak Park Heights this 31 day of January, 2012. /� e /`` ttf) David Beaudet, Mayor ATTEST: .1, '" A. � s i n, City Administrator 1 4 ATTACHMENT A Design Guideline Review, Site Plan Review, Planned Unit Development Amendment, And Sign Variance New Horizon Academy Child Care 5903 Neal Ave. N. Legally described as: Lot 6, Block 1, Oak Park Ponds Addition Washington County GEO Code: 06.029.20.11.0012 ,. • ATTACHMENT B Design Guideline Review, Site Plan Review, Planned Unit Development (PUD) Amendment, And Sign Variance For New Horizon Academy Child Care 5903 Neal Ave. N. Application Materials • Application Form • • Fees • Plan Sets (3 Large Scale Sets /20 11X17 Sets) • Written Narrative and Graphic Materials Explaining Proposal • Mailing List from Washington County (500' from subject property) • Proof of Ownership or Authorization to Proceed • Property Tax Statement(s) /Legal Description(s) Meeting With City Staff Upon Application Submittal: December 7, 2011 Required Approvals: PUD Amendment City Council 4/5 PUD Amendment - Limitation on General Concept Plan Approval: Unless a General Plan of Development covering the area designated as in the General Concept Plan as the first stage of the PUD has been filed within twelve (12) months from the date Council grants General Concept Plan approval, or in any case where the applicant fails to file General Plan of Development Stage and Final Plans and to proceed with development in accordance with the provisions of this Ordinance and of an approved General Concept Plan, the approval may be revoked by Council action. (401.06.C.2.e) Variance Lapse of Approval: Unless the City Council specifically approves a different time when action is officially taken on the request, the variance shall become null and void twelve (12) months after the date of approval, unless the property owner or applicant has substantially started the construction of any building, structure, addition or alteration, or use requested as part of the variance. An application to extend the approval of a variance shall be submitted to the Zoning Administrator not less than thirty (30) days before the expiration of said approval. (401.04.C.4.1 and 2)