HomeMy WebLinkAbout2006-03-09 PC Recommending ResolutionA RECOMMENDING RESOLUTION
OF THE
PLANNING COMMISSION
CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS
WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA
A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING FINDINGS OF FACT AND
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL THAT THE
REQUEST BY TIM NOLDE, REPRESENTING ANCHOBAYPRO INC.
AND VALLEY SENIOR SERVICES ALLIANCE, FOR A REVISED PUB
CONCEPT PLAN FOR THAT AREA WEST OF OAKGREEN AVENUE
AND NORTH OF 58 STREET FOR A TOTAL OF 67 RESIDENTIAL
UNITS AS PART OF A FIRST PHASE OF THE OAKGREEN VILLAGE
DEVELOPMENT
BE APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS
WHEREAS, the City of Oak Park Heights has received a request from Tim
Nolde, representing Anchobaypro Inc. and Valley Senior Services Alliance, for a revised PUD p p
concept plan for that area west of Oakgreen Avenue and north of 5 8 Street for a total of 67
residential units as part of a first phase of the Oakgreen Village development; and after having
conducted a public hearing relative thereto, the Planning Commission of Oak Park Heights
makes the following findings of fact:
1. The real property affected by said application is legally described as
follows, to wit:
SEE ATTACHMENT A
and
2. The applicant has submitted an application and supporting
documentation to the Community Development Department consisting of the following items:
and
SEE ATTACHMENT B
3. The subject property is zoned B-4, Limited Business District which allows
for residential development as a conditional use. The Oakgreen Village development is proposed
as a planned unit development; and
4. City staff prepared a planning report dated March 2, 2006 reviewing the
request for the concept plan of development; and
5. The March 2, 2006 planning report recommended approval of the concept
plan of development subject to the fulfillment of conditions; and
6. The Planning Commission held a public hearing at their March 9, 2006
meeting, took comments from the applicants and public, closed the public hearing, and made the
following recommendation:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING
COMMISSION FOR THE CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS THAT THE PLANNING
COMMISSION RECOMMENDS THE FOLLOWING:
A. The application submitted by Tim Nolde, representing Anchobaypro Inc. and Valley
Senior Services Alliance, for a revised PUD concept plan for that area west of Oakgreen Avenue
and north of 58 Street for a total of 67 residential units as part of a first phase of the Oakgreen
Village development and affecting the real property as follows:
SEE ATTACHMENT A
Be and the same as hereby recommended to the City Council of the City of Oak Park Heights for
approval subject to the following conditions:
1. B -4 District standards are compliant with the proposed project application.
2. The applicant provides a property appraisal, acceptable to the City Attorney to calculate
park dedication.
3. The plat shall dedicate right-of-way for Nova Scotia Avenue, 59 Street, and Oakgreen
Avenue as required by the City Engineer and City Attorney.
4. The Planning Commission recommends that the City acquire the right-of-way for 59
Street as part of the Oakgreen Village plat but not construct the roadway at this time.
5. The Planning Commission is favorable to the design of Nova Scotia Avenue including
the screening, landscaping, and beans proposed on the preliminary plans.
6. The Planning Commission recommends a public street network for this development.
7. The Fire Marshal and Police Chief should review the plans and determine the
accessibility of emergency vehicles throughout the development.
8. The Park Commission should comment on the proposed private and public trail system.
9. All required setbacks to conform with zoning and wetland ordinance requirements and
shall be incorporated in the general plan of development.
10. All perimeter units must maintain a 20 foot setback to the lot lines.
2
11. The applicant shall provide vehicle count information and projections as required by the
City Engineer.
12. Detailed tree inventory, tree preservation, and landscape plans shall be provided for
general plan of development.
13. Detailed park plans will be required for general plan of development review.
14. Detailed grading, drainage and utility plans shall be provided for general plan of
development review.
15. Detailed architectural plans for the proposed buildings in the project shall be required for
general plan of development review.
Recommended by the Planning Commission of the City of Oak Park Heights this 9th day
of March 2006.
Eric A.
hnson, City Administrator
3
.ATTA A ,
F olz , F eman, Ericks on, Inc,
LAND PLANNINc 4 SURVEYING ¢ ENGIN
b akgreen Village Preltmitiary Plat - Legal De
(Legal Description of Property Surveyed Taken. by Boundary Survey of Kurth Surveying, Inc. knuary 31, 2002)
All of the North Half of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 5,
T'own.s
hi p g 29. R.an e 20. Washington: County Minnesota, except the following:
.Ail. that p art of the North Half of the Southeast .axterr of the Northeast darter of
S ect on . 5 , Townshi p 2 9 . Range 2 0 : descried as follows : Coirnencin g at the
outh.east corner of said North Half of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast
S
Quarter: thence North. along the East line thereof 560 feet to the point,of be . g
of thi s descri p txon: thence Westerly at right angles to the last described line 200 feet
to a p olnt : thence North and p arall.el with, the East line of the S outh.east Quarter o f
the Northeast uarter. 100 feet to a point on the Nprth line of said Southeast
Quarter of the Northeast Quarter: thence East along said North line 200 feet to the •
East Elie of said Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter: thence South along
said. East line 100 feet to the point of beginn ng of this description. .,
.And except: . .
