The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2001-08-28 CC Meeting Packet EnclosureMeeting Date: Agenda Item Title: Estimated Time Required: Agenda Placement: Originating Department/Requestor: Requester's Signature: Oak Park Heights Request for Council Action August 28, 2001 Sigstad Carpets: 1. Utility and Street Improvements 2. Resolution to Approve Site Plan Review and Conditional Use Permit. 3. Development Agreement 5 Minutes Old Business Pla ing Co fission /StafiF /Consultants Action Requested: Approval of Resolution and Development Agreement Receive Engineering Report and Direct Staff /Legal to proceed regarding street and utility improvements. The Planning Commission voted 5 -0 to recommend approval of the Sigstad Carpet application at their meeting of 8/9/01 and this application was considered at the City Council meeting of 8/14/01. The City Council tabled this issue to tonight's meeting so that additional research could be conducted by staff on a number of issues. Enclosed with this cover memo please find a memo from the City Planner which addresses the questions raised at the City Council meeting as welt as a Development Agreement prepared by the City Attorney and a Utility and Street improvement report prepared by the City Engineer. Also included in this packet is a letter from the City Attorney regarding Brown's Creek's jurisdictional authority for plan review in this area and a memo from the City Engineer which finds the on -site pond and drainage calculations for the project to be acceptable. 1 have spoken with Mr. Mark Doneux of Browns Creek who has advised me that Brown's Creek is not issuing any permits in this area, but may submit comments regarding the project dependent on their workload and/or level of interest or concern. 1 have also spoken with Ken Hartung regarding Middle St. Croix WMO's plan review for the project. Middle St. Croix's review would also consist of the submittal of comments or suggestions, without a permit requirement. Mr. Hartung let me know that the Middle St. Croix will not have their next meeting until 10/10/01, that this item will be placed on their agenda and that they may submit any comments they have regarding the project. The applicant has made application to both organizations. Please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions you may have. Administrative Recommendation: Approve Denial No Recommendation S:ISHARED\Forms \COUNCIL ACTION REQUEST.doc 4 AUG 2 2 2001 er James F. Lammers Robert G. Briggs * Mark J. Vierling • Thomas J. Weidner 4. Susan D. Olson 4- David K. Snyder Timothy M. Kelley Ms. Kris Danielson Community Development Director City of Oak Park Heights 14168 - 57th Street North P.O. Box 2007 Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 Dear Kris: M.TVldcb LAW OFTICES OF Lammers, Briggs, Wolff & 1835 Northwestern Avenue Stillwater, Minnesota 55082 (651) 439 -2878 FAX (651) 439 -2923 cc: Kim Karnper, Acting City Administrator Writer's Direct Dial: (651) 351-2118 August 21, 2001 Re: Sigstad Carpets Application Question of Jurisdiction!Stormwater Management Authority A question has arisen relative to the authority of stormwater management within the City of Oak Park Heights in terns of which government entity has the current jurisdiction to determine stormwater flows, etc. within the community. Although there is an appeal pending with the Minnesota Court of Appeals relative to the orders of the Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources of January 24, 2001, the Board of Water and Soil Resources orders are, nonetheless, jurisdictional and effective until such time as they would be reversed by the Court of Appeals. Consequently, their order assigning the City of Oak Park Heights to Brown's Creek Watershed District for purposes of watershed authority is effective and does assign stormwater management issues to Brown's Creek Watershed District for purposes of authority at the present tine. Obviously, that directive could change should the Court of. Appeals issue its order in a manner so as to reverse that directive; however, such ne as that would occur the Board of Water and Soil Resources is the juri ` ctional a ority on stormwater management issues within the community. Vierling, P.L.L.P. Paul A. Wolff (1944 -1996) Lyle J. Eckberg of Counsel Qualified Neutral Arbitrator *Certified Real Estate Specialist Qualified Neutral Mediator VIA FACSIMILE & U. S. MAIL (651) 439-0574 August 17, 2001 City of Oak Park Heights 14168 North 57 Street P.O. Box 2007 Oak Park Heights, MN 55082-2007 Attn: Kris Danielson Re: Sigstad's Carpet Oak Park Heights, Minnesota Dear Kris: We are in the Conditional Use Permit process with the City of Oak Park Heights on the above-mentioned project. We hope to receive approval for this project and apply for a Building Permit in the next three to four weeks. We have been unable to determine who has jurisdiction authority over this project as it relates to the watershed. We would appreciate a response by August 24, 2001, as to whether your agency has jurisdiction in this area. If your agency has jurisdiction, please forward any additional information we may need to expedite this process. Sincerely, GREYSTONE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY Jeff Hensel Sales _Manager JJH/dq 41r4 mErvit gri ,'w L ir Irak kiktrof 1r 1221 East Fourth Avenue, Suite 110 Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 77 ,I TAMA, i 71,VSLes-, - ...11M11! Equal Opportunity Telephone: 952-496-2227 Employer/Contractor Fax: 952-445-4191 Nov 27 01 02:08p Debbie Quinnell August 17, 2001 Middle St. Croix WMO %City of Bayport 294 N. St Street Bayport, MN 55003 Re: Sigstad's Carpet Oak Park Heights, Minnesota Jeff Hensel Sales Manager J]H/dq GR,E111 a i LP I' 1 221 East Fourth Avenue, Suite 110 Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 CONSTRUCTION COMPANY Dear Sir or Madam: We are in the Conditional Use Permit P rocess with the City of Oak Park Heights on the above - mentioned project. We hope to receive approval for this project and apply for a Building Permit in the next three to four weeks We have been unable to determine who has jurisdiction authority over this project as it relates to the watershed. We would appreciate a response by August 24, 2001, as to whether your agency has jurisdiction in this area. If your agency has jurisdiction, please forward any additional information we may need to expedite this process. Sincerely, GREYSTONE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY Equal opportunity Employer/Contractor 952 - 278 -1195 P.4 Telephone: 952-496 2227 Fax: 952-445-4191 Nov 2? 01 02 :O8p0 Debbie Quinnell August 17, 2001 Jeff Hensel Sales Manager J �K r,X a 1 VN E Valley Branch Watershed District P.O. Box 838 Lake Elmo, MN 55042 Re: Sigstad's Carpet Oak Park Heights, Minnesota Dear Sir or Madam: We are in the Conditional -Use Permit process with the City of Oak Park Heights on the above - mentioned P ect. j ro We hope to receive approval for this project and apply for a Building Permit in the next three to four weeks. We have been unable to determine who has jurisdiction authority over this project as it relates to the watershed. We would appreciate a response by August 24, 2001, as to whether your agency has jurisdiction in this area. If agency our has jurisdiction, please fonvard any additional information we may need to y expedite this process. Sincerely, GREYST o E CONSTRUCTION C OMPAN Y 1221 East Fourth Avenue, Suite 110 Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 CONSTRUCTION COMPANY ' mo w , w. - »..w r ..