HomeMy WebLinkAbout08-26-2014 City Council Packet CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS
TUESDAY,AUGUST 26, 2014
CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA
7:00 P.M.
7:00 p.m. I. Call to Order/Pled a of AHep-iance/Avvroval of Agenda
Estimated
times
7:05 p.m. II. Council/Staff Reports
A. Mayor McComber
B. Councilmember Dougherty
C. Councilmember Liljegren
D. Councilmember Runk
E. Councilmember Swenson
F. Staff
• Party in the Park: Sunday, September 7
• Recycling Award(1)
7:10 p.m. M. Visitors/Public Comment
This is an opportunity for the public to address the Council with questions or concerns on issues not part of the regular agenda(please
limit comments to 3 minutes in lengHr).
7:15 p.m. IV. Consent Agenda.(Roll Call Vote)
A. Approve Bills&Investments
B. Approve City Council Minutes—August 13,2014 (2)
C. Approve Boulevard Tree Removal at 14249 55th Street North(3)
D. Approve Kennel Permit for Julie Praus of 14566 57h Street North(4)
E. Reimburse$725.38 to Jennifer Bye—June 14,2014 Storm Related Damages(5)
F. Approve Labor Contract Amendment#1 for Implementation of Health Savings
Account Proposal and Approve Separation from South Central Services
Cooperative(6)
G. Approve Hardrives Inc. 3'd Payment for 2014 Street Reconstruction( )
7:20 p.m. V. Public Hearings
None
7:20 p.m. VI. Old Business
A. St. Croix River Crossing Project Update (no enclosure)
B. Street Reconstruction Project Update (no enclosure)
7:30 p.m. VII. New Business
A. 2014 Community Award Nominations(8)
B. RCM Pothole Hot Patching(9)
C. 55'h Street Drainage Correction Project(10)
D. Palmer Station Development-Engineering Services(11)
1 of 57
Agenda
August 26,2014
Page 2
7:40 p.m. VIII. Other Council Items or Announcements
7:45 p.m. X. Adjournment
2 of 57
sy
Oak Park Heights
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date August 26, 2014
Agenda Item Recycling Award
Time Req. 0
Agenda Placement Staff Reports
Originating Departmenfi/Requestor dministration/Jennifer Pinski
i
Requester's Si ure
Action Requested Receive Information
Background/Justification(Please indicate any previous action has been taken or if other public
bodies have been advised).
See Attached.
3 of 57
CITY OF
OAK PARK HEIGHTS
+*"'' 74168 Oak Park Boulevard No. P.O.Box 2007 • Oak Park Heights,MN 55082.2047 • Phone:6511439 4439 • Fax:6511439-0574
August 14, 2014
Gary Larson
5646 Oldfield Avenue North
Oak Park Heights, MN 55082
Dear Mr. Larson;
Thank you for participating in the City's recycling program. As an incentive to
recycle and to increase fire prevention awareness, the City rewards two
residents each month with their choice of an award of $25.00 or a fire
extinguisher and/or smoke detector(s).
Your residence was checked on Thursday, August 14, 2014, to determine if
you had your recycling bin out with your regular garbage. Your recycling was
out and ready for collection; therefore, you are one of this month's winners.
Please contact me at 439-4439 to let me know your choice of award.
On behalf of the Oak Park Heights City Council, thank you for participating in
the City's recycling program.
Congratulations!
Jen ' er Pinski
Deputy Clerk
4 of 57 Tree City U.S.A.
x: CITY OF
OAK PARK 14E I G HTS
= 13166 Oak hir1s BD1AlevimI No. • P.O.Box 2007 Dak markXepghis,MN 55082-2007 • Nii,iie!G51'-}39L;439• Fax:651:41 574
August 14, 2014
Katelyn Bossany
6371 Peacan Avenue North
Oak Park Heights, MN 55082
Dear Ms. Bossany:
Thank you for participating in the City's recycling program. As an incentive to
recycle and to increase fire prevention awareness, the City rewards two
residents each month with their choice of an award of $25.00 or a fire
extinguisher and/or smoke detector(s).
Your residence was checked on Thursday, August 14, 2014, to determine if
you had your recycling bin out with your regular garbage. Your recycling was
out and ready for collection; therefore, you are one of this month's winners.
Please contact me at 439-4439 to jr-t me know your choice of award.
On behalf of the Oak Park Heights City Council, thank you for participating in
the City's recycling program.
Congratulations!
e ,S
k
Je er Pinski
Deputy Clerk
5 of 57 Tree City U.S.A.
Oak Park Heights
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date August 25, 2014
Agenda Item Approve City Council Minutes—August 13, 2014
Time Req. 0
Agenda Placement Consent
Originating Departrnent/Requestor inistration/Jennifer Pinski
Requester's Signa
Action Requested Approve
Background/Justification(Please indicate any previous action has been taken or if other public
bodies have been advised).
See Attached.
6 of 57
CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS
WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 13, 2014
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
I. Call to Order/Pledge of Allegiance/Approval of Agenda: Mayor McComber
called the meeting to order at 5:35 p.m. Present: Councilmembers Dougherty,
Liljegren, Swenson, and Runk. Staff present: City Administrator Johnson, City
Attorney Vierling, Public Works Director Kegley, and City Engineer Reifsteck.
Absent: City Planner Richards.
Councilmember Swenson, seconded by Councilmember Liljegren, moved to
approve the Agenda. Carried 5-0.
II. Council/Staff Re orts:
A. Mayor McComber: She reported she attended the NLC summer meetings
in St. Paul and the MNDOT tour of the bridge progress. She reported that
the next Parks Commission meeting was set for August 18 at 7:00 p.m.,
with the Tree City USA tree planting at 6:00 p.m. at Autumn Hills Park
and sign placement meeting at 6:30 p.m. at Oak Park Crossing Park. She
also reported that Party in the Park was set for Sunday, September 7, the
Fall Clean-up was set for October 4, and she received a letter from the
family of the hit-and-run victims asking for support for justice.
B. Councilmember Dou : He reported the Middle St. Croix Watershed
Management Organization's next meeting was set for August 14 at 7:00
p.m. and the Convention and Visitors Bureau meeting was set for August
14 at 10:00 a.m.
C. Councilmember Liljegren: He reported that the August 14 Planning
Commission meeting was cancelled, and the next meeting was set for
September 11.
D. Councilmember Runk: No report.
E. Councilmember Swenson: He reported that the Cable Commission would
meet the following week to discuss the franchise agreement and the
upcoming sale of Comcast.
F. Staff: No report.
III. Visitors/Public Comment:
None
IV. Consent Agenda:
7 of 57
City Council Meeting Minutes
August 13, 2014
Page 2 of 3
A. Approve Bills & Investments
B. Approve City Council Minutes—July 22, 2014
C. Approve Special City Council Minutes—July 30, 2014
D. Approve Change Order 42—City Street Reconstruction Project—Sanitary
Sewer Line
E. Approve Data Breach Response Policy
F. Authorize Staff to Enter into NLC Video Contest for Congress of Cities
and Exposition
Councilmember Runk, seconded by Councilmember Liljegren,moved to approve
the Consent Agenda. Roll call vote taken. Carried 5-0.
V. Public Hearings:
None
VI. Old Business:
A. St. Croix River Crossing Project Update:Jon Chiglo from MNDOT
reported that the contractor hoped to pave eastbound Highway 36 that
week and then would construct the south frontage road Oakgreen to
Osgood the following week. He stated they were on schedule to re-open
Osgood Avenue that Saturday, and they have cast three bridge segments
and would continue to produce segments through the fall into winter until
it was too cold.
B. Street Reconstruction Project Update: City Engineer Reifsteck reported
that the contractor completed the first lift of bituminous at Olene and
Olinda and Perkins Avenue and would be working on the sidewalks. He
stated that the water main in Area E east of Peller Avenue was completed
but the testing had not been completed. Reifsteck also reported that the
contractor was about two to three weeks behind schedule.
VII. New Business:
A. STH 36 & Osgood Ave. —Redevelopment Area—TIF: Councilmember
Swenson, seconded by Councilmember Dougherty, moved to authorize the
Resolution determining that the parcels were structurally substandard.
Roll call vote taken. Carried 5-0.
Councilmember Dougherty, seconded by Councilmember Liljegren,
moved to accept the findings in the"Renewal and Renovation Tax
Increment Financing District—Eligibility Study—2014"report. Carried
5-0.
8 of 57
City Council Meeting Minutes
August 13,2014
Page 3 of 3
Councilmember Runk, seconded by Councilmember Dougherty, moved to
approve the Resolution for a Public Hearing for the TIF. Roll call vote
taken. Carried 5-0.
B. Authorize the Design and Replacement of the Water Line in Oren Ave.—
Related to the North Frontage Road Realignment: City Engineer Reifsteck
reported that the existing water main along Oren Avenue was over thirty-
five years old. He requested authorization to move ahead with the design
of a new water main along the corridor in conjunction with the St. Croix
River Crossing Project. Mayor McComber questioned if they should do
the sewer at that time or in the future. Reifsteck stated that any lining can
wait until after the road was reconstructed.
Councilmember Runk, seconded by Councilmember Swenson, moved to
authorize the design of the replacement for the water line at Oren Avenue.
Carried 5-0.
VIII. Other Council Items or Announcements
None
X. Adjournment
Councilmember Swenson, seconded by Councilmember Liljegren,moved to
adjourn at 6:12 p.m. Carried 5-0.
Respectfully submitted, Approved as to Content and Form,
Jennifer Pinski Mary McComber
Deputy Clerk Mayor
9 of 57
�VL-
Oak Park Heights
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date August 26,2014
Agenda Item Approve Boulevard Tree Removal at 14249 55th Street North
Time Req. 0
Agenda Placement Consent
Originating Department/Requestor Arborist Kathy Widin
Requester's Signature
Action Requested Approve
Background/Justification(Please indicate any previous action has been taken or if other public
bodies have been advised).
