Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutOPH Population Study 4 12694 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 45 / Tuesday, March 8, 2011 / Notices innovative capacity of the United States trade restrictions and State and Federal To be considered for membership, by January 4, 2012. This study is to be export promotion activities. please provide the following: conducted in consultation with the (x) The effectiveness of the Federal 1. Name, title, and personal resume of National Economic Council, Federal Government and Federally funded the individual requesting consideration; agencies as the Secretary considers research and development centers in 2. A brief statement of why the person appropriate, and an Innovation supporting and promoting technology should be considered for membership Advisory Board. commercialization and technology on the Board. This statement should COMPETES directs that the study transfer. address the individual's relevant shall include the following: (xi) Domestic and international expertise in factors impacting the (A) An analysis of the United States intellectual property policies and economic competitiveness and economy and innovation infrastructure. practices. innovative capacity of the United States; (B) An assessment of the following: (xii) Manufacturing capacity, logistics, and (i) The current competitive and and supply chain dynamics of major 3. A brief biography. innovation performance of the United export sectors, including access to a Appointments of members to the States economy relative to other skilled workforce, physical Board will be made by the Secretary of countries that compete economically infrastructure, and broadband network Commerce. with the United States. infrastructure. Dated: March 2, 2011. (ii) Economic competitiveness and (xiii) Federal and State policies John Connor, domestic innovation in the current relating to science, technology, and Office of the Secretary. business climate, including tax and education and other relevant Federal [FR Doc. 2011 -5133 Filed 3 -7 -11; 8:45 am] Federal regulatory policy. and State policies designed to promote BILLING CODE 3510 -EA -P (iii) The business climate of the commercial innovation, including United States and those of other immigration policies. countries that compete economically Selection Criteria DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE with the United States. (iv) Regional issues that influence the COMPETES directs the Secretary of Bureau of the Census economic competitiveness and Commerce to appoint a 15 member [Docket Number 110209126- 1124 -02 ] innovation capacity of the United Innovation Advisory Board representing States, including— all major industry sectors for purposes The 2010 Census Count Question (I) the roles of State and local of obtaining advice with respect to the Resolution Program governments and institutions of higher conduct of the study described above. education; and The majority of Board members must be AGENCY: Bureau of the Census, (II) regional factors that contribute comprised of representatives from Commerce. positively to innovation. private industry, including large and ACTION: Notice of Program. (v) The effectiveness of the Federal small firms, representing both advanced SUMMARY: On May 26, 2010, the Bureau Government in supporting and technology sectors and more traditional promoting economic competitiveness sectors that use technology. The Board of the Census (Census Bureau) and innovation, including any may include economic or innovation published in the Federal Register an duplicative efforts of, or gaps in policy experts, State and local initial notice relating to the 2010 Census coverage between, Federal agencies and government officials active in Count Question Resolution (CQR) departments. technology -based economic Program (75 FR 29508). This notice (vi) Barriers to competitiveness in development, and representatives from provides final information concerning newly emerging business or technology higher education. the CQR Program. The CQR Program sectors, factors influencing Board members will serve until the will address requests for corrections to underperforming economic sectors, completion of the study, which, under the 2010 Census count of housing units unique issues facing small and medium the Act must be completed by January and /or group quarters (GQs) and enterprises, and barriers to the 4, 2012. associated population, based on three development and evolution of start -ups, Members are required to meet to types of challenges (1) boundary, (2) firms, and industries. provide input to the study at two critical geocoding, and (3) coverage. The CQR (vii) The effects of domestic and development points: Development of Program is not a mechanism or process international trade policy on the the extended outline and review of to challenge or revise the population competitiveness of the United States draft. In addition, members may be counts sent to the President by and the United States economy. called upon to participate in events December 31, 2010, which are used to (viii) United States export promotion around the country designed to solicit apportion the U.S. House of and export finance programs relative to additional information regarding Representatives. The Census Bureau export promotion and export finance specific issues related to the economic will accept challenges between June 1, programs of other countries that competitiveness and innovative 2011, and June 1, 2013, and will review compete economically with the United capacity of the United States. challenges in the order they are States, including Canada, France, Board members are not considered received. Germany, Italy, Japan, Korea, and the Federal government employees by DATES: Effective Date: This program will United Kingdom, with noting of export virtue of their service as a member of become effective on June 1, 2011, and promotion and export finance programs the Board and will receive no will end on June 1, 2013. carried out by such countries that are compensation from the Federal FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: not analogous to any programs carried government for their participation in Count Question Resolution Program, out by the United States. Board activities. Members participating Decennial Management Division, U.S. (ix) The effectiveness of current in Board meetings and events will be Census Bureau, Washington, DC 20233. policies and programs affecting exports, not be compensated for travel or other Telephone: 301 763 - 9329; Fax: 301 – including an assessment of Federal expenses. 763 - 9321; E -mail: dmd.cqr@census.gov: Federal Register/Vol. 76, No. 45 / Tuesday, March 8, 2011 / Notices 12695 or visit the CQR Web site at: http: // units affected. These corrections may be The full LUCA operation included the 2010census.gov /about /cqr. used by the governmental units for review of materials by participants SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: future programs requiring official 2010 (described above) from November 2007 Introduction Census data. The Census Bureau will through March 2008; Census Bureau use these corrections to: Address Canvassing field work from On May 26, 2010, the Census Bureau — Modify the decennial census file for March through July 2009; LUCA published in the Federal Register an use in annual postcensal estimates Detailed Feedback to participants from initial notice relating to the 2010 Census beginning in December 2012, and October through November 2009; and Count Question Resolution (CQR) — Create the errata information we will the LUCA Appeals process which Program (75 FR 25908). The Census make available on the Census concluded at the end of March 2010. In Bureau received one set of comments. Bureau's American FactFinder Web addition to LUCA, governmental units The comments suggested additional site at http: / /factfinder2.census.gov. with city -style address areas had clarifying text for key concepts The Census Bureau will NOT another opportunity to update the 2010 presented in the document regarding the incorporate the CQR corrections into Census address list by the New scope of and required documentation 2010 data summary files and tables Construction program, which occurred for the CQR Program. The Census prepared after the CQR process begins from November 2009 through March Bureau incorporated text to clarify the nor will the Census Bureau re tabulate 2010. The purpose of the New description of the program concepts, Summary File 1 or Demographic Profile Construction program was to obtain and the revisions are included in this tables. city -style addresses for newly built program announcement. Please see the housing units. Participants in this Definitions of Key Terms section at the Background program were asked to submit addresses end of this notice for an explanation of The Census Bureau has a for any housing unit for which basic various terms throughout this notice. comprehensive program to improve the construction would have been CQR Program procedures include quality of the housing unit and GQ completed between March 2009 (the researching challenges and, as counts. In 2002, the Census Bureau start of the Address Canvassing appropriate, making corrections and issuing revised official population, and initiated the Master Address File/ operation) and before Census Day, housing and group quarters counts, Topologically Integrated Geographic (April 1, 2010). Addresses sent to the which the Census Bureau will also use Encoding and Referencing (MAF/ Census Bureau from New Construction TIGER) Accuracy Improvement Project program participants were added to the for the Census Bureau's Population Mail Delivery for Late Adds op eration Estimates Program. The Census Bureau (MTAIP) as part of the MAF /TIGER Iy will not accept challenges to the Enhancements Program (MTEP). This or, if received after that program began, overseas counts of persons in the project acquired Geographic Information the addresses were included in the military and Federal civilian personnel System (GIS) files, aerial photography, Vacant Delete Check operation. Between stationed overseas and their dependents and Global Positioning System (GPS) 2009 and 2010, the Census Bureau data from various sources nationwide to conducted the Boundary Validation living with them. The Census Bureau Program. This program provided hi hest obtains overseas counts using update the TIGER database. One of the g P g P g administrative records and uses the primary goals of the project was to elected officials and Tribal chairpersons records solely for apportioning seats in develop a highly accurate geographic with maps that showed boundaries of database of the United States, Puerto the U.S. House of o prro their respective jurisdictions and provide Representatives. These records do not provide the sub- Rico, and the Island Areas. The Census instructed them on how to make State geographic information required Bureau focused on improving the boundary corrections. for the CQR Program. accuracy of street feature coordinates to From September through October The Census Bureau will only accept provide base information suitable for 2009, the Census Bureau also conducted challenges from the highest elected use with GPS- equipped hand -held the Group Quarters Validation and official of State, local, and Tribal area devices that would facilitate the Reinterview operations to verify or governments or those representing them gathering of accurate location and correct address records identified as or acting on their behalf. All challenges census information for all living GQs. From March through April 2010, must be sent to the Census Bureau's quarters and workplaces. the Census Bureau conducted the headquarters. The Census Bureau implemented a Enumeration at Transitory Locations The Census Bureau will make all number of address list development operation that was designed to corrections on the basis of appropriate programs in preparation for the 2010 enumerate eligible populations living in documentation provided by the Census, the earliest of which was the transitory locations such as challenging entities and through Local Update of Census Addresses campgrounds and marinas. After the research of the official 2010 Census (LUCA) Program that started in 2007. development of the 2010 Census records by the Census Bureau. The Participating State, local, and Tribal mailing list, a number of situations Census Bureau will not collect area governments were given the occurred requiring the Census Bureau to additional data for the enumeration of opportunity to review and update the implement an additional mail delivery. living quarters through the CQR Census Bureau's address list of living This was referred to as the Mail Delivery Program. The Census Bureau will quarters before it was used for the actual for Late Adds and included city -style respond to all challenges and will notify census enumeration. In cases where the addresses from the LUCA appeals, all affected governmental units of any State, local, or Tribal area government Census Bureau research of ungeocoded corrections to their official counts as a and the Census Bureau could not agree addresses in the Master Address File, result of a CQR Program decision. on the address list, the governmental and additional self - response from the Corrections made to the population, unit could use an appeal process spring 2010 Delivery Sequence File and housing and group quarters counts administered by the LUCA Appeals update from the United States Postal by this program will result in the Office, which was set up by the Office Service. The Mail Delivery for Late issuance of new official 2010 Census of Management and Budget (OMB) to Adds operation reduced the number of counts to the officials of governmental provide an independent adjudication. addresses included in the Nonresponse 12696 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 45 / Tuesday, March 8, 2011 / Notices Follow -up (NRFU) Vacant Delete Check Many data users have automatic 2010 Census data. The Census Bureau operation (described below). programs to retrieve data at certain time will not make corrections to the 2010 Between April and August 2010, the intervals. This GQ file will include population counts for individual Coverage Follow -up (CFU) operation block -level GQ counts by GQ type. The housing units or GQs, or corrections to improved the 2010 Census by calling Demographic Profile table, which the characteristics of the population and households that were identified as contains selected population and housing inventory. The Census Bureau having a potential error in their housing characteristics, will also be will modify the decennial file with the household count. From July through released in May 2011. The release of CQR corrections for use in generating August 2010, the NRFU Vacant Delete Summary File 1 (SF1) on a flow basis the 2012 postcensal estimates. The Check operation verified the vacant and to States will occur between June and American FactFinder will provide the delete assessments of census workers. August 2011. The SF1 will contain inventory of corrections as errata to the Vacant Delete Check also enumerated block -level housing unit and GQ counts. original data. The Census Bureau will housing units that census workers Collectively, these census data products not revise 2010 Census base files, 2010 inaccurately classified as vacant or will provide CQR Program participants Census apportionment counts, nonexistent in an earlier census with the appropriate tools for accessing redistricting data, or 2010 Census data operation. This operation also the accuracy of their decennial census products. The Census Bureau will send enumerated added housing units counts. a letter with a certification of the discovered in an earlier census The highest elected official or population, housing and group quarters operation such as those added or chairperson from a State, local, or Tribal counts for all jurisdictions affected by reinstated through the 2010 LUCA area government must contact the the results of a CQR challenge. appeals process; records added from the Census Bureau CQR Office in order to Challenges That Do Not Result in Housing Unit Address Review initiate the challenge process. The Corrections conducted as part of the Count Review Census Bureau will also accept operation; records added as a result of challenges on official jurisdictional When a State, local, or Tribal area research into potentially missed letterhead from county clerks, city government provides evidence that the addresses in Address Canvassing (as planners, local planning board Census Bureau missed housing units or reported on internal documents known representatives, and State legislative GQs that existed on April 1, 2010, but as INFO — COMMs); previously representatives with redistricting the CQR research and 2010 Census ungeocoded addresses which obtained functions within each State and State records show that all of the Census geocodes from the Census Bureau equivalents who are acting on the behalf Bureau's boundary information, research of ungeocoded addresses in the of a local or Tribal jurisdiction to submit geocoding, and coverage processing Master Address File; new addresses a challenge. were correctly implemented, the Census from periodic postal updates; records Bureau will respond by sending a letter added by Update /Leave; and addresses Types of Challenges Considered for the to the official or his /her representative provided in the New Construction 2010 Census CQR Program stating that the Census Bureau will operation by Tribal and local The 2010 Census CQR Program may maintain the documentation for governments. make corrections as a result of the consideration in the context of address In August through early September following three types of challenges: list updating activities in the future, but 2010, the Census Bureau conducted the • Boundary —These challenges may will not issue a revised count. Field Verification operation. The Field address the inaccurate reporting or the Internal Census Bureau Review Verification operation was a final check inaccurate recording of boundaries for certain address records from sources, legally in effect on January 1, 2010. The The primary internal review process such as Be Counted, Telephone Census Bureau needs to ensure that the for the 2010 Census counts is the Count Questionnaire Assistance (TQA), Group geographic assignment information Review Program. This program started Quarters Enumeration, questionnaire provided by governmental units does in February 2010, with Census Bureau fulfillment and TQA interview, as well not, in fact, reflect boundary changes staff and members of the Federal -State as particular categories of housing -level made after January 1, 2010. Cooperative Program for Population cases identified through person • Geocoding— These challenges Estimates (FSCPE) working together to matching for the CFU operation. Data identify suspected errors in the review address lists and identify collection for the 2010 Census ended in geographic location of living quarter clusters of missing housing unit the Local Census Offices in September addresses within the governmental unit addresses. The Count Review Program 2010. The Census Bureau strictly boundaries and census tabulation also includes a Census Bureau staff enforced the schedule to allow the time blocks. review of housing unit and group to produce the State -level • Coverage —These challenges, if quarters counts and associated apportionment counts by December 31, upheld by the Census Bureau, result in population totals prior to the release of 2010, as required by law. the addition or deletion of specific the data. In August 2010, the FSCPE Relevant 2010 Census Data Releases living quarters and persons associated representatives reviewed potential with them identified during the census missing or misallocated 2010 Census The Redistricting Data (pursuant to process, but which were erroneously GQs. Pub. L. 94 -171) are scheduled for included as duplicates or excluded due In addition to challenges received release from February through March to processing errors. through the CQR Program, findings from 2011. In May 2011, the Census Bureau the Count Review GQ internal review will release the "Advance Release of Challenges That Result in Corrections may result in cases for the CQR Program Group Quarters Data from Summary The Census Bureau will issue when there was insufficient time to Filet "to the public through a file corrected CQR counts based on the make corrections before the end of the transfer protocol (ftp) site. The ftp site housing unit and population counts as Count Review operation on August 17, is a link to a location at a Census Bureau of April 1, 2010. The governmental 2010. The Count Review Program staff network server. Users go to the link and units may use new official census will create CQR internal referrals for download data from electronic folders. counts for all programs requiring official unresolved GQ issues within the scope Federal Register/Vol. 76, No. 45 / Tuesday, March 8, 2011 / Notices 12697 of the CQR Program. The Census Bureau Boundary Challenge Criteria and Boundaries —These maps should may make corrections as a result of this State, Local, or Tribal area show geographic boundaries as of review. When the Census Bureau makes governments must base challenges on January 1, 2010, that identify census changes to the housing unit and /or GQ boundaries legally in effect on January tabulation blocks, census tracts, legal counts based on internal review, new 1, 2010. The Census Bureau will and statistical entities and State official counts will be issued to all compare the maps and appropriate boundaries; maps depicting data affected jurisdictions as changes are supporting documentation submitted by collection blocks cannot be used. In verified and recalculations are the challenging governmental unit with general, maps should be comparable to completed. The CQR corrections will be the information used by the Census 2010 Census maps. presented on the American FactFinder Bureau to depict the boundaries for the Challenge Criteria to represent total population, housing 2010 Census. unit and group quarters count changes Maps submitted by State, local or Housing Unit Count made to governmental units from the Tribal area governments must show the The Public Law 94 -171 Redistricting 2010 Census CQR Program. correct location of the boundary and the Data Summary File and the Summary portion of the boundary that the Census File 1 can be used to obtain census Method of Collection Bureau potentially depicted incorrectly, tabulation block housing unit counts. Criteria for Acceptable Documentation including the 2010 Census tabulatio Challenges must include a complete Necessary To Initiate the 2010 Census block numbers associated with th address list for all units that the CQR Process boundary. The State, local, or Trib challenger thinks the Census Bureau area government must also provide the should include in each contested block. The Census Bureau requires Census Bureau with a list of addresses (Refer to the Section "Types of Address documentation before committing in challenged 2010 Census tabulation Lists. ") State, local, or Tribal area resources to investigate concerns raised blocks, indicating their location in officials must certify that the addresses by State, local, or Tribal area officials or relationship to the boundary that the on their lists existed and could be lived their representatives about boundary governmental unit wants the Census in on April 1, 2010. The supporting and geographic assignment errors or the Bureau to correct. evidence must specifically show the accuracy of the census housing unit or For boundary challenges affected by validity of any address and reflect GQ counts. The submitted challenges legal actions not recorded by the Census residential addresses that existed as Q g Bureau, governmental units must must specify whether the challenge submit the effective date and the viable living quarters on April 1, 2010. disputes the location of a governmental ordinance number or law that Challenges to housing unit counts must unit boundary or the number of housing effectuated the change in boundaries, specify the 2010 Census tract and units and /or GQs in one or more census provide evidence that the State tabulation block(s) for which the counts tabulation blocks, or both. The certifying official has approved the are being challenged. challenger must provide the following boundary change if required by State Group Quarters Count documentation based on the type of law, and provide a statement that the The "Advance Release of Group challenge: boundary is not under litigation. Quarters Data from Summary File 1" • For boundary challenges, indicate Types of Acceptable Maps provides the GQ counts for 2010 Census on a map the location of the .2010 Census Public Law 94 - 171 tabulation blocks. Summary File 1 itself governmental unit boundary in dispute County Block Maps —The Census may also be used to obtain census and show where the Census Bureau Bureau produces these maps as a tabulation blocks and GQ counts. incorrectly depicts the boundary. Show reference for the Redistricting Data Files Challenges must include a complete the correct boundary legally effective available for all States, the District of address list for all GQ buildings that the January 1, 2010. Additionally, provide Columbia, and Puerto Rico. challenger thinks the Census Bureau the Census Bureau with a list of • 2010 Census County Block Maps— should include in each contested block. addresses in challenged 2010 Census The Census Bureau produces maps as a The State, local, or Tribal area official tabulation blocks, indicating their reference to the Summary File 1 data. must certify that the addresses on their location in relationship to the boundary • The 2010 TIGER /Line File —The lists existed and could be lived in on that the governmental unit wants the Census Bureau provides digital data in April 1, 2010. The supporting evidence Census Bureau to correct. A ESRI shapefile format. The must specifically reflect the validity of governmental unit does not need to governmental unit may generate maps any address list source, showing the provide the Census Bureau with a list of based on information from the Census population within a GQ, and must addresses if their challenge is solely for Bureau 2010 TIGER /Line shapefiles clearly identify the list as being the a name or status change, or to add a new using a commercial geographic resident population no later than April entity. (See the section "Types of information system (GIS). These maps 1, 2010. Challenges to GQ counts must Acceptable Maps ".) must identify the State, county, specify the associated 2010 census tract governmental unit, census tract, census and census tabulation block(s). • For geocoding and coverage tabulation block, and any other legal challenges, identify the specific entity involved in a challenge. If a Types of Address Lists contested 2010 Census tabulation block challenge involves an American Indian • City -Style Address Lists —A city - and a list of the addresses for all reservation or off - reservation trust style address must include house housing units or GQs in that block on lands, the maps must identify the number, street name, city, State, ZIP April 1, 2010. A governmental unit does American Indian area, the census tract Code, and county. The city -style address not need to provide the Census Bureau (either county -based census tract or list must be organized by 2010 Census with a list of addresses if their challenge Tribal census tract) and the census tabulation block within 2010 Census is solely for a name or status change, or tabulation block. tract. Also, it must include any to add a new entity. (See "Boundary • Other Maps Showing Census applicable housing unit identifiers in Challenge Criteria. ") Bureau 2010 Tabulation Block Numbers multi -unit buildings (such as apartment • 12698 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 45 / Tuesday, March 8, 2011 / Notices numbers). The Census Bureau requests available through the Internet, and the arrangement. These services may the challenger to use the address list Census Bureau will use it to disseminate include custodial or medical care as templates provided on the CQR Web site the results of the 2010 Census. The well as other types of assistance, and and submit the challenge electronically. American FactFinder Web site can be residency is commonly restricted to In addition, mark the exact location of found at: http: / /factfinder2.census.gov. those receiving these services. People each challenged address on a map Census Tabulation Block —A living in GQs are usually not related to containing 2010 census tract and geographic area bounded by visible each other. The two general types of tabulation block(s). features, such as streets, roads, streams, GQs are institutional and non- • Non - City -Style Address Lists —Non- and railroad tracts, and by nonvisible institutional. Institutional GQs include city -style addresses include rural route boundaries, such as city, town, nursing homes, mental hospitals and addresses and any other addresses that township, and county limits, and short psychiatric units in other hospitals, do not contain a complete house line -of -sight extensions of streets and hospitals with patients who have no number, street name, city, State, ZIP roads. Generally, census blocks are usual home elsewhere, inpatient Code, and county. The non - city -style small in area; for example, a block in a hospice facilities, correctional facilities address list must be organized by 2010 city bounded on all sides by streets. for adults and juveniles, and residential Census tabulation block within census Census blocks in suburban and rural schools for people with disabilities. tract. If a household receives mail at a areas may be large, irregular, and Non- institutional GQs include college or post office box address, provide the E– bounded by a variety of features. In university dormitories and residence 911 address if it exists. The State, local remote areas, census blocks may halls, military barracks, group homes, or Tribal area government must provide encompass hundreds of square miles. shelters, convents, migratory farm the exact location for each challenged Census blocks are the smallest worker camps, military ship, and address on a map containing 2010 geographic entities for which the Census maritime /merchant vessels. GQs may census tract and tabulation block(s). Bureau tabulates decennial census have housing for staff as their usual Focus the list on the specific area where information. residence at the GQ address. the challenged addresses exist. All Census Tract — Small, relatively Hawaiian Homelands —An area addresses in the challenged block must permanent statistical subdivisions of a created and held in trust for the benefit contain a description of the housing county or equivalent entity updated by of native Hawaiians by the State of units and locations. local participants prior to each Hawaii, pursuant to the Hawaiian • Group Quarters Address Lists —GQ decennial census as part of the Census Homes Commission Act of 1920, as addresses can include city -style or non- Bureau's Participant Statistical Areas amended. Hawaiian homelands were a city -style addresses. Provide the name, Program in accordance with Census new type of geographic entity for the number and street address, city, State, Bureau guidelines. Census tracts 2000 Census. ZIP Code, and county of the GQ as of generally have a population size Housing Unit — Living quarters in April 1, 2010. Also provide a current between 1,200 and 8,000 people, and which the occupants live separately telephone number or e -mail address for have an optimum size of 4,000 people. from any other individuals in the the contact at the GQ. The GQ address County or Equivalent Entity —The building and have direct access to their list must be organized by 2010 Census primary legal subdivision of States and living quarters from outside the building tabulation block within census tract. equivalent entities. In Louisiana, these or through a common hall. Housing The challenger must provide divisions are known as parishes. In units include such places as houses, documentation that supports the Alaska, which has no counties, the apartments, mobile homes or trailers, number of persons residing at the GQ on equivalent entities are boroughs, city groups of rooms, or a single room that April 1, 2010. In addition, the and boroughs, municipalities, and is occupied as a separate living quarters, challenger must provide the 2010 census areas; the latter of which are or if vacant, is intended for occupancy Census tract and tabulation block delineated cooperatively for statistical as a separate living quarters. A housing number for the location of the GQ, purposes by the State of Alaska and the unit is defined as a living quarters that including the exact location for each Census Bureau. In Puerto Rico, the is closed to the elements and has all challenged address on a map containing primary divisions are municipios. exterior windows and doors installed 2010 Census tract and tabulation Demographic Profile —A table and final usable floors in place. For block(s). containing data that shows information vacant units, the criteria of separateness on total population, sex, age, race, and direct access are applied to the Census Bureau Actions Hispanic or Latino origin, household intended occupants, whenever possible. The Census Bureau will investigate relationship, GQ population, household If the Census Bureau cannot obtain the acceptable challenges to determine type, housing occupancy, and housing information, the criteria are applied to whether it can identify information tenure. the previous occupants. about the existence of a housing unit or E -911 Address —An E - 911 address is Incorporated Place —A type of occupied GQ on April 1, 2010, that does a site location address assigned by using governmental unit, incorporated under not appear in the final census files due a mileage measurement to a driveway State law as a city, city and borough, to an error in processing the on a named road. An E - 911 address municipality, town (except in New information. The Census Bureau will helps emergency services to locate England, New York, and Wisconsin), neither collect new data nor make residents and are required to be borough (except in Alaska and New changes to apportionment counts, displayed on living quarters and visible York), or village, that has legally redistricting data, or any 2010 Census from the road. prescribed limits, powers, and data products. Group Quarters — group quarters is functions. A few incorporated places do defined as a place where people live or not have a legal description. Definitions of Key Terms stay, in a group - living arrangement that Minor Civil Division(MCD) —A type of American FactFinder —An interactive is owned or managed by a governmental governmental unit that is the primary Web site used for accessing and unit or organization providing housing governmental or administrative division disseminating the results of many and services for the residents. This is of a county or statistically equivalent Census Bureau programs. The system is not a typical household -type living entity in 28 States, the District of • Federal Register/Vol. 76, No. 45 / Tuesday, March 8, 2011 / Notices 12699 Columbia, Puerto Rico, and the Island State - Recognized American Indian which entities are eligible to be Areas. MCDs are represented by several Reservation —A type of legal geographic challenged? types of legal entities, such as entity that is a recognized American The Census Bureau will research and, townships, towns (in eight States), and Indian land area with a boundary if necessary, correct the counts for the districts. established by final treaty, statute, following entities. Municipio —The primary legal executive order, and /or court order, and • States and statistically equivalent subdivision of Puerto Rico (equivalent over which the Tribal government of a entities can submit challenges for their to county). State- recognized American Indian Tribe State or equivalent, plus any counties or Overseas Counts — Counts of military has governmental authority. A governor equivalent entities, minor civil and Federal civilian personnel stationed appointed State liaison provides the divisions, incorporated places overseas with their dependents living name and boundary for each State (including consolidated cities), State with them. recognized American Indian designated Tribal statistical areas, State - Postcensal Estimates— Population Reservation to the Census Bureau. recognized American Indian estimates for the years following the last Summary File 1 —A data file that Reservations, Hawaiian homelands, and published decennial census. The Census presents decennial census counts and (in Hawaii and Puerto Rico only) for Bureau uses existing data series, such as basic cross - tabulations of information census designated places within their births, deaths, Federal tax returns, collected from all people and housing jurisdiction. Puerto Rico may also Medicare enrollment, immigration, and units. This information includes age, submit challenges for sub -minor civil housing unit information, to update the sex, race, Hispanic or Latino origin, divisions. decennial census counts during the household relationship, and whether • Counties and statistically estimating process. These estimates are the residence is owned or rented. Data equivalent entities can submit used in Federal funding allocations, will be available at the block level, but challenges for their county or equivalent monitoring recent demographic trends, limited to the 2010 Census tract level in entity plus any minor civil divisions, and benchmarking many Federally cases where there are concerns with incorporated places, and (in Hawaii and funded survey totals. disclosure. The Census Bureau also will Puerto Rico only) Census Designated Public Law 94- 171 —The Federal law include summaries for other geographic Places within their jurisdiction. amending Section 141 of Title 13 that areas, such as ZIP Code tabulation areas Municipios in Puerto Rico may also directs the Secretary of Commerce (who and Congressional Districts. submit challenges for subminor civil delegates that responsibility to the divisions. dele g P Y Exhibit — Additional Information • Actively functioning minor civil Director of the Census Bureau) to This section provides additional Y g provide selected decennial census data P divisions can submit challenges for their tabulations to the States by April 1 of information about the 2010 Census CQR minor civil division plus any the year following the census. These Program. incorporated place within their tabulations are used the the States to 1. Where should a governmental unit jurisdiction. submit a challenge for the 2010 Census • Incorporated (including redistrict areas used for elections such CQR Program? consolidated cities) P orate ( nc in g as congressional, le islative nd school ) can submit as legdata a districts. In addition, the a are school Governmental units challenging the challenges for their place. completeness or accuracy of the 2010 • Federally - recognized American for local redistricting such as the Census counts need to submit their Indian Tribes can submit challenges for drawing of county council and city challenge in writing to: Count Question an American Indian Reservation or off - council districts. Resolution Program, Decennial reservation trust lands, Tribal - State Designated Tribal Statistical Management Division, U.S. Census designated statistical areas, and Area (SDTSA) —A statistical entity Bureau, Washington, DC 20233 -0001. Oklahoma Tribal statistical areas plus delineated for an American Indian Tribe Governmental units can submit their any American Indian Tribal that does not have a land base challenge electronically to subdivisions within their jurisdiction. (reservation) and is recognized as a dmd.cqr@census.gov. • Alaska Native Regional Tribe by a State government, but not the 2. Will the Census Bureau make Corporations can submit challenges for Federal government. SDTSAs are corrections to the census counts based their regional corporation and for identified and delineated for the Census on information submitted by Alaska Native Village Statistical Areas Bureau by a liaison identified by a governmental units? (ANVSAs) within their jurisdiction. State's governor's office. SDTSAs The Census Bureau will make • Alaska Native Village Statistical generally encompasses a compact and corrections if research indicates they are Areas can submit challenges for their contiguous area that contains a warranted. The Census Bureau will base ANVSA. concentration of people who identify its determination of whether a The Census Bureau will not accept with a State recognized American correction is necessary or not, on the challenges for any other types of Indian Tribe and in which there is quality and completeness of the statistical or legally defined areas. structured or organized Tribal activity. information provided by State, local, or 4. Will the Census Bureau incorporate SDTSAs may not be located in more Tribal governmental unit corrections from the CQR Program into than one State unless the Tribe is representatives and the results of the the apportionment, redistricting data, or recognized by both State governments, Census Bureau's research of the census 2010 Census data products? and it may not include an area within records. The Census Bureau will not In accordance with the law, the an American Indian Reservation, off- incorporate the CQR corrections into apportionment counts are delivered to reservation trust land, Oklahoma Tribal 2010 data summary files and tables the President by December 31, 2010. statistical area, Tribal designated prepared after the CQR process begins The Census Bureau will not change the statistical area, or Alaska Native village nor will the Census Bureau retabulate apportionment counts to reflect statistical area. SDTSAs were included Summary File 1 or Demographic Profile corrections resulting from the CQR with Tribal designated statistical areas tables. Program. for the 1990 Census; this designation 3. Which governmental units are The Census Bureau plans to begin was new for the 2000 Census. eligible to submit CQR challenges and delivery to the States on the counts 12700 Federal Register/Vol. 76, No. 45 /Tuesday, March 8, 2011 /Notices required for redistricting purposes in Insular Affairs, Department of the February 2011 and will complete this Interior. Annual delivery by the statutory deadline of ACTION: Notice. Program producer allocation March 31, 2011. The Census Bureau will not change the data in these products to Belair Quartz, Inc. 500,000 reflect the results of CQR challenges. SUMMARY: This action allocates calendar The Census Bureau will not year 2011 duty exemptions for watch The balance of the units allocated to incorporate CQR corrections into any assembly producers ( "program the USVI is available for new entrants 2010 Census data roducts. The producers ") located in the United States P Islands ("USVI") pursuant to into the program or existing program Virgin planned CQR Program allows the g ( ) P producers who request a supplement to Census Bureau to maintain consistency Public Law 97 -446, as amended by their allocation. between data products while Public Law 103 -465, Public Law 106 -36 maintaining the schedule for timely and Public Law 108 -429 ( "the Act "). Carole Showers, release of the data. However, the Census Director, Office of Policy, Import FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Administration, International Trade Bureau will issue revised, certified Su ri a Kumar, Subsidies Enforcement population and housing unit counts for P y Administration, Department of Commerce. the affected governmental unit co ), Office; phone number: (202) 482 -3530; Dated: March 1, 2011. maintain a list of CQR corrected fax number: (202) 501 -7952; and e-mail N Pula, geographic areas on the American address: Supriya.Kumar@trade.gov. Director of Office of Insular Affairs, Factfinder, and /or other Census Bureau SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant Department of the Interior. URL locations, and will incorporate any to the Act, the Departments of the [FR Doc. 2011 -5129 Filed 3 -7 -11; 8:45 am] corrections into its Postcensal Estimates Interior and Commerce ( "the BILLING CODE 3510 -DS-M; 4310 -93-M Program beginning in December 2012. Departments ") share responsibility for Executive Orders the allocation of duty exemptions among program producers in the United DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE This notice has been determined to be States insular possessions and the not significant for purposes of Executive Northern Mariana Islands. In International Trade Administration Order (E.O.) 12866. This program does accordance with Section 303.3(a) of the [A- 549 -821] not contain policies with federalism regulations (15 CFR 303.3(a)), the total implications sufficient to warrant quantity of duty -free insular watches Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags From preparation of a federalism assessment and watch movements for calendar year Thailand: Final Results of Antidumping under E.O. 13132. 2011 is 1,866,000 units for the USVI. Duty Administrative Review Paperwork Reduction Act This amount was established in Changes AGENCY: Import Administration, Notwithstanding any other provision in Watch, Watch Movement and Jewelry International Trade Administration, of law, no person is required to respond Program for the U.S. Insular Department of Commerce. P q p Possessions, 65 FR 8048 (February 17, to, nor shall a person be subject to a 2000). There are currently no program SUMMARY: On September 2, 2010, the c ollect on of a information comply ubject to the producers in Guam, American Samoa or preliminary results of the published the requirements of the Paperwork the Northern Mariana Islands. re erwork P y q p The criteria for the calculation of the administrative review of the Reduction Act (PRA), 44 U.S.C., Chapter antidumping duty order on 35, unless that collection of information calendar year 2011 duty- exemption polyethylene retail carrier bags from displays a current valid OMB control allocations among program producers Thailand. We gave interested parties an number. In accordance with the PRA, within a particular territory are set forth opportunity to comment on the OMB approved the CQR Program on in Section 303.14 of the regulations (15 preliminary results. Based on our February 22, 2011, under control CFR 303.14). The Departments have analysis of the comments received and number 0607 -0879. The estimated verified and, where appropriate, an examination of our calculations, we burden hours are 7,800. adjusted the data submitted in have made certain changes for the final Dated: March 2, 2011. application form ITA -334P b USVI results. The final weighted- average Robert M. Groves, program producers and have inspected dumping margins for the respondents these producers' operations in are listed below in the "Final Results of Director, Bureau of the Census. accordance with Section 303.5 of the Review" section of this notice. [FR Doc. 2011 -5217 Filed 3 -7 -11; 8:45 am] regulations (15 CFR 303.5). DATES: Effective Date: March 8, 2011. BILLING CODE 3510-07 -P In calendar ear 2010, USVI program Y P g FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: producers shipped 63,990 watches and Thomas Schauer or Richard Rimlinger, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE watch movements into the customs AD /CVD Operations, Office 5, Import territory of the United States under the Administration, International Trade International Trade Administration Act. The dollar amount of corporate Administration, U.S. Department of income taxes paid by USVI program Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR producers during calendar year 2010, Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; and the creditable wages and benefits telephone (202) 482 -0410 or (202) 482 — Allocation of Duty- Exemptions for paid by these producers during calendar 4477, respectively. Calendar Year 2011 for Watch year 2010 to residents of the territory Producers Located in the United States was a combined total of $1,214,003. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Virgin Islands The calendar year 2011 USVI annual Background AGENCY: Import Administration, duty exemption allocations, based on On September 2, 2010, the International Trade Administration, the data verified by the Departments, are Department of Commerce (the Department of Commerce; Office of as follows: Department) published Polyethylene • r^• wa 1 City of Oak Park Heights 14168 Oak Park Blvd. N • Box 2007 • Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 • Phone (651) 439 -4439 • Fax (651) 439 -0574 July 6, 2009 MEMO To: Libby Starling, Metropolitan Council From: Austin Bleess, City Intern Re: Population Study In the annual Metropolitan Council (Council) population estimate, the Council found the City of Oak Park Heights to have a population of 4,708 people. The Council calculations a r(1 -seers low for the sole reason the formula used to calculate the homeownership rates were changed since the previous estimate. In 2007 the Council found the number of owner occupied housing units to be 1,141 (Exhibit A). Under the new homeownership rates by type of housing for 2008 the total number of owner occupied housing units is 1,310 (Exhibit B). However, in an email from Todd Graham to City Administrator Eric Johnson, dated June 11, 2009 (exhibit C), Mr. Graham states the MN Dept. of Revenue believes there are 1,062 owner occupied housing units in the City in the year 2008. The number of owner occupied housing units directly effects the population of the city. The Council believes that only 2.74 people live in each owner- occupied single - family home, whereas a renter - occupied single - family home would have 3.009 people. By increasing the number of owner- occupied homes in the City from the 2007 number of 1,141 (Exhibit A) to the 2008 number of 1,310 (Exhibit B), the population numbers have been decreased by 50 people. using the 1,062 owner occupied units as the MN Department of Revenue says, without knowing exactly how many of the 1,062 owner occupied housing units fall into each stock area, the city population would be 100 people higher in household population. That would bring the total city population to 4,808. The City contests the number provided by the Council of housing units that are owned and therefore their 2008 population estimate. Based upon our estimation and using the data from the MN Department of Revenue, as provided by Mr. Graham, for the year 2008 the population for the City of Oak Park Heights is 4,808. s 2007 Population Estimates: Oak Park Heights city, Washington County, Estimates of housing stock are segmented into ownership housing and rental housing. The ownership housing subtotal is controlled to a target ownership range of 100 to 107 percent of the homestead units count from the Abstract of Assessment. Each housing type will have a specifically estimated occupancy rate. Each combination of housing type and tenure (ownership housing or rental) will have a specifically estimated average household size. Homeownership rates Housing stock by type of housing Occupancy rates estimated for April I (estimated) Owned Rented Single-family detached 779 87.7% 98.0% Duplex / threeplex /fourplex 146 31.5% 94.1% Townhouses 230 73.0% 97.5% Multifamily 952 25.6% 96.3% 96.3% Estimated built housing units 2,107 Owned: Occupancy rates Mobile homes 0 95.0% Boats, etc., serving as housing 0 100.0% ( Following housing stock estimation, the Council model multiplies housing units by occupancy rates, segmented by housing type, to determine occupied housing. The number of occupied housing units is equivalent to households: A household is a group of people (or a person living alone) occupying a non - institutional housing unit. (* Institutional or group quarters housing is accounted separately through an annual survey by Metropolitan Council.) Households 2,038 Population in households is estimated mutliplying occupied housing units (equivalent to households) by average household sizes (persons per household), segmented by housing type and tenure. The final step in poulation estimation is to add population in households + population in group quarters, counted by the Council's annual survey. Persons per Household Multipliers Owner- occupied Renter - occupied Single-family detached 2.745 3.009 Duplex /threeplex /fourplex 1.422 1.924 Population in households 4,205 Townhouses 1.901 2.520 Multifamily 1.414 1.546 Population in group quarters 546 Mobile homes 2.420 Total population 4,751 Boats, etc., serving as housing 2.000 Tuesday, June 30, 2009 Page 2 of 2 i I �wfo- o 'T e,./. Ur/ 10.4.