Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Daily Reports and Logs
Page of SIDRPT RAMN TERTEC Special Inspection Daily Report City of ak. krv_ a ; t,. S P Report No.: " ` Date of This Report: 3 - l -10 Project Nome: Oak �a -V. }�C`1�.�5 C.j 0r.11 Project No.: _ 6?-- d' - 013 i 1 Project Address: t'', iL0 C 4c 'IAri Client: i,41 1'f (54c Client Project No.: �-- Weather: ©%)-r j 1 ._ Temperature: 3C, 4 f0 Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: ❑ Continuous ❑ Masonry ❑ Reber Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases N eriodic ❑ Welding & Bolting ❑ Concrete Placement ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles & Piers ❑ Tendon Placement KSoils Did the archited or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes ❑ (Listed Below) No ❑ Description and location of work completed: Q g i 9 )-) yn E j � A, r .,prn 0'J\ & „ afr s a4- one_ �U47'�L rv� $ii`.0.`. \ yr.s'Q. : !C7ot�" lf 1�1 .r•• S'M/uk - 1 c rC s?c,! •OCc?r\C n+J b c,,: 1 c�,,gS 5 F <„.&'f s-* `r, `to..__ kA_Ado P _ a GCV.Pr\ Stne, - �i7r k - tote fr. j.i 4-- > � sr,.•t s - .o� oA Lk-- 9 S 4-, sue. l� r V L A. t Cx2S� rs 1�7odt5 List tests performed: l- - Al-,e- /-C • Are there any discrepancies noted from this days observations? Yes ❑ No i rJ • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No ❑ • If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of t e current 1 C/UBC, exce t as noted above. Signed: / Date: ,3 is -(0 Print Full Name: eke �, S =q I.D. No.: • White copy to Braun lnfertec file. Blue copy to Project Site Representative. • Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 Page ` of BRAUN • I NTE RTEC Hand Auger /Dynamic Cone Penetrometer Test Report . Project No.: 6P °0° - O'13L °k Client: C A l OF D tar k4 Ike- Date: 3- L -1 0 Project Name: Oa�C TcrkIC 1-\e: CA. a1i PM 5L c.r■ eSS - Location Sketch: s Safety First! — Pinch Danger ALWAYS WEAR GLOVES! , � _..w .� ..�, � _.M., � _...�..�..,..�...w.w.,_.,_, ,.w ..... qr� s t ; f t 1 i tQ0. ;� i ,,RR �'yS.IV A1/4N A` ` _,...... f .... u .. t.. .+..... ... . i y ......_ y .w,.w...........v,w. w....w.w. 't- a m j § i c , 1 ,.H ' i i : - ...� ? �. w <. # # H. - i € t w l 1 i 1 C t . t € o....... • - J i v F # i i S t i I I I { i £ 3 £ ' ; 3 ; s 1 w ; < E ! z i ' t 3 i # . 1 1 ! i • • DCP /HAP # • Surface Elev. 95.5" ,95 5 !, . Blows 3 Soils Blows Soils Blows l Soils s - N.... # SC b .. 11 __... k ra,.r... ._. w..5),..�.«. �Zs1..,�..:A. a.�. 12 18" w . S { ..� B bSiYL� !t% � ._. .... W W ` # w... Gruozl 18 - 24" 1 \ jc- - 8rap 1 (Ssi 1. . 24 30 wm . ._,w. ,� r ..V �., _..' ,....:.......`V 30 .w - 36 f 48 - 54" 54 - 60" i # ,..s., Groundwater: .�..,.. t0 kc si- ,,,), w vnri� ar at, t`z s\- An& :lb' Q of 4-e. 3J &rs'— a'& 3l � 1.)0,4.„ r)- Location: p , .,.M_ ww...w._ -. A .. .. k'.1.. n Ji .e.1.3ta..�. w la;.it ..,..�.Q4., ... 6 . ......6):. '.c .J.. DS ..,w. Notes, Inclusions, inconsistencies, associated site features, etc. • Note: This information Is not to left on -site. rum it in to the PM along with your daily. Performed By: i'/ , / Reviewed By: Date: . • Rev. 1/07 J--' • Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 Page •:: " of " BRAUN • INTERTEC Hand Auger /Dynamic Cone Penetrometer Test Report Project No.: 6 t - Oot — C 1 ` l Client: GAL 4 k OK.k -t( ate:. 3 - 0 - I 0 Project Name: Oc ( ear \x CAI "'\ PM terrc.JA, haRE s Location Sketch: 1 Safety First! — Pinch Danger — ALWAYS WEAR GLOVES' .... .. ! . .....N ti . ... .. 1 i l . S : t r.... .- ......x;1,1 R l . t.:. 1 .,...p... .. ).... _...': ........• ..._n._ ......} k1, {yam Q . i ..... - .y...... ,,..,. _,w.,�.._ ) % . .... `5,.. ,�..,--....�... ..... +,...., -_k ; ... , , i _ _ti. ...w..- ..- ....... ........3.......,.. .. ...._..t+ -.r.. ..... ». w..w..... H_ -.. .......... - n........- .....w..... .. }..... -; . 4.....r j...._...- ..`........ri.w..... ;... ....., -:.., i S t .....,.. .'� .»..• I S -. Y A 4 i y w....,. a ..,-.. k ) , , n ! 1 I 33 ? 3 j f 3 , { 1 4 i i , ! i F 1 s J 1 3 .... S f z t i pp ? i ; E t i I i t I ? t i s 1 3, w. M ; .. ,.�.. - ..... - . E ~ ' i • ~ t om .h......_. , . i....... »j,. -... .. ...._.................'.,_..... ,.+_....� i.., { ,..- ......� - DCP /HAP # OM' it 9 • . Surface Elev. r 95$.5— Blows i Soils Blows J Soils Blows f Soils 0 6" Iw _w.x .. s ,. - 12^ ti.... ,��w ' 4�Q a,��R. it w w H _ w M .ww _______..i__ 1.5(e. (( f 12 - 18" L I x i 18 24" I ' 3o ww..36" 3 w M mw 42 - 48" i 48 - 54" ! Y7} f f 54 - 60" Groundwater: 0 pr Location: i.' 6.4- c,), ► p' No+iln of 4 t-t , Notes, Inclusions, J inconsistencies, associated site features, etc. Nola: This Information is not to be le on site. Tam It In to the PM along with your dally. Performed By: _A/A(' Reviewed By: Date: 0 Rev. 1/07 4111 111111. . • Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 Page_ of BRAUN cnit -dfn 4/07 OINTERTEC Daily Field Notes Project No.: /f� 9--C� / 3/9 Date: Report No.: Project Name: «• 1 ‘ 44 .- ,7L1// Project Location: Client: YALE. /i Gt L 11 5 Temp/Weather: efe'vvh -ti — 4/ S Project Manager c 1 `M? 4 Time Arrived: Departed: Services Performed 0 Compaction Testing Testing 0 Cylinder Pickup 0 Proctor Pickup 0 Masonry Pickup O DCP 0 Other (describe) tensity Testing ., Areas Tested: ❑ Mass Grading 0 Building Pad 0 Wall Backfill 0 Slab Subgrade 0 Parking/Walks O Utilities 0 Roadways ❑ Bituminous 0 Other (describe) Method: ❑ Nuclear ❑ Sandcone # of tests: Fill Source: ❑ On -site 0 Imported Tests taken met specification? ❑ Yes 0 No 0 Waiting on Proctor results? Contractor notified of test results? 0 Yes 0 No Name of person notified: Concrete Testing information Areas Tested: 0 Footing ,,,..Erglab on Grade 0 Deck 0 Columns /Piers 0 Walls • ❑ Pile Cap /Pile Fill ❑ Pavement 0 Curb & Gutter 0 Other (describe) No. of placements: / Yards per placement: lie, Method of placement: Set # Cylinder Size Air % Slump Temp Mix Supplier Spec. Strength Workorder # »11M31111=111 /-3, INIVINFMIOM 6 4, MEM IMO Contrador notified of test results? _1s 0 No, Name of person notified: �j� -.� , Overall Remark' /Comments (Frpluin "Fans eoti<orns,prablerrs or unusual. cccu'raneesj Was everything available to test /observe? , . i'es 0 No Were there any delays? (Explain below if yes) 0 Yes ,�-Ncr Was a copy of this report left on site? D Yes ❑ No If so, whom was it submitted to: Co L l / ✓11 !NFL IFIL. ,..I AJ4 • J., '/. <A_ CAS Performed By: Reviewed by: Date: • This is a preliminary report and is provided solely as evidence that field observations and /or testing was performed. Observations and /or conclusions and /or recommendations conveyed in the final report may vary from, and shall take precedence, over those indicated in a preliminary report • Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 BRAUN 0 INTERTEC Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder Report Date: 3/25/10 LIMS WO #: 1001108 Test Method: ASTM C39, 4x8 Cylinder Client: Eric Johnson (Email Test Results) Project: SP -09 -01319 City of Oak Park Heights Oak Park Heights City Hall 14168 Oak Park Blvd 14168 Oak Park Boulevard North Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 Oak Park Heights, MN Field Test Conditions and Results . ASTM C31* Set Number: 29 Mix Design: 4163P Date Cast: 03/16/10 Supplier: Cemstone Time Cast: 7:45 am Specified Air ( %): Not Required Date Received: 03/17/10 Specified Strength (psi): 3,500 Measured Slump (in.): (ASTM C143) 5 1/4 Truck Number: 787 Measured Air ( %): (ASTM C231) 2.3 Ticket Number: 2419973 Concrete Temp. ( °F): (ASTM