The Beckers at 14249 55th St. are requesting removal of a 15 in. silver maple in their
front yard. The tree has large surface roots that are interfering with lawn mowing and
making lawn maintenance difficult. 1 have inspected the situation and agree that it is a
problem. There is room for a new tree between the existing tree and the driveway, and
this tree could be planted in 2015. 1 have sent them a copy of the recommendation form
which also says that a $100 co-pay is required if the City Council approves the
removal. Attached are two images of the tree roots.
Kathy Widin
OPH Arborist
10 of 57
July 16, 2014
City of Oak Park Heights
Attn:Arborist Dr. Kathy Widin
14158 Oak Park Blvd N
PO Box 2007
Oak Park Heights MN 55082-2007
Dear Dr. Kathy Widin:
I am writing in regards to a boulevard maple tree, whose above ground roots are showing
damage to our property and street.
I am asking that you review our tree situation (located directly in front of our house)to approve
it's removal and a new/different type of tree be planted—if not in 2014 for sure in 2015.
Address: 14249 55"'St N, Oak Park Heights MN 55082
Phone: 651.430-9058 .
Email: tsbecke bremer.com
Owners: Timothy& Suzanne Becker
Please let us know the results of your investigation. We appreciate you taking the time to
review our request.
Sin rely,
�v
Suzanne Becker
11 of 57
CITY OF
OAK PARK HEIGHTS
r. 14168 North 57th Sarecr-P.O.Box 2007.Oak Park Hcighrs.MN 55082-Phonc.(651)439-4439-Fax-439-0574
Municipal ArborW-Ycatharine Widin
[ticSa.KC,ci 1VC�t.
Recommendations - Qi , TYee Program
Date: Se44 C.0
Name: -k /� o�+�•.�
Address:
V
Boulevard Tree Tree in Yard
Problem: 11ww���s�- �/f• 1
15
IV,, S �4✓ Vw'�p�V �i� f�•�✓ (�NG� PK
1,, 04,.-(; f., 1er,.1v. L..,t
Recommendations: y! 1r ff r, �• J / /f
v` 1!-•OcGr'Il.v V.14vy• ,� IFrcoY�vww-�— V Cw►'�.N�R d1
,,4,
Ada., ' ',
sub.
P� �-• last -�, a��s �
WHEN USING PESTICIDES,OBSERVE PROPEL SAFETY PRECAUTIONS AND
ALWAYS FOLLOW LABEL DIRECTIONS.
Tree City U.S.A.
12 of 57
� .
� � �� �� �� � • � ' � � ��}%� \ \
\ � . � , � � •2
ƒ�
-
. �
LOW
Atr P «
/ 46
�
: .
Oak Park Heights
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date August 26, 2014
Agenda Item Approve Kennel Permit for Julie Praus of 14566 57a' Street North
Time Req. 0
Agenda Placement Consent
Originating Department/Requestor A stration/Jennifer Pinski
Requester's Signature J
Action Requested Approve
Background/Justification(Please indicate any previous action has been taken or if other public
bodies have been advised).
Julie Prause of 14566 57`' Street North has made application with the City of Oak Park Heights
for a kennel permit. She has three dogs, and has provided the City with proof of their rabies
vaccination. The$100.00 permit fee has been paid. I recommend approval.
14 of 57
Oak Park Heights
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date August 26h, 2014
Time Required: 1 Minute
Agenda Item Title. MMbX59 $725,38 Ms,Jennifer 13ye,=June 14''.2414 Storm__rel t
Dam_ es
Agenda Placement Consent e
Originating Department/Reques Eric Jo o Ci Administrator
Requester's Signature
Action Requested imburse 7 .38 To Ms. Jennifer B e—June 14m 2014 Storm related
Damages
Background/Justification(Please indicate if any previous action has been taken or if other public
bodies have advised):
Please see the attached memo.
15 of 57
City of Qak Park Heights
14168 Oak Park Blvd. N•Box 2007.Oak Park Heights,MN 55082•Phone(651)439-4439•Fax(651)439-0574
August 20th,2014
MEMO
TO: Mayor and City Council Me ber
FROM: Eric Johnson,City Administrator
RE: Jennifer Bye Car Damages
(Ms. Bye resides at 15269 Upper 61 Street)
As you will recall,on June 14, 2014 a tree fell on City resident Ms.Jennifer Bye's vehicle at Valley View
Park.The City did submit the damages to the LMCIT for review and possible payment for such claim.The
LMCIT did properly deny the claim as the City did not have any direct liability relative to the failing of the
tree, i.e. it was not rotten, un-kept or a known risk tree. In essence, it was"act-of-god". Luckily of course
no one was injured.
Ms. Bye is asking the City Council to consider the reimbursement for her damages sustain as a result of
the City's tree falling on her car. Please see the enclosed pictures and information.
The total amount is as follows:
Rental: $225.38
Deductible: $500.00
Total: $725.38
If the City Council does desire to reimburse this claim,fund could be derived from the City Council
Contingency which has a fund balance of$6,973.22
16 of 57
0 �
LEAGUE of CONNECTING &INNOVATING
-MINNESOTA SINCE 1913
CITIES
July 8,2014
Jennifer Bye
15269 Upper 61 s'St.
Oak Park Heights, MN 55082
RE: LMCTT CLAIM NO.: PCO032555
TRUST MEMBER: City of Oak Park Heights
CLAIMANT: Jennifer Bye
D/OCCURRENCE: 6114114
Dear Ms. Bye:
The League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust provides coverage to our trust member,the City
of Oak Park Heights. I have finished my investigation into the above-referenced matter and feel
the city is not negligent for the damage to your vehicle and must respectfully deny your claim.
Our investigation revealed that the City of Oak Park Heights had no notice or reports that this tree
was diseased or hazardous. The city was not aware of any condition that this tree was susceptible
to falling prior to this incident. The city does have a tree inspection program and this area was last
inspected August 2013 with no issues noted. It appears that the cause of the tree falling was the
excessive winds in your area on the above date.
We regret that we could not provide you with a more favorable resolution to your claim. If you
have any questions regarding my decision,please call me at 651-215-4067.
Sincerely,
Danielle Monteith
Claims Adjuster
c: Matt Hanley, LMCIT
Eric Johnson, City of Oak Park Heights
Andy Kegley,City of Oak Park Heights
Forest Lake Insurance Agency
LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES
INSURANCE TRUST 145 UNIVERSITY AVE.WEST PHONE.(651)281-1200 FAX:(651)281-1297
CLAIMS DEMTMENT 5T.PAUL,MN 55103-2044 'POLL FREE:(800)925-1122 WEB:WWW.LMcoRG
17 of 57
Eric Johnson
From: Jenny Bye <jennybye®msn.com>
sent Saturday,June 14,2014 3:08 PM
TO.- Eric Johnson;aaronaacerinspections.com
Subject Tree down at Valley View Park
Eric,
We had our daughter's birthday party today at Valley View Park. About 1:30 a tree on on the north side of the
parking lot fell.... and landed on my car of course...lucky mel Fortunately everyone Is safe and just a few dings
and scratches from what we can see so far. Waiting for the rain to stop.
With today's wind I fear others are going to fall. Hopefully someone can get out and assess on Monday.
-Jenny Bye
18 of 57
Ali.ip 11.
` r
_+IL
be
IL
J �'•.� _ , Al .
Jo. }+
t de
ep
{ 1
.j
Oak Park Heights
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date Au st 26�2014
Time Required: 1 Minute
Agenda Item Title:--Approve Labor Contract Amendment#L for Imnlntation of Health
Savings Account Pro os d Approve Separation from South Central
Services Come
Agenda Placement Consent A
Originating Department/Re es *Eriwfoidson. Citv Administrator
Requester's Signature
Action Requested A j3prove,Lab Contract Amendment#1 for Im lementation of Health
San SgnM Ac unt Proposal and Approve Separation from South Central
Services C o native.
Background/Justification(Please indicate if any previous action has been taken or if other public
bodies have advised):
Please see the attached memo.
20 of 57
City of Oak Park Heights
14168 Oak Park Blvd. N+Box 2007.Oak Park Heights,MN 55082 a Phone(651)439-4439+Fax(651)439-0574
August 15, 2014
MEMO
T0: Mayor and City until m
FROM: Eric Johnso , City Ad
RE: Health Care
The City of Oak Park Heights ("the City") and the three Labor Unions (TEAMSTERS —Supervisors—Local
320, Law Enforcement Labor Services — Police Patrol - Local 382 and AFSCME — Local 517) (tithe
Unions")each agreed during the labor negotiations preceding the current Contract that all parties desired to
explore health care opportunities, prevent the future implementation of a luxury tax or fee on premium costs
and that would provide quality coverage but possibly result in cost savings for both the City and Employees.
Pursuant to such agreements, subsequent discussions between the City and the Unions have been held in
in good-faiith during the Spring-Summer of 2014.
This group met with the City insurance consultant on numerous occasions and evaluated various health
care plans and programs including a high-deductible - Health Savings Account (HSA) option. The HSA
typically induces the consumer to better value their health care choices by incentivizing the possible
savings from not over-taxing their health care opportunities — i.e. doctor visits. This group also met with
representatives about an HSA from both Health Partners and Blue Cross Blue Shield of Minnesota —the
effective carrier for the SCSC.
In summary, the resulting product was the proposal to move from a standard provision health care plan as
purchased from the South Central Services Cooperative (SCSC)to a Health Savings Account as offered by
the Health Partners firm_
The implementation of a HSA will result in the following estimated savings for the first year transition:
Health Care Costs-'transitional Plan to H.S.A.Plan
Total Health Care Cosa-Smndard Polky2014 $3K243.
