HomeMy WebLinkAbout2002-08-13 CC Meeting Packet EnclosureB ackgroundaustification:
Oak Park Heights
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date August 13, 2002
Agenda Item Title Oakgreen Villas Concept P.U.D.
Time Required 5 Minutes
Agenda Placement New Business
Originating Department /Requester Planning Cornmission/Communit Development
Requester's Signature KV°i.seDGuvLi3O740-W
Action Requested Approval of Concept Plan with Planning Commission
Recommendations
Please be advised that the Planning Commission voted 4 -1 to recommend that the Cit Council vote to
approve the Concept Plan Planned Unit Development for the Oakgreen Villas application. The public
hearing had been continued monthl since the original public hearing in March 2002.
At the meeting of 8/8/02, area residents were present to comment on the proposed project. Issues of
concern for residents of Oakgreen. Avenue and for residents of Pond. View Condominiums included:
• The current condition of Oakgreen Avenue and traffic congestion at the intersection of Hw 36
and Oakgreen Avenues.
• The proximit of affordable rental housing to their properties.
• Tot lots and pla should be located awa lrom roadwa families with children will need a
place for their children to pla
• The uncertaint of how future development will impact their properties.
• The desire for a privac fence and screening to be incorporated into the Villas plans.
In addition the Commission discussed:
• How the applicants arrived at a decision to place this development in its proposed location.
• The need for compliance with an re Xcel Energ ma have relative to its easement and
the proximit of development.
The applicant has volutaril extended the review period for this project until 8/28/02, which allows the
Cit Council the opportunit to review this project at its meeting of 8/13/02 and the meeting of
8/27/02. Please contact me with an questions y ou ma have at 439 -4439.
RESOLUTION NO.
OF THE
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS
WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA
A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING FINDINGS OF FACT AND RESOLUTION
OF THE CITY COUNCIL THAT THE REQUEST BY VALLEY SENIOR
SERVICES ALLIANCE, INC. AND TIM NOLDE FOR A PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT/ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CONCEPT PLAN REVIEW
TO ALLOW MULTIPLE FAMILY TOwNIOViES WITHIN THE CENTRAL
BUSINESS DISTRICT BE APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS
WHEREAS, the City of Oak Park Heights has received a request from Valley
Senior Services Alliance, Inc. and Tim Nolde for a concept plan review to allow twenty
two multiple family townhomes for the property north of the Xcel Energy power line
easement within the Central Business District, and after having conducted a public
hearing relative thereto, the Planning Commission of Oak Park Heights recommended
that the application be approved with conditions. The City Council of the City of Oak
Park Heights makes the following finding of fact:
1. The real property affected by said application is legally described as
follows, to wit:
and
SEE ATTACHMENT A
2. The applicant has submitted an application and supporting documentation
to the Community Development Department consisting of the following items:
and
SEE ATTACHMENT B
3. The subject site is zoned CBD, Central Business District in which
multiple family townhomes are a conditional use; and
4. A planned unit development concept/general plan review is required for
developments with more than one building on a defined lot with private driveways; and
5. The City Staff prepared a memorandum dated August 2, 2002 reviewing
the request; and
6. The memorandum dated August 2, 2002 recommended the request be
approved with conditions; and
7. The Planning Commission held a public hearing at their August 8, 2002
meeting, took comments from the applicants and public, closed the public hearing, and
recommended that the application be approved subject to conditions.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL FOR
THE CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVES
THE FOLLOWING:
A. The application submitted by Valley Senior Services Alliance, Inc and Tim Nolde
for a concept plan review to allow twenty two multiple family townhomes for property
north of the Xcel Energy power line easement within the Central Business District, and
affecting the real property as follows:
SEE ATTACHMENT A
Be and the same as hereby recommended to the City Council of the City of Oak Park
Heights for approval subject to the following conditions:
1. The master plan of the CBI] Design Guidelines allow for residential townhomes in the
Medium Box Mixed Use Precinct.
2. The preliminary /final plat shall be submitted as part of general plan of development
review and approvals.
3. The Parks Commission should comment on the preferred form of park dedication for
this area. If a land dedication is preferred, the Parks Commission and City Council shall
determine if the parcel under the Xcel power line easement proposed by the applicant for
dedication is appropriate.
4. The applicant shall dedicate an easement for 59 Street and all required drainage and
utility easements as required by the City in the final plat and development contract.
5. The Park Commission should comment on the trail requirements for this area and
recommend the desired trail /sidewalk locations for incorporation into the general plan of
development.
