Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutField Test Conditions & Results BRAUN r � 5 f ,a4.-' NTE RTEC I Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder Report Date: 7/28/09 1 Test Method: ASTM C39, 4x8 Cylinder LIMS WO #: 9004408 t Client: Eric Johnson (Email Test Results) Project: SP -09 -01319 • �. * _ City of Oak Park Heights Oak Park Heights City Hall 14168 Oak Park Blvd 14168 Oak Park Boulevard North Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 Oak Park Heights, MN Field Test Conditions and Results ASTM C31* Set Number: 5 Mix Design: 4066 Date Cast: 06/16/09 Supplier: Cemstone Time Cast: 10:00 am Specified Air ( %): 6.0 +/- 1.0 Date Received: 06/17/09 Specified Strength (psi): 4,000 Measured Slump (in.): (ASTM C143) 4 1/2 Truck Number: 702 Measured Air ( %): (ASTM C23I) 7.0 Ticket Number: 2298698 Concrete Temp. ( °F): (ASTM C 1064) 68 Cylinders per Set: 4 Air Temp. ( °F): 71 Cylinders Cast By: Brown, Sean Liquid Added On Site: None Placement Location: Building Interior, Foundation Wall, Grid locations: J - 1 to 6. H.5 to J - 1. • Sample Location/Notes: J -3. Compression Test Results Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder Break Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture Capping Remarks Sample No. Date (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in.) (sq. in.) ,(psi).. Type Method ** Code(s) 5-01 6/23/09 1 6 7 32,230 4.01 12.63 (- 2,550 2 N C2 5 -02 7/14/09 1 27 28 50,640 4.01 12.63 4,010 2 N 5 -03 7/14/09 1 27 28 50,180 4.01 12.63 3,970,, 2 N Z c * Concrete sampled in accordance with ASTM C172 ** Capping Method: N = ASTM C1231, Unhanded Caps S = ASTM C617, Sulfur Caps f -BreRk Remarks: C2 } The 7 day test result projects that the specified strength may not be met at 28 days according to a typical age` i rengtli gitionsh p. , El The average 28 day test result meets or exceeds the specified strength. Z:Zi The Lo w Break Result should be evaluated per ACI 318, Chapter 5. Types of Fracture IX ' At \ A ath-4.4-' -- 04,', 4 (t ---- ' TYPE 1 TYPE 2 TYPE 3 TYPE 4 TYPE 5 TYPE 6 Mattes, Sarah 1 approve the document Jul 28 2009 ver 1.3b BRAUN INTERTEC Report Date: 7/30/09 Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder LIMS WO 0: 9006157 fi Test Method: ASTM C39, 4x8 Cylinder Project: SP -09 -01319 Client: Eric Johnson (Email Test Results) Oak Park Heights City Hall 14168 Oak Park Heights 14168 Oak Park Boulevard North t4168 8 Oak Park Blvd Oak Park Heights, MN Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 Field Test Conditions and Results ASTM C31* Mix Design: 4066 Set Number: 15 07/17/09 Supplier: Gemstone Tate Cast: Specified Air ( %): 6.5 + / -1.0 Time Cast: 1:33 pm 07/20/09 Specified Strength (psi): 4,000 Date Received: Truck Number: 541 Ticket Measured Slump (in.): (ASTM C143) 61/2 tN4321407 Measured Air ( %): (ASTM C231) 6.8 T ck Nu umber: 5 per Set: 4 A oncrete Temp. ( °F): (ASTM C 1064) 60 Cylinders 58 By: Davis, Trent Air Temp. ( °F): Liquid Added On Site: None i 8 2 Placement Location: Building Exterior, Foundation Wall, (A)(1- 1.7),(A)(1. 9 3 ),p ers (D )( ) ) ' 3 ) Sample Location/Notes: (A)(2) Compression Test Results Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder p Remarks Break Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture Capping s } Sample No. Date (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in.) (sq. in.) (psi) Typ e Method ** Coda ( des 15 -1 7/24/09 3 4 7 31,050 4.01 12.63 2,460 2 N CO 1 • * Concrete sampled in accordance with ASTM C172 * * Capping Method: N = ASTM C1231, Unhanded Caps S = ASTM C617, Sralfrr• Caps Break Remarks: C2 The 7 day test result projects that the specified strength may not be met at 28 days according to a typical age- strength relationship. Types of Fracture M/N i Mattes, Sarah TYPE 1 TYPE 2 TYPE 3 TYPE 4 TYPE 5 TYPE 6 1 approve the document Jul 30 2009 Page 1 or 1 ver 1.3c BRAUN INTERTEC Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder Report Date: 7/30/09 Test Method: ASTM C39, 4x8 Cylinder LIMS WO #: 9006460 Client: Eric Johnson (Email Test Results) Project: SP -09 -01319 City of Oak Park Heights Oak Park Heights City Hall 14168 Oak Park Blvd 14168 Oak Park Boulevard North Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 Oak Park Heights, MN Field Test Conditions and Results ASTM C3 1 Set Number. 16 Mix Design: 4066 Date Cast: 07/23/09 Supplier: Cemstone Time Cast: 2:58 pm Specified Air ( %): 6.0 + / -1.0 Date Received: 07/24/09 Specified Strength (psi): 4,000 Measured Slump (in.): (ASTM C143) 4 1/2 Truck Number: 797 Measured Air ( %): (ASTM C231) 6.8 Ticket Number: 2325447 Concrete Temp. ( °F): (ASTM C 1064) 79 Cylinders per Set: 4 Air Temp. (°F): 83 Cylinders Cast By: Zierden, Joseph A. Liquid Added On Site: 0 GAL Water (per 6.50 cu. yds.) Placement Location: Building Interior, Wall, Entry Vestibule and Stoop From Grids D to E, South of Grid 8 Sample Location/Notes: Same Compression Test Results Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder Break Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture Capping Remarks Sample 14o. Date (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in.) (sq. in.) (psi) Type Method •• Code(s) 16 -01 7/30/09 1 6 7 32,720 4.01 12.63 2,590 2 N C2 * Concrete sampled in accordance with ASTM C172 *• Capping Method: N =ASTM C1231, Unbouded Caps S =ASTM C617, Sulfur Caps Break Remarks: C2 The 7 day test result projects that the specified strength may not be met at 28 days according to a typical age - strength relationship. Types of Fracture 1 / �� \ ' ' -��- TYPE 1 TYPE 2 TYPE 3 TYPE 4 TYPE 5 TYPE 6 Mattes, Sarah I approve the document Jul 30 2009 ver 1.3c Page 1 of 1 BRAUN • INTERTEC Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder Report Date: 7/28/09 Test Method: ASTM C39, 4x8 Cylinder LIMS WO #: 9004408 Client: Eric Johnson (Email Test Results) Project: SP -09 -01319 City of Oak Park Heights Oak Park Heights City Hall 14168 Oak Park Blvd 14168 Oak Park Boulevard North Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 Oak Park Heights, MN Field Test Conditions and Results ASTM C31* Set Number: 5 Mix Design: 4066 Date Cast: 06/16/09 Supplier: Cemstone Time Cast: 10:00 an Specified Air ( %): 6.0 +/- 1.0 Date Received: 06/17/09 Specified Strength (psi): 4,000 Measured Slump (in.): (ASTM C143) 4 1/2 Truck Number: 702 Measured Air ( %): (ASTM C231) 7.0 Ticket Number: 2298698 Concrete Temp. ( °F): (ASTM C 1064) 68 Cylinders per Set: 4 Air Temp. ( °F): 71 Cylinders Cast By: Brown, Sean Liquid Added On Site: None Placement Location: Building Interior, Foundation Wall, Grid locations: J - 1 to 6. H.5 to J - 1. Sample Location/Notes: J -3. Compression Test Results Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder • Break Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture Capping Remarks Sample No. Date (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in.) (sq. in.) (psi) Type Method ** Code(s) 5 -01 6/23/09 1 6 7 32,230 4.01 12.63 2,550 2 N C2 5 -02 7/14/09 1 27 28 50,640 4.01 12.63 4,010 2 N El 5 -03 7/14/09 1 27 28 50,180 4.01 12.63 3,970 2 N ZZ * Concrete sampled in accordance with ASTM C172 ** Capping Method: N = ASTM C1231, Unbonded Caps S = ASTM C617, Sulfur Caps Break Remarks: C2 The 7 day test result projects that the specified strength may not be met at 28 days according to a typical age - strength relationship. El The average 28 day test result meets or exceeds the specified strength. ZZ The Low Break Result should be evaluated per ACI 318, Chapter 5. Types of Fracture • TYPE 1 TYPE 2 TYPE 3 TYPE 4 TYPE 5 TYPE 6 Mattes, Sarah I approve the document Jut 28 2009 ver 1.3b , BRAUN • INTERTEC Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder Report Date: 7/30/09 Test Method: ASTM C39, 4x8 Cylinder LIMS WO #: 9004615 Client: Eric Johnson (Email Test Results) Project: SP -09 -01319 City of Oak Park Heights Oak Park Heights City Hall 14168 Oak Park Blvd 14168 Oak Park Boulevard North Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 Oak Park Heights, MN Field Test Conditions and Results ASTM C31* Set Number: 6 Mix Design: 4066 Date Cast: 06/19/09 Supplier: Cemstone Time Cast: 12:00 pm Specified Air ( %): 6.0 +/- 1.5 Date Received: 06/22/09 Specified Strength (psi): 4,000 Measured Slump (in.): (ASTM C143) 4 1/4 Truck Number: 766 Measured Air ( %): (ASTM C231) 6.7 Ticket Number: 2301677 Concrete Temp. ( °F): (ASTM C 1064) 78 Cylinders per Set: 4 Air Temp. ( °F): 85 Cylinders Cast By: Eric Klein Liquid Added On Site: None Placement Location: Building Exterior, Wall, Foundation wall at grid locations B.5 to H.5 -1 Sample Location/Notes: B.5 Compression Test Results Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder • Break Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture Capping Remarks Sample No. Date (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in.) (sq. in.) (psi) Type Method ** Code(s) 6 -01 6/26/09 3 4 7 35,670 4.00 12.57 2,840 2 N B2 6 -02 7/17/09 3 25 28 54,100 4.00 12.57 4,310 2 N E 1 6 -03 7/17/09 3 25 28 57,660 4.00 12.57 4,590 1 N El * Concrete sampled in accordance with ASTM C172 ** Capping Method: N = ASTM C1231, Unbonded Caps S = ASTM C617, Suter Caps Break Remarks: B2 The 7 day test result projects that the specified strength will likely be met at 28 days according to a typical age- strength relationship. E 1 The average 28 day test result meets or exceeds the specified strength. Types of Fracture X /\ 111 \ / " 4 „A....4'k.... -- 141,-,7t --- 0 TYPE 1 TYPE 2 TYPE 3 TYPE 4 TYPE 5 TYPE 6 Mattes, Sarah I approve the document Jul 30 2009 ver 1.3c Page 1 of 1 1 • BRAUN • INTERTEC Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder Report Date: 7/30/09 Test Method: ASTM C39, 4x8 Cylinder LIMS WO #: 9004885 Client: Eric Johnson (Email Test Results) Project: SP -09 -01319 City of Oak Park Heights Oak Park Heights City Hall 14168 Oak Park Blvd 14168 Oak Park Boulevard North Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 Oak Park Heights, MN Field Test Conditions and Results ASTM C31* Set Number: 7 Mix Design: 4066 Date Cast 06/24/09 Supplier: Cemstone Time Cast: 1:30 pm Specified Air ( %): 6.0 +1- 1.0 Date Received: 06/25/09 Specified Strength (psi): 4,000 Measured Slump (in.): (ASTM C143) 3 1/2 Truck Number: 649 Measured Air ( %): (ASTM C231) 8.0 Ticket Number. Not Given Concrete Temp. ( °F): (ASTM C 1064) 67 Cylinders per Set: 4 Air Temp. ( °F): 80 Cylinders Cast By: Cremin, Mike Liquid Added On Site: None Placement Location: Building Exterior, Wall, grids A.5 to B.5 -I Compression Test Results Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder Break Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture Capping Remarks ill Sample No. Date (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in.) (sq. in.) (psi) Type Method •• Code(s) 7-01 7/1/09 1 6 7 30,640 4.02 12.69 2,410 1 N C2 7 -02 7/22/09 1 27 28 52,610 4.01 12.63 4,170 1 N El 7 -03 7/22/09 1 27 28 55,770 4.01 12,63 4,420 2 N E1 • Concrete sampled in accordance with ASTM C172 * * Capping Method: N = ASTM C1231, Unhanded Caps S = ASTM C617, Sulfur Caps Break Remarks: C2 The 7 day test result projects that the specified strength may not be met at 28 days according to a typical age - strength relationship. El The average 28 day test result meets or exceeds the specified strength. Types of Fracture 'i ill / 4.,,,,,,i,_ -- 11,47t ---- • TYPE 1 TYPE 2 TYPE 3 TYPE 4 TYPE 5 TYPE 6 Mattes, Sarah I approve the document Jul 30 2009 ver 1,3c Page 1 of 1 w BRAUN • INTERTEC Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder Report Date: 7/30/09 Test Method: ASTM C39, 4x8 Cylinder LIMS WO #: 9005047 Client: Eric Johnson (Email Test Results) Project: SP -09 -01319 City of Oak Park Heights Oak Park Heights City Hall 14168 Oak Park Blvd 14168 Oak Park Boulevard North Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 Oak Park Heights, MN Field Test Conditions and Results ASTM C31* Set Number: 8 Mix Design: 4066 Date Cast: 06/26/09 Supplier: Cemstone Time Cast: 1:40 pm Specified Air ( %): 6.0 +/- 1.5 Date Received: 06/29/09 Specified Strength (psi): 4,000 Measured Slump (in.): (ASTM C143) 5 1/4 Truck Number: 798 Measured Air ( %): (ASTM C231) 6.4 Ticket Number: 2306946 Concrete Temp. ( °F): (ASTM C 1064) 84 Cylinders per Set: 4 Air Temp. ( °F): 88 Cylinders Cast By: Davis, Trent Liquid Added On Site: None Placement Location: Building Interior, Foundation Wall, Grid locations: A to C - 8. Sample Location/Notes: C -8 Compression Test Results Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder • Break Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture Capping Remarks Sample No. Date (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in.) (sq. in.) (psi) Type Method ** Code(s) 8 -1 7/3/09 3 4 7 40,060 4.02 12.69 3,160 2 N B2 8 -2 7/24/09 3 25 28 57,740 4.01 12.63 4,570 2 N El 8 -3 7/24/09 3 25 28 56,890 4.01 12.63 4,500 2 N El * Concrete sampled in accordance with ASTM C172 *.* Capping Method: N = ASTM C1231, Unbonded Caps S = ASTM C617, Sulfur Caps Break Remarks: B2 The 7 day test result projects that the specified strength will lively be met at 28 days according to a typical age - strength relationship. El The average 28 day test result meets or exceeds the specified strength. Types of Fracture 1>< /\' 1) r r \ . e 4- , fl • TYPE 1 TYPE 2 TYPE 3 TYPE 4 TYPE 5 TYPE 6 Mattes, Sarah 1 approve the document Jul 30 2009 ver 1.3c Page 1 of 1 BRAUN • INTERTEC Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder Report Date: 7/30/09 Test Method: ASTM C39, 4x8 Cylinder LIMS WO #: 9005377 Client: Eric Johnson (Email Test Results) Project: SP -09 -01319 City of Oak Park Heights Oak Park Heights City Hall 14168 Oak Park Blvd 14168 Oak Park Boulevard North Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 Oak Park Heights, MN Field Test Conditions and Results ASTM C3 1 * Set Number. 9 Mix Design: 4066 Date Cast: 07/02/09 Supplier: Cemstone Time Cast: 1:20 pm Specified Air ( %): 6.5 +/- 1.0 Date Received: 07/07/09 Specified Strength (psi): 4,000 Measured Slump (in.): (ASTM C143) 5 Truck Number: 800 Measured Air ( %): (ASTM C231) 7.0 Ticket Number: 02311075 Concrete Temp. (°F): (ASTM C 1064) 78 Cylinders per Set: 4 Air Temp. ( °F): 80 Cylinders Cast By: Davis, Trent Liquid Added On Site: None Placement Location: Building Exterior, Wall, Lines ( J)( 7- 8),(8)(H- J),(H)(8- 9),(A)(6 -8) Sample Location/Notes: (A)(7.5) Compression Test Results Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder • Break Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture Capping Remarks Sample No. Date (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in.) (sq. in.) (psi) Type Method ** Code(s) 9 -1 7/9/09 5 2 7 34,710 4.01 12.63 2,750 2 N B2 9 -2 7/30/09 5 23 28 55,900 4.01 12.63 4,430 1 N E1 9 -3 7/30/09 5 23 28 54,400 4.01 12.63 4,310 2 N El * Concrete sampled in accordance with ASTM C172 ** Capping Method: N = ASTM C1231, Unbonded Caps S = ASTM C617, Sulfur Caps Break Remarks: B2 The 7 day test result projects that the specified strength will likely be met at 28 days according to a typical age- strength relationship, El The average 28 day test result meets or exceeds the specified strength. Types of Fracture • TYPE 1 TYPE 2 TYPE 3 TYPE 4 TYPE 5 TYPE 6 Mattes, Sarah I approve the document Jul 30 2009 ver 1.3c Page 1 of 1 BRAUN 1111/ I NTE RTEC Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder Report Date: 7/30/09 Test Method: ASTM C39, 4x8 Cylinder LIMS WO 4: 9005706 Client: Eric Johnson (Email Test Results) Project: SP -09 -01319 City of Oak Park Heights Oak Park Heights City Hall 14168 Oak Park Blvd 14168 Oak Park Boulevard North Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 Oak Park Heights, MN Field Test Conditions and Results ASTM C31* Set Number: 10 Mix Design: 4066 Date Cast: 07/10/09 Supplier: Cemstone Time Cast: 1:45 am Specified Air ( %): 6.5 +/- 1.5 Date Received: 07/11/09 Specified Strength (psi): 4,000 Measured Slump (in.): (ASTM C143) 4 Truck Number: 766 Measured Air ( %): (ASTM C231) 7.0 Ticket Number: 2316375 Concrete Temp. ( °F): (ASTM C 1064) 80 Cylinders per Set: 4 Air Temp. ( °F): 80 Cylinders Cast By: Cremin, Mike Liquid Added On Site: 5 GAL Water Placement Location: Building Exterior, Foundation Wall, grids A(1.1 -3)and piers at grids C7,D8 Sample Location/Notes: A1.5 Compression Test Results Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder Break Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture Capping Remarks • Sample No. Date (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in.) (sq. in.) (psi) Type Method ** Code(s) 10 -1 7/17/09 1 6 7 42,600 4.00 12.57 3,390 1 N B2 * Concrete sampled in accordance with ASTM C 172 ** Capping Method: N = ASTM C1231, Unhanded Caps S = ASTM C617, Suter Caps Break Remarks: B2 The 7 day test result projects that the specified strength will likely be met at 28 days according to a typical age - strength relationship. Types of Fracture IX! ./'\ • TYPE 1 TYPE 2 TYPE 3 TYPE 4 TYPE 5 TYPE 6 Mattes, Sarah 1 approve the document Jul 30 2009 ver 1,3c Page 1 of 1 BRAUN • INTERTEC Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder Report Date: 7/30/09 Test Method: ASTM C39, 4x8 Cylinder LIMS WO #: 9005805 Client: Eric Johnson (Email Test Results) Project: SP -09 -01319 City of Oak Park Heights Oak Park Heights City Hall 14168 Oak Park Blvd 14168 Oak Park Boulevard North Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 Oak Park Heights, MN Field Test Conditions and Results ASTM C3 1 * Set Number: 11 Mix Design: 4066 Date Cast: 07/10/09 Supplier: Cemstone Time Cast: 1:45 am Specified Air ( %): 6.5 +/- 1.5 Date Received: 07/13/09 Specified Strength (psi): 4,000 Measured Slump (in.): (ASTM C 143) 4 Truck Number: 766 Measured Air ( %): (ASTM C231) 7.0 Ticket Number: 2316375 Concrete Temp. (°F): (ASTM C 1064) 80 Cylinders per Set: 4 Air Temp. (°F): 80 Cylinders Cast By: Cremin, Mike Liquid Added On Site: None Placement Location: Building Exterior, Foundation Wall, grisd A(1.1 -3) and piers at grids C7,D8 Sample Location/Notes: A1.5 Compression Test Results Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder Break Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture Capping Remarks Sample No. Date (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in.) (sq. in.) (psi) Type Method" Code(s) 11 -1 7/17/09 3 4 7 34,680 4.00 12.57 2,760 2 N B2 * Concrete sampled in accordance with ASTM C172 ** Capping Method: N = ASTM C1231, Unhanded Caps S = ASTM C617, Sulfur Caps Break Remarks: B2 The 7 day test result projects that the specified strength will likely be met at 28 days according to a typical age - strength relationship. Types of Fracture /:\ Pli r 71 • TYPE 1 TYPE 2 TYPE 3 TYPE 4 TYPE 5 TYPE 6 Mattes. Sarah I approve the document Jul 30 2009 ver 1.3c Page 1 of 1 BRAUN 411 INTERTEC Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder Report Date: 7/28/09 Test Method: ASTM C39, 4x8 Cylinder LIMS WO #: 9005919 Client: Eric Johnson (Email Test Results) Project: SP -09 -01319 City of Oak Park Heights Oak Park Heights City Hall 14168 Oak Park Blvd 14168 Oak Park Boulevard North Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 Oak Park Heights, MN Field Test Conditions and Results ASTM C31* Set Number: 12 Mix Design: 4066 Date Cast: 07/14/09 Supplier: Cemstone Time Cast: 1 :10 pm Specified Air ( %): 6.0 +/- 1.5 Date Received: 07/15/09 Specified Strength (psi): 4,000 Measured Slump (in.): (ASTM C I43) 5 Truck Number: 768 Measured Air ( %): (ASTM C231) 7.0 Ticket Number: 2318069 Concrete Temp. ( °F): (ASTM C 1064) 75 Cylinders per Set: 4 Air Temp. ( °F): 76 Cylinders Cast By: Brown, Sean Liquid Added On Site: None Placement Location: Building Interior, Foundation Wall, Wall at grid locations: E - 8 to 8.9. D to E - 8. C to D - 7 to 8. Sample Location/Notes: E -8. Compression Test Results Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder 11111 Break Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture Capping Remarks S ample No. Date (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in.) (sq. in.) (psi) Type Method ** Code(s) 12 -01 7/21/09 1 6 7 35,210 4.01 12.63 2,790 2 N B2 * Concrete sampled in accordance with ASTM C172 ** Capping Method: N = ASTM C1231, Unhanded Caps S = ASTM C617, Sulfur Caps Break Remarks: B2 The 7 day test result projects that the specified strength will likely be met at 28 days according to a typical age - strength relationship. Types of Fracture X /N 111 \ / 7 \ et - 111171(t--' • TYPE 1 TYPE 2 TYPE 3 TYPE 4 TYPE 5 TYPE 6 Mattes, Sarah 1 approve the document Jul 28 2009 ver 1.3b BRAUN I NTE RTEC Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder Report Date: 7/28/09 Test Method: ASTM C39, 4x8 Cylinder LIMS WO #: 9006036 Client: Eric Johnson (Email Test Results) Project: SP -09 -01319 City of Oak Park Heights Oak Park Heights City Hall 14168 Oak Park Blvd 14168 Oak Park Boulevard North Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 Oak Park Heights, MN Field Test Conditions and Results ASTM C31* Set Number. 13 Mix Design: 3067 Date Cast: 07/15/09 Supplier: Cemstone Time Cast: 1:00 pm Specified Air ( %): Not Required Date Received: 07/16/09 Specified Strength (psi): 3,000 Measured Slump (in.): (ASTM C143) 3 1/4 Truck Number: 766 Measured Air ( %): (ASTM C231) 2.1 Ticket Number: 2319163 Concrete Temp. (°F): (ASTM C 1064) 75 Cylinders per Set: 4 Air Temp. ( °F): 73 Cylinders Cast By: Brown, Sean Liquid Added On Site: None Placement Location: Building Exterior, Footing, Retaining wall footing at grid locations: 45' West of A to A - 3. Column pad at grid locations: B -3. Sample Location/Notes: A -3. Compression Test Results Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder Break Cure Cure Age eter Area Strength Fracture Capping Remarks Sample No. Date (days) (days) (days) (poundsLoad ) Diameter (in.) (sq. in.) (psi) Type Method ** Code(s) 13 -01 7/22/09 1 6 7 29,700 4.01 12.63 2,350 5 N B2 * Concrete sampled in accordance with ASTM C172 ** Capping Method: N = ASTM C1231, Unbonded Caps S = ASTM C617, Sulfur Caps Break Remarks: B2 The 7 day test result projects that the specified strength will likely be met at 28 days according to a typical age - strength relationship. Types of Fracture rgvt---- \ / / \ l� K./"t,^' r� • TYPE 1 TYPE 2 TYPE 3 TYPE 4 TYPE 5 TYPE 6 Mattes, Sarah 1 approve the document Jul 28 2009 vet 1.3b BRAUN lNTERTEC Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder Report Date: 7/28/09 Test Method: ASTM C39, 4x8 Cylinder LIMS WO #: 9006038 Client: Eric Johnson (Email Test Results) Project: SP -09 -01319 City of Oak Park Heights Oak Park Heights City Hall 14168 Oak Park Blvd 14168 Oak Park Boulevard North Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 Oak Park Heights, MN Field Test Conditions and Results ASTM C31 * Set Number: 14 Mix Design: 4066 Date Cast: 07/15/09 Supplier: Cemstone Time Cast: 1:15 pm Specified Air ( %): 6.0 +/- 1.5 Date Received: 07/16/09 Specified Strength (psi): 4,000 Measured Slump (in.): (ASTM C143) 4 Truck Number: 541 Measured Air ( %): (ASTM C231) 6.8 Ticket Number: 2319130 Concrete Temp. (°F): (ASTM C 1064) 71 Cylinders per Set: 4 Air Temp. ( °F): 73 Cylinders Cast By: Brown, Sean Liquid Added On Site: None Placement Location: Building Interior, Foundation Wall, Grid locations: A - 1 to 1.5. Sample Location/Notes: A-1 Compression Test Results Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder Break Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture Capping Remarks • Sample No. Date (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in.) (sq. in.) (psi) Type Method ** Code(s) 14 -01 7/22/09 1 6 7 38,080 4.01 12.63 3,020 2 N B2 * Concrete sampled in accordance with ASTM 0172 ** Capping Method: N = ASTM C1231, Unbonded Caps S = ASTM C617, Sulfur Caps Break Remarks: B2 The 7 day test result projects that the specified strength will likely be met at 28 days according to a typical age - strength relationship. Types of Fracture 11 1 r /\ f • TYPE 1 TYPE 2 TYPE 3 TYPE 4 TYPE 5 TYPE 6 Mattes, Sarah 1 approve the document Jul 28 2009 ver 1.3b BRAUN • INTERTEC Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder Report Date: 7/30/09 Test Method: ASTM C39, 4x8 Cylinder LIMS WO #: 9006157 Client: Eric Johnson (Email Test Results) Project: SP -09 -01319 City of Oak Park Heights Oak Park Heights City Hall 14168 Oak Park Blvd 14168 Oak Park Boulevard North Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 Oak Park Heights, MN Field Test Conditions and Results ASTM C31 * Set Number. 15 Mix Design: 4066 Date Cast: 07/17/09 Supplier: Cemstone Time Cast: 1:33 pm Specified Air ( %): 63 +/- 1.0 Date Received: 07/20/09 Specified Strength (psi): 4,000 Measured Slump (in.): (ASTM C143) 6 1/2 Truck Number: 541 Measured Air ( %): (ASTM C231) 6.8 Ticket Number: 02321407 Concrete Temp. ( °F): (ASTM C 1064) 60 Cylinders per Set: 4 Air Temp. (°F): 58 Cylinders Cast By: Davis, Trent Liquid Added On Site: None Placement Location: Building Exterior, Foundation Wall, ( A)( 1- 1. 7),( A )(1.9- 3),piers(D)(8.2),(D)(8.3) Sample Location/Notes: (A)(2) Compression Test Results Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder Break Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture Capping Remarks • Sample No. Date (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in.) (sq. in.) (psi) Type Method ** Code(s) 15 -1 7/24/09 3 4 7 31,050 4.01 12.63 2,460 2 N C2 • Concrete sampled in accordance with ASTM C 172 i • Capping Method: N = ASTM C1231, Unbonded Caps S = ASTM C617, Sul fie Caps Break Remarks: C2 The 7 day test result projects that the specified strength may not be met at 28 days according to a typical age- strength relationship. Types of Fracture lirg-71 • TYPE 1 TYPE 2 TYPE 3 TYPE 4 TYPE 5 TYPE 8 Mattes, Sarah I approve the document Jul 30 2009 ver 1.3c Page 1 of 1 BRAUN • I NTE RTEC Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder Report Date: 7/30/09 Test Method: ASTM C39, 4x8 Cylinder LIMS WO #: 9006460 Client: Eric Johnson (Email Test Results) Project: SP -09 -01319 City of Oak Park Heights Oak Park Heights City Hall 14168 Oak Park Blvd 14168 Oak Park Boulevard North Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 Oak Park Heights, MN Field Test Conditions and Results ASTM C3 1 * Set Number. 