City PremiumCnsts T $316,76800
Employee Premium fasts $ 77,48000
Total Mealth Care Casts-WAProposai Jul 2014 rate $3071146.00
City Premium and Dedct. $257,95600
Employee Premium and Dedct. $ 49,200.00
1�
Tated SWIM
Savingstoclty $ Sgi3I2.00 -IR5
Savings to Employee $ 28,28000 -36.50%
L
21 of 57
Important Points to note:
1. The HSA rates from Health Partners are based on statewide pool offering average premium rates
that are required to be submitted and approved by the State of Minnesota. This pool is a statewide
pool and generally blends down loss-experiences compared to the relatively small group of the
SCSC.
2. At this time the City does not know what rate increases may be coming from the SCSC nor from
the HSA provider, anticipated being Health Partners. The savings estimated are based on 2014
rates. Staff would expect sizeable increases in the SCSC rates over the coming years and which
may additionally trigger the Affordable Care Act"Cadillac fees"starting in 2017 which are based on
premium rates.
3. The plans and coverages under the HSA and the SCSC are materially identical.
4. The City must inform the SCSC of its decision to leave prior to 90 days from its renewal, being Jan
1 St.
5. The enclosed Labor Contract Amendment #1 would implement the necessary changes described
above. Inclusive of that, the City is being asked to allow a cash-in of accrued benefits of sick-leave
and vacation employees may fund their first year deductibles. These benefits have already accrued
to the employee and would be required to be paid out by the City. So this is not a new cost to the
City.
6. For these employees who do not maintain adequate vacation or sick leave balances, the City
would provide a one-time upfront contribution for 2015, but these funds would be reimbursed to the
City over the course of 2015 via a payroll deduction. The City will not be requiring to make any
future allocations of this type and employees must consider the use of future payroll deductions.
7. The City would be paying for a portion of the employee deductible, at the beginning of each year,
($6001 $1,200 - family 1 single) however should an employee leave the City and paid amounts
would be prorated and would be required to be reimbursed back to the City.
8. The transition to any new health care plan will have its difficulties and in this instance does require
the employee to understand that the cost of a doctor's visit first comes from their deductible
account, up to the annual maximum ($4,0001$2,000—family 1 single), but then costs are covered.
However, should the employee not utilize these amounts each year, this fund would grow with their
added contributions and accrued interest,for future health care eligible expenses.
9. The City would engage the services of a HSA fund manager, such as Wells Fargo or other
reputable firm to handle HSA transactions and accounts.
22 of 57
Considering the foregoing and anticipated savings, Staff would recommend at this point the approval of the
transition from the South Central Services Cooperative in favor of establishing the Health Savings Account
HSA as offered under Health Partners; accordingly the following actions are necessary if the Council is
comfortable in moving to the new proposal:
1. Approve the Amendment#1 (as attached)to the Labor Agreements the City maintains with the
three labor unions. Subject to any final changes deemed necessary by the City Attorney.
2. Authorize the separation of the City from the SCSC and establish the necessary agreements with
the Health Partners group and an appropriate HSA management firm.
23 of 57
Health Care Discussion—FINAL VERSION FOR SIGNATURE—(8-15-14 VERSION)
Amendment 91 to the 2014-2016 Labor Agreements
Between the City of Oak Park Heights and Labor Unions of the City of Oak Park Heights
The City of Oak Park Heights C the City")and the three Labor Unions (TEAMSTERS—Supervisors—
Local 320, Law Enforcement Labor Services— Police Patrol - Local 382 and AFSCME— Local 517)
("the Unions") each agreed during the labor negotiations preceding the current Contract that all
parties desired to explore health care opportunities, prevent the future implementation of a luxury
tax or fee on premium costs and that would provide quality 1coverage but possibly result In cost
savings for both the City and Employees. Pursuant to such agreements, subsequent discussions
between the City and the Unions have been held in in good-faith doc pring-Summer of 2094
resulting in this Amendment 01.
The Cit y and the Unions hereby make the following changes to the respective contracp'
1. The current health care policy shall amended from the relationship with the South Central Service
Cooperative: "Double Gold Limited Health Care Plan"to the Health Partners—"Gold Empower
HSA—Rx Plus Gold 2000-100"—(Mayo Inclusive)plan as attached here to as Exhibit A and shall
become the baseline Primary Benefit Standard (PBS) under a Health Savings Account protocol
and as may be permitted by State and Federal Law.The new PBS shall commence on January 1st,
2015. It is the obligation of both the City and Unions to ensure that any transition to a new provider
is managed in good—faith and that all required documents are executed promptly.
2. Neither the City nor the Union(s) may alter the PBS unless agreed to in writing. Necessary
changes to the PBS due to changes in Federal or State law will be implemented as required.
3. Such plan shall be operated through a Health Savings Account(HSA)system as may be permitted
under State and Federal Law. The third-party administrator costs associated with administrating
the HSA are to be paid by the City but shall be limited to a maximum of$5.00 per covered
employee group or family unit, per month. Costs beyond the$5.00 shall be the expense of the
Employee.
4. Until such time as the HSA is discontinued by joint agreement of the City and Unions, or as a
requirement of State of Federal Law the following shall occur:
A. The City shall pay all 100 percent of the employee's premiums based on the 2014 plan
year rates as of July 1 st,2014(as shown in Exhibit B)for the Primary Benefit Standard,
non-smoking 1 non-tobacco rates only. The Employee is at all times solely responsible for
any Premium cost differentials due to smoking or tobacco use. Increases for effective Jan
1e, 2015(compared to July 1312014 rates)shall be apportioned as follows: the City will
pay up to the increase up to five percent(5%), any amount over the first five percent shall
be apportioned on a 70%City 130%employee allocation.All subsequent increases in
24 of 57
Health Care Discussion—FINAL VERSION FOR SIGNATURE—(8-15-14 VERSION)
premiums for 2016 and beyond shall be wholly apportioned on a 70% City 130%employee
allocation,
B. The City shall pay a Deducible Benefit to all Employees of$50.00 per month—totaling
$600 annually. The City shall pay an additional Deductible Benefit to single employees
only in the amount of$100.40 per month—totaling$1,200 annually.The Deductible
Benefit payments apply to Employees only, not per individual in each employee group or
family unit. Should the Employee leave City employment the Employee shall reimburse the
City any remaining prorated amounts from the$600 or ayments, prorated monthly
and/or the City may withhold from any final separation pay a to the Employee to
refund the City.
C. The City shall pay the annual Deductible Benefits in a lump-sum payment by January 15
of each year. Should the Employee leave City employment the Employee shall reimburse
the City a prorated monthly amount and/or the City may withhold from any final separation
payments due to the Employee to refund the City.
5. For current City employees as of June 1s, 2014, any existing persons(spouse, child,etc.)covered
under the health care policy in 2014 under a"family definition"shall also benefit from this plan and
the City shall pay the Premium costs and Deductible Benefit as defined under Section 4, under the
HSA proposal until such time as:the employee leaves the City employment,the employee no
longer requires coverage from the City or is not eligible for family coverage.
6. The City will accept current employees onto this coverage plan consistent with State and Federal
law, (e.g. period of open enrollment or should there be a"qualifying event"). For these current
employees, Deductible Benefits would be prorated monthly and prospectively through the end of
the current year. For new employees,the City will make a similar upfront Deductible Benefit
contribution, prorated monthly and prospectively,through the end of the current year. Should the
Employee leave City employment the Employee shall reimburse the City a prorated monthly
amount and/or the City may withhold from any final separation payments due to the Employee to
refund the City.
7. For the initial year(2015), if the Employee may select to fully fund their required deductible amount
(calculated after the application of any City provided Deductible Benefit) but must be done by
January 15m. Such funding may only be executed in one of three methods:
a. The Employee may pay"out-of pocket"with post-tax Employee derived funds.
b. The Employee may cash-in the equivalent value of sick leave or vacation time to make the
one-time account deposit.
25 of 57
Health Care Discussion—FINAL VERSION FOR SIGNATURE—(8-15-14 VERSION)
c, For 2015 only, and should the Employee have less than 200 hours of accrued sick leave or
vacation leave as of 6130114, the Employee may request that the City make an upfront
deposit, called an Immediate Deducible Deposit(IDD)of the Employees share of the
deductible;calculated as the deductible amount($4,000 family 1$2000 single)minus any
applicable City paid Deductible Benefit, into the Employee's designated HSA account to
provide immediate coverage for eligible HSA expenses.Any IDD paid by the City shall be
reimbursed to the City(or withheld by the City)by the Employee by December 31stof each
year, through prorated payroll deductions. Should the Employee leave City employment
prior to this IDD being fully reimbursed to the City,the City may withhold any final
separation payments, including payroll, to the Employee to cover the IDD upfront outlay or
may seek other methods of collection. It is understood that except for the specifically
defined Deductible Benefits paid by the City for the Employee,the IDD shall be fully
reimbursed to the City.
It is the Employees responsibility to ensure that future deductible costs are funded afthcoming
year(s). Future cash-ins of vacation or sick leave will not be permitted.
S. Investment decisions made with accrued HSA dollars are the sole responsibility of the employee
and the City is not responsible to direct or insure these funds from possible loss.
9. This Primary Benefit Standard (defined above)shall be in place until such plan is required tore-bid
pursuant to Minnesota and Federal Law at such time the City and the Union shall be required to
re-evaluate and renegotiate the policy, premium rates, deductible benefits, rates and other related
terms and conditions. The City and the Union may agree to terminate this Primary Benefit Standard
and alter other conditions, but must be negotiated and agreed upon by involved parties,
10. The City shall not be obligated to provide a health insurance policy and/or pay any health
insurance premiums that may lead to the imposition of any penalty surcharge, luxury tax, 'Cadillac
tax7 or other provision that increases costs to the City due to an imposed federal or state tax,
surcharge,fee or other costs not currently imposed and in effect as of 12-31-13. Both the City and
the Unions are responsible for proactively monitoring the Federal and State legislative landscape
that continually impacts health care rates and delivery systems. Should a condition arise that would
lead to the imposition of such penalty surcharge, luxury tax, OCadlllac tax"or other provision that
increases costs to the City,to the extent that is practicable, the City and Unions shall collectively
discuss options in advance of the City eliminating any policy. Upon the elimination of any policy by
the City due to this form of penalty,the City shall fall back to the most similar benefit plan that is
reasonably available that does not trigger such penalty and which shall include maintaining the
equivalent cost sharing for premiums,deductibles or other costs between the City and the Unions.
