Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2000
. . ��..... Opportunity Bonestroo,Rosene,Anderlik and Associates.Inc.is an Affirmative Action E / 9 PPortunity Bonestroo Employer and Employee Owned Rosene Principals:Otto G Bonestroo.P.E •Marvin L.Sorvala.PE.• Glenn R.Cook,P.E.• I. Robert G.Schunicht.PE.• Jerry A.Bourdon.PE. Anderlik & Senior Consultants:Robert W Rosene,PE • Joseph C Anderlik,PE.•Richard E.Turner,PE • Susan M.Eberlin.C PA. VI Associates Associate Principals:Howard A.Sanford PE.• Keith A.Gordon.2E.• Robert R. Pfefferle,P.E.• Richard W Foster.PE.•David O.Loskota.PE.• Robert C.Russek.A.I.A.•Mark A.Hanson.PE.• Engineers& Architects Michael T.Rautmann.PE.• Ted K.Field,PE • Kenneth P.Anderson.PE.•Mark R.Rolfs.P.E.• David A.Bonestroo.M.B.A.• Sidney P Williamson.PE.L.5.• Agnes M.Ring,M.B.A.• Allan Rick Schmidt,P.S. Offices:St.Paul.Sr.Cloud_Rochester and W:^mar.MN•Milwaukee.WI Website:www.bonestroo corn April 14. 2000 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Oak Park Heights 14168 Oak Park Boulevard Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 ' Re: 2000 Street Reconstruction— Village Area of Oak Park Heights BRA File No. 55-00-104 Dear Mayor and Council: Transmitted herewith is the feasibility report of the 2000 Street Reconstruction Project- Village Area. This report is an update to the Report on the 1999 Street Reconstruction Project. This summary is reviewing only' Area E from the 1999 report. The summary includes information regarding the design, updated costs and tentative assessment for the reconstruction of Area E. It is recommended that you refer to the 1999 Street Reconstruction Report for background on the project and conditions of the streets. Respectfully Submitted, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. /74.1./:.41 )444.7-vi , Karen S. Shimon, P.E. I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the Sta of Minnesota, .ell Aa . Vigd'— Dennis M. Post er, P.E. Date:April 14. 2000 Reg. No. 22011 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, MN 55113 • 651-636-4600 • Fax: 651-636-1311 Table 1 Area E Length Existing Recommended Street Name (Feet) Street Width Street Width (Feet) (Feet) Peller Avenue North (56`'' to 59°') 1350 24 28 Penrose Avenue North (56th to 59`h) 1350 22.5 28 Penfield Avenue (57th to end) 360 18 24* Penfield Avenue (Upper 56`h to 57th) 200 22 28 56`h Street North (Penrose to Peller) 370 24 28 Upper 56th Street North 220 24 28 57th Street North (Peller to Penfield) 830 24 28 58`h Street North (Stagecoach to Peller) 990 23 28 Perkins Avenue North (56th to 57th) 650 18 24* Total 6320 ( 1.2 miles) *Due to the narrow right of way on Perkins Avenue and Penfield Avenue it is recommended that these streets be widened to 24'. On each of these streets the following improvements will be made: Street Improvements • full depth recycling of the existing bituminous pavement (grinding it up to create aggregate base), • subgrade correction where necessary, • installation of concrete curb and gutter, • installation of concrete driveway aprons, • paving a 3" bituminous mixture surface, and • saw and seal bituminous wear course. Sewer Improvements • Storm sewer improvements. -, /.Sli'.,. r'C::. -?.iii...... .-Li.... O,7%i Assessments As directed by City staff. the assessments were determined by assessing 50% of the street construction costs. Attachment 3 shows the location of 80 potential assessable units. The units were determined by utilizingexistin average lot width of 75'. For example. if a Y b g g .roperty was 1-50' wide, it was broken into 2 units of 7' -ach. Table 5 shows the total assessments for each of the alternatives. Table 5 Assessments Alternative A B C D E Total Cost of $664,300 $1,051,300 $759,300 $914,300 $886,300 Project Street Construction $603,000 $990,000 $687,000 $842,000 $814,000 Cost � Assessable - \ Construction $301,500 $495,000 $343,500 $421,000 S407,000 Cost _ 4 Residential Unit $3,800 $6,200 $4,300 $5.300 $5,100 Assessment Burden on City $362,8000 $556,300 $415,800 $493,300 $479,300 Recommendations Alternative A is the least expensive, but it is not practical to build a 24' wide street with curb and gutter. When a curb is in place a driver tends to drive 2-1 from the face of the • curb. This results in the driving lane feeling very narrow with an oncoming car. In addition, parking would not be recommended on a 24' wide street. Alternative C appears to be the most feasible for the area. The 28' wide street will provide a comfortable driving lane; and when compared to the other alternatives, it will minimize the impact to the neighborhood. 5 '-')!,c,r;c, )l1: ,i7.ilP!fL1:017- l'Arch: :-1r ci(1i Ou i __ Tentative Project Schedule Receive Feasibility Report April 2000 Neighborhood Meetings May 2000 • Public Hearing/Order Plans May 2000 And Specifications Approve Plans and Specifications July 2000 Open Bids July 2000 Award Project August 2000 Construction Begins August 2000 • Substantial Construction Completed November 2000 Final Project Completion June 2001 Assessment Hearing June 2001 6 2(l li Src t Rc: ;r7slr ll0u1_ :llu,ize• �rca,),oak Par); He•ightc • AREA C ziZZ a ` .5 `" N AREA D a. a 0 0 o < a 0 a ----�_— E. 65th S,. it EVER T2R. I.. z Q. �� N W E. 64th S7. N AA C- - E. w ' c0 .---��C < C -UP.' 63rd 5_-T_N-1 m - F -�% N `�I-E_ 63rd t ST. N II w } Haac,`S STILLWATE ol; ■ ��, L( d EAST:; 622nd I ST. N ! FS u,,U O ,I - ry T Ce H o I 2 — 61st = h co �2 61st ST. N �-I _L(. -r Gist Si. CT. .�•,m� / 6Cth ST. N ,,.yQ s I I57.Ni - . 36 ,::'!60thi. Si.N.: Z z Z 1 _ > .� I�z—� UP.,59th Si.N. '' > Q Q Q W W z 0 a > 9 5T.I'N.. 59th ST. N. Z. 0 I I 1 158th® N.','m ; �. w:' z - 0 58th ST. N. II 11 1 y, c 0I' m y 57th ST. N. ® I ,la. �i Lx; \:�s ".a 0 t.; II57th N. iz� j ''•'�y a JQQE� ® °i o z - i Ii56th Z � 9� — C_ d1 l ,n a a ®® I 90 Z t, � ' w z II Ii 5th Si. N. ��� �< 7 •0 I I —J W W N ZI \ K. I�• V...—. -____ -__,',' �_ W W `"I i t I L I AREA B a E. _ BAYPORT A R EA A c 1 o p 8th S:. � •I �� AvE. \9y o � / a N. A_, m `d 7tn AREAPLUMB ST. AvT, OAK PARK HEIGHTS i: -tom' BAYPORT Stn AVE. • STREET AREAS Bonestroo Rosene OAK PARK HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA - Anderlik d ATTACHMENT 1 1JIAaeociatea COMPREHENSIVE STREET PLAN APPENDIX ALTERNATIVE C 2000 STREET RECONSTRUCTION - VILLAGE AREA PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE- 28' WIDE, NO SIDEWALK 28' F-F Street Section (500' section) Item Unit Quantity Unit Price Cost Bituminuos Removal (24') SY 1200 $1.50 $1,800.00 Excavation (31' x 2') CY 1150 5.00 5,750.00 CL. 5 gravel (8") TN 760 7.25 5,510.00 Bituminous 3" TN 260 30.00 7,800.00 Conc. C & G B618 LF 1000 7.00 7,000.00 Restoration Sod/Top Soil SY 1200 3.00 3,600.00 Conc. Driveway SY 90 34.00 3,060.00 0.00 Const. Total $34,520.00 Const. Cost per foot $69.04 10% $37,972.00 $75.94 25% $47,465.00 Cost per foot $94.93 Additional Costs Item Unit Quantity Unit Price Cost Location* Remove Landscaping LS 1 500 500.00 Block R Place Retaining Wall SF 600 16.00 9600.00 Block B Place Retaining Wall SF 600 16.00 9600.00 Block D Place Retaining Wafl SF 1200 16.00 19200.00 Block I Extend existing Wall SF 150 16.00 2400.00 Block B Tree Removal Each 3 200.00 600.00 Block A Tree Removal Each 5 200.00 1000.00 Block C Tree Removal Each 4 200.00 800.00 Block D Tree Removal Each 3 200.00 600.00 Block E Tree Removal Each 2 200.00 400.00 Block F Tree Removal Each 3 200.00 600.00 Block I Tree Removal Each 4 200.00 800.00 Block J Tree Removal Each 1 200.00 200.00 Block M Tree Removal Each 4 200.00 800.00 Block N Tree Removal Each 1 200.00 200.00 Block Q Tree Removal Each 2 200.00 400.00 Block R Tree Removal Each 3„-- 200.00 600.00 Block L Hedge Removal LF 100 3 5.00 500.00 Block J Hedge Removal LF 100 5.00 500.00 Block J Hedge Removal LF 225 5.00 1125.00 Block M trim Trees Each 1 500.00 500.00 Block K Replace Trees Each 32 250.00 8000.00 . Hydrant relocate Each 1 2000.00 2000.00 Hydrant relocate Each 1 2000.00 2000.00 Pathway construction LF 400 12.00 4800.00 Redo Storm Sewer EACH 10 0.00 0.00 Const. Total $67,725.00 10% $74,497.50 25% $93,121.88 'Block Locations are shown in Attachment 4 APPENDIX ALTERNATIVE C 2000 STREET RECONSTRUCTION-VILLAGE AREA PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE-24'PENFIELD & PERKINS 24' F-F Street Section (500'section) Item Unit Quantity Unit Price Cost Bituminuos Removal (24') SY 1200 Excavation (27'x 2') $1.50 $1,800.00 CY 1000 5.00 5,000.00 CL. 5 gravel (8") TN 725 7.25 5,256.25 Bituminous 3' TN 220 30.00 6,600.00 Conc. C & G B618 LF 1000 7.00 7,000.00 Restoration Sod/Top Soil SY 1200 Conc. Driveway SY 3.00 3,600.00 90 34.00 3,060.00 Const. Total $32,316.25 Const. Cost per foot $64.63 10% $35,547.88 Cost per foot $71.10 25% $44,434.84 Cost per foot $88.87 l 06/02/00 15:29 5 :02/02 N0:641 ii801111S1700,Rosette.Anderlik and Associates.Inc.is an Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity ' Bonestroo Employer and Employee Owned Rosene Principals:Otto C.®oneahuu•Pk.•Marvin Servals,I!E.•Glenn R.Cook,P.E.• El Robert G.SChUlllfht.PF.• Jerry A.Bourdon,PE. Anderlik & Senior Consultants:Robert W Resent,P.E..Joseph C.Anderlik,P.C.•Richard E. turner,P.E.- In Susan M.EDeriln,C.P.A. Associates A,SOelate Pflncl pal s:Muward Sanford.PF,.Keith Gordon,PF'.-Robert R.PfefrarlC.P.! - s. Richard W.Foster,PE,•f).,vldr O.Loskota,P.E.•Robert C.RUSsek.A.I.A..Mark A.hlanfon,PE. Engineers&Architects Michael T.Reutmann.P.f.•Ted K.Pleld,P.E.•Kenneth Anderson.P .•Mark R.Roll's.PE.- Davld A.Bonestroo.M.H.A.. Sidney P.Williamson,P.E.L.S.•Agnes M.Ring,M.B.A.•Allan Rick%rnmrdt,P.E. Offices:St.Paul,Si.Cloud,Rochester and Willmar,MN•Mllwaukev.WI %ttibslte:www.bonestroo.corn June 2, 2000 I Mr. Thomas M. Melena, Administrator I. City of Oak Park Heights 1„ 14168 Oak Park Blvd., P.O. Box 2007 Oak Park Heights, MN 55082-2007 '` Re: 2000 Street Reconstruction—Village Area Proposed Assessment Alternatives . Our File No. S5-00-104. ' iDear Tom: :. !I, As requested during the May 24, 2000 Village Area neighborhood meeting at Cover Park, we have analyzed various assessment alternatives for the proposed street improvements. Four different methods were calculated and are explained below and summarized in the following table (all of the following scenarios utilize the costs associated with Street Design Alternate A—24'-wide streets with no sidewalks; Assessable Construction Cost $296,700 after removing the costs associated with the bituminous „. pathway): 1. Average Lot Width of 75 feet(80 potential assessable units)—This is the method outlined in the 2000 Street Reconstruction Report. 2. Front Footage (6,535 linear feet potentially assessable = $45.40/LF) —This method assumes "front yard" footages will be assessed, side yards will not be assessed. Only those properties fronting residential streets to be improved were included. 3. Square Footage/Area (1,000,480 square feet potentially assessable ., $0.30/SF) — This method includes the total area of all parcels adjacent to residential streets being improved. 4. Existing Structures (57 potential assessable units) — This method assumes equal assessments to existing units in the Village Area regardless of parcel size. Assessment ! 