---K i (/ i 2008 Population Estimates: Oak Park Heights city, Washington County, Estimates of housing stock are segmented into ownership housing and rental housing. Each housing type will have a specifically estimated occupancy rate. Each combination of housing type and tenure (ownership housing or rental) will have a specifically estimated average household size. Homeownership rates Housing stock by type of housing Occupancy rates estimated for April 1 (estimated) Owned Rented Single-family detached 775 95.6% 98.0% Duplex / threeplex / fourplex 147 38.8% 95.1% Townhouses 248 88.7% 95.7% Multifamily 954 30.6% 96.3% 96.3% Estimated built housing units 2,124 Owned: 1,310 Occupancy rates Mobile homes 0 95.0% Boats, etc., serving as housing 0 100.0% ` The Council's model multiplies housing units by occupancy rates, segmented by housing type, to determine occupied housing. The number of occupied housing units is equivalent to households: A household is a group of people (or a person living alone) occupying a housing unit. (* Institutional or group quarters housing is accounted separately through an annual survey by Metropolitan Council.) Households 2,056 Population in households is calculated mutliplying households by average household sizes (persons per household), segmented by housing type and tenure. The final step in poulation estimation is to add population in households + population in group quarters, counted by the Council's annual survey. Persons poillo4t,sehold Multipliers Owner- /ccupied Renter - occupied Single-family detached /! 2.740 3.009 Duplex / threeplex /fourplex I 1.422 1.920 Population in households 4,180 Townhouses 1.900 2.520 Multifamily 1.400 . 1.546 ) Population in group quarters 528 Mobile homes 2.420 Total population 4,708 Boats, etc., serving as housing 2.000 Tuesday, June 30, 2009 Page 2 of 2 1 '1. Eric Johnson From: Graham, Todd [todd.graham ©metc.state.mn.us] Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 11:23 AM To: Eric Johnson Cc: Starling, Libby Subject: RE: Oak Park Heights population Mr Johnson — You asked about Metropolitan Council's estimation methodology, and specifically household size estimation. Metropolitan Council's model estimates eight separate average household sizes for eight combinations of housing type and tenure (own or rent). For more on this, see Metropolitan Council's detailed methodology, available at www.metrocouncil.org/metroarea/AboutEstimates.htm You can find Oak Park Heights' array of estimated multipliers in the report you received from Libby Starling. The specific multipliers have not changed greatly for Oak Park Heights. The PPH for single family detached ownership housing is reduced; this is an adjustment that was applied for all communities in the region. The major, market - wide trend has been a continuing decline in household sizes associated with single family detached ownership housing. The major methodology change affecting Oak Park Heights' estimates, in this cycle of estimation, concerns the segmentation of ownership housing vs rental housing: • Starting with this cycle of estimation, we are no longer using "homesteads counts" as a hard constraint on the estimation of ownership housing. The Abstract of Assessment (source: Minnesota Department of Revenue) lists Oak Park Heights having 1,062 homesteads in year 2008 – and the homesteads count declines every year. Metropolitan Council staff have concluded that homesteads counts are no longer a reliable benchmark. We announced this change on pages 1 -2 of the detailed methodology, avail -bl at www.metrocouncil. org /metroarea /AboutEstimates.htm ' • • Instead, Council's method for segmenting ownership housing vs rental housing now r: '-s on Me = •olitan Council's Affordable Housing Production survey. The net effec • .e a more - - ion of ownership and rental housing subtotals. During 2000 -200 , 8°. •f new .0 • g rear - • • •ak Perk Heights has been ownership housing; 22 %, rental housi g. i' nnual counts e rec ed • r- City, and annual details are published at www.metrocouncil.org /pl- nine • • ' - ' - Housin• • pt/ e •9.pdf • Using this new method, Metropolitan Council estimates 1,311 • • • - I'• unit '• - • -s occupied and vacant) and 814 rental units (includes occupied and vacant) in Oak Park Heights. We find this is a more accurate estimation of ownership and rental housing subtotals. The recalculated estimates of ownership housing vs rental housing does affect the population estimates. 6/11/2009 1 a6c t vi i KV\,:19A 4v -c Ownership housing and rental housing have different average household sizes. In Oak Park Heights, households in ownership housing are marginally smaller than renting households. Again, you can find Oak Park Heights' array of estimated multipliers in the report you received from Libby Starling. Metropolitan Council's objective is to certify a realistic representation of population and households. Please send any additional written comments or questions by June 24 to Todd Graham, Metropolitan Council Research, 390 Robert Street North, Saint Paul, MN 55101; or by e-mail to todd.orahamCa)metc.state.mn.us Regards. -- Todd Graham Metropolitan Council Research 651/602-1322 From: Eric Johnson [ mailto: eajohnson @cityofoakparkheights.com] Sent: Monday, June 08, 2009 1:55 PM TO: Starling, Libby Subject: Oak Park Heights population 6-8-09 Ms. Starling: I have received you rmost recent population counts for the City of Oak Park Heights My question at this time is how the average household population fell from 2.06 to 2.03. Please provide the detailed methodology on how this was determined. Thank You Eric Johnson City Administrator 6/11/2009 i 4 , '4; ^ x0 City of Oak Park Heights 14168 Oak Park Blvd. N • Box 2007 • Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 • Phone (651) 439 -4439 • Fax (651) 439 -0574 July 6, 2009 MEMO To: Libby Starling, Metropolitan Council From: Austin Bleess, City Intern Re: Population Study The City contests the number provided by the Metropolitan Council (Council) of housing units that are owned and therefore their 2008 population estimate. Based upon the data from the MN Department of Revenue, as provided to the City by Mr. Graham, for the year 2008 the population for the City of Oak Park Heights is 4,808. In its annual population estimate the Council found the City of Oak Park Heights to have a population of 4,708 people. The Council calculations seem low for the sole reason the formula used to calculate the homeownership rates were changed since the previous estimate. In 2007 the Council found the number of owner occupied housing units to be 1,141 (Exhibit A). Under the new homeownership rates by type of housing for 2008 the total number of owner occupied housing units is 1,310 (Exhibit B). However, in an email from Todd Graham to City Administrator Eric Johnson, dated June 11, 2009 (exhibit C), Mr. Graham states the MN Dept. of Revenue believes there are 1,062 owner occupied housing units in the City in the year 2008. The number of owner occupied housing units directly effects the population of the city. c35.95c /'The Council believes that only 2.74 people live in each owner- occupied single -fame y .,,-, Lhome, whereas a renter - occupied single - family home would have 3.009 people. ' increasing the number of owner - occupied homes in the City from the 2007 number of 1,141 (Exhibit A) to the 2008 number of 1,310 (Exhibit B), the population numbers have been decreased by 50 people. By using the 1,062 owner occupied units, as the MN Department of Revenue says, without knowing exactly how many of the 1,062 owner occupied housing units fall into each stock area, the city population would be 100 people higher in household population. That would bring the total city population to 4,808. r . City of Oak Park Heights 14168 Oak Park Blvd. N • Box 2007 • Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 • Phone (651) 439 -4439 • Fax (651) 439 -0574 July 6, 2009 MEMO To: Libby Starling, Metropolitan Council From: Austin Bleess, City Intern Re: Population Study In its annual population estimate the Metropolitan Council (Council) found the City of Oak Park Heights to have a population of 4,708 people, with 2,124 housing units. The City agrees with the overall number of housing units. However, the City contests the number provided by the Council of housing units that are owner- occupied and the Council's 2008 population estimate. The Council's calculations are low for the sole reason the formula used to calculate the homeownership rates were changed since the previous estimate. Based upon the data from the MN Department of Revenue, as provided to the City by Mr. Todd Graham of the Met Council, for the year 2008 the population for the City of Oak Park Heights is 4,803. Under the new homeownership rates for 2008 the total number of owner occupied housing units is 1,310 (Exhibit A). However, in an email from Todd Graham to City Administrator Eric Johnson, dated June 11, 2009 (Exhibit B), Mr. Graham cites data from the MN Dept. of Revenue that shows 1,062 owner occupied housing units in the City in the year 2008. The City finds the 1,062 owner occupied housing units to be accurate, and not the Councils estimate of 1,310. The number of owner occupied housing units directly effects the population of the city. The Council believes that 0.383 fewer people live in an owner- occupied housing unit than a rented housing unit (Exhibit C). By using the 1,310 estimate of owner - occupied housing (Exhibit A) and the lower multiplier rate associated with owner - occupied housing the Council is inaccurately decreasing the population of the city. By using the 1,062 estimate of owner occupied units, as the MN Department of Revenue says, which increases the renter occupied housing by 248 units, the city population would be 95 people higher in household population. That would bring the total city population to 4,803. 1 2008 Population Estimates: Oak Park Heights city, Washington County, Estimates of housing stock are segmented into ownership housing and rental housing. Each housing type will have a specifically estimated occupancy rate. Each combination of housing type and tenure (ownership housing or rental) will have a specifically estimated average household size. Homeownership rates Housing stock by type of housing' Occupancy rates estimated for April 1 (estimated) Owned Rented Single-family detached 775 95.6% 98.0% Duplex / threeplex / fourplex 147 38.8% 95.1% Townhouses 248 88.7% 95.7% Multifamily 954 30.6% 96.3% 96.3% Estimated built housing units 2,124 Owned: 1,310 Occupancy rates Mobile homes 0 95.0% Boats, etc., serving as housing 0 100.0% The Council's model multiplies housing units by occupancy rates, segmented by housing type, to determine occupied housing. The number of occupied housing units is equivalent to households: A household is a group of people (or a person living alone) occupying a housing unit. (* Institutional or group quarters housing is accounted separately through an annual survey by Metropolitan Council.) Households 2,056 Population in households is calculated mutliplying households by average household sizes (persons per household), segmented by housing type and tenure. The fmal step in poulation estimation is to add population in households + population in group quarters, counted by the Council's annual survey. Persons I : Ho ehold Multi I liers Owner - i ccu I ied Renter - occupied • Single-family detached / 2.740 3.009 Duplex /threeplex /fourplex j 1.422 1.920 Population in households 4,180 Townhouses 1.900 d 2.520 Multifamily 1.400 1.546 Population in group quarters 528 Mobile homes 2.420 Total population 4,708 Boats, etc., serving as housing 2.000 Tuesday, June 30, 2009 Page 2 of 2 1 rage 1 01 .4, Eric Johnson From: Graham, Todd [todd.graham @metc.state.mn.us] Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 11:23 AM To: Eric Johnson Cc: Starling, Libby Subject: RE: Oak Park Heights population Mr Johnson— You asked about Metropolitan Council's estimation methodology, and specifically household size estimation. Metropolitan Council's model estimates eight separate average household sizes for eight combinations of housing type and tenure (own or rent). For more on this, see Metropolitan Council's detailed methodology, available at www.metrocouncil.oro/metroarea/AboutEstimates.htm You can find Oak Park Heights' array of estimated multipliers in the report you received from Libby Starling. The specific multipliers have not changed greatly for Oak Park Heights. The PPH for single family detached ownership housing is reduced; this is an adjustment that was applied for all communities in the region. The major, market - wide trend has been a continuing decline in household sizes associated with single family detached ownership housing. The major methodology change affecting Oak Park Heights' estimates, in this cycle of estimation, concems the segmentation of ownership housing vs rental housing: • Starting with this cycle of estimation, we are no longer using "homesteads counts" as a hard constraint on the estimation of ownership housing. The Abstract of Assessment (source: Minnesota Department of Revenue) lists Oak Park Heights having 1,062 homesteads in year 2008 – and the homesteads count declines every year. Metropolitan Council staff have concluded that homesteads counts are no longer a reliable benchmark. We announced this change on pages 1 -2 of the detailed methodology, avail -bl at www.metrocouncil.org/metroarea/AboutEstimates.htm ' • • Instead, Council's method for segmenting ownership housing vs rental housing now r= '-s on Me = •o itan Council's Affordable Housing Production survey. The net effec • •e a more - -• - -; •• = ion of ownership and rental housing subtotals. During 2000 -200 8°. •f new •u ' g rear - • • •ak Perk Heights has been ownership housing; 22 %, rental housi g. a nnual counts v- e re ed • • - City, and annual details are published atwww.metrocouncil.org /pl- gnin• .. Housin• - pt/ e.9.pdf • Using this new method, Metropolitan Council estimates 1,311 • • - I• unit .. -s occupied and vacant) and 814 rental units (includes occupied and vacant) in Oak Park Heights. We find this is a more accurate estimation of ownership and rental housing subtotals. The recalculated estimates of ownership housing vs rental housing does affect the population estimates. 6/11/2009 i rage zorz Ownership housing and rental housing have different average household sizes. In Oak Park Heights, households in ownership housing are marginally smaller than renting households. Again, you can find Oak Park Heights' array of estimated multipliers in the report you received from Libby Starling. Metropolitan Council's objective is to certify a realistic representation of population and households. Please send any additional written comments or questions by June 24 to Todd Graham, Metropolitan Council Research, 390 Robert Street North, Saint Paul, MN 55101; or by e-mail to todd.graham a,metc.state.mn.us Regards. — Todd Graham Metropolitan Council Research 651/602-1322 From: Eric Johnson [ mailto: eajohnson @cityofoakparkheights.com] Sent: Monday, June 08, 2009 1:55 PM TO: Starling, Libby Subject: Oak Park Heights population 6-8 -09 Ms. Starling: I have received you rmost recent population counts for the City of Oak Park Heights My question at this time is how the average household population fell from 2.06 to 2.03. Please provide the detailed methodology on how this was determined. Thank You Eric Johnson City Administrator 6/11/2009 Exhibit C Multipliers Owner- Renter - Occupied* Occupied* SF Homes 2.740 3.009 Duplex, etc 1.422 1.920 Townhouses 1.900 2.520 Multifamily 1.400 1.546 Avg Multiplier 1.866 2.249 Difference 0.383 *Data taken from Exhibit A 1 agG 1 U1 . . g . bA- C- I O Eric Johnson From: Graham, Todd [todd.graham @metc.state.mn.usj Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 11:23 AM To: Eric Johnson Cc: Starling, Libby Subject: RE: Oak Park Heights population Mr Johnson — You asked about Metropolitan Council's estimation methodology, and specifically household size estimation. Metropolitan Council's model estimates eight separate average household sizes for eight combinations of housing type and tenure (own or rent). For more on this, see Metropolitan Council's detailed methodology, available at www.metrocouncil.org/metroarea/AboutEstimates.htm You can find Oak Park Heights' array of estimated multipliers in the report you received from Libby Starling. The specific multipliers have not changed greatly for Oak Park Heights. The PPH for single family detached ownership housing is reduced; this is an adjustment that was applied for all communities in the region. The major, market - wide trend has been a continuing decline in household sizes associated with single family detached ownership housing. The major methodology change affecting Oak Park Heights' estimates, in this cycle of estimation, concerns the segmentation of ownership housing vs rental housing: • Starting with this cycle of estimation, we are no longer using "homesteads counts" as a hard constraint on the estimation of ownership housing. The Abstract of Assessment (source: Minnesota Department of Revenue) lists Oak Park Heights having 1,062 homesteads in year 2008 – and the homesteads count declines every year. Metropolitan Council staff have concluded that homesteads counts are no longer a reliable benchmark. We announced this change on pages 1 -2 of the detailed methodology, avail -bl at L 7 www.metrocouncil. org /metroarea /AboutEstimates.htm ' • • Instead, Council's method for segmenting ownership housing vs rental housing now r= '-s on Me = .0 itan Council's Affordable Housing Production survey. The net effec •e a more - �, �� = ion of ownership and rental housing subtotals. During 2000 -200 , 8% •f new .0 ' g rep. - • • leak Perk Heights has been ownership housing; 22 %, rental housi g. nnual counts e re v.' ed • City, and annual details are published at www.metrocouncil.org /.t- • nin • • • • = ' Housin• ' • N9. •df • Using this new method, Metropolitan Council estimates 1,311 • • - i' • unit ' • - • -s occupied and vacant) and 814 rental units (includes occupied and vacant) in Oak Park Heights. We find this is a more accurate estimation of ownership and rental housing subtotals. The recalculated estimates of ownership housing vs rental housing does affect the population estimates. 6/11/2009 11 rage .c of L Z 49 Ownership housing and rental housing have different average household sizes. In Oak Park Heights, households in ownership housing are marginally smaller than renting households. Again, you can find Oak Park Heights' array of estimated multipliers in the report you received from Libby Starling. Metropolitan Council's objective is to certify a realistic representation of population and households. Please send any additional written comments or questions by June 24 to Todd Graham, Metropolitan Council Research, 390 Robert Street North, Saint Paul, MN 55101; or by e-mail to todd.graham@metc.state.mn.us Regards. -- Todd Graham Metropolitan Council Research 651/602-1322 From: Eric Johnson [ mailto: eajohnson @cityofoakparkheights.com) Sent: Monday, June 08, 2009 1:55 PM TO: Starling, Libby Subject: Oak Park Heights population 6-8 -09 Ms. Starling: I have received you rmost recent population counts for the City of Oak Park Heights My question at this time is how the average household population fell from 2.06 to 2.03. Please provide the detailed methodology on how this was determined. Thank You Eric Johnson City Administrator 6/11/2009 Metropolitan Council • . H� .. • xa w • ` , - Affordable Housing Production in the Twin Cities January 2009 (Corrected Mav 2009) This annual report summarizes new affordable housing added each year by Highlights Twin Cities area cities and townships. Every year the Metropolitan Council Percent of Units Permitted that were Affordable, 2007 determines a price -point for new owner - occupied housing that is 52% affordable to households at 80 percent of area median family income, as calculated by the U.S. Department of ° 36% Housing and Urban Development, at 32 /0 30% 28% the prevailing home mortgage interest 230/ 24 0 rates, estimated to be 6.2 percent for a 1 % 20% 18% ° 19 °/ ° 30 -year fixed -rate home loan in 2007. 17 / 15 ° /° 16% This definition assumes that households earning 80 percent of the region's median income can afford! 1 rt mortgage costs (mortgage payments, taxes, insurance and related housing 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 costs) without spending more than 30 Total MI Rental 1 Owner percent of their income. The area median income (AMI) for 2007 was • Overall in 2007, there were 2,096 new affordable units (owner and rental $78,500; 80 percent of AMI was units combined) added in the Twin Cities region; 24 percent of all housing $62,800. The Council considered built in 2007 was affordable. This was an increase from the 19 percent owner - occupied units affordable if the calculated in 2006. price was less than $206,800. • 729 new affordable rental units were added. A majority were built in the For affordable rental units, the Council cities of Brooklyn Park and Minneapolis. used the maximum monthly rents permitted in the metropolitan area for • Twenty -eight percent of all rental units added were affordable. This was a the federal low- income housing tax decrease from the 52 percent calculated in 2006. credits to housing serving households 1,367 new affordable owner units were added. A majority were built in • at 50 percent of AMI or $39,250 in 2007 ($687 /month for an efficiency or developing communities. single -room occupancy unit, • Twenty -two percent of all new owner- occupied housing units added were $736 /month for a one - bedroom unit, affordable. This was an increase from the 16 percent calculated in 2006. $883 /month for a two- bedroom unit, and $1,020 /month for a three - bedroom • From 1996 through 2007, there were 47,280 new affordable units (owner or larger unit). and renter units combined) added in the Twin Cities region; 25 percent of all new housing added was affordable. For more information on the methodology, see Appendix A on p. 9. • 9,802 affordable rental units were added, or 31 percent of all rental units added. For questions on this report, contact: • 37,478 new affordable owner - occupied housing units were added, or 24 Joel Nyhus percent of all new owner - occupied housing units added. joel.nyhust metc.state.mn.us 651 - 602 -1634 Publication No. 74 -08 -059 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL • RESEARCH • 390 ROBERT STREET NORTH, ST. PAUL, MN 55101 -1805 • WWW.METROCOUNCIL.ORG MetroStats Affordable Housing Production in the Twin Cities January 2009 (Corrected slay 2009) Total New Affordable Housing Permitted in 2007 Overall in 2007, there were 2,096 new affordable units (owner- occupied and renter units combined) added to the Twin Cities region, which means almost 24 percent of the owner and rental housing built in 2007 was affordable. This was an increase from the 19 percent calculated in 2006, though the total number of affordable units fell 5 percent from 2006. Reflecting overall weakness in new housing Twin Cities Metropolitan Area constrction, 2,096 was the lowest total number of T Affordable Units Added by Community affordable units permitted in the 12 years of the Y y Metropolitan Council's survey. 2007 The majority of the new affordable units constructed r – (66 percent) were built in the developing Total Number of Affordable communities with 1,381 units being added. The Units Added in 2007 central cities had 305 new affordable units added or 1 — Under 10 �• 15 percent of the regional total in 2007. The 10 - 29 developed communities had 234 new affordable 30 -59 ,is i ''''' '— II lc) units units added or 11 percent of the regional total in E. 60 \ -.,,,,s , 4 2007. The rural centers had 170 new affordable 1 _ � units added or 8 percent of the regional total in Ov er 100 `L ' i -/ - 2007. Other rural communities added 6 new Not Under 1 � ,.,, ',_ - _ -1 Jurisdiction ` ...__._..� Council I 0 F'� affordable units or less than 1 percent of the ,. i �, z -, IF 111 regional total in 2007. t { (__ The top 10 communities producing combined new 1 � "' gt• 44 � -- affordable renter and owner - occupied units during ; — t' • 2007 were. __ t Brooklyn Park 379 Hugo 197 'il r ll " Minneapolis 189 -- ,. I 1 , \`i St. Paul 116 t ,s Rosemount 79 ,--; I ` FJ 1.r' Cl U ^ ... Ramsey 78 i' Woodbury 70 `- –! (Lr-y Lakeville 69 ; -- -w Savage 67 -� Carver 64 Rural Areas 0% Central Cities Rural Centers 15% 8% �, Developed ;;.,. Communities 11% Developing Communities 66% 2 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL • RESEARCH ■ 390 ROBERT STREET NORTH. ST. PAUL. MN 55101 -1805 1 WWW METROCOUNCIL ORG MetroStats Affordable Housing Production in the Twin Cities January 2009 (Corrected May 2009) New Affordable Owner - Occupied Housing Permitted in 2007 Almost 22 percent of the new owner - occupied housing units permitted in 2007 were estimated to be affordable. This increase from the 16 percent calculated in 2006 resulted from the 50 percent contraction in unaffordable construction relative to the 25 percent in affordable construction. Thirty -two communities showed gains in affordable owner units from the previous year with the largest number built in Hugo (197 units). Of all the new affordable owner units added in 2007 (1,367 units), over 69 percent were built in Twin Cities Metropolitan Area the developing communities. The fully Affordable Owner Units Added by Community developed communities contributed almost 13 2007 percent of the total, while the rural centers and central cities added around 9 percent each of -- ------------ -_____ the total. Other rural areas added less than 1 Number of Affordable percent. Owner Units Added in 2007 1 I 1 The top 10 communities producing new under 10 I — — k affordable owner - occupied units in 2007 were i 10 -29 . -- . ;� _ MI 30 - 49 s-^ . _v' t — . w Hugo 197 Ramsey 78 over 70 . - 7 p Not Under Minneapolis 75 1 f f ._____ _ .__ T `Y' Woodbury 70 Council 1 r g Lakeville 69 Jurisdiction o . >y Savage 67 Carver 64 1 if Blaine 57 l” " - ,,,,, ■ Farmington 57 l 7 i Brooklyn Park 53 (tied) I Waconia 53 (tied) I . r r- 1 El i I it 1 r r 1 I Central Cities Rural Areas 9% 0% Rural Centers Developed 9V° .. Communities 13% Developing Communities 3 69% METROPOLITAN COUNCIL • RESEARCH • 390 ROBERT STREET NORTH, ST. PAUL. MN 55101 -1805 • WWW (v1ETROCOUNCIL ORG MetroStats • Affordable Housing Production in the Twin Cities January 2009 (Corrected May 2009) New Affordable Rental Housing Permitted in 2007 Over 28 percent of the new renter - occupied housing units permitted in 2007 were estimated to be affordable. This was a decrease from the 52 percent calculated in 2006. Seven communities showed gains in affordable rental units from the previous year, with the largest number in Brooklyn Park (326 affordable rental units). There were only 11 communities that produced Twin Cities Metropolitan Area affordable rental units in 2007. Of the stock of new Affordable Rental Units Added by Community affordable rental units added in 2007 (729 units), around 59 percent were built in the developing 2007 communities. The central cities added around 26 percent of the total, while the developed --- -- communities were at 9 percent. The rural centers Number of Affordable ! added 6 percent of the total, while other rural areas Rental Units Added in 2007 didn't add any affordable rental units in 2007. l y None Permitte I ' 1-24 I The top 10 communities producing new affordable :, A ___ 25 - 49 rs :- ........ renter-occupied units in 2007 were: j t 1 mg 50 - 100 __ _ __.._. _ I , , Brooklyn Park 326 Brooklyn Park (32 L Minneapolis s 114 Not Under _ Minneapolis (114 p It _ _._._. i St. Paul 72 i Council -- ' Jurisdiction I I Lino Lakes 60 + - L Vadnais Heights 47 c Y Jordan 44 (� Rosemount 32 : :2,1 Minnetonka 13 Maple Grove 10 -- ,- , _. Hastings 8 l ev 1 _ 1 • 1 Rural Areas 0% Rural Centers 6% Central Cities ot 26% Developed ' ^ IL ,' 5 : ; Communities Developing i. f1 9% Communities 59% 4 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL • RESEARCH • 390 ROBERT STREET NORTH. ST. PAUL, MN 55101 -1805 • WWW METRO0OUNCIL.ORG MetroStats Affordable Housing Production in the Twin Cities January 2009 (Corrected May 2009) Production of New Affordable Housing, 1996 -2007 In their responses to the survey, communities reported permits issued for 186,906 combined new rental and new owner units between 1996 and 2007. Of these, 47,280 were deemed affordable. These units include 9,802 new affordable rental units out of the 31,916 total new rental units constructed, and 37,478 new affordable owner units out of the 154,990 total new owner units constructed. Over twenty -five percent of the new housing Twin Cities Metropolitan Area units (rental and owner) reported from 1996 to 2007 were deemed affordable. Total Affordable Units Added by Community 1996 -2007 The majority (60 percent) of the new affordable owner and renter units constructed from 1996 to r 2007 were built in the developing communities, Total Number of Affordable with 28,418 units being added. The developed Units Added 1996 -2007 I communities had 8,986 new affordable units 1 1 ! —L - 1 - - - - -- Under 200 ! added, or 19 percent of all new affordable units , 200 - 499 added. The central cities had 7,092 new ' affordable units added, or 15 percent of all new soo - sss affordable units added. The rural centers had im 1,000 -2,000 _ 3 2,163 new affordable units added, or 5 percent NE Over 2,000 . ,, I i 1 of all new affordable units added. Rural Not Under — F ?, j -, -, o c added 621 new affordable units, or I council . ; Jurisdiction fn_t -1_ , I f 1 percent of all new affordable units added. -- ,T The top ten communities producing new 'X� '` affordable renter and owner units since 1996 r �; ' i AI were: i i ;4 Minneapolis 4,686 J ` d - �� Shakopee 2,584 , I St. Paul 2,406 - _ 1 ! >. _ Maple Grove 2,133 - - -7 1 F, Woodbury 1,917 , „,,,,,,,,1,57. rr ! , � Farmington 1,622 r x ,, l I 0 - i - -- Blaine 1,555 t; l r ' Lakeville 1,522 '� - ----------- �' "�= i 1 - ' ! Inver Grove Heights 1,440 Ramsey 1,266 Rural Areas 1% Central Cities Rural Centers 1 5% Developed Communities 19% Developing Communities 60% 5 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ■ RESEARCH • 390 ROBERT STREET NORTH ST PAUL. MN 55101 -1805 • 'WNW METROCOUNCIL ORG MetroStats Affordable Housing Production in the Twin Cities January 2009 (Corrected May 2009) Production of New Affordable Owner Housing, 1996 -2007 Over 24 percent of the new owner - occupied housing units reported from 1996 to 2007 were estimated to be affordable. Of all the new affordable owner units added to the region (37,478 units) from 1996 to 2007, 67 Twin Cities Metropolitan Area percent were built in the developing Affordable Owner Units Added by Community communities. The developed communities 1996 -2007 contributed almost 18 percent of the total, while the central cities added 9 percent of the total. The rural centers added 5 percent, and the Number of Affordable other rural communities added almost 2 percent Owner Units Added 1996 -2007 of the new affordable owner units during these --- ..., Under 50 __._. years. 50 - 249 The top ten communities producing new 2e0 -599 1 affordable owner- occupied units since 1996 an 600 -999 were - Over 1,000 i'. - ' ,._ r' Not Under ----- - - - - -- Al 1 ' ''' Shakopee 2,491 coons L µ F _ 1, Jurisdiction ,� t Minneapolis 2,087 m Maple Grove 1,870 1 1, Woodbury 1,816 1 ` Farmington 1,546 a L.I ~ . li Blaine 1,421 +P, t : Lakeville 1,372 _ ,. -, ° ,4 Ramsey 1,217 H Aid ugo 1,165 ___ St. Paul 1,160 _/' o _____ I- Rural Areas Central Cities 2% 9% Rural Centers 5% Developed Communities 18% Developing Communities 67% • 6 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 2 RESEARCH u 390 ROBERT STREET NORTH ST. PAUL. MN 55101 -1805 11 WWW METRCCOUNCIL ORG MetroStats Affordable Housing Production in the Twin Cities January 2009 (Corrected May 2009) New Affordable Rental Hous Perm 1996 -2007 Almost thirty -one percent of the new renter - occupied housing units added from 1996 to 2007 were estimated to be affordable. Of all the new affordable rental units added Twin Cities Metropolitan Area (9,802 units) from 1996 to 2007, around 40 Affordable Rental Units Added by Community percent were built in the central cities. The 1996 - 2007 developing communities contributed about 35 percent of the total, while the developed communities added around 24 percent of the total. Rural centers added around 1 percent of Number of Affordable Rental Units Added 1996 -2007 — - the total, while the other rural communities added a negligible number (less than 1 Under25 percent). 25 -99 I iii 100 - 199 1 `, The top ten communities producing affordable 200 -349 ,t� -, renter occupied units since 1996 were - Minneapolis (2,599) T' st. Paul (1,246) t _ -> '\,.., a 1 r� , _ Not Under 1 Minneapolis 2599 .;: , 1 p �- Co uncil it ti -- t � -` �-� St. Paul 1,246 Jurisdiction t I I r - ,4;,= 1 Brooklyn Park 349 — , -__I 1 `! 1 Inver Grove Heights 306 1 , ___ ., 1 ' riktv t , ,�/ Plymouth 274 t — i ± f tir Eden Prairie 270 y I Maple Grove 241 — �C'► r r I , iimi Hastings 240 I M I _, :, Apple Valley 216 1 �' t �( Eagan 215 -- -- .,.,.��r� South St. Paul 184 . r L I I J ,, ,,. E _ _- --- ---- - --- 1 .. ti t I rj ' . 1 b' l ,I Rural Areas Rural Centers 0% 1% Developing Communities ;, a Central Cities 35% 40% Developed Communities 24% 7 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ■ RESEARCH ■ 390 ROBERT STREET NORTH ST. PAUL, MN 55101 -1805 1 i ORG i : Stats Affordable Housing Production in the Twin Cities January 2009 (Corrected May 2009) Regional Goals and Production Levels of Affordable Units, 1996 -2007 Participants in the Livable Communities Act (LCA) program have negotiated goals that represent the addition of 100,821 affordable units (as of November 2007) for the region by 2010 (84,981 owner units and 15,840 rental units). Even if production continues at the pace it has for the last twelve years, the region will fall short of the goals by about 42,000 units. These numbers are intended to help communities understand the significant number of new affordable and rental units that would need to be added if they're to achieve their 2010 LCA housing goals. For some communities, these goals may well be unattainable as the overall production of new housing units has decreased. The 8,526 housing units permitted in 2007 was even lower than the previously lowest recorded total in 1975, which had 8,710 units permitted that year. However, the negotiated LCA goals numbers are a useful reminder that communities should facilitate efforts to develop medium and high density multifamily homes that offer the greatest opportunity for affordability and life -cycle housing choices. Affordable Housing New Affordable New Affordable Total New Total 1996 -2010 Units Units Reported, Units Reported, Affordable Production Goals 1996 -2006 2007 Units Reported, Projected 1996 -2007 through 2010 (assuming production at average 1996- 2007 levels) Owner - occupied 36,111 1,367 37,478 46,848 84,981 Renter - occupied 9,073 729 9,802 12,253 15,840 All 45,184 2,096 47,280 59,101 100,821 If the production of owner - occupied units continues at its historical pace, which, given the current market conditions is highly unlikely, the region's communities will fall short of their negotiated LCA goals of nearly 85,000 owner - occupied affordable units by about 38,000 units. The region would have to add around 16,000 affordable owner - occupied units each year from 2008 to 2010 to reach the negotiated affordable owner- occupied goals; this would be nearly three times the region's overall housing production in 2007. If the production of rental units continues at its historical pace, again which, given the current market conditions is highly unlikely, the region's communities will fall short of their negotiated LCA goals of 15,840 affordable rental units by about 3,600 units. The region would have to add around 2,000 affordable rental units each year from 2008 to 2010 to reach the negotiated affordable rental goals; this would be nearly three times the affordable rental production of 2007. 8 ME- RO'OLITAN COUNCIL • RESEARCH 1 390 ROBERT STREET NORTH ST PALL MN 55101 1805 It 'Xi'vo MET ROCOUNCIL OR'; • liVietiOStatS Affordable Housing Production in the Twin Cities January 2009 (Corrected May 2009) Appendix A. Data Sources and Definitions Data Sources Metropolitan Council's Annual Residential Construction Survey: The Metropolitan Council conducts an annual survey of each city and township in the Twin Cities to track the number of units by type (single - family, townhouse, duplex and multi- family) that are permitted. This survey includes questions about units that have been removed from the housing stock each year. The building permit survey has nearly a 100 percent response rate. • • Housing Production Survey: Data on the number of new permitted units that are affordable and the number intended for owner or renter occupancy are collected through the Metropolitan Council's annual Housing Production survey. Other Sources: The Metropolitan Council utilizes various sources of data to monitor residential building activity. In addition to the Annual Construction Survey and the Housing Production Survey, other sources of data include monthly residential building reports from the U.S. Department of Commerce, sales of existing units from the Minneapolis Area Association of Realtors (MAAR), rental data from Minnesota Housing, GVA Marquette and the Dakota County Community Development Agency (CDA). Methodology for Identifying Affordable Units Each year, respondents to the survey are asked to estimate how many of the new units built in their jurisdiction meet the council's affordability. Some are able to provide sale price information, but others cannot. In 1996 and 1997, many communities filling out the survey utilized building permit valuations as indicators of affordability status. These valuations were readily accessible for the communities, but they often excluded the price of lots, and some finishing costs, such as landscaping and wall and floor coverings. Therefore, the building permit valuations did not represent the value of the housing unit. In 1998, communities completing the survey were asked to add an average lot price to permit valuations in order to estimate the final cost. While these adjusted costs were not exact, they more closely reflected the market value of new homes. This practice of applying an additional lot price to the permit value was applied until 2001. Beginning in 2002, county assessor data were used to estimate the price of each new housing unit added. The county assessor data contain many attributes regarding residential and commercial properties, including the selling price or market value of each housing unit within the county. The selling price was used first, and if it was not available, the market value was then used. These two attributes were used extensively to establish whether a unit met the affordability threshold or not. Starting in 2004, the Minnesota Housing's Tax Credit Programs— Funded Developments data and HousingLink's Housing Counts were used to estimate the number of affordable rental units added. These databases include many attributes including the total number of tax credit units by municipality, development name, project type, and project inception date. These fields were used to validate the number of rental units that met the affordable rental thresholds. In general, these affordable housing numbers can be fluid from one year to the next. Changes in the numbers are reflective of not only market activity but also the input of new data sources. As new data sources become available, better quality of data can be presented in this report. 9 METROROLITA.N COUNCIL 111 RESEARCH t 3X ROBERT STREET NORTH ST PAUL. MN 55101 1805 11 'vMTIMETRCCOUNCiL CR13 MetroStats' Affordable Housing Production in the Twin Cities January 2009 (Corrected N 1ay 2009) Summary of Building Activity by Geographic Planning Areas, 1996 -2007 Rental Housing Owner - Occupied Housing All Housing Planning Afford- Total Percent Afford- Total Percent Afford- Total Percent Area able Afford- able Afford- able Afford- able able able Central Cities 3,845 8,872 43.3% 3,247 12,515 25.9% 7,092 21,387 33.2% Developed 2,389 9,157 26.1% 6,597 28,021 23.5% 8,986 37,178 24.2% Developing 3,387 13,488 25.1% 25,031 100,156 25.0% 28,418 113,644 25.0% Rural Centers 146 248 58.9% 2,017 7,285 27.7% 2,163 7,533 28.7% Other Rural 35 151 23.2% 586 7,103 8.4% 621 7,164 8.7% Communities Metro Area 9,802 31,916 30.7% 37,478 154,990 24.2% 47,280 186,906 25.3% Twin Cities Metropolitan Area Geographic Planning Areas Geographic Planning Areas ■ Central Cities Fully Developed Communities Developing �, ,,= -f �_ Communities , Rural Centers I - ,� L,�l Other Rural ! ;,' �s I 1 ,, , p Not Under — I , I 1 _ } 1 - t + � l s Council 1 I 7 .� s Jurisdiction I 1 { 1 f ' rj j A �, L r t. � 1f I _.( s I t I' i 7 T , I 7 10 METROaOLITAN COUNCIL • RESEARCH 1 390 ROBERT STREET NORTH ST PAUL MN 55101 1805 • 'AVM METROCOUNCIL ORG }_troSt ats Affordable Housing Production in the Twin Cities January 2009 (Corrected May 2009) ANOKA COUNTY Affordable Owner - Occupied Units Community 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Total Andover 177 28 0 0 0 9 28 27 24 30 30 12 365 Anoka 58 45 22 17 3 3 0 1 0 3 8 0 160 Bethel 0 4 2 2 2 0 2 0 0 1 2 1 16 Blaine 0 0 252 192 8 265 135 219 224 51 18 57 1,421 Burns Township 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Centerville 19 40 59 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 130 Circle Pines 0 0 0 0 2 0 20 20 0 0 0 0 42 Columbia Heights 15 6 6 16 4 3 6 15 0 0 4 3 78 Columbus 0 4 6 0 2 4 0 1 1 0 0 0 18 Coon Rapids 193 148 245 0 25 137 10 4 16 18 19 8 823 East Bethel 5 40 0_ 0 68 82 1 0 0 0 1 0 197 Fridley 28 35 8 2 9 33 2 23 0 3 0 2 145 Ham Lake 37 26 19 7 33 84 0 0 0 3 3 1 213 Hilltop 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lexington 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 5 Lino Lakes 68 81 29 42 32 49 17 0 16 10 42 2 388 Linwood Township 33 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 36 Oak Grove 24 22 6 18 19 53 17 8 10 0 1 0 178 Ramsey 175 67 0 50 5 94 38 199 349 101 61 78 1,217 Spring Lake Park 25 22 13 0 0 0 4 19 0 0 0 0 83 St. Francis 41 32 110 76 23 129 110 68 8 47 30 12 686 Affordable Owner Totals 898 600 777 435 235 945 395 604 649 267 220 176 6,201 Unaffordable O wner- Occupied Units Community 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Total Andover 95 254 0 0 342 276_ 220 185 227 226 123 79 2,027 Anoka 38 28 9 2 6 13 28 36 38 47 2 1 248 Bethel 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 16 12 0 1 1 33 Blaine 0 0 335 519 556 403 663 597 761 617 404 233 5,088 Burns Township 0 0 39 56 0 0 - 55 98 52 30 26 16 372 Centerville 19 10 84 66 56 0 48 33 25 17 10 3 371 Circle Pines 2 1 1 0 3 0 74 99 5 47 2 0 234 Columbia Heights 5 4 5 4 6 0 11 4 80 30 121 33 303 Columbus 0 8 21 0 13 10 12 24 17 18 9 8 140 Coon Rapids 52 90 34 0 114 197_ 146 259 267 154 113 56 1,482 East Bethel 0 77 0 0 25 13 77 115 126 77 37 23 570 Fridley 34 18 12 1 7 10 9 2 6 6 10 1 116 Ham Lake 0 111 128 185 143 84 171 184 159 99 75 35 1,374 Hilltop 0 0 0 0 0_ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lexington 0 0 0 2 2 1 1 4 31 7 9 1 30 Lino Lakes 121 98 191 198 208 161 201 121 174 186 49 90 1,798 Linwood Township 16 0 0 0 0 42 38 21 53 50 31 31 282 Oak Grove 0 28 54 30 25 23 53 93 99 88 64 37 594 Ramsey 100 198 105 66_ 28 24 148 207 211 290 115 89 1,581 Spring Lake Park 7 0 0 0 0 0 28 1 1 5 1 0 43 St. Francis 22 14 56 90 103 17 90 128 97 50 19 111 697 Unaffordable Owner Totals 511 939 1,074 1,219 1,637 1,274 2,076 2,227 2,413 2,044 1,221 748 17,383 Anoka County Owner Totals 1,409 1,539 1,851 1,654 1,872 2,219 2,471 2,831 3,062 2,311 1,441 924 23,584 11 ME?RCPOLITAN COUNCIL II RESEARCH 1 390 RCRERT STREET NORTH ST PAUL MN 55101 1805 1 WiVW ME - RCCOUNCiL CPt; • d : : ixStats • Affordable Housing Production in the Twin Cities January 2009 (Corrected May 2009) CARVER COUNTY Affordable Ow ner- Occupied Units Community 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Total Benton Township 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Camden Township 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 Carver 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 7 12 64 96 Chanhassen 13 84 145 55_ 4 32 147 141 0 0 16 26 663 Chaska 0 0 12 61 87 229 86 209 142 55 6 24 911 Cologne 0 20 0 33 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 75 Dahlgren Township 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hamburg 3 2 3 1 1 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 18 Hancock Township 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 Hollywood Township 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Laketown Township 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Mayer 1 0 3 0 1 19 17 15 0 9 8 8 81 New Germany 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 2 5 Norwood Young America 3 4 5 0 0 6 25 21 21 8 3 2 98 San Francisco Township 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 Victoria 0 0 0 4 0 60 5 0 0 0 0 0 69 Waconia 53 120 97 0 117 39 30 49 121 62 21 53 762 Waconia Township 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Watertown 15 0 0 20 21 1 17 31 16 2 29 2 154 Watertown Township 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Young America Township 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Affordable Owner Totals 88 230 270 174 266 390 334 466 304 143 98 181 2,944 Unaffordable Owner - Occupied Units Community 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 _ 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Total Benton Township 0 0 3 0 0 1 2 2 3 2 3 1 17 Camden Township 0 0 0 0 0 3 6 7 1 4 4 3 28 Carver 0 0 29 0 66 0 72 90 86 90 61 18 512 Chanhassen 194 194 281 222 154 97 153 94 93 84 115 142 1,823 Chaska 0 156 152 133 110 163 302 258 334 227 85 42 1,962 Cologne 0 0 0 0 1 0 5 21 30 47 19 11 134 Dahlgren Township 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 4 7 3 4 5 26 Hamburg 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 1 1 0 9 Hancock Township 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 4 1 2 2 0 12 Hollywood Township 0 0 0 0 0 7 3 6 4 5 4 0 29 Laketown Township 16 0 4 0 0 0 5 4 7 1 2 2 41 Mayer 1 0 0 0 1 6 55 55 82 66 52 20 338 New Germany 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 2 2 7 Norwood Young America 2 2 1 0 0 8 23 30 35 51 5 5 162 San Francisco Township 0 0 0 5 3 2 4 4 4 3 4 1 30 Victoria 99 52 54 50 0 88 157 102 124 174 97 106 1,103 Waconia 57 69 100 0 93 114 153 123 79 73 78 66 1,005 Waconia Township 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 6 3 2 0 6 20 Watertown 8 0 34 40 37 78 67 40 57 20 15 12 408 Watertown Township 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 4 5 5 3 2 21 Young America Township 0 2 3 0 0 0 2 1 3 1 2 0 14 Unaffordable Owner Totals 378 477 661 450 465 568 1,019 859 958 864 558 444 7,701 Carver County Owner Totals 466 707 931 624 731 958 1,353 1,325 1,262 1,007 656 625 10,645 12 METRO ')OLITAN COUNCIL. 