The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAnderson/Lindquist 1974r - .. .v-- - . . „,.. .„,..„, - , - .0,. . fil, - `,:*. OW. ' , ;" ''',„;,f ,, '',;:icty •-, •-.-• 41...- ,' ...e ' --*-61 --."-.. ' ' ' y ..‘ 't t',,, - ". , .• „,..--te---- %‘.- '. A., . ...- 4. = -4- , -, '4,., ' ), ',A, '-,.-- ir,'' Li .-,`4 4;%MOO t„or44,., •'''!" •-;'4.• ,4,, .,,''„. . . ,4 iiir .w i . *, s 0::.',.,(r Air ...t. 4'.:4:4: '''''''' ' '-'•-, t..-..- .. ., ..,. . .....4-41.4.40-4-$4,44a-, ,,$-%,:,): . - --. - -- ,.,,A,:'4 ,1,...x,..!''..‘,40-.2.: - ,s 5a . , - 4''', . '',...p'''',- '- , 4,1'44' ' ? s'''4,r..r Ve 'lare';' '",''''''''‘' :\ '''.' ''' •■ '‘I 14''L 'tj ■ .., , .' b 1:0; ' . 4, . '. ■'.'' ''',.,d;. -'611 ,,,,,,ggit4.,0:Atefe ''`.7.1it", ',4;",,.''' •Ne-'7'..!""-g, ,-,t ''''4 ''... , - A' -;''' ''''' ''''' , '' '4'4'4 A-44.44''4 jusnametiuvii4i.4:,,........., . / 4 '' '*4.44',..1.4" 4i41101 ' W Obi/004M •'''' 1, ':i ',4,, -444140 i‘ .2' ii.444.4.4444244.44.4...„................r. .... ... jialed.401 . 0414.._City',Of_,- . 4,1t..• AL4titablakt.P. I 11014Statil--------- t — ........... –MUJIMMZ6L_ _ aphar 44.&so of Me Mak of— --, Pm*4 OM loreeltillmri, rig thell a. iala " •, • AO ' pert,41*easiddireShas 4 Oa sons tri ilk oelli DOI ta r 'A.44..: ' . ' :..,. . .. "°. tioratigi...._oesseaw. i .., , ;„ ht.._ Alltok *a hand paid by M 1 60 mid Pgarir 4 the "Wad Por., 0" "1"4,4 wildrese .` i„,.11.44 7 bpi* acksiewedod, do_Aeresiv Irmo, lleveln, godiakeino, olia am** mob iike Aga Pm* 4 sesassiasse sod eidgeo, ' ""k'''.q• '!'04, ''-' -'-,'”4-.- 0 WW01 tart 00 —wand 840 if MOM"dameesdeefritos 4 ,, • , . .., ., . ' ,'" •:,' "4'''' .' '-." . 41,..,,,s,-..,w, ,_ ..„*,...-cit 414.4...v.;,471.,- . Noskiloyrs., -hoar - . *...aterli, ""IMIltkNetit - 4'...-r, c.,,,, ,• s ap.f.efirgiekceisws„' , , ..r a 1 ' ' - ',.; -:': •f" ,,,.,, -,4 '- ,,: 1 0., Ar:- _ , • , •• ''''4.‘ '' '''':''',,P:' ' '' '': l't'' ' 'lig ,alt: • , -, , It ',4 , ' ' , ." .k'''' ' - ' 471it Oho tioitheost goorter 004. , ..isousit ,..., • •A • . Oat rive Ilmodireit .., - ' 41 -' 01111•02$ feet tO OW A, ti011ea 11111002.1.10 102.2111 ' , ...441...410;„40,....ot Ufa ail sis sweeva Putt-We NM Not W ,,. fahoor of sold stottlaset Ihortor eft flamp .4 ,se -,, - , A a I IVO' et esfAS 11404fit SOW 114111 afoot , - , tho of self floelloweetillesatee of learthwest - - --- -- tormi.014040. es! Sialkii et soatiaa Ihnor 141 fee , ,, - - - - - . - • - .-ei..* . -i - i tifilifhoty-ltre ant a& leatille ($12.7) ithe preellol sod fteee lloalooll cr * ., ' ''.i-i: ,t feet AM ao VW* limo et thootteo Pour ipeaMileireift- ea.t4 No* Vile of ' '''' '''' • ,„,, -, ,, (4) tor noel fololkosit oiler (sso), 0.4,U thump .10012.11 NNW% SSW Illfrtls liike Of 12411194141, .- -• ,,,ir -- .- -- 1.4'- -,, ,- . -4 :„.. iteallisillred (3041) *Nett few ., .,..,.9y. . with said west Us. elf Sooties femit (41) iligr `'.,- „ awe ilea Names (204.4) foot **es Sot moil '. 4 . '`12*.- 1,. ‘,.. - - with wadi north lbw of illeotleo ligoorr (4) Ihot sin -, 11141hty-41110et ase Five ? (4111).5) fest to the of beoliostoo. fa ?, how000r to esemsesto of railmoi 1 to the merthers States Pewee Ceppoov as ipreated by Alvin S. Meeney, trying A. ead Mee X. thelletwoef, end Albert Peter Klein are -sable A. Stela. - .- IPAICaliita All those poste of the imost)wast essittime of the - ---- _ i-, •k,' quartos fahlit of ims%) of Sloot tea Oftile (4hc ir Wine (29)(29) llorth. limps TWOlity tan iilllist. eseeelbool as foi1000, to-wit, • t The North Siztr-Sia (oe) feet of the west Fero Illasbdrad Ttrenty Aline (439) feet of the South Five Mendred Fifty , i (330) feet thereof, and the South Seventy 170) feet of • the Worth One Modred Thirty-Sin (134) feet of the lest : •-.4,.44 - Two Nwedred (200) feet of the seat Pour Semdred Twenty- 4,44 Wine (429) feet of the south Five Nemdred Fifty (S30) feet thereof. •4. mall, im _ Lot Ten (10) • *lock One (1) except the North Seventeen and F i f ty-N ins Shissdredths (17.S9) feet thereof, Albert . Addition, according to the plat thereof on tile and of record in the office of the Register of Deeds In and for irk;t On Coterty, Minnesota, , h 1111h, ''' • e', -*-414,--. ,,, _ _ - , - 4...',140;,;:,---. AO . 4:-.-.'1_,. 11.,,_' '.-" ,,Y0!*'"."-,'-'7:::,-k.': ,=.1".''.*-t- 'too *** --. P' 4 8 M t' , b : 1-, ,. '' TMGT+M� 4 ' Y! "t JUDICIAL 01STRICT r t ,41t zr`,_ 4r, - ,t of Oak Park Heights. C -enbicipal corporation, ".' PetitpeWer 4, P t v s• �* �' 'l - a } �r *!4 a,-_ i!►n; ol.d N. ' - ..z' ..E+ . Paulsy, Ruby 1. Peaky, 4''. :4106 14101110y4 Sill J• Paisley, ,4- .Y 4, ``°c °11. Fawley, *or 1 ,, mar tower Company, a- .M, , ",: ' the CW'anty of lfashi*gtob. 5t v F `7 �t� "a `_' By authority Tom;$ cti a 117.20 Minnesota Statutes, . 4 I, the undersigned, attorksy for the Village of Oak Park Heighti, do hereby certify that the '4.ands or rights hoteio ' deacribed have been taken by the Vihlhge of Oak Park Heights ,, 4` A.>. in eminent domain proceeding for a municipal well site, adip , 'S construction of a utility; buL,iding`;ead other village purposes q in canto city with theY'regairnM eats of Chapter 117 of said statutes; that commissioner* were duly appointed by the 4 , Court to ascertain and report the amount of damages sustained 0— - by the owners on account of such taking; that said commission- ers qualified and sad* and tiled their report of such damages; that the time to appeal from said awards in said report has expired; that all damages have been paid by the Village of Oak Park Heights; that *hid proceedings are now complets and that said Village now owns a permanent interest and right of way in said land for a municipal well site, the construction of a utility building.' rbd• other village purposes, which land, interest and owner is described as follows, to-wit: • •. � a r d 1.A3 « • • h�a ., 1 ` "d,�. A _ 4'0*. " ..y 'H"` wt.'`F'�3 . s fr M'r , r r k :1'7,.. �`at' yy T, r•t A �. a fk ,fir..,2, +t •> ?' W "w «+} .. -,,?, ipl k-• .-_ t w ,,„i• id 5 '''''-t`=+'' '” y s '`y 4 y„,'�,wsy t • 'f mx `{4g'°' y. l .r4 '�...!-',: • 3+"_'_* :a' ° . fwnY..'jykK.I„ .4 qP-AN4• B�°', "` R '• '` 4 b '' g:.n ^``S41t rn "' . t"'s� ter 9: , Ri'.!'"a� ".° �g� '' r +,. ,,,,,,,..4.4.„,....snn .1�a:rM u t ,�., fir. + . '' `�'iR '' t :.'`e,, .:. 2, f MN ' xef '.! 'r�+,''','•• .r( .:"akow,'=.�F ..1 .a'i.4w, ,r ♦ a Al.*, a f' -E K" -.l— ¢•. 1•o x+ "T• . :. ry,_ i,. }•' bf0" t. 1 2 ,. ,,,:• '4•,t,�ry' 4.r:; .1 .' a ';'"••••,''.:b t -F ,ti<x '. „i s k:,'1„:--'i'-:".•-'-'-'1,',TZy f y, '•... a z'"� ,rz# xWM '4.41f,,,,"!:',1*; =N "tdR ,� +c �„�Tae w� w,t a+, y .� ''F�r a�'r �. + � ".4:•7:44%,g. •A �� lw sky.'." ,"ylk'� �xq 0, 4.;�Y r'"`.37. 4 ,,,,.,..;S.;':'+r e i iltF, h { 1 ,..,,,,,,,,,..,s... ,...-......,,..-.-- -,„ y^ J. • , air .- r -_w rs • , e` -''7 t .4 . , Y �"+ .. - ;. p:' - ♦, W`'xa�sa'.._. ' y U 1 -x 'i 4`,1 '.1*e ti ' - - 'e»'.p? y A'�•..1 ui�.i6'� 4 r v 4 • �g, e ' , . r.� rti,,,ult ... 'a P%, b 4 •Yr y 4 a'y ,t a 1k w q 5 '[ '4.11.4' :, r $� _ w 6: " 1a . % a B y Su, • .r *%l" r: -r a 7 3 � 4. 1 4 ^Y+� 6"3 a• � � k 4 r xd ' r' ' *� � tr � r � » y"p "y r • �'' ', r 7Y .a. .#, n�.s .` "1,, Ax�Fi K �y, Mo .t�n,r a♦r as �. � S��t "' s�a V � 4 y0.;;' a 4 x r e �C r• . w ya r } t h k :: . x 1f a e 7,1 y ti ` >a ? `dry$ 4;' y. - . _ t. V k• i W .y • v c c X} . • r .," r z as Y k 4 t :,' ';'''''r.4'''';'..- q 7 ; { 4 3;:..1 '.,.em--;-',.k4 �' �,,w r :{ ` ti` Saes � s y,+. ' C'9. " 7 ,ra , ka� ' e -::; .1 ' r . d, r ' ,n a a ! '' xh a i ''# k s y a- i;:'. , � n , s k ." r h`"4 M� m , r a r r ,, t., .. 4 f `6 is • + x . /+, s , r" ` A r` aid 4P4' { ,fie" ,,�sr`r.. 1:".7.".:;_ ` e L S° � y a 't '',•.. iSd . p�x h..,5 �y 44.40,,..)1:44r .:7.•, Sc 7h , p 4." y k J •• Ba K. a ' #m r r t y ' � i` r^ r :' ;$ . `l� e ;,*? .° f - 1 r�',4'4111(a. a a" `- 1't f (55G) , .., Mid l M mdx Fity%fr 4 ' ' , t Q 1iRM 4. lo 9) pint �> r � � ,...� S�strq�e !E» �` aka ' ��" a $ort % Sts r' ,r' a �' 4, t x`F 4 m; ' d�, fa"7 eda4 ,',.'".;.,,,,',.....4,w .�s"y5',' , ",.. , , G,�,}# N^ k tr u g *,� ' xz.tr�m ,- { .iock 4n ,,' an PiEty-n e T mdrs rs ,t1 1;,,,,t,..,,,,,,4,-,�'u !,:t.:4"...!..,''..:''''''''''''''''''''I'' ,(' Add/.G4t, Y, ac��}i'yMWll. i e '' �� A} 1.6 ., x / 0 reCo d mfr b : 3., k ila�l'11ite�tp�1 CO ty, �N .- for Dated a �It vat.r� ' �t �� .#, Afday of ,. .: ' .p .5.,,, 'lam .,� � W1 t.tJA .y� l. m}'w T• �/s■ n..MY- r '�FAQ .,�e f3k'}"S rr !! 'k- �7�.t-, s / � *+ � yam• + ."�'4 ,..M.Oiligleig:= .' . ' a At m r e .for_ titioti r Fria `� tdt,RG. , 19.7. . 126 Mouth Second Street �� a `.�rrx• ",„rt... �. Stillwater' !E� 55 082 `r+ " � 4 above Certificate is hereby approved. Dated• fge � �� * Gf ? l++a M.nnesota this �QM day of December 197.1. _ Wm T. Johnson Juci(je of Di&tc ct Court • ?-. ' '� +.• f�t .« ! d.'7 F et a',. .t a y y s r K k'Y s s*x., y" "k`:''id a 4w 4 .: 7_ r 4, * r} o eta ` d, ' --.r � xis ;a s i> . �:...._ .•-__ ,„:,„,..•:;-.„,. . .t'''..,:„‘4. t . , ,, ,,. _. L. . ,y i �. +w ! {,.- , y ry �,a,,9 ,sue ,'s 9 i " ; 514 a ri ', 4. A 1."'.i r' '�%.1,Y V°' ''.r"a ti" €t °' -. 'eta 1� p' 4 =,w ', ', g 7,."- q, { sq + ` rq e { m 4+ r . i ..d c-,my�, cy '„:Y. 4 YX k C 4Z� .;, SKr r p R1' * �VV. _ ... . . Dec 10-3.9% '� ' f -- Anita P Kalinaff t • PETITION` FOR ANNEXATION IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION OF CERTAIN FREE- . HOLDERS FOR THE ANNEXATION OF LAND TO THE CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS, WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOT2 SUBJECT MATTER: Petitioners request the annexation :of certain lands located in the North Half of the North- east Quarter (Nh of NE1) of Section 5'; Town- ship 29, Range 20, Washington CoUnty, Minnesota, ota ... of Oak Park Heights. to the City o hts.g The territory included within this petition consists - of three parcels of land owned by three freeholders, all of whom are individuals. The undersigned, constituting a majority of the owners of the real property, hereby petition and request the City Council of the City of Oak Park Heights, Washington County, Minnesota, to annex the land legally described as follows, to-wit: The West Four Hundred (400) feet of the "Eatt - Seven Hundred Thirteen (713) feet of the North Three Hundred Twenty-five (325) feet of the North Half of the Northeast Quarter (Nh of NEB) of Section Five (5) , Township Twenty-nine (29) , Range Twenty (20) , and the. West Three Hundred Thirteen (313) ,feet of the North Five Hundred Sixty-five (565) ' feet Of Section ;Fi're: Township Twenty-nine (29) , Range Twenty, (20) , all subject to existing highways and easements. to the City of Oak Park Heights, and to extend the city boundaries to include the same. The above-de scribed' property is now owned as three separate parcels of land which, are legally described on Exhibit A attached hereto. In support of this petition, the undersigned respectfully state: 1. That the aforementioned land to be annexed is unpiatted land and does not exceed 200 acres in area. 2. That the property to be annexed is now or about to become urban or suburban in character. 3 . That the land hereby petitioned to be annexed, is now or about to be developed into commercial uses, and that 111 I municipal government is required to protect the public health, welfare and safety and to protect the future develop- ments of the area. 4. That the annexation of the aforementioned land is in the best interests of the City of Oak Park Heights in that it will provide for planning and controlled developments of utilities, provide room for expansion, and is in an area which can reasonably be served for current fire, police and general government facilities of the city. 5. A. That there are no residents residing in the area to be annexed and that the population of the City of Oak Park Heights is approximately 1, 940 B. That the area proposed to be annexed is approximately 71 acres and that the area of the City of Oak Park Heights is approximately 625 acres. C. That the assessed valuation of the area to be annexed.. is as follows: land $30,925.00, buildings $110,180.00, total $141,1(0.00:- That the total assessed valuation of the City of Oak a •-ark Heights is :$310,086,639.00 . D. That the City of Oak Park Heights has grown from a pop lotion of 332 iP 1960. to a population of 1,238 according, to the 1970 census. The present population is estimated :to -be 1,940 . There have been substantial private and public improvements within the city in the last 10 years. The city is it the metropolitan area and under the jurisdiction of the Metropolitan Council. Further population increase and substantial construction is anticipated. E. That the area to be annexed abuts upon the westerly boundary of the City of Oak Park Heights and the owners anticipate further development of the area within the. very near future. F. That the taxes in the area proposed to be annexed will increase as the City of Oak- Park Heights has a higher mill rate than the adjoining unincorporated townships, -2- but in turn the property owners: will obtain polic4jprotection, : zoning and subdivision controls, utilities, and general administrative services which will be'proportional to the expected tax increase and will inure to- the benefit of your petitioners and the area proposed to be annexed. G. That it is feasible and practical that the afore- mentioned municipal services be provided by the City of Oak Park Heights. H. That the property is presently located in the Town of Baytown, but that the existence and continuation of the said town will not be affected by the annexation of the aforementioned property. I. That the township form of government is not able to cope with the aforementioned problems relating to the public health, safety and welfare and the development of the property as an urban or suburban area. 6. Attached hereto and marked Exhibit '`B is a detailed map which reflects in outline the aforedescribed territory which your petitioners request be annexed to the City of Oak Park Heights. 7. The undersigned owners constitute a majority of the owners and freeholders of the property proposed to be annexed. 8. That none of the territory proposed to be annexed is presently included within the corporate limits of any incorporated city, village or borough. The undersigned freeholders petition the annexation of the aforedescribed property to the City of Oak Park Heights because we believe that these properties need municipal government and municipal services which are not available under the township form of government and are available from and by the existing City of Oak Park Heights. We further -3- believe that the annexation of these properties will aid and assist us in the planning and economic development of our properties, That Parcel No I is owned by Robert V. Anderson; that Parcel No. II is owned by George N. Croft and is being purchased on a Contract for Deed by David C. Linguist and Leighton Johnson; that Parcel No, III is owned by David C. Linguist. • Dated this 6 day of % i , 1976. Robert V. An erson 'Margate An .n David C Li '►uis pp fi � Linqu - Agri. Lei ' on Jo n--. .11:41 $1vseP'•r, 2roh on • } -4 . , . • EXHIBIT A PARCEL NO. I That part of the North Half of the Northeast Quarter (N1/2 of NE1) of Section Five (5) , as follows: Commencing at a point on the North line of Section Five (5) , Township Twenty-nine (29) North, Range Twenty (20) West, One Hundred Fifty-seven (157) feet West of the Northeast corner of said Section Five (5) ; thence South and perpendicular to the North line of said Section Five (5) , Five Hundred Sixty-five (565) feet to a point; thence West and perpendicular to the last described line, One Hundred Fifty-six (156) feet to a point; thence North and perpendicular to the last described line, Five Hundred Sixty-five (565) feet to the North line of said Section Five (5) ; thence East along the North line of said Section Five (5) , One Hundred Fifty-six (156) feet to the point of beginning, containing two (2) acres, more or less. Subject to existing highways and easement to Northern States Power Company; and That part of the North Half of the Northeast Quarter (Nk of NE1) of Section Five, as follows : Commencing at the Northeast corner of Section Five (5) , Township Twenty-nine (29) North, Range Twenty (20) West, and running thence Westerly from the North line of said Section Five (5) , One Hundred Fifty-seven (157) feet to a point; thence South and perpendicular to said North line of Section Five (5) , Five Hundred Sixty-five (565) feet to a point; thence East and perpendicular to the last described line, One Hundred Fifty-seven (157) feet to the East line of said Section Five (5) , the same being the center line of the so-called Speed Bowl Road; thence North along the East line of said Section Five (5) , Five Hundred Sixty-five (565) feet to the point of beginning, containing approximately two (2) acres, more or less. Subject to existing highways and easement to Northern States Power Co. PARCEL NO. II The West Two Hundred (200) feet of the East Five Hundred Thirteen (513) feet of the North Three Hundred Twenty-five (325) feet of the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter (NE1 of NE1 ) of Section Five (5) , Township Twenty-nine (29) , Range Twenty (20) . PARCEL NO. III The West Two Hundred (200) feet of the East Seven Hundred Thirteen (713) feet of the North Three Hundred Twenty-five (325) feet of the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter (NEB of NE4) of Section Five (5) , Township Twenty-nine (29) , Range Twenty (20) . 410 III 0 City of Oak Park Heights Minutes of Hnect. ino held Monday, May 10 , 1 °82 `. Page two :r',. . O' Neal moved to adopt a resolution (48267 ) to reimburse the petitioners ' o . the Anderson/Linguist annexation approximately 2./3 or. 5422. 00 of thy, planner ' s fees representing costs directly relating to sewer ' discharge which would benefit the city . Seconded by Westphal . Roll. call vote taken with 4 aye votes cast . Carried. {''' p. , Clerk was instructed to request NSP to install aerial street lights F� r^/ on 57th and 58th Sts. on the east side of Osgood at no cost to „..,„..,1'M: the city . Motion by Westphal. and seconded by O' Neal . Aye votes t cast by Lang, O' Neal and Westphal . Abstain by Seggelke. Carried. ...,,,' ,,,:4: Cable `1V nl nut es were discussed. '.,:' ic . S gge l.ke moved to approve Fred ' s' s 'ri re Co. Proposed n I an for the e e fascia i n order to bring the building into conformance with the ` original ' sketches . Seconded by Westphal . A ave votes cast by Westphal , Lang and Seagelke. ray vote cast. by 0 ' Nea I . Carried. O' Neal moved to anprove o �yment of b i l l s as rtresentvd . Seconded ,,, by ,ec.lgal.ek: 4 aye vote Carried . (' (.4. • ,a Westphal moved for council to temnorarily approve hireing of 4A maintenance personnel for summer work only, until the next council meeting. Seconded by O' Neal . 4 aye votes. Carried. ..n O' Neal moved to approve the interfund audit adjustments in the r�=`' amount. of $11 , 929 . 63 (details available at Clerk ' s office) . Seconded e,'. by Seggelke. 4 aye votes. Carried. -.4: ray' Sequel ke moved to anprove City Assessor ' s figures as presented in f,' his report dated May 8, 1982. Seconded by O' Neal . 4 aye votes. Carried. �'. Council recessed ed and reconvened to discuss the Police tJni on Agreement . O' Neal moved to adjourn, with Seergelke second:inq . 4 aye votes. Asjourned. L C/ .�rQ,a, \tonne Wilson a*- Administrator/Treasurer t k.'' t s • LAW OFFICES OF ECKBERG, LAMMERS, BRIGGS 8E WOLFF 126 SOUTH SECOND STREET STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 438.2878 LYLE J. ECKBERG OF COUNSEL: JAMES F. LAMMERS WINSTON E. SANDEEN ROBERT G. BRIGGS May 20, 1976 PAUL A. WOLFF Mr . Ken Heuer, Clerk City of Oak Park Heights 6141 Panama Avenue North Stillwater, Minnesota 55082 Re: Annexation petition of Linguist, Anderson and Johnson Dear Ken: Since I last talked to you, I have had an opportunity to check the Tract Index at the Register of Deeds ' office and also our files regarding the question of whether Oak Park Heights abuts on the property owned by Anderson Interiors, Inc. , which is one of the parcels included in the above annexation. According to my investigation, the only acquisition of property by the City of Oak Park Heights in the area near the proposed annexation was the condemnation of the property owned by Bill Pauley, et al, which took place in 1974. In that regard, please find enclosed a copy of the Partial Final Certificate and the Quit Claim Deed which are of record in the office of the Register of Deeds. It is my understanding, however, that this condemnation has never been completed since Oak Park Heights has not adopted the required ordinance. If it is the desire of the City to acquire this property, such an ordinance should be adopted. In any event, it does not appear that this property abuts any of the property included in the petition for annexation. The property owned by Anderson Interiors, Inc , includes the North 565 feet of the NE a of the NE a of Section 5, Township 29 North, Range 20 West. The most Northerly point of the property acquired in the above described condemnation would be located approximately 657 feet from the North line of the NW4 of the NW4 of Section 4, Township 29 North, Range 20 West. Accordingly, although both parcels abut on Oakgreen Avenue, there is approximately a 100 foot gap between the Anderson parcel and the parcel included in the condemnation proceeding. 0 , Mr. Ken Heuer Page 2 May 20, 1976 By copy of this letter to Anderson, Linguist and Johnson, I am advising them of this fact. If they wish to proceed with the proposed annexation, it would be necessary that they amend the petition so as to include property located South of Anderson Interiors, Inc. , which would abut on the property acquired by condemnation. It would also, of course, be necessary that Oak Park Heights complete the acquisition of that property by adoption of the proper ordinance. If the petitioners are unable or unwilling to amend their petition, but still desire sewer and water extended to their property, I would suggest that they submit a petition to that effect. Yours very truly, Robert G. Briggs RGB:kf Enc. 2 cc: David C. Linguist Robert V. Anderson Leighton Johnson • • LAW OFFICES OF ECKBERG, LAMMERS, BRIGGS & WOLFF 126 SOUTH SECOND STREET P. O. BOX 40 STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 85082 439-2878 LYLE J. ECKBERG JAMES F. LAMMERS ROBERT G. BRIGGS May 20 , 1981 PAUL A. WOLFF MARK J. VIERLING LaVonne Wilson, Clerk City of Oak Park Heights 5851 Oldfield Avenue North. Stillwater, MN 55082 Re: Petition for Annexation Dear Ms . Wilson: Enclosed herewith. please find two signed Petitions for Annexation for property in Baytown, together with a proposed Resolution to be adopted by the Council of Oak. Park Heights . Please place this matter on the agenda for your next regular meeting and advise as to the date. If you have any questions or need any additional information, please advise. Yours ver truly, R• •ert G. Br RGB:bg Enclosures cc: Petitioners s • 411 411 PETITION FOR ANNEXATION IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION OF CERTAIN FREEHOLDERS FOR THE ANNEXATION OF LAND TO THE CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS , WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA SUBJECT MATTER : Petitioners request the annexation of certain lands located in the North Half of the Northeast Quarter (N2 of NE4 ) of Section 5 , and the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter (NW'-4 of NWf of Section 4 , all in Township 29 , Range e 20 Washington County, Minnesota, to the City of Oak Park Heights . The territory included within this Petition consists of nine parcels of land owned by thirteen free- holders , all of whom are individuals . The undersigned , constituting a majority of the owners of the real property, hereby petition and request the City Council of the City of Oak Park Heights , Washington County, Minnesota, to annex the land legally described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto - to the City of Oak Park Heights , and to extend the City boundaries to include the same. The above-described property is now owned as nine separate parcels of land. The ownership interests and legal descriptions are set forth on said Exhibit "A" . In support of this Petition, the undersigned respectfully state : 1 . That the aforementioned land to be annexed is unplatted and does not exceed 200 acres in area. 2. That the property to be annexed is now or about to become urban or suburban in character . 