C 1064) 62 Cylinders per Set: 5 Air Temp. (°F): 45 Cylinders Cast By: Brown, Sean Liquid Added On Site: .5 GAL HRWRA -High Range Water Reducing Admixture (per 10.00 cu. yds.) Placement Location: Building Interior, Slab on Grade, North and West additions Sample Location/Notes: South East corner of West addition. Compression Test Results Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder Break Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture Capping Remarks • Sample No. Date (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in.) (sq. in.) (psi) Type Method ** Code(s) 29 - 3/23/ 1 6 7 47,100 4.00 12.57 3,750 4 N B2 * Concrete sampled in accordance with ASTM C172 ** Capping Method: N = ASTM C1231, Unbonded Caps S = ASTM C6I7, Sulfur Caps Break Remarks: B2 The 7 day test result projects that the specified strength will likely be met at 28 days according to a typical age - strength relationship. Types of Fracture M .52. fib TYPE 1 TYPE 2 TYPE 3 TYPE 4 TYPE 5 TYPE 6 Mattes, Sarah I approve the document Mar 25 2010 ver 1.3C Page 1 of 1 Page of 1 SIDRPT •RAUN 1 NTE RTEC Special Inspection Daily Report aok grf.el City of 61k- 1444.4%.. Sri wirJ Report No.: Date of This Report: P.tix 7 Project Name: O,A....141.+4, HfltSirirr e.,,,,, I Project No.: 5P61•1/2 /1 Project Address: V Client G>T e* d.4.4. 1.1 rs. Client Project No.: Weather: P' f eattott) Temperature: ViV Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: ❑ Continuous 2117Aasonry .debar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases El Periodic ❑ Welding & Bolting ❑ Concrete Placement ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles & Piers ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes ❑ (Listed Below) No ❑ Description and location of work completed: ��iY1IG�yt,�,�1t ,�✓S' Aiditeifilt.tvar% Atok. orivE ,70 [tint. rimima.t. 01 444 et. �r,S. " 4 C , es. !. - . 4 314-+ 4d o " .g IA s ?a </'1', List tests performed: • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ No le • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No • If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable workmanship provisions ofthe current IBC /UBC, except as noted above. Signed: .- "`_ ..r Date: 8'11-0 . iii not F ull Name: ■.• L�t►0.... _ LD. No.: White copy to Braun lntertec file. Blue copy to Project Site Representative. • Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 Page t of [. SiDRPT •RAUN I NTE RTEC Special Inspection Daily Report fun Spud Cit of eAA. �,at i,, bfaubir c Report No.: �y Date of This Report: t _2 Project Name: 0406 Ai". Kg (4rs 64 , AG+tL Project No.: 3J -of -a /s! 9 Project Address: ` ,g i/ Client: �yl Client Project No.: Weather: er�l►r/ Temperature: f i N. ?D $ Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: [2' Continuous ❑ Masonry I Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases 0 Periodic ❑ Welding & Bolting Concrete Placement ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles & Piers ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes ❑ (Listed Below) No ❑ Description and location of work completed: , _ . , .,..,/ „ .._ iit tiOtt to taste tious : 4- hr/12.., aor "Mr l - - tie 4 of. y '". e ,, fir '' e S6.+ e!. ,Tr 7 &. &. o4/sr''S • List tests performed: Sty,w,P • kmti 719,41044,1144 E • Are there any discrepancies rioted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ No Cr • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No • If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC /UBC, except as noted above. Signed: Date: 9' • rint Full Name: J 4'r1o_ I.D. No.: White copy to Braun Intertec file. Blue copy to Project Site Representative. • Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 Page J of SIDRPT •RAUN , I NTE RTEC Special Inspection Daily Report Esc City of 6 0/le. yfiw Report No.: Date of This Report: t /2 Vl Project Name: j lark 164.. w ows Ot 1 � °"! ` Project No.: 4 1"'O/3 /' Project Address: 1/ Client: , _ Client Project No.: Weather: Cr Temperature: 9/O f' Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: ❑ Continuous a Masonry I ' Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases R'Periodic ❑ Welding & Bolting ❑ Concrete Placement ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles & Piers ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes ❑ (Listed Below) No ❑ 4,40 6 Description and location of work completed: assaimo 1pJVti�I f r " ,�. • C 171 — las!S 4T` 6t li' Ws/ 4 tb 9 /..10 4104 4 0 dt 00 List tests performed: • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ No ID • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes No • If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC/UBC, except as noted above. Signed: .... Date: 2.12r49 *Print Full Name: LOidar•4 I.D. No.: White copy to Braun Intertec file. Blue copy to Project Site Representative. • Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 , Page _L of SIDRPT BRAUN N TE RTEC Special Inspection Daily Report Mi4W City of �t /! M A Report No.: Date of This Report 1-24 -es Project Name: a4 OLt__ yPit � Project No.: 'Sb. 9 Project Address: f1 Client: e Client Project No.: Weather: e' Temperature: 740 Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: � a Continuous ❑ Masonry El Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases 2 Periodic ❑ Welding & Bolting E Concrete Placement ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles & Piers ❑ Tendon Placement .2"'Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes ❑ (Listed Below) No ❑ . Description and location of work completed: coe6e,Likib gyp, &, jr 4, . j e ,„,,,,, (414 - i _ ,... _ !1. 1, _ ._ _ _ !4t. il....• • -. E.., /. L •+ fpat e.....0 y .. 01.-Y . .17% A./ -3 ; 9 -3 a►s` F IV- s:r; i S - P i . 6-8 ; f , ..3 , . . 2 . h i - y • F • S, e 3 - Ie C . ,�u s o 1St. ti∎ a, to -y • 4-3 . . p4b (_r • SirrC, 1 , List tests performed: . A.4).^'`'9,. ".„...writ,„„ep 1 ' ! p1044 . Pflisi t y "Iptruji 1 C.�S/IIGLtu,A.._. b►11ik : 1:006X6d/ • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ No j • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No .• • if yes, see attached Summary Sheet. To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC /UBC, except as noted above. Signed: .. "T�� - Date: q.44?-0 9' . Print Full Name: 'f B44,0"...1 I.D. No.: • White copy to Braun Intertec file. Blue copy to Project Site Representative. • Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 Page 2... of "f'" SIDRPT2 Rev 10/03 •BRAUN 1 NTE RTEC Continuation of Special Inspection Daily Report City of ea414, 4eA. beirS Report No.: Date of This Report: 7•'1_9.-101 Project -Nam-. __ • :jcctNo: lk. Note: This is a continuation of a report. The first page of this report has information which should not be separated from this continuation) bfiteNriA 44cfl11 grarlioNAZ 9157T1u.0 ?fX44F4040:1e,•IS ,S14 . 70 csa J ii4. •r A-Gt E?G*utnw aerar&A. Z cF so o. p irr P SG 43,1 ,pGeit ,t4e,q. 4R6A 1v n 4 st, 'U IR1440.444•Moot- IV To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC /UBC, except as noted above. PP P Signed: Date: 4 . Print Full Name: I.D. No: • White copy to Braun Intertec file. Blue copy to Project Site Representative. • Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 j Page ( _ of SIDRPT : ila Uri .• NTERTEC Special Inspection Daily Report City of Ilk lG ar /L Pr./ $1fs Report No.: tl Date of This Report: 1 2.3/o e l Project Name: at i- j 4 v 1.1 i4 612 /4 f1 Project No.