��. -A ... .. • -n -a.. r r •..a. ...... - .. .. -- .. - - r rte Equal Opportunity Employer /Contractor S52-278-1195 p.5 Telephone: 952 -496 -2227 Fax: 952-445-4191 Nov 27 01 02:08p Debbie Qu i nne l l August 17, 2001 Jeff Hensel Sales Manager JJH/dq %IHtVT.7 1 lJN r, 1221 East Fourth Avenue, Suite 110 Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 Washington Soil & Conservation District 1825 Curve Crest Blvd, Suite 101 Stillwater, MN 55082 Re: Sigstad's Carpet Oak Park Heights, Minnesota CONSTRUCTION COMPANY Dear Sir or Madam: We are in the Conditional Use Permit process with the City of Oak Park Heights on the above-mentioned project. We hope to receive approval for this project and apply for a Building Permit in the next three to four weeks. We have been unable to determine who has jurisdiction authority over this project as it relates to the watershed. We would appreciate a response by August 24, 2001, as to \vhether your agency has jurisdiction in this area. If P g jurisdiction, y y enc our a has please forward any additional information we may need to expedite this process. Sincerely, GREYSTONE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY Equal Opportunity Employer/Contractor 952-278 p • 8 Telephone: 952-496-2227 Fax: 952 -445 -4191 Kris Danielson From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Dennis M. Pastier Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik & Associates 2335 West Highway 36, St. Paul, MN 55113 Direct: (651) 604 -4815 Office: (651) 636 -4600, x4815 Fax: (651) 636 -1311 Cellular: (612) 865 -9187 E -mail: dpostler @bonestroo.com Pastier, Dennis M [dpostler a@bonestroo.com Thursday, August 23, 2001 2:15 PM Jay Johnson (E- mail); Kimberly Kamper (E -mail) Kris Danielson (E- mail); Mark Vierling (E- mail); Scott Richards (E -mail) Sigstad Carpets -- Drainage /Pond Calculations I have had a chance to review the drainage calculations and pond sizing for Sigstad's and talked to the engineer at Otto Associates would prepared them. In short, the drainage calculations, pond sizing and proposed stormwater runoff for the developed conditions are acceptable as submitted. A "brief" explanation: The existing site conditions have slightly over half of the site draining to the north /northeast to the southerly ditch of 60th Street North, which then drains easterly. Slightly less than half of the site drains to an existing swale to the southeast corner of the site, then easterly. Drainage from both directions eventually ends up at the lowpoint in the southwest corner of 60th St. N. and Oakgreen Avenue. The proposed site conditions take almost all of the storm water runoff from the site to a pond in the southeast corner of the property. Although half of the site that used to drain northeasterly is now redirected to the southeast, the pond retains the runoff under various sized storm events and discharges approximately the same rate of runoff to the southeast that the existing site conditions do. Overall, the developed site is discharging at a rate less than the existing site conditions. And when we use the term "redirected ", this flow is tributary to the same ultimate ponding area, so the developed scenario is actually better than the existing conditions, in terms of rate control. facsimile transmittal R CC: Date: I Vg- VC „iv, (fr "77 Pages: 0 Urgent Notes: free, Adr • 01.z)(s 0414/1-10, idiv4/PfriAy--Tei&/v .7 Ver?v 0 For Review 0 Please Comment 0 Please Reply 0 Please Recycle 97 .4 777 L /ee_ SP Le) City of Oak Park Heights 14168 Oak Park Blvd. Box 2007 Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 Phone (651) 439-4439 Facsimile (651) 439-0574 a c.--1 7 -- 0 • • • • • 0 • • • • • • M. AUG 2 2 2001 James F. Lammers Robert G. Briggs * Mark j. Vierling • + Thomas j. Weidner •+ Susan D. Olson 4- David K. Snyder Timothy M. Kelley Ms. Kris Danielson Community Development Director City of Oak Park Heights 14168 - 57th Street North P.O. Box 2007 Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 Dear Kris: MJV/dcb LAW OFFICES OF Lammers, Briggs, Wolff & Vierling, P.L.L.P. 1835 Northwestern Avenue Stillwater, Minnesota 55082 (651) 439-2878 FAX (651) 439-2923 Writer's Direct Dial: (651) 351-2118 August 21, 2001 Re: Sigstad Carpets Application Question of Jurisdiction/Stormwater Management Authority A question has arisen relative to the authority of stormwater management within the City of Oak Park Heights in terms of which government entity has the current jurisdiction to determine stormwater flows, etc. within the community. Although there is an appeal pending with the Minnesota Court of Appeals relative to the orders of the Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources of January 24, 2001, the Board of Water and Soil Resources orders are, nonetheless, jurisdictional and effective until such time as they would be reversed by the Court of Appeals. Consequently, their order assigning the City of Oak Park Heights to Brown's Creek Watershed District for purposes of watershed authority is effective and does assign stormwater management issues to Brown's Creek Watershed District for purposes of authority at the present time. Obviously, that directive could change should the Court of Appeals issue its order in a manner so as to reverse that directive; however, e as that would occur the Board of Water and Soil Resources is the juri ctional a o ity on stormwater management issues within the community. cc: Kim Kamper, Acting City Administrator Paul A. Wolff (1944-1996) Lyle j. Eckberg Of Counsel •Qualified Neutral Arbitrator *Certified Real Estate Specialist -e>-Qualified Neutral Mediator VIA FACSIMILE & U. 5. MAIL (651) 439-0574 { .',, fc".etaa`}'A + w. aw+ w ... e...”,,+I. MM :,c•it .' "+.., - :+ .x[M'.r v... v .vWr- ,.. . wnr+..:[•i'r: -+ ..w•Gt.�.a..tiM.4r•. '- -^[[m: n.:T......••••r.'v•• I 1 .,. 1... . . . f. y S i f . ENGINEERS & LAND SURVEYORS, INC. 3 # .... . 1 TTO SSOCIATES • 'w=« N .[9�7.. e�C[er} ".•:l.yy�[{,j: .•F.C/rirH'. ./r-�' •s;e• .•••• • - +•••ew.eo0e• .u••.�5[«+rew: :.:- -n • _ _ _ __^.. r-.' FVVwr.+ w+-.•..• e • • • •.u.af f } go 4, sfbit 1 I r i 1 • = 4 G .1 i 1 _.... ....., . ,. . .. t . ......, ,.., t ..- i _„......: . . ... . . ........ i r i ..: . t } T y y r s ,s:.r.,vecee.. ' ..c«w...•..ven• o•...._. x•a.a ..„..+•w'- -..a -. [...w y v+�••'•r....., < "r:- '.t•- .e[,...e.rr�N... -c r.:ax�:..�a ...aa. y . i f ; , , '..' .. $ r r # r, } r .. r. i. i 7, k .rw.mv -o.-• r...r ...... irr• xv..,.:H..r.-.- .., . ,..-.x?-'. n cwt.,..,.,„ . Yn-r.,.;.. { - - ---f.- .,....�- �r......�...,,. -. ,e.._...co.r ..:.>x . en•. xe:.... u.,r bsevwrS�... wr...- •.vw-.,.......w.�er.di....e•.: .=r:+. G...r,,...n '-r.- : .r -,G.: �• o - A r.+., c - : •Y .,.- ..:,.....e..,•.........i•.• a ....- .a•w..jrv,.n..wr�•b•.+.a•: rw..++�ax= : r.r. ..c ..s•y.»..rr< € 's i 5 i = 4 s s PROJECT SI LDcJ;;RPr JOB NO. � J g5 �� CALCULATED BY DATE 141 SHEET NO. j OF 1 9 WEST DIVISION STREET - BUFFALO, MINN. 55313 - (763) 682-4727 FAX (763) 682 -3522 0 t..) P, v •r -::. v.• rr. ..:..y.ti....M1:.,,,' ,•. .., r ..•., rr e•. v ti.. Yr...... r.. e:.,, kr.- a•.+ rr.- sr- iw,z.,u- .e..,� +.t•,: x r ..•f+,e<.,..n.....[r..P•.x,.aw .+ew f � .e.. • Q, • evr..,. varrr r' +:- ac•:e.vGrx..:.r._r.. • r ftM[ L1 K![ +�ee[:..x'r.rvv- +ri '�[.u�.:.8�� r..�:ws•a+0; cr4ee i . .- n ..�- wv. .b..•...a:rr.A ems[- ..,.�.,,[e�.:,: 4 y ] . . ... . . .. .... . ..... .... .. .......f ... ....... ... .. .. ....... y .. . -. ... - ...... .. ... .. .. ... 1 11 . ........... 1 1 .--... t 1 .... . . s. . 1 .. .... ... . 1 t 13:%e n•✓l w+.w>•..r-�..A.O+..R+.,.•i. == •- - .c: -r. - ',C......uw -.•ra . r.,. vw...[ .w++o•,,...w,�'.«.�.wx4.i•4w• f x 1 • ..a.