26 of 57
Health Care Discussion—FINAL VERSION FOR SIGNATURE—(8-15-14 VERSION)
11, With the execution of this document,any labor contract language related to the delivery and
expenses of health care(not dental) are wholly managed and governed under this Amendment. In
general,the following paragraphs of each Labor Agreement are deleted from each Agreement, are
no-longer in effect and are replaced with the language of this Amendment#1:
• Teamsters—Supervisors—Local 320: Art. 25.1
• L.E.L.S—Police Patrol—Local 382: Art. 22
• AFSCME—Local 517 : Art. 20(except Art.20.3 and 20.4)
12. The City and the Unions have negotiated this Agreement collectively, however should
circumstances arise in which the City and any of the participating Unions have a legitimate grieve-
able dispute regarding the direct or indirect effects of this Agreement, pursuant to the individual
Labor Contracts,the City and the Unions agree that such disputes shall be deemed as"severable"
from involvement of other participating Unions and that any final disposition of a dispute may not
require approval of other Unions. Or, in the event the dispute is between the Unions,he City shall
be held-harmless. A
13. Should any one(or several)of the provision of this Agreement be found to be un-enforceable, the
balance of the Agreement shall remain intact and in-force.
SIGNED and AGREED UPON:
AFSCME--Local 517—Steward L.E.L.S—Police Patrol—Local 382-Steward
AFSCME—Local 517—Business Agent L.E.L.S—Police Patrol—Local 382—Business Agent
Teamsters—Supervisors—Local 320-Steward City of Oak Park Heights—Mayor
Teamsters—Supervisors—Local 320—Business Agent City of Oak Park Heights—City Administrator
27 of 57
Health Care Discussion—FINAL VERSION FOR SIGNATURE—(&15-14 VERSION)
EXHIBIT A to:Amendment#1 to the 20142016 Labor Agreements
Between the City of Oak Park Heights and Labor Unions of the City of Oak Park Heights
Primary Benefit Standard: Health Partners—"Gold Empower HSA—Rx Plus Gold 2000-100"(1)plan
Further Defined With:
Group Membership Contract CON-700.49-HPSE-C
Benefits Chart- BCH-700.49 SE
Summary of Coverage— ACA Requirements
Statement of Rates— Open Access-Effective 7-1-14 (with Mayo Clinic--in network)
(1)Changes in plan coverages may vary to a limited degree from year to year as may be required by the provider under this plan
or defined by Federal or State requirements.The City,the Employees or Unions may interject into what may or may not be
covered under the scope of the plan.
28 of 57
Wq
Oak Park Heights
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date August 26 201
Agenda Item Title Hardrives Inc. qrd Payment for 2oi Street Reconstruction
Agenda Placement Consent
Originating Department/Requestor Finance — BgM Caruso Finance Director
Requester's Signature
Action Requested Approveqrd pMment re guest to Hardrives Inc. for the 2014 Street
Reconstruction
Background/Justification (Please indicate any previous action, financial implications
including budget information and recommendations).
See attached and pay request.
29 of 57
e
Owner: City of Oak Park Heights,P.O.Box 2007,Stillwater,MN 55082 Date: August 19,2014
Staritec For Period: 6/28/2014 to 8/19/2014 Request No: 3
Contractor: Hordrives,Inc., 14475 Quiram Dr.,Rogers,MN 55374
CONTRACTOR'S REQUEST FOR PAYMENT
2014 STREET RECONSTRUCTION
STANTEC PROJECT NO. 193801994
SUMMARY
1 Original Contract Amount $ 3,387,731.66
2 Change Order-Addition $ 0,00
3 Change Order-Deduction $ 0.00
4 Revised Contract Amount $ 3,387,731.66
5 Value Completed to Date $ 871,901.77
6 Material on Hand $ 144,916.92
7 Amount Earned $ 1,016,818.69
8 Less Retainage 5% $ 50,840.93
9 Subtotal $ 965,977.75
10 Less Amount Paid Previously $ 418,868.29
11 Liquidated damages- $ 0.00
12 AMOUNT DUE THIS REQUEST FOR PAYMENT NO. 3 $ 547,109.46
Recommended for Approval by:
STANTEC
Approved by Con actor: AITY er:
HARDRIVES,INC. HEIGHTS
Specified Contract Completion Date: ate:
193801994REQ3Asm
30 of 57
Contract Unit Current Quantity Amount
No. Item Unit Quantity Price Quantity to Date to Date
PART 1 -STREETS
I MOBILIZATION LS 1 134263.29 0.5 $67,131.65
2 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1 5882.43 0.5 $2,941.22
3 TEMPORARY MAIL LS 1 4812.90 0.5 $2,406.45
4 INLET PROTECTION EA 34 69.52 0.8 4 $278.D8
5 SILT FENCE,TYPE MACHINE SLICED LF 1400 2.04 80 505 $1,030.20
6 REMOVE LANDSCAPING LS 1 5347.67 $0.00
7 REMOVE SIGN EA 50 32.09 $0.00
8 REMOVE STREET SIGNS EA 21 53.48 $0.00
9 SALVAGE AND REINSTALL SIGN EA 55 64.17 $0.00
10 REMOVE TREE EA 45 320.86. 86 $27,593.96
11 REMOVE RETAINING WALL LS 1 3208.60 $0.00
12 REMOVE BOLLARDS LS 1 1497.35 $0.00
13 CLEARING AND GRUBBING,INCLUDING LARGE STUMP
REMOVAL LS 1 6951.97 1 $6,951.97
14 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SY 41300 1.39 1222 6876 $9,557.64
15 SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT-STREET LF 720 2.26 88 $198.88
16 REMOVE CONCRETE CURB&GUTTER LF 8480 1.87 10 $18.70
17 REMOVE BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SY 2100 3.21 $0.00
18 REMOVE CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SY 480 3.21 $0.00
19 REMOVE CONCRETE WALK SF 1000 0.53 $0.00
20 REMOVE GRAVEL DRIVEWAY SY 260 1.07 $0.00
21 COMMON EXCAVATION(P) CY 22270 7.78 $0.00
22 SUBGRADE EXCAVATION (CV) CY 4800 7.78 $0.00
23 AGGREGATE BASE,CLASS 5 TN 24900 7.91 2929.67 2929.67 $23,173.69
24 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW(MODIFIED) TN 9500 6.95 367.85 367.85 $2,556.56
25 4'PVC PERFORATED DRAIN TILE,WITH COARSE FILTER
AGGREGATE AND FILTER FABRIC LF 2500 4.76 360 360 $1,713.60
26 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL 1775 2.52 $0.00
27 TYPE SP 12.5 NON-WEARING COURSE MIXTURE(2,B) TN 3220 62.00 $0.00
28 TYPE SP 12.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE(2,C) TN 3220 71.00 $0.00
29 TYPE SP 9.5 BITUMINOUS MIXTURE FOR DRIVEWAYS (2,B) TN 365 145.00 $0.00
30 TYPE SP 9.5 BITUMINOUS MIXTURE FOR TRAIL(2,B) TN 60 75.00 $0.00
31 6"CONCRETE DRIVEWAY SF 3050 5.29 $0.00
32 B618 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER LF 1480 9.89 1118 1118 $11,057.02
33 SURMOUNTABLE CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER LF 23980 9.14 1587 1587 $14,505.18
34 CONCRETE WALK SF 2D00 4.76 $0.00
35 CONCRETE PEDESTRIAN RAMP SF 200 5.29 $0.00
36 TRUNCATED DOME SURFACE SF 60 32.09 $0.00
37 SEEDING,INCLUDING SEED,FERTILIZER,AND WOOD
FIBER BLANKET SY 900 2.37 134.4 $318.53
38 HYDROSEED WITH MULCH SY 28600 1.08 1674.5 $1,808.46
39 SELECT TOPSOIL BORROW CY 1570 19.04 74.5 279.14 $5,314.83
40 SIGN PANELS SF 58 37.43 $0.00
41 STREET NAME BLADE SIGNS EA 21 336.90 $0.00
42 12"SOLID WHITE STOP BAR LF 215 6.42 $0.00
43 STREET SWEEPER(WITH PICKUP BROOM) HR 115 151.14 18.5 25.25 $3,816.29
TOTAL PART 1 -STREETS $182,372.89
PART 2-WATERMAIN
44 TEMPORARY WATER SERVICE LS 1 15508.24 0.5 $7,754.12
45 REMOVE WATERMAIN LF 7150 5.88 538 1598 $9,396.24
46 ABANDON WATERMAIN LF 950 12.30 1221 1221 $15,018.30
47 REMOVE WATER SERVICE LF 2425 2.67 100.5 100.5 $268.34
48 REMOVE HYDRANT EA 14 213.91 4 6 $1,283.46
49 REMOVE VALVE AND BOX EA 31 106.95 6 6 $641.70
50 ROCK EXCAVATION-WEATHERED CY 60 106.95 $0.00
51 ROCK EXCAVATION-HARD CY 30 133.69 $0.00
52 SAND CUSHION LF 700 2.67 $0.00
53 IMPROVED PIPE FOUNDATION LF 815 3.74 $0.00
ISIT"EQUIsm
Contract Unit Current Quantity Amount
No. Item Unit Quantity Price Quanttly to Date to Date
54 CONNECT TO EXISTING WATERMAIN EA 11 962.58 1 4 $3,850.32
55 6"DIP WATERMAIN,CLASS 52 LF 6010 35.83 768.6 1590.1 $56,973.28
56 8"DIP WATERMAIN,CLASS 52 LF 2840 42.78 560 1396 $68,276.88
57 DIRECTIONAL DRILL 6"PVC,C900 WATERMAIN,
INCLUDING DUAL TRACER WIRE LF 620 55.62 585 1521.97 $84,651.97
58 6"GATE VALVE AND BOX EA 38 1229.96 9 18 $22,139.28
59 8"GATE VALVE AND BOX EA 9 1657.78 1 5 $8,288.90
60 WATERMAIN OFFSET-6" EA 4 3369.03 $0.00
61 WATERMAIN OFFSET-8" EA 3 3957.27 $0.00
62 HYDRANT EA 21 3689.89 4 9 $33,209.01
63 ADJUST HYDRANT EA 5 732.63 $0.00
64 DUCTILE IRON FITTINGS LB 4160 7.33 925 1896 $13,897.68
65 INSULATION-4"THICK SY 240 45.46 8.9 8.9 $404.59
