HomeMy WebLinkAbout2003-12-12 Weekly Notes ReferenceCITl'.Q.F PA ''-
-vi
TO: Cit Council Members FROM: Eric Johns+
WEEKLY NOTES.1 2/12.03
1. Various Develo Items:
for
Copies of the submitted plans for Oak Villa (General) G and Oak Villa South
%..0
(Concept) are attached for y our files. Staff has had a chance to review and has responded that the
applications are complete.
As discussed last week, the Cit will re VSSA to hold a nei meetin for the
Oak Green South project. A cop of our letter to residents is attached advisin them of that
meetin VSSA shall hold the Nei Meetin at BoutweH's Landin Please recall that
the Cit does have an OPTION to purchase a majorit of this propert (south of 58th Street for
$278,456-
Z. Denn Hecker - Amoco Site
Mark Vierlin is completin the CUP documents and will be filed b the 1' of the y ear.
3. Salem Lutheran Church
Salem Luther Church has submifted a4etter re the initiation of a process where the can
detach a small portion of their campus from the Cit and annex into Stillwater in order to
facilitate an expansion. Enclosed is their letter and I have provided a map so y ou can understand
the lot issues. Please see letter from Bill Hansen and m initial response. We will be in further
contact with them - probabl - next week.
4. Snow Plowin
I have enclosed a cop of the CURRENT Cit Polic for snowplowin Ja Lind and I have
" I allowing -so
met on Idle matter and worKM on a few chan Namel allowin omeers, on dut to directl
contact Ralei Truckin I will continue to monitor and advise.
5. AMRP Resolution.
Enclosed is a cop of the Resolution sent to Burl Harr, Executive Secretar of the Minnesota
Public Utilities Commission (PUC) statin the Cit support of the pollution reduction project,
but that various element at the Kin Plant should remain as taxable. The MERP project passed the
PUC 4-1 on Dee 181. How the ultimate taxabilit standards pla out will more than likel be
decided in the upcomin le session. Please see meetin notice from the Coalition of
Utilit Cities (CUC)
6. Ci Nall Security Alarm
The Cit will no lon be receivin monthl reports on who turns on/off the Cit securit alarm.
After consultin with some of y ou and Lind the report is g enerall y not important. The s
IMP
will still fimction fine and alarms will g o off, but we will be savin about $120/ month.