•,••.rta..c....r.•�•FS -:+�• : e�.±+. ee.:l cc[. s-..+ �a .r.i..:.,oro- L�..se:vrrriw.« +. .a • v - •.. • 3 r1 J � s ! - s 33$ 1/13/99 Page 1 RECORD NUMBER : 5 TYPE : UNIV. RATIONAL DESCRIPTION : Existing 2yr Runoff [HYDROGRAPH INFORMATION] HYDROGRAPH REPORT Peak Discharge.. a O 0 0 • O O O O O O O O O O Y 0 Y 0 P ■ 0 9 0 i Y volume.aoao ....O000 OOOOOOm.O®OO.a..e..m. Time Interval... aa aaaeoaaaaaaa®aaa®aa . aooa Timeto Peak. ® ®........... ®s... ®.. ®.. ®. Timeof Base o.......o......4 ®,........... Multiplication factor........ ®..O®®®OOOOOO [RATIONAL HYDROGRAPH INFORMATION] Flow Multiplier. . e e . . . . . . . e . . . . . . . . . . e . . . . Receding limb factor ® ®. ®.... ® ®.e® [BASIN DESCRIPTION] = 0.93 (cfs) - 0e18 (acft) = 1.00 (min) 132.95 (min) = 487.48 (min) = 1.00 1.00000 1.00000 Watershed Area... ..................®.®.... = 2.00 (ac) Curve Number. ..... ..�� ®�� ®�........... = o Runoff coefficient .. ...... ®......,..... 0.30 1/13/99 [TIME CONCENTRATION -- TR -55] SHEET FLOW Manning's Roughness ooef. (n)...........0. Flow Length (L).... ®m ..................... 2-yr 24-hr Rainfall (R) 0 ............... . Land Slope (S) ............................ Travel Time of Sheet Flow................. SHALLOW FLOW I Coef (surface description) (K)....000000 Watercourse (S).. ..... ....®.0d000000 Velocity (V).. ..... ....................... Flow Length (L).0000.0oo.o.o 0 00.00o.s o ogi.0 Travel Time of Shallow Flow... ..... �..��m® CHANNEL FLOW Hydraulic Radius (R)...0.................. Channel Slope (S)...... ®............ ®..... Manning's Roughness Coef. (n) ®............ Channel Velocity (V)..........0.. o os. Flow Length (L)................0000e••o o oo Travel Time of Shallow Flow.. 0009000009000 TIME OF CONCENTRATION Time of Concentration........ ............. [RAINFALL DESCRIPTION] Distribution Type.... • .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.* o o 0 Total Precipitation.. woo o®000000000®00oo Return Period.. .......... . ............. Storm Duration.. O 00000000000s0000000m000 Page 2 0.20000 450.00 (ft) 2.75 (i n ) 0.02000 44.32 (min) 0.00000 0.00000 0.00 (ft/s) 0.00 (ft) 0.00 (min) 0.00 (ft) 0.00000 0.20000 0.00 (ft /s) 0.00 (ft) 0.00 (min) 44.32 (min) SYNTHETIC 1.14 (in) 2 (yr) 0.74 (hr) 1/13/99 Page 1 HYDROGRAPH REPORT RECORD NUMBER : 4 TYPE : UNIV. RATIONAL DESCRIPTION : Proposed 2yr Runoff to Pond [HYDROGRAPH INFORMATION] Peak Discharge . ®0.06909099 @@00®900000$00®0 = 7.31 (cfs) V o l ume a a s v 9 v. 9. 0 6 9 ®.. 9.9.0 9 r+ 9. 9 6 9 9 9 a. m a a 9 -- 0.19 (Cac ft ) Time Interval............ 9 9 9 0• 9 9 9 9 9 9 9® 9 9 9 a 19 00 (min) Time to Pea; } Y m O 0 V O . .......WO ■ 0 0 9 9 * 0 0 0 0 0 9 = 18.66 ( min ) Time of Base 966.69..99..6..6.99.660.9.9..• -- 68943 (min) Multiplication factor.99900990000000e90 ®00 = 1000 [RATIONAL HYDROGRAPH INFORMATION] Flow Multiplier 999 ....... .99..909999090® Receding limb factor...... ®090990600900000 [BASIN DESCRIPTION] 1.00000 1.00000 Watershed Area . ........... ..... ..... 2.00 (ac ) Curve Number....... . ....... ............. = 0 Runoff coefficient... ....6999............ = 0.83 1 /13/99 [TIME CONCENTRATION -- TR- 5 5 ] SHEET FLOW Manning' s Roughness Coef. . (n)... ..... 0 0 0 Flow Length (L). ................ 000Y0.0000 2-yr 24-hr Rainfall (R) ........ m a .... 0 0 0 Land Slope (S)00...00...000....0 Travel Time of Sheet Flow.. SHALLOW FLOW CHANNEL FLOW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 K_Coef ( surface description ) (K). . 0 ...... . Watercourse Slope (S).0.000 ®...0000...0.00 Velocity (v) 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.. 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Flow Length (L)00.mm. ®....0..0000.000.. ® @0 Travel Time of Shallow Flow00.000000006000 Hydraulic Radius (R)m..........0.000.000 ®0 Channel Slope (S)s ®0...0. ®...0..000 ®0 ®0..® Manning's Roughness Coef. (n)............. Channel Velocity (x)0..0...0..0.00.0.. ®... Flow Length (L).. ........................ Travel Time of Shallow Flow® ®0000000000 TIME OF CONCENTRATION Time of Concentration .. .... ® ®. ® ®. ®....g... [RAINFALL DESCRIPTION] Distribution Type.... 0000000000000600.0.00 Total Precipitation.. 000000000 *.00..0 Return Period00.000 ®..0... ®...... ®.0000... Storm Duration.. Wee 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Page 2 0.01300 260000 (ft) 2.75 (in) 0.00700 4.88 (min) 0.00000 0.00000 0.00 (ft /s) 0.00 (ft) 0.00 (min) 0.50 (ft) 0.00500 0.01300 5.11 (ft /s) 410.00 (ft) 1.34 (min) 6022 (min) SYNTHETIC 0.46 (in) 2 (yr) 0.10 (hr) 1/14/99 RECORD NUMBER : 8 TYPE : RESER STOR € IND DESCRIPTION : Routing [ HYDROGRAPH INFORMATION] P eak Discharge0.0 ®0..00••••.00.0.... ®.0.•• 1Iolume O i 0 0 0 a Y 0.. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 Time Interval Time to Peak ...000600000000000000000000000 Timeof Base.... ..000000000000000000000000 PeakElevation0000000000000000000000000000 [RESERVOIR STRUCTURE INFORMATION] Reservoir##. ... ®..a...a..a0.a00.0.0.00,..0. Description .00..00.0..0.... ....... ........ Storage type. .0 ........ 0000 ®�� Max storage.. ..... 000. Discharge 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .. 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0. 0 0 Max discharge ..00.0.....0. 0000000000000000 [RESERVOIR INFORMATION] Reservoir Description.. . [INFLOW HYDROGRAPH INFORMATION] HYDROGRAPH REPORT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reser ## 0....0.....0 ®000000000000000000 2 • pond2 • MAN STAGE /AREA 14495.29 tuft • COMP STAGE /DIS �- 2.54 cfs — *0 0 � = pond2 Page 1 0.65 (cfs) 0.19 (acft) 1.00 (min) 63.00 (min) 1355.00 (min) 935.36 (ft) 2 Hydrograph •000000* -� 4 Hydrograph Description.. = Proposed 2yr Runoff to Pond 1/13/99 Page 1 HYDROGRAPH REPORT RECORD NUMBER : 3 TYPE : UNIV. RATIONAL DESCRIPTION : Existing 10yr Runoff [ HYDROGRAPH INFORMATION] Volume....... Peak Discharge. 0000.0.0000�0��0...0m0..a0. e m s.. 0 0. 0 0 0 0® o a. 0.. 0 0 0. B 0... TimeInterval... .. m m .. ®........ o .. m .. a ... . Time Peak 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0# Ti me of Base 0000.0...000000000 coo 00000000 Multiplication factor®.®®® @.0.0000.000 ® ®00 [RATIONAL HYDROGRAPH INFORMATION] [BASIN DESCRIPTION] O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Flow Multiplier .......... ® ®. @ ®............ Receding limb factor...................... 1.68 (cf s ) 0.33 (acft) -- 1.00 (min) 132.95 (min) - 487.48 (min) - 1000 1.00000 1.00000 Watershed j- Area ...00.. 0...00.000.0 ®.0.0. ®.. - 2.00 (ac) Cur ve Number 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ® 0 0 0 ® 0 0 0 0 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 = 0 Runoff coefficient........................ = 0.35 1/13/99 [TIME CONCENTRATION -- TR -55] SHEET FLOW Manning ' s Roughness Coe f 0 (n) 0 0 . 0 . . Flow Length (L )..00004.0.00000000000000000 2-yr 24 -hr Rainfall (R)...9 Land Slope ( S } v 0 0 0 e 0 0 0 0 0 a O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Travel Time of Sheet SHALLOW FLOW CHANNEL FLOW TIME OF CONCENTRATION Time of Concentration.. [RAINFALL DESCRIPTION] Distribution Type..00 Total Precipitation... Return Period.0.000 Storm Duration...-. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ® 0 0 0 K Coe f (surface description) [ . Watercourse Slope (S )..0.0 ®0000.00000000 ® Velocity(v ).000. ®0® 0000000000000000000000 Flow Length (L)ra00000o0as00.0 Travel Time of Shallow Flow..... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hydraulic Radius (R)0 ®...00.0000.0000.0..0 Channel Slope (S ).0..0.00.000.0.000. 000000 Manning's Roughness Coef0 (n). ®00.000000.0 Channel Velocity (v ).000..0.0.0. ®000 000000 Fl Length ( L) . e,... ®. ®.® r . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 Travel Time of Shallow Flow00.000......0.0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0® 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Page 2 0.20000 450000 (ft) 2.75 (in) 0.02000 44.32 (min) 0.00000 0.00000 0.00 (ft/s) 0.00 (ft) 0.00 (min) 0.00 (ft) 0.00000 0.20000 0.00 (ft/s) 0000 (ft) 0.00 (min) 44.32 (min) SYNTHETIC 1.77 (in) 10 (yr) 0.74 (hr) 1/13/99 Page 1 RECORD NUMBER : 4 TYPE : UNIV. RATIONAL DESCRIPTION : Proposed 10yr Storm [HYDROGRAPH INFORMATION] Peak Discharge. O00Oa. ®..00 @A..00®O060O®. V olume. a. o e o0 ■ 0 0 0 0. 0.. 0 0. 0.® v 0 0 0 a. 0 m 0 0 Time Interval s.. ®.......,. @o..........a.o9 T ime to Peak . O 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ti me of Base.000.0.000.00. Multiplication factor.. [RATIONAL HYDROGRAPH INFORMATION] HYDROGRAPH REPORT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Flow Multiplier0.0 ®0.0..0..0..0 ®0.0.0090.0 Receding limb factor0.0 ..... .............. [BASIN DESCRIPTION] = 10.26 ( cfs ) = 0.26 (acft) - 1.00 (min) = 18.66 (min) = 68e43 (min) = 1.00 1.00000 1.00000 Watershed . 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ® 0 0 0 0 0 = 2.00 ( ac curve . ® 0 . Number....... .. 0.00 600.06e.0000,0 = 0 Runoff coefficient... ..................... = 0.83 1/13/99 [TIME CONCENTRATION -- TR -55 ] SHEET FLOW Manning's Roughness Coef. (n)m.. ..... 0�0�� Flow Length (L) 2-yr 24 -hr Rainfall (R) . , Land Slope (S )$ 0. e o m v e. a o a 0 .. a o• 0• + 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Travel Time of Sheet Flow 0m..$ SHALLOW FLOW CHANNEL FLOW O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 K_Coef (surface description) (K) 0 . 0 .... . 0 Watercourse Slope (S)0.0.00...00®O0000000O Velocity(V )Y00... ®.O ®90 .... ..... P. ®.. ... . Flow Length (L)0.m...0... ®0...0......0...0 Travel Time of Shallow Flow000 000000000000 Hydraulic Radius ( R) 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0® 00 0 9 0 0 0 Channel Slope (S)00...00.0. ®.® ®..000000000 Manning's Roughness Coef. (n)0..000000•0 Channel Velocity (V)...0..0.00...00.b....0 Flow Length (L)m.0. ®0000000.00000000000000 Travel Time of Shallow Flow.. . . . • ..... . TIME OF CONCENTRATION Time of Concentration .•••••0.0000000000000 [RAINFALL DESCRIPTION] Distribution Type.... ...000.0900•000000909 Total Precipitation...................... R eturn Period. @,..0000000.000000000090009® Storm Duration. .. .•... O 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Page 2 0.01300 260.00 (ft) 2.75 (in) 0.00700 4.88 (min) 0.00000 0.00000 0.00 (ft /s) 0.00 (ft ) 0.00 (min) 0.50 (ft) 0.00500 0.01300 5.11 (ft/s) 410.00 (ft) 1.34 (min) 6.22 (min) SYNTHETIC 0.64 (in) 10 (yr) 0.10 (hr) 1/14/99 RECORD NUMBER : 6 TYPE : RESER STOR. IND DESCRIPTION : Routing [HYDROGRAPH INFORMATION] HYDROGRAPH REPORT P eak Discharge............................ OlUrne e• a e• o•• v 0. 0 6 a® 0 o e. a 6 m e• w a a• m ®• m• TimeInterval .a. ®....a............ ®....e ®. Timeto Peak ....••••••••••••••••■•••••••••• Timeof Base . ® ®.... ® ® ® ®.......... ®... ®... Peak Elevation .m. ®a. 4...a.... ..... [RESERVOIR STRUCTURE INFORMATION] Reservoir# ..............................m Description ...4 ®..........a.. ®.a....a.. ®.. Storage •G t ' ype ® ®• • • • ®••••• •••••• ®••••••••• • Maxsto. Lge .....•••••••••••••••••000es®00e Discharge type M ax discharge............................. [RESERVOIR INFORMATION] Reservoir ## . w ...... . [INFLOW HYDROGRAPH INFORMATION] 00000000•0006.000 *••• Reservoir Description.. ........ • ®��® = Pond2 Page 1 0.71 (cfs) 0.26 (acft) 1.00 (min) 63.00 (min) 1431.00 (min) 935.84 (ft) 2 Pond2 = MAN STAGE /AREA 14495.29 tuft COMP STAGE/DIS -� 2.54 cfs 2 Hydrograph ...... a ....................... '"'" 4 Hydrograph Description..oe0000.... ® • 0®4.4..0 = Proposed 10yr Storm 1/13/99 Page 1 HYDROGRAPH REPORT RECORD NUMBER : 3 TYPE : UNIV. RATIONAL DESCRIPTION : Existing lOOyr Runoff [HYDROGRAPH INFORMATION] Peak Discharge.. . ....... 0 0. 0 0 0 0 v a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 = 2.21 (cfs) Volume.......... v 0 0 0 0 Q 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 v a o ■ o o v 0 0 0 . 0.43 (acft) Time Interval... .00000060000•0000000000000 = 1.00 (min) Time to Peak . ®.aamaoaoa.a.s0..0.0a.00®OOO. = 132.95 (min) Time of Base...... a s ®. 0. ®® a v a a v v O ra a v a a a a 0 a . 487.48 (min) Multiplication factor00.aaa.aa.......00..a = 1.00 [RATIONAL HYDROGRAPH INFORMATION] Flow Multiplier.a0.a ......... ............. Receding limb factor ®...,0..0....000.00.00 [BASIN DESCRIPTION] 1.00000 1.00000 Watershed Aream. . ........... • ......... . - 2.00 (ac) Curve Number....... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 00 0 0 00 = Runoff coefficient... s00000.otpeocto®eemee = 0.30 1/13/99 [TIME CONCENTRATION -- TR- 5 5 SHEET FLOW Manning's Roughness Coef. (n)............ Flow Length (L)...$00.00.. @000........ ®® 2-yr 24-hr Rainfall (R)..... ... 0 ... . La nd Slope (S). ...0a ....... 0000.00.. @ �0 Travel Time of Sheet Flow...-0 00a0m0�� SHALLOW FLOW K Coef (surface description) (K)... ...... . Watercourse Slope ( S) 0 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Velocity ( V ).. ®.0.0m.00........ 000..00.. Flow Length (L) Travel Time of Shallow Flow. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CHANNEL FLOW Hydraulic Radius (R)00000000000000000 Channel Slope (S).. .. ................... Manning ' s Roughness Coe f . ( n) .0..0...0 0 0 . 0 Channel Velocity ( V) .. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Flow Length (L)000 ....................... Travel Time of Shallow F1ow..0000.......00 TIME OF CONCENTRATION Time of Concentration..................... [RAINFALL DESCRIPTION Distribution Type000$0000000000 Total Precipitation. Return Period0000.0••00.0.. ®. ®® O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0000000.00 Storm Durat ion.. ® ••...... ®.••...•. Page 2 0.20000 450000 (ft) 2.75 (In) 0.02000 44.32 (min) 0.00000 0.00000 0.00 (ft /s) 0.00 (ft) 0.00 (min) 0.00 (ft) 0.00000 0.20000 0.00 (ft/s) 0.00 (ft) 0.00 (min) 44.32 (min) SYNTHETIC 2.72 (in) 100 (yr) 0.74 (hr) 1/13/99 Page 1 HYDROGRAPH REPORT RECORD NUMBER : 4 TYPE : UNIV. RATIONAL, DESCRIPTION : 100yr Post Dev Runoff to Pond [HYDROGRAPH INFORMATION] Peak Discharge ......a..... ®a....�� ®.�..o. = 14a9 (cfs) Volumeo..... ............. ......... a..... = 0.38 (acft) Time Interval .........ao..m...a.4e.ee. - 1.00 (min) Time to Peak. ..... ......00®•0000000000 18.66 (min) Time of Base..... ..... ................ 0 0 0 0 = 68.43 (min) Multiplication factor. ® 0® ................. = 1.00 [RATIONAL, HYDROGRAPH INFORMATION] Flow Multiplier. ®....m....... ®000000000000 Receding limb factor ®....m. ® .............. [BASIN DESCRIPTION] 1.00000 1.00000 Watershed Area.. ..... ..� ®��.��..... .m. . m 2.00 (ac) Curve Number...... . . B . • . . . . . . . . @ 0 • . . . • . 00 . = 0 Runoff coefficient .a...o.... .............. 0.83 1/13/99 [TIME CONCENTRATION -- TR-55] SHEET FLOW Manning's Roughness Coef. (n)..0.00.a00... Flow Length (L)..000....000..g0..m.000.000 2-yr 24-hr Rainfall (R).........o.a.R$. Land Slope (S) v o a o 0 e 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a m 0 0 0. a r. w a 0 0 0 0 Travel Time of Sheet Flow.. SHALLOW FLOW CHANNEL FLOW TIME OF CONCENTRATION [RAINFALL DESCRIPTION] 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 K Coef (surface description) (K) ®.. 