66 1"CORPORATION STOP EA 99 197.86 40 44 $8,705.84
67 1"CURB STOP AND BOX EA 99 315.51 44 44 $13,882.44
68 1"TYPE"K"COPPER PIPE LF 2750 26.36 1098 1098 $28,943.28
69 2'CORPORATION STOP EA 2 481.29 $0.00
70 2"CURB STOP AND BOX EA 2 641.72 $0.00
71 2"TYPE"K"COPPER PIPE LF 130 35.83 $0.00
72 CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER SERVICE EA 92 267.38 44 44 $11,764.72
73 DIRECTIONAL DRILL 1"COPPER WATER SERVICE LF 500 49.20 324 324 $15.940.80
74 WATER SERVICE CONNECTION INSIDE HOME EA 8 1604.30 1 1 $1,604.30
75 REPLACE WATER METER EA 8 855.63 1 ] $855.63
TOTAL PART 2-WATERMAIN $407,751.08
PART 3-SANITARY SEWER
76 REMOVE SANITARY SEWER CASTING AND RINGS EA 50 101.61 13 15 $1,524.15
77 REMOVE SANITARY SEWER PIPE LF 380 5.35 87.28 91.28 $488.35
78 ABANDON SANITARY MANHOLE EA 3 625.68 $0.00
79 ABANDON SANITARY SEWER PIPE LF 200 13.37 $0.00
S0 BULKHEAD SANITARY SEWER PIPE EA 1 481.29 $0.00
81 REMOVE SANITARY MANHOLE EA 22 588.24 7 9 $5,294.16
82 8"PVC SANITARY SEWER PIPE-SDR 26 LF 215 32.35 47.73 52.33 $1,692.88
83 10"PVC SANITARY SEWER PIPE-SDR 26 LF 190 35.46 18.65 18.65 $661.33
84 CONNECT TO EXISTING SANITARY SEWER PIPE EA 39 855.63 14 15 $12,834.45
85 8"X4"PVC WYE EA 9 278.08 2 3 $834.24
86 4"PVC SANITARY SEWER SERVICE PIPE LF 310 25.88 13 21.5 $556,42
87 CONNECT TO EXISTING SEWER SERVICE EA 9 336.90 2 3 $1,010.70
68 IMPROVED PIPE FOUNDATION LF 70 4.28 $0.00
89 4'DIAMETER SANITARY SEWER MH EA 23 4545.52 6 8 $36,364.16
90 4'DIAMETER SANITARY SEWER MH WITH OUTSIDE DROP EA 1 10240.78 1 1 $10,240.78
91 SANITARY MANHOLE OVERDEPTH LF 77 294.12 $0,00
92 FURNISH &INSTALL NEW SANITARY MH CASTING AND
RINGS EA 26 641.72 1 $641.72
93 SEWER REHABILITATION WITH CIPP,8" LF 1580 28.23 $0.00
94 SEWER REHABILITATION WITH CIPP,9" LF 1574 26.60 $0.00
TOTAL PART 3-SANITARY SEWER $72,143.33
PART 4-STORM SEWER
95 REMOVE STORM SEWER CASTING AND RINGS EA 41 101.61 13 13 $1,320.93
96 REMOVE STORM SEWER MH OR CATCH BASIN EA 29 374.34 10 10 $3,743.40
97 REMOVE STORM SEWER PIPE LF 647 12.30 213.5 411.5 $5,061.45
98 12'RCP STORM SEWER,CL 5 LF 800 26.74 194.5 388.5 $10,388.49
99 15"RCP STORM SEWER,CL 5 LF 1065 28.34 393 538 $15,246.92
100 18"RCP STORM SEWER,CL 5 LF 1590 31.82 291 533.5 $16,975.97
101 21"RCP STORM SEWER,CL 4 LF 95 37.27 68 $2,534.36
102 24"RCP STORM SEWER,CL 4 LF 70 42.25 $0.00
103 4'DIAMETER STORM SEWER MH OR CBMH EA 44 1671.68 9 14 $26,203.52
104 5'DIAMETER STORM SEWER MH OR CBMH EA 2 2085.59 1 2 $4,171.18
105$x@ 6''�7DII�AMErER STORM SEWER MH OR CBMH EA 2 2780.79 1 $2,780.79
IS M 1 5/ Q3.rlsm
Contract Unit Current Quantity Amount
No. Item Unit Quantity PrICe Quantity to Date to Date
106 2'x3'CATCH BASIN EA 32 1764.73 9 14 $24,706.22
107 18"RCP FLARED END SECTION EA 1 561.51 0.98 0.98 $550.28
108 24"RCP FLARED END SECTION EA 1 802.15 $0.00
109 FURNISH&INSTALL NEW STORM SEWER CASTINGS-MH EA 6 727.28 1 1 $727.28
110 FURNISH&INSTALL NEW STORM SEWER CASTINGS-CB EA 6 828.89 $0.00
111 CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM SEWER PIPE EA 18 411.77 2 2 $823.54
112 CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM STRUCTURE EA 7 614.98 5 5 $3,074.90
113 CONNECT TO STRUCTURE(DRAINTILE) EA 92 315.51 18 18 $5,679.18
114 DRAINAGE SWALE GRADING LS 2 1283.44 $0.00
115 CLASS Ili RIP RAP CY 30 77.01 $0.00
TOTAL PART 4-STORM SEWER $123,988.41
PARTS-STAGECOACH TRAIL NORTH-WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENTS
116 TEMPORARY WATER SERVICE-STAGECOACH TRAIL
WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENTS LS 1 1336.92 $1,336.92
117 TRAFFIC CONTROL-STAGECOACH TRAIL WATERMAIN
IMPROVEMENTS LS 1 3101.65 0.5 $1,550.83
118 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SY 2000 1.39 1719 $2,389.41
119 SALVAGE AND REINSTALL AGGREGATE BASE SY 2000 1.39 1719 $2,389.41
120 AGGREGATE BASE,CLASS 5 TN 250 8.98 94.87 574.31 $5.157.30
121 REMOVE WATERMAIN LF 1025 5.88 497 $2,922.36
122 ABANDON WATERMAIN LF 930 12.46 250 250 $3,115.00
123 REMOVE WATER SERVICE LF 200 2.67 $0.00
124 REMOVE HYDRANT EA 4 213.91 $0.00
125 ABANDON HYDRANT EA 2 213.91 1 1 $213.91
126 REMOVE VALVE AND BOX EA 7 106.95 2 $213.90
127 ROCK EXCAVATION-WEATHERED CY 20 106.95 $0.00
128 ROCK EXCAVATION-HARD CY 20 133.69 $0.00
129 SAND CUSHION LF 200 2.67 $0.00
130 IMPROVED PIPE FOUNDATION LF 40 3.74 $0.00
131 CONNECT TO EXISTING WATERMAIN EA 2 962.58 2 $1,925.16
132 6"DIP WATERMAIN,CLASS 52 LF 330 35.83 109.4 $3,919.80
133 8"DIP WATERMAIN,CLASS 52 LF 720 42.78 541 $23,143.98
134 6'GATE VALVE AND BOX EA 4 1229.96 2 $2,459.92
135 8"GATE VALVE AND BOX EA 1 1657.78 1 $1,657.78
136 HYDRANT EA 2 3689.89 1 $3,689.89
137 ADJUST HYDRANT EA 1 732.63 $0.00
138 DUCTILE IRON FITTINGS LB 500 7.33 379 $2,778.07
139 INSULATION-4"THICK SY 0 50.00 11 $550.00
140 1"CORPORATION STOP EA 5 197.86 5 5 $989,30
141 1"CURB STOP AND BOX EA 5 315.51 5 5 $1,577.55
142 1"TYPE"K"COPPER PIPE LF 225 26.47 7 7 $18519
143 CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER SERVICE EA 5 267.38 5 5 $1,336.90
144 SEWER REHABILITATION WITH CIPP,9" LF 400 26.60 $0.0D
TOTAL PART 5-STAGECOACH TRAIL NORTH- $63,502.68
WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENTS
ALTERNATE 1 -VALLEY VIEW PARK ENTRANCE ROAD
145 MOBILIZATION LS 1 3000.00 $0.00
146 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1 534.77 $0.00
147 REMOVE STORM SEWER LF 160 12.30 186 $2,287.80
148 RECLAIM BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SY 4801 1.18 $0.00
149 SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT-STREET LF 115 2,66 $0.00
150 AGGREGATE BASE,CLASS 5 TN 650 8.56 $0.00
151 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL 275 2.25 $0.00
152 TYPE SP 12.5 NON-WEARING COURSE MIXTURE(2,8) TN 410 61.00 $0.00
153 TYPE SP 12.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE(2,C) TN 410 71.00 $0.00
154 15"RCP STORM SEWER,CL 5 LF 70 28.34 64 $1,813.76
155 18"RCP STORM SEWER,CL 5 LF 30 31.82 40 $1,272.80
156 21"RCP STORM SEWER,CL 4 LF 60 37.27 24 54 $2,OT2.58
19Y107"E03xlsm
Contract Unit Current Quantity Amount
No, Rem Unit Quantity Price Quantity to Date to Date
157 15"RCP FLARED END SECTION EA 2 550.81 2 $1,101.62
158 18"RCP FLARED END SECTION EA 2 561.51 1 $561.51
159 21"RCP FLARED END SECTION EA 2 614.98 1 2 $1,229.96
160 SEEDING,INCLUDING SEED,FERTILIZER,AND WOOD
FIBER BLANKET SY 2500 1.52 $0.00
161 SELECT TOPSOIL BORROW CY 300 19.04 $0.00
162 SIGN PANELS SF 13 37.43 $0.00
163 12"SOLID WHITE STOP BAR LF 25 16.04 $0.00
164 STREET SWEEPER(WITH PICKUP BROOM) HR 5 151.14 $0.00
TOTAL ALTERNATE 1 -VALLEY VIEW PARK ENTRANCE ROAD $10,28D.03
ALTERNATE 2-STAGECOACH TRAIL NORTH TO PERKINS
AVENUE NORTH-WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENTS
165 MOBILIZATION I.S. 1 2540.00 0.5 $1,270.00
166 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1 534.77 0,5 $267.39
167 REMOVE TREE EA 3 320.86 2 $641.72
168 REMOVE WATERMAIN LF 250 5.88 196.5 $1,155.42
169 IMPROVED PIPE FOUNDATION LF 25 4.28 $0.00
170 6"DIP WATERMAIN,CLASS 52 LF 250 35.83 196.5 $7.040.60
171 DUCTILE IRON FITTINGS LB 200 7.33 96 $703.68
172 PATCH GRAVEL ACCESS/DRIVEWAY SY 315 3.74 $0.00
173 SEEDING,INCLUDING SEED,FERTILIZER,AND WOOD
FIBER BLANKET SY 800 2.11 $0.00
174 HYDROSEED WITH MULCH SY 800 1.44 222.2 $319.97
175 SELECT TOPSOIL BORROW Cy 150 19.04 24.4 $464.58
TOTAL ALTERNATE 2-STAGECOACH TRAIL NORTH TO PERKINS $11,863.34
AVENEU NORTH-WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENTS
TOTAL PART 1 -STREETS $182,372.89
TOTAL PART 2-WATERMAIN $407,751.08
TOTAL PART 3-SANITARY SEWER $72,143.33
TOTAL PART 4-STORM SEWER $123,988.41
TOTAL PART 5-STAGECOACH TRAIL NORTH-WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENTS $63,502.68
TOTAL ALTERNATE 1 -VALLEY VIEW PARK ENTRANCE ROAD $10,280.03
TOTAL ALTERNATE 2-STAGECOACH TRAIL NORTH TO PERKINS AVENUE NORTH- $11,863.34
WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENTS
TOTAL WORK COMPLETED TO DATE $871,901.77
S34 OT 5/E03 xkm
PROJECT PAYMENT STATUS
OWNER CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS
STANTEC PROJECT NO. 193801994
CONTRACTOR HARDRIVES, INC.