16 Mix Design: 4066 Date Cast: 07/23/09 Supplier: Cemstone Time Cast: 2:58 pm Specified Air ( %): 6.0 +/- 1.0 Date Received: 07/24/09 Specified Strength (psi): 4,000 Measured Slump (in.): (ASTM C143) 41/2 Truck Number: 797 Measured Air ( %): (ASTM C231) 6.8 Ticket Number: 2325447 Concrete Temp. ( °F): (ASTM C 1064) 79 Cylinders per Set: 4 Air Temp. (°F): 83 Cylinders Cast By: Zierden, Joseph A. Liquid Added On Site: 0 GAL Water (per 6.50 cu. yds.) Placement Location: Building Interior, Wall, Entry Vestibule and Stoop From Grids D to E, South of Grid 8 Sample Location/Notes: Same Compression Test Results Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder Break Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture Capping Remarks • Sample No. Date (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in.) (sq. in.) (psi) Type Method ** Code(s) 16 -01 7/30/09 1 6 7 32,720 4.01 12.63 2,590 2 N C2 * Concrete sampled in accordance with ASTM C172 ** Capping Method: N = ASTM C1231, Unbonded Caps S = ASTM C617, Sulfur Caps Break Remarks: C2 The 7 day test result projects that the specified strength may not be met at 28 days according to a typical age- strength relationship. Types of Fracture at r n 4a4.A.,L A„,i(es • TYPE 1 TYPE 2 TYPE 3 TYPE 4 TYPE 5 TYPE 6 Mattes, Sarah 1 approve the document Jul 30 2009 ver 1.3c Page 1 of 1 r • Adm nnesota 1 DRARIVExT er aawaldrRArt)R Special Structural Testing and inspection Program Summary Schedule Prefect Nome Oak Park Heights City Hai • Project No..R Location 14188 Oak Park Boulevard Noah. Oak Park Hrtohts, Minnesota 55082 Penult No. I Technical rz) Type at Specific Report Assigned section Article - Description (3) Inspector (41 Frequency (5) Finn (8) • IBC 1704.3 IBC Table Steel Construction 8FS Periodic Braun !Marten 1704.3 I IBC 1704A IBC Table Concretecorsttucdon SI-s Periodic Braun fntettec 1704,4 IBC 1704.5 IBC Tables Masonry Construction SFS Periodic Braun intertec 1704.5.1 and 1704.5.3 MC 1704.7 IBC Table Soils (Site) Si.T Continuos Braun Intartec 1704.7 1B0 1704.7 IBC Table Solis (Building) SI-T Continuous Braun lntertec 1704.7 • - $t ,JG ?U/ZA(..' ,iLOGAW JNC71 ,117ie "'pOR4'' I/o7` i No Thla schedule shall be filled out and Included in a Special Structural Testing anci Progeam. Stan BrMdnp Code � as modified by suite 4 adopted�IBC. Special t e ar 3 Testing' as cornaMad to the •A complete epeoltion-nsedy program can be downloaded directly by Melling CASEMJ etwww.otontReferenced to the specific tectsioet scope section it the program. (1) Use dehodptlorn per 113C Chapter 17, as adopted by Minnesota State Building Code. i ( Spedal Ii pectru-Tec (SIT); Special inspector- Stns aural (S1S) (4) N Firn won spices. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS (Each appropriate representative shall sign below) Owner: Film: City of Oak Park Metairie, timnesota Date: • Contact %_ , . "al �. i.� �" ��'� Fsm Jorgenson Canatrucdon, Inc. ikrie: q - 10 Architect I .W 0 .1011 111 111P Firer Suetowend ASaodates, Ma.- Data: ° ' SEM -of ` - „/�- - Fk Winkler Structural Engineers, inc. Date: 9 9.d f S1•$ .4'r in m: i . Finn: Brain Intense (Ctn.'s Consultant) Date: Y- g • TA -�— .. Firm: Braun kl edec (Clry'a Consultant) Date .1-x-04 i Date: F: s ' . �.0 • # rim: Roden Iron, Inc. (Contractor's Subcontractor) ' Date:, 7 F. !'^ 7� vl Firm Twin City Wire, Inc. (Contractors &rbconitactoey Date : if requested by anglneerlardn8act of record or building offkiel, the Individual names of ail prospective special Inspectors end the work they intend to observe shaft be bandied as tit attachment . legend: SER = Structural Engineer of Record St.7 = Special Iapector -Technical TA =Testing Agency SI-S = Spedal inspector - Structural F = Fabricator ' Act for the Bulling Department By Date _ i • i 1 • I"' BRAUN Braun Intertec Corporation Phone: 652487.3245 INTERTEC 1826 Buerkle Road Fax 651.487.1812 Saint Paul, MN 55110 Web: braunintertec.com January 12, 2010 Project SP -09 -01319 Mr. Eric Johnson City of Oak Park Heights 14168 Oak Park Boulevard No. Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 Re: Extra Cost Associated with Construction Observations and Testing Oak Park Heights City Hall 14168 Oak Park Boulevard North Oak Park Heights, Minnesota Dear Mr. Johnson: Per our discussion, Braun Intertec has exceeded our initial proposed budget of $17, 004.50 provided in our Revised Proposal dated May 12, 2009. Our proposal was based on the provided construction documents, our discussion with the architect and the provided quantities in your Request for Proposal (RFP). Our additional services to meet special inspection and testing requirements stated in the Special Structural Testing and Inspection Program Summary Schedule and structural plan sheet S1 (dated February 27, 2008) for the City Hall project are listed below. • RFP Category 2 requested 12 trips for concrete reinforcement inspections and 9 trips for concrete testing, we provided 31 trips associated with concrete reinforcement, testing and cylinder pick -up. • RFP Category 2 requested 96 concrete cylinders for compression testing, 117 concrete cylinders have been taking to date for the project. • RPF Category 5 requested 12 trips for masonry reinforcing inspections and testing, 16 trips were made to meeting special inspection requirements. • RPF Category 8 requested a total of 17 hours of project management, to date 22.5 hours have been put into the project associated with day -to -day review and paperwork. However, additional issues arose during the duration of the project such as, failing concrete and masonry test specimens. There was a considerable amount of additional effort spent on concrete and masonry observations and testing to meet special inspection requirements. Please note it is difficult to project the quantity of services required for a project due to weather, the contractor's schedule and other performance issues. Furthermore, please note that there are still structural steel observations to close out some currently open discrepancies and Categories 6 and 7 have yet to be completed (bituminous observations and built -up roof assembly observations). • Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 ` City Oak Park Heights Project SP -09 -01319 January 12, 2010 Page 2 Remarks Services performed by Braun Intertec Corporation for this project have been conducted in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the profession currently practicing in this area, under similar budget and time restraints. No warranty, expressed or implied, is made. We appreciate the opportunity to provide this testing service. If you have any questions or if we can be of further assistance, please call Sarah Mattes at 651.487.7090. Sincerely, BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION 'i PA4 ° A '1 a Sarah A. Mattes Staff Engineer e,- f or Keith S. Rosvold, PE, PG Principal Attachments: Daily Reports associated with concrete and masonry (Ak M S Page ` of a SIDRPT BRau N 1NTERTEC Special Inspection Daily Report t p p Y o p City of Omit- At 51,V-3 Report No.: 2... Date of This Report: C? ^ Z ^o Project Name: P) a k. N./. k- ∎Nee -S C4 F k . 0roject No.: b1 o ° s o 1319 Project Address: 1 y Me 8 J II I Client: 6,141 r.,� U4e. 1L Kegiaent Project No.: Weather: Temperature: Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: ❑ Continuous ❑ Masonry Er Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases Iiit Periodic ❑ Welding & Bolting Concrete Placement ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles & Piers ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes ❑ (Listed Below) No ❑ Description and location of work completed: O Strcrel w r ton 1-1,.1 fe.nrrt.4 bawl cs' J Z � e 4-.r (/wl l 4,6 tw M•s it e' T',,, i-t\i J w oo -er U e i. e, /` , '2 S / 1 . rn r . t_ _ d 1 . atCa 1 ` r ooke.l. %..44.1 45., l S V.. -t a-c. f (Cl ( A. / Pe c • o r 4 )(41_4_N-4.A. - �.f- CL n 1-4.A.4. • t-i t S V44. (4- &ostJ tP . Ct S List tests performed: 4.�,�, Jr i r+ p (,,,�. 0 a-- r _ , -.• 1 F -f... "S .. C., rte r-m 1.4... c 1 " Ca "-- ts, - C'• r a.r ylr•'r 3(.1 t ivi : A tl1-t S C Set eirtt nay) e- : t. e- 4-.a e (C- , A. c n•.n ∎. i" n o Cc... n+ : na.. c Z) r� 1 • Are there any discrepancies noted from this days observations? Yes ❑ No EL • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No • If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. To the best of our nowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable workmanship pro'isions of the curr: t IBC /UBC, except as noted above. Signed: i i 411 4 Date: 0' 2 - „, c► Print Full N. d, . .t'.! 6 I.D. No.: ■v 7i L I/ W. White copy to Braun Intertec file. Blue copy to Project Site Representative. • Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 , Page / of �. SIDRPT 8IGLU N NTE RTEC • Special Inspection Daily Report City of 41A, Lg. knbiii Report No.: Date of This Report: 0-2-49 Project Name: #�'. - L.- 1 -...L► r /- Project No.: '59"6 •^0/.3/ Q Project Address: /#' /6' 4m-, Rt vAa. Client: _ - el.." .0 , / / �,/� Client Project No.: Weather: .." e /4A Temperature: °. Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: ❑ Continuous ❑ Masonry .®"kebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases a Periodic ❑ Welding & Bolting ❑ Concrete Placement ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles & Piers ❑ Tendon Placement' Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes ❑ (Listed Below) No ❑ _ . Description and location of work completed: 4„ jam'. C ff- 4• ,, ale., A 72 /us •.c 6.- dAs 1 71) 3 / , 7 _ /'D e • 4 - / � e- Alt {:� . _ :".a emu.- .60n /e-tote 0,,, va-- -- Join dlsi‘ IN, /!{i ik p-4,r tot iurc.7 fit- d cwt., S WtwC, 44 J rw kr- List tests performed: • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ No • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No g' • If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC /UBC, except as noted above. Signed: Date: 6 'Z —Qg Print Full Name: ' •,.1 “•••3 I.D. No.: White copy to Braun Intertec file. Blue copy to Project Site Representative. • Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 Page lof .1,,, NnG14C -,5 5. B N ( SIDRPT2 1 NTE RTEC Continuation of Special Inspection Daily Report City of Oak- Pkt k. 11.44b in Report No.: 2 Date of This Report: 6— Z — v'i Project Name: Cl'ak-. ,�.r(- (n4, J ** e.41-k( �, - P roject No.: f 64 O 1 �i `t Note: This is a continuation of a report. The first page of this report has information which should not be separated from this continuation) 00 • C /IC e C .C1 PI t_rQA - e... kr•CA- e(4c:G 4(.t.. SCo Air t..4. . t . c) rl ).- (--u P V t; . akks y S i _ 0 ..I� _ .. - _ dee . ki }S). alt G4.4. -&r J\'5 ,►t, b\ C awl t_ r-* k. i n 4. co \-e -tr.► t c,- r C -e- te...t •' _/.- H 4-7' .+ 11 0 -t_.. . n 4P r . S c. r - . tr r d1) r 4.e.5).-N. l e i/ 100,5-e, 3 . To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable workmanship pro sons of the c rrent IBC /UBC, except as noted above. /,�,,, Signed: Date: `r �`, Print Full Na 11 4 f 4.. 1. . r# I.D. No: S Z 2 ' w White copy to Braun lntertec file. Blue copy to Project Site Representative. • Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 Page / of BRAUN SIDRPT I NTE RTEC Special Inspection Daily Report City of 441st /4iGK- /47b,trr5 Report No.: Date of This Report: 4 -3•d Project Name: Project No.: 'SI"d9 -d Project Address: 14/G2 DAN. 141146— Btu Client: *1 , 4/p1rb • Client Project No.: Weather: AL( &IL.AO j Temperature: q0 4 °1= Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: ❑ Continuous ❑ Masonry Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases ❑ Periodic ❑ Welding & Bolting ❑ Concrete Placement ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles & Piers ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes ❑ (Listed Below) No ❑ Description and location of work completed: � I /R /h, i /N-. Am/ S 004 ‘, ti► p n PI/lefss . List tests performed: • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ No • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No E • If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC /UBC, except as noted above. Signed: -� Date: 400'3 'd 4, Print Full Name: a ° )b.l 3Q6/'■) I.D. No.: White copy to Braun Intertec file. Blue copy to Project Site Representative. • Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 S Page ! of ' n c t SIDRPT BRAUN , "` I NTE RTEC Special Inspection Daily Report City of oak kr 1/- \r\R t.f. - 5 Report No.: 3 Date of This Report: SP C5 - S - a 5 Project Name: C t lAc k, Project No.: Sr C C C3 1319 Project Address: _ at 147 v 0 a k- k r V $(,U P. Client: C /AA/ c..J C.) .AL G a✓k1ie, Client Project No.: Weather: Temperature: Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: YP P P 9 ❑ Continuous ❑ Masonry QrRebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases l Periodic ❑ Welding & Bolting Ili Concrete Placement ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles & Piers ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes ❑ (Listed Below) No ❑ Description and location of work completed: 0 Sc-C -(, Z r t.a ",44.4,1 V t 1r:2, a 1 c V Fs, �.t. ,ti►t— '- A) jr, <.c. 4e.L c. I- j (n .3 5. Y + D ; 1 i- 1. Ce CA.S c,4.11 as pr, qs S' j 1 4-v 4 . 4 t h i fi a i l ( 1 1 1, ) 6 - 4 - 1 1 c l . _ _ • f 4- ,etL: � c oh un� An,L. G,A„�.iltc e. e ( 4 4 - , 5 p.>\9ae. trt. L CJ'r c r! 1-4.. ‘„ ( i.rtc.eJ 1- pr04- Ai 0I4" ,)41;. 5 � s 13.5 • - p i --1.C.1 c ,.1. 64,0- e.. { e., ,G h c - > 1-- c . � I s d ,<< . List tests performed: et( I cA -v- 4-e -› --c-re a)... U. .-. c! -e .4- - di., cL �.a d ? l -tom+ ! CeCt. c..< c. -A .c. (M p,j ,1- *,OeG,1Gi'c. Gro.. S • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ No k • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No • If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable workmanship pro ..ion• - ^- curren IBC /UBC, except as noted above. -- Signed: i Il j p 1LIlI Date: 6 -ann'"c Print Full - e: ...1i l &WI . I.D. No.: gB Ir 1 White copy to Braun Intertec file. Blue copy to Project Site Representative. • Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 Page _ / of / BRAUN SIDRPT NTE RTEC Special Inspection Daily Report n City of �/� L t, //176.41 Report No.: / Date of This Report: b -4/ -04 Project Nome: a„.._ 141€4, heoznir5 f J+ ,Pro No.: 6/%0 J L Project Address: /y /4 4A. �� 4tv . Client: " lax.- MT. Client Project No.: Weather: t4�� Temperature: .80 ° f Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: e' Continuous ❑ Masonry ERebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases I Periodic ❑ Welding & Bolting Efr Concrete Placement ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles & Piers ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes ❑ (Listed Below) No ❑ Description and location of work completed: aree,ex •jy(, f fifiycCfiaec..er J, f t A{.imet" Fa& '(1n( rzefi+.L7S *ion* 47 IMP .1 toodm erS : Ar g -/ - 0721C - -3 , 1. Mare' : war yrert *o wa w,pt440' /,ca■ as pftte14144 List tests performed: t , , 1 A_ L - , . . • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ No �T' • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No • If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC /UBC, except as noted above. Signed: Date: rp -444? • Print Full Name: �f{.,l�t� I.D. No.: White copy to Braun Intertec file. Blue copy to Project Site Representative. • Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 ' Page 1 • of/ SIDRPT BRAUN INTERTEC Special Inspection Daily Repoir° /� MaS City of ,a,,.._ YAI 4E7v -S Report No.: /� Date of This Report: 6, Project Name: CUI4i4/2 470, -/ 'S C7, //4"t4.. Project No.: 0 D /3/ Project Address: Al Client: ,�. i 4., ',..z..,,. / r Client Project No.: Weather: % 1YZJ ail, Temperature: -v"� Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: ar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special ❑ Masonry ��Reb ecial Cases c P lPeriodic ❑ Welding & Bolting E Concrete Placement ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles & Piers ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes ❑ (Listed Below . e ( ) No ❑ Description and location of work completed: b x,v i2D.-6641-44914 -ai GG 7 /1'7 r- , / /5- el= 9, r i List tests performed: Wf n# : 1 • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ Nor I • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No A --- " -r • If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC /UBC, except as noted above. Signed: -- ---I - Date: 0--/ 2 -c9 Print Full Name: — f /1-0 ,..`� I. D. No.: White copy to Braun Intertec file. Blue copy to Project Site Representative. • Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 Page) of SIDRPT BRAUN I NTE RTEC Special Inspection Daily Report AAA. MaC/� City of aAIG >P AA. Hpbol Report No.: h Date of This Report: to 1 L.- 0 Project Name: 64r SAi (L�1�Ibr�f'5 r! Dl. Project No.: SQ -d - e/3 Project Address: //Jj Client: 672 1- 4", IR1iSfl Hi /1 Client Project No.: /� S Weather: / i� ✓!] Temperature � • Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: Continuous ❑ Masonry Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases Periodic ❑ Welding & Bolting �I Concrete Placement ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles & Piers ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes ❑ (Listed Below) No ❑ Description and location of work completed: Oeiw Q,£1j,tE 4Jr +AO apJCAf'7 . l-l. S ra S — 1 . Il i �-� .iti ' 7F A•> "..,.L, „ o &KOJI 1. G 8.3 ' . List tests performed: $UJ. , At L TCA4.1 . • 10b ulyof 44k: 4&riss, /or: c.,.l 0744 ✓s/s4o 414/4-7 / w aft/4 • Are there any discrepancies noted from this days observations? Yes ❑ No B"''' • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No 0-- • If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC /UBC, except as noted above. Signed: ned: Date: �p b'� 9 �r . . Print Full Name: '�� .13461‘4",1 I.D. No.: White copy to Braun Intertec file. Blue copy to Project Site Representative. • Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 Page / of BRAUN SIDRPT I NTE RTEC Special inspection Daily Report Mays City of a l ti tf 7tortrS Report No.: A /� Date of This Report: t/ 4.24.09 Project Name: Abu Lg - u.�S a ro ki4L4. Project No.: •-09- o/319 Project Address: n Client: �t7� Ah' OA-K- /4*. KE1tsrtr% Client Project No.: Weather: C(pvy Temperature: So #1 6 Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: Continuous ❑ Masonry RRebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases ❑Periodic ❑ Welding & Bolting l2 Placement ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles & Piers ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes ❑ (Listed Below) No ❑ Description and location of work completed: e ss e0 „,,, b0 -,../F 4 0.. g ,.i?' j 4 y .a et,,.JCitorfE ft4orfristuajS Tz a �i,.up w1414, 0 4 1 - 24, Credifrn..s : L1 NIS .) 8.5— / List tests performed: -5 t A ,,.9 • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ No LE • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No • If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC /UBC, except as noted above. Date: (p ■14 Print Full Name: 1 J 1 I.D. No.: White copy to Braun Intertec file. Blue copy to Project Site Representative. • Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 Page t of _ B R A U N c.nit -dfri 4., I NTE RTEC Daily Field Notes Project No.: P " ©9 - 013 IS 6 O I /141 Date: / 4 /a4 . r Report No.: Project Name: ©lik �.�k TI'S c,17 Project Location: <Pu 1P�rk tT 1 Client: n 7 ©4 1'4{k ��(( 4-s Temp/Weather: GIo /7 / 70 Project Manager: <a rt. L Mc.ije5 Time Arrived: Departed: x , � a� v �a -A '� ` - ' w"z x' " os ❑ Compaction Testing ❑ Concrete Testing X Cylinder Pickup 0 Proctor Pickup 0 Masonry Pickup ❑ DCP ❑ Other (describe) Density T esting Areas Tested: ❑ Mass Grading ❑ Building Pad ❑ Wall Backfill ❑ Slab Subgrade ❑ Parking/Walks O Utilities ❑ Roadways ❑ Bituminous ❑ Other (describe) Method: ❑ Nuclear ❑ Sandcone # of tests: Fill Source: ❑ On -site ❑ Imported Tests taken met specification? ❑ Yes ❑ No 0 Waiting on Proctor results? Contractor notified of test results? ❑ Yes ❑ No Name of person notified: x „ so- p p �..� Concrete T"esti g o�ti Y , g � .., -. �.w �a'"q��� " r �� ��� � �� - ..,,r ��s � ,u�.�.a . � s r Areas Tested: ❑ Footing ❑ Slab on Grade ❑ Deck ❑ Columns /Piers 0 Walls ❑ Pile Cap /Pile Fill ❑ Pavement 0 Curb & Gutter ❑ Other (describe) No. of placements: Yards per placement: ( Method of placement: Set # Cylinder Size Air % Slump Temp Mix Supplier Spec. Strength Workorder # Contractor notified of test results? ❑ Yes ❑ No, Name of person notified: Overall Remarks/Comments $pion ony concerns hems or n o s u c 1 ocourren Was everything available to test /observe? 'Yes ❑ No Were there any delays? (Explain below if yes) ❑ Yes ,No Was a copy of this report left on site? 006 Yes ❑ No If so, whom was it submitted to: Comments: p,& d w Ga1e� � , e— -5 6/2 4/0 Performed By: c , ✓ (S Reviewed by: Date: (o y fb T This is a preliminary report and is provided solely as evidence that field observations and /or testing was performed. Observations and /or conclusions and /or recommendations conveyed in the final report may vary from, and shall take precedence, over those indicated in a preliminary report. • Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 Page _ of __ B RAUN SIDRPT INTERTEC Special Inspection Daily Report Nlr�ti�s city of 84 k P a,k 14e,, t k-s Report No.: Date of This Report: 7JZ /o `f Project Name: ©a (-4 e.7.I4 Cr 44( Project No.: se- 0% -0131c? Project Address: % Wl61 B HP v Client: C 14'Y pc /9..k. P � f K t t? (^ Client Project No.: Weather cl e J 1 /74-- Temperature: Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: ❑ Continuous ❑ Masonry Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases y +�1 Periodic ❑ Welding & Bolting kr. Placement ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles & Piers ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes ❑ (Listed Below) No ❑ Description and location of work completed: /,.,V s c,-e J if 6$ i e c ae „`( �• - r t v (�y << ....es' %(7"09, i( - ( - 3) H ( -1 )„ A (6-13), M It! /ec'f) +0 Ids' + sfeeS, C o,ict frac. f te.ae1 ,, c.W•a✓e IyeC.Tia -t . y o, r t. cJ J Cow'iol.d.�i'Cc' � Y lo List tests performed: _ S / u „ , S t � A _ 1 7. w p 78 ° �} - rf 'r 9 c 7 1 , i! er'S • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ No jg • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No IR • If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBCIUBC, except as noted above. Signed: Date: "7/2—/c3 Ii Print Full Name: "t"; I.D. No.: White copy to Braun Intertec file. Blue copy to Project Site Representative. • Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 Page of SIDRPT BRAUN I NTE RTEC Special inspection Daily Report 4ck k S City of 1, cr. ( 4 P .-r� au ? ttf - s Report No.: Date of This Report: 7(q /C, Project Name: f7u Pe.,* ttc 5 CA-- I (l Project No.: 4f_ - o L41, Project Address: 1 dEc k f c / k 1 /d Client: V- P.-04 4,4 Client Project No.: Weather: C (P•u i Temperature: -$O Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: ❑ Continuous ❑ Masonry %Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases ❑ Periodic ❑ Welding & Bolting Concrete Placement ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles & Piers ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes ❑ (Listed Below) No ❑ Description and location of work completed: /peck) /'Gl / e ( cic ei ,i4 e . 4 cvr Lki 1(5 4'o^ ),4e-S /l 4.1.9 - 44N •,1 le .le 6 $ Do i ... ,,.-, le .-,e (A)(( - 2 ) , A(( a ea /e) �o Le t,,' fi.a.,. Pro e�f p(. 4 S ec , . 5 - 4 Xi4 l f 6241.441 / I yobs Pl ea, ell - 6 -4e Ft0.4 r,Jc1( aH f,we CN)(s.$) . List tests performed: lj ` .,c wt . c, ZS A-, der Z % �-c 715 °, c tt / )C0 G y l) ✓ S • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ No zio • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No • If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC /UBC, except as noted above. Signed: Date: 7/ 9 /01 Print Full Name: be. tic S I.D. No.: White copy to Braun lntertec file. Blue copy to Project Site Representative. • Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 Page of .BRAUN eiue -din 4 1 07 I NTE RTEC Daily Field Notes Project No.: P- Report No.: 0 q pp - O (� I q Date: 7 / 7/0 q Project Name: 04k f c• /k t�it Ct4 y Jt i ( P ro ject Location: 0414 P -r 14 ' Lk Client: CA o-c 04. p k Net 9 STS Temp/Weather: 4 . 1 o u; y / Project L Manager: 7ur� Ma e4 Time Arrived: Departed: g p > x ,� Z , ' .. .,�`,� saw i ;' �� a aE ❑ Compaction Testing ❑ Concrete Testing IX Cylinder Pickup ❑ Proctor Pickup ❑ Masonry Pickup O DCP ❑ Other (describe) P� � s�,, t � � �'�c ti^ e`�r en Ling Areas Tested: ❑ Mass Grading ❑ Building Pad ❑ Wall Backfill ❑ Slab Subgrade ❑ Parking/Walks O Utilities ❑ Roadways ❑ Bituminous 0 Other (describe) Method: ❑ Nuclear ❑ Sandcone ! # of tests: Fill Source: ❑ On -site ❑ Imported Tests taken met specification? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Waiting on Proctor results? Contractor notified of test results? ❑ Yes ❑ No Name of person notified: .�v roi..;,r ..=,: `���it es fo�:��� �.> ,.. ._.. ,.... ' �,. ......m ' .z„s.. ...._ Areas Tested: ❑ Footing ❑ Slab on Grade ❑ Deck ❑ Columns /Piers ❑ Walls O Pile Cap /Pile Fill ❑ Pavement ❑ Curb & Gutter ❑ Other (describe) No. of placements: Yards per placement: Method of placement: Set # Cylinder Size Air % Slump Temp Mix Supplier Spec. Strength Workorder # Contractor notified of test results? ❑ Yes ❑ No, Name of person notified: a . ,.. n .... O verall Remarks/Commen t s � x p l aa �'roble s ar unusual occurrences �... 'e 'concerns , w� „ms Was everything available to test /observe? tiirYes ❑ No Were there any delays? (Explain below if yes) ❑ Yes No Was a copy of this report left on site? L$) Yes ❑ No If so, whom was it submitted to: 3 Comments: ricked I-if C o n e - P e i - e Cyj e g < -Ea co Ayr 5ton 4-eg-}-, Performed By: ar tit S Reviewed by: Date: 7/ ?to f This is a preliminary report and is provided solely as evidence that field observations and /or testing was performed. Observations and/or conclusions and /or recommendations conveyed in the final report may vary from, and shall take precedence, over those indicated in a preliminary report. • Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 Page of B RA U N on,t -Etfat 4/(}7 I NTE RTEC Daily Field Notes Project No.: S? O - 01 i Date: 0 c i Report No.: Project Name: 04 , C, hcAcAyt.ts \-& . \'' Project Location: C 46,\ c.r4 Vkt,41ti"ICx 00 Client: C.t k'tt, o.\ P,.r K. �ei11�5 Temp/Weather: SO' ! GAE.ra 1"` V Project Manager: `St.+rw,L, � erg " J Time Arrived: +fir Departed: a S anti ma �, y e Performed y' � � ..,';...a�.�.,a:: ❑ Compaction Testing Concrete Testing (2t Cylinder Pickup ❑ Proctor Pickup ❑ Masonry Pickup O DCP ❑ Other (describe) Areas Tested: ❑ Mass Grading ❑ Building Pad ❑ Wall Backfill ❑ Slab Subgrade ❑ Parking/Walks ❑ Utilities ❑ Roadways 0 Bituminous ❑ Other (describe) Method: ❑ Nuclear ❑ Sandcone I # of tests: I Fill Source: ❑ On -site ❑ Imported Tests taken met specification? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Waiting on Proctor results? Contractor notified of test results? 0 Yes ❑ No Name of person notified: � av Con crete e tying information �,, Areas Tested: 0 Footing 0 Slab on Grade ❑ Deck ❑ Columns /Piers (EL Walls ❑ Pile Cap /Pile Fill ❑ Pavement ❑ Curb & Gutter ❑ Other (describe) No. of placements: I Yards per placement: `3- C> Method of placement: Set # Cylinder Size Air % Slump Temp Mix Supplier Spec. Strength Workorder # \ hr fo ktO ti-1 40 6, Co , otc- 4.-Cm Contractor notified of test results? Lg. Yes O No, Name of person notified: Remar /Comore n tE �i or �a , " � o c nc r inns stzcrt occurrences) ..�.. „ � Was everything available to test /observe? RI Yes ❑ No Were there any delays? (Explain below if yes) (NZ Yes ❑ No Was a copy of this report left on site? ❑ Yes No If so, whom was it submitted to: Comments: �■nC,�+'G'itt, 4delrPMhR.v�' "Cwr t` 0 t s.. 4 G3. C . t c ire �C .rMr - ` f "t: , .: c cco".. 1. ,t \ 1164 et., 4'v1 4 i ?\*O.LiJA , . .. , c°w aw vet r � + r u` • • LdA.. A v*. vol, k ` r f 14 , o.r ivkt)fe tr..pwvv .isko r, \.L, ',l< sous Performed By: "7/4:04,44, . Reviewed by: Date: '; "' ‘,7 This is a preliminary report and is provided solely as evidence that field observations and /or testing was performed. Observations and /or conclusions and /or recommendations conveyed in the final report may vary from, and shall take precedence, over those indicated in a preliminary report. • Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 Page / of SIDRPT B RAU N I NTE RTEC Special Inspection Daily Repor City of ,04&. 44 AL_ 14741.1 S Report No.: Date of This Report: 4 7-/13 , -69 Project Name: t4*.