0 Watercourse Slope (S) Velocity . a e P 0 e 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Flow Length (L)..0.0..0...00...0.0000.0..0 Travel Time of Shallow Flow.. Hydraulic Radius (R)0000000000000000000000 Channel Slope (S)............00 ®0000••00.0 Manning's Roughness Coef. (n)0 ®0 ®.0000000. Channel Velocity (V)m ®...00000000000000000 Flow Length (L) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Travel Time of Shallow Flow 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Time of Concentration ......... ®.. ®.... ® ®.. Distribution Type.... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Precipitation.................... .0. Return Period. ................. . 0 . 0 StormDuration00000..0.000.0000000000 0 Page 2 0.01300 260.00 (ft) 2.75 (In) 0.00700 4.88 (min) 0.00000 0.00000 0.00 (ft /s) 0.00 (ft) 0.00 (min) 0.50 (ft) 0.00500 0.01300 5.11 (ft /s) 410.00 (ft) 1.34 (min) 6.22 (min) SYNTHETIC 0.93 (in) 100 (yr) 0.10 (hr) 1/14/99 RECORD NUMBER : 5 TYPE : RESER STORO IND DESCRIPTION : Routing [HYDROGRAPH INFORMATION] HYDROGRAPH REPORT Peak Discharge........ .............. ...... V olume..... ..........Goo.. ®m........ ®. ®..® Time Interval...... ..... ��o�� Ti me to Peak.................. ............ Time of Peak Elevation........... ....... .......... [RESERVOIR STRUCTURE INFORMATION] R eservoir # o r 9 4. 0 w v Description o..000e0000.e m oo9 ®0000v0®®o0® Storage type.... ........................ Max storage............................... Discharge ........................ Max discharge ... ®..... ......... ........... [RESERVOIR INFORMATION] Reservoir # .... . . [INFLOW HYDROGRAPH INFORMATION] 2 • pond2 = MAN STAGE /AREA -- 14495.29 Cuft • COMP STAGE /DIS 2.54 cfs Reservoir Description... • • . m ... ®... = pond2 Page 1 1.57 (cfs) 0.38 (acft) 1.00 (min) 59.00 (min) 1440.00 (min) 936036 (ft) 2 Hyd rograph # #..4.m ®... ® ®0000000000.®49®0s000 4 Hydrograph Description.. ®.......• = 10Oyr Post Dev Runoff to Pond 1/14/99 Page 1 RECORD NUMBER : 4 TYPE : STAND PIPE WEIR DESCRIPTION : Pond Outlet [RATING CURVE LIMIT] Minimum Elevation MaximumElevation ..°.00....0.0000.00.000• El evation Increment . ®0000Y000000000000 [STANDPIPE INFORMATION] CIRC. STAND PIPE WEIR DESCRIPTION [OUTLET STRUCTURE INFORMATION] R ad i.0 s .. 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0. 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Crest Length...... ■ v . . . a . a . . . r . . . . . e . . . . . . Crest Elevation- Q..0o,000tp®ooseoocm ®o®oo Fraction Area..00g.b0.oweeeoeeoeeee [RECTANGULAR STAND PIPE EQUATION] [DEFINITIONS] SUBRECORD : 1 DESCRIPTION [OUTLET STRUCTURE INFORMATION] Coefficient Cw....00.,00 ® ®0.0004....... E xponential .......m �� 0�p��0� �� [DEFINITIONS] OUTLET STRUCTURE REPORT [WEIR INFORMATION] - 2.00 (ft) - 12.57 (ft) - 936.25 (ft) � - 0.70000 ORIFICE EQ: 0 = Co *A(2gh) "0.5 WEIR EQ: Q = Cw *L*H "exp Coefficient Co 0 .................... 0.60000 Coefficient Cw 0 0 . 0 ..................•.�� 3.33000 Exponential..... ®.0..00. ®00. &cite ". 1.50000 H = Headwater depth above inlet control section invert, (ft) A = Wetted area, (sq f t ) L = Crest length, (ft) 933.00 (ft) 936.50 (ft) 0.25 (ft) 0.000 0.000 H = Headwater depth above inlet control section invert , (ft) 1/14/99 Page 2 1 SUBRECORD CIRCULAR DESCRIPTION [OUTLET STRUCTURE INFORMATION] Rad ua7 a. o a a e a a a• v a a 0 o a o. e o a a a. e a a ®.... e a m. Invert Elevation .a.®aa.aaar.waa®a.oaoaaa.. Coefficient Co............................ # of Openings.... a...®.o...®.......o...... [CIRCULAR ORIFICE EQUATION] = Co *A* [2gh] /k] - 0.5 A = Wetted area, (sqft) K = 1 [ORIFICE INFORMATION] [CULVERT INFORMATION] DESCRIPTION CIRCULAR CONCRETE w/ square edge w/ headwall [OUTLET STRUCTURE INFORMATION] Circular Radius ...... ®.......a..®...... Culvert Invert Elevation. ..... ........... v Pipe Length Slope ........ . . .. . . 0 0 . ® . 0 0 0 0 . 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 . 0 Manning's N- value........ ®...........s Orifice Coefficient....... ■ . . 0 . . . 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 T ai 1w a ter . a o r . o a a ® so a a a . . ® ® a. a.. a w a a Numbe barrels. .. 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 0 . [UNSUBMERGED EQUATION] [SUBMERGED EQUATION] * * * * * * * ** [DEFINITIONS] 0.17 (ft) L(" c = 933.00 (ft) = 0.60000 1 H/Diam = He /Diam 4- K * (Q /A *Diam - 0.5)) `° M - 0.5 *S - 2 Coefficient K . ................s..........s = 0.00980 coefficient M............0. ®0............4 = 2.00000 0.50000 (ft) 12.2 934.16000 (ft) 10. 00000 (ft) 0.01000 0.01300 0.60000 934.06000 (ft) 1 H/Diam = c* (Q/ (A *Diam" 0.5)) ~ Z 4- Y - 0.5 *S - 2 Coefficient c........... ..... ..O.. ....... . = 0.03980 Coefficient Y.. ....... ..... ®...m...... ®... = * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** H = Headwater depth above inlet control section invert, (ft) Diam = Inerior height of culvert barrel, (ft) He = Specific head at critical depth (dc Vc f 2 / 2g) , (ft) = Discharge, (cuft/s) A = Full cross sectional area of culvert barrel, (sqft) S = Culvert barrel slope, (ft/ft) 1/14/99 Page 1 RESERVOIR REPORT RECORD NUMBER STORAGE TYPE DISCHARGE TYPE DESCRIPTION [RATING CURVE LIMIT] MinimumElevation............ OOOOOO ....- Maximum Elevation ................... ® ®.... Elevation Increment... ..... ®........ [STAGE STORAGE INFORMATION] Input file = NULL Output file = NULL [Manual Contour Area vs. Elevation] ELEVATION (ft) 934.16 936.00 936.50 2 MAN STAGE /AREA COMP STAGE /DIS pond2 [STAGE DISCHARGE INFORMATION] OUTLET STRUCTURE: STR # 4 TYPE : STAND PIPE WEIR DESCRIPTION : Pond Outlet CONTOUR AREA (sqft) 4255.00 6888.00 9450.00 933.00 (ft) 936.50 (ft) 0.25 (ft) 10/89 M==M1UUM1111111100111►111111111110r11111110111111111•111111111111111111111011111 ammunammill1110111111111011111111111=1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 N 7U r == M,= =NU===M=====E�►�===N=====______ _ IN f► 11__►■ 1111►■__ ■►1__■ M1111M ==U==U=N=■ .__01■_ 0_■ 11111_= ►■==U0■ ■11011_■ ■■__■■=111=UU=U=U 11.1==1111=11:.111 U 1101== 0U= 01 =_►1111=01==■ ■====UM==E ■ IU=l►II=rI__UMIIIIIKI__►■__M ■SIII_ ■■___■■____ r01=r 01■_0111_`M_IN■_►■=rIN=NIMI ISIMM=_=====E■ U 10r=11r.1==►1U11NO MI=U ►■U■N1__: M■ !IINIUWI ■ ■ ►Ir■K ■ ■NIIIII I■U►MM■U►■■IBN■___■■==M■ r01E=��_M1_■ ��►1UU►.=111_�0==►1■ 1 �=U=====___ _g�_lgOEIM=�I=E� == ►I==►Nt=IIII=WMHZIIE_====__■ ■=Mi=M==MM=E Ui1=M ►'I==►1==V■ ♦ 'MIIII/V=====M=== ■= 1111110 U ►3111WOM � III lilln==1111111111=.0 11011rU0.=►.=r.= iU MENS=Iil 0 0� 11.111 rrr ==ii=E ■11 !11 _ �i1W INI M=► = ■ 111111011111111111111111111111111 111111011111111111111111111111111 0 1111110 ■ ►"�_■ OM110E =1 '1=N �Ui ==l1=E = =__■ UiA=0 1110 ■U= = =► =U ►�1►0 , i!� = ►U= ► / =i /UE=E■■ 11111101111101111011111101111131111M11 11 i■ ►a■ ►1=1111rui ui___■ .1■Ur.111Mr0U =► =11:1 =i4 • r11=►I =►,IrSII=►IUU►III==U=■ 11101111110111110.11111101111101111101 11= =01=111‘=10=•11=0====111 =Er.U= ►=111.■ r0=M11 1:111110,1111101111L11111:1111011111:111111111111111111111 ■ ==U =U ►�=iMME\■ MMI►= =►1=rE=►1=/= /I/_MII___■ =Ui = =i= ►'ii11 °, , =101 = ►1=i= ►�Uii=►'I=►IU►IA = == __ == =E =110 M► s `1 i".'l=1► ■=►1=■ __0_► ■ /=11!11 ii==■ ■==U==.RE10■ ,1 :IIIIr OMINr1 r11a‘11:1111r►1r10111 01111111r ■___■ ■E ` II■ 1 i■ ■0I =i► io=im =►'I=► ■ ■=iii■ =1 11111111111111111111•0 MN_ MINO.M =i: =E0i= ►1=►0U ►1=►/iM== ===.= =U■ 0 6111i 1111i! 1111 ► 1 111110 ►! 1 1111 1►' ►11 ■_11_11__■ 0 , 1 1111101111111:" ! 0.111W !►''1 MEN11► .• 1_ ■ 0=11:1 =1►11=0_ ■� 7U►1 =►�U►'1 /M /1/MU __ • Y =�►1�� 01111 ��►�r►1111111■ _ ii .• �_ ■01111 � =►�i►'I= ►� =► ■M► ■L1■ =r= '0 .