• S ,p 47 ~ d I. 1 Project Address: q ? LV( 4/ Client: Cal d Oar_ Are. Meij+:tS Client Project No.: Weather: C.l �� Temperature: .83# Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: Continuous ry i ❑ Masonry � ' Rebar Placement 0 0 Cases ❑ Periodic ❑ Welding & Bolting E.r Concrete Placement ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles & Piers ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes ❑ ( Listed Below) No • Description and location of work completed: O , k,vt; thm,L,114.14" • e 1314 et A - . t / q A b g- Cot/44 4- wi.1IS A+ E371y . 4 Z v14- owe 5ILO., "Fro," Gird + C ( S t h e o F Af /J . kbobe L-5 . t.of or • Z , S L At / as Go rei a . 1 1...0 A+,11 / Ls L/ fr tccv( 4 t rWC . List tests performed: 6/over 1 4, � , / 4 tit Gr$ ta ( , «y . 1,' • Are there any discrepancies noted from this days observations? Yes ❑ No • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No • If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable workmanship pr. ' • ns of the current IBC/UBC, except as noted above. s Signed: „ � Date: " 1/# 7. '-3/0' 1 Print Full jf: f 'el i Vs.,1I/1 I.D. No.: , p �f'1 4 0 ” '97. 1 White copy to Braun Intertec file. Blue copy to Project Site Representative. • Providing engineering and environmental sdutions since 1957 Page of SIDRPT RAVN NTE RTEC Special Inspection Daily Report r i +k ) City of i9 4 Pc k 11 ryt hS Report No.: '' // // Date of This Report: '717/ 1 Project Name: Oetk ?' ZT1t - ln.(5 C f4I1 . Project No.: - 0131 Project Address: ' BLS`! a aritroMiI' 'i . Client: _ Cl4 DAk 1 r.ItF go7i4 Client Project No.: Weather: a )o oca 7 Temperature: Co 0 Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: ❑ Continuous ❑ Masonry Reber Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases Periodic ❑ Welding & Bolting 7jConcrete Placement ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles & Piers ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes ❑ (Listed Below) No ❑ Description and location of work completed: / pJ .i� to 1 da r..we r' ro✓ W , !l4 - .■ 1 —l A 1 , 1_2 .3 i u 4-o ...N -e- t., c , 4 W ,� 7o66 I57 / 64- /6 List tests performed: 6j t v ,,,, t p 6 %t r . t � o • 8 7o , �'c.r• (o„ ` � — 4 del " — • ++) tr s • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ No • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No • If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC/UBC, except as noted above. Signed: Date: 7/e Print Full Full Name: (( + ,,, ✓ e sp. ID. No.: White copy to Braun Interfec file. Blue copy to Project Site Representative. • Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 Page r of J SIDRPT ar _______RAUN TERTEC Special Inspection Daily Report Ma Iles City of edit_ 44s... //flix4r5 Report No.: Date of This Report. q" t5%-di Project Name: t AtliA... 04a* H rs On Rill: Project No.. SP- 691Pa Project Address: ' - % �_ aLtd� Client: • f 7� 42. t, 1470.1/, Client Project No.: d Weather: Plt'rtfti�.. f r'�tN.av� Temperature: erature. a r t Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: ❑ Continuous ❑ Masonry lRebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases i" Periodic ❑ Welding & Bolting Concrete Placement ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles & Piers ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes ❑ (Listed Below) No ❑ Description and location of work completed: iBSg .4 t/eV) a 4) •C.,tA6 .Ls- 4,0 (i� -- 4 A — ' pAAlrtrJ t ss L 44 ht. -•e5 1.-004 : 4 - / T'► As. ' T 7 . . 41 1 A4- r La. * I . ' . At 6, - . . List tests performed: 1 ..0 - 17 "T s .' .•.. - Wb # - LIDO warn (tasit.utaS) `rsA.td' : /eel lgn3 0.... Le..) Se .rat: 1 3 ' r-ii j 14 • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ No • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No • If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC/UBC, except as noted above. . .. Signed: Date: 'q— fSra4. _ Print Full Name: I.D. No.: 410 White copy to Braun intertec fife. Blue copy to Project Site Representative. • . Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 Page / of / SIDRPT • BRAUN I NTE RTEC Special Inspection Daily Report MUS City of AJ4A. / iirt_s Report No.: Date of This Report: 7- /441—.0 Project Name: 44a Ate_ i/74»4r3 49{!{ Project No.: <I-49,51319 Project Address: /4// lei Q+4 P �jLI�• Client atiti +rJ AEA- 444, Joina/Ir - Client Project No.: Weather. & krt." (',(,. d Temperature: 0 Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: , .+ ❑ Continuous , ❑ Masonry CJ Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases m Fireproofing . 0 Welding &Bolting Concrete Placement ❑ Fi p roofin g ❑ Piles & Piers ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes ❑ (Listed Below) No ❑ Description and location of work completed: plasm/pc l i►„Arr teFµtk it 4,,es fki - 7" btr S))L' . 7' 44 -0CS : 17 LaarlrLt� 47- & 0 4 ✓ 7 L dr✓r zw5 : � • 71 �• 9 . b ?a r r I • C p L-- -7>a C451 I sue el -77377,ab pwk List tests performed: "S_, -t-'t bad.. Gam-+ � • 7P oy ulte t 4 01 X59 /T * • Are there any discrepancies noted from this days observations? Yes ❑ No Q-"' • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No C- • If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC /UBC, except as noted above. Signed: Date: Full Name: I.D. No.: White copy to Braun Intertec file. Blue copy to Project Site Representative. • Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 Page / of / SIDRPT 4013 RAU N NTE RTEC Special Inspection Daily Report asks City of Gem_ 4L&. H Report No.: Date of This Report: '7 - /6. Project Name: 411): _ P_Fo&L MtL Project No.: ' 2- -09 -01319 Project Address: / /44 Q444.. B L✓G• Client Client Project No.: Weather: -L • Temperature: Type of Inspection: - Inspection Coverage: ❑ Continuous ❑ Masonry E Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases a Periodic ❑ Welding & Bolting ErCon&ete Placement ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles & Piers ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes ❑ (Listed Below) No ❑ Description and location of work completed: QaseK y &v . j i ttewo- e_ 41 1Lt eaLno- b 4 - / To 3 - n %. 4451- / 5e, 4 /- £/ / eig.. 'B J +G;+•• MFs 1 C' e 't- nrira4t. lwtlas ' • List erf s test performed: +CLV.,.../1 , ,4 e_ Jrr.rr 1 eted4 " w fD * Ws-go C ____l7 ffr Ate • Are there any discrepancies noted from this dot's observations? Yes ❑ No 12r • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? • , Yes ❑ No 2" • If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC /UBC, except as noted above. Signed: �- Date: '7- / 00 Print Full Name: ..-i e to I.D. No.: White copy to Braun lntertec file. Blue copy to Project Site Representative. • Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 Page of SIDRPT • B RAU N 1 NTE RTEC Special Inspection Daily Report b �1 Via 46 City of b cc ( f °-r� 1 / 4-1 Report No.: Date of This Report 71'3 /01 Project Name: f) 4*- C,;1-.. "t-I lI Project No.: 4e- D ? - 3G if Project Address: 1 (9 � 14 N . ' I 'a / v A • Client ba F Pc-t 47 l Client Project No.: Weather: C Temperature: '`So Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: ❑ Continuous ❑ Masonry Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases ❑ Periodic ❑ Welding & Bolting � . Concrete Placement ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles & Piers ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes ❑ (Listed Below) No ❑ Description and location of work completed: /Lg Piet) / P 1cec.elwio.•T Coe Wat(5 1 4 1.5 N 1 - mss" h 'i e- E O �OT�^ ` Ov► 1 1_I€. • , (A)0-2). 41 R / /tA/'e �o ))4e. w fro) ro(e4 p(..v�S �" Seer.: . 5 yJ r 4 ; S�'vire r-t I X 7066 P . a .M.