- e4A-10. kE trt•^S Cs Ham. L Project No.: "0 O (3.01 Project Address: / /fa Q*A.• tis 51.1/0. Client: f w J Client Project No.: Weather: - • Temperature: 8 0 is Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: ❑ Continuous ❑ Masonry er Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases a Periodic ❑ Welding & Bolting FrConCrete Placement ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles & Piers ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes ❑ (Listed Below) No ❑ Description and location of work completed: _ of.se6ve azay.f suf,„ r44,p4'r" As.io 4. C.a.t ' _ �.. / c i Lc. -, , w,..lV lnt-' 4 7' List tests performed: • I A e„00214.e7 L,N,F . • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? • Yes ❑ No d' • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? ` , Yes ❑ No 2 • If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC /UBC, except as noted above. Signed: C Date: 7 - IO .— G9 Print Full Name: C i •• r. I.D. No.: White copy to Braun Intertec file. Blue copy to Project Site Representative. • Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 Page of .B RA V N cmt -dfn 4/07 I NTE RTEC Daily Field Notes Project No.: 6I -Of ° OI S 19 ( Date: 7// 5/,q '/ Report No.: Project Name: Oak Paid tiGI f S Cf'r )/A ( Project Location: Ok k.- t r r � /(c t, IAES Client: t%J - f #/ ( F � t4s/ (415 Temp/Weather: dew I '70 Project Manager: ScrAt Ivt M(- Time Arrived: Departed: K ��� 2* c �.... ,.�....k ..� Performed ❑ Compaction Testing ❑ Concrete Testing P.I Cylinder Pickup ❑ Proctor Pickup ❑ Masonry Pickup O DCP ❑ Other (describe) € �,�� a '�" n � � a �' i. � � �a...a -�.� ... ... , Testing ' o� '< �,. Areas Tested: ❑ Mass Grading ❑ Building Pad ❑ Wall Backfill ❑ Slab Subgrade ❑ Parking/Walks ❑ Utilities 0 Roadways ❑ Bituminous ❑ Other (describe) Method: ❑ Nuclear ❑ Sandcone # of tests: Fill Source: ❑ On -site ❑ Imported Tests taken met specification? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Waiting on Proctor results? Contractor notified of test results? ❑ Yes ❑ No Name of person notified: Coricrete Testing Information ° Areas Tested: ❑ Footing ❑ Slab on Grade ❑ Deck ❑ Columns /Piers ❑ Walls O Pile Cap /Pile Fill ❑ Pavement ❑ Curb & Gutter ❑ Other (describe) No. of placements: I Yards per placement: J Method of placement: Set # Cylinder Size Air % Slump Temp Mix Supplier Spec. Strength Workorder # Contractor notified of test results? ❑ Yes ❑ No, Name of person notified: O verall Rennctrks/Comments (Explain any concerns, problems c r unusual occurrences) ate <.�„as�.'.x�,, s�o�r ..,..,, Was everything available to test /observe? 'Yes ❑ No Were there any delays? (Explain below if yes) ❑ Yes X No Was a copy of this report left on site ? Yes ❑ No If so, whom was it submitted to: J C,1 Comments: Pi4r-) `^ c y rrl ) e, S � o/ l oH..� o•-• 4 , Performed By: ems.. c g Reviewed by: Date: 7//3`0 5 This is a preliminary report and is provided solely as evidence that field observations and /or testing was performed. Observations and /or conclusions and /or recommendations conveyed in the final report may vary from, and shall take precedence, over those indicated in a preliminary report. • Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 Page / of • SIDRPT BRAUN I NTE RTEC Special Inspection Daily Report City of dim ! 1144.. iF f„ ers Report No.: Date of This Report: 7 - /y-O 9 Project Name: Project No.: 09 -1319 Project Address: /y /(4 Q#M g &✓/. Client: Client Project No.: Weather: 411.1 C4.4 Temperature: ? w l S Type of Inspection: Inspedion Coverage: ❑ Continuous ❑ Masonry Friebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases Periodic ❑ Welding & Bolting ErConcrete Placement ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles & Piers ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes ❑ (Listed Below) No ❑ Description and location of work completed: esSaideo arj * ..y tZF •ear 42.40 f c.4 bt4euTS -F&_ 7T1F A ST .fl ' 4 .. . 7 a.✓4 -�c.. ^^ ,E}T - 64.4.0 L.e. S : E_ 8 m 3.9 . n Ta �' .- 8 . C p 1)� q e As, I .F1--4,4 q a ra" lit orAS Rut".. .Fit.FSP4 40.30-.4.01* ■.%._ ' "1372.Jt) 0014A#3FS List tests performed: - O �*- C � �,,,A� 6r,A.`"P � om _T • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ No • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No 2 • If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC /UBC, except as noted above. Signed: Date: [ q-GQ� Print Full Name: r - ;:ii �.+�.) I.D. No.: \ White copy to Braun Intertec file. Blue copy to Project Site Representative. • Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 Page of _ SIDRPT BRAY N I NTE RTEC Special Inspection Daily Report City of ��k. ®. . Report No.: Date of This Report: •15 Project Name: I Project No.: S) -69-031 Project Address: /L1/(� D� � 61. Client: n / 7b.ff S Client Project No.: Weather: PAA.11 3 Temperature: 70 Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: ❑ Continuous ❑ Masonry ErRebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases S" Periodic ❑ Welding & Bolting a Concrete Placement ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles & Piers ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes ❑ (Listed Below) No ❑ Description and location of work / completed: ,n 1144 Aw. A 4,6,49Jr ,. 4 C D p ILF :41. 6.4tz t to t_ L—. Rsvrr •u A-T A �Q4t1444.714V Vitun ¥ s iJES. i GA 4 Ts .4 -3. s� , t oturw Pae 4-c 4s..b4 1-04411‘....: 8 - 3 . rate L t_ 41 lsn.•d L0c'0.-) : 4 - •- T,.,4(1 Aer !moo Lam. 41"/ : 4 m A f. - List tests performed: ' J�V�+ , pt 4_ Ge�'IL�+T ' pfd 44'+tsA. - WA i3' : ?OD 443(o () 1,.ae 9D&C■ lq/,,; Se.r. . 13 5ers-A j 14 • Are there any discrepancies noted from this days observations? Yes ❑ No e • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No • If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBCIUBC, except as noted above. Signed: - Date: Print Full Name: �'��A,� �� I.D. No.: White copy to Braun Intertec file. Blue copy to Project Site Representative. • Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 ' Page _ of SIDRPT B RAUN I NTE RTEC Special Inspection Daily Report City of be purk gery1t S II I Report No.: p j , / Date of This Report: '7// 7/01 Project Name: Oak ia( I C1 1 t4c 1/ Project No.: S/d 09 _d13/ Project Address: H/65 bot A, kz €ivy' AI • Client: C t 'I- r of 00, P -/4 ?[ / Client Project No.: 4004 T m fv Weather: e pe rature: o Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: ❑ Continuous ❑ Masonry Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases eriodic ❑ Welding & Bolting F2 Concrete Placement ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles & Piers ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes ❑ (Listed Below) No ❑ Description and location of work completed: 1 N4re A...j feL, „. 4- f�, � � - e b I �.�P ,.,, �.1f o.• wti614 v 1..ie l4)(1- 1.7),(A)( 3 ) k _ i ;.z g. A6( a ppe rz) -I-o G," tAl f'{A.z. fPQte f P(e,,,,< 4- s . u / er 6 J e4 6 ;864 1q7 / , 5ef- VP /S. List tests performed: ,t,,,,,,p v _A-, i 6,570 , -c, .p 66 ` / 11 - �3 `• c �. 1, J., J u-s • Are there any discrepancies noted from this days observations? Yes ❑ No • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No • If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC /UBC, except as noted above. Signed: �� _ Date: 7 7/b y Print Full Name: ��,4- ,� ✓ c s I.D. No.: White copy to Braun Intertec file. Blue copy to Project Site Representative. • Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 Page / of SIDRPT BRAUN m.4.14-4 I NTE RTEC Special Inspection Daily Report City of iw /G a r/L uv . N 1'3 Report No.: /� Date of This Report 1 073,7 t I Project Name: 04 A Hc13ss ' G /4 r/ Project No.: .0 '01311 Project Address: II 1 ` 4 04' . Avz &Z /V Client: C+ " d 4 " ►� Are..Are..- H4�$ Client Project No.: Weather: U Q Temperature: !J 3 Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: ill Continuous ❑ Masonry K R ebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases ❑ Periodic ❑ Welding & Bolting C oncrete Placement ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles & Piers ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes ❑ (Listed Below) No J' Description and location of work completed: 0 ejvcru( riod,Z11444 ♦ f /374 6 . iCAsf1 A /X qvg G c c.,4.4.4.,,„ AI wsai .'+ & z,&iy Veis/Y - 04 4.4 51-Dc2,' C'loM &tr,)4 b c 5 5 4-11 £ . • F 4-Lc:e 1A-4.3 _ _ e or ' Z , 4 t x.+4 alet ea Vet dt 7 L. a M' � air G S te 5 fic q bwvNe . List tests performed: 61,,,,,, q, 5 , M g ' 4,11 / s / redly' 7 q 0 • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ No • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No T • If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable workmanship pr. ' . ns of the current IBC /UBC, except as noted above. s Signed: / ,de' Date: 1 , 6'7 Print Full e: f ,e—ii in Zt �/� L/� 1.D. No.: $ White copy to Braun Intertec file. Blue copy to Project Site Representative. • Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 Page i of t 5. .Mc 'ks SIDRPT B RAU N NTE RTEC Special Inspection Daily Report City of Oa k Povr k In e, 5 '--s Report No.: Date of This Report: 1." ZS —c'9 Project Name: &e- Pahrie- I i y.j.?s 41 Kw l.1 Project No.: C Po S 0 / 3 d Project Address: I Li /V A (,a,k ?aria 5/t t) Nu rJ. . Client: . a , '. • • Client Project No.: Weather: Temperature: Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: ❑ Continuous ❑ Masonry 1e' Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases Periodic ❑ Welding & Bolting DYConcrete Placement ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles & Piers ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes ❑ (Listed Below) No ❑ Description and location of work completed: pb!,l y ,! 4 roe 11 r et ' n [ ' Al 044 F,urM> G r C°.,11u iv", rays tac,.ii4 . 'Ai- y 1 ;)s S 0 an/ .E t cos t..e -! t a.s 1 r i 2 S . 5 ! G , t o 7PF L te4. 4 j•r ,rot -u Jr[ 3 • N N.o i t►+ ii l'.•.% 9 4,tr I exec ,r dw.a[..o W : 11-- I r t i e . - r i 44. ktr. 5 c,,. 4 64.4J041 ovi, /t. `iev. . R yS#l A pi 24 tA..u.,,1- c f.' a w 1 1 '1 & cf Gun c.iG k-- f Iat t L cur c.et,...• !ta 13 (.' >141 saMcs v .. Ctrl- e",e.. VA- 6 J J.e-5/" Nv i u r S%- min yet, 5r,► _ tal bs4 -tGa y 0.li' iR.e s k List tests performed: �.u,1( rGlt, :n tii;c.a Z 9 «L c ,.s�� b.." .e._ ,4 - �e'v C'a. J e t'..t,r *- c .,.}-,1ut`1 . • Are there any discrepancies noted from this days observations? Yes ❑ No S1 • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No ❑ • If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable workmanship pro sions ,� e u- - nt IBC /UBC, except as noted above. . ` Signed: 4 4 L i Date: — 1" ZS — U °t Print Full Na ,f L f . 9 tJ4! U v I.D. No.: ..28? a 8 i i , II White copy to Braun Intertec file. Blue copy to Project Site Representative. • Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 Page � of SIDRPT BRAUN I NTE RTEC Special Inspection Daily Report City of 41A ',fast leRti rS Report No.: Date of This Report: '7.-21,77 Project Name: adk Qat&t. `Jp(r 6 H( Project No.: • 49-o 9 Project Address: V Client: �t.t..�'�fjLyn� Client Project No.: Weather: Temperature: s3 Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: Et Continuous ❑ Masonry ErRebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases Periodic ❑ Welding & Bolting PrEoncrete Placement ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles & Piers ❑ Tendon Placement 'Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes ❑ (Listed Below) No ❑ •- Description and location of work completed: e>e RE+ eici u..p■..11 4.46 Lr ��t.a.1.,►1� e:V..0 1 •r •.zu..K • J . 4./ -3 � 9--1.1 A S' ; r- , • '- sr P ? r ' , � - w -8 . 6 -3 . Iii - 4 • 1 - If • i. V • a 150 aS4- PI F&A kr v4,410 t oe.4"u.S : a -N ; e 3. 41 9) re $.4Ld € tithvt, ,tjurJecak. A-417744/ i2nt• 4-0t. ptu, -1 9' a 441•x► -S List tests performed: • r % .0 : [ L b • ga66xed/ • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ No • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No • If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC /UBC, except as noted above. Signed: - Date: 7'Z9 -- o9' Print Full Name: Saft.1 BitiL ■1 I.D. No.: White copy fo Braun lnfertec file. Blue copy to Project Site Representative. • Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 Page 2, of "f6. SIDRPT2 Rev 10/03 BRAUN I NTE RTEC Continuation of Special Inspection Daily Report City of Z34$4, �syttA. elvers Report No.: /1 Date of This Report: 7°14-1x'9 Project Name: 04144404 / 14 d uM•TS L1?VJ Rig C. - Project No.: vj3 Note: This is a continuation of a report. The first page of this report has information which should not be separated from this continuation) , ,cy .tA V on."-4 eer/Tb4 „t _ - 'R / , TO - a . 1 424.&4 fit, r- mart -w fratug TD ed6o0 - Y f . Ott _Avreq.7 do. ,$ 4J /e44- T 6E a� 44A-a . r P&P. - 1.1— 4 ec.+44 sur.i To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC /UBC, except as noted above. Signed: Date: Print Full Name: I.D. No: White copy to Braun Infertec file. Blue copy to Project Site Representative. • Providin g engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 Page / of / SIDRPT . BR'AUN I NTE RTEC Special Inspection Daily Report Bmthutik.cf City of 411A. km. *ors p Report No.: Q Date of This Report: 0•12 Project Name: oak. P A�t w, �1 141'S CLI'4 1444 Project No.: SA /9 Project Address: �v/ Client: Client Project No.: Weather: PM., Temperature: 9 /diF I I Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: ❑ Continuous Q Masonry LJ Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases gr Periodic ❑ Welding & Bolting ❑ Concrete Placement ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles & Piers ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect plans? d t e archt ect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans. Yes ❑ (Listed Below) No ❑ Description and location of work completed: ��(_fLE.1.I�LFs�C1wrb�f.JT �yt�r l �.. 1 me A L • / / . _.1.. A •• • r Art 1 1 ' List tests performed: • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ No Er • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No • If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC /UBC, except as noted above. Signed: Date: 1"12,-.0(1 Print Full Name: °,1 I.D. No.: White copy to Braun Intertec file. Blue copy to Project Site Representative. • Providing engineering and environmental solutions since I957 Paget of SIDRPT BRAUN 1NTERTEC Special Inspection Daily Report CAW SVitcl City of Ha twr-r Report No.: Date of This Report: _ g - Z -ag Project Name: OA&' AAA- KF1(wr t2 HALL, Project No.: S -of er /di/ 9 Project Address: Client: rl aot L /l 1 flirMl.S Client Project No.: Weather: � /✓ Temperature: LO. 72, 4 cS Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: 1:1' Continuous ❑ Masonry 2Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases 2 Periodic ❑ Welding & Bolting 2 Concrete Placement ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles & Piers ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes ❑ (Listed Below) No ❑ Description and location of work completed: e ,y 1741,4 AAA„1 17 - 4,40 Cov.yese.S t lAKCitF.urS > 1 5gA." A•n Gum& lou+4146 4 73I C ••-•ts. 4'.74 " C •., ,�.K„ac�, List tests performed: SLu.we At,ti G, rrtkir _'J'-e LIpn i ( • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ No �? • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No • If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC /UBC, except as noted above. Signed: Date: g• iptpej Print Full Name: I.D. No.: White copy to Braun Intertec file. Blue copy to Project Site Representative. • Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 Page / of II' BRAUN SIDRPT III 1 NTE RTEC • Special Inspection Daily { - ti3r.a sad City of 04 K 14a,‘,.. He u•e rS Report No.: /� Date of This Report: ' Z$O1 Project Name: 4�r. �ds�, HF7uu -a C�Ls•t Project No.• '�Q 9 O /2 /1 Project Address: V Client: Client Project No.: P .4 11 1640./410 Weather: (.4 ✓� Temperature: °` S Type of Inspection: X IIn Coverage: �' ❑ Continuous Masonry o Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases © Periodic ❑ Welding & Bolting ❑ Concrete Placement ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles & Piers ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes ❑ (Listed Below) No ❑ Description and location of work completed: l�• 1 KGA , r. , .l' 6.0 � - -t. E 2- " t wv. .004pr -r^ e List tests performed: • Are there any discrepancies noted from this days observations? Yes ❑ No Et • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No • If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC /UBC, except as noted above. Signed: Date: 8'11.01 Print Full Name: 72:(40%. I.D. No.: White copy to Braun lntertec file. Blue copy to Project Site Representative. • Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 Page of ,BRAUN rn" -''fn 4/07 NTE RTEC Daily Field Notes Project No.: 5? • 0 9 ' C9 is 1 g Date: IQ • l 9 Report No.: Project Name: d 74% \--kr,1n�C C1 \-14 Project Location: OA \ iZ par - 1'4ek \�TS Client: 0 Ak ?0,(\t-- f Temp/Weather: 1 -1 � � u () S Stinvt Project Manager: Skrak1 Time Arrived: 7 lS Departed: ' ' GQ s �. ��✓"" ,a oaf , rQ✓� -a'3 `& T%' ,a...�"s < O Compaction Testing ca Concrete Testing 0 Cylinder Pickup 0 Proctor Pickup 0 Masonry Pickup O DCP 0 Other (describe) ce h u - " r „ s° `Densi ; Testing Areas Tested: 0 Mass Grading 0 Building Pad 0 Wall Backfill 0 Slab Subgrade 0 Parking/Walks O Utilities 0 Roadways 0 Bituminous 0 Other (describe) Method: 0 Nuclear 0 Sandcone # of tests: 1 Fill Source: 0 On -site 0 Imported Tests taken met specification? 0 Yes 0 No 0 Waiting on Proctor results? Contractor notified of test results? 0 Yes 0 No Name of person notified: Concrete T� estin information Areas Tested: 0 Footing Ca Slab on Grade 0 Deck 0 Columns /Piers 0 Walls O Pile Cap /Pile Fill 0 Pavement 0 Curb & Gutter 0 Other (describe) No. of placements: I Yards per placement: o I Method of placement: "'ik%) Set # Cylinder Size Air % Slump Temp Mix Supplier Spec. Strength Workorder # 1.1x a 3• a 5" 71° 63? C H000 9 6 13 Contractor notified of test results? 0 Yes 0 No, Name of person notified: Overall RGtYteriKS /GOrrilt#ent5 tExplonn or3y concerns, problems or unusual occureantesj Was everything available to test /observe? D Yes 0 No Were there any delays? (Explain below if yes) Q Yes 0 No Was a copy of this report left on site? ( Vi Yes 0 No If so, whom was it submitted to: Comments: { c;rt (n•0 C(C � s ovl COO erre c)I6CQ AS SIF6 crv. fa gym" 4,rS h44 � f lour( levc\ Cloof - Al' es 'Is q ??c 4 red 4-a MCG+ S 7 ctS Ye, ur bnrritr AA !.le r14 VT( e (e5e'vli- 4 4;0,c. of ou 1 c i bT l■45 +0 't' • r tk , 10 c..111 - e \-o c)VIc1 • C1 ( tkl C C 40 4 + ovl G S I O t 514C f Ql'1�O✓1S P � d� � �I u �� � Performed By: ij'e , ! ' Reviewed by: Date: This is a preliminary report and is provided solely as evidence that field observations and /or testing was performed. Observations and /or conclusions and /or recommendations conveyed in the final report may vary from, and shall take precedence, over those indicated in a preliminary report. • Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 Page of 'B R A U N e,pr -cifn Or I NTE RTEC Daily Field Notes Project No.: [C 0q CJ l 1 `9 p Date: 1I - G t _ Report No.: Project Name: _ I9O� ?A( \t. Ce� \4 {Vk P roject Location: CZ 1 "(� II.. \A, 11 L `` N JJJ Client: oAfc ?Mfk 4P,kkS Temp/Weather: 50 Sc. NHC� Project Manager: 54(04 p\ttkCS Time Arrived: 1: l5 Departed: t ) 45 Serriices Performed ❑ Compaction Testing [.J toncre ` to Testing 0 Cylinder Pickup 0 Proctor Pickup 0 Masonry Pickup ❑ DCP ❑ Other (describe) Density Testing Areas Tested: ❑ Mass Grading ❑ Building Pad ❑ Wall Backfill ❑ Slab Subgrade ❑ Parking/Walks ❑ Utilities ❑ Roadways 0 Bituminous ❑ Other (describe) Method: ❑ Nuclear ❑ Sandcone # of tests: Fill Source: 0 On -site ❑ Imported Tests taken met specification? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Waiting on Proctor results? ej Contractor notified of test results? ❑ Yes ❑ No Name of person notified: Concrete Testing Information Areas Tested: ❑ Footing ❑ Slab on Grade ❑ Deck ❑ Columns /Piers ❑ Walls ❑ Pile Cap /Pile Fill (6 Pavement ❑ Curb & Gutter ❑ Other (describe) No. of placements: 1 ' Yards per placement: 1'3. 1 Method of placement: ck,-) c Set # Cylinder Size Air % Slump Temp Mix Supplier Spec. Strength Workorder # 3 I-1 5.9 3 �i — 1� 6 aoctl° 6r01540vte LIOCC, 90IelbgI Contractor notified of test results? ❑ Yes ❑ No, Name of person notified: Overall Remarks /Comments (Explain any concerns, test/observe? problems or unusual occurrences) Was everything available to . _ test /observe? ,� Yes ❑ No Were there any delays? (Explain below if yes) � Yes ❑ No Was a copy of this report left on site? 'Yes ❑ No If so, whom was it submitted t to: Comments: Pe f (y i (I - i'Cl o (nvicie4 .)-01 e. T S Ovv COv1Lc le plat to 45 lle.rlec >141.1. A (Ai c5 f5A (avtcc. .\ lover le ✓d. A'It ,r54 /esti q ) 4'a(cc! -1t, Mne I— ^►' 4Cr t e?r •\- e- AC a(+rv� aWd A f _I e e}0 � v1ClG C 9110.41.1 Mk a l'iN �� ( �� w ' (� � cI I I //` Performed By: K,, ���f : Reviewed by: Date: This is a preliminary report and is provided solely as evidence that field observations and /or testing was performed. Observations and /or conclusions and /or recommendations conveyed in the final report may vary from, and shall take precedence, over those indicated in a preliminary report. • Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 Page _ of B RAU N eint -dfn 4/07 I NTE RTEC Daily Field Notes Project No.: 5 ?- Dy - U ' } \ ' i c} Date: 11 6 Report No.: Project Name: OC t Perk 'T1C: \ S C , J \L Project Location: Unk ar k- <iJ1'1�S Client: otk �t4t 1 Temp/Weather: 5d saNN. Project Manager: • /I'14 US Time Arrived: _ E L1 5 Departed: Services Performed rvlces P ❑ Compaction Testing C(Concrete Testing O Cylinder Pickup ❑ Proctor Pickup 0 Masonry Pickup O DCP ❑ Other (describe) Density Testing Areas Tested: ❑ Mass Grading ❑ Building Pad ❑ Wall Backfill ❑ Slab Subgrade ❑ Parking/Walks O Utilities ❑ Roadways ❑ Bituminous ❑ Other (describe) Method: ❑ Nuclear ❑ Sandcone # of tests: Fill Source: ❑ On -site ❑ Imported Tests taken met specification? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Waiting on Proctor results? --I Contractor notified of test results? 0 Yes ❑ No Name of person notified: Concrete Testing Information Areas Tested: ❑ Footing p Slab on Grade 0 Deck ❑ Columns /Piers ❑ Walls 0 Pile Cap /Pile Fill ❑ Pavement ❑ Curb & Gutter ❑ Other (describe) No. of placements: 3 , Yards per placement: $ 404-a) I Method of placement: e' c Set # Cylinder Size Air % Slump Temp Mix Supplier Spec. Strength Workorder # 4,)- 1 . d- 3 /4 1 ' - t ° P (t-Iskovnc 4000 C 0116 • -6 Contractor notified of test results? ❑ Yes ❑ No, Name of person notified: Overall Remarks /Comments (Explain any concerns, problems or unusual occurrences) Was everything available to test/observe? ... ? � Y es 0 No Were there any delays? (Explain below if yes) 14 Yes ❑ No Was a copy of this report left on site? aYes ❑ N o If so, whom was it submitted to: 1 �\j1 Comments: VP( f tied PrMLrC'te 'rtf7S 0A co (t?\ -e_ v 1ctr e4 C) 1V af7r1 g,'de 6,' to as ir>1ero c ?old d Ewa door 1.)% s40oes. �t --ics ( e4 _ eaf ).‘c Le :kilt's sret. C o ,n�ft c "C3 1yAe Performed By: f Jf�. Vi Reviewed by: Date: This is a preliminary report and is provided solely as evidence that field observations and /or testing was performed. Observations and /or conclusions and /or recommendations conveyed in the final report may vary from, and shall take precedence, over those indicated in a preliminary report. • Providing engineering and environmental solutions since I957 Page / of B RAUN SIDRPT 1 NTE RTEC Special Inspection Daily Report MMk City of 4h. 4th- /147 Report No.: Date of This Report: jl•i, Project Name: 41,4,*t. th (.f J Project No.: SQ ' 04 O /30 Project Address: t Client: U*L 2A4L4 klr/ ur r'S Client Project No.: Weather: • C% Temperature: S77 ° s Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: �_�,�- ❑ Continuous ID Masonry .e Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases .eriodic ❑ Welding & Bolting ❑ Concrete Placement ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles & Piers ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes ❑ (Listed Below) No ❑ Description and location of work completed: Via" H,V06 14 ".j4"e■lr T2 E" DcY1t.Sc.>t bout., 1 Lt,c wrc� ' SH OP 16 ...s- b4 . List tests performed: • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ No/Er • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No • If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC /UBC, except as noted above. Signed: -�'' Date: Print Full Name: t... I.D. No.: White copy to Braun Intertec file. Blue copy to Project Site Representative. • Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 Page of ,B RA IJ N crnt -dfn 4/07 I NTE RTEC Daily Field Notes Project No.: _ S P o ! ? ` 0/3/ Date: // ` I Report No.: Project Name: tP A 4.1 ,44:',"A Cl 6,/ Project Location: / e % eu/ / k j3 %K�/�,, Client: Temp/Weather: 3 r Project Manager: i� . �- /0-14 S Time Arrived: Departed: 0 Compaction Testing Concrete Testing 0 Cylinder Pickup 0 Proctor Pickup 0 Masonry Pickup O DCP 0 Other (describe) Areas Tested: 0 Mass Grading 0 Building Pad 0 Wall Backfill 0 Slab Subgrade 0 Parking/Walks O Utilities 0 Roadways 0 Bituminous 0 Other (describe) Method: 0 Nuclear 0 Sandcone # of tests: I Fill Source: 0 On -site 0 Imported Tests taken met specification? 0 Yes 0 No 0 Waiting on Proctor results? Contractor notified of test results? 0 Yes O No Name of person notified: , Concrete Testing information 3 <a. :� ... a� : rt. '� x ... s Areas Tested: E' Footing 0 Slab on Grade 0 Deck 0 Columns /Piers 0 Walls O Pile Cap /Pile Fill 0 Pavement 0 Curb & Gutter 0 Other (describe) No. of placements: / ( Yards per placement: / C f I Method of placement: � Set # Cylinder Size Air % Slump Temp Mix Supplier Spec. Strength Workorder # £ 7 9 3 �� C�..�_s ,rl 30,0 9ev .2s�� Contractor notified of test results? 4e yr Yes 0 No, Name of person notified: 7 4 P ,,41 v Overall Remarks/Comments (ExPlam ony eonr - e } rats, Problems or enusuc'l occurrences) Was everything available to test /observe? ca Yes 0 No Were there any delays? (Explain below if yes) ("Yes 0 No Was a copy of this report left on site? 0 Yes No If so, whom was it submitted to: CommComments: j 54 C®,rGr € I ee {v - �k - / � �/ act' (�'7 and / -/-7: /� `� Q / � ed.. S I 61, 74 t 74- 4e., /'s e/7 / �I s lC % r GG7' / e G r Q / C � � �l, "to �/��f y /mo e� t o cv / rdv _ Y.ct.r j _ ,(5e ��� ,� s Eves J ®f e ; x, `Sfi ma c�r/ v /` 3 c9 �'iF st cs - 'vt4C Q/ /r Le Q/ - Performed By: Reviewed by: Date: // — /2 This is a preliminary re rt and is provided solely as evidence that field observations and /or testing was performed. Observations and /or conclusions and /or recommendations conveyed in the final report may vary from, and shall take precedence, over those indicated in a preliminary report. • Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 Page ) of l , B R A U N runt -dfn 4/07 INTERTEC Daily Field Notes Project No.: S P- o 9- o t 31 q Date: 11 /f 2 /D 1 Report No.: Project Name: Clock ark 1115 C,-1- /44‘,1I Project Location: 04 j t hl 4-s Client: Cit ©a � ' i7(�5 Temp/Weather: GI awci y I `/ Project Manager: 44 e / 4 -t4 5 Time Arrived: Departed: Services Performed 3 ✓ .. _ _. O Compaction Testing 3RKoncrete Testing 0 Cylinder Pickup 0 Proctor Pickup 0 Masonry Pickup 0 DCP 0 Other (describe) Density Testin Areas Tested: 0 Mass Grading 0 Building Pad 0 Wall Backfill 0 Slab Subgrade 0 Parking/Walks 0 Utilities 0 Roadways 0 Bituminous 0 Other (describe) Method: O Nuclear 0 Sandcone # of tests: Fill Source: 0 On -site 0 Imported Tests taken met specification? 