3 . That the land hereby petitioned to be annexed is now or about to be developed into commercial uses , and that municipal government is required to protect the public health, welfare and safety and to protect the future devel- opment of the area. • . • • 4 . That the annexation of the aforementioned land is in the best interests of the City of Oak Park Heights in that it will provide for the planning and controlled developments of utilities , provide room for expansion, and is in an area which can reasonably be served for current fire, police and general government facilities of the City. 5 . a. That there are three residences in the area to be annexed and that the population of the City of Oak Park Heights is approximately 2 , 591 . b . That the area proposed to be annexed is approximately 18 acres , and that the area of the City of Oak Park Heights is approximately 1 , 400 acres . c. That the total assessed valuation of the area to be annexed is $158 , 222 .00 and the assessor' s market valuation is $544 ,335 .00. That the total assessed valuation of the City of Oak Park Heights is $43 , 343 , 294 .00 with personal property and $42 , 657 , 078 .00 without personal property. -d. That the City of Oak Park Heights has grown from a population of 332 in 1960 to a population of 2 , 591 according to the 1980 census . There have been sub- stantial private and public improvements within the City in the last 10 years. The City is in the metropolitan area and under the jurisdiction of the Metropolitan Council . Further population increase and substantial construction is anticipated. e . That the area to be annexed abuts upon the westerly boundary of the City of Oak Park Heights and the owners anticipate further development of the area within the very near future. - 2 - > • . f. That the taxes in the area proposed to be annexed will increase as the City of Oak Park Heights has a higher mill 'rate than the adjoining unincorporated townships , but in turn the property owners will obtain police protection, zoning and subdivision controls , utili- ties , and general administrative services which will be proportional to the expected tax increase and will inure to the benefit of your petitioners and the area proposed to be annexed. g. That it is feasible and practical that the aforementioned municipal services be provided by the City of Oak Park Heights . That Parcels No. 1 and 2 as shown on Exhibit "B" are already hooked up to the Oak Park Heights sanitary sewer system. h. That the property is presently located in the Town of Baytown, but that the existence and con- tinuation of the said town will not be affected by the annexation of the aforementioned property. i . That the township form of government is not able to cope with the aforementioned problems relating to the public health, safety and welfare and the develop- ment of the property as an urban or suburban area. That the area is in need of storm sewer and sanitary sewer which the Town of Baytown cannot provide. 6 . Attached hereto and marked Exhibit "B" is a detailed map which reflects in outline the aforedescribed territory which your petitioners request be annexed to the City of Oak Park Heights . 7 . The undersigned owners constitute a majority of the owners and freeholders of the property proposed to be annexed; that the parties entitled to notice of this Petition are : City of Oak Park Heights , Washington County, Washington County Planning Commission, Baytown Township , and Baytown Township Planning Commission. - 3 - • 8 . That none of the territory proposed to be annexed is presently included within the corporate limits of any incorporated city, village or borough. The undersigned freeholders petition the annexa- tion of the aforedescribed property to the City of Oak Park Heights because we believe that these properties need municipal government and municipal services which are not available under the township form of government and are available from and by the existing City of Oak Park Heights . We further believe that the annexation of these properties will aid and assist us in the planning and eco- nomic development of our properties . Dated this 20th day of May 1981 . /s/ Donald R. Anderson Donald R. Anderson /s/ Karen L. Anderson Karen L. Anderson /s/ Leland James Kendrick Leland James Kendrick /s/Richard J. Anderson Richard J . Anderson /s/ Judith M. Anderson Judith M. Anderson /s/ David C. Linguist David C . Linguist /s/ Mabel L. Linguist Mabel L. Linguist /s/ Leighton W. Johnson Leighton W. Johnson /s/ Karen T,_ Johnson Karen L. Johnson • /s/ Mary F. Bieging Mary F. Bieging - 4 - • • . 111 . EXHIBIT "A" Parcel No. 1 - Owners: C . C . Kirschenman and Jeanne Ellen Kirschenman All that part of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter (N ■4 of NW-1 ) of Section Four (4) , Township Twenty- Nine ( 29 ) North of Range Twenty (20) West described as follows , to-wit: Commencing at the Northwest corner of said Section Four (4) , thence East along the North line of said Section Four (4) for Eight Hundred Thirty-Three ( 833 ) feet to the point of beginning; thence continuing East along said North line of Section Four (4) for One Hundred Forty ( 140) feet ; thence South and parallel with the East line of said North- west Quarter of Northwest Quarter (NW4 of NW-1) for Five • Hundred Fifty-Five and Twenty-Six Hundredths ( 555 . 26 ) feet , thence West and parallel with the North line for a distance of One Hundred, Forty (140) feet to a point ; thence North Five Hundred Fifty-Five and Sixty-Two Hundredths ( 555 . 62 ) feet more or less to the point of beginning, together with a temporary easement for a period of Ten ( 10) years from May 26 , 1970 , over and across the present driveway leading from the service lane on Highway 212 South for a distance of Two Hundred (200 ) feet . Reserving unto the vendors the right to use the well on the property for a period of Twenty-Five ( 25 ) years from May 26 , 1970 , or until such time as vendors connect to the municipal water system. Parcel No. 2 - Owner : Mary F . Bieging All that part of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter (NW4 of NW4) of Section Four (4) , Township Twenty- nine (29) North , Range Twenty ( 20) West, described as follows : Beginning at a point on the South Right of Way line of State Trunk Highway No. 212 , said point being 633 feet east of the west line of Section 4 , Township 29 , North, Range 20 West, thence South and parallel to the west line of said Section 4 , a distance of 524 . 24 feet , thence East and parallel to the North line of said Section 4 a distance of 200 feet , thence North and parallel to the west line of said Section 4 , a distance of 524 . 52 feet to the South Right of Way line of State Trunk Highway No. 212 , thence west along said South Right of Way line a distance of 200 feet to the place of beginning, containing in all 2. 18 acres . Parcel No. 3 - Owners : Peter J . Dielentheis and Olga A. Dielentheis The West Six Hundred Thirty-three (633 ) feet of the North- west Quarter of the Northwest Quarter (NW4 of NW4 ) of Section Four (4) , Township Twenty-nine ( 29 ) North, Range Twenty-one ( 21 ) West, excepting the South Five Hundred- fifty ( 550) feet thereof, subject to easements and restric- tions of record. • 411 Parcel No. 4 - Owners : Donald R . Anderson and Karen L. L. Anderson; Contract Purchaser: Leland James Kendrick That part of the North Half of the Northeast Quarter (N2 of NE4 ) of Section Five ( 5) , Township Twenty-nine (29 ) North, Range Twenty ( 20) West , as follows : Commencing at the Northeast corner of Section Five ( 5) , Township Twenty-nine (29 ) North , Range Twenty ( 20) West , and running thence Westerly along the North line of said Section Five ( 5 ) , One Hundred Fifty-seven ( 157) feet to a point; thence South and perpendicular to said North line of Section Five ( 5 ) , Five Hundred Sixty-five ( 565 ) feet to a point ; thence East and perpendicular to the last described line , One Hundred Fifty-seven ( 157 ) feet to the ' East line of said Section Five (5 ) , the same being the • center line of the so-called Speed Bowl Road; thence North along the East line of said Section Five (5 ) , Five Hundred a Sixty-five (565 ) feet to the point of beginning, containing approximately two (2) acres , more or less . Subject to existing highways and easement to Northern States Power Company. Parcel No. 5 - Owners : Richard J . Anderson and Judith M. Anderson. That part of the North Half of the Northeast Quarter (NZ of NE4) of Section Five ( 5) , as follows : Commencing at a point on the North line of Section Five ( 5) , _Township Twenty-nine (29) North, Range Twenty (20) West, One Hundred Fifty-seven ( 157 ) feet West of the North- east corner of said Section Five ( 5 ) ; thence South and per- pendicular to the North line of said Section Five ( 5) , Five Hundred Sixty-five ( 565) feet to a point ; thence West and perpendicular to the last described line , One Hundred Fifty-six ( 156) feet to a point ; thence North and perpen- dicular to the last described line , Five Hundred Sixty-five ( 565 ) feet to the North line of said Section Five ( 5) ; thence East along the North line of said Section Five ( 5 ) , One Hundred Fifty-six (156) feet to the point of beginning , • containing two (2) acres , more or less . Subject to exist- ing highways and easement to Northern States Power Company. Parcel No. 6 - Owners : David C . Linguist and Mabel L . Linguist ; Leighton W. Johnson and Karen L. Johnson The West Two Hundred (200 ) feet of the East Five Hundred Thirteen ( 513 ) feet of the North Three Hundred Twenty-five ( 325) feet of the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter (NE4 of NE1) of Section Five ( 5) , Township Twenty- nine ( 29 ) North, Range Twenty (20) West . EXHIBIT "A" (Page Two of Three) i i • , . Parcel No. 7 - Owner : David C . Linguist The West One Hundred ( 100) feet of the East Six Hundred Thirteen (613 ) feet of the North Three Hundred Twenty-five ( 325) feet of the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter (NE4 of NE4) of Section Five ( 5) , Township Twenty- nine (29 ) North , Range Twenty (20) West. Parcel No. 8 - Owner : David C . Linguist The West One Hundred ( 100) feet of the East Seven Hundred Thirteen ( 713) feet of the North Two Hundred Twenty-four and Five Tenths (224 . 5 ) feet of the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter (NE4 of NE4) of Section Five (5) , Township Twenty-nine (29 ) North, Range Twenty (20) West. o Parcel No . 9 - Owner : David C . Linguist The West One Hundred ( 100 ) feet of the East Seven Hundred Thirteen ( 713 ) feet of the South One Hundred and Five 1 Tenths ( 100 . 5 ) feet of the North Three Hundred Twenty-five ( 325) feet of the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter (NE4 of NE4) of Section Five ( 5) , Township Twenty- nine (29 ) North, Range Twenty (20 ) West. • • EXHIBIT "A" (Page Three of Three) .. • • 411 . . . • • . .. .. .. . . .. . .• .. ‘ . . •. • . . f.• (.(f•,-Tn •f O . '.1 :11_2_,-)(7' ; a•:r.."- •:. . ) - - �`• c I :�j0 / a ..r kJ M �c7 - a�s� N in / _ _ - O O 1-1 U ; - _ .0 / * 1 y c0 S-1 0 $4 - y rV ['. N O � :-2 y ' ■ 4 F-•Y 1 3-4 tr 1 r-1 bi m i 0. - - 0 - - rJ • 0O NN Z Pc I M - -may / N U{ bn ° c!1 { 1 2 r / 1'. S1H913H )if1d 'P G Jo ...ii17 ti • . " (1 '1' 1 / .f, �r NMOI AJ _ -2 --7- 'li O 0 N Lift"3. .- I - G4,1 'n N N . V� r r _ 1 • a. 3 AV- 0 - � � � rl tt O - . O O O.$4 „,. . OS9Z Sa o o 7To0 Y 1 0 r N N i c�, ` cw '-1 ' 1 Z I - to_ •1 :::1.4 inu0i = It' OOLZ 0 ;..1 11 ; I J. ,:. I Ot3 ` : N N I- , - 4 ( I • I H ;CV OZLZ a �o •� i ,_ • 1N • • . • w — (1c- - I ; iJ In 0 N • ' OLLZ u •-,-I • ` 1 rz[ b 0 �. 1 •19L2 10.. OOg 0 7 1 . I_ n - .= 2 2 - ► ► 1 - M i 1 , i • • 410 CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS • MINUTES OF MEETING HELD MONDAY, MAY 26 , 1981 Call to order and HRA meeting opened by Mayor Mondor. Present: O'Neal, Westphal, Lang, Seggelke, Eckber.g, Wilson and Licht. Seggelke moved to hold a special meeting Tuesday, June 9th at 7 : 00 P.M. with Chaves, NSP, City Attorney, Planner and Engineer. Seconded by Westphal . 5 aye votes . Carried. Lang moved to adjourn the HRA meeting, seconded by Seggelke. 5 aye votes. Carried. Seggelke moved to return Abrahamson Nurseries bid bond in the amount of 5512 . 70 upon receipt of acceptance of project from tree inspector. Seconded by O 'Neal. 5 aye votes . Carried. Mondor moved to hold a public hearing Monday, July 13, 1981 at 7 : 00 P.M. for proposed sewer and water increases . Seconded by Westphal . 5 aye votes . Carried. Lang moved to adopt a resolution for City Council to support the Petition for Annexation presented by R. G. Briggs and directing Clerk to forward Petition and Resolution to the Executive Director of the Minnesota Municipal Board. Seconded by Seggelke. Roll call vote taken with 5 aye votes cast. Carried. Lana moved to direct Clerk to forward letter to NSP requesting them to clean up area along fence line from Osgood to Ozark and Park Committee to discuss at next meeting and return findings and recommendations to Council at next meeting. Seconded by Westphal . Aye votes cast by O' Neal, Westphal , Mondor and Lang. Abstain by Seggelke. Carried. Westphal moved to place two "Caution - children playing" signs at 56th Street and Upper 55th Street with police department enforcing them. Seconded by Seggelke. Roll call vote taken with 5 aye votes . Carried. Lang moved to direct Clerk to submit letter to property manager at Oak Park Development requesting them to develop a time table to clean up the mall area due to numerous complaints the Council has received. Seconded by O'Neal . 5 aye votes . Carried. Lang moved to return cashier ' s check in the amount of fil500 .00 to W. Westphal contingent upon the receipt of acceptance of project by building inspector. Seconded by O ' Neal . 5 aye votes . Carried. • • May 29, 1981 Minnesota Municipal Board Metro :Square Building 7th and Robert Streets St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 Attention: Mr. Terrance Merritt, Executive Director Dear Mr. Merritt: At:: the:_City Council meeting held Tuesday, May 26th, the Council`.adopted. a resolution to support the Petition for Annexation Enclosed is a copy of the petition and the. resolution. Shou&d you have questions on the matter, please do not' hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, La Vonne Wilson, Clerk-Treasurer City of Oak Park Heights LW/lam Enclosures • An Equal Opportunity Employer • Phoney 296.2426 t•, STATE OF MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL BOARD Suite 165 Metro Square 7th & Robert Streets St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 June 19, 1981 MMB Docket No.A3824 Oak Park Heights Donald R. Anderson, et al, petition Mr. Robert G. Briggs Attorney at Law 126 South Second Street P.D. Box 40 Stillwater, MN 55082 Dear Mr. Briggst The Minnesota Municipal Board acknowledges receipt of your petition for annexation. Please refer to the above docket number in future com- munications regarding this proposed annexation. It is the responsibility of the initiating party to meet all necessary requirements before the board can accept the annexation ordinance for filing. [Under Minnesota Statute 414.033, Subdivision 5, the city may assist the petitioners in complying with these requirements.] In cases where the procedure is initiated by service of a petition on a municipality or by service of notice of intent on a town board, the ordinance must not be passed until 90 days after the township has been served, unless the town board signs a waiver stating they have no objection to the annexation. The following checked requirements need to be met: X The petition must be accompanied by a certification showing that it was served upon the town board, county board, the council of any abutting municipality, and the date filed. A petition must be served upon s id parties within 10 days after filing the petition with the city. is there any abutting municipality?) Map requirements are as follow: A. If platted land is included, maps, including copies of plats, which are necessary to support and identify the land description are required. B. A map showing the property proposed for consideration and its relationship to any surrounding municipality. Page 2 • • • A filing fee of $2.00 an acre with a minimum of $50.00 and a maximum of $300.00. X Under M.S. 414.033, Subd. 5, if the petition is not signed by all the property owners of the land proposed to be annexed, the ordinance shall not be enacted until the municipal council has held a hearing on the proposed annexation after at least 30 days mailed notice to all pro- perty owners within the area to be annexed. The Department of Transportation Mapping Section will review the pro- perty description, and you will be contacted if there are any problems. Other • We also recommend that you purchase the Minnesota Municipal Board Rules of Practice from the Minnesota Documents Section, 117 University Avenue, St. Paul, Minnesota 55155. If you have any questions, please contact this office for assistance. Sincerely, MUNICIPAL BOARD Patricia D. Lun Assistant Executive Director PDL:kj [REV. 10/801 cc: La Yonne Wilson City Clerk-Treasurer _ J 0 I J Y LAW OFFICES OF ECKBERG, LAMMERS, BRIGGS 84 WOLFF 126 SOUTH SECOND STREET P. O. BOX 40 STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 439-2878 LYLE J. ECKBERG JAMES F. LAMMERS ROBERT G. BRIGGS September 10, 1981 • PAUL A. WOLFF MARK J. VIERLING Mr. David R. Licht Midwest Planning and Research, Inc. 416 East Hennepin Avenue Minneapolis, Minnesota 55414 Re: Anderson/Linguist Annexation Dear Mr. Licht: On May 20, 1981, the Council of the City of Oak Park Heights passed a Resolution supporting the above-referenced Petition for Annexation, a copy of which is enclosed herewith for your information. That annexation Petition and Resolution have been filed with the Minnesota Municipal Board, and have been docketed as M.M.B. Docket No. A03824 . The Town of Baytown has objected to the annexation, and it is my understanding that the matter will probably be set on for hearing within the next couple of months. The purpose of my writing is to make inquiry concerning an amendment to the Oak Park Heights Comprehensive Plan to reflect this property as an area proposed for annexation. In reviewing the original draft of the Comprehensive Plan, it does not appear that the area included within our Petition was designated as proposed for annexation. It would be appreciated if you could advise me as to whether or not the area has now been included, and if not, what steps are required to amend the Comprehensive Plan to provide for this property. Your prompt response would be appreciated. Yours very truly, Robert G. Briggs RGB:jb cc: Members of the Oak Park Heights City Council Otto Bonestroo L ' 1 a a NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS INC. September 21, 1981 Mr. Robert G. Briggs Attorney at Law Eckberg, Lammers, Briggs & Wolff 126 South 2nd Street Stillwater, Minnesota 55082 RE: Oak Park Heights - Anderson/Lindquist Annexation File No: 798.02 - 81.24 Dear Bob: We anticipate the Oak Park Heights City Council to hold a Comprehensive Plan amendment public hearing for consideration of the Anderson/Lindquist annexation matter on 13 October 1981. From my initial review of this possible addition to the City, I would believe we have a strong chance of winning the case. We will keep you advised as our work on this matter progresses. Very truly yours, NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC. David R. Licht, AICP President DRL/nd cc: LaVonne Wilson Brad Lemberg 4820 minnetonka boulevard, suite 420 minneapolis, mn 55416 612/925-9420 411 , .c � a City of Oak Park Heights Minutes of meeting held September 14, 1981 Page two - • Due to the holiday, Seggelke moved to hold the October 12th meeting on October 13th. Seconded by O'Neal. 4 aye votes. Carried. Seggelke moved to amend the comprehensive plan to incorporate • the Donald R. Anderson, et al, petition for annexation at the October 13th meeting at 7:00 P.M. Seconded by Lang. 4 age votes. Carried. Clerk read public hearing notice,& presented affidavit of publication for public hearing on ammendment to comprehensive plan. O'Neal moved to continue the hearing September 28th at 7:00 P.M. in order to give the planner' s further time to compile information. .� Seconded by Westphal. 4 aye votes. Carried. Acting Mayor Lang called for nominations to fill the vacant position of Mayor. Westphal moved to nominate Lang, with Lang seconding. O'Neal moved to nominate Seggelke, with Seggelke seconding. O'Neal moved to close nominations, with Westphal seconding. 4 aye votes. Carried. One aye vote was cast by Westphal for Lang and one aye vote was cast by O'Neal for Seggelke. Being a tie vote, acting mayor Lang will make an appointment September 28, 1981. Acting Mayor Lang requested that anyone interested in the position of Mayor should contact him at 439-3845. Westphal moved to accept the revised engineering rates which will become effective January 1, 1982. Seconded by Seggelke. 4 aye votes. Carried. O'Neal moved to approve reinvestments, details available at clerk' s office. Seconded by Seggelke. 4 aye votes. Carried. Seggelke moved to authorize clerk and deputy clerk to attend cash management - investment seminar October 7, 1981 and city to cover registration expense -of 826.00. Seconded by O'Neal. 4 aye votes. Carried. Westphal made motion to ado - the reaolttion (with corrections) commemorating the dedicated services of the late Donald (Dewey) Mondor, Mayor of the City, to be formally presented to his family Sunday, September 20, 1981. Seconded by O'Neal. Roll call vote taken with 4 aye votes cast. Carried. • • MEMORANDUM T4: a Brad Lemberg nr, FROM: Anne Bronken ' ' DATE: 22 September 1981 NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS RE: Anderson/Lindquist Property Annexation Incorporated 798.02 - 81.24 4820 Minnetonka Boulevard,Suite 420 FILE NO: Mpls., Mn. 55416 612/925-9420 We have just been informed of another annexation proposal for the land located east and west of Oakgreen Avenue and immediately south of Highway 36 (212). I have enclosed a drawing of the properties. Again, as with the Kimmel Property, the City will need a statement addressing utility service to the properties. Thank you for your attention to this matter. cc: LaVonne Wilson Lyle Eckberg . • 0 • • • t • ' F7 '--74 .r ° •/ ." 2 F ; t s1 9 t sa s re>"'2, .. 0 i '• 0'. v m 1M •I is " •1 it - .t' f t ' CI .. !• fI S 1 14••• • .�. • .. . . - ••••is •N,IJ.:t l►• T • J ' • ..- .. .., . • O (I) .-Oa. ;?` M �� / 40 _1 U N I N 4S •ri ■ i• { •• r-1 T! a G •, to U N '� O / cf N it a) i r- v, = i 4 o- • ti • 1 N t• - N913H )48 N7G 40 x117 ,■ • • Sl �'d -c MOt■0 J.. . CI Nc" • O dl to , - - t tS. I z..� N • •Q ti r-t U y 1 N. _ w N . • c U ,—t I • \• O I • O . • $.4 Q) • to ly • 0 r: N .+ a D _ . N ) N I • t4 c Q. _ �t_ • 3AVJ • 1 =:t__1_ 4 • O v —r --. - I -- - 1 059 U L , • • _ o o to N • 0 " , � c\ N c» o : I cv n v RI Z Q . • 0 ii I GI ..- CV 1 4s, >4 ' M 1. N I 1 O - I •••.1. r-1 0 N N ( O . 1 OGLZ to u >N M 0 . . I • (1) j 1 •„ (CI ob 1 CV i Q to .. -; ;CV OZLZ g u:• "4 r, . Cr + •• g roo •rt I • •1 ) 41 , 1 41 a . I. . , .44 OLLZ }U1 „III ' I - f I 01 ti[� C. .2. !� t t ►.19LZ o= ON o ( + I— --- 2 I ' I . I , • • CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS 14168 . 57th Street North STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 439-4439 September 30, 1981 Stillwater Gazette Stillwater, Mn. 55082 Gentlemen: Please publish the following Friday, October 2, 1981. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON AMMENDMENT TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IN THE CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Oak Park Heights, Washington County, Minnesota, shall hold a public hearing to consider an ammendment to the City Comp- rehensive Plan for annexation of property located in the North 1 of the Northeast 4 of Section 5, and the Northwest of the Northwest ki of Section 4, all in Township 29, Range 20 and located in the Town of Baytown, Washington County, Minnesota. The hearing shall be held Tuesday October 13, 1981 at 7:00 P.M. at the Municipal Building, 14168 57th St. North, Oak Park Heights, Minnesota. All oral and written testimony will be considered. Dated this 30th day of September, 1981. La Vonne Wilson, Clerk-Treasurer City of Oak Park Heights • NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS INC. October 5, 1981 Mr. Robert G. Briggs Eckberg, Lammers, Briggs & Wolff 126 South 2nd Street Stillwater, Minnesota 55082 RE: Oak Park Heights - Anderson/Lindquist Annexation File No: 798.02 - 81.24 Dear Bob: With regard to your letter of 23 September and the need for you or the petitioners to attend the City Council meeting on 13 October, I would believe it would be beneficial if someone would be present. While we foresee no problems, the Council may have questions of the petitioners. We continue to see no problems with the annexation, although we have yet to hear from Brad Lemberg. Should a problem surface, I or Anne Bronken of our office will contact you immediately. Very truly,.yours, NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC. At?