HomeMy WebLinkAbout1999-02-11 CA Ltr to Planing CommissionLAW OFFICES OF
Echoer , Lammers, bri Wotff
1855 \oiAwcstern Avenue
Stillwater, i\Atnnesota 55082
((3 5 t) 4 5(1) -?878
FAX 459-22925
V ierlln
Direct Dial No.: (651) 351-2118
Februar 11, 1999
E 1 ��
too
-------------------------
I ) atil �\. Wolff
(1J- -t- t - 1
*Q11rdiked NCtI(I'di Arkilrator & eiator
+0 Ll d lift ed Neutral ' Uttrator
mCertified Real Estate Spelallst
OQU,111fled NCUtl'dl �k
edldtor
Ll
UPY
Mr. Geor Vo
6411 St. Croix Trail North
Oak Park Hei MN 55082
Ms. Ann Wasecha
5675 Newberr Avenue North
Oak Park Hei MN 55082
Re: Public Hearin for Amended Conditional Use Permit
Independent School District No. 834
Hi School Ropes Course
Dear Chairman and Members of the Plannin Commission:
We presentl have scheduled upcomin public hearin as
it affects a re to amend the Conditional Use Permit that was
issued to Independent SrChocl District No. 834. The purpose of the
hearin of course, deals with the issue of the ropes course which
has been constructed in the rear portions of the facilit
Althou some confusion has occurred with re to the
process whereb those facilities were constructed, the issue before
y ou is whether or not the amended Conditional Use Permit should
issue. For that purpose, y ou will be receivin a memorandum from
Mr. Scott Richards of Northwest Associated Consultants detailin
the criteria of the ordinance under which that determination should
Mr. Chuck Hedlund, Chair
13991 - 56th Street North
Oak Park Hei MN 55082
Mr. Mike Dal
14150 - 54th Street North
Oak Park Hei MN 55082
Mr. Kirk Schultz
5660 New Circle North
Oak Park Hei MN 55082
Rokert G.
45i.iQ
A cl r L •J.
\." I C 11 1 1 11 �*
G1'C
G. Galierl♦
Susan D.
Olson*
s n'ACT,
LAW OFFICES OF
Echoer , Lammers, bri Wotff
1855 \oiAwcstern Avenue
Stillwater, i\Atnnesota 55082
((3 5 t) 4 5(1) -?878
FAX 459-22925
V ierlln
Direct Dial No.: (651) 351-2118
Februar 11, 1999
E 1 ��
too
-------------------------
I ) atil �\. Wolff
(1J- -t- t - 1
*Q11rdiked NCtI(I'di Arkilrator & eiator
+0 Ll d lift ed Neutral ' Uttrator
mCertified Real Estate Spelallst
OQU,111fled NCUtl'dl �k
edldtor
Ll
UPY
Mr. Geor Vo
6411 St. Croix Trail North
Oak Park Hei MN 55082
Ms. Ann Wasecha
5675 Newberr Avenue North
Oak Park Hei MN 55082
Re: Public Hearin for Amended Conditional Use Permit
Independent School District No. 834
Hi School Ropes Course
Dear Chairman and Members of the Plannin Commission:
We presentl have scheduled upcomin public hearin as
it affects a re to amend the Conditional Use Permit that was
issued to Independent SrChocl District No. 834. The purpose of the
hearin of course, deals with the issue of the ropes course which
has been constructed in the rear portions of the facilit
Althou some confusion has occurred with re to the
process whereb those facilities were constructed, the issue before
y ou is whether or not the amended Conditional Use Permit should
issue. For that purpose, y ou will be receivin a memorandum from
Mr. Scott Richards of Northwest Associated Consultants detailin
the criteria of the ordinance under which that determination should
Mr. Chuck Hedlund, Chair
13991 - 56th Street North
Oak Park Hei MN 55082
Mr. Mike Dal
14150 - 54th Street North
Oak Park Hei MN 55082
Mr. Kirk Schultz
5660 New Circle North
Oak Park Hei MN 55082
Planning commission Members
City of oak Park Heights
February 11, 1999
Page 2
be made. It is the criteria of the ordinance, as well as the
standards proposed by law, that determine the scope of your review
and must serve as the basis for your determination, either to grant
or deny the requested amendment to the Conditional Use Permit.
For that purpose, we would also suggest that any action
taken by the Planning commission to recommend on either side of
this issue to the council be specific with regard to the individual
findings made by the Planning commission on each of the ordinance
criteria.
You should also be aware that in law, a municipality
certainly has broad discretionary power to grant or deny
applications for conditional use permits or amendments to
conditional use permits. That discretionary power, however, is
limited by the criteria of the ordinance that determines the
individual issues detailing each application for amended
conditional use permit.
In theory, if not in practice, the provisions of
ordinances allowing for the issuance of conditional use permits are
intended to provide for more flexibility and land use control than
provisions authorizing and dealing with issues of variance. A
conditional use permit implies by law that the use will be
permitted absent the specific conditions or circumstances that make
it unreasonable to do so. If in fact a proposed use meets all of
the city criteria within its ordinance as it affects the issuance
of a conditional use permit or amended. conditional use permit, the
city would be without authority to deny the issuance of that
permit.
It is only when the requested application can not meet
the criteria of the ordinance and/or raises special or inherent
problems with the health, safety and welfare of a city's resident s
or the public in general that permits can be denied. Provisions of
the special or conditional use permit always provide the city the
opportunity to grant permits but limit the application of the
permit or otherwise condition it upon certain factors if indeed the
council finds that the permit is generally acceptable but needs
some special conditions or limitations placed on it to avoid
unnecessary harm to the public health and welfare or to make it
compliant with the city criteria as contained within the ordinance.
Planning commission Members
City of oak Park Heights
February 11, 1999
Page 3
I trust that this information is helpful, however, I
appreciate that there are many questions that come up from time to
time on issues such as this and., as always, we invite the Planning
Commission members to forward those questions to this office or
contact me at your convenience so we can discuss them.
Yours very truly,
Mark J. vierling
MJV /sdb
cco Scott Richards
Tom Melena
Kris Danielson