0 Yes 0 No 0 Waiting on Proctor results? Contractor notified of test results? 0 Yes 0 No Name of person notified: Concrete Testing information Areas Tested: 0 Footing Slab on Grade 0 Deck 0 Columns /Piers 0 Walls O Pile Cap /Pile Fill 0 Pavement 0 Curb & Gutter 0 Other (describe) No. of placements: 1 I Yards per placement: /'/ I Method of placement: 67,,x y Set # Cylinder Size Air % Slump Temp Mix Supplier Spec. Strength Workorder # 71/' 4116 3 e CC,+45-I -04e 1-/too 9B 12gyz. Contractor notified of test results? (( Yes 0 No, Name of person notified: .J G ( Overall Remarks /Comments (Expltnn riry concerns, rns, problems or unu 0ccurrenes) Was everything available to test /observe? pal Yes 0 No Were there any delays? (Explain below if yes) Yes 0 No Was a copy of this report left on site? b Yes X No o/n� If so, whom was it submitted to: Comments: 13: p ° A4 () -Site Se le) coeicie4'e- 51 - ' / f l ee.��.. - , ,.N. t 41.,f. u.,1 - ,I t 9 : m 0 AA , / . S k r . ' , rf a J coscrd -e PLe.J , r.���.,o. so+�i , t i_es e�- �4f -• . IGS�'S h o Gah{L . ft. J ed - S f ecs . Performed By: � J S Reviewed by: Date: tit/ zip This is a preliminary report and is provided solely as evidence that field observations and /or testing was performed. Observations and /or conclusions and /or recommendations conveyed in the final report may vary from, and shall take precedence, over those indicated in a preliminary report. • Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 Page of .BRAUN ant-dill 4/07 1 NTE RTEC Daily Field Notes Project No.: -C P-07-013/9 Date: /1- / 3 9 Report No.: Project Name: 0 e.1C P I� 0 f 1 C ■41 144.1 Project Location: Oak Pc.-4/ fS Client: C11-1 O 'r 0A.1( eK ti C Temp/Weather: y C iO&cl y Project Manager: Sax A. Mat's Time Arrived: Departed: �� i� >"z a G ' w.� � �S ks �, ` ` ' 3 - Services Performed .,.... . � ,..., � �.. `� v 0 Compaction Testing 0 Concrete Testing 0 Cylinder Pickup 0 Proctor Pickup 0 Masonry Pickup 0 DCP 0 Other (describe) Density Testing Areas Tested: 0 Mass Grading 0 Building Pad 0 Wall Backfill ❑ Slab Subgrade ❑ Parking/Walks O Utilities 0 Roadways ❑ Bituminous ❑ Other (describe) Method: 0 Nuclear 0 Sandcone # of tests: I Fill Source: 0 On -site ❑ Imported Tests taken met specification? ❑ Yes 0 No 0 Waiting on Proctor results? Contractor notified of test results? 0 Yes ❑ No Name of person notified: { 3 ti �� s Concrete Testing information r _. � .,, � a , Areas Tested: IT Footing ❑ Slab on Grade ❑ Deck Columns /Piers 0 Walls 0 Pile Cap /Pile Fill 0 Pavement ❑ Curb & Gutter 0 Other (describe) No. of placements: 1 Yards per placement: I Method of placement: Set # Cylinder Size Air % Slump Temp Mix Supplier Spec. Strength Workorder # ZC 4/,t Z- `i et 3o( trivLSI -c 3000 90 /3a / 6 9.7 (iXt G. v 3 G 8 4/0(C GL, -.sfo" <00o ?013030 Contractor notified of test results? ) Yes ❑ No, Name of person notified: Overall Remarks /Comments ;(Explain any cscer prC'bkerns or unusual oc Was everything available to test /observe? 0 Yes ❑ No Were there any delays? (Explain below if yes) Yes 0 No Was a copy of this report left on site? ❑ Yes No If so, whom was it submitted to: Comments: Oh sL✓v�a' (1(c_t, ct~•c., ,11 rti1961 ,ea,,. , 'N +o C / - o / n $7 ' 14/ o'F tit .t Z Pibl:c Lv, lc ,04 _ • - C.2 4 1.1-0. . /t' 1 r ,fla-t +a tk S n i t <‘fc patiS- fe5LJ evncr - +C e:, t. Sa v.-C rye {a S, tr.,A wl a s {.csf a � / ,,.... _ ' .. c.. 4 - -,. f.ed Performed By: LI% Reviewed by: Date: //-/3 This is a preliminary report and is provi d solely as evidence that field observations and /or testing was performed. Observations and /or conclusions and /or recommendations conveyed in the final report may vary from, and shall take precedence, over those indicated in a preliminary report. • Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 Page 1 of SIDRPT BRAUN NTE RTEC Special Inspection Daily Report City of Oa (,C.. tl'cxr /A424.31 Report No.: Date of This Report: 9. (- o 01 Project Name: C (4 f c.J1t C.rk( kcal Project No.: 6 Po O 1311 Project Address: /CO al 8 c fk,r{/ r�V P M . Client: � c..T' 0. P. f4 Client Project No.: Weather: Temperature: Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: ❑ Continuous Er Masonry Er Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases ISi Periodic ❑ Welding & Bolting ❑ Concrete Placement ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles & Piers ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes ❑ (Listed Below) No ❑ Description and location of work completed: vLC{'Ut 1n�v rCe nr.ter1 . r (J U R ., 9 1 by r;.,...„1„..1 4 u ��1�G . ' S u/ k- re: f. ,r cc_ 6,-vo- 0. r e z - a �Q1�.Cf�- ( exc.( err' Lr4; , �� e� le- ci*c5.h4"s �.- / G , ,,�sp.r fable- icv∎S © ru L Gun b4-rvrz c, CMU er ;WAS„ cxlbo List tests performed: Glx-e. .,�. . �1 • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ No k • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No • If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable workmanship pro •sions of the current IBC /UBC, except as noted above. 1 q Signed: Da '- 1 - v ` Print Full Na • - �(L • ?.rr. I.D. No.: �d F White copy to Braun Intertec file. Blue copy to Project Site Representative. • Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 Page of SIDRPT BRAUN I NTE RTEC Special Inspection Daily Report City of c'/X /i /k � /Gh1s Report No.: Date of This Report: 7` Z • a 9 Project Name: O4'( 7A 041e760,f e'i7e/ffzl Project No Ste' 043 / Project Address: ! L / B alit ?WC 4'0 4/ Client: e G.� " V < fieee 1'l4AY1S Client Project No.: Weather: Temperature: 5 - 6 d Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: ❑ Continuous [2i Masonry 0 Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases • Periodic ❑ Welding & Bolting ❑ Concrete Placement ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles & Piers ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes ❑ (Listed Below) No Z Description and location of work completed: 4213,5674-6 -77/6 / 7E -/A," 'G /4/6 57&orG /iSTfJLG eV /.r/ j Jee:c>, "3499/t9 5zo /x ; I _ ��i.d�olz�i •✓l w/f5 "kiz. . ,7 - 7" ,t>L �//z"s,�wi•�� 52 Vi/Pk yes -o List tests performed: • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ No Er • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No Er • If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. li To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC /UBC, except as noted above. Signed: L %2 Date: 94Z • !J q Print Full Name: 55fj?jry reWee?/ I.D. No.: 3 73 a White copy to Braun Intertec file. Blue copy to Project Site Representative. • Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 Page ( of t BRAUN SIDRPT 1 NTE RTEC Special Inspection Daily Report I S\1 City of ©A Q 4 lilt- I-` 11, 4 4 Report No.: Date of This Report: / " 5' 0 9 Project Name: OIIL P/14- H l(', - ra• Lin ) 4 LL Project No.: Seol - 013/4 Project Address: I L4I bt ©41L 1'4fcI S3 Lv p NoL) r Client: 6riJ BF P4 t4, 14 j GI S Client Project No.: Weather: Temperature: �p g Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: ❑ Continuous Igt Masonry Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases *Periodic ❑ Welding & Bolting ❑ Concrete Placement ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles & Piers ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes ❑ (Listed Below) No X Description and location of work completed: 0S',GrVec,4 6.14o.4,', ,c.✓1 � 4 tL.•wi� d� 12‘..104✓' r (Nit/ 9 SfAirG' S art- W7 LiA A-1� ; �Ferc% ors WG(G 2 1' 4 4 k-cr D Iel Le/1 -vt�- 6 WG*I C-tre,4 - . & (ckA- � ' 1 L$ 4'4 d175.uve poor f + p or- (nrcv4— { tie- a ( . r&.1 I y Uto✓► ivi b G Parbr; 5 . A P b4r a-tit 6 fov.i- '4" ‘�o�l 1 ' n I i� rot c h P /�- ��cyl .� � � @^ erg c,Lc Ce W f roo p tovv, oviet List tests performed: / /0 6 • Are there any discrepancies noted from this days observations? Yes ❑ No gf • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No • If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable workmanship pro ' ions of the current IBC /UBC, except cis noted above. Signed: Date: / 9 Print Full N _)vse.fvl Zierd-v) I.D. No.: 2,0 ?-d- C sj - 44 . White copy to Braun Intertec file. Blue copy to Project Site Representative. • Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 ' Page l of 1 SIDRPT BRAY N I NTE RTEC Special Inspection Daily Report t _ 6r.,�.. City of oa p k. VtenyeNa--S Report No.: Date of This Report: C t ` 4 1' -- to C t Project Name: 'Cx(i; k �O.ibif0 c (na`t■ Project No.: S f p a 9 1 d ( ( Project Address: / / (t1 ct.c.,1e-.. e>sv� $(...00 N , Client: (L'I -.j c.i— c.)c,k' e ...rt (/'t( client Project No.: Weather: Temperature: Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: ❑ Continuous IS Masonry la Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases Periodic ❑ Welding & Bolting ❑ Concrete Placement ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles & Piers ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes ❑ (Listed Below) No ❑ Description and location of work completed: ,,„ b V.c,b.. , . sv . r A (�'d\.Fj rC e_n '.-- i r. l i ') - \ tw o N\ r �.. r . ei s S cl (u+� r tt \nom - t" U u lJa ^- U r n, h v„ L a.r O,L_ - j J' —= _ C_ct i vel /._ Z AA- ca c.Sle_ List tests performed: • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ No Cil • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No 0. • If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable workmanshi i provisions of) . A. Date: z e current IBC /UBC, except as noted above. Signed: ° Si C l 9 '/`//' Print Full a e: AN t. _ IP- (Z,... , .. . I.D. No.: -� 2 a White copy to Braun lntertec file. Blue copy to Project Site Representative. • Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 Page of SIDRPT B RAU N 1 NTE RTEC Special Inspection Daily Report 01Y5 City of 4#1../14.1_, y/lv✓t✓'3 Report No.: ��, �, Date of This Report: 9 09 Project Name: '4'i AA.". //Ei 12►r.0 Co �'Id t G Project No.: Project Address: Client: Client Project No.: Weather: Temperature: 700 'S Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: Continuous LJ Masonry .Snebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases Periodic ❑ Welding & Bolting ❑ Concrete Placement ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles & Piers ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes ❑ (Listed Below) No ❑ Description and location of work completed: . - L _ _ _ , a_ •_ • _ -_ 10 - y •► Folk-. Ike s� r,.,..�j 04 efAtiOE Ci i Hw4G� c r - 1 , a , . T- I vo 1-s 6.4,0‘... l 00. i Q"l • 4 ($Q C .1D 3 ( ..4 J r / !v 1.g •i.. /6 ' n 4 7 List tests performed: • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ No Ifi • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No • If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC /UBC, except as noted above. Signed: - Date: 9— -d1 Print Full Name: (lb I.D. No.: White copy to Braun Infertec file. Blue copy to Project Site Representative. • Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 Page / of SIDRPT BRAUN I NTE RTEC Special Inspection Daily Report ,li■t'► s City of C14"... At trE710 rf3 Q Report No.: Date of This Report: / - 9 -al Project Name: CAA. LA.,. kiElUi.41 G HALL Project No.: - 0g'6/4/4 Project Address: Client: 6 1 Al t. l.h/1flcwl Client Project No.: Weather: � Temperature: - Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: Er ,asonry ...21 Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases Periodic ❑ Welding & Bolting ❑ Concrete Placement ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles & Piers ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes ❑ (Listed Below) No ❑ Description and location of work completed: ai3SE -J ,,1 A P44 c4 C16 'l'� - •RiLLoiv,,..., 46,14 C,A.Alle h.e41,,,% ' . G ra r- 1 a... -o T - / 7+4 / - 5 4 z. _ - / - .v.,•- ! ,' To / 'N List tests performed: • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ No C.' • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No CJ' • If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC /UBC, except as noted above. Signed: Date: Print Full Name: r - I.D. No.: White copy to Braun Intertec file. Blue copy to Project Site Representative. • Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 Page j of SIDRPT B RAU N I NTE RTEC Special Inspection Daily Report City of AO_ 4g, `IElvfrJ Report No.: �/�"� Date of This Report: 140• Project Name: �/igwtr •... HF)Vw Ct;'11 H4 Project No.: Project Address: Client: Client Project No.: Weather: Temperature:A"S Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: •a Continuous Masonry ,2Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases Periodic ❑ Welding & Bolting ❑ Concrete Placement ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles & Piers ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes ❑ (Listed Below) No ❑ Description and location of work completed: ( tw 04,0.aT Aw4 &LaMar PtAir 4E ' G - 1 Kati•. coy' -ro List tests performed: • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ No Ei • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No 1 • If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC /UBC, except as noted above. Signed: Date: 9t - /D - 9 • Print Full Name:(' ,d„ I.D. No.: White copy to Braun Intertec file. Blue copy to Project Site Representative. • Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 Page / of / SIDRPT B RAU NTE RTEC Special Inspection Daily Report City of l5,41.`. /-if /vim 'FS Report No.: Date of This Report: 9 "/ 4 Project Name: ( A /LLr HT= n rt i S em L Project No.: S Q - oei — 61;11 Project Address: Client: _ �: h. � K 1 Client Project No.: Weather: t • C_ - Temperature: &p° Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: Er Continuous ❑ Masonry Rebar Placement 0 Foundations Special Cases p Er Periodic ❑ Welding & Bolting ❑ Concrete Placement ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles & Piers ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes ❑ (Listed Below) No ❑ Description and location of work completed: .Sept, ,i,�,^_,�,�`�. „� ^ /jl_ aivi -rAir =fz 34.F. Ae-Axir A m C.- 1 4 - ( 1 l 0'4'1; Tv /o I / S" 41 St) -6/14,4.4- /01 � 1 is THC 1 (/ sAAAil in r ,0,3 • List tests performed: • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ No • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No t • If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC /UBC, except as noted above. Signed: Date: / Print Full Name: .o • LD. No.: White copy to Braun Intertec file. Blue copy to Project Site Representative. • Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 Page ( of SIDRPT BRAUN 1NTERTEC Special Inspection Daily Report VyYUXtS� City of OA . k N Fi L>-ti `� Report No.: Date of This Report: 1 Project Name: t tifiai 'S A �3 1, Project No.: SP - 0'9-0/3/ . 9 Project Address: U Client: tt. " I�. K Client Project No.: Weather: Vt • Temperature: Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: LContinuous Masonry ebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases B Periodic ❑ Welding & Bolting ❑ Concrete Placement ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles & Piers ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes ❑ (Listed Below) No ❑ 9 9 tY Pp P I ) Description and location of work completed: O+ Ser..v , - i .... Ft V.tF n ►,r i, �-�� 5 l' . v1A.0 g .,40. 4- yt�►M 1 ► 1 U L! I ( List tests performed: • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ No • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No LJ • If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC /UBC, except as noted above. Signed: Date: Print Full Name: . !g4o I.D. No.: White copy to Braun Intertec file. Blue copy to Project Site Representative. • Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 Page / of / BRAUN SIDRPT I NTE RTEC Special Inspection Daily Report City of � ,K. / -iTS Report No.: ( I Date of This Report: / c� -/5 Project Name: Dom- Project No.: - / D/3 / 9 Project Address: nn Client: CI' £ vet 44 tt Wt Uri fS Client Project No.: Weather: k^t. . Temperature: /1 Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: Continuous Masonry LRebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases Periodic ❑ Welding & Bolting ❑ Concrete Placement ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles & Piers ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes ❑ (Listed Below) No ❑ Description and location of work completed: Vj ��� �� i fQ ern H - ° I :,, /o/> rt. /6 9 " 4C / T / 5 Ts g evt /Oy o ) / , ,41 SD, - / y A / ; ' ro ,p Tap . 44 AAA- — L-2,4-1,44-71a.--s (1/.44 E'S List tests performed: • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ No • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No II • If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC /UBC, except as noted above. Signed: Date: Print Full Name: , f( " � (1.0",--3 I.D. No.: White copy to Braun Intertec file. Blue copy to Project Site Representative. • Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 Page / , of SIDRPT BRAUN I NTE RTEC Special Inspection Daily Report City of 6A Report No.: t Date of This Report: 9" /2?-e, Project Name: h- P41LLt. H1"1I S e /44 I Project No.: Project Address: Client: • .t. /1 / Client Project No.: Weather: C , C- Temperature: Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: � E Continuous ,la Masonry ArJ Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases d Periodic ❑ Welding & Bolting ❑ Concrete Placement ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles & Piers ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes ❑ (Listed Below) No ❑ Description and location of work completed: O�CC -xv J TLIY� Vl.vw -(tom r vF, z-42.4O1% 1 A. J LS 4 7D C.- / E- gr0 _Cr() (, S — 9 .4 `s.i.r." /Old / I . : _ d l' 4.1" ( 1 A-i 64-0 G 9 1Th0•1 19 Alt I /A-() - t m 7Lr 7zr (v4i...iff--,) . List tests performed: � ,v (fin �rs �rh L. E • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ No • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No • If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC /UBC, except as noted above. q Signed: Date: 9 -/J ! . Print Full Name: I.D. No.: White copy to Braun Intertec file. Blue copy to Project Site Representative. • Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 Page ! of SIDRPT B RAUN I NTE RTEC Special Inspection Daily Report p p Y p Ci of tk , K r City A F 0 Report No.: Date of This Report: 91 (r Project Name: KElytT S �t l�lvr.� Project No S/ 0 'i /3/4 Project Address: Client: b Client Project No.: . Weather: ,laVdr Temperature: Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: YP P Pe Continuous <ErMasonry eErltebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases Periodic ❑ Welding & Bolting ❑ Concrete Placement ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles & Piers ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes ❑ (Listed Below) No ❑ Description and location of work completed: o.z ..vt.,,tiv QC,,,,,4%),,rr f'/si6JT ' �^ z B ..b a H rn -o►" 102 ro 41.46 h.96 .a SP.raa /2`' &4 i - , 04.4I1/c ;22_ (1-4 , List tests performed: • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ No la • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No • If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC /UBC, except as noted above. Signed: Date: Print Full Name: 2A1 - I.D. No.: White copy to Braun lntertec file. Blue copy to Project Site Representative. • Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 Page / of ., SIDRPT B RAY N I NTE RTEC Special Inspection Daily Report City of ()A p.,4,2h_ I-i r 1br -cam Report No.: }} Date of This Report: 9-/7.- c Project Name: ()k t1 HFi b-ti -c Crt Atli.- Project No.: "°t 3 Project Address: �/ Client: Oil) d..s c 6 hil.ln. yL7 tf Client Project No.: Weather: e j'4. Temperature: ° cS Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: <E Continuous Masonry er Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases Periodic ❑ Welding & Bolting ❑ Concrete Placement ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles & Piers ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes ❑ (Listed Below) No ❑ Description and location of work completed: /' .vcrl (L.{� -1 .,3 t r,1,_,ntt44,1 i ,_e) J.„ et_4,,,-A..tg rs .• .;. it T" Li , ru/ - 7n /. -. /J2 L L ,,rjr ( 'lit/ It t [ e..�._ •∎ g. ni re ' ' � _ a., eN r"' . List tests performed: • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ No • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No • If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBCJUBC, except as noted above. r Signed: " Date: 9--/ - G)5 Print Full Name: ... 9riP..t L YLO ^ -r. LD. No.: White copy to Braun Intertec file. Blue copy to Project Site Representative. • Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 Page / of / SIDRPT BRAUN 1 NTE RTEC Special Inspection Daily Repor st City of 4w /itct. �F /cNrS Report No.: Date of This Report: 9- e'T Project Name: lily`' AAA. iffibi.er S �.� Jfitt Project No.: --19 ' -01 3 /4 Project Address: f,/ Client: i t % ., 1 at." Client Project No.: Weather: Temperature: 10 S Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: IJ Continuous Masonry ,aRebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases Er Periodic ❑ Welding & Bolting ❑ Concrete Placement ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles & Piers ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes ❑ (Listed Below) No ❑ Description and location of work completed: , ,,,` t T meotua[ .✓ %Li ft f^a�t Oc. ti--' - 14$0 -- �� eJYtr) ,„..4"..s E-71))--/- G 1 A .}Q 7-09 f 'v`' _oi 74> /01/' 14' //? AN6 /4 - /ire J 4 7-3. G 640,, /D4'N / /)'. it ,1 A _. _ t/ • / t /14A fV`'�' i / f.b Fikt., 'T ( (»t A-- tl a st44 - ll1-61 - , t T1N{ �� t t. 4- P L4-Ca7D eA/A A., A 1'+ • H4,10 JWL,NI- Alto hes ii& P_ H �/zU�- t�fG+t t� List tests performed: _ • II I Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ No • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No J • If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC /UBC, except as noted above. Date: * —J- G Print Full Name: I.D. No.: �..� ���,,,,�, � White copy to Braun Intertec file. Blue copy to Project Site Representative. • Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 I - Page of SIDRPT B R N 1 NTE RTEC Special Inspection Daily Repori City of OA,ti.. QA4, 14Ft 01--r Report No.: AIL Date of This Report: q-- 2209 Project Name: 19 P .A , NP v �1 S CIO AIL Project No.: ()` -O/3 19 Project Address: V Client: is J ', d Client Project No.: Weather: Nil • C_ . Temperature: 7-0 S Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: Continuous M asonry iRebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases a Periodic ❑ Welding & Bolting ❑ Concrete Placement ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles & Piers ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes ❑ (Listed Below) No ❑ Description and location of work completed: t i..s N.✓ vk p- lean �c�n- a� et>40 l4 , t. t/ J1J tom-& , t, 71, ry G ZG.a^^ 14 1) 1/3'. List tests performed: 1,,.+6Q • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ No_/ • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No ,l!j • If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC /UBC, except as noted above. Signed: Date: a 1 Print Full Name: I.D. No.: White copy to Braun lntertec file. Blue copy to Project Site Representative. • Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 4 Page / of / , SIDRPT B RAU N I NTE RTEC Special Inspection Daily Rgport City of /,4.. Report No.: Date of This Report: 4'23 D9 //�� Project Name: S �.i 14 0._Nri '6 Project No.: /J 9 d13 /9 Project Address: Client: /' ; . / • 1► Client Project No.: Weather: A/N.Uy¢-S1- Temperature: 70 tS Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: ❑ Continuous Masonry ,bar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases ❑ Periodic ❑ Welding & Bolting ❑ Concrete Placement ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles & Piers ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes ❑ (Listed Below) No ❑ Description and location of work completed: np „, / , � ,,yt u ---'r 4/74,g Ott'" ri& ty a 46 rat r9 List tests performed: • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ No Er • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No • If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC /UBC, except as noted above. Signed: Date: G- 2 3_ a 9 • c - Print Full Name: J I.D. No.: White copy to Braun Intertec file. Blue copy to Project Site Representative. • Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 BRAUN 1 NTE RTEC Letter of Transmittal Client: City of Oak Park Heights Braun Intertec Project No: SP -09 -01319 Transmittal No: 31 Date: January 12, 2010 Braun Intertec Corporation 1826 Buerkle Road Saint Paul, MN 55110 To: Eric Johnson (Email Test Results) City of Oak Park Heights 14168 Oak Park Blvd Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 Phone: 6514394439 Fax: 6514390574 Re: Oak Park Heights City Hall, 14168 Oak Park Boulevard North, Oak Park Heights, MN This Transmittal is being Sent: For your approval As requested X For your records For review I Information Sent I Copies 1 Reference Numbers 1 Comments /Clarification 1 Miscellaneous Letter 1 I Transmittal List I Information Sent Eric Johnson (Email Test Results), City of Oak Park Heights Miscellaneous Letter (1) Sent By: Laurie A. Dudero Phone: (651) 487 -3245 Rev. 8/6/04 • Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 r -- BRAUN INTERTEC Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder Report Date: 4/30/10 Test Method: ASTM C39, 4x8 Cylinder LIMS WO #: 1002301 Client: Eric Johnson Project: SP - 09 - 01319 City of Oak Park Heights Oak Park Heights City Hall 14168 Oak Park Blvd 14168 Oak Park Boulevard North Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 -6476 Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 Field Test Conditions and Results ASTM C31* Set Number: 30 Mix Design: ROC4064 Date Cast: 04/22/10 Supplier: Cemstane Time Cast: 8 :45 am Specified Air (%): 6.5 +/- 1.5 Date Received: 04/23/10 Specified Strength (psi): 3,900 Measured Slump (in.): (ASTM C143) 4 1/4 Truck Number: 782 Measured Air ( %): (ASTM C231) 7.1 Ticket Number: 2431018 Concrete Temp. ( °F): (ASTM C 1064) 65 Cylinders per Set: 5 Air Temp. ( °F): 55 Cylinders Cast By: Brown, Sean Liquid Added On Site: 5 GAL Water (per 6.00 cu. yds.) Placement Location: Paving, Sidewalk, Grid locations: A to B.5 - 8 to 9. Sample Location/Notes: Same Compression Test Results Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder Break Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture Capping Remarks 0 Sample No. Date (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in.) (sq. in.) (psi) Type Method ** Code(s) 30-1 4/29/10 1 6 7 34,680 4.01 12.63 2,750 1 14 B2 * Concrete sampled in accordance with ASTM C172 ' * Capping Method: N = ASTM C1231, Unbonded Caps S = ASTM C617, Sulfur Caps Break Remarks: B2 The 7 day test result projects that the specified strength will likely be met at 28 days according to a typical age- strength relationship. Types of Fracture i ill 0 1><1 /\ a \ r r ..,-4/ i ,/,/ ez.,t_ /.,,y,---- TYPE 1 TYPE 2 TYPE 3 TYPE 4 TYPE 5 TYPE 6 Mattes, Sarah 1 approve the document Apr 30 2010 ver 1.3c Page 1 of 1 BRAUN • lNTERTEC Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder Report Date: 3/25/10 Test Method: ASTM C39, 4x8 Cylinder LIMS WO #: 1001 108 Client: Eric Johnson (Email Test Results) Project: SP -09 -01319 City of Oak Park Heights Oak Park Heights City Hall • 14168 Oak Park Blvd 14168 Oak Park Boulevard North Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 Oak Park Heights, MN Field Test Conditions and Results ASTM C3 1 * Set Number: 29 Mix Design: 4163P Date Cast: 03/16/10 Supplier: Cemstone Time Cast: 7:45 am Specified Air ( %): Not Required Date Received: 03/17/10 Specified Strength (psi): 3,500 Measured Slump (in.): (ASTM C143) 5 1/4 Truck Number: 787 Measured Air ( %): (ASTM C231) 2.3 Ticket Number: 2419973 Concrete Temp. (°F): (ASTM C 1064) 62 Cylinders per Set: 5 Air Temp. (°F): 45 Cylinders Cast By: Brown, Sean Liquid Added On Site: .5 GAL HRWRA -High Range Water Reducing Admixture (per 10.00 cu. yds.) Placement Location: Building Interior, Slab on Grade, North and West additions Sample Location/Notes: South East corner of West addition. Compression Test Results Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder Break Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture Capping Remarks • Sample No. Date (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in.) (sq. in.) (psi) Type Method •* Code(s) 29 - 3/23/10 1 6 7 47,100 4.00 12.57 3,750 4 N B2 * Concrete sampled in accordance with ASTM C172 ** Capping Method: N = ASTM C1231, Unhanded Caps S = ASTM C617, Sulfur Caps Break Remarks: 132 The 7 day test result projects that the specified strength will likely be met at 28 days according to a typical age - strength relationship. Types of Fracture y 7-. , 2\\, ill \ A a i‘ ( : . // (A 7 — - 0 TYPE 1 TYPE 2 TYPE 3 TYPE 4 TYPE 5 TYPE 6 Mattes, Sarah I approve the document Mar 25 2010 ver 1.3c Pagel of 1 ! • S-■ T .24 : C C U6666 _N . y vs o O >3 w cn a ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ .0 o o mmmmmm w 0o d .Q w ti ° 4 a . : 2 :: 2 2 15 N 0 in 0 0 a a a a a n. n o O r ' a c o 10 . 