��e / - k- Et em 1n1A11 os^ I/ (N)(s. S) , List tests performed: S l ,,t....,t r S. Z t i A- t /: �� Z % . ,o ' 1 1 1 ij t X I. Cy e 5 • • Are there any discrepancies noted from this days observations? Yes ❑ No ■' • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No �' • If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC /UBC, except as noted above. Signed: Date: 7/ 1/01 • Print Full Name: v.) e•-• ✓t S I.D. No.: White copy to Braun Infertec file. Blue copy to Project Site Representative. • Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 • Page _ of SIDRPT BRAUN Nor INTERTEC Special Inspection Daily Report City of ve4k P.,k /e19z.k Report No.: Date of This Report: 7/Z/0 Project Name: OA V P4. (4t ∎1 fn C �( 144( Project No.: se - oc• —043/9 Project • dress: I MAM A &t v3 ' t Client C 14- T � , Zak ?o t ( i4 t tl 145 Client Project No.: Weather. c(.J r /7r- Temperature: Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: ❑ Continuous ❑ Masonry Itebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases Er Periodic ❑ Welding & Bolting $ Placement ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles & Piers ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes ❑ (Listed Below) No ❑ Description and location of work completed: / ,�i Mod; i daces..•. - �•r t tiw ((..S e ( -ac's i( ) / /( / HL A�� �'), AI ' Artee, To 1 wt-La'— re. - ) 4 + lees. ocerte r .,ias D (44e ) /r m Je fDC ' ao—. . 7 t ye74 rte.. 1 Y Vi ta. Ors . List tests performed: rj 1 1" r J ", Al r .1 77. i 4.... 78 ° �{ - "� d �� c- f te0^5 • Are there any discrepancies noted from this days observations? Yes ❑ No jg • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No El • If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC/UBC, except as noted above. Signed: Date: 7/2./01 Print Full Name: f e. ik I.D. No.: • White copy to Braun Intertec file. Blue copy to Project Site Representative. • Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 Page .L of J. RAV N sIDRPT 1 NTE RTEC Special Inspection Daily Report Mmes City of ay.. /4,'i_ / 1Lir r Report No.: Date of This Report 1/ 4/.109 Project Name: ill+. ldtaI. Hrri.2rf S 1 J /4414. Project No.: "5P'b9�0/319 Project Address: d Client: tM e� �iP" 411.4. KEtt , 1i Client Project No.: Weather: C tftn Temperature: SO a t S Type of inspection: t`JJ Inspection Coverage: 12 ❑ Masonry Q ' Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases ❑ ❑ Welding & Bolting OConcrete Placement ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles & Piers ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes ❑ (listed Below) No ❑ Description and location of work completed: er"3r.>ei[.trtto ac ,y.g ,r n /'t4 ? $' JJS FM.. *Titer FoupAli 41+.1 oar >AoZ4cwwtt, o Ilegkerks4 • A *5 ss List tests performed: .1 5 t ,41 44. { .nro • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ No • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No LD • If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC/UBC, except as noted above. Signed: Date: (1 . Z , Print Full Name: ►1 l.D. No.: White copy to Braun lntertec file. Blue copy fo Project Site Representative. • Providing engineering and environnu ntal solutions since I957 Page j. of SIDRPT * BRAUN I NTE RTEC Daily Inspection ection '� P Re ort �vs City of OA& /keak. //pie srS Report No.: Date of This Report 6— /L- 61 Project Name: O9K -PAY(f;k, 14r ILirtf% Ca T�l�"� Ivt:. Project No.: SQ — 0 /3 Project Address: vv Client: Client Project No.: Weather: jl Temperature: 10° S Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: a Continuous ❑ Masonry ar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases Periodic ❑ Welding & Bolting ►J Concrete Placement ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles & Piers ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes ❑ (Listed Below) No ❑ Description and location of work completed: Mc*? q j,i l,44 *AO f.? Jafirnr a - .I.77 - 1 .., • 410 ' S. . M•5 1. List tests performed: 'A1.4 g A L. TC . Wpb: 10D '44 a • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ No Er • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No IR • If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC/UBC, except as noted above. d Signed: Date: (p —I t '3 Print Full Name: �� StejleuJ I.D. No.: White copy to Braun fntertec file. Blue copy to Project Site Representative. • Providing engineering and envirorunental solutions since 1957 Page of/ • SIDRPT .BRAUN 1 NTE RTEC Special inspection Daily Report Mottle City of 2 9 & 4 ) . , 7 7 5 Report No.: Date of This Report (p -- /2 - 2::)g Project Name: -4/ - //&WtS Cr) /1 Project No.: O D /2/9 Project Address: ) i` / Client: .z. i '; ,v. . T Client Project No.: Weather: (4ArLj t Temperature: -.0 ti Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: ❑ - Continuous ❑ Masonry � Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases lJ , Periodic ❑ Welding & Bolting Concrete Placement ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles & Piers ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes ❑ (Listed Below) No ❑ Description and location of work completed: [ - ,Uev i2.t ! 6= -6 v4ao &-r-g 7Z . , L4t(m,..Ii Tut- WC /,ol/•Je .S 4T 7 G/•71.-- , *fain "'elf .4-0 11. - S /q7a j - 7 . Afar= / n.,(7 . F 97.) A/ 9 List tests performed: WlO# : 9UQiL9 1 .- • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ No • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No F;1-- • If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC /UBC, except as noted above. Signed: Date: (a -09 Print Full Name: .. , -s I.D. ‘ - No.: fp White copy to Braun Intertec file. Blue copy to Project Site Representative. • Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1 957 Page / of / SIDRPT *BRAUN 1 NTE RTEC Special Inspection Daily Report City of / rte.., #17hrsolS Report No.: / /� Date of This Report: b -W 09 Project Name: apt_ 144-4. Hi!'ll 'r5 ( 1 #01.Project No.: Dg�4 /7 Project Address: ,V,(,, C =� 44/ � • /JPAJ& b # ,. . j &i . Client: A 4,,_ f��R�t, Client Project No.: Weather: ( il44AR.. Temperature: Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: a Continuous ❑ Masonry iRebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases la Periodic ❑ Welding & Bolting EfrConcrete Placement ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles & Piers ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes ❑ (Listed Below) No ❑ Description and location of work completed: +V p p xJ� - rttiF 1�Fr �CEik�*N - s - &AO tos,...$C.4-I"J( ; 7NE Czar+ Wan tr to A-T au Ijco.?LarS' 4 s -/ . Qv-A c - - 3 n 8. lure: tuannt. sra( A.►o k r 0.40 $ kLI 4b /ma"- p r s List tests performed: +C r A IA. • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ No e • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No • If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC/UBC, except as noted above. Signed: Date: 10 - 4444 • Ink Print Full Name: I.D. No.: White copy to Braun lntertec file. Blue copy to Project Site Representative. • Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 Page I of I A SIDRPT #RAUN INTERTEC Special Inspection Daily Report City of ©ct k kt,f V- \Q tr.k Report No.: 3 Date of This Report: Q CP - 3 • a 9 . Project Name: C,41 kcA k ` Project No.: S r� a c ? o 1315 Project Address: � 1 o ( G.it- CtfJ +- � Lu � p• Client: C• c..