/t(le./.444- David R. Licht, AICP DRL/nd cc: LaVonne Wilson Lyle Eckberg Brad Lemberg 4820 minnetonka boulevard, suite 420 minneapolis, mn 55416 612/925-9420 • • • • NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS INC. MEMORANDUM TO: Oak Park Heights Mayor and City Council FROM: Anne Bronken DATE: 5 October 1981 RE: Greeley and 36th Annexation (Anderson/Lindquist) FILE NO: 798.02 - 81.24 Attached is a draft of the textual amendment to the Comprehensive Plan addressing the City's position on the proposed Greeley and 36th Annexation (Anderson/Lindquist). Due to the relatively small size of the subject area, the development of a graphic plan for this area similar to the Stillwater Township Annexation Area Plan is not needed. A general statement regarding the desired effect of additional development and circulation in the area is felt to be sufficient. It is also recommended that a statement be added to the text regarding annexation on pages 69-71 of the Development Framework portion of the Compre- hensive Plan to the effect of the following: "It should be emphasized that the areas specifically noted in this text are not intended to be inclusive of all future annexations to Oak Park Heights, and that the City remains open to consider all lands for which annexation petitions are made. Proposals for annexation that arise in the future will be studied individually and the position of the City will be included in the appendix of this report. " cc: LaVonne Wilson Lyle Eckberg Robert Briggs Brad Lemberg 4820 minnetonka boulevard, suite 420 minneapolis, mn 55416 612/925-9420 • I Baytown Township Annexation The area lying southeast of Highway 36 (212) and Oakgreen which was addressed in the land use section of the Comprehensive Plan as being a logical addition to the City, has been formally proposed for annexation. Five parcels of land on the west side of Oakgreen Avenue have also been included in the petition. The area in question includes residential and commercial uses and some vacant land. It is surrounded by residences on the east, residences and agricultural land to the south, a commercial use and agricultural land to the west, and com- mercial uses to the north fronting on Highway 36 (212). Further development of the area is expected within the very near future, which would benefit from public utilities. The extension of utilities from Oak Park Heights is the most logical means of providing utilities. Part of the annexation area is already served by the Oak Park Heights Sanitary Sewer System. Mixed Usage such as office commercial and higher density housing has been 9 9 Y proposed in the Comprehensive Plan to protect low density homes from highway associated impacts. The existing uses are of the type that are desired in the area. Some vacant land still exists that could develop into office or higher density housing. At the onset of additional development proposals, access and circulatory design of the specific projects should be studied comprehensively with consideration for the rest of the parcels and surrounding area. Care should be taken that the residences to the south are not adversely impacted by traffic, lights, noise, etc. An Equal Opportunity Employer • • Phone: 296-2428 ♦o �'T '7InnE`' STATE OF MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL BOARD Suite 165 Metro Square 7th & Robert Streets St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 October 9, 1981 MMB Docket No. A-3824 Oak Park Heights Donald R. Anderson, et al, petition Ms. LaVonne Wilson City Clerk/Treasurer City Hall 14168 - 57th Street No. Oak Park Heights, Minnesota 55082 Re: Preparation for hearing Dear Ms. Wilson: A hearing will be held by the Municipal Board on the above-proposed boundary adjustment. Minnesota Statutes 414 requires the Municipal Board to consider certain specified factors in arriving at its decision. It is important that you are prepared to present adequate testimony so that the board can arrive at the best decision for the total area. The evidence presented on the record will serve as the basis for the order subsequently issued by the board. State aids to your governmental unit may be adjusted because of the board's decision and will be based upon the evidence received at the hearing. One example is that the Department of Revenue will adjust the Local Government Aids distribution based on the data you present at the board hearing on the following: (1) population breakdown of the territory proposed for annexation, the city, and the township, (2) the assessed value of the property proposed for annexation, the city, and the township, (3) the township mill levy, for township purposes only, on the area proposed for annexation payable in the year of the annexation. The parties involved may jointly stipulate facts into the record to expedite the proceeding. Enclosed with this letter is a possible format for preparing a stipulation. This format may also serve as a guide for the presentation of evidence at the hearing. The stipulation should not be regarded as complete evidence for the proceeding, but rather as a useful tool to assist in the preparation for the hearing. If complete and accurate information and maps are presented at the hearing it will facilitate a more expeditious decision. r • • • Page Two We recommend that you purchase the Minnesota Municipal Board Rules of Practice from the Documents Section, 117 University Avenue, St. Paul 55155. These rules outline the procedures for the conduct of an orderly hearing. The rules are also contained in Minnesota Statutes Annotated immediately following Chapter 414 in the pocket part. to have legal representation at the hearing, it is strongly If you are going recommended that you forward this letter to y our attorney. Please contact our office if you have any questions. Sincerely, • MUNICIPAL BOARD Patricia ll. Lundy Assistant Executive Director • • PUL.:mem (Rev. 11/80) • To : MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL BOARD 16 Metro Square Building St. Paul , Minnesota 55101 • A-0001 , XYZ City. and ABC Township S T I P U L A T I A N The City of and the Town of stipulate and agree to the following facts concerning Min esota Statutes 414.031 to-wit: Section 414. 031 , Subd . 4(a) Population Data : a. The City of 1 . In there were residents . 2. The present estimated population is 3. By , the projected population is b . The area subject to annexation: 1 . In there were residents . 2. The present estimated population is 3. By , the projected population is c. The Township of • 1 . In there were residents . 2. The present estimated population is • 3. By , the projected population is Section 414. 031 , Subd. 4(b) (c ) Geographic Features : a . The area subject to annexation is unincorporated and abuts the City of b. The total area of the City of is approximately acres/miles . The total area of the territory subject to annexation is approximately acres/miles . c . The perimeter of the area to be annexed is approxiudi.ely % bordered by the municipality . d. The natural terrain , including general topography, major water- sheds , soil conditions , and natural features such : s rivers , lakes , and major bluffs is : Section 414. 031 , Subd. 4(d) • The pattern of physical development , including land already in use , in the process of being developed, and remaining for varir;us uses . • 1 . Area in use • a. In the City of . • 1 . Residential : acres 4. Industrial : acres 2. Institutional : acres 5. Agricultural : acres 3. Commercial : acres 6. Vacant land : acres b . In the area subject to annexation : 1 . Residential : acres 4. Industrial : acres 2 . Institutional : acres 5 . Agricultural : acres 3. Commercial : acres 6 . Vacant land : acres 411 .. c. In the Township of _ 1 . Residential : acres 4. Industrial: acres 2 . Institutional : acres 5 . Agricultural : acres 3. " Commercial : acres 6. Vacant land: acres 2 . Area being developed a . In the City of • • 1 . Residential : acres 4. Industrial : acres 2 . Institutional : acres 5 . Agricultural : acres • 3. Commercial : acres b . In the area subject to annexation: 1 . Residential : acres 4. Industrial : acres 2 . Institutional : acres 5. Agricultural : acres 3. Commercial : acres c. In the Township of • 1 . Residential : acres 4 . Industrial : acres 2 . Institutional : acres 5.. Agricultural : acres 3. Commercial : acres 3. Area remaining for various uses a. In the City of 1 . Residential : acres 4. Industrial : acres • 2 . Institutional : acres 5 . Agricultural : acres 3. Commercial : acres b . In the area subject to annexation : 1 . Residential : acres 4. Industrial : acres 2 . Institutional : acres 5 . Agricultural : acres 3. Commercial : acres c. In the Township of 1 . Residential : acres 4. Industrial : acres 2 . Institutional : acres 5 . Agricultural : acres 3 . Commercial : acres Section 414. 031 Subd. 4(d) Transportation : • 1 . The present transportation network is : a. In the City of b . In the area subject to annexation : 2. Potential transportation issues include: Section 414. 031 , Subd. 4(e) Land use controls and planning , including comprehensive plans , in the city and the area subject to annexation : 1 . In the City of a . Zoning b. Subdivision Regulations . c . Comprehensive Plan d. Official Map e. Capital Improvements Program f. Fire Code g . Inspector ' h . Planning Commission i . Other 2 . In the Township of a . Zoning b. Subdivision Regulations c . Comprehensive Plan d . Official Map e . Capital Improvements Program f. Fire Code g . Building Inspector h . Planning Commission i . Other 3. In the County of a . Zoning b. Subdivision Regulations c . Comprehensive Plan d . Official Map e . Capital Improvements Program f. Fire Code g . Building Inspector h . Planning Commission i . Other 4 . The Metropolitan Council provides the following planning and land use services :. Section 414 . 031 , Subd. 4 (e ) If there is an inconsistency between the proposed development and the planning and land use controls for the area , what is the reason for said inconsistency? • Section 414. 031 , Subd. 4(f) (g ) (h ) Governmental Services : 1 . The Town of provides the area subject to annexation with the following services : a . water: • b . sewer : c. fire protection and rating : d. police protection : e. street improvements : f. street maintenance : g . recreational : h. administrative services : i . other : 2. The City of provides its residents with the following services : • a . . water : b . sewer : • c. fire protection and rating : d. police protection : e. street improvements : f. street maintenance : g . recreational : h. administrative services : i . other : • 3. The City of provides the area subject to annexation with the following services : 411 -4 4 S '. • a. water: b . sewer: c. fire protection: d. police protection : e. street improvements : f . street maintenance: g. recreational : h . administrative services : - i . other: • Existing or potential environmental problems and the need for additional services to resolve these problems : Plans and programs by the annexing municipality to provide needed governmental services for the area proposed for annexation include: Section 414. 031 , Subd. 4( i ) 1 . Tax Base a . In the City of , the tax base includes the following : 1 ) Residential property in was valued at $ generating $ in taxes or % of the total . 2) Commercial property in was valued at- $ generating $ in taxes or % of the total . • 3) Industrial property in was valued at $ generating $ in taxes or % of the total . 4) Agricultural property in was valued at $ generating $ in taxes or % of the • total . 5) Vacant land in was .valued at $ generating $ in taxes or % of the total . 6 ) Non-taxable property a . Institutional use in included acres worth , as developed, $ b . Other non-taxable uses (such as roadways , parks ) in included acres/miles. b . In the Township of , the tax base includes the following : 1 ) Residential property in was valued at $ generating $ in taxes or % of the total . 2) Commercial property in was valued at $ generating $ in taxes or % of the total . 3) Industrial property in was valued at $ generating $ in taxes or % of the total . 4) Agricultural property in was valued at $ , generating $ in taxes or _ % of the total . • 5) Vacant land in was valued at $ generating $ in taxes or _ % of the total . 6 ) Non-taxable property a . Institutional use in included acres worth , as developed , $ .6- . III 410 !II 1 • _ b . Other non-taxable uses (such as roadways , parks ) in included acres/miles . c. In the area subject to annexation , the tax base includes the following : 1 ) Residential property in was valued at $ ,- , generating $ in taxes or % of the total . 2) Commercial property in was valued at $ , generating $ in taxes or % of the total . 3) Industrial property in was valued at $ , generating $ in taxes or % of the total . 4 ) Agricultural property in was valued at 9 $ , generating $ in taxes or % of the total . 5 ) Vacant land in was valued at $ , generating $ in taxes or % of the total . 6 ) Non-taxable property a . Institutional use in included acres worth , as developed , $ b. Other non-taxable uses (such as roadways , parks ) in included acres/miles . 2 . Fiscal Data . a . In the City of • 1 ) Mill rate in is/was . 2 ) Bonded indebtedness in is/was • b. In the Township of 1 ) Mill rate in is/was 2 ) Bonded indebtedness in is/was c. In the area subject to annexation : . 1 ) Mill rate in is/was 2) Bonded indebtedness in is/was d . Mill rate in • 1 ) County in is/was 2 ) School district in is/was .• 3) Township in is/was Section 414 . 031 , Subd. 4(j ) Relationship and effect of the proposed annexation on area school districts and on adjacent communities : Section 414 . 031 , Subd. 4( k) - • Adequacy of town government to deliver services to the area ' proposed for annexation : Section 414. 031 , Subd . 4(1 ) Could necessary governmental services best be provided by incor- poration -or .annexation to -an adjacent _muni_cipality or township? • -60 • . • Section 414. 031 , Subd . 4(m) Present assessed valuation of the- Town of Present assessed valuation - or proposed annexation area : New valuation of the Town of if entire area is annexed : If the annexation is approved , should the remainder of the township: a. be incorporated? b . be annexed to another municipality ? c . be annexed to another township? Section 414. 031 , Subd. 5 A 'majority of property owners have/have not petitioned the Minne- sota Municipal Board requesting this annexation . AGREED BY : City of , this day of , 19 Mayor City Clerk AGREED BY : - Town of , this day of , 19 Chairman Town Clerk • (REV . 3/78) • • • ,A-832.4 Oak Park Heights r;• , : x' � • ‘.a.e.?u; • • BEFORE THE MUNICIPAL BOARD OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA • Robert J. Ferderer Chairman Robert W. Johnson Vice Chairman Kenneth Sette Member County Commissioner Ex-Officio Member County Commissioner Ex-Officio Member • IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION ) FOR THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN ) LAND TO THE CITY OF OAK PARK ) NOTICE OF HEARING HEIGHTS PURSUANT TO MINNESOTA ) STATUTES 414 Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held pursuant to • Minnesota Statutes 414, as amended, before the Minnesota Municipal Board • in the above-entitled matter. • The hearing will be held on the 12th day of November, 1981 in the Oak Park Heights City Hall, Oak Park Heights, Minnesota commencing at 9:30 a.m. All persons shall be given an opportunity to be heard orally, and to submit written data, statements or arguments concerning the above-entitled matter. The right to testify and the admission of testimony and other evidence shall be governed by the Rules of the Minnesota Municipal Board. (The rules of the Minnesota Municipal Board may be purchased from the Documents Section, 117 University Avenue, St. Paul, Minnesota 55155. ) • The property proposed for annexation is described as follows: - All that part of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter (NVy4 of NW'4 ) of Section Four ( 4 ) , Township Twenty- Nine (29 ) North of Flange Twenty ( 20) West described as follows , to-wit : Commencing at the Northwest corner of said Section Four (4) , thence East along the North line of said Section Four (4) for Eight .Hundred Thirty-Three ( 833 ) feet to the point • of beginning ; thence continuing East along said North line of Section Four (4 ) for One Hundred Forty ( 140) feet ; thence South and parallel with the East line of said North- west. Quarter of Northwest Quarter. (NW4 of NW4 ) for Five Hundred Fifty-Five and Twenty-Six Hundredths ( 555 . 26 ) feet , thence West and paral1 el with the North l inc for a dirtanoc of One Hundred Forty (140) feet to a point ; thence North Five Hundred Fi fty--F i_ve and Sixty-Two Hundredths ( 555 . 62 ) feet more or 1-ess to the point of beginning , together with a temporary easoment for a period of Ten ( 10 ) years from May 26 , 1970 , over and across the present driveway 3eading from the service lane on Highway 212 South for a distance of 'Iwo Hundred ( 200 ) feet . Reserving unto the vendors the • right to use: the w ., ' an the property for a period of Twenty--Fi.ve ( 25 ) years from May 26 , 3970 , or unti.1 such time as vendors connect to the municipal water system. • All that pea l of the Noi :hwe.'s>i, Quarter of the Northwest; Quarter' (NW; of NW'2 ) of S ect:i.o'n Four (4 ) , 'i'ol nship Twenty-- %� Wino ( 29 ) North , 1�e: r.c• Twenty ( 20 ) West , described as \� 1 011 oaf; : lie cTi n i 1)(:) et point on the South �t 1 oht of Way 1 i ne of State:! Trunk unk H a ghway No. 232 , said po i nt being 633 feet east of the west 1foe of Section 4 `*Yj 411 North , Range 20 West , thence South and pera.t.icl to the west said Section 4 , a d:is•L )xce of C .4 . 24 feet , thence line of .,clld • East 61)d pu 'ci_llei to the NoeLh line of aa_Ld SeeLioo 6 a di.steece of 200 feet, thence 71ort,h and parai :tei to -the west line cf said Section 4 , a d i _L-.ur'r' of 524 . 52 feel to the Sou Le :?iclht of Way line of State Trunk Highway No . 212 , - thence west along said South Right ght of Way line a distance of 200 feet to the place of beginning , containing in all 2 . 18 acres . • The West Six Hundred "Thirty-three (633 ) feet of the North--- west .Qu rter of the Northwest Quarter (NU of NW ) of Sect:i on Four (4 ) , Township Twenty-nine ( 29 ) North , Range Twenty-one ( 21 ) West ,. except:i ng the South Five hundred-- fifty ( 550 ) feet thereof , subject to easements and restric- . tions of record. • That part of the North Half of the Northeast Quarter (N2 _ of NE- ) of Section Five (5 ) , Township Twenty-nine (29 ) North, Range Twenty ( 20) West , as follows : Commencing at the Northeast corner of Section Five ( 5) , Township Twenty-nine (29 ) North , Range Twenty ( 20) West, and running' thence Westerly along the North line of said Section Five ( 5 ) , One Hundred Fifty-seven ( 157 ) feet to a point; thence South and perpendicular to said North line of Section Five ( 5 ) , Five Hundred Sixty-five ( 565 ) feet to a point; thence East and perpendicular to the last described line , One Hundred Fifty-seven ( 157 ) feet to the ' East line of said Section Five ( 5 ) , the same being the center line of the so-called Speed Bowl Road ; thence North • along the East line of said Section Five ( 5 ) , Five Hundred . a Sixty-five ( 565 ) feet to the poirt of beginning , containing • approximately two (2) acres , more or less . Subieet to existing highways and easement to Northern States Power Company. - • That part of the North Half of the Northeast Quarter (NZ • of NE-1) of Section Five ( 5 ) , as follows: Commencing at a point on the North line of Section Five ( 5) , Township Twenty-r. _ne (29 ) North, Range Twenty (20) West, One Hundred Fifty-seven ( 157 ) feet West of the North- east corner of said Section Five ( 5) ; thence South and per- pendicular to the North line of said Section Five ( 5 ) , Five Hundred Sixty-five ( 565 ) feet to a point; thence Wes.*6 and perpendicular to the last described line , One Hundred • Fifty-six ( 156) feet to a point ; thence No; th and perpen- dicular to the last described line , Five Hundred Sixty-five . ( 565 ) feet to the North line of. said Section Five (5) ; thence East along the North line of said Section Five (5 ) , One Hundred Fifty-six ( 156 ) feet to the point of beginning, • containing two (2)- -acres ,' moue or less, Subiect to eyi. t- ing highways and easement to Northern States Power Company. a The West Two Hundred ( 200) feet of the East Five Hundred Thirteen ( 513) feet of the North Three Hundred Twenty-five (325) feet of the Northeast Quarter of. the Northeast Quarter (NE2- of NE-,'- ) of Section Five ( 5 ) , Township Twenty- nine (29) North, Range Tvent y ( 20) West . cat , The West One Hundred .( 100 ) feet of the Fast Six Hundred Thirteen ( 613 ) feet of. the North Three Hundred Twenty-five ( 325) feet of the Northeast. Quarter of the Northeast • r ... .. • Quarter (NE1 of NF' ) of Section Five ( 5) , Township Twenty- nine (29 ) North , hange Twenty ( 20) West . The West One Hundred ( 100 ) feet of the East Seven Hundred Thirteen ( 713 ) feet of the North Two Hundred Twenty-four and Five Tenths (224. 5 ) feet of• the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter (NE1 of NE1 ) of Section Five ( 5 ) , Township Twenty-nine ( 29 ) North , Range Twenty ( 20 ) West . The West One Hundred ( 100 ) feet of the East Seven Hundred Thirteen ( 713 ) feet of the South One Hundred and Five Tenths ( 160 . 5 ) feet of the North Three Hundred Twenty-five (325) feet of the Northeast 'Quarter of the Northeast Quarter (NE1 of NE 1 ) of Section Five ( 5 ) , Township Twenty- nine (29 ) North , Range Twenty ( 20) West . After the testimony is complete and the record is closed, the Board will its meet from time to time to deliberate, approve and issue t findings and order. Persons desiring to be present at such meetings or conference calls should contact the Board office. Dated this 9th day of October, 1981 MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL BOARD Suite 165 Metro Square Building St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 i Patricia D. Lundy Assistant Executive Director • • 110 r O CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS ' MINUTES OF MEETING HELD TUESDAY, OCTOBER 13, 1981 HRA meeting called to order by Chairman Seggelke at 6 : 50 P.M. Present: O'Neal, Westphal , Lana, Sommerfeldt, Vierling, Wilson, and Licht. Discussion held regarding HRA projects, with Mr. Licht informing the council that the preliminary phasing plan -would be completed for the council meeting October 26th, and that further discussion on the Chaves matter ?mould be continued at that time. Lang moved to close the hearing, with O'Neal seconding. 5 aye votes. Carried. Sommerfeldt called regular mee inr Order- -t_7 :00 P.M. and opened public hearing on t]e_Anderson/Lindtu Annexation ammendment to the city comprelieizsive pIan. Clerk read public hearing notice and presented affidavit of publication. Lang moved to adopt a resolution adopting the proposed annexation as part of the comprehensive plan. Seconded by O'Neal . Roll call vote taken with 5 aye votes. Adopted. O'Neal moved to authorize the planner to submit the above ammendment to Metro Council and to add a text ammendment to the city comp plan. Seconded by Seggelke. 5 aye votes. Carried. Seggelke moved to close the hearing, with Lang seconding. 5 aye votes. Hearing closed. Clerk read public hearing notice and presented affidavit of publication for the liquor license transfer request from Mill Road Inn, Inc. to Timark, Inc. Application and bonds being in order, comments were called for. Being no objections, Mayor Sommerfeldt called for a motion. Seggelke moved to adopt a resolution to approve the liquor license transfer, seconded by Westphal. Roll call vote taken with 5 aye votes. Transfer approved. Lang moved to close the hearing, with Seggelke seconding. 