1 _ 2 3 4 Alternative (Ave.Lot Width 75') (Front Footage) (Square Foots.e xis Units)._ Assessment for a "Typical" 75'-Wide, $3,710 $3,405 $3,375 $5,205* 150'-DemLot (9 all lots the sane) Very truly yours, `i` ,I, 0. BONES ROO,ROSENE,ANDERLIK&ASSOCIATES, INC. la‘94;44-d41 Dennis M. Postler, P.E. cc: Kris Danielson, Community Development Director DMP, DDH, KSS, File- BRAA r' K:1SSIS500fOd 1Wurd1Curtespundence`Cortespbnilence,OutgdinB,•LeherlleadlASSessmcnl Ahernativvs 6.2.00 doe 2335 West Highway 36• St.Paul, MN 55113 a 651-636-4600 • Fax: 651-636-1311 Oak Park Heights 2000 Street Reconstruction Plan Is it Fair? You compare the City Council's Present and Future Actions: 1995 Street Current Plan to Reconstruct 2001 Plan to Reconstruction Streets this year in the Reconstruct behind St. Croix Village Neighborhood Streets in Upper Mall Oak Park Heights Advance Public 1 year None yet Hearing Notice ? Curb and Gutter 25% Homeowner 50% Homeowner ? Assessment 75 % City 50% City Sewer Assessment 0 % Homeowner 0% Homeowner 100 % City 100 % City Street Assessment 50% Homeowner 50% City 50% City 50% Homeowner ? Additional Fees None 1.5% Administrative Fee ? Additional Expenses None New sidewalks and street widening in low traffic neighborhood imposed by City Council against neighborhood wishes. ? Basis for Size of All Homeowners Homeowners assessment Assesssment paid equally based on lot width regardless of lot ? size Average Assessment $2645 $3800 to $6200 ? Per Homeowner _ Payment Plan Interest rate based on bond rate rounded up plus 1% ? ? Is it a coincidence that the 1995 Plans affected the neighborhoods of Councilmember Jerry Turnquist and Mark Swenson? Is it a coincidence that the City went over budget in 1999, and the Administrative fee of 1.5% will help balance the budget for the year 2000? Only Councilmember David Beaudet has demanded that all neighborhoods be treated the same. Contact the Mayor and other Councilmembers to let them know what you think is fair: Mayor Dave Schaaf 439-9501 Mark Swenson 439-1479 Lynae Byrne 275-9183 Jerry Turnquist 439-1619 10 Project Questions • What size road - - 28 feet or 24 feet? • What type of gutter - - B618 or surmountable? • Construction time table - - this year or next spring? Other Programs • Desire for loan program? • Desire for special assessment financing? • Desire for pathway connections? • Acceptance of N.S.P. land acquisition offer? • What should be in Cover Park? • Desire for purchase of Johnson property? • Desire for less restricting single family zoning? CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS 14168 North 57th Street • P.O. Box 2007 • Oak Park Heights, MN 55082-2007 • Phone: 651/439-4439 • Fax: 651/439-0574 February 16, 2000 All Residents and Businesses in Lower Oak Park Heights Dear Sir/Madam: The Oak Park Heights City Council has requested that the City staff explain a potential project that we are currently investigating in the lower Oak Park Heights area. Approximately three to four years ago, the City Council authorized an engineering analysis for the reconstruction of all the remaining streets in the City of Oak Park Heights. Those were streets that had not been reconstructed or built new within the last ten years. That engineering analysis was conducted by the consulting and engineering firm of Bonestroo. Rosene. Anderlik and Associates, and showed two major areas still left to he reconstructed. That being the northeastern portion of Oak Park Heights and your neighborhood, commonly referred to as lower Oak Park Heights. That information was received and put aside pending incorporation into the capital expenditure process. In the meantime, we'have been having substantial dialogue with MnDOT concerning the land of northern lower Oak Park Heights that was acquired for the new St. Croix bridge. After considerable dialogue, reflection and engineering analysis, MnDOT realized that about 10 acres of that land would actually be available for redevelopment once the bridge is constructed. As a result, the Metropolitan Council included that parcel as part of their `Calthorpe Planning Analysis', known as the St. Croix Valley Development Design Study. The City of Oak Park Heights was aware of these studies and as a result, staff pulled together various ways in which the rest of the lower Oak Park Heights neighborhood could also benefit from that study and, in fact, possibly be able to have similar programs available to the lower Oak Park Heights area before the redevelopment of that other property were to happen. With all of the above in mind, the City staff approached the City Council in January of this year with some thoughts on the possibility of a redevelopment plan for lower Oak Park Heights. Please realize that these were preliminary investigations and because staff works for the City Council, they must first go to the City Council with this information to see if any of this makes sense. After those preliminary discussions, the City Council indicated a desire for staff to proceed with the analysis and possibilities for a - Tree City U.S.A. Residents/Businesses February 16, 2000 Page 2 redevelopment program for lower Oak Park Heights. In order to answer the questions of cost and scope of the project, the City Council authorized our engineering firm to move ahead to update their past work and to look at how this whole program could be implemented in the future. Our next step is to receive that information back from our Engineers, share that with the City Council and then to have meetings in the neighborhood with you, the residents and owners of the homes and businesses in the neighborhood, to inform you of the various options available. Once those neighborhood meetings have taken place, we wii then inform the City Council of your thoughts. We will then be able to proceed to the Planning Commission, the Park Commission and the City Council for other actions as necessary. At the same time, it has been suggested by the City Council that we consider a citizen's committee to be formed in the neighborhood to help the City continue its communication efforts. Our thoughts are that this committee will be formed from neighborhood volunteers after the public neighborhood meetings held in the area. So what are we talking about as the project for the lower Oak Park Heights area? We presently realize that the public infrastructure is in need of repair. We•know that we need new roads, curbs, gutters, stomisewer, possibly sidewalks, and pathways as Weil as potential repair of water and sewer tines. underneath these roads. Considering these infras ructure improvements, I think you can see why its important that we have an engineering analysis as to cost estimates. Then we can let you know what those costs are and then be able to evaluate various ways to be able to pay for those improvements. In addition to the above, we have ongoing dialogue with NSP to coordinate the use of the land under the power lines for park purposes. We have ongoing dialogue with the Park Commission that envisions a bridge and pathway constructed through Valley View Park connecting lower Oak Park Heights to the west side of the park area,thereby allowing access by pedestrians and bicyclists to the St. Croix Mall area. Additionally, we have dialogue occurring.with NSF for the possible construction of a northern n pathway that V+ouh be just to the south of their asii pit. At the same time, we are having dialogue with NSP that would allow for certain uses of the reclaimed ash nit area for athletic facilities and other park improvements. We also realize that there are a couple of houses in the neighborhood that are in disrepair. We are hopeful that through this process, we will be able to assist those homeowners in either major repair of their structure or help them to relocate to a good, sound home either in the neighborhood or help them rebuild on another site.in the neighborhood. In conjunction with this, the City staff is investigating ways in which low interest financing a hi s can be made available the i l to 1. their home s..^.1„ .,rry •., m_�1,, u rµiluC:1V i.0 i.hie entire lleh�.l3orllt,t)d. �0 help in �hc.i' :)'v�";1 ttC�C rC improvements. Residents/Businesses February 16, 2000 Page 3 We all realize that this is an ambitious project. it is a project with the goai of aiding the existing_neighborhood and ensuring that the people in the neighborhood benefit from the project and have ways to improve their homes and continue to live in the neighborhood. At the same time, we know there will be several lots available for construction of new homes and we want to ensure that those homes fit with the rest of the neighborhood and will provide housing that is affordable for people in the neighborhood or like neighbors. Lastly,the City realizes there are major traffic issues caused by both the State and the County through its neighborhood. The City does have, as a major goal in this redevelopment, to try to mitigate those traffic issues so that you have one neighborhood in place not divided by all the traffic currently funneled through the neighborhood. There is a Chinese proverb that states that a trip of a thousand leagues starts with the first step. We see what we are doing at this time to be the first step in what may be a long process, but a process that should allow for a better, stronger neighborhood that allows for the neighborhood to have the public infrastructure they deserve and allows for a neighborhood that can reclaim itself. We look forward to working with you. As soon as the engineering information is available, we will be sharing that information with you and asking for your direct input once we know some of the cost numbers for this program. Thank you very much for letting us talk to you and we look forward to working with you. Sincerely, ---�—� , a Thomas M. Melena City Administrator . TMM/lmk • r- 1 iii 1 Bonestroo,Rosene,Anderlik and Associates,Inc.is an Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity / Bonestroo Employer and Employee Owned Rosene Principals:Otto G Bonesvoo.P.E • Marvin L Sorvala.PE.• Glenn R.Cook,P.E.• . ,.. Robert G.Schurncht.PE.• Jerry A.Bourdon,PE. Anderlik & Senior Consultants:Robert W Rosene.PE • Joseph C Anderlik.PE•Richard E.Turner.PE il Susan M.Eberlin.C PA. Associates Associate Principals:Howard A.Sanford.PE.• Keith A.Gorden,P.E.• Robert R.Pfefferle.PE.• Richard W.Foster.PE.• David O.Loskota.PE.• Robert C.Russek.A.I.A.• Mark A.Hanson.P.E.• Engineers & Architects Michael T Rautmann,PE.• Ted (Field,PE Kennem P Anderson,PE.• Mark R.Rolfs,P.E David A.Bonestroo.M.B.A. • Sidney P Williamson.PE..L.S.• Agnes M.Ring.M.B.A.• Allan Rick Schmidt.PE. Offices:St.Paul,St.Cloud.Rochester and V./;;:mar. MN•Milwaukee,WI Website:www.bonestroo.corn April 14. 2000 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Oak Park Heights 14168 Oak Park Boulevard Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 Re: 2000 Street Reconstruction— Village Area of Oak Park Heights BRA File No. 55-00-104 Dear Mayor and Council: Transmitted herewith is the feasibility report of the 2000 Street Reconstruction Project- Village Area. This report is an update to the Report on the 1999 Street Reconstruction Project. This summary is reviewing only Area E from the 1999 report. The summary includes information regarding the design, updated costs and tentative assessment for the reconstruction of Area E. It is recommended that you refer to the 1999 Street Reconstruction Report for background on the project and conditions of the streets. Respectfully Submitted, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. 41LYI . Karen S. Shimon, P.E. I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the Stat of Minnesota. / .?X'-- Dennis M. Post , P.E. Date:April 14. 