( C) R pj✓et►4 . Client Project No.: Weather. Temperature: Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: ❑ Continuous ❑ Masonry [Rebor Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases i2r Periodic ❑ Welding & Bolting Lr Concrete Placement ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles & Piers ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes ❑ (Listed Below) No ❑ Description and location of work completed: 6 -I 1., r , - ..u i 4w% CA MA..- . li e rAt a 1 rf-AV A (-- '- 4 ',-- - Av la <. 4. z i:- i A rt"4 .5 13.9' 4u D ; 1 h. 1.4 r.►.5 t/.DU GS e,r, S � 1 dv 4 . wt1 re, h,rce— YuAA4- ` a�t 1 AAA 1 h 6.4.. 11., f €.i (-11 cut w�- c. a.. r.�e. t Ta =r "A- , pLG..r`I ill.? AA. QiIuGJ le,r,-.s r f -el _.. . 1vS Z CJ - �.1e extre. V„ Cr.c. yyr.i+.0 (( e.—/L et4- /N * v -rv 13.9 - 2; 1 -/.G 4%.-1. 6%0 - }- i-e yt- lend -erS . List tests performed: c ( 1 r j 4J 4-Qi c.c 4 Co J►.. 4. z-oud ? I Csc4at a c.—c - V`"' t ■ (J 4"ri- V =4.4 1r' L41.4o ..s • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ No k • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No • If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable workmanship pro .ion- - curren IBC /UBC, except as noted above. Signed: ! 4 / AiA Date: 6- 3 Print Full : e: j f _ �t,r y • I. D. No.: t/a v. 4111, White copy to Braun lnfertec file. Blue copy to Project Site Representative. • Providing engineering and environmental soludoru since 1957 Page / of SIDRPT 43 RAU N 1 NTE RTEC Special Inspection Daily Report City of �.4st �. i2476,yp5 Report No.: Date of This Report: 4-3-9 Project Name: •SP•t14- �/.5 /�f _,.�. .7 Project No.: . , tom. r Project Address: Nib D.4 M. ' piJ3D x Client � � • Client Project No.: Weather. 44,11 G' j Temperature: '40 Temperature: Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: � / 0 Continuous ❑ Masonry Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases Lr Periodic ❑ Welding & Bolting ❑ Concrete Placement ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles & Piers ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes ❑ (Listed Below) No ❑ Description and location of work completed: 7,F/ A,R #r f t14 1' .T aft_ 6 . 4 . " 4 0 1Ik 4Th : F /7 74 1 IP 01/41611 xtyuaiS A7.11 tr.A.e, u45 .] etisoo- pi,44514"..117. List tests performed: • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ No • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No Er • If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC /UBC, except as noted above. Signed: Dote: 67-3 X04 Print Full Name: [ geleu• "V 1.D. No.: White copy to Braun Intertec file. Blue copy to Project Site. Representative. • Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 , • i kkoMa..b I S Page 1 of a., SIDRPT BRAY N I NTE RTEC Special Inspection Daily Report cit of Oak- Pk In�.a --s Report No.: Z.. Date of This Report & Z--cs q Project Name: M c 1L Pc. r k- Vntee (j i) Gall k Iroject No.: bT O °‘ v" 1319 Project Address: 1 TcI E n(� Client Uhl ac 0 Ark. htbfAeent Project No.: Weather: Temperature: Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: ❑ Continuous ❑ Masonry 0 Rebor Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases 1 Periodic ❑ Welding & Bolting l2r Concrete Placement ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles & Piers ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes ❑ (Listed Below) No ❑ Description and location of work completed: oketrurcl, {nv r. Z v n tu i t'Cen re. rr.614 _ 45,10 Cis (^4M as Few n,4-5 fve 4c4 ht e k c,CP.e h b r- .. 5 1 +is v . •rCoAn PIN' ee....r rl.- "....,L A r,...s c,, e.A t. Z J Via- r ,- ,.tn..a..7 acct► r 2 e.-.c -..._ lA c n y4t. c-'— 'r • r1 E+r IMO ►(, j Are.t,�..�, 4i....0- t ft_.P• .",c. l kooka 1,..w11 1 6.. ‘,.t 1 S W -t r-t la,. f (ct Ct, 4 / 4-i'e a r . v r .1-.) . l CO etc. t - 1 .. CJ - . List tests performed: 4.. k e„ f j ce. t o.. a" G, r.. el a 1 , F 4. A" .. Ct.J AC P` • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ No • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No NI • If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. To the best of our nowiedge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable workmanship pro sions of the cum_ t IBC/UBC, except as noted above. /,, Signed: / j /j(_ 0 _ Date: Z 0 * - : Print Full N. : a"� _s�,7 __ . _l .."A 6 . I.D. No.: 243 2 L 0 IV 1 11 , White copy to Braun lntertec file. Blue copy to Project Site Representative. • Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 n,� Page2of , v`, ( 5 . SIDRPT2 • BRAUN 1 NTE RTEC Continuation of Special Inspection Daily Report • City of oct k fiv k. vt.e.eb le)*. 6 / Report No.: Z Date of This Report - Z. - C,ci Project Name: Crkk-• 1 11-- r te- trues, es (trot t• Project No.: 6P4I Cl. O 1 g l e k Note: This is a continuation of a report. The first page of this report has information which should not be separated from this continuation) 00 0 (,/1C e C -or+ c..rt4l- •t4 tett la/ •i.t� £'�(0 ti1Ar t...c.iN C -noni. 6 tat- Plc2 ,S s .c ., cv} 3t , qet t 1 c - c ,,,,.., t a� r ...etcr -Q. 4s i k A �a 1-c 2. 111. 1 S all G�-tr � J , Y •2n -v Ct(_t ...r A e..., t --. t,.J . X.. Wn �if c a. 4.7./..-• . 0 n—e- ,S-0- - cwt" e l. / b.n .L? r'S fN $ C c. Si r g" c,tftr... ?r l4 ■j JS Cyr 4-t. S t.y p +u- (11)05-2 S • J To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable workmanship pro isions of the c rrent IBC /UBC, except as noted above. Signed: i , / %% Date: 6 Z r`J / ea Print Full Na , :- ,it f � . f {/w 1.D. No: Z i G► J c+ • r or White copy to Braun tntertec file. Blue copy to Project Site Representative. • Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 Page / of B RAt� N SIDRPT NTERTEC Special Inspection Daily Report rn0\ City of Lh, LK. 41/0.erS Report No.: Date of This Report: 0" ^4 Project Nome: �'� . �: _ s �. � /, Project No.: 6f 1 Project Address: / f' > — 221, — /A Client: _ _ ` , / �.�1 Client Project No.: Weather. et -i-ra e� 0 ' j Temperature: Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: ❑ Continuous ❑ Masonry .a"ltebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases Periodic ❑ Welding & Bolting ❑ Concrete Placement ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles & Piers ❑ Tendon Placement 'Moils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes ❑ (Listed Below) No ❑ /"Description and location of work com tiF+rA aD NAA.„4„ks_. e ,/F l ,F1-. (or wade, 4o 44 f oltir5 px z rbrrmw• -s 411,07 .6: , 7 ' f , 4 _ •nom. la Signs iw . % 44 ,,c /F It- grinsa.. /644Litie..tsr" . AltWo (At g no �Fs a corm rwr fi.ott`Wpt,0 Ac- %ut Awti s Waal() List tests performed: • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ No • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No • If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC /UBC, except as noted above. Signed: Date: 0-2-09 Print Full Name: "ems) ,6ttx•*4P •3 ID. No.: • White copy to Braun lntertec file. Blue copy to Project Site Representative. • Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 Page of DFNTS ;i Rev 3/04 IF NTE RTEC Daily Field Notes • Project No.: 5 119 -15/3/9 Report No.: Location: At 1A114 yr Date: 6 Personnel Classification Regular Hours .Overtime Hours 1v(, ' 1. Areas and work performed this day: r1►$4,l n Sf P t T dR'$ d og meth-3 A$0 66,'5ov /to ly �✓' 41 �y� s � -) t7Lt�� +�/a'Gl 1i 4 � ::r ...._...AA.4 - -- • 411.7 1 z _ a • r 6. _ �.,. y u .f.1._.;. 1 �._ _ +•,� ,1.� ` � t H bbtvwwJ IV .�. w N r e t y 7 gF t r A cm- F D Weather: C1Ekfet. "` 7 S Performed By: �-t Submitted To: • White copy to Braun lntertec file. Blue copy to Project Site Representative. • Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 Z U . LU 0 . ...... '1' .......,......—.. att pe a it- ir„,.., .... . . 4Z1 Iamb . 