CHANGE ORDERS
No. Date Description Amount
Total Charge Orders
PAYMENT SUMMARY
No. From To Payment Retainage Completed
1 05/01/2014 105/30/20141 $346,667.81 $18,245.67 $364,913.49
2 06/03/2014 06/27/2014 $72,200.48 $22,045.70 $440,913.99
3 06/28/2014 08/19/2014 $547,109.46 $50,840.93 $1,016,818.69
Total Payment to Date $965,977.75 Original Contract $3,387,731.66
Retainage Pay No. 3 $50,840.93 Change Orders
Total Amount Earned $1,016,818.69 Revised Contract $3,387,731.66
Materlal on Hand $144,916.92
PR 3 Quantity Unit Unit Payment Total Pa ment
FURNISH AND]WALL NEW STORM
SEWER CAMNGS-CB 4.59053674 EA 828.89 $3 805.05
CBMH 16.1605242 EA $1,871.68 $30),247.33
FURNISH AND INSTALL NEW
SANITARY MH CASTING AND RINGS 7.45485002 EA $641.75 $4,784.15
6" DIP 496.03712 LF $35.83 $17,773.01
8" DIP 1346.04418 LF $42.78 $57,583.77
6"GATE VALVE&BOX 11 EA $1,229.96 $13,529.56
8" GATE VALVE &BOX 1 EA $1,657.78 11,657.78
8"X4" PVC WE 3 EA 1278.08 $834.24
4'DIA SAID. SEWER EA $4,545.52 $4,545.52
HYDRANT 2.7525237911 EA $3,689.89 $10,156.51
_$W,916.92
198007 VREQ3 xlsm
3 -
Oak Park Heights
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date August 26, 2014
Agenda item 2014 Community Award Nominations
Time Req. 0
Agenda Placement New Business
Originating Department/Requestor Administration/Jennifer Pinski
I
Requester's Signa
Action Requested Approve
Background/Justification(Please indicate any previous action has been taken or if other public
bodies have been advised).
The City of Oak Park Heights has received two applications for the Community Award program.
Per policy, the City Council should appoint a review committee to make an award, and the City
Council would announce the winner at the annual Party in the Park event. As time is of the
essence,the City Council may wish to bypass the committee appointment and make an award at
the City Council meeting. The City Council may also want to consider awarding multiple
Community Awards by category: local business, resident, student, etc.
A plaque would be ordered for the award winner, which would be either presented at Party in the
Park or mailed to the recipient.
36 of 57
City of
} ' Oak Park Hei hts
14168 oak Park Blvd. N.Box 2047•oak Park Heights,MN 55082+Phone(651)439-M a Fax(651)439.0574
Community Award Nomination Form
The City of Oak Park Heights recognizes exceptional businesses and distinguished
residents of our community who have made a significant impact on the City. To
nominate someone for this award, please complete this form and submit it to the City of
Oak Park Heights with supporting documentation.
Nominations are due by 4:30 p.m. on August 15. Nominations will be reviewed by the
City Council and will be announced by the mayor at the City's annual Party in the Park
event on the first Sunday after Labor Day in September.
You may submit your nomination either by mail or in person. No faxed or e-mailed
nominations will be accepted. Oak Park Heights City Hall, ATTN: City Administrator,
14168 Oak Park Boulevard North, PO Box 2007, Oak Park Heights, MN 55082.
Please complete a separate nomination form for each person or organization you are
nominating. If you have any questions, please call (651)439-4439.
Who are you nominating?
Name: 6JV
Address: �U c�N� r 8VT
Phone: i- ,) �L -5kSo
E-mail:
Information about you:
Name: arm cn
Address: 1 LLYLti
Phone: —(-,51 b- �;'
E-mail: Sc,�Y•,s�. Ch a.. �.3,ne�.�. �vy\
Supporting documentation:
Please attach to this nomination form a statement that answers the following questions:
1. What contributions has the nominee made to the community that are beyond the
scope of normal civic responsibilities?
2. How have those contributions impacted this community?
3. Discuss the time and energy devoted to community projects.
4. How would you describe the examples set by the nominee?
5. What challenges has the nominee met?
37 of 57
Community Award Polic
I. Guidelines
Oak Park Heights Residents and local businesses are eligible for consideration
of a community award presented each year at the City's annual Party in the Park
event. The nominator need not be a resident of the City of Oak Park Heights;
however, the nominee must be an Oak Park Heights resident or an owner,
manager, or employee of a business located in Oak Park Heights.
II. Criteria
The purpose of the Community Award is to recognize individuals or local
businesses who have made a positive impact on the community. Contributions
to the community need not have been within a certain time period.
III. Procedure
For consideration of the Community Award, applicants must complete the
nomination form and attach the supporting documentation by the deadline. The
entry must be submitted by mail or in-person. No faxed or e-mailed entries will
be accepted.
IV. Winner Selection
A review committee will be appointed by the City Council. All nominations
received by the deadline will be reviewed by the committee, and a
recommendation will be made to the City Council. Winner will be selected based
on best match to the criteria.
V. Award Presentation
The award winner will be notified by the end of August. The award winner will
receive a plaque which will be presented by the mayor at the City's Annual Party
in the Park which is held the first Sunday after Labor Day. Details of the event
will be provided to the award winner prior to the event. The award winner need
not be present at the event. If the award winner cannot be at the event, the
plaque will be mailed to the award winner the week following the event.
Photographs may be taken at the event, and the photographs may appear in the
City's newsletter or on the City's website and/or Facebook page.
TREE CITY U.S.A.
38 of 57
am requesting that Andersen Window Corp receive a community Award for the following reasons.
• AW has continued to support its team members and Employees in elected positions.Andersen
has personally allowed me the opportunity to serve as a City Council member for 20 years.
Without this type of support from local employers we cannot find dedicated individuals to serve
the community.
• By ensuring that employees that are elected to serve in the political arena and support the
volunteer fire service in the valley we continue to have excellent representation.
• Andersen allows use of its grounds to hold spring and fall clean-up.
• Andersen Corporation is a community asset that has been here for over 100 years and continues
to grow in the valley and invest in the community.
39 of 57
City Of
Oak Park Hei hts
14168 Oak Pads Blvd. N e Box 2067.Oak Palk Heights,MN 55082•Phone(651)4384439•Fax(651)439-0574
Community Award Nomination Form
The City of Oak Park Heights recognizes exceptional businesses and distinguished
residents of our community who have made a significant impact on the City. To
nominate someone for this award, please complete this form and submit it to the City of
Oak Park Heights with supporting documentation.
Nominations are due by 4:30 p.m. on August 15. Nominations will be reviewed by the
City Council and will be announced by the mayor at the City's annual Party in the Park
event on the first Sunday after Labor Day in September.
You may submit your nomination either by mail or in person. No faxed or e-mailed
nominations will be accepted. Oak Park Heights City Hall, ATTN., City Administrator,
14168 Oak Park Boulevard North, PO Box 2007, Oak Park Heights, MN 55082.
Please complete a separate nomination form for each person or organization you are
nominating. If you have any questions, please call (651)439-4439.
