HomeMy WebLinkAbout2002-08-27 CC Resolution #02-08-48RESOLUTION NO. ca r-vp-
OF THE
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS
WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA
A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING FINDINGS OF FACT AND RESOLUTION
OF THE CITY COUNCIL THAT THE REQUEST BY VALLEY SENIOR
SERVICES ALLIANCE, INC. AND TIM NOLDE FOR A PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT/ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CONCEPT PLAN REVIEW
TO ALLOW MULTIPLE FAMILY TOWNHOMES WITHIN THE CENTRAL
BUSINESS DISTRICT BE DEAD
WHEREAS, the City of Oak Park Heights has received a request from Valley
Senior Services Alliance, Inc. and Tim Nolde for a concept plan review to allow twenty
two multiple family townhomes for the property north of the Xcel Energy power line
easement within the Central Business District, and after having conducted a public
hearing relative thereto, the Planning Commission of Oak Park Heights recommended
that the application be approved with conditions. The City Council of the City of Oak
Park Heights makes the following finding of fact:
1. The real property affected by said application is legally described as
follows, to wit:
and
SEE ATTACHMENT A
2. The applicant has submitted an application and supporting documentation
to the Community Development Department consisting of the following items:
and
SEE ATTACHMENT B
3. The subject site is zoned CBD, Central Business District in which
multiple family townhomes are a conditional use; and
4. A planned unit development concept/general plan review is required for
developments with more than one building on a defined lot with private driveways; and
5. The subject site is included in the area of the Central Business District
Urban Design Study. The Central Business District Design Guidelines apply to the
proposed project; and
6. The City Staff prepared a memorandum dated August 2, 2002 reviewing
the request; and
7. The memorandum dated August 2, 2002 recommended the request be
approved with conditions; and
8. The Planning Commission held a public hearing at their August 8, 2002
meeting, took comments from the applicants and public, closed the public hearing, and
recommended that the application be approved subject to conditions.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL FOR
THE CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS THAT THE CITY COUNCIL MAKES
THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS OF FACT AND DENIES THE APPLICATION:
A. The application submitted by Valley Senior Services Alliance, Inc and Tim Nolde
for a concept plan review to allow twenty two multiple family townhomes for property
north of the Xcel Energy power line easement within the Central Business District, and
affecting the real property as follows:
SEE ATTACHMENT A
Be and the same as hereby denied by the City Council of the City of Oak Park Heights
subject to the following findings of fact:
1. The City Council finds that the provision of one stall garages for the two bedroom
units is not in conformance with Section 401.15.x.9 related to parking
requirements of the Zoning ordinance.
2. The City Council finds that the stormwater ponding should be located on site.
3. The City Council finds that the proposed location of the 59 Street North and
Oakgreen Avenue intersection will create adverse traffic issues on Oakgreen
Avenue.
4. The City Council finds that the proximity of the proposed tot lot to the proposed
59 Street is not safe.
5. The City Council finds that residential development shall not be allowed in this
location, north of the Xcel power line easement, in accordance with the Central
Business District Design Guidelines Master Plan.
2
Denied by the City Council of the City of Oak Park Heights this 27 day of
August 2002.
ATTEST:
Kimberly Kam ser, cting tity Administrator
3
11,1* 011141",
1 it'
id Beau .
"FROW WINTHROP & Y!EINSTT 'rPi3
(TUE) 2. 19' 02 dl/Sr, 14:09/NO. 4863698798 P 3
ATTACHMENT A
pAR FTt1:
Registered Tracts A, B and D, and Survey of 114, as surveyed and filed in the
office of The Registrar of Titles in d for Washington Cody Minnesota.
PAR F142:
- f fhb Northeast Qu&ter 114 of1E1 /4)
of All that part ��` -the Northeast e '�`v��. ����
Section Five , Township Twenty- -nine (29) North of �
C described as follows: )3eginnig at a point on the East line of thet said
of the Northeast Qiuirtr (NE1/4 of NE1/4) 472 feet North. of
,
Northeast ling �1+ the South ���
the So�-eaSt corner thereof thence West on .
e North on a line panel to th East line thereof �'� � feet to a point; they �� 275
c: East on a line parallel w ith th S lit theme
�,1 � feet to a �.� thy. East tie thereof 110
ift on the �t line thereof; thence � on the
feet to � - public highway on the East side of
to the point of b ginning; subject to t �
feet �
said tract.
FROM
{
TO 2/19/2002 2:11 PM Page 4
For:
Required Approvals:
Planning Commission
City Council 4/5
....LTACHMENT B
Planned Unit Development: Concept Plan
OAKGREEN VILLAGE VILLAS
Application Materials
6 Application Form
O Fees
• Plan Sets (3 Large Scale Sets/20 11X17 Sets)
• Written and Graphic Materials Fully Explaining Proposal/Consistency with City's
Comprehensive Plan
O Mailing List from Washington County (350/150)
• Proof of Ownership or Authorization to Proceed
• Property Tax Statement
Limitation on General Concept Plan Approval
Unless a General Plan of Development covering the area designated in the General
Concept Plan as the first stage of the PUD has been filed within twelve (12) months
from the date Council grants General Concept Plan approval, or in any case where the
applicant fails to file General Plan of Development State and Final Plans and to proceed
with development in accordance with the provisions of this Ordinance and of an
approved General Concept Plan, the approval may be revoked by Council action.