44. ry Cr 01 "" • .. . A - ...1.....4 ■ . ... • - . 4 • i . 4 . • } ' 4 .110 '.1.. MOW • II • 4 .-: , ....._.. ‘. . • 0 A ... , . ....,, . ... • ._ .......•.,.• • .. , ' .1: ,..,.. .. . . ,,.. , 4 .,._ .,. . . 1 z •tra r i 0 0 • Itti::''''‘... 4:;* elk. g a l .., ! dr 40 '-'• T ,,..........-....: . , etror L., 4:1- s., - .. 0 in 1 , E , 1 x ! v, 4 1 0 .I . ,. J t 1 1 1 : t. a 01. .D1 fa) 0 . • ‹; FIGURE# t Page f of it RAUN k TE RTEC Daily Field Notes Project No.: 'SP -4 a/4 Date: $'117 j.� Report No.: Project Name: P. .A¢ai 1�Fittet t Project Location: . A4'ti, I LfiD4 Client: P P 1 TIS Temp/Weather: C i 'O Project Manager: 'G / r5 Time Arrived: Departed: ffi 6# b . $# . t Services it dorm s Compaction Testing ❑ Concrete Testing ❑ Cylinder Pickup ❑ Proctor Pickup 0 Masonry Pickup O DCP 0 Other (describe) Density Testing Areas Tested: ❑ Mass Grading 0 Building Pad all Backfill 0 Slab Subgrade O Parking/Walks O Utilities 0 Roadways ❑ Bituminous 0 Other (describe) Method: .o Nuclear ❑ Sandcone # of tests: �' Fill Source: ❑ On -site imported Tests taken met specification? Yes 0 No ❑ Waiting on Proctor results? Contractor notified of test results? es 0 No Name of person notified: '' fr .... Concrete Testing informatio ». Areas Tested: ❑ Footing ❑ Slab on Grade 0 Deck 0 Columns /Piers ❑ Walls 0 Pile Cap /Pile Fill ❑ Pavement ❑ Curb & Gutter ❑ Other (describe) No. of placements: Yards per placement: Method of placement: Set # Cylinder Size Air % Slump Temp Mix Supplier Spec, Strength Workorder # Contractor notified of test results? ❑ Yes 0 No, Name of person notified: • v _. . . erull ' Remarks/comments ': . (Exptoii arty c zn,erns, problems o' u,nusuol.occurroncezi • Was everything available to test /observe? - Yes ❑ No Were there any delays? (Explain below if yes) ❑ Yes Si No Was a copy of this report left on site? sldi Yes 0 No If so, whom was it submitted to: t1 Comments: _ A .Sti. . MJ t. +,.. ". wr .4 .. 1 y.. ie /Al Lei. Ai 7 .i w I /r -1 ♦ I ra iY i ( � erformed By: -- - Reviewed by: Date: This is a preliminary report and is provided solely as evidence that field o servatians and /or testing was performed. Observations and /or conclusions and /or recommendations conveyed in the final report may vary from, and shall take precedence, over those indicated in a preliminary report. • Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 Page ( of alt A U N TERTEC Daily Field Notes Project No.: 5fr119r0 /.7/ Date: 8"3 .-o7 j,�, Report No.: Project Name: M.• iJh tit, a b t 61/1) + a Project Location: Kf /. P 1 t tl i Client: i Aim++ !'t it Temp/Weather: f + ti. " G �-► Project Manager: 'I Time Arrived: Departed: - Sereiceiterfotitted 4 Compaction Testing 0 Concrete Testing 0 Cylinder Pickup 0 Proctor Pickup 0 Masonry Pickup 0 DCP 0 Other (describe) { penalty Testing !` Areas Tested: 0 Mass Grading 0 Building Pad Wall Backfill O Slab Subgrode 0 Parking/Walks O Utilities 0 Roadways 0 Bituminous O Other (describe) Method: clear 0 Sandcone J # of tests: ,,, I Fill Source: 0 On -site d ielmported Tests taken met specification? es 0 No 0 Waiting on Proctor results? Contractor notified of test results? 0 L2rIes 0 No Name of person notified: ()t tlry 4 CI Concrete Testing lntornlatian • Areas Tested: 0 Footing 0 Slab on Grade 0 Deck 0 Columns /Piers O Walls O Pile Cap /Pile Fill 0 Pavement 0 Curb & Gutter 0 Other (describe) No. of placements: I Yards per placement: 1 Method of placement: Set # Cylinder Size Air % Slump Temp Mix Supplier Spec. Strength Workorder # Contractor notified of test results? ❑ Yes ❑ No, Name of person notified: o Remarks rkurients ( plain any corlearns pro,oictIns or unusual pcc Was everything available to test /observe ?es O No Were there any delays? (Explain below if yes) O Yes o Was a copy of this report left on site? "es O No If so, whom was it submitted to: "r Comments: .-ii.. n.....a / a _ ■ l a. .i1 . .71 .�: 4 1 2.4 -, r tt . .... /.! `rI..A . 1. Jo S �..t y A. / /la_ r .. wtn • erformed By: ..••' Reviewed by: Date: This is a preliminary report and is provided solely as evidence that field observations and /or testing was performed. Observations and /or conclusions and /or recommendations conveyed in the final report may vary from, and shall take precedence, over those indicated in a preliminary report. Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 CIA U N Page of v„.rwtt :, 117 TERTEC Daily Field Notes Project No.: e-iir Date: ~ "it Report No.: / Project Name: W :•. ®t ! 1 .1 1 it A Project Location: ri Client: Mri..:'. ;.. 4 +.x A Temp/Weather: r ; u. N Project Manager: Time Arrived: Deported: ry S 7 � � a x,Y 4 i t £ .a s '# x . k. ' t .x A sa. Compaction Testing ❑ Concrete Testing 0 Cylinder Pickup ❑ Proctor Pickup ❑ Masonry Pickup ❑ DCP ❑ Other (describe) _ _ .:..�. .�,. _ .,. �... .r Via _., ^x' " # 3� . Areas Tested: 0 Mass Grading ❑ Building Pad � Woll Backfill ❑ Slab Subgrade 0 Parking/Walks O Utilities 0 Roadways ❑ Bituminous ❑ Other (describe) Method: Nuclear 0 Sandcone # of tests: Fill Source: 0 On -site Imported Tests taken met specification? I Yes ❑ No ❑ Waiting on Proctor results? Contractor notified of test results? I/ Yes ❑ No Name of person notified:( t o,_■ Concrete 'Testing Information < . Areas Tested: ❑ Footing ❑ Slab on Grade ❑ Deck 0 Columns /Piers ❑ Walls IN Pile Cap /Pile Fill ❑ Pavement ❑ Curb & Gutter 0 Other (describe) No. of placements: Yards per placement: Method of placement: M i tlell Cylinder Size 111=1 Slump Temp Mix Supplier Spec. Strength Workorder # .1111111 1111111111111 0111111111 Contractor notified of test results? 0 Yes ❑ No, Name of p erson notified: s ( p : 4bie1Y.� , at' oAtttUo hf'e+tr.0)% Was everything available to test /observe? o lifi7es ❑ No Were there any delays? (Explain below if yes) ❑ Yes .--EEI Was a copy of this report left on site? es ❑ No If so pY P � so, whom was it submitted to: TG Comments: 4111 6rformed By: ; ---- Reviewed by: Date: This is a preliminary report and is provided solely as evidence thot field observations and /or testing was performed. Observations and /or conclusions and /or recommendations conveyed in the final report moy vary from, and shall take precedence, over those indicated in a preliminary report. • Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 R A U � Page �_ of 4iQ7 TERTEC Daily Field Notes Project No.: ,t� [ " O e/3 /, ,rt Date: 7 -3e Report No.: Project Name: [r+ &i. HIIr�3 (2 h4SL Project Location: 1 }} Ii, /A.t+. E ?S Client: " J £A r J Temp/Weather: & 1 $023 •- A1►O ' d +�'! Project Manager: e SkILArk .AAPAT3" Time Arrived: Departed: Q i k# : S xR:?A5 T�. � 9 A4 et vices P�onned .e Compaction Testing ❑ Concrete Testing "ylinder Pickup ❑ Proctor Pickup ❑ Masonry Pickup O DCP 0 Other (describe) 'Density Testing Areas Tested: ❑ Mass Grading ❑ Building Pad is Wall Backfill ❑ Slab Subgrade ❑ Parking/Walks ❑ Utilities ❑ Roadways ❑ Bituminous 0 Other (describe) Method: i Nuclear ❑ Sondcone # of tests: 7 Fill Source: ❑ On -site Imported Tests taken met specification? s 0 No 0 Waiting on Proctor results? Contractor notified of test results? s 0 No Name of person notified: 471, pJ &A, Concrete Testing tnfot otion Areas Tested: ❑ Footing ❑ Slab on Grade 0 Deck 0 Columns /Piers 0 Walls O Pile Cap /Pile Fill ❑ Pavement ❑ Curb & Gutter 0 Other (describe) No. of placements: Yards per placement: Method of placement: Set # Cylinder Size Air % Slump Temp Mix Supplier Spec. Strength Workorder # Contractor notified of test results? ❑ Yes 0 No, Name of person notified: i if Repor' lCommen x plu u ny dots s, orcable� 11 or +jnusvrl orrorrencest Was everything available to test /observe? ,,(2r res 0 No Were there any delays? (Explain below if yes) 0 Yes .fe3'No Wos a copy of this report left on site? es 0 No If so, whom was it submitted to: 4 4 Comments: :_ ,,.