2000 Reg. No. 22011 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, MN 55113 • 651-636-4600 • Fax: 651-636-1311 2000 Street Reconstruction Village Area of Oak Park Heights City of Oak Park Heights, MN In 1993 the City of Oak Park Heights authorized the preparation of a Comprehensive Street Plan to develop a street rehabilitation program for its older streets. Attachment 1 identifies the areas that were incorporated into the rehabilitation program. The program started in 1995 with the reconstruction of Area A. A report was written in 1999 to review the feasibility of reconstructing Area D, Area E and Area B. However, this project was not approved for construction by the City Council. In 2000 the City requested an update to the 1999 report for Area E only. This summary will review five alternatives for the street widths in Area E and compare their associated costs and assessments. All background information on the conditions of the streets can be found in the 1999 report. Project Description This 2000 reconstruction project includes Area E from the original pavement management report. Attachment 2 shows that Area E lies south of Highway 36 and includes Peller Avenue, Penrose Avenue, Penfield Avenue, 58th Street, 57th Street, 56th Street and Perkins Avenue. The streets included in this project are listed below along with the length and recommended width of each street. ' 1 P7( 'fir4?_ l'f.. Y � • • Table 1 Area E Length Existing Recommended Street Name (Feet) Street Width Street Width (Feet) (Feet) Peller Avenue North (56th to 59°i) 1350 24 28 Penrose Avenue North (56th to 59`h) 1350 22.5 28 Penfield Avenue (57th to end) 360 18 24* Penfield Avenue (Upper 56th to 57`h) 200 22 28 56`h Street North (Penrose to Peller) 370 24 28 Upper 56th Street North 220 24 28 57th Street North (Peller to Penfield) 830 24 28 58th Street North (Stagecoach to Peller) 990 23 28 Perkins Avenue North (56`h to 57th) 650 18 24* Total 6320 ( 1.2 miles) *Due to the narrow right of way on Perkins Avenue and Penfield Avenue it is recommended that these streets be widened to 24'. On each of these streets the following improvements will be made: Street Improvements • full depth recycling of the existing bituminous pavement (grinding it up to create aggregate base), • subgrade correction where necessary, • installation of concrete curb and gutter, • installation of concrete driveway aprons, • paving a 3" bituminous mixture surface, and • saw and seal bituminous wear course. Sewer Improvements • Storm sewer improvements. O;.lr/'iir.S • J Attachment 2 also shows future improvements to Stagecoach Road (C.S.A.H 21), C.S.A.H. 23 and C.S.A.H. 28. It is anticipated that Stagecoach be improved with the installation of storm sewer, curb and gutter and a bituminous surface overlay. The proposed improvements for C.S.A.H. 23 and 28 will be similar to the improvements described above for Area E. The timing of these improvements depends on county participation and the possibility of turning these roadways back to the City for ownership and maintenance. Table 2 lists the lengths and recommended widths of these roads. Table 2 County Roads Street Name Length Recommended Street Width (Feet (Feet) Stagecoach (CSAH 21) 2100 28 CSAH 23 600 28 CSAH 28 400 28 Summary of Costs As requested by the City, several alternatives for the project were studied. The alternatives are as follows: A. 24' F-F*, no sidewalk B. 24' F-F, sidewalk both sides C. 28' F-F, no sidewalk, 24' F-F Penfield & Perkins D. 28' F-F, sidewalk one side E. 32' F-F, no sidewalk * F-F means from face of curb to face of curb. 3 '(:r 111 �Jl•lii. ��.. ii l'7{• 'Hon- 1 f?/ate 11.C.1 ) f),1A ? , Table 3 shows the alternatives and their associated total costs. Table 3 Total Cost for the Alternatives Street Construction Additional Costs* Storm Sewer Cost Total Cost Cost Including Contingency. Including Contingency, Including Contingencc.Legal, Legal.Eng.,Admin.,&Bond Legal,Eng..Admin.,& Eng...Admin.,&Bond Bond A. $561.700 $41,200 $61,300 $664,200 B. $822,400 $167,200 $61,300 $1,050,900 C. $593,900 $93,100 $72,300 $759,300 D. $730,300 $111,800 $72,300 $914,400 E. $646,500 $167,200 $72,300 $886,000 * Additional items include costs associated with widening the road. These costs include items such as the removal and replacement of trees and removal and replacement of retaining walls(See Appendices). Table 4 shows the total costs associated with future improvement to the county roads. Table 4 Total Costs for the County Roads* Street Construction Cost Storm Sewer Cost Total Cost Including Contingency,Legal,Eng., Including Contingency,Legal, Admin..&Bond Eng.,Admin.,&Bond Stagecoach $141,900 $12,100 $154,000 (CSAH 21) CSAH 23 $66,300 NA $66,300 CSAH 28 $43,400 NA $43,400 *These costs include sidewalk on one side of the street. 4 I"1+1(1 llt•:.':',t 'T.'�:i"7l c:Ch. — ..;.I�'�' -I�'i'CI iii l4:A Assessments As directed by City staff, the assessments were determined by assessing 50% of the street construction costs. Attachment 3 shows the location of 80 potential assessable units. The units were determined by utilizingexisting average lot width of 75'. For example. if a .roperty was 1-50' wide, it was broken into 2 units of 7 -ach. Table 5 shows the total assessments for each of the alternatives. Table 5 Assessments Alternative A B C D E Total Cost of $664,300 $1,051,300 $759,300 $914,300 $886,300 Project Street Construction $603,000 $990,000 $687,000 $842.000 $814,000 Cost Assessable Construction $301,500 $495,000 $34.3,500 $421,000 $407,000 Cost Residential Unit $3,800 $6,200 $4,300 $5.300 $5,100 Assessment Burden on City $362,8000 $556,300 $415,800 $493.300 $479,300 b Recommendations Alternative A is the least expensive, but it is not practical to build a 24' wide street with curb and gutter. When a curb is in place a driver tends to drive 2-3' from the face of the curb. This results in the driving lane feeling very narrow with an oncoming car. In addition, parking would not be recommended on a 24' wide street. Alternative C appears to be the most feasible for the area. The 28' wide street will provide a comfortable driving lane; and when compared to the other alternatives, it will minimize the impact to the neighborhood. 5 201)t/c!i c'c'/ y(r?(c.'!!(U7- I /Li t. I i ea Oi Oak P-irA phi' Tentative Project Schedule Receive Feasibility Report April 2000 Neighborhood Meetings May 2000 Public Hearing/Order Plans May 2000 • And Specifications Approve Plans and Specifications July 2000 Open Bids July 2000 Award Project August 2000 Construction Begins August 2000 Substantial Construction Completed November 2000 Final Project Completion June 2001 Assessment Hearing June 2001 6 2000 'Vrieel R.c')n.lruc(um- 1-ill age .Irea C)t r)ak ParA /h'ig/;t . • • AREA C = zZZ > , G Z Z - a y - z AREA D � Q VI 0 ¢ Z U O O a '- Li EVER, E. 65th 5,. iI R, ,_. Z s _ N a w E. 64th S7. N W; Off\ Q p E.: 'SUP.i' 63rd ! S7. Nil c- mil >_I _ NPAFtCS • NO i�_'�,I E. 63rd I 57. N II �� ,f., w STILLWATE' i �. I v a� EAST., 62nd I ST. N I' : F ct bef'7 �i 61st �t � 1 UP.^ 1\\61st �I iST. CT 6Cth g�� � OIi60th S7.N. Z Z < > a' z z z 59t �� 59th ST. N. wj, _W o 58th® „.' • m I 7� \' c — 58th ST. N. I t� , p 57th ST. N. \I Q' o 1211131 ° ti' p 56:' ST. N. I i I z 57th ,�IAI ‘a2 • OL ,E:.p JQQE,E ® y v N. > \gyp I _ CC,. I ° ¢ I:56th®® Z (� ^I I L_� Z r �_ 'PO W VI I 1i f ., _ I O �� W Z .I�LI I ff\ 9 \\\ Li j z < 5th ST. N. < Z \� \< a •-i W W N Z� Z Lo a Z ill A R EA A o I AREA B I I ;, - p d o l i �I a AvE.`' 9y N. m \?B ii! . AREA E s- PLUMB ST. AtVE,t i t..... i NI_ OAK PARK HEIGHTS OR U II IE I i_ 5th AVE. t \I I I • STREET AREAS BoJi :: oo str d fl Associates na OAK PARK HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA p COMPREHENSIVE STREET PLAN ATTACHMENT 1 Anderlik limilliMA ■ ■ I_ nal� UPP : .TH � 1111111411 rn . 1111110111•11 in■ %,, III Iii g., . .., ,..2.0. -5. NI COVER M�-, . , O'P, PARK , 'S• 1 ■■ ; . ■i - ' cy M1 mot - -I -lima -,7,1_ ;1' _______= WM :: lit MIL -y 1... _ _ _ _ 1 m.11, . ....,„ , ,,r: , ini ,., .„.....„,.,....., , „.... ..,.. ,........'•A,3 I.V I I I I ll I IrM I I M I= I 6 ■ prill rill N / �'5 W E . Legend , r Assessable Lots 'NSP Easement ASSESSABLE LOTS ,,Bonestroo Rosen - Anderilk 6 OAK PARK HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA ATTACHMENT 3 Associates em/k»ers RArt,IQCfl 2000 STREET PROGRAM K:155155001041cadlgislavprojecls\area_e.apr Mardi,2000 I IIIIM 11111 ') UPPE: •TH ,p O r 111 111 1/.1 0,',po N1 0../...--1 Mill NM EN $191,11#2-'' i i.. •,m lik,!. 11 i I 1 lanimim 4 . 1 i„, . , ■, ,, 1 ♦ ,.9s --.)• -/ it / �, / ® I m I /S ® 'H, a i 0 L _�L /y Iron ?/ ,i i -9. '' RI ; . i 5: i ,I it4 r / ter i1101-11087A610 NOVI II N • 1/ W `V E S — Legend City Street Reconstruction 2 � •County State Aid Highways- Future x , Curb and Gutter/Overlay 0 PROPOSED STREET IMPROVEMENTS -AREA E iLA Rosne stroo Anderhlc s OAK PARK HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA ATTACHMENT 2 Associatcs 2000 STREET PROGRAM K:\55\5500104\cadlgis\avprojects\area_e.apr March,2000 "P _ cillM \iii (s),\0,p, ii ■ .3.• ssi ---/-- i . — – - - _ - ori--- 3 Ell il i >,,t.‘ tt i 1 c te-0° z -' . L ID�.��' -c-: a 3' ' 011 1 . R • t L. ��__ llis I �Ayy A- F L N�1�4i i ,, • \ 7. \+ J �.- 1l0 p�G ���� --2,J'I/ -i 1 B �‘,17)C J k,` 0•1r" © - \cciA.A V. .d4 E - I N I /#`1° 4 ZJb © I 0 -x.i‘ \ .) 0 • -L 5: - , iff6IFHNOTOIEEF WORTH II 1 • 2t I I N Atli IA wFo. E S LOCATIONS /y e«,estrr" Rosen OAK PARK HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA ATTACHMENT 4 VI " s 2000 STREET PROGRAM K:\55\5500104\cad\gis\evprojects\area_e.apr March,2000 CO • N O) r cn N mt •• CO N to co r• O) to to O L) O) O c0 CO NJ Cr) aOo00 N c‘i t00v O co CA co to Co r 69 69 U 69 E9 E9 69 E9 E9 C o • r to N co c0 O O O li m u) co to N (0 c0 69 69 to J E T T T N- T 0o N •- I P') T I. c co 0) r• t0 G C O 69 r E9 69 E9 4 o U --0 v cQ w . _ CO CO Co Co Co Ct) C M .- to tf) N- to 0 V 0) to to R) CO CO 0 n CO V OD N CO — N 4 O) O co- .-CO C J C N Oco Cr) v vCOd Co Lo Ell t� CO r- 69 69 c — U E9 E9 69 69 69 to C) 0 N m O (1n 0) 0 to 0) c0 N Co O OD O to C•) Cr) CO r- 0 CO r- 0 C>4 �, �� 69 b9 �i9 d9 C 0 . ✓ O co co h O) N 0, +- .- N- r to 0 V' O) r r CO L 0.1 co N.. co_ CO Co tO0 (0 C CO yccoC) NN NU)) r (0 CEO m C O09E9C N•N• 69 E9 cS O U V c Q < N N N N N +- 0 0 • to t*) CO CI) tl) 0 0 0 .- r 01 N CV a 69 67 to nt' M 0) 0 CO 69 69 69 dJ Co Co n t` t` L U • E at ts v mt.t` C 69 69 E9 69 69 E9 >,2.-... cNr� M_ n O00CM7 W w+ 0 ltl O 6.9 69 69 69 69 c O) N coU 8 �N+ .c y to .0 0 < n N o lc •� p to CCD0 - �) ,- r- CO W , COOO NCO Nr- t00c0 + 0)I- C').