�■E=i:1N► 1111101111:11111011111:11110•0111101101111111110111111 ■■ 1111E 0 111110111111.1111101116111101111:11131111101M1111 � 1111 ■__■ , ', ) , 1 ►` =i�l =M =i►�� \r►M ■i�/�if ■�i E■ 1111101111111 ,) U�MriM ■ ►r= ►U ► ■ ■'iM/=►'111 1I/ Mill =====M = =lli.Ua►!i►'1U milU►'Ir=►1■ 11 11 U , i = =Ui 11iii ►' ,i isma►'Ii■' ii ►�i� ►�� /ti UU o t ___ = == ==U =UM =i► ii!1i i'1i 131111 ►111M E_ 0 _ ■E_= = == == =U = =iiEi► i!IiI ►i'N► I LI __ as ; w rn ■____■ =1111■ •11 =ii=► III MiMLIIII ■_ N 1111___ = = = ■ ■M == ==Mi \=► ►iVM:I► 1m no w o d ■E_====__== = =M = = =U ►'. =E Nib i► i ►niin►'l��ll __ e _ immoi=====M=am _� _►��►ls►►� it __ - tc) II II ■________________► MENie IN 0 ■ MENU=== ■iiii�iii111 ■111M �ww�ra�� I z E .. �� ■�.ir►��►� ■1111,11 as ■_E_=■ ==11_11__■__= =.11110111►��►��►�i► 1111 CO EE = ■ ■■ ■E==■ ■M=M= ■= = = ►7 ■iMiM 1101 M/11 IMO 0 ) a' 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111110.1111101111:WM MI ca)) 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111101111MIMIM IMO 0 -c 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111101110111MIN MI 11111111•111111111111111111101111111111111111111111111111100.1111011101M RIO •111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111101110110ti MI 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111011N 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111M11110111111111111111111111111111111111111011 CO to sayou! (0) jjoun,A 4DD..q.a Figure 7.1 -3: Solution of the runoff equation. CD c� CD 0 0I N Q '--•o \] l i OQ Q cp co • a — 0 0 4 rtl Eil 0 J T 7.1 -9 STORM SEWER DRAINAGE AREA DATA PROJECT: JOB NO.: J 1 GSrPI1j GPtR F'jDESiGNED BY: DATE: �l � ► �,p � s CB TOTAL PAVED GRASS RUNOFF RETRD_ NO. ACRES ACRES ACRES "C" Ct D.S D.S 2t O,7- Oi 1 2&4 •t C' t .1 O ► O2 _1 �-- \ sS OcfA TES En�ieer and L €, hjt. LENGTH SLOPE F Iio TTO TC MfN 9 West Division Buffalo, MN 55313 682-4727 Fax: 682 -3522 z o I (7) 6 w r {n,, 6 0 (1) j m Lil 0 W LLJ < CI CI slool!LioN Jeuun pinea NOLLVA21g Viosnt4N11 'SIN >leiNicl >I'VO 1V1€ C�7 U z 6 w F-- a 0 lorm 14, miO 1 111 11 1 111 1 1 _ monk • 1 1 it 0 11 V n not4 tuoing dump, gl ;P! Ogitri .+-c4,4 4 ZA Z W LL. vz Ci w t. w a4 Z CC a M ft 0 C U ! f f 4 f 1 +IPtns 41.1.3 NrYl31,1 Mani.° A@ 13A011d111 36 01 CVO8 2' • • 44 7 a� w» � d 3 s G uoIlo s 4 $./i '3'H '4 ;a Vi TM .41 ;n •uli 1. g uolwa.S VI '3'H CO }G $'/ I '31.1 141 4 Op'£ IOL 1 •43 la vvel mom "A ' fl l° Gull }to3 bumps buj i CZ' N Cr) cM D I • o e 3 NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC. MEMORANDUM 5775 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 555, St. Louis Park, MN 5541 6 Telephone: 952 596.9636 Fa lr it : 962 595.9837 planner @ nacplLnning.corn TO: Kimberly Damper FROM: Scott Richards DATE: August 23, 2001 RE: Oak Park Heights — Sigstad Carpet FILE NO: 798.02 01.06 As you are aware, the City Council, at their August 14, 2001 meeting, voted to table the request for a conditional use permit and site plan approval to allow for the retail development south of 60 Street North pending additional information from staff. Please find attached the following information related to approval of the site plan and construction of the street access into the Central Business District. 1. Dennis Pastier, the City Engineer, has submitted a memo and information related to construction of the street and stormwater improvements required for the development. 2. Mark Vierling, the City Attorney, has drafted a development agreement which is submitted for City Council review. 3. The unnamed street which would provide access into the Central Business District and to the property proposed for development would be called Novak Avenue in compliance with the Washington County roadway naming system and the existing roadway that aligns in the residential development to the south. 4. The City has allowed parking on the utility easement south of 60 Street within the Applebee's parking lot. The City Attorney has added a provision in the Sigstad development agreement requiring the property owner to assume all costs for site restoration in the parking lot if utility repairs are required. 5. The parking lot setback from 60 Street for the Applebee's development was 14 feet. The site plan for Sigstad's includes a ten foot setback. The proposed setback complies with City standards. The Applebee's plans were not subject to any requirements of MnDOT as it relates to future need of additional right -of -way on 60 Street. MnDOT has not indicated a need for additional right-of-way for the frontage road at this time. 6. The signage included in the site plans is not the final sign plan but shows conceptually what the building elevations with signs will look like. The applicant has not submitted the final site plan at this time but agrees to comply with the sign provisions within the Zoning Ordinance. The City Council can ask that the sign plan come back for approval once it is developed. 7. The resolution for approval of the CUP and site plan has been revised to address the issues of the City Council and City staff. pc: Kris Danielson 2 7425 Lake Blvd - Hwy 8 Forest Lake, MN 55025 July 19, 2001 City of oak Park Heights 14168 North 57 street P.O. Box 2007 Oak Park Heights, MN 55052 -2007 Attn.: City Council Re: Sigstad's Carpet Street improvements Thank You, Jerry Sigstad MILL RECT CARPETS This letter is sent to petition the City of Oak Park Heights to improve the street to the west side of our property on 60 Street North. (See attached legal description) We request that the City improve the street with the following conditions: It is our intent to begin construction on our project in September of this year. Phone: 462-5698 Fax: 462-3297 1. The street will be designed to meet City specifications. 2. The street improvements can be completed in conjunction with our building construction. 3. The cost of the street improvements will be assessed against our property at this time. 4. We propose the assessment will be spread over a 15-year period at an interest rate approximately 1% over the City's rate. 5. As properties along the street are developed in the future, they will be assessed their share of the street improvements and we will be reimbursed in the amount of their share. 6. We request temporary access from 60` Street North (frontage road) until the street improvements are complete. If you have any questions or concerns, contact Jeff Hensel of Greystone Construction Company at 952- 496 -2227 -- Shakopee Office or 651 -257 -2742 -- Lindstrom Office. Nov 27 01 02:07p Debbie Qu i nne I t August 17, 2001 cjiKr, 7Pv VN City of Oak Park Heights 14168 North 57 Street P.O. Box 2007 Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 -2007 A ttn : .his Danielson Re: Sigstad's Carpet Oak Park Heights, Minnesota CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 952-278-1195 p 2 Dear Kris: We are in the Conditional Use Permit process with the City of Oak Park Heights on the above - mentioned project. We hope to receive approval for this project and apply for a Building Permit in the next three to four weeks. We have been unable to determine who has jurisdiction authority over this project as it relates to the 'watershed. We would appreciate a response by August 24, 2001, as to whether your agency has jurisdiction in this area. If your agency has jurisdiction, please forward any additional information we may need to expedite this process. Sincerely, GREYSTONE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY Jeff Hensel Sales Manager JJH /dq 1221 East Fourth Avenue, Suite 110 Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 Equal Opportunity Employer /Contractor 11 Telephone: 952-496-2227 Fax: 952- 445 -4191 Nov 27 01 02:07p Debbie Qu i nne 1 1 i e-Rim wiry xI J iNrj s CONSTRUCTION C Fax COMPANY /LOCATION: FAX NUMBER: ATTENTION: FROM: DATE: TOTAL PAGES: D Urgent MESSAGE AND OR SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: For Re iew 1221 East 4th Avenue, Suite 110 Shakopee, MN 55379 1 3) Equal Opportunity 1 637- #3 e-- 952-278-1195 p . 