► _ irfi, ,.. r. . i:. 1 i. I ill erformed By: •ReYjayy _ed by: Date: This is a preliminary report and is provided solely as evidence that field observations and /or testing was performed. Observations and /or conclusions and /or recommendations conveyed in the final report may vary from, and shall take precedence, over those indicated in a preliminary report. • Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 R A V H Page of NTE RTEC Daily Field Notes Project No.: S p" n b - 0642071, Date: 7 9 - 0 Report No.: Project Name: C,.Vt'!o ..+inr /stil. Project Location: -.‘t Client: j tefi Y r4 ' te #' Temp/Weather: J' ' e,, Project Manager: `" w Time Arrived: Vt.^ -a Departed: t J .� . �, y i �., i• k 4 i ice,` . 1R ���!'3�I� � k�?,�r`"�''`� d*F�` ;j 3 7 �� ' :: X Compaction Testing ❑ Concrete Testing ❑ Cylinder Pickup ❑ Proctor Pickup ❑ Masonry Pickup ❑ DCP ❑ Other (describe) 3 }f # tie/telly toottoit Areas Tested: 0 Mass Grading ❑ Building Pad ❑ Wall Backfill RI Slab Subgrade ❑ Parking/Walks tiig Utilities 0 Roadways 0 Bituminous ❑ Other (describe) Method: Cit Nuclear 0 Sandcone # of tests: Fill Source: egl On -site 0 Imported Tests taken met specification? ® Yes 0 No 0 Waiting on Proctor results? Contractor notified of test results? IX Yes 0 No Name of person notified: VItc.1,w c ,t V Concrete Testing "Information Areas Tested: ❑ Footing 0 Slab on Grade ❑ Deck ❑ Columns /Piers 0 Walls O Pile Cap /Pile Fill ❑ Pavement ❑ Curb & Gutter 0 Other (describe) No. of placements: Yards per placement: Method of placement: Set # Cylinder Size MEI Slump Temp Mix Supplier Spec. Strength Workorder # Contractor notified of test results? 0 Yes ❑ No, Name of person notified: fl R arks / 'om e»t; cry s, usua tics rren �r� t't1 �t� ` !'t� #� �� l a sl Was everything available to test /observe? ❑ Yes t$ No Were there any delays? (Explain below if yes) 0 Yes I. No Was a copy of this report left on site? ❑ Yes No If so, whom was it submitted to: �. Comments: L� ( 4 + �( � l�ia°G1U.r Y�d`A�C..,. ,�.. .v,: ! �._': ' �r '..�aLt jt -t-c__ rlr- ^ .•t.[ ` .....�r.:.c:y.s� w.l ..,• , ';:. �d� ..+���. ':�� { 4 Y' "� " (r '• 1 `+k •erformed By: / g `€ !xa t , . , . Reviewed by: Date: - This is a preliminary report and is provided solely as evidence that field observations and /or testing was performed. Observations and /or conclusions and /or recommendations conveyed in the final report moy vary from, and shall take precedence, over those indicated in o preliminary report. • Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 Page of RAUN NTE RTEC Daily Field Notes Project No.: 4P -Of - 0I S 19 Date: 7/ / 3/0 Report No.: Project Name: Stele .P :_ ?Lt alt. 4 C1.(--- 411 Project Location: 4( 14I 4c. i Client: Cri £ k lalk 14 14.f5 Temp/Weather: e1 l 70 Project Manager: '�c.rA . tAttG4 Time Arrived: Departed: � ,,� r tervi Cet# rforMetRi O Compaction Testing ❑ Concrete Testing G1 Cylinder Pickup 0 Proctor Pickup 0 Masonry Pickup O DCP 0 Other (describe) Density letting Areas Tested: 0 Mass Grading 0 Building Pad 0 Wall Backfill ❑ Slab Subgrade ❑ Parking/Walks ❑ Utilities ❑ Roadways 0 Bituminous ❑ Other (describe) Method: 0 Nuclear 0 Sandcone # of tests: Fill Source: 0 On -site 0 Imported Tests taken met specification? 0 Yes 0 No 0 Waiting on Proctor results? Contractor notified of test results? ❑ Yes ❑ No Nome of person notified: Concrete Tasting information Areas Tested: ❑ Footing 0 Slab on Grade ❑ Deck ❑ Columns /Piers 0 Walls O Pile Cap /Pile Fill ❑ Pavement ❑ Curb & Gutter ❑ Other (describe) No. of placements: Yards per placement: Method of placement: Set # Cylinder Size Air % Slump Temp =MI Supplier Spec. Strength Workorder # 11111111111 1.111111111 iiiii 1111111111111 11.1111111111 Contractor notified of test results? ❑ Yes 0 No, Nome of person notified: overolt Remarks/Comments (Exoloin o y concoms r ritOblaIng or urotiAuat occurrences) Was everything available to test /observe? M. es 0 No Were there any delays? (Explain below if yes) ❑ Yes I No Was a copy of this report left on site? Yes 0 No If so, whom was it submitted to: J C J Comments: t tG 1 c t tit" a/ o w. 0.. - •erformed By: S Reviewed by: Date: 7//1/p 9 This is a preliminary report and is provided solely os evidence that field observations and /or testing was performed. Observations and /or conclusions and /or recommendations conveyed in the find report may vary from, and shall take precedence, over those indicated in a preliminary report. • Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 BRAUN Page of , WITE RT E C Daily Field Notes Project No.: S4 O`1 O1l 1 Date: _+ " \ tU - t. c ‘ Report No.: Project Nome: . ', /,� r, "4,c. k.' c. i .s.v i'c t`', Project Location: 0o -•14 Qk4- 4 GiK1hlkoj Client: C.i a C. a,G ' n.r c, G. + L*v" `s Temp/Weather: ° 6C? • f' 1 C . co. r V Project Manager: ;);e..e i `, #, t C_- Time Arrived: t a . . 2. > 4'g #t Deported: . 4.,....; S C> f t t x6' � i *�� x�� ex k r: Y k p� � ka t � ��• . i yP 't ., e ., q "fl i ' " � �.,, f ,'i � tt ... .._ w..., _. {� �• �'! .� -a i �' , '�F fib.. "�p� .� ' � ❑ Compaction Testing Concrete Testing (g Cylinder Pickup ❑ Proctor Pickup ❑ Masonry Pickup O DCP ❑ Other (describe) ' Density besting Areas Tested: ❑ Mass Grading ❑ Building Pod ❑ Wall Backfill 0 Slab Subgrade ❑ Parking/Walks O Utilities ❑ Roadways ❑ Bituminous ❑ Other (describe) Method: ❑ Nuclear ❑ Sandcone # of tests: Fill Source: ❑ On -site ❑ Imported Tests taken met specification? ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ Waiting on Proctor results? Contractor notified of test results? ❑ Yes ❑ No Name of person notified: Concrete t Testing Information Areas Tested: ❑ Footing 0 Slab on Grade ❑ Deck ❑ Columns /Piers lg Walls IS Pile Cap /Pile Fill ❑ Pavement ❑ Curb & Gutter ❑ Other (describe) No. of placements: ").. Yards per placement: 7- , 0 Method of placement: ,,tir..,,a 't' MEI Cylinder Size Air % Slump Temp Mix Supplier Spec. Strength Workorder # ® 4 x <6 111111E 'k.c) = .';car IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 11111111111.1111 1111111111111111111111111 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII Contractor notified of test results? 2( Yes ❑ No, Name of person notified: C-. t,v , ".. 4' f„, it R :/C tttxt e nt cplotn o' , cats 'm. problem:, or t husuu) occurrences) ,. Was everything available to test /observe? IS) Yes ❑ No Were there any delays? (Explain below if yes) 53' Yes ❑ No Was a copy of this report left on site? ❑ Yes lgt No If so, whom was it submitted to: C "meats: ... � ,..Leih 4.+d G`> i t, 19 :. . � �� !` t �� L� i {.��' i e t ' � `t... C.. A ■J , r 13�S.L. _,+� °r t +x t r ' _� „:t�.a. e �s > � ..,�.?� ` pp � c't, f U •1 4 s C.A..at`- i4 " i, t r At -I c . . "k f v ,, , : r ,..., , .°.. ,µ , .. .. "C ! .7 h t 4,4' �,5 k , l e, ? + 1. ' �". T+ n o' , - ", c C { ..� •G` e 4 c ,i t, 4. ,' ", 1 % ` -% 4 e ,5 4.'; '( r'.,1. 1 ? J '- i t � . rFormed By: by: ,r © :' ,' , . y: Qate: �! ` h i s Y� '/ �t,�(.Q'liGkfl� l. ?.Lyl Reviewed is a preliminary report and is provided solely os evidence that field observations and /or testing was performed. Observations and /or conclusions . r and /or recommendations conveyed in the final report moy vary from, and shall toke precedence, over those indicated in a preliminary report. 