5 aye votes. Hearing closed. Mayor Sommerfeldt opened and continued the public hearing on the Kimmel annexation request. In order to gather further data regarding utility connections, Lang moved to continue the hearing October 26th. Seconded by O'Neal. 5 aye votes. Carried. Westphal moved to adopt a resolution instructing Chief Ostendorf to request informational signs from the State to be posted at the scenic overlook. Seconded by O'Neal . Roll call vote taken with 9 aye votes cast.. Adopted. • • I M E T R O P O L I T A N C O U N C I L 300 Metro Square Building, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101 INFORMATION SUBMISSION COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS This worksheet must be filled out and submitted to the Metropolitan Council with a copy of each proposed comprehensive plan amendment. The purpose of this worksheet is to summarize the proposed change so that the Metropolitan Council will have enough information about contemplated plan amendments to determine whether it has an interest in reviewing the amendment in more detail. Please be as specific as possible; attach additional explanatory materials if necessary. I. GENERAL INFORMATION A. Sponsoring governmental unit City of Oak Park Heights Name of local contact person Mrs. LaVonne Wilson Address 14168 57th Street North Stillwat-r t 'nn- s . I: Telephone 439-4439 B. Attach a copy of the proposed amendment, including a map showing the location of the proposed change, the current plan map, and the proposed plan map; indicate which section(s) of the original plan are now being amended. C. What is the official local status of the proposed amendment? NA Adopted by planning commission on • X Approved by governing body subject to Metropolitan Council review on October 13, 1981 • D. Summarize the reasons for the proposed amendment. To annex land needed for residential and/or commercial development to the City and to provide City utility service to the annPxM land E. Provide a list of all local units and all jurisdictions the change affected by t (school districts, watershed dis- tricts, etc. ) that have been sent copies of this worksheet and plan amendment and the dates copies were sent to them. Baytown Township October 15, 1981 n October 15, 1981 Independent School District 834 1 , Stillwater Township October 15, 1981 City of Stillwater October 15, 1981 Washington County October 15, 1981 6 II. LAND USE A. Describe the following, as appropriate: o Size of area in acres 22.19 o Proposed type(s) of land use Commercial and/or.Residential o Number of residential dwelling units NA o Proposed density 6-10 units per acre o Proposed square footage of commercial, industrial, or public buildings s NA 9 B. Population, Household and Employment Forecasts Would you expect the proposed amendment to result in changes to the population, household or employment forecasts for 1990, or for the five-year stages contained in the original plan, for those land parcels affected by the change? No/Not applicable. X Yes/Not sure. If yes, show below the expected changes: Forecast Based on Forecast Based on Previous Plan Plan Amendment Year Pop. Hsg. Empl. Pop. Hsg. Empl. 1990 Interim Stages 19 19 C. Changes to Timing and Staging of Urban Service Area Will the proposed amendment result in changes to the boundaries of the urban service area or to the timing and staging of development or of the urban service area? No/Not applicable. X Yes. Be sure Section I contains a map of these changes, measurements of the land area involved, and designation of new timing and staging. 7 . . . D. Housing Will this change have an effect on the community's ability or intent to achieve the long-term goals for low- and moderate-cost and modest-cost housing opportunities contained in the original plan? No/Not applicable. X Yes. Describe effect Medium to high density housing has been deemed an appropriate use for the land to be annexed. Higher density housing -Tends well to being lower cost housing. III. IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM A. Official Controls Will the proposed amendment require a change to zoning, subdivision, or on-site sewer ordinances? X No. Yes. Please describe. B. Capital Improvement Program Will the proposed amendment require a change to the CIP? )� No. Oak Park Heights assesses services and utilities to abutting benefited properties - ._._ Yes. Please describe. IV. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS (Optional) You may add comments stating your conclusions about the effects of the proposed amendment on metropolitan plans. This would be particularly appropriate in those instances where a metropolitan system plan is affected, but you feel that the change is minor or inconsequential. You may also use this statement to provide the Council with factors or considera- tions not covered elsewhere in the worksheet or that directly address the criteria the Council will use to make its initial determination. The proposed addition is substantially developed (approximately 40%) and already partially serviced with City utilities. The area is a geographically logical addition to Oak Park Heights. Due to the small size and the extent of development of the land, any impact on metropolitan systems is felt to be EP5641 inconsequential . 8 1 • 0 ti s El aSa / zm�' z Z LU -- �LL I� SO 0)Lii N J W /• p8a (l 1 1 God/ .� � ,5; • fks ¢` o` 7%,..'‘ J 0 / /r = �• j LLJ Ce n. r, — o CZ ■ 6,a ✓ P�� R ,,N J ,_,/ PE -_ AVF N N w� N � _.R 4� i LN � N 3AV ad ¢ ,A .�\ _ '_, /""- �iP�� % t 3n 03 c {N % i, ), ,i d e� L L N l3 o-' _ N 13AV (allf h .3"v lla3, R_ c c anV I \ l[O N ' ‘',\ N 3AV�A009V3d '^ 1 AQOBV3d I O !l N 3A NVDV3d \_ `\ il z ° N 3n lnvd O , % I ^� N A1 3nvl� slave ��, 8 L.LI ■ J m "il�o^Ia W N N u 3nV ( VWVNtld I'I L IIGGG........��.��JJJJJJ l_JL C_.— ][__ 1 w at N 3AV tLIOTNO ■ .y-=,=1_,‘-‘, ( / � _IL�u, N a‹.--..:,, N lnV VW 0'° - . UJ ^ i I Cr II w, '1 i p0.N/pNE A. N�W)) )nI Q �N c CO �L'i N 3AV '.,W3 g tf, (Aidk cu N EIL 3nV 3N310 l v, W N 3AV VON,10 UNI 4— I '.N 3nv 0313010 o I �� II c Z CC o O WQH Q H •I'A. T 1 r ,-- 7 : I 1 Hu I1 1 A ..., , , r . ,, ... . • 1 • z , •- - i ill 4 . 4 . 4. Ir . Ial . .......) 3M 1 es • s--.4 • N380 r—1-11 o 144 ,-. :2, es 0 r• ! llilliii 3- tx I • , L 13 6,4 *0 10 1 ri> i f . .y...,"_ I 1 1 , i .2.. - -- g •-- • 7 1.. st d se . 1 'Y. ) I • I it i 1 t ss, v 0 8 A _ ,_c„, .. 1 9 1...; t ______ 1 .1 I to I.,. I , --II---"977— vl—ry Pro—---——--""""—r " /Mr "M0 . V 9L I .to .-: gri 0 2 k • -•__ .: i e tzl •N 3 1. -------------":" ; •,: /0: r t ■ 1 , • ' I i 8 3..- : .:( . , ot I-, - cr■ 1 .4,... z ,.23 se d ..., 7 17, e TY; 1 •' -"-A, . t . i i I s . -" ii .. ---____ . ' . • .-. N 3AY Va N110 _1 _ ,....- II _ P., " • • ., 9 .. In " i .Q.:: •' ' ,. [ .. . I • '• / ' 'N .. S, . . , -.—. . ..., AL- ■ rr) o I J 2 It - ".', * - 4 ,,.;_. < .'':.:,■ . . ' I . N •ill ai din= ..., [ ;.1 1 . 1/1 • • .X.1 I. - --. 1.... _ • LI 7 i 111 IV . •- ta <t• •-% In 144 '' ••• • /1 /11E/ . t4.' . ,.... • ..., 3•. / 4, , A qr K • 1 e‘ i.:.,1„,_i____.„..,.,,..... 1 i.4■•• kl V 31k4 1.--..• • . I / A. 0) / 4 I-, or,t,..3. ... 9 K / / / ■ ••• "..-.. - i .... -.. ''' iri - 61 / F -.1 4 N \(......-----Y1 / v, / X - ),- I- / .:._....--= ..) ..< I—.I/ / / , f..:) CI Ir. '1,-• , •I = 1 ir / O..,,i,: i , - r • . '' • C) ...Ott 04.!it 1 1........'t ,..i SMW....... . CO • ' ,/ >- I-- )--1 (/. 1 (ANDI3H NVO'd 3V: p..I N M0.1.AV 444 ,,,3 s-•• 1 1 .1.4, = >cc g ti re- . I..■I 1.-4- CD ,..--..... I..-1 44t 1, —_—__-- ----a. _-_— W --- 1 \\ 3 A V ( 1 I _---.., Z < ,-...I - CI.- . , C..0 ,.-....• P-4 , . F.•• (..) . o ›.< w T -- i i 11 6 . i I • 4 I 1 i ^g 1t � , 0 L___ "' _ vi+vwo_._—..._.,�,T�._N 'any viivwo = k °[ I I i " 8 1! k r 0 o I .- ( 9 rtp N 1 3AV 1 s _ I , 1 • to Cr I -�� 1 LIT' . 3 310 V¢ ~ A. . 011 , 2 N• 3AY VCNV 0 _ r. • w • u a h L t') . FL--1 g r ..._ ›.- w n` ` Q oil■ • L I • I ❑ CD Ell ;- gin m; / // r'? : � - 1 -/� h1 8 / J � X . f w r r N r- .••••• U pp . 0 H- rte? ;n e.. ii. o Gt I NM01AY8 a z.0 a W ! on J1- N N W N 1 M Q- 1- o - d O 1 I o w V) a O a • • • PROPOSED TEXT ADDITION TO APPENDIX OF THE OAK PARK HEIGHTS POLICY PLAN/ DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK: Baytown Township Annexation The area lying southeast of Highway 36 (212) and Oakgreen which was addressed in the land use section of the Comprehensive Plan as being a logical addition to the City, has been formally proposed for annexation. Five parcels of land on the west side of Oakgreen Avenue have also been included in the petition. The area in question includes residential and commercial uses and some vacant land. It is surrounded by residences on the east, residences and agricultural land to the south, a commercial use and agricultural land to the west, and com- mercial uses to the north fronting on Highway 36 (212). Further development of the area is expected within the very near future, which would benefit from public utilities. The extension of utilities from Oak Park Heights is the most logical means of providing utilities. Part of the annexation area is already served by the Oak Park Heights Sanitary Sewer System. Mixed usage such as office commercial and higher density housing has been proposed in the Comprehensive Plan to protect low density homes from highway associated impacts. The existing uses are of the type that are desired in the area. Some vacant land still exists that could develop into office or higher density housing. At the onset of additional development proposals, access and circulatory design of the specific projects should be studied comprehensively with consideration for the rest of the parcels and surrounding area. Care should be taken that the residences to the south are not adversely impacted by traffic, lights, noise, etc. 411 • • Annexation of Stillwater Township land located north of Highway 212/36 between the western border (Summit Park) of the City and Oasis Avenue has been an issue for many years. The City of Oak Park Heights provides utility services to a major portion of this area and has taken the position that addition of this area to the City would be a logical boundary extension. This position is furthered by the factor of similar uses developing in the Township area as compared to uses adjacent within the City. As such, the area is felt to be best governed by one unit which can exercise uniform control and thus.establish compatible transitions between activities. Based upon the City's policy and position regarding this tract, a detailed area plan has been prepared and is contained in the appendix to this report. In dispute, however, is the jurisdiction which should annex this tract of land. The City of Stillwater has also proposed that the land be brought into its jurisdiction and an orderly annexation process has been formally established between Stillwater, Stillwater Township and Washington County. As a con- sequence, hearings on the annexation of the tract in question have been held before the Minnesota Municipal Commission, at which both Stillwater, through the Orderly Annexation Joint Powers Committee, and Oak Park Heights have presented their cases. It is anticipated that the Municipal Commission's decision on the area's annexation will be reached in the near term future. While not formally proposed for annexation, the small area lying within the southeast quadrant of Highway 212 (36) and Oakgreen would appear to be a logical addition to the City. Since urban services for this area would likely be provided by the City and its future development could adversely impact the City's transportation framework if not designed according to sound development policies and standards, its annexation should be studied and pursued in the near future. It is anticipated that annexation questions will continue to be major issues for sometime in the future. In this regard, the City should continue to monitor development activities in adjacent areas in an attempt to open and maintain communications with adjacent units of government. Discussions have, in fact, been initiated with Baytown Township and these efforts should be furthered and continued so that agreement and orderly development can be achieved. PROPOSED TEXT ADDITION TO PAGE 70 OF THE OAK PARK HEIGHTS POLICY PLAN/ DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK: 11 It should be emphasized that the areas specifically noted in this text are not intended e ded to be inclusive of all future annexations to Oak Park Heights, and that the City remains open to consider all lands for which annexation petitions are made. Proposals for annexation that arise in the future will be studied individually and the position of the City will be included in the appendix of this report." 70 w • NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS INC. October 15, 1981 Mrs. Charlotte Kirby Clerk of Baytown Township 13131 40th Street North Stillwater, Minnesota 55082 Dear Mrs. Kirby: Accompanying this letter is the worksheet that has been submitted to the Metropolitan Council describing a proposed amendment to the Oak Park Heights Comprehensive Plan. As an affected governmental unit, you may submit written comments to the Metropolitan Council regarding the proposed amendment. The worksheet has been submitted simultaneously to you and the Metropolitan Council , so you have the full 60 day review period to submit comments. The amendment is essentially the annexation of 22 acres of land lying south of Highway 212 along the west boundary of the City of Oak Park Heights. No definite development plans have been submitted, but the area is slated for mixed usage as office commercial and mid to high density residential . Please distribute copies of the worksheet and plan amendment to the parties in the Township that will be involved in the review. Thank you in advance for your consideration of this amendment. Sincerely, NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC. /e Anne Bronken cc: LaVonne Wilson Lyle Eckberg Enclosure 4820 minnetonka boulevard, suite 420 minneapolis, mn 55416 612/925-9420 41, . • NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS INC. October 15, 1981 Ms. Pat Bantli Clerk of Stillwater Township 13565 116th Street North Stillwater, Minnesota 55082 Dear Ms. Bantli : Accompanying this letter is the worksheet that has been submitted to the Metropolitan Council describing a proposed amendment to the Oak Park Heights Comprehensive Plan. As an affected governmental unit, you may submit written comments to the Metropolitan Council regarding the proposed amendment. The worksheet has been submitted simultaneously to you and the Metropolitan Council , so you have the full 60 day review period to submit comments. The amendment is essentially the annexation of 22 acres of land lying south of Highway 212 along the west boundary of the City of Oak Park Heights. No definite development plans have been submitted, but the area is slated for mixed usage as office commercial and mid to high density residential . Please distribute copies of the worksheet and plan amendment to the parties in the Township that will be involved in the review. Thank you in advance for your consideration of this amendment. Sincerely, NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC. Anne Bronken cc: LaVonne Wilson Lyle Eckberg Enclosure 4820 minnetonka boulevard, suite 420 minneapolis, mn 55416 612/925-9420 • • • NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS INC. October 15, 1981 Ms. Dorothy R. Schnell , Clerk City Administrative Offices 216 No. 4th Street Stillwater, Minnesota 55082 Dear Ms. Schnell : Accompanying this letter is the worksheet that has been submitted to the Metropolitan Council describing a proposed amendment to the Oak Park Heights Comprehensive Plan. As an affected governmental unit, you may submit written comments to the Metropolitan Council regarding the proposed amendment. The worksheet has been submitted simultaneously to you and the Metropolitan Council , so you have the full 60 day review period to submit comments. The amendment is essentially the annexation of 22 acres of land lying south of Highway 212 along the west boundary of the City of Oak Park Heights. No definite development plans have been submitted, but the area is slated for mixed usage as office commercial and mid to high density residential . Please distribute copies of the worksheet and plan amendment to the parties in the City that will be involved in the review. Thank you in advance for your consideration of this amendment. Sincerely, NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC. Anne Bronken cc: LaVonne Wilson Lyle Eckberg Enclosure 4820 minnetonka boulevard, suite 420 minneapolis, mn 55416 612/925-9420 • • • NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS INC. October 15, 1981 Mr. Robert G. Briggs Eckberg, Lammers, Briggs and Wolff 126 South Second Street P.O. Box 40 Stillwater, Minnesota 55082 RE: Oak Park Heights - Anderson/Linquist Annexation - Comp Plan Amendment File No: 798.02 - 81.24 Dear Mr. Briggs: The City of Oak Park Heights has recently approved a resolution re- garding the fees and procedures for processing an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan. Since the Anderson/Linquist Annexation is presently being processed, I have enclosed a copy of this resolution for your information and use. You may want to supply the land owners with copies, since I was unsure of their addresses. Sincerely, NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC. % %r1J Anne Bronken cc: LaVonne Wilson Lyle Eckberg Enclosure 4820 minnetonka boulevard, suite 420 minneapolis, mn 55416 612/925-9420 • • NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS INC. October 15, 1981 Washington County Administrator 14900 61st Street Stillwater, Minnesota 55082 Dear County Administrator: Accompanying this letter is the worksheet that has been submitted to the Metropolitan Council describing a proposed amendment to the Oak Park Heights Comprehensive Plan. As an affected governmental unit, you may submit written comments to the Metropolitan Council regarding the proposed amendment. The worksheet has been submitted simultaneously to you and the Metropolitan Council , so you have the full 60 day review period to submit comments. The amendment is essentially the annexation of 22 acres of land lying south of Highway 212 along the west boundary of the City of Oak Park Heights. No definite development plans have been submitted, but the area is slated for mixed usage as office commercial and mid to high density residential . Please distribute copies of the worksheet and plan amendment to the parties in the County that will be involved in the review. Thank you in advance for your consideration of this amendment. Sincerely, NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC. f # / Anne Bronken cc: LaVonne Wilson Lyle Eckberg Enclosure 4820 minnetonka boulevard, suite 420 minneapolis, mn 55416 612/925-9420 f r NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS INC. October 15, 1981 I.S.D. 834 Superintendent Central Services Building 6225 Oasis Avenue North Stillwater, Minnesota 55082 Dear Superintendent: Accompanying this letter is the worksheet that has been submitted to the Metropolitan Council describing a proposed amendment to the Oak Park Heights Comprehensive Plan. As an affected governmental unit, you may submit written comments to the Metropolitan Council regarding the proposed amendment. The worksheet has been submitted simultaneously to you and the Metropolitan Council , so you have the full 60 day review period to submit comments. The amendment is essentially the annexation of 22 acres of land lying south of Highway 212 along the west boundary of the City of Oak Park Heights. No definite development plans have been submitted, but the area is slated for mixed usage as office commercial and mid to high density residential . Please distribute copies of the worksheet and plan amendment to the parties in the School District that will be involved in the review. Thank you in advance for your consideration of this amendment. Sincerely, NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC. / if %G0v Anne Bronken cc: LaVonne Wilson Lyle Eckberg Enclosure 4820 minnetonka boulevard, suite 420 minneapolis, mn 55416 612/925-9420 o • • NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS INC. October 21, 1981 Mr. Charles Weaver, Chairman Metropolitan Council 300 Metro Square Building 7th and Robert Streets St. Paul , Minnesota 55101 RE: City of Oak Park Heights Comprehensive Plan Amendment File No: 798.02 - 81.24 Dear Mr. Weaver: • Accompanying this letter is a proposal to amend the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Oak Park Heights. Specifically, the City has resolved to annex 22 acres of land lying south of Highway 212 along the west boundary of the City of Oak Park Heights. The area is addressed in the City's Comprehensive Plan as a logical addition to the City. A mixed usage of office commercial and medium to high density residential has been designated for the area in the Comprehensive Plan. No specific development plans have been proposed for the area at this time. The amendment has been summarized on the worksheet specified by the Metro- politan Council . Ten copies of this worksheet have been enclosed for your review. If additional information is needed, please contact our office or Mrs. LaVonne Wilson at the City. Thank you for your consideration of this matter. Sincerely, NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC. /eetale? e/?4Y-le:dte David R. Licht, AICP President DRL/nd cc: LaVonne Wilson ,`9Q� Lyle Eckberg Brad Lemberg t,� • Q 4820 minnetonka boulevard, suite 420 minneapolis, mn 55416 612/925-9420 MEMNDUM TO: LaVonne Wilson FROM David Licht DATE: 2 November 1981 NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS RE: Oak Park Heights-Anderson/Lindquist Incorporated Annexation 4820 Minnetonka Boulevard, Suite 420 FILE NO: 798.02 - 81.24 Mpls., Mn. 55416 612/925-9420 At the Council meeting where the Anderson/Linquist Annexation was considered as a Comprehensive Plan amendment, mention was made that the proposed 12 November hearing by the Municipal Commission on this matter was to be delayed. Please advise me of any formal notice you receive regarding the delay and when the hearing is rescheduled. air,/ /A19 l 114v oiv_y • I 40 1111 • NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS INC. November 3, 1981 Mr. Mark Vierling Attorney at Law Eckberg, Lammers, Briggs & Wolff 126 South 2nd Street Stillwater, Minnesota 55082 RE: Oak Park Heights - Anderson/Lindquist Annexation File No: 798.02 - 81.24 Dear Mark: I have just been advised by Pat Pahl of the Metropolitan Council that a meeting between Council staff and City representatives has been scheduled for 10:00 a.m. on Tuesday, 10 November. Our office plus Brad Lemberg have been asked to attend. I thought you should be advised of this meeting and may wish to attend as well. The items to be discussed are summarized in the attached memo to the file from Al Brixius. Very truly yours, NORTHWEST ASSOCIAT 1 e ANT , C. David R. Lich ' , AICP President DRL/nd Enclosure 4820 minnetonka boulevard, suite 420 minneapolis, mn 55416 612/925-9420 1 110 11/ NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS INC. MEMORANDUM TO: File FROM: Alan Brixius DATE: November 3, 1981 RE: Greeley and 36th Annexation (Anderson/Lindquist) On Monday, November 2, 1981, Pat Pahl of the Metropolitan Council contacted our office to inform us that the Metropolitan Council found the Comprehensive Plan amendment for the proposed Greeley and 36th Annexation (Anderson/Lindquist) to have impact on metropolitan systems and that a 90 day review was necessary. The system impact results over the provision of sewer service to the proposed annexation area. Ms. Pahl noted that Oak Park Heights' re- maining sewer capacity had been allocated to undeveloped areas within the City which are proposed to develop at high densities. Reallocation of the sewer capacity will require some revisions to the Comprehensive Plan Development Framework and the Comprehensive Sewer Plan. I asked her to notify all of the City staff directly of the 90 day review. Upon receiving the Metropolitan Council 's comments we shall arrange a meeting with Ms. Pahl to determine what needs to be done to resolve this matter. cc: LaVonne Wilson Mark Vierling Brad Lemberg 4820 minnetonka boulevard, suite 420 minneapolis, mn 55416 612/925-9420 . o November 12, 1981 Mr. Robert G. Briggs Attorney at Law Eckber9, Lammers, Briggs & Wolff 126 South 2nd Street Stillwater, Minnesota 55082 RE: Oak Park Heights - Anderson/Lindquist Annexation File No: 798.02 - 81.24 Dear Mr. Briggs: Pursuant to your request relative to Municipal Board stipulations, we have reviewed the form completed by Mr. Turrentine. Please find attached a revised copy marked with changes and also noting additional deforma- tion. Also enclosed is an unmarked copy of the same form. If we can be of further assistance on this matter, please so advise. Very truly yours, NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC. David R. Licht, AICP President ORL/nd cc: LaVonne Wilson SF-00006-02 • • STATE OF �dNNESOTA DEPARTMENT Municipal Board Office Memoran um TO • Parties of Record DATE: November 24, 1981 FROM Karen Juliot PHONE: (612)296-2428 Secretary to the Director SUBJECT: A-3824 Oak Park Heights Annexation There is a hearing scheduled for December 2, 1981 for the above-entitled proceeding. The Municipal Board has received a request from counsel to continue the matter to a later date. Therefore, the hearing will be opened on December 2, 1981 and immediately continued to January 27, 1982 at 9:30 a.m. in the Oak Park Heights City Hall. If you have any questions or concerns regarding this matter, please feel free to contact this office. kj r � 41111 NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS INC. November 24, 1981 Mr. Joe Anderlik Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik & Associates 2335 W. Highway 36 St. Paul , Minnesota 55113 RE: Oak Park Heights - 36th and Greeley (Anderson/Lindquist) Annexation File No: 798.02 - 81.24 Dear Joe: At a meeting with Metropolitan Council staff on 20 November, an issue relative to storm drainage was noted. It was indicated that this was not a major factor, but one which should be considered. From a subse- quent conversation with Bob Briggs, we understand that you are looking into this matter. We would as a consequence, request that you keep us advised of your findings on this potential problem. At our meeting we also went into sewer discharge concerns and from initial indications, have gained acceptance of figures suggesting we are within assignement limits. Al Brixius and I will keep you posted of this aspect of the case and will clear material with you prior to going further with Metro. Sincerely yours, NORTHWEST ASSOCIA 1 CO■ _c FA , IN . ,/ David R. Licht, AIC President DRL/nd cc: LaVonne Wilson Bob Briggs Mark Vierling 4820 minnetonka boulevard, suite 420 minneapolis, mn 55416 612/925-9420 • • • NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS INC. MEMORANDUM TO: Pat Pahl Metropolitan Council FROM: Alan Brixius DATE: 2 December 1981 RE: Oak Park Heights Sewer Flow Projections (Greeley/Highway 36 Annexation) FILE NO: 798.02 (81.24) The City of Oak Park Heights is currently considering annexing 22.2 acres of land on the western side of the City. The anticipated land uses and sewer flows for this area are shown below: Sewer Flow Land Use Acres Estimated Greeley/Highway 36 R-2 Medium Density 13.9 B-2 Commercial 7.1 Undeveloped (NSP Easement) 1.2 22.2 .0193 The Metropolitan Council , in reviewing Oak Park Heights' Comprehensive Plan amendment application for annexation, has questioned whether the additional sewer flow generated from the annexation area would cause the City to exceed the projected 1990 sewer flow of .426 mgd as noted in the City's Comprehensive Sewer Plan. The following information includes the sewer flow calculations for the major undeveloped areas and the smaller infill development areas within the City that are expected to be developed by 1990. These flow projections, along with the flow projections from the annexation area, have added to the City's 1981 total flow estimate to produce a 1990 total sewer flow projection for the City of Oak Park Heights. SEWER ESTIMATES FOR MAJOR UNDEVELOPED AREAS The Comprehensive Sewer Plan identifies the following major undeveloped areas that are anticipated to be developed in the next ten years. These areas are listed below along with their acreage and projected sewer flows. 