1 RESEARCH 1 390 ROBERT STREE1 NORTH ST PALL MN 55101 1805 • 'WW* ME TPOCOUNCW JRG me a Stats January 2009 Affordable Housing Production in the Twin Cities ( Corrected May 2009) Affordable Owner -Occu • ied Units DAKOTA COUNTY 1996 1997 1998 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 22 ®Totaal Communit 44 97 147 274® 674 A• •le Valle 94 28 24 2 0 0 42 0�© 2362 0 62 09 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C Rock Townshi• 0 0 0 0 0 001111‘c! 0 0 0 0 Coates 0 0 0© 0 0 0 633 0 0 p 0 Dou • las Townshi • 86 167 102 69 98 95 50 © 118 © 20 21 8© 0 0 0 0111111111111 0 0 0 0 1, 546 Em• ire Townshi • ONE 116 120 61 74 47 Eureka Townshi• 264 180 159 108 145�� 0 61 0 0 0 4 Greenvale e 0 0 0 0 0© 011111111113 0 0 5 Greenvale Townshi • 0 1 6 0 0 43 9 0 0 0 4 Ham•ton 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 8 0 851 p © 1 ® 141 182 102 108 ifiglingl 68 54 41 0 65 7 0 1,134 56 147 262 180 69 Inver Grove Hei•hts 0 236 130® 192 263 165® 0 0 14® 67 94 24�® 0 0 0 0 0© 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M dale 0 0 0© 0 0 p 0 0 0 0 0 Me a Townshi• 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 Mendota 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p 0 0 0 p 0 0 Mendota Hei•hts 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6221222 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 R nin•erTownshi• 0 0 12 ONE 00 0� 001.112 Randol • h 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 Ra venna ownshi 0 0 0 0 0 � 47 1,099 0 138 65 ® ® � 8 0 0 011111 Ravenna Townshi• 45 65 49 Rosemount ® © 10��0 19 9 ® © © ©© S Townshi• 4 0 South St. Paul 0 116 0 0 0 0 0 p 0 0 p 0 � 0 0 0 0 0 p 0 0 p p 0 0 Vermillion 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 74 MIMI 0 Vermillion Townshi • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Waterford Townshi • 0 p 0 0 = = __ West St. Paul 26g 8,552 Totals 1, 1,009 89 �� = __ Affordable Owner _ ______ 13 �L ■ RESEr1RCH • 390 RCRERT STREET NUR`N SC PALL MN 5510 1805 B �r'1'�PV+'�1METRCCOL NC;L �CRG (,;'E`=�U'CiL1TAN t�'JUi�L }.e , OStats Affordable Housing Production in the Twin Cities January 2009 (Corrected May 2009) • DAKOTA COUNTY Unaffordable Owner - Occupied Units Community 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Total Apple Valley 317 324 251 234 259 216 273 232 284 169 67 49 2,675 Burnsville 105 • • 42_ 53 91 120 100 151 65 228 172 20 33 1,180 Castle Rock Township 0 4 6 0 2 2 5 4 1 3 3 3 33 Coates 0 0 0 0_ 0 0 1 0_ 0 0 0 0 1 Douglas Township 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 8 2 4 1 3 23 Eagan 364 185 171 218 234 153 239 166 147 161 119 67 2,224 Empire Township 2 11 21 33 8 0 52 77 30 25 19 7 285 Eureka Township 0 8 9 0 0 3 3 9 1 3 4 5 45 Farmington 91 65 127 234 265 239 440 415 166 124 164 88 2,418 Greenvale Township 0 0 0 0 4 4 5 9 7 4 6 0 39 Hampton 0 0 0 0 0 17 8 1 3 1 1 2 33 Hampton Township 0 2 0 4 3 0 8 4 5 1 4 0 31 Hastings 52 59 65 0 117 80 204 196 191 74 75 30 1,143 Inver Grove Heights 0 152 268 212 207 168 105_ 153 210 106 43 27 1,651 Lakeville 449 330 583 708 582 458 433 597 643 500 333 233 5,849 Lilydale 0 0 0 0 0 16 21 9 8 0 0 0 54 Marshan Township 0 0 0 4 0 0 2 2 5 4 0 2 19 Mendota 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 2 1 8 Mendota Heights 15 33 14 15_ 24 35_ 14 21 42 27 127 7 374 Miesville 0 0 0 0 0 0 0_ 1 0 1 2 0 4 New Trier 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 2 Nininger Township 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 4 6 3 3 0 21 Randolph 0 0 4 0 0 0 1 6 5 5 6 2 29 Randolph Township 0 0 9 11 9 8 11 3 4 6 7 3 71 Ravenna Township 6 0 0 0 0 0 9 7 5 6 7 1 41 Rosemount 32 49 125 308 273 177 205_ 375 400 282 147 64 2,437 Sciota Township 0 2_ 2 2 0 0 5 3 5 4 5 2 30 South St. Paul 0 7 2 7 12 11 16 21 65 36 23 72 272 Sunfish Lake 0 0 0 0 8 2 1 1 2 2 0 2 18 Vermillion 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 4 Vermillion Township 0 0 0 0_ 2 5 5 8 7 6 4 3 40 Waterford Township 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 4 3 2 1 2 15 West St. Paul 14 0 0 0 136 102 12 10 13 27 31 10 355 Unaffordable Owner Totals 1,447 1,274 1,710 2,087 2,265 1,797_2,235 2,412 2,494 1,759 1,224 720 21,424 Dakota County Owner Totals 2,356 2,300 2,464 2,623 2,735 2,806 3,130 3,275 3,331 2,408 1,559 989 29,976 14 ME`RO COUNCIL.. U RESEARCH • 390 ROBERT STREET NORTH ST PAUL MN 55101 1805 r `' \' 4'E ?ROCOUNCIL CRC3 iy _ e a Stats Affordable Housing Production in the Twin Cities January 2009 (Corrected May 2009) HENNEPIN COUNTY Affordable Owner - Occupied Units Community 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Total Bloomington 0 1 0_ 0 13 5 0 100 17 49 14 0 199 Brooklyn Center 17 2 5 0 3 2 0 0 0 0 1 2 32 Brooklyn Park 179 144 34 25 7 2 1 0 26 4 24 53 499 Champlin 0 8 56 38 0 99 36 116 4 0 0 0 357 Corcoran 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 3 Crystal 0 8 2 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 Dayton 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 Deephaven 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Eden Prairie 322 116 47 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 1 492 Edina 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Excelsior 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Fort Snelling 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Golden Valley 3 1 1 2 7 135 0 2 6 0 0 0 157 Greenfield 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 1 4 0 1 0 10 Greenwood 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Hassan Township 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hopkins 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 8 0 4 0 0 20 Independence 0 4 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 1 10 Long Lake 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Loretto 1 0 1 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 Maple Grove 5 209 67 175 297 230 86 317 271 166 38 9 1,870 Maple Plain 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Medicine Lake 0 0 0 0 0_ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Medina 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 10 Minneapolis 57 52 53 57 81 185 111 205 374 380 457 75 2,087 Minnetonka 90 2 6 60 1 3 1 0 2 43 2 0 210 Minnetonka Beach 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Minnetrista 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 7 Mound 0 5 2 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 New Hope 3 0 0 1 2 2 0_ 0 0 1 41 0 50 Orono 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Osseo 0 0_ 2 1 0 0 78 0 0 0 8 0 89 Plymouth 142 19 1 25 2 86 353 41 2 2 3 5 681 Richfield 5 11 3 139 32 10 2 48 6 0 1 0 257 Robbinsdale 4 6 1 0 2 5 2 0 0 0 0 3 23 Rogers 30 50 47 70 0 175 30 8 4 5 22 0 441 Shorewood 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spring Park 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 St. Anthony 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 0 2 0 33 St. Bonifacius 0 0 0 4 38 45 18 3 4 0 0 0 112 St. Louis Park 2 1 9 0 0 11 0 0 10 13 60 0 96 Tonka Bay 0 0 0 0 0 Oi 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Wayzata 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Woodland 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 Affordable Owner Totals 861 642 338 607 489 991 728 866 768 668 675 150 7,783 15 ME`ROOLITAN COUNCI'- ■ RESEARCH 1 390 - 3C?ERT STREET NOR'N Sf PALL MN 55101 1805 • vVvVA' ME'RCCO'U NC L CP3 1.,:.4,t,:::._..,.. Stats • Affordable Housing Production in the Twin Cities January 2009 (Corrected May 2009) HENNEPIN COUNTY Unaffordable Owner -Occu 'led Units Community 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Total Bloomington 0 68 0 2 16 13 28 34 99 377 29 16 682 Brooklyn Center 1 0 1 18 0 0 10 17 18 17 1 2 85 Brooklyn Park 369 367 319 432 303 270 251 474 532 457 399 178 4,351 Champlin 0 60 177 174 182 48 105 109 96 53 105 60 1,169 Corcoran 20 0 0 0 0 0 24 16 16 18 10 5 109 Crystal 4 6 4 9 22 46 32 12 15 9 24 9 192 Dayton 18 7 0 5 5 8 15 10 11 19 14 8 120 Deephaven 0 0 0 5 0 0 10 12 6 1 19 5 58 Eden Prairie 0 140 229 336 0 0 442 493 366 325 160 119 2,610 Edina 0 61 0 52 28 94 127 82 25 96 205 62 832 Excelsior 0 0 1 0 0 0 3 20 0 0 10 4 38 Fort Snelling 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Golden Valley 7 0 28 59 191 28 14 20 15 33 4 9 408 Greenfield 0 29 0 49 41 29 19 27 40 56 27 7 324 Greenwood 0 0 0 16 0 0 5 5 3 8 3 3 43 Hassan Township 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 18 15 24 13 7 91 Hopkins 12 57 9 9 64 16 16 92 22 64 26 3 390 Independence 29 34 27 30 52 0 40 25 16 20 6 5 284 Long Lake 0 0 0 1 2 8 3 8 10 3 1 1 37 Loretto 0 0 10 31 22 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 65 Maple Grove 310 288 383 694 574 441 398 391 413 285 292 258 4,727 Maple Plain 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 1 0 1 0 7 Medicine Lake 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 3 1 2 2 1 12 Medina 0 0 0 43 43 0 60 146 53 68 45 37 495 Minneapolis 45 122 47 210 312 257 646 497 1597 788 1350 152 6,023 Minnetonka 152 93 98 85 93 107 67 63 94 108 76 33 1,069 Minnetonka Beach 0 0_ 0 0 3 0 2 0 2 2 1 3 13 Minnetrista 0 43 0 0 0 0 0 157 130 105 61 51 547 Mound 0 20 12 0 19 20 72 79 58 30 49 18 377 New Hope 0 0 0 0 6 2 3 0 226 82 4 2 325 Orono 43 35_ 18 46 41_ 47_ 46 46 50 97 31 23 523 Osseo 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 49 1 0 12 0 62 Plymouth _ 505 301 177 511 554 94 239 476 287 271 196 220 3,831 Richfield 8 1 10 40 2 6 2 208 2 19 0 0 298 Robbinsdale 2 0 5 6 4 0 3 5 6 57 59 47 194 Rogers 0 0 0 0 0 175 171 18 60 72 146 86 728 Shorewood 37 0 0 0 0 0 12 23 25 24 32 17 170 Spring Park 4 20 26 15 5 87 20 121 2 159 3 2 464 St. Anthony 9 0 0 0 4 0 5 4 99 132 8 16 261 St. Bonifacius 0 0 37 37 30_ 13 27 4 11 9 1 3 172 St. Louis Park 3 8 11 11 14 11 2 10 110 316 437 7 940 Tonka Bay 0 0 0 6 2 0 11 4 8 5 7 6 49 Wayzata 46 27 0 18 10 0 4 9 8 7 11 17 157 Woodland 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 1 2 1 0 2 10 Unaffordable Owner Totals 1,624 1,787 1,631 2,952 2,644 1,821 2,957 3,788 4,551 4,219 3,880 1,504 33,358 Hennepin County Owner 2,485 2,429 1,969 3,559 3,133 2,812 3,685 4,654 5,319 4,887 4,555 1,654 41,141 16 ME'HO;-'0L11 AN CC,)UNCI'_ • RESEARCH • 390 ROBERT STREET NORTH Sr PAUL. MN 59101 1805 ■ 'W"v'v"A ME'RCCOUNC'L UR3 ,x . � Stats Affordable Housing Production in the Twin Cities January 2009 (Corrected May 2009) RAMSEY COUNTY Affordable Owner- Occupied Units Community 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Total Arden Hills 3 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 Falcon Heights 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Gem Lake 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Lauderdale 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 Little Canada 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Maplewood 127 70 10 25 17 143 136 25 56 42 10 46 707 Mounds View 0 3 2 0 4 0 6 2 0 0 0 0 17 New Brighton 72 0 19 0 0 1 1 0 0 123 3 1 220 North Oaks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 North St. Paul 0 11 2 0 0 0 77 0 0 0 1 0 91 Roseville 54 24 26 14 0 5_ 0 101 9 12 16 2 263 Shoreview 0 12 6 20 24 1 7 2 1 2 2 1 78 St. Paul 23 24 83 99 64 142 91 70 315 55 150 44 1,160 Vadnais Heights 11 0 0 18 0 28 0 8 1 5 0 0 71 White Bear Lake 28 0 2 2 3 4 1 0 12 2 5 0 59 White Bear Township 0 5 14 8 16 60 15 6 0 1 0 0 125 Affordable Owner Totals 318 149 176 187 128 384 334 216 394 242 187 94 2,809 Unaffordable Owner - Occupied Units Community 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Total Arden Hills 16 16 4 0 5 5 4 5 5 3 8 3 74 Falcon Heights 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 18 Gem Lake 0 0 0 1 0 2 6 1 3 3 3 0 19 Lauderdale 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Little Canada 0 0 45 0 0 0 12 20 23 37 17 8 162 Maplewood 72 112 129 70 46 77 57 128 87 266 152 18 1,214 Mounds View 0 2 1 0 6 0 8 4 9 12 11 25 78 New Brighton 0 0 4 0 5 6 9 19 2 8 1 2 56 North Oaks 0 24 31 17 55 42 32 19 34 18 4 21 297 North St. Paul 0 6 6 0 26 0 5 8 7 17 10 5 90 Roseville 191 34 44 22 0 12 9 33 27 151 45 11 579 Shoreview 57 27 61 154 222 14 5 10 20 35 29 12 646 St. Paul 0 0 22 28 96 162 451 307 1,172 399 397 211 3,245 Vadnais Heights 0 0_ • 0 16 0 17 29 25 5 12 7 3 114 White Bear Lake 22 87 60 43 60 17 41 53 83 23 17 7 513 White Bear Township 56 39 56 54 53 48 80 58 40 23 12 5 524 Unaffordable Owner Totals 414 347 463 405 579 402 748 690 1,517 1,021 713 331 7,630 Ramsey County Owner Totals _ 732 496 639 592 707 786 1,082 906 1,911 1,263 900 425 10,439 17 ME 'RUPOL11ANNd CQUh.C:l . • RESEARCH • 3)( - CS3ERT STREET NOR H S' PAUL MN 55101 1805 • Pa +lr'. ''.'E ROCO: N&L 0013 �.._ Affordable Housing Production in the Twin Cities January 2009 (Corrected May 2009) SCOTT COUNTY Affordable Owner - Occupied Units Community 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Total Belle Plaine 23 14 34 0 61 100 24 12 60 0 0 12 340 Belle Plaine Township 0 0 0 7 0 2 1 0 0 0 1 1 12 Blakeley Township 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cedar Lake Township 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 Credit River Township 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Elko New Market 0 0 0 6 6 8 2 0 0 0 7 22 51 Helena Township 0 0 5 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 8 Jackson Township 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Jordan 26 4 19 0 0 61 14 12 6 0 1 0 143 Louisville Township 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 New Market Township 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Prior Lake 29 82 28 37 103 202 172 263 25 33 12 15 1,001 Sand Creek Township 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Savage 4 20 54 0 8 44 0 38 46 59 20 67 360 Shakopee 370 267 362 268 344_ 202 109 216 262 34 21 36 2,491 Spring Lake Township 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 St. Lawrence Township 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Affordable Owner Totals 452 387 502 318 522 623 326 541 399 126 62 153 4,411 Unaffordable Owner -Occu I ied Units Community 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Total Belle Plaine 4 12 20 0 88 112 197 139 150 117 58 34 931 Belle Plaine Township 0 0 11 0 0 7 9 13 9 10 4 2 65 Blakeley Township 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 2 1 2 0 1 10 Cedar Lake Township 0 0 0 0 0 48 44 34 41 29 16 11 223 Credit River Township 0 0 0 0 0 0 53 76 73 70 63 29 364 Elko New Market 0 0 24 10 98 28 123 209 141 89 134 29 885 Helena Township 0 0 15 0 0 18 19 17 15 17 9 6 116 Jackson Township 0 0 0 0 0 4 6 3 0 1 5 3 22 Jordan 0 54 38 0 0 26 80 65 85 86 42 19 495 Louisville Township 0 0 24 0 0 5 15 8 5 6 8 6 77 New Market Township 0 0 51 0 0 47 34 23 23 24 18 4 224 Prior Lake 224 81 186 206 172 204 538 253 275 187 157 104 2,587 Sand Creek Township 0 0 0 0 0 23 11 5 11 7 2 1 60 Savage 0 0 447 0 0 285 176 195 277 192 129 62 1,763 Shakopee 50 74 229 669 387 490 484 690 476 534 293 161 4,537 Spring Lake Township 0 0 0 0 0 37 22 19 19 22 5 3 127 St. Lawrence Township 0 0 0 0 10 5 2 2 1 0 1 0 21 Unaffordable Owner Totals 278 221 1,045 885 755 1,342 1,814 1,753 1,602 1,393 944 475 12,507 Scott County Owner Totals 730 608 1,547 1,203 1,277 1,965 2,140 2,294 2,001 1,519 1,006 628 16,918 18 ME'HC- 'OLIIAN COMO _ . HE �EJ\RCH • ,)C ROaER1 STREET NORTH ;3 . PALL MN 5 101 1805 ■ ML HCCOUNC!L �R 3 t � - 1 1 4 a t ats �,, Affordable Housing Production in the Twin Cities January 2009 (Corrected May 2009) WASHINGTON COUNTY Affordable Owner - Occupied Units Community 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Total Afton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Bayport 0 0 1 0 1 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 6 Baytown Township 0 0 0 1 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 Birchwood Village 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Cottage Grove 112 99 91 0 31 119 155 37 33 40 0 0 717 Dellwood 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Denmark Township 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 Forest Lake 38 10 43 35 20 0 0 0 22 0 15 15 198 Grant 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Grey Cloud Island Township 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hugo 44 5 11 70 162 90 72 54 15 282 163 197 1,165 Lake Elmo 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 Lake St. Croix Beach 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lakeland 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 Lakeland Shores 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Landfall 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mahtomedi 0 0 40 0 0_ 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 70 Marine on St. Croix 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 May Township 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Newport 7 0 7 5 6 4 3 2 4 0 1 4 43 Oak Park Heights 0 7 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 16 Oakdale 154 72 34 18 31 36 51 10 23 11 14 7 461 Pine Springs 0 0 0 0 0 0_ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Scandia 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 St. Mary's Point 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 St. Paul Park 0 0 1 0 5 2 0 26 38 10 19 2 103 Stillwater 0 0 6 0 10 52 20 0 40 0 6 17 151 Stillwater Township 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 West Lakeland Township 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Willernie 0 0 0 2 1 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 7 Woodbury 378 331 566 259 36 0 8 44 57 33 34 70 1,816 Affordable Owner Totals 734 527 800 390 311 323 311 175 234 376 253 344 4,778 19 ME "RO= 'C)LITAN C')I NC.I_ • PESE_ARCH • �?' r 1 1 r, �� �.• .5 ::. RL: AFT . TREE' �1..i =i`F� ;3" PALL t,d .+1C; �t3r.1.. • 11'= ;'E'RCC;UINC;L �f=', Stars Affordable Housing Production in the Twin Cities January 2009 (Corrected May 2009) WASHINGTON COUNTY Unaffordable Owner -Occu • ied Units Community 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Total Afton 9 8 8 17 11 0 15 15 14 6 10 7 120 Bayport 0 1 0 0 8 1 5 3 7 7 9 18 59 Baytown Township 0 0 0 20 8 0 15 22 11 9 7 5 97 Birchwood Village 0 0 0 1 3 0 2 1 0 1 0 1 9 Cottage Grove 118 93 127 0 114 61 141 246 274 223 181 67 1,645 Dellwood 7 6 4 12 10 5 3 7 3 2 1 3 63 Denmark Township 0 0 8 5 0 0 17 33 33 16 16 6 134 Forest Lake 0 41_ 64 80 53 0 317 499 234 106 76 58 1,528 Grant 17 15 18 24 0 22 22 17 15 10 3 4 167 Grey Cloud Island Township 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 3 Hugo 20 13 26 215 174 237 91 173 190 515 175 56 1,885 Lake Elmo 0 61 0 0 98 141 98 46 13 21 28 24 530 Lake St. Croix Beach 0 0 2 2 1 0 8 5 2 1 2 2 25 Lakeland 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 5 Lakeland Shores 0 0 2 0 0 1_ 0 0 2 2 0 2 9 Landfall 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mahtomedi 93 0 74 0 31 21 22 34 19 31 28 40 393 Marine on St. Croix 0 20 3 0 0 7 1 5 4 4 4 2 50 May Township 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 21 17 17 12 9 85 Newport 0 0 2 7 2 3 2 27 0 1 1 1 46 Oak Park Heights 0 25 0 10 5 0 0 122 46 29 10 19 266 Oakdale 66 73 92 117 103 155 48 98 74 28 65 9 928 Pine Springs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 Scandia 0 0 28 0 21 30 33 37 31 33 16 7 236 St. Mary's Point 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 3 1 0 0 8 St. Paul Park 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 5 60 42 29 3 143 Stillwater 0_ 0 36 112 0 103 154 179 163 280 47 24 1,098 Stillwater Township 0 0 2 9 12 11 9 13 9 4 3 1 73 West Lakeland Township 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 15 11 19 7 7 85 Willernie 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 13 1 10 1 0 27 Woodbury 581 702 876 727 748 429 192 447 1230 948 590 321 7,791 Affordable Owner Totals 911 1,058 1,372 1,358 1,403 1,227 1,243 2,086 2,466 2,366 1,321 698 17,509 Washington County Owner 1,645 1,585 2,172 1,748 1,714 1,550 1,554 2,261 2,700 2,742 1,574 1,042 22,287 Totals 20 % "E R .- COUNU:1_ ■ RESEARCH 11 3)O -iG?..•;:f S I HEE1 NOR H ;if PAUL MN 55101 1805 'v`i}iJ' +s' i.'E- ROCC)'JNC F,; ■ I 1 ., 1 StatS January 2009 Affordable Housing Production in the Twin Cities ( Ja re ua May 2009) Affordable Owner -Occu s ied Units Count 1996 1997 1998 1999 99 2 2001 005 20 02 2 003 2 20 2 2007 Toll Anoka Count 898 600 777 Carver Count 88 230 270 174 47� 1009 895 863 837 4 143 98 181 2,944 649 335 269 8,552 Dakota Count 909 1026 754 536 Henne•in Count 861 642 338 607 128 991 334 216 394 242 675 87 150 94 2,809 176 Ramse Count 318 Count 452 38 7 7 502 Scott 38 502 390 311 323 311 175 234 376 253 344 4,778 Washin•ton Count 734 527 800 ___ Affordable Owner Totals 4,260 3,561 3,617 2,647 2,421 4,665 3,323 3,731 3,585 2,471 1,830 1= 3 ____ Unaffordable Owner -Occu •ied Units Count 1996 1997 1998 1 2 1 2001 2002 2003 2 076 2,227 2,4 2,044 2006 2007 48 Total 17 383 Anoka arve Count 511 477 1,07 Carver Count 378 477 661 40 2 465 65 1,79 2, 2,412 2,494 1, 759 1,224 720 21,424 Dakota Count 1,447 1,710 2,087 Henne•in Count 1,624 4 1,787 1,631 2'405 2,644 579 1 402 2,948 3,788 690 � 517 � 029 3'713 1,304 30;630 Sc Count 414 347 443 885 755 1,342 1,814 Scott tt Count 278 78 221 1, Washin•ton Count 911 1,058 1,372 1,358 358 1,403 1,227 1,243 2,086 2,466 2,366 1,321 698 17,509 Unaffordable Owner 5,563 6,103 7,956 9,356 9,748 8,431 12,092 13,815 16,001 13,666 9,861 4,920 117,512 Metro Area Owner 9,823 9,664 11,573 12,003 12,169 13,096 15,415 17,546 19,586 16,137 11,691 62,87 154,990 21 'r)Lii:AN ., ,1. }; " 1 FE EI • a4__HT STAGE NO H .a PAUL MN 18 5 r N . E ROW C � Gf- ,'E `=-iCJ � �Rv' -i , 9!� a _ � , 'f11 �� C� � "; '/ r N' �' '3 f ,. Stats Affordable Housing Production in the Twin Cities January 2009 (Corrected May 2009) ANOKA COUNTY Affordable Rental Units Community 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Total Andover 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Anoka 0 0 0 0 0 0_ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Bethel 0 0_ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Blaine 0 0 0 102 0 0 14 0 18 0 0 0 134 Burns Township 0_ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Centerville 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 29 Circle Pines 48 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 48 Columbia Heights 0 0 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 Columbus 0_ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Coon Rapids 28 61 31 0 0 0 38 8 0 0 0 3 169 East Bethel 0 0_ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Fridley 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 4 Ham Lake 35 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 35 Hilltop 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lexington 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0_ 0 0 0 0 0 Lino Lakes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 60 60 Linwood Township 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Oak Grove 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ramsey 0 0 0 18 0 0 31 0 0 0 0 0 49 Spring Lake Park 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 St. Francis 0 0 0 0 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 Affordable Rental Totals 111 77 71 120 21 0 83 8 31 4 0 63 589 Unaffordable Rental Units Community 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Total Andover 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Anoka 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 4 Bethel 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Blaine 0 0 0 50 0 0 4 0 69 0 0 0 123 Burns Township 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Centerville 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 0 0 0 18 Circle Pines 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 144 0 0 0 144 Columbia Heights 0 0 0 0_ 4 0 3 0 0 0 0 52 59 Columbus 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Coon Rapids 0 6 9 118 24 0 28 61 0 5 40 24 315 East Bethel 0_ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Fridley 0 0_ 0 128 0 0 0 0 4 12 0 0 144 Ham Lake 14 0 0 0 0 0 50 0 0 0 0 0 64 Hilltop 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lexington 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lino Lakes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Linwood Township 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Oak Grove 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 52 0 0 52 Ramsey 0 0 0 32 0 0 3 48 4 12 0 106 205 Spring Lake Park 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 St. Francis 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 Unaffordable Rental Totals 14 6 9 328 37 0 88 109 243 81 40 182 1137 Anoka County Rental Totals 125 83 80 448 58 0 171 117 274 85 40 245 1,726 22 w'E RC'CLIIAN r )uket_ • FE: EARC.1 ■ 3 ^ +i; -'tC 3i RT SFREEI NOR —i :if FAL L MN 55101 1805 11 , tVd',", ME`RCCOLJNUL �i■G . i da Stats Affordable Housing Production in the Twin Cities January 2009 (Corrected May 2009) CARVER COUNTY Affordable Rental Units Community 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Total Benton Township 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Camden Township 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Carver 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Chanhassen 39 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 0 0 48 0 123 Chaska 0 39 30 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 39 0 122 Cologne 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Dahlgren Township 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hamburg 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hancock Township 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hollywood Township 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Laketown Township 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mayer 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 New Germany 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Norwood Young America 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 0 0 45 San Francisco Township 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Victoria 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Waconia 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 Waconia Township 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Watertown 0 0 0 0 15 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 Watertown Township 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Young America Township 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Affordable Rental Totals 39 48 30 0 29 6 0 39 0 36 87 0 314 Unaffordable Rental Units Community 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Total Benton Township 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Camden Township 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Carver 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Chanhassen 26 0 0 0 162 100 0 125 0 0 0 1 414 Chaska 0 0 0 53 246 12 127 0 0 0 76 0 514 Cologne 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Dahlgren Township 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hamburg 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hancock Township 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hollywood Township 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Laketown Township 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mayer 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 New Germany 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Norwood Young America 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 San Francisco Township 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Victoria 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Waconia 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 65 75 0 0 0 140 Waconia Township _ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Watertown 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 Watertown Township 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Young America Township 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Unaffordable Rental Totals 26 0 0 53 417 112 127 190 75 0 76 1 1,077 Carver County Rental Totals 65 48 30 53 446 118 127 229 75 36 163 1 1,391 23 )Li iAi: ,I_1 .t: FE.'E, RCH >•;; i; ? l^i STHEE` NOR-"H S` PALL MN O' 1805 L •P ; • i a ; Stats Affordable Housing Production in the Twin Cities January 2009 (Corrected May 2009) DAKOTA COUNTY Affordable Rental Units Community 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Total Apple Valley 0 0 0 27 60 17 22 48 36 36 0 0 246 Burnsville 0 0 66 0 17 0 91 0 0 0 0 0 174 Castle Rock Township 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Coates 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Douglas Township 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Eagan 42 0 30 25 0 28 0 115 0 0 0 0 240 Empire Township 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Eureka Township 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Farmington 0 0 28 0 16 32 0 0 0 0 0 0 76 Greenvale Township 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hampton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 Hampton Township 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hastings 31 0 0 0 5 58 0 0 63 63 21 8 249 Inver Grove Heights 0 0 0 0 0 60 0 176 0 30 40 0 306 Lakeville 0 0 30 0 80 0 0 0 40 0 0 0 150 Lilydale 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Marshan Township 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mendota 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mendota Heights 55 0 0 0 24 0 0 60 0 0 0 0 139 Miesville 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 New Trier 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Nininger Township 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Randolph 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Randolph Township 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ravenna Township 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Rosemount 44 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32 76 Sciota Township 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 South St. Paul 40 0 0 60 0 0 20 40 0 0 56 0 216 Sunfish Lake 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Vermillion 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Vermillion Township 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Waterford Township 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 West St. Paul 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 59 0 0 0 0 65 Affordable Rental Totals 212 6 154 112 202 195 133 498 139 132 117 40 1,940 24 ME ROonL11AtJ C ;UN(L ■ RE AHC-1 r i s,s Y k1 SrREE" NOH I-! }' FAIL i,1N 55101 1805 r WWA VETHCCOUNC.L 0P3 1. i Stats January 2009 Affordable Housing Production in the Twin Cities ( Corrected May 2009) Unaffordable Rental Units DAKOTA COUNTY 1996 1997 1998 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Total 0 0 0 0 813 Cpmmunit 0 0 0 164 228 95 8 ® 0 0 0 0 767 Apple Valle 0 114 0 343 24 44 106 136 0 0 0 0 0 Castle Re 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Castle Rock Township 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p 0 Coates 0 0 0 0 0 538 0 84 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Dou•las Townshi• 240 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Em Eureka Township 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Eureka Township 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Greenvale 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Greenvale Townshi• 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hampton 0 0 0 0 0 0 58 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hampton Township 0 0 0 0 16 138 00 1 00 0 0 58 4 0 0 0 0 0 p® 0 0 0 0 76 76 Inver Grove Hei•h 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ma 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 rsha 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Marshan Townshi• 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mendota 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mendota Hei•hts ® 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 R nin • er Township 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Randolph 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Randolph Township 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 R Township 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Rosemount 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 SciotaTownshi• 14 0 p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 South St. Paul 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Vermillion 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Water 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Vermillion Townshi• 0 0 90 0 90 Waterford Township 0 0 0 0 0 = =__ West St. Paul g 634 226 0 0 197 3,027 Unaffordable Rental Totals 114 0 �__ to Count R Totals 154 619 472 667 461 3 Dako 25 • F1,3EEi+F? :--1 i ',` ?. 2i;`?LR1 SCREE' t`d"k.r PALL MN !*-510 1805 s 4 i'» `a'E RCGQ „NCIL' :PG .... Stats January 2009 Affordable Housing Production in the Twin Cities (Corrected May 2009) HENNEPIN COUNTY Affordable Rental Units Community 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Total Bloomington 0 0 1 0 41 44 37 0 0 0 50 0 173 0 0 Brooklyn Center 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 326 349 Brooklyn Park 0 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 42 Champlin 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Corcoran 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Crystal Dayton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Eden haven Eden Prairie 32 32 32 0 38 73 63 0 0 0 0 0 270 Edina 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Excelsior 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Fort Snelling 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Golden Valley 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 0 0 0 0 0 25 Greenfield 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Greenwood 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hassan Township 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hopkins 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Independence 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Loretto L Long Lake 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Maple Grove 66 0 0 19 48 50 0 35 0 0 35 10 263 Maple Plain 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Medicine Lake 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Medina 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Minneapolis 59 139 45 175 681 107 387 217 334 224 117 114 2,599 Minnetonka 70 88 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 171 Minnetonka Beach 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Minnetrista 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mound 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 0 20 11 0 0 35 0 0 0 100 Orono Hope 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 12 Oro Osseo 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 70 59 0 0 27 34 0 34 50 0 274 Richfield Plymouth 0 0 0 0 33 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 Ric - Robbinsdale 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Rogers 0 0 0 0 159 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 159 Shorewood 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spring Park 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 67 0 0 0 67 St. Anthony St. Bonifacius 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 St. Louis Park 0 0 0 19 0 0 45 0 0 0 0 0 64 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Way a Bay 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Woodland Way 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Affordable Rental Totals 251 300 182 272 1,020 285 596 286 436 258 252 463 4,601 26 ME RC;;DOlaiAN C.1 )N(:I_ 1 PL—SE -iC, -1 s 3: - s':C:. H I s rPLL NOR F1 w ,' PALL. MN 55101 1805 1 't' iVA' Mk'ACCOJNC:L CPr.3 I '-. Y I. ;, Affordable Housing Production in the Twin Cities January 2009 (Corrected May 2009) HENNEPIN COUNTY Unaffordable Rental Units Community 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Total Bloomington _ 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 10 Brooklyn Center 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Brooklyn Park 0 0 0 70 0 0 0 0 0 297 0 4 371 Champlin 24 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 54 Corcoran 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Crystal 0 0 0 78 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 79 Dayton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Deephaven 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Eden Prairie 0 0 0 0 148 337 588 188 0 0 0 0 1,261 Edina 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 100 Excelsior 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Fort Snelling 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Golden Valley 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 193 0 0 0 193 Greenfield 0 0 0 0 0_ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Greenwood 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 10 Hassan Township 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hopkins 0 64 0 0 37 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 101 Independence 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Long Lake 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 Loretto 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Maple Grove 70 0 0 0 520 0 0 115 0 0 0 0 705 Maple Plain 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Medicine Lake 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Medina 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Minneapolis 31 0 186 292 387 275 661 216 289 117 146 651 3,251 Minnetonka 152 121 126 0 0 60 172 0 61 0 0 39 731 Minnetonka Beach 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Minnetrista 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mound 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 New Hope 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Orono 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 0 0 0 0 0 50 Osseo 0 29 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 Plymouth 0 0 40 139 206 622 486 96 0 62 0 0 1,651 Richfield 0 0 0 138 206 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 344 Robbinsdale 0 0 0 57 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 57 Rogers 0 0 0 0 33 0 0 21 141 0 0 0 195 Shorewood 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spring Park 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 St. Anthony 0 0 0 0 0_ 0 0 0 194 0 0 0 194 St. Bonifacius 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 St. Louis Park 8 _ 0 0 162 247 45 396 0 0 0 0 220 1,078 Tonka Bay 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Wayzata 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Woodland 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Unaffordable Rental Totals 285 244 352 936 1,784 1,349 2,473 636 878 476 147 914 10,474 Hennepin County Rental Totals 536 544 534 1,208 2,804 1,634 3,069 922 1,314 734 399 1,377 15,075 27 . � C 'ii O.„ � JC L v r.'E � :- '.,�L.1;C _ .,1_)..la_ 1 F� ,�i.R�; -1 a .;r -+.1.,:i.:-HT -+.1.,:i.:-HT `wTR,kE N.'.� H .. PALL PALL �MN ;75 � 1805 ,'!'v:i� `' ::C `� ,R, { Stats Affordable Housing Production in the Twin Cities January 2009 (Corrected May 2009) RAMSEY COUNTY Affordable Rental Units Community 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Total Arden Hills 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Falcon Heights 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 50 0 0 0 53 Gem Lake 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lauderdale 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Little Canada 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Maplewood 31 0 0 0 0 13 0 58 0 0 0 0 102 Mounds View 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 New Brighton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 52 0 0 52 North Oaks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 North St. Paul 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Roseville 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 0 0 0 0 22 Shoreview 44 0 0 0 0 29 0 0 0 0 0 0 73 St. Paul 0 18 0 18 66 159 327 284 100 49 153 72 1,246 Vadnais Heights 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 47 47 White Bear Lake 22 0 1 0 0 0 3 0 14 0 0 0 40 White Bear Township 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Affordable Rental Totals 97 18 11 18 66 201 330 367 164 101 153 119 1,645 Unaffordable Rental Units Community 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Total Arden Hills 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Falcon Heights 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 53 69 0 0 0 122 Gem Lake 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lauderdale 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Little Canada 0 0 0 0 0 0 35 79 0 0 0 0 114 Maplewood 0 0 0 168 70 60 0 42 0 3 0 44 387 Mounds View 0 0 0 0 1 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 21 New Brighton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 125 0 0 0 0 125 North Oaks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 84 0 0 76 160 North St. Paul 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Roseville 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 50 0 0 0 0 53 Shoreview 64 0 0 0 0 39 0 0 0 0 0 0 103 St. Paul 0 11 0 18 119 264 646 295 194 95 28 106 1,776 Vadnais Heights 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 White Bear Lake 0 0 0 0 177 18 90 60 0 0 0 0 345 White Bear Township 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Unaffordable Rental Totals 64 11 0 189 367 381 791 704 347 98 28 226 3,206 Ramsey County Rental Totals 161 29 11 207 433 582 1,121 1,071 511 199 181 345 4,851 28 ME -- iOaOL_IIA J(..Cu F:F:r- Af-i(H . s r.;rR roc: F+ :3* PA U MN f' 180C> • i';; :E•ROCO.NJCL .1;14'3 StatS Affordable Housing Production in the Twin Cities January 2009 (Corrected May 2009) SCOTT COUNTY Affordable Rental Units Community 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Total Belle Plaine 0 8 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 Belle Plaine Township 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Blakeley Township 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cedar Lake Township 0 0 0 0 0 0_ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Credit River Township 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Elko New Market 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Helena Township 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Jackson Township 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Jordan 0 0 0 0 0 0_ 0 0 0 0 0 44 44 Louisville Township 0 0 0 0 0 0_ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 New Market Township 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Prior Lake 37 0_ 0 0 0 0 34 0 0 0 0 0 71 Sand Creek Township 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Savage 0 42 10 0 32 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 88 Shakopee 0 0 26 0 32 0 16 19 0 0 0 0 93 Spring Lake Township 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 St. Lawrence Township 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Affordable Rental Totals 37 50 40 0 64 0 50 19 0 4 0 44 308 _ Unaffordable Rental Units Community 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Total Belle Plaine 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 81 84 Belle Plaine Township 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Blakeley Township 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cedar Lake Township 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Credit River Township 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Elko New Market 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Helena Township 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Jackson Township 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Jordan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Louisville Township 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 New Market Township 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Prior Lake 15 0 0 0 0 49 69 0 0 0 208 0 341 Sand Creek Township 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Savage 0 1 0 0 96 0 0 14 0 0 0 62 173 Shakopee 0 52 26 60 0 52 0 162 40 101 0 0 493 Spring Lake Township 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 St. Lawrence Township 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Unaffordable Rental Totals 15 53 26 60 96 101 72 176 40 101 208 143 1,091 Scott County Rental Totals 52 103 66 60 160 101 122 195 40 105 208 187 1,399 29 t.'E -3 , -) 'It _H N C;.,1l sL STHEE' NQ H i PAL L `5101 1805 • 1 v ': , ' ME'ROCOvNC L 0P3 0 ,S tats Affordable Housing Production in the Twin Cities January 2009 (Corrected May 2009) WASHINGTON COUNTY Affordable Rental Units Community 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Total Afton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Bayport 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Baytown Township 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Birchwood Village 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cottage Grove 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Dellwood 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Denmark Township 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Forest Lake 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 38 0 38 Grant 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Grey Cloud Island Township 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hugo 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lake Elmo 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lake St. Croix Beach 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lakeland 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lakeland Shores 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Landfall 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mahtomedi 0 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 Marine on St. Croix 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 May Township 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Newport 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Oak Park Heights 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Oakdale 22 18 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 52 Pine Springs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Scandia 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 St. Mary's Point 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 St. Paul Park 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Stillwater 0 0 0 0 30 50 92 0 6 6 0 0 184 Stillwater Township 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 West Lakeland Township 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Willernie 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Woodbury 36 0 0 0 30 35 0 0 0 0 0 0 101 Affordable Rental Totals 58 18 30 0 60 97 92 0 6 6 38 0 405 30 rJ E O oL1 rAN COUNCi 1 PE: f- A1IC -1 11 ror , t F f S f PL-F 1 rg; E :, PALL MN 55101 180 ■ AVP.; ME' HCCOUNC L O 3 / _ t -'' Stats Affordable Housing Production in the Twin Cities January 2009 (Corrected May 2009) WASHINGTON COUNTY Unaffordable Rental Units Community 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Total Afton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Bayport 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Baytown Township 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Birchwood Village 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cottage Grove 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 187 187 Dellwood 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Denmark Township 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Forest Lake 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 6 0 0 14 Grant 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Grey Cloud Island Township 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hugo 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 0 0 0 24 Lake Elmo 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lake St. Croix Beach 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lakeland 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lakeland Shores 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Landfall 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mahtomedi 0 0 0 0 70 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 70 Marine on St. Croix 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 May Township 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Newport 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 4 Oak Park Heights 0 0 0 52 56 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 108 Oakdale 0 0 0 0 12 243 0 89 0 0 0 0 344 Pine Springs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Scandia 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 St. Mary's Point 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 St. Paul Park 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Stillwater 21 0 0 0 20 0 18 0 0 0 0 0 59 Stillwater Township 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 West Lakeland Township 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Willernie 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Woodbury 0 240 206 529 10 5 0 0 0 213 89 0 1,292 Affordable Rental Totals 21 240 206 581 168 248 18 89 36 219 89 187 2,102 Washington County Rental Totals 79 258 236 581 228 345 110 89 42 225 127 187 2,507 31 . RG - 'OL!1AN :,:',It ^,! L. ■ FE: EARC;H IREk (`NO" H FA 1805 ■ OCO N ...f .A Stats Affordable Housing Production in the Twin Cities January 2009 (Corrected May 2009) Affordable Rental Units County 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Total Anoka County 111 77 71 120 21 0 83 8 31 4 0 63 589 Carver County 39 48 30 0 29 6 0 39 0 36 87 0 314 Dakota County 212 6 154 112 202 195 133 498 139 132 117 40 1,940 Hennepin County 251 300 182 272 1,020 285 596 286 436 258 252 463 4,601 Ramsey County 97 18 11 18 66 201 330 367 164 101 153 119 1,645 Scott County 37 50 40 0 64 0 50 19 0 4 0 44 308 Washington County 58 18 30 0 60 97 92 0 6 6 38 0 405 Affordable Rental Totals 805 517 518 522 1462 784 1,284 1,217 776 541 647 729 9,802 Unaffordable Rental Units County 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Total Anoka County 14 6 9 328 37 0 88 109 243 81 40 182 1,137 Carver County 26 0 0 53 417 112 127 190 75 0 76 1 1,077 Dakota County 279 114 0 507 270 472 328 634 226 0 0 197 3,027 Hennepin County 285 244 352 936 1,784 1,349 2,473 636 878 476 147 914 10,474 Ramsey County 64 11 0 189 367 381 791 704 347 98 28 226 3,206 Scott County 15 53 26 60 96 101 72 176 40 101 208 143 1,091 Washington County 21 240 206 581 168 248 18 89 36 219 89 187 2,102 Unaffordable Rental Totals 704 668 593 2,654 3,139_2,663 3,897 2,538 1,845 975 588 1,850 22,114 Metro Area Rental Totals 1,509 1,185 1,111 3,176 4,601 3,447 5,181 3,755 2,621 1,516 1,235 2,579 31,916 32 ;: +E H0=OE3 [ AN r „r 1, . PF A HC H . ..-t. , ‘-- .)1 HFE . rJr a' H 1 , 1 PAL L_ MN 13 iO 1 1805 ■ ,W,.. ` E `HCCOL)NC L 2P 3 Metropolitan Council April 14, 2009 Metropolitan Council's Annual Population Estimates Methodology Metropolitan Council prepares local population estimates for the Twin Cities seven- county area. These estimates are the official population and household estimates for State government purposes. Metropolitan Council has the statutory responsibility to develop the estimates, distribute them for local government review, receive comments or challenges, revise estimates as warranted, and certify final estimates (Minnesota Statutes 473.24). Since the 1970s, Metropolitan Council has used a housing- stock -based estimation model. In 2005 -06, Metropolitan Council Research conducted a review and redesign of the Council's methodology and process. Minnesota Population Center demographers at University of Minnesota advised and collaborated. The model resulting from the 2005 -06 redesign remains a housing- stock -based model and allows multi -year review of housing gains and losses. In reduced form, the Council's model determines housing units, households and population as follows: Housing Units 2008 = Housing Units 2000 + E(Housing Changes 200o to 2007) Households 2008 = Housing Units Zoos X Occupancy Rates Total Population 2008 = (Households 2008 X Persons Per Household) + Group Quarters Pop2oos Methodology improvements. Over the past four years, Council staff have worked to continue the improvement of the Annual Estimates methodology. • With the 2006 -07 estimates cycle', the Council began using new USPS address vacancy data and Census American Community Survey (ACS) data to adjust housing occupancy rates and household size multipliers. These improvements allow a more realistic, real -time representation of population growth since 2000. • In 2007 -08, the Council revised the algorithm for household size multipliers to reflect the observed phenomenon of newly -built houses attracting housing consumers (households) with a larger average household size. • With the 2008 -09 estimates cycle, the Council revised assumptions of completion rates (from building permit to completion) for multi - family housing (apartments and condominiums). • Also new in 2008 -09, the Council has revised the algorithm for estimating tenure (renting vs. owning) of newly -built attached housing and multi - family housing. The new programming uses data that local governments report to the Council in the Affordable Housing Production survey (formerly known as the Livable Communities Act survey). The net effect will be a more accurate estimation of owner - occupied and rental housing stock subtotals. At the same time, the Council 1 Previous -year estimates are prepared the following year and certified by July 15. For example, population as of April 1, 2008, is estimated in Spring 2009 and certified by July 15, 2009. This timeline is specified in Minnesota Statutes 473.24. Metropolitan Council Annual Population Estimates Methodology p. is reducing its use of homestead counts in estimation; homestead counts will be used only as a quality check on modeled ownership subtotals. Estimation of housing stock. For the April 1, 2008, estimates, the Council works to estimate housing unit counts, segmented by housing type: • Single - family detached houses • Townhomes and other single - family attached • Units in duplexes and 3- and 4 -unit buildings • Units in multi- family buildings (5 or more units, condos or apartments) • Manufactured homes Revised 100% count statistics provide the year 2000 base for the four categories of built housing stock. The Council's model adds on housing stock changes since 2000. These include: • Housing units permitted — see below • Other gross additions to housing stock — see page 3 • Gross losses to housing stock (a debit) — see page 3 Apart from built housing stock, many cities and towns have manufactured homes. Manufactured homes are fully recounted each year. (See page 4.) Housing units permitted. Council Research collects data on housing units permitted through an annual survey of cities and towns. Where cities or towns do not participate, Council Research may substitute data from the US Commerce Department's Building Permits Survey. The substitute data are comparable but not always complete. The Council's model assumes that not all housing units permitted will be built in the year permitted. In crediting the most recent year of permitting, the Council assumes: • 85% completion for multi- family developments (5 or more units) • 90% for townhomes, duplexes, 3- and 4 -unit buildings • 95% for single family detached These multipliers are suggested by cycle -time (permit to start to completion) distributions from the US Commerce Department's Survey of Construction (SOC). Single- family detached are the most likely to be completed in the same year permitted; multi - family construction has the longest cycle- times. 