1 Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 Page of R A► U N crrat -clfrr -ft7 NTERTEC Daily Field Notes Project No.: 5 p - t7q O(3 ( Date: 7/ 7//ar t a �l Report No.: Project Name: 04k ps.ik Re4?/i l 44- r r�. i( Project Location: t 4 K Tr et, L'�"S Client: CAT r ( ©l•k C's,.k /4et q 44 Temp/Weather: G I y 1 6S ° Project Manager: 7p re- L Ms. (¢S Time Arrived: Departed: ... ... .. serviter „ e K S.. ed ¢ .. a' ,...�..:_ '�{ a .. i Z � ... . .. ❑ Compaction Testing ❑ Concrete Testing 1 , Cylinder Pickup ❑ Proctor Pickup ❑ Masonry Pickup ❑ DCP ❑ Other (describe) Density Tootles! Areas Tested: ❑ Mass Grading ❑ Building Pad ❑ Wall Backfill ❑ Slab Subgrade ❑ Parking/Walks ❑ Utilities ❑ Roadways ❑ Bituminous ❑ Other (describe) Method: ❑ Nuclear ❑ Sandcone # of tests: Fill Source: ❑ On -site ❑ Imported Tests taken met specification? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Waiting on Proctor results? Contractor notified of test results? ❑ Yes ❑ No Name of person notified: Concrete Testing Information_..... , `. Areas Tested: ❑ Footing ❑ Slab on Grade ❑ Deck ❑ Columns /Piers ❑ Walls ❑ Pile Cap /Pile Fill ❑ Pavement ❑ Curb & Gutter ❑ Other (describe) No. of placements: Yards per placement: Method of placement: IMMII Cylinder Size En Slump Temp IIMMI Supplier Spec. Strength Workorder # Contractor notified of test results? ❑ Yes ❑ No, Name of person notified: Overall Remarks/Comments (E o oin arty concerns, Problems orurusuat occurronc+ s) Was everything available to test /observe? 'Yes ❑ No Were there any delays? (Explain below if yes) ❑ Yes .. T No Was o copy of this report left on site? Yes ❑ No If so, whom was it submitted to: \c Comments: t � a .t #•( or Co•., r155 t o.+ �e 4, — •erformed By: � ✓ � Reviewed by: Date: 7/ 7/e ?t This is a preliminary report and is provided solely as evidence that field observations and /or testing was performed. Observations and /or conclusions and /or recommendations conveyed in the final report may vary from, and shall take precedence, over those indicated in o preliminary report. • Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 BRAUN Page of � ITE RTEC Daily Field Notes Project No.: 4 P '0q -c>13 1 `3 Dote: /2 /" / Report No.: Project Name: ©a paid i7'f'� G r /a 1 Project Location: ©a k /��k 14 k Client: Gtk d 04k. 1' / � . ,A� rk �(( 4'S Temp/Weather: 4.112‘+4/7 / 70 Project Manager: �a rti L M c. 4l e5 Time Arrived: Departed: p� '14:1"/' � jj , i �j. y �n��yy� / � . `a e a. vv Se Pe fo e ❑ Compaction Testing 0 Concrete Testing X Cylinder Pickup ❑ Proctor Pickup ❑ Masonry Pickup O DCP ❑ Other (describe) Areas Tested: ❑ Mass Grading ❑ Building Pad ❑ Wall Backfill ❑ Slab Subgrade ❑ Parking/Walks O Utilities ❑ Roadways ❑ Bituminous ❑ Other (describe) Method: ❑ Nuclear 0 Sandcone # of tests: Fill Source: ❑ On -site ❑ Imported Tests taken met specification? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Waiting on Proctor results? Contractor notified of test results? ❑ Yes ❑ No Nome of person notified: _ r a x Concrete Testing Information , Areas Tested: 0 Footing ❑ Slab on Grade ❑ Deck 0 Columns /Piers ❑ Walls X Pile Cap /Pile Fill ❑ Pavement 0 Curb & Gutter ❑ Other (describe) No. of placements: Yards per placement: Method of placement: MEM Cylinder Size 1115MI Slump Temp Mix Supplier Spec. Strength Workorder # Contractor notified of test results ?{ y� p} ❑ No, :: p o, Name of person notified y .4 .... fl Rema .... / Comments ( x t t'tt ry i conc•1 bloc 4.11. Ufl4E o i r Was everything available to test /observe? V.V Yes ❑ No Were there any delays? (Explain below if yes) ❑ Yes ,No Was a copy of this report left on site? "At Yes ❑ No If so, whom was it submitted to: Comments: p � , � t.� ' GC •-^)e-e4 c - + 6 2T 09 •rformed By : � j G ' /S Reviewed by: Date: /a!L f/° y This is a preliminary report and is provided solely as evidence thot field observations and /or testing was performed. Observations and /or conclusions and /or recommendations conveyed in the final report may vary from, and shall take precedence, over those indicated in o preliminary report. • Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 Page / of •RAUN SIDRPT I N T E RT E C Special Inspection Daily Report NtetAkS City of 44. hiLy_ iffui, r Report No.: Date of This Report (/0=H -#9 Project Name: 41s. Iii*., I rrtsoirs arj /4444. Project No.: "5P"+e►�ii - OJ 3l"1 Project Address: V Client: f ettt 0/04* Ant. htg� t Client Project No.: Weather: C 6't/ kot Temperature: ©� 30"S Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: t!1 Continuous ❑ Masonry ❑''Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases ❑"Periodic ❑ Welding & Bolting lConcrete Placement ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles & Piers ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes ❑ (Listed Below) No ❑ Description and location of work completed: agri,„JAA4.44 44.40 A' cntrf1s 1441. lr140WI S > 4 a 14,444. 441 titan ajag 61.44 /04641744 A aS 8.5 a - ?Z! e : • L • su.. .�. 7 tb List tests performed: • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ No ca- • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No Er • If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC /UBC, except as noted above. Signed: _/ Date: 0.2,44-01 not Full Name: Ii-. O,j- •. I.D. No.: White copy to Braun lntertec file. Blue copy to Project Site Representative. • Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 Page of a p RAU PI r,-,1,-dirt 4417 i ITERTEC Daily Field Notes Project No.: SI t5 b 124 Cl f Date: 07 Report No.: Project Name: 4 L. A ''''roject Location: 1P. ; Jo • Client: el.t 81" Of, Temp/Weather: eit • Project Manager: //At /1 f Time Arrived: 30 Departed: '7 2 Senrices Performed _ 0 Compaction Testing 0 Concrete Testing 0 Cylinder Pickup Proctor Pickup 0 Masonry Pickup 0 DCP 0 Other (describe) Density Testing Areas Tested: 0 Mass Grading 0 Building Pad 0 Wall Backfill 0 Slab Subgrade 0 Parking/Walks 0 Utilities 0 Roodways 0 Bituminous 0 Other (describe) Method: 0 Nuclear 0 Sondcone # of tests: Fill Source: 0 On-site 0 Imported Tests taken met specification? 0 Yes 0 No 0 Waiting on Proctor results? Contractor notified of test results? 0 Yes 0 No Name of person notified: Concrete Testing information Areas Tested: 0 Footing 0 Slab on Grade 0 Deck 0 Columns/Piers 0 Walls 0 Pile Cap/Pile Fill 0 Pavement 0 Curb & Gutter 0 Other (describe) No. of placements: Yords per placement: Method of placement: MAI Cylinder Size Air % Slump Temp NEM Supplier Spec. Strength Workorder # MIN 111111111111111111111111111111 111111111111111111 11111111•1111111 1111111111111111111111111 Controctor notified of test results? 0 Yes 0 No, Name of person notified: Overoll , Rerncoks/Cornroehrs 1E-I*"° fP1 on Y tr-a P' 0 0 or unrJol Was everything available to test/observe? 0 Yes 0 No Were there any delays? (Exploin below if yes) 0 Yes 0 No Was a copy of this report left on site? 0 Yes 0 No If so, whom was it submitted to: Camments 40 //;* „Are _of Ir -411 al • , 4 4 P ,.- +14 . ' _ 1,1111MMICIIIIMMININPRIM Mr ..„,* .1 AA. di Oa' • r e It lI Oj _ rb0 ' 'We 4/4 ) 31 it-c. 411Kftwrned ay: 14 1/ Reviewed by: Date: 5 This is o preliminary report and is provided solely as evidence that field observations and/or testing was performed. Observations and/or conclusions and/or recommendations conveyed in the final report may vary from, and shall take precedence, over those indicated in a preliminary report. • Providing engineering and eriviroilmentai solutions since 1957