1 0 Please Comment CI Please Reply 0 Please Recycle This fax transmit and any attachments are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this fax in error, please notify the sender immediately. Telephone: 952496-2227 Emptoyer /Contractor Fax: 952- 445 -4191 LAW OFFICES OF Eckberg, Lammers, Btiggs, Wolff & Vierling, PLLP. 1835 Northwestern Avenue Sril.lwatex, Minnesota 55082 (GSA) 439 -2875 FAX (651) 439 -2923 lames F. Lammers Robert G Briggs Mark.). V erling . Thomas ,j, Weidner Susan ID. Olson 4. David- IC Snyder Timothy M. Kelley Lyle J. Eckberg Of Counsel Qualified Neutral Axhitrator * C exti5ed Real Estate Sp eci its r +Qua1 ed Neutral Med .atOx COVER SHEET - FACSJMLLE TRANSMISSION DATE: September 11, 2001 Please deliver the following page(s) to: FAX NO: NAME: Kamper FROM: Mark 3. Vierling/Sandy TOTAL ER OF PAGES 14, INCLU E G COVER SHEET. The p com es a g comprising this facsimile transmission contain confidential information from Eckberg, ers Brigs, Wolff & Vierlan , • This information is intended solely for use by the ind yid al 'or entity named as the recipient hereof. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any entity this disclosure, �J � � co y�° distribution or use of the contents of i s nsmission is prohibited€ If you in notify immediately received this transmission n ens', please notify us by telephone mmediately so we may arrange to retrieVe this transmission at no cost to you Violation of this confidentiality notice could constitute a basis for a claim for damages against the violation. If you received this communication zn error, please immediately notify us by telephone at (651) 439-2878. IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL OF THE PAGES, PLEASE CALL US BACK AS SOON AS POSSIBLE AT (651) 439 -2878 COMMENTS: Re: MSCVWMO v. Browns Creek and BWS ,attached Coat of a gals decision- We Prevailed * * * * ** * * ** HARD COPY WILL (NOT) FOLLOW BY MAIL Paul A. Wolff 0 9444 996) STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS CO-01-322 In the Matter of the Enlargement and Increasing the Number of Managers of the Brown's Creek Watershed District in Washington County pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 1031).261 and 305. Filed September 11, 2001 Reversed Peterson, Judge Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources Mark J. Vierling, Eckberg, Lamxners, Briggs, Wolff & Vierling, P.L.L.P., 1835 Northwestern Avenue, Stillwater, MN 55082 (for relator Middle St. Croix River Water Management Organization) Mike Hatch, Attoiney General, Matthew B. Seltzer, Assistant Attorney General, 445 Minnesota Street, Suite 900, St. Paul, MN 55101-2127 (for Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources) ., , .,.. Doug Johnson, Washiniton County Attorney, Richard D. Hodsdon, Assistant County Attorney, Washington County Government Center, 14949 - 62nd Street North, Stillwater, MN 55082 (for County of Washington) Considered and decided by Harten, Presiding Judge, Schumacher, Judge, and Peterson, Judge. SYLLABUS Minn. Stat. § 103D.261, subd. 2(a) (2000), does not authorize the Board of Water and Soil Resources to enlarge a watershed district to include territory already within a joint powers water management organization. PETERSON, Judge Respondent Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources (I3WSR) granted respondent County of Washington's petitions to enlarge two watershed districts, Brown's Creek Watershed District and Valley Branch Watershed JDjstrjct. The enlarged watershed districts include property within the territories of two joint powers water management organizations (JPWMOs), relator Middle St. Croix Valley Water Management Organization and Lower St. Croix Valley Water Management Oranti In this certiorari. appeal, Middle St. Croix argues that BWSR lacks the authority to assign to a watershed district territory within a JP-WM4. We reverse. FACTS . There are currently 11 water management organizations in Washington County, �t o� OPINION including Brown's Creek, Valley Branch, Middle St. Croix, and Lower St. Croix: Brown's Creek and Valley Branch are watershed districts. Middle St. Croix and Lower St. Croix are JP-WMOsa Under the jointpowers agreement that created Middle St. Croix in 1984, eleven communities authorized Middle St. Croix to manage their storm -water drainage and storm-water-regulatory-control systems pursuant to the Metropolitan 1 the order enlarging Malley Branch also changed its name to Lower St. Croix Valley Watershed Djst:rict. To avoid confusion between Lower St. Croix Valley Watershed District and Lower St. Croix Valley Water Management Organization, we will refer to Lower St. Croix Valley Watershed District as Valley Branch and Lower St. Croix Valley Water Management Organization as Lower St. Croix. 2 Surface Water Management Act. Minn. Stat. §§ 413.875wo8$3 ( see also Minn. Scat. § 477.59 (1982) (jointpowers agreements). In 1998, Washington County initiated a study of water ,governance in the county. The study identified several problems with JP-WMOs and both problems with and advantages of watershed districts. The study recommended that the number of water management units in the county should be reduced from 11 to six and that local water management units should be watershed districts, not JP -WMOs. As part of implementing the study's recommendations, Washington County brought the petitions to enlarge Brown's Creek Watershed District and Valley Branch Watershed District. The county alleged that watershed districts would be more effective and efficient in managing water resources than were JP- W1v10s. At the hearings on the petitions, Washington County Administrator James Schug and Washington County Planner - Jane Harper testified about the feasons why Washington County . sought to enlarge the watershed districts. They both testified that growth pressures require a comprehensive solution to water and natural resources management in the county. They explained that watershed districts will be large enough to be professionally staffed and to provide a full range of programs and that a professional staff will facilitate communication with citizens and communities and promote accountabylity. Schug also addressed how watershed districts can be structured to promote tax equity and uniform costs for watershed districts throughout the county° based on its conclusions that enlarging Brown's Creek and Valley Branch would further the public welfare, the public interest, and the purposes of Minn. 5tat. chs. 103B 3 and 103D, BWSR granted the county's petitions. The area added to Brown's Creek includes the northern part of Middle St. Croix's territory. The area added to Valley Branch includes the southern part of Middle St. Croix's territory and all of Lower St. Croix's territory. ISSUE .t enlarging Did BWSR exceed its authority by � g the Brown's Creek and Valley include territory already watershed dist�ricts to �nclu �. Y within the Middle St Croix and Lower St. Croix water management organizations? ANALYSIS decision enlarging a watershed district is governed by Judicial review of a BWSR � � Minn. tat. § 1.69 (2000), w overns h ich judicial review o£ agency decisions. See In re governs Sauk ' NW,2d 416 418 1 (Minm App. 1987) (establishment Sauk River a��rsh�c� .2��s�a .?bo 416, • . ( r�. R 4 v� w r� • 8ti1 •, • �tL Stat. 14 69 BWSR'S decision will be re" rse . if it o� watershed district). index Minn. � exceeds BWSR's statutory authority. p t" o is a question of law subject to de novo