2 Census 2000, SF3, table H3 and table of "Corrected Counts" provide the total numbers of units in each minor civil division. Table H30 provides the housing type distribution within those totals. 3 The Council assumes that housing units permitted in 2000 would not be completed and readied for occupancy until 1 Quarter 2001; and that housing units permitted in 2007 would not be completed and readied for occupancy until 1s Quarter 2008. 4 The Council has found, in a number of instances, that cities and towns under -report to US Commerce Department. The data are online at http: / /socds.huduser.org /permits/ Metropolitan Council Annual Population Estimates Methodology P. 3 Most of the units "held back" will be completed and readied for occupancy after April 1 of the year following permitting, and will be counted in subsequent years' estimates. Over the long -term, Council Research assumes 100% eventual completion for most types of built housing; and 92.5% eventual completion for multi- family buildings (5 or more units). During years 1999 -2004, across a national sample of cities, the Census Bureau's Survey of Construction (SOC) documented an 85% permit -to- start -to- completion rate in multi- family, mostly due to design changes, misclassification, and units not started, as well as starts abandoned. Metropolitan Council staff determined, based on Twin Cities market experience, that eventual Twin Cities completion rates are better than the national average. The Council's model assumes 92.5% eventual completion for multi- family buildings (5 or more units). Gross additions and gross losses. Gross additions include moved -in housing units and conversions reported to the Council's annual survey, as well as units annexed in and reported to Minnesota State Demographer's survey. Gross losses include moved -out units and demolitions reported to the Council's annual survey, as well as units annexed out and reported to Minnesota State Demographer's survey. Other adjustments. Beyond this, Council Research is able to make other needed, but date - uncertain adjustments to housing stock. There are three situations where Council Research has done this: • Evidence of housing units missed by Census 2000 or missed by local building permits record - keeping may warrant an upward adjustment to housing unit counts. Such evidence might include a municipal housing stock enumeration or administrative records analysis. • Comparison of estimated total housing vs. homestead counts (owned and occupied) may also necessitate an upward adjustment. • Evidence of unreported demolitions may warrant a downward adjustment. Housing stock calculation. As an example, for Single- Family Detached (SFD) housing stock, the calculation can be specified: SFD 2008 = SFD 2000 + (SFD Permit 2000 thru 2006) + (SFD Permit 2007 X 95% Completion) + (SFD Additions 2000 thru 2007) + (SFD Loss 2000 thru 2007) + SFD Other Adjustments Where: • SFD 2000 = 2000 housing units • SFD Permit = Number of units permitted since 2000 • SFD Additions = Other gross additions since 2000 • SFD Loss = Gross losses since 2000 • Completion rate assumes that not all permitted units from previous year will be completed by April 1 of estimates year. 'US Census Bureau, "Relationship Between Building Permits, Housing Starts, and Housing Completions," online at www.census.goviconst/www/nrcdatarelationships.html 6 The State Demographer's survey is authorized by Minnesota Statutes 4A.02, paragraph (b)(10). Homestead counts come from Minnesota Department of Revenue's Abstract of Assessments database. Metropolitan Council Annual Population Estimates Methodology p. 4 The calculation of Townhomes, Duplex /Triplex /Quads, and Multi- family housing stock use the same formula specification —but with housing type- specific completion rate assumptions, discussed above. Ownership and rental housing segmentation and re balancing. Council Research accounts housing stock estimates, segmented by housing type, as described above. These estimates of housing stock are multiplied by estimated ownership rates. For older housing (pre - 2000), ownership shares are determined from Census 2000 statistics. For new (2000 and after) attached and multi - family housing, the model uses the Council's Affordable Housing Production Survey data to determine owner and renter shares. (The model assumes all new Single Family Detached houses will be ownership housing.) The resulting products, by housing type, are summed to determine an ownership housing subtotal, and a rental housing subtotal. Following this, the estimated housing segmentation is re- balanced: The "first cut" ownership subtotal is quality checked against Minnesota Department of Revenue's homestead units counts. Homestead units are, by definition, owner - occupied housing, and so are used in the model as a minimum expectation for the modeled ownership subtotal. If necessary, some rental units can be "re- cast" from estimated rental housing into ownership housing. Housing units outside of built housing stock. In addition to the built housing stock, Council Research also estimates manufactured home units. Manufactured homes in manufactured home parks are enumerated through a survey of park operators /managers. Manufactured homes outside of parks are counted through Council Research's annual survey of cities and towns. Council Research does not attempt to estimate the number of boats or RVs serving as "housing units." The number of boats and RVs serving as "housing units" is impossible to estimate without direct enumeration. The Council takes the Census 2000 estimate of such units and retains those numbers as a placeholder. Estimation of households. Following the completion of housing stock estimation, the Council model applies occupancy rates to minor - civil - division -level housing units, segmented by housing type. The number of households is equivalent (in definition) to non - institutional occupied housing units. It is calculated as the sum of: • Single family detached units multiplied by occupancy rate • Townhome units multiplied by occupancy rate • Duplex, triplex, quads units multiplied by occupancy rate • Owned multi - family (condo) units multiplied by occupancy rate • Rental multi - family (apartment) units multiplied by occupancy rate • Manufactured homes multiplied by occupancy rate • Boats and RVs serving as "housing units" according to Census 2000 multiplied by 100 %. 8 Each minor civil division's number of owner - occupied units (found in Census 2000, SF3, table H32) is divided by total occupied units (determined from SF3, tables H32 and H33). Metropolitan Council Annual Population Estimates Methodology P. 5 Occupancy rates. The Council's model is programmed to calculate and apply six occupancy rates: • Single family detached occupancy • Townhomes occupancy • Duplexes, triplexes, and quads occupancy • Owned multi - family units (condos) occupancy • Rented multi - family units (apartments) occupancy • Manufactured homes occupancy The first four occupancy rates listed are composite' measures, designed to represent the variation of occupancy rates by housing type and by local area: • USPS address occupancy rates for a local area (but without housing type segmentation) are given 50% weight. • Adjusted Census occupancy rates for specific housing types are also given 50% weight. The adjusted Census occupancy rate takes Census 2000 occupancy rates (locally - specific and housing type- specific) and deflates (or inflates) for regional average change since 2000. The adjustment comes from a region -level comparison of Census 2000 occupancy rates vs. more recent Census data on occupancy rates. As an example, Single- Family Detached (SFD) occupancy rates are specified: SFD Occ Rate Local, 2008 50% X (Addresses occupied Local, 2008 / All addresses Local, 2000 + 50% X (SFD Occ Rate Local, 2000 X SFD Occ Rate Region, 2007 / SFD Occ Rate Region, 2000) At region - level, Council Research's analysis of Census data finds that occupancy rates have declined across housing types. The declining occupancy rates are not a surprise: The market has re- balanced after extremely low vacancy rates in year 2000. The formula applied in the Council's estimation model accomplishes an across - the -board deflation of occupancy rates." For rented multi- family units (apartments), occupancy rates from GVA Marquette's March survey of apartment properties are substituted into the Council's estimation model, where available. The GVA Marquette survey covers 73 communities with substantial numbers of rental apartments (over 250 apartment units). For other communities, with less consequential numbers of rental apartments, the Council's model again applies the composite rate discussed above: USPS address occupancy rates and adjusted Census occupancy rates. 9 USPS address occupancy rates are calculated from USPS route administrative data, summarized by Census tract, available online at www.huduser.org /datasets /usps.html 10 Each minor civil division's number of vacant units (found in Census 2000, SF3, table H31) is divided by total units (found in SF3, table H30). 11 Council staff have considered local -level American Community Survey data in place of Census 2000 data. Starting with the 2011 -12 annual estimates cycle, the Council will replace Census 2000 local vacancy rates data with ACS 5 -Year Average vacancy rates data. More information on the American Community Survey can be found online at www.metrocouncil.org/Census/acs.htm Metropolitan Council Annual Population Estimates Methodology p. 6 Finally, for manufactured homes, local occupancy is taken directly from Metropolitan Council's annual survey of manufactured home parks. The survey counts total manufactured homes and occupied manufactured homes. Population in group quarters. Metropolitan Council Research enumerates known group quarters in order to account persons living in institutional or non - household settings. The list is refreshed annually to include licensed group homes known to the Minnesota Department of Human Services (DHS). Small group homes (less than 10 beds) are assumed to be occupied at the capacity identified by DHS. Other types of group quarters, as well as medium and larger group homes (at least 10 beds) are surveyed annually. Since the Council's survey is conducted annually, the resulting counts fully replace the counts from previous years or from Census 2000. Estimation of population in households. The final step in the Council's model is calculation of population in households. To accomplish the calculation, households estimates are segmented by housing type and tenure; and household size multipliers are applied. Council Research favors this approach because changes in housing units by type can be reliably estimated, as described in previous sections of this paper. Household size change. Average household sizes in a community adjust over time. This necessitates modification of the household size multipliers from Census 2000. Council Research has studied the shifts using public use microdata (PUMS) from 2005 -07 American Community Surveys and from Census 2000. At the region - level, average households sizes generally declined for Owner - Occupied Single Family Detached housing. There is an exception to the decline trend: Owner- occupied households in newly built (since 2000) Single Family Detached units have larger numbers of people in the household. The household size multipliers used in the Council's annual estimation model start with Census 2000 person per household multipliers, for each community, segmented by housing type and tenure, but then adds (or subtracts) a change adjustment. At region- level, cross - section analysis of Census data finds: • Average household size for Rented Single Family Detached housing increased to 3.18 persons per household (PPH); +0.10 persons per household is added to local Census 2000 PPH multipliers for this housing type. • Average household size for Rented Duplex /Triplex/Quad units is 2.41 PPH; for Rented Townhomes, 2.82 PPH; and for Rented Multi - family (apartments), 1.72 PPH; these multipliers are unchanged from Census 2000. 12 If a survey for a facility is not returned and field follow -up does not result in participation, Council Research carries over the group quarters population from the previous annual survey. Metropolitan Council Annual Population Estimates Methodology P. 7 • Average household size for Owner - Occupied Townhomes is 1.89 PPH; this multiplier is unchanged from Census 2000. • Average household size for Owner - Occupied Duplex /Triplex /Quad units declined to 1.99 PPH; accordingly -0.10 persons per household is debited from local Census 2000 PPH multipliers for this housing type. • Average household size for Owner - Occupied Single Family Detached housing declined to 2.83 PPH; -0.08 persons per household is debited from local PPH multipliers for this housing type. • Average household size for Owner - Occupied Single Family Detached housing built since 2000 is higher: 3.43 PPH. To represent this, local PPH multipliers are increased by a variable amount where recent housing production substantially outpaces the historical production. • Average household size for Owner - Occupied Multi- family (condominiums) is 1.40 PPH; this multiplier is unchanged from Census 2000. • Average household size for Owner - Occupied Multi - family (condominiums) built since 2000 is higher: 1.60 PPH. To represent this, local PPH multipliers are increased by a variable amount where recent housing production substantially outpaces the historical production. At the region - level, average household sizes related to housing age were evaluated for all housing and tenure combinations. The cross - section analysis found average household sizes of: 3.43 in newly built Owner - Occupied Single Family Detached housing; 2.83 overall in Owner - Occupied Single Family Detached housing. Recognizing this significant, stock - related difference, the community -level adjustment of average household size for this housing type will be variable with the "newness" of Single Family Detached housing stock. The average household size may be credited upward, by a variable amount, if recent production of Single Family Detached Housing in a community outpaces the historical production. A difference was also found in Owner - Occupied Multi- family housing (condominiums): Average household size was 1.60 in newly built units; 1.40 overall in Owner - Occupied Multi - family. So, PPH multipliers for this housing type may be increased by a variable amount where recent housing production outpaces the historical production. For other housing segments, cross - section differences related to age of housing were either not statistically significant or not estimable due to sample sizes. It may be viable in the future to use local -level American Community Survey data in place of the household size calculations described above. This is an anticipated enhancement for the 2009 -10 annual estimates cycle. " The shift for Single Family Detached housing is calculated through comparison: Years 1992 -99 production of housing is subtracted from 2000 -07 production in a given community. The difference, representing a shift in "newness" of housing stock, is then divided (normalized) by the total Single Family Detached housing stock. The resulting variable ranges from 0 to 67% (an instance where 69% of homes were built in the current decade, 2% in the previous decade). This resulting variable was multiplied by +0.60 persons per household, representing an improvement in average household size due to the amount of new Owner- Occupied Single Family Detached housing. 14 Years 1992 -99 production of Multi- family housing is subtracted from 2000 -07 production in a given community. The difference, representing a shift in "newness" of housing stock, is then divided (normalized) by the total Multi- family housing stock in the community. The resulting variable, ranging from 0 to 100 %, was multiplied by +0.20 persons per household, representing an improvement in average household size due to the amount of new Owner - Occupied Multi- family housing. Metropolitan Council Annual Population Estimates Methodology p. 8 Population in households calculated. Estimates of households, segmented by housing type and by tenure (owner or renter), are multiplied by type- and - tenure - specific persons per household (PPH) multipliers. The product is the population in households: Population in Households = Ehousin types, tenure (Households h.t., tenure X PPH h t, tenure) Total population. Total population requires one additional term -- group quarters population enumerated annually by the Metropolitan Council: Total Population = housin types, tenure (Households h.t., tenure X PPH h.t., tenure) + Group Quarters Pop Maintenance of the model. The Council's model is maintained as a Microsoft Access database. When input tables are loaded, subsequent calculations and compilations are performed as a series of Microsoft Access queries. Input tables include minor - civil- division -level data on: • Permitted housing units, segmented by housing type • Other gross changes, segmented by housing type • Homestead counts • Ownership and rental units counts for new housing built since 2000 • Rental apartment vacancy rates • Manufactured home counts • Census 2000 revised 100% count statistics on housing, segmented by housing type • Census 2000 housing units, segmented by housing type and tenure • Census 2000 persons - per - household multipliers • United States Postal Service (USPS) data on address occupancies and vacancies The US Census Bureau's long range plan is to provide continuous collection and release of local demographic and housing data through the American Community Survey. The first data for the Twin Cities region, based on 2.5% annual sampling of all households and a 68% response rate, were released in 2006, 2007 and 2008. The Council's model is designed to allow annual adjustment of local assumptions — specifically occupancy rates, and persons - per - household multipliers — with regional analysis of American Community Survey data used to calculate adjustment factors. Starting with the 2011 -12 annual estimates cycle, the Council will replace Census 2000 local data with ACS 5 -Year Average data and decennial Census 2010 counts. s More information on the American Community Survey can be found online at www.metrocouncil.org /Census /acs.htm IV Metropolitan Council AA July 14, 2009 David Beaudet, Mayor City Of Oak Park Heights PO Box 2007 Oak Park Heights, MW 55082 -6409 Dear Mayor Beaudet: During the local government review of population estimates, several cities, townships, and counties submitted requests or comments on the estimates — or provided data or evidence that inform the Council's estimation process. Considering these comments and additional research, the Council has finalized and certified for your community: • The City of Oak Park Heights is estimated to have 4,708 people and 2,056 households as of April 1, 2008. Household size averaged 2.03 persons per household. The Council has delivered its 2008 population estimates for the metropolitan area to the State Demographer and the Commissioner of Revenue as authorized by Minnesota Statutes 473.24. We greatly appreciate the cooperation and consultation that local governments provide to our population estimation process. If you would like additional details, please contact me at todd.graham @metc.state.mn.us or 651/602 -1322. Sincerely, Todd Graham Principal Forecaster www. metro co u ncil. org 390 Robert Street North • St. Paul, MN 55101 -1805 • (651) 602 -1000 • Fax (651) 602 -1550 • TTY (651) 291 -0904 An Equai Opportunity Employer , rg ,,be , City of Oak Park Heights 14168 Oak Park Blvd. N • Box 2007 • Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 • Phone (651) 439 -4439 • Fax (651) 439 -0574 July 6, 2009 MEMO To: Libby Starling, Metropolitan Council From: Austin Bleess, City Intern Re: Population Study In its annual population estimate the Metropolitan Council (Council) found the City of Oak Park Heights to have a population of 4,708 people, with 2,124 housing units. The City agrees with the overall number of housing units. However, the City contests the number provided by the Council of housing units that are owner- occupied and the Council's 2008 population estimate. The Council's calculations are low for the sole reason the formula used to calculate the homeownership rates were changed since the previous estimate. Based upon the data from the MN Department of Revenue, as provided to the City by Mr. Todd Graham of the Met Council, for the year 2008 the population for the City of Oak Park Heights is 4,803. Under the new homeownership rates for 2008 the total number of owner occupied housing units is 1,310 (Exhibit A). However, in an email from Todd Graham to City Administrator Eric Johnson, dated June 11, 2009 (Exhibit B), Mr. Graham cites data from the MN Dept. of Revenue that shows 1,062 owner occupied housing units in the City in the year 2008. The City finds the 1,062 owner occupied housing units to be accurate, and not the Councils estimate of 1,310. The number of owner occupied housing units directly effects the population of the city. The Council believes that 0.383 fewer people live in an owner - occupied housing unit than a rented housing unit (Exhibit C). By using the 1,310 estimate of owner - occupied housing (Exhibit A) and the lower multiplier rate associated with owner- occupied housing the Council is inaccurately decreasing the population of the city. By using the 1,062 estimate of owner occupied units, as the MN Department of Revenue says, which increases the renter occupied housing by 248 units, the city population would be 95 people higher in household population. That would bring the total city population to 4,803. C X h b 5e b''<'"`"l 2008 Population Estimates: Oak Park Heights city, Washington County, Estimates of housing stock are segmented into ownership housing and rental housing. Each housing type will have a specifically estimated occupancy rate. Each combination of housing type and tenure (ownership housing or rental) will have a specifically estimated average household size. Homeownership rates Housing stock by type of housing Occupancy rates estimated for April 1 (estimated) Owned Rented Single-family detached 775 95.6% 98.0% Duplex / threeplex /fourplex 147 38.8% 95.1% Townhouses 248 88.7% 95.7% Multifamily 954 30.6% 96.3% 96.3% Estimated built housing units 2,124 Owned: 1,310 Occupancy rates Mobile homes 0 95.0% Boats, etc., serving as housing 0 100.0% T Council's model multiplies housing units by occupancy rates, segmented housing type, to determine occupie housing. The n of occupied ho un its is equ to h A by household is a group of people (or a p l iving alone) occupying a housing unit (* Institutional or group qu hou is accounted separately thr an ann ual s by M etropol i tan Co H ouseho l ds 2, 056 Population in households is calculated mutliplying households by average household sizes (persons per household), segmented by housing type and tenure. The final step in poulation estimation is to add population in households + populati in group quarters, counted by the Council's annual survey. Persons p Ho ehold Multipliers Owner- ccu ied Renter - occupied Single family detached f 2.740 { 3.009 Duplex /threeplex /fourplex i 1.422 i 1.920 Population in households 4,180 Townhouses 1.900 j 2.520 Multifamily 1.400 . � 1.546 Population in group quarters 528 Mobile homes 2.420 Total population 4,708 Boats, etc., serving as housing 2.000 Tuesday, June 30, 2009 Page 2 of 2 CAV\19 q5 c )ss Eric Johnson From: Graham, Todd [todd.graham @metc.state.mn.us] Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 11:23 AM To: Eric Johnson Cc: Starling, Libby Subject: RE: Oak Park Heights population Mr Johnson — You asked about Metropolitan Council's estimation methodology, and specifically household size estimation. Metropolitan Council's model estimates eight separate average household sizes for eight combinations of housing type and tenure (own or rent). For more on this, see Metropolitan Council's detailed methodology, available at w ww.metrocouncil .org /metroarea /AboutEstimates.htm -- You can find Oak Park Heights' array of estimated multipliers in the report you received from Libby Starling. The specific multipliers have not changed greatly for Oak Park Heights. The PPH for single family detached ownership housing is reduced; this is an adjustment that was applied for all communities in the region. The major, market - wide trend has been a continuing decline in household sizes associated with single family detached ownership housing. The major methodology change affecting Oak Park Heights' estimates, in this cycle of estimation, concerns the segmentation of ownership housing vs rental housing: • Starting with this cycle of estimation, we are no longer using "homesteads counts" as a hard constraint on the estimation of ownership housing. The Abstract of Assessment (source: Minnesota Department of Revenue) lists Oak Park Heights having 1,062 homesteads in year 2008 – and the homesteads count declines every year. Metropolitan Council staff have concluded that homesteads counts are no longer a reliable benchmark. We announced this change on pages 1 -2 of the detailed methodology, avail- ble at ww w.metrocouncil. org /metroarea /AboutEstimates.htm , ..d • • Instead, Council's method for segmenting ownership housing vs rental housing now r; '-s on Me = .olitan Council's Affordable Housing Production survey. The net effec • •e a more - - -.• : ion of ownership and rental housing subtotals. During 2000 -200 , 8% •f new •u • g rep). oak Perk Heights has been ownership housing; 22 %, rental housi g. nnual counts e re u. ed • r- City, and annual details are published at www.metrocouncil.or. /•1 g nin Housin•' • !19..df • Using this new method, Metropolitan Council estimates 1,311 • • - . -s occupied and vacant) and 814 rental units (includes occupied and vacant) in Oak Park Heights. We find this is a more accurate estimation of ownership and rental housing subtotals. The recalculated estimates of ownership housing vs rental housing does affect the population estimates. 6/11/2009 • ragc.c.ul� Ownership housing and rental housing have different average household sizes. In Oak Park Heights, households in ownership housing are marginally smaller than renting households. Again, you can find Oak Park Heights' array of estimated multipliers in the report you received from Libby Starling. Metropolitan Council's objective is to certify a realistic representation of population and households. Please send any additional written comments or questions by June 24 to Todd Graham, Metropolitan Council Research, 390 Robert Street North, Saint Paul, MN 55101; or by e-mail to todd.graham @metc.state.mn.us Regards. — Todd Graham Metropolitan Council Research 651/602 -1322 From: Eric Johnson [ mailto: eajohnson @cityofoakparkheights.coma Sent: Monday, June 08, 2009 1:55 PM TO: Starling, Libby Subject: Oak Park Heights population 6-8-09 Ms. Starling: I have received you rmost recent population counts for the City of Oak Park Heights My question at this time is how the average household population fell from 2.06 to 2.03. Please provide the detailed methodology on how this was determined. Thank You Eric Johnson City Administrator 6/11/2009 Exhibit C Multipliers Owner- Renter - Occupied* Occupied* SF Homes 2.740 3.009 Duplex, etc 1.422 1.920 Townhouses 1.900 2.520 Multifamily 1.400 1.546 Avg Multiplier 1.866 2.249 Difference 0.383 *Data taken from Exhibit$llr, A 2008 Population Estimates: Oak Park Heights city, Washington County, • Households 2,056 Population in households 4,180 Persons per household 2.033 Population in group quarters 528 Total population 4,708 The Council's model accounts for built housing stock changes since 2000. These include housing units permitted, gross additions and gross losses. Relying on research by the US Census Bureau, the Council's model assumes that not all housing units permitted will be built in the year permitted. Permtted Years Permitted Year Estimated units built New housing units permitted 2000 -2006 2007 2000 -2007 Single-family detached 2 + 1 X 95% = 3 Duplex /threeplex /fourplex 9 + 0 X 90% = 9 Townhouses /single family attached 98 + 18 X 90% = 114 Multifamily 429 X 100.0% 0 X 85% = 429 Estimated new housing units permitted and built: 555 • Other gross changes to housing stock Years 2000 - Total additions and 2006 Year 2007 losses 2000 -2007 Gross additions include building conversions (units added), relocated structures, units annexed in: Single-family detached additions 0 0 0 Duplex /threeplex /fourplex additions 0 0 0 Townhouse additions 0 0 0 Multifamily additions 0 0 0 Gross losses include demolitions, building conversions (units lost), relocated structures, units annexed out: Single-family detached losses -11 -1 -12 Duplex /threeplex /fourplex losses 0 0 0 Townhouse losses 0 0 0 Multifamily losses 0 0 0 Other gross changes to built housing stock: -12 Total changes to built housing stock: 543 Tuesday, June 30, 2009 Page 1 of 2 • 104-Kc A „, 7 • 2008 Population Estimates: Oak Park Heights city, Washington County, Estimates of housing stock are segmented into ownership housing and rental housing. Each housing type will have a specifically estimated occupancy rate. Each combination of housing type and tenure (ownership housing or rental) will have a specifically estimated average household size. Homeownership rates Housing stock by type of housing Occupancy rates estimated for April I (estimated) Owned Rented Single-family detached 775 95.6% 98.0% Duplex /threeplex /fourplex 147 38.8% 95.1% Townhouses 248 88.7% 95.7% Multifamily 954 30.6% 96.3% 96.3% Estimated built housing units 2,124 Owned: 1,310 Occupancy rates Mobile homes 0 95.0% Boats, etc., serving as housing 0 100.0% • The Council's model multiplies housing units by occupancy rates, segmented by housing type, to determine occupied housing. The number of occupied housing units is equivalent to households: A household is a group of people (or a person living alone) occupying a housing unit. (* Institutional or group quarters housing is accounted separately through an annual survey by Metropolitan Council.) Households 2,056 Population in households is calculated mutliplying households by average household sizes (persons per household), segmented by housing type and tenure. The final step in poulation estimation is to add population in households + population in group quarters, counted by the Council's annual survey. Persons pacHoitsehold Multipliers Owner - occupied `; Renter - occupied Single-family detached 2.740 3.009 Duplex /threeplex /fourplex 1.422 1.920 Population in households 4,180 Townhouses 1.900 2.520 Multifamily 1.400 1.546 Population in group quarters 528 Mobile homes 2.420 Total population 4,708 Boats, etc., serving as housing 2.000 • Tuesday, June 30, 2009 Page 2 of 2 • 2007 Population Estimates: Oak Park Heights city, Washington County, Households 2,038 Population in households 4,205 Persons per household 2.060 Population in group quarters 546 Total population 4,751 The Council's model accounts for built housing stock changes since 2000. These include housing units permitted, gross additions and gross losses. Relying on research by the US Census Bureau, the Council's model assumes that not all housing units permitted will be built in the year permitted. Permtted Years Permitted Year Estimated units built New housing units permitted 2000 -2005 2006 2000 -2006 Single-family detached 1 + 1 X 95% = 2 Duplex /threeplex /fourplex 9 + 0 X 90% = 9 Townhouses /single family attached 88 + 10 X 90% = 97 Multifamily 429 X 100% 0 X 80% = 429 Estimated new housing units permitted and built: 537 • Other gross changes to housing stock Years 2000- Total additions and 2005 Year 2006 losses 2000 -2006 Gross additions include building conversions (units added), relocated structures, units annexed in: Single-family detached additions 0 0 0 Duplex / threeplex / fourplex additions 0 0 0 Townhouse additions 0 0 0 Multifamily additions 0 0 0 Gross losses include demolitions, building conversions (units lost), relocated structures, units annexed out: Single-family detached losses -10 -1 -11 Duplex / threeplex /fourplex losses 0 0 0 Townhouse losses 0 0 0 Multifamily losses 0 0 0 Total other gross changes to housing stock: -11 Total changes to housing stock, 2000 -2006: 526 Tuesday, June 30, 2009 Page 1 of 2 • 2007 Population Estimates: Oak Park Heights city, Washington County, Estimates of housing stock are segmented into ownership housing and rental housing. The ownership housing subtotal is controlled to a target ownership range of 100 to 107 percent of the homestead units count from the Abstract of Assessment. Each housing type will have a specifically estimated occupancy rate. Each combination of housing type and tenure (ownership housing or rental) will have a specifically estimated average household size. Homeownership rates Housing stock by type of housing Occupancy rates estimated for April 1 (estimated) Owned Rented Single-family detached 779 87.7% 98.0% Duplex / threeplex / fourplex 146 31.5% 94.1% Townhouses 230 73.0% 97.5% Multifamily 952 25.6% 96.3% 96.3% Estimated built housing units 2,107 Owned: Occupancy rates Mobile homes 0 95.0% Boats, etc., serving as housing 0 100.0% Following housing stock estimation, the Council model multiplies housing units by occupancy rates, segmented by housing type, to determine occupied housing. The number of occupied housing units is equivalent to households: A household is a group of people (or a person living alone) occupying a non - institutional housing unit. (* Institutional or group quarters housing is accounted separately through an annual survey by Metropolitan Council.) Households 2,038 Population in households is estimated mutliplying occupied housing units (equivalent to households) by average household sizes (persons per household), segmented by housing type and tenure. The final step in poulation estimation is to add population in households + population in group quarters, counted by the Council's annual survey. Persons per Household Multipliers Owner- occupied Renter - occupied Single-family detached 2.745 3.009 Duplex / threeplex /fourplex 1.422 1.924 Population in households 4,205 Townhouses 1.901 2.520 Multifamily 1.414 1.546 Population in group quarters 546 Mobile homes 2.420 Total population 4,751 Boats, etc., serving as housing 2.000 • Tuesday, June 30, 2009 Page2of2 Page 1 of 1 • Austin Bleess From: Starling, Libby [ Libby .Starling @metc.state.mn. us] Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2009 1:52 PM To: Eric Johnson Cc: Austin Bleess; Graham, Todd; Conley, Debbie Subject: RE: population - group quarters 1 Eric — " The Metropolitan Council annually surveys r up quarters for their population as of April Pt of that year. Here are the .' /' numbers the Group Quarters in Oak Par eights reported for 2007 and 2008: u City of Oak Park Heights 2007 200 0 sikt, Boutwell's Landing -'lh_e Commons' 79 6 L, ct-'A Or Boutwell's Landing - The Arbors 30 29 - 51 r---\ v Is o � ' Prison 429 433 1 Mains'1 on Oldfield 4 4 0 Apollo Homes on Oxboro 4 Not licensed TOTAL 546 528 , Our only calculation is to sum the group quarters populations reported to us to a commip total. • Libby V .A Libby Starling • Research Manager • Community Development Division \t c- 0k13 Metropolitan Council • 390 Robert Street North • Saint Paul, MN 55101 C j 651 - 602 -1135 (p) • 651 - 602 -1674 (f) • lib.. by.starling(c�nletc.state.mn.us (e) 1 - e Ct Please consider the environment before printing this email. ,, 1 ' kr . . ..............._._............. From: Eric Johnson [ mailto: eajohnson @cityofoakparkheights.com] Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2009 10:47 AM To: Starling, Libby Cc: Austin Bleess Subject: population - group quarters Libby, If you happen to have the data as to how the group quarters was calculated in Oak Park Heights we could look at that prior to our meeting next week Thanks Eric • 7/1/2009 D� h: % ' 0 Zr,- z i.r �, . City of Oak Park Heights 14168 Oak Park Blvd. N • Box 2007 • Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 • Phone (651) 439 -4439 • Fax (6 ) 439 -0574 June 23, 2009 V fr Ms. Libby Starling � '1 d al METROPOLITAIN COUNCIL ;. " 390 Roberts Street North �'" St. Paul, MN 55101 -1805 *'**VIA EMAIL ONLY - libbv.starlino anmetc state mn us *** RE: April 1, 2008 Population Estimate. Dear Ms. Starling: With this letter the City is informing you that the City maintains 1 ' a letter dated May 27f, 2009 from your office. Specifically, we have the fo lowing concerns aannd unt of would like to as supplied engage intdi� ity in discussion about as a opposed to being directed to a website: 1 . Last years population was 4 . considering that we have only grown in the past year we have difficultly understating how our population declines • 2. Related to this since 2003 according to the MET Council, the City household size has decline fro lilt Ei c a 5.9 percent drop. Considering that there has been a continued growth in the housing stock, and p y a zero vacancy rate in SF homes we cannot immediately support this household size without further in -depth discussion. 3 . We require additional data on how the " rou figures utilized. 9 P quarlers °was calculated and would like to be provided the exact While we understand that this is not an exact methodology, the City cannot support reductions as suggested. Please note that with the figures provided this year, it is the fourth consecutive year in which the City has had to endeavor to seek corrections from MET Council, and we naturally must to do so again. w e m fin t hat v a acceptable In the afternoon the on Census J Pt, au I solve ces questions o thr gn the a figures in more detail so very near future. Please let me know if you are available at this time and date to discuss this matter. /' Regards, '-- Eric Johnson AICP - (= � py City Administrator / Cc: Sherry Broecker, MET COUNCIL - District 12 Member — via -us 3 C ,� Todd Graham, MET COUNCIL — via email only, todd. • rahm • metc.state. ' ' .uS ecker • metc.state.mn.us Austin Bless, City of Oak Park Heights Weekly Notes • Page 1 of 2 • Eric Johnson From: Graham, Todd [todd.graham c©metc.state.mn.us] Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 11:23 AM To: Eric Johnson Cc: Starling, Libby Subject: RE: Oak Park Heights population Mr Johnson— You asked about Metropolitan Council's estimation methodology, and specifically household size estimation. Metropolitan Council's model estimates eight separate average household sizes for eight combinations of housin type and tenure (own or rent). For more on this, see Metropolitan Council's detailed methodolo g www.metroco o rg /metroarea /AboutEstmate 9y , available at • You can find Oak Park Heights' array of estimated multipliers in the report you received from Libby Starling. The specific multipliers have not changed greatly for Oak Park Heights. The PPH for single family detached ownershi p housing is reduced; this is an adjustment that was applied for all communities in the region. The major, market - wide trend has been a continuing decline in household sizes associated with single family detached ownership housing. The major methodology change affecting Oak Park Heights' estimates, in this cycle of estimation, concerns the segmentation of ownership housing vs rental housing: • Starting with this cycle of estimation, we are no longer using "homesteads counts" as a hard constraint on the estimation of ownership housing. The Abstract of Assessment (source: Minnesota Department of Revenue) lists Oak Park Heights having 1,062 homesteads in year 2008 – and the homesteads count declines every year. Metropolitan Council staff have concluded that homesteads counts are no longer a reliable benchmark. We announced this change on pages 1 -2 of the detailed methodology, avail- ble at t ? www. metrocou ncil. or g / metroarea /AboutEstimates. htm • • Instead, Council's method for segmenting ownership housing vs rental housing now r- '-s on Me -l Council's Affordable Housing Production survey. The net effec .e a more _ , _ olitan ownership and rental housing subtotals. During 2000 -200 , 8% if new .0 ion of Heights has been ownership housing; 22 %, rental housi g. a nnual counts _i r r.. • e • . • Ci P rk annual details are published at www.metrocouncil,or / l- qn n• - e usin Q • • - City and • Using this new method, Metropolitan Council estimates 1,311 • • Housm. -s c gy . pdf • vacant) and 814 rental units (includes occupied and vacant) in Oak Park Heights. We find thoccupied is a more accurate estimation of ownership and rental housing subtotals. The recalculated estimates of ownership housing vs rental housing does affect the population estimates. • 6/11/2009 Page 2 of 2 • Ownership housing and rental housing have different average household sizes. In Oak Park Heights, households in ownership housing are marginally smaller than renting households. Again, you can find Oak Park Heights' array of estimated multipliers in the report you received from Libby Starling. Metropolitan Council's objective is to certify a realistic representation of population and households. Please send any additional written comments or questions by June 24 to Todd Graham, Metropolitan Council Research, 390 Robert Street North, Saint Paul, MN 55101; or by e-mail to todd.graham @metc.state.mn.us Regards. -- Todd Graham Metropolitan Council Research 651/602 -1322 From: Eric Johnson [ mailto: eajohnson @cityofoakparkheights.com] To: Se nt: Sta Monday, rlingLi June bby 08, 2009 1 :55 PM , • Subject: Oak Park Heights population 6-8 -09 Ms. Starling: I have received you rmost recent population counts for the City of Oak Park Heights My question at this time is how the average household population fell from 2.06 to 2.03. Please provide the detailed methodology on how this was determined. Thank You Eric Johnson City Administrator • 6/11/2009 1.1A Metropolitan Co uncil AA • May 25, 2010 Eric Johnson, Administrator City of Oak Park Heights 14168 Oak Park Blvd. PO Box 2007 Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 Dear Mr. Johnson: Each year, the Metropolitan Council prepares population and household estimates as of April 1 of the previous year. Local governments are invited to review and comment on the preliminary estimates. The Council will certify final estimates by July 15 for State government use in allocating local government aid and local street aid. The Metropolitan Council estimates that the City of Oak Park Heights had 4,653 people and 2,033 households as of April 1, 2009. Household size averaged 2.02 persons per household. Starting with counts from Census 2000, the Council estimates current population and households through changes in the housing stock, occupancy rates and persons per household. Input data sources now include the U.S. Census Bureau's American Community Survey, occupancy information from the U.S. Postal Service, and housing stock data collected by Metropolitan Council Research. Incorporating ongoing methodological refinements, the � Council's estimates provide a realistic representation of growth since 2000. With this letter, the Council is reporting the data inputs used to develop the preliminary estimates for your community. For more information on the Council's population estimates model, please visit the Council's website at www. metrocouncil. org /metroarea/AboutEstimates.htm, or contact Todd Graham at 651- 602 -1322. Council staff welcomes discussion of these preliminary estimates. Under Minnesota Statutes 473.24, the Metropolitan Council must receive your comments, questions or specific objections, in writing, by June 24, 2010. Please send any written comments or questions to Todd Graham, Metropolitan Council Research, 390 Robert Street North, Saint Paul, MN 55101; or by e -mail to todd.graham @metc.state.mn.us . Sincerely, (470 PA- Libby Starling Research Manager • www.metrocouncil.org 390 Robert Street North • St. Paul, MN 55101 -1805 • (651) 602 -1000 • Fax (651) 602 -1550 • TTY (651) 291 -0904 An Equal Opportunity Employer vit. 2009 Population Estimates: Oak Park Heights city* ty* Washington County, Minnesot do Households � 2,033 Population in households 4,110 Persons per household 2.022 Population in group quarters 543 Total population � 4,653 j The Council's model accounts for built housing stock changes since 2000. These include housing units permitted, gross additions and gross losses. Relying on research by the US Census Bureau, the Council's model assumes that not all housing units permitted will be built in the year permitted. New housing units permitted Permtted Years Permitted Estimated units built 2000 -2007 Year 2008 since 2000 I Single-family detached L 3 + 0 X 95% = 3 Duplex / threeplex / fourplex 9 + 0' x 90% = 1 i g. Townhouses /single family attached 1 116' + a X 90% = — 120 Multifamily 1 429 X 100.0% = 0 X 85% = �o — � 429 Estimated new housing units permitted and built: 561 • Other gross changes to housing stock Years 2000- Total additions and 2007 Year 2008 losses since 2000 Gross additions include building conversions (units added), relocated structures, units annexed in: Single-family detached additions 0 Duplex / threeplex /fourplex additions 0 0 0 Townhouse additions 0 Multifamily additions p 0 0 Gross losses include demolitions, building conversions (units lost), relocated structures, units annexed out: Single-family detached losses -12 _ 1 -1 -13 Duplex / threeplex /fourplex losses 0 0 -- o Townhouse losses p — 0 0 Multifamily losses 0 1 0 Other gross changes to built housing stock: 13 Total changes to built housing stock: 548 41, 114 Metropolitan Council Monday, May 24, 2010 i i AA Metropolitan Council 40 /41 May 27, 2009 Eric Johnson, Administrator City Of Oak Park Heights 14168 Oak Park Blvd. PO BOX 2007 Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 Dear Mr. Johnson: Each year, the Metropolitan Council prepares population and household estimates as of April 1 of the r year. After local governments have the opportunity to review and comment on the preliminary estimates, the Council certifies final estimates, including any estimates still under objection, by July 15 for State government e use in allocating local government aid and local street aid. The Metropolitan Council estimates that the City Of Oak Park Heights had 4,708 people and 2,0 households as of April 1, 2008. Household size averaged 2.03 persons per household. 56 Starting with counts from Census 2000, the Council estimates current population and households through • in the housing stock, occupancy rates and persons per household. Input data sources now include the changes Bureau's American Community Survey, occupancy information from the U.S. Postal Service conducted by Metropolitan Council Research. Incorporating ongoing methodological refinements, the Council's U.S. Census estimates provide a realistic representation of growth since 2000. and surveys With this letter, the Council is reporting the data inputs used to develop the preliminary estimates for your community. Any community objections to the Council's preliminary estimates should ideally reflect specific concerns about the Council's assumptions or data inputs. For more information on the Council's population t estimates model, please visit the Council's website at www. metrocouncil .org /metroarea/AboutEstimates.htm, or contact Todd Graham at 651 - 602 -1322. P p lai on Council staff welcomes discussion of these preliminary estimates. Under Minnesota Statutes 473.24 Metropolitan Council must receive your comments, questions or specific objections, in writing, b June 2009. Please send any written comments or questions to Todd Graham, Metropolitan Council 473.24, th h 390 Robert Street North, Saint Paul, MN 55101; or by e -mail to todd. graham @metc.state.mn.u . ll Researc v ne 24, Sincerely, W V Libby Starling Research Manager w ww.metrocouneil.org 390 Robert Street North • St. Paul, MN 5 5101 -1805 • (651) 602 -1000 • Fax (651) 602 -1550 • TT'y (651) 291 -0904 An Equal Opportunity Employer 2008 Population Estimates: Oak Park Heights city, Washington County, Minneso 1111 tY t Households f --- Z05 2056 Population in households a,18o y �,� Persons per household 2.03 �-' d V / O ' - - - - -- - _._ - -_ -- Population hi group quarters ` 528 p�, � Total population - 4,708 des The Council's model accounts for built housing stock changes since 2000. These include housing units i �� ^ � additions and gross losses. Relying on research by the US Census Bureau, the Council's mod a ssumes that permitted, all housiin $ Gl units permitted will be built in the year permitted. g New housing units permitfvd Permtted Years Permitted Estimated units built 2000 -2006 Year 2007 - 2000 -2007 Single-family detached - 2- + i - 1 X 95% - 3 Duplex /threeplex /fourplex 9 . — -- ft Townhouses /single family attached 98 , � + 90% c' 1 8 X90 b. .a 114 Multifamily 42 x 100 .o °r° - _ _ - - --- - X 85% _ 429 Estimated new housin units ermitted and built: 5551 • Other gross changes to housing stock Years 2000- 2006 Total additions and Year losses 2000 -2007 Gross additions include building conversions (units added), relocated structures, units annexed in: Single-family detached additions 0 Duplex / three lex / ourplex additions 0 0 0 Townhouse additions o 0 0 Multifamily additions o 0 0 Gross losses include demolitions, building conversions (units lost), relocated structures, units annexed out: Single-family detached losses Duplex /threeplex /fourplex losses 0 i — 2 - -. 0 - Townhouse losses 0 0 0 0 Multifamily losses 0 - Other gross changes to built housin stock: -12 Total changes to built housing stock: - - - - - -- 543 Metropolitan opolitan Council Friday, May 22, 2009 • City of Oak Park Heights 14168 Oak Park Blvd. N • Box 2007 • Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 • Phone (651) 439 -4439 • Fax (651) 439 -0574 June 24, 2008 Ms. Libby Starling Research Manager Metropolitan Council 230 East Fifth Street St. Paul, MN 55101 -1626 RE: Population Estimates as of 4/1/07 Dear Ms Starling: The City is in receipt of the MET Council's population estimates for the City of Oak Park Heights as submitted to the City in your letter dated May 22, 2008. Generally, the City finds that the recently provided figure of 4,751 persons to be an acceptable • approximation at this time. However the City reserves the right to modify and/or adjust these figures or the statements in this letter at anytime when more accurate data may be available. Please note that Todd Graham and I did discuss today a small discrepancy related to number of units that may have been demolished or move out of the City, si family units to 11 single family units being eliminated. Thi may result a small upti k the le 4,751 figure. However at this time this figure is not critical and can be revisited in the future. Please let me know if you have any questions. Very Best Regards, Eric Johnson, MCP City Administrate (,) Cc: City Council Members Mr. Todd Graham Mr. Mark VanderSchaaf Mr. Tom Weaver, Administrator. "Exhibit A" City of Oak Park Heights Residential Construction - New Type of Unit mili Sin:le Family Houses Duplexes ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ Townhou ■ se /Condominiums ■ 46 ■ 29 10 18 4 Apartments ill 317 (See Notes 1-3**) Prison Public Housing ceps 60 Total Units: 330 60 0 apai 46 29 ® 19 4 * * NOTES: (1) 1 Accumulated Total Units: 621 94 Unit Assisted Living Building — 25 Studios, 47 1 -BR & 22 2 -BR (2) 116 Bed Assisted Living Building — Each bed treated as an apartment (3) 107 Unit Independent Living Building — 49 1 -BR & 58 2 -BR City of Oak Park Heights Residential Construction - Demolition Type of Unit 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007* 2008* Sin:le Family Houses ©■ sa •a Du • lexes 111111111111111 111111111111111111111 To wnhouse/Condominiu ms 11.111111111 1111111111111111 artme Apartments nts ■ Pub ■ T ■ otal Units ■ nits De ■ mohsh ■ ed ■ v 0 © o Units: v 0 Accumulated Total U * 2008 Data for period of January 1 through May 31, 2008 "Exhibit A" Z.4-' City of Oak Park Heights \---- Residential Construction - New Type of Unit 2000 2001 2002 2003 Sin:le Family Houses 2004 2005 2006 2007* Duplexes � 3/6 _1 6/25 - 1 p exes ■ Towrih ouse /Co ndomm>ums ® 8/04' . 