- v N. Er)Cr)et. m 044N6� to � 4t9EA E E9 C 0 4t L CL 0 3 CD >, - 0 0. CO _ 0)Qoo 0o O O N- 0 N- N- 0)to Cr]^) C 0 Co CO N- - N O r t00 rn�- CCOO It 63 r- 69 ER E9 E9 ER ER E9 m VJ C CA O- In in r Oj hh L fn E9 O to tt) to ER ^ N C9 CO O CM C. U iR 69 E9 E9 69 i o cr a at CO v 3 m o 0 O O) CO r0- �v G g 0 O q 69 ER 49 69 ...! + v v' C c a) o 'o 0 0 . . - G Y Cl) Li. U � c LL � 17 N LL 0 C O t ■ y u) 0 LL N N 0 0 LL w N C C ... N C C O` U - N C L O O to 0 0 Z6 O C co y '� Y Y t CD ^ Y Y N ^ Y _` :0 C 0 N co co . :0 C 0 N (C f0 0 .00 C 0 N fE c N Y 0 = 0 0 a u) Y N = m co O 0 y Y N = 0 C E O YO. c . Cn N co m Y O Ya CY ca h 8 Y p Yd CY O N7 N R DI O B 0 0 0 .o -iii otS O 03 U M .0 Ct) otS O CO V w• N N — N 0 •0 V a LC LI:LL T3 0 ct 0 _ its co •0 32 LL LL 'O m co d -O l0 I 22 LL L u) 0 N C 0 co L C N N y N 0 cA C 0 u) L C N N V) 0 u) C 0 N .0 C N C O .2 00 -00 O 0 8 o O co -0 O 0 O 0 0 0 0 .0 O 0 O C N CO.. u) C (d (r)we,: C N C d N C 0 Cry Qj ~O C y C Ll N C CO C7 C LL LL W LL. u.LL U cv N N o LL LL LL U.. LL LL U N N N y LL. LL LL LL LL LL 015 • L L 0) d < < LLLL LLLL lLLL p) m QQ 0 LLLL ti. LL LL •o) mQc ;t- ;1- Co et COfV -5 : 0000 -5 it ;;1• (0 r- CON 0 .0 U) (1) 0 '4 ;:1- Cow Co CV :0U) a NN NN_CM CO_•Cl) a_00 Q NN NNNCr) C/) E00 • NN NN NCr) Cl) h0C APPENDIX ALTERNATIVE A 2000 STREET RECONSTRUCTION -VILLAGE AREA PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE-24'WIDE 24' F-F Street Section (500'section) Item Unit Quantity Unit Price Cost Bituminuos Removal (24') SY 1200 $1.50 $1,800.00 Excavation (27'x 2') CY 1000 5.00 5,000.00 CL. 5 gravel (8") TN 725 7.25 5,256.25 Bituminous 3' TN 220 30.00 6,600.00 Conc. C &G B618 LF 1000 7.00 7,000.00 Restoration Sod/Top Soil SY 1200 3.00 3,600.00 Conc. Driveway SY 90 34.00 3,060.00 Const.Total $32,316.25 Const. Cost per foot $64.63 10% $35,547.88 Cost per foot $71.10 25% $44,434.84 Cost per foot $88.87 Additional Costs • Item Unit Quantity Unit Price Cost Location* Place Retaining Wall SF 1200 16.00 19200.00 Block Tree Removal Each 3 200.00 600.00 Block I Tree Removal Each 3 200.00 600.00 Block L Hedge Removal LF 225 10.00 2250.00 Block M Hedge Removal LF 100 10.00 1000.00 Block L Replace trees Each 6 250.00 1500.00 Pathway construction LF 400 12.00 4800.00 6 Const.Total $29,950.00 10% $32,945.00 25% $41,181.25 *Block Locations are shown in Attachment 4 APPENDIX ALTERNATIVE B 2000 STREET RECONSTRUCTION-VILLAGE AREA PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE-24'WIDE,SIDEWALK BOTH SIDES 24' F-F Street Section (500'section) Item Unit Quantity Unit Price Cost Bituminuos Removal (24') SY 1200 $1.50 $1,800.00 Excavation(27'x 2') CY 1000 5.00 5,000.00 CL. 5 gravel(8") TN 725 7.25 5,256.25 Bituminous 3" TN 220 30.00 6,600.00 Conc. C&G B618 LF 1000 7.00 7,000.00 Restoration Sod/Top Soil SY 1200 3.00 3,600.00 Conc. Driveway SY 90 34.00 3,060.00 Sidewalk-Both Sides SF 5000 3.00 15,000.00 Const.Total $47,316.25 Const.Cost per foot $94.63 10% $52,047.88 $104.10 25% $65,059.84 Cost per foot $130.12 Additional Costs Item Unit Quantity Unit Price Cost Location* Remove Landscaping LS 1 500 500.00 Block R Remove&Replace wall SF 300 25.00 7500.00 Block N Remove& Replace wall SF 200 25.00 5000.00 Block C Remove&Replace wall SF 700 25.00 17500.00 Block R Place Retaining Wall SF 600 16.00 9600.00 Block A Place Retaining Wall SF 600 16.00 9600.00 Block B Place Retaining Wall SF 600 16.00 9600.00 Block C Place Retaining Wall SF 600 16.00 9600.00 Block D Place Retaining Wall SF 600 16.00 9600.00 Block I Extend existing Wall SF 150 16.00 2400.00 Block B Tree Removal Each 12 200.00 2400.00 Block A Tree Removal Each 7 200.00 1400.00 Block C Tree Removal Each 9 200.00 1800.00 Block D Tree Removal Each 6 200.00 1200.00 Block E Tree Removal Each 7 200.00 1400.00 Block F Tree Removal Each 3 200.00 600.00 Block I Tree Removal Each 4 200.00 800.00 Block J Tree Removal Each 3 200.00 600.00 Block M Tree Removal Each 4 200.00 800.00 Block N Tree Removal Each 3 200.00 600.00 Block Q Tree Removal Each 7 200.00 1400.00 Block R Hedge.Removal LF 100 5.00 500.00 Block J Hedge Removal LF 100 5.00 500.00 Block J Hedge Removal LF 225 5.00 1125.00 Block M trim Trees Each 1 500.00 500.00 Block K Replace Trees Each 65 250.00 16250.00 Hydrant relocate Each 1 2000.00 . 2000.00 Hydrant relocate Each 1 2000.00 2000.00 Pathway construction LF 400 12.00 4800.00 Const.Total $121,575.00 10% $133,732.50 25% $167,165.63 'Block Locations are shown in Attachment 4 • r APPENDIX ALTERNATIVE C 2000 STREET RECONSTRUCTION - VILLAGE AREA PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE-28'WIDE, NO SIDEWALK 28' F-F Street Section (500'section) Item Unit Quantity Unit Price Cost Bituminuos Removal (24') SY 1200 $1.50 $1,800.00 Excavation (31'x 2') CY 1150 5.00 5,750.00 CL. 5 gravel (8") TN 760 7.25 5,510.00 Bituminous 3" TN 260 30.00 7,800.00 Conc. C& G B618 LF 1000 7.00 7,000.00 Restoration Sod/Top Soil SY 1200 3.00 3,600.00 Conc. Driveway SY 90 34.00 3,060.00 0.00 Const. Total $34,520.00 Const. Cost per foot $69.04 10% $37,972.00 $75.94 25% $47,465.00 Cost per foot $94.93 Additional Costs Item Unit Quantity Unit Price Cost Location* Remove Landscaping LS 1 500 500.00 Block R Place Retaining Wall SF 600 16.00 9600.00 Block B Place Retaining Wall SF 600 16.00 9600.00 Block D Place Retaining Wall SF 1200 16.00 19200.00 Block I Extend existing Wall SF 150 16.00 2400.00 Block B Tree Removal Each 3 200.00 600.00 Block A Tree Removal Each 5 200.00 1000.00 Block C Tree Removal Each 4 200.00 800.00 Block D Tree Removal Each 3 200.00 600.00 Block E Tree Removal Each 2 200.00 400.00 Block F Tree Removal Each 3 200.00 600.00 Block I Tree Removal Each 4 200.00 800.00 Block J Tree Removal Each 1 200.00 200.00 Block M Tree Removal Each 4 200.00 800.00 Block N Tree Removal Each 1 200.00 200.00 Block Q Tree Removal Each 2 200.00 400.00 Block R Tree Removal Each 3,-3 200.00 600.00 Block L Hedge Removal LF 100 3 5.00 500.00 Block J Hedge Removal LF 100 5.00 500.00 Block J Hedge Removal LF 225 5.00 1125.00 Block M trim Trees Each 1 500.00 500.00 Block K Replace Trees Each 32 250.00 8000.00 . Hydrant relocate Each 1 2000.00 2000.00 Hydrant relocate Each 1 2000.00 2000.00 Pathway construction LF 400 12.00 4800.00 Redo Storm Sewer EACH 10 0.00 0.00 Const.Total $67,725.00 10% $74,497.50 25% $93,121.88 'Block Locations are shown in Attachment 4 APPENDIX ALTERNATIVE C 2000 STREET RECONSTRUCTION-VILLAGE AREA PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE-24' PENFIELD &PERKINS 24' F-F Street Section (500'section) Item Unit Quantity Unit Price Cost Bituminuos Removal (24') SY 1200 $1.50 $1,800.00 Excavation (27'x 2') CY 1000 5.00 5,000.00 CL. 5 gravel (8") TN 725 7.25 5,256.25 Bituminous 3" TN 220 30.00 6,600.00 Conc. C & G B618 LF 1000 7.00 7,000.00 Restoration Sod/Top Soil SY 1200 3.00 3,600.00 Conc. Driveway SY 90 34.00 3,060.00 Const. Total $32,316.25 Const. Cost per foot $64.63 10% $35,547.88 Cost per foot $71.10 25% $44,434.84 Cost per foot $88.87 r APPENDIX .. , ALTERNATIVE D 2000 STREET RECONSTRUCTION -VILLAGE AREA PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE-28'WIDE, SIDEWALK ONE SIDE 28' F-F Street Section (500'section) Item Unit Quantity Unit Price Cost Bituminuos Removal (24') SY 1200 $1.50 $1,800.00 Excavation (31'x 2') CY 1150 5.00 5,750.00 CL. 5 gravel (8") TN 760 7.25 5,510.00 Bituminous 3" TN 260 30.00 7,800.00 Conc. C & G B618 LF 1000 7.00 7,000.00 Restoration Sod/Top Soil SY 1200 3.00 3,600.00 Conc. Driveway SY 90 34.00 3,060.00 Sidewalk One side SF 2500 3.00 7,500.00 Const.Total $42,020.00 Const. Cost per foot $84.04 10% $46,222.00 $92.44 25% $57,777.50 Cost per foot $115.56 Additional Costs Item Unit Quantity Unit Price Cost Location* Remove Landscaping LS 1 500 500.00 Block R Remove & Replace wall SF 300 25.00 7500.00 Block N Place Retaining Wall SF 600 16.00 9600.00 Block B Place Retaining Wall SF 600 16.00 9600.00 BlockD Place Retaining Wall SF 1200 16.00 19200.00 Block I Extend existing Wall SF 150 16.00 2400.00 Block B Tree Removal Each 3 200.00 600.00 Block A Tree Removal Each 7 200.00 1400.00 Block C Tree Removal Each 9 200.00 1800.00 Block D Tree Removal Each 6 200.00 1200.00 Block E Tree Removal Each 7 200.00 1400.00 Block F Tree Removal Each 3 200.00 600.00 Block I Tree Removal Each 4 200.00 800.00 Block J Tree Removal Each 1 200.00 200.00 Block M Tree Removal Each 4 200.00 800.00 Block N Tree Removal Each 3 200.00 600.00 Block Q Tree Removal Each 2 200.00 400.00 Block R Hedge Removal LF 100 5.00 500.00 Block J Hedge Removal LF 100 5.00 500.00 Block J Hedge Removal LF 225 5.00 1125.00 Block M trim Trees Each 1 500.00 500.00 Block K Replace Trees Each 45 250.00 11250.00 Hydrant relocate Each 1 2000.00 2000.00 Hydrant relocate Each 1 2000.00 2000.00 Pathway construction LF 400 12.00 4800.00 Redo Storm Sewer EACH 10 0.00 0.00 Const.Total $81,275.00 10% $89,402.50 25% $111,753.13 'Block Locations are shown in Attachment 4 y APPENDIX ALTERNATIVE E 2000 STREET RECONSTRUCTION-VILLAGE AREA PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE-32'WIDE, NO SIDEWALK 32' F-F Street Section (500'section) Item Unit Quantity Unit Price Cost Bituminuos Removal (24') SY 1200 $1.50 $1,800.00 Excavation (35'x 2') CY 1300 5.00 6,500.00 CL. 5 gravel (8°) TN 860 7.25 6,235.00 Bituminous 3" TN 300 30.00 9,000.00 Conc. C & G B618 LF 1000 7.00 7,000.00 Restoration Sod/Top Soil SY 1200 3.00 3,600.00 Conc. Driveway SY 90 34.00 3,060.00 0.00 Const.Total $37,195.00 Const. Cost per foot $74.39 10% $40,914.50 $81.83 25% $51,143.13 Cost per foot $102.29 Additional Costs Item Unit Quantity Unit Price Cost Location* Remove Landscaping LS 1 500 500.00 Block R Remove&Replace wall SF 300 25.00 7500.00 Block N Remove& Replace wall SF 200 25.00 5000.00 Block C Remove&Replace wall SF 700 25.00 17500.00 Block R Place Retaining Wall SF 600 16.00 9600.00 Block A Place Retaining Wall SF 600 16.00 9600.00 Block B Place Retaining Wall SF 600 16.00 9600.00 Block C Place Retaining Wall SF 600 16.00 9600.00 Block D Place Retaining Wall SF 600 16.00 9600.00 Block I Extend existing Wall SF 150 16.00 2400.00 Block B Tree Removal Each 12 200.00 2400.00 Block A Tree Removal Each 7 200.00 1400.00 Block C Tree Removal Each 9 200.00 1800.00 Block D Tree Removal Each 6 200.00 1200.00 Block E Tree Removal Each 7 200.00 1400.00 Block F Tree Removal Each 3 200.00 600.00 Block I Tree Removal Each 4 200.00 800.00 Block J Tree Removal Each 3 200.00 600.00 Block M Tree Removal Each 4 200.00 800.00 Block N Tree Removal Each 3 200.00 600.00 Block Q Tree Removal Each 7 200.00 1400.00 Block R Hedge Removal LF 100 5.00 500.00 Block J Hedge Removal LF 100 5.00 500.00 Block J Hedge Removal LF 225 5.00 1125.00 Block M trim Trees Each 1 500.00 500.00 Block K Replace Trees Each 65 250.00 16250.00 Hydrant relocate Each 1 2000.00 2000.00 Hydrant relocate Each 1 2000.00 2000.00 Pathway construction LF 400 12.00 4800.00 Redo Storm Sewer Each 10 0.00 0.00 Const.Total $121,575.00 10% $133,732.50 25% $167,165.63 'Block Locations are shown in Attachment 4 • APPENDIX STAGECOACH- CSAH 21 2000 STREET RECONSTRUCTION-VILLAGE AREA PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE-28'WIDE, SIDEWALK ONE SIDE StageCoach Total Len Length 9 (ft) 2100 28' F-F(Typical 500' section) Item Unit Quantity Unit Price Cost Bit Removal S.Y. 780 1.5 $1,170.00 Bit Patching Ton 125 28 $3,500.00 Bit. Overlay Ton 115 30 $3,450.00 Conc. C & G B618 LF 1000 7.00 $7,000.00 • Sidewalk-One side SF 2500 3 $7,500.00 Restoration-Sod SY 650 3 $1,950.00 Total $24,570.00 Cost per foot $49.14 total $103,194.00 10% $27,027.00 cost per foot $54.05 total $113,513.40 25% $33,783.75 Cost per foot $67.57 Total Cost $141,891.75 APPENDIX CSAH 23 2000 STREET RECONSTRUCTION -VILLAGE AREA PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE-28'WIDE, SIDEWALK ONE SIDE Total Length 600 28' F-F Street Section (500' section) Item Unit Quantity Unit Price Cost Bituminuos Removal (36') SY 2000 $1.50 $3,000.00 Excavation (31'x 2') CY 1150 5.00 5,750.00 CL. 5 gravel (8") TN 760 7.25 5,510.00 Bituminous 3" TN 260 30.00 7,800.00 Conc. C&G B618 LF 1000 7.00 7,000.00 Restoration Sod/Top Soil SY 1200 3.00 3,600.00 Sidewalk One side SF 2500 3.00 7,500.00 Const.Total $40,160.00 Const. Cost per foot $80.32 10% $44,176.00 $88.35 Total $53,011.20 25% $55,220.00 