review. Stroud v. Statutory c o�st�c � n q .l Hennepin County Med. Cyr. 556 NW.2d 552, 555 (Minn. 1996). When a statute is unambiguous, the court must give effect to the statute's p lain meaning. But, when a statute is ambiguous, bi uous that is when it is reasonably susceptible to more than one interpretation, the court must determine the probable legislative intent and construe the statute in e a manner consistent with that i Astleford Equipment Co., Inc. v. Navistar Intl Trans p, Corp., 611 N.W.2d 33, 37 (MirnL ■ t in N.W.2d �•rY 0 1) (citations App. 2000), arc! in part, r d in part, (Minn. ��no July � �� ... omitted). "While statutory construction focuses on the language of the provision at issue, it is sometimes necessary to analyze that provision in the context of surrounding sections." American Family Ins. Group v. Schroedl, 616 N W.2d 273, 278 (Minn. 2000). We are to read and construe a statute as a whole and must interpret each section in light of the surrounding sections to avoid conflicting interpretations Finally, courts should construe a statute .to avoid absurd results and unjust consequences. Id. at 277 -78 (citations omitted). The boundaries of a watershed district located wholly within the metropolitan area can be changed pursuant to chapter 10311 Minn. Scat. § 103B.215, subd. 1 (2000)0 Minn. Stat. § 103D.261, subd. 2(a) (2000), grants BWSR the following authority to enlarge a watershed district: Mier [a public] hearing, if the board determines that the • en3argement off' ih watershd disfrict 'as 'asked' �' viz the petition would be for the public welfare and public interest and the purpose of this chapter would be served, the board shall, by m findings and an order, enlarge the watershed district. The parties dispute whether Minn. Stat. § 103D.261, subd. 2, permits enlargement of a watershed district by adding territory already within a JP -WMO. There is no claim that a JP-WMO ceases to exist if the territory within it is added to a watershed district. BWSR argues that Minn. Stat. § 103D.261 expressly contains only faux requirements for enlargement of a watershed district: a petition by the county or other authorized party; service of the petition on specified parties; notice and a public hearing; and the requisite findings and order by BWSR. BWSR argues that the construction urged 5 by Middle St. Croix would require this court to add language creating a fifth requirement for enlarging a watershed district, that the territory to be added not be within a JP -WNZ4. This argument has merit if we consider only section 103D.261. But we must consider this section in light of surrounding sections. To address :13WSR's argument, we mist analyze Minn. Stat. §§ 103B.215, subd. 1, and 103D.261, subd. 2, in light of other provisions in chapters 103B and 103D. And our analysis must: be guided by the "fundamental principle" that in interpreting a statute, form should not be exalted over substance and literal constructions should not override the general policy and objectives of the law. Krumm v. RaA..Nadeau Co., 276 N.W.2d 641, 643 (Minn. 1979). The powers that JPdWMOs and watershed districts may exercise overlap. Minn. State § 103B211, subd. 1(a) (2400), which applies to JP- WMOs, states: • • • .. ' — ',Axiy agreezxiexit - wider " section 471.59 to jointly or cooperatively manage or plan for the management of surface .water in a watershed delineated pursuant to subdivision 2, as required by sections 10313.205 to 103B.255, may provide, in addition to other provisions authorized by section 471.59, for a joint board having: (1) the authority to prepare, adopt, and implement a plan for the watershed meeting the requirements of section 10313.231N 2 Middle St. Croix was created under Minn. Scat. §§ 473.875 -.883 (1988). In 1990, the legislature repealed Minn. Stat. §§ 473.875 -.883 and recodified water laws in chapter 10313. 1990 Minn. Laws ch. 391, arts. 1 -10. The legislature intended the recodification "to be a clarification and reorganization of provisions of haws affecting water" and did not intend the changes that were made "to alter the laws affecting water." 1990 Minn. Lawsch391,axt 1O, § 1. 6 In describing the powers that a .TP-WIvXO can exercise to regulate land use and development in a watershed, to maintain and construct new drainage systems, and to conduct frnancial activities, Minn. Star. § 103B.211, subd. 1(a)(3)(7), specifically grants JP-WMOs the same powers granted to watershed districts under Minn. Stat. ch. 103D. Furthermore, Minn. Stat. § 103B231, subd. 3(a) (2000), provides that, "Where a watershed management organization exists, the plan for the watershed must be prepared and adopted by the organization." The plan is subject to review by BWSR "for conformance with the requirements of sections 10313.205 to 103B.255, and chapter 143D." Minn. Stat. § 1038.231, subd. 9 (2000). After BWSR determines conformance with those requirements, the watershed management organization shall adopt and implement the plan. ,td., subd. 10. A watershed district can also be authorized to prepare, adopt, and implement surface water management plans in a watershed. See Minn. Stat. § 103D.201, subds. 1e2 (2040) (general and specific purposes of watershed disticts)a When a watershed district is established for that purpose, its managers must adopt a watershed management plan. Minn. Stat. § 103D.401, subd. 1 (2000). The plan is subject to approval by BWSL Id., subd. 5. Upon approval, the plan becomes the watershed management plan for the watershed district. Id. Because both JP-WMOs and watershed districts have authority to adopt and implement water management plans, enlarging a watershed district to include territory within a JP-WMO would create a situation where two entities have authority to perform the same water management tasks for the same territory. In light of the general policy 7 and objective of chapters 10313 and 103D to provide water management, we conclude that the legislature did not intend to allow two water management organizations to have concurrent authority to perform water management tasks for the same territory. At a minimum, doing so would be juefficient and, at the extreme, it could result in conflicting water management plans that call for different things to be done at a single location. In that situation, it could be impossible to implement the conflicting plans. We, therefore, construe Minn. Stat. § 1O3D261, subd. 2(a), as not authorizing BWSR to enlarge a watershed district to include territory already within a JP -WMO when both the watershed district and the flWMO would be performing the same water management functions. See Minn. Stat. § 645.17(1) (2000) ("legislature does not intend a result that is absurd, impossible of execution, or unreasonable Although BWSk2. did not make any findings on the functions to be performed by • :Brown's Creek and Valley Branch, the record shows that Brown's Creek, Valley Branch, Middle St. Croix, and Lower St. Croix are all authorized to manage surface water.. We recognize that the county presented evidence that watershed districts would be more effective and efficient than JP -WMOs in managing water resources, but we, nevertheless, conclude that BWSR erred in granting the petitions to enlarge Brown's Creek and Valley Branch because expanding the watershed districts into territory already within 3P -WMOs creates conflicting surface - water- management authorities. 8 DECISION BWSR exceeded its statutory authority in granting Washington County's petitions to enlarge Brown's Creek and Valley Branch to include territory already within JP- WMOs. Reversed. ►a ' 9 4•