1 /11 - 4 ■ � 46 29 9/28 '7 5/29 - 7 Apartments I (See Notes 1 -3 * *) Public Housing Prison 11111 60 Cells Total Units: 330 60 0 ® 46 Accumulated Total Units: 610 29 ®® * * NOTES: (1) 94 Unit Assisted Living Building (' S (2) 116 Bed Assisted Living Buildin — 25 Studios, 47 1 -BR & 22 III (3) 107 Unit Independent Living B— uilding — 49 9 1 1 - -BR & 58 2- treated ing Build Each treated 8s a a a ment City of Oak Park Heights Residential Construction - Demolition Type of Unit Year 1 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 Sin:le Famil Houses ©. as 6/1 - 2005 2006 6/12 - 1 Du . lexes 1 ■ Townhouse /Co ndomimums Ilsonsimmlow Apartments 11111111111111111111 Public Housing t LIMOIMIMIIIIIIIIIIII nits D e mol><she d. Total U ° 0 0 vv 0 • Accumulated Total Units: 13 v rAM 3 * 2007 Data for period of January 1 through June 30. AA Metropolitan Council u May 22, 2008 Eric Johnson City Administrator a , a City of Oak Park Heights �� � 0 ✓ ( " /"- 14168 Oak Park Blvd. i , �`- 1;;r, Box 2007 Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 y H.> Dear Mr ohnson: 'N " '-- As required by Minnesota Statutes 473.24, the Metropolitan Council annually prepares population and household estimates as of April 1 of the previous year. After local governments have the opportunity to review and comment on the preliminary estimates, the Council certifies final estimates by July 15 for use in allocating local government aid (LGA) and local street aid. The Metropolitan Council estimates that the City of Oak Park Heights had 4,751 people and 2,038 households as of April 1, 2007. Household size averaged 2.06 persons per household. Starting with counts from the 2000 Census, the Council estimates current population and households through changes in the housing stock, vacancy rates and persons per household. Input data sources now include the .S. • Census Bureau's American Community Survey, occupancy information from the U.S. Postal Service, and surveys conducted by Metropolitan Council Research. To update decennial Cen newly- available data sources which indicate slight increases in residential vacancy r tes small loses in the uses curren and number of persons per household since 2000. After local suggestions prompted an in -depth review of current Census data, the Council has adjusted the persons per household in areas with accelerating single-family home construction. Incorporating newly - available data and ongoing methodological improvements, these estimates provide a realistic, real -time representation of population and household growth since 2000 but are not completely comparable to prior years' estimates. Beginning this year, the Council is pleased to provide you a report of the data inputs and intermediate estimates used to develop your Local population and household estimates. Those who attended the Council's Population Estimates Workshops in April and May will find this format familiar; others may visit the Council's website or contact Council Research staff for assistance. (See www.metrocouncil.or• metr oarea/AboutEstimates.htm, or contact Todd Graham at 651- 602 - 1322.) Council staff welcomes discussion of these preliminary estimates. Under Minnesota Statutes 473.24, the Metropolitan Council must receive your comments, questions or challenges to these preliminary estimates in writing by June 2008. By law, the Metropolitan Council certifies the estimates of population and the average household size by July 15, including any estimates still under objection. Please send any written comments or questions to Todd Graham, Metropolitan Council Research, or by e -mail to todd. raham metc.state.mn.us , g � (a Sincerely, t lt)i r - - /v) cl t, L' l 7 _17 0 Libby St Research Manager ww w.metrocouncil.org 390 Robert Street North • St. Paul, MN 5 5101 -1805 • (651) 602 -1000 • Fax (651) 602 -1550 • 1T'Y (651) 291 -0904 An Equal Opportunity Employer 2007 Population Estimates.. Oak Park Heights city, Washington County, Minnesot sot Households -- 2 Population in households 4,205 Persons per household 2.060 I Population in group quarters 546 Total population 4,751 The Council's model accounts for built housing stock changes since 2000. These include hou units permitted, gross additions and gross losses. Relying on research by the US Census Bureau, the Council's mode ssumes that not all housin g units permitted will be built in the year permitted. New housing units permitted Permtted Years p 2000 - 2005 Estimated units built ° ` t 6 2000 -2006 Single-family detached 1 + X 95% = 2 Duplex / threeplex /fourplex -- i 9 ! + r 0 x90% ^ - - -� Townhouses /single family attached 8 + 9 10 /o X 90 = 97 Multifamily ! 429 0 X 80% = 429 Estimated new housin units ermined and built: III 537 Other ross than es to housin stock �'_ 20�s_ Total additions and Year 2006 losses 2000 -2006 Gross additions include building conversions (units d),a3cated structures, units annexed in: Single-family detached additions Duplex / threeplex /fourplex a ion o o _ 0 Townhouse additions - 0 — _ Multifamily additions - _ — 0 i---� 7 0 ' �i r� p Gross losses include demoli �3 � � � ,� `��.T f inversions (units lost), relocated structur�I out: Single family det cos -11 s 1 Du f Duplex , ,--- -� 12 p /three. �� rplex losses o ° o Townhouse losses _ , 0 0 Multifamily losses j o Total other ross changes to housing stock • - — - 4 Total than es to housing stock 2000-2006: - l 523 i 11 Metropolitan Council // Tuesday, May 20, 2008 Page 265 of 388 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIMIMIMIMIM rt. 2007 Population Estimates: Oak Park Heights city, Washington County, Minnesot 1110 Estimates of housing stock are segmented into ownership housing and rental housing. The ownership housing subtotal is controlled to a target ownership range of 100 to 107 percent of the homestead units count from the Abstract of Assessment. Each housing type will have a specifically estimated occupancy rate. Each combination of housing type and tenure (ownership housing or rental) will have a specifically estimated average household size. Homeownership rates Housing stock by type of housing Occupancy rates estimated for April 1 (estimated) Ad Rented Single-family detached 778 87.8 % 98.0% Duplex / threeplex /fourplex 146 31.5 °70l 94.1% Townhouses 230 73. 97.5% , Multifamily 950 25.6% 96.3% 96.3% 111/4 11111 Estimated built housing units 2,104 I Owned: Ve Occupancy rates Mobile homes 0 95.0% Boats, etc., serving as housing o 100.o% S Following housing stock estimation, the Council model multi s sing units by occupancy rates, segmented by housing type, to determine occupied housing. The number of h sin units is equivalent to households: A household is a group of people (or a person living alone) occupyi a •n onal housing unit. (* Institutional or group quarters housing is account a through an annual survey by Metropolitan Council.) Households 2,038 Population in households is estimate. utli 'mg •• cupied housing units (equivalent to households) by average household sizes (persons per household), segmen'. hou g type and tenure. The final step in poulation estimation is to add population in households + pop in g afters, counted by the Council's annual survey. sons per Household Multipliers Ow - occupied Renter - occupied Single-family deta 2.745 3.009' Duplex / threeplex /fou 1.422 1.924 _ Population in households 4,205 Townhouses 1.901 2.520 1.414 546 Multifamily 1.54x Population in group qu arters Mobile homes 2.420 Total population 4,751 g housing f 2.000 Boats, etc., serving as housin Metropolitan Council Tuesday, May 20, 2008 l Tuesda fp 11- 4 etropolltan Counci Page 266 of 388 ii ii Metropolitan Council AA • July 13, 2007 Eric Johnson City Administrator City Of Oak Park Heights 1 b 14168 Oak Park Blvd. y6 PO Box 2007 Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 Dear Mr. Johnson: During the local government review of population estimates, several city and county governments provided comments on the estimates and the council's estimation model. Taking these comments into consideration, the Council is certifying and publishing final estimates that are revised for your community. • Therefore we are certifying the following: • Oak Park Heights is estimated to have 4,676 people and 2,008 households as of April 1, 2006. Household size averaged 2.06 persons per household. (Note: Household size averages represent persons living in households.) Final estimates for the seven county metropolitan are can be found online at http://www.metrocouncil.org/metroarea/stats.htm We greatly appreciate the cooperation of the cities, towns and county governments in the Council's data collection. Sincerely, Todd Graham Research Manager www.metrocouncil.org 390 Robert Street North • St. Paul, MN 55101 -1805 • (651) 602 -1000 • Fax (651) 602 -1550 • TTY (651) 291 -0904 Art Equal Opportunity Employer ( r' • . City of Oak Park Heights 14168 Oak Park Blvd. N • Box 2007 • Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 • Phone (651) 439 -4439 • Fax (651) 439 -0574 July 11, 2007 Ms. Olivia McGaha Metropolitan Council 230 East Fifth Street St. Paul, MN 55101 -1626 N. •, . RE: Population Estimates as of 4/1/06 - a Dear Ms. McGaha: Thank you for meeting and corresponding with me to again discern more reliable population counts for the City of Oak Park Heights. Generally, the City finds that the recently provided figure of 4,676 persons is a figure that is much closer to reality than MET Council's initial estimate of 4,627. I still maintain there are • some issues related to household size and numbers of households that can warrant addition upward revisions; due in part to both methodology and actual data. However, because of time constraints the City will accept the MET Council's revised figure but does reserve the right to revise this figure for the 4/1/07 calculation. Moreover, we have stated and you have acknowledged that this figure does not include any households permitted after 4/1/06. Please let me know if you have any questions. Very Best Regards, Eric Johnson, AICP City Administrator Cc: City Council Members Mr. Blair Tremere Mr. Mark VanderSchaaf Mr. Tom Weaver, Administrator. • Eric Johnson F m: Olivia McGaha [ Olivia.McGaha @metc.state.mn.usj wi Wednesday, July 11, 2007 2:31 PM Eric Johnson Subject: Re: Oak Park Heights Population Hi Eric, Excuse me for the delay Eric, The process of verifying details took longer than I anticipated. The Oak Park Heights final estimates are: Population: 4676 Households: 2008 Thanks for your patience. Olivia Olivia McGaha Researcher Dept. of Data Resources Metropolitan Council 390 N. Robert Street O x Paul, MN 55101 ne: (651) 602 -1331 : (651) 602 -1674 »> "Eric Johnson" < eajohnson @cityofoakparkheights.com> 07/11/07 01:58PM »> Olivia: I have not heard from your as to the status of our population. This is my second request. Please advise Eric • 1 Eric Johnson , From: Olivia McGaha [ Olivia.McGaha @metc.state.mn.usj t .Wednesday, July 11, 2007 3:09 PM Eric Johnson Subject: RE: Oak Park Heights Population I used your numbers except for Single Family. Since you once said you had an intern to do the multifamily survey for you, we felt it was fair to use your numbers but for SF it was not the case. So we used our rates. Our rate is 98.08 and your rate is 97.93 for SF. The good news is that, it actually worked to Oak Park Heights' advantage. I am glad we worked this out well. Our deadline is 15 July. Thanks Olivia »> "Eric Johnson" < eajohnson @cityofoakparkheights.com> 07/11/07 02:51PM >» Olivia: Thanks for the update, two clarifications It in the calculation you have implemented, what occupancy rate you utilizing? 2) what is your deadline for submission to the State? Eric Original Message---- - From; Olivia McGaha [ mailto: Olivia.McGaha @metc.state.mn.us] Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2007 2:31 PM To: Eric Johnson Subject: Re: Oak Park Heights Population Hi Eric, Excuse me for the delay Eric, The process of verifying details took longer than I anticipated. The Oak Park Heights final estimates are: Population: 4676 Households: 2008 Thanks for your patience. Olivia • 1 Olivia McGaha Researcher Dept. of Data Resources Metropolitan Council 0 N. Robert Street Paul, MN 55101 one: (651) 602 -1331 Fax: (651) 602 -1674 »> "Eric Johnson" < eajohnson @cityofoakparkheights.com> 07/11/07 01:58PM »> Olivia: I have not heard from your as to the status of our population. This is my second request. Please advise Eric • • 2 111 I 1 erg 1 • 11 , i ,,,,,,,,,::: ts 3 In 1 INF ,,,..,,,„,„„r„,„.,,,,,„ 1 i i j Fir ;,,.,,,„..1 •„,z eXI,Nte')4 ' ',.il,'' .. `,' ' - ' ' --; • i ,,,- 4,, , , - s,wo , ' II 1I : I IIII1IIiIiIIIjIIi I I' �� 1 o> m E 11111 C� QO =o 11 1111111111 00 n n M M 0 C 0 f 1 II I IIiI j 1IIji 1! itft • 11 i C (� 11 !1 IIIflIII i i i J IIIIIiIIIIIIi,uIIIIIIIIII 'v (\ ,_. t- l\ ,..) IIIiI \ I z o f= Q Fr E m -J n E °I Z O o F \ .. c d Z c E H 3 E I n d o c a - v U CO CO 0 u CC 0 ¢ c 411E111111111111111110111 S lilt ty • - a - m � 0 "Exhibit A" • City of Oak Park Heights Residential Construction - New Type of Unit 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 I 11111111111111111111 2006 2007* Sin ! le Family Houses _ 3/6 - 1 6/25 1 Duplexes ■ 111111111 Townhouse /Condominiums 11111111111111111ffil 8/04 3 1 /11 - 4 46 9 29 /28 7 5/29 - 7 t Apartments (See Notes 1 -3 * *) Prison Public Housing ceus 60 Total Units: 330 60 Accumulated Total Units: 610 29 11101111119111 * *NOTES: (1) 94 Unit Assisted Living Building — 25 Studios, 47 1 -BR & 22 i -BR • (2) 116 Bed Assisted Living Building — Each bed treated as an apa ment (3) 107 Unit Independent Living Building — 49 1 -BR & 58 2 -BR City of Oak Park Heights Residential Construction - Demolition Type of Unit 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 ©. 2005 2006 2007* Single Family Houses •. as 6/12 - 1 Duplexes 111 e ■ ■ ■ ■ Townhouse /Condominiums ■ ■ ■ ■ t ■ Apartments ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ 111111111 Public Housing ■ Total U ■ nits De ■ mohsh ■ ed: ■ © 0 v o 000MINI • Accumulated Total Units: 13 * 2007 Data for period ofJanuary 1 through June 30. "Exhibit A" • City of Oak Park Heights Residential Construction - New Type of Unit 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007* Single Family Houses 1 Duplexes ■ ■ Town house /Condominium ■ 46 29 10 1/11 Apartments (See Notes 1-3**) Prison Public Housing ceus 60 Total Units: 330 60 0 Accumulated Total Units: 606 46 29 8 ** NOTES: (1) 94 Unit Assisted Living Building — 25 Studios, 47 1 -BR & 22 2 -BR • (2) 116 Bed Assisted Living Building (3) 107 Unit Independent Living Building — 49 1- BR a & 2-BR artment City of Oak Park Heights Residential Construction - Demolition Type of Unit 2000 2001 2002 2003 ii 004 2005 2006 2007* Single Family Houses ©. s Duplexes 11111111111111111111111111111 � s Townhouse /Condominiums 1111111111111111111111111 ■ Apartments 11111111111111111111111111 Public Housing ■ ■ Total ■ otal U ■ nits De ■ moLshe ■ d. ■ ■ v MEMO v 0 o 110 Accumulated Total Units: 13 * 2007 Data for period of January 1 through June 30. It Metropolitan Council June 26, 2007 Mr. Eric Johnson City Administrator City of Oak Park Heights 14169 Oak Park Blvd. N. Box 2007 Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 Dear Mr. Johnson: In response to your letter of June 22, 2007, I have scheduled 11 a.m., July 5 as a time for us to meet here at the Metropolitan Council offices to discuss the Council's estimates of households and population for Oak Park Heights as of April 1, 2006. As we've previously discussed, I understand that you have information regarding occupancy rates that could change our estimates. I think it would be especially fruitful to discuss that information. I note, however, that I am obliged to use our standard estimation model for all cities this year. As you know, Regional Administrator Tom Weaver directed that an alternate model be used for Oak Park Heights' estimates a year ago, resulting in higher totals than would otherwise have been the case (see attached letter). However, he also emphasized in that letter that we would use the standard model for Oak Park Heights in the future. Your letter also asks a question about SAC charges. For information regarding this matter I would refer you to Jason Willett of our Environmental Services Division, phone 6 51- 602 -1196 or email Lson.willett a metc state mn us If you have questions before our meeting, feel free to contact me. Otherwise, I'll plan for a conversation on July 5th Sincerely, / / l • a McGaha cc: Sherry Broecker, Council District 12 Designee Tom Weaver Guy Peterson Mark Vander Schaaf Todd Graham w ww.metrocouncil.org 390 Robert Street North • St. Paul, MN 55101 -1805 • (651) 602 -1000 •Fax (651) 602 -1550 • TTY (651) 291 -0904 An Equal Opportunity Employer t � t Metropolitan Council Jul 7, 2006 Eric Johnson, City Administrator City of Oak Park Heights FAX 651- 439 -0574 14168 Oak Park Blvd. N., Box 2007 Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 Dear Mr. Johnson: Thank you for your letter of June 22 with your proposed calculation of Oak Park Heights' population estimate for April 1, 2005. Our meeting ofJune 16 and the information you subsequently provided have been useful in refining the Metropolitan Council's estimate of your community's households and population. In particular, as surmised by Mark Vander Schaaf at the June 16 meeting, we did not have a complete record of building permits issued in Oak Park Heights since the year 2000 — notably those associated with the Boutwell's Landing 41) development. We have adjusted our records accordingly and will use those adjusted records to finalize our estimates. As you know, the Metropolitan Council used a revised methodology for the 2005 estimates. This change was initiated at my direction a year ago, principally to ensure that we have a more accurate and logical methodology for complying with the new statutorily - mandated reporting requirements. I directed staff to develop a method of estimating households (occupied housing units) and population that is compatible with our method of estimating housing units. The resu was the model that we used this year for deriving preliminary It area community. This preliminary estimate for Oak Park Heights was sent to each your con1mun on June 1. ty Basically, our new model works as follows: 1. Housing Units 2005 = Housing Units 2000 + Net Addition to Housing 2005. Housing units are defined in accordance with the U.S. Census p a 2000- excluding group quarters and counting only those occupied and unoccupied dwellings where people live independently. The Housing Units 2000 figure comes from Census 2000. We estimate Net Additions to Housing Units, 2000 -2005 based on building permits issued from 2000 through December 31, 2004 (since there is a time lag between when building permits are issued and construction is completed). Also, we make reasoned assumptions about the percentage of building permits that result in completed construction, since not all buildings for which permits are issued actually get constructed. www.metrocouncil.org 390 Robert Street North • St. Paul, MN 55101 -1805 • (6th) 602 -1000 •Fax (651) 602 -1550 • TTY (651) 291 -0904 An Equal Opportunity Employer • 2. Households 2005 = Housing Units 2005 x Occupancy households by multiplying the number of housing un times t oc upanc drate nine the housing units segmented by housing t Y ,with detached homes typically have a higher oc upancy than m For example, single family data sources for the occupancy rate factor include the 2000 Census, a the Curre t Our Population Survey (of the Census Bureau), and GVA Marquette Inc. Current 3. Population 2005 = (Households 2005 x Persons-per-Household 2005) + Quarters Population 2005. Our method of determining group ) Group remained unchanged from previous years: we conduct an p quarters population has in each community regarding their population as of April annual Y r each year. As gs in the case n of occupancy rates, p - per - household is applied to housing type p quarters single family detached housin t Again, ypically has a higher persons-per-household figure an apartment, for example. gme than As we go forward, this new model will be used for determining all estimates defines as the responsibility of the Metropolitan Council. However, given that State law the unusual circumstances in your case, we believe it is reasonable during this transitio an estimate based largely on the approach you used in your letter. nal year to allow for I offer the following comments regarding your alternative method and its results: • • Your method posits the year 2000 population of 3,777 as an This is similar to the Metropolitan Council's past approach of ugrog baseline. sing househo baseline. However, since we can track changes in housin Ids as a changes in population, our current model begins g units more accurately than basis for its calculations and then applies local occupancy rt00and so units as the household figures to determine the population for each co mmurut p ns per y. • You have included year 2005 buildin 2005 population. Buildin g Permits as a basis for your estimate of April 1, housing units by g permits issued in 2005 would not result in occupied y April 1 of that year. Our approach in the past, as well as our current model, counts most or all permits of the previous year, but no permits from being estimated. the year • Your method seems to assume that all e occupied. On average, this is not the case, so so assume that only and that it is also all percentage of permitted housing is built (based on Census Bureau research), an that a certain percentage of the housing stock is vacant (again, based on Census Bureau research). For Oak Park Heights, we are assuming also has been built, but do not assume that all housing units ccu pled emitted housing p • You apply the persons - per - household figure of 2.13 to all post -2000 regardless of type. Our methodolo housin 4110 gy continues apply to a 1 housing anus figures that are customized for different housing types. For per the l development in the city, Boutwells Landing, has provided Councilf with the h est th a 2005 2 • population estimate of 93 people in Group (295 households); the p i 3 figu ehfor people u Landing households calculates to 1.35. I otwells this year for non Boutwells Landing households added s nce since that i figure figure we used during our discussion at our June 16 meeting, before we that s the incorporated Boutwells Landing data into our records. e had • We would use the results of our annual population of persons in this living situation. p Quarters survey to identify the Incorporating the above co ing estimates for 2005 am prepared to certify the following lieu of an estimates prepared our current model. 2005 Households =1,528 from Census 2000 + x 100% completion rate x 93% occupancy (473 permitted housing units since 2000 P �y rate in 2005) = I,528 + 440 =1,968 2005 Population = 3, 777 from Census 2000 + 228 gain in group quarters 39 7people in Bout►+'ells households + x 2.13 persons per non- Boutwells household) = 4 ,664 since 2000 outside ofBoutwells )= 4,664 For your reference, I am attaching the results of applying our new mo del to the revised data which you have provided. • Again, while we are willing to a 1 transition e� pp Y the above methodology for your estimate during this Y year, be advised that we will adhere to our new model in determinin estimates for 2006. g your I hope that this compromise satisfies your concerns. If you have ad ditional questions or concerns, we would be happy to meet with you again prior to our July 17 deadline. Sincer ly, '''''I" as H. Weaver Regional Administrator C: Blair Tremere Mark VanderSchaaf • 3 • • Revised Estimate for Oak Park Heights Using New Methodology 1 . Oak Park Heights Housing Units in 2005 =1,581 in 2000 + 485 ermitt 2004 —12 removed in 2 000 -2004 = 2,054 p ed in 2000- 2. Oak Park Heights Households in 2005 = 2,054 Housing Units in 200 Occupancy Rate in 2005 =1,961 S * 95.5% 3. Oak Park Heights Population in 2005 = Persons per - Household in 2005) + 552 Group Households in 2005 * 2.065 4,602 P Quarters Population in 2005 = • 1 4 -1**. City of Oak Park Heights 14168 Oak Park Blvd. N • Box 2007 • Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 • Phone (651) 439 -4439 • Fax (651) 439 -0574 June 22, 2007 Ms. Olivia McGaha Metropolitan Council 390 Robert Street N. St. Paul, MN 55101 -1805 RE: 2006 Population Estimates Dear Ms. McGaha: With this letter the City is informing you that we maintain significant objections to the supplied to the City in a letter dated May 25` 2007 from Mr. Todd Graham. Population count of 4,627 as Specifically: 1. Last years population was 4,662 — considering that we have only difficultly understating how our grown 'n the past year we have population declines. • 2. MET also Council nand also indicates that the 2.06; co s that there has eons per household has also apparently declined from 2.11 to vacancy .06; rid ri SF homes and with i a continued groom in the housing stock, and practically a zero I would comment that the MET Council's SAC charges have not declined with relation to this household support this household size. Related to this, size, if there are less people per household, why the continued increase in SAC charges, I would presume that there is less effluent per SAC unit? 3. The MET Council also demonstrates a decline in number of households, which is again confusing considering that the City has added 40+ units from last year. At this time and pursuant to my phone call communication with Mr. Mark Vander Schaaf of June 21st, the City will be Preparing for additional discussion with MET Council staff to discuss these figures discussion prior to July 15 so that the MET Council can communicate with tha emo Wa must conclude our Accordingly, I would ask if you have availability at your office on , Demographer's office. thus fr ur 'n d 7 o ho efull come to an a rue bl o ulati n, July S`" 2 ll.pp am to Please note that the figure provided this year is the third consecutive year in which the City has had to endeavor t o seek corrections from MET Council, due to reductions each year, and we are naturally prepared to do so Please let me know if t u � ay.flab again. /: at this time and date to again discuss these figures. garde / - Jo so , AICP City ; i stator Cc: Ms. She Br. er, Dis. 12 Commissioner Mr. Mark ander Schaaf, MET Council • �� Metropolitan Council 40 A4 May 25, 2007 is Eric Johnson City Administrator 3 20Q' City Of Oak Park Hts 14168 Oak Park Blvd. Box 2007 Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 Dear Mr Johnson: Each year, the Metropolitan Council prepares population and household estimates as of April 1 in the previous year. Preliminary estimates are shared with local governments for review and comment. Final estimates certified by the Council in July, will be used by the State in determining local government aid (LGA) and local street aid allocations. Minnesota statutes provide the timeline for estimates delivery and local government review: • The Council is expected to convey preliminary • "A governing body may challenge anetimate made undeb his section by filin its s objections in writing with the Metropolitan Council by June 24." g pecific • "The Metropolitan Council shall certify the estimates of population and the average household size... by July 15 each year, including any estimates still under objection." (Minnesota Statutes, III section 473.24) We are now delivering preliminary April 1, 2006, estimates of o ulation and households: Household size averaged 2.06 persons per househol (Note: Household size averages represent persons living in households.) These estimates are benchmarked with Census 2000 counts. Annual updates reflect housing stock changes since 2000 and other information collected by Metropolitan Council Research. We have significantly enhanced the Council's estimates model this year with newly available data inputs. This should result in a more realistic, real -time representation of population growth since 2000. Council staff welcome discussion of the estimates. We have time to consider your comments, provided t adhere to the timeline: Correspondence introducing specific requests or a "governing body's challenge" filed with Metropolitan Council Research by June 24, 2007. Y allenge" must be that you Written comments can be sent by mail, to Olivia McGaha, Metropolitan Council Research, or by e-mail to olivia.mc aha metc.state.mn.us. Sincerely, Todd Graham Research Manager ww w.metrocouncil.org 390 Robert Street North • St. Paul, MN 5 5101 -1805 • (651) 602 -1000 • Fax (651) 602 -1550 • TTY (651) 291 -0904 An Equal Opportunity Employer • knne t oto STATE AND COMMUNITY SERVICES Department of Administration State Demographic Center 658 Cedar Street 300 Centennial Office Building St. Paul, MN 55155 Phone: 651- 296 -2557 Fax: 651- 296 -3698 LUCA and Census 20/0 It's only 2007, three years from the Census in 2010 - so why are we talking about Census 2010? As you realize, the Census is a huge undertaking. Almost as soon as the 2000 Census was taken, work began on the 2010 Census. Now the first major opportunity for local governments to participate is beginning - LUCA or Local Update of Census Addresses. LUCA is a cooperative effort between local governments and the Census Bureau. Local governments are asked to help the Census Bureau to update and correct their address lists. Officials in your government should have received an announcement of this program in January or February of this year. In July 2007, you will receive an invitation to participate in LUCA. We hope that you will decide to participate, and our office is available to give whatever assistance we can. The 2010 Census like the last Census will be mailed out to residents and mailed back to the Census Bureau. In order to make sure that every person is counted, the address list for every locality must be accurate and complete. That's where you can make a difference. By providing the Census Bureau with accurate and complete addresses for your area, you can ensure that Minnesota has the best count ever. Why is that important? There is a strong possibility that Minnesota could lose a Congressional seat in reapportionment after the 2010 Census - making sure that we count every resident could make the difference between 7 seats in the Congress or our current 8 seats. Many forms of local government aid are distributed on the basis of Census counts, and the population and household estimates from the State Demographic Center and the Metropolitan Council use the counts from the Census as a baseline. Opportunities to make corrections after the Census are limited. An incorrect Census count can have negative impacts for the next ten years. Don't let this happen to your city, your township or your county! When you receive the invitation in July, please respond "YES" - make sure that everyone in your locality is counted in 2010. If you have not received any information about the LUCA program, please contact Barbara Ronningen in the State Demographic Center at 651- 201 -2473 or barbara.ronningen@a,state.mn.us She will see that you received the necessary materials. 1111 � ��' ZED le , �c d� 0,164, / a to Z .r II ill ftlisr , 0 Oak Park Heights city, Washington County, Minn, 4083 az r pop inHH ' Households 2.p64 NOM � _ Pop in Group Qtrs PPH in Households Total Population IIIIIIII New h ousin units er mitted Year 2005 Years 2000 -200 0 1 S.F. Detached — — — 0 Duplex/3 /4 9 ° Townhouses , • 2s I Multi family 400 Other ross chan es to housin stock elocated structures, units annexed in. Gross additions include de conversions, r Gross losses include demolitions, conversions, relocated structures, units annexed out. Years 2000 -200 Year 2005 0 0 SF adds 0 DU adds 0 0 TH adds 0 0 MF adds 0 10 SF loss 0 DU loss 0 0 TH loss 0 0 MF loss 1lNNIIIIIIIIIIC Page 373 of 398 II Friday, June 08, 2007 • Oak Park Heights city, Washington County, Minn Housing stock estimated for April 1 Estimated as ownership housing S.F. Detached 778 86.5% Duplex/3 /4 146 30.8% Townhouses 221 68 Multi family 9361 26 Built H. U. Subtotal 2081 Homesteads 1067 Mobile Homes 0 Other (Census '00) 0 Occupancy rates OccRt SFD 98.1% u `h � OccRt 234 93.5% OccRt TH 95.7% /F OccRt MFown 1 92.7% OccRt MFrent OccRt Mobile 100.0% fi3/ Persons per Household Multipliers Owner - occupied Renter - occupied PPH sfd 2.7551 2.939 PPH 234 1.452 1.894 PPH TH 1.831 2.550 PPH mf5 1 1.235 1.576 PPH MH2006 2.480 PPH other 2.460 Friday, June 08, 2007 Page 374 of 398 Metropolitan Council P/ June 7, 2007 Metropolitan Council's Annual Population Estimates Methodology area. These Metropolitan Council prepares local population estimates for State golvegovernment purposes. for local estimates are the official population and household Metropolitan Council has the statutory responsibility to develop l the estimates, died, and certify fi lo government review, receive comments or challenges, revise estimates. (Minnesota Statutes 473.24, revised June 2005)• estimation model. In 2006, Since the 1970s, Metropolitan Council has used a housing- stock - based Metropolitan Council Research conducted a review and redesign of the Councico methodology and process. Minnesota Population Center at University of Minnesota model and allows multi -year 11) The model resulting from the 2006 redesign remains a housing- stock - based review of housing gains and losses. The Council can incorporate corrected local data inputs and information received late. Additionally, the Council can adjust Census -based assumptions of occupancy rates and household sizes, if adjustments are warranted. o ulation as follows: In reduced form, the Council's model determines housing units, households and population — Housg in Units 2000 + I (Housing Changes 2000 to 2006) Housing Units 2006 — Occupancy Rates Households 2006 = Housing Units 2006 * pc p Quarters Population Total Population = (Households * Persons Per Household) + Group Q 1 incorporated USPS address vacancy data and Census American For the 2006-07 y Survey cycle, the Council has ata sources, rove men used to result in a Surve (ACS) data. These data sources, available s�Theserimp time, are used to adjust Community Y current housing occupancy rsenta representation of population growth household grotl since 2000. more realistic, real-time p Estimation of housing stock. April 1, 2006, estimates, the Council's model starts with revised 100% housing unit counts from Census 2000, segmented by housing type. published in July 2007. prepared the initial 1 Housing for April d population , r reP in spring 2007 and will be finalized and p ou uarters population were revised for selected cities following 40 2 Housing C ns, s e ol 2000 dd .These re and group 9 release o f Census 2000 data. These revisions are filed on the Census website as "Corrected Counts." Most of the changes resulted from resolution of municipal boundaries errors. The Council classifies built housing into four types: • • single family detached • townhomes and other single attached • units in duplexes and 3- and 4 -unit buildings • units in multi - family buildings (5 or more units) Revised 100% count statistics from Census 2000 provide the year 2000 base for built housin sto The Council's model adds on built housing stock changes since 2000. These include: g ck s • housing units permitted • other gross additions to housing stock • gross losses to housing stock (a debit) • other needed, but date - uncertain, adjustments to housing stock. Apart from built housing stock, many cities and towns have mobile homes. Mobile homes are full counted each year. The data is provided to Council Research by local governments and mobile home park managers. y re- Housing units permitted Data is collected by Council Research through an annual survey of cities towns. Where cities or towns do not participate, Council Research substitutes in data from the US substitute data is mostly Commerce Department's Building Permits Survey. The Y ties and always complete y c omparable, but not The Council's model assumes that not all housing units permitted will be built in the year ermitte crediting the most recent year of permitting, the Council assumes: p d. In • • 80% completion for multi- family developments (5 or more units) • 90% for townhomes, duplexes, 3- and 4 -unit buildings • 95% for single family detached These multipliers are suggested by cycle -time (permit to start to completion) distributions from the US Commerce Department's Survey of Construction (SOC). Single - family detached are the most lik be completed in the same year permitted; multi - family construction has the longest cycle-times. ely to Y Most of the units "held back" will be completed and readied for occupancy after April 1 of the year following permit, and will be counted in subsequent years' estimates. In the long -term, Council a 100% completion for most types of built housing; and a 90% completion rate for multi-family buildings (5 or more units). The 90% completion rate is a compromise between the 100% upper assumes and Survey of Construction (SOC) findings: During years 1999 -2004, across a national sample the SOC documented an 85% p rate in multi -famil pee limn changes, misclassification, and units not started, as well as starts abandoned .6 mple of cities, y, mos due to design feel, based on observation of development in the Twin Cities market, that eventual com etion rat staff better than the national average. p rates are 3 Census 2000, SF3, table H3 and table of "Corrected Counts" provide the total numbers of units in each minor civil divisi on. Table H30 provides the housing type distribution within those totals. 4 The Council assumes that housing units permitted in 2000 would not be completed and readied for occupancy until 1st Quarter 2001; and that housing units permitted in 2006 would not be completed and readied for occupancy until 1 Quarter 2007. 5 Council has found, in a number of instances, that cities and towns under -report to US Commerce Department. The data is • online at httn: / /socds huduser or /permits/ 6 US Census Bureau, "Relationship Between Building Permits, Housing Starts, and Housing Completions," onli ne at www.census.. ov/con st/www/nrcdatarelationshi • s.html 2 ! . , Gross additions and ross losses. Gross additions include moved -in housin g units and conversions • reported to th Cou ncil's annual survey, as well as units annexed in and reported to Minnes ota State Demographer's survey. Gross losses include moved -out units and demolitions reported to the Council's annual survey, as well as units annexed out and reported to Minnesota State Demographer's survey. Other adiustments. Beyond this, Council Research is able to make other needed, but date - uncertain adjustments to housing stock. There are three situations where Council Research has do ne this: • Strong evidence of unreported demolitions may warrant a downward adjustment. Council Research has data -mined parcels data to flag records with a year -built change or building removals. Researchers then reviewed 2000 and 2005 aerial photography for flagged parcels determine whether demolitions occurred. In those cases where detected demolitions from aerial photos) outnumbered what cities had reported, Council Research de ns (determined p to difference. bits the • Strong evidence of housing units missed by Census 2000 or missed by local building record - keeping may warrant an upward adjustment to housing unit counts. Such evidence m' include a municipal housing stock enumeration or administrative records a permits • Comparison of estimated total housing vs. homestead counts (owned and o nalysis. might necessitates an upward adjustment. ccupied) also Housing stock calculation As an example, for Single-Family housin g stock, the calculation can be specified: y Detached (SFD) SFD 2006 = SFD 2000 + E(SF Permitted _ t th 2004) + (SF Permitted 2005 * completion rate) + 40 E(SF Additions 1=2000 thr, 2005) + E(SF Losses t=2000 tt,n, 2005) + SF Other Adjustments tments Where: • SFD 2000 = 2000 housing units • SF Permitted = Number of units permitted since 2000 • SF Additions = Other gross additions since 2000 • SF Losses = Gross losses in 2000 through 2005 • Completion rate assumes that not all permitted units from previous year will be completed by April 1 of estimates year. The calculation of Townhomes, D uplex/Triplex/Quads, and larger Multifamily housing stock use the same formula specification, but with housing type- specific completion rate assumptions. Ownershi and rental housin se mentation and re- balancin . Council Research tallies "first cut" housing stock estimates, segmented by housing type, as described above. These estimates of housing stock are multiplied by ownership rates from Census 2000. products, by housing type, are summed to determine a "first cut" owners hip subtotal (both (g occupied and vacant ownership units), and a rental housing subtotal a The resulting ain occupied , occuppied and vacant). 7 Minnesota Department of Administration's survey is authorized by Minnesota Statutes 4A.02, paragraph b June 2005. 8 Homestead counts come from Minnesota Department of Revenue's parcel market value database. O(10), revised J 9 Each minor civil division's number of owner- occupied units (found in Census 2000, SF3, table H32) is divid units (found in SF3, table H30). ase ed by total 3 0 Following this, the estimated housing segmentation is re- balanced: The "first cut" own (includes both occupied and vacant ownership units) is controlled to a target ownershi o 105% of the homestead units count. (Homestead units are, by definition occupied rship subtotal so a "first cut" ownership total that is 1% to 5% higher than the homestead count is p range: Is reasonable and /o to expected.) Rental housing units make up the difference. °upied ownership housing; The Council's assumption is that homestead unit counts, from Minnesota Department Abstracts of Assessment, are a reliable, independent validation of ownership housing. I where the "first cut" ownership subtotal is lower than 100% to 105% of p nt of Revenue's Council's "first cut" estimate is revised upward. This involves a "re-casting" of some units from g In those cases estimated rental housing into ownership housing. the homestead count„ the It's also possible for the "first cut" ownership subtotal to be lower than 100% to 105% of the homestead count. In those cases, some estimated ownership units are "re- cast" as rental units. Housin units outside of built housin stock. In addition to the built housing stock also estimates mobile home units. Mobile homes in mobile home parks are enumerate survey of park operators /managers. Mobile homes outside of arks are g � Council Research Research's annual survey of cities and towns. p counted through Council enumerated through a Council Research does not attempt to estimate the number of boats and RVs serving s " The number of boats and RVs serving as "housing units" is impossible to estimate with decennial enumeration. The Council takes the Census 2000 estimate of such g "housing units." III numbers, unchanged, as a placeholder. without a thorough h units and retains those Estimation of househo /ds. Following the completion of housing stock estimation, the Council model o applies occ minor- civil- division -level housing units, se � housing type. The number equivalent (in definition) to non- institutional i occupied housing units. It p upancy rates to f • Single family detached units multiplied by occupancy rate is calculated d as s the sum households of • Townhome units multiplied by occupancy rate • Duplex, triplex, quads units multiplied by occupancy rate • Owned multi - family units multiplied by occupancy rate • Rental multi- family units multiplied by occupancy rate • Mobile homes multiplied by occupancy rate • Boats and RVs serving as "housing units" multiplied by 100 %. Occu uancy rates. Metropolitan Council Research has explored several alternatives f or occupancy rate multipliers. The Council's model is programmed to calculate and apply six occu anc ra • single family detached p y rates: • townhomes • duplexes, triplexes, and quads • owned multi - family units (condos) • rented multi - family units (apartments) • mobile homes / The first four occupancy rates listed are coin occupancy rates by housin l� site measures, designed to represent the variation of g 4 • Current USPS address occupancy rates for a local area (but with III are given 50% weight. without housin • Adjusted Census occupancy rates are also given 50% weight. housing type segmentation) The adjusted Census occupancy rate takes Census 2000 occupancy rates local - type - specific)" and adjusts for estimated change, since 2000, in the housing- type- specific occupancy ly specific and housing g rates. The adjustment is derived from a region -level comparison of Census 2000 occupancy American Community Survey occupancy rates. As an example, for Single-Family Detached (SFD) housing stock, the calculation for a city or town can be specified: g >! rates vs. SFD Occ Rate Lo ,20 = 50% * Addresses not vacant Local, 2006 / EA11 addresses Local, 2006 + 50% * (SF Occ Rate Local, 2000 + (SF Occ Rate Region, ACS — SF Occ Rate Region, 2000)) At region - level, Council Research finds that occupancy rates have declined fo types. This is not a surprise to housing market - watchers: The market has re -bala nced after extreme conditions (extremely low vacancy rates) in year 2000. for three of the four housing In the future, it may be desirable to use local -level American Community adjusted Census 2000 data. For now though, the 2.5% sampling from the first e provide the statistical robustness necessary to fully replace the Survey data in place of ACS have not been published by Census Bureau — and will not be Census is ublis year of ACS does not e h base. Small area detail from sampling (over years 2005 -09) is complete.12 p ed 2010, when a 12.5% Two occupancy rate multipliers are drawn from sources other than Census 2 000 • Occupancy in mobile homes is taken directly from Metropolitan Council's a mobile home parks. 1110 • Occupancy in rented multi - family units (apartments) is taken from annual survey of survey of apartment properties. om GVA Marquette's quarterly Estimation of population in rou Metropolitan Council Research enumerates kno q uarterS, group quarters in order to account persons living in institutional or non - household settings. The list is refreshed annuall to incl known to Minnesota Department of Human Services. Small y ude licensed assumed to be occupied at the capacity identified by DHS. Other types of group homes (less than 10 beds) are grou gr ° homes medium and larger group homes (at least 10 beds) are surveyed annually. p quarters, as well as Since the Council's survey is conducted annually, the resulting counts full y re place the counts from previous years or from Census 2000. Estimation of population in households. The final step in the Council's model is calculation of population in households. 10 USPS address occupancy rates are calculated from USPS route administrative data, available o line at www.huduser.or datasets /us s.html in Each minor civil division's number of vacant units (found in Census 2000, SF3, table H31 is d 11 Each table r iv ' 12 More information on the American Co ) divided by total units (found Community Survey can be found online at www.metrocouncil.or• Census /ACS I O.htm 13 If a survey for a facility is not returned and field follow -up does not result in the group quarters population from the year before. participation, Council Research carries over 5 r Household size chap e. Generally, household sizes are shrinking, necessitatin modific • average household size multipliers from Census 2000. g anon of the The Council's model starts from Census 2000 person per household multipliers, for each segmented by housing type and tenure, but then adds (or subtracts) the region -level difference between Census 2000 and ACS average household sizes. Across all cities and towns, the Council's model added +0.03 to Census 2000 Veen for renter - occupied housing. 00 PPH multipliers • Across all cities and towns, the Council's model debited —0.07 PPH from Census 2000 PP multipliers for owner- occupied housing. H At the region - level, average household sizes have slightly increased in the rental market installments of ACS data will reveal whether this is a statistically significant trend. market; Ave sizes have significantly decreased in owner- occupied housing. There is a demographic shift the region's (as well as nation's) age composition and the region's mix rage household demographic shift is far more apparent in the owner- occupied housing p ft occurring in g g m of household types. This As described earlier, it may be desirable in the fu g arket than the rental market. data in place of adjusted Census 2000 data. For now though, area detail from ACS have not bee published by Census Bureau. Therefore, region -level change in average household sizes, w hich is available and judged statistically reliable, is used for adjustments. ave not been Estimates of households, segmented by housing (owner type- and - tenure - specific persons per household (PPH) . p oduct is ter a o pu multiplied ind by ul plie s households: p p anon in Population in Households = E housin types, tenure (Households h.t., tenure PPH h.t., tenure) Total population, Total population requires one additional term, group quarters population enumerated annually Metropolitan Council: by the Total Population = housing types, tenure (Households h.t., tenure PPH h.t., tenure) + Group Quarters Pop Maintenance of the model. The Council's model is maintained as a Microsoft Access database. When input tables ar subsequent calculations and compilations are performed as a series of MS Access queriesa loaded, Input tables include minor - civil- division -level data on: • permitted housing units, segmented by housing type • other gross changes, segmented by housing type • homestead counts • rental apartment vacancy rates • mobile home counts • Census 2000 revised 100% count statistics on housin se • Census 2000 housing units, segmented by g, gmented by housing type vacant) y housing type and tenure (owner- occupied, rented, 111 • Census 2000 persons - per - household multipliers • quarterly United States Postal Service (USPS) data on address occupancies and vacancies 6 • US Census Bureau's long range plan is to provide continuous collection and release of local demographic and housing data through the American Community Survey. The first d ata for the Twin Cities region, based on 2.5% sampling of all households, was released in late summer The Council's model is designed to allow annual adjustment of local assumptions 006. occupancy rates, and persons -per- household multipliers — with American Community Survey to derive adjustment factors i4 and replacing Census 2000 data mptions — specifically size reaches 12.5% sampling. completely in future as the ACS sample Housing stock base -year counts should be re benchmarked with the decennial Census counts. US Census Bureau will conduct a decennial Census in 2010. i 010. Housing stock distributions published by 2012. in 2010 should be • 14 More information on the American Community Survey can be found online at www.metrocouncil.or _ Census /ACSlO.htm 7 • Methodology Summary Method Used: Housing Stock Model 1. Housing Stock - we measured housing stock change since Census 2000 based on: • Housing units permitted data is collected by Council Research through an annual survey of cities and towns. Where cities or towns do not participate, Council Research substitutes in data from the US Commerce Department's Building Permits Survey. Completion rates are applied where necessary. • Moved -in housing units, conversions reported to the Council's annual survey, as well as units annexed in and reported to Minnesota Department of Administration's survey. • Moved -out units and demolitions reported to the Council's annual survey, as well as units annexed out and reported to Minnesota Department of Administration's survey. • Addition of mobile homes boats and RVs that are used as residential units. Mobile homes in mobile home parks are enumerated through a survey of park operators /managers. Mobile homes outside of parks are counted through Council Research's annual survey of cities and towns. Note Well: The calculations are done by whether the housing type is single family detached; single family attached/townhome; duplex/triplex/quadruplex; multifamily with 5 or more units because dynamics associated with the housing types could be different. 