Cost per foot $110.44 Total 66264 • . r - „ APPENDIX CSAH 28 2000 STREET RECONSTRUCTION -VILLAGE AREA PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE-28'WIDE, SIDEWALK ONE SIDE Total Length 400 28' F-F Street Section (500' section) Item Unit Quantity Unit Price Cost Bituminuos Removal (28') SY 1500 $1.50 $2,250.00 Excavation (31'x 2') CY 1150 5.00 5,750.00 CL. 5 gravel (8") TN 760 7.25 5,510.00 Bituminous 3" TN 260 30.00 7,800.00 Conc. C& G B618 LF 1000 7.00 7,000.00 Restoration Sod/Top Soil SY 1200 3.00 3,600.00 Sidewalk One side SF 2500 3.00 7,500.00 Const.Total $39,410.00 Const. Cost per foot $78.82 10% $43,351.00 $86.70 Total $34,680.80 25% $54,188.75 Cost per foot $108.38 Total 43351 L Oak Park Heights 2000 Street Reconstruction Plan Is it Fair? You compare the City Council's Past, Present and Future Actions: 1995 Street Current Plan to Reconstruct 2001 Plan to Reconstruction Streets this year in the Reconstruct behind St. Croix Village Neighborhood Streets in Upper Mall Oak Park Heights Advance Public 1 year None yet Hearing Notice ? Curb and Gutter 25% Homeowner ,50% Homeowner ? Assessment 75 % City 50% City Sewer Assessment 0 % Homeowner 0% Homeowner 100 % City 100 % City ? ■ Street Assessment 50% Homeowner 50% City 50% City 50% Homeowner ? Additional Fees None 1.5% Administrative Fee ? Additional Expenses None New sidewalks and street widening in low traffic neighborhood imposed by City Council against neighborhood wishes. ? Basis for Size of All Homeowners Homeowners assessment Assesssment paid equally based on lot width regardless of lot ? size Average Assessment $2645 $3800 to $6200 ? Per Homeowner Payment Plan Interest rate based on bond rate rounded up plus 1% ? Is it a coincidence that the 1995 Plans affected the neighborhoods of Councilmember Jerry Turnquist and Mark Swenson? Is it a coincidence that the City went over budget in 1999, and the Administrative fee of 1.5% will help balance the budget for the year 2000? Only Councilmember David Beaudet has demanded that all neighborhoods be treated the same. Contact the Mayor and other Councilmembers to let them know what you think is fair: Mayor Dave Schaaf 439-9501 Mark Swenson 439-1479 Lynae Byrne 275-9183 Jerry Tumquist 439-1619 CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS . „.,, A MINNESOTA STAR CITY January 12 , 1995 Dear Oak Park Heights Property Owner: A public hearing has been scheduled by the Oak Park Heights City Council for 7 : 30 P .M. Monday, January 23 , 1995 at City Hall, 14168 N. 57th Street . The purpose of the hearing is to discuss proposed street improvements in the area shown below. The proposed improvements are similar to those discussed at previous meetings on February 14 , 1994 and October 20 , 1993 . Due to the nature of the improvements, it is proposed to assess a portion of the project cost to the abutting residential property owners on a lot equivalent basis . Your property is included in the project and is proposed to be assessed. The estimated assessment;, per residential lot isi_laElaLlanit . Commercial, industrial, and high density property is proposed to be assessed on a front foot basis, estimated at $31 . 85/front foot . Approximately-40k of the, project cost is proposed to be assessed to p±oper°ty osiers. .: We encourage your attendance . Sincerely, CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS Michael Robertson City Administrator 14168 North 57th Street • Box 2007 • Oak Park Heights, Minnesota 55082-2007 Phone: 612-439-4439 • Fax: 612-439-0574 ---_ate v�-._"v- - - .�.n - - - - - VLG J�J JV..l. . •VG• VV ENCLOSURE 6 NA Northwest Associated Consultants , Inc . • C j U R B A N P L A N N I N G • D E S I G N • M A R K E T R E S E A R C H 4 , MEMORANDUM ('/■ ) 1.2k TO: Oak Park ei City ghts C ty Council FROM: Dan Wilson DATE: , 23 March 1995 RE: Oak Park Heights - Modification No. I to St. Croix Mall TIP FILE NO: 798.02 - 95.01 Attached is a draft TIP Plan Modification that will permit the City to use tax increments generated by the St. Croix Mall to pay for storm sewer extension and utility system repairs. .v Zec ecember 22 , ath and Company report calculated these expenses at cc $736,200 that were not to be assessed. . k-t(1. ! The original TIP Plan had already provided for 4. ,.V worth . • • • • cos The original plan did not describe the project area to include the area south of 57th street No Therefore, the modification will permit the use of TIP funds on 56th street No., 55th Street N "7 Omar Avenue, Obrnn Avenue No. and Omaha Avenue No. ' A 0-4_,=-;75-4,--pi sfi UiW/Vt Vi� , The approval process is as follows: (� I c(.�) - -","� 1. City Council holds public hearing. 2. City Council adjourns. 3. ERA meeting called to order (your staff posted the required 3 day notice for an HRA meeting). 4. ERA considers resolution approving Modification No. 1. 5. ERA adjourns. 6. City Council reconvenes. 7. City Council considers resolution. We will prepare the final draft subject to any changes the Council would like to make. subject Y g 7 _ 5 75 Wayzata Blvd. - 555 • St. Louis Park, MN 55416 (612) 595-9636•Fax. 595 9837 05/05/95 09:51 $`612 426 5004 TAUTGES. REDPATH Q002/005 Enclosure 1OB TAUTGES, REDPATH & CO., LTD. ca r,Fi O PUeLuC ACCCuN r 4N'S May 4, 1995 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Oak Park Heights 14163 North 57th Sweet Stillwater, MN 55082 - RE: STREET RECONSTRUCTION FINANCING Pursuant to your request, l have updated the street reconstruction financing plan as it relates to Area A (south of Highway 36 and west of Osgood Avenue). This update incorporates the estimated construction costs based on the bid opening of April 28, 1995. Estimated Project Costl The project costs for Area A are estimated to be as follows: Storm Street Sewer Utility RcconStruction, '.` Extensions Repairs Total Contractor \ S7 ,/18 S185,483 S12.080 Contingency @ 5% 39,885 9,274 604 Subtotal 837.603 194,757 12,684 1.045,044 Engineer,legal,administrative @ 25% 2Q9„400 48,690 3,170 261.260 Total 51,047,00 'i 5243,447 515.854 51.306.304 • Proposed Financing The City engineer recommended the costs associated with storm sewer extensions and utility repairs not be assessed. Additionally, the City council has previously decided against increasing tax levies to finance storm sewer extensions and utility repairs. Therefore, the costs related to storm sewer extensions and utility repairs must be financed with existing reserves. 4810 White Bear Parkway • White Bear Lake. Minnesota 55110 • 612/426-7000 • FAX/426.5004 • Member of HL9 international 05/05/95 09:52 `$'612 426 5004 TACTGES. REDPATH Ql 004/005 Honorable Mayor and City Council Street Reconstruction Financing May 4, 1995 Page 3 The City engineer recommends assessments totalin: $638,331 or street improvements and concrete curb/gutter. Based on this, theapprimfgbassessment to residential property is 2,645 ,, 0 0 per lot. umung an interest-rte of 3% and a I ye3z-assessment period, the annual assessment 5/ -'. -1 would be as o ows: 19a4a oil 75 Year Principal Interest Total 5"' 5lz 1 $265 $212 $477 2 265 190 455 3 265 170 435 4 265 148 413 ' Ilt11-°1 5 265 126 391 UV� 6 265 106 371 7 265 84 349 rti 8 26 5 63 328 9 265 42 307 Z�JQ t0 260 21 _.. 1 /LJJ Total x52.645 $1.162 53.807 '�'�I/ The remaining portion of the debt service is proposed to be repaid by property taxes. A schedule of existing and proposed bonded debt tax levies is as follows: 3 . 1995 L u Existing Improvement Year Levies Bonds(1) Total I`1 • 1995 525,000 $ - $25,000 V- 1996 25,000 - 25,000 1997 25.000 - 25.000 j-' ` 1998 25,000 67,000 92,000 , 1999 25,000 68.000 93,000 2000 25,000 69,000 94,000 2001 • 70.000 70,000 2002 - 71,000 71,000 2003 - 72,000 72,000 2004 - 73,000 73.000 2005 - 74,000 74.000 Total 5150.000 $564,000_ $714,000 (I)See schedule prepared by Juran and Moody.Inc_ M INC JURAN & MOODY, INC. INVESTMENT SECURITIES SINCE 1939 SAINT PAUL,MN 55101-2091 MINNEAPOLIS,MN 55402-3300 HOUSTON,TR 77027-9008 CLEARWATER,FL 34619.1035 Minnesota Mutual Life Center 130 International Centre 1177 West Loop South Two a Place 400 North Robert Street,Suite 800 900 Second Avenue South Suite 1850 2650 McCormick Wife,Suite 150 (612)224-1500 (612)339-8100 (713)961-1882 (813)791-8897 (800)950-4666 (800)950-4666 (800)950-5444 (800)950-2055 Fax: (612)22401524 Fax: (612)339-2019 Fax: (713)961-0962 Fax: (813)725-9973 TABULATION OF BIDS CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS,MINNESOTA $1,130,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT BONDS OF 1995 AWARD DOUGHERTY,DAWKINS,STRAND&BIGELOW DATE OF SALE MONDAY.JUNE 12,1995 MOODYS RATING: A BIDDER INTEREST RATE NET INTEREST COST (RATE) DOUGHERTY,DAWKINS,STRAND 4.05% - 1996 &BIGELOW 4.15% - 1997 4.25% - 1998 4.40% - 1999 4.50% -2000 4.55% - 2001 4.65% -2002 4.75% - 2003 5.00% - 2004/05 PURCHASE PRICE: S1,124,3 50.00 8332,636.25 tf (4.1718%) NORWEST INVESTMENT SERVICES,INC. 3.90% - 1996 4.10% - 1997 4.25% - 1998 4.40% - 1999 4.50% - 2000 4.60% -2001 4.70% - 2002 4.80% - 2003 4.90% -2004 5.00% - 2005 PURCHASE PRICE: $1,120,960.00 $335,949.58 (4.819%) FIRSTAR BANK MILWAUKEE.N.A. 4.000% - 1996 OPPENHEIMER&CO.,INC.)CO-MANAGER 4.250% - 1997 4350% - 1998 4.450% - 1999 4350% - 2000 4.625% - 2001/02 4.750% - 2003 4.875% - 2004 5.000% - 2005 PURCHASE PRICE: S1,120,9 18.60 $336,192.23 (4.8228%) • I U, CO T 1 < (n 0 (/Ii v rn n V. _1 X m / Z W F '�� m 8 7) = z OS JD AVENUE $i OSGOOD VENU[ NORTH C S A H 24 ! 1 i O arr w nu�wwe 0O D o CU 11101 '•11101 Z 1R In CID o Q IT� '!�� 11111011! O 1 Z *e; -AIM_ IMPI rT X) 1 (6 1111111MEN . Ir M I. IOXBORO MM"u , 1 r_l OR m W _ .,�_, orux m ° ° iii■IIIIIMIN p # �� ° ST'LLWFMTER D 11 1E11 EE! � iii : :M MEN 3 - M �L� I II v , . y: C s s � �E� � iii @� :TRrFT ` . 94Q .0 _I EMS 1. h k = ' C.11 : ~ MB 0 CM run ° e----)i NM Mme' �� P �� : �� e JPAl �� — � �� a Eta INN _ am: �� �� �� 111I� Al C7 PANAMA • -_ ., i� ' - . . ° .�� . . fi x.. �� o ■ n ■M7N v ' • i, ., mac j A ITT) PARIS P'.`A * E - MINIM �1 -r- la ,: -! PARIS c Himil:Am mom 141 \ :us ®=I r, A „' IIPI 1 .ji ';:, , v) :.:,: c -_ � ' MOM �1 r lam NMIIIIP''' emwf .:/ � ; � 3” Mil 111 1 _{ nt= ` C7 MOr� j - V, t.,4,7. ! 111111111111, ,iiiiiiii iilEmi . . — 4... 41 .... V 7.1 Mrli: _. .------"■1 til4t ----a=1::1:1 114 - 11 sA \\ NM c.'6 �.,, ..1■11A i Ingo 'I T'.• �, ��ril n 9£ ),,,,,\1_10/0 31tl 1S__� NI ■ 11111 1111111, \ 96 V H TH -id 1 TH 31d 1S ' s 0 W 1 Ili 0, iiiiiiiIIIll , _, ... to . s 61 III 15 e� 1 4A ds° ,�w,0 1 of:i f ./ .,ass -.� �M/•� `fir+r �. =:t ,_.„8...,„,...,_,,,v4-081- DDxQl COOO coQcoD C Co Pe 0 I' O u co D D cp c0 T� < w m m i 70 Z ca m 2 m 0 M- C) O o - Z O 0 (f) o r-1 :Cl —I v D O Fit IH SII2El CO K 7o Z Z g Z I . co m — - `.° Z 0 0 I I ! X FOURTH STREET (8 1.34,4_ •\ K > I it, 1 XI .,'MI! y x Trvou CJ1 M il, 00-1 '94,Ruj D . n „,,: mil t 7:1- 'AI/2 .• •• • LL • •y •• UEt .,•.;`.;r: „.•,:\ AVENUE N PEELER .: s.�..: i.,;,t try 1 c.:.... ., 2 N‘,. m t"�''h`�'Q"'ii _,.:k.Q4 ..h i 'i '-1 r�� , C%. m CD rp:Mil 0 Illi I t _kW 111 I is ,u► 'o--, �� II , I I I I 1 VI VI E p hS ! �r ,r S FDURIH ST E PFR c a A '- '' 0 stliiislivliviiiii111.....,.. ..„ ......._ _, ,: ■*".% I! .) ' !I I IEJIEf ;:1 FIRST SIRELT `ti . n li 011111111111 i r,.J I - 1 '--- I = I city or T ai �+r N 1� poet f7 HI k` IIIIII 10 1 1 i Z 1, I IfirAll NI I I I I 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 1 ...-- -4.i Milli -‘3'.5 I !” MZAP NUM N�la�y 6i e I I-- '! v Z $ , • I I �dys !I o _ ��� 0 02°° y I 3 N d y131''`d 1111' Ill i L 4 ! 