4820 minnetonka boulevard, suite 420 minneapolis, mn 55416 612/925-9420 • • • Pat Pahl 2 December 1981 Page Two Area Land Use Acres Sewer Flow County Seat Estates R-1 Low Density Residential 1.76 R-B Commercial 1.76 3.52 .0033 Swager Bros./Oren Ave. B-2 General Commercial 7.2 R-B Commercial 2.8 10.0 .0150 TCF Area/Osgood Ave. R-2 Medium Density 6. 1 R-B Commercial 1.7 B-2 Commercial 1.9 9.7 .0078 Brekke Annexation R-1 Low Density 55.6 .0272 TOTAL PROJECTED FROM MAJOR UNDEVELOPED AREAS .0533 INFILL DEVELOPMENT Within the City of Oak Park Heights, there are scattered areas of undeveloped land. In some instances, the property has development limitations that pro- hibit any type of development to occur on the property. Two areas comprise the majority of undevelopable land in Oak Park Heights. A 30 acre site at the center of the City is currently the disposal site for NSP fly ash. This is a very low area with steep slopes, however, with continual filling of this area development is anticipated in the distant future. The second site is located north of Highway 36 along Panama Street. This area is zoned R-2 Low and Medium Density Residential , however, severe slopes in this area present obstacles to development. The developable infill areas within the City are anticipated to be fully developed in the next ten years. The acreages of the infill areas have been identified below, along with the expected sewer flows. Pat Pahl 2 December 1981 Page Three INFILL AREAS BY ACRES AND SEWER FLOWS INFILL AREA Estimated Flow Buildable Unbuildable Buildable Area Zoning District Acreage Acreage Gal/Acre/Day 0 Open Space 0 0 0.0 R-1 Single Family Residential 1.21 0 592.9 R-2 Low & Medium Density Residential 15. 18 18.18 9411.6 R-3 Multiple Family Residential 1.03 0 721.0 R-B Residential/Business Transitional 2.64 0 3960.0 B-1 Neighborhood Business 0 0 0.0 B-2 General Business .76 0 1140.0 I Industrial 12.58 33.91 18870.0 TOTAL INFILL AREA 33.40 52.09 34695.5 .0347 mgd The projected sewer flows from all the potential development areas in Oak Park Heights have been added together to calculate the projected 1990 sewer flow as shown below. The total estimated 1990 sewer flow is .4213 mgd which is consistent with the Comprehensive Sewer Plan's 1990 sewer flow projection of .426. 1981 Total Estimated Sewer Flow .294 Total Projected Sewer Flows from Major Undeveloped Areas .0533 Total Projected Sewer Flow from Infill Areas .0347 Additional Projected Sewer Flow from Prison Post 1982 .020 Total Projected Sewer Flow from Annexation Area .0193 .4213 Comprehensive Sewer Plan 1990 Sewer Flow Projection .426 cc: LaVonne Wilson Joe Anderlik Robert Briggs Barbara Moeller .. firth , • • or „. II I ,'1 _. ::, i ' *I. w • , ,,I . ,. , , 2 : , ;'' CIC%. 0 /,; if / r F f i fp"., ,� �' Elea! i I + • i !■ • • Z. . I 1 t ' �� cr • toe t.. is �4 •aj 4�I i ,...44,01 I A 4:4 I ii �� 1_ .. 7:1 ' s-3 • G. - y ir ,, 146i w- -- . t t• i Ap� ff k r + -107. r r 1:14:#4,- R,- "1 . (- fig �� q1r 1' pp�� {E(� ! t�i r,, rl l • •pia u.,IIha11111,0 SI MI%MI* t: i •0 ' / ..'a�� rt�u Iry��11 fi pM f' w r r ', a.111 7' i.�^.I ... 111 a. / I w.M. I HtIN•. ..its k n�i \ I / I Nt t 1a µ,.. • . +44. ' ''• i -a It r A`' _ r )I ""tai MY1 I CC t t !;- ° .i :; 1!I iCI iiI ' a.rw.c.. ., . 1a ;41' '-.1. .. Mgt = tl 1 li W ! • • • SEWER FLOW CALCULATION METHOD FOR THE CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS The sewer flows for the undeveloped areas of Oak Park Heights have been calculated with the following method: STEP 1 Acres x Density = Number of Units Acres: The gross number of developable acres within a defined area. No calculations for streets, utility easements or environmentally sensitive area were subtracted. Acres in a particular area were broken down by land use in areas of mixed land use. Density: Units per acre. The densities used for flow calculations are the averages of development that exists in the City of Oak Park Heights. Low Density R-1 Zoning District 2.2 units/acre Medium Density R-2 Zoning District 3.7 units/acre High Density R-3 Zoning District 5.0 units/acre STEP 2 Number of Units x Persons/Unit = Projected Population Number of units as calculated in Step 1 represents the total number of units that is anticipated if the entire acreage of the developable area is developed. Persons/Unit represents the average household size by type and size of unit. Low Density R-1 Zoning District 3.2 persons/unit Medium Density R-2 Zoning District 2.4 persons/unit Low Density R-3 Zoning District 2.0 persons/unit STEP 3 Projected Population x Gallons/Capita/Day = Gallons/Acre/Day Projected population as calculated in Step 2 represents the estimated population that is anticipated with full development of the gross acreage of the developable area. Gallons/Capita/Day: The gallons per capita per day is the estimated flow generated by each household member on a daily basis. • i STEP 4 Gallons/Area/Day = 1,000,000 = Million Gallons/Day Gallons per area per day as calculated in Step 3 is the total daily sewer flow generated if full development of the developable area was to occur. By dividing the gallons per area per day by 1,000,000 the area flows are measured in million gallons per day which can be easily compared to the City's existing sewer flows as well as its proposed future flows. NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS INC. December 29, 1981 r4: Mr. Robert Briggs • Mr. Mark Vierling Attorneys At Law -� Eckberg, Lammers, Briggs & Wolff 126 So. 2nd Street Stillwater, Minnesota 55082 RE: Oak Park Heights - Anderson/Linguist and Kimmel Annexations File NO: 798.02 - 81.24 and 81.22 Gentlemen: We have just learned that the Metropolitan Council is anticipated to act on the two Oak Park Heights annexation matters on 21 January 1982. We understand from our staff contacts in that agency that a favorable Comprehensive Plan amendment will be recommended for the Anderson/ Linguist Annexation. The Kimmel Annexation will , however, be recom- tir mended for denial . , , , t Very truly yours, n: NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC. David R. Licht, AICP , President "',r` DRL/nd cc: LaVonne Wilson Joe Anderlik 4820 minnetonka boulevard, suite 420 minneapolis, mn 55416 612/925-9420 2 For-Rule$e: 4:OO p.m., 01.21.82- ; 8us to I t..,F B-6 . METRO POLITAN COUNCIL Suite 300 Metro Square Building, Saint Paul , Minnesota 55101 291-6359 January 15, 1982 REPORT,OF THE" PHYSICAL DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REFERRAL REPORT NO 82-05 TO: Metropolitan Council SUBJECT: City of Oak Park Heights Comprehensive Plan Amendment Greeley - Highway 36 Annexation Metropolitan 'Council District 14 Metropolitan Council Referral File No. 7803-3 On January 14, 1982, the Physical Development Committee considered the attached report on the oak Park Heights Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Greeley - Highway 36 Annexation Area. 4 The recommendations were adopted as follows: RECOMMENDATIONS A. That the Council find that the Oak Park Heights Plan Amendment has no impact on metropolitan systems and is consistent with other adopted Metropolitan Development Guide chapters. B. That the City of Oak Park Heights be advised that with this annexation, Oak Park Heights will reach its allocated 1990 sewer capacity and any further annexation could represent an impact on the metropolitan: disposal system. C. That Oak. Park' Heights should address any need for ponding in thearea to handle storm sewer flows when the area is developed:`` Respectfully submitted, Marcia Bennett, Chairperson Amk MB:emp Attachment W145P3 ! 4 i METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 300 Metro Square Building, Saint Paul , Minnesota 55101 RESOLUTION NO. 82- RESOLUTION APPROVING COUNCIL REVIEW OF GREELEY-HIGHWAY 36 ANNEXATION AMENDMENT TO THE OAK PARK HEIGHTS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN WHEREAS , the Metropolitan Council , pursuant to the Metropolitan Land Planning Act has reviewed the City of Oak Park Heights Comprehensive Plan; and adopted a Plan review report, and WHEREAS, the City of Oak Park Heights by letter submitted October 23, 1981, has transmitted an Amendment to its adopted Comprehensive Plan in accordance with the Council 's Guidelines for Reviewing Local Comprehensive Plan Amendments; and WHEREAS, the Council has determined that the proposed Amendment has no impact on metropolitan systems; and WHEREAS , the proposed Amendment has been reviewed for apparent inconsistency with other adopted Metropolitan Guide chapters. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Metropolitan Council : That the City of Oak Park Heights be informed that the Greeley-Highway 36 Annexation Amendment to its adopted Comprehensive Plan transmitted to the Council on October 23, 1981 is found to have no impact on metropolitan systems and to be consistent with other Metropolitan Council Development Guide chapters. Adopted this day of , 1981. METROPOLITAN COUNCIL Charles R. Weaver, Chairman Eugene E. Franchett, Secretary • • 411 • METROPOLITAN COUNCIL Suite 300 Metro Square Building, St. Paul , Minnesota 55101 MEMORANDUM January 5, 1982 TO: Physical Development Committee FROM: Comprehensive Planning (Pat Pahl) SUBJECT: Oak Park Heights Comprehensive Plan Amendment Greeley - Highway 36 Annexation Area Metropolitan Council District 14 Metropolitan Council Referral File No. 7803-3 I. AUTHORITY TO REVIEW The Metropolitan Land Planning Act of 1976 requires that amendments to local comprehensive plans be prepared, submitted to the Metropolitan Council for review and adopted in the same manner as the original plans. Minn. Stat. 473.864, subd. 2 (1978) . Guidelines adopted pursuant to Minn. Stat. 473.854 for reviewing proposed amendments provide a 90 day review period for amendments potentially affecting one or more of the metropolitan systems. Oak Park Heights submitted the proposed amendment for review on October 23, 1981. On November 2, 1981, the Chairman determined that the amendment presented a potential impact on metropolitan systems. The 90 day deadline for review of the amendment is January 21, 1982. II. DESCRIPTION AND ISSUES The City of Oak Park Heights is proposing to annex and provide sewer service to approximately 22 acres of land adjacent to Highway 36. The proposed addition is partially developed (approximately eight acres) and already has City sewer service to two lots. The area is addressed in the City's Comprehensive Plan as a logical addition to the City. A mixed usage of office commercial and medium to high density residential has been designated for the area in the Comprehensive Plan. The issue raised in this proposed annexation is whether the additional sewer flow generated from the proposed annexation will cause the City to exceed the Council 's 1990 sewer flow forecast. III. ANALYSIS Oak Park Heights receives metropolitan sewer service through the Stillwater Wastewater Treatment Plant. That plant also serves the City of Stillwater and will serve the City of Bayport when the Bayport treatment plant is closed. At the present time capacity in the • Stillwater plant is limited and upgrading has been proposed; but no firm time-table has been established nor have funds been committed to the upgrading. Therefore flows exceeding the 1990 flow forecast represent a potential impact on the metropolitan disposal system. 111/ 4110 2 • The issue is especially critical because, at the present time, there are three other pending or approved annexations of sewered areas which would contribute sewage flow to the Stillwater plant when service is extended to them. A letter has been received from the City of Stillwater commenting on the impact of the Oak Park Heights proposed amendment on the capacity of the treatment plant (Attachment 1) . In response to staff co n cerns regarding the possible increased 1990 flow, Oak Park Heights undertook an indepth analysis of its existing and projected (1990) land uses. The City stated that, including the proposed annexation, there would be approximately 133 acres of developable land within the City's corporate limits. This includes both infill and major undeveloped areas, as discussed in the City's Comprehensive Plan. Oak Park Heights identified these areas by land use and by density. Based on this information and using 80 gallons per capita per day for new domestic flow and 1,500 gallons per day for commercial/industrial flows, a flow of .113 mgd is obtained. Adding the 1981 metered flow ( .26 mgd), a 1990 total flow of .373 mgd is obtained. This projection is within the Water Quality Management Policy Plan's 1990 flow estimate ( .38 mgd) . Oak Park Heights should be aware, however, that with the proposed annexation, the City will reach its allocated capacity. Any further development (annexation) will exceed the 1990 flow forecast and could represent an impact on the metropolitan disposal system. No other issues were identified in the plan amendment review process. Oak Park Heights should note that the City of Stillwater has commented in Ill its letter (Attachment 1) on a need for ponding in the.area to handle storm sewer flows when the area is developed. IV. FINDINGS The Oak Park Heights Plan Amendment has no impact on metropolitan systems and is consistent with other adopted metropolitan development guide chapters. However, the City should note that, with this annex- ation, Oak Park Heights will reach its allocated 1990 sewer capacity and any further annexation could represent an impact on the metropolitan disposal system. In addition, Oak Park Heights should address any need for ponding in the area to handle storm sewer flows when the area is developed. V. RECOMMENDATIONS A. That the Council find that the Oak Park Heights Plan Amendment has no impact on metropolitan systems and is consistent with other adopted • Metropolitan Development Guide chapters. B. That the City of 0ak Park Heights be advised that with this annexa- tion Oak Park Heights will reach its allocated 1990 sewer capacity and any further annexation could represent an impact on the metropolitan disposal system. C. That Oak Park Heights should address any need for ponding in the area when the area is developed. to handle storm sewer flows PP:ad W145P3 IP • • Phonr. 612/439-6121 CITY F STILLWATER C) On the Beautiful St. Croix 216 North Fourth Street MAYOR DAVID C.JUNKER STILLWATER,MINNESOTA FINANCE DIRECTOR-COORDINATOR NILE L.KRIESEL 55082 COUNCILMEN: CITY CLERK BARBARA AVISE DOROTHY R.SCHNELL ANNE MARIE BODLOVICK BRAD MAC DONALD CITY ATTORNEY • HARRY D.PETERSON . December 10, 1981 DAVID T.MAGNUSON ROUTING Mr. Charles Weaver, Chairman H. R. . Metropolitan Council CS/P10 300 Metro Square Bldg. DEG ?. 1981 St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 f In re :. Oak Park Heights Comprehensive for your iniorma.on Plan Amendments Taice appropriate action `./. Please reply • Prepare reply for Chmn sig Dear Mr. Weaver: The City of Stillwater has reviewed the proposed amendments to the Oak Park Heights Comprehensive Plans and has the following concerns regarding the amendments : First, the plan amendment indicates a desire to annex property that will require the extension of the Oak Park Heights urban service area to provide sewer service to the annexed land. It should be determined what sort of impact these annexations will have upon the existing capacity in the Stillwater Treatment Plant. Next, one of the proposed annexations includes part of the property in a watershed contributory to the Greelef Street storm sewer. There is no indication that the Oak Park Heights Plan Amendment addressses the need for ponding on this area to properly handle storm sewer flows in its developed state . Our Greeley Street downstream improve- ments are predecated upon the flow under T. H. 36 not being substan- tially increased. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Very truly yours , / 'e '� Nile L. Kriesel Finance Director/Coordinator NLK: ds iii \, 4 1 0 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL. 300 Metro Square Building, Saint Paul , , Minnesota 55101 • ' RESOLUTION NO. 82- 16 . • RESOLUTION APPROVING COUNCIL REVIEW OF GREELEY-HIGHWAY 36 ANNEXATION AMENDMENT TO THE • OAK PARK HEIGHTS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN WHEREAS , the Metropolitan Council , pursuant to the Metropolitan Land Planning Act has reviewed the City of Oak Park Heights Comprehensive Plan; and adopted a Plan review report, and WHEREAS.,, the City of Oak Park Heights. by letter submitted October 23, 1981, has transmitted an Amendment to its adopted Comprehensive Plan in accordance with the Council 's Guidelines for Reviewing Local Comprehensive Plan Amendments; and WHEREAS, ;the Council has determined that the proposed Amendment has no impact on metropolitan systems; and , • WHEREAS_, the proposed Amendment has been reviewed for apparent inconsistency with other adopted Metropolitan Guide' ch.apters. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Metropolitan Council : That the City of Oak Park Heights be informed that the Greeley-Highway 36 Annexation Amendment to its adopted Comprehensive Plan transmitted to the Council on October 23, 1981 is found to have no impact lin metropolitan systems and to be consistent with other Metropolitan Council Development Guide chapters. . . Adopted this 21st day of January , 1981. METROPOLITAN COUNCIL • • Charles R. Weaver, Chairman Euge, - E.• ranchett, ecreta• • • MEIVIIANDUM • TO: Z14 4)/(s 11,1, FROM: :DM/0 e DIkt 4,c Iry DATE: tz411-1e/lhf ffz- , /6, ,1 NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS RE:0,/,‘ Incorporated 4820 Minnetonka Boulevard, Suite 420 FILE NO: 776f-i- Mpls., Mn. 55416 612/925-9420 rr- i / ,sesoi/er X2E.fc v /7/4" 0.‘ 7A 4 vile' 7,5 A A-cl- b// 091 rcklbd ,. Afze 64-..s.-5, C dr 74-.7A, c. rIvA.-. ,se' Ai/06p 4, , 5 Ve.t .0 (4.11.11 A.),eowes,e)7 (e 2 ,7/11- 6-2r/bAd /e 1Wzg' f c ze _.s..4-4/A 0 • • • NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS INC. MEMORANDUM TO: Oak Park Heights � Mayor and City Council FROM: David Licht 1)'/"�' DATE: 21 January 1982 RE: Comprehensive Plan Amendment - Greeley - 36th Area Annexation FILE NO: 798.02 - 81.24 The Metropolitan Council is anticipated to take final action today on the City's proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment adding the Greeley/36th Annexation Area to the City. Based upon the staff's recommendation and the action taken by the Physical Development Committee, we expect a favorable decision by the full Metropolitan Council . To conclude this matter now on the part of the City of Oak Park Heights, final adoption of the plan amendment is recommended at your meeting on Monday night. We have attached a draft resolution for this action. Due to timing, Mr. Eckberg may have some modifications to present at your meeting. We believe, however, some formal action is necessary, as the Municipal Commission will be hearing this issue on Wednesday, 27 January 1982. Should there be questions, please contact our office accordingly. cc: LaVonne Wilson Lyle Eckberg Robert Briggs Joe Anderlik 4820 minnetonka boulevard, suite 420 minneapolis, mn 55416 612/925-9420 • • • • CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS 14168. 57th Street North STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 439.4439 25 January 1982 RESOLUTION NO. #8260 CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA A RESOLUTION ADOPTING AN AMENDMENT TO THE OAK PARK HEIGHTS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICY PLAN/DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK WHEREAS, the City of Oak Park Heights formally adopted its Comprehensive Plan Policy Plan/Development Framework on 27 July 1981; and WHEREAS, a request to amend the Comprehensive Plan was filed, duly processed through public hearing, and approved on a preliminary basis by the City Council ; and WHEREAS, the Twin Cities Metropolitan Council on 21 January 1982 has formally determined that the proposed amendment is in conformance with regional plans and within the capacity of regional service systems. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS: The Comprehensive Plan - Policy Plan/Development Framework amendment, a copy of which is attached and incorporated herein, is hereby formally adopted and made part of the City's official development policy and plan. CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS BY ,, Frank Sommerfeldt Mayor ATTEST: LaVonne Wilson, City erk • • • Baytown Township Annexation The area lying southeast of Highway 36 (212) and Oakgreen which was addressed in the land use section of the Comprehensive Plan as being a logical addition to the City, has been formally proposed for annexation. Five parcels of land on the west side of Oakgreen Avenue have also been included in the petition. The area in question includes residential and commercial uses and some vacant land. It is surrounded by residences on the east, residences and agricultural land to the south, a commercial use and agricultural land to the west, and com- mercial uses to the north fronting on Highway 36 (212). Further development of the area is expected within the very near future, which would benefit from public utilities. The extension of utilities from Oak Park Heights is the most logical means of providing utilities. Part of the annexation area is already served by the Oak Park Heights Sanitary Sewer System. Mixed usage such as office commercial and higher density housing has been proposed in the Comprehensive Plan to protect low density homes from highway associated impacts. The existing uses are of the type that are desired in the area. Some vacant land still exists that could develop into office or higher density housing. At the onset of additional development proposals, access and circulatory design of the specific projects should be studied comprehensively with consideration for the rest of the parcels and surrounding area. Care should be taken that the residences to the south are not adversely impacted by traffic, lights, noise, etc. • . • The following text amendment is added to the Comprehensive Plan- Policy Plan/Development Framework Section on Annexation (page 69-71) . "It should be emphasized that the areas specifically noted in this text are not intended to be inclusive of all future annexations to Oak Park Heights, and that the City remains open to consider all lands for which annexation petitions are made. Proposals for annexation that arise in the future will be studied individually and the position of the City will be included in the appendix to this report. " P 411 411 CITY OF OAK PARK HEIOUTS MINUTES OF MEETING HELD MONDAY , JPNUARY 25, 1982 Chairman Seggelke opened the annual PtA mekting at 6: 45 P.M. Present: O' Neal , Westphal , Lang , erNierfeldt , EckPerq and Wilson. Discussion ensued regarding USA proi, ct . Nomination of officers were called for with Sommerfeldt movind to re-elc, 1 present officets . Seconded by Lang. 5 aye votes . Clint; cast en aye vote. Lang moved to close the meeting , with O' Nel secondind . 5 aye votes . Meeting closed. Bid for miscellaneous construction s, tvices and equipment was opened. Lang moved to adopt a resolution acceptind Miller Excavating total bid of $3i9. 