2. Households in Housing Units 40 • Following the completion of housing stock estimation, occupancy rates are applied to occupied housing units, segmented by housing type, while making some assumptions. • Census 2000 occupancy rates are used after adjusting them by 2005 American /AC 5) S SP Community Survey rates in combination with United States Postal Service (USPS) address vacancy data ( the latter provided by U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development) • Occupancy rates in rented multi - family Tits (apartments) are taken from GVA Marquette's quarterly survey of apartnjei proper ies. • Mobile homes occu anc is to R r�M -� • �n Council's survey of mobile home p arks. : l� 6 = Z 3. Population � J> 4 • In households: Ceps':is household sizes (PP . Tiers) are applied after It adjusting them bi 2005 American Community Survey rate while' making some assumptions. `- - - - - -- — __ ---------- • In group quarters: Council's conducts a survey of group quarters annually; the resulting counts fully replace the counts from previous years or from Census 2000. The total population is the sum of population in households (where the occupied housing units are segmented by housing type) and population in group quarters. Assumptions are based on the fact that local detail is not available for cities and towns since • Census 2000. 1. Example: Since local detail is not available for cities and towns, the Council's • starts from Census 2000 occupancy rates, se model the regional 2005 gmented by housing type, adjust each city by American Community Survey rate. Council Research considers this solution fair, since all cities and towns share in the regional change of housing ousin g market • 1 ! , AAA Metropolitan Council a ll May 25, 2007 David Beaudet r- F �' P � � 1 Mayor i City Of Oak Park Hgts , Box 2007 + I ' `. MAY292007 ` j , Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 -6409 `' 1 ; ,+, Dear Mayor Beaudet: Each year, the Metropolitan Council prepares population and household year. Preliminary estimates are shared with local governments for review and comment. Final esti mates, certified by the Council in July, will be used by the State in determining estimates as of April 1 in the previous street aid allocations. g focal government aid (LGA) and local Minnesota statutes provide the timeline for estimates delivery and local government review: • The Council is expected to convey p • "A governing body may challenge an made undeb his section by filing its s pecific • objections in writing with the Metropolitan Council by June 24." "The Metropolitan Council shall certify the estimates of population and the average house size... by July 15 each year, including any estimates sT' ur der objection." (Minnesota Stat section 473.24) household utes, • We are now delivering �C` • g preliminary Apr 1, 2646 estimates o f population and households: • Oak Park Hgts is estimated to,iiave' 4,627 Household size averaged 2.0_ maple and 1,978 households as of April 1, 2006. (Note: Household size averages present persons living in households.) °usehold. These estimates are benchmarked with Census 2000 changes since 2000 and other information collected by Metropolitan Council Research. We counts. Annual updates reflect housing stock have p significantly enhanced the Council's estimates model this year with newly available data inputs. This should result in a more realistic, real -time representation of population growth since 2000. Council staff welcome discussion of the estimates. We have time to consider your comments, adhere to the timeline: Correspondence introducing specific requests or a "governing body's challenge" must be filed with Metropolitan Council Research by June 24, 2007. y provided that you Written comments can be sent by mail, to Olivia McGaha, Metropolitan Council Research or by e -mail to olivia.mcgaha metc state mn us. Sincerely, Todd Graham Research Manager 10 www. rnetrocouneil.org 390 Robert Street North • St. Paul, MN 55 101 -1805 • (651) 602 -1000 • Fax (651) 602 -1550 • 1'1'y (651) 291 -0904 An Equal Opportunity Employer MetB ld Council ing commun that work July 17, 2006 Eric Johnson, City Administrator City of Oak Park Heights 14168 Oak Park Blvd. N., Box 2007 Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 Dear Mr. Johnson: Regional Administrator Tom Weaver asked me to respond to the request meeting regarding the occupancy rate for housing in the City of Oak Park Heights. your belief that this occupancy rate should be at least � you made at our July 14 percent rate used to generate our estimate of 4,664 persons in eights. Y the itas per than the 93 n the city y as 1, 2005. --�_ I conferred with Tom Weaver and Community Development Director 2005 estimate, applies an occupancy rate only to B agree that the occupancy rate for all Oak Park Heights housing percent the in 2005. occupancy rate for estimation method lair Tremerneighborhood , and we and which we used in a modified form for your 2 which yo was likely in the proposed in your J of the 473 housing units added in the city since 2000, units which are primarily r, • For that reason, condominiums and apartments. In general, townhomes, condominiums and rate that is lower than single - family housing. P arily townhomes, rate does not require modification, and thus we used the d apartments have an slightly lower than the overall rate for the city. �3 Percent occupancy concluded that the lac cy rate which is . In summary, we are certifying estimates o 1,968 1househol_ds a nd a population City of Oak Park Heights as of April 15, 2005, as explained t er f Jul the We appreciate your concern that the occupancy in Tom Weaver's lettre of July 7. We will certainly welcome your comments next year f y uohave information that p the city for as acchat p ro o vides s possible. accurate data that can be used with the formulas we will be using. Sincerely, P- Mark E. Vander Schaaf ,\\ Director, Data Resources 7. 0 6() cc: Tom Weaver Blair Tremere ■: Todd Graham Chris Georgacas (Council District 12) ww. metrocouncil. org 230 East Fifth Street • St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 -1626 • (651) 602 -1000 Metro Info Line 602 -1888 Arz Equal Opportunity 6 02 -1550 • TTY 291 -0904 Employer • It Metropolitan Council Building co that work • July 14, 2006 Eric Johnson City Administrator City Of Oak Park Heights 14168 Oak Park Blvd. Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 Dear Mr. Johnson: k you for the comments concerns Thank April 1, 2005 estimates of and additional information you you on June 1, 2006. p pulation and households in your o`ommunit titre to the y, mailed to The preliminary estimate for your community was: • Oak Park Heights is estimated 2005. to have 4,223 people and 1,724 households as of April 1, We have considered your comments, concerns and additional • • today certified the following as the community's estimate: to have Oak Park Heights is estimated information. The Council has 2005. 4,664 people and 1,968 households as of April 1, Minnesota Statutes provide that for communities which do no estimate to be acceptable, the governing body rnay have a special United States Bureau of the Census not find the s condo tean Council (Minn. Stats., revised June 2005nsechon 473.24 by the The Statutes further state: "The political subdivision must bear ) Results of the special census must be received by the Metropolitan Results to s used in that year's June 1 estimate received this Ple ase ear all costs Council tby the n the next Aprl el census. 15 eass e notti fy y me e as soon as possible if your community intends to have a special census c ndl. ct If you have any ed. y questions about the community's estimate, please call me at 6 - Sincerely, 51 602 -1322. Todd Graham Research Manager go cc: Bob Mazanec Sector Representative Council Member Chris Georgacas www. metrocouncil. org 230 East Fifth Street • St. Paul, Minnesota 55101-1626 • (651) 60 2 -1000 • Metro Info Line 602 -1888 Arz Equal Opportunity Employer FaX 60 2 -1550 • TTY 291 -0904 10 et 0 N a , 0 a) a) E .. r.+ o p ) c 0 o c 0 c - c y- .0 o _c co c Q ° U co fa a) N = . U s O p U p fo i s 0 N p a) 0 0 'a 2 N'' p a.-- n c >, O M o o c E' a) +6 0 E cn C 'o te —o ca 2 w �oaj cco o Z = v) g - r i_ c- .0 c . "5 . o _se r- N p V O c W "` O t jc O - E°) E ON c o - a) _ Q o �O co.Lrn E wow w N . N O c CN. �n .( fa c +- y M U � E' c a 0) ) CU .� a) 4-. � (1 c � 0 � � CO a cv) - ��c Y4; °� � 76 a a ° coo o � ca y - �.co = u ,c)�. a) c c .c rn O C v) y i , >, fts U c -- O a) of E.D. ca O «+ c.. .O o o. 'ooc mccn 15 0) co m m b O+ co �Y m c o �t E Jo y p .c t o , o v W °) O f 0 C .c. 3- as O O t o •� N E o . . w ZM 0 c -p 2�v) mo flH o U c o n .c Z '" 0 "Q O - O la c `' f o to N o o N1 °' ` � ~ m c c ° � .c o - o maxi = 0Q) 0 -c E 8 • E . -aa oc Uo o =ocsc, cn o °E� = O ° �� o.. m : If ....-1 c _c= EP.' c v N m :«. m°o E co y 0 .c to ca ,c ca u) c o c � a) a) a) o cn r o ° m > v) c = .co ) E aE o I- va E c� U m o f ° fl •� C 3 co -- o .co Eoo� , � o N�fa co�'Q o o= >, c ,� 6 rncn c m" E � i o v c _� o -' O ' . t g :73 > , c u o - 5 a �' c 1° .�.c a c a) o a0i o to' Q z0)ca Fo ot' i . _ raoca... m 5 �'UU F-a mca o�' aQ .c o I- E i a 0 0 O a th co > a c a) e c- c o.o' -� 1 3 0 a El) nf o a0c ' a`i °a) 'CN (0 4 5 c c I _ a� I- a M _ >>,y to — . c v� t ca (9 0 o , CD 13 0 • o ° > � o c ai t > aiZ ! D o E ea 8c ..c::: cp s . c =o o�� o v «. . to 0- ' N Ofn vn 0) (5 U C > O 4 0 a t 0 N 3 0 of 0 t Cr) 0 a> c c U 3 N E° N c 2 2 - a3 c0> A. c. 3 '-' 0cc w aD 5 • 0 O CA 0 a) a m �? � � Io 0 a ij c ° 0 ,• .- ai a c3 c a� -- 0 0 a)�-o a -' a ) >, N 'C O N -a coo ca Q. .cLca 0 cri . Izi E 0 , w 40 N a) cc o 1- >. o = a) 03 0 3 co 0 U -o 0 CO 0 0 ° C>, N a) 4 - U O m. O o o 0 C e' O . 0 a) .� O a) = a C *-. O co .c 0) y.. — a t N co O .0 0 0) p c ° 01 C to c . t °� • C i ~ N N N yam E >' C•> a) � O C c � '— o >,�oo 2 CC ao` '3° _ - N m ca F co .....c ° =0 Oa_ coo Ca CO LI J CC) c a) 0 a) 0 a) a 'a; 0) i-. 3 cv 0_ O C = e co v '- t ° c o Ha o= „,0 LL �'m 0> 3 v� a>i oEca 0>' mE a) ° �°'•- m - u i c S ..c ca ,e -� o o c ° ' ca 0)a as °� � °�' °o ) ,._ co w = cv � � �c o. •c o 4- ri.� -Q o o a) N L 3 N c o F - o L O eau ° co 0 ..c .12 c c L. u i ca a o 0 ° � 3 ' x . 0 00 c 0.� (0 = a0 c ( E s c ca c c . °' o c ac c t o .o :co c �y = o a� o °' ca Q.c 0 C U >a� ca o._ v c� m ca - - _ >, 3 -w •._a) V TO ,42 . a a) N M 0 N •C C N J = N C C * .. N ro CO C = O O C � , , ,� a) c=2 3 L + � O Q' .. E ' a) co -C o O te 2 ti c �ci °c -$.2°0 -$.2°0 F a) U oa 4- ° = E .0 o C U . 0) 3 , c Y Cl. •C 0 o c c c a) 0 -1-' CO c o = a) O O U u) O Z7 O N r O C -p O.- — C L O , - c U u) O C g� 0 > V c O c = 42 c EmW o ° -04 c aa) 4 c o ANT, 0 v .cvc mO.L, 0 E Aa) 3.:' 0 = E .u) = w c — c0 -QCt1 � • 2- ... ~ 'p 3a� Ei C3c EN .c 0 o a6 -C ca a) O o C3 OVN C C y cu 03> a) ) mC UO>, a o L- - Qa Uo cH 0 m CD ( i) CD -0 cv a. o ` c ` �_ c . a c c a 'v x i ca � - . c o. c�� a�N��� = aN L �3 me c � GO ` O CO 4. oco a .e a) ca.Qg3 , m c s m = �,. c m a �-0c . cc _ > - 2 U . 0 - c c = .� � ft a� 0 . c � • - a - co c ° 0 a) L `= �'. I->' / p' H ° 0 00 c a) co >a)co • C V `'- L a)1- Z E.� > co E 1 • �r w 0 M N d4 «3 a) N = 0) -c O o -c o 3-0 s- _ 4:7 ° . c 0 c (0 0 c w $ Q a'�` o : 3.c 4° � o Sw a) cao v) 3' Q. E s o o s 4-. cca c0�a) 'c�c0 ma moo N c) O o o 02 > , a, E 2 > 22 al _ $�= c -Q� o = v) a) ca a) Zf c c0 'co E 0 o o E c0 o vi a) N 0 O cn 2 CU 0 " • y 3 N CO Q 0 4) 0) , co +.. E 0 C Y y -c z ... v • L 0) 0 C O N = N Q > , j 'Q 00 >. '= CU C1 (0 E O C _ v- • .c O C t co co U• 0) C Q. "''� c0.0)0 0 a) u) O � :c 413 a`oi0t 3$3 �.� E E QE3 c=o ati) cc5 _ 0 .c co a � o o_c � ca 'al L N O N v_ 8- (1) 2 E •5 app c0 '= v, rn > U �.r o o 0 0 .0 era •••-• •••-• �, N c O ' -' o co y C O E E - 0 4- a = i ' c ��c o��vc o a) >, —c oo•L ... c �o • U� _oc(0 E � -�c� ° 0O)o y o cy rut) co a)Q co (0 a '_ -)c rn— v) = cn c0 0 *r _, o a 3 0 0o Q 04 0 a � � � 0 o c o • ,° r a ic ` 0 y 0 o °_ °t as co o ° �co o�cc5 a � X00 oa = .� s °) � c ost 34 m».,0 m yCUa) ° mo o co �NUi^ w c v� 0 c =as 0E 0 ,-._, 0 - oN co a) CD 2co �� 0 ` O i- O f0 C N c w --- -- Q) ,- c a) .= N 2 O o iii i o- O . 0CU0) .V a ON° tca°__, co `m -r a 0 o n.m .0 3 0 C E a = ) 'm E, a o) > .< m o ? v o o o o 0 m a $ 3 + -,: ti =-0 r 3 =0s] 0 c i. c0 to 4- = _._0 ay") 0= . O 4-. ON a) 46 - p ° =o . U) ° 0 ° °CU E o c 0. a °° ai v T) 2? 03 N >, o g 0 0 a) : o . 0 co c0 41 i0 - = N •t 0 0 _ a) c0 t o . via`-) . .c =? c c c a) = v im ) cv) om03 =E� z C. c 3 c5 a c 4 o i c 0 00 . °O ° • _ ° o to c o.cc o ° ) c � °Q y E` �� _ c0 v U= > o 03 Ti .a - w= o (o $a� °N ° $yco0C � 0 00 0. 0.,∎cc ,'3 `-0 O —0 .� 0 Mao SP (a >c0 >+. 0 c= 0 . _ a)a? + >,i_ = .— . .c >, co c . � °o-c co eo o c E'y' " . a) 0 =c .a) °(0> .k" (..) - o Cif O c0O L z 0)::. 4 �N V .,, � .� (1) c .cE� _ _ rn o to a) E - O rn a) o V 6- = O a) z N a _ O 0 L. O . a) (q C t U u- 0 a) .0 C -0 N 0 ° t ' c as (a O .Q ` ` O 0_ t/) .c (a O 0 a O a) _ N= co 0 ", RI a . ' V 0 0 _ 0) O 0 c0 RI 0) 0 . - I-- .0 C - fg= mu90.ca) o>0 c''' -. co .cEa I a c ) a0 # < o CO F - - . H 4,o.N O.i 4 t Metropolitan Council • July 7, 2006 Eric Johnson, City Administrator FAX 651- 439 -0574 City of Oak Park Heights 14168 Oak Park Blvd. N., Box 2007 Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 Dear Mr. Johnson: Thank you for your letter of June 22 with your proposed calculation of Oak Park Heights' population estimate for April 1, 2005. Our meeting of June 16 and the information you subsequently provided have been useful in refining the Metropolitan Council's estimate of your community's households and population. In particular, as surmised by Mark Vander Schaaf at the June 16 meeting, we did not have a complete record of building permits issued in Oak Park Heights since the year 2000 — notably those associated with the Boutwell's Landing • development. We have adjusted our records accordingly and will use those adjusted records to finalize our estimates. As you know, the Metropolitan Council used a revised methodology for the 2005 estimates. This change was initiated at my direction a year ago, principally to ensure that we have a more accurate and logical methodology for complying with the new statutorily- mandated reporting requirements. I directed staff to develop a method of estimating households (occupied housing units) and population that is compatible with our method of estimating housing units. The result was the model that we used this year for deriving preliminary estimates for each metropolitan area community. This preliminary estimate for Oak Park Heights was sent to your community on June 1. Basically, our new model works as follows: 1. Housing Units 2005 = Housing Units 2000 + Net Addition to Housing Units, 2000- 2005. Housing units are defined in accordance with the U.S. Census practice of excluding group quarters and counting only those occupied and unoccupied dwellings where people live independently. The Housing Units 2000 figure comes from Census 2000. We estimate Net Additions to Housing Units, 2000 -2005 based on building permits issued from 2000 through December 31, 2004 (since there is a time lag between when building permits are issued and construction is completed). Also, we make reasoned assumptions about the percentage of building permits that result in completed • construction, since not all buildings for which permits are issued actually get constructed. www.metrocouncil.org 390 Robert Street North • St. Paul, MN 55101 -1805 • (6th) 602 -1000 • Fax (651) 602 -1550 • TTY (651) 291 -0904 An Equal Opportunity Employer 2. Households 2005 = Housing Units 2005 x Occupancy Rate 2005. We determine the households by multiplying the number of housing units times occupancy rate, with housing units segmented by housing type in each community. For example, single family detached homes typically have a higher occupancy rate than multifamily housing. Our data sources for the occupancy rate factor include the 2000 Census, the Current Population Survey (of the Census Bureau), and GVA Marquette Inc. 3. Population 2005 = (Households 2005 x Persons-per-Household 2005) + Group Quarters Population 2005. Our method of determining group quarters population has remained unchanged from previous years: we conduct an annual survey of group quarters in each community regarding their population as of April 1 for each year. As in the case of occupancy rates, persons -per- household is applied to housing type segments. Again, single family detached housing typically has a higher persons - per - household figure than an apartment, for example. As we go forward, this new model will be used for determining all estimates that State law defines as the responsibility of the Metropolitan Council. However, given the unusual circumstances in your case, we believe it is reasonable during this transitional year to allow for an estimate based largely on the approach you used in your letter. I offer the following comments regarding your alternative method and its results: • Your method posits the year 2000 population of 3,777 as an unchanging baseline. This is similar to the Metropolitan Council's past approach of using households as a baseline. However, since we can track changes in housing units more accurately than changes in population, our current model begins with year 2000 housing units as the basis for its calculations and then applies local occupancy rates and persons per household figures to determine the population for each community. • You have included year 2005 building permits as a basis for your estimate of April 1, 2005 population. Building permits issued in 2005 would not result in occupied housing units by April 1 of that year. Our approach in the past, as well as our current model, counts most or all permits of the previous year, but no permits from the year being estimated. • Your method seems to assume that all permitted housing is built, and that it is also all occupied. On average, this is not the case, so we assume that only a certain percentage of permitted housing is built (based on Census Bureau research), and also that a certain percentage of the housing stock is vacant (again, based on Census Bureau research). For Oak Park Heights, we are assuming that all permitted housing has been built, but do not assume that all housing units are occupied. • You apply the persons - per - household figure of 2.13 to all post -2000 housing units regardless of type. Our methodology continues to apply persons - per - household • figures that are customized for different housing types. For example, the largest development in the city, Boutwells Landing, has provided Council staff with a 2005 2 population estimate of 93 people in Group Quarters and 397 other people in households (295 households); the persons - per - household figure for Boutwells Landing households calculates to 1.35. I am, however, willing to use the 2.13 figure this year for non - Boutwells Landing households added since 2000, since that is the figure we used during our discussion at our June 16 meeting, before we had incorporated Boutwells Landing data into our records. • We would use the results of our annual Group Quarters survey to identify the population of persons in this living situation. Incorporating the above comments, I am prepared to certify the following estimates for 2005 in lieu of an estimates prepared using our current model. 2005 Households = 1, 528 fr mo Census 2000 + (473 permitted I 000 x 100% completion rate x 93% occupancy rate in 2005 = .1,528 + 441 =1,968 • 2005 Population = 3,777 from Census 2000 + 228 gain in group quarters since 2000 + 397 people in Boutwells households + (123 households since 2000 outside of Boutwells x 2.13 persons per non - Boutwells household) = 4,664 For your reference, I am attaching the results of applying our new model to the revised data which you have provided. 10 Again, while we are willing to apply the above methodology for your estimate during this transition year, please be advised that we will adhere to our new model in determining your estimates for 2006. I hope that this compromise satisfies your concerns. If you have additional questions or concerns, we would be happy to meet with you again prior to our July 17 deadline. Sincer ly, as H. Weaver Regional Administrator C: Blair Tremere Mark VanderSchaaf • 3 Revised Estimate for Oak Park Heights Using New Methodology 1. Oak Park Heights Housing Units in 2005 = 1,581 in 2000 + 485 permitted in 2000- 2004 —12 removed in 2000 -2004 = 2,054 2. Oak Park Heights Households in 2005 = 2,054 Housing Units in 2005 * 95.5% Occupancy Rate in 2005 = 1,961 3. Oak Park Heights Population in 2005 = (1,961 Households in 2005 * 2.065 Persons-per-Household in 2005) + 552 Group Quarters Population in 2005 = 4,602 4 • City of Oak Park Heights 14168 Oak Park Blvd. N • Box 2007.Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 • Phone (651) 439 -4439 • Fax (651) 439 -0574 July 14, 2006 Mr. Tom Weaver, Administrator Metropolitan Council 230 East Fifth Street St. Paul, MN 55101 -1626 RE: Population Estimates Dear Mr. Weaver, Thank you for meeting with me this morning to again discuss our population estimates relative to our recent exchange of correspondence and communication. Generally, the City finds that the recently provided figure o 4,664 p rsons is a figure that is much closer to a reality that MET Council's initial estimate. r, as we discussed I wanted to clarify two points, one of which may result in a slight adjustment of your recently communicated figure of 4,664. MET Council's utilization of a 93 percent occupancy rate for Oak Park Heights is low. By this analysis there would be 70 vacant units for per 1,000 household units, or about 140 vacant units in the City. Based on someone who lives and works in this community, there are not such levels of vacancy. Instead, I would estimate the figure between 95 and 97 percent occupancy. There are few apartment complexes that would generate this volume of vacancy and all home units constructed by VSSA / Boutwells are occupied. In fact it is my understanding that there is a waiting list. Accordingly, the 93 percent figure should be discarded and a higher figure of at least 95 percent should be inserted which would naturally result in a slightly greater population than 4,664 - Secondly, the only other point of clarification we dis : • agreed upon was that the Fox Hollow Condominium Units as permitted in 2005. n • mclu • - • in the 4.664 figure and would be captured in the 2006 estimate. I trust that this short letter appropriately summarizes our meeting. Please let me know if you have any questions. I would however be immediately curious as to the impacts of the higher occupancy rates as discussed above. I look forward to additional communication and verification on this matter. Very Best Regards, q . Eric Johnson, AICP City Administrator & 10 Cc: City Council Members Mr. Blair Tremere Mr. Mark VanderSchaaf f City of Oak Park Heights 14168 Oak Park Blvd. N • Box 2007. Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 • Phone (651) 439 -4439 • Fax (651) 439 -0574 January 19, 2007 Memo TO: Eric Johnson, City Administrator FROM: Nicole Morris, Intern RE: Occupancy study on multi - family housing units and owner occupied homes The purpose of this project was to find the current occupancy rate for all housing in Oak Park Heights. The primary focus was on rental housing being they typically have a higher vacancy rate than do single family homes that are lived in by the owner. Secondary focus was conducted on the city's occupancy rate of single family homes occupied by the owners. Since September I have been compiling a list of all the rental housing in the city of Oak Park Heights and gathering information regarding the number of units and occupancy rate as of October 2006. I have compiled a list containing all rental housing Oak Park Heights by using city utility billing records and Washington County property tax records. These records were used to determine which residents were owners and which were renters. I then contacted the owners or property managers of the rental units to find out how many units they had and what their past and current occupancy rates are. With this information I was able to create a spreadsheet in Excel which presents total number of units, and occupancy rate. The city's rental housing occupancy rate is at approximately ninety-one percent please refer to column K under totals in the spreadsheet. This lower occupancy is due to vacancies at Boutwells Landing at the time when I was gathering data. Other considerations for this lower rate could be that I have missed some rental housing in the city and also a handful of rental units have not returned my phone calls to tell me what their current occupancy rate is. The city's owner occupied single family homes occupancy rate is at approximately one hundred percent according to the city's Finance Department, please refer to column K. Referring to column H under Owner occupied single family homes the city has a total of 813 and 710 rental housing units, with a combined total of 1523 housing units. Calculating the average occupancy rate for the city was done by combining the occupancy rate for the rental units (see column K) and the single - family homes (see column K). The city of Oak Park Heights total occupancy rate for rental and owner occupied housing units is 95 percent (see column K). This occupancy rate is more accurate and correct than the Metropolitan Council's figure of 93 percent. I suspect if the City of Oak Park Heights kept an updated list of rental units and added to it as they see fit and follow up on the occupancy rates the percentage would possibly rise. Sincerely, Nicole ( Morris .7 >.. n 0 0 0 O n N 0 0 O M O 00 M M n 0 0 0 0 N >.._ 0 co O , O 0 0 (O O O O (0� - O O 000 O O n M(0 O O O O 0 0 '- 0 0 t0 .- m 0 (Q (00 coo ' (0 M CO O W F y Q O r O. A q (0 CO CO 0) MO . A V) csJ CO (�j O V1 O) N co W (0 U o n u) " (0 n u co 80 U ) a0 .< 0 m .- (8 O C4 03 CO 0) 0) O) (O 0) O r4 0) y M O V 80 a) N n a0 0) N N M (V M 00 r m W M o (a co (o as (0 D 7 d - O sO O g 0 0 ~ o 0 W i (0 .- 0 0 (0 (O n 00 O) O N NA V N M M 0 ( A- O _ ( Co M 'Q O) N n g N Em n o E c - . • • - z 0 zo L O E 0 O - O - "t5 0 L _c L ` c 3 3� � 'E c.E o .E dxxxEmxx m to x Ew a x ) LrE a ) co N a) a) a) a) C c c3) 0 = _ c c r O) ac nnnam nn a a3 o c _ O) O.c o o a c Q N v v o Q C n o0 0_' Q F- F- V) v < &D 1- )- F- < f5 N . _ _ _ (0 V 3 ° M� 0. ('4 ( (O O O N 00 OO n n O 0 O 00 C (O CO O O O N N OD O W (O (O N N N O 0) 0) O n O n (0 (0 (0 1�� N (0 00 00 O O O O 00 00 O N 00 tT tr V O CO n M O) N O O n < U) n n 00 O 0) ,- (0 (010 n n C a) O F g cg O) Q7 V (f) O) O) (0 O M 0) O) 0) O) O) O M M M M M M ([) Y) or- n n M (() M M M M M M M (��Y(O��YYMM NN M M ?c?v(O 1'1'1'1' Y (0 LO O (0 (0 u) u) (0 U") (f) .4 N N (0 (1) Y) (0 4) (0 (0 (f) 10 (0(01(0(0(0(0(0(0 (0 (0 a0 (0(0(0(0(0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 c iu a) 2 m t m Z -9 c co a) w 0 0 o m •� Y O J 0 N m 01 O) 0 7 0 0 -o U 4') � m N O S m O N- V L d d m m m Q 0 '` U U a) 3, z0 V U_ N lC N N o t N (0 C m l0 Op E8 M woo rm am0_ E0_N, Fm N C a d a) a) J ( Q a) 0 a) 0 0 E —E E E y 0 y . ;; E E E C 0, m CD rn rn CO VR 00 ( 0) o( °1 o dw c c CO m 0 0000 m Ce � .Y mm m m f r 00.> E E n d 2 m m m m 0 a)�z �� a ° o ) ° 0 a a) > 2222 2 E O. y -§-§.. 0 0 2 ' O rn' a) o o C1 �) v o) ` ` w c a c m = m o 0 0 o 0 0 A N 3 3 a>i a �- 0 T5o Y o %%3 3 c oz_ RI or c Y YYOO > � 0 Z��< 0 000' Y Y 6. o_ z O D D W .c V r u ? U C) �' 1N 0 O 5) u) z > O co zL (oo < , `.3 n 0 y (o 0) 0 2 L .-. W 0 U c ( 0 0 ) D (1) O ( 7 c O a 0 • v Ot) 'O m 7 v O c ? a1 Z a) c O Q 0 L O c 6. CD M j O >� o a) p 0 n -o> a w. c ' 0 v d mm0E > ooa�E 3 E a) Y v)UO N O Q O -) EY 0 m 5 c c �m3 a °� i 0c?oO o O o-O 0 ) >. CL y E m z maw YL m��om ma �� a) a� N E Y E y m Q Z a E o o?? 0 3'v M n 0 Q O Q m n@ d d d Z c o w r 0 co CO z � Q � (ry � a C C�� 0 0 m N ar 0 0 2 0� � ' 02 8 V) V) N E f n N .. N O 8 M N O . . .0 . d• 0 o 0 < O O N N aD c 0 0. 0- 0( d (O C Y O 0 ) 0 0 0 c i Y 9 C O N a c0 pm-o o o��otS dy)�n) °0( 0(°Oa'lin a d y 0 a) (0 00 (0 7 E E (0 n 0° V O N O N N (0 O O n 00 0) O n (O (� O N v M a0 m >• 8 1....r.- 00 - 7 O 0) con n 00 . ( m- 0) 0) (() 00 n .5 c .5 0. 10 v a) m m O0 (0 0 (n 0 00 00 00 00 00 ( m n 7 M M M V V (O O O m C�a —rom... -- (nOm -0 01n(n(00L0,00-- -(o —u) 0 O H 4..— a) .- N c) 0. (0 (O n (D 0) A- N M n 00 0) O N M (0 a) n 0) O N M d' U r u 0 A- A- A- V 80 x0 1- N N N N N N N N O N M M M M M CO ( CO N )7/072006 14:31 FAX 651 602 1358 METRO COUNCIL 2001 Metropolitan Council FAX COVER SHEET 390 North Robert Street St. Paul, MN 55101 -1633 www.metrocouncil.orq FAX: 651-602-1358 Date: May 31, 2006 To: Eric Johnson Phone: 651- 439 -4439 City Administrator, Oak Park Heights Fax: 651- 439 -0574 From: Pat Curtiss Phone: 651 602 1390 For: Tom Weaver, Regional Administrator Phone: 651- 602 -1723 Metropolitan Council Re: Revised Housing Estimates cc: Number of pages including cover sheet: 5 Message: Original letter to follow 1 )7/07/`2006 14:31 FAX 651 602 1358 METRO COUNCIL fj 002 g o t Metropolitan Council July 7, 2006 Eric Johnson, City Administrator FAX 651 -439 -0574 City of Oak Park Heights 14168 Oak Park Blvd. N., Box 2007 Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 Dear Mr. Johnson: Thank you for your letter of June 22 with your proposed calculation of Oak Park Heights' population estimate for April 1, 2005. Our meeting of June 16 and the information you subsequently provided have been useful in refining the Metropolitan Council's estimate of your community's households and population. In particular, as surmised by Mark Vander Schaaf at the June 16 meeting, we did not have a complete record of building permits issued in Oak Park Heights since the year 2000 — notably those associated with the Boutwell's Landing development. We have adjusted our records accordingly and will use those adjusted records to finalize our estimates. As you know, the Metropolitan Council used a revised methodology for the 2005 estimates. This change was initiated at my direction a year ago, principally to ensure that we have a more accurate and logical methodology for complying with the new statutorily- mandated reporting requirements. I directed staff to develop a method of estimating households (occupied housing units) and population that is compatible with our method of estimating housing units. The result was the model that we used this year for deriving preliminary estimates for each metropolitan area community. This preliminary estimate for Oak Park Heights was sent to your community on June 1. Basically, our new model works as follows: 1. Housing Units 2005 = Housing Units 2000 + Net Addition to Housing Units, 2000- 2005. Housing units are defined in accordance with the U.S. Census practice of excluding group quarters and counting only those occupied and unoccupied dwellings where people live independently. The Housing Units 2000 figure comes from Census 2000. We estimate Net Additions to Housing Units, 2000 -2005 based on building permits issued from 2000 through December 31, 2004 (since there is a time lag between when building permits are issued and construction is completed). Also, we make • reasoned assumptions about the percentage of building permits that result in completed construction, since not all buildings for which permits are issued actually get constructed. www.metrocouncil.org 390 Robert Street North • St. Paul, MN 55101 -1805 • (641) 602 -1000 • Fax (651) 602 -1550 • TTY (651) 291 -0904 An Equal Opportunity Employer D7/07 / 14:32 FAX 651 602 1358 METRO COUNCIL [0003 2. Households 2005 = Housing Units 2005 x Occupancy Rate 2005. We determine the households by multiplying the number of housing units times occupancy rate, with housing units segmented by housing type in each community. For example, single family detached homes typically have a higher occupancy rate than multifamily housing. Our data sources for the occupancy rate factor include the 2000 Census, the Current Population Survey (of the Census Bureau), and GVA Marquette Inc. 3. Population 2005 = (Households 2005 x Persons-per-Household 2005) + Group Quarters Population 2005. Our method of determining group quarters population has remained unchanged from previous years: we conduct an annual survey of group quarters in each community regarding their population as of April 1 for each year. As in the case of occupancy rates, persons - per - household is applied to housing type segments. Again, single family detached housing typically has a higher persons- per - household figure than an apartment, for example. As we go forward, this new model will be used for determining all estimates that State law defines as the responsibility of the Metropolitan Council. However, given the unusual circumstances in your case, we believe it is reasonable during this transitional year to allow for an estimate based largely on the approach you used in your letter. I offer the following comments regarding your alternative method and its results: • Your method posits the year 2000 population of 3,777 as an unchanging baseline. This is similar to the Metropolitan Council's past approach of using households as a baseline. However, since we can track changes in housing units more accurately than changes in population, our current model begins with year 2000 housing units as the basis for its calculations and then applies local occupancy rates and persons per household figures to determine the population for each community. • You have included year 2005 building permits as a basis for your estimate of April 1, 2005 population. Building permits issued in 2005 would not result in occupied housing units by April 1 of that year. Our approach in the past, as well as our current model, counts most or all permits of the previous year, but no permits from the year being estimated. • Your method seems to assume that all permitted housing is built, and that it is also all occupied. On average, this is not the case, so we assume that only a certain percentage of permitted housing is built (based on Census Bureau research), and also that a certain percentage of the housing stock is vacant (again, based on Census Bureau research). For Oak Park Heights, we are assuming that all permitted housing has been built, but do not assume that all housing units are occupied. vhok Cri • You apply the persons - per - household figure of 2.13 to all post -2000 housing units 110 regardless of type. Our methodology continues to apply persons - per - household figures that are customized for different housing types. For example, the largest development in the city, Boutwells Landing, has provided Council staff with a 2005 2 )7/07t20O6 14:33 FAX 651 602 1358 METRO COUNCIL L004 population estimate of 93 people in Group Quarters and 397 other people in households (295 households); the persons- per - household figure for Boutwells Landing households calculates to 1.35. I am, however, willing to use the 2.13 figure this year for non - Boutwells Landing households added since 2000, since that is the figure we used during our discussion at our June 16 meeting, before we had incorporated Boutwells Landing data into our records. • We would use the results of our annual Group Quarters survey to identify the population of persons in this living situation. Incorporating the above comments, I am prepared to certify the following estimates for 2005 in lieu of an estimates prepared using our current model. 2005 Households = 1,528 from Census 2000 + (473 permitted housing • • ce 2000 x 100% completion rate x 93% occupancy rate in 2005) = 1,528 + 44 =1,968 2005 Population = 3, 777 from Census 2000 + 228 gain in group quarte • 000 + 397 people in Boutwells households + (123 households since 2000 outside of Boutwells x 2.13 persons per non - Boutwells household) = 4,664 For your reference, I am attaching the results of applying our new model to the revised data • which you have provided. Again, while we are willing to apply the above methodology for your estimate during this transition year, please be advised that we will adhere to our new model in determining your estimates for 2006. I hope that this compromise satisfies your concerns. If you have additional questions or concerns, we would be happy to meet with you again prior to our July 17 deadline. Sincer ly, 41 113 as H. Weaver Regional Administrator C: Blair Tremere Mark VanderSchaaf 1 3 07/07/2006 14:33 FAX 651 602 1358 METRO COUNCIL Q005 1 Revised Estimate for Oak Park Heights Using New Methodology 1. Oak Park Heights Housing Units in 2005 = 1,581 in 2000 + 485 permitted in 2000- 2004 —12 removed in 2000 -2004 = 2,054 2. Oak Park Heights Households in 2005 = 2,054 Housing Units in 2005 * Occupancy Rate in 2005 = 1,961 3. Oak Park Heights Population in 2005 = (1,961 Households in 2005 * 2.065 Persons-per-Household in 2005) + 552 Group Quarters Population in 2005 = 4,602 • 4 J xTM y City of Oak Park Heights 14168 Oak Park Blvd. N • Box 2007 • Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 • Phone (651) 439 -4439 • Fax (651) 439 -0574 une 22, 2006 Mr. Tom Weaver, Administrator Metropolitan Council k ` l�� �� :7 230 East Fifth Street St. Paul, MN 55101 -1626 RE: Population Estimates Dear Mr. Weaver, Before I get into the discussion of the attached data and estimates I wanted to say taking the time to meet with me to discuss this matter. As you can understand t issusue e is of you for d thi s i s utmost importance to the City as it can have massive financial and planning ramifications for years to come. Accordingly, reasonable and logical estimates for actual population fi • be the normative process as no city or agency will strike an exact figure. The above have enclosed for your consideration two short spreadsheets, Exhibits A and B. gores should listing of new construction and demolished residential structures. Exhibit B Exhibit A is a being o fid, I i population impacts resulting from these new and demolished buildings. s an estimate of the In essence, the City calculates that the population for April r , 2005 is 4,774 and is and , adjustment upward from the 2004 figure of 139 persons. This calculation is explained p � below. p A review of Exhibit A demonstrates that there are 575 NET units from 2000. Ideally, this figure would be multiplied by 2.13 (the average household size) which would then be added to the Census figure of 3,777 (which remains tentative) would then total 5 2000 of these units are prison cells and should not have the 2.13 multiplier applied to a s ther isr' nlyty one person per cell. Additionally, 141 of the 317 A only p are erso one-room assisted living partment u types of housing can only account for units are either studio a 1 person per unit. The balance of the units (176) must have the 2.13 average apartments or applied as there are typically more than one person living in such units. MET Council cannot pick and choose whom they wish to apply the avg. household size. t With this data in mind, when one adds the 2000 population of 3,777 to the new 997.62 (See Exhibit B) persons the resulting figure is 4,774. This figu may also increase of one takes into account the discussion we held at our meeting about vacancy rates. It was explained at the meeting that the vacancy rate is estimated at 4 percent. As someone increase when and works in this City, I believe this figure to be inaccurate as it would result in 40 vacancies 1,000 housing units. I would estimate that this figure is closed to 1.8 to one who lives curious as to the impact of this adjustment. 2.0 percent. I would be leis per 4 As must reserve its right to appeal any decisions as may arise • du you can understand, the City this communication must take the opportunity to inform the during this process. Accordingly MET Council that this letter shall also be considered as our same time to review this information expressed figure of 4,223 persons. I assume it will y Once you have had some time to digest this material I and get back to me with y our comments. in early July to discuss these figures once would suggest and ask that we hold a second meeting again. As we are all dealing in estimates, the intention of my analysis is to be within a reasonable threshold of correctness which I believe is a threshold we are more than meeting with the enclosed data and anal is. est Re;r; yfr Eric Jo • ,, n, AICP City ' , , mistrator p.s. for the sake of / e reference and tracking, the 2005 permits discussed herein do include the 29 -unit Fox Hollo ndominium Cc: City Council Members Mr. Blair Tremere Mr. Mark Van de Schaaf ill III City of Oak Park Heights It ! • • New Residential Construction Type of Unit room 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Since FamiL Houses Du dex es 11111111.111111111111111111 Townhouse /Condominiums 11111 46 4 `' 11111111111 Grt 13° 29 29 Apartments 317 simmerl Public Housing Prison g P ass ion 60 Total Units: 330 60 0 UM Accumulated Total Units: 588 46 30 • City of Oak Park Heights Demolition Residential Construction Type of Unit 2001 2002 Sinae . Famil im2mo 2003 iii004 2005 Houses Du Ilexes Townh ouse /Condominium Apartment Public Housing Total Units Demolished: Accumulated Units: 0 0 13 includes one du , lex �� 10 \, (,( II ti' Ex 1N l 13; i & MuRI ier 1 • Ava, Nausehoh! Poau S e Malt #o_ fUn ^� -�- 2 2.13 4.26 New Units 209 2.13 445.17 Du ple Family Homes Duplex 116 1 116.00 Apartments (317 Units): 25 1 25.00 1-unit io A meing 45 2.13 125.00 Sroom p s Uving 22 2.13 00.11 1 Bedroom Assst. Living 4 2 2.13 1 6 2 Bedroom Asst Living 56 2.13 123.54 1 Bedroom Independent Living 60 1 2 3. 54 2 Bedroom Independent Living Prison Cells _13 2.13 (27.69) Demolitions All were SFH & 1 Duplex Total New Units (NET) 575 Total Net Persons 2000 to 2005 997.62 2000 Census 3,777_ New Population 4111 4,774.62 i Metropolitan Council t i t Buildin communities that work June 1, 2006 lo ilit P *fit Eric Johnson tet City Administrator City Of Oak Park Heights 14168 Oak Park Blvd. PO Box 2007 Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 Dear Mr. Johnson: Each year, the Metropolitan Council prepares population year for year, and towns in the Twin Cities area. ptionary estimates o se P P reli m n and household estimates it local April 1 in the previous review and comment. Final estimates, certified by local overnment aid (LGA) Y s he Coud a oc at monthew II be used b cal government; for 9 g ( A and local street aid allocations. Y the State in Minnesota statutes provide the timeline for estimates delivery and • The Council is expected to conve Y local government review: "A governing body Y preliminary estimates "b • June y ma challenge an estimate made under this section by filing its specific objections in writing with the Metropolitan Council by June 24_ Population and the average household Year." • "The Metropolitan Council shall certify the estimates of P c size... et po 15 each year, includin • siz e 2005, sy 15 ch year, any estimates still under objection." (Minn. Stats., revised Accordingly, we are now deliverin your community: g Preliminary April 1, 2005, estimates of population and households in • Oak Park Heights is estimated to have 4,223 Household size averaged 2.13 people and 1,724 households as of April 1, 2005 (Note: Household size e averages represent persons living n per household. These estimates are benchmarked with demographics from Census g households.) 4 2." - residential construction data and other information collected by ! 7" reside appreciate the cooperation data nd other of the cities and towns in the Council's olit Annual it Research. reflect Y Metrnpolitan Council Research. We 4 Council staff welcome d of the estimates. We have time data collection. adhere to the timeline: Correspondence discussion scu iof th introducing estimates. adhere timeline: Research by e to consider objections your comments, must filed that you y June 24, 2006. s requests or objections (if any) must be filed with Written comments can be sent b e -mail to todd. raham Y mail, to the attention of Todd Graham, metc.state.mn.us. Metropolitan Council Research, or by Sincerely, Todd Graham Research Manager • w ww.metrocouncil.or g 230 East Fifth Street • St. Paul Minnesota 55101 -1626 • (651) 602 -1000 Metro Info Line 602 -1888 iiiimmininimmon.......__An Equal Opportunity Employer • Fag 602 -1550 hJ • T 291 -0904 / • j 4 . X 6 I N n� • b •A 0, \ , - i .., .. V` I� C 1 �. pi ` ., .s o 7 � s � - 3 - -- o - 0 2 4 6 r .cN , 5 ( : 1 2)/ - ---,. - . ) .., 4 4-, ) i t c ; ‘ A v r t .0 1 1 1- '1 ° t T -, .... � , 9 ®, ,, Z e 4 °oc..._ + al J i 1 1 . --&.. , 6 .• i �L "2 Z-,- % ° < -4-- d a G s.-:. "Y-. 4 ii .. o , 2 NI ( "43 \‘ k.,_ "-J- (, tt � N � ° cc • . ,.... • 3A- Cr 0 City of Oak Park Heights 14168 Oak Park Blvd. N • Box 2007 • Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 • Phone (651) 439 -4439 • Fax (651) 439 -0574 July 15 2005 Ms. Kathy Johnson, Metropolitan Council Research Metropolitan Council 230 East Fifth Street St. Paul, MN 55101 -1626 ** *VIA FACSIMILE — 651 602 - 1550 * ** - also via US Mail Dear Ms. Johnson, .........._..._....... Thank you for taking the opportunity to discuss with me the discrepancies our two entities have had regarding the MET Council's recent population estimates for the City of Oak Park Heights as of 4/1/04. Based on our two meetings and several hours of research, it appears that a population figure that is acceptable to both parties as of April 1 , 2004 is 4,633. As I recall, this number varies from your initial estimate by 108 persons due primarily to a net understatement of the group quarters in both 2003 and 2004, in large part resulting from Oak Park Heights Prison. The City's overstatement of 123 was due to MET Council policy of not allowing the utilization of a 2.14 multiplier for senior housing facilities (McKean Square), thus bringing our total lower. One additional element of our discussion and agreed upon was that this figure took into account all the construction of McKean Square, except for 8 town home units and also only included two of nine units at Oakgreen Town -homes (Home4me). Per that agreement, these uncounted numbers shall be included in the 2005 estimate. Please endeavor to direct future population estimates or related communications directly to my attention as this will help avoid some confusion or delay down the road. • • you for ' it e. egards "tic Johns City A trator Cc: City Council Members • • gs c-, , ), s r) 4,.. s o s.. b ( - ) t. t 1 0 . i b I n y n tti o 0 cm y Nt° Co 4 A O �- +a oc a oo o 4a tat b w oo oo N O ON `all y �7 h ti y 4i Oo w • b a tli t/1 w ti ti a w ti y tefty O Sb `'' a `" o G+ cv O n C) ti °p ° Z1? 'A ti ti ti t.. • tll n ,, b AAA ALJA Metropolitan Council 0 / 4 1 - Chais Geor September 19, 2005 292.8 2 - x�u Eric Johnson City Administrator City of Oak Park Heights 14168 Oak Park Boulevard Oak Park Heights, Minnesota 55082 Dear Mr. Johnson: This letter is intended as written documentation for your files. Following your submittal of a challenge to the Metropolitan Council's preliminary April 1, 2004 population and household estimates, we met twice to clarify data, methodological, and other issues of concern to you. I appreciated the opportunity to meet with you and explore solutions to our differing growth estimates. • Our discussion of the data and approaches you use when estimating household growth was helpful to me. It is my hope that we will continue pop and together on solving estimate issues as they arise. Based on our discussions, we both deemed an April 1, 2004 population estimate of 4,633 acceptable. Thank you for providing me with a summary of our agreement. As you stated the 2004 household estimate of 1,928 included units in McKean Square, with the exception of eight town home units. Two of nine units at the Oak green development were included as completed and occupied as of April 1, 2004. The remaining units and accompanying population will be included in the Council's April 1, 2005 population and household estimates. As you have requested, we will send communication about future data needs and annual estimates to your attention. I look forward to working with you in the future. Sincerely, iptit '444. Kathy John • n Demographer 110 Metropolitan Council www.metrocouncil.org 230 East Fifth Street • St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 -1626 Metro Info Line 602 -1888 (651) 602 -1000 • Fax 602 -1550 • TTY 291 -0904 An Equal Opportunity Employer at 1. PI 0 11 , - ,,,,. 11. 't,:r, . ma Ids. ~- City of O P ark 68 Oak park Blvd. N • Heights 1 Box 2007. Oak park Heights MN 55082 • Phone (651) 439 -44 • Fax T - 39651) 439-0574 Ms. Kathy Johnson, Metropolitan Council Research Metropolitan Council 230 East Fifth Street St. Paul, MN 55101 -1626 ***VIA FACSIMILE — 651- 602 - 1550 * ** - also via US Mail RE: Population Estimates Dear Ms. Johnson: I have had an opportunity ity indicates that to review the letter dated June 3 :a , 2005 from oh have had , the City's population review as the e to this City's in total and asks April w the 004 is 4,551. Mr. s Todd Graham where he the 0 o ®r is f i, udocumentation MET Council d this comes nden i detail on how this F nre was de rived. • In 2003, the City sue the C is r� e ' ' ; you to the attached ty spe nt a Feat deal of ty spe a from time coming to a figure you my to been m Connoll as of agreement. 