0.. I h n. .� y A Z G. V) to d <4 A o ° o vi )r-) cn .n ° h ^ v n h h r• r• r- V C . O S ° ON ON O` ON O y ,n , n vi .n , i1 41 c = en � ^ h N V p % en en rn M M en M rn 0 U V' C 4 0 a, .0 r. ,.„ V • -- NO •'- O kn 00 NO h 0 "g R y CS C o Cr ON ON ON o a a e 0 0 C W W W W W W o ' aa. .. e: Li. W W W 10 4. �M y V 0 N N N N N N N N li 10 W 4. W W g CG H -0 v a) ,4"4-1 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O ts E ' C 0 0 au C¢. A 'F O rn N r• •O O, a P Q w U C C `r A Q -- Tt h h N VD v a u P a a` co oo 00 co a` C cc N .--74. C1 u 4., oo O+ rri O A rn p A y N N .. N U w so x 'b Cl. n c m S 4 _ m • o m II II • 7 co a V h N N h C t?. v v tf v r- \o r oo r -o c o n c W 2 "' N 0 A.. a' - 0 � a 4 v v v 4--) v) ,n �n )n V-o a¢ a 33 C - ' X p C U Ci rn co; •fl c..; 'D M N N A 4.) 0. N N N N N N N N V' ° (� v1 V O M ' Q GL 3 Q G g a G N N W M O 6� O V O y h r- h N t'- N M1 - . O v C G. 0. N C •� ° 7_, o; Q+ T O� O N .q 0 a. L. b y D 'O f" M L'j 0. ,. o O ' 0 �' G 2 8 a A v 0 w w w � o Q a. c a 000 0 � " 0. V p A V C m O LLl O ? 4+ t w m A o 2 Z W r Z o o g 5 ,� a 0 p .._ a G. Cl, 4 0. 0. n, a, m. z M w rn V Q C krs .r C Q LA . Ln ti S!i V) V7 U) VS K C z _..; v w _ Q Q to 0. .. 4f g CG U �° A° c a J a - t °d 3 'a -di H T . Ei ° t• CO Cl CO Cl W y n. y x --• _ _ Q -, -. .•. N N N N N co R is t� i0 R N O 3 o a a, a. a. a s a. a. a 3 3 3 3 a o a c o 0 0 0 .5 0 - 0 'a 'C 'c •w "C c a c ' 0 r a) s s ?> O O O V .3 o O o° O O O LA co W kp. .G C ,..q. LL. U y V F rii { -. Q (3 N rN r` Q 7 Z. tl w 7 7 M M M rn to O W 10 I.c. W li W L% W ` 21 .2 F, mi �`" e - r 1 a (. a °' ' F tncnrn vnri6in ii 11 li 8 v5 rn aw0 Z 7 n 0 o r N M V V1 \O h 00 Q -" N M V k/') 0 h 00 j 43 • t-. r, IP 5.: . _. . v w m g O cd �_ Q Q Q .' , Cfl c cli ° N C 1 111 < a • co E -es o a: r., \\\‘) ,,,,,,: v o v • O, N E a: � r < a z ° 0 h 0 O 0 O y cc" r ` v v L v w '''...i.) . U y Cj r n r, ; ,4 e ra a- c 0.c 0 0 00 15 E ° U w v 0 V _ N •-• v NI ti M o G a N G y r L v O A p er . , Q a o c' < v Q 'L` v to r ° v, v N •• U c e O a m <r v CT ' 0 o• p. 4 O N c V N M r.-; W . ` O r § rn a co ' . r-. n. U 4x p `C 5 C Q C • r`V G w ri) ° A ry U y N C? a ,^ c on v, on V a CO H E 'y o M M r•; p K e, O N N w N' ' 1:3 ea a bll 00 Ltl Jd Q ^ . N g wr N CI Q p " ~ 4 " n r ' o z N w y Cr 5.7:2 ' a v c o E Q M Q p 0 0 y °- v o �w a o C W td 0:1 0 U y . � . 1.3 ,4 Q 4 L. ri h ran r°n c c 04/ 00 c ° H . c ° Z o o ; Q i- i 5 w N cn rn T R w C P. c N C) N CP 4 N 0. 0. O v 9 c7:1 co op 7 ' `� T � O A. A. R G C C C O 0. p O 'O E c ( O O O ° O -0 C) E �.f a�.� LE Q7. y i fi r N N m O+ U a` =^ N y y LLI E"" Q M M M D W W Pe c0 r H E-• it 4 D :5., E... •..• •..• • tri. 41 a I.L! w d 0 ^ N gg 2 u n u - Cl PG u va rn c.7) Q co V N Cd 1".". E m A y O 6 O G o 0 F eu • BRAUN I NTE RTEC Letter of Transmittal Client: City of Oak Park Heights Braun Intertec Project No: SP-09 -01319 Transmittal No: 30 Date: January 08, 2010 Braun lntertec Corporation 1826 Buerkle Road Saint Paul, MN 55110 To: Eric Johnson (Email Test Results) City of Oak Park Heights 14168 Oak Park Blvd - Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 Phone: 6514394439 Fax: 6514390574 Re: Oak Park Heights City Hall, 14168 Oak Park Boulevard North, Oak Park Heights, MN This Transmittal is being Sent: For your approval As requested . X_ For your records For review 1 Information Sent J Copies 1 Reference Numbers 1 Comments/Clarification E Concrete Tests 1 Set 28 Masonry Tests 1 Set M -3 Transmittal List [ Information Sent Randy Engel (email only), Buetow & Associates, Inc. Concrete Tests (1), Masonry Tests (1) Eric Johnson (Email Test Results), City of Oak Park Heights Concrete Tests (1), Masonry Tests (1) Jim Butler (Email Only), City of Oak Park Heights Concrete Tests (1), Masonry Tests (1) ill Steve Gansmoe (Email Test Results), Jorgenson Construction, Inc. Concrete Tests (1), Masonry Tests (1) Ronn A. Winkler (Email Test Results), Winkler Structural Engineers Concrete Tests (1), Masonry Tests (1) Sent By: Cheryl A. Nelson Phone: (651) 487 -3245 Rev. 81604 • Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 BRAUN Minneapolis Laboratory Braun Intertec Corporation 1NTERTEC Phone: (851) 4874245 • i.--.7 - 94:051(1441:-;-: Masonry Test Report -.:-.;..z.,:y -...._., F....-1=1 Client: Eric Johnson (Email Test Results) Laboratory Results Reviewed By: City of Oak Park Heights 14168 Oak Park Blvd Oak Park Heights, MN, 55082 106: Project: SP-09-01319 Oak Park Heights City Hall Wayne Golembeck 14168 Oak Park Boulevard North Oak Park Heights, MN, Concrete Laboratory Supervisor PM: Sarah A. Mattes, smattes@Braunintertec.com Date of Issue: 11/18/2009 , -,7---- $ Sample ID: WO 9-002581-M1 Set No.; M-3 Supplier: On Site Mix Plant On-Site Date Cast 9/17/2009 Date Received: 11/17/2009 Sample Location: H to F-9 Mix Design: On-Site Received Age: 63 Masonry Units: Slump (in.): 9.00 8-11 No. Used: Grout Temperature (°F): Max. Curing Temperature (F): Min, Curing Temperature (F): cr . ...1: - .: :-. ..-:::: . :- . !.,:." Specimen ID Date Tested Age (Days) Avg. Width (in) Avg. Length (in) Avg. Height (in) Ultimate Load (Ibf) Compressive Strength (psi) M-3'.1 11118(2009 62 3.62 3.63 ' 6.70 59060 4510 M-312 11718/2009 . 62 3.54 3.52 6.39 52540 4230 94-3%3 11/1812009 62 3.59 3.58 6.54 60920 4750 • I _ Specified Strength (psi): 3000 at 28 Days ' I Notes : . : - :*::, 1 5-4 . , ., - ':::4:: : : 1 5 . ":, , T.Z .. .;'2 : :: : ;-$ . -:, :i . :: :: : :: - 0 - ::- ,-: : : :...* : =Vi:4 RentittliCt SaMPled sit Polled — — - - - — - ' . . The semptes meet the specifiee strength requirements. Form No: 1119581M 00. Report No: Ct.tw09 M2000 QES7Lab by SpectratiESTcam Page 1 of 1 • BRAUN I NTE RTEC • Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder Report Date: 1/7/10 Test Method: ASTM C39, 4x8 Cylinder LIMS WO 4: 9013490 Client: Eric Johnson (Email Test Results) Project: SP -09 -01319 City of Oak Park Heights Oak Park Heights City Hall 14168 Oak Park Blvd 14168 Oak Park Boulevard North Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 Oak Park Heights, MN Field Test Conditions and Results ASTM C31* Set Number: 28 Mix Design: P4297 Date Cast: 11/24/09 Supplier: Cemstone Time Cast: 8:30 am Specified Air ( %): Not Required Date Received: 11/25/09 Specified Strength (psi): 4,000 Measured Slump (in.): (ASTM C143) 5 3/4 Truck Number: 756 Measured Air ( %): (ASTM C231) 2.2 Ticket Number: 2403550 Concrete Temp. ( °F): (ASTM C 1064) 64 Cylinders per Set: 5 Air Temp. (°F): 45 Cylinders Cast By: Brown, Sean Liquid Added On Site: None Placement Location: Building Interior, Precast Topping, Grid locations: A to .1 - 1 to 8. E to H - 8 to 9. Sample Location/Notes: H -9. Compression Test Results Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder Break Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture Capping Remarks Sample No. Date (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in) (sq. in.) (psi) Type Method** Code(s) • 28-01 12/1109 1 6 7 47,630 4.01 12.63 3,770 1 N B2 28-02 12/22/09 1 27 28 72,550 4.00 12.57 5,770 1 N E I 28-03 12/22/09 1 27 28 71,060 4.00 12.57 5,650 5 N E l 28-04 12/22/09 1 27 28 73,140 4.00 12.57 5,820 2 N El * Concrete sampled in accordance with ASTM C 172 * * Capping Method: N = ASTM C1231, Unbonded Caps S = ASTM C6 17, Sulfur Caps . Break Remarks: B2 The 7 day test result projects that the specified strength will likely be met at 28 days according to a typical . age- strength relationship. El The average 28 day test result meets or exceeds the specified strength. Types of Fracture - It \ ,. .c.a,l�. ligveL TYPE 1 TYPE 2 TYPE 3 TYPE 4 TYPE 5 TYPE 6 Mattes, Sarah I approve the document Jan 07 2010 • vet 1.3c Page 1 or 1 BRAUN • , NTE RTEC Letter of Transmittal Client: City of Oak Park Heights Braun Intertec Project No: SP -09 -01319 Transmittal No: 29 Date: December 29, 2009 Braun Intertec Corporation 1826 Buerkle Road Saint Paul, MN 55110 To: Eric Johnson (Email Test Results) City of Oak Park Heights 14168 Oak Park Blvd Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 Phone: 6514394439 Fax: 6514390574 Re: Oak Park Heights City Hall, 14168 Oak Park Boulevard North, Oak Park Heights, MN This Transmittal is being Sent: For your approval As requested _X._ For your records For review [information Sent J Copies 1 Reference Numbers I Comments/Clarification 1 Concrete Tests 1 Set 26 -27 Transmittal List j Information Sent Randy Engel (email only), Buetow & Associates, Inc. Concrete Tests (1) Eric Johnson (Email Test Results), City of Oak Park Heights Concrete Tests (1) JIm Butler (Email Only), City of Oak Park Heights Concrete Tests (1) • Steve Gansmoe (Email Test Results), Jorgenson Construction, Inc. Concrete Tests (1) Ronn A. Winkler (Email Test Results), Winkler Structural Engineers Concrete Tests (1) Sent By: Cheryl A. Nelson Phone: (651) 487 -3245 Rev. • Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 B RAU N 1NTERTEC ill Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder Report Date: 12/17/09 Test Method: ASTM C39, 4x8 Cylinder LIMS WO #: 4013010 Client: Eric Johnson (Email Test Results) Project: SP -09 -01319 City of Oak Park Heights Oak Park Heights City Hall 14168 Oak Park Blvd 14168 Oak Park Boulevard North Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 Oak Park Heights, MN Field Test Conditions and Results ASTM C31* Set Number: 26 Mix Design: 3067 Date Cast: 11/13/09 Supplier: Cemstone Time Cast: 12:00 pm Specified Air ( %): Not Required Date Received: 11/16/09 Specified Strength (psi): 3,000 Measured Slump (in.): (ASTM C143) 4 Truck Number: 663 Measured Air ( %): (ASTM C231) 2.6 Ticket Number: 02398714 Concrete Temp. ( °F): (ASTM C 1064) 68 Cylinders per Set: 4 Air T Cylinders Cast By: Gutzke, Scott R. Liquid Added On Site: None Placement Location: Building Interior, Footing, O'N to 42'N - 0'W to 87W of the N.E. public works garage building comer. Sample Location/Notes: 5'W - O'N of the N.W. building corner Compression Test Results Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder Break Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture Capping Remarks Sample No. Date . (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in.) (sq. in.) (psi) Type Method ** Code(s) • 26-01 11/20/09 3 4 7 40,010 4.01 12.63 3,170 2 N D2 26 -02 12/11/09 3 25 28 68,170 4.00 12.57 5,420 1 N E1 26-03 12/11/09 3 25 28 71,040 4.00 12.57 5,650 l N E1 * Concrete sampled in accordance with ASTM C172 * * Capping Method: N = ASTM C1231, Unhanded Caps S = ASTM C617, Sulfur Caps Break Remarks: . D2 The 7 day test result meets or exceeds the 28 day specified strength. El The average 28 day test result meets or exceeds the specified strength. Types of Fracture T I X s/ Pli TYPE 1 TYPE 2 TYPE 3 TYPE 4 TYPE 5 TYPE 6 Mattes, Sarah 1 approve the document Dec 17 2009 ill ver 1.3c Page 1of1 BRAUN INTERTEC Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder Report Date: 12/17/09 P 1; Y LIMS WO #: 9013030 Test Method: ASTM C39, 4x8 Cylinder Client: Eric Johnson (Email Test Results) Project: SP -09 -01319 City of Oak Park Heights Oak Park Heights City Hall 1 4 16 8 Oak 14168 Oak Park Boulevard North ak Par k Blvd Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 Oak Park Heights, MN � B Field Test Conditions and Results ASTM C31* Set Number: 27 Mix Design: 4066 Date Cast: 11/13109 Supplier: Cemstone Time Cast: 12:40 pm Specified Air ( %): 6.0 +1- 1.5 Date Received: 11/16/09 Specified Strength (psi): 4,000 Measured Slump (in.): (ASTM C143) 3 Truck Number: 806 Measured Air ( %): (ASTM C231) 6.0 Ticket Number: 02398682 Concrete Temp. (°F): (ASTM C 1064) 68 Cylinders per Set: 4 Air Temp. (°F): 45 Cylinders Cast By: Gutzke, Scott R. Liquid Added On Site: None Placement Location: Building Exterior, Column, grid 9 -C.2 and 9.1 -D.5 Sample Location/Notes: 9 -C.2 Compression Test Results Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder Break Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture Capping Remarks Sample No. Date (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in.) (sq. in.) (psi) Type Method ** Code(s) • 27-01 11/20/09 3 4 7 47,630 4.01 12,63 3,770 1 N 82 27-02 12/11/09 3 25 28 72,710 4.00 12.57 5,790 1 N E1 27-03 12/11/09 3 25 28 70,190 4.00 12.57 5,590 1 N El * Concrete sampled in accordance with ASTM C172 ** Capping Method: N = ASTM CI 231, Untronded Caps S = ASTM C61 7, Sulfur Caps • Break Remarks: B2 The 7 day test result projects that the specified strength will likely be met at 28 days according to a typical • age- strength relationship. E1 The average 28 day test result meets or exceeds the specified strength. • Types of Fracture • N /''\ At \ 7 n 4,,,,,,,L1 TYPE 1 TYPE 2 TYPE 3 TYPE 4 TYPE 5 TYPE 6 Mattes, Sarah 1 approve the document Dec 17 2009 0 ver 1.3e Page 1 of 1 y •BRAUN 1 NTE RTEC Letter of Transmittal Client: City of Oak Park Heights Braun Intertec Project No: SP -09 -01319 Transmittal No: 28 Date: December 14, 2009 Braun Intertec Corporation 1826 Buerkle Road Saint Paul, MN 55110 To: Eric Johnson (Email Test Results) City of Oak Park Heights 14168 Oak Park Blvd - Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 Phone: 6514394439 Fax: 6514390574 Re: Oak Park Heights City Hall, 14168 Oak Park Boulevard North, Oak Park Heights, MN This Transmittal is being Sent: For your approval As requested X _ For your records For review !Information Sent 1 Copies 1 Reference Numbers 1 Comments /Clarification Concrete Tests 1 Set 22 -25 'Transmittal List J Information Sent Randy Engel (email only), Buetow & Associates, Inc. Concrete Tests (1) el Eric Johnson (Email Test Results), City of Oak Park Heights Concrete Tests (1) Jim Butler (Email Only), City of Oak Park Heights Concrete Tests (1) Steve Gansmoe (Email Test Results), Jorgenson Construction, Inc. Concrete Tests (1) Ronn A. Winkler (Email Test Results), Winkler Structural Engineers Concrete Tests (1) Sent By: Cheryl A. Nelson Phone: (651) 487 -3245 Re • &6 U4 • Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 • *1 < BRAUN • I NTE RTEC Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder Report Date: 12/10/09 Test Method: ASTM C39, 4x8 Cylinder L1MS WO #: 9012636 Client: Eric Johnson (Email Test Results) Project: SP -09 -01319 City of Oak Park Heights Oak Park Heights City Hall 14168 Oak Park Blvd 14168 Oak Park Boulevard North Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 Oak Park Heights, MN Field Test Conditions and Results ASTM C31* Set Number: 22 Mix Design: ROC4064 Date Cast: 11/06/09 Supplier: Cemstone Time Cast: 10:37 am Specified Air ( %): 6.0 +/- 1.5 Date Received: 11/09/09 Specified Strength (psi): 4,000 Measured Slump (in.): (ASTM C143) 3 1/4 Truck Number: 697 Measured Air ( %); (ASTM C231) 7.2 Ticket Number: 2394317 Concrete Temp. (°F): (ASTM C 1064) 74 Cylinders per Set: 4 Air Temp. (°F): 50 Cylinders Cast By: Eric Klein Liquid Added On Site: None Placement Location: Building Exterior, Slab on Grade — Stoop, Stoops and slab north of building. Sample Location/Notes: Slab Compression Test Results Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder • Break Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture Capping Remarks Sample No. Date (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in.) (sq. in.) (psi) Type Method ** Code(s) 22 -1 11/13/09 3 4 7 42,850 4.01 12.63 3,390 2 N B2 22 -2 12/4/09 3 25 28 65,970 4.00 12.57 5,250 1 N El 22 -3 12/4/09 3 25 28 65,510 4.00 12.57 5,210 1 N E 1 * Concrete sampled in accordance with ASTM CI72 ** Capping Method: N = ASTM C1231, Unbonded Caps S - ASTM C617, Sulfur Caps Break Remarks: B2 The 7 day test result projects that the specified strength will likely be met at 28 days according to a typical age - strength relationship. E 1 The average 28 day test result meets or exceeds the specified strength. Types of Fracture f 111 \ 7 /2� • TYPE 1 TYPE 2 TYPE 3 TYPE 4 TYPE 5 TYPE 6 Mattes, Sarah I approve the document Dec 10 2009 ver 1.3c Page 1 of 1 . ,Y v BRAUN • INTERTEC Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder Report Date: 12/10/09 LIMS #: Test Method: ASTM C39, 4x8 Cylinder WO 9012691 Client: Eric Johnson (Email Test Results) Project: SP -09 -01319 City of Oak Park Heights Oak Park Heights City Hall 14168 Oak Park Blvd 14168 Oak Park Boulevard North Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 Oak Park Heights, MN Field Test Conditions and Results ASTM C31* Set Number: 23 Mix Design: ROC4064 Date Cast: 11/06/09 Supplier: Cemstone Time Cast: 2:46 pm Specified Air ( %): 6.0 +/- 1.5 Date Received: 11/09/09 Specified Strength (psi): 4,000 Measured Slump (in.): (ASTM C143) 2 3/4 Truck Number: 695 Measured Air ( %): (ASTM C231) 5.9 Ticket Number: 2394689 Concrete Temp. (°F): (ASTM C 1064) 74 Cylinders per Set: 4 Air Temp. (°F): 50 Cylinders Cast By: Eric Klein Liquid Added On Site: None Placement Location: Paving, Driveway, Heated entrance slab to lower level garage. Sample Location/Notes: West end of heated slab Compression Test Results Field Lab Test Max, Cylinder Cylinder • Break Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture Capping Remarks Sample No. Date (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in.) (sq. in.) (psi) Type Method ** Code(s) 23 -1 11/13/09 3 4 7 46,910 4.01 12.63 3,710 2 N B2 23 -2 12/4/09 3 25 28 63,790 4.00 12.57 5,080 1 N El 23 -3 12/4/09 3 25 28 62,760 4.00 12.57 4,990 2 N E1 * Concrete sampled in accordance with ASTM C172 * * Capping Method: N= ASTM C1231, Unbonded Caps S = ASTM C617, Sulfur Caps Break Remarks: B2 The 7 day test result projects that the specified strength will likely be met at 28 days according to a typical age - strength relationship. E1 The average 28 day test result meets or exceeds the specified strength. Types of Fracture 1 >< T t r CAud. ' $2 ' v 6 fr } • TYPE 1 TYPE 2 TYPE 3 TYPE 4 TYPE 5 TYPE 6 Mattes, Sarah !approve the document Dec 10 2009 ver l.34 Page 1 of 1 t ',O► J BRAUN • INTERTEC Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder Report Date: 12/10/09 Test Method: ASTM C39, 4x8 Cylinder LIMS WO #: 9012942 Client: Eric Johnson (Email Test Results) Project: SP -09 -01319 City of Oak Park Heights Oak Park Heights City Hall 14168 Oak Park Blvd 14168 Oak Park Boulevard North Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 Oak Park Heights, MN Field Test Conditions and Results ASTM C31* Set Number: 24 Mix Design: 4163P Date Cast: 11/12/09 Supplier: Ccrostone Time Cast: 9:15 am Specified Air ( %): 2.0 None Date Received: 12/02/09 Specified Strength (psi): 4,000 Measured Slump (in.): (ASTM C143) 3 3/4 Truck Number: 472 Measured Air ( %): (ASTM C231) 2.2 Ticket Number: 02397619 Concrete Temp. ( °F): (ASTM C 1064) 74 Cylinders per Set: 5 Air Temp. ( °F): 40 Cylinders Cast By: Davis, Trent Liquid Added On Site: 5 GAL Water (per 7.00 cu. yds.) Placement Location: Building Interior, Slab on Grade, A -B,1 -3 Sample Location/Notes: A.I @1.2 Compression Test Results Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder Break Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture Capping Remarks • Sample No. Date (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in.) (sq. in.) (psi) Type Method ** Code(s) 24 -1 12/10/09 20 8 28 62,940 4.02 12 -69 4,960 4 N El 24 -2 12/10/09 20 8 28 62,330 4.02 12.69 4,910 2 N El 24 -3 12/10/09 20 8 28 59,370 4.02 12.69 4,680 2 N El * Concrete sampled in accordance with ASTM C172 ** Capping Method: N = ASTM C1231, Unbonded Caps S = ASTM C617, Sulfur Caps Break Remarks: El The average 28 day test result meets or exceeds the specified strength. Types of Fracture X 111 \\I r il 9,,, ID TYPE 1 TYPE 2 TYPE 3 TYPE 4 TYPE 5 TYPE 6 Mattes, Sarah I approve the document Dec 10 2009 ver 1 . 3c Page 1 of 1 BRAUN INTERTEC Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder Report Date: 12/10/09 Test Method: ASTM C39, 4x8 Cylinder UMS WO 4: 9012962 . Client: Eric Johnson (Email Test Results) Project: SP -09 -01319 City of Oak Park Heights Oak Park Heights City Hall 14168 Oak Park Blvd 14168 Oak Park Boulevard North Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 Oak Park Heights, MN Field Test Conditions and Results ASTM C31* Set Number: 25 Mix Design: 3067 Date Cast: 11/12/09 Supplier: Gemstone Time Cast: 2:20 pm Specified Air ( %): Not Required Date Received: 11/13/09 Specified Strength (psi): 3,000 Measured Slump (in.): (ASTM CI43) 2 1/2 Truck Number: 751 Measured Air ( %): (ASTM C231) L8 Ticket Number: 2398169 Concrete Temp. ( °F): (ASTM C 1064) 65 Cylinders per Set: 5 Air Temp. ( ° F): 55 Cylinders Cast By: Justin Kolander Liquid Added On Site: None Placement Location: Building Exterior, Footing, pads at C,9 and D,9, west and south side Footings west of existing garage Sample Location/Notes: grid C,9 Compression Test Results Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder Break Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture Capping Remarks Sample No. Date (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in.) (sq. in.) (psi) Type Method ** Code(s) 25 -01 11/19/09 1 6 7 31,520 4.00 12.57 2,510 1 N B2 25 -02 12/10/09 1 27 28 52,590 4.02 12.69 4,140 2 N El 25 -03 12/10/09 1 27 28 49,950 4.02 12.69 3,940 1 N El 25 -04 12/10/09 1 27 28 50,350 4.02 12.69 3,970 2 N El * Concrete sampled in accordance with ASTM C172 ** Capping Method: N = ASTM C1231, Unbonded Caps S = ASTM C617, Sulfur Caps Break Remarks: B2 The 7 day test result projects that the specified strength will likely be met at 28 days according to a typical age - strength relationship. El The average 28 day test result meets or exceeds the specified strength. Types of Fracture X ) \ 111 \ / a,� =`'l • 'TYPE 1 TYPE 2 TYPE 3 TYPE 4 TYPE 5 TYPE 6 Mattes, Sarah I approve the document Dec 10 2009 ver 1.3c Page 1 of 1 • *BRAUN 1 NTE RTEC Letter of Transmittal Client: City of Oak Park Heights Braun Intertec Project No: SP -09 -01319 Transmittal No: 27 Date: November 23, 2009 Braun Intertec Corporation 1826 Buerkle Road Saint Paul, MN 55110 To: Eric Johnson (Email Test Results) City of Oak Park Heights 14168 Oak Park Blvd Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 Phone: 6514394439 Fax: 6514390574 Re: Oak Park Heights City Hall, 14168 Oak Park Boulevard North, Oak Park Heights, MN This Transmittal is being Sent: For your approval As requested _X._ For your records For review I Information Sent 1 Copies 1 Reference Numbers [Comments/Clarification I Concrete Tests 1 Set 25 -27 'Transmittal List 1 Information Sent Randy Engel (email only), Buetow & Associates, Inc. Concrete Tests (1) • Eric Johnson (Email Test Results), City of Oak Park Heights Concrete Tests (1) Jim Butler (Email Only), City of Oak Park Heights Concrete Tests (1) Steve Gansmoe (Email Test Results), Jorgenson Construction, Inc. Concrete Tests (1) Ronn A. Winkler (Email Test Results), Winkler Structural Engineers Concrete Tests (1) Sent By: Cheryl A. Nelson • Phone: (651) 487 -3245 Rev. M 6 04 • Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 BRAUN • I NTE RTEC Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder Report Date: 11/20/09 Test Method: ASTM C39, 4x8 Cylinder LIMS WO 11: 9012962 Client: Eric Johnson (Email Test Results) Project: SP -09 -01319 City of Oak Park Heights Oak Park Heights City Hall 14168 Oak Park Blvd 14168 Oak Park Boulevard North Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 Oak Park Heights, MN Field Test Conditions and Results ASTM C31* Set Number: 25 Mix Design: 3067 Date Cast: 1 1/12/09 Supplier: Cemstone Time Cast: 2:20 pm Specified Air ( %): Not Required Date Received: 1 1/13/09 Specified Strength (psi): 3,000 Measured Slump (in.): (ASTM C143) 2 1/2 Truck Number: 75I Measured Air ( %): (ASTM C23I) 1.8 Ticket Number: 2398169 Concrete Temp. ( °F): (ASTM C 1064) 65 Cylinders per Set: 5 Air Temp. (°F): 55 Cylinders Cast By: Justin Kolander Liquid Added On Site: None Placement Location: Building Exterior, Footing, pads at C,9 and 0,9, west and south side footings west of existing garage Sample Location/Notes: grid C,9 Compression Test Results Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder Break Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture Capping Remarks • Sample No. Date (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in.) (sq. in.) (psi) Type Method ** Code(s) 25 -01 11/19/09 1 6 7 31,520 4.00 12.57 2,510 1 N B2 * Concrete sampled in accordance with ASTM C172 ** Capping Method: N = ASTM C1231, Unbonded Caps S = ASTM C617, Sulfur Caps Break Remarks: B2 The 7 day test result projects that the specified strength will likely be met at 28 days according to a typical age - strength relationship. Types of Fracture TYPE 1 TYPE 2 TYPE 3 TYPE 4 TYPE 5 TYPE 8 Mattes, Sarah I approve the document Nov 20 2009 ver 1.3c Page 1 of 1 BRAUN f NTE RTEC Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder Report Date: 11/20/09 LIMS WO #: 9013010 Test Method: ASTM C39, 4x8 Cylinder Client: Eric Johnson (Email Test Results) Project: SP -09 -01319 City of Oak Park Heights Oak Park Heights City Hall 14168 Oak Park Blvd 14168 Oak Park Boulevard North Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 Oak Park Heights, MN Field Test Conditions and Results ASTM C31* Set Number: 26 Mix Design: 3067 Date Cast: 11/13/09 Supplier Cemstone Time Cast: 12:00 pm Specified Air ( %): Not Required Date Received: 11/16/09 Specified Strength (psi): 3,000 Measured Slump (in.): (ASTM C 143) 4 Truck Number: 663 Measured Air ( %): (ASTM C231) 2.6 Ticket Number: 02398714 Concrete Temp. ( °F): (ASTM C 1064) 68 Cylinders per Set: 4 Air Temp. ( °F): 45 Cylinders Cast 13y: Gutzke, Scott R. Liquid Added On Site: None Placement Location: Building Interior, Footing, 0"N to 42'N - 0'W to 87'W of the N.E. public works garage building corner, Sample Location/Notes: 5'W - 0'N of the N. W, building corner Compression Test Results Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder Break Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture Capping Remarks • Sample No. Date (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in.) (sq. in.) (psi) Type Method ** Code(s) 26-01 11/20/09 3 4 7 40,010 4.01 12.63 3,170 2 N D2 * Concrete sampled in accordance with ASTM C 172 ** Capping Method: N= ASTM C1231, Unhanded Caps S = ASTM C617, Sulfur Caps Break Remarks: D2 The 7 day test result meets or exceeds the 28 day specified strength. Types of Fracture T M I1 N • Ge<Akei C TYPE 1 TYPE 2 TYPE 3 TYPE 4 TYPE 5 TYPE 6 Mattes, Sarah I approve the document Nov 20 2009 ver 1.3c Page 1 of 1 BRAUN NTE RTEC Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder Report Date: 11/20/09 Test Method: ASTM C39, 4x8 Cylinder LIMS WO #: 9013030 Client: Eric Johnson (Email Test Results) Project: SP -09 -01319 City of Oak Park Heights Oak Park Heights City Hall 14168 Oak Park Blvd 14168 Oak Park Boulevard North Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 Oak Park Heights, MN Field Test Conditions and Results ASTM C31* Set Number: 27 Mix Design: 4066 Date Cast: 11/13/09 Supplier: Cemstone Time Cast: 12:40 pm Specified Air ( %): 6.0 +/- 1.5 Date Received: 11/16/09 Specified Strength (psi): 4,000 Measured Slump (in.): (ASTM C143) 3 Truck Number: 806 Measured Air ( %): (ASTM C231) 6.0 Ticket Number: 02398682 Concrete Temp. ( °F): (ASTM C 1064) 68 Cylinders per Set: 4 Air Temp. (°F): 45 Cylinders Cast By: Gutzke, Scott R. Liquid Added On Site: None Placement Location: Building Exterior, Column, grid 9 -C.2 and 9.1 -D.5 Sample Location/Notes: 9 -C.2 Compression Test Results Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder • Break Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture Capping Remarks Sample No. Date (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in.) (sq. in.) (psi) Type Method " Code(s) 27 -01 11/20/09 3 4 7 47,630 4.01 12.63 3,770 1 N B2 • Concrete sampled in accordance with ASTM C 172 ** Capping Method: N = ASTM C1231, Unbonded Caps S = ASTM C617, Sulfur Caps Break Remarks: B2 The 7 day test result projects that the specified strength will likely be met at 28 days according to a typical age - strength relationship. Types of Fracture t 1 i TYPE 1 TYPE 2 TYPE 3 TYPE 4 TYPE 5 TYPE 6 Mattes, Sarah 1 approve the document Nov 20 2009 ver 1.3c Page 1 of 1 • BRAUN 1 NTE RTEC Letter of Transmittal Client: City of Oak Park Heights Braun lntertec Project No: SP -09 -01319 Transmittal No: 26 Date: November 19, 2009 Braun lntertec Corporation 1826 Buerkle Road Saint Paul, MN 55110 To: Eric Johnson (Email Test Results) City of Oak Park Heights 14168 Oak Park Blvd Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 Phone: 6514394439 Fax: 6514390574 Re: Oak Park Heights City Hall, 14168 Oak Park Boulevard North, Oak Park Heights, MN This Transmittal is being Sent: For your approval As requested For your records For review I Information Sent 1 Copies 1 Reference Numbers J Comments /Clarification Concrete Tests 1 Set 21 -23 1 Transmittal List 1 Information Sent Randy Engel (email only), Buetow & Associates, Inc. Concrete Tests (1) • Eric Johnson (Email Test Results), City of Oak Park Heights Concrete Tests (1) Jim Butler (Email Only), City of Oak Park Heights Concrete Tests (1) Steve Gansmoe (Email Test Results), Jorgenson Construction, Inc. Concrete Tests (1) Ronn A. Winkler (Email Test Results), Winkler Structural Engineers Concrete Tests (1) Sent By: Cheryl A. Nelson Phone: (651) 487 -3245 • Rev. 8 '04 • Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 BRAUN 1 NTE RTEC Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder Report Date: 11/17/09 Test Method: ASTM C39, 4x8 Cylinder LIMS WO #: 9011613 Client: Eric Johnson (Email Test Results) Project; SP -09 -01319 City of Oak Park Heights Oak Park Heights City Hall 14168 Oak Park Blvd 14168 Oak Park Boulevard North Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 Oak Park Heights, MN Field Test Conditions and Results ASTM C31* Set Number: 21 Mix Design: 4163P Date Cast: 10/19/09 Supplier: Cemstone Time Cast: 8:53 am Specified Air ( %): 1.0 Not Required Date Received: 10/26/09 Specified Strength (psi): 4,000 Measured Slump (in.): (ASTM C143) 5 Truck Number: 790 Measured Air ( %): ( ASTM C231) 3.2 Ticket Number: 2381560 Concrete Temp. ( °F): (ASTM C 1064) 71 Cylinders per Set: 4 Air Temp. ( °F): 48 Cylinders Cast By: Eric Klein Liquid Added On Site: 1 GAL HRWRA -High Range Water Reducing Admixture (per 10.00 cu. yds.) Placement Location: Building Interior, Slab on Grade, West half of lower level slab on grade. Sample Location/Notes: East side of pour Compression Test Results Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder Break Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture Capping Remarks • Sample No. Date (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in.) (sq. in.) (psi) Type Method ** Code(s) 21 -01 10/27/09 7 1 8 35,200 4.00 12.57 2,800 5 N BI 21 -02 11/16/09 7 2! 28 63,750 4.01 12,63 5,050 2 N El 21 -03 11/16/09 7 21 28 62,830 4.01 12.63 4,970 1 N EI * Concrete sampled in accordance with ASTM C172 ** Capping Method: N = ASTM C1231, Unbonded Caps S = ASTM C617, Sulfur Caps • Break Remarks: B1 The test result projects that the specified strength will likely be met at 28 days according to a typical age- strength relationship. El The average 28 day test result meets or exceeds the specified strength. Types of Fracture 1 >'' X1,1 \ / r I 5 s • TYPE 1 TYPE 2 TYPE 3 TYPE 4 TYPE 5 TYPE 6 Mattes, Sarah I approve the document Nov 17 2009 ver l.3c Page 1 of 1 • BRAUN I NTE RTEC Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder Report Date: 11/17/09 Test Method: ASTM C39, 4x8 Cylinder LIMS WO #: 9012636 Client: Eric Johnson (Email Test Results) Project: SP -09 -01319 City of Oak Park Heights Oak Park Heights City Hall 14168 Oak Park Blvd 14168 Oak Park Boulevard North Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 Oak Park Heights, MN Field Test Conditions and Results ASTM C31 Set Number: 22 Mix Design: ROC4064 Date Cast: 11/06/09 Supplier: Cemstone Time Cast: 10:37 am Specified Air ( %): 6.0 +/- 1.5 Date Received: 11/09/09 Specified Strength (psi): 4,000 Measured Slump (in.): (ASTM C143) 3 1/4 Truck Number: 697 Measured Air ( %): (ASTM C23 I) 7.2 Ticket Number: 2394317 Concrete Temp. (°F): (ASTM C 1064) 74 Cylinders per Set: 4 Air Temp. ( °F): 50 Cylinders Cast By: Eric Klein Liquid Added On Site: None Placement Location: Building Exterior, Slab on Grade -- Stoop, Stoops and slab north of building. Sample Location/Notes: Slab Compression Test Results Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder • Break Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture Capping Remarks Sample No. Date (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in.) (sq. in.) (psi) Type Method ** Code(s) 22 -1 11/13/09 3 4 7 42,850 4.01 12.63 3,390 2 N B2 * Concrete sampled in accordance with ASTM CI72 ** Capping Method: N = ASTM C 123 Unbonded Caps S = ASTM C617, Sulfur Caps Break Remarks: B2 The 7 day test retult projects that the specified strength will likely be met at 28 days according to a typical age - strength relationship. Types Fracture M,1 f 47‘ele-8 'C • TYPE 1 TYPE 2 TYPE 3 TYPE 4 TYPE 5 TYPE 6 Mattes, Sarah 1 approve the document Nov 17 2009 ver l.3c Page 1 of 1 BRAUN • I NTE RTEC Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder Report Date: 11/17/09 Test Method: ASTM C39, 4x8 Cylinder LIMS WO #: 9012691 Client: Eric Johnson (Email Test Results) Project: SP -09 -01319 City of Oak Park Heights Oak Park Heights City Hall 14168 Oak Park Blvd 14168 Oak Park Boulevard North Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 Oak Park Heights, MN Field Test Conditions and Results ASTM C3 1 * Set Number: 23 Mix Design: ROC4064 Date Cast: 11/06/09 Supplier: Cemstone Time Cast: 2:46 pin Specified Air ( %): 6.0 +/- 1.5 Date Received: 11/09/09 Specified Strength (psi): 4,000 Measured Slump (in.): (ASTM C143) 2 3/4 Truck Number: 695 Measured Air ( %): (ASTM C231) 5.9 Ticket Number: 2394689 Concrete Temp. ( °F): (ASTM C 1064) 74 Cylinders per Set: 4 Air Temp. ( °F): 50 Cylinders Cast By: Eric Klein Liquid Added On Site: None Placement Location: Paving, Driveway, Heated entrance slab to lower level garage. Sample Location/Notes: West end of heated slab Compression Test Results Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder Break Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture Capping Remarks Sample No. Date (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in.) (sq. in.) (psi) Type Method ** Code(s) 23 -1 11/13/09 3 4 7 46,910 4.01 12.63 3,710 2 N B2 * Concrete sampled in accordance with ASTM C172 ** Capping Method: N = ASTM C1231, Unhanded Caps S = ASTM C617, Sulfur Caps Break Remarks: 82 The 7 day test result projects that the specified strength will likely be met at 28 days according to a typical age- strength relationship. Types of Fracture 1111 • TYPE 1 TYPE 2 TYPE 3 TYPE 4 TYPE 5 TYPE 6 Mattes, Sarah 1 approve the document Nov 17 2009 ver 1.3c Page 1 011 •BRAUN 1 NTE RTEC Letter of Transmittal Client: City of Oak Park Heights Braun Intertec Project No: SP -09 -01319 Transmittal No: 25 Date: November 12, 2009 Braun Intertec Corporation 1826 Buerkle Road Saint Paul, MN 55110 To: Eric Johnson (Email Test Results) City of Oak Park Heights 14168 Oak Park Blvd Phone: 6514394439 Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 Fax: 6514390574 Re: Oak Park Heights City Hall, 14168 Oak Park Boulevard North, Oak Park Heights, MN This Transmittal is being Sent: For Y approval ap roval - As requested X_ For your records For review [Information Sent [ Copies 1 Reference Numbers Comment s /Clarification Concrete Tests 1 Set 20 Masonry Tests 1 Sample M -2 I 1 Transmittal List 1 Information Sent Randy Engel ( email only), Buetow & Associates, Inc. Concrete Tests (1), Masonry Tests (1) • g Eric Johnson (Email Test Results), City of Oak Park Heights Concrete Tests (1), Masonry Tests (1) Jim Butler (Email Only), City of Oak Park Heights Concrete Tests (1), Masonry Tests (1) Steve Gansmoe (Email Test Results), Jorgenson Construction, Inc. Concrete Tests (1), Masonry Tests (1) Ronn A. Winkler (Email Test Results), Winkler Structural Engineers Concrete Tests (1), Masonry Tests (1) Sent By: Cheryl A. Nelson Phone: (651) 487-3245 Rev. R 6.04 • Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 BRAUN • f NTE RTEC . Report Date: 11/11/09 Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder R p Test Method: ASTM C39, 4x8 Cylinder LIMS WO #: 9011177 Client: Eric Johnson (Email Test Results) Project: SP -09 -01319 City of Oak Park Heights Oak Park Heights City Hall 14168 Oak Park Blvd 14168 Oak Park Boulevard North Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 Oak Park Heights, MN Field Test Conditions and Results ASTM C31* Sei Number: 20 Mix Design: 4163P Date Cast: 10/09/09 Supplier: Cemstone Time Cast: 7:45 am Specified Air ( %): Not Required Date Received: 10/13/09 Specified Strength (psi): 4,000 Measured Slump (in.): (ASTM C143) 6 Truck Number: 744 Measured Air ( %): (ASTM C231) 2.5 Ticket Number: 2376345 Concrete Temp. ( °F): (ASTM C 1064) 68 Cylinders per Set: 4 Air Temp. (°F): 35 Cylinders Cast By: Yemberg, Jeremiah R Liquid Added On Site: 5 GAL Water (per 10.00 cu. yds.) Placement Location: Building Interior, Slab on Grade, basement slab grids E -J, 1 -8 Sample Location/Notes: J -8 Compression Test Results Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder Break Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture Capping Remarks • Sample No. Date (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in.) (sq. in.) (psi) Type Method ** Code(s) 20 -1 10/16/09 4 3 7 45,010 4.00 12.57 3,580 1 N B2 20 -2 11/6/09 4 24 28 68,250 4.01 12.63 5,400 1 N E1 20 -3 11/6/09 4 24 28 66,780 4.01 12.63 5,290 1 N E1 * Concrete sampled in accordance with ASTM C172 ** Capping Method: N = ASTM C1231, Unhanded Caps S = ASTM C617, Sulfur Caps Break Remarks: B2 The 7 day test result projects that the specified strength will likely be met at 28 days according to a typical age- strength relationship. El The average 28 day test result meets or exceeds the specified strength. Types of Fracture T PI F \ � ( wiles 1 e TYPE 1 TYPE 2 TYPE 3 TYPE 4 TYPE 5 TYPE 6 Mattes, Sarah , • I approve the document Nov 11 2009 ver 1.3c Page 1 of 1 1 R 11 N Minneapolis Laboratory Braun Intertec Corporation l T E R T E C Phone: (651) 487 -3245 MS s allt6P* 4 1 - iii:::011:WOM0,20:004N11 Masonry Test Report _.- fsueN Client: Eric Johnson (Email Test Results) Laboratory Results Reviewed By: City of Oak Park Heights Oak Park Blvd Oak Park t U Oak Park Heights, MN, 55082 Project: SP -09 -01319 Oak Park Heights City Hall Wayne Golembeck 14168 Oak Park Boulevard North Oak Park Heights, MN, Concrete Laboratory Supervisor PM: Sarah A. Mattes, smattes @Braunlntertec.com Date of Issue: 10/20/2009 Sample :aetaifs - . Sample ID: W09- 002030 -M1 Set No.: M -2 Supplier: Cemstone Plant: Childs Road Date Cast: 9/18/2009 Date Received: 9/23/2009 Sample Location: A to C-8; E -8 to 9; E to G.5-9 West Retaining Wall at A -3 to the West All From 100' to 104' Mix Design: 3498N Received Age: 5 Masonry Units: Slump (in.): 8.50 8 - 11 No. Used: Grout Temperature (°F): Max. Curing Temperature ( °F): Min, Curing Temperature ( °F): t 4 iO'S Grout - 00.0- Omens .ASTANZAT W Specimen ID Date Tested Age (Days) Avg. Width (In) A. Length (in) Avg. Height (in) Ultimate Load (Ibf) Compressive Strength (psi) 10-211 10/16/2009 28 4.03 4.03 7.26 46900 2890 M-2'2 10/16/2009 28 4.03 4.03 7.41 48670 2870 M -213 10116/2009 28 4.01 4.01 7.31 47130 2940 Avg. Compressive Strength (psi): 2900 Specified Strength (psi): 3000 at 28 Days Notes - _ : Remark .. - Sampled at project The average 28 day tests do not meet the specified strength requirements F orm No 18956.V1.00. Report No: CU:W09.002030 -M1 (c) 2000 -2008 QESTLab by SpeclraQEST.com Page 1 of 1 • BRAUN 1 NTE RTEC Letter of Transmittal Client: City of Oak Park Heights Braun Intertec Project No: SP -09 -01319 Transmittal No: 24 Date: October 29, 2009 Braun Intertec Corporation 1826 Buerkle Road Saint Paul, MN 55110 To: Eric Johnson (Email Test Results) City of Oak Park Heights 14168 Oak Park Blvd Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 Phone: 6514394439 Fax: 6514390574 Re: Oak Park Heights City Hall, 14168 Oak Park Boulevard North, Oak Park Heights, MN This Transmittal is being Sent: For your approval As requested For your records For review I Information Sent 1 Copies 1 Reference Numbers 1 Comments/Clarification Concrete Tests 1 Set 19 - -21 1 Transmittal List 1 Information Sent Randy Engel (email only), Buetow & Associates, Inc. Concrete Tests (1) • Eric Johnson (Email Test Results), City of Oak Park Heights Concrete Tests (1) Jim Butler (Email Only), City of Oak Park Heights Concrete Tests (1) Steve Gansmoe (Email Test Results), Jorgenson Construction, Inc. Concrete Tests (1) Ronn A. Winkler (Email Test Results), Winkler Structural Engineers Concrete Tests (1) Sent By: Cheryl A. Nelson . Phone: (651) 487 -3245 Rev. 8/6/04 • Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 BRAUN • INTERTEC Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder Report Date: 10/28/09 Test Method: ASTM C39, 4x8 Cylinder LIMS WO #: 9008674 Client: Eric Johnson (Email Test Results) Project: SP -09 -01319 City of Oak Park Heights Oak Park Heights City Hall 14168 Oak Park Blvd 14168 Oak Park Boulevard North Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 Oak Park Heights, MN Field Test Conditions and Results ASTM C31* Set Number: 19 Mix Design: 4066 Date Cast: 08/25/09 Supplier: Cemstone Time Cast: 12:30 pm Specified Air ( %): 6.0 +/- 1.5 Date Received: 08/26/09 Specified Strength (psi): 4,000 Measured Slump (in.): (ASTM C143) 4 Truck Number: 768 Measured Air ( %): (ASTM C231) 5.9 Ticket Number: 2346521 1 Concrete Temp. (°F): (ASTM C 1064) 72 Cylinders per Set: 4 Air Temp. (°F): 78 Cylinders Cast By: Brown, Sean Liquid Added On Site: None • Placement Location: Building Interior, Beam /Wall at grid locations: A - 1.5 to 2.9. . Sample Location/Notes: A. -1.5 Compression Test Results Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder • Break Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture Capping Remarks Sample No. Date (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in.) (sq. in.) (psi) Type Method ** Code(s) 19 -1 9/1/09 1 6 7 40,200 4.01 12.63 3,180 2 N B2 19 -2 9/22/09 1 27 28 63,170 4.01 12.63 5,000 2 N El 19 -3 9/22/09 1 27 28 62,630 4.01 12.63 4,960 2 N El * Concrete sampled in accordance with ASTM C172 ** Capping Method: N = ASTM C1231, Unhanded Caps S = ASTM C617, Sulfur Caps Break Remarks: B2 The 7 day test result projects that the specified strength will likely be met at 28 days according to a typical age - strength relationship. b 1 '1 he average 28 day test result meets or exceeds the specified strength. Types of Fracture M,J 1\7 M • TYPE 1 TYPE 2 TYPE 3 TYPE 4 TYPE 5 TYPE 6 Mattes, Sarah 1 approve the document Oct 28 2009 ver 1.3c Page 1 of 1 BRAUN 1 NTE RTEC Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder Report Date: 10/28/09 LIMS WO #: 9011177 Test Method: ASTM C39, 4x8 Cylinder Client: Eric Johnson (Email Test Results) Project: SP -09 -01319 City of Oak Park Heights Oak Park Heights City Hall 14168 Oak Park Blvd 14168 Oak Park Boulevard North Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 Oak Park Heights, MN Field Test Conditions and Results ASTM C3 1 * Set Number: 20 Mix Design: 4163P Date Cast: 10/09/09 Supplier: Cemstone Time Cast 7:45 am Specified Air ( %): Not Required Date Received: 10/13/09 Specified Strength (psi): 4,000 Measured Slump (in.): (ASTM C143) 6 Truck Number: 744 Measured Air (%); (ASTM C231) 2.5 Ticket Number: 2376345 Concrete Temp. (°F): (ASTM C 1064) 68 Cylinders per Set: 4 Air Temp. (°F): 35 Cylinders Cast By: Yernberg, Jeremiah R Liquid Added On Site: 5 GAL Water (per 10.00 cu. yds.) Placement Location: Building Interior, Slab on Grade, basement slab grids E -J, 1 -8 Sample Location/Notes: J -8 Compression Test Results Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder Break Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture Capping Remarks Sample No. Date (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in.) (sq, in.) (psi) Type Method ** Code(s) 20 -1 10/16/09 4 3 7 45,010 4.00 12.57 3,580 1 N B2 * Concrete sampled in accordance with ASTM C172 ** Capping Method: N = ASTM C1231, Unbonded Caps S = ASTM C617, Sulfur Caps Break Remarks: B2 The 7 day test result projects that the specified strength will likely be met at 28 days according to a typical age - strength relationship. Types of Fracture 1111 \ I 9.‘ — , 7 2 / a 7 r • TYPE 1 TYPE 2 TYPE 3 TYPE 4 TYPE 5 TYPE 6 Mattes, Sarah I approve the document Oct 28 2009 ver 1.3c Page 1 of 1 BRAUN • 1 NTE RTEC . e t Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder Report Date: 10/28/09 Test Method: ASTM C39, 4x8 Cylinder LIMS WO 4: 9011613 Client: Eric Johnson Email Test Results) Project: SP- 09 -013I9 ( ) j City of Oak Park Heights Oak Park Heights City Hall 14168 Oak Park Blvd 14168 Oak Park Boulevard North Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 Oak Park Heights, MN Field Test Conditions and Results ASTM C31* Set Number: 21 Mix Design: 4163P Date Cast: 10/19/09 Supplier Cemstone Time Cast: 8:53 am Specified Air ( %): 1.0 Not Required Date Received: 10/26/09 Specified Strength (psi): 4,000 Measured Slump (in.): (ASTM C143) 5 Truck Number: 790 Measured Air ( %): (ASTM C231) 3.2 Ticket Number: 2381560 Concrete Temp. ( °F): (ASTM C 1064) 71 Cylinders per Set: 4 Air Temp. (°'F): 48 Cylinders Cast By: Eric Klein Liquid Added On Site: 1 GAL HRWRA -High Range Water Reducing Admixture (per 10.00 cu. yds.) Placement Location: Building Interior, Slab on Grade, West half of lower level slab on grade. Sample Location/Notes: East side of pour Compression Test Results Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder Break Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture Capping Remarks 410 Sample No. Date (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in.) (sq. in.) (psi) Type Method ** Code(s) 21 -01 10/27/09 7 1 8 35,200 4.00 1237 2,800 5 N BI * Concrete sampled in accordance with ASTM C172 ** Capping Method: N = ASTM C1231, Unbonded Caps S = ASTM C617, Suter Caps Break Remarks: B1 The test result projects that the specified strength will likely be met at 28 days according to a typical age - strength relationship. Types of Fracture N ) \' II "1 46......,e L - 1/47,7? , (7 -- s ---- • TYPE 1 TYPE 2 TYPE 3 TYPE 4 TYPE 5 TYPE 6 Mattes, Sarah I approve the document Oct 28 2009 ver 1.3c Page 1 of 7 • BRAUN INTERTEC 0 Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder Report Date: 6/11/09 Test Method: ASTM C39, 4x8 Cylinder LIMS WO #: 9003809 Client: Eric Johnson Project: SP -09 -01319 City of Oak Park Heights Oak Park Heights City Hall 14168 Oak Park Blvd 14168 Oak Park Boulevard North Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 Oak Park Heights, MN Field Test Conditions and Results ASTM C31* Set Number: 2 Mix Design: 3067 Date Cast: 06/03/09 Supplier: Cemstone Time Cast: 1:40 pm Specified Air ( %): Not Required Date Received: 06/04/09 Specified Strength (psi): 3,000 Measured Slump (in.): (ASTM C143) 4 Truck Number: 703 Measured Air ( %): (ASTM C231) 2.3 Ticket Number: 2290080 Concrete Temp. ( °F): (ASTM C 1064) 70 Cylinders per Set: 5 Air Temp. ( °F): 70 Cylinders Cast By: Yernberg, Jeremiah R Liquid Added On Site: None Placement Location: Building Interior, Footing, B.9 -D, 1 -1.6 and J, 1 -7 Sample Location/Notes: B.9 -D, 1 -1.6 Compression Test Results Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder Break Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture Capping Remarks . Sample No. Date (days) (days) (clays) (pounds) (in.) (sq. in.) (psi) Type Method ** Code(s) 2 -1 6/10/09 1 6 7 25,050 4.01 12.63 1,980 1 N B2 * Concrete sampled in accordance with ASTM C172 * * Capping Method: N = ASTM C1231, Unbonded Caps S = ASTM C617, Sulfur Caps Break Remarks: B2 The 7 day test result projects that the specified strength will likely be met at 28 days according to a typical age - strength relationship. Types of Fracture M )\ at \ / " A - 1110:7 4 ( S TYPE 1 TYPE 2 TYPE 3 TYPE 4 TYPE 5 TYPE 6 Mattes, Sarah I approve the document Jun 11 2009 ver 1.3b BRAUN INTERTEC ill Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder Report Date: 6(12/09 LIMS WO #: 9003879 Test Method: ASTM C39, 4x8 Cylinder Client: Eric Johnson Project: SP -09 -01319 City of Oak Park Heights Oak Park Heights City Hall 14168 Oak Park Blvd 14168 Oak Park Boulevard North Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 Oak Park Heights, MN Field Test Conditions and Results ASTM C31* Set Number: 3 Mix Design: 3067 Date Cast: 06/04/09 Supplier: Cemstone Time Cast: 1:45 pm Specified Air ( %): Not Required Date Received: 06/08/09 Specified Strength (psi): 3,000 Measured Slump (in.): (ASTM C143) 3 3/4 Truck Number: 545 Measured Air ( %): (ASTM C231) 2.1 Ticket Number: 2291250 Concrete Temp. ( °F): (ASTM C 1064) 72 Cylinders per Set: 4 Air Temp. ( °F): 76 Cylinders Cast By: Brown, Sean Liquid Added On Site: None Placement Location: Building Interior, Footing, Grid locations: A to B - 1. A to C - 8. A - 3 to 8. Sample Location/Notes: B -I. Compression Test Results Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder Break Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture Capping Remarks Sample No. Date (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in.) (sq. in.) (psi) Type Method ** Code(s) • 3 -1 6/11/09 4 3 7 24,870 4.01 12.63 1,970 1 N C2 * Concrete sampled in accordance with ASTM C172 ** Capping Method: N = ASTM C1231, Unbonded Caps S = ASTM C617, Sulfur Caps Break Remarks: C2 The 7 day test result projects that the specified strength may not be met at 28 days according to a typical Y p J p g Y age- strength relationship. Types of Fracture 7 461,,,,,,A, - 711 .iztt X ^ All \ S TYPE 1 TYPE 2 TYPE 3 TYPE 4 TYPE 5 TYPE 6 Mattes, Sarah I approve the document Jun 12 2009 ver 1.3b A BRAUN INTERTEC Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder Report Date: 6/19/09 Test Method: ASTM C39, 4x8 Cylinder LIMS WO #: 9004292 Client: Eric Johnson Project: SP -09 -01319 City of Oak Park Heights Oak Park Heights City Hall 14168 Oak Park Blvd 14168 Oak Park Boulevard North Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 Oak Park Heights, MN Field Test Conditions and Results ASTM C31* Set Number: 4 Mix Design: 3067 Date Cast: 06/12/09 Supplier: Cemstone Time Cast: 2:30 pm Specified Air ( %): Not Given Date Received: 06/15/09 Specified Strength (psi): 3,000 Measured Slump (in.): (ASTM C143) 3 1/2 Truck Number: 701 Measured Air ( %): (ASTM C231) 1.7 Ticket Number: 2296988 Concrete Temp. ( °F): (ASTM C 1064) 71 Cylinders per Set: 4 Air Temp. ( °F): 70 Cylinders Cast By: Eric Klein Liquid Added On Site: None Placement Location: Building Exterior, Footing, Footings at H to J -8, H to H.5 -8 to 9, E to H -9 Sample Location/Notes: H.5 -8 Compression Test Results Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder Break Cure Cure Age Load - Diameter Area Strength Fracture Capping Remarks 0 Sample No. Date (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in.) (sq. in.) (psi) Type Method ** Code(s) 4 -1 6/19/09 3 4 7 22,530 4.01 12.63 1,780 2 N C2 * Concrete sampled in accordance with ASTM C172 ** Capping Method: N = ASTM C1231, Unbonded Caps S = ASTM C617, Sulfur Caps Break Remarks: C2 The 7 day test result projects that the specified strength may not be met at 28 days according to a typical age- strength relationship. Types of Fracture X ./N 11 \ / ,7\ G • TYPE 1 TYPE 2 TYPE 3 TYPE 4 TYPE 5 TYPE 6 Mattes, Sarah I approve the document Jun 19 2009 ver 1.3b BRAUN 411 INTERTEC • Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder Report Date: 6/23/09 • LIMS WO 4: 9004408 Test Method: ASTM C39, 4x8 Cylinder Client: Eric Johnson (Email Test Results) Project: SP -09 -01319 City of Oak Park Heights Oak Park Heights City Hall 14168 Oak Park Blvd 14168 Oak Park Boulevard North Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 Oak Park Heights, MN Field Test Conditions and Results ASTM C31* Set Number: 5 Mix Design: 4066 Date Cast: 06/16/09 Supplier: Cemstone Time Cast: 10:00 am Specified Air ( %): 6.0 +/- 1.0 Date Received: 06 /17/09 Specified Strength (psi): 4,000 Measured Slump (in.): (ASTM C143) 4 1/2 Truck Number: 702 Measured Au ( %): (ASTM C231) 7.0 Ticket Number: 2298698 Concrete Temp. ( °F): (ASTM C 1064) 68 Cylinders per Set: 4 Air Temp. (°F): 71 Cylinders Cast By: Brown, Sean Liquid Added On Site: None Placement Location: Building Interior, Foundation Wall, Grid locations: J -1 to 6. H.5 to J - 1. Sample Location/Notes: J -3. Compression Test Results Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder Break Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture Capping Remarks Saniple No. Date (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in.) (sq. in.) (psi) Type Method ** Code(s) 411 5 -1 6/23/09 1 6 7 32,230 4.01 12.63 2,550 2 N C2 * Concrete sampled in accordance with ASTM C172 ** Capping Method: N = ASTM C1231, Unhanded Caps S = ASTM C617, Sulfur Caps Break Remarks: C2 The 7 day test result projects that the specified strength may