Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2006-05-23 CC Resolution #06-05-25RESOLUTION No. 06-05-25 CITY COUNCIL CITY OF OAK PARIS HEIGHTS WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING FINllINGS OF FACT AND RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL THAT THE REQUEST BY TIM NOLDE REPRESENTING ANCHOBAYPl20 INC. AND VALLEY SENIOR SERVICES ALLIANCIC FOR PLANNED Y1101IT DEVELOPMENT (PUD), GENERAL PLAN, PRELIMINARY /FINAL PLAT AND A CONllITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW A TOTAL OF 67 RESIDENTIAL TOWNHOIVIE i1NITS AS PART OF THE FIRST PHASE OF THE OAKGRFI,N VILLAGE DEVELOPMENT IN THE B -4, LIMITED BUSINESS DISTRICT AND IN THAT AREA WEST OF OAKGI2EEN AVENUE AND NORTH OF 58 STREET NORTH BE APPROVED WITH CONDI'T'IONS WHEREAS, the City of oak Park Heights has received a request from TIM Nolde representing Anchobaypro Inc. and Valley Senior Services Alliance for PUD, general plan, preliminary /final flat and a conditional use permit to allow a total of 67 residential townhome - units as part of the first phase of the oakgreen Village development in the B-4, Limited Business District and in that area west of oakgreen Avenue and north of 58"' Street North; and after having conducted a public hearing relative thereto, the Planning Commission of Oak Parr Heights recom.niended that the request be approved with conditions. The City Council makes the following findings of fact and resolution: follows, to wit: and L The real property aff=ected by said application is legally described as SEE ATTACHMENT A 2. The applicant has submitted an application and supporting documentation to the Community Development Department consisting of the following items: and SEE ATTACHMENT B 3. The subject property is zoned BA Limited Business District which allows for residential development as a conditional use. The oakgr een village development is proposed as a planned unit development; and 4. The City Council, at their April 1. 1, 2006 meeting, approved the concept plan with conditions for the first phase of the Oakgreen Village development; and 5. City staff prepared a planning report dated May 4, 2006 reviewing the request for the general plan of development; and 6. The May 4, 2006 plan -ring report recommended approval of the general plan of development subject to the fulfillment of conditions; and 7. The Planning Commission held a public hearing at their May 11, 2006 meeting, took comments from the applicants and public, closed the public hearing, and recommended that the application be approved with conditions. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE CITY OF OAK PARIS HEIGHTS THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVES THE FOLLOWING A. The application submitted by Tim Nol.de representing Anchobaypro Inc. and Valley Senior Services Alliance for PUD, general plan., preliminary /final plat and a conditional use permit to allow a total of 67 residential townhon-ie units as part of the first phase of the Oakgreen Village development in the B -4, Limited Business District and in that area west of Oakgreen Avenue and north of 58"' Street North and affecting the real property as follows: SEE A.'rTACHMENT A Be and the same as hereby approved by the City Council of the City of Oak Park Heights subject to the following conditions: 1. The preliminary/final plat is subject to review and approval by the City Engineer and City Attorney. 2. The Park Commission recommends a cash park dedication for oakgreed. Village. Park dedication must be paid at the time of recording of the final plat. The specific terms of the dedication will be addressed in the development agreement. 3. All easements, as required by the City Engineer and City Attorney, shall be dedicated to the City as part of the subdivision approvals. 4. The applicant shall dedicate the right-of-way area for Nova Scotia Court North and Oakgreen Avenue as part of the final plat. 5. The City Council is favorable to the berming and screening provided for Nova Scotia Avenue North as part of the grading and landscape plans. K 6 . Sidewalks /trails and timing for construction are subject to review and approval by the Parks Commission, City Council, and City Engineer. 7. The applicant's traffic study for the oakgreen Village development shall be subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. 8. The tree preservation and landscape plans are subject to review and approval of the City Arborist. Additional trees and landscaping shall be provided on the north edge of the development. The landscape plan shall be updated and approved by the City Arborist. The applicant shall remove the dead trees within the stormwaterlwetland ponding area identified as outlot D. 9. The plans for the private park shall be provided and reviewed as part of the Phase 2 concept and general plan of development review process. 10. [wading, drainage, erosion control, and utility plans are subject to review and approval by the City Engineer. Stormwater issues are also subject to review and approval by the applicable watershed authority. 11. The applicant must comply with Xcel Energy's requirements for construction of a pond within the Xcel. Energy easement. The applicant shall resubmit the development plans to Xcel Energy to assure compliance with all utility requirements. written approval from Xcel Energy shall be provided to the City. 1.2. Prior to the issuance of any grading permit, all existing wells and septic systems must be identified and abandoned in conformance with Minnesota Rules. 