00. Details avaik„hle at Clerk ' s office. Seconded by Seggelke, Roll call vote taken with 5 aye votes cast . Resolution adopted. Ken Kaiser, City 1-r & inspect or , sprino planting of 75 trees . Westphal moved to authorize specifications and bids to be opened Monday , February 22 , 1982 at 7 : 00 P.M. Planting to be completed on or before May 28, 1082. Seconded by Segoelke. 5 aye votes. Carried. Lang moved to hold a public hearing Monday, Voloruary 8, 1982 at 7:00 P.M. to amend the zoning ordinance peitaining to certificate of occupancy - conditional use permits and variances . Seconded by Westphal . 5 aye votes. Carried. Tractor-loader bids were discussed with Secidelke moving to purchase John Deere Model 401C from Valley Equipment Company at a cost of $17, 619 . 00 . Clerk to return all other bid bonds. Seconded by O' Neal. 5 aye votes . Carried. Cable TV was discussed . Any resident interested in being on the Advisory Committee is asked to contact the i'lerk . Residents are again requested to remove snow from fire hydrants . Seggelke moved to adopt a resolution amending the City ' s Comprehensive Plan Policy Plan/Development Framework adding the Creeley/436 annexation area to the City. Seconded by Lang . Poll_ call vote taken with 5 aye votes . Resolution adopted. Seggelke moved to defer assessments on the Dielentheis property. Seconded by O ' Neal . 5 aye votes . Carried. O ' Neal moved to adopt a resolution authorizing City Attorney to file DNR annexation with the Municipal Board. Seconded by Lang . Roll call vote taken with 5 aye votes cast . Resolution adopted. L r • . • NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS INC. January 27, 1982 Mr. Robert Briggs Eckberg, Lammers, Briggs & Wolff 126 South 2nd Street Stillwater, Minnesota 55082 RE: Oak Park Heights - Anderson/Linquist Annexation File NO: 798.02 - 81.24 Dear Bob: I felt I should take a moment to remind you that should the annexation of the Anderson/Linquist property be approved and the property added to the City of Oak Park Heights that the land will come into the City as an open space/conservation zone. Should any of the property owners involved wish to pursue development, a rezoning to an appropriate classification will be required. This will involve filing applications plus public hearing and City Council action. You may wish to advise your clients of this situation in the event they are unaware of this requirement. Very truly yours, NORTHWEST ASSOCIATE' n ry4, C. David R. Li t, AICP President DRL/nd cc: LaVonne Wilson Lyle Eckberg Frank Leier 4820 minnetonka boulevard, suite 420 minneapolis, mn 55416 612/925-9420 ~ • • METROPOLITAN COUNCIL Suite 300 Metro Square Building , St . Paul , Minnesota 55101 P,N 2 1982 CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the attached Resolution No . 82-16 is a true and exact copy of the original resolution adopted by the Metropolitan Council on January 21 , 1982 , which is in the Metropolitan Council files . Dated this 22nd day of January , 1982 . a' . re Council Recording Secretary Title *. MIPTROPOL ItAN COUNCIL 300 Metro Square Building, Saint Paul ,. Minnesota 55101 ' RESOLUTION NO. 82- 16 FN 2� 1g�� RESOLUTION APPROVING COUNCIL REVIEW OF GREELEY-HIGHWAY 36 ANNEXATION AMENDMENT TO THE OAK PARK HEIGHTS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN WHEREAS , the Metropolitan Council, pursuant to the Metropolitan Land Planning .Act has reviewed the City of Oak Park Heights Comprehensive Plan; and adopted a Plan review report, and WHEREAS•,• the City of Oak Park Heights by letter submitted October 23, 1981, has transmitted an Amendment to its adopted Comprehensive Plan in accordance with the Council 's Guidelines for Reviewing Local Comprehensive Plan Amendments; and WHEREAS, the Council has determined that the proposed Amendment has no impact on metropolitan systems; and WHEREAS, the proposed Amendment has been reviewed for apparent inconsistency with other adopted Metropolitan Guide chapters. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Metropolitan Council : That the City of Oak Park Heights be informed that the Greeley-Highway 36 Annexation Amendment to its adopted Comprehensive Plan transmitted to the Council on October 23, 1981 is found to have no impact -on metropolitan systems and to be consistent with other Metropolitan Council Development Guide chapters. Adopted this 21st day of January , 1981. METROPOLITAN COUNCIL • /f2-- .....ed. Charles R. Weaver, Chairman Eu. ' - E. Franchett, Sec etary • • • • METROPOLITAN COUNCIL Suite 300 Metro Square Building, St. Paul , Minnesota 55101 MEMORANDUM January 5, 1982 TO: Physical Development Committee FROM: Comprehensive Planning (Pat Pahl) SUBJECT: Oak Park Heights Comprehensive Plan Amendment Greeley - Highway 36 Annexation Area Metropolitan Council District 14 Metropolitan Council Referral File No. 7803-3 I. AUTHORITY TO REVIEW The Metropolitan Land Planning Act of 1976 requires that amendments to local comprehensive plans be prepared, submitted to the Metropolitan Council for review and adopted in the same manner as the original plans. Minn. Stat. 473.864, subd. 2 (1978). Guidelines adopted pursuant to Minn. Stat. 473.854 for reviewing proposed amendments provide a 90 day review period for amendments potentially affecting one or more of the metropolitan systems. Oak Park Heights submitted the proposed amendment for review on October 23, 1981. On November 2, 1981, the Chairman determined that the amendment presented a potential impact on metropolitan systems. The 90 day deadline for review of the amendment is January 21, 1982. II. DESCRIPTION AND ISSUES The City of Oak Park Heights is proposing to annex and provide sewer service to approximately 22 acres of land adjacent to Highway 36. The proposed addition is partially developed (approximately eight acres) and already has City sewer service to two lots. The area is addressed in the _ City's Comprehensive Plan as a logical addition to the City. A mixed usage of office commercial and medium to high density residential has been designated for the area in the Comprehensive Plan. The issue raised in this proposed annexation is whether the additional sewer flow generated from the proposed annexation will cause the City to exceed the Council 's 1990 sewer flow forecast. III. ANALYSIS Oak Park Heights receives metropolitan sewer service through the Stillwater Wastewater Treatment Plant. That plant also serves the City of Stillwater and will serve the City of Bayport when the Bayport treatment plant is closed. At the present time capacity in the Stillwater plant is limited and upgrading has been proposed; but no firm time-table has been established nor have funds been committed to the upgrading. Therefore flows exceeding the 1990 flow forecast represent a potential impact on the metropolitan disposal system. • • • • METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 300 Metro Square Building, Saint Paul , Minnesota 55101 RESOLUTION NO. 82- RESOLUTION APPROVING COUNCIL REVIEW OF GREELEY-HIGHWAY 36 ANNEXATION AMENDMENT TO THE OAK PARK HEIGHTS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Council, pursuant to the Metropolitan Land Planning Act has reviewed the City of Oak Park Heights Comprehensive Plan; and adopted a Plan review report, and WHEREAS, the City of Oak Park Heights by letter submitted October 23, 1981, has transmitted an Amendment to its adopted Comprehensive Plan in accordance with the Council 's Guidelines for Reviewing Local Comprehensive Plan Amendments; and WHEREAS, the Council has determined that the proposed Amendment has no impact on metropolitan systems; and WHEREAS, the proposed Amendment has been reviewed for apparent inconsistency with other adopted Metropolitan Guide chapters. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Metropolitan Council : That the City of Oak Park Heights be informed that the Greeley-Highway 36 Annexation Amendment to its adopted Comprehensive Plan transmitted to the Council on October 23, 1981 is found to have no impact on metropolitan systems and to be consistent with other Metropolitan Council Development Guide chapters. Adopted this day of , 1981. METROPOLITAN COUNCIL Charles R. Weaver, Chairman Eugene E. Franchett, Secretary • Phone:612/4384121 CITY OF STILLWATER • On the Beautiful St. Croix 216 North Fourth Street MAYOR STILLWATER,MINNESOTA FINANCE DIRECTOR-COORDINATOR DAVID C.JUNKER NILE L.KRIESEL 55082 COUNCILMEN: CITY CLERK BARBARA AVISE DOROTHY R.SCHNELL ANNE MARIE BODLOVICK • BRAD MAC DONALD CITY ATTORNEY HARRY D.PETERSON December 10, 1981 DAVID T.MAGNUSON ROUTING Admin. P. R. Mr. Charles Weaver, Chairman H. R. Metropolitan Council CS/P10 300 Metro Square Bldg. DEC 14 1981 St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 For your information In re:. Oak Park Heights Comprehensive --�+ Plan Amendments Take appropriate action {/ . Please reply Dear Mr. Weaver: Prepare reply for Chmn sig The City of Stillwater has reviewed the proposed amendments to the Oak Park Heights Comprehensive Plans and has the fallowing concerns regarding the amendments : • First, the plan amendment indicates a desire to annex property that will require the extension of the Oak Park Heights urban service area to provide sewer service to the annexed land. It should be determined what sort of impact these annexations will have upon the existing capacity in the Stillwater Treatment Plant. • Next, one of the proposed annexations includes part of the property in a watershed contributory to the Greer Street storm sewer. There is no indication that the Oak Park Heights Plan Amendment addressses the need for ponding on this area to properly handle storm sewer flows in its developed state. Our Greeley Street downstream improve- ments are predecated upon the flow under T. H. 36 not being substan- tially increased. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Very truly yours , Nile L. Kriesel Finance Director/Coordinator NLK:ds • \'1 • • I LAW OFFICES OF ECKBERG, LAMMERS, BRIGGS 8t WOLFF 126 SOUTH SECOND STREET P. O. BOX 40 STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 439-2878 LYLE J. ECKBERG JAMES F. LAMMERS January 28 , 19 8 2 ROBERT G. BRIGGS PAUL A. WOLFF MARK J. VIERLING LaVonne Wilson, Clerk-Treas. City of Oak Park Heights 14168 57th Street North Stillwater, MN 55082 Re: Anderson Annexation Dear LaVonne: Enclosed herewith please find a copy of a letter I have written to Bob Turrentine, the attorney for Baytown township. At the annexation hearing held January 27 , Mr. Turrentine requested that he be given an opportunity to make a request on behalf of the township for a pro-rated deferral of the tax loss which would accrue to the township if the annexation is approved. After receiving that request, I would appreciate it if you would place the matter on the agenda for Council decision on February 8 . I will advise the City' s attorney of the request and that it will be on the agenda that evening. Also, as indicated in my letter to Mr. Turrentine, please obtain the Mayor' s signature on the Stipulation and return it to me so I can forward it for filing with the Municipal Commission. All of this must be completed prior to February 16, when the record on the annexation proceeding will be closed. Yours ver truly, Robert G. Briggs RGB:bg Enclosure cc: Johnson Linauist Anderson Kendrick • . • LAW OFFICES OF ECKBERG, LAMMERS, BRIGGS 84 WOLFF 126 SOUTH SECOND STREET P. 0. BOX 40 STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 439-2878 LYLE J. ECKBERG JAMES F. LAMMERS January 28 , 19 8 2 ROBERT G. BRIGGS PAUL A. WOLFF MARK J. VIERLING Mr. Bob Turrentine Attorney at Law 5995 Oren Ave. No. Oak Park Heights , MN 55082 Re: Anderson Annexation Docket No. A-3824 Dear. Bob: As agreed at the annexation hearing on Wednesday, _ January 27 , I will be requesting that the Oak Park Heights City Council consider a pro-rated 5-year adjustment on the Baytown real estate tax loss as a result of the annexation at their next regular meeting which will be held Monday, February 8 , 1982. However, I feel that the formal request should initiate from your office and should spell out the exact terms of your proposal , including the anticipated tax loss to the township and the manner in which you would handle the reimbursement. I will be advising LaVonne Wilson, the City Clerk, that she should expect such a request from you and ask that she put it on the agenda for that meeting. In addition, it is my understanding that you will obtain the signature of the township Clerk on the Stipulation on' Monday, February 1, and will forward it to LaVonne Wilson, the Oak Park Heights City Clerk, so she can obtain the Mayor' s signature and file it with the Municipal Commission prior to _ February 16 , when the record will be closed. Unless I hear from you to the contrary, I assume you will, insure. that these two matters are taken care of prior to. February 8 . If you have any questions, give me a call. Yours very truly, Robert G. Briggs RGB.:bg / cc: LaVonne Wilson "/ Johnson Linguist Anderson Kendrick 4110 • 1- tt %itaitz if II] lido February 1, 1982 114 keg IN Cl,rl- 300 Metro Square Building Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101 La Vonne Wilson, Clerk Telephone 612/291-6359 City of Oak Park Heights 14168 57th Street North Stillwater, MN 55082 RE: City of Oak Park Heights Comprehensive Plan Amendment Review Greeley - Highway 36 Annexation Area Metropolitan Council Referral File No. 7803-3 Dear Mrs. Wilson: At its meeting on January 21, 1982, the Metropolitan Council considered the proposed amendment to the Oak Park Heights Comprehensive Plan. This amendment proposes to annex and provide sewer service to approximately 22 areas of land adjacent to Highway 36. This consideration was based on a report of the Physical Development Committee, Referral Report No. 82-05 (copy attached) . The Council adopted this report as presented and the following recommendations contained in the report: A. That the Council find that the Oak Park Heights Plan Amendment has no impact on metropolitan systems and is consistent with other adopted Metropolitan Development Guide chapters. B. That the City of Oak Park Heights be advised that with this annexation, Oak Park Heights will reach its allocated 1990 sewer capacity and any further annexation could represent an impact on the metropolitan disposal system. C. That Oak Park Heights should address any need for ponding in the area to handle storm sewer flows when the area is developed. The Council adopted Resolution No. 82-16 approving the Council 's review of this proposed amendment to the Oak Park Heights Comprehensive Plan. A copy of the resolution is attached. An Agency Created to Coordinate the Planning and Development of the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area Comprising: Anoka County 0 Carver County 0 Dakota County 0 Hennepin County 0 Ramsey County 0 Scott County 0 Washington County An Equal Opportunity Employer • O ,1taz Oho G 104 La Vonne Wilson, Clerk City of Oak Park Heights February 1, 1982 Page Two vv-IN C1r1� 300 Metro Square Building Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101 This concludes the Council 's review of this amendment. Telephone 612/291 6359 Sincerely, METROPOLITAN COUNCIL Charles R. Weaver Chairman CRW:bm Attachment cc: David Licht, Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc. Russell Kirby, Clerk, Baytown Township Nile L. Kriesel , Finance Dir./Coord., City of Stillwater Pat Pahl , Metropolitan Council Staff An Agency Created to Coordinate the Planning and Development of the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area Comprising: Anoka County 0 Carver County 0 Dakota County 0 Hennepin County 0 Ramsey County 0 Scott County 0 Washington County An Equal Opportunity Employer • • 1111 LAW OFFICES OF ECKBERG, LAMMERS, BRIGGS 8C WOLFF 126 SOUTH SECOND STREET P. O. BOX 40 STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 439-2878 LYLE J. ECKBERG JAMES F. LAMMERS February 3, 1982 ROBERT G. BRIGGS PAUL A. WOLFF MARK J. VIERLING LaVonne Wilson, Clerk-Treas. City of Oak Park Heights 14168 57th Street North Stillwater, MN 55082 Re: Anderson Annexation Dear LaVonne: Enclosed please find Stipulation which has been signed by the Baytown Chairman and Clerk and yourself. Pursuant to my letter of January 28, please have the Mayor sign this Stipulation and return it to me so I can forward it to the Municipal Commission. Yours very truly, Robert G. Briggs RGB:bg Enclosure 741;1/ 411 110 4111. • CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS MINUTES OF MEETING HELD MONDAY, FEBRUARY 8, 1982 Call to order at 7:00 F .M. by Mayor Sommerfeldt. Present : O'Neal , Westphal, Lang , Seggelke, Eckberg and Wilson. Public hearing was opened relating to certificate of occupancy requirements and discussion ensued. Mayor Sommerfeldt closed the hearing. Seggelke moved to adopt an ordinance to amend the 1980 code of ordinances for •the City of Oak Park Heights by amending chapter 401 relating to zoning by adding section 401. 20 addressing certificate of occupancy requirements for conditional use permits and variances . Seconded by Westphal. Roll call vote taken with 5 aye votes cast. Ordinance adopted. Bob Post requested an eight foot variance for an addition to the Erickson Post Service Station for a convenience store. Lang moved to schedule a public hearing Monday , February 22 , 1.982 at 7:00 P.M. Seconded by O'Neal. 5 aye votes . Carried. Mr. Strohbehn requested permission to construct a driveway off Peacan Avenue to Lot #2 , Beaudettes Addition. Council approved and found no objection to the driveway. CB radios for the police department have been received by Custom Communications. The VFW has offered to finance the cost of the radios, antennacs and installation. O' Neal moved to approve the minutes of January 11th and 25th. Seconded by Seggelke. 5 aye votes . Minutes approved. Cable Board appointments will be made February 22 , 1982. Lang moved to deny the request of Baytown Town Board to pro--rate deferralof tax loss for the #36 & Greeley annexation. Seconded by O' Neal. 5 aye votes . Denied Lang moved to approve the installation of roadway delineators to be installed along the curvature of the frontage road at Oak- green and Highway #36 . Seconded by Westphal. 5 aye votes . Carried. O' Neal moved to approve payment of bills as presented, with the exception of Northwest Associated Consultants. Details available at Clerk ' s office. Seconded by Lang. 5 aye votes . Carried. Lang moved to adjourn, with Seggelke seconding. 5 aye votes . Adjourned. La Vonne Wilson City Administrator/Treasurer II) I ip ..„ ,,,, , _ „ 4 ( 0 I' i -) } \` BEFORE THE MUNICIPAL BOARD OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA Robert J. Ferderer Chairman Robert W. Johnson Vice Chairman Kenneth Sette Member Joseph Fogarty Ex-Officio Member Lester Rydeen Ex-Officio Member IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION ) FINDINGS OF FACT, FOR THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN ) CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, LAND TO THE CITY OF OAK PARK ) AND ORDER HEIGHTS PURSUANT TO MINNESOTA ) STATUTES 414 ) The above-entitled matter came on for hearing before the Minnesota Municipal Board pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 414, as amended, on November 12th, 1981, and continued from time to time at Oak Park Heights, Minnesota. The hearing was conducted by Terrence A. Merritt, Executive Director and by Robert J. Ferderer, Chairman, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 414.01, Subd. 12. Also in attendance were County CommissionersJoseph Fogarty and Lester Rydeen, ex-officio members of the board. The City of Oak Park Heights made no appearance, the town of Baytown appeared by and through Harold Turrentine and the petitioners appeared by and through Robert Briggs. Testimony was heard and records and exhibits were received. After due and careful consideration of all evidence, together with all records, files and proceedings, the Minnesota Municipal Board hereby makes and files the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order. FINDINGS OF FACT I. On June 1st, 1981, a petition for annexation by the majority of the property owners along with a resolution of the City of Oak Park Heights in support of the petition, was filed with the Minnesota Municipal Board. The petition contained all the information required by statute including a description of the territory subject to annexation which is as follows: All that part of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter (NW4 of NW4) of Section Four (4) , Township Twenty- Nine ( 29 ) North of Range Twenty (20) West described as follows , to-wit: Commencing at the Northwest corner of said Section Four (4) , thence East along the North line of said Section Four (4) for Eight Hundred Thirty-Three ( 833 ) feet to the point of beginning; thence continuing East along said North line of Section Four (4) for One Hundred Forty ( 140) feet ; thence South and parallel with the East line of said North- west Quarter of Northwest Quarter (NW4 of NW4) for Five ' • Hundred Fifty-Five and Twenty-Six Hundredths ( 555 .26 ) feet , thence West and parallel with the North line for a distance of One Hundred Forty ( 140) feet to a point ; thence North Five Hundred Fifty-Five and Sixty-Two Hundredths ( 555 .62) 411 ._ _ 110 feet more or less to the point of beginning, together with a temporary easement for a period of Ten ( 10) years from May 26 , 1970 , over and across the present driveway leading from the service lane on Highway 212 South for a distance of Two Hundred (200 ) feet. Reserving unto the vendors the right to use the well on the property for a period of Twenty-Five ( 25 ) years from May 26 , 1970 , or until such time as vendors connect to the municipal water system. • All that part of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter (NW4 of NW4) of Section Four (4) , Township Twenty- nine ( 29) North, Range Twenty ( 20 ) West , described as follows : Beginning at a point on the South Right of Way line of State Trunk Highway No. 212 , said point being 633 feet east of the west line of Section 4 , Township 29 , North, Range 20 West, thence South and parallel to the west line of said Section 4 , a distance of 524.24 feet , thence East and parallel to the North line of said Section 4 a distance of 200 feet , thence North and parallel to the west line of said Section 4 , a distance of 524 .52 feet to the South Right of Way line of State Trunk Highway No. 212 , thence west along said South Right of Way line a distance of 200 feet to the place of beginning, containing in all 2. 18 acres. The West Six Hundred Thirty-three (633 ) feet of the North- west Quarter of the Northwest Quarter (NW4 of NW4) of Section Four (4) , Township Twenty-nine ( 29 ) North, Range Twenty-one (21 ) West, excepting the South Five Hundred- fifty ( 550) feet thereof, subject to easements and restric- tions of record. • That part of the North Half of the Northeast Quarter (Ni of NE-I) of Section Five ( 5 ) , Township Twenty-nine (29 ) North, Range Twenty ( 20) West, as follows: Commencing at the Northeast corner of Section Five ( 5 ) , Township Twenty-nine ( 29 ) North, Range Twenty ( 20) West, and running thence Westerly along the North line of said Section Five ( 5 ) , One Hundred Fifty-seven ( 157) feet to a point; thence South and perpendicular to said North line of Section Five ( 5 ) , Five Hundred Sixty-five ( 565 ) feet to a point ; thence East and perpendicular to the last described line, One Hundred Fifty-seven ( 157) feet to the • East line of said .Section Five (5 ) , the same being the center line of the‘ so-called Speed Bowl Road; thence North along the East line of said Section Five ( 5 ) , Five Hundred Sixty-five ( 565 ) feet to the point of beginning, containing approximately two (2) acres , more or less . Subject to existing highways and easement to Northern States Power Company. That part of the North Half of the Northeast Quarter (Ni of NE4) of Section Five ( 5 ) , as follows: Commencing at a point on the North line of Section Five (5 ) , Township Twenty-nine ( 29) North, Range Twenty ( 20) West, One Hundred Fifty-seven ( 157) feet West of the North- east corner of said Section Five ( 5 ) ; thence South and per- pendicular to the North line of said Section Five ( 5) , Five Hundred Sixty-five ( 565 ) feet to a point ; thence West and perpendicular to the last described line, One Hundred Fifty-six ( 156) feet to a point ; thence North and perpen S •_ ._ dicular to the last described line , Five Hundred Sixty-five ( 565 ) feet to the North line of said Section Five ( 5 ) ; thence East along the North line of said Section Five ( 5 ) , One Hundred Fifty-six ( 156 ) feet to the point of beginning , containing two ( 2) acres , more or less . Subject to exist- ing highways and easement to Northern States Power Company. The West Two Hundred ( 200 ) feet of the East Five Hundred Thirteen ( 513 ) feet of the North Three Hundred Twenty-five ( 325 ) feet of the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter (NE4 of NE4) of Section Five ( 5 ) , Township Twenty- nine ( 29 ) North, Range Twenty ( 20 ) West . Y The West One Hundred ( 100 ) feet of the East Six Hundred Thirteen (613 ) feet of the North Three Hundred Twenty-five ( 325) feet of the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter (NE4 of NE4) of Section Five ( 5 ) , Township Twenty- nine ( 29) North, Range Twenty (20) West. The West One Hundred ( 100) feet of the East Seven Hundred Thirteen (713 ) feet of the North Two Hundred Twenty-four and Five Tenths (224. 