1 { y I I 6�"45# r I I . a1 �yS I d d���l i 7. C 7:11 m M Z j � - i - 6 1 tat DD3l7OD Q. co D O -I w CO CD 0 o, A 0 the report. The work is intended to be completed in the Summer of 2000. Summary of Costs The following table summarizes the estimated costs of the proposed project. In Area D, Area E and a small portion of Area B concrete curb and gutter is proposed. The majority of Area B has existing concrete curb and gutter (Figure 4) and therefore, it is recommended that the curb in this area be removed and replace only where necessary. The cost for the street reconstruction has been divided into two categories, "Areas of Proposed Concrete Curb and Gutter"and"Areas of Existing Concrete Curb and Gutter". Summary of Estimated Costs Areas of Proposed Concrete Curb and Gutter Construction Construction Total Cost Total Cost Cost Total Cost per foot per foot Street Reconstruction $1,737,600.00 $73.00 $2,172,100.00 $91.00 Storm Sewer $223,100.00 $9.00 $278,900.00 $12.00 Total $1,960,700.00 $82.00 $2,451,000.00 $103.00 Summary of Estimated Costs Area of Existing Concrete Curb and Gutter Construction Construction Total Cost Total Cost Cost Total Cost per foot per foot Street Reconstruction $137,400.00 $50.00 $171,800.00 $62.00 Storm Sewer NA NA NA NA Total $137,400.00 $50.00 $171,800.00 $62.00 Oak Park Heights 1999 Street Reconstruction Project 4 Summary of Total Cost Construction Total Cost Cost Total Street Reconstruction- Areas of Proposed $1,737,600.00 $2,172,100.00 Concrete Curb and Gutter Street Reconstruction- Areas of Existing $137,400.00 $171,800.00 Concrete Curb and Gutter Storm Sewer $223,100.00 $278,900.00 Total $2,098,100.00 $2,622,800.00 Note: The total cost of the project does not include the cost for televising the sanitary sewer or testing the water main for leaks. These tests are necessary to determine if any major repairs are needed. Summary of Financing Implications (Assessments and City Costs) The following summarizes the financing implications that will result from implementing these projects. Revenue Total Project Cost $2,622,800 t{p-tr0 Residential Assessment Revenue (261 units) $1,030,950 C 1 fit 3.O 2 Proposed Concrete Curb and Gutter ,J V Residential Assessment Revenue (60 units) $85,800 Existing Concrete Curb and Gutter OPH Commercial Assessment Revenue $108,680 Stillwater Revenue $230,230 County Turnback Reimbursement General Fund $1,167,140 The following streets within Area D are bordered by properties within the Stillwater city limits: -Panama Avenue -Paris Avenue south of Beach Road. - Osman Avenue - 65th Street North - Ozark Avenue North - 64th Street North - Part of Oxboro Avenue -Alley(Oxboro to Panama) Oak Park Heights 1999 Street Reconstruction Project 5 The condition of the existing pavements in Area D,Area E and Area B were last rated in 1987. For the 1998 street reconstruction report, the computer program, Paver, was used to help predict the ranking of the roads. These predicted rankings are shown in Appendix C and on Figure 5, Figure 6 and Figure 7. For Area D and Area E the average pavement condition index (PCI) for the predicted 1998 value was 58 and for Area B the average was 47. The general life cycle of a street is shown in Figure 8. This figure shows that by the year 2000 the average PCI for the streets in Area D/Area E and Area B will be 24 and 18, respectively. The table below presents general categories to define PCI Rankings. Maintenance Recommended Pavement Condition Index Seal Coat 50-100 Overlay 30-60 Reconstruct 0-40 In general, PCI rankings below 35 require removal of the existing bituminous pavement before constructing a new bituminous surface. The existing aggregate base may also have to be reconstructed. ZCILankings,between 35 and 55 require bituminous surface removal or major Datching before constructing a bituminous overlay. PCI rankings over 55 typically do not require bituminous overlays and generally routine maintenance such as patching, crack sealing, and seal coats are cost effective. The deflection testing of Area D and Area E was completed in the summer of 1997. The results of this test show that the majority of the streets have an adequate subgrade. The testing identified Paris, Peabody and Ozark as streets that may need subgrade correction. Therefore,quantities and costs for some subgrade correction have been included in this report. In addition, the results showed that 65th, 64th,Upper 631.d, 62nd, Paul, Peabody,Paris, Ozark, Penrose and Perkins would experience cracking of the bituminous surface. From Figure 8, the predicted average PCI ranks the streets in the "Reconstruct" category. The deflection tests showed that a majority of the streets would crack under repetitive use and several streets actually require subrgrade correction. The test holes showed that the streets are in need of a solid base. These results make it feasible to recommend the total removal of the existing bituminous. Some streets will require removal of the existing aggregate base and subgrade improvements as well. In Area D, Area E and a small portion of Area B concrete curb and gutter Oak Park Heights 1999 Street Reconstruction Project 8 Area E Length Existing Proposed Street Name (Feet) Street Width Street Width (Feet) (Feet) Peller Avenue North (56th to 59th) 1350 24 28 Penrose Avenue North (56th to 59th) 1350 22.5 28 Penfield Avenue 560 18 18* 56th Street North (Penrose to Peller) 370 24 28 Upper 56th Street North 220 24 28 57th Street North (Peller to Penfield) 830 24 28 58th Street North (Stagecoach to Peller) 990 23 28 Perkins Avenue North (56th to 57th) 650 18 18* 57th (west of Perkins) 330 20.5 24 Total 6650 ( 1.3 miles) * cation of existing buildings, the maximum allowable street width is 18 feet. Area B Length Existing Proposed Street Name (Feet) Street Width Street Width (Feet) (Feet) Ozark 660 32 32 Upper 55th Street 550 32 32 56`h Steet 1150 32 32 56th Street Circle 400 32 32 Total 2760 (0.5 miles) Oak Park Heights 1999 Street Reconstruction Project 10 Feasibility The 1998 Reconstruction Project is feasible. The following table summarizes the estimated costs of the proposed projects. The cost for the street reconstruction has been divided into two categories, "Areas of Proposed Concrete Curb and Gutter" and "Areas of Existing Concrete Curb and Gutter". Summary of Estimated Costs Areas of Proposed Concrete Curb and Gutter Construction Construction Total Cost Total Cost Cost Total Cost per foot per foot Street Reconstruction $1,737,600.00 $73.00 $2,172,100.00 $91.00 Storm Sewer $223,100.00 $9.00 $278,900.00 $12.00 Total $1,960,700.00 $82.00 $2,451,000.00 $103.00 Summary of Estimated Costs Area of Existing Concrete Curb and Gutter Construction Construction Total Cost Total Cost Cost Total Cost per foot per foot Street Reconstruction $137,400.00 $50.00 $171,800.00 $62.00 Storm Sewer NA NA NA NA Total $137,400.00 $50.00 $171,800.00 $62.00 Summary of Total Cost Construction Total Cost Cost Total Street Reconstruction- Areas of Proposed Concrete Curb and Gutter $1,737,600.00 $2,172,100.00 Street Reconstruction- Areas of Existing Concrete Curb and Gutter $137,400.00 $171,800.00 Storm Sewer $223,100.00 $278,900.00 Total $2,098,100.00 $2,622,800.00 Oak Park Heights 1999 Street Reconstruction Project 11 Assessments / Revenue The assessment policy as established by the city council for the 1995 Reconstruction Project was based on the following: Each residential property will be assessed the same amount • This amount is based on the amount to be paid by the average size lot on this project • Commercial properties will be assessed on a front footage basis A new policy that is presented in this report is that the city of Stillwater should pay for half of the cost of the streets that abut properties that lie within Stillwater city limits. The assessment amounts are as follows: \ Residential Property in Oak Park Heights $3,950/each Proposed Concrete Curb and Gutter Residential Property in Oak Park Heights $1,430/each Existing Concrete Curb and Gutter Commercial Property in Oak Park Heights $56.00/front foot Stillwater Properties $51.50/front foot The figures above were calculated using the following rate schedule, which was established in the 1993 Comprehensive Street Plan. Assessments Rate Classifications Residential Curb (75% of total Curb Cost) Commerical/Industrial Curb (75% of total Curb Cost) Residential Street(50% of total Street Costs) Commercial/Industrial Street (50% of total Street Costs) Oak Park Heights 1999 Street Reconstruction Project 15 Project Schedule Q(/� Receive Feasibility Report/ScheduIe February 1999 Neighborhood Meetings Meeting with the City of Stillwater March 1999 Meeting with the County March 1999 V Neighborhood Meeting April 1999 Public Hearing/Order Plans W' ,/ May 1999 and Specifications Approve Plans and Specifications September 1999 Open Bids October 1999 Award project November 1999 42-11' S Construction Begins ,A2000 Substantial Construction Completed September 2000 Final Project Completion October 2000 Assessment Hearing i October 2000 I N� Oak Park Heights 1999 Street Reconstruction Project 18 O) 0) rOCDCATCpr 03 rrror- o f MO 0 et CO T et N O M CD V) � �rerOCOrN id NN10 N (%. O» N C7) C.) �ErRERERER4969.69 R LO To+ O F- 0) V/ T 0 CO In T CO T CO C T T T O N 0) V' C*) O 0 � NI-t CO N O M CO +- � N N N in C0 N N 0) d~ N 00)) • T T w Ef} 63 EA EA Eft 69. co if).ER Ef3 p O < 0 c), c a) CO CO CO CO CD CO CO CO 0 M 1- CVCVN (V C1lNCVCVCA N to Ei> 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) O N N L O O � v U C0 CO 0) 0 T CO C") 0) r o N 0 M07ODCJNO) 0) c OD LA NNNTCACO0 N CU 0 C 0 0 T h CO T (. h T CO 0 0) 0) d N T CO N. M N N- C N Ef?Ef9 69.69 409 ER 419 69-E9 E N 15 Qw + N N. CO N. M M Cr; M M M M 1: X • O NNNNNNN10 (0 O O EA ER ER EA)EA)EA)EA) EA)EA) • V U C <C co w00000co Q N N T N N N N T N LL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o w c M M CONOM0) (nM T ttCo o C O a) LL J CU 5 a) 'a a c rno °-) o � o +O a U sm ° vCO r m o a C O) zmrarraa. o C c 0 0 0 a) a) Cu Z U) Z Z aco i E Z Q m co Q �i t 62 c .c a- - fit ao �v a) a) 1-- Appendix B Area D-Testing Results Street Name Soil Boring PCI Test Hole 1998 Predicated Value Upper 61st At county rd. 51 Street 5.5"Bituminous 59 North 7.5"Base 85 Fill,mostly silty sand with little gravel 62'd Street North 70 2"Oil&Rock 78 18"-20"sandy clay Below heavier clay 63'd Street North 59 74 Upper 63`d Street North 2.5 "Bituminous 52 2"Oil&Rock 9.5 base 70 Sandy Clay some small Fill to 5.0' mostly silty Rock sand 20"Sandy clay Below more clay 64th Street North 55 2"Oil&Rock 77 18"Sandy Rocky Clay Bigger Rock more Clay Pecan Avenue North 68 4-5"Oil &Rock 70 12"Sandy Clay Below Heavier Clay Peabody Avenue North 84 Paris Avenue North/ Range from 5.5"—7" 16 Beach Road Bituminous Pavement Range from 7.5"- 18.5" Base e Fill mostly silty sand Paul Avenue North 42 51 Appendix B Area D-Testing Results Street Name Soil Boring PCI Test Hole 1998 Predicated Value Panama Avenue North 38 3"Oil&Rock 18"Sandy Gravel Below 18"Rocky, some big Paris Avenue 39 (residential area) 53 Osman Avenue North 56 5"Oil&Rock 20"Sandy Clay Heavy Clay Y Some Big Rocks 65th Street North 67 2-3"Oil &Rock (Beach to Pecan) Sandy Clay Some Bigger Rock 64th Street North (Oxboro to Ozark) Ozark Avenue North 58 (64th to 65th) Oxboro Avenue North (62°d to Hwy 36) 5"Oil&Rock 20"Sandy Clay Heavy Clay Some Big Rock Alley (Oxboro to Panama) Appendix B Area E-Testing