Who are you nominating?
Name: czvex Aq �,)
Address: JG a 6d
Phone:
E-mail: - --
Information about you:
Name: r.ryl Np AAAW Address:
Phone:
�� r
Phone: --
E-mail: 66 M
Supporting documentation:
Please attach to this nomination form a statement that answers the following questions:
1. What contributions has the nominee made to the community that are beyond the
scope of normal civic responsibilities?
2. How have those contributions impacted this community?
3. Discuss the time and energy devoted to community projects.
4. How would you describe the examples set by the nominee?
5. What challenges has the nominee met?
40 of 57
Contributions:
Most of us think we are fulfilling our"normal civic responsibilities" by keeping a neat property,
putting our garbage on the street on the right days and not being a nuisance to our neighbors.
Though Dick and Judy Tunender do those things to perfection,they go far beyond that. They
are the best of neighbors helping whomever and wherever there is need;they volunteer at the
Courage Center;without them I truly believe the Knights of Columbus would need to fold;they
pick up along the highway;they sell candy for causes and on and on. In short,Judy and Dick
step in wherever there is a need and always do so cheerfully.
Impact:
It is hard to know how one impacts the community at large; however, I think we can be certain
that Dick and Judy Tunender have had a major impact on all within the community with whom
they have contact. They are the type of people who have an impact on you at the first meeting
and continue to have an impact all through your relationship with them.
Time and Energy:
I am not sure Dick and Judy see themselves as devoting time and energy to building some sort
of vague "community";they devote their time and energy to people, making sure the needs of
individuals and groups are being met. Perhaps the best way to get at who they are and the
time and energy they give to and for others is to describe what I know they have done and will
do on this one day.
Early this morning they were on a walk to find the new townhome where a widowed friend was
moving. They were looking so that they might give future support to a friend. After their walk
they spent several hours working to enhance the appearance of the neighborhood by working
on their yard and deck. Their day will be concluded by volunteering at a picnic so the KCs can
make money to pay for their charitable work. This is not an unusual day for Judy and Dick.
The Example They Set:
Humility. Dick and Judy do not stand out in a crowd nor do they wish to. However,all who
know them wish to emulate them;they are people we wish our kids to be like when they grow
up. The dictionary defines an example as "a person. . .taken as a model to be copied. . .by
others."
Dick and Judy truly are examples of what it means to be good persons,good neighbors, good
citizens, and distinguished residents of Oak Park Heights.
41 of 57
Challenges:
I am not sure Judy and Dick would like one looking at their lives from the point of view of
challenges;they would, I think, see life as presenting them with opportunities or hurdles to be
dealt with and overcome. For example, they lived four hours away when Judy's mother was in
a nursing home. Though they visited frequently the stress of distance was something that they
dealt with every day.
Dick and Judy also have a grandson with cerebral palsy,a grandson with whom they are deeply
involved and for whom they volunteer hours and hours of time, energy and self.
Like in most marriages and early family life,there was a time when the end of the check came
before the end of the month. To stretch things a bit further Judy cleaned houses and took in
ironing while take care of four kids.
Challenges? What is required to be good people, good parents,good grandparents and great
citizens of our community is not a challenge but just what your do.
42 of 57
wmll�
Oak Park Heights
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: Tuesda Au t 26 2014
Agenda Item : RCM Pothole Hot Patching
Time Req. 3 Minutes
Agenda Placement:New Business
Originating Department/Requestor blic Works Andy KegrIeL Public Works Director
Requester's Signature
Action Requested: Authorize Hot othole Patching
Background/Justification(Please indicate any previous action has been taken or if other public
bodies have been advised).
Please see attached memo.
43 of 57
I I
City of
Oak Park Heights
14168 Oak Park 81W Re Box 2007.Oak Park Heights,MN 55082.Phone(651)439-4439,o Fax 439-0574
Memorandum
Toe Eric Johnson,Administrator
Cc: Mayor and Council
From Andrew Kegley, Public Works Director
Date: 08ti 3114
Re: Spot Hot Patching
Having received several complaints from residents on Pecan Ave, Upper 63rd St.N 56th Street
N, 57th St.N Newberry Ave,Newgate Ave and Newgate Ct, in mid to late July,I contacted
RCM to apply hot patch on selected City streets in the areas where skin patch potholes and
deeper potholes that would not hold cold patch are prevalent. I also added areas along Neal
Ave,60th St N and 58th Street N,although RCM,the patching company hired to do the work
was directed to stop before these streets were completed. My estimate was based on previous
years cold patch material required to fill potholes.It is now apparent that although the
materials are similar(chip rock mixed with emulsion),the hot patch requires more material
than cold patching, but appears to be far superior in terms of durability.
The contractor charged$2,800 per nine(9)tons of materials and machinery to apply the hot
patch_Based on previous City patching quantities with cold patch, I made the presumption that
18 tons of patch with a cost of$5,600 would be ample to fill potholes outlined on a map that
would be applied to select streets from which complaints have been generated.As I provided
the contractor a prioritized map as direction,I did not realize the contractor reached 63 tons
costing roughly$20,000 before the work was complete.I stopped the contractor at this point. I
anticipated at most an expenditure of$5,600 to be funded with the operations budget. This
work would have been presented to Council before work commenced if I anticipated the
overage of the operations budget.
Please review the attached photos. The photos show the type of skin patch potholes that
cannot be patched with cold mix and show the results after patching. This method of patching
blends in nicely with the existing street surface and appears to be a durable permanent patch.
TREE CITY U.S.A.
44 of 57
As patching and other such work has previously been funded Using the seal coat/crack seal
budget I am requesting the seal coat/crack seal budgeted projects fund be used to pay for the
work already completed. Additionally,I would recommend that the Council authorize an
additional 63 tons of material be applied to the areas that were not finished at an additional
expense a of approximately$20,000. This will bring the total hot patching project cost to
$40,000. The seal coat/crack seal budgeted projects fund currently has a balance of$221,948.
2
TREE CITY U.S.A.
45 of 57
Ai ,
— '• 44 Sir��,. "'yyi y�� A�' 1. Sr._ _
_ fit_
I��.4,-ter y.F � u14'i� - -I ti 4�i..�•`�"�4.k�x••_-� _ 1k_. �r 1
• � It ��- - }.� � � ti '� �--_i ��"�µa�.a::�`� � ,• ..f'r;. ..� � :� _, _
• Ft. {._. -'n} �+ � `4 r..,T= yl�"Kf•
Im 1���{ �f"`."max-- _!"{+• ,` ' }
_.1 x+++777".�I�' ,S • `__./+ {�- +a��,"4�'•f�t� }..5,�`�:�4' _�tk_.�' _.:r�- :=
i if� i rjL
•4��. X Y ti..+�,}.• ,�4
_ � .1 a s ryr -5� �. �• �. C�'�t� .xr:k�F�#E'-'���.ryry� �`.�$�i�',['„ 5:.,'-""}r,�•a'= -_ �=;
- }'.' �'�µ�. .k•� T • �
'� N
,.�F,�` a i�{t:�:'y+76� .•,r1{t:�;ti `,;,�;��,.j{,`y a� :"�`-'ryS�,'�_,``* -
�"t �+r� art}:. 4
'r 7 f. r~1e"
�• � �3ti� �'4- I I � 4}. � L��7�t. �_ '{�f+,•I
" iN �7
. _ I.+S �'.rTf{��, i y� 1yyi�I, �i {•lTrt� �4yy '�.,+k "*y; Y -
- !.,} �` .sJL�� ,�`y � 'Sl'`+ ���;`I. '$*T✓�. '. �k�- -.%- ?���,��!r�'u�.i.���_':{a•/�-v'� i-
12
- � •r �. tk-y4��1'��rl�'. xf. '�`�5�h��-a• •4R'���'+�#-• i:� � �t '_p-' +�'}�`•1lff
•y� ti SKr�� } � �k\S �,��. �L. � fi , A�`F �j ,� •f �- -?L''T" �-
=y. w ��:�a'y�'r ^- �;"•c:a [°,.. �,+� Rib, 'S-
'4y�}:.46. k. 1t..1 I+i}F}I �l� •. I }YW .r { yt
Jk
Awl,
I
�Y
1 ra
t - _
�l
cn
CD cn o cn
1100 _
lLn
--fo Ir 10
jT
X.
rn
aS
v
r-
W
O
Uk
CD
mi-
F•-II
it— �!• ail; 1 ■ ���� :Afrr�.T,,�[ •
1-
t L _ tJl
r
CD
Y �� / /'1l1/6 I � •R
XI I_ilrue_°`J_'
cl
CD
}s I I
48
Oak Park Heights
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: Tuesday_,August 26,2014
Agenda Item : 55�h St.N Drainage Correction Pro'ect
Time Req. 5 Minutes
Agenda Placement:New Business
Originating Department/Request : Public Works And Kealex,Public Works Director
Requester's Signature
Action Requested: Authorize na a correction vroiect on 55th St.N
Background/Justification(Please indicate any previous action has been taken or if other public
bodies have been advised).
Please see attached memo for discussion.
Note—if quotes are returned out of line with the estimated$15,000 total project cost,
including engineering,staff will return to Council for direction.
49 of 57
4
1
- - City of
Oak Park Heights
14168 Oak Park Blvd Me Box 2007.Oak Park Heights,MN 55082•Phone(651)439-4439•Fax 439-0574
Memorandum
To: Eric Johnson,Administrator
Cc: Mayor and Council
From: Andrew Kegley, Public Works Director
Data 08/21/14
Rn 14250 55"' Street N Drainage
In front of 14250 55th St.north exists a perpetual drainage problem that the resident is requesting the
City correct. It is apparent that the curb and gutter in front of the property does not have proper slope to
drain water to the east as designed. Further,the curb elevation is higher than the road;therefore sheet
drainage from the road puddles until it evaporates rather than reaching the gutter and draining to the
east.