13. The site plan does not include light fixtures on buildings. If lights are proposed on the buildings, they must be illustrated on the building plans, details submitted, and the photometric plan must be revised to include them subject to City staff review and approval. 14. Two monument signs shall be allowed for the development, subject to final review and approval of locations, and compliance with the City's Sign ordinance. 15. The City Council is favorable to the final design and materials for the tows- llorne structures. 16. The proposed vinyl lap siding must be changed to steel or Hardiboard siding subject to final review and approval of City staff. 17. The Fire Marshal and Police Chief should review the plans and determine the accessibility of emergency vehicles throughout the development. 18. The applicant shall supply the homeowners association documents as required by the City Attorney for review and approval. I 19. The applicant shall provide all association duties and maintenance until the completion of Phase 2. The homeowners association shall be organized with a funded reserve provided by the developer. The details of the reserve amount shall be outlined in the development agreement. only one homeowners association for both Phase 1 and Phase 2 will be allowed. 20. The applicant shall be required to disclose the entire development plans to include Phase 2 for all Phase 1 buyers. Disclosure is also required for modification of all buyers within the development that the roadway and wetlands are to be private and will not be accepted as public in the future by the City. 21. The applicant shall dedicate the wetland area north of 58"' Street (Outlot D) to the City. 22. The applicant is required to enter into a development agreement with the City in a form acceptable to the City, and subject to review and approval of the City Attorney. 23. A plan for postal box design and locations on the site shall be submitted to and approved by City staff_ and the Postmaster. 24. The City Engineer shall review and submit for approval to the Parks Commission and Cit y Council a plan for crosswalks and 58 Street and Nova Scotia. Avenue North. 25. The applicant shall provide a snow removal plan su�j ect to review and approval of City staff. 26. All conditions and recommendations as listed in the May 15, 2006 letter from the City Engineer shall be complied with. 27. A temporary play area /open space area shall be provided by the applicant and shall be provided with an appropriate play surface to be completed no later than occupancy of the first two story building of the development. Approved by the City Council of the City of Oak Park Heights this 23 "' y of May 2006. t David I3eaudet, ayor Attachment A 'tea- shington Count} GEo Code: 05,029.20WXX -XX Legal Description.& Lot 1--4, Block 1, Oakgreen Village Lot 1 -4, Block 2, Oakgreen Village Lot 1 -8, Block 3, Oakgi - een Village Lat 1-3, Block 4, Oakgreen Tillage Lot 1-8, Block 5, Oakgreen Village Lot 1 -4, Block 6, Oakgreen pillage Lot 1 -4, Block 7, Oakgreen Village Lot 1-4, Block 8, Oakgreen Village Lot 1 -4, Block 9, Oakgreen Village Lot 1 M4 Block 10, Oakgreen Village Lot 1 -4, Block 11 , Oakgreen Village Lot 1 -4, Block 12, Oakgreen Village Lot 1-4, Block 13, Oakgreen village Lot 1-4, Block 14, Oakgreen Village Lot --4., Block 51, Oakgreen pillage All located within the NEI r4 of Section 5, Township 29, Mange 20, Washington County, MIN Page 72 of 126 ATTACHMENT B s zi 'l K „Y r Planned Unit Development (PUD) - k General Plan, Preliminary/Final Plat & Conditional Use Permit OAKGREEN VILLAGE —Phase I (67 Residential Townhouse Units) Application Materials 0 Application Form 0 Fees (applicable) ® Plan Sets (3 Large Scale Sets/20 11 X1 7 Sets) 0 Written Narrative and Graphic Materials Explaining Proposal 0 Mailing List from Washington County (500' from subject property) 0 Proof of ownership or Authorization to Proceed 0 Property Tax Statement(s)/Legal Description(s) Plannin g Commission Public bearing & Recommendation: May 11, 2006 Required Approvals: Plannin g commission Majority Mote City Council Majority Vote Conditional Use Permit M Lapse of Approval Unless the City Council specifically approves a different time when action is officially taken on the request, the conditional use permit shall become null and void twelve (12) months after th - e date of approval, unless the property owner or applicant has substantially started the construction of any building, structure, addition or alteration, or use p as requested art of the conditional use, An application to extend the approval of a g conditional use p ermit shall be submitted to the Zoning Administrator not less than thirty (3o ) days before the expiration of said approval. (401,03,C.4.a and b) Y Page 73 of 126 n Bonestroo � RQSenE' Anderlik & Associates Fngfneers & Architects May 15, 2 005 2335 west Highway 36 , St. Paul. MN 55113 Office: 651- 636-4600 9 F ax: 651 - 6 36~1311 wwwhonestroo cam Mr.. Eno Johnson City A.dmiri ist rator' City of Oak Park rk I--l.ei ghts 14168 Oak Park Blvd.., P .0. Box 2007 Gak. Park 11 eitlits, MN 5 5 082.2007 Oakgrcen Village General Plan Review BRA. r=ilc'No_ 5505 --000 Decar Eric: e gencral plans, dated. A.pri 1 26, 2006, for the Oakgreea 'pillage We. have revicwed