not be met at 28 days according to a typical ' age- strength relationship. Types of Fracture X >\ ill \ / n 91€2,cdotit--- 1/(4 TYPE 1 TYPE 2 TYPE 3 TYPE 4 TYPE 5 TYPE 6 Mattes, Sarah 1 approve the document Jun 23 2009 var 1.3b III 19 of 49 • BRAUN INTERTEC • Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder Report Date: 6 /29/09 Test Method: ASTM C39, 4x8 Cylinder LIMS WO #: 9004615 Client: Eric Johnson (Email Test Results) Project: SP -09 -01319 City of Oak Park Heights Oak Park Heights City Hall 14168 Oak Park Blvd 14168 Oak Park Boulevard North Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 Oak Park Heights, MN Field Test Conditions and Results ASTM C31* Set Number 6 Mix Design: 4066 Date Cast: 06/19/09 Supplier: Cemstone Time Cast: 12 :00 pm Specified Air (%): 6.0 +(- 1.5 Date Received: 06/22/09 Specified Strength (psi): 4,000 Measured Slump (in.): (ASTM C 143) 4 1/4 Truck Number: 766 Measured Air ( %): (ASTM C231) 6.7 Ticket Number: 2301677 Concrete Temp. (°F): (ASTM C 1064) 78 Cylinders per Set: 4 Air Temp. (°F): 85 Cylinders Cast By: Eric Klein Liquid Added On Site: None Placement Location: Building Exterior, Wall, Foundation wall at grid locations B.5 to 11.5 -1 Sample Location/Notes: B.5 Compression Test Results Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder Break Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture Capping Remarks Sample No. Date (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in.) (sq. in.) (psi) Type Method ** Code(s) • 6-01 6/26/09 3 4 7 35,670 4.00 12.57 2,840 2 N B2 * Concrete sampled in accordance with ASTM C172 ** Capping Method: N = ASTM C1231, Unbanded Caps S = ASTM C617, Sulfur Caps Break Remarks: B2 The 7 day test result projects that the specified strength will likely be met at 28 days according to a typical age - strength relationship. Types of Fracture \ It $' TYPE 1 TYPE 2 TYPE 3 TYPE 4 TYPE 5 TYPE 6 Mattes, Sarah I approve the document Jun 29 2009 • vat 1.3b BRAUN • INTERTEC Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder Report Date: 6/30/09 Test Method: ASTM C39, 4x8 Cylinder LIMS WO #: 9003728 Client: Eric Johnson (Email Test Results) Project: SP -09 -01319 City of Oak Park Heights Oak Park Heights City Hall 14168 Oak Park Blvd 14168 Oak Park Boulevard North Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 Oak Park Heights, MN Field Test Conditions and Results ASTM C31* Set Number: 1 Mix Design: 3067 Date Cast: 06/02/09 Supplier: Cemstone Time Cast: 2:00 pm Specified Air ( %): Not Required Date Received: 06/03/09 Specified Strength (psi): 3,000 Measured Slump (in.): (ASTM C143) 4 1/2 Truck Number: 702 Measured Air ( %): (ASTM C231) 2.4 Ticket Number: 2289071 Concrete Temp. (°F): (ASTM C 1064) 73 Cylinders per Set: 5 Air Temp. (°F): 70 Cylinders Cast By: Yernberg, Jeremiah R Liquid Added On Site: 4 GAL Water (per 3.50 cu. yds.) Placement Location: Building Interior, Footing, along grid 1, from grid F to grid J Sample Location/Notes: same Compression Test Results Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder Break Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture Capping Remarks • Sample No, Date (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in.) (sq. in.) (psi) Type Method ** Code(s) 1 -1 6/9/09 1 6 7 20,620 4.01 12.63 1,630 3 N C2 1 -2 6/30/09 1 27 28 45,460 4.01 12.63 3,600 1 N El 1 -3 6/30/09 1 27 28 44,080 4.01 12.63 3,490 2 N El 1 -4 6/30/09 1 27 28 47,350 4.01 12.63 3,750 1 N El * Concrete sampled in accordance with ASTM C 172 ** Capping Method: N = ASTM C1231, Unbonded Caps S = ASTM C617, Suter Caps Break Remarks: C2 The 7 day test result projects that the specified strength may not be met at 28 days according to a typical age - strength relationship. El The average 28 day test result meets or exceeds the specified strength. Types of Fracture // li,v%---- I X ^ '„ \ CAL. 40 TYPE 1 TYPE 2 TYPE 3 TYPE 4 TYPE 5 TYPE 6 Mattes, Sarah I approve the document Jun 30 2009 ver 1.3b BRAUN • INTERTEC Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder Report Date: 7/1/09 Test Method: ASTM C39, 4x8 Cylinder LIMS WO 4: 9003809 Client: Eric Johnson (Email Test Results) Project: SP -09 -01319 City of Oak Park Heights Oak Park Heights City Hall 14168 Oak Park Blvd 14168 Oak Park Boulevard North Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 Oak Park Heights, MN Field Test Conditions and Results ASTM C31* Set Number: 2 Mix Design: 3067 Date Cast: 06/03/09 Supplier: Cemstone Time Cast: 1:40 pm Specified Air ( %): Not Required Date Received: 06/04/09 Specified Strength (psi): 3,000 Measured Slump ( in.) : ( ASTM C143) 4 Truck Number: 703 ) Measured Air ( %): (ASTM C231) 2,3 Ticket Number: 2290080 Concrete Temp. (°F): (ASTM C 1064) 70 Cylinders per Set: 5 Air Temp, (°F): 70 Cylinders Cast By; Yernberg, Jeremiah R Liquid Added On Site: None Placement Location: Building Interior, Footing, (B.9 -D)1, (1 -I.6 B.9, 1- 1.6)D, (13.9-D)1.6 and J, 1 -7 g g ) ( Sample Location/Notes: (B.9 -D)1 Compression Test Results Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder Break Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture Capping Remarks f p Sample No. Date (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in.) (sq, in.) (psi) Type Method ** Code(s) 2-1 6/10/09 1 6 7 25,050 4.01 12.63 1,980 1 N B2 2 -2 7/1/09 1 27 28 44,520 4.02 12.69 3,510 2 N E 2 -3 7/1/09 1 27 28 50,200 4.02 12.69 3,960 1 N El 2 -4 7/1/09 1 27 28 44,320 4.02 12.69 3,490 1 N El * Concrete sampled in accordance with ASTM C172 ** — Capping Method: N = ASTM C1231, Unbonded Caps S = ASTM C617, Sulfur Caps Break Remarks: B2 The 7 day test result projects that the specified strength will likely be met at 28 days according to a typical age - strength relationship. El The average 28 day test result meets or exceeds the specified strength. Types of Fracture ' eZCA.A ' /1 ..,4 t. (17(r 0 TYPE 1 TYPE 2 TYPE 3 TYPE 4 TYPE 5 TYPE 6 Mattes, Sarah I approve the document Jul 01 2009 ver 1.34 BRAUN INTERTEC • Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder Report Date: 7/1/09 Test Method: ASTM C39, 4x8 Cylinder LIMS WO #: 9004885 Client: Eric Johnson (Email Test Results) Project: SP -09 -01319 City of Oak Park Heights Oak Park Heights City Hall 14168 Oak Park Blvd 14168 Oak Park Boulevard North Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 Oak Park Heights, MN Field Test Conditions and Results ASTM C31* Set Number: 7 Mix Design: 4066 Date Cast: 06/24/09 Supplier: Gemstone Time Cast: 1:30 pm Specified Air (%): 6.0 +/- 1.0 Date Received: 06/25/09 Specified Strength (psi): 4,000 Measured Slump (in.): (ASTM C143) 3 1/2 Truck Number 649 Measured Air ( %): (ASTM C231) 8.0 Ticket Number: Not Given Concrete Temp. (°F): (ASTM C 1064) 67 Cylinders per Set: 4 Air Temp. (°F): 80 Cylinders Cast By: Cream, Mike Liquid Added On Site: None Placement Location: Building Exterior, Wall, 8.5 to B.5 -1 for wall Sample Location/Notes: location = B1 notes: wall scope = C to E - 7 to 8 Compression Test Results Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder Break Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture Capping Remarks Sample No. Date (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in.) (sq. in.) (psi) Type Method ** Code(s) 411 7-01 7/1/09 j 6 7 30,640 4.02 12.69 2,410 1 N C2 * Concrete sampled in accordance with ASTM C172 ** Capping Method: N = ASTM C1231, Unhanded Caps S = ASTM C617, Sulfur Caps Break Remarks: C2 The 7 day test result projects that the specified strength may not be met at 28 days according to a typical age- strength relationship. • Types of Fracture 11; 1 TYPE 1 TYPE 2 TYPE 3 TYPE 4 TYPE 5 TYPE 6 Mattes, Sarah approve the document Jut 01 2009 ' � ver 1.3b BRAUN NTERTEC Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder Report Date: 7/6109 y LIMS WO #: 9003879 Test Method: ASTM C39, 4x8 Cylinder Client: Eric Johnson (Email Test Results) Project: SP -09 -01319 City of Oak Park Heights Oak Park Heights City Hall 14168 Oak Park Blvd 14168 Oak Park Boulevard North Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 Oak Park Heights, MN Field Test Conditions and Results ASTM C31* Set Number: 3 Mix Design: 3067 Date Cast: 06/04/09 Supplier: Cemstone Time Cast: 1:45 pm Specified Air ( %): Not Required Date Received: 06/08/09 Specified Strength (psi): 3,000 Measured Slump (in,): (ASTM C143) 3 3/4 Truck Number: 545 Measured Air ( %): (ASTM C231) 2.1 Ticket Number: 2291250 Concrete Temp. ( °F): (ASTM C 1064) 72 Cylinders per Set: 4 Air Temp. ( °F): 76 Cylinders Cast By: Brown, Sean Liquid Added On Site: None Placement Location: Building Interior, Footing, Grid locations: A to B - 1. A to C - 8. A - 3 to 8. Sample Location/Notes: B -1. Compression Test Results Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder Break Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture Capping Remarks 0 Sample No. Date (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in.) (sq. in.) (psi) Type Method ** Code(s) 3 -1 6/11/09 4 3 7 24,870 4.01 12.63 1,970 1 N B2 3 -2 7/2/09 4 24 28 50,420 4.01 12.63 3,990 4 N El 3 -3 7/2/09 4 24 28 49,220 4.01 12.63 3,900 2 N El * Concrete sampled in accordance with ASTM C172 ** Capping Method: N = ASTM C1231, Unbonded Caps S = ASTM C617, Sulfur Caps Break Remarks: B2 The 7 day test result projects that the specified strength will likely be met at 28 days according to a typical age - strength relationship. El The average 28 day test result meets or exceeds the specified strength. X /s\ Types of Fracture \ �� 12i/674(t-----' 1►j ► 0 TYPE 1 TYPE 2 TYPE 3 TYPE 4 TYPE 5 TYPE 6 Mattes, Sarah I approve the document Jul 06 2009 ver 1.3b 1 BRAUN INTERTEC • Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder Report Date: 7/7/09 LIMS WO #: 9005047 Test Method: ASTM C39, 4x8 Cylinder Client: Eric Johnson (Email Test Results) Project: SP -09 -01319 City of Oak Park Heights Oak Park Heights City Hall 14168 Oak Park Blvd 14168 Oak Park Boulevard North Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 Oak Park Heights, MN Field Test Conditions and Results ASTM C3 I Set Number: 8 Mix Design: 4066 Date Cast: 06/26/09 Supplier: Cemstone Time Cast: 1:40 pm Specified Air ( %): 6.0 +/- 1.5 Date Received: 06/29/09 Specified Strength (psi): 4,000 Measured Slump (in.): (ASTM C143) 5 1/4 Truck Number: 798 Measured Air (%): (ASTM C231) 6.4 Ticket Number: 2306946 Concrete Temp. (°F): (ASTM C 1064) 84 Cylinders per Set 4 Air Temp. (°F): 88 Cylinders Cast By: Davis, Trent Liquid Added On Site: None Placement Location: Building Interior, Foundation Wall, Grid locations: A to C - 8. Sample Location/Notes: C -8 Compression Test Results Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder Break Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture Capping Remarks Sample No. Date (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in.) (sq. in.) (psi) Type Method "" Code(s) • 8 -1 7/3/09 3 4 7 40,060 4.02 12.69 3,160 2 N B2 * Concrete sampled in accordance with ASTM C172 ** Capping Method: N = ASTM C1231, Unbonded Caps S = ASTM C617, Sulfur Caps Break Remarks: B2 The 7 day test result projects that the specified strength will likely be met at 28 days according to a typical age- strength relationship. Types of Fracture )\\ liv\ TYPE 1 TYPE 2 TYPE 3 TYPE 4 TYPE 5 TYPE 6 Mattes, Sarah 1 approve the document Jul 07 2009 f lo ver tab BRAUN I NTE RTEC gib Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder Report Date: 7/16/09 Test Method: ASTM C39, 4x8 Cylinder LIMS WO #: 9005377 Client: Eric Johnson (Email Test Results) Project: SP-09 -01319 City of Oak Park Heights Oak Parts Heights City Hall 14168 Oak Park Blvd 14I68 Oak Park Boulevard North Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 Oak Park Heights, MN Field Test Conditions and Results ASTM C31* Set Number: 9 Mix Design: • 4066 Date Cast: 07/02/09 Supplier: Cemstone Time Cast: 1:20 pm Specified Air (%): 6.5 +1- 1.0 Date Received: 07/07/09 Specified Strength (psi): 4,000 Measured Slump (in.): (ASTM C143) 5 Truck Number 800 Measured Air ( %): (ASTM C231) 7.0 Ticket Number 02311075 Concrete Temp. (°F): (ASTM C 1064) 78 Cylinders per Set: 4 Air Temp. (°F): 80 Cylinders Cast By: Davis, Trent Liquid Added On Site: None Placement Location: Building Exterior, Wall, Lines 0)( 7- 8),(8)(H-J),(H)(8- 9),(A)(6 -8) Sample Location/Notes: (AX7.5) Compression Test Results Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder Break Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture Capping Remarks Sample No. Date (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in.) (sq. in.) (psi) Type Method *' Code(s) 9 -1 7/9/09 5 2 7 34,710 4.01 12.63 2,750 2 N • B2 * Concrete sampled in accordance with ASTM C172 ** Capping Method: N = ASTM C1231, Unbonded Caps S ASTM C617, Sulfur Caps Break Remarks: B2 The 7 day test result projects that the specified strength will likely be met at 28 days according to a typical age - strength relationship. Types of Fracture 1 \\\ r ` t ► TYPE i TYPE 2 TYPE 3 TYPE 4 TYPE b TYPE 6 Mattes, Sarah 1 approve the document Jul 16 2009 ver 1.3b • BRAUN 1 0 NTE RTEC Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder Report Date: 7/16/09 Test Method: ASTM C39, 4x8 Cylinder LIMS WO 4: 9004292 Client: Eric Johnson (Email Test Results) Project: SP -09 -01319 City of Oak Park Heights Oak Park Heights City Hall 14168 Oak Park Blvd 14168 Oak Park Boulevard North Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 Oak Park Heights, MN Field Test Conditions and Results ASTM C31* Set Number: 4 Mix Design: 3067 Date Cast: 06/12/09 Supplier: Cemstone Time Cast: 2:30 pm Specified Air ( %): Not Given Date Received: 06/15/09 Specified Strength (psi): 3,000 Measured Slump (in.): (ASTM C143) 3 1/2 Truck Number: 701 Measured Air ( %): (ASTM C231) 1.7 Ticket Number: 2296988 Concrete Temp, ( °F): (ASTM C 1064) 71 Cylinders per Set: 4 Air Temp. ( °F): 70 Cylinders Cast By: Eric Klein Liquid Added On Site: None Placement Location: Building Exterior, Footing, Footings at H to J -8, H to H.5 -8 to 9, E to H -9 Sample Location/Notes: H.5 -8 Compression Test Results Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder • Break Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture Capping Remarks Sample No. Date (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in.) (sq. in.) (psi) Type Method ** Code(s) 4 -1 6/19/09 3 4 7 22,530 4.01 12.63 1,780 2 N C2 4 -2 7/10/09 3 25 28 45,410 4.01 12,63 3,600 2 N EI 4 -3 7/10/09 3 25 28 48,950 4,01 12.63 3,880 1 N El * Concrete sampled in accordance with ASTM C172 ** Capping Method: N = ASTM C 1231, Unbonded Caps S = ASTM C617, Sulfur Caps Break Remarks: C2 The 7 day test result projects that the specified strength may not be met at 28 days according to a typical age- strength relationship. El The average 28 day test result meets or exceeds the specified strength. Types of Fracture X /N : 0 \ 7 \ I .s --- Zilitticifes • TYPE 1 TYPE 2 TYPE 3 TYPE 4 TYPE 5 TYPE 6 Mattes, Sarah I approve the document Jul 16 2009 ver 1,3b 4. BRAUN INTERTEC Report Date: 7/28/09 e o Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder R LIMS WO #: 9004408 Test Method: ASTM C39, 4x8 Cylinder Client: Eric Johnson (Email Test Results) Project: SP -09 -01319 • . City of Oak Park Heights Oak Park Heights City Hall 14168 Oak Park Blvd 14168 Oak Park Boulevard North Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 Oak Park Heights, MN Field Test Conditions and Results ASTM C31* Set Number: 5 Mix Design: 4066 Date Cast: 06/16/09 Supplier: Cemstone Time Cast: 10:00 am Specified Air ( %): 6.0 +/- 1.0 Date Received: 06/17/09 Specified Strength (psi): 4,000 Measured Slump (in.): (ASTM C143) 4 1/2 Truck Number: 702 Measured Air ( %): (ASTM C23I) 7.0 Ticket Number: 2298698 Concrete Temp. ( °F): (ASTM C 1064) 68 Cylinders per Set: 4 Air Temp. (°F): 71 Cylinders Cast By: Brown, Sean Liquid Added On Site: None Placement Location: Building Interior, Foundation Wall, Grid locations: J - 1 to 6. H.5 to J - 1. Sample Location/Notes: J -3. Compression Test Results Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder Break Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture Capping Remarks Sample No. Date (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in.) (sq. in.) (psi) Type Method '= Code(s) 5 -01 6/23/09 1 6 7 32,230 4.01 12.63 2,550 2 N C2 5 -02 7/14/09 1 27 28 50,640 4.01 12.63 4,010 2 N E1 5 -03 7/14/09 1 27 28 50,180 4.01 12.63 3,970 2 N ZZ * Concrete sampled in accordance with ASTM C172 ** Capping Method: N= ASTM 01231, Unhanded Caps S = ASTM C617, Sulfur Caps Break Remarks: • C2 The 7 day test result projects that the specified strength may not be met at 28 days according to a typical age- strength relationship. El The average 28 day test result meets or exceeds the specified strength. ZZ The Low Break Result should be evaluated per ACI 318, Chapter 5. Types of Fracture Ian M 11\ r , 0 TYPE 1 TYPE 2 TYPE 3 TYPE 4 TYPE 5 TYPE 6 Mattes, Sarah I approve the document Jul 28 2009 ver 1.36 4 BRAUN INTERTEC Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder Report Date: 7/28/09 Test Method: ASTM C39, 4x8 Cylinder LIMS WO #: 9005919 Client: Eric Johnson (Email Test Results) Project: SP -09 -01319 City of Oak Park Heights Oak Park Heights City Hall 14168 Oak Park Blvd 14168 Oak Park Boulevard North Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 Oak Park Heights, MN Field Test Conditions and Results ASTM C31* Set Number. 12 Mix Design: 4066 Date Cast: 07/14/09 Supplier: Cemstone Time Cast: 1:10 pm Specified Air ( %): 6.0 +/- 1.5 Date Received: 07/15/09 Specified Strength (psi): 4,000 Measured Slump (in.): (ASTM C143) 5 Truck Number: 768 Measured Air ( %): (ASTM C23I) 7.0 Ticket Number 2318069 Concrete Temp. ( °F): (ASTM C 1064) 75 Cylinders per Set: 4 Air Temp. (°F): 76 Cylinders Cast By: Brown, Sean Liquid Added On Site: None Placement Location: Building Interior, Foundation Wall, Wall at grid locations.: E - 8 to 8.9. D to E - 8. C to D - 7 to 8. Sample Location/Notes: E-8. Compression Test Results Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder III Break Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture Capping Remarks Sample No. Date (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in.) (sq. in.) (psi) Type Method ** Code(s) 12 -01 7/21/09 1 6 7 35,210 4.01 12.63 2,790 2 N B2 * Concrete sampled in accordance with ASTM C172 * * Capping Method: N = ASTM C1231, Unbonded Caps S = ASTM C617, Sulfur Caps Break Remarks: B2 The 7 day test result projects that the specified strength will likely be met at 28 days according to a typical . age- strength relationship. Types of Fracture N 1 \ r 5 r n S TYPE 1 TYPE 2 TYPE 3 TYPE 4 TYPE 5 TYPE 8 Mattes, Sarah I approve the document Jul 28 2009 ver 1.3b BRAUN INTERTEC Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder Report Date:. 7/28/09 Test Method: ASTM C39, 4x8 Cylinder LIMS WO #: 9006036 Client: Eric Johnson (Email Test Results) Project: SP -09 -01319 City of Oak Park Heights Oak Park Heights City Hall 14168 Oak Park Blvd 14168 Oak Park Boulevard North Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 Oak Park Heights, MN Field Test Conditions and Results ASTM C31* Set Number: 13 Mix Design: 3067 Date Cast: 07/15/09 Supplier: Cemstone Time Cast: 1:00 pm Specified Air ( %): Not Required Date Received: 07/16/09 Specified Strength (psi): 3,000 Measured Slump (in.): (ASTM C143) 3 1/4 Truck Number: 766 Measured Air ( %): (ASTM C231) 2.1 Ticket Number: 2319163 Concrete Temp. (°F): (ASTM C 1064) 75 Cylinders per Set: 4 Air Temp. (°F): 73 Cylinders Cast By: Brown, Sean Liquid Added On Site: None Placement Location: Building Exterior, Footing, Retaining wall footing at grid locations: 45' West of A to A - 3. Column pad at grid locations: B -3. Sample Location/Notes: A -3. Compression Test Results Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder Break Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture Capping Remarks S ample No. Date (days) (clays) (days) (pounds) (in.) (sq. in.) (psi) Type Method ** Code(s) 13 -01 7/22/09 1 6 7 29,700 4.01 12.63 2,350 5 N B2 * Concrete sampled in accordance with ASTM C172 ** Capping Method: N = ASTM C1231, Unbanded Caps S = ASTM C617, Sulfur Caps Break Remarks: 132 The 7 day test result projects that the specified strength will likely be met at 28 days according to a typical age- strength relationship. Types of Fracture X / 1111 \ r r\ .52‘,,,,,,,L -- 1/R,7?/---- ---- il TYPE 1 TYPE 2 TYPE 3 TYPE 4 TYPE 5 TYPE 6 Mattes, Sarah 1 approve the document Jul 28 2009 ver 1.3b BRAUN 0 I NTE RTEC • Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder Report Date: 7/28/09 LIMS WO #: 9006038 Test Method: ASTM C39, 4x8 Cylinder Client: Eric Johnson (Email Test Results) Project: SP -09 -01319 City of Oak Park Heights Oak Park Heights City Hall 14168 Oak Park Blvd 14168 Oak Park Boulevard North Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 Oak Park Heights, MN Field Test Conditions and Results ASTM 3 Set Number: 14 Mix Design: 4066 Date Cast: 07/15/09 Supplier: Cemstone Time Cast: 1:15 pm Specified Air ( %): 6.0 +/- 1.5 Date Received: 07/16/09 Specified Strength (psi): 4,000 Measured Slump (in.): (ASTM C143) 4 Truck Number: 541 Measured Air ( %): (ASTM C231) 6.8 Ticket Number: 2319130 Cylinders per Set: 4 T Air Temp. (°F): Concrete Temp. ( °F): (ASTM C 1064) 73 Cyl Cast By: Brown, Sean Liquid Added On Site: None Placement Location: Building Interior, Foundation Wall, Grid locations: A - 1 to 1.5. Sample Location/Notes: A -1 Compression Test Results Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder Break Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture Capping Remarks S ample No. Date (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in.) (sq. in.) (psi) Type Method ** Code(s) 14 -01 7/22/09 1 6 7 38,080 4.01 12.63 3,020 2 N B2 * Concrete sampled in accordance with ASTM C172 1 * Capping Method: N = ASTM C1231, Unbonded Caps S = ASTM C617, Sulfur Caps Break Remarks: B2 The 7 day test result projects that the specified strength will likely be met at 28 days according to a typical age- strength relationship. Types of Fracture M \ r n 5?‘ eg,cioa-: — 11.,1 4 e8 --- 0 TYPE 1 TYPE 2 TYPE 3 TYPE 4 TYPE 5 TYPE 6 Mattes, Sarah I approve the document Jul 28 2009 ver 1.3b BRAUN • INTERTEC Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder Report Date: 7/30/09 Test Method: ASTM C39, 4x8 Cylinder LIMS WO #: 9004615 Client: Eric Johnson (Email Test Results) Project: SP -09 -01319 City of Oak Park Heights Oak Park Heights City Hall 14168 Oak Park Blvd 14168 Oak Park Boulevard North Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 Oak Park Heights, MN Field Test Conditions and Results ASTM C31* Set Number: 6 Mix Design: 4066 Date Cast: 06/19/09 Supplier: Cemstone Time Cast: 12:00 pm Specified Air ( %): 6.0 +/- 1.5 Date Received: 06/22/09 Specified Strength (psi): 4,000 Measured Slump (in.): (ASTM C143) 4 1/4 Truck Number: 766 Measured Air ( %): (ASTM C231) 6.7 Ticket Number: 2301677 Concrete Temp. (°F): (ASTM C 1064) 78 Cylinders per Set: 4 Air Temp. (°F): 85 Cylinders Cast By: Eric Klein Liquid Added On Site: None Placement Location: Building Exterior, Wall, Foundation wall at grid locations B.5 to H.5 -1 Sample Location/Notes: B.5 Compression Test Results Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder Break Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture Capping Remarks • Sample No. Date (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in.) (sq. in.) (psi) Type Method'* Code(s) 6 -01 6/26/09 3 4 7 35,670 4.00 12.57 2,840 2 N B2 6 -02 7/17/09 3 25 28 54,100 4.00 12.57 4,310 2 N El 6 -03 7/17/09 3 25 28 57,660 4.00 12.57 4,590 1 N El * Concrete sampled in accordance with ASTM C172 ** Capping Method: N = ASTM C1231, Unbonded Caps S = ASTM C617, Sulfur Caps Break Remarks: B2 The 7 day test result projects that the specified strength will likely be met at 28 days according to a typical age - strength relationship. El The average 28 day test result meets or exceeds the specified strength. Types of Fracture 1 ). <1 ^ at \7 71 4--- 6,,,,„,,,,,,--07.,,Ryz,----- 411 TYPE 1 TYPE 2 TYPE 3 TYPE 4 TYPE 5 TYPE 6 Mattes, Sarah I approve the document Jul 30 2009 ver 1.3c Page 1 of 1 BRAUN • I NTE RTEC Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder Report Date: 7/30/09 Test Method: ASTM C39, 4x8 Cylinder LIMS WO #: 9004885 Client: Eric Johnson (Email Test Results) Project: SP -09 -01319 City of Oak Park Heights Oak Park Heights City Hall 14168 Oak Park Blvd 14168 Oak Park Boulevard North Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 Oak Park Heights, MN Field Test Conditions and Results ASTM C31* Set Number: 7 Mix Design: 4066 Date Cast: 06/24/09 Supplier: Cemstone Time Cast: 1:30 pm Specified Air ( %): 6.0 +/- 1.0 Date Received: 06/25/09 Specified Strength (psi): 4,000 Measured Slump (in.): (ASTM C143) 3 1/2 Truck Number: 649 Measured Air ( %): (ASTM C231) 8.0 Ticket Number: Not Given Concrete Temp, ( °F): (ASTM C 1064) 67 Cylinders per Set: 4 Air Temp. ( °F): 80 Cylinders Cast By: Cremin, Mike Liquid Added On Site: None Placement Location: Building Exterior, Wall, grids A.5 to B.5 -1 Compression Test Results Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder Break Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture Capping Remarks Sample No. Date (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in.) (sq. in.) (psi) Type Method " Code(s) 7 -01 7/1/09 1 6 7 30,640 4.02 12.69 2,410 1 N C2 7 -02 7/22/09 1 27 28 52,610 4.01 12.63 4,170 1 N El 7 -03 7/22/09 1 27 28 55,770 4.01 12.63 4,420 2 N E1 * Concrete sampled in accordance with ASTM C172 ** Capping Method: N = ASTM C1231, Unbonded Caps S = ASTM C617, Sulfur Caps Break Remarks: C2 The 7 day test result projects that the specified strength may not be met at 28 days according to a typical age- strength relationship. El The average 28 day test result meets or exceeds the specified strength. Types of Fracture X /N' T I t' \ / / G L �ld( • � TYPE 1 TYPE 2 TYPE 3 TYPE 4 TYPE 5 TYPE 6 Mattes, Sarah I approve the document Jul 30 2009 ver 1,3c Page 1 of 1 BRAUN • I NTE RTEC Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder Report Date: 7/30/09 Test Method: ASTM C39, 4x8 Cylinder L1MS WO #: 9005047 Client: Eric Johnson (Email Test Results) Project: SP -09 -01319 City of Oak Park Heights Oak Park Heights City Hall 14168 Oak Park Blvd 14168 Oak Park Boulevard North Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 Oak Park Heights, MN Field Test Conditions and Results ASTM C31* Set Number: 8 Mix Design: 4066 Date Cast: 06/26/09 Supplier: Cemstone Time Cast: 1:40 pm Specified Air ( %): 6.0 +/- 1.5 Date Received: 06/29/09 Specified Strength (psi): 4,000 Measured Slump (in.): (ASTM C143) 5 1/4 Truck Number: 798 Measured Air ( %): (ASTM C231) 6.4 Ticket Number: 2306946 Concrete Temp. ( °F): (ASTM C 1064) 84 Cylinders per Set: 4 Air Temp. ( °F): 88 Cylinders Cast By: Davis, Trent Liquid Added On Site: None Placement Location: Building Interior, Foundation Wall, Grid locations: A to C - 8. Sample Location/Notes: C -8 Compression Test Results Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder • Break Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture Capping Remarks Sample No. Date (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in.) (sq. in.) (psi) Type Method ** Code(s) 8 -1 7/3/09 3 4 7 40,060 4.02 12.69 3,160 2 N B2 8 -2 7/24/09 3 25 28 57,740 4.01 12.63 4,570 2 N El 8 -3 7/24/09 3 25 28 56,890 4,01 12.63 4,500 2 N El * Concrete sampled in accordance with ASTM C172 ** Capping Method: N = ASTM C1231, Unbonded Caps S = ASTM C617, Sulfur Caps Break Remarks: B2 The 7 day test result projects that the specified strength will likely be met at 28 days according to a typical age- strength relationship, E 1 The average 28 day test result meets or exceeds the specified strength. Types of Fracture 1 /\ Pli / - 7 1 A/ aicA/L — 11Y. (17 • TYPE 1 T YPE 2 TYPE 3 TYPE 4 TYPE 5 TYPE 6 Mattes, Sarah I approve the document Jul 30 2009 ver 1,3c Page 1 of 1 BRAUN ! I NTE RTEC Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder Report Date: 7/30/09 Test Method: ASTM C39, 4x8 Cylinder LIMS WO #: 9005377 Client: Eric Johnson (Email Test Results) Project: SP -09 -01319 City of Oak Park Heights Oak Park Heights City Hall 14168 Oak Park Blvd 14168 Oak Park Boulevard North Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 Oak Park Heights, MN Field Test Conditions and Results ASTM C31* Set Number: 9 Mix Design: 4066 Date Cast: 07/02/09 Supplier: Cemstone Time Cast: 1:20 pm Specified Air ( %): 6.5 +/- 1.0 Date Received: 07/07/09 Specified Strength (psi): 4,000 Measured Slump (in.): (ASTM C143) 5 Truck Number: 800 Measured Air ( %): (ASTM C231) 7.0 Ticket Number: 02311075 Concrete Temp. ( °F): (ASTM C 1064) 78 Cylinders per Set: 4 Air Temp, (°F): 80 Cylinders Cast By: Davis, Trent Liquid Added On Site: None Placement Location: Building Exterior, Wall, Lines ( J)( 7- 8),(8)(H- J),(H)(8- 9),(A)(6 -8) Sample Location/Notes: (A)(7.5) Compression Test Results Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder lip Break Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture Capping Remarks Sample No. Date (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in.) (sq, in.) (psi) Type Method * * Code(s) 9 -1 7/9/09 5 2 7 34,710 4.01 12.63 2,750 2 N B2 9 -2 7/30/09 5 23 28 55,900 4.01 12.63 4,430 1 N EI 9 -3 7/30/09 5 23 28 54,400 4.01 12,63 4,310 2 N El Concrete sampled in accordance with ASTM C172 ** Capping Method: N = ASTM C1231, Unbonded Caps S - ASTM C617, Sulfur Caps Break Remarks: B2 The 7 day test result projects that the specified strength will likely be met at 28 days according to a typical age- strength relationship. El The average 28 day test result meets or exceeds the specified strength. Types of Fracture ia i 1 TYPE 1 TYPE 2 TYPE 3 TYPE 4 TYPE 5 TYPE 6 Mattes, Sarah 1 approve the document Jul 30 2009 ver 1.3c Page 1 011 V •. BRAUN filb INTERTEC Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder Report Date: 8/5/09 Test Method: ASTM C39, 4x8 Cylinder LIMS WO #: 9006728 Client: Eric Johnson (Email Test Results) Project: SP -09 -01319 City of Oak Park Heights Oak Park Heights City Hall 14168 Oak Park Blvd 14168 Oak Park Boulevard North Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 Oak Park Heights, MN. Field Test Conditions and Results ASTM C31* Set Number: 17 Mix Design: 3067 Date Cast: 07/28/09 Supplier: Cemstone Time Cast: 1:52 pm Specified Air ( %): Not Required Date Received: 07/29/09 Specified Strength (psi): 3,000 Measured Slump (in.): (ASTM C143) 4 Truck Number: . 