Stantec has proposed this solution:
Remove the segment of curb that does not have proper slope for drainage.
• Reinstall curbing with proper slope to drain east to the existing storm sewer.
Overlay the street segment with hot asphalt to increase elevation therefore allowing sheet
drainage to the curb and gutter.
A project of this scope could cost approximately$15,000,however exact costs will not be known until
the city of obtains quotes from contractors. The requests for quotes for this project should provide
enough detail to communicate the importance of achieving proper slope of the curb and gutter and
elevation of the street overlay. It is therefore necessary to have an engineered plan guiding the work_
If the council is amiable to correcting the drainage problem in front of 14250 55'h St.I recommend also
authorizing Stantec to draft a detailed plan to communicate the scope and specifications of the work-
not to exceed$1000. If quotes come back with costs out of line with the estimate, staff will bring the
issue back to Council; otherwise this is a formal request for approval to move forward with the drainage
correction work on 55th Street N.
As this issue is a failure in the storm water drainage system, storm sewer renewal and replacement
funds may be used to complete the project.The storm sewer renewal replacement fund currently has a
balance of$86,000.
TREE CITY U.S.A.
50 of 57
OARS -
k
y -~ '14-2
k .{ ... VIT. 7
AF
- - -- .=
}
i,* 5
—fs
Sir-
31
.4-7
0-1 — — .%
07
xa�
dp
t XL
47�
10
Jb
PT- V
- �l
10
PF
52 of 57
(10 Stantec Memo
To: Andy Kegley From: Brad Reifsteck, PE
City of Oak Park Heights Stantec
Date: August 21,2014
Reference: 14250 560 Street Drainage Issue
Existing Conditions: The City of Oak Park Heights has placed a
high priority on resolving a drainage issue located at 14250 55th
Street N.The current condition of the concrete curb and gutter
sits above the adjacent bituminous mat which creates standing
water in the street at the above mentioned address (See photo
right). It appears the bituminous pavement has settled at this
location causing the low spot in the street which prevents the
flow of storm water into the gutter flow line. The curb and gutter lip
at this location is also very flat with very little positive grade as
evident by the standing water and sediment trapped in the
curb. In a recent site inspection,surveyors performed differential
leveling techniques to determine the elevation change along this section of curb. The information
gathered by the surveyors confirmed no change in elevation (flat) for approximately thirty foot
section of curb just west of the driveway apron located at 14286 55th Street N.
Recommendation: Making the street improvements including replacing the curb and gutter will
provide positive drainage for storm water to reach the curb gutter and escape to the existing storm
inlets located at the intersection of 55th Street N.and Oldfield Ave. N. In order to provide the
positive drainage, it will be necessary to remove a section of curb and gutter approximately sixty
four foot in length to the east end of the concrete driveway apron located at 14286 55th Street N.
Total Project Cost:The total project cost includes construction,engineering and administration costs
to improve approximately 64 lineal feet of drainage along the curb and street cross section is as
follows:
Project Cost Breakdown
Total Estimated Construction Cost $12,600.00
Engineering and Administration (25%) $1,000.00
10%Contingency $1,360.00
Total Project Cost $14,960.00
The total estimated project cost to remove and replace curb and gutter and improve drainage at
14250 551h Street N is$14,960.
guo&-A-444
Brad Reifsteck, PE
City Engineer, City of Oak Park Heights
Phone:651-604-4722
Fax:651-636-1311
Brad.reifsteck@stantec.com
Design with commwwy in mind
rb r.\cgeni\munMpal\oaltpark-heights eLmn\12450 55th sheet drainage\14250 55th sheet mem docx
53 of 57
Oak Park Heights
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date August 22 2014
Time Required: 5 Minutes
Agenda Item Title: Approve Palmer Station Development for Engineering Services.
Agenda Placement New Business
Originating Department/Requ r ric Johnso Qfty Administrator
Requester's Signature
Action Requested Below
—e5$�� /
Background/Justification(Please indicate if any previous action has been taken or if other public
bodies have advised):
The City remains in discussion with the Developer of the Palmer Station Development relative to the final
Development Agreement(DA)as required.
In the interim,the Developer would like to have the City commence final design and bidding for the public elements
being the streets,water,sewer and storm systems.The City typically does not begin these until the DA is completed
and securities are provided. The City Engineer has provided the enclosed estimate of$63,645.00 for these various
anticipated services.
However,the Developer would like the City to proceed with Task 1,(final Design and Bidding)for these
improvements prior to the DA being complete so that the area could possibly commence construction this fall.The
Developer has been advised that he City Council consider this if an appropriate security is posted for just that
element and which would be 125%of$22,681 or=$28,681.00 (cash or letter of credit).
Recommendation:
1. Approve the overall proposal(all tasks)as submitted by STANTEC pending final Developer's
Agreement between the City and the Developer.
2. Authorize the early implementation of Task 1 upon the receipt of the required security noted above
(or other documents)from the Developer in a form as approved or required by the City Attorney.
54 of 57
Stantec Consulting Services Inc.
2335 Highway 36 West
St.Paul MN 55113
Tel: (651) 636-4600
y Stantec Fax:(651) 636-1311
August 22,2014
Eric Johnson
City of Oak Park Heights
14168 Oak Park Blvd. N.
P. O. Box 2007
Oak Park Heights, MN 55082-2007
Re; Palmer$tation Development Proposal for Engineering Services
Dear Mr.Johnson:
Attached to the letter is a Task Hour Budget work Plan for Professional services between the City
of Oak Park Heights, Owner and Stantec Consulting Services Inc.for providing engineering
services as part of the Palmer Station Development Improvement Project located in Oak Park
Heights,MN.The estimated fee is$63,645 including expenses and equipment.
The proposed project tasks and estimated fees for each task are as follows:
Task 1 -Final Design and Bidding $22,681 (Hourly not to Exceed)
Task 2-Construction Services $35,964 (Hourly)
Task 3-Materials Testing $5,000.00 (Hourly not to exceed)
Total Estimated Fee $63,645.00
This letter,the attached Task Hour Budget for Professional Services represents the entire
understanding between you and us in respect of the Project and may only be modified in writing
signed by both of us.
If this letter satisfactorily sets forth conditions of our Agreement,please sign in the space below
and return one copy to our office.Thank you again for the opportunity to provide these services.
CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS
Print Name and Title
Date
Design with community in mind
55 of 57
I.0
August 22,2014
Eric Johnson
Reference: Palmer Station Development Proposal for Engineering Services
Stantec Consulting Services Inc.wishes to thank you for this opportunity to work with the City of
Oak Park Heights. If you have any questions, need additional information or wish to discuss this
matter in greater detail, please contact me.
Regards,
STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES, INC.
A4jW-A-49V-
Brad A. Relfsteck, PE
t351-6044734
Design with community In mind
56 of 57
Palmer Station Final Design Plan Review and Construction Services
Task Hour Budget
cSekO�ofOetPek
ana
w� M�agerl sr.Prof EegioeeHSr inspector r
Tasks Tech Admen. TOTAL
1.1 DaM CORN&@,000e inspoa&CAD fife aview 1 0 6 0 2 9
12 95%Plane end 8peeffiGW"Mcdi.&Reviser and Ctsmew 1 12 0 0 2 IS
l,3 100%Coxup as Fund Phze and SpeaiBcabon to som Cqy Smdeds 10 40 120 0 4 174
1.4 Pmmatio8 U"K WA) 1 2 4 0 2 4
1.3 Dfddiug 2 4 8 0 6 20
Dahmables:Hid Doeusneom for Pd&UU131a e,Storm Sewer and Roadways wkbin plsmvd ROW ae essensents forpobrie
t24 b*mvememe.Does not mc)ode BIOS Demdman,Gm&ugw WDdwaPm&
7bafrL051eAmdr111awra 13 38 Im 0 Yd 777
014Cmmwtpti00lgappptiva-UNieioegadegbetadBpOVAapNpp(Aggpmd47luspgrxsakfns3waalsa) 4 8 0 135 8 13!
2013 CmseOUCflen htepecfion-Tolea sce Class 5 Am Hose,Curb and 41dta cod Bess Course(Arsmoe 20 Ism perwak far 2 a 0 40 a SO
2 weeks)2016 Camhucfim]nspecbm-Wee Came end Cudq Adjustments(Asmme 20 Ms�1 week) 1 2 0 20 0 23
Cook=Admimsw3 n 2 0 4 0 12 18
2.5 Cmsnundon Smlhe 2 0 40 40 0 82
2.6 Remd Dmwior 1 0 20 8 0 29
2.7 AMW hwousaecfion Meetft 1 2 0 4 1 8
2.9 Review Ba(oeitmis 1 4 24 It 2 39
2-4 Pinch list(As®ma 2 wnikdu ugbe,moual and Hurl,whb&e Iopm omracOS) 1 2 0 IZ 2 17
2.10 Find Wasmoly rnspeadm 2 2 0 8 2 14
2.11 Pmjoaclmeoa 2 2 0 4 2 10
Den,e-Wer-Daily hwerlfon nporfA SabmfHarA Record&-4W Upba.boar-W—S.C.rutrdpa,W&adaru.
AUN d IPMEW cwemt dmfi eelbega facla*a all FuW E&flea.Wane Sewer madRo2xaya wldrbe plmmdROWar
aareauM+:Doer nor bnfardr SY& .Wid-ar
TWkz®SrbdeddlYann: 19 M 8d 779 33 I4S
1XITALHOi1RS 34 8a 226 Tn 49 672
TOTAL LAWS,OV$RNEAD PROFPf $57143
CONSTRUC M MATERiAL4 TEUNGL'81.M&U 85,000
REtslmnraarsrn EUHMSES OMEME AND EQUPMENr 8300
TOTAI,FROACT COST 563A S
R:1dledltetddpdmk omk! d sooAM PdvamlPam Props*Redevelepment20141Palmer Pmp q flmy Design V"Men-bustle paps N.1
57 of 57