1 20tH that tim e, I would refer further communication be amendments e expresses rce agreement. n d e that time at the requests shall be sent directly to MET Council related to polo correspondence i estimate. data Accordingly, a no point has Y attention, you may of course "Cc" whomever you w i sh . and all other � we receive the above d fever You wish. Until Council determination te above ove crafted. doc umentation, the City cannot analyze and give thought on how Until such data is received this MET cam, the correct ed and we have had a potentially re reasonable weed °the figure as of a e o ` Abe 4 756. U II� to Bch c and agree at the Oak as o in 2003) of4,329 new by � inmates as a that have dwelling units constructed since the 344 new arrived since new d ww However, is cons ruc out that o w 1, is namely. McKean generated as a result a the 161 may case_ - � and erg ease - me 4 , 1 w ifyou have any f S �. - Roos_ Eric Jo r; Cit • °Sr + ' NI .1 Or Cc Tom Weaver Todd Graham, Regional ``� nistr f – ID City Co Research Manager— MET Council V f • % Mail From Debbie Conley Ere giii Yew Wiindow 6cf!o►a Look �� . ia �. k•• l e, <21 s, rte•: From U eb6ie Conisy . f CC Ts: amur __.._ ; ... : KathYJoir ua , Fork H °1 9hfs.'°i?i11_2002 - Close Silbieat Oak - ., BM Byers, fi eseadr S�isor at the M v a for Oak Pe *e tr rk Heg The population estimate Heights bekve Mre,ad`9e in the Ap�7 f gate for Oak p Please cal me at 651 " to 4.329 based on won from fly' 602-1335 a e mad me /you have any questions. Conley �h ® Mtar, Forward { Deb C .t 1 Delete lui Allhilik . • Date 130/032 . 4. l�Start � Novel Gr. • ... �Plopertjat - q in a Mai F O Den.., %Maa raintetneteal• �N�??'w ®.. � sos,4M • • 0 ' * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** —COMM. JOURNAL— * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** DATE JUN-22-2005 * * *, IME 14:37 * ** P. 01 • MODE = MEMORY TRANSMISSION FILE NO.= 200 START = JUN -22 :18 END = JUN - 22 14:37 STN NO. COM RBBR NO. STATION NAME /TEL. PAGES DURATION 001 400 a 6 021550 %00/003 00:00'37" ***** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** _ 1• PARK HEIGHTS CITY - 439 0574 — * * * ** — — • • 71 ° ` - .b' r , - : nd.J \ * 1gti f. 4 I ' ,, • z rm a �r�r' Y Y ri > 1 G-► v ` t City of Oak Pork Heights 14168 Oak Pick Blvd. Box 2007 Oak peck Heights, MN 55082 Phone (651) 439.4499 facsimile transmittal Facsimile (651) OS74 • 6 To: A 04k J (. 7, / i ■ Fax & _,. 7 ?? (O - t7 /J S • Date: 6 - IA- ej Re: Pages: CC: 0 Urgent ❑ For Review ❑ Please Comment • 0 Please RePIy 0 Please Recycle Notes: • 0 °, � P5•'fC '�,, -FAT, . t " r r f, -.4 c C s , - A x L Nr" 'II 4 v y 01 N 40 Z y c 2 a a , o N --I r I it a $ to 01 m O = i ' rD O C = 0 C ' r n n c c • = O a, a. g c m n cu z a Q IY1 .. rt (f , m (6 o �, (1) 73 c E m e ft 3 10. n, m m ,, o w ' o n 0 o c O ` • yy � E•.. Cv m c o' 3 CO D 'a m ' = jai v9 ni o W 43 C p- I = co ^ N a) ? L T i (p N ' 'r 1 O a j co l N I ai p = 0 X Q Co Cn ' : U7 al ^'I o C p ft c a- 0 � O �D N 0 IV f ' D W cn o c 01 co 3 5 m m = �, rn Gr (0 = cn_► O � D m (1) a, ' ( c N CA CA I Z . m C th o ^ o a v) ci r i L.) <3 t, _ A r--- \ \15/ (). b �1� I i t / 1 i c u� VI)) w N tl Itkli o 0 N Metropolitan Council o -_-------___,_____ Thp June 3, 2005 ak Mr. Eric Johnson City Administrator (II 0 P City Of Oak Park Heights i 1 4168 Oak Park Blvd. PO Box 2007 Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 Dear Mr. Johnson: / Each year, the Metropolitan Council prepares / / Twin Cities area. Preliminary p pares Twin Cities a by rY estimates are shared with and household for review for cities and towns in th (LGA) and local street aid allocationsXt month, with local govn►nents for review and com Final will be used by the y the State in determining local government aid provides a new timeline De signed b ist estimates � A new session law ' Y Governor Pawlent • The Council is expected s delivery and local on June 2, and effective on June 3 • T governing Cu c pected to convey preliminary a ces by June 1 e 2005, objections in w odn may challenge Y estimates Mby June 1 g with the g p estimate it made under this section by year." • "The Metropolitan Council shall cer�if the estimates of population titan Council by Y filing its specific • size... et opo t 5 each certify unk u4 June 2005, year, including any estimates still under objectiion the average household section 473.24) 4i Accordingly, we are now delivering (Minn. Stats., revised your community: g Preliminary April 1 • ; tes of population and households in ' • City Of Oak Park estimates 2004. Heights is estimated t- Household size avers hav �/ � 7 ged 2.14 pe hous e ° � _' °Ale and 1,928 households as of q (Note: Household size average _ -sent These estimates are benchmarked with demo r : sent Aril 1, persons living in households.) T ese estimates construction acs are data and other information provide graphics from Census 2000. Annual updates Aeration of the cities and towns in the d by local government staff, reflect Council's data collection. Council staff welcome We greatly appreciate the coo adhere to the timeline: Correspondence of the estimates. W e have time to consider Metropolitan Council Research b introducing specific requests or objections by June 24, Your comments, provided that you Written co 2 005. sections (if an comments can be sent by any must be filed with e -mail to kath ..ohnson Y mail, to the attention of Kathy Johnson, Metropolitan Council Research, or metc.state.mn.us. b Sincerely, Y Todd Graham > i 7 0, 'v ink Research Manager `� / ill www.metr ocouncil. org 230 East Fifth Street • St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 -1626 • (651) 60 2 -1000 • Metro Info Line 602 -1888 An Equal O ppo , runiry Ern fo Fax 602 - 1550 •TTY 291 - 0904 P yer :/.5" Eric A. Johnson Object: Blair temere tom weaver Start: Fri 6/16/2006 11:00 AM End: Fri 6/16/2006 11:30 AM Recurrence: (none) In tom weavers office Room 5b At the new MET Council office CM) vh I (Alt - Ay - C74., 61 i+ /a Tem OE - /11A -/j 1/144 /JE Sclr • • 1 • / - r ---------- ,, 1 . - / Lr,Da C'wtC XO I Co 0 _.............■ 6 3 7 -=-ft-' , • 7,005 Ikhkrecol 7 o00 - \ uv,� � ( Ldvt,Wfr14 .-1) N: �s des, GP 4111 ( 61. 1 ,_ Ad , 1 _ )-5 - c3, N.°0 Yboo • N 4 1 y r \ In o tt QC 0 a O N 0 p U d C? m N - Ai (0 it U 0 CO o • v rn v ► N V = T fh 6) C of - i H a O U = co N V Y C� N a � j a3 GJ o a c v c H cli u) CO v O o' s U ° o a G is- m N U 1 p ( 0 @ = N M in c c cn Ii CI C n, t co U fl U * w 0 a c a) ai v 1 N 0 m d N 3 c as rn v O O N 6 CO r O N '� = aa) — (n 4 t N E r aw 0) 0 N N m d o— d D Y C O C m co • f 6 0 ca c a ++ '11 c (° = c m a) N ..,e >7.; co = y • D O g d p y O ai N as p 2 d It 1 at a+ O cls a ' o 0. co v Z 0 o O 0. LL Z _ ° E Q • p — N J W tti 5 d > 0 d. 1-- > CS ic, CL -CS 'c p, a .0 O co E cct 0 { 0 . .1. a) ao a III lit c co mer., .c 414 __ _N LI: U Q 03 Q) O U a) E 0 2� in; • ci o c � � \ (-I) .. v., ti, O a c! N ai . R .. J ~ I ..le 0 Op 0i M N r C C i o a) "- O C N 15. • R N= • W m a) a ' 1C7 N C C -. C r�i1 d (p ( p (Q 00 0 r, i U O 7. 0 O __ea a) g 0o cq t 'C U Section 1. Adult In H-0 y mate Profile (excluding short-tenn • o ffender) as of 01 /01/2004 CO OF COMMITMENT (top six total: 4,607): Ramsey Dakota 2,049 26.3% St. Louis 1,344 17.2% Anoka 262 3.4% 379 4.9% Olmsted (Note: 327 4.2% Percentages are based on total 246 POPULATION population of 7,795) 3 .2% Stillwater FACILITY; Lin Lakes F aribault 1 ,302 1,262 16.7% Rush River/Moose bake 1 ,228 16 City 15.8% Willow St. Cloud 1 ,129 O ak Park 14.5% Shakopee Hei ghts 3. 986 12.6% Red Wing 432 • 10. o ( ;, Work Relea % C Institution ' 6 5.0% CA) n w{- �t ■ Total Community Work Crew 209 28 2 % wt \�� cN`� • (Note: Red Wing / 5 g s tarted housing 40 0 .5% g adult offenders 7 795 t,, effective 11 / 06 /2003) �'/ Minnesota Department o� Corrections ,adult Inmate Profile as of 01/01/2004 Page 3 of 5 Section 1 • Adult Inmate Profile (excluding short-term offenders) as of 01/01/2005 • 1/01/2005 /"' - °S CO ATI' OF COMMITMENT Ramsey (top six total: 4,818): Dakota 2 ,112 24.9% St. Louis 1,411 16.6% Olmsted 303 3.6% 372 4.4% Anoka (Note: 342 4.0% Percenta 3 are based on total 2 POP�ATION B Population 3.3 of 8,482) Stillwater Y FACILITY/Location: Lino Lak F aribault 1,375 16.2% Willow River/Moose 1,290 15.2% Rush Cit Lake 1,234 14.5% St. Cloud 1,121 13.2% Shakopee Heights 1,023 12.1 % Oak Park 11.5% Red Win 5.1 Thistlede 5.3% Re lease 55 04% 24 County Community Work Crews 0.3% Work Prairie Jail (Contract) 222 2.6% Institution Co • Correctional Facility 0.5% (Note: Total acility (pC 87 1 0 Red Wing started ) 0% Thistlede arted housin 82 1.7% County v' started housing g adult offenders 612 Jail a p g adult offenders n effective 11/06/2003, 2 004 and OS/2S started housing adul effective 01/20/2004, 2004, res pectively,) offenders effective Minnesota Department of Corrections Adult Inmate Profile as of 01/01/2005, Pa 3 ofS Minnesota Statutes 2005, 473.24 Page I of' Minnesota { Legislature Home - Office Lisaks to the World Hein A, the Reviso of Statutes House 1 Senate 1 Joint Departments and Commissions r Bill Search and Status i Minnesota Statutes 2005, 473.24 Statutes, Laws, and Rules Copyright 2005 by the Office of Revisor of Statutes, State of Minnesota. Minnesota Statutes 2005, Table of Cha•ters Table of contents for Chaster 47 473.24 Population estimates. (a) The Metropolitan Council shall annually prepare an estimate of population for each county, city, and town in the metropolitan area and an estimate of the number of households and average household size for each city in the metropolitan area with a population of 2,500 or more, and an estimate of population over age 65 for each county in the metropolitan area, and convey the estimates to the governing body of each county, city, or town by June 1 each year. In the case of a cit town that is located partly within and partly without the or metropolitan area, the Metropolitan Council shall estimate the proportion of the total population and the average size households that reside within the area. The Metropol t- y Council may prepare an estimate of the population and of the average household size for any other political subdivision located in the metropolitan area. • (b) A governing body may challenge an estimate made under this section by filing its specific objections in writing with the Metropolitan Council by June 24. If the challenge does not result in an acceptable estimate, the governing body may have a special census conducted by the United States Bureau of the Census. The political subdivision must notify Council on or before July 1 of its intent to h ate e + - M census conducted. The political subdivision ~e, of the special census. Results of the special censsus ne��� received by the Metropolitan Council by used in that year's June 1 estimate under the thishsecttion 15 e be Metropolitan Council shall certify The and the average household size totheestatemdemo of pepuandion the commissioner of revenue by Jul , i ncl r and n estimates still under objection July 15 each year, including any HIST: 2005 c 151 art 4 s 4 Please direct all comments concerning issues or legislation to your House Member or State Senator. 11 10 For Legislative Staff or for directions to the Capitol, p , visit the Contact Us page. http: / /ros.leg.mn/ bin/ getpub .php ?pubty STAT _CHAP_SEC &year = cu rren t & sect i on= 473.... 6 /6/2006 • • • • City of Oak Park Heights 14168 Oak Park Blvd. Box 2007 Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 Phone (651) 439 -4439 facs Facsimile (651) 439 -0574 transmittal To: r- , • q1 Fax: — 29 2 069/ From: F rt4 c OMkiSfM Date: G _ Re: v ' " ' ' Pages: ,l cc: ❑Urgent 0 For Review 0 Please Comment ❑ Please Reply ❑Please Recycle Notes: 3 ¢ uf/1.3 /05 09:46 FAX 651 602 1674 METRO COUNCIL X T 001 It Metropolitan Council w Building communities ommunities that work Facsimile Transmittal from fax # 651 - 602 -1674 Date: July 13, 2005 10:36 AM CST Cover page plus: p age Sent By: Deb Conley Phone: 651 - 602 -1335 To: Eric Johnson Organization: City of Oak Park Heights Fax: 651 439 -Q574 • Mr. Johnson, Kathy Johnson asked me to send the attached information to quarters in the city of Oak Park Hei hts, you regarding group quarters numbers. I'm g I apologize for the confusion about trthe where I got the information I used for g the several last se years,I hope will help explain tht Although the Census was conducted in 2000, the Metropolitan Council did not on the group quarters numbers for it until 2002. So for 2000 and only facility I was aware of that was considered group quarters t Oak Heights was the prison. The prison count for April 1, 2000 was sent to me by nd 200N Dept. of Corrections (see attached). P q arters in Oak Park phone from Rachel Hinske, MN Dept. of Cor ns. cAgai tthe data aas over the 1. In 2002 I received the information in a fax (copy the information over the phone from Deb Kerschner was from . of Corrections, 651 6 32 - 5074. The counts were ( pY attached). In 2003 and 2004 I MN Dept of e as of April 1 of each year. Beginning in 2002, I was able to determine that there were 5 small group Oak Park Heights that should be included in the rou and addresses of these facilities are on an attached s quarters page. The T he dat dat a was names from the MN Dept. of Human Services's website on licensed faciltiies. Y In 2003 and 2004, however, the address of the 4 AmeriHealth homes was and the 15 people In those homes were put in Stillwater and removed from Oak Park Heights. as listed as • back to Oak Park Heights group quarters for 2004, and again, mistakenly g Kathy has indicated that 15 people will be added error, gain, I apologize for the Please feel free to call me with any questions. Mears Park Centre, 230 E. 5th Street, St. Paul, MN 55101 (651) 602 -1000 TTY (651) ) 291.09 04 '"° 001 602 1674 ■ METRO COUNCIL r• Q 002 111 • Z > d 0 0 .o X 0 Cr) 00 CO Z in Q� v 1 .0 v 0 t 4 7' CO to10 co co M Ct r O ) v Lo M M . t v. V- IA .-� N C = a) U to ca <}• "U (0 n. O a L. d O C7 v x n o` w a, O Q b X D 0) 0 O b 4� G Q C 0 Q E v O 0 c ill Q yC Q '�, U b d 0 a) r_ al c o N c MI 0 o c z c r o o v �° O a ci a � E ca CO Ym • � < 0 O t- a u , q co a� ° ° • - 0 N <r 0 o _ L. U N ° ° O O U ° N N N 0 O c 0 M N 0 o° o0 N N . -s, "y FAX 651 602 1674 `" METRO COUNCIL y 003 ( 16('';-: : : **7 -4 Z . .) State of Minnesota Minnesota Departme of Corree fions April 17, 2000 Deb Conley Research Division Metropolitan Council 230 East Fifth Street St. Paul, MN 55101 -1626 Dear Ms. Conley: On April 1, 2000 there were 3,094, inmates in t facilities. The breakdown is as follows 0 1111 he four metropolitan state-run col�•eCfional Still water -1,339 Oak Park Height — 356 Shakope — 349 Lino Lakes — 1,050 Let me know if you need fiu'ther information. Sincerely, My phone number is 651 - 603_01 4 41,,, 46f44irk-- LeAnn Brown Research Director • 1450 Energy Park Drive, Suite 200 • Phone 651 / 6 42 -0200 • St. 651, Minnesota 55108 - TDD 651/64.3 -3589 5219 An equal opportunity employer ,they �. 602 1674 ISCa i ispar� eS ",;�C .. ., n _ METRO COUNCIL ::�." . • ram. x � .. � 004 �+uas 61+��n.atEUr,,,� -- •`�RHN,OnNWHJtl2i age � Kt G;p'iY Nse From: To: "Laura Monett" <Imortell Date: bbie.confey @met @ Subject: 4/24/02 2:14PM mn.us> Re: Fiscal Disparities Act Not a problem. It is Not let not diffrcult fo break it dow n by faci me know if you are in need of an r. MCF_Stillwafer; anything further. On grounds =1332 Hospital = 1 Furlough Zero On F - Oak Park Heights: grounds 384 Hospital = 1 Furlough Zero MCF Shakope O n - grounds = 382 Hospit = 2 Furlough = Zero MCF -Lino Lakes: On- grounds - /193 Hospital = Zero Furlough = Zero Laura Morten Research and Evaluation 65 1/603 -01 »> Debbie Conley <debbie.conleyC�metc.state. I apologize for this mn •us > 04/23/02 04;;i9PiV1 or on (I should have made myself more each of the phone), but can 1 the f our e prisons? get a breakdown of the number o f in es the s even -count I have to allocate number hf inmates in each v the y metro area, so I numbers to each city s four facilities area, A rather than need to know how man for h of them four facilities April 1 ' many inmate were in a you. I hope this won't be lust o single number a lot of trouble for Again, sorry for the lack of clarity in my request. Thanks for your help. Deb Here "Laura Morten" <lmortel! are the totals requested The quested for the mn•utm nt 04/23/02 of Re en • ° number of inmates the $tatE. Department of Revenue PM »> Minnesota D epartment of Corrections has va:47 FAX 651 602 1674 + e• pie on ey e: isca` + METRO COUNCIL ,,. �.. span i es c ., . � 005 ._ ..,..*gam... antaltOYi4f ip'aN 3 M24fiIHNW.K1VgN� I pyQ physically located in it's four institutions found within the seven county metro totals 3291. Those offenders found off ground but were questioned if they should be counted are as follows: Hospitals: 4 Furlough: Zero The numbers were calculated using each institutions daily count. Laura Mortell Research and Evaluation 65 1/603 -0199 1 1 Metropolitan Council July 6, 2005 Sent via FAX and U.S Mail. Mr. Eric Johnson City Administrator City of Oak Park Heights 14168 Oak Park Boulevard Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 Dear Mr. Johnson: Your letter of June 22 to Kathy Johnson and your phone conver sations with me refer to the April 1, 2002 Metropolitan Council estimates for Oak Park For your information, I am attaching copies of the Heights. and Mayor Beaudet on July 7, 2004 containing the April 1, 2003 m Kathy Johnson to you community. estimates for your Please inform me if these letters should be mailed to an other parties in the future. Sincerely, au(4_67 Mark E. Vander Schaaf Director of Planning and Growth Management Enclosure cc: Tom Weaver Blair Tremere www.m etrocounciLo rg 230 East Fifth Street • St. Paul, Minnesota 55 101 - 1626 • Metro Info Line 602 - 1888 (651) 602 -1000 •Fax 602 -1550 •TTY 291 An Equal Opportunity �'� plo} -0904 t Metropolitan Council • July 7, 2004 Mr. Eric Johnson City Administrator City Of Oak Park Hts 1 4168 Oak Park Blvd. Box 2007 Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 Dear Mr. Johnson: M The Metropolitan Council's The Metropolitan are shown below for urinary A ril 1 p , 2003 estimates of population and numbers of your community. PO • ulation 2003 Estimate 4,379 Households 1,814 Persons Per Household The estimates are based on demographic using information from the 2000 U n 16 are residential construction data and other local information members. process relies on the valuable information U.S. Census. Annual updates you very provided to us by local Sources. plates rY much for your assistance this Y local The Council's population and household estimates supply year. The popula government staff budgetary Lion and and a ol m in funding estimates gr are used in the pp data for many purposes r ams. ►n government aid Minnesota Department de termination for grant programs. planning, aid allocations determined distributions. Revenue's formulas f or calculating � locZed c ommunities nmties aid at A) d trio Also, estimated population plays an important y the Minnesota Department s Y al suppo b 0 residents. of Transportation role in local street used in the estimation pf population and household trends development (MN /DOT )for pment monpony process. of the accompany activities are No reply to this letter is necessa panying information direct them to my attention by necessary. however ' you have comments re No . reply to this Y July 2 owe metc.state.mn.us, or to the streetraddress listed bean . My tole h estimates please (651) 602 -1332. below. my e-mail address, Sincerely y telephone number is Kathy Johnson Planning An Metropolitan Council Mears Park Centre 230 East Fifth Street St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 www. metrocouncil.o rg 230 East Fifth Street • St. Paul, Minnesota 55101_1626 • (651) 60 2_1000 • Metro Info Line 602 -1888 AR Equal Opportune Fax 602 - 1550 •TTY Opportunity Emp� °yer 291 - 0904 i Metropolitan Council July 7, 2004 David Beaudet Mayor City Of Oak Park Hgts PO Box 2007 Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 -6409 Dear Mayor Beaudet: The Metropolitan Council's preliminary April 1, 2003 estima tes of population and numbers of households are shown below for your community. Po. elation 2003 Estimate 4,379 Households Persons Per Household 1,814 The estimates are based on demographic information from the 2.16 are calculated using residential construction data and other local are d using relies on the valuable information oc l nf U.S. Census. Annual updates calculated i members. Thank you very on provided to us by lotcal government sta Council's y ry much for your assistance this year. o • The ff p pulation and household estimates supply budgetary analysis, and as factors in funding d termination for grant budgetary are used in the as factors De many purposes including planalize estimates are aid used in he Minnesota utions. Department of Revenue's formulas f o a calculating local d aid allocations determined by the Minnesota Department of Tr Also, estimated population plays ti important role in local street communities with at least 5,000 residents. The Council's development supported communities by y Transportation (MN /DOT) for used in the estimation process. population and household trends and o the annum monitoring activities are accompanying information reply eply to this letter is necessary. No re them to m If, however, you have comments regarding the estimates kith .'oh them to y attention, by July 20, 2004. Written comments can be sent to me tc.state.mn.us, or to the street address listed below. M please (651) 60 2 - 1332. my e-mail address, y telephone number is Sincerely, y 1. 7 „ (,,,,,,# , A, A . 4 ,- Kathy Johnson Planning Analyst Metropolitan Council Mears Park Centre 0 230 East Fifth Street St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 www. m etrocouncil. org 230 East Fifth Street • St. Paul, Minnesota 55 101 - 1626 • (651) 602 - 1000 Metro Info Line 602 -1888 An Equal Opportunity Employer Fax 602 - 1550 •TTY 291 - 0904 ' • MAY -19 -2003 16:51 CITY OF OPH : f 4. .7 _ „ � , ,., r : ; .1 P. 02/05 4. ti • ^ " < r y ' ;' . I <. ,,, ` : N iii " . - x : ."' = n • ° !'fi Z 5 ' b O iiiii. ;` .., i . � eig a :a a A .... ..- '71 R• i �; M' .- Ct O :.k :A.:IH: 0 a t 13f. ^ :F: w4 ♦� U :' • 42 t d I u vpr . l t - C .. , : ° :J i i h ihi i i Tit ••; a 1 : :,R, M ,..... i f 1 6 /1 . i o: : ar '.: I b I .s . $ -4.4 $1 ill i , • -- - - -. —.— — 'i MAY -19 -2003 16:51 CITY OF OPH P.03/05 I c 111- 1 0 = ; i _m $° Y ■ IV MN 8 1 I. Y a Ir j 4 d gl a m i co m P E. a w Tr E O V o b es CI cL, Ili w g 1 ii 0 o A �''' E Ni E to O r ate a v A . w p CJ L g a s,$.0. b . ii .-f p `'' 2 8 8 o y r w 0 • E a to 8 s g a 2 4 m S0 . z w 1 1 ° i 8 t 1 a 2 z e • co 0 ~ � ++ o � o f g c ' i N s ea r• ENS I Q v I • 3 JR A - � I E �� 0 m t co a V = G J g 7 M 0 . w c o x e �, ( � a • 4 i 3`-1U E v A i C • +gy w x x dX M' 1 na 2 J • MAY -19 -2003 16:52 CITY OF OPH P.04/05 • O _ • N 1 C w E Z O. • 1 0 _ X 2 e. 5 r i i Q. 1 7 E ea s ii .. G 1 1 os E i X • C a 1 .I m o 3 z a I to TS d 2 c Z. i m • • to it I ee Ca. a° CL F O CT 1 y w y'6 1 i .. MAY -19 -2003 16:51 CI 7Y pp� • ray 0 . • 5 .. :N r : �L . :'l k^' • J•:•.: .�1� .. l' Y� r .h- .7Z � . FAX To: . 1 s11 , l ■ it r1• — From 111_ -' Pax • a. - 1550 _ 4 Date: - - -0 Pages: wing cover sheet Ra iou.k VoLCA- nrAscALIDIC % ..V.IINIA..1..r i ticu-d_ • • • • . , • • 14165 Oak Park Blvd, N. • P.O. Box 2007 Phones (651) 439.4439 Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 • RUC (651) 439 -0674 • ,Ll.. u7 — e Uld4 08:37 OAK PARK HEIGHTS CITY isms •,‹,_ ill P.02/07 li 2 J 0 t 3 i n . : /5 • °.; I Ag mi ni rg I 1_1 -Iiinnonon 0 C R�;�:pri O f C '. gib:.. z a c .„-; f 1 CDf, • 4 a : ��• D 1E /i I Z I I G _ 17 egg V m ; i; ,,,nonono : I go Z o / . is 0 i :.:.;. TIC.Z:12,e:. ifi f g 5 . . I i ;I i 1 ir i:iti'..1:D;;',..::, I . I b f' 1 . iN : ,,, m g a I II J 1..1 0. Lt(..-0 -2804 08.37 OAK PARK HEIGHTS CITY P.03ie7 c 0 yy 's o c II y t E Z -0 ets Q 4 H E. r--! CI lel . - 4 0 U °' co H 7 z • a • 1 5 ii > ��' co v C c 0 to cu . E 1 a c C .O . 8' E = -0 s 0 i M .5 d + �• m h 1 i I I1 O O o € Q� 6. e4 IX y 0 O h CQ � � L N 111 C N l To 8 a O c 8 Le C a 0 da 0 g - r. E m =° 0) 8 m G "0 to. e 1 o g m o ' O co -2 L E m = E a 0 12 8 E d 2 c = 0 8 a . z_ tt C Q 3' ? ° 0 _m q C RI E C cv �E � w 3 � 7 E C E E 0 0 2 O a� is e I E � m N a y 1 r N O V DEC - 09 -2004 08 37 OAK PARK HEIGHTS CITY ' P.04i07 N cl C Q X ofi 4 C .... As 5 3 3 3 E � � 2 J a) w aa) z .. m 3 H to V 0 ° o ° �0, az o a o a z z z N N t4 0 i i 1 Z o 0 M I ,.".44 N O VO i ��aqqs is 4 3 2 6. 715 - 0 O rn ^ ca Z `J Let N" 1 r 14 $ C N O S o°° M 3 � w a, l at W enc ,M O al al a3 o� 1 en ..6 co �W\ Z Z N CO o " 4.7 CO A N W vNi �.. eq D � la a9 � � 4 d 01 Q to p M N *" f CV C i y = I" Z M k'1 t en O H Se ma O o 0. 41 4.7 c rte o to to CO 3 1 CO ir I-1 CO 0 0:1 PP Pri 4. N N 4) H 0 c0 CJ o a Cr Ea er RI CL Z r-f CO e. v v Cr) s? U a;,_a A C r w C ' 0 E - > E o Z L ° O w 0 U N O 0 O ° _ f p O T U ininin I'- d X L_ Z C ° Z m m Q Z th IF MINI 0 ri ° ° Q. V _, E E x ^ ,. Z D d i i a a w E E m a " z ° D E w c Y Q, J Z m m o O Q 0 H O I inin.,„„,„, m U f .Q L W U LL ZN °° 0 d D as ° I L L D C 111 i Q) E.2 ° w u a w m rd ;' a o g v � rn ul L C N Z '"7 0 Z Dm�a LL »2j j co r ,' !,tb").01.'" t 1 I ninon, E 5 u; �-r Zc3N Z ,un - N O 2 v o m O. w m m o _ � a m a C N U U . E C N y N° C V 7 O O O C ul C > >l J h O w 1 ul U c N o w O v W a ." .c a , O 2 " E. m LL ° m = w o m w w ° s' a .o . ' ,� e, °¢ m .c t ° v Y 3 E = 3 rn m w E° m o` .E 'w g: c , y �•� � �a F-° w 3-a v n w o f -i ~ h )- ~' f � E $ O~ I- a ± • 5 ® c \ 2 k 7 0 0 �/ L. » : j z s 2 5 &§ o ® @ $ ƒ 0 k< < k @ \ - { / } \ 5 0 \ u E _ \ k o tii o ca \ _ — 0 / J 2 \ 0 E o a) - \ \ ° • ( lc I w 0 k ® k }� �� @ \ / . \ � / CD ® - E cu �k = % \ c w "rd ®) / 9 0 0 CO 2 ..1 in" @ (/) 0 > f & w { as \\ 2 \ Ti 2 ! * f § \ \ Lei / / 5 c \ m ° 3 oc ° E 0 \ o W c E # 2 = @ o = P � ° ^ § a7 .0 / L. Le } co / ° / . o ° } © { ) { ` o ; @ 2 ») ro 7 o k \ "-I" /( a k 1 0 y / 0 / ^ 2 \ 0 0 \ § \ \ �\ 2 11. } CD C f �/ <\ .4.• E _ CV 2 / / ] ƒ /� U E k f \ / (5 0 o § %ƒ 22 £ o e a % k ® ._ E / 0 >. CU E / \ ( (/) f } \ 7 { ca o o / / \ 2 / o § / / / e / . . ,, 2 E c 2 5 2 / ° / / / § / ' CD \ j . \ \ g g 2 \ d A @ / ° 2 0 / / \ / / g 2 § r < a f ■ g \ R , / • & z ______,......,........ , . 40 . w a a .= Q - N o co 0 .11 o U 0 co z Q 13 CD _ N CD L.. w M . €� C.) a y L E 4. E ots w N d w a)i ii i P �I a) Z o c a) L a 0 To' ---1, O R ._ E a `o CD 0 C L ti N y.. a) CD a .Q w *° z � o a) O u) i N 0 a >- w Q t d.+ Cs. CD a) w S 2 V) 0 M. 0 L E O 0 c V N CD N m Q axi m c 0 E A cn E a R. N o RI C.) m P, • H w c,.. V .... ` o r-I j 3 ■ C Z 3 ,s < a z T co ~ co 4...) o 3 z T CO • E F F . f" Ts 'C) en() E I! 1! ' Z j 0 , S ,, 0 _, ,.. ,, Z n <3 m c g C nnIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII ic) in ,„ . „z Y '' J O J L z =s O Q- / 7 L 4. U) ( 1) �"%j 2 u u n r y _ o (Q a s CC n x d r • c ° N 0 Q CD £ p ..,,,,„, E. d O (:) � Z 42 y W 2 c=3, 1 1 1 In N 2 a CT) CZ = a E CJ /� i wr //i� S �Sr” h -y '^^ e^s w} h ms `s Cl O N --- � �� ��' O W a a rA w,# W a o w c y c« rn N ° s , ' _ E cLam °ve 'y =a E p �. W z c 3 E E Q -1 1` § a s (� m 4i,� � ^ 8�: J N 111 a v O O Q 0 cn E s k X:1.40040 4 00i, ,, � 9 / 4 0 g. 5_ b w C C ®k �4 = C 0 p y co 0 ,c, :!..,4 A °n' ? W O� O ED N E ° O. . O .5 C Y1 1 E / � g- � y m ' .n N O ry 'S'$F j p� 10 y N N O! N § - +' D t y j p C U ._.0 V . N 0 x y L IL a¢vx c f ' 'j N N c`4 �.�r 3212 m a fi 3 c O N LY E O 2 to j ., L co E ` � W 7 W fr , temq- V' W O N W N N .« W y LL C 11� m c y E y 2 .=m22 ai —t- x '� t ° o` y c 2 } c 1 N •° ¢ C L try .� F h F v O H F F L - I�c c O 0 c 0 c � � c j o i _ Y o E f�0 z ■ 0 O 4 RI co 0 0 C � O O co L N (Du) N R a z Q 'y m I i i E CD A co N 'Q N C1 a = E N 3 CO O. o = r N ( N N C1 O v J I: , ,.... ,.. 0 E > f t.r) •4 L C 0 4 .. N m -� N o E vi O O C N O . 0 `° E 0) L N II al .4 vi t -u E ay c H L o ..4 C N `L 1 cu co o_ d co ca 4 �v �, -o o Q E a o .-6. o 0 3 cp C o E o L a m ,� o Z ro N d c o co 'vi v = y 4 7 5 1 . 0 E a ° 0- a c° a a d o m c °� +a 0 1 A o I ?- W NI H = O 1 y N C = a E c w w .c II y U CU 0 O y 0 y �J 2c:::) c.3 ill y c,) O 4.. MI E S co co = o E ° y 41 a _ 3 __, _ E .0 R m e d = ,...9 7 0 a .5 _...\0 j •••• 0 0 .0 O. — 11 ) r' J 7 O q ‘., I.. ....I Z A „, $ -g ..,. ,. .. O .cK::) ,, - ■IMMMMIMIIIMMIMMIMIMMIMIMMMIIIIIIIIIII. ma C MK O . Q C y O V L � w O Z Q . a) H y L CD R r C €d w 0 a i .O L W L = R Q 'i a .E w E oa CD N v� m g lc i a w l a) Z o := a) o 0) ru L a O To E v `° a) 0 c = L ai c0 w N d a .0 w RI c v+ 0 o c H o O o O v 4. Q d .c CD a) a oI o tif $-- CO CD u) CL d m If E 0 a d o V v o o to o a` CI. m 3 E . M _______,............... . . c 0 0 G c w :a- c 3 7 CO • 135 '> v co CD �(/'_ 1 T •C �/ -o _ o` c W O Gov E c $ 0 c 8 N y c o c c 0 5 dam. N L co o _co co c CD N O c a ` O O G c•• c 'G a w il .2 co O e f6 G O C . O p N .Q T c a) o 3 N 2 8 = 3 E c a .o w Z y 2 a a c _ O 3.- i o` 3 • o 0. a E 0 . 0 m a) 17 - o m a �.+ 3 E a) a 0 Ip 40 Zi3 o m 3 3 a' L c ) 3 0 c 3 w m c G a a N o c c a G a` o i h ° v a) E T a) w *'' m c T m o E E m c T U • 3 o 3 E o c Q = _° 0 3 E o • _ 2 a ..ap = Q • fi 3 t t _ 7'-'1';';'''''''''' J`'` hrt th,, F q t Sc a- d A i ? F . { c y , '. .' - .. ',:- : '.,.'-'-'''!. ,:,:: '. '„',.';',."2...p, ',.: ''''.:, y iM , . - . „, ,,,.: -, : , ' , ..:„,.;;;11,..-„-z...; 3' � � a a r a ! i, is � '1 , .,.., .1 - . , ., , .,, i , '',-' f., ,'. „\ ..' `, , .,,_ - -' ''t ----'4;.744' ' ' '''' ''' ' '' ' ''-'''''':''''''' '-').: -'* ,. ..,,„,,...,,,,.. , , i = , ,, .. , . - f\s . .. , I , . a bV. IP It Mail From Debbie Conley PIO el - fie Edit yew actions iools Window Bele d Z' l I I in 0 co From Debbie Cofly cc IN Byers: Kathy Johnson X Tg: mternetlarry wley@state.mn.us BC: Close In Sgbject Illak Park Heights April 1, 2002 population estimate memo; kr. Bewley. Bi Byers. Research Supervisor at the Metropolitan Council, asked me to nobly you about a change in the (J ul Ap 1, 2002 re/ Reply C population estimate for Oak Pak Heights. I beim Mr. Byers spoke to you about this by phone yesterday uly 29). The population estimate for Oak Park Heights has been changed 4,329 based on intonation from the city. ..11.14 Please cal me at 651 602-1335 or e-mail me if you have any questions. Forward 114 Deb Corley Research Division Aus Metropolitan Council Delete A I Data /30/03 a54PM "Start I el Novell G . . ise 11F4opettiz11 Roar Deb... ElMal TO: interne:sail kfpNatftiogizsio2 06J4 11 P/a C P 2. • • Eric A. Johnson From: Debbie Conley [ debbie.conley @metc.state.mn.us] t: Thursday, July 31, 2003 9:09 AM P ject: Eric A. Johnson Population estimate Ibewley.doc Department of Attached the e -mail I sent on Wednesday (7 -30) to Mr. Bewley at the Please call if you have any questions. 1 1 • cu c. 15 a IS r )' -' i a 3- ri N g - : d Z w � F- A a I - c. co t � } Y F y 94i v/ V ,, : :, s . z g O co i tif., , w LLI Isl,. ,AA,,, Z = O g _ CD i as � ;, z • ) „-, i 4 j 1:4. 'a 7 . i .1. m (.._)— CD N & ' ° 2 _ Z 'FS . r v= 1 y x. "f4 fl b .w,,,,,,,I, iill li "6 ,.,. , ,,, �? Q ' ',,,, 'apfia .71 ill co .0 o 1 41) .,` V FA i to ,p ,J�1.� co '" � a Iwo -f1 g o s_ ., k L� CO N ', ra:§ � ` ) 7 W 3 V X i �'y L A Z h an c c N e k 3 c �1 m i � d ' R i��`. ' r . 0 J��2 17i N i N u SO V � C � C g • � _ � L r� ! �. 1 g � 1 po m L • 1•"r �� . Ry O L = y yy I p i N U= N 6 .� r� C N G N 6 C '� Q B y re L ' _ �, i' m $ N m u � ° i N ' d ; ti > > U.S .g y � ✓ vaY o� il .c•- .c Z' c} C pp E g W bQ 10 H N.i1 -n p, c .w., o o� 13 r w r- 1- c 2 E E O ~ 3 a) . c n c 0 O a 1 . N a) • -73 o 1 a Z a .1 co co ` E € m d c m a ` 3 • co c m d a w A m a> 2 3 a R ..c cu m cu ij o 8' A j o s... •t) 2 t 8 ca ts 19 CD N co g .0 0 N E J° O O r, --.13 co w '0 c 8 J. 0 ..j Qiti US to $ 1 3 CD po E g 3 c U J O • ` ZJ 'V t a. 0 �"''' © Cr al ____ L 11 o S o I a co a O o c l L ° � E C I ._5 c. C c H "Zi ' a7 al H G7 ..-7. d a 0 c �_ E E o cc; c — H O O O o 8 c N ^ i .. d 4) c 2 .A o iii El , .. 4 a. a O a z - 7 C y ' ,- cv . 0 z - I- 'n d n r! Metropolitan Council EnviironmentaI Se Service ce Avarlabi /ity Charge M onthly Report MCES 92A .0 Municipality Oak Park Heights Re mit to : Metropolitan Council Environmental Services Division Month December Year 2000 Mears Park Centre, 6th Floor 230 East Fifth Street f a� f St. Paul Minnesota 55101 • ��" z.w �� � �� y .1 '�3�3 '3 1 � � .�`� '�3 �. ' f � � � � S�� E ..? � � {. "� 7 _,' RESI : 42.40;.4V-5;;;;W4' ,�; � � � ' „���� ����� s �*��� Each Housing Unit = 1 SAC Unit (Per attached Form MCES 928 '; ', ,' ) ot h . �� � 4 �5� fi u�.Y P� ' +��§ SINGLE FAMILY HOUSE z , `:a' ., s u s t DUPLEXES - - -- -_ ___ TOWNHOUSES / CONDOMINIUMS APARTMENTS (20% reduction with MCES approval) "— - -- PUBUC HOUSING (25% reduction with MCES approval) — COMMERCIAL / INSTITUT ( Net SAC charges per attached Form MCES 92C) INDUSTRIAL 164 1 $180,400.00 ( Must attach MCES SAC determination letter ) l Net SAC credit brought forward from ! -- previous month's (MCES 92A) report $ ( SUB —TOTAL SAC CHARGES $ 1$0 40 i . Eligible SAC credits from current month activity: Residential = Tota SAC u nits credit ( per attached Form MCES 928) $ Commercial = t City —wide Net SAC units credit ( per attached Form MCES 92C) $ Industrial = I City —wide Net SAC units credit ( Per attached MCES SAC determination letter) $ ( i SUB —TOTAL SAC CREDITS $ ( -( }_ FCR.MCES USE ONLY NET SAC CHARGES or CREDITS $ 180, 400.00 (If NET is a CREDIT balapce, stop here and carry forward to next month ) Invoice No. Administrative Fee (1 % of Net Charges) subtract $ ( 1, t304.O0 Customer No. Suffix 420 �'" ..,::,.. Asset Acct No. 11820 a 4'I� ';$ 17 8,596.00 Revenue Acct. No. 14201 -____T Amount Paid $ Check No. Date Monthly report prepared by Batch No. Name SJ {il; A ' 3317 t--nan Date 1131 /01 White Copy — Retum to MCES Yencwcc Title Community Dear. g (651) 439 -4439 py — Municipality Copy Phone N0. Metropolitan Council • Working for the Region, Planning for the Future Environmental Services January 2, 2001 313CM Tim Butler - :; : , Building Inspector JAN 4 2001 • City of Oak Park Heights I P.O. Box 2007 - 1� Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 -2007 Dear Mr. Butler: The Metropolitan Council Environmental Services Division has determined SAC for the Boutwells Landing Independent Living to be located within the City of Oak Park Heights. This project should be charged 76 SAC Units, as determined below. 6590 J\ten LL t.,O-h SAC Units Charges: Independent Living (w /washers) 49 —1 bdrm x 1.5 people/unit = 73.5 people • 58 — 2 bdrm x 2.0 people/unit = 116 people . 189.5 people @ 2,5 people/SAC Unit ,75.80 0 (L. I , )OO .Q.. If you have any questions, call me at 602 -1113. 5 ' 3,1200 Sincerely, (9,LOOTh Jodi I . Edwards • Staff Specialist Municipal Services Section JLE: (210) 010102S2 cc: S. Selby, MCES Dan Neudecker, Johnson Sheldon Sorenson & Hafner • • CF 6 13( • 230 East Fifth Street St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 -1626 (651) 602 -1005 Pax llI tI Y 229 -3760 An Equal Opportunity Employer MCES 92C Service Availability Charge (SAC) Commercial Detail • PROJECT TYPE : g New Building Only 0 Alteration ( change in use ) 14 Addition 0 Demolition with New Use n Demolition Declaration Only ( Attach to Form MCES 92A) ( Attach to Form MCES 92D ) 100 •r.:y. ,;a: 'a.' .��;'4:" ";:.:h::rii, -' " �;," 3':. �n' Y. 4^r+ ?i*'r "<<:,.si; :t.. 1. " , i .,. 1 Proposed Occupant Type of Business VSSA - Independent Living I Sr. Housing Site Address 5910 Norwich Parkwa Building Permit No. 12-28-2000 d I Total Square Footage 00 -00409 SAC UNITS CALCULATION OF SAC CHARGES : s . Quantity Retail sq.ft. @ 3000 sq.ft. Per SAC = Office sq.ft. 6 2400 sq.ft. Per SAC = Warehouse sq.ft. @ 7000 sq.ft. Per SAC = Other Sr.Housing - determined by # of people per unit = determined by unit composition. 189.5 people @ = 2.5 people/SAC Unit Determination Made by : Met Council Date : * 1 /2 /01 TOTAL CHARGES = 76 * date of letter les attached (in units) �° " '��� � pk�yci)�ja. �r��I , ���'�h����I�di�. ���'t3� "tl ���i,�k, u r;Yd!a�y" f grr. V l�s s �ls l kut �`' 3,J .wn;ttrr P...;..� 1 � L '71kht� . wi . + . � `� Previous Occupant Type of Business Site Address IIIII Demolition Permlt No. I Demolition Date I Total Square Footage CALCULATION OF SAC CREDITS : SAC UNITS Was previous use in existence prior to 1973 ? [I yes a no if no, Original Building Permit No. Date Issued Actual SAC paid for space Involved: (choose one) Q Entire Building U Portion of _ Building = Additional SAC paid for space involved: Bldg. Permit No(s) TOTAL CREDITS = ( ) If yes, Use 200M (In units) 1973 Retail sq.ft. @3000 sq.ft. Per SAC = 1 973 Office sq.ft. @ 2400 sq.ft. Per SAC 1973 Warehouse s sq.ft. to 7000 sq.ft. Per SAC = = Other = Actual SAC paid after 1973: Bldg. Permit No(s) Date(s) = Determinatiop Made by : Date : TOTAL CREDITS = ( 0 ) (in units) roi , pr'v� ,,i'L i r of d a a' "v9 - 1ri . l r rS ! 76 NET SAC UNITS • = (0.5 rounds up to whole number in units ) If a determination for this location was made by MCES, If NET SAC UNITS is a CREDIT BALANCE, please please reference date of letter or attach copy. indicate how many will be reserved as... Site - specific units of credit (Form 92RCR) NOTE : Determinations based on phone or taken as... conversations are only estimates. City-wide units of credit (Form 92A). WI It Metropolitan Council Working for the Region, Planning for the Future Environmental Services January 2, 2001 Jim Butler Building Inspector 5 t 00 .Nct) w � J 1 PIS I City of Oak Park Heights P.O. Box 2007 COPY • Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 -2007 Dear Mr. Butler: • The Metropolitan Council Environmental Services Division has determined SAC for the Boutwells Landing Assisted Living to be located within the City of Oak Park Heights. This project should be charged 39 SAC Units, as determined below. Charges: SAC Units Assisted Living • 116 beds @ 3 beds /SAC Unit 3 8.67 o 39 at ,16O If you have any questions, call me at 602 -1113. 6 4a / 9 Q'j Sincerely, 6 Urrth— Jodi . Edwards Staff Specialist Municipal Services Section JLE: (210) , 010102S3 cc: S. Selby, MCES Dan Neudecker, Johnson Sheldon Sorenson & Hafner • 230 East Fifth Street St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 -1626 (651) 602 -1005 Fax 2 1100 my 229_3760 An Equal Opportunity Employer MCES 92C 7 7 7 . Service Availability Charge (SAC) Commercial Detail ' • PROJECT TYPE New Building Only 0 Alteration (change in use ) D Addition n Demolition with New Use p Demolition Declaration Only ill ( Attach to Form MCES 92A) ( Attach to Form MCES 92D ) .... ,, .... tiy, .. ... 1 i ray .5: i^.'y .i::.:. ( Proposed Occupant VSSA - S oas i; Type of Business in - Town Center I Sr. Housing Site Address . 5600 Norwich Parkway , Building Penult No. I Date Issued 12 -28 - I Total Square Footage 2000 00 -00408 SAC UNITS CALCULATION OF SAC CHARGES : • gm Quantity Retail sq.ft. @ 3000 sq.ft. Per SAC = Office sq.ft. @ 2400 sq.ft. Per SAC = Warehouse sq.ft. @ 7000 sq.ft. Per SAC = Other Sr. Housing - determined by number of beds _ _ 39 or 116 beds @ 3 beds /SAC Unit Determination Made by Met Council D 1/2/2001 TOTAL CHARGES = 39 an units) °�'° A * Date letter was received ��3��N� , �' as is attached) {!� r :zk Y rz,; + �i.,' ��'4�'' M „ 4«'' SPI;ti �::';�.h �I , a ' • L " , 4 '�' I — v, siN'Jwf'. Previous Occupant Type of Business • Site Address illh Tlir Demolition Date ( Total Square Footage Demolition Permit No. 1 CALCULATION OF SAC CREDITS : SAC UNITS Was previous use in existence prior to 1973 ? a yeS (1 no If no, Original Building Permit No. Date Issued Actual SAC paid for space involved: (choose one) p Entire Building fl Portion of Building = Additional SAC paid for space involved: Bldg. Permit No(s) Date(s) = TOTAL CREDITS = ( 0 ) On units) If yes, lvan'dt Office sq.ft. @ 3000 sq.ft. Per SAC = 1973 O 1973 Retail c e @ sq.ft. 2400 sq.ft. Per SAC = 1973 Warehouse s sq.ft. @ 7000 sq.ft. Per SAC = _ Other = Actual SAC paid after 1973: Bldg. Permit No(s) Date(s) = Determination Made by : Date : TOTAL CREDITS = ( 0 ) (in units) Y t`; � , i ),. , ,, i,. ,I,' ' y1a. , I 1 , ry� E�iliyi iu , i . �. I 'Ntis� 'k,�tJBISC1 � s „..�. .:: .jlf : NET SAC UNITS = 39 ( 0.5 rounds up to whole number in units ) If a determination for this location was made by MCES, If NET SAC UNITS is a CREDIT BALANCE, please please reference date of letter or attach copy. indicate how many will be reserved as... Site - specific units of credit (Form 92RCR) NOTE : Determinations based on phone or taken as..: conversations are only estimates. City-wide units of credit (Form 92A). tili 1 Metropolitan Council = Workingfor the Region, Planning for the Future W Environmental Services October 19, 2000 Tun Butler �\ 7 :' ;' _j Building Inspector City of Oak Park Heights OCT 2 3 �QQO • P.O. Box 2007 ., j Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 -2007 Dear Mr. Butler: The Metropolitan Council Environmental Services Division has determined SAC for the Boutwell Landing Sr. Housing to be located within the City of Oak Park Heights. This project should be charged 47 SAC Units, as determined below. 51o' o n 01 w �.e./1 • Charges: SAC Units Assisted Living 25 — studio x 1 person/unit = 25.0 people 47 — 1 bdrm x 1.5 people/unit = 70.5 people COPY 22 — 2 bdrm x 2.0 people/unit = 44.0 people 139.5 people @ 3 people/SAC Unit 46.50 o If you have any questions, call me at 602 -1113. Sincerely, a W41 ( uorliz Jodi . Edwards Staff Specialist Municipal Services Section JLE: (210) 001019SA cc: S. Selby, MCES Julie Dahm, Adolfson & Peterson 230 East Fifth Street St. Paul, Minnesota 55101-1626 (651) 602 -1005 -- . I2-11813 TDD /TTY _ •_3760 An Equai Opportunity Employer ■ • L• MCES 92C ' Service Availability Charge (SAC) Commercial Detail . PROJECT TYPE; New Building OnIY 0 Alteration (change in use ) (] Addition 0 Demolition with New Use 0 Demolition Declaration Only (Attach to Forth MCES 92D ) (Attach to Form MCES 92A) .E US ..' - �.r _ + Type of Business _ Proposed Occupant Unit Sr. Housing VSSA - Assisted Living Site Address 5610 Norwich Parkway Total Square Footage Date Issued Building Permit No. 00 -00373 12/6/2000. SAC UNITS CALCULATION OF SAC CHARGES : ft Per SAC = O Retail sq.ft. @ 3000 sq.ft. ffrc e sq•ft. 2400 sq.ft. Per SAC = _____ Officsq.ft. @ 7000 sq.ft. Per SAC = warehouse � . , , _ - . � • - _ ! _ - = 4 _? ---- Other S - fie ! - . ___ ---- Determination Made by Met Council Date : 10 / 19 / 2000 TOTAL HAtC RGES (In units) ' Previous Occupant Site Address III Demolition permit No. Demolition Date Total Square Footage SAC UNITS – CALCULATION OF SAC CREDITS : to 1973 ? Y� no Was previous use In existence prior Date Issued Original Building Permit No• of Building = It no, (choose one) 0 Entire Building 0 Portion = �_ Q 1 Actual SAC paid for space involved: ( Permit No(s)____ ----- e(s) t-- = —� Additional SAC paid for space Involved: Bldg. TOTAL CREDITS fi units) Um g An-ft sq.ft. 3000 sq.ft. Per SAC = If yes, ft 2400 sq.fL Per SAC = 1973 Retail sq 1973 Office � sq.it. 6 7000 sq.ft. Per SAC = _____-- ._._ ----- 1973 Warehouse ------ _ �— Other ----- = D a t e s ) _.�— L _ _ _ 0 _ _ _ _ _ ) A c t u a l SAC paid a ft e r 1973: Bldg. Permit No(s) TOTAL CREDITS Date : (In units) Determination Made by , De erm ,a. ,� ,�� ;`'f�' �,,�,�,' ice ,� �,, 47 M1c n u &';'.'�t �o•� 4 ���,, Vii!;' NET SAC UNITS = _._ ---- -- ��''� - � (0.5 rounds up to whole number in units MCES, UNITS a CREDIT BALANCE, please If a l determination for date of e ti on was made by If NET SAC Indicate how UNIT will S is a be CR E DIT as... Site - specific units of credit (Form 92RCR) please reference date of letter or attach copy. -- or taken as... City -wide _ units of credit (Form 92A). NOTE : Determinations ag y estimates. _ It Metropolatn Env ironmenit anal se Counegl rv Service Availability Charge Monthly Report MCES 92A 1 10 icipality of Oak Park Hei hts Remit to Metropolitan Council OC tOber Environmental Services Division Year 2000 Fifth Centre 6th Floor 6 +hfiL.i .� y e ars Pa t } . 230 East Fifth Street ^,,.... • ::. 'c�' .. �' ,; F11 ei4'�i. w6p ',...0 :..: b .' ..; w' J x'' N h 14, :`:;?::4 y ;i . yztr St Paul, Minn , . q w� Jw' �r •: .'S , . �e'st ;r •. Minnesota 55101 ti •;:ti„#'1 :. r :'p��'}' g Y , Y: 4 :: tf6 � r � � �1 r �'„�";• ? � Ap l bl �'n : '�:' , r '7`a T s t; # �R'.' r . d. r . S r. e£ 7.1 ...Y . i `iy"f '.. ✓ :'i '^ ". •' t a•"' ',„t;.••• . ; � ; • -- - -- k fir. •,r ; j �' rw tl� �t�,, ti �. r ;.n 9' ��+' tw� J • pp,,4� "ar w i.. a•r •. ! •cx' . — ---_ r :. '� -;�'�� " ' '� v,5''p � h$: ��: tl.t .� E(�7 T^ ,,��,p},M,..!.� �'h;l :. : `• sa'!; .. t "�� w RESIDENTIAL: — -- 4?r,'g �`:ski.. ) t..rt .i�i,iz. : =Ki., • *ti n., "° "�1.5 �"' P °I .� (7�!j* ;�','.i. N I. k�.aa t" '�:' ;.•3. J ': ; 6� n EachHousingUnits1 P �h'�3Ayi�k, " `: . .. i.,a : L .a,fAll;'Y .:44,,,-,,..,...,...,..--:...- z )31�Ir�''!14A$)� SINGLE FAMILY (Per attached Form MCES 928) ` ° ti �r 04 , ! { r I . 0: � MILY HO v4 = T it G; ' , o- • , Ri` �' ,n:,!,,,::-.`v. " ` , ; : i s .... ‘‘ . {'" fs AR ' . .a .. ' x ' DUPLEXES TOWNHOUSES / CONDOMINIUMS 111111 APARTMENTS (20% reduction with MCES approval 1 100 s , 2 200 PUBLIC HOUSING (2558 reduction with MCES approval ) 111.111111111 COMMERCIAL / INSTITUTIONAL iiiiniiimmi _______________ Net SAC -- ( C charges per attached Form MCES 92C ) INDUSTRIAL ( Must attach MCES SAC determination letter) • AC credit brought ry for e rd from ''dr'! previous moth's ( MCES 92A) report $ f SUB -TOTAL SAC CHARGES $ _ 2.200.00 t E ibis SAC credits from current month activity Residential s Total SAC units credit ( per attached Form MCES 928 ) Commercial = $ City -wide Net SAC units credit ( Per attached Fare MCES 92C ) Industrials $ f I City -wide Net SAC units credit (par attached MCES SAC determination fetter) $ L L t SUB -TOTAL SAC CREDITS $ ( —0_ 2,200.00 ) NET SAC CHARGES or CREDITS $ _ =2 =14114_ ( if NET is a CREDIT balance, stop here and carry forward to next month ) n Administrative Fee (1 % of Net Charges) subtract $ ( 22.00 I �R�� iCp � "ul�x p un'��'ll y � I7 f 1'� t � t u�:•�' ��� � .:J � 1 y i 4 �� � a t r a 'q !1', ��k 4 J :Y'.a�:,. yu�L i ) y w }t i 'l� 1 It1, µ�� 4 .� Ir . y. V _ � 4411. 4!u LW:'I ap(h�.t 9 t A M ' 1• • . +F .,i I�x! ,, ' i y c 1 8 .. ', " IF, ,' ' 4 a 1,41.6;;i;11 1 .�•u I n iS M5ipT' l �14. � 7ss 2 4, 1 *i'y . P . • ,17800 *, �. h>��, f�mtrtr. , f k a .gy 0 m § � i "7 �rr� , r r� p .� Monthly report prepared b u • � y: 4+ "i I !s �' �'' "�r,y � 9� , ...'7.!';'; • 1 n 5 i? Name JuI A. It . ie Hultman • - Return to MCES 4w "'`" )r 711a Date 11/3/00 IIow Copy - Municipality Copy Title Com>111trii t Dev. p Sec . Phone No.6 __ /439 -4439 / MCES 92B / Residential ATTACH TO FORM MCES 92A Unit Deta Report DEMOLITION : • y tom; , ; A .. . :• •!, a. d 'nywn L« a IO i ., ' '; : , 2" : , � ; . �{, 1 W4'! " �k 5 6`� • ' � w ; r 7, r� . .�F � .: � !� P,r:2 u Y'' �i. } + c�`a` . ili ii ,, , ry o . f 4µ 7F,1rlit . q . , , a, i � ** i � ''Y i 4 2 , � .,. ' e' � s 4s ! a i<N 'I'. *0111`Arer'': N ; UM9 tR 5 _ r __ -_ r , - , : 6 '� P ' Sr 46 A' n'Y,� � ��� P 9 31 � o � ? - 'A"' —___- ° - - - -- 00 -00333 14795 57th St. N. U 111131 14815 57th.St• N. Ni 1111 IIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIMNIIIIIIMIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIINIIIIIIIINIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIUIINI IIIIIIIIIIIMIIIIIIIIIIMIIIIIIII 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 . INIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIMIIIIIM IIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIUINIMIIIIIIIMIIIIIIIIII IIIMIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIUNIINIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIMIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIMNIIIIIII IIINIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIAIIIIIIINIUIIIIIMIII INIIIIIN IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIMIMIIIIINIIIIMIB IIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIMIMIIIIIIMIIIIIIIII IIIIIINIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIMINIIMIIIMIII RESIDENTIAL DEMOLITION CREDIT : • Where no Building Permit is involved (ie. connecting to sewer) ' enter the sewer oonneationlplumbing permit number. SUB -TOTAL i IN UNITS 1 D T = 2 units A s units S = unit m SAC UNIT SUBTOTALS : t 1 (bY tYP° 1 = a artment •* RESIDENTIAL TYPES : S = single family dwelling D = duplex T = townhouse /condo A P metropolitan Coun Service Availability Charge En Services Monthly Report MCES 92A • '�unicip Septem City of Oak Park Heights Remit to : Metropolitan Council ber Enviro Servi Year 2 000 c:es Division Mears Park Centre 6th Floor L East F St Pa MiMinnesota • SS��1 -- -- � 9.s au _ G � eJ +I ;�, r rn � �.� r � � i Rr , . ,, Hk _� I w �. � p ��i e.. ���tts i�'Yr dv�4)a� "'�tj ■ l�' '1 :! � 1 r, ,.. q �, ,di1'�'� � r . "'>� . �+` .' ,' ewrvu " '1, - I ,,, h , , ' , , r i 1. , N � ' w i . � („ , ;� , n+�' a ��ff ia..E „ r � : , a: o duyu av�s' �,+ tta ��i , ( ,,� a, r!«i l�' 'F d i r i '.i' RESID b r,,,,. ,h,. , ' d,,,, 1144 hfi �A t t Rd , f € r i g t ; e t k � i ii � 71"w 2 � „ p ! 1 " YJ , - 9 r �t� �� G h ' 4 $ 4 Each Housing t 1 s t � ` j � , �4 1, 14‘11'• � 4 } t , 3 �9 � . ',' d t . , 9Unit =1 SACLnIt(Peratt a B ��p � a .�+,� rl �� }W a�� a�"" 011 � b Vi € e _ SINGLE FAMILY HOUSE attached Form MCES 92B) q t y p + I 1 40 - M J N'2 _ ' d am' � r " : DUPLEXES _.€ — TOWNHOUSES /CONDOMINIUMS APARTMENTS (20% reduction with MCES approval 1 10 IIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIII � 0 $4,400. PUBLIC HOUSING (25% reduction with MCE IMMI S approv al) IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII COMMERCIAL / INSTITUTIONAL ( Net SAC charges Per attached For MCES ax ) INDUSTRIAL a''2, Must attach MCES SAC determination letter) IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII F +�d�Tt '1/ 7 RmP et SAC credft brought forward from SUB -TOTAL SAC CHARGES $ 4,400.00 previous month's ( MCES 92A) report $ L Eligible SAC credits from current month .a Residential . - - - - --� Total SAC units credit ( per attached Form MCES 92B ) Commercial = $ L I City -wide Net SAC units credit ( per attached Form MCES 92c) $ L 1 Industrial —_______– City-wide Net SAC units credit ( per attached MCES SAC determination letter) 3 SUB -TOTAL SAC CREDITS $ -0— NET SAC CHARGES or CREDITS $ 4 ,400.00 (N NET is a CREDIT balance, stop here and carry forward to next month ) 4 � r Administrative Fee ( 1 "/0 of 44 00 ' f p � r f n } i a � o `�ItN t� �,> L , "P{ Net Charges subtract $ ,r % fh € dl ti 4 i ( ;t K ( , , tl �jf�j4, �' (. �� dN'�, ul } �,I t ,g �7kv N '∎ z. ,N mr p, t „ '44"'';'1 ' ' " r ) y VIN vl X, P l r NI r d i r " , r , � u I nr; d w w �," 'l r , t I r ,; m 4 .. .q ,. �4i� , 'n `11144 , �i t u ',' I u , �' ! i ' u LdH' 'm 1 7 , ' } d U -'�I u � i ,,tM j' �, ry; ! J 00 , yr 1 N i RPM v6 , Fk� 4 ,' m! } N a i'1 a , Dk 4 J ' . Lr , , ( x � x p d2 ''6 irf ny��C1 e ,1N '',, � P., ,. t i alL', Ndi' T p-4,� „, $,,i,N1. v✓�1 ' e olk, � �,,,,! . u,- M, �? x rg'1Y' ` •R�44, . , ,'��r r .,, r W o2 a. tr i HV�i o` Y x u b, � rn n is p .. +r , y +' "u Monthly report WA S 7p ,°� ,o ppm Jtd , x, a � , ' P prepared b °vr 9t9 „,,A$421 d y: .d ,, I ry m,g �k Pp I, �d y N rl Name Julie A Hultman Copy- to MCES " "' � ' � ' '' Date IO -4 -2000 ellow Copy - Municipality Copy Title Community Y Dev. Secretary 651/439 -4439 Phone No. MCES , Residential ATTACH TO FORM MCES 92A Unit Detail Repot DEMOLITION a ea m °d r 4.W s: i B , f M 1' . a :�� ��,� A � �t ��ii +�, �`�" �' `� ��+� ' ��• ` a a T C. t 7Y { � Y , 4 .41 t Y '1 a •• tl 1 t i � R nL 'G`' d p r IF i f � i' l h�{ f� { L � t m �'* c gg ;, 0 ' 96'� ` 0- .711 J V, � ' i 4 r 70*' ' ' � w ' � U, , 7 $ h ' Rtl ' 13� 'tea Y�;g K r �* t � �3 � , 1 � " t � , u � `' p �� k. �,, � �. {` 4 4 h rtq : N �i ,,G � pi 1 �i , , �.,ut ti � g l l , 4 fi i l i N t P y�vt h `� - - - - -- "� i w V"" �, -!B — 00 -00 3 57th St. N. 1 a 00 -00310 1477 00 -00311 14785 57th St. N. a 00 -00312 14789 57th St. N• miumumis ON 111.11111111111111111111111011. NI wol minimmomo 111111_,,,1111111,mii 111111 mommimill11 =NB wow IMII .. ...11111111111111111.11111 . all. imi lialliIIM WHIN 0 11111111 MI 011111111111111 1111111111111111111.11111 1111 NI ow. INNINIII =N. immum11111116.• ..