766 Measured Air ( %): (ASTM C231) 2.5 Ticket Number: 2328381 Concrete Temp. (°F): (ASTM C 1064) 73 Cylinders per Set: 4 Air Temp. (°F): 78 Cylinders Cast By: Yernberg, Jeremiah R Liquid Added On Site: None Placement Location: Building Interior, Column Pad, D-5, E-5 and C -3 Sample Location/Notes: 3 -C. and 5 -D. Compression Test Results Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder S Break Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture Capping Remarks S ample No. Date (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in.) (sq. in.) (psi) Type Method ** Code(s) 17 -1 8/4/09 1 6 7 26,540 4.01 12.63 2,100 1 N 82 * Concrete sampled in accordance with ASTM C172 ** Capping Method: N = ASTM C1231, Unbonded Caps S = ASTM C617, Sulfur Caps Break Remarks: B2 The 7 day test result projects that the specified strength will likely be met at 28 days according to a typical age- strength relationship. Types of Fracture NI /\ a t \7 71 At eu...4,4_ --oid7t---- 0 TYPE 1 TYPE 2 TYPE 3 TYPE 4 TYPE 5 TYPE 6 Mattes, Sarah I approve the document Aug 05 2009 ver 1.3c Page 1 of 1 I ., • BRAUN INTERTEC Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder Report Date: 8/5/09 LIMS WO #: 9006864 Test Method: ASTM C39, 4x8 Cylinder Client: Eric Johnson (Email Test Results) Project: SP -09 -01319 City of Oak Park Heights Oak Park Heights City Hall 14168 Oak Park Blvd 14168 Oak Park Boulevard North Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 Oak Park Heights, MN Field Test Conditions and Results ASTM C31* Set Number: 18 Mix Design: 3067 Date Cast: 07/29/09 Supplier: Cemstone Time Cast: 1:30 pm Specified Air ( %): Not Required Date Received: 07/30/09 Specified Strength (psi): 3,000 Measured Slump (in.): (ASTM C143) 5 Truck Number: 544 Measured Air (%): (ASTM C231) 2.2 Ticket Number: 2329532 Concrete Temp. ( °F): (ASTM C 1064) 72 Cylinders per Set: 4 Air Temp. ( °F): 75 Cylinders Cast By: Brown, Sean Liquid Added On Site: None Placement Location: Building Interior, Footing, Grid locations: A to A.l - 3. B - 3.9 to 5. F -3. F -5.5. F -7. F.5 -8. 0-8. G -3. 1-1-2. IH-4. E -5. B -1.5. Piers at grid locations: B-4 and C -3. • Sample Location/Notes: F -3 Compression Test Results Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder Break Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture Capping Remarks Sample No. Date (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in.) (sq. in.) (psi) Type Method ** Code(s) 18 -1 8/5/09 1 6 7 24,160 4.01 12.63 1,910 3 N C2 * Concrete sampled in accordance with ASTM C172 ** Capping Method: N = ASTM 01231, Unbonded Caps S = ASTM C617, Sulfur Caps I Break Remarks: C2 The 7 day test result projects that the specified strength may not be met at 28 days according to a typical age - strength relationship. Types of Fracture 1>1 —j— 0 111\7 1 A* ei.ciat- aret TYPE 1 TYPE 2 TYPE 3 TYPE 4 TYPE 5 TYPE 6 Mattes, Sarah I approve the document Aug 05 2009 ver 1.3c Page 1 of 1 BRAUN • INTERTEC Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder Report Date: 8/7/09 Test Method: ASTM C39, 4x8 Cylinder LIMS WO II: 9005706 Client: Eric Johnson (Email Test Results) Project: SP -09 -01319 City of Oak Park Heights Oak Park Heights City Hall 14168 Oak Park Blvd 14168 Oak Park Boulevard North Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 Oak Park Heights, MN Field Test Conditions and Results ASTM C31* Set Number: 10 Mix Design: 4066 Date Cast: 07/10/09 Supplier: Cemstone Time Cast: 1:45 am Specified Air ( %): 6,5 +/- 1.5 Date Received: 07/11/09 Specified Strength (psi): 4,000 Measured Slump (in.): (ASTM C143) 4 Truck Number: 766 Measured Air ( %): (ASTM C231) 7.0 Ticket Number: 2316375 Concrete Temp. ( °F): (ASTM C 1064) 80 Cylinders per Set: 4 Air Temp. ( °F): 80 Cylinders Cast By: Cremin, Mike Liquid Added On Site: 5 GAL Water Placement Location: Building Exterior, Foundation Wall, grids A(1.1 -3)and piers at grids C7,D8 Sample Location/Notes: A1,5 Compression Test Results Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder 0 Break Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture Capping Remarks Sample No, Date (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in,) (sq. in.) (psi) Type Method ** Code(s) 10 -1 7/17/09 1 6 7 42,600 4.00 12.57 3,390 1 N B2 10 -2 8/7/09 3 25 28 61,520 4.01 12.63 4,870 2 N El 10 -3 8/7/09 3 25 28 64,480 4.01 12.63 5,110 1 N El * Concrete sampled in accordance with ASTM C172 ** Capping Method: N = ASTM C1231, Unbonded Caps S = ASTM C617, Sulfur Caps Break Remarks: B2 The 7 day test result projects that the specified strength will likely be met at 28 days according to a typical age - strength relationship. El The average 28 day test result meets or exceeds the specified strength. Types of Fracture , 1X1 2\n\r n 5-.,a,(4.,, -iiie.de- • TYPE 1 TYPE 2 TYPE 3 TYPE 4 TYPE 5 TYPE 6 Mattes, Sarah I approve the document Aug 07 2009 ver 1,3c Page 1 of 1 BRAUN • INTERTEC Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder Report Date: 8/7/09 Test Method: ASTM C39, 4x8 Cylinder LIMS WO #: 9005805 Client: Eric Johnson (Email Test Results) Project: SP -09 -01319 City of Oak Park Heights Oak Park Heights City Hall 14168 Oak Park Blvd 14168 Oak Park Boulevard North , Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 Oak Park Heights, MN Field Test Conditions and Results ASTM C31* Set Number: 11 Mix Design: 4066 Date Cast: 07/10/09 Supplier: Cemstone Time Cast: 1:45 am Specified Air ( %): 6.5 41 1,5 Date Received: 07/13/09 Specified Strength (psi): 4,000 Measured Slump (in.): (ASTM C 143) 4 Truck Number: 766 Measured Air ( %): (ASTM C231) 7,0 Ticket Number: 2316375 Concrete Temp. (°F): (ASTM C 1064) 80 Cylinders per Set: 4 Air Temp. (°F): 80 Cylinders Cast By: Cremin, Mike Liquid Added On Site: None Placement Location: Building Exterior, Foundation Wall, grisd A(1.1 -3) and piers at grids C7,D8 Sample Location/Notes: A1.5 Compression Test Results Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder 110 Break Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture Capping Remarks Sample No, Date (days) (days) (days) (pounds) } (sq. in.) (psi) Type Method ** Code(s) 11 -1 7/17/09 3 4 7 34,680 4.00 12.57 2,760 2 N B2 11 -2 8/7/09 3 25 28 52,800 4.01 12.63 4,180 2 N EI 11 -3 8/7/09 3 25 28 52,810 4.01 12,63 4,180 1 N El * Concrete sampled in accordance with ASTM C172 ** Capping Method: N = ASTM C1231, Unbonded Caps S = ASTM C617, Sulfur Caps Break Remarks: B2 The 7 day test result projects that the specified strength will likely be met at 28 days according to a typical age- strength relationship, El The average 28 day test result meets or exceeds the specified strength, Types of Fracture M /\ T r / / 1111 54 >/ � a • TYPE 1 TYPE 2 TYPE 3 TYPE 4 TYPE 5 TYPE 6 Mattes, Sarah I approve the document Aug 07 2009 ver 1.3c Page 1 of 1 BRAUN • INTERTEC Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder Report Date: 8/11/09 Test Method: ASTM C39, 4x8 Cylinder LIMS WO ii: 9005919 Client: Eric Johnson (Email Test Results) Project: SP -09 -01319 City of Oak Park Heights Oak Park Heights City Hall 14168 Oak Park Blvd 14168 Oak Park Boulevard North Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 Oak Park Heights, MN Field Test Conditions and Results ASTM C31* Set Number: 12 Mix Design: 4066 Date Cast: 07/14/09 Supplier: Cemstone I Time Cast: 1:10 pm Specified Air ( %): 6.0 +/- 1.5 Date Received: 07/15/09 Specified Strength (psi): 4,000 Measured Slump (in.): (ASTM C143) 5 Truck Number: 768 Measured Air ( %): (ASTM C231) 7.0 Ticket Number: 2318069 Concrete Temp. ( °F): (ASTM C 1064) 75 Cylinders per Set: 4 Air Temp. ( °F): 76 Cylinders Cast By: Brown, Sean Liquid Added On Site: None Placement Location: Building Interior, Foundation Wall, Wall at grid locations: E - 8 to 8.9. D to E - 8. C to D - 7 to 8. Sample Location/Notes: E -8. Compression Test Results Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder • Break Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture Capping Remarks Sample No. Date (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in.) (sq. in.) (psi) Type Method ** Code(s) 12 -01 7/21/09 1 6 7 35,210 4.01 12.63 2,790 2 N B2 12 -02 8/11/09 1 27 28 55,760 4.01 12.63 4,420 2 N El 12 -03 8/11/09 1 27 28 57,540 4,01 12.63 4,560 2 N EI * Concrete sampled in accordance with ASTM C1 72 ** Capping Method: N = ASTM C1231, Unbonded Caps S = ASTM C617, Sulfur Caps Break Remarks: B2 The 7 day test result projects that the specified strength will likely be met at 28 days according to a typical age- strength relationship, El The average 28 day test result meets or exceeds the specified strength. Types of Fracture / / \ 1 /N. al \ 5- Ii --- • TYPE 1 TYPE 2 TYPE 3 TYPE 4 TYPE 5 TYPE 6 Mattes, Sarah I approve the document Aug 11 2009 ver 1.3c Page 1 of 1 BRAUN • INTERTEC ress Com ive Strength of Concrete Cylinder Report Date: 8/11/09 h g y LIMS WO #: 9004408 Test Method: ASTM C39, 4x8 Cylinder Client: Eric Johnson (Email Test Results) Project: SP -09 -01319 City of Oak Park Heights Oak Park Heights City Hall 14168 Oak Park Blvd 14168 Oak Park Boulevard North Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 Oak Park Heights, MN Field Test Conditions and Results ASTM C31* Set Number: 5 Mix Design: 4066 Date Cast: 06/16/09 Supplier: Cemstone Time Cast: 10:00 am Specified Air ( %): 6.0 +/- 1.0 Date Received: 06/17/09 Specified Strength (psi): 4,000 Measured Slump (in.): (ASTM C143) 4 1/2 Truck Number: 702 Measured Air ( %): (ASTM C231) 7.0 Ticket Number: 2298698 Concrete Temp. ( °F): (ASTM C 1064) 68 Cylinders per Set: 4 Air Temp. ( °F): 71 Cylinders Cast By: Brown, Sean Liquid Added On Site: None Placement Location: Building Interior, Foundation Wall, Grid locations: J - 1 to 6. H.5 to J - 1. Sample Location/Notes: J -3. Compression Test Results Field e Lab Test Max Cylinder Cylinder 411 Y Y Break Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture Capping Remarks S ample No. Date (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in.) (sq. in.) (psi) Type Method ** Code(s) 5 -01 6/23/09 2 2 N C2 1 6 7 32,230 4.01 12.63 2,550 C 5 -02 7/14/09 1 27 28 50,640 4.01 12.63 4,010 2 N El 5 -03 7/14/09 1 27 28 50,180 4,01 12.63 3,970 2 N ZZ 5 -04 8/11/09 1 55 56 60,390 4.01 12.63 4,780 1 S Dl * sampled in accordance samp m acco dance with ASTM C172 ** Capping Method: N = ASTM C1231, Unhanded Caps S = ASTM C617, Sulfur Caps Break Remarks: C2 The 7 day test result projects that the specified strength may not be met at 28 days according to a typical . age- strength relationship. D 1 The test result meets or exceeds the 28 day specified strength. El The average 28 day test result meets or exceeds the specified strength. ZZ The Low Break Result should be evaluated per ACI 318, Chapter 5. Types of Fracture / ' / --.1/9/1 ' v� [>" ^ � ' a - L TYPE 1 TYPE 2 TYPE 3 TYPE 4 TYPE 5 TYPE 8 Mattes, Sarah I approve the document Aug 11 2009 ver 1.3c Page 1 of 1 BRAUN 411/ I NTE RTEC Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder Report Date: 8/12/09 Test Method: ASTM C39, 4x8 Cylinder LIMS WO #: 9006036 Client: Eric Johnson (Email Test Results) Project: SP -09 -01319 City of Oak Park Heights Oak Park Heights City Hall 14168 Oak Park Blvd 14168 Oak Park Boulevard North Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 Oak Park Heights, MN Field Test Conditions and Results ASTM C31* Set Number: 13 Mix Design: 3067 Date Cast: 07/15/09 Supplier: Cemstone Time Cast: 1:00 pm Specified Air ( %): Not Required Date Received: 07/16/09 Specified Strength (psi): 3,000 Measured Slump (in.): (ASTM C143) 3 1/4 Truck Number: 766 Measured Air ( %): (ASTM C231) 2.1 Ticket Number: 2319163 Concrete Temp. ( °F): (ASTM C 1064) 75 Cylinders per Set: 4 Air Temp. (°F): 73 Cylinders Cast By: Brown, Sean Liquid Added On Site: None Placement Location: Building Exterior, Footing, Retaining wall footing at grid locations: 45' West of A to A - 3. Column pad at grid locations: B -3, Sample Location/Notes: A -3. Compression Test Results • Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder Break Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture Capping Remarks Sample No. Date (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in.) (sq. in.) (psi) Type Method ** Code(s) 13 -01 7/22/09 1 6 7 29,700 4.01 12.63 2,350 5 N B2 13 -02 8/12/09 1 27 28 55,260 4,01 12.63 4,380 2 N El 13 -03 8/12/09 1 27 28 58,230 4,01 12.63 4,610 1 N E1 * Concrete sampled in accordance with ASTM C172 ** Capping Method: N = ASTM C1231, Unbonded Caps S = ASTM C617, Sulfur Caps Break Remarks: B2 The 7 day test result projects that the specified strength will likely be met at 28 days according to a typical age- strength relationship. El The average 28 day test result meets or exceeds the specified strength, Types of Fracture 1><1 111 \ / fl • X, TYPE 1 TYPE 2 TYPE 3 TYPE 4 TYPE 5 TYPE 6 Mattes, Sarah I approve the document Aug 12 2009 ver 1.3c Page 1 of 1 BRAUN • INTERTEC Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder Report Date: 8/12/09 LIMS WO #: 9006038 Test Method: ASTM C39, 4x8 Cylinder Client: Eric Johnson (Email Test Results) Project: SP -09 -01319 City of Oak Park Heights Oak Park Heights City Hall 14168 Oak Park Blvd 14168 Oak Park Boulevard North Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 Oak Park Heights, MN Field Test Conditions and Results ASTM C31* Set Number: 14 Mix Design: 4066 Date Cast: 07/15/09 Supplier: Cemstone Time Cast: 1:15 pm Specified Air ( %): 6.0 +/- 1.5 Date Received: 07/16/09 Specified Strength (psi): 4,000 Measured Slump (in.): (ASTM C143) 4 Truck Number: 541 Measured Air ( %): (ASTM C231) 6.8 Ticket Number: 2319130 Concrete Temp, ( °F): (ASTM C 1064) 71 Cylinders per Set: 4 Air Temp. ( °F): 73 Cylinders Cast By: Brown, Sean Liquid Added On Site: None Placement Location: Building Interior, Foundation Wall, Grid locations: A - 1 to 1.5. Sample Location/Notes: A -1 Compression Test Results Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder Break Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture Capping Remarks Sample No. Date (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in.) (sq. in.) (psi) Type Method ** Code(s) 14 -01 7/22/09 1 6 7 38,080 4.01 12.63 3,020 2 N B2 14 -02 8/12/09 1 27 28 63,350 4,01 12.63 5,020 1 N El 14 -03 8/12/09 1 27 28 59,320 4.01 12.63 4,700 2 N E 1 * Concrete sampled in accordance with ASTM C172 ** Capping Method: N = ASTM C1231, Unbonded Caps S = ASTM C617, Sulfur Caps Break Remarks: B2 The 7 day test result projects that the specified strength will likely be met at 28 days according to a typical age - strength relationship. El The average 28 day test result meets or exceeds the specified strength, Types of Fracture 1><1 X / /\ , Ill • TYPE 1 TYPE 2 TYPE 3 TYPE 4 TYPE 5 TYPE 6 Mattes, Sarah I approve the document Aug 12 2009 ver 1.3c Page 1 of 1 BRAUN • INTERTEC Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder Report Date: 8/20/09 LIMS WO #: 9006157 Test Method: ASTM C39, 4x8 Cylinder Client: Eric Johnson (Email Test Results) Project: SP -09 -01319 City of Oak Park Heights Oak Park Heights City Hall 14168 Oak Park Blvd 14168 Oak Park Boulevard North Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 Oak Park Heights, MN Field Test Conditions and Results ASTM C31* Set Number: 15 Mix Design: 4066 Date Cast: 07/17/09 Supplier: Cemstone Time Cast: 1:33 pm Specified Air ( %): 6,5 +/- I.0 Date Received: 07/20/09 Specified Strength (psi): 4,000 Measured Slump (in,): (ASTM C143) 6 1/2 Truck Number: 541 Measured Air ( %): (ASTM C231) 6,8 Ticket Number: 02321407 Concrete Temp. (°F): (ASTM C 1064) 60 Cylinders per Set: 4 Air Temp. ( °F): 58 Cylinders Cast By: Davis, Trent Liquid Added On Site: None Placement Location: Building Exterior, Foundation Wall, ( A)( 1-1. 7),( A )(1.9- 3),piers(D)(8.2),(D)(8.3) Sample Location/Notes: (A)(2) Compression Test Results Field Lab Test Max, Cylinder Cylinder Break Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture Capping Remarks lio Sample No. Date (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in.) (sq. in.) (psi) Type Method ** Code(s) 15 -1 7/24/09 3 4 7 31,050 4.01 12.63 2,460 2 N C2 15 -2 8/14/09 3 25 28 53,540 4.01 12.63 4,240 2 N El 15 -3 8/14/09 3 25 28 52,790 4.01 12.63 4,180 2 N El * Concrete sampled in accordance with ASTM C172 * * Capping Method: N= ASTM C 1231, Unbonded Caps S = ASTM C617, Sulfur Caps Break Remarks: C2 The 7 day test result projects that the specified strength may not be met at 28 days according to a typical age - strength relationship. E 1 The average 28 day test result meets or exceeds the specified strength. Types of Fracture ^ _ - 0 TYPE 1 TYPE 2 TYPE 3 TYPE 4 TYPE 5 TYPE 6 Brunstad, Tom Signed on behalf of Mattes, Sarah A. Aug 20 2009 ver 1,3c Page 1 of 1 BRAUN 0 INTERTEC Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder Report Date: 8/20/09 Test Method: ASTM C39, 4x8 Cylinder L1MS W O #: 9006460 Client: Eric Johnson (Email Test Results) Project: SP - 09 - 01319 City of Oak Park Heights Oak Park Heights City Hall 14168 Oak Park Blvd 14168 Oak Park Boulevard North Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 Oak Park Heights, MN Field Test Conditions and Results ASTM C3 1 * Set Number: 16 Mix Design: 4066 Date Cast: 07/23/09 Supplier: Cemstone Time Cast: 2:58 pm Specified Air ( %): 6,0 +/- 1.0 Date Received: 07/24/09 Specified Strength (psi): 4,000 Measured Slump (in.): (ASTM C143) 4 1/2 Truck Number: 797 Measured Air ( %): (ASTM C231) 6,8 Ticket Number: 2325447 Concrete Temp. ( °F): (ASTM C 1064) 79 Cylinders per Set: 4 Air Temp. (F): 83 Cylinders Cast 13y: Zierden, Joseph A. Liquid Added On Site; 0 GAL Water (per 6.50 cu. yds.) Placement Location: Building Interior, Wall, Entry Vestibule and Stoop From Grids D to E, South of Grid 8 Sample Location/Notes: Same Compression Test Results Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder Break Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture Capping Remarks • Sample No. Date (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in,) (sq. in.) (psi) Type Method ** Code(s) 16 -01 7/30/09 1 6 7 32,720 4.01 12.63 2,590 2 N C2 16 -02 8/20/09 1 27 28 52,340 4.01 12.63 4,140 2 N El 16 -03 8/20/09 1 27 28 52,760 4.01 12.63 4,180 2 N El * Concrete sampled in accordance with ASTM C172 * * Capping Method: N = ASTM C1231, Unbonded Caps S = ASTM C617, Sulfur Caps Break Remarks: C2 The 7 day test result projects that the specified strength may not be met at 28 days according to a typical age - strength relationship. E1 The average 28 day test result meets or exceeds the specified strength. 1 Types of Fracture , M 2 N. t Y4 \ Tivfm3 4" R itAmA gtoyi TYPE 1 TYPE 2 TYPE 3 TYPE 4 TYPE 5 TYPE 6 Brunstad, Tom Signed on behalf of Mattes, Sarah A. Aug 20 2009 ver 1.3c Page 1 of 1 BRAUN 411 INTERTEC Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder Report Date: 9/3/09 Test Method: ASTM C39, 4x8 Cylinder LIMS WO #: 9006728 Client: Eric Johnson (Email Test Results) Project: SP -09 -01319 City of Oak Park Heights Oak Park Heights City Hall 14168 Oak Park Blvd 14168 Oak Park Boulevard North Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 Oak Park Heights, MN Field Test Conditions and Results ASTM C31* Set Number: 17 Mix Design: 3067 Date Cast: 07/28/09 Supplier: Cemstone Time Cast: 1:52 pm Specified Air ( %): Not Required Date Received: 07/29/09 Specified Strength (psi): 3,000 Measured Slump (in.): (ASTM C143) 4 Truck Number: 766 Measured Air ( %): (ASTM C231) 2.5 Ticket Number: 2328381 Concrete Temp. ( °F): (ASTM C 1064) 73 Cylinders per Set: 4 Air Temp. ( °F): 78 Cylinders Cast By: Yernberg, Jeremiah R Liquid Added On Site: None Placement Location: Building Interior, Column Pad, D -5, E -5 and C -3 Sample Location/Notes: 3 -C. and 5 -D. Compression Test Results Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder Break Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture Capping Remarks ii• Sample No. Date (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in.) (sq. in.) (psi) Type Method ** Code(s) 17 -1 8/4/09 1 6 7 26,540 4.01 12.63 2,100 1 N B2 17 -2 8/25/09 1 27 28 51,280 4.01 12.63 4,060 1 N E 1 17 -3 8/25/09 1 27 28 53,880 4.01 12.63 4,270 1 N El * Concrete sampled in accordance with ASTM C172 ** Capping Method: N = ASTM C1231, Unhanded Caps S = ASTM C617, Sulfur Caps Break Remarks: B2 The 7 day test result projects that the specified strength will likely be met at 28 days according to a typical age - strength relationship. E 1 The average 28 day test result meets or exceeds the specified strength. Types of Fracture M I i!\ 7 • TYPE 1 TYPE 2 TYPE 3 TYPE 4 TYPE 5 TYPE 6 Brunstad, Tom Signed on behalf of Mattes, Sarah A. Sep 03 2009 ver 1,3c Page 1 of 1 BRAUN , 0 I NTE RTEC Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder Report Date: 9/3/09 Test Method: ASTM C39, 4x8 Cylinder LIMS WO 4: 9006864 Client: Eric Johnson (Email Test Results) Project: SP -09 -01319 City of Oak Park Heights Oak Park Heights City Hall 14168 Oak Park Blvd 14168 Oak Park Boulevard North Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 Oak Park Heights, MN Field Test Conditions and Results ASTM C31* Set Number: 18 Mix Design: 3067 Date Cast: 07/29/09 Supplier: Cemstone Time Cast: 1:30 pm Specified Air ( %): Not Required Date Received: 07/30/09 Specified Strength (psi): 3,000 Measured Slump (in.): (ASTM C143) 5 Truck Number: 544 Measured Air ( %): (ASTM C231) 2.2 Ticket Number: 2329532 Concrete Temp. ( °F): (ASTM C 1064) 72 Cylinders per Set: 4 Air Temp. (°F): 75 Cylinders Cast By: Brown, Sean Liquid Added On Site: None Placement Location: Building Interior, Footing, Grid locations: A to A.1 - 3. B - 3.9 to 5. F -3. F -5,5. F -7. F.5 -8. G -8. 0-3. H -2. H -4. E -5. B -1.5. Piers at grid locations: B-4 and C -3. Sample Location/Notes: F -3 Compression Test Results • Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder Break Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture Capping Remarks Sample No. Date (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in.) (sq. in.) (psi) Type Method ** Code(s) 18 -1 8/5/09 1 6 7 24,160 4,01 12.63 1,910 3 N C2 18 -2 8/26/09 1 27 28 47,760 4.01 12.63 3,780 2 N EI 18 -3 8/26/09 1 27 28 45,980 4.01 12.63 3,640 2 N E I * Concrete sampled in accordance with ASTM C172 ** Capping Method: N = ASTM C1231, Unbonded Caps S = ASTM C617, Sulfur Caps Break Remarks: C2 The 7 day test result projects that the specified strength may not be met at 28 days according to a typical age - strength relationship, El The average 28 day test result meets or exceeds the specified strength. Types of Fracture M 1 i '< f ' 1 p 3 9� /eh ^ 44 TYPE 1 TYPE 2 TYPE 3 TYPE 4 TYPE 5 TYPE 6 Brunstad, Torn Signed on behalf of Mattes, Sarah A. Sep 03 2009 ver 1 . 3c Paget of 1 BRAUN • I NTE RTEC Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder Report Date: 9/3/09 Test Method: ASTM C39, 4x8 Cylinder LIMS WO #: 9008674 Client: Eric Johnson (Email Test Results) Project: SP -09 -01319 City of Oak Park Heights Oak Park Heights City Hall 14168 Oak Park Blvd 14168 Oak Park Boulevard North Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 Oak Park Heights, MN Field Test Conditions and Results ASTM C31* Set Number: 19 Mix Design: 4066 Date Cast: 08/25/09 Supplier: Cemstone Time Cast: 12:30 pm Specified Air ( %): 6.0 +/- 1.5 Date Received: 08/26/09 Specified Strength (psi): 4,000 Measured Slump (in.): (ASTM C143) 4 Truck Number: 768 Measured Air ( %): (ASTM C231) 5.9 Ticket Number; 2346521 Concrete Temp. ( °F): (ASTM C 1064) 72 Cylinders per Set: 4 Air Temp. (°F): 78 Cylinders Cast By: Brown, Sean Liquid Added On Site: None Placement Location: Building Interior, Beam/Wall at grid locations: A - 1.5 to 2,9, Sample Location/Notes: A.-1.5 Compression Test Results Field Lab Test Max, Cylinder Cylinder • Break Cure Cure Age Area Strength Fracture Capping Remarks Sample No. Date (days) (days) (days) {pounds ) {in.) (sq. in.) (psi) Type Method ** Code(s) 19 -1 9/1/09 1 6 7 40,200 4.01 12.63 3,180 2 N B2 * Concrete sampled in accordance with ASTM C172 * * Capping Method: N = ASTM C1231, Unbonded Caps S = ASTM C617, Sulfur Caps Break Remarks: B2 The 7 day test result projects that the specified strength will likely be met at 28 days according to a typical age - strength relationship. • Types of Fracture 1 >1 )\ 1 \ is kg, • TYPE 1 TYPE 2 TYPE 3 TYPE 4 TYPE 5 TYPE 6 Brunstad, Tom Signed on behalf of Mattes, Sarah A. Sep 03 2009 ver 1.3c Page 1 of 1