Results Street Name Soil Boring PCI Test Hole 1998 Predicated Value Peller Avenue North 59 2-3"Mix (56 th to 59th) 81 Rocky,Sandy Clay 63 Penrose Avenue North 56 2-3" (56th to 59th) 73 12"Sandy Clay 72 Heavier Clay More Rock Penfield Avenue 32 .0 56 56th Street North 56 (Penrose to Peller) Big- " Bg Rocks 12"Sandy Clay Heavier Clay Upper 56'x'Street No. 55 57th Street North 55 (Peller to Penfield) 58 Street North 84 (Stagecoach to Peller) 54 71 Perkins Avenue North 23 4-5"(2 Lifts) (56th to 57th) 42 Big Rock Limestone 57th(west of Perkins) 87 • Summary of Costs The following table summarizes the estimated costs of the proposed projects. Summary of Estimated Costs Construction Construction Total Cost Total Cost Cost Total Cost per foot per foot Street Reconstruction $1,441,400.00 $62.00 $1,981,940.00 $85.00 Storm Sewer $216,580.00 $9.00 $270,730.00 $12.00 Total $1,657,980.00 $71.00 $2,252,670.00 $97.00 Note: The total cost of the project does not include the cost for televising the sanitary sewer or testing the water main for leaks. These tests are necessary to determine if any major repairs are needed. Summary of Financing Implications (Assessments and City Costs) The following summarizes the financing implications that will result from implementing these projects. Total Project Cost $2,252,670 Residential Assessment Revenue $725,000 OPH Commercial Assessment Revenue $67,580 Stillwater Revenue $216,840 County Turnback Reimbursement ? General Fund $1,243,250 The following streets within Area D are bordered by properties within the Stillwater city limits: - Panama Avenue - Paris Avenue south of Beach Road. - Osman Avenue - 65th Street North - Ozark Avenue North -64th Street North -Part of Oxboro Avenue - Alley(Oxboro to Panama) The condition of these streets are such that they require reconstruction. Since Oak Park Heights residents do live on one side of the road it would be appropriate for the city to attempt to arrange the reconstruction of the street and ask the City of Stillwater to fund their half of the roadway either Oak Park Heights 1998 Street Reconstruction Project 4 reclamation process, which would grind up the existing bituminous and mix it with some of the sandy clay to create an aggregate material that would provide a solid base for the road. The condition of the existing pavements in Area D and Area E were last rated in 1987. For this report, the computer program Paver, was used to help predict the ranking of the roads in 1998. These predicted rankings are shown in Appendix C and on Figure 3 and Figure 4. The pavement condition indexes dropped from an average of 75 in 1987 to an average of 58 in 1998. The table below presents general categories to define PCI Rankings. Maintenance Recommended Pavement Condition Index Seal Coat 50-100 Overlay 30-60 Reconstruct 0-40 In general, PCI rankings below 35 require removal of the existing bituminous pavement before constructing a new bituminous surface. The existing aggregate base may also have to be reconstructed. PCI rankings between 35 and 55 require bituminous surface removal or major patching before constructing a bituminous overlay. PCI rankings over 55 typically do not require bituminous overlays and generally routine maintenance such as patching, crack sealing, and seal coats are cost effective. The deflection testing of the two areas was completed in the summer of 1997. The results of this test show that the majority of the streets have an adequate subgrade. The testing identified Paris, Peabody and Ozark as streets that may need subgrade correction. Therefore, quantities and costs for some subgrade correction have been included in this report. In addition,the results showed that 65th, 64th,Upper 63w, 6211d,Paul,Peabody,Paris, Ozark,Penrose and Perkins would experience cracking of the bituminous surface. The average PCI ranks the streets on the border of the "Overlay"/"Seal Coat" category. The deflection tests showed that a majority of the streets would crack under repetitive use and several streets actually require subrgrade correction. The test holes showed that the streets are in need of a solid base. These results, coupled with the fact that new concrete curb and gutter is proposed, make it feasible to recommend the total removal of the existing bituminous. Some streets will require removal of the existing aggregate base and subgrade improvements as well. Oak Park Heights 1998 Street Reconstruction Project 7 Area E Length Existing Proposed Street Name (Feet) Street Width Street Width (Feet) (Feet) Peller Avenue North (56th to 59th) 1350 24 28' Penrose Avenue North (56th to 59th) 1350 22.5 28' Penfield Avenue 560 18' 18'* 56th Street North (Penrose to Peller) 370 24' 28' Upper 56th Street North 220 24' 28' 57th Street North (Peller to Penfield) 830 24' 28' 58th Street North (Stagecoach to Peller) 990 23' 28' Perkins Avenue North (56`h to 576) 650 18' 18'* 57th (west of Perkins) 330 20.5' 24' Total 6650 ( 1.3 miles) *Due to the location of existing buildings, the maximum allowable street width is 18 feet. Oak Park Heights 1998 Street Reconstruction Project 9 Feasibility The 1998 Reconstruction Project is feasible. The following table summarizes the estimated costs of the proposed projects. Summary of Estimated Costs Construction Construction Total Cost Total Cost Cost Total Cost per foot per foot Street Reconstruction $1,441,400.00 $62.00 $1,981,940.00 $85.00 Storm Sewer $216,580.00 $9.00 $270,730.00 $12.00 Total $1,657,980.00 $71.00 $2,252,670.00 $97.00 The costs for the 1998 Reconstruction Project are slightly higher than the costs stated previously in the 1993 Comprehensive Plan for Areas D and E. The difference in cost is displayed in the table below. 1993 Comprehensive 1998 Reconstruction Street Plan Feasibility Report Streets - as shown in 1993 Plan $1,798,000 $1,383,630 Additional Streets -0- $598,310 Storm Sewer -0- $270,730 Total Project Cost $1,798,000 $2,252,670 The increase in the project cost from the 1993 Comprehensive Street Plan is due to the addition of the following: • This project proposes reconstructing additional streets in Area D. There is approximately 4,470 feet more than in the 1993 report at the cost of$386,480. This is due to the fact that streets bordered on one side by the city of Stillwater were not included with the previous report. • Storm sewer- the 1993 Comprehensive Street Plan did not include storm sewer costs and stated that these numbers would be evaluated with each individual project. The total cost of storm sewer is $270,730. Oak Park e' H cghts 1998 Street Reconstruction Project 10 Assessments / Revenue The assessment policy as established by the city council for the 1995 Reconstruction Project was based on the following: • Each residential property will be assessed the same amount • This amount is based on the amount to be paid by the average size lot on this project • Commercial properties will be assessed on a front footage basis A new policy that is presented in this report is that the city of Stillwater should pay for half of the cost of the streets that abut properties that lie within Stillwater city limits. The assessment amounts are as follows: Residential Property in Oak Park Heights $2900* /each Commercial Property in Oak Park Heights $34.80*/front foot Stillwater Properties $48.50* /front foot *Appendix B shows how these figures were obtained. There are 250 residential properties in Oak Park Heights to be assessed as part of this project. The total assessments for the project are as follows: Oak Park Heights Commercial Property Assessments Property Assessable Assessment Footage St Croix Villas Condos 1087 $37,830 ($1260 per unit) Church 330 $11,480 Orchard Park Condos 165 $5,740 Oak Park Heights Garden 360 $12,530 Total $67,580 Oak Park Heights 1998 Street Reconstruction Project 13 Appendix C Area D- Testing Results Street Name Soil Boring PCI Test Hole 1998 Predicated Value Upper 6l S`- At county rd. 51 Street 5.5"Bituminous 59 North 7.5"Base 85 Fill,mostly silty sand with little gravel 62"Street North 70 2"Oil&Rock 78 18"-20"sandy clay Below heavier clay 63`°Street North i 59 74 Upper 63t°Street North 2.5"Bituminious 52 2"Oil&Rock 9.5 base 70 Sandy Clay some small Fill to 5.0'mostly silty Rock sand 20"Sandy clay Below more clay 64m Street North 55 2"Oil&Rock 77 18" Sandy Rocky Clay Bigger Rock more Clay Pecan Avenue North 68 4-5"Oil&Rock 70 12" Sandy Clay Below Heavier Clay Peabody Avenue North 84 Paris Avenue North/ Range from 5.5"—7" 16 Beach Road Bituminous Pavement Range from 7.5"- 18.5" Base Fill mostly silty sand Paul Avenue North 42 51 Appendix C Area D- Testing Results Street Name Soil Boring PCI Test Hole 1998 Predicated Value Panama Avenue North 38 3"Oil&Rock 18"Sandy Gravel Below 18"Rocky, some big Paris Avenue 39 (residential area) 53 Osman Avenue North 56 5"Oil& Rock 20" Sandy Clay Heavy Clay Some Big Rocks 65m Street North 67 2-3"Oil&Rock (Beach to Pecan) Sandy Clay Some Bigger Rock 6401 Street North (Oxboro to Ozark) Ozark Avenue North 58 (64th to 65m) Oxboro Avenue North 5"Oil&Rock (62nd to Hwy 36) 20"Sandy Clay Heavy Clay Some Big Rock Alley (Oxboro to Panama) Appendix C P Area E-Testing Results Street Name Soil Boring PCI Test Hole 1998 Predicated Value Peller Avenue North 59 2-3"Mix (56t to 596) 81 Rocky, Sandy Clay 63 Penrose Avenue North 56 2-3" (56th to 59th) 73 12"Sandy Clay 72 Heavier Clay More Rock Penfield Avenue 32 56 56U1 Street North 56 3-3.5" (Penrose to Peller) Big Rocks 12"Sandy Clay Heavier Clay Upper 56th Street No. 55 5701 Street North 55 (Peller to Penfield) 58th Street North 84 (Stagecoach to Peller) 54 71 Perkins Avenue North 23 4-5"(2 Lifts) (56 th to 57th) 42 Big Rock Limestone 57th(west of Perkins) 87 co 0> CP (O < U) o vUl (0 m 0 0 w a) iz �' —Ini......_- // CD - m 0 ,\ rt WO C) z I _ OSGOOD AVE. N 7,1 0 (n 0 a CSAHP4 CSAH?4 > K O (�� �_ _) /1/ n / O Z \\ / �I ;ry m \ \ I / / ��11 + O0 \ / 'rte - I D mx 1 i i i I X I I 1 I I --1 I 1 I n a n 111 0 I 11 ■tv N K D I P1 1 I I' u,A I1 o I I I I I 1 1 1 1 - L l, i __ 1 l 11 ._ I - (VTI, I I I\F I I Cn O I 1 1 w� II 1 II I T I 1 Il I I I I I I li J x `.. , , — 1 i - X I 'a; D I ^ I I r Cji 0 h I 1 E.. f^el 0 I 1 t• 1 j I � � II 11 1 1. al C - 11 \ •I t.. - -' U I C co i i i, 11 I C \ i. c %1 ‘,.., II (01) — cA 1 1 .f Q 1 \1 1 I Q I > I \ '1 \ I i - \ \\ 1\\\ ,_[. _ _ -ham-/\,`!�, - ' 1 —_—_ - � I I 11 `, \\ , WO t —I t \\ \A\\ \\\\ ®® ;! i, : �- z 1 \ \\A\ \\\ RC 4 ` 'G 'Gtl�4�.*•.0 k"vO Yh 1;; �, © M, .I: 1111\ \\ \ \\ ':...::>;thUrs �' .. t i:-.:. LcoJ ,a Mr i \ \\ \ '' tc. �■� I \ \\ \ • I,, 1\' 1111111L�I _ ,,, ....-,..... \\,..\\ ., P0111 ------------ \ ,_ , ,,,. \\.\\\\.., ,_ , _,, , ,..1::):A 1161`1■11,._ ------1.---- -. \ 7 \\\\\\N\\\\.\\\\\\,N 11.11 I --I --- --- -- ------ - - VVI\\ \CD \ 1 1 N-.----.--, (1: 111r1 is,,„, ,,-,,,, _ , ...._:_.\- (._ ) , \ ....... , _- -- -- ___ _ _ __ __-4-- , ui ^ I _ice, .____ ,__----...... V of ' I ,� 1 __I ` Z 2-------: ----- 1 Ilit , ' s rri`i 4 t:t \ , l DDa/ 03 co a w 0 4 0 w fa 0 p -� cn 0 vi c < coo in 5. Z- G' -I xi in A T Z - m r: O 6' O = Z rTi O // \ \ // \\ TIJ O // \\ _— J — `--� Z Z // i cp == (O Z i 7 m — 7 77 t (f) Z 77 ■ i D M 7%� P' ABODY AVE. N, ( .dr .e (-) , z oo .,,,. Al . yz , vi M s �� CO •> PELLER kVE, N -I' .4 4, :0 11111 m :',i,‘:(.,-) cENROSE AVE N \\I-z-----------------.z . j ,:.„ 1 z 111.. Ill 1 O) 5 IP .•p DO��d� Ned I 1 - - N 1 *az=- .--:-- _ ,,,-, ,-- II _ _� ' - 116 (( ,..11,---------...,,..,-..... 