That p art of th.e Nort Ha
h .f of the S outh.east Qu of the Northeast uarter descr b ed as follows: Comthenc .ng at the S outheast corn er of said North Sa.f of
the Southeast uarter ofthe Northeast Q uarter': theirce north along East lie thereof,
�
18 2 feet to the P oint of b egging of hi s description: thence continue Northerly
alon g said East line 21 S feet to a point: thence West and perpendicular to last
'
described line 20 3 feet to a point: thence South and parallel w� th th,e E ast lln.e o f .
sar
d S outheast ' arter of the Northeast Quarter 21 S feet to a point: thence East and
perp
endicular to last described line 200 feet to the port ofbeginning. .
Together w i `
Tracts A and B , Registered Land Surrey No. 114
Also together with:
Th p art eas at of the Northt Q uarter of the Northeast Quarter described as follows :
Be ' `n at a oxnt on the Bast line of the said Northeast Quarter of the Northeast
�ng p
Quarter. 472 feet North of the Southeast corner thereof: thence West on a lin e
p oral.
el 'th the South line thereof. 27.5 feet to a point: thence North on a line
`th th.e East line thereof. 110 feet to a point. thence East on a he parallel
parallel �.
mirth th
e South, Line thereof. 275 feet to a pointon the East line thereof: thence South
an th.e East line thereof 110 feet to the point of beginning.
Also together with: .
That part of the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section. 5. Township
29', Range 20. Washington County, Minnesota described as follows:. .
B eginn:ing at a point on the east line of said 1` ortheast Quarter of the Northeast
Quarter. 242.00 feet north of th.e southeast corner thereof. thence west on a
lire parallel with the south line thereof. 150.00 feet to a point: thence north on
w
a lira e parallel with the east lin6 thereof. 115.00 to a point: thence east on aline
parallel with the south line thereof. 150.00 feet to a point on the east line, •
thereof: thence south on the east .line thereof. '115.00 feet to the point of
'beginning.
Also together vth:
That part of the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 5. Township
29. Range 20. Washington County, Minnesota described as follows:
Beginning at a point 242.00 feet north of the south line of said Northeast '
Quarter of the Northeast Quarter. and 150.00 feet west of the east he of said
'Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter: thence west on a line parallel r th
the south line of said Northeast. Quarter of the Northeast Quarter. 125.00 feet
to a point: thence north on a live parallel to the east line thereof. 115.00 feet to
a point: thence east on a line parallel with, the south line thereof. 125.00 feet to
a point: thence south on a line parallel with the east line thereof 115.00 feet to
. the point ofbegiuning.
Also together with:
That part o f. the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of S ego n: 5. township
29 Range 20.• Washington. County, Minnesota described as follows : ,
B eginnin.g at the southeast corner thereof and run thence west along the south.
line thereof. 150.00 feet to a point: thence north on a line parallel with the east
line thereof. 80.00 feet to a point: thence East onn a line parallel with the south
line thereof. 150.00 feet to a point on the east line thereof: thence south 80.00
feet to the point of beginning.
Also together with:
All that part of the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter descri.bed as
follows: Beginning at a point on the south line of said Northeast Quarter of
the Northeast Quarter, 3 85 feet to West of the South East Oorner thereof:
thence North on a line parallel with the East line thereof. 80 feet to a point:
thence East on a line parallel with South line thereof. 225 feet to a point:.
thence South on a line parallel with the East li thereof. 80 feet to the South
fine thereof: thence West on the South line thereof. 225 feet to the point of
b
egin.ng.
Outlot A., BOUTWELLS LANDING, according to the plat on ale and of record, in the
Office of the County Recorder, Washington County, Minnesota,
2 oft
ATTACHMENT B
Planned Unit Development (PUD): Revised Concept Plan
OAKGREEN VILLAGE
Application Materials
es Application Form
O Fees
• Plan Sets (3 Large Scale Sets /20 11X17 Sets)
• Written Narrative and Graphic Materials Explaining Proposal
• Mailing List from Washington County (500' from subject property)
• Proof of Ownership or Authorization to Proceed
® Property Tax Statements} /Legal Description(s)
Planning Commission Public Hearing & Recommendation: March 9, 2006
Required Approvals: PUD: General Conceit
Planning Commission 4/5
City Council 4/5
PUD: General Gonceat — Effect of Concept Plan Approval:
Unless the applicant shall fail to meet time schedules for filing General Plan of
Development Stage and/or Final Plans or shall fail to proceed with development in
accordance with the plans as approved or shall in any other manner fail to comply with
any condition of Ordinance 401 or any approval granted pursuant to it, a General
Concept Plan which has been approved and a PUD Agreement signed by the applicant
shall not be modified, revoked or otherwise impaired pending the application for
approval of the General Plan of Development Stage and Final Plans by any action of
the City of Oak Park Heights without consent of the applicant. (401.06.C.2.d)
PUD: General Concept - Limitation on General Concept Plan Approval:
Unless a General Plan of Development covering the area designated as in the General
Concept Plan as the first stage of the PUD has been filed within twelve (12) months
from the date Council grants General Concept Plan approval, or in any case where the
applicant fails to file General Plan of Development Stage and Final Plans and to
proceed with development in accordance with the provisions of this Ordinance and of an
approved General Concept Plan, the approval may be revoked by Council action.
(401 .06.C.2.e)