5) feet of the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter (NE4 of NE4) of Section Five ( 5 ) , Township Twenty-nine (29) North, Range Twenty ( 20) West. The West One Hundred ( 100) feet of the East Seven Hundred Thirteen (713 ) feet of the South One Hundred and Five Tenths ( 100 . 5 ) feet of the North Three Hundred Twenty-five (325) feet of the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter (NE4 of NE4) of Section Five ( 5) , Township Twenty- nine ( 29 ) North, Range Twenty ( 20 ) West . II. An objection to the proposed annexation was received by the Minnesota Municipal Board from Baytown Township on August 3rd, 1981. The Minnesota Municipal Board upon receipt of this objection conducted onducted further proceedings in accordance with M.S. 414.031 as required by M.S. 414.033, Subd. 5. III. Due, timely and adequato legal notice of the hearing was published, served and filed. IV. The area subject to annexation is unincorporated,p ed, approximatel Y 22 acres in size and abuts the City of Oak Park Heights by approximately 30% of its border. The City of Oak Park Heights is g approximately 1 287 Y acres in size. V. The natural terrain of the area proposed for annexation is a rolling topography with natural ponding area; coils are a silt-loam, mostly well drained, • • well suited for building site development, fair to poor suitability for septic tank absorption due to slow permeability of the soils. VI. The population of the City of Oak Park Heights in the year 1980 was 2,591, the present estimated population is 2,591 and it is projected by the year 1990 will have a population of 3,600. VII . In the area subject to annexation, the present estimated population is seven, which was the population in 1980. VIII. In the Town of Baytown, in 1980 there were 850 residents, the present estimated population is 850, and by 1990 it is projected that its population will be 1,050. IX. In the City of Oak Park Heights land is presently in use as follows: approximately 292 acres for residential use, approximately 348 acres for institutional use, approximately 77 acres for commercial use, approximately 254 acres for industrial use, and approximately 228 acres of land is presently vacant or farmed. X. Land in the City of Oak Park Heights remaining for various uses in the following amounts: residential use, 179 acres, commercial use, 15 acres, industrial use, 34 acres. XI. In the area subject to annexation the land is used as follows: approximately 15.1 acres for residential use, approximately 5.5 acres for commercial use, and approximately 1.5 acres in vacant land. In the anea subject to annexation there remains approximately 3.5 acres for residential or commercial use, as some of the land in use is presently underutilized. XII. There has been .failure of an on-site septic system within the area subject to annexation. Further development requires the installat4on of municipal sewer and water because of the area's soils. XIII. The Township of Baytown has 6,500 acres and its land is used for residential purposes, commercial purposes, utility property, and agricultural- property. XIV. The City of Oak Park Heights has a zoning ordinance, a subdivision regulation, a comprehensive plan, an official map, a capital improvements program, a fire code, a building inspector, a planning commission, and a Housing and Redevelopment Authority. XV. The Town of Baytown has zoning regulations, subdivision regulations, an official map, a fire code, building a wilding inspector, and a planning commission. The comprehensive plan of the Town of Baytown is not yet completed. XVI. The County of Washington has a zoning ordinance, subdivision regulations, a comprehensive plan, an official map, a capital improvements program, a fire code, a building inspector, and a planning commission. • ; - • XVII. The Town of Baytown provides the area subject to annexation with fire protection through a contact with the City of Bayport. XVIII. The City of Oak Park Heights provides its residents with water service, sewer service, police protection, street improvements and maintenance, recreational opportunities, administrative services, as well as fire protection by a contract with the City of Bayport. XIX. The City of Oak Park Heights provides the area subject to annexation with some t service er ser ice and some sewer service. XX. The City of Oak Park Heights is willing to extend the services it presently provides its residents to the area proposed for annexation should that area be annexed. XXI. The present transportation network in the City of Oak Park Heights includes Highways 212 and 95 as well as numerous city streets and county roads. The area proposed for annexation has a direct access to Highway 212. XXII. The tax base in the City of Oak Park Heights includes the following: residential property assessed in 1980 and payable in 1981 was established at $6,287,344, generating $69,556 in taxes; commercial property assessed in 1980 and payable in 1981 was established at $3,946,511, generating $43,532 in taxes; industrial property assessed in 1980 and payable in 1981 was established at $55,623, generating $473.10 in taxes; agricultural property assessed in 1980 and payable in 1981 was established at $10,009, generating $94 in taxes; seasonal recreational property assessed in 1980 and payable in 1981 was established at $19,455, generating $189.27 in taxes; utility property assessed in 1980 and payable in 1981 was established at $30,130,307, generating $334,060.84 in taxes; blind classification property assessed in 1980 and payable in 1981 was established at $29,883, generating $283.90 in taxes; National Housing Association property assessed in 1980 and payable in 1981 was established at $1,052,172, generating $11,829.35 in taxes; multiple dwelling property assessed in 1980 and payable in 1981 was established at $1,125,774, generating $12,302 in taxes. XXIII. The Town of Baytown's tax base includes the following: residential property assessed in 1980 and payable in 1981 was established at $2,585,133, generating $6,351 in taxes; commercial property assessed in 1980 and payable in 1981 was established at $919,680, generating $2,259 in taxes; industrial property assessed in 1980 and payable in 1981 was established at $0, generating $0 in taxes; utility property assessed in 1980 and payable in 1981 was • 4-6- I established at $7,038, generating $17 in taxes; agricultural property assessed in 1980 and payable in 1981 was established at $593,894, generating $1,459 in taxes. XXIV. In the area subject to annexation the tax base includes the following: residential property assessed in 1980 and payable in 1981 was established at $101,510, generating $2,044 in taxes; commercial property assessed in 1980 and payable in 1981 was established at $296,790, generating $11,558.40 in taxes; vacant land assessed in 1980 and payable in 1981 was established at $19,380, generating $710.54 in taxes. XXV. The City of Oak Park Heights has a mill rate in 1980 of 10.84 and a bonded indebtedness of $1,760,000. XXVI. The Town of Baytown in 1980 had a mill rate of 2.457 and no bonded indebtedness. XXVII. In '1980 the mill rate for the County of Washington was 26.330, for the school district 43.288, and for the Metropolitan Council 4.007. XXVIII. The land within the area subject to annexation is suitable for development. XXIX. The Town of Baytown is unable to deliver a full range of municipal services to the area subject to annexation. XXX. Annexation to the City of Oak Park Heights will not have an adverse impact upon the City of Stillwater, which is adjacent to the area proposed for annexation. XXXI. The Town of Baytown can continue to function without the area subject to annexation, without undue hardship. XXXII. There is no evidence that the annexation of the area subject to annexation to the City of Oak Park Heights will have any adverse impact on the area school district. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW I. The Minnesota Municipal Board duly acquired and now has jurisdiction of the within proceeding. II. The area subject to annexation is now or is about to become urban or suburban in nature and the annexing municipality is capable of providing the services required by the area within a reasonable time. III. Municipal government is required to protect the public health, safety, and welfare in the area subject to annexation. • •-7- IV. The best interest of the area subject to annexation will be furthered by annexation. V. The remainder of the Town of Baytown can carry on the functions of government without undue hardship. VI. There is a reasonable relationship between the increase in revenues for the City of Oak Park Heights and the value of benefits conferred upon the area subject to annexation. VII. Annexation of all or a part of the property to an adjacent municipality would not better serve the interests of the residents who reside in the area subject to annexation. VIII. Two years will be required to effectively provide full municipal services to the annexed area. IX. This Minnesota Municipal Board order is not subject an annexation election. X. An order should be issued by the Minnesota Municipal Board annexing the area described herein. O R D E R I. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: That the property described in Findings of Fact II in the Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order be and g the same is hereby annexed to the City of Oak Park Heights, Minnesota the same as if it had been originally made a part thereof. II. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED: That the population of the City of Oak Park Heights has increased by 7. III. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED: That the population of the Town of Baytown is decreased by 7. IV. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED: That the mill levy of the City of Oak Park Heights on the property herein ordered annexed shall be increased in substantially equal proportions over a period of two years to equality with the mill levy of the property already within the city. V. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED: That the effective date of this order is April 15, 1982. Dated this 15th day of April, 1982 MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL BOARD 165 Metro Square Building St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 Q, taVt.11± Terrence A. Merritt Executive Director • • • LAW OFFICES OF ECKBERG, LAMMERS, BRIGGS & WOLFF 126 SOUTH SECOND STREET P. O. BOX 40 STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 439-2878 LYLE J. ECKBERG JAMES F. LAMMERS April 20 , 1982 ROBERT G. BRIGGS PAUL A. WOLFF MARK J. VIERLING Mayor and City Council Oak Park Heights 14168 57th Street North Stillwater, MN 55082 Gentlemen and Madam: As you no doubt know, the Minnesota Municipal Board on April 15 , 1982 , issued its order providing that certain property located in the Town of Baytown abutting the Northwest portion of the City near Oakgreen and 60th Street North be annexed to the City of Oak Park Heights. Now that the annexation has been successfully concluded, I am again representing certain property owners from that area in connection with two requests they would like considered at your next meeting scheduled for April 26, 1982 . The first request concerns partial reimbursement for annexation expenses and the second request concerns the extension of municipal services to the newly annexed area. During the course of the annexation proceeding, the property owners whose names appear on the Petition for Public Improvement enclosed, reimbursed the City of Oak Park Heights for all of the expenses incurred in connection with the annexation proceedings. A substantial portion of those expenses involve fees from the City Planning office, Northwest Associated Consultants , Inc. , which total $2 ,286.77. In discussing these fees with Dennis Licht, he indicated that a substantial part of the fees were incurred in connection with studies and reviews which were of general benefit to the City of Oak Park Heights. To the extent that those expenses were of general benefit to the City, my clients would like consideration given to reimbursement from the general fund. To the extent that the fees represent services which were of benefit only to the area which was annexed, we understand that those expenses should be paid by the benefitted property owners. • Oak Park Heights • April 20. 1982 Page 2 The second request is for the extension of municipal services as set forth in the Petition for Public Improvement. As most of you know, the primary reason for seeking annexa- tion to Oak Park Heights was because of the urgent need for municipal services, particularly sanitary sewer and storm water control which the Town of Baytown was unable to furnish. As indicated in the Findings of Fact of the Municipal Board, there has been failure of an on-site septic system within the area and further development requires the installation of municipal utilities because of the areas soils. Accordingly, it is respectfully requested that the City Council undertake the steps necessary to initiate these projects so they could be constructed, if possible, during the 1982 calendar year. Thank you for your consideration of these matters. Yours ver truly, f, ert ;G = %s RGB:bg Enclosure • • NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS INC. MEMORANDUM TO: Oak Park Height�Mayor and City Council FROM: David Licht !i DATE: 5 May 1982 RE: Annexation - Anderson/Linquist (36th & Greeley) FILE NO: 798.02 Pursuant to a request by LaVonne Wilson, we have reviewed our billings on the Anderson/Linquist annexation issue. As part of our analysis, we have identified work which was conducted on sewer discharge calculations which could be viewed as having City-wide significance and related to general comprehensive planning. The findings of this work will for example, be of benefit in any future annexation matters and will be important as the Metropolitan Council reviews its own plans and submits them to the City for comment. I have attached copies of our statements on the Anderson/Linquist request and starred those items which relate to the sewer discharge question. These items total $633.50. If we can be of further assistance on this matter, please contact me accordingly. cc: LaVonne Wilson 4820 minnetonka boulevard, suite 420 minneapolis, mn 55416 612/925-9420 • •ICE '• NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS INC. 4820 minnetonka boulevard, suite 420 tk. minnea olis 5 4 p mn 5 16 612/925-9420 City of Oak Park Heights City Administrative Offices DATE October 5, 1981 14168 57th Street North Oak Park Heights, Minnesota 55082 JOB NO. 798.02 Attn: LaVonne Wilson INVOICE NO. 547 HOURS RATE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 81.24 - Anderson/Lindquist Annexation (#36 R Greeley) Principal .5 50.00 9/16/81 Meeting with City Clerk. 25.00 .5 50.00 9/17/81 Review project with staff, letter from and to 25.00 City Attorney. Designer 5.3 17.50 9/17/81 Copied City's file and reviewed, reviewed Comp 92.75 Plan regarding property in question. 3.1 17.50 - 9/18/81 Began drafting Comp Plan amendment. 54.25 .5 17.50 9/22/81 Memo to Brad Lemberg regarding utilities. 4.9 17.50 9/24/82 Drafting Comp Plan amendment. 8.75 2.0 17.50 9/25/81 Site visit. 35.75 2.9 17.50 9/29/81 Researching and compiling information. 50.75 1.1 17.50 ;0/01/81 Review and call to petitioners. 59.25 1.6 17.50 X0/02/81 Drafting Comp Plan amendment. 28.00 28.00 .2 15.00 9/22/81 Photocopying 3.00 .2 20.00 Secretarial 4.00 Photocopies 4.20 Postage 1.24 Mileage 21.25 Total $458.19 • Pay Last Amount In This Column wolf • iNvglif . MI ¢: °° NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS iNC. r"1/4.1 .:::,:ie 4820 minnetonka boulevard, suite 420 a: minneapolis, mn 55416 612/925-9420 City of Oak Park Heights DATE fiber 3, 1981 City Administrative Offices 14168 57th Street North JOB NO. 798.02 Oak Park-Heights, Minnesota 55082 INVOICE N0. 564 Attn: LaVonne Wilson HOURS RATE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 81.24 - f36 & Greeley Annexation (Anderson/Lindquist) Principal .3 50.00 10/13/81 Follow-up with stiff on processing amendment. 15.00 Designer 2.5 17.50 10/05/81 Preparation of Memo to Council , preparation of 43.75 statement for annexation text, finalized Comp Plan amendment. 5.0 17.50 10/14/81 Preparation p Metropolitan and graphics to refer 87.50 Pr 1:4 17.50 10/15/81 Preparation of letters to governmental units re: 59.50 Comp Plan amendment.. 1.6 17.50 10/20/81 Preparation of letter to Metro Council and copy- 28.00 ing of Comp Plan amendment. 1.1 17.50 10/28/81 Phone calls from Pat Pahl of Metro Council re: * 19.25 sewer projections, call to Brad Lemberg, gathered acreage and other information from file. 1.8 20.00 Secretarial 36.00 Photocopies ._ 29.70 Postage 12.91 Total $331.61 General Assistance Principal .3 50.00 10/11/81 Correspondence from City and filing. 15.00 2.0 50.00 10/12/81 Correspondence from City and filing, preparations 100.00 of items for City Council meeting, review 701 phasing plan and discuss with staff, review sign report to City Council. 4.0 50.00 10/13/81 Preparation for and attendance of City Council 200.00 meeting, follow-up with staff. .3 50.00 10/15/81 Phone calls from W. Lux and Mr. Bradshaw. 15.00 .3 50.00 10/16/81 Phone call to and from Mrs. Wilson, call from 15.00 developer on zoning question, correspondence from City and filing. . Pay Last Amount In This Column so4 • IiICE • ffr, NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS INC. J74j 4820 minnetonka boulevard, suite 420 minneapolis, mn 55416 612/925-9420 City of Oak Park Heights City Administrative Offices DATE December 7, 1981 14168 57th Street North JOB NO. 798.02 Oak Park Heights, Minnesota 55082 J INVOICE NO. 594 Attn: LaVonne Wilson HOURS RATE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 81.22 - Kimmel Annexation (Continued) Designer 4.0 17.50 11/05/81 Calls to Judy of City Hall and residents, pre- 70.00 paration of Stipplation Form. 3.1 17.50 11/06/81 Preparation.of soil analysis, acreages of land 54.25 uses, finish preparation of Stipulation Form. 6.3 17.50 11/10/81 Preparation of Metro Council Worksheet, prepara- 110.25 tion of referral letters to affected governments and Metro Council. 1.2 17.50 11/12/81 Prepared Kimmel worksheet for referral - copied 21.00 and mailed. .8 17.50 11/12/81 Trip to Post Office to register packet to the 14.00 Metro Council. 3.7 20.00 Secretarial 74.00 Photocopies 34.50 Postage 8.13 Mileage .75 Total $676.63 81.24 - f36 & Greeley Annexation (Anderson/LindgIiist) Principal .2 50.00 11/02/81 Review Metro referral status with staff, memo 10.00 to City Clerk on hearing. .3 50.00 11/03/81 Discuss Metro Council questions and issues with 15.00 staff, call from Metro Council on meeting, letter to City Attorney on meeting with Metro Council . .2 50.00 11/09/81 Call from Metro Council on questions on plan 10.00 and change in meeting. .2 50.00 11/10/81 Review Metro Council issues with staff. 10.00 .3 50.00 11/12/81 Review revised stipulations and forward to Mr. 15.00 Briggs. .2 50.00 11/18/81 Call from Attorney on Metro concerns and possible 10.00 delay in hearing. .5 50.00 11/19/81 Review sewer calculations with staff, prepara- 25.00 tion for Metro meeting. 2.0 50.00 11/20/81 Preparation for and attendance of meeting with 1 100.00 Metro Council , call to Mr. Briggs on hearing schedule, review documentation. Pay Last Amount In This Column IrseCE • NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS INC. nka boulevard, suite 420 4820 minneto 0 minneapolis, mn 55416 612/925-9420 City of Oak Park Heights DATE December 7, 1981 City Administrative Offices • 14168 57th Street North JOB NO 798.02 Oak Park Heights, Minnesota 55082 INVOICE NO. 594 Attn: LaVonne Wilson HOURS RATE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 81.24 - #36 & Greeley Annexation (Anderson/Lindquist) (Continued) Principal (Continued) .3 50.00 11/23/81 Letter to City Engineer on storm drainage questicn, 15.00 review Metro response with staff. .2 50.00 12/02/81 Review sewer projections with staff. 10.00 Planner 2.8 22,50 11/10/81 Meeting with Pat Pahl of Metro Council regarding 63.00 Greeley & #36 Annexation. 2.0 22.50 11/17/81 Meeting with Metro Council regarding annexation. it 45.00 .7 22.50 11/18/81 Discussion of amendment options with staff, call 15.75 from Pat Pahl to discuss amendment options. .5 22.50 11/19/81 Calls to Joe Anderlik forfflow projections of .1k 11.25 undeveloped areas of Oak Park Heights. 4.1 22.50 11/19/81 Preparation of report and graphics regarding a( 92.25 sewer flow impact on 1990 sewer flow allocations. 1.8 22.50 11/20/81 Meeting with Metro Council staff regarding sewer 4 40.50 flow projections. 3.0 22.50 11/24/81 Trip to Oak Park Heights to check land use. 67.50 5.2 22.50 11/25/81 Determination of amount of vacant land by zoning 4( 117.00 district. 2.2 22.50 11/25/81 Preparation of sewer flow estimates for infill -l( 49.50 areas, phone call to Barb Moeller of Metro Council . 1.2 22.50 12/01/81 Calculate sewer flows by zoning district for 4( 27.00 infill areas. .3 22.50 12/02/81 Phone call to Joe Anderlik to verify sewer flow -f 6.76 projections. 4.0 22.50 12/02/81 Finish preparation of report on 1990 sewer pro- 4‹ 90.00 jections for Metro Council. Designer 6.3 17.50 11/09/81 Preparation of Stipulation Form, call to Fire 110.25 Chief. 2.0 17.50 11/10/81 Call to Washington County regarding Baytown land 35.00 use, call to LaVonne Wilson. Finish preparation of Stipulation Foam. .3 17.50 11/19/81 Preparation of graphics. 5.25 Pay Last Amount In This Column WV • I,ICE • Dr NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS INC. Jjijjg 4820 minnetonka boulevard, suite 420 ;; ( minneapolis, mn 55416 612/925-9420 City of Oak Park Hw&ihts City Administrative Offices DATE December 7, 1981 14168 57th Street North JOB Na 798.02 Oak Park Heights, Minnesota 55082 INVOICE NO. 594 Attn: LaVonne Wilson HOURS RATE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 81.24 - #36 & Greeley Annexation (Anderson/Lindquist) (Continued] 4.6 20.00 Secretarial 92.00 Photocopies 9.15 Postage 6.85 Mileage _ 18.00 Total $1,122.00 81.25 - Erickson Post - Convenience Food Development Principal .3 50.00 12/03/81 Receipt and review of site plans, refer to staff 15.00 Call to City Clerk. Planner' 2.1 17.50 12/03/81 Review of request for convenience grocery. 47.25 Total $62.25 General Assistance Principal .2 50.00 11/06/81 Call from City Clerk on meeting agenda, corres- 10.00 pondence from City and filing. 3.8 50.00 11/09/81 Preparation for and attendance of City Council 190.00 meeting. .3 50.00 11/10/81 City Council meeting follow-up. 15.00 .2 50.00 11/18/81 Correspondence from City and filing, call to 10.00 Clerk on meeting agenda and schedule of Sign Committee meeting. .5 50.00 11/24/81 Call from City Clerk, review referral file for 25.00 Washington County Plan, research file on condo con- version, call to S. Hesse. .3 50.00 11/25/81 Letter to Mr. Hesse on condo conversion, call 15.00 from Mr. Hesse' .5 50.00 11/30/81 Forward Washington County Plan to City of Stillwater, 25.00 correspondence from City and filing. .5 50.00 12/01/81 Call from City Clerk, memo to Sign Committee 25.00 members, correspondenee from City and filing. .5 50.00 12/02/81 Meeting with City Clerk, review work status. 25.00 Pay Last Amount In This Column 04 .„t4w • INFICE • DT c NO RTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS INC. 7a 4820 minnetonka boulevard, suite 420 tkg. minneapolis, mn 55416 612/925-9420 City of Oak Park Heights City Administrative Offices DATE January 4, 1982 14168 57th Street North Oak Park Heights, Minnesota 55082 JOB NO. 798.02 Attn: LaVonne Wilson INVOICE NO. 601 HOURS RATE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 81.22 - Kimmel Annexation Planner .1 22.50 12/29/81 Check status of comprehensive plan amendment. 2.25 .1 20.00 Secretarial 2.00 Photocopies .60 Postage .41 Total $5526 81.24 - #36 & Greeley Annexation (Anderson/Linquist) Principal .1 50.00 12/29/81 Letter to attorney on status of Metro Council 5.00 review. Planner .1 22.50 12/29/81 Check status of comprehensive plan amendment. 2.25 .1 20.00 Secretarial 2.00 Photocopies .60 Postage .41 Total $10.26 Pay Last Amount In This Column • LICE • T A NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS INC. 4820 minnetonka boulevard, suite 420 �� aa. minnea olis, mn 55416 612/925-9420 P City of Oak Park Heights City Administrative Offices DATE February 1, 1982 14168 57th Street North 798.02 Oak Park Heights, Minnesota 55082 JOB NO. INVOICE NO. 617 Attn: LaVonne Wilson HOURS RATE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 81.24 - !36 & Greelgy Annexation (Anderson/Linquist) Principal .2 50.00 1/12/82 Review Metro Council staff report and forward 10.00 to City staff and. attorney. .1 50.00 1/15/82 Call from Bob Briggs on hearing. 