0 ----)- ) ai / y.. ......, D ' Eillin, di , ,,),,--,) , __, , ,, . 4 , 1, ,...„.., p i ..,,,.,, .,,,,,,,z 1,.. / Cfl i 1 co , ,r Il C rn \__pppp0 dsi \-\'\'4 .' ' J • i O -o C / 0 rn 0 (7, 5' -=-- 3' rn o w —o 0 t;:t co 0 w D Q nc(D (bCb O ... 0 03 A 0 • o C° D D � (0 < vi (f) D K -� m - 73 ? z ID m -I o v 0 O i0 -I Z1 - - - - I I • C) v' ApryJl ' '="I �_r ill 1 1 0 OM ANA AVE. N z z V Z 1 I I 1 'T1 0 0 XU1 '1 1 ' c O, I , 1 D - , I U7 D- ----.1--F I I MI r I H D U.) .� _ U a D 1 z 1 K 1 11 (il I - I , (1) W Owl=- WM 1 1 � MP I I Il ri i / I , t1 1\\ 1 Co. Rd. 67 11111 OSMAN AVE. N 1----, ,r ii 1,___; I\; F----� _- I I, v_=a IR1 I• 1 s Ar AN ali I \ \ I 1t• \t 1 ; ,, ,/ / CY1 ., air— 1_,_,J K..\ I 0 i ,. ,,,., i _,, , , ,,, , , , ,, . , I , i, • ,..„ tun, 1 1 .,., ,n • I i 1i Aga rig 't ' 1 , 1 ill ' - . i , .. oil ,� 3 r y �", vas; — I I 1 .49A (I) i ..... 1 ii 11\it V/ ■ // ////// I I 1 I Ng.Cfl -qv ©J$d , 1 ;' \ 4 '/11 , 1 1 }r _ = �I di /lll i �\t, I I - J Ii 1 O It I� I I _ 0 // I 1 _ « I . _ \\ I I _ 1 \\ I I 1 1 \ I 1 CD CA \\ 1 1j 1( '-t- 0 1\ 111 U -17 11 1 � I \\ 1 \\ I 1 C I I 1t1I'11 o�tt Z7 1\ 't 'ti (1\ 1 tt \t M 1 1t 11\ 1 1\ 1\ ^ - \\ tt \ 11 \ \\ t �\ t t1 , // \ // 1 „ \ :It D D 33 m _DI 0 oawz iiii NUMBER VERBAL CONDITION RATING RATING GROUPING 100-------_ _ Excel lent `°-..■ 9 Pavements that hove little or . 80 no distress. •\■ Seal Coot Very Good \\ (50-100) Z Pavements that have \ o 70 a significant level \ 1998 F— of distress. \\ PCI OF 58 non-load related . \ Z 60 Good \ Pavements that have \ p a significant level \ 1998 o of distress. \ PCI OF 47 F . 50 load related. I Z Overlay 1999 W Fair (30-60) I PCI OF 32 M 40 > Pavements that have �\ PCI OF 28 a_ Poor major distress. `-' 30 \\ 2000 \ PCI OF 24 Reconstruction 20 Very Poor Pavements that have (0-40) "�— 2000 significant amounts ■■PCI OF 18 ■ of major distress. ■ 10 0 Foiled 3 1I5 ( YEARS) 20 2 I0 I5 APPROXIMATE AVERAGE FOR AREA D Sc ARES E APPROXIMATE AVERAGE FOR AREA B STREET LIFE CYCLE pi Bonestroo Rosene IN In b OAK PARK HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA FIGURE 8 Associ t s Associates COMPREHENSIVE STREET PLAN K:\55\5599100/5599100F81 FEB. 1999 COMM. 5599100 C �- fii7 /- oa c, 1/4-- 3 ‘ _ ....._ ___ 1 ,3 ,5 /?r&ett-- •- , 34-r-e e_ .7G - ey, ,,6,,,/ fV - (,Si �cS L _ y7 2 3 e S V iJW ;R . K 4. l� M :i1 /t"V/ V >e_ vi g Pitik —D //t3 c,.. / �s� 74c .s °J g 3 l ''/Id---7e..., e A - I A--(I LX-/ CP.-- A.. .,. ? °I.&/L r 7e, - ••:••„....,.. ,...,.:. .: .. „...:‘,„:„:“„,....,..„.•,::::,...„:„.:„...,,.. .,. 9 o . j.____5_. s . . • 7'; ,....A.it,-,,,,i,;,- *:*•‘=,:f"::f.0",-,,..,--. ,. I , [ • 8onestroo,Rosene,Anderlik and Associates.Inc.is an Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Bonestroo Employer and Employee Owned Rosene Principals:Otto G Bonestroo.PE • Marvin L.Sorvala.PE.• Glenn R.Cook,P.E.• 1111 - Robert G.Schunicht.PE.• Jerry A.Bourdon.PE. Anderlik & Senior Consultants:Robert W.Rosene.PE • Joseph C.Anderlik.PE.•Richard E.Turner.RE.• Susan M.Eberlin.CPA. VIII Associates Associate Principals:Howard A.Sanford.FE.• Keith A.Gordon.PE.• Robert R.Pfefferle,P.E.• Richard W.Foster.PE.• David O.Loskota.PE.•Robert C.Russek.A.I.A.• Mark A.Hanson.P.E.• Engineers & Architects Michael T.Rautmann.PE.• Ted K.Fteld,PE • Kenneth P Anderson,PE.• Mark R.Rolls,P.E.• David A.Bonestroo.M.B.A. • Sidney P.Williamson.PE..L.S.• Agnes M.Ring,M.B.A.•Allan Rick Schmidt.PE. Offices:St.Paul.S: Cloud.Rochester and'Z'almar,MN•Milwaukee.WI Website:www.bonestroo.corn April 14, 2000 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Oak Park Heights 14168 Oak Park Boulevard Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 Re: 2000 Street Reconstruction— Village Area of Oak Park Heights BRA File No. 55-00-104 Dear Mayor and Council: Transmitted herewith is the feasibility report of the 2000 Street Reconstruction Project- Village • Area. This report is an update to the Report on the 1999 Street Reconstruction Project. This summary is reviewing only Area E from the 1999 report. The summary includes information regarding the design, updated costs and tentative assessment for the reconstruction of Area E. It is recommended that you refer to the 1999 Street Reconstruction Report for background on the project and conditions of the streets. Respectfully Submitted, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. 4447-v7 Karen S. Shimon, P.E. I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the Sta of Minnesota. D nnis M. Post er, P.E. Date:April 14. 2000 Reg. No. 22011 2335 West Hiahwav 36 + St_ Part; MN cc111 a AC1-f.ZA-atinn . F.v• AcI-A2A-1/11 Table 1 Area E Length Existing Recommended Street Name (Feet) Street Width Street Width (Feet) (Feet) Peller Avenue North (56`'' to 59°i) I350 24 28 • Penrose Avenue North (56t to 59th) 1350 22.5 28 Penfield Avenue (57th to end) 360 18 24* Penfield Avenue (Upper 56th to 57`'') 200 22 28 56th Street North (Penrose to Peller) 370 24 28 Upper 56th Street North 220 24 28 57th Street North (Peller to Penfield) 830 24 28 58`h Street North (Stagecoach to Peller) 990 23 28 Perkins Avenue North (56th to 57th) 650 18 24* Total 6320 ( 1.2 miles) *Due to the narrow right of way on Perkins Avenue and Penfield Avenue it is recommended that these streets be widened to 24'> On each of these streets the following improvements will be made: Street Improvements • full depth recycling of the existing bituminous pavement (grinding it up to create aggregate base), • subgrade correction where necessary, • installation of concrete curb and gutter, • installation of concrete driveway aprons, • paving a 3" bituminous mixture surface, and • saw and seal bituminous wear course. Sewer Improvements • Storm sewer improvements. 2,,, .Sli' :'i r'l;'i t:.•7.)i!'7!_... �7- I �={� -Ii (ILIA:I'iar.. /1'i i1:c Assessments As directed by City staff, the assessments were determined by assessing 50% of the street construction costs. Attachment 3 shows the location of 80 potential assessable units. The units were determined by utilizingexisting'average lot width of 75'. ,t_oLexampk. if a , •ro•erty was 1.50' wide, it was broken into 2 units of 7 ' -ach: Table 5 shows the total assessments for each of the alternatives. Table 5 Assessments Alternative A B C 9 D E Total Cost of $664,300 $1,051,300 $759,300 $914,300 $886,300 Project - Street Construction $603,000 $990,000 $687,000 $842.000 $814,000 Cost Assessable N\ Construction $301,500 $495,000 $343,500 ` $421,000 $407,000 Cost Residential Unit $3,800 $6,200 $4,300 / $5.300 $5,100 Assessment Burden on City $362,8000 $556,300 $415,800 $493,300 $479,300 Recommendations Alternative A is the least expensive, but it is not practical to build a 24' wide street with curb and gutter. When a curb is in place a driver tends to drive 2-3' from the face of the curb. This results in the driving lane feeling very narrow with an oncoming car. In • addition, parking would not be recommended on a 24' wide street. Alternative C appears to be the most feasible for the area. -The 28' wide street will provide a comfortable driving lane; and when compared to the other alternatives, it will minimize the impact to the neighborhood. 5 'IN)li SJr;:.el /1::: ,,7,totc[ion- I fIlu;; .-1 Pea al Oa k Par. I L _wit. Tentative Project Schedule Receive Feasibility Report April 2000 Neighborhood Meetings May 2000 9 Public Hearing/Order Plans May 2000 And Specifications Approve Plans and Specifications July 2000 Open Bids July 2000 Award Project August 2000 Construction Begins August 2000 Substantial Construction Completed November 2000 Final Project Completion June 2001 Assessment Hearing June 2001 6 _''(i'i .SIr e'i ec,inSfruction- ()ak Park I'It k hfc AREA C Z w z z z Z AREA D > > a vt a N N _ z O cl a ¢ m O 0 0 o a a _ E. 65th S.. EVER._ .R. z N 64th I, E • . ST . N W a :I 1 O E 'UP.' 63rd i' ST. N ;I st.0 s* �`'`/ Q•.. II I; I'E. ::: ii ST. N� �. `c F� - =��� • iii ■•ri '�. 'T , I SJ JI'I H . _ STILLWATE i i EAST!; 62nd 'I !' ti �� d c _ O• Lt.Il u c;', ,� 61st ST. N T II , UP.^ 1\� �.{' 42 61st 61st 'I `•m z ST. CT. 9� st I ST.N.'`,'•, `,•wommimomimI ----- '"----.40/alk—/ 6GIh SL N 4,1 60C1i�--ii — , ST.N:. ,,`. /z UP.' S9th�j ST.N. z ' _ \� 59th u w — , , 59t ST. N. > I < a 59th z a a i l ,D I 79.''s ; 'a > z z N I[ 58th® N.',' a I p ' c p 58th ST. N. Lf it \'y! a z z �o w' w 57th ST. N. I I Z 11 J ..•,:. `L ce m 57th ST. N. 157th N. ''�I r S < c v, J 1 z �'• 5 v 56th • JQ ��r a 0 z - 0 1 of w -., w z i 1 1 ��.� p �i > .\\ y a a � ' 5th Si. N. o ¢ > �r 1M�. ,�r- z _ m = r ' a �'` a w o I i 1 I'`,I!• w Z a I t — w mi! L _ J AREA B �! � Z 11 AREA A o I AVE. ��ti O Bth�L O 4'I BAYPORT r . oI m \,\,, 7th 0 ti PLUMB ST. �. A`F_. I 4 AREA E I " � , ' z i I 1 L i' _ OAK PARK HEIGHTS I �I ; 5th AVE. BAYPORT I IN I STREET AREAS IA Bonestroo Rosene iiOAK PARK HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA ATTACHMENT 1 Associa b Associates COMPREHENSIVE STREET PLAN APPENDIX ALTERNATIVE C 2000 STREET RECONSTRUCTION -VILLAGE AREA PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE-28'WIDE, NO SIDEWALK 28' F-F Street Section (500'section) Item Unit Quantity Unit Price Cost Bituminuos Removal (24') SY 1200 $1.50 $1,800.00 Excavation (31'x 2') CY 1150 5.00 5,750.00 CL. 5 gravel (8") TN 760 7.25 5,510.00 Bituminous 3" TN 260 30.00 7,800.00 Conc. C &G B618 LF 1000 7.00 7,000.00 Restoration Sod/Top Soil SY 1200 3.00 3,600.00 Conc. Driveway SY 90 34.00 3,060.00 0.00 Const.Total $34,520.00 Const. Cost per foot $69.04 10% $37,972.00 • $75.94 25% $47,465.00 Cost per foot $94.93 Additional Costs Item Unit Quantity Unit Price Cost Location* Remove Landscaping LS 1 500 500.00 Block R Place Retaining Wall SF 600 16.00 9600.00 Block B Place Retaining Wall SF 600 16.00 9600.00 Block D Place Retaining Wall SF 1200 16.00 19200.00 Block I Extend existing Wall SF 150 16.00 2400.00 Block B Tree Removal Each 3 200.00 600.00 Block A Tree Removal Each 5 200.00 1000.00 Block C Tree Removal Each 4 200.00 800.00 Block D Tree Removal Each 3 200.00 600.00 Block E Tree Removal Each 2 200.00 400.00 Block F Tree Removal Each 3 200.00 600.00 Block I Tree Removal Each 4 200.00 800.00 Block J Tree Removal Each 1 200.00 200.00 Block M Tree Removal Each 4 200.00 800.00 Block N Tree Removal Each 1 200.00 200.00 Block Q Tree Removal Each 2 200.00 400.00 Block R Tree Removal Each 3i, 200.00 600.00 Block L Hedge Removal LF 100 3° 5.00 500.00 Block J Hedge Removal LF 100 5.00 500.00 Block J Hedge Removal LF 225 5.00 1125.00 Block M trim Trees Each 1 500.00 500.00 Block K Replace Trees Each 32 250.00 8000.00 . Hydrant relocate Each 1 2000.00 2000.00 Hydrant relocate Each 1 2000.00 2000.00 Pathway construction LF 400 12.00 4800.00 Redo Storm Sewer EACH 10 0.00 0.00 Const.Total $67,725.00 10% $74,497.50 25% $93,121.88 'Block Locations are shown in Attachment 4 APPENDIX ALTERNATIVE C 2000 STREET RECONSTRUCTION -VILLAGE AREA PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE-24' PENFIELD& PERKINS 24' F-F Street Section (500'section) Item Unit Quantity Unit Price Cost Bituminuos Removal (24') SY 1200 $1.50 $1,800.00 Excavation'(27'x 2') CY 1000 5.00 5,000.00 CL.5 gravel (8') TN 725 7.25 5,256.25 Bituminous 3' , TN 220 30.00 6,600.00 Conc. C&G B618 LF 1000 7.00 7,000.00 Restoration Sod/Top Soil SY 1200 3.00 3,600.00 Conc. Driveway SY 90 34.00 3,060.00 Const.Total $32,316.25 Const. Cost per foot $64.63 10% $35,547.88 Cost per foot $71.10 25% $44,434.84 Cost per foot $88.87 • I '