th 1-D I. * c, Followin are our P devolo meat as submitted by Folz, Fr ecrxra", �1 l� g comments an / or rec0M111on6ati01 eve o anent o mments tl�c stree sanita sewer water main and 111aJority of the storm sower will be �. Y p owned. T he exception is all storm sewer that connects trunk storms. p r � y water ponds will be owned by the City. Sb eet 2 I. The south cu is s hown with a 42' radius- A. 45 " radius is tho rniniMUM lic cul -de -sacs in the City. It should be verified bar the fire chief rcquired for pub that this radi'LIS is acceptable for mancrrvering emergency Vehicles. Sheet 4 Spot elevation should he shown for the top and bottom of all retaining , walls . drawings and calculations for ally retaining walls over 3.0 "fcct tall Detailed design g shall b submitted to t1je City for review and approval prior to corIsl:Rrcttoll. 2, The grading contours on the west side of the wetland go from 940 ditectly to 9 It appears the 942 contour is missing. 3 . Clearly define tile, wetland boundary and provide verification that proper wetland setbacks and buffers are being rnet. 4_ Verily that al slopes are 3 .1 or less. It appears there arc slopes greater than 1 l i n the s outhwest corner of tile property and Iust - southwest o f the north pond. St Paul. St Cloud. Rochester. MN m Milwaukee. W( w Cilicago. IL Affifma Action /Equal ❑PPorcunity r:mPloyer an(I rmployc e 0Wnu d Page 74 of 126 5. Label the Emergoncy overflow Routes of elevations and drainagc arrows, especially it' critical ( I c' � . Identify sot e spot 1 ocat is s srtel1 as .SOLIth of snits 52 -5A-. At this location the overland drainage appears to be mi m mal . 7. Tile. existing ti southwest NURP fond is being significantly reduced. Show the gr ading an for this pond and provide information on tts water' gt proposed � p ty treatm � eijt. The e cistin g drainage area to the pond is being maintained, however the sfze of'tho pond is being reduced.. The south 1 east. NLJRP pond and the existing wetland are labeled with a NWL of 8. 936.O and the sorttl��west �I�TURP pond is labeled with a WL of937.7, However, tlje colitours shown in this area ar not corresponding with the blue area shown on the plans as the XW L of the pond s. ,q lwk 7 1 w i tll the constr oction of' Nov - Scotia Av - enu e 1110AII the City wi install the followirjg items that will be paid for by the Oakgreen Village dcvelopment: a 'Tree 8 "water main stubs extended to the right-Of. . b. Concrete curb and gutter radii (It the two entrances to the development. c.. The bituminorls pathway in the east boulevard of Nova Scotia. The p la ll s currently show the connection of'the water main in Nova Scotia Avenue. This should be revised to show the conn.ectim) at the right of way. 3. The drainage e area to the existing wetland is being decreased with the grading of' tli c site. To maintain hydrology to the wetland the outlet for the south ponding cyst e should be placed on the existing wetland, rather than on the cast �]RP � n pond as current] drawn. This will allow both the east and the West N W Ponds to discharge into the wetland. To niaxim'ze the upland buffer surroundit g the wetland it is recommond the outlet be placed at 935.50. 4. I F p roposed ES t 03 in the ro osed north pond is directly across from. the outlet.. This configuration decreases the treatment capabilities of the pond, The inlet/outlet locations should be moved to 111aximize the hydraulic length between the two structures.. 5 Both the sanit ary sewer and storm s ewer pass b etween units 39 and 40 and between units 51 and 52. The pipes are approximately 15' deep relative to the finish floor elevations of the units. The plans show only 10' between the pip d the building At these depths there should be a rn.inirnunn of 15' from tl�e an g utilities to the buildings.. Page 75 of 126 6. In the HydroCAD model a 1 Ilk an 8" submerged pipe are shown ill the outlet ror 01C soLrth pond and north pond, respectively. The, prinlary Mitict for the south pond is 15" RC.P and 12" RCP for the north pond. Submerged pipes easily rill witil scdiment and debris, therefore to maintain capacity to the primary outicts the r)jijjimi.ze size for the; submerged pipes shall be 24 ", Plat L The stoma sewer From pond to pond and the storrr� sewer outlet fr om the proposal nor - th pond to the existing system will part ofthe City's public ire rastrtrcture.. A 30' utility easement will be required for this system. General Comments 1. The additional items shall be submitted for review: a, Pipe profilos for public storm sewer. b. Details, including outlet structures, c, Typical S cction for Roads - d. Erosion Control plan, including native seed mixture for upland area surrounding the wetland. e.. Copy of the Approval letter ftom the Middle SL Croix Watershed, The plans will require Wither review when items discussed in this letter are submitted.. If you have any questions or require additional information please contact meat (65 1) 604-478 8 or Dennis Posticr at (651.) 604-4815- Si ncerely, BONE TROO, ROSENE, ANDERLI K & ASSOCL.T ES, INC.. area S. Erickson, P.E. cc: Tom ozzello, NNW works Director Jim Butler Building official Scott Richards, City Planner Marls Vicr City Attorney `odd FT- Ickson -Folz, Freeman Brickson, Inc. DMP, BMK, File ---- Bonestroo & Associates : L55�55priti�tcl�ak�re�nvii la�rc�'u y£��i1 at�rssfln� C5 r ^oa r ct� village geicsai plans 5d5 Page 76 of 126