5.00 .5 50.00 1/20/82 Review project file, have soils of area checked, 25.00 review testimony with Mr. Briggs. .5 50.00 1/21/82 Assemble documentation for Municipal Commission 25.00 hearing. .5 50.00 1/26/82 Call from Mr. Briggs, preparation for Municipal 25.00 Coasuission hearing. 2.5 50.00 1/27/82 Municipal Board testimony, letters to Mr. Briggs. 125.00 Planner .2 22.50 1/22/82 Call to Pat Pahl to obtain copy of Metro Council 4.50 Resolution approving Greeley/36 Annexation. Designer 1.5 17.50 1/20/82 Call to Joe Anderlik regarding drainage analysis, 26.25 preparation of soil analysis. .3 17.50 1/21/82 Phone calls to Fire Chief. 5.25 .5 17.50 1/22/82 Trip to Albinsons for copies of Zoning Map. 8.75 .6 17.50 1/26/82 Preparation of soil slap and copying. 10.50 1.1 20.00 Secretarial 22.00 Photocopies 9.45 Reproductions 1.28 Postage 6.23 Mileage 18.50 Total $327.71 Pay Last Amount In This Column ssP • 410 CITY OI OAK PARK HEIGHTS 14168-57th Street North STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 439-4439 February 22, 1982 Eckberg, Lammers, Briggs & Wolff 126 South Second Street Stillwater, Minnesota 55082 Attention: Bob Briggs Re: Anderson/Linquist Annexation Dear Bob: Listed below are the charges for the above project: 10/81 Planner $ 458. 19 / 11/81 331. 61/] 12/81 1122. 00 1/82 10. 26 2/82 327. 71" 12/81 Engineer 37 .00 1/82 81.00- $2367. 77 To date we have received payment from you in the amount of $1985. 80 leaving a balance of $381. 97. Sincerely, CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS a Vonne Wilson City Administrator/Treasurer LW/lw Enc: NAC invoice #617 vt. 3,1 ,77 1 / S . CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS 14168- 57th Street North STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 439.4439 February 19, 1982 E ckberg, Lammers , Briggs & Wolff 126 South Second Street Stillwater, Minnesota 55082 Attention: Bob Briggs gg Re: Anderson/Linquist Annexation Dear Bob: Charges to date on the above project total $2367. 77. Payments received to date total $1985. 80 leaving a total Y $ g amount due the city of $381. 97. Should you have questions on the above matter, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS La Vonne Wi son City Administrator/Treasurer LW/lw // 5- • C 6 ..2. L 3 . 7/ 3/ , av 3 S • CITY OF • OAK PARK HEIGHTS 14168 - 57th Street North STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 4394439 December 23, 1981 Eckberg, Lammers , Briggs & Wolff 126 South Second Street Stillwater, Mn. 55082 Attention: Bob Briggs Re: Anderson/Linguist Annexation Dear Bob: Thank you for your check in the amount of $519. 80 for, the above request. Planning charges for the month of November total $1122.00 and engineering costs were $ Balance is $1 --6. 0 ,3 7.va ii s'9• v d I have enclosed copies of the planner ' s invoices for your files. Any questions, please call. Sincerely, La Vonne Wilson, Clerk-Treasurer City of Oak Park ,Heights LW/lw Enclosures erd . fib ' 1 CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS 14168 - 57th Street North • STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 439-4439 November 9, 1981 Mr. Robert G. Briggs, Attorney at Law 126 South Second Street Stillwater, Minnesota 55082 Re: Anderson/Linquist Annexation Dear Mr. Briggs : Thank you for the check in the amount of $270. 00 for the above request. There have been additional planning charges totaling $331. 61, leaving a balance of $519. 80 to date. Should you have questions on the above matter, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, La Vonn a Wilson, Clerk K� City of Oak Park Heights ,oe- -/?-8a "Ii,l-j8/ • �! cI'PY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS • 14168. 57th Street North STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 439.4439 October 15, 1981 Mr. Robert G. Briggs, Attorney at Law 126 South Second Street Stillwater, Mn. 55082 Dear Mr. Briggs: • Costs incurred to date for the annexation request from Anderson/Lindquist are as follows: Planner' s Fee $458.19 Should you q h uld have questions regarding the charges, please • do not hesitate to contact me. • • • Sincerely, La Vonne Vonne Wilson, Clerk-Treasurer City of Oak Park Heights LW/lw • / '''/271/157 ? 8°E) /1/i 4 , 0 //C/t - 8/. 17 °2/1.0 '' L_ II A INVOICE r:. . Ar :< NOtIWEST ASSOCIATED SNSULTANTS INC. � ' 4820 minnetonka boulevard, suite 420 k. A' minneapolis, mn 55416 612/925-9420 r tt ?R. ■. City of Oak Park Heights City Administrative Offices DATE October 5, 1981 14168 57th Street North Oak Park Heights, Minnesota 55082 JOB NO. 798.02 , INVOICE NO. 547 Attn: LaVonne Wilson HOURS RATE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT I 81.24 - Anderson/Lindquist Annexation (#36 & Greeley) Principal .5 50.00 9/16/81 Meetin 9 City with Cit Clerk. 25.00 .5 50.00 J ro Review 9/17/81 project with staff _ letter froth and to 25.00 / p City Attorney. Designer 5.3 17.50 9/17/81 Copied City's file and reviewed, reviewed Comp 92.75 Plan regarding property in question. 3.1 17.50 9/18/81 Began drafting Comp Plan amendment. 54.25 .5 17.50 9/22/81 Memo to Brad Lemberg regarding utilities. 8.75 4.9 17.50 9/24/81 Drafting Comp Plan amendment. 85.75 2.0 17.50 9/25/81 Site visit. 35.00 2.9 17.50 9/29/81 Researching and compiling information. 50.75 1.1 17.50 .O/O1/81 Review and call to petitioners. 19.25 1.6 17.50 .0/02/81 Drafting Comp Plan amendment. 28.00 .2 15.00 9/22/81 Photocopying 3.00 .2 20.00 Secretarial 4.00 Photocopies 4.20 Postage 1.24 Mileage 21.25 • Total 058.19 ' Pay Last Amount In WA, rRf= ...s.0•I INVOICE r NORTONEST ASSOCIATED dlINSULTANTS INC. v �` r 4820 minnetonka boulevard, suite 420 ' �� ''�', • `, �- minneapolis, mn 55416 612/925-9420 City of Oak Park Heights City Administrative Offices DATE November 3, 1981 14168 57th Street North JOB NO. 798.02 Oak Park Heights, Minnesota 55082 INVOICE NO. 564 Attn: LaVonne Wilson HOURS 1 RATE 1 DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 81.24 - #36 & Greeley Annexation lAnderson/Lindquist) Principal .3 50.00 10/13/81 Follow-up with staff on processing amendment. 15.00 `' 4 tlj Designer 2.5 17.50 10/05/81 Preparation of Memo to Council , preparation of 43.75 statement for annexation text, finalized Comp ti Plan amendment. 5.0 17.50 10/14/81 Preparation of worksheet and graphics to refer 87.50 amendment to Metropolitan Council . 3.4 17.50 10/15/81 Preparation of letters to governmental units re: 59.50 Comp Plan amendment. 1.6 17.50 10/20/81 Preparation of letter to Metro Council and copy- 28.00 ing of Comp Plan amendment. 1.1 17.50 10/28/81 Phone calls from Pat Pahl of Metro Council re: 19.25 sewer projections, call to Brad Lemberg, gathered acreage and other information from file. 1.8 20.00 Secretarial 36.00 Photocopies 29.70 Postage 12.91 Total $331.61 General Assistance Principal .3 50.00 10/11/81 Correspondence from City and filing. .15.00 2.0 50.00 10/12/81 Correspondence from City and filing, preparation 100.00 of items for City Council meeting, review 701 phasing plan and discuss with staff, review sign report to City Council . 4.0 50.00 10/13/81 Preparation for and attendance of City Council 200.00 meeting, follow-up with staff. .3 50.00 10/15/81 Phone calls from Mr. Lux and Mr. Bradshaw. 15.00 .3 50.00 10/16/81 Phone call to and from Mrs. Wilson, call from 15.00 developer on zoning question, correspondence from City and filing. JO Pay Last Amount In This r,,6, ,, INVOICE tr RT EST ASSOCIATED C SULTANTS INC. Ili:: , .1:,, 4820 minnetonka boulevard, suite 420 rt. Y ~ '� '' :::;204*.:,..• . 4: minneapolis, mn 55416 612/925-9420 City of Oak Park Heights DATE December 7, 1981 City Administrative Offices 798.02 14168 57th Street North JOB NO, Oak Park Heights, Minnesota 55082 INVOICE NO. 594 Attn: LaVonne Wilson HOURS i RATE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 81.22 Kimmel Annexation (Continued1 Designer 70.00 , 4.0 17.50 11/05/81 Calls to Judy of City Hall and residents, pre- # paration of Stipulation Form. 54.25 3.1 17.50 11/06/81 Preparation o�aion ofaStipulationaForm of land uses, finish preparation 6.3 17.50 11/10/81 Preparation of Metro Council Worksheet, prepara- 110.25 , { tion of referral letters to affected governments and il Metro Council . 1.2 17.50 11/12/81 Prepared Kimmel worksheet for referral - copied 21.00 and mailed. 14.00 � .8 17.50 11/12/81 Trip to Post Office to register packet to the r . Metro Council . il- � x 3,7 20.00 Secretarial 74.00 x :.' 4.50 Photocopies 34.50 r; Postage .13 Mileage . b, $676.63 �: Total 4 81.24 - #36 & Greeley Annexation (Anderson/Lindquist) • Principal .2 50.00 11/02/81 Review Metro referral status with staff, memo to City Clerk on hearing. .3 50.00 11/03/81 Discuss Metro MCouuncil questions and with 15.00 staff, call from Me to City Attorney on meeting with Metro Council . .2 50.00 11/09/81 Call from Metro Council on questions on plan 10.00 . and change in meeting. 10.00 .2 50.00 11/10/81 Review Metro Council issues with staff. .3 50.00 11/12/81 Review revised stipulations and forward to Mr. 15.00 Briggs. .2 50.00 11/18/81 Call from Attorney on Metro concerns and possible \ 10.00 delay in hearing. 25.00 .5 50.00 11/19/81 Review sewer calculations with staff, prepara- 25.00 tion for Metro meeting. 2.0 50.00 11/20/81- Preparation for and attendance of meeting with 100.00 Metro Council , call to Mr. Briggs on hearing schedule, review documentation. Pay Last Amount In This Column SIT I INVOICE °°° ii:a .0.. NORT NEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS INC. Y.. :g: 4820 minnetonka boulevard, suite 420 An } - *.*:-. P 1:: ..... minnea olis mn 55416 612/925-9420 City of Oak Park Heights City Administrative Offices DATE December 7, 1981 14168 57th Street North JOB NO 798.02 Oak Park Heights, Minnesota 55082 INVOICE NO. 594 Attn: LaVonne Wilson HOURS RATE i DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 81.24 - #36 & Greeley Annexation (Anderson/Lindquist) (Continued) Principal (Continued) 3 .3 50.00 11/23/81 Letter to City Engineer on storm drainage question, 15.00 e' review Metro response with staff. k, .2 50.00 12/02/81 Review sewer projections with staff. 10.00 Planner r, 2.8 22,50 11/10/81 Meeting with Pat Pahl of Metro Council regarding 63.00 • Greeley & #36 Annexation. 2.0 22.50 11/17/81 Meeting with Metro Council regarding annexation. 45.00 .7 22.50 11/18/81 Discussion of amendment options with staff, call 15.75 from Pat Pahl to discuss amendment options. .5 22.50 11/19/81 Calls to Joe Anderlik for flow projections of 11.25 • undeveloped areas of Oak Park Heights. - 4.1 22.50 11/19/81 Preparation of report and graphics regarding 92.25 sewer flow impact on 1990 sewer flow allocations. 1.8 22.50 11/20/81 Meeting with Metro Council staff regarding sewer 40.50 ' flow projections. 3.0 22.50 11/24/81 Trip to Oak Park Heights to check land use. 67.50 5.2 22.50 11/25/81 Determination of amount of vacant land by zoning 117.00 district. 2.2 22.50 11/25/81 Preparation of sewer flow estimates for infill 49.50 areas, phone call to Barb Moeller of Metro Council . 2 .00 8 Calculate sewer flows by zoning district for 7 1.2 22.50 12/01/ 1 Y 9 infill areas. ° • .3 22.50 12/02/81 Phone call to Joe Anderlik to verify sewer flow 6.75 projections. 4.0 22.50 12/02/81 Finish preparation of report on 1990 sewer pro- 90.00 jections for Metro Council . Designer 6.3 17.50 11/09/81 Preparation of Stipulation Form, call to Fire 110.25 Chief. 2.0 17.50 11/10/81 Call to Washington County regarding Baytown land 35.00 use, call to LaVonne Wilson. Finish preparation of Stipulation Form. .3 17.50 11/19/81 Preparation of graphics. 5.25 Pay Last Amount In This t`atd.•f+:r, ...,_ A 4 INVOICE C ° . :1, f,: - °<; NORTSVEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS INC. p.k . 4820 minnetonka boulevard, suite 420 ,{ :'• • .,`�t.• minneapolis, mn 55416 612/925-9420 City of Oak Park Heights City Administrative Offices DATE December 7, 1981 14168 57th Street North JOB NO 798.02 Oak Park Heights, Minnesota 55082 INVOICE NO. 594 Attn: LaVonne Wilson HOURS I RATE I DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 81.24 - #36 & Greele Annexation Anderson/Lind•uist Cont nued 4.6 20.00 Secretarial 92.00 rr= L Photocopies 9.15 6.85 ': Postage 00 18. Mileage �; Total 2 . 0 ;; 81.25 - Erickson Post - Convenience Food Development t_ + . Principal .3 50.00 12/03/81 Receipt and review of site plans, refer to staff 15.00 tI Call to City Clerk. V' Planner `' a 2.1 17.50 12/03/81 Review of request for convenience grocery. 47.25 Total $62.25 General Assistance Principal . .2 50.00 11/06/81 Call from City Clerk on meeting agenda, corres- 10.00 pondence from City and filing. 3.8 50.00 11/09/81 Preparation for and attendance of City Council 190.00 meeting. .3 50.00 11/10/81 City Council meeting follow-up. 15.00 Correspondence from City and filing, call to 10.00 .2 50.00 11/18/81 �' f i n Committee d and schedule of S Clerk on meeting agenda 9 meeting. .5 50.00 11/24/81 Call from City Clerk, review referral file for 25.00 Washington County Plan, research file on condo con- version,9 version, call to S. Hesse. .3 50.00 11/25/81 Letter to Mr. Hesse on condo conversion, call 15.00 from Mr. Hesse. .5 50.00 11/30/81 Forward Washington County Plan to City of Stillwater, 25.00 correspondence from City and filing. .5 50.00 12/01/81 Call from City Clerk, memo to Sign Committee 25.00 members, correspondence from City and filing. .5 50.00 12/02/81 Meeting with City Clerk, review work status. 25.00 Pay Last Amount In This(wpm+, } INVOICE ,-a7-111rig NORTONEST ASSOCIATED CIIVISULTANTS INC. '9x=ref 4820 minnetonka boulevard, suite 420 sovx, RA. minneapolis, mn 55416 612/925-9420 City of Oak Park Heights City Administrative Offices DATE January 4, 1982 14168 57th Street North Oak Park Heights, Minnesota 55082 JOB NO. 798.02 INVOICE NO. 601 Attn: LaVonne Wilson HOURS RATE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 81.22 - Kimmel Annexation Planner .1 22.50 12/29/81 Check status of comprehensive plan amendment. 2.25 .1 20.00 Secretarial 2.00 t . Photocopies .60 Postage .41 Total $5.26 81.24 - #36 & Greeley Annexation _SAnderson/Linquist) Principal .1 50.00 12/29/81 Letter to attorney on status of Metro Council 5.00 review. Planner .1 22.50 12/29/81 Check status of comprehensive plan amendment. 2.25 .1 20.00 Secretarial 2.00 Photocopies .60 • Postage .41 Total $10.26 Pay Last Amount In This Column OAP INVOICE NX . ' .. NORTONEST ASSOCIATED dINSULTANTS INC. i 4820 minnetonka boulevard, suite 420 • :..$xs>: K: ' *. � g minneapolis, mn 55416 612/925-9420 City of Oak Park Heights City Administrative Offices DATE February 1, 1982 . 14168 57th Street North dos NO. 798.02 c.- Oak Park Heights, Minnesota 55082 INVOICE NO. 617 x, Attn: LaVonne Wilson f AMOUNT . DESCRIPTION • HOURS I RATE i 81.24 • #36 & Greeley Annexation (Anderson/Linquist) Principal ,r .2 50.00 1/12/82 Review Metro Council staff report and- forward 10.00 to City staff and attorney. 5.00 .1 50.00 1/15/82 Call from Bob Briggs on hearing. 25.00 .5 50.00 1/20/82 Review project file, have soils of area checked, ,; review testimony with Mr. Briggs. t , .5 50.00 1/21/82 Assemble documentation for Municipal Commission 25,00 ' r hearing. ' .5 50.00 1/26/82 Call from Mr. Briggs, preparation for Municipal 25.00 Commission hearing. ,' 2.5 50.00 1/27/82 Municipal Board testimony, letters to Mr. Briggs. 125.00 ;r Planner .2 22.50 1/22/82 Call to Pat Pahl to obtain copy of Metro Council 4.50 Resolution approving Greeley/36 Annexation. Designer 26.25 1.5 17.50 1/20/82 Call to Joe Anderlik regarding drainage analysis, preparation of soil analysis. 5.25 .3 17.50 1/21/82 Phone calls to Fire Chief. .25 5 .5 17.50 1/22/82 Trip to Albinsons for copies of Zoning Map. 18.75 .6 17.50 1/26/82 Preparation of soil map and copying. • 1.1 20.00 Secretarial 22.00 Photocopies 9.45 Reproductions 1.28 Postage 6.23 Mileage 18.50 Total 432t71 71 gaa r d o F, '4 Pay Last Amount In This Column r/I Rv, a r t Glom R.Coeds.P.E.''. .4;. / 'I Rodens, sdst 4 f d ` , Ago.■ ' Kroh A.Gorton. I.E. f r Ono t..pone»roe.I.E. Thomas E.Noyer. I.E. 4' . e 0 Robert W.Roane.I.E. Rickard W.roster.L£. t4 Jorebb C. Antnhk.P.E. Robert l.'..frkamrkt, I.E. ' 1107 UratMrJ A. Lnnbrrg,P.E. Man!"C.sorwta P.E.'. 335 */. 1..4/yAasy 36 �9g c t Richard E. Twiwr,LE. Donald C. Rarot►.P.S. a A. P.04. Maanwats 53113 • Jana►C.Olson. I.E. Jerry A.dasrtaa.I.E. Nark A.Na..,...P.E. . , Pi...e.'61.2.636.4600 .. December 1981 ;ka'M►;;.aAr,n * Nolan M.Otren City of Oak Park Heights florid E.OWN 14168 - 57th Street North Stillwater, Minnesota 55082 RE: File No. 55 General INVOICE NO. 8 5489 FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES RENDERED November 1 thru November 30, 1981 Prepare Ozark Avenue storm sever plan • Grad.Engr. 4 Mts. @ $27.00 $108. Sr.Tech.- 14 Hrs. @ $22.00 33.0 7�z Draftsman 6 Hrs. @ $22.00 .132.0 Review Oak Perk Heights Comprehensive Plan Prin.Engr. 1 Hrs. @ $37.00 37.00 _ Attend meeting with Metro Council Staff re: sewer r--77. flows end annexations on November 10, 1981 Prin.Nngr. 2 Era. @ $37.003 l- Stake soil borings for Brae haw sewer extension Sr.Tech. 6 Hrs. @ $22.00 2.00 704' Attend meeting on November 16 re: Bradshaw sewer Prin.Engr. 1 Hrs. @ $37.00 37.00-A , Attend meeting on November 16 re: Kimmel annexation Prin.Engr.l Era. @ $37.00 • 37.0 v/ Assist with easements for Stt:I er storm sewer Sr.Tech. 1% Hrs. @ $22.00 I:00 Provide sewer flow data to Planner for Comprehen- sive Plan revision Prin.Engr. 2% Era. @ $37.00 92.50 -7.: Review sewer flow and cost data re: MWCC billing Prin.Engr. 3 Hrs. @ $37.00 111.00-7d� 826..50 1 /1/„/„, r 0- , . i ,) 7,,- •1 ,e,_ 4- 00 �1' U lj 1°7 Z PP e 1 All bills due and payable within 30 days. Interest will be charged at the rate of 6%after 60 doss. I declare under the penalties of perjury that I am the person making the within claim:that I have examined said claim and that the same is lust and true:that the services therein charged were actually rendered and were of the value therein charged:that the fees therein charged are official and are such as are allowed by law: and that no part of said claim has been paid. The effect of this verification shall be the some as it subscribed and swum to under oath. KO FSTKOO.RIISF.YF.7t DERI.IK A ASSIWIAI•FS.INC. L by trJ4/ '. Signature sal t'latmant T f+; ' 9 • - Glenn R.Cook.P.E. le ane41400, A , .�/ Ijj & 4, 1U s, ,K�.a Keith A.Gordon,T.E. " tr T s� Otto G.Bonettroo,P.E. Thomas E.Noyes,P.E. {.i6tp1/r��i/s� j! p Robert W. Rosette.P.E. Richard W.Foster, P.E. t v sa"�`r7 v Joseph C.Anderlik.P.E. Robert G.Schunichf,P.E. .2335 `h/. `7a.•4 XipArrry 36 Bradford A.Lemberg,P.E. Mania L.Solvate,P.E. Richard E.Turner,P.E. James C. Donald C.Burgardt.P.E.y.Olson. P.E. Jerry A.Bourdon,P.E. St. pa..l M«..r.�.�551/3 Mark A.Hanson.P.E. pa.r..:612-636-4600 January 1982 Charles A.Erickson Leo M. Pawelsky Harlan M.Olson David E.Olson City of Oak Park Heights 14168 - 57th Street North Stillwater, Minnesota 55082 RE: File No. 55 General INVOICE NO. 0 5724 FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES RENDERED December 1 tbru December 31, 1981 Meet with Twin City Testing on December 10, 1981 at Sunnyside for borings, prepare cost estimate and letter Sr.Tech. 5 Hrs. @ $22.00 $110.001°1' Review Baytown annexation L+M - :.k' Grad.Engr. 3 Hrs. @ $27.00 r/ #t2.oe Hrs. $37.00 18.50 0, with Staff re: Bradshaw se e�3 r Prin.Engr. '� H @ $ � Discussions ng �gy° Field measure quantities for Ramie Johnson storm sewer Sr.Tech. 2 Hrs. @ $22.00 44.00 Tech. 4 Hrs. @ $16.50 6 .0 Qv- Review sanitary sewer layout at 60th and Stagecoach Sr.Tech. 1 Hrs. @ $22.00 22.001°N�?` $341.50 k! • • , P ,)' t ti , �(q� . .<-9 0 . oV �o; 60 . . v i t� " ' t, #i , i 01 � . d� q X1 �8 n� ri 001 O Q° All bills due and payable within 30 days. Interest will be charged at the annual rate of 12%after 60 days. I declare under the penalties of perjury that I am the person making the within claim;that I have examined said claim and that the same is just and true;that the services therein charged were actually rendered and were of the value therein charged;that the fees therein charged are official and are such as are allowed by law; and that no part of said claim has been paid.The effect of this verification shall be the same as if subscribed and sworn to under oath. BONESTROO,ROSENE,ANDERLIK&ASSOCIATES,INC. by . Ir�A�1 ,:M l ��I. ignsature of Claimant . - • ill' � ' �/� �� f Ago. Glenn R.Cook,P.£. ON__,,/. 0 J e Keith A.Gordon,P.E. LP/Jr(/i�i Otto G.Bonestroo,P.£. Thomas E.Noyes, P.E. 1 /�OOu fJ, (! p I Robert W.Rosette.P.E. Richard W.Foster,P.E. yµr �i if�/�fg ei Joseph C. Anderiik,P.E. Robert G.Schunichl,P.E. z= 2335 14.4.1141.0•1136 Bradford A.Lemberg,P.E. Marvin L.Sorvala,P.E. Richard E. Turner, P.E. Donald C.8urgardt.P.E. Si. Paul J� uuwata 55f1.3 James C.Olson.P.E. Jerry A.Bourdon,P.E. Mark A.Hanson.P.E. Nem.:6f.2-636-4600 • February 1982 Charles A.Erickson Leo M. Pawelsky • Harlan M.Olson David E.Olson City of Oak Park Heights 14168 - 57th Street North - Stillwater, Minnesota 55082 RE: File No. 55 General �j INVOICE NO. v 5909 FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES RENDERED January 1 ttlru January 31, 1982 AttendCouncil Meeting on January 11, 1982 $ 40.00 Review Baytown annexation report and prepare letter of recommendation, prepare for and attend annexa- tion hearing on January 27, 1982 a ; anti/" ..,td in.Engr. 3 Hrs. @ $40.00 . ; ,. . Grad.Engr. A Hrs. @ 29.50 :��,7► . Attend meetings re: recommendations for tractor- loader bids Prin.Engr. 41 Hrs. @ $40.00 180.00 r Field check three lots for proposed sanitary sewer and water at 60th Street and Stagecoach and pre- ,- r pare letter Field Sup. 2 Hrs. @ $29.50 59.00 ?.0 Sr. Tech. 1 Hrs. @ $24.00 24.00 r` Review Oasis.Pond Storm Sewer Report , Prin.Engr. 2 Hrs. @ $40.00 $� 040000 r • .. - f dJ $724.25 v (I J -vi 027 1 /i - i t o 07 ' ,�x, Job , , , - /0 i 1 01' Zq 1 / I 7' 'P, c____.( ._,,,,,All bills due and payable within 80 days. Interest will be charged at the annual rate of 1216 after 60 days. I declare under the penalties of perjury that I am the person making the within claim;that I have examined said claim and that the same is lust and true;that the services therein charged were actually rendered and were of the value therein charged;that the fees therein charged are official and are such as are allowed by law; i and that no part of said claim has been paid.The effect of this verification shall be the same as if subscribed and sworn to under oath. , S BONESTROO,ROSENE, DERLIK&ASSOCIATES,INC. 1 iron. s Lk", by 17.o.li turd of Claimant 110 CITY OF .OAK ,P,ARK HEIGHTS MINUTES OF MEETING HELD TUESDAY, OCTOBER 12, 1982 • Call to order by Mayor Sommerfeldt at 7 :00 P.M. Present: O' Neal, Lang, Westphal, Seggelke, Bonestroo, Ryan, Vierling & Wilson. Absent : None. Clerk read public hearing notice, presented affidavit of publication and mailing list for public hearing for Schwantes , Inc. request for rezoning, subdivision & PUD. Discussion ensued. Mayor called for comments from residents present. O ' Neal moved to close the hearing with Seggelke seconding. 5 aye votes . Hearing closed. Lang moved to deny the rezoning request from Schwantes, Inc. Seconded by O'Neal. Roll call vote taken with O'Neal , Lang and Seggelke voting .ye and Westphal and Sommerfeldt voting nay. Rezoning denied with parcel remaining a B-2 District. Mr. Red Swager moved to withdraw request for PUD & subdivision at this time. Clerk read public hearing notice and presented affidavit of publication for the establishment of Storm Sewer Improvement District No. 1. Mayor Sommerfeldt opened hearing, calling for comments from residents. Seggelke moved to close hearing, with O ' Neal seconding. 5 aye votes. Hearing closed. Seggelke moved to adopt Ordinance No. 41600 establishing a storm sewer improvement tax district within which the Council may acquire, construct, reconstruct, extend, maintain, and otherwise improve storm -sewer systems and related facilities and within which the Council kr may levy a tax on all taxable property therein to finance the cost of such improvements, including maintenance and the payment of principal and interest on obligations issued inmaking such improve- ments . Seconded by Lang. Roll call vote taken with 5 aye votes. Ordinance adopted., x Seggelke moved to direct City Attorney to contact R. Lafayette to update appraisal dated. October` 1, 1979 of City owned property. Seconded by Westphal. 5 aye votes. Carried. Westphal moved to direct City Engineer to add an a}anndum to the Anderson/Linguist -- NSP project to include sewer and water extensions to the Junker property. Seconded by Lang. 5 aye votes. Carried. • Lang moved to table Junk'er' s' request for increase in residential garbage service until the, November 8th . meeting. Seconded by O ' Neal . 5 aye votes. Carried. • O' Neal moved to approve plans And specs for the Anderson/Linguist - NSP project. Seconded by_ `Westphal-. 5 aye votes . Approved.