•••-• wilmio MI 0.1•011111111111.0.11 a DEMOLITION CREDIT . OW Mil OIMMMIIIIMIIII SO to sewer) RESIDENTIAL 0 Where no Building Permit is p mbin lie• existing home connecting SUBTOTAL l IN UNITS 1 enter the sewer oonneotion/Plumbin9 Permit number. A _ units f T = —4-- unite — — D _ S= unit IIP SAC UNIT SUBTOTALS : ( by tYPe T = townhouse/condo A = apartment S = single family dwelling D = duplex +* RESIDENTIAL TYPES : ...b... 441. vpinlia.11 C01112C11 Service Availability Charge Envi'onmen Services Municipality C i t y Monthly Report of Oak Park Heights � MCES 82A � e Remit to : Metropolitan Council Year 2 � 0� Environmental Services f � Mears Park Division r>f a ' � i Y �j� Floor East h Street 41 401 a lt i> l'' n ' I �. a a "� �Y l ' ; A°8 @ d a� ' j� l''4 1 i!' 'il '' ' A St. PBUI Mlnn '��J nXM+ �" 'r� r , ' ° tq s r 0444i � F � �, � �' N �. � � 1 r G, ��, n Gt'� , H r 55101 RES ENTIAL ; -� _ it ' ' ® 4111: h i C k'y s w} "t i w i �r i AttP F rn: Eech ---�� _ �� ' ' � � ' � 7 � 1� d�a,� �i` � + �, � yF "�k Housing Unit 1 SAC S t 4'10, �' i P rr t�� ' M xrP a, ! m u i y : � 5ti'� ' 4 'v aL � U nit (Per attached Form MCES 92B) I , I 7 �� '' ' tw :"7' SINGLE FAMILY HOUSE ) � � _ � n �tr' m � '` ` � ; ��sr , . x � �` d �' � � +� � "� DUPLEXES imismina ___. ' . pr�ga, t at v t TOWNHOUSES � CO NDOMINIUMS APARTMENTS (20% reduction with MCES approval ) ® z,zoo PUBLIC HOUSING (25% reduction with MCES a 400 ) COMMERC 1AL / INSTRUTIONAL (Net SAC charges 11111111 per Fpm MCES 92C) INDUSTRIAL deter (Must attach MCES SAC letter) ) , 050 2,100 credit brought forward from 4, SUB -TOTAL SAC Previous rAOrnh� (MCES 92A) report $ C En ibis SAC c CHARGES $ 6, 500 from current month activity Residential = —'- -�--_ Total SAC units credit Commercial a ( per attached Form MCES 92B ) City -wide Net SAC units credit ( per attach Fpm MCES 92C Industrial = ) $ � City -wide Net SAC units credit ( per attached MCES SAC determination letter) $ l' SUB - TOTAL SAC CREDITS $ — O— (fl NET a CREDIT NET SAC CHARGES or CREDITS $ 6,500 DIT balance, stop here and care, forward to next month ) of Administrative Net Ch Ad '� m q 7. 11. fi a Fea 1% 4s afr p � �;f, � & A Charges subtract • F e * 4',. � ' 9i ,�� " , , 1 i . N 4 p a , $ 6 5.00 P 3 SN 0 ' Lt 7 P ,� �� 0 ' r ti (' � q 'Ay, ai th J pi g 7''"0 ° r �N X41 7 a , , � ¢ 6 ea al.�� � u i t . f o o ® e b t �� � , n h , 6 435 00 '"1. 10 � f J J�� A4i' 4,4 " , Y, i " I , :td n `ri 7 1' a �d r Monthly port pre , p re prepared G ; >r r, 0 A m ' ; Nam Ju - Hultman COPY- Return to MCES rt . t ; Copy - Municipality Copy Title Comrrttin i t Date -E162_29 Y Development (6 5 I) Phone No. 43) -4434 � MCES 92B Unit Detail Report Residential .111111111111!"1111111111111111111.1.11111111111. • .. , • Residential ATTACH TO FORM MCES 9 DEMOLITION �, • �` ..4:', 1 ei t fm' q q,� t F $ R 7" i �' u° �. �" t 31G *20:41' • 'y r, 1Y . � T' �� ' s ��L A�� „�1 il;' u i4 i�P'ri , ' 11 irta t S ys 4'l 0ai iu` i ° � � �s�tr�i q � a � �,� � Qa d,} ��' ���a � �d � � 1 a Aw Amk \ � � � a �9� �m1h� i y h i�i fi�� � ;.,�y'� i,���',� a„ At r, tY�,41,� w1� �' ��_ � �' I,d � ---- N O0-00200 5535 Nolan Ave. N. gm 10-0201 5545 Nolan Ave. N. 46, , 111111111 OQ -00202 5555 Nolan Ave. N. LaixoU-ei , Miwaummunumillin 00-00203 5 5 65 Nolan Ave. N • - - los mo mmi s i m ill a mossomm woomm■mo ges imismo r omomos . 00.01 •ali go i g oi_o_JEsso mmosom osimIl_N.I.N.N.Brd ami iiimo r ommuiss No __________—.P oliffimestr gli sommoi * RESIDENTIAL to s ewer) DEMOLITION CREDIT : Q h c onnecting SUB-TOTAL t IN UNITS enter the ewe Building Permit is plumbed l permit number. sewer connectionlPlumbing � —units enter the sew T = 1:L..... unite A = 5 - —_ unit 0 SAC UNIT SUBTOTALS : A _ apartment ( b type 1 T = townhouse /c ondo •• RESIDENTIAL TYPES S o single family dwelling D = duplex metropolitan Council Environment S ervices Service Availability Charge Monthly Report MCES 92A AA unicipality City of Oak Park /lei hts S Remit to : Metropolitan Council • April Environmental Sri Division Year 2000 Mears Park . Centre, 6th Floor `° , x' II I '' 230 East ' `� � � � ,� 7��'afr,� 1�1�'��� rr Fifth Str o L u'rP 4 ' I , i s. ' r S b ..1 i ryr ' . ' : i a l i i w St Paul Minn BSOtd .. J� i a r f . R ,� '�' ';+ ; N Iha nk ',, F i t 1 r �. -, ,. y ■ + A � ! ,yy,, ��gg j 4 �N� �I�' rt a, mex; . Ai7 ` 7 ti, �{ t l pp�� ? N' i. ,*„4 ! , 'rt 4 }� � I ri� 114th rce�' 3 E 4 Q � ' � y ,��' ,, p41.14V, y � f 0 1;�' r ^ i , xy ;, de..+ `r, "e. ,� ��; 4'7 N 1� � ,)��1 .d :. ,��, � 5 ♦ �� a`>? rrn, "Al��`' i '�'� k �c �, ;A:" a J � RESIDENTIAL — Yh �a1 a,PA I k ��� ? 8 Ct11"IOUSIn U � ' k�r�� 4 �' r. �. P °' t', 7 ; , t , .m '' r• ' ',.4 . 9 nit =1 SAC 1 4 '�' . ,� ' � � � � � � �t � x'�t per attached Form MCES ' r7 � . r , , ` ' W 928 SINGLE FAMILY HOUSE f ' 1' ' N r, ' ; : M x4 , a +r i r t A41,., :G -" a 't' `: atklA e _ -- � � l �� DUPLEXES ® i IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 1 100 TOWNHOUSES / CONDOMINIUMS APARTMENTS (20% reduction with MCES approval PUBLIC HOUSING (25% reduction with MCES aPP►oval) COMMERCIAL / INSTITUTIONAL ( N et SAC changes Per attached Form MCES 92C) INDUSTRIAL ( Must attach MCES SAC determination letter) I. R^ C'.rl d -' 70�i IP t oy 1 7f !qpC 1 *.•,.,. :, fi IN h Vp 1' i ' I �4l tf, ! ir ';. , _ Net SAC credit brought forward ,., ' ■ 8� !�dP I i tr' Previous month's ( MCES 92A) report $ L 99.00 SUB -TOTAL SAC CHARGES $ 1 ,100.00 El bie SAC credits from parent month acm Residential = Total SAC units credit ( per attached Forst MCES 929 ) Commercial = $ L i " — � City-wide Net SAC units credit ( p attached Form MCES 92C ) Industrial = $ L City-wide Net SAC units credo i ( per attached MCES SAC determination letter) $ SUB -TOTAL SAC CREDITS $ L 99.00 NET SAC CHARGES or CREDITS $ 1 ,001.00 (If NET is a CREDIT balance, stop here and carry forward to next month ) �i` , p �"�P a� r �� 9 Administrative Fee 1% q 0 , , , , ,F p "rr ly ,� Y � g ^) " T,E r '`� I a i �� � � °" - , �y }" 4 � , ,, , iI, I b '7P Sf7 . . 4 r 1 of N� ChargesSU subtract $ 10. Vl ? �,Caa '1 I , 0,,,' h tti 1 71,' taa '', � 0 I!1 NN hi'I h � p r �, `, �d h P u�ry r l'� II ��I r 4 L•, t( �' I4d�4 i l�(, +1 ft r } [ ' I f, � . 11 , ry ' (j I'�Y , �, ry 144 ;1 14„ , 1 d4 "V it � ' '' � ) ( +ry + t lt7r but P �,tk N ! u , xF ,� N �µ; n iN +�' i � .'� 3n .. �7� i . �fi' pp , + L 4.; i N {�� � fd � s a r i� 1� J � ♦r� 4 '+N I g , dl !l1��� I ,. N� Y d u r '�P. ". �) i ' 4 'ry �, ' ,. 'h �fek B 8 � 770 ` . I • (](� u"utl. , w , L T.+d0 > ' Y ' : Ai Frc 1 ' ' 14 , p m't9giH w t '� � 99 i a" w � , r , P p i t w i �i �, w ui Fz>J d 'W ('rE 'ur �I'Ir # P r d .711,91'.., , 1 , ' 44 + el,' , + 4,I + II ` " P �' q e M�t �i� vl�w o i' }n� � � ' � }ir� pce �r �'' �'� l i + !u�' F9 � , ,,y � I A A " " AY � � r s " ',,�,��r��'F� Monthly report prepared IT rm a r Few�7i71,71' ° s ub. g Pe aced by; ,,1 � m (t7� , i'K�' r im! Name Julie '.A. Hultman spy- Return to MCES Date 5 11 -2000 :uowCo M unicipalityCopy rills Community Developm (651) Phone NQ. 439'4439 MCES 928 a Residential ATTACH TO FORM MCES 92A U ni t Detail Rep ort . ON DEMOLM i 5 w x� a R�o� l a 4 , i . . if.. a 4 d� i s `� t i ' � a i a � s;i �p� I i •ry fr e ro a t ` . t � . " k p n � ' '∎ , flh ti pp '' d' � � A fi '� .k , '', i r u a A FB 1,r j .. t yi a y "N a 4", w' a ka a t i ,y4,e 4 ,'' ' � ., 4 'MV4t r � • "S� p ,NIt ki' �+ x i ' y. '' t T $ i �xA � E d ^^ `^k 'T '� 1` C pl Ia ' �t i � � 1111 1 7 .. ;.. �V � �f s'�'u'iL .E16wti.u- �' - " - ---_ �Ar^� --"" 00 -00096 5680 Newell Circle N. ummu oulligli 111111 1111011.11111111111 IIIIIIIIII 11111111111111111111.1111110 1111 1 02 111111111111111 11111111011 gill 1 • 11101011011 gilliiii 1111111 111111111111111 111 r 1111 i I 011111/ TION CREDIT tAl DEMOL► 11W 0 to sewed RESIDENT IN UNITS ) 1 e . existing home connecting SU &TOTAL enter ere n o Building o Permit is involved ( • umbing permit number- units D enter the sewer oonnectionl T �_ unite r S _unit . �u SAC UNIT SUBTOTALS : _____./ A = a partment (by type .-- duplex T = townhouselcondo dwelling D *4- RESIDENTIAL 'TYPES S = single family • 1 . if 1 (Jo � (Oa - 4o0 3 9 Spic u,a6 1 - L- Cob - 4Gi) 9 5uQ0 P �� w6-\ i No .. i. • 4 L , (cc-373) 1'7 S L/0 J\(o) w'.ch //-2.k.d 4 .( - /04 C 7 r 3_7 /y/ \Iwn how -. • 6(0 u-h_4, - .0-e..cki . I 1 ---- - 7 ) ____.. 1 . ,,1/4., \ (e.--. .::-Lt loctds ) 1 //(c) : 2-0 66 ecplA .,--- 4 , . ' • --Ebuch.o_sas_ .n.k),:,,, i n , . .. If 060 an o-r Issiwg6-' ci \ a63,,_J 1 2.00 55.553:5 5 )( i 1)1110° 5 555 @) ` 1 2GG0 qo u,�cN (((-) �qqq 5s 1 � 50 6 �� 0 4:0 No 5550 J�,64t,r� - o ' 5s�5 5585 I 32 / 55 ` 55�� 5s�o N (�� go 5 ;.70 7tn✓ s7�Qo • 551 7) 5�f coo at' i 6 1.1 �t,� 5N �,j� tu 3.,i (( i I 1 5 ?1.1 ya 3•I (82) 5� 02-) ql 5 co c, 0 Cj ' - -------• - • $ OF c UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE • A °44,0 Economics and Statistics Administration U.S. Census- Bureau =� Washington, DC 20233 -0001 cto • a rq$ 1' OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR July 17, 2003 FROM THE DIRECTOR U.S. CENSUS BUREAU This is an official statement of the revised Census 2000 population and housing unit counts for Oak Park Heights city, Minnesota, including corrections made through July 2, 2003. According to the official returns of the TWENTY - SECOND DECENNIAL CENSUS OF THE UNITED STATES, on file in the U.S. Census Bureau, the counts as of April 1, 2000, for Oak Park Heights city, Minnesota, are: Population 3,777 Housing Units 1,581 Sincerely, Charles Louis Kincannon This statement is being sent to the highest elected official of this governmental unit, the Secretary of State, and other state officials. Census counts used for Congressional apportionment and legislative redistricting and the Census 2000 data products will remain unchanged. The Census Bureau will include the corrections in the errata information to be made available via the Internet on the American FactFinder system and used specifically to modify the decennial census file for use in yearly postcensal estimates beginning in December 2002. Details regarding the Census Bureau's calculation of these figures are attached. If you require additional information, please call the Census Bureau's Count Question Resolution program staff, toll - free, on 1 (866) 546 -0527. 11/ USCENSUSBUREAU www.census.gov Helping You Make Informed Decisions t N N N N N IN N N N N N 0000 a CD 0 cn W N �O O COO i : CO • • • -� N aQDDD ocO o o. 0- 000°i o w m {, Ii E . ! LUff ! ao ou . • v ci am" rn N • . j Q IH rn cn - p i s if • n N ithio"nii O � Q Q N 0° ti° 0 D O as co _ cD G N v .. G D 0 n N v, N c 0 D 0 3 N _a 0 • • � N N , = V O Q O Cn 0 5 co. fD N 0 N lD O 7 0 • Q O •. p L) fn N S a > 0) v m III 0 3 a • .: co 0 CD M m S 4 w w 01 01 o° o o c o c cil O o O l z 0. 0 cn rn O -I1 * O 4 `d CD 5 b o' CD o o _ O CI) ?� o o o 0 0 w b H Cr 0 0 J G �. 0. • - O• 0 �n * (to o -o 0 5' 0 0 0 : � b N O 0 0 .� C cD 0 o o 0 00 ., o 0 07/22/03 14:02 FAX 651 602 1674 METRO COUNCIL [ifl002 It Metropolitan Council Building communities that work rr��,, r l __ ( v July 22, 2003 �S -2,00/ 0 � D Eric A. Johnson 35 7 3 9 7 7 City Administrator City of Oak Park Heights 14168 Oak Park Boulevard North Box 2007 Oak Park Heights, Minnesota 55082 Dear Mr. Johnson: We have received your letter dated July 15, 2003. In it you raise important issues that I have attempted to address below. The locations of the correctional facilities we've discussed include the Stillwater prison in Bayport, the MN Correctional Facility -Oak Park Heights in Oak Park Heights, and the Washington County Jail, located at 15015 62 Street North in Stillwater. The Census Bureau in Washington, D.C. has recently corrected its 2000 Census geographic identification records to relocate the Washington County Jail from Oak Park Heights to Stillwater. In April 2003 the Census Bureau notified Oak Park Heights and Stillwater that Census Bureau staff found and corrected a coding error in the 2000 Census that had erroneously placed the Washington County Jail in Oak Park Heights. Along with the Census Bureau's geographic revisions, they also corrected Oak Park Heights' official 2000 population from 3,957 to 3,777 residents. In determining population estimates for the metropolitan region, the Metropolitan Council uses the Census Bureau's counts as its base. Accordingly, when the Census Bureau officially corrects its Census counts, the Metropolitan Council follows by making changes to Census databases used for calculating local estimates for the region. Our April 1, 2002 estimate reflects the changes made by the Census Bureau. Our estimates, therefore, show a drop from the original Census population counts, due to the transfer of the jail population from Oak Park Heights to Stillwater. Our estimating methods also include new residential construction as an indicator of household and population chan e. Your ins ctions department reported 11 new homes permitted in 2000, and no new units in 2001. Three demolitions were reported during these years. The average number of persons per household for single - family homes was 2.83 for the City in the 2000 Census. An estimated population addition of 111 about 26 persons seems reasonable between April 2000 and April 2002. www.metrocouncil.org Metro Info Line 602 -1888 230 East Fifth Street • St. Paul, Minnesota 55 10 1 -1626 • (651) 602 -1000 • Fax 602 -1550 • TTY 291 -0904 An Equal Opportunity Employer 07/22/03 14:03 FAX 651 602 1674 METRO COUNCIL C� 003 • • 40 Our Ap ril 1, 2002 population estimate of 3,875 is based on the calculations above, of and the increased number of group quarters residents reported in our recent survey o the facilities located in Oak Park Heights. Your population estimate for this same date is 4,291 residents, representing a population gain of over 500 persons since the Census was conducted. The Commissioner of Revenue has statutory obligation (MN Statues Chapter 477A, subdivision .014) to notify local governments of their Local Government Aids for 2004, by August 1, 2003. If you would like us to consider your estimates methodology, please provide us with supporting documentation at your earliest convenience. We must complete our review and submit any revisions to Revenue by July 29, 2003. The estimates are used in the LGA formulas calculating aids. The option of conducting a special census is always available to you. The Census Bureau's website at www.census.gov has instructions for requesting a special count, or I would be happy to direct you to staff in that division of the Census Bureau. Finally, if you still believe our estimates are in error, we would be happy to meet with you and attempt to resolve our differences. All Sin erely, 1.41.042.--- athy athy d o Community Development Division Metropolitan Council Cc: Regional Administrator Tom Weaver Ann Beckman, Acting Director of Planning and Growth Management 07/22/03 14:02 FAX 651 602 1674 METRO COUNCIL 0 001 Metropolitan Council Working for the Region, Planning for the Future Mears Park Centre, 230 East Fifth Street, St. Paul; MN 55101 -1634 (612)291 -6359 Metro Info Line 229 -3780 TDD/TYY 291 -0904 FACSIMILE COVER SHEET Date: _July 22, 2003 Time: 2:50pm Number of pages, including cover sheet 3 To: _Eric Johnson _ Oak Park Heights _(651)439 -0574 Sent by: _Kathy Johnson _Metropolitan Council Return Fax Number (651) 602 -1674 Special Instructions: 8 z • e*7; f , City of Oak Park Heights 14168 Oak Park Blvd. N • Box 2007 • Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 • Phone (651) 439 -4439 • Fax (651) 439 -0574 July 7 2003 Ms. Kathy Johnson Metropolitan Council 230 East Fifth Street RE: Your Population Estimates Ms. Johnson The City of Oak Park Heights disagrees with your April 1, 2002 population estimate of 3,875. The US Census Bureau cites a 2000 population of 3,957, which is 82 persons more than your estimate - roughly two years later. ill The City has experienced growth since the 2000 census, so how possibly can your current estimate show a reduction from 2000? Your data is inaccurate. Based on various building permits issued since 2000 and the development of Boutwell's Landing, a massive retirement community /complex, our population estimate - as of April 1, 2002 is approximately 4,291. S City Administrator Cc: City Council Scott Richards, AICP Tom Weaver 0 It Metropolitan Council Building communities that work July 3, 2003 City Administrator City Of Oak Park Hts PO Box 2007 Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 Dear Sir or Madam : The Metropolitan Council's preliminary estimates of population and numbers households, as of April 1, 2002, are listed below for your community. of These estimates are based on Census 2000 data and the housing construction information you provide us for your community. No reply to this letter is necessary. If, however, you have comments regarding the estimates please submit them to me in writing by July 11, 2003. The estimates are used in the Department of Revenue's local aid formulas and by the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MNDOT) for calculating local street aids. The Department of Revenue certify final estimates for these uses by August 1, 2003. must Sincerely, y ,4 5ti tt , er #0...i t „ rt , e .„ $ _, Kathy Johnson Community Development Metropolitan Council 2002 Estimate Po. ulation Households 3,875 Persons Per Household 1,538 2.26 w ww.metrocouncil.org 230 East Fifth Street • St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 -1626 Metro Info Line ( -1000 602 - 1888 Fax 602- 1` 55U " : ' i i, 291 -0904 An Equal Opportunity Employer • r1 i.i.c. . ut r ill; Lr 111 LCI . rag Ct uti U.S. Census Bureau , , � � �z 4 American F'actFiindoar a drage4 o Quick Tab / @S Main Search Feedback 1 FAQs GIo Basic facts QT -PL. Race His•anic or Latino and A•e: 2000 Data Set: Census 2000 Redistrictin• Data Public Law 94 -171 Summa File Geographic Area: Oak Park Heights city, Minnesota NOTE: For information on h p-- -Eacttindencensus oov confidentiality / /d /ex I o htm r i npling error, and definitions, see • ub 18 ears and over Numbe IrM1 Numbe 11, _ _ m_. 1._ ._ ._ mm.......______MErll.III.MIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIMIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIMIIIIMIIII Total ulagon �— One race 100. . white 3 . 0 ' 100. • r 98. 3,05 98.: Black or African American 3,60. 91 American Indian and Alaska Native 89. Min 0 . • c: Immegnal MEE Native Hawaiian and Other P a�c Islander ' , Some other race 0 Two or more races -� 0. • H ISPANIC OR LATINO AND RACE S Total o ulat i Hi s • anic or Latino of an race - --- Not His. - nic or Latino 3,09 100.1 One race - ; iI 97. • • NNW ��,•.,�,� 3,03 98.1 uuu- 96. Black orAf scan American 3 00. �� 90.1 89.1 American Indian and Alaska Native Native H 0. Hawaiian and O ther Pacfic Island er Some other race � 0. � ' Two or more races ft„ 0 �_ 0. � lut (X) Not applicable 0 • Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2000 Redistricting Data (Publi Law�� Matrices PL1, PL2, PL3, and PL4. 94 171 Summary File, 4 http : / /factfin.../ law -en vt n DEC 2000 PL U QTPL_geo id =16000 - _ US2747914.htm 7/7/2003 rz • City of O Park Heights 14168 Oak Park Blvd. N • Box 2007 • Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 • Phone (651) 439 -4439 • Fax (651) 439 -0574 July 15 2003 Ms. Kathy Johnson Metropolitan Council 230 East Fifth Street St. Paul, MN 55101 -1626 RE: Your Population Estimates Ms. Johnson I have sent you additional maps and made greater clarification for your use as to where State located in Washington County. You and your staffhowever continue to fail to realize that facility the "Stillwater Jail" does not mean it is in STILLWATER. Neither the level 6 nor 1 sons are in the City of Stillwater, they are in Oak Park Heights and Bayport, respectively. calling a State ev e15 facility is Additionally, your staff continues to mistakenly state that the Washington County Jail is also called the Stillwater Jail is also completely inaccurate. Why staff spend more time on research and confirm data before you draw to your conclusions. clear you have cclusions. It is cle never bothered to take the time to come here and look. uO I suggest your Finally, the US Census Bureau has provided a population of 3,957. You and the MET Co absolutely no authority to amend these figures or re resent other otentiall fmanciall the State of Minnesota. Specifically, this issue relates to where the US Census Bureau placed the have Jail. Therefore our estimate of 4,291 (calculated plus 2 years of o is data, to FINAL number. ated by the 2000 census data P d the County gr wth) is the We do not take this action lightly. I refer you to my letter of July 7 2003 Sincerely, Eric A. Johnson City Administrator Cc: City Council Scott Richards, AICP Tom Weaver Metropolitan Council Building c ommunit ies t hat work November 25, 2003 DEC -8 2003 Mr. David Beaudet Mayor City Of Oak Park Heights PO Box 2007 14168 Oak Park Blvd Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 -6409 Dear Mayor Beaudet: In a letter dated September 10, 2003, the Metropolitan Council sent a copy of your communit 's current forecasts for review prior to the adoption of a new Regional Framework. Based on y information provided by your community, the Council has agreed to make the followin overall forecast changes for your community. g • Revised forecasts based on community input (left blank where no change was made) 1990 2000 2010 Households 2020 2030 Po • ulation 111111111111111111MUM11.111111111111111111.1111111111111111 Em•lo ent Original forecasts sent for review 1990 2000 2010 Households 1,528 2020 2030 Posulation 2,000 2,300 2,500 ation 3,486 Posul ent 3,957 4,900 5,400 Em 2,220 3,000 3,900 5,700 4,500 5,100 For questions about the proposed population or household changes please contact Michael Mun (651) 602 -1331. For questions about the employment forecasts please contact Regan Carlson son, 602 -1407. , (651) Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. Best Regards, Tom Weaver, Regional Administrator i www. metrocouncil.org 230 East Fifth Street • St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 -1626 Metro Info Line 602 -1888 (651) 602 -1000 • Fax • 602 -1550 An Equal Opportunity Employer • TTY 291-0904 t Metropolitan Council Building communities that work November 17, 2003 Mr. Eric Johnson City Administrator City Of Oak Park Heights 14168 Oak Park Blvd Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 Dear Mr. Johnson: In a letter dated September 10, 2003, the Metropolitan Council sent a copy of your community's current forecasts for review prior to the adoption of a new Regional Framework. Based on information provided by your community, the Council has agreed to make the following overall forecast changes for your community. • MUM Revised forecasts based on community input (left blank where no change was made) 1990 2000 2010 2 020 2030 Households Po ulation Em.loyment Original forecasts sent for review 1990 2000 2010 Households 2020 2030 Po se 1,528 2,000 2,300 _ 3,486 3,957 4,900 2,500 Em lo ent 2,220 3,000 5,400 5,700 3,900 4,500 5,100 For questions about the proposed population or household changes please contact Michael Munson, (651) 602 -1331. For questions about the employment forecasts please contact Regan Carlson, (651) 602 -1407. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. Best Regards, Tom Weaver, Regional Administrator 111 www.metrocouncil.or 230 East Fifth Street • St. pain, Metro Info Line 602 -1888 Minnesota 55 101 -1626 • (651) 602 -1000 • Fax 602 -1550 TTY 291 -0904 An Equal Opportunity Employer • it Metropolitan Council i iip_______________ .______vmmmmm...... ,4 , Z- Building communities that work September p er 10, 2003 Mr. Eric Johnson City Administrator City Of Oak Park Heights 14168 Oak Park Blvd Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 Dear Mr. Johnson: The Metropolitan Council is currently drafting a new regional growth strategy, called 2030 Regional Development Framework, that will state its regional goals, policies g and strategies for meetin the c hallenges associated with growth during the next three decades. As part of this process the Council will be reviewing and updating community -level population ho and employment forecasts. We are asking for your help to make sure that the new Framework is based current and accurate growth expectations for your community. � household largely on target, new development proposals have been put forth some commun Itletie appear still these forecasts. s that couu still impact Below are the current forecasts for your community. If you believe these forecasts do not reflect o 4, community's current growth expectations, please contact us as soon as possible, as we need to resolve th ese differences by the end of October. Y ur 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 Households Population 1,528 2,000 2,300 3,486 3,957 4,900 2,500 Em.lo ent 2,220 5,400 5,700 3,000 3,900 4,500 As the Council has done in the past, we are also asking communities to allocate the 5,100 e Council's community - level forecasts to Traffic Analysis Zones (TAZs). TAZ data is needed for travel forecast models used for highways and transit. The allocations are important because the federal government, the state, ed to plan counties and cities use the data to prioritize needs and justify funding of transportation projects. Please fill out the attached TAZ allocation worksheets and return them to Bob Paddock in the enclosed postage -paid envelope by the end of October. If you have any questions about the allocation of forecasts to TAZs or would like to obtain previous TAZ forecasts for your community you may contact Bob at 1340. We would like to resolve any significant differences between your community's (65 n 02- � growth expectat i on and the Council's current forecasts as soon as possible so that the TAZ allocations can be based o totals where necessary. For population or household forecast issues s 602 -1331. For questions about the employment forecasts please contact Regan Carlson please contact Michael Munson, (651) on revised (651) 602 -1407. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. Best Regards, Tom Weaver, Regional Administrator www. metrocouncil.org Metro Info Line 602 -1888 230 East Fifth Street • St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 -1626 • (651) 602 -1000 • Fax 6 02 -1550 • An Equal Opportunity Employer TTY 291 - 0904 • A 4 mils tie A 111 iii i,, \ ipt .. :n 1 " i .-',..:i::: r 4 A i: Dr -, „-1 ,, EMI" I i 1 NMI! cn N min \ ,r,t a.I't Lb . ......�... : :iii ..1 ::::i: Ism � CD 0 \ n — , ,., _--71r4,-,,c7--,,f4 Ilkmw. . r i \ __., 0 momm110 10 I IMMEMOI> Elm CD Imminina 1\3 , CD. - _ ;Awl , - 0 . P • @w 1'0 0 / m"0 / /f 0 - -- a �f � u2 G2\ Fe; ] � . a A o = ƒ = 0) to @ Fr"; § ,.,= 5 • o_ 7 m CD c . (D _ n) CI 3 "0 ) 3 7 7 11 11 1 � m f 2- Es c - (D 3 8 111111 o 0 3 \, = j ,,,= \- / / - ® R %\ \ / J / I \0 0 \ O co d I I • ƒ 7 D a a ƒ a 0 = R 2 } m fl) k = a 2 1 11111 o a 2 0 3 CL m m m 0 3 @ - 3 « CD R 1 0) a g m E ) o / 3 . \Z } 7 / \c 0 CD I IIIII ca CD 13 Iv 3 \ : CO = d ? ' r J to • % 1044 \ r -I O -A -A y D CO W W CO Ni • 1� N O W C y CD CD 2 ill loop%) (D A i I1 O n) Q -i ! ci) 1 E11 Si 16) D o CD m 0 %. 111111 N CD 1 C z 5 0 -+ v m ica,01::) 0 0 3 5 0 0 > 4 = N D 11111 CD o > • �' o T o v gicg,1 2 o _m - 0 O v -4 ° v) D o 'er m m n .. r 0 m r = O o 2 11111 ‘" � O Z C o o 0 3 0 cD m i IV 0 0 o 0 3 111111 a) 11111 N 0 O z 3 a a o 111111 C3 w 0 O • • Community Housing Profiles for Oak ak Park Heights Data from 1990 and 2000 U.S. Census except as noted. Table 1: Demographics • Demographic information 1990 2000 Change % change Total population 3,486 3,957 471 Number of households 13.5% 1,322 1,528 206 15.6% Persons per household 2.35 2.26 Number of families 829 922 93 0. 93 13.2% 11.2% Persons per family 3.02 2.94 -0.08 -2.6% Table 2: Population by age Age 1990 2000 Change Number % of total Number % of total Number Percent Under 5 years 203 5.8% 234 5.9% 31 15.3% 5 to 9 � ° 212 6.1% 234 _ 5.9% 22 10.4% 10 to 14 224 6.4% 239 6.0% 15 6.7% 15 to 17 150 4.3% 156 3.9% 6 4.0% 18 to 21 197 5.7 %_ 213 5.4% 16 8.1% 22 to 24 166 4.8% 149 3.8% -17 - 10.2% • 25 to 34 702 20.1% 655 16.6% -47 -6.7% 35 to 44 585 16.8% 707 17.9% 122 20.9% 45 to 54 361 10.4% 556 _ 14.1% 195 54.0% 55 to 64 254 7.3% 306 7.7% 52 20.5% 65 to 74 216 6.2% 225 5.7% 9 4.2% 75 to 84 170 4.9% 201 5.1% 31 18.2% 85 and older 46 1.3% 82 2.1 % 3 6 - 78.3% Total population 3,486 100.0% 3,957 100.0% 471 13.5% Table 3: Race/ethnicity by age, 2000 Black or Asian or Two or Age African American Pacific Other more Hispanic White American Indian Islander race races or Latino Under 5 years 219 2 0 2 0 11 7 5 to 17 602 1 0 12 2 12 17 18 to 24 277 51 11 9 4 10 25 to 44 1,172 104 24 14 18 18 26 40 45 to 54 529 13 0 8 1 5 3 55 to 64 296 4 1 3 0 2 1 65 to 74 224 0 0 0 0 75 and older 1 1 283 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total population 3,602 175 36 52 25 67 83 44 Metropoli Coun cil Mears Park Centre • 230 East Fifth Street • St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 -1626 • (651) 602 -1000 • Fax 602 -1550 • TTY 291 -0904 Metro Info Line 602 -1888 • data.center@metc.stale.mn.us • www.metrocouncilorg • r Community Housing Profiles for Oak Park Heights Page 2 of 8 • Table 4: Households by type Household type 1990 2000 Change % Change .2% Family households 698 43 829 922 93 11 1.2% Married couples 655 328 4 1.2% - With related children under age 18 324 39 11.2% No related children under age 18 331 370 174 224 50 28.7% Other families 69 33 91.7% Male householder, no wife present 36 - With related children under age 18 23 42 19 82.6% - No related children under age 18 13 27 14 107.7% 17 12.3% Female householder, no husband present 138 155 17 7.0% - With related children under age 18 100 107 - No related children under age 18 38 48 10 26.3% 22.9% Non - family households 493 606 427 532 105 24.6% 1- person 66 74 g 12.1 2 or more persons 12. % Total 1,322 1,528 206 Table 5: Household type by age of householder, 2000 Other non - family Age of owner householder Family household 1- person household household 16 14 III Young adults (15 -24 years) 2 1 116 14 Working -age population (25 -64) 630 28 Elderly (65 and older) 111 80 0 Other non - family Age of renter householder Family household 1- person household household 37 18 12 Young adults (15 -24 years) 3 98 12 Working -age population (25 -64) 126 Elderly (65 and older) 18 163 4 Table 6: Tenure by age of householder 1990 2000 Change Age of householder Owners Renters Owners Renters Owners Renters 13 43 15 37 2 -6 15 24 years — 25 -34 188 127 146 82 -42 -45 12 35 -44 217 61 285 73 68 15 45 -54 151 46 248 61 97 55-64 92 57 106 44 14 -13 113 37 _ 65-74 159 38 46 1 65 -74 75 and over 54 123 95 139 41 16 Total households 828 494 1,054 474 226 -20 ill Community Housing Profiles for Oak Park Heights Page 3 of 8 Table 7: Race /ethnicity by tenure and age of householder, 2000 Owner- occupied units Renter - occupied units Age of householder White Non-white i _ Hispanic or Latino White Non -white or Latino �+ © 0 39 2 1 279 6 2 79 3 1 MIEN 68 55 64 239 6 60 0 0 65 -74 105 MUM= 44 0 75 and over 95 0 0 Total households 1,027 0 139 ® 462 Table 8: Occupied housing units by type and tenure Type of housing and 1990 units in structure 2000 Single family, detached Owners Renters Owners 634 MIMI Single family, attached N11111131 26 750 Duplexes ® 101 25 Buildings with 3 or 4 units 11.11101 21 22 Buildings with 5 to 19 units 64 ® 66 NM Buildings with 20 or more units 56 95 68 Mobile homes 68 253 86 0 Other units 0 0 0 0 Total occupied housing units 11111111111 0 0 1,051 483 Table 9: Measures of crowding by tenure, 2000 Measures of crowding Owner households Renter households 1.0 person per room or fewer More than 1.0 person per room 1 0 � 0 Table 10: Value of owner - occupied units, county assessors' data Number of Number of Under $50,000 units in 2000 units in 2002 $50,000- $74,999 205 207 $75,000- $99,999 46 $100,000 - $124,999 329 $125,000- $149,999 149 305 $ $175,000-$199,999 298 61 Maw $ - $249,999 $250,000 - $299,999 • $300,000 - $399,999 smilinimil $400,000 - $499,999 6 $500,000 or more 0 3 0 Total owner units: 0 0 Source: County Assessors' database. Community Housing Profiles for Oak Park Heights Page 4 of 8 • Table 11: Value of owner - occupied units, 2000 Table 12: Median value of owner - occupied units $85,300 Value of owner - occupied units: Number of units 1990 value $300 161 1990 value in 2000 $'s $108,982 Under $100,000 2000 value $148,400 $100,000- $ 149,999 179 $150,000- $ 174,999 $175,000- $199,999 1.1111111111113 102 $200,000 - $29 9,999 40 $300,000 4399,999 0 $400,000 - $ 499,999 $500,000 or higher 1,051 Total owner units: Table 13: Monthly housing costs by mortgage status, 2000 Owner- occupied units with a mortgage Owner- occupied units with no mortgage Monthly housing costs Owner units Monthly housing costs Owner units 0 Less than $300 10 Less than $200 $300 -$399 0 $200 -$299 67 $400 -$499 $300 -$499 10 $500 -$799 0 $500-$599 $800 or more $700 -$799 26 Total $700 -$799 64 $800 -$899 $900 -$999 179 44 $1,000- $1,249 169 $1,250- $1, $1,500 or more 162 175 Total Table 14: Median housing costs for owner - occupied units Median monthly housing costs 1990 1990 cost in 2000 $'s 2000 by mortgage status $1,003 With a mortgage $192 Without a mortgage Table 16: Median gross rent Table 15: Gross monthly rent paid, 2000 1990 Gross rent Number of units 1990 in 2000 $'s $616 Less than $200 111111111111111311 2000 $614 $200 -$299 26 $300 -$399 $400 -$499 11111 1 . 11111111123 95 $500 -$599 $600-$699 __ 95 $700 -$799 $800 -$899 111111111111111131 ill $900-$999 $1,000- $1, $1,250 or more Community Housing Profiles for Oak Park Heights Page 5 of 8 Table 17: Gross rents paid by number of bedrooms, 2000 Rent categories Number of bedrooms None One 10 TWO Three or more Less than $200 0 192 $200 -$299 -© 16 6 0 $300 -$499 0 6 $500 -$749 8 19 IMIIIIIMME $750-$999 0 109 0 $1,000 or more 0 No cash rent 6 0 27 Total 0 0 6 10 111111111110115 111111MEMMIIMMICII Table 18: Household income by age of householder, 1999 Income Age of householder Less than $10,000 Under 25 25 -34 35 -44 45 -54 6 �� 55 -64 65 74 75 and over 10 26 $15,000 - $19,999 � 25 $10,000- $14,999 0 29 19 14 80 $ $24,999 1 0 $ - $29,999 12 � 6 $30,000- $34,999 19 6 15 $35,000- $39,999 27 13 19 ® 17 $40,000 - $44,999 6 16 $45,000- $49,999 _ 7 ® 16 0 0 19 6 $ - $59,999 0 ® 14 3 $ - $74,999 16 6 $ $99,999 3 50 61 111111a1MINIIIIIMMEMIEW $1 00,000 - $124,999 0 45 82 MCI 0 9 39 $ 150,00 0 - $199,999 ©® © 7 9 $125,000- $149,999 0 $200,000 $ more 0 4 0 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 1111.3 2 0 0 206 0 Total households 209 Table 19: Median household income by age, 1999 Age of householder Median household income Under 25 years $20,268 $60,500 45-54 $68,583 55-64 $75,689 65 -74 $31,607 75 and older $16,696 0 All households Community Housing Profiles for Oak Park Heights Page 6 of 8 • Table 20: Housing costs as a percent of household income, 2000 Households paying 30% o% Households paying less than of income for housing of income for housing Owners Renters 1999 income Owners Renters 0 0 40 Less than 1 0 36 $10,000-$19,999 91 6 $20,000- $34,999 68 0 $35,000-$49,999 186 0 $50,000 - $74,999 170 10 0 $75,000 - $99,999 0 $100,000 or more 146 or more of income for housing costs, 2000 Table 21: Households paying 35% � % of household income Households paying for housing 211 ° 40% - 49.9% 50% or more 3 5/0 -39.9% Owners 40 IIIIIIIIIIII IICIIIIIIIINIIIIIIEI 110 Renters 30 111111111111113 Table 22: Households paying 30% or more of income for housing by age of householder, 2000 Age of householder Owner NM IIII Under 25 years 10 MED 25 -34 9 35 -44 111. 9 45 -54 111. 111113 55-64 65-74 20 65 -74 26 104 75 and older Table 23: Poverty rates level in 1999 Below poverty level in 1989 Below poverty rates Number Percent Poverty Number Percent 3.4% 244 7.9% 2.1 Individuals 5.6% 20 49 66 4.3% Households 119 8.9% Table 24: Poverty status by age in level 1999 Persons below poverty level in 1989 Persons below poverty l le ere in Age group Number Percent Number 6.3% 20 Under 5 0 7% 5 13.0% • 6 11 6.3% 12 -17 119 6.6% 18-64 1111111111113111111111023 65 -74 29 75 and over Community Housing Profiles for Oak Park Heights Page 7 of 8 Table 25: Poverty status by family type, 1999 Family type Number below Percent below poverty level poverty level Married - couple family With related children under age 18 2 0.3% 0 0.0% - No related children under age 18 Male householder, no wife present 2 0.5% - With related children under age 18 0 0.0% 0 0.0% - No related children under age 18 Female householder, no husband present 0 0.0% 18 - With related children under age 18 10.7% % 18 1 - No related children under age 18 . 0 0.0% % Table 26: Homeless population by county Scott and Year Anoka Dakota Hennepin Ramsey Carver Washington Total 2000 259 175 3,592 981 100 2002 289 238 3,659 1,429 53 103 3 176 5, 5,8 8 2 4 24 Source: MN Dept. of Children, Families and Learning Quarterly Shelter Survey. • Table 27: Year structure was built Year structure 1939 or 1940- 1950- 1960- 1970- 1980- 1990- 1995- March was built earlier 1949 1959 1969 1979 1989 1994 1998 2000 Owner- occupied 89 27 41 76 359 137 131 178 Totals Renter - occupied 25 0 18 54 212 131 13 1,051 24 13 6 483 Table 28: Residential permits issued, 1970 through 2001 Type of residential permits issued Number of units permitted in: 1970 -1979 1980 -1989 1990 -1994 1995 -1999 2000 2001 Single family, detached 282 Townhouse 97 122 147 1 0 Duplex 61 86 6 30 10 2 12 8 0 Multifamily 380 153 0 0 0 Total permits 6 60 0 0 725 348 142 237 11 Source: Metropolitan Council Annual Building Permit Survey. Table 29: Residential demolitions, 1990 through 2001 Type of unit demolished Number of demolitions Single- family, detached 70 Other residential 0 • Total 70 Source: Metropolitan Council Annual Building Permit Survey. Community Housing Profiles for Oak Park Heights Page 8 of 8 • Table 30: Job growth 1990 2000 Change % change Employment 2,220 3,000 780 35.1% Source: Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development (formerly Minnesota Department of Economic Security) and Metropolitan Council. Table 31: Wage information, 2002 Wage group Jobs* Jobs paying $5.15 or less/hr 55 Paying $5.16 to $11.04/hr 1,250 Paying $11.05 to $18.44/hr 534 Paying $18.45 to $29.49/hr 349 Paying $29.50 to $36.87/hr 56 Paying over $36.87/hr 48 Total jobs in community 2,293 *Numbers may not add to total due to rounding. Source: Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development (formerly Minnesota Department of Economic Security) and Metropolitan Council. • Data Sources: Table # Data Sources 1990 Census: SF1 Database - Tables P1 — 3, P17A, H17A 2000 Census: SF1 Database _ Table P1, P15, P31, P33, H12 2 1990 Census: SF1 Database 2000 Census: SF1 Database - Table P12 © 2000 Census: SF1 Database - Tables P12a -i 4 1990 Census: SF3 Database - Tables P16, P19 2000 Census: SF1 Database - Table P18 © 2000 Census: SF3 Database - Table H19 6 1990 Census: SF1 Database - Table H12 2000 Census: SF1 Database - Table H16 NM 2000 Census: SF1 Database - Tables H16a -i 8 1990 Census: SF1 Database - Table H43 2000 Census: SF3 Database - Table H32 9 2000 Census: SF3 Database - Table H2O 10 2000 & 2002 values from Coun Assessors Database 2000 Census: SF3 Database - Table H84 ® 1990 Census: SF3 Database - Table H61A 2000 Census: SF3 Database - Table H90 ® 2000 Census: SF3 Database 14 1990 Census: SF3 Database - Table H52A 2000 Census: SF3 Database - H91 ® 2000 Census: SF3 Database - Table H62 411 16 1990 Census: SF3 Database - Table H43A 2000 Census: SF3 Database - Table H63 N' 2000 Census: SF3 Database - Table H67 18 2000 Census: SF3 Database - Table P55 19 2000 Census: SF3 Database - Table P56 20 2000 Census: SF3 Database - Tables H73, H97 ® 2000 Census: SF3 Database - Tables H69, H94 ® 2000 Census: SF3 Database - Table H96, H71 ® 1990 Census: SF3 Database - Tables P117, P123, P127 2000 Census: SF3 Database - Table P87, 7 90, P92 24 1990 Census: SF3 Database 2000 Census: SF3 Database - Table P87 ® 2000 Census: SF3 Database - Table P90 26 MN De et. of Children, Families and Learnin•; Quarterl Shelter surve ® 2000 Census: SF3 Database - Table H36 28 Metro•olitan Council Annual Buildin• Permit Surve 29 Metro•olitan Council Annual Buildin• Permit Surve ic 30 First quarter ES202 Covered Employment Minn. Metro•olitan Counc I Develo • ment former) Minn. De •t. of Economic ecu ormerly Minn. Special tabulation from Minn. Dept. of Employment and Economic D nt and Wage Detail Dept. of Economic Security), first quarter ES202 Covered Employ File and Metro•olitan Council estimates. 1 Definitions • Employment. For this document, employment is defined as the number of jobs within the city, including part-time and full time jobs, based on data from the Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development (MDEED) and Metropolitan Council estimates for the first quarter 2002. The total number of jobs in a city may differ from final Covered Employment totals published by MDEED and Metropolitan Council due to data processing differences. Family. A family includes a householder and one or more other people living in the same household who are related by birth, marriage or adoption. Gross rent. The contract rent plus the estimated average monthly cost of utilities and fuels if these are paid by the renter. Hispanic /Latino. Respondents who classify themselves as Hispanic or Latino can be of any race because the Census records Hispanic or Latino as an ethnic category. Homeless population. An estimate of the number of persons provided with temporary shelter and the number turned away due to lack of space for each of the seven counties within the Twin Cities metropolitan area, based on a survey conducted in May of each year. Household. A household includes all of the people who occupy a housing unit. A housing unit is a house, an apartment, a mobile home, a group of rooms, or a single room occupied as separate living quarters. Household income. Includes the income of the householder and all other individuals 15 years old and over in the household, whether they are related to the householder or not. Householder. One person in the household is designated as the householder —it is usually someone who owns, is buying or rents the unit. It can be any household member aged 15 or over. i Housing costs as a percentage of household income. A computed ratio of monthly housing costs to monthly household income. Owners and renters who reported no income or a net loss for 1999 are not included in these tables. Additionally, renters who do not pay cash rent are also not included. The Department of Housing and Urban Development uses 30 percent, and in some instances 40 percent, as the upper limit households can pay for housing costs before they become unable to pay for the other necessities of life, such as food and clothing. Housing unit. A housing unit may be a house, apartment, a mobile home, a group of rooms or a single room intended for occupancy as a separate living quarters. Married couple family. A family where the householder and his or her spouse live in the same household. Measure of crowding. The Census considers a housing unit to be crowded if it has more than one person per room. For each unit, rooms include living rooms, dining rooms, kitchens, bedrooms, finished recreation rooms, enclosed porches suitable for year -round use, and lodgers' rooms. Excluded are strip or pullman kitchens, bathrooms, open porches, balconies, halls or foyers, half- rooms, utility rooms, unfinished attics or basements, or other unfinished space used for storage. A partially divided room is a separate room only if there is a partition from floor to ceiling, but not if the partition consists solely of shelves or cabinets. This definition is open to much interpretation based on cultural or preferential factors. Median. The point where one half of the cases have values below that amount and the other half have values above that amount. Monthly housing costs. For owners: the sum of payments for mortgages, deeds of trust, contracts to purchase, or similar debts on the property (including payments for the first mortgage, second mortgage, home equity loans, and other junior mortgages; real estate taxes; fire, hazard, and flood insurance on the property; utilities; and fuels. It also includes fees such as condominium fees and mobile home site rent. For renters: the monthly housing cost is the same as their gross rent (see above). Non - family household. A householder living alone or with non- relatives only. 1110 Non - White. All householders who indicated that their race was other than "white" or who indicated that they were of two or more races. One- person household. An occupied unit with only one inhabitant. Other family. These are families where one spouse is not present, and are classified by the sex of the householder. Male householder, no wife present, for instance, includes a household with a male maintaining a family household without a spouse present. Persons per family. The result of dividing the number of persons living in families by the number of families. Persons per household. The average number of persons living in households. To calculate this number, the people living in group quarters are subtracted from the total population. The result figure is the total number of persons in households. This number is divided by the total households to give persons per household. Poverty. Defined according to the Office of Management and Budget's (OMB's) Statistical Policy Directive No. 14. The Census Bureau uses a set of money income thresholds that vary by family size and composition to determine who is poor. The poverty thresholds vary depending upon three criteria: size of family, number of children, and, for 1- and 2- person families, age of the householder. If a family's total income is Tess than the threshold, the family and every individual in it is considered poor. The poverty thresholds do not vary geographically, but they are updated annually for inflation using the official consumer price index. The official poverty definition counts money income before taxes and excludes capital gains and the value of non -cash benefits (such as public housing, Medicaid, and food stamps). The thresholds used by the Census are shown in the table below. For a detailed discussion of poverty definitions, please see U.S. Census Bureau, Current Population Reports, "Poverty in the United States: 1999." P -60 -210. Poverty Thresholds in 1999, by Size of Family and Number of Related Children Under 18 Years Old (Dollars) Size of family unit Weighted Related children under 18 years old average None One Two Three Four Five Six Seven Eo ht threshold One person (unrelated more individual) 8,501 Under 65 years old 8,667 8,667 65 years old and over 7,990 7,990 Two people 10,869 Householder under 65 years old 11,214 11,156 11,483 Householder 65 years 10,075 10,070 11,440 old and over Three people 13,290 13,032 13,410 13,423 Four people 17,029 17,184 17,465 16,895 16,954 Five people 20,127 20,723 21,024 20,380 19,882 19,578 Six people 22,727 23,835 23,930 23,436 22,964 22,261 21,845 Seven people 25,912 27,425 27,596 27,006 26,595 25,828 24,934 23,953 Eight people 28,967 30,673 30,944 30,387 29,899 29,206 28,327 27,412 27,180 Nine people or more 34,417 36,897 37,076 36,583 36,169 35,489 34,554 33,708 33,499 32,208 • Family poverty status. Based on a comparison of the total family income with the poverty threshold • appropriate for that family's size and composition. If the total income of the family is less than the appropriate threshold, then all members of the family are considered to be poor. • Individual poverty status. Poverty status is initially determined at the family level and that status is then applied to all family members. If a person is living in a single person household, or a non - family household (not living with anyone related by birth, marriage, or adoption), then the person's ow his or her poverty threshold. Poverty status was determined for all people except institutionalized people in military own income is compared to ry group quarters, people in college dormitories, and unrelated individuals under 15 years old. These groups also were excluded from the numerator and denominator when calculating o people, They are considered neither "poor" nor "non- poor." • Household poverty g p VertY rates. rty status. Since poverty is defined at the family level and not the household level, the poverty status of the household is determined by the poverty status of the householder. Households classified as poor when the total 1999 income of the householder's family is below the appropriate threshold. (For non - family householders, their own income is compared with the a are The income of people living in the household who are unrelated to the householder is noc nsi poverty determining the poverty status of a household, nor does their presence affect the family size en threshold) the appropriate threshold. considered when determining Race. The 1990 and 2000 Censuses asked the question about people's race enumeration, respondents were asked to classify themselves in one racial category, two or more races. For 2000, respondents were able to report more completely, b differently. In the 1990 race groups. The change in questions makes comparisons between years difficult. I even if they were of w ere roues. summarized A change the following groups: black or African twee ay t. i n 20 9 u p to six white, Asian, native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander, some other race, or into a number er of categories two or more races. Individual races are also tabulated, such as Chinese American Indian or Alaska native, classification. The categories in this table include persons who recorded one race o nly. The "two or categori es es of more races" category includes all persons who indicated more than one race. r Hmong within the Asian Related children. Related children include the sons and daughters of the householder (including natural -born, adopted, or stepchildren) and all other people under 18 years old, regardless status, in the household, who are related to the householder, except the spouse of t Foster children are not included since they are not related to the householder. g the householder. ess of marital Residential demolitions. Residential demolitions are reported by com the Council's annual building permit survey. Y munities in their response to • y Demolition permits are not consistently required in all areas. Some communities are able to accurately measure and report how many units are housing stock, others cannot, and some communities report only sporadically. Co expected that these totals are low. taken out of the Y nsequently, it is Residential permits issued. The Council annually surveys all cities and about housing construction that occurred during the previous calendar year. accurate, complete information. Townhouses are difficult to classify from permit townships in the region often rely on the designation made by the developer for this classification. p mit reports. Communities Most communities send very Single- family, attached units. Townhouse units most commonly fall into this definition. Value of owner - occupied units. For Census tables, these values are 2000. The question asks the respondent to estimate how much their property (house home and lot, or condominium unit) would sell for if it were for sale. The County in Census provided by the County Assessor's office. Y ( se and lot, mobile y Assessors' value is Wage Information, 2002. Earnings ranges shown represent mini mum wage; and 30 %, 50 %, 80 %, and 100% of estimated 2002 median family income (U.S. HUD). White -only. Householders who indicated "white" as their only race. i for first quarter 2002. Year structure was built. Refers to when the building was first constructed, remodeled, added to, or converted. The information is provided by residents of the hou sing unit in the census, and thus may not be accurate, especially for rental properties and older homes. not when it was homes. •