6. The current setbacks for the villas project as proposed are acceptable.
7. The applicant shall provide drainage calculations for the proposed site as part of the
general plan application. The drainage plans and any required drainage easements shall
be subject to review and approval of the City Engineer and the applicable watershed
authority.
8. Utility plans shall be subject to review and approval of the City Engineer.
9. A development contract between the applicant and the . City shall be required as part of
the general plan of development approvals subject to City Attorney and City Council
review and approval.
10. A privacy fence of six (6) feet in height along with appropriate landscaping screening
be incorporated as part of the general plan development along the north and east of the
development.
11. A proposed construction access plan shall be submitted along with the general plan
application.
12. The general plan application will meet all requirements of Xcel Energy related to
their power line easement.
Approved by the City Council of the City of Oak Park Heights this 13 day of
August 2002.
ATTEST:
Kimberly Kamper, Acting City Administrator
David Beaudet, Mayor
PARCEL 1:
PARCEL 2:
ATTACHMENT A
Try A, B and D, Register Land Survey No. 114, as surveyed and filed in the
office of the Registrar of Titles in and for Washington County, Minnesota.
All that part of the No theat Qom of the Northeast Qu&te 1J4 of NE) )4)
of Section Five ( Township Twenty-nine (29) North of Range Twenty (2
West, described as follows: Beginning at a point on the East line of the said
Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter (114 ofNBi /4) 472 feet North of
the Southeast comer thereof, thence West on a line parallel with the South line
thereof 275 feet to a point; thence North on a line paraliel to the East line thereof
110 feet to a point; thence East on a the parallel with the South tin the of 275
fit to a point on the East line thereof; thence South on the East line thereof 110
feet to the point of beginning; subject to the public highway on the East side of
said tract
For:
Required Approvals:
Planning Commission
City Council 4/5
TACHMENT B
OAKGREEN VILLAGE VILLAS
Planned Unit Development: Concept Plan
Application Materials
1 Application Form
• Fees
• Plan Sets (3 Large Scale Sets/20 11X17 Sets)
• Written and Graphic . Materials Fully Explaining Proposal/Consistency with City's
Comprehensive Plan
• Mailing List from Washington County (350/150)
• Proof of Ownership or Authorization to Proceed
• Property Tax Statement
Limitation on General Concept Plan Approval
Unless a General Plan of Development covering the area designated in the General
Concept Plan as the first stage of the PUD has been filed within twelve (12) months
from the date Councii.grants General Concept Plan approval, or in any case where the
applicant fails to file General Plan of Development State and Final Plans and to proceed
with development in accordance with the provisions of this Ordinance and of an
approved General Concept Plan, the approval may be revoked by Council action.
A RECOMMENDING RESOLUTION
OF THE
PLANNING COMMISSION
CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS
WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA
A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING FINDINGS OF FACT AND
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL THAT THE REQUEST BY
VALLEY SENIOR SERVICES ALLIANCE, INC. AND TIM NOLDE FOR A
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT /CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CONCEPT
PLAN REVIEW TO ALLOW MULTIPLE FAMILY TOWNHOMES WITHIN
THE CENTRAL, BUSINESS DISTRICT BE APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS
WHEREAS, the City of Oak Park Heights has received a request from Valley
Senior Services Alliance, Inc. and Tim Nolde for a concept plan review to allow twenty
two multiple family townhomes for property north of the Xcel Energy power line
easement within the Central Business District, and after having conducted a public
hearing relative thereto, the Planning Commission of Oak Park Heights makes the
fallowing findings of fact:
1. The real property affected by said application is legally described as
follows, to wit:
and
and
SEE ATTACHMENT A
2. The applicant has submitted an application and supporting documentation
to the Community Development Department consisting of the following items:
SEE ATTACHMENT B
3. The subject site is zoned CBD, Central Business District in which
multiple family townhomes are a listed conditional use; and
4. A planned unit development concept /general plan review is required for
developments with more than one building on a defined lot with private driveways; and
5. The City Staff prepared a memorandum dated August 2, 2002 reviewing
the request; and
6. The memorandum dated August 2, 2002 recommended the request be
approved with conditions; and
7. The Planning Commission held a public hearing at their August 8, 2002
meeting, took comments from the applicants and public, closed the public hearing, and
made the following recommendation:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING
COMMISSION FOR THE CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS THAT TIIE
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDS THE FOLLOWING:
A. The application submitted by Valley Senior Services Alliance, Inc and Tim Nolde
for a concept plan review to allow twenty two multiple family townhomes for property
north of the Xcel Energy power line easement within the Central Business District, and
affecting the real property as follows:
SEE ATTACHMENT A
Be and the same as hereby recommended to the City Council of the City of Oak Park
Heights for approval subject to the following conditions:
1. The Planning Commission recommends that the master plan of the CBD Design
Guidelines allow for residential townhomes in the Medium Box Mixed Use Precinct.
2. The preliminary /final plat shall be submitted as part of general plan of development
review and approvals.
3. The Parks Commission and City Council should comment on the preferred form of
park dedication for this area. If a land dedication is preferred, the Parks Concession and
City Council shall determine if the parcel under the Xcel power line easement ro osed
p p
by the applicant for dedication is appropriate.
4. The applicant shall dedicate an easement for 59 Street and all required drainage and
utility easements as required by the City in the final plat and development contract.
5. The Park Commission and City Council should comment on the trail requirements for
this area and recommend the desired trail /sidewalk locations for incorporation into the
general plan of development.
6. The Planning Commission recommends the current setbacks for the Villas project as
proposed.
7. The applicant shall provide drainage calculations for the proposed site as part of the
general plan application. The drainage plans and any required drainage easements shall
be subject to review and approval of the City Engineer and the applicable watershed
authority.
8. Utility plans shall be subject to review and approval of the City Engineer.
9. A development contract between the applicant and the City shall be required as part of
the general plan of development approvals subject to City Attorney and City Council
review and approval.
10. A privacy fence of six (6) feet in height along with appropriate landscaping screening
be incorporated as part of the general plan development along the north and east of the
development.
11. A proposed construction access plan shall be submitted along with the general plan
application.
12. The general plan application will meet all requirements of Xcel Energy related to
their power line easement.
Recommended by the Planning Commission of the City of Oak Park Heights this
8th day of August 2002.
ATTEST:
Kimberly Kamper, Acting City Administrator
George Vogt, Chair
PARCP, 1:
PARCPj, 2;
ATTACBNENT A
Tiwts A, B and D, Registerod Land Survcy No, 114, as surveyed and filed in the
office oft the Registrar of Titles in trici for Washington County, Minnesota
All that part of the Northam Quartet. of the Northam Queer (NE1J4 ofNE1 /4)
of Section Five (5), TQwnship Twenty-nine (29) North of age Two (20)
West, described as follows: Beginning at a point on the East line of the said .
Northam Quartr of the Norm darter (NBI/4 ofNE1 /4) 472 feet North of
the Southeast corner thereat theme West on a line parallel with the Sow lit .
thereof 275 feet to a point; tb.cnce North on a line par e1 to the East line thereof
110 feet to a point; thence East on a line parallel. with the South 1ine thoteof 275
feet to a point on the :fast line thereof; thence South on the BP st line thereof 110
feet to the point of hugixming; subject to the public highway on the East side of
said fit.
For:
Required Approvals:
Planning Commission
City Council 4/5
ATTACHMENT B
Planned Unit Development: Concept Plan
OAKGREEN VILLAGE VILLAS
Application Materials
• Application Form
• Fees
• Plan Sets (3 Large Scale Sets/20 11X17 Sets)
• Written and Graphic Materials Fully Explaining Proposal/Consistency with City's
Comprehensive Plan
• Mailing List from Washington County (350/150)
▪ Proof of Ownership or Authorization to Proceed
• Property Tax Statement
Limitation on General Concept Plan Approval
Unless a General Plan of Development covering the area designated in the General
Concept Plan as the first stage of the PUD has been filed within twelve (12) months
from the date Councii.grants General Concept Plan approval, or in any case where the
applicant fails to file General Plan of Development State and Final Plans and to proceed
with development in accordance with the provisions of this Ordinance and of an
approved General Concept Plan, the approvaf may be revoked by Council action.
^
NOLIN
-
1 '
51143A .;112.LZ30110014
(
�
~~~ ~~1 3 .1 � I
~~ -~
wax
~~
writ
.
m
1 1:
tWOIAVEI
~~
i=:,
I
it 11 :l
J I J. 1
\ . 11 1 1 . ! f 1
• . f.l E�
.1i 1 I1 =
II • f z j .
w
ww � i�
'i I
, .w ‹. •
1 in
I I f
! II II • 'ES, 5
lf1
�oN n 3n ► iiVAEIN 1 r' f �.
1
I `� ���
f
[I
p 1 1
� �� I I
Lit
! II
_._) [1(
") il f
1I 1
I'lI�
1ij.I 1 1
1 1
li l
z I
w-s
•i
Z
1
.
,n i
1
- r�
1
Y ON
NM
1 ; 1 � � l - � 1141 yet
. • / m ow mop Ill mum
I
IL
ee
air
I -•
3Nd3 d3$3nelA
• !r
s.+u ssa�ar
IN I .
Neu rol
VAG:
iv' la 1211
Fs ga III
ry unw•
MI
nN n • >dnor � - w
w
HAW 1DN 3nF
gia i li a . pi
. • -,,SIOVIDIDAY
~
-
r --'
'm inzoo
•
. - /1
�
� Ja11
11 193 34
1
}
( ` � `
` �w
• � �'1 --'_
`~ ^ s - /
^-.-_
' ' '
|/
,�
�
/8Q
co
g 11
14
T
,�
/
/ /
' ' -- - ' -
'
' /
. /
�
/ ,'
` \
•/ '
-
• /
'
_
__
~/ l
�
' -- ' . �nv�''�----_'`�' / ` ' ,
' _..
��--� '/}" / M3fTh \
`.. . •
. . .. ~' .
��1/
/
( 1 , )
|�� �""�=�=_ / / \- •
' �
. ` ` `
) —
~ � - r I "="=="=^. ' ` '
,
-.`
l`'_
/
•
$1.10 -1E15-- � • 1.L'E$ -irk -844 'Id
- �} }ggp • = '� xuayannpar
91.5aii L IQtLfg92411
`qui '53,,78lifin f HSSr
sw
x+1
Ma N
t N114
rx uei�i
JAN
r0/1=1 /1-
Si1191R11 711P41 71
5,1711 HaRtii.fsi0
NY1d OIOHd 1W1,1ad
111CikL7
t i r
-0
LCD
•
T
Cin
GOd
fy ON OcNO3
112,8 11- SSE -td 'I 1,££94£E - Ei
at 0 11 4 hMR #iii 424)1
'� F 'SL3ZLllWl T HS$r
1'
as
Alta
;hi
HIUON-
3f N2AV . N3 UD)IYO
fig ON OEM
'i'4 C2
Gs Ye
nee
wO 11W vai-tslaH 7f f I :*'o
9d."11V►.T 9 >W0
-4 -4
li 1 A
if. i::
1 R iii
i,
ni Limm
m ill ,....d
Lim,
u
I in 1,11
J ,F
Wricl 31.1S
ssaltias
.. , ..,
as -0,, .1. At ' . . - • WOOFFM •
. ' ' aMM I WaY MS' W: =
WY1.1 MAYOSCINY o
s it.
11151 VIOSeliMI'S.1.1-1 N'egi
g
virrirA 1 NY?
LcD
SIM 1S1A OMNI
tg ON OGNO3
WY 1,11A (Wed
tg ON OGNO0
T tivf
0 ItLVM,V
-
NEW
N EWri
%3.
�•7
■
11
VIPME
1 1 ; 111111 f.'lllll
%IllllW#lilt
1.
f 11
Ir 11
0
61.81} ->r£E- ' •J LE£$ £E-Z9.5
i£4 `4 • mu o1�
• �u�lt
. 1 1 111aL1110tlY HfiBt
VIMWR
syorsr w 7a„rxarur 4rru r s�xs �r.,m �
•
f
so 11
0
11
-. • IEIM
V O 1 !H''y.H91 i 7i+4Vd »'O
�Ilt maws 71Ya
nifili
liiall1111
$ x f ,Ykl 9N1c311f19
11VI41 61
9
11
f
0
0
1
• Q--2 1s99 1 • 03 q unIw
915 .11. £
A xRL 9Z4f1
•aa� 'E1.1wFIDaY 1155!
1.
GYM I�CSI.N( Wit] {�{M� � b ]�i ���Y 1xiYt �
,]GlAI•Y! 9clL+f zi ' 7�'ll ►+%� 1.Cllq'7` 1 FFF
y20lYAT71
• P
'BIDS IIW i91ai•1 >TWd WO
aG'�1 it11 i•Gtalti5 7�YO
zi:
A, 1
0
0
0
R �-
t.
1
0
0
•
1L
.d.
0
tr
0
X
0
0
0 k-
`❑
c
0 !1
V.
{ W
m
X
,
0
0
a
m
i
9
griorp
��eo>>is� -�3s�g � z•�a- Ica -�•�
41.1i 94g .11Th. "4144i 1< ►i su Haan Aaatx
'63,?k�&?111! H&6! , A �
sx Smf -Lx
VIZ TR �y#
�
y l fJlS]f37 AC.IYN .
rax
MEN
NEM
ylo atit W 'rs f x491 F E litiNe d ,p irs#i01. d7C11-1 HOCTIC Gg